Institute for Information Law Self-Assessment Report (2009–2015)

Institute for Information Law

Self-Assessment Report (2009–2015) ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Amsterdam, March 2016

Institute for Information Law (IViR) Vendelstraat 7 1012 XX Amsterdam The Netherlands

Website: http://ivir.nl/ Phone: + 31 (0)20 525 3406 Email: [email protected]

Layout: Suzanne Bakkum

2 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Table of Contents

Section I Description of the research group and its research program 1 1.1 Organization 1 Title 1 General description 1 Composition 1 Organization 1 Financing 2 1.2 Overall strategy 2 Mission and vision 2 Paradigm and research methods 2 Research profile and strategy 3 1.3 Past and future targets 4 1.4 Applicable performance indicators 5 Research quality 6 Relevance to society 6 1.5 Results obtained 7 Societal relevance 11 1.6 Own assessment of quality, relevance and viability 14 Research quality 15 Relevance to society 15 Viability 15 Previous external assessments 15 1.7 Relevant environmental factors and developments 16 1.8 SWOT analysis and benchmark/positioning 17 Benchmarks 18

Section II Appendices 19 2.1 Table describing the composition of the research unit 19 2.2 Table reflecting the publications output 20 2.3 Table indicating the research unit’s financing structure 21 2.4 Five most important scientific publications 21 2.5 Five most important societal publications 22 2.6 Previous external assessment reports 23 2.7 Awards and individual research grants 31 Prizes, honors and awards 31 Individual research grants 32 2.8 Publications output 33 2.9 Reports and studies of societal relevance 173 2.10 IViR events (2009-2015) 177 IViR Speaker Series 177 Honorary Doctorate 180 Inaugurals 180 PhD Defenses 180 Conferences, symposia, (expert)workshops 181 Public debate – Spui 25 183 Organisation of workshops for stakeholders, policy makers, etc 184 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

4 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Section I Description of the research group and its research program

1.1 Organization

Title Institute for Information Law, IViR Influx InfluxInformation General description InfluxInformation The Institute for Information Law (IViR), operational since 1986 and officially estab- InfluxInformationFrom 2-4 July 2014 IViR celebrated its lished in 1989 by decree of the University of InfluxInformation25th birthday with a major three-day Amsterdam (UvA) Executive Board, is the InfluxInformationinternational conference on current oldest research institute within the Faculty InfluxInformationand future issues in information law of Law. The institute’s mission is to further InfluxInformationand policy, Information Influx, with the development of information law into a Informationopening keynotes by ec Vice-President balanced framework that accommodates the InfluxN. Kroes and Y. Benkler (Harvard U.), needs and interests of the information society. Informationand keynotes and panel contributions by Information law is a normative concept that leading scholars in the field of informa- integrates the law relating to the production, tion law worldwide. Approximately 250 marketing, distribution and use of informa- information law scholars, practitioners, tion. The institute is one the largest research lawyers, professionals, and students from centres in the field of information law in the all over the world attended the anniver- world. IViR has a strong presence in European sary conference. and international academic networks through a broad array of activities, regularly engages in national and international research collaborations, and collaborates with non-legal disciplines such as economics, communications science, computer science, philosophy, digital humanities and the arts.

Composition IViR has a staff of currently about 40 full- and part-time researchers (21 fte) from legal studies, but also economics, social sciences and philosophy. (cf. Appendices 2.1). The institute has been steadily growing from the start of the reporting period (2009), when its staff counted approximately 25 members (15 fte). Today, the composition of staff is fairly balanced with four Professors, two Associate Professors (part-time), seven Assistant Professors (five part- time), the equivalent of seven postdoctoral researchers and six PhD candidates. The institute’s operations and administra- Advisory Board Executive Board tion are supported by three administrative staff.

Documentation Organization Secreteriat Centre IViR’s organization is structured so as to optimally stimulate and coordinate the Management institute’s research and output as well as Team to ensure research quality and valorization. The management of the institute lies in the hands of the four professors: Researchers Nico A.N.M. van Eijk (director), P. Bernt Hugenholtz (institute director until 2014, currently research director), Mireille

1 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

M.M. van Eechoud and Natali Helberger. Together they form the Board of Directors, which convenes every two weeks and is tasked with general scientific, financial and human resource management. Prospective and ongoing research projects are discussed and monitored at regular meetings of the institute’s senior research staff. Every research project is assigned to a principle investigator (pi) who is either one of the directors or a senior staff member, and oversees the implementation and reports to the senior staff meeting. The institute’s research staff are encouraged to initiate and develop new research projects that fit within the confines of the research program, and to acquire funding, subject to approval of the Board of Directors. The institute’s advisory board, which is composed of leading academics, business leaders and other experts, annually convenes with the Board and senior staff to discuss past performance and future research.

