DOCSLIB.ORG

Summitville Mine - EPA Region 8 Superfund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summitville Mine - EPA Region 8 Superfund Summitville Mine - EPA Region 8 Superfund Region 8 - Superfund Serving Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations Contact Us | Print Version Search: EPA Home > Region 8 > Superfund > Sites > Colorado Cleanup Sites > Active NPL Sites > Summitville Mine Superfund Summitville Mine Sites Colorado, Rio Grande County, Congressional District #3, EPA ID# COD 983778432 Superfund Basics National Priorities List Remedial Action Underway Risk Assessment April 2003 CERCLIS ABOUT THE SUMMITVILLE MINE SITE . Contacts The Summitville Mine site covers about 1,400 acres of Rio Grande County. It lies some twenty miles southwest of Del Norte, high in the San Juan Mountains of southwestern Colorado. It is Congressional Reports an abandoned gold mine that was leaking cyanide, acid and metal-laden mine water into the headwaters of the Alamosa River. The pollutants killed aquatic life and threatened the irrigated Public Liaison farmland downstream. The State of Colorado, citizens of the San Luis Valley and the U.S. EPA are working together to clean up the site. BACKGROUND Mining began at Summitville in the 1870s. In the 1980s, Summitville Consolidated Mining Company, Inc. (SCMCI) started large-scale surface gold mining, using the heap-leach process. Pyritic, gold-bearing ore was mined, crushed and stacked or heaped on a multi-layered, lined pad. A solution of sodium cyanide was used to leach gold from the ore. It was sprinkled on the heaped ore and allowed to percolate down through it. Then the sodium-cyanide solution was pumped to a facility that removed the gold. The mining greatly increased the acidity and dissolved metals in the surrounding streams, damaging aquatic life. Those dissolved metals include aluminum, copper, iron, manganese and zinc. ACTIONS COMPLETED ● Backfilling mine waste into the existing open pits, which reduced water leaching into the ground; ● Rinsing the heap-leach pad to reduce the cyanide; ● Regrading and capping the heap-leach pad to reduce the seepage of snow melt and summer rain; ● Plugging two mine adits (passages into the underground mine) to significantly reduce water flow from the mine workings; ● Constructing a 90-million-gallon wastewater holding pond for treatment to remove metals and acidity; ● Replanting 585 acres of mining-disturbed land. Additional long term activities are ongoing: Retrofitting a water-treatment plant that is capable of treating 1000 gallons of water per minute. Monitoring surface water and seepage to evaluate the effectiveness of the water-control strategy. http://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/sites/co/sville.html (1 of 3)9/4/2006 5:34:20 AM Summitville Mine - EPA Region 8 Superfund Mine reclamation activities were completed in October 2001. They included constructing more storm-water controls, and reshaping and replanting the mining-disturbed lands. The soils were prepared with a mixture of crushed limestone and organic compost to help the grass seed grow in the acidic soils. Some 585 acres have been restored. They now support plant and wildlife habitat. Studies have been completed of soil amendments; reclamation practices; exposure effects on livestock, wildlife and irrigated cropland. The site was added to the Superfund National Priorities List in May 1994. So far, about $155 million has been spent on the Summitville project. Water quality of the Alamosa River downstream of the site has improved considerably. Residents have reported the return of aquatic life to impacted areas of the river. As a result of these reports, CDPHE conducted a caged-fish experiment to see if rainbow trout would survive in various locations in the Alamosa River and the Terrace Reservoir. During the 96-hour exposure study, all of the rainbow trout survived. At the end of the study, the fish were released. This experiment has been viewed as one indication of water-quality improvement in the river and does not imply that remedial work there is complete. WHAT REMAINS TO BE DONE The final site Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS), led by CDPHE, were completed in summer 2001. After considering public comment, EPA and CDPHE selected a final remedy for the site in September 2001. The goal of the remedy is to restore both water chemistry and aquatic life in the Alamosa River and Terrace reservoir. The final remedy includes: ● containment of contaminated water from the mine ● construction of a new water-treatment plant ● possible construction of a large containment reservoir ● contaminated ground water and surface water interceptor drains ● site maintenance Design of the water-treatment plan will continue throughout 2003, with construction beginning in 2004. It is scheduled to be completed in 2005. Thus far, the Agency has recovered a small percentage of the cost from settlements with responsible parties, including Robert Friedland. The money will be used for ongoing cleanup actions at the site, and for restoration, acquisition, or replacement of natural resources. The majority of cleanup costs are being paid by the EPA Superfund program and the State of Colorado. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT A group of concerned community members, has a Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) from EPA. The purpose of a TAG is to hire an independent technical advisor to review cleanup issues and help inform the community. April 2003 [Active NPL Sites][Summitville Proposed Plan][Alamosa River Test] [Summitville Photo][Summitville Waste Pond][Summitville Pad Cap] http://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/sites/co/sville.html (2 of 3)9/4/2006 5:34:20 AM Summitville Mine - EPA Region 8 Superfund [Summitville Contacts][Summitville Map] Record of Decision (ROD) List The table below lists all available documents for this site. All full-text RODs are in PDF format. To download a full-text ROD, right click on the link below and select Save Link As. To view a full-text ROD or abstract, click the appropriate link below. Please note that download time may be extended given the size of the full-text document. File size is noted in kilobytes (K) or megabytes (M) next to each download link. If file size exceeds 15 M, please request a customized RODS report. ROD ROD Fiscal Year Type ROD Date Operable Unit(s) 1995 ROD 12/15/94 00 Abstract Full-text [251K] 1995 ROD 12/15/94 01 Abstract Full-text [189K] 1995 ROD 12/15/94 02 Abstract Full-text [183K] 1995 ROD 12/15/94 04 Abstract Full-text [194K] Other Colorado RODs EPA Home | Region 8 Home | Privacy and Security Notice | Contact Us | Search EPA Last updated on Monday, June 12th, 2006 URL: http://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/sites/co/sville.html http://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/sites/co/sville.html (3 of 3)9/4/2006 5:34:20 AM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impact of the Summitville Mine on Irrigation Water, Agricultural Soils, and Alfalfa in the Southwestern San Luis Valley, Colorado
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Impact of the Summitville Mine on irrigation water, agricultural soils, and alfalfa in the southwestern San Luis Valley, Colorado By J. A. Erdman* and K.S. Smith* Open-File Report 93-616 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. *U.S. Geological Survey, DFC, Box 25046, MS 973, Denver, CO 80225 1993 Impact of the Summitville Mine on Irrigation Water, Agricultural Soils, and Alfalfa in the Southwestern San Luis Valley, Colorado J.A. Erdman and K.S. Smith Contamination from the Summitville gold mine in the San Juan Mountains has raised concerns over the effects of low pH and metal-laden surface waters carried down the Alamosa River. These waters enter the Terrace Reservoir, which provides irrigation water to the southwestern part of the San Luis Valley. The purpose of this study was to assess whether significant differences exist between the effects of two source waters on the compositions of alfalfa and the associated soils, respectively. The two source waters are Terrace Reservoir water and Rio Grande River water and (or) confined ground water. Sampling was conducted June 3-6, 1993, just prior to the first cutting of alfalfa. Irrigation water, soils, and alfalfa were collected from four sprinkler-irrigated Terrace Reservoir fields and from similarly irrigated "control" fields using a balanced one-way analysis-of-variance design.
    [Show full text]
  • U. S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey an Update on Usgs Studies of the Summitville Mine and Its Downstream
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AN UPDATE ON USGS STUDIES OF THE SUMMITVILLE MINE AND ITS DOWNSTREAM ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS By Geoffrey S. Plumlee1 Patrick Edelman2 Open-File Report 95-23 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. 1995 ^.S. Geological Survey, Branch of Geochemistry, MS 973 Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO, 80225, (303) 236-9224, FAX (303) 236-3200, email [email protected] 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Norwest Bank Building, Suite 200, 8th and Main, Pueblo, CO, 81003, (719) 544-7155, FAX (719) 544-7155, email pedelman@ws9scopbl Introduction The Summitville gold mine, located at -3800 meters (11,500 ft) elevation in the San Juan Mountains of southwestern Colorado (Fig. 1), was the focus of extensive public attention in 1992 and 1993 for environmental problems stemming from recent open-pit mining activities. Summitville catalyzed national debates about the environmental effects of modern mining activities, and became the focus of arguments for proposed revisions to the 1872 Mining Law governing mining activities on public lands. In early 1993, the State of Colorado, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Colorado State University, San Luis Valley agencies, downstream water users, private companies, and individuals began a multi-disciplinary research program to provide needed scientific information on Summitville's environmental problems and downstream environmental effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Summitville Mine Site
