DOCSLIB.ORG

State Regulations of Private Schools (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Regulations of Private Schools (PDF) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EduCATION State Regulation of Private Schools State Regulation of Private Schools U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Non-Public Education 2009 The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the view or policies of the U.S. Department of Education, nor does the mention of trade names, commercial products, curricula, and curricular materials and approaches, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. government. This publication also contains Internet Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) for information created and maintained by private organizations. This information is provided for the reader‘s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education is not responsible for controlling or guaranteeing the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of outside information mentioned in this report. Further, the inclusion of information or a URL does not reflect the importance of the organization, nor is it intended to endorse any views expressed, or products or services offered. U.S. Department of Education Arne Duncan Secretary Office of Innovation and Improvement James H. Shelton Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement Office of Non-Public Education Jack Klenk Director July 2009 This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement, State Regulation of Private Schools, Washington, D.C., 2009. This report is available on the Department‘s Web site at: <www.ed.gov/admins/comm/choice/regprivschl/index.html>. ii Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. v Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 ALABAMA ........................................................................................................................ 3 ALASKA ............................................................................................................................ 8 ARIZONA......................................................................................................................... 13 ARKANSAS ..................................................................................................................... 18 CALIFORNIA .................................................................................................................. 23 COLORADO .................................................................................................................... 31 CONNECTICUT .............................................................................................................. 36 DELAWARE .................................................................................................................... 42 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ............................................................................................ 46 FLORIDA ......................................................................................................................... 51 GEORGIA......................................................................................................................... 57 HAWAII ........................................................................................................................... 63 IDAHO .............................................................................................................................. 70 ILLINOIS .......................................................................................................................... 75 INDIANA ......................................................................................................................... 82 IOWA ................................................................................................................................ 89 KANSAS........................................................................................................................... 96 KENTUCKY................................................................................................................... 103 LOUISIANA ................................................................................................................... 108 MAINE ........................................................................................................................... 116 MARYLAND ................................................................................................................. 124 MASSACHUSETTS....................................................................................................... 131 MICHIGAN .................................................................................................................... 136 MINNESOTA ................................................................................................................. 143 MISSISSIPPI .................................................................................................................. 150 MISSOURI ..................................................................................................................... 154 MONTANA .................................................................................................................... 158 NEBRASKA ................................................................................................................... 163 NEVADA ........................................................................................................................ 169 NEW HAMPSHIRE ....................................................................................................... 176 NEW JERSEY ................................................................................................................ 182 NEW MEXICO ............................................................................................................... 188 NEW YORK ................................................................................................................... 192 NORTH CAROLINA ..................................................................................................... 200 NORTH DAKOTA ......................................................................................................... 207 OHIO............................................................................................................................... 212 OKLAHOMA ................................................................................................................. 219 OREGON ........................................................................................................................ 