Financing Information law is one of the Research Priority Areas (rpa’s) of the University of Amsterdam and of the Faculty of Law, and as such the institute’s research program is publicly financed (eerste geldstroom). IViR also participates in various research projects specifically financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (nwo) and the European Union (tweede geldstroom). A third source of financing is commissioned research derde( geldstroom), usually for governmental organizations, such as the Dutch government, the Council of Europe, the European Parliament and Commission, the oecd, wipo, etc. Occasionally, research is commissioned by non-governmental organisations or private actors. In all cases, IViR research is carried out subject to rigid rules of academic independence and transparency. With university funding under increasing pressure, IViR constantly faces the challenge of maintaining a balance between these sources of financing (cf. Appendices 2.3). 1.2 Overall strategy

Two new professors of information law were inaugurated at UvA. On May 23, 2014, Mireille van Eechoud held her inaugural lecture on ‘The lure of open data’. On September 19, 2014, Natali Helberger held her inaugural lecture on ‘Media, users and algorithms: towards a new balance’. JEROEN OERLEMANS

Mission and vision The institute’s mission is to further the development of information law into a balanced framework that accommodates the needs and interests of the information society while respecting fundamental rights and freedoms. Information law is a normative concept that integrates the law relating to the production, marketing, distribution and use of information. The essence of the information law paradigm is that formerly distinct issues and sectors, which are intrinsically connected or converging, are treated within a single and coherent normative framework. The institute has played a pioneering role in this approach, which has been followed at home and abroad.

Paradigm and research methods As the Association of universities in the Netherlands (vsnu) recognized in previous evaluations, the institute’s early choice to focus on information (law) rather than on information technology (law) distinguishes its research program from comparable programs, in the

2 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Netherlands and abroad (cf. Section 1.6). The focus on the normative principles underpinning intellectual property law, freedom of expression, media regulation, consumer protection, privacy and data protection, among others, has led to valuable new insights. IViR brings together all the disciplines necessary to study the normative, legal and regulatory frameworks that define, govern and condition information. The field of information law cuts across traditional legal boundaries and draws from research in other disciplines, such as economics and the social sciences. Research methods applied depend on the type and goals of a specific research project, using either descriptive, comparative, and normative/argumentative legal methodology, or (more often) a combination of these – mixed – methods. IViR research projects increasingly comprise empirical research components that require appropriate (e.g. statistical or qualitative) methods. In addition, IViR regularly carries out collaborative research projects with research institutes from other disciplines, such as communications science or cultural studies, incorporating non-legal methods.

Research profile and strategy Information law is one of the rpas expressly designated by UvA’s Executive Board to “represent the very best the UvA has to offer in terms of research and are also areas in which the UvA is a worldwide leader”. IViR has played an IViR has initiated, and presently hosts (B. important role in establishing the university’s van der Sloot), the Amsterdam Platform profile as a world-leading university in the field for Privacy Research (appr) that brings of information and communications studies, together more than 60 UvA privacy and by initiating interdisciplinary collabora- researchers from such diverse disci- tions with other UvA institutes and centres plines as law, communications science, built bridges across the faculties. informatics, medicine and philosophy. The institute’s mission is reflected in its Under the co-leadership of N. van Eijk, research strategy, which aims at producing the appr has now twice organized the scholarly output that lives up to rigorous highly successful Amsterdam Privacy academic standards, while feeding into societal Conference (apc 2012 and 2015), which discussions and policy debates on information has quickly become Europe’s leading law-related issues at the national, European interdisciplinary conference on privacy and international levels. This “360 degree and data protection. apc 2015 drew approach” towards research and valorization is more than 500 participants and included reflected in IViR’s research strategy that values keynotes by A. Allen, J. Brill, G. Coleman, both cutting-edge scholarly publications and A. Etzioni, V. Mayer-Schönberger, D. groundbreaking policy-oriented studies and Mulligan, H. Nissenbaum, M. Schrems, reports. IViR initiates research only on the and L. Sweeney. conditions that a new project, first, is situ- ated within the domain defined in its research program, second, tackles an important research question of scientific value, and, third, has potential impact on the shaping of the information society. Following these principles, commissioned research contributes both to producing scientific excellence and societal relevance, while allowing the institute to grow even in times of tightening faculty budgets. All research activities undertaken by IViR conform to the Declaration of Scientific Independence of the Royal Nether- lands Academy of Arts and Sciences and the relevant European principles on research integrity. IViR, therefore, refrains from providing consultancy services. The present self-assessment concerns the 2009-2015 period. This covers the final two years of the institute’s Research Program 2005-2010, and its current Research Program 2012- 2016. The 2005-2010 Research Program encompassed seven distinct themes, which span the entire spectrum of information law:

3 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

1. General development of information law theory 2. Freedom of expression and other communication freedoms 3. Protection of privacy 4. Intellectual property 5. Commercial communications 6. Government information 7. Media and telecommunications

In response to the research evaluation of Dutch Law Faculties in 2009, which was very positive for IViR (cf. Section 1.6), the research program of the institute was amended to further enhance its coherence and accentuate the interdependence of the different research themes. This has led to the ‘clustering’ of research themes in the current 2012-2016 research program. In our present research program (2012-2016) we set as specific targets to concentrate our research efforts on six different research topics or fields, two for each of the three ‘clusters’:

1. the creation and production of information –– the boundaries of Intellectual Property –– alternative compensation schemes 2. the transmission and communication of information –– freedom of expression in the information age –– regulating online intermediaries 3. the end use (consumption) of information –– informational privacy: from autonomy to regulation? –– accommodating the user in information law

Since informational transactions commonly transcend one or more clusters, these principles will often concurrently apply. Whereas each of these principles is enshrined in fundamental rights and represents a normative value, none is absolute. Rather, these rights and freedoms will tend to compete and, in many cases, even collide with each other, which calls for striking a balance between normative values and conflicting interests. Many of the salient issues of information law today concern these areas of colliding legal principles, e.g. defining the boundaries of copyright protection and use exception; secondary liability of online intermediaries; laws on defamation and hate speech; information flows and net neutrality; user’s privacy rights in behavioral targeting; et cetera. 1.3 Past and future targets

In pursuit of its mission, IViR has set three strategic goals: first, to produce cutting-edge scholarship and remain international leaders A. Arnbak produced ground-breaking in our field; second, to conceive and develop research on communications security, legal concepts and doctrine that suit the publishing his findings in the leading requirements of the information society, and international journal of computer science, for that purpose help define policy agenda’s in Communications of the acm, in regular our field, at the national, European and inter- opinions in het Financieel Dagblad, and national levels; and, third, to (further) promote finally in his PhD thesis ‘Securing Private the paradigm of information law in law and Communications’. legal scholarship worldwide. These goals are backed by its current research program and continue to guide IViR’s next research program.

4 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

With the ambition to further consolidate IViR’s leading position in the field of information law and policy in the Netherlands, Europe and beyond, specific targets are, first, to identify emerging legal challenges to the information society and be the first to address them through our research; second, to further expand and strengthen the institute’s international academic network; and, third, to enhance multidisciplinary cooperations both within UvA and through external collaborations. Given the incessant growth of the information society, one of the major challenges shall be to apply a policy of managed development that allows the institute to meet the challenges for legal research and society, against the tide of budgetary constraints. The institute’s forthcoming research program (2017-2021) will preserve the ‘clus- tered’ approach towards information law, which has proven its robustness, while further pronouncing evidence-based research and interdisciplinary methods. The institute has successfully embarked on new research projects that tackle major challenges and set the research agenda, for example, in the field of personalized communications in politics, commerce and health; the growing and changing role of data in the information value chain (commercial use, communications security, electronic communications, open data and governmental use of data); the growing divide between legal and social norms in the field of intellectual property; the diverse but central roles of information intermediaries; et cetera. Complementing the institute’s exceptional strength in intellectual property law, the institute will continue to expand its expertise in public policies and regulations across sectors of the information-driven society and attendant users’ right, in particular the growing relevance of legal research on privacy and data protection. Owing to the dynamics of information law, IViR’s long-term research programs leaves the necessary room for maneuver and agility to respond to relevant developments, emerging research questions and considerations of societal relevance.