    RE-Powering America’s Land: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine Sites Summitville Mine, Rio Grande County, Colorado Success Story Hydroelectric plant powers contaminated water treatment at former gold mine January 2009 EPA is encouraging the development of renewable energy facilities on potentially contaminated land and mine sites. This series of stories highlights successful projects and the benefits of siting renewable energy facilities on potentially contaminated land and mine sites. Site Description The 1,400-acre Summitville Mine Superfund site is located approximately 18 miles southwest of Del Norte, Colorado. The former mine is in the San Juan Mountains at an elevation of 11,500 feet, two miles from the Continental Divide. The Wightman Fork of the Alamosa River flows from the site through forest and agricultural land. The Terrace Reservoir, used for irrigation, is on the Alamosa River 18 miles downstream from the site. Property History U.S. Forest Service owns the property and began leasing it in 1870 QUICK FACTS: for gold mining operations. The latest mining operator, Summitville Consolidated Mining Corp., Inc. operated a pit heap leach gold Location: EPA Region 8, Rio Grande County, CO mining operation, using cyanide to extract the gold, from July 1986 Property Size: 1,400 Acres through October 1991. The company abandoned the site in Site Ownership: Federal – U.S. Forest Service December 1992 after declaring bankruptcy. The site is contaminated Former Use: Heap leach gold and silver mining with heavy metals (i.e., copper, cadmium, manganese, zinc, lead, Cleanup Type: Superfund—OSRTI/OSW/Mining Team nickel, aluminum and iron) onsite.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Mineral Potential of Public Lands Located Within Proposed Solar Energy Zones in Colorado
    1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Colorado SEZ Mineral Assessment July 2012 CONTENTS NOTATION .............................................................................................................................. vii SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................................................ ix SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 1 S.1 Antonito Southeast SEZ .......................................................................................... 1 S.2 De Tilla Gulch SEZ ................................................................................................ 2 S.3 Fourmile SEZ .......................................................................................................... 3 S.4 Los Mogotes East SEZ............................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Legal Description of the Subject Lands .................................................................. 5 1.3 Methodology and Resources ................................................................................... 7 1.4 Locatable Minerals.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • First Place Student Essay the Effect of Acidic Irrigation Water on Soils of the Alamosa River Basin, Colorado
    First Place Student Essay The Effect of Acidic Irrigation Water on Soils of the Alamosa River Basin, Colorado Erik T. Holtz* HIS RESEARCH was conducted to determine the impact of PROJECT DESIGN Tacidic irrigation water on the chemical and mineralogi- cal characteristics of the major soil series in the Alamosa Given that the chemistry of the Alamosa River water is River Basin in southwestern Colorado. The Alamosa River acidic and has high levels of sediment and soluble metals, it is used to irrigate about 45,000 acres in the San Luis Valley is suspected that irrigation has greatly altered native proper- of Colorado. The river is impacted by acid in the drainage ties of the soils of the Alamosa River Basin. In order to doc- from the Summitville Mine. Funding was provided by the ument any impact that irrigation with Alamosa River water United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has had on these soils, a detailed study of the morphologi- to fill data gaps in the USEPA Superfund Site Risk cal, mineralogical, and chemical characteristics of these Assessment and Off-Site Impact Statement associated with soils was conducted across a management gradient. The the Summitville Gold Mine. The study involved three agen- management regimes consisted of virgin sites which had cies: Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Co., AGRO- never been farmed or irrigated, sites which received high- Engineering, Alamosa, Co., and Colorado State University, priority Alamosa River Water, sites which received Rio Ft. Collins, Co. These agencies cooperated under the author- Grande or Conejos River water as an alternate source, and ity of the Colorado Department of Public Health and pre-1984 sites (farmed and irrigated).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Data Gaps for Determining Natural Resource Injuries from The
    CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN RALPH L. CARR Attorney General COLORADO JUDICIAL CENTER DAVID C. BLAKE 1300 Broadway, 10th Floor Chief Deputy Attorney Denver, Colorado 80203 General Phone (720) 508-6000 MELANIE J. SNYDER Chief of Staff STATE OF COLORADO DANIEL D. DOMENICO DEPARTMENT OF LAW Office of the Attorney Solicitor General General AGENDA Colorado Natural Resources Trustees Meeting November 4, 2016, 3:00 pm to 5:00 pm Location: AGO Room 1B Open Session 1. Approval of Minutes from November 4, 2015 Meeting – 5 minutes Action Item: Review and approve minutes from November 4, 2015 meeting Document: Draft Minutes from November 4, 2015 meeting 2. Suncor Update (Kendall Griffin, Susan Newton, Ed Perkins) - 5 minutes 3. Rocky Mountain Arsenal Recovery Fund Adams County Replacement Project (David Banas, Susan Newton, Ed Perkins) – 10 minutes Action Item: Adams County’s request to approve funding for Willow Bay project Documents: Adams County Willow Bay Property Acquisition Project Proposal Draft Resolution approving Willow Bay Property Acquisition Project Proposal 4. Summitville Update and Request for Project Approval (Jennifer Robbins, Doug Jamison) – 10 minutes Action Items: Review and approve new projects in the Alamosa River Watershed with the remaining Summitville NRD funds; approve extending MOU with the US Documents: 2002 MOU between State and Department of Interior 2007 Trustee Resolution extending MOU Draft Resolution approving new projects and approving extension of MOU with US 5. Security-Widefield Water Quality (David Banas, Susan Newton, Ed Perkins) – 5 minutes 6. Fountain Creek Truck Rollover (David Banas, Susan Newton, Ed Perkins) - 5 minutes 7. Manweiler Trucking Arkansas River Truck Rollover (David Banas, Susan Newton) - 5 minutes 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned Mines and Naturally Occurring Acid Rock Drainage on National Forest System Lands in Colorado