225 PENNSYLVANIA .......................................................................................................... 229 PUERTO RICO .............................................................................................................. 238 RHODE ISLAND ........................................................................................................... 242 SOUTH CAROLINA...................................................................................................... 247 iii SOUTH DAKOTA ......................................................................................................... 252 TENNESSEE .................................................................................................................. 260 TEXAS ............................................................................................................................ 267 UTAH ............................................................................................................................. 272 VERMONT ..................................................................................................................... 277 VIRGIN ISLANDS ......................................................................................................... 285 VIRGINIA ...................................................................................................................... 288 WASHINGTON ............................................................................................................. 294 WEST VIRGINIA .......................................................................................................... 301 WISCONSIN .................................................................................................................. 306 WYOMING .................................................................................................................... 313 APPENDIX A: TABLES ON STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVATE SCHOOLS ......................................................................................................................................... 317 APPENDIX B: TABLE ON STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR HOMESCHOOLS ..... 333 APPENDIX C: LEGAL HISTORY OF THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE SCHOOLS (2000) .............................................................................................................................. 335 iv Acknowledgments Special thanks are extended to the many individuals who assisted in the work of this report. State liaisons from all 50 state departments of education, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands (see below), worked to ensure the information provided here is as accurate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adoption Policy
    Adoption Policy West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources Bureau for Children and Families Office of Children and Adult Services Jane McCallister, Director, Children and Adult Services Carla Harper, Program Manager II, Children and Adult Policy Revised September 16, 2015 Contents 1.0 Introduction and Overview ............................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Mission and Vision ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Philosophy ..................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Legal/Regulatory Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 2.0 Definitions ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3.0 How Children Enter the State’s Custody .................................................................................. 12 3.1 How Children Enter Foster Care ............................................................................................ 12 3.2 Legal Authority for Adoptive Placement ................................................................................ 12 3.3 Permission to Accept Guardianship ...................................................................................... 13 3.4 Required Consents
    [Show full text]
  • The Nebraska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits, 76 Neb
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 76 | Issue 4 Article 6 1997 The eN braska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits Kim Robak Nebraska Lieutenant Governor Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation Kim Robak, The Nebraska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits, 76 Neb. L. Rev. (1997) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol76/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Kim Robak* The Nebraska Unicameral and Its Lasting Benefits TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................... 791 II. Background ........................................... 793 III. Why and How the Unicameral Works ................. 799 A. Organization ...................................... 800 B. Process ........................................... 802 C. Partisanship ...................................... 804 D. The Lobby ........................................ 804 IV. Why a Nonpartisan Unicameral Is Superior to a Bicameral System ..................................... 805 A. Duplication ....................................... 805 B. Representative and Open Process .................. 809 C. Nonpartisanship .................................. 810 D. Leadership ........................................ 812 E. Lobby ............................................. 814 F. Balance
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Adjudication Guidelines