IViR has played a pioneering role in developing and promoting Creative Commons licenses in the Netherlands and across Europe. On 8 January 2010, L. Lessig (Harvard U.) received an honorary doctorate from the UvA for his important contributions to the field of information law, in particular as regards open content licensing. IMAGE BY ANNE HELMOND

1.4 Applicable performance indicators

IViR’s performance resonates in its commitment to academic research that is both scientifi- cally excellent and yields societal impact. Rather than fostering a mono-culture of scientific publishing, IViR encourages its research staff to commit to a broad spectrum of integrated activities that combine producing high-quality scholarly output and high-impact policy- oriented studies, initiating and actively engaging in the international academic debate and societal dialog, in addition to successfully competing for awards and research funding. Based on the sample of output indicators created by the Faculty of Law’s Scientific Advisory Committee following the Standard Evaluation Protocol 2015-2021, the institute has selected the following performance indicators for each quality domain on research quality and relevance to society, respectively.

5 Results in a nutshell: ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015) 213 peer reviewed publications SSelected indicators 75 international speakers in IViR Top-downloaded publications Speakers’ Series Research quality Open access publications 42 International workshops and 4 inter- groups. Contributing to publications in news media and blogs, or writing op-eds, are also Invitations to speak and give keynotes national conferences Research products for peers Invitations to participate in research consortia, workshops 3 inaugural lectures important indicators. Participation and impact in the national, European and international academic debate is and round tables 12 PhDs, two award winning Prizes, honours and awards Major awards and grants (NWO Veni, an important element of our research strategy, which is measurable through the academic output in the form of publications. IViR maintains a list of high-quality and relevant academic 1.5 Results obtained Personal research grants HERA, NWO Top, NWO Top Talent, Marie Invitations to become member in editorial boards, scientific Curie, ERC) journals in the field of information law, based on a variety of criteria, namely peer review, ranking (where available), international scope, academic prestige, impact, open access, quality Publications committees and expert groups and assessment committees 10 International Summer Courses Invitations to act as reviewers Most downloaded UvA paper (60.000 +) and reputation of the editorial board, and circulation. Advanced students, PhD candidates Over the past seven years, IVIR has produced and young scholars are encouraged to start publishing early in their career, and turn project a reported total of 1.245 publications, an Publications available in open access Most downloaded paper from UvA Repos- Personal research grants itory DARE research into academic publications, under the supervision of senior staff members. average annual output of 9.75 publications per fte (cf. Appendices 2.2.). IViR delivers on its The ability to attract external funding Use of research products and marks of recognition commitment to publishing in international, There is a lack meaningful metric indicators for use and impact of academic legal publica- peer-reviewed journals in addition to other tions, and download figures are not fully reliable. Nevetheless, IViR staff researchers maintain forms of publications, i.e. monographs, edited an active presence on platforms dedicated to provide optimal (open) access to academic books, book chapters, PhD theses, conference research, such as ssrn, in addition to consequently maintaining an open repository of our papers, professional publications and publi- Selected indicators: research output on the IViR website and UvA’s dare publication database. cations aimed at the general public. In the Reports for policy making and expert opinions To IViR, peer recognition is a direct and emblematic reflection of the use and impact of reporting period IVIR staff produced 213 peer-reviewed publications (1.7 publication per fte Articles in professional journals its staff researchers’ publications. Official recognition in the form of prizes, honors and other per year), showing a clear upwards trend towards more publications in international peer-re- Annotations awards is such an indicator of peer recognition, particularly for early career researchers. Aside viewed journals. In 2012, peer-reviewed publications in national journals still outnumbered Outreach activities (e.g. workshops, lectures for general from collaborative research funding, personal research grants are also important marks of international publications, but since then this ratio was reversed. For example, the year 2015 audiences and exhibitions ) recognition of peers, since these are usually awarded after a rigorous and highly compet- generated 23 international peer reviewed publications and 11 national peer reviewed articles. Contributions to blogs and other social media itive international peer-selection process. Finally, invitations are significant marks of peer IViR publications have also appeared in several high ranking, non-legal international Contributions in the professional media recognition. These include invitations to give keynotes and invited talks; invitations to attend peer reviewed journals This is a direct reflection of IVIR’s ambition to further develop its Organization of workshops and other outreach activities scholarly workshops, symposia and roundtables all over the world; invitations to participate multi-disciplinary research strategy. For example, while in 2012 we published in only three targeting/involving (also) societal groups in European and international project consortia; visiting scholarships (both outgoing and non-legal journals, the number went up to nine in 2015, which marks a fifth (26 percent) of incoming); requests to act as reviewers and referees of publications, dissertations and research IVIRs overall peer-reviewed publications in that year. proposals; and memberships of editorial boards, scientific committees and expert groups, Over the reporting period 14 PhD theses were completed and subsequently published and academic assessment committees. (W. Steenbruggen, A. van Rooijen, W. Sakulin, H. Fischer, S. van Gompel, J. van Hoboken, A. Ramalho, E. Janssen, F. Zuiderveen Borgesius, J. Poort, A. Arnbak, L. Pessers, H. Hijmans, and Relevance to society C. Angelopoulos), in the form of books and/or journal publications. Two of these won prizes IVIR has a rich history of bringing legal scholarship to broader society, and ensuring its above the university and local level. For his thesis on ‘Search Engine Freedom’ J. van Hoboken research programmes identify and address societal challenges at home, in Europe and further received the Erasmus Research Prize 2014. F. abroad. Our commitment shows itself in the variety of ‘research products’ we provide to Zuiderveen Borgesius ’s thesis, ‘Behavioural societal groups. Targeting: How to Regulate’, earned him the René Cassin Thesis Prize of the International Research products for societal target groups Institute of Human Rights in 2015. IViR’s main research products for societal target groups are policy-oriented studies and IViR continued its strategy of combining A peer-reviewed paper by A. Arnbak, N. van Eijk and others, reports for European and intergovernmental institutions, and the Dutch government. IViR’s excellent academic research with societal rele- ‘Security Collapse in the HTTPS Market’, was downloaded over policy-oriented reports and studies are often combined with invitation-only workshops for vance. For example, IViR’s influential report 60.000 times from the ACM archive. With 17.482 downloads, the policy makers, stakeholders and academics. This is usually accompanied by publications in for the European Commission on consumer study ‘User-created content: supporting a participative informa- professional journals and annotations. IViR research is also increasingly reported by way of protection in relation to digital content tion society’ by Natali Helberger and Lucie L. Guibault et.al. was blogs and the social media. contracts, co-written with UvA’s Centre for the most downloaded document in 2015 from the University of the Study of European Contract Law (CSECL), Amsterdam’s open digital repository DARE. Use of research products and marks of recognition resulted in several peer-reviewed publications An important indicator of the use of our research by societal groups is the extent to which and eventually was converted into a book IViR is approached during the formation stage of larger research consortia applying for volume in Kluwer’s Information Law Series, funding. Often this will include projects in cooperation with societal groups. the organization of an international workshop Invitations to join advisory or steering boards of organizations and groups are other and various invitations to speak at interna- indicators of the usefulness of our research for societal groups, as are invitations to give tional conferences. lectures and trainings. Memberships of governmental, European or international advisory boards and of civil society advisory boards are other indicators of recognition by societal