    Abandoned Mines and Naturally Occurring Acid Rock Drainage on National Forest System Lands in Colorado Matthew A. Sares1, Daryl L. Gusey2, and John T. Neubert1 ABSTRACT The Colorado Geological Survey completed an inventory of environmental degradation associated with abandoned and inactive mines on National Forest System lands in Colorado. In the course of the inventory, areas with naturally occurring acid rock drainage were also noted. Approximately 18,000 abandoned mine-related features were inventoried, including about 900 features that are considered significant enough environmental problems to warrant further investigation. Water quality data, such as pH and conductivity were gathered at all features where water was present, such as draining adits, seepage at the toe of dumps and tailings, and standing water in shafts. Samples were taken where field tests indicated low pH and/or high conductivity, including several areas with naturally occurring acid rock drainage. Samples were analyzed for dissolved and total metals, and for selected anions. All mine locations and data collected by the field geologists were entered on field forms and, subsequently, into a computer database and GIS format. With the information provided by the inventory, the Forest Service, in cooperation with other agencies, has been able to prioritize abandoned mines for reclamation. In most cases, cleanup is approached on a watershed basis. Mines in priority watersheds have been selected for reclamation first. Watersheds where studies prerequisite to cleanup are occurring include the upper Animas River, Willow Creek (tributary to the upper Rio Grande), Chalk Creek (tributary to the upper Arkansas River), the Uncompahgre River, and the Alamosa River.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Evaluation of the Gold King Mine Incident
    Technical Evaluation of the Gold King Mine Incident San Juan County, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado October 2015 Mission Statements The Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation's natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Technical Evaluation of the Gold King Mine Incident San Juan County, Colorado Peer reviewed by: U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado October 2015 Technical Approval The results, findings, and recommendations provided in this Technical Evaluation of the Gold King Mine Incident are technically sound and consistent with current professional practice. Technical Evaluation of the Gold King Mine Incident Table of Contents page Executive Summary ...............................................................................................1 Introduction............................................................................................................5 Composition of the Evaluation Team ..................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Five Year Review Summary Form
    Summitville Mine Superfund Site Five-Year Review September 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the five-year review is to evaluate the implementation and performance of a remedy in order to determine if the remedy is or will be protective of human health and the environment. CERCLA 121(c) statutorily mandates five-year reviews. In addition to considerations of a five-year review, the EPA conducted a Superfund 120 Day Study. As a result, the Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI) decided to conduct a review at the Summitville Mine Superfund Site to make sure that the selected remedy incorporated new technology and the most cost- effective cleanup approach based on experiences with proven and emerging technologies. Future remedial activities and decisions will include consideration of NRRB recommendations issued in September 2005. The State of Colorado has conducted the second five-year review of the remedial actions performed at the Summitville Mine Superfund Site located in Rio Grande County, Colorado. The review evaluates the data collected since the last 5-year review, which was completed by EPA in August 2000. Overall, the results of this five-year review indicate that all immediate threats at the site have been addressed and the remedy is expected to continue to be protective of human health. Though significant improvements to the environment have been realized as the result of remedial actions implemented to date, the final remedy will not be fully protective of the environment until the final remedy components are completed as proposed. Therefore, a protectiveness determination is deferred until either the remedy is complete or additional information is obtained to make a protectiveness determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Creede, Colorado