    Basic Adjudication Guidelines These materials are provided for general informational purposes only and do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice. You should consult your own legal counsel concerning your particular facts and circumstances and any specific legal questions you may have regarding the issues addressed in these materials. As an independent business owner, you remain solely responsible for recruiting, hiring, training, scheduling, supervising and paying the persons who work in your store and those persons are your employees, and not employees of Domino’s Pizza LLC. By providing these materials, we do not assume any of your responsibilities or duties. You may use these materials, or not, at your discretion. Adjudication Results Client must set results to Does Not Meet after HireRight review Adjudication Results Explanation MEETS COMPANY The applicant’s background check results do not trigger any of the defined STANDARDS (MEETS adjudication criteria, allowing the hiring process to continue for the candidate. COMPANY STANDARDS) The applicant’s background check results have triggered some questions. Please PENDING/ Pending Potential review the report details and make the appropriate employment decision. Conflict Does Not Meet Company Once the client sets a report to “Does Not Meet Company Standards”, The FCRA Standards pre-adverse/adverse letter process should start. Social Security Trace (SSN) Item # Description Recommended Adjudication Status 1 Valid SSN Trace Meets Company standards 2 No data or invalid trace Pending 3 No data age 21 and older Pending 4 No DOB available and No data Pending 5 No data under 21 Meets Company Standards SSN Validation Item # Description Recommended Adjudication Status 1 SSN has not been issued Pending 2 SSN belongs to deceased individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Rowansom Student Handbook Regarding the Rowansom Student Code of Conduct and Adhere to the Code of Ethics of the American Osteopathic Association
    STUDENT HANDBOOK Go to Table of Contents Stratford, NJ 08084-1501 856-566-6000 https://som.rowan.edu/ August 2021 1 Acknowledgements Preparation of this Student Handbook was made possible through the cooperation of the offices of all divisions of Academic Affairs, Academic Technology, the Dean’s Office, Graduate Medical Education, and Student Financial Aid. The Student Handbook is informational only and does not constitute a contract between Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine and any student. It may be changed by RowanSOM without prior notice to students. Any rules, regulations, policies, procedures or other representations made herein may be interpreted and applied by RowanSOM to promote fairness and academic excellence, based on the circumstances of each individual situation. When modifications of the Student Handbook occur, students will be notified by email. It is each student’s responsibility to check their RowanSOM email on a daily basis and keep abreast of all notifications from RowanSOM. 2 Table of Contents MISSION STATEMENT ................................................................................................................................................. 8 ROWAN UNIVERSITY MISSION ............................................................................................................................................. 8 ROWANSOM MISSION, VISION, ESSENTIAL, VALUES & GUIDING PRINCIPLES ...................................................................... 8 OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Effects of Boarding School on Chinese Students’ Academic Achievement
    FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education Vol. 6, Iss. 3, 2020, pp. 36-57 COMPENSATING FOR FAMILY DISADVANTAGE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF BOARDING SCHOOL ON CHINESE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Minda Tan1 Shandong Normal University, China Katerina Bodovski Pennsylvania State University, USA Abstract China implemented a policy to improve education equity through investing in boarding programs of public schools in rural and less-developed areas. However, this policy has not been informed by empirical research in the Chinese context. By using the nationally representative longitudinal data, this study investigates whether and to what extent boarding schools compensate for children's family disadvantages in terms of mathematics and reading achievement. The findings, drawn from multilevel logistic regression and hierarchical models, indicate that students from low-SES families or rural areas tend to board at schools. Boarding students performed better than day students in 8th-grade mathematics tests. Among students with essential needs, those residing at school during the week significantly benefitted in their school performance in both subjects. Overall, it appears that governmental investment in boarding programs can, to some extent, compensate for some family disadvantages. Keywords: boarding school; academic performance; socioeconomic status; family support; education equity 1 Correspondence: Minda Tan, 88 Wenhuadong Road, Shandong Normal University, 250014, Jinan, Shandong Province, China; Email: [email protected] M. Tan & K. Bodovksi 37 Introduction Family educational resources are unequally allocated among families within countries. In China, students from socioeconomically disadvantaged families are challenged to achieve academic success similar to that of their peers because their parents cannot provide adequate financial and cultural resources (Luo & Zhang, 2017) .
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsory Education
    LAWS OF BRUNEI CHAPTER 211 COMPULSORY EDUCATION S 56/07 REVISED EDITION 2011 B.L.R.O. 7/2011 LAWS OF BRUNEI Compulsory Education CAP. 211 1 LAWS OF BRUNEI REVISED EDITION 2011 CHAPTER 211 COMPULSORY EDUCATION ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Citation. 2. Interpretation. 3. Compulsory education. 4. Exemption. 5. Establishment and constitution of Board. 6. Period of office. 7. Meetings of Board. 8. Powers and duties of Board. 9. Penalties. 10. No person to be charged for offence except on complaint of Permanent Secretary. 11. Compounding of offences. 12. Protection from personal liability. 13. Operation of Act not to affect Chapter 210. 14. Regulations. ________________________ B.L.R.O. 7/2011 LAWS OF BRUNEI Compulsory Education CAP. 211 3 COMPULSORY EDUCATION ACT An Act to provide for compulsory education and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto Commencement: 24th November 2007 Citation. 1. This Act may be cited as the Compulsory Education Act. Interpretation. 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires — “Board” means the Compulsory Education Board established by section 5; “child of compulsory school age” means a child above the age of 6 years who has not yet attained the age of 15 years and who satisfies such conditions for receiving primary and lower secondary education as the Permanent Secretary may determine; “Government school” means any institution for the provision of full-time primary or lower secondary education, being — (a) a school established and maintained exclusively by the Government; or (b) such other school as may be prescribed; “Minister” means the Minister of Education; “parent”, in relation to a child to whom section 3(1) applies, has the same meaning as in section 2 of the Education Act (Chapter 210); “Permanent Secretary” means the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Education or any other officer appointed under section 4 of the Education Act (Chapter 210).