6 Results in a nutshell: ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015) 213 peer reviewed publications SSelected indicators 75 international speakers in IViR Top-downloaded publications Speakers’ Series Research quality Open access publications 42 International workshops and 4 inter- groups. Contributing to publications in news media and blogs, or writing op-eds, are also Results in a nutshell: Invitations to speak and give keynotes national conferences Research products for peers Invitations to participate in research consortia, workshops 3 inaugural lectures important indicators. – 213 peer reviewed publications Participation and impact in the national, European and international academic debate is – 75 international speakers in IViR and round tables 12 PhDs, two award winning Prizes, honours and awards Major awards and grants (NWO Veni, an important element of our research strategy, which is measurable through the academic Speakers’ Series output in the form of publications. IViR maintains a list of high-quality and relevant academic 1.5 Results obtained – 42 International workshops and 4 Personal research grants HERA, NWO Top, NWO Top Talent, Marie Invitations to become member in editorial boards, scientific Curie, ERC) journals in the field of information law, based on a variety of criteria, namely peer review, international conferences ranking (where available), international scope, academic prestige, impact, open access, quality Publications – 2 inaugural lectures committees and expert groups and assessment committees 10 International Summer Courses Invitations to act as reviewers Most downloaded UvA paper (60.000 +) and reputation of the editorial board, and circulation. Advanced students, PhD candidates Over the past seven years, IVIR has produced – 12 PhDs, two award winning and young scholars are encouraged to start publishing early in their career, and turn project a reported total of 1.245 publications, an – Major awards and grants (nwo Veni, Publications available in open access Most downloaded paper from UvA Repos- Personal research grants itory DARE research into academic publications, under the supervision of senior staff members. average annual output of 9.75 publications per hera, nwo Top, nwo Top Talent, fte (cf. Appendices 2.2.). IViR delivers on its Marie Curie, erc) The ability to attract external funding Use