    May 2-4, 2018 - Creede, Colorado “ Planning for Resiliency ” 0 Conference Hosts 2018 Willow Creek Reclamation Committee was formed in 1998 to address water quality issues in the Willow Creek watershed caused from historic mining. This year, the WCRC is celebrating its 20th year of hard work! The WCRC has accomplished several characterization studies of the watershed, implemented projects to correct water quality impairments, and engaged stakeholders and community members in their work. In 2016, WCRC merged with the Headwaters Alliance to implement the same techniques that proved impactful in the Willow Creek watershed, across the Upper Rio Grande. www.headwatersalliance.com Mountain Studies Institute (MSI) is a non-profit, non- advocacy, mountain research and education center established in 2002 in Silverton, Colorado in the heart of the San Juan Mountains. MSI has developed a highly collaborative, dynamic, and unique approach to serving our region, which has grown to encompass fourteen counties in Southwest Colorado. Our mission is to enhance understanding and sustainable use of the San Juan Mountains through research and education. This mission has positioned MSI to identify and articulate information needs, facilitate and complete research and restoration initiatives, and most importantly to ensure that pertinent scientific information is made available to decision makers and the general public. It is our vision that through science education, information is not only understood, but used to transform our communities into healthier, more sustainable places to live. More information available at www.mountainstudies.org The Uncompahgre Watershed Partnership was founded in 2007 by a coalition of citizens, nonprofits, local and regional governments, and federal and state agencies dedicated to understanding, restoring and protecting land and natural resources within the Upper Uncompahgre Watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Fact Sheet
    Summitville Mine Rio Grande County, Colorado Site Description Key The Site covers about 1,400 acres and is located in the southeastern portion of Accomplishments the San Juan Mountains, in the southwest corner of Rio Grande County, CO. • Mine reclamation Mining began at Summitville in the 1870s. In the 1980s, Summitville activities were Consolidated Mining Company, Inc. (SCMCI) started large-scale surface gold completed in mining, using the heap-leach process. Gold-bearing ore was mined, crushed October 2001. and stacked or heaped on a multi-layered, lined pad. A solution of sodium cyanide was used to leach gold from the ore by sprinkling it on the heaped ore • EPA and its and allowing it to percolate down. Then the sodium-cyanide solution was partners have pumped to a facility that removed the gold. These actions greatly increased the replanted 585- acidity and dissolved metals in the surrounding streams, damaging aquatic life. acres of mining- The dissolved metals include aluminum, copper, iron, manganese and zinc. disturbed land, which now support Current Site Status and Cleanup Actions to Date plant and wildlife habitat. • In December 1992, the owner of the Site declared bankruptcy, and the State of Colorado requested EPA’s assistance. EPA’s Removal • Water quality of Program immediately began water treatment plant modifications to treat the Alamosa River cyanide-contaminated leachate and acid mine drainage from numerous downstream of the sources at the Site. site has improved considerably. • In May 1994, the Site was added to the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). For more information on the projects at this site, • EPA and its partners constructed a 90-million-gallon wastewater holding please read the pond.
    [Show full text]
  • Rod, Record of Decision for Summitville Mine Final Site
    555707 _———•————— SDMS Document ID Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllll200430l2 RECORD OF DECISION FOR SUMMITVILLE MINE FINAL SITE-WIDE REMEDY OPERABLE UNIT 5 SUMMITVILLE MINE SUPERFUND SITE RIO GRANDE COUNTY, COLORADO RECORD OF DECISION FOR SUMMITVILLE MINE FINAL SITE-WIDE REMEDY OPERABLE UNIT 5 SUMMITVILLE MINE SUPERFUND SITE RIO GRANDE COUNTY, COLORADO DECLARATION FOR THE SITE-WIDE RECORD OF DECISION Site Name and Location Summitville Mine Superfund Site, Summitville, Rio Grande County, Colorado. Statement of Basis and Purpose This document represents the final Record of Decision for the Summitville Mine Superfund site (site) final site-wide remedial action, designated as Operable Unit (OU) 5. The site is defined as the permitted 1,231- acre mine site that is located in the southeastern portion of the San Juan Mountains, in the southwest comer of Rio Grande County, Colorado. This decision document presents the Selected Remedy for the site, which was chosen in accordance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1986, as amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, and the National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). This decision is based on the Administrative Record file for this site. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA) CERCLA identification number for the site is COD983778432. This document is issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), the lead agency for the site-wide Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study, and the U.S. EPA Region VIII. Both U.S. EPA and the State of Colorado concur with the Selected Remedy presented herein. The remedial action selected in this Record of Decision is necessary to protect the public health or welfare or the environment from actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from the site into the environment.
    [Show full text]