    [Show full text]
  • Gifts That Give Back a Guide for Independent School Families On…
    THE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL PARENT SERIES Gifts That Give Back A guide for independent school families on… How everybody wins—including you—when you volunteer Why schools ask for tuition plus a gift What those fund-raising appeals are really asking for “ In an uncertain world, the school is a stable, nurturing community. That makes it all the more necessary and important to support it.” Helen Colson, former associate headmaster for development and planning at Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC “ What you give to your school you’ll get back.” Judy Schwarz, director of parent involvement at Paideia School in Atlanta, GA © 2009 by the National Association of Independent Schools. All rights reserved. The opinions expressed in this book are not necessarily those of the publisher, NAIS. ISBN: 1-893021-56-4 Printed in the United States of America. The National Association of Independent Schools represents approximately 1,400 independent private schools in the United States and other countries. All are accredited, non-discriminatory, nonprofit organizations governed by independent boards of trustees. NAIS’s mission is to serve and strengthen member schools and associations by “articulating and promoting high standards of education quality and ethical behavior; to work to preserve their independence to serve the free society from which that independence derives; to advocate broad access for students by affirming the principles of diversity, choice, and opportunity.” To find out more information, go to the NAIS website at www.nais.org. To receive a listing of NAIS books, call (800) 793-6701 or (240) 646-7052. Writer: Karla Taylor Editor: Nancy Raley Designer: Fletcher Design, Inc./ Washington, DC Cover image: Lambert/Archive Photos/Getty Images; Page 8: ESTHER BUBLEY/Getty Images All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential of Urban Boarding Schools for the Poor: Evidence from SEED∗
    The Potential of Urban Boarding Schools for the Poor: Evidence from SEED∗ Vilsa E. Curtoy Roland G. Fryer, Jr.z October 14, 2012 Abstract The SEED schools, which combine a \No Excuses" charter model with a five-day-a-week boarding program, are America's only urban public boarding schools for the poor. We provide the first causal estimate of the impact of attending SEED schools on academic achievement, with the goal of understanding whether changing both a student's social and educational en- vironment through boarding is an effective strategy to increase achievement among the poor. Using admission lotteries, we show that attending a SEED school increases achievement by 0.211 standard deviations in reading and 0.229 standard deviations in math, per year of attendance. Subgroup analyses show that the eff ects are entirely driven by female students. We argue that the large impacts on reading are consistent with dialectical theories of language development. ∗We are grateful to Eric Adler, Anjali Bhatt, Pyper Davis and Rajiv Vinnakota for their cooperation in collect- ing data necessary for this project. Matt Davis, Will Dobbie, and Meghan Howard provided exceptional research assistance. Support from the Education Innovation Laboratory at Harvard University (EdLabs) is gratefully ac- knowledged. Correspondence can be addressed to either of the authors by mail: Department of Economics, Harvard University, 1805 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 [Fryer]; Department of Economics, Stanford University, 579 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305 [Curto]; or by email: [email protected] [Fryer] and [email protected] [Curto]. The usual caveat applies. yStanford University zRobert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Quick Guide
    College of Medicine Curriculum Vitae for Promotion and Tenure Quick Guide CV Section AI Screen(s) Feeding to Activity Description and Notes (In Order of Report) This Section . Personal and Contact Name and credentials, primary academic Information CV Header department, division/section, primary administrative . Yearly Data role, office location, and other contact information . Administrative Leadership Postgraduate Education Postgraduate training, including internship, . Postgraduate Education and Training residency, fellowship, and postgraduate research. and Training Education Education leading to formal academic degrees . Education Current and previous professional employment history, including academic, government, Professional hospital/agency, military, and other private/public Experience professional positions . Academic . Administrative Administrative leadership roles such as Dean, . Professional Experience . Government Program Director, Chair, and Chief will also fall . Administrative Leadership . Hospital/Agency under this section, but are to be entered on the . Other Professional Administrative Leadership screen. Committee roles will not appear here. Those roles U.S. Military Experience are to be entered on the Service screens and will fall under Service on the CV report. Honors, awards, and special recognition received Honors and Awards Distinguished professorships and endowed . Honors and Awards positions should be captured here. Specialty certification that is required for professional practice within your discipline . Board Certification, Board Certification Certification received as a result of continuing Practice Certification, and education will not appear here. That should be Licensure entered on the Professional Growth and Development screen. Professional licensure required for professional practice within your discipline . Board Certification, Licensure License numbers will be captured in the system, but Practice Certification, and will not appear on the CV report.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample School Board Policy Prohibition Against Bullying
    Louisiana Department of Education Office of Student Programs July 2012 Sample School Board Policy Prohibition Against Bullying The _______________School District believes that all students have a right to a safe and healthy school environment. All schools within the district have an obligation to promote mutual respect, tolerance, and acceptance among students, staff, and volunteers. Behavior that infringes on the safety of any student will not be tolerated. A student shall not bully or intimidate any student through words or actions. Such behavior includes, but is not limited to direct physical contact, verbal assaults, the use of electronic methods, and social isolation and/or manipulation. The school district policy prohibiting bullying is included in the student code of conduct and includes but is not limited to the following: • Any student who engages in bullying will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including expulsion. • Students are expected to immediately report incidents of bullying to the principal or designee. • School staff and/or administrators will promptly investigate each complaint of bullying in a thorough and confidential manner. • If the complainant student or parent of the student feels that appropriate resolution of the investigation or complaint has not been reached after consulting the school principal, the student or the parent of the student should contact the local superintendent or his or her designee. • The school system prohibits retaliatory behavior against any complainant or any participant in the complaint process. All students and/or staff shall immediately report incidents of bullying, harassment or intimidation to the school principal or designee. School staff members are expected to immediately intervene when they see a bullying incident occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedagogy, Curriculum, Teaching Practices and Teacher Education in Developing Countries
    Pedagogy, curriculum, teaching practices and teacher education in developing countries EVIDENCE BRIEF The evidence suggests that when teachers see pedagogy as entailing communication with students they use practices in interactive ways that mean that learning is more likely to take place: the ‘how’ is more important than ‘what’ teachers do. drawing on students’ alignment of professional About this brief backgrounds and experiences. development with teachers’ This paper summaries evidence Six practices used in interactive needs, the promoted pedagogy from a DFID-funded review by ways by effective teachers were and in-class monitoring of Westbrook et al. (2013), entitled more likely to enhance learning: teachers Pedagogy, Curriculum, Teaching support from head teachers demonstration and explanation, Practices and Teacher Education alignment of forms of drawing on subject knowledge in Developing Countries, produced assessment with the school flexible use of whole-class, group by the University of Sussex. The curriculum. review identifies pedagogic and pair work where students practices that most effectively discuss a shared task Practices were disabled by support all students to learn, and frequent, relevant use of learning misalignment of: determines ways that these can be materials beyond the textbook initial teacher training with the supported by teacher education open and closed questioning, school curriculum and the school curriculum. expanding responses, Continuing professional encouraging questioning development with the promoted This brief provides an overview of use of local languages and code pedagogy the strength of evidence, key switching (switching between two the school curriculum with findings and theory of change, to languages within a sentence to assessment. assist policy makers and ensure understanding) Further disabling factors were: researchers in assessing the planning and varying lesson poor communication with the evidence in this field.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Prepare for an Adjudication - Tactics, Strategies, Planning and Panic
    HOW TO PREPARE FOR AN ADJUDICATION - TACTICS, STRATEGIES, PLANNING AND PANIC Karen Groulx, Partner Dentons Canada LLP 77 King Street West, Suite 400 Toronto-Dominion Centre Toronto, ON M5K 0A1 42165803_2|NATDOCS How to Prepare for an Adjudication – Tactics, Strategies, Planning and Panic Construction dispute interim adjudication has been introduced in the new Construction Act1 and will apply as of October 1, 2019 to all public and private sector construction contracts entered into on or after October 1, 2019, except with respect to those contracts or subcontracts that were the subject of a procurement process relating to the improvement at issue prior to October 1, 2019. (A procurement process is commenced at the earliest of the making of a request for qualifications, request for quotation, request for proposals, or a call for tenders.2 )The Act provides for adjudication as a cost effective, flexible, and swift means of enforcing the prompt payment regime set out in the Act, which will take effect as of the same date as interim adjudication. Parties to a construction contact or subcontract will not be able to contract out of the prompt payment or adjudication provisions set out in the Act. The UK Experience As noted in the report entitled Striking the Balance: An Expert Review of Ontario’s Construction Lien Act3 which led to the introduction of prompt payment and adjudication through amendments made to the Act, the phrase “pay now, argue later” has been used to describe adjudication under the Construction Act (UK).4 This description is equally applicable to adjudication under the new Act.
    [Show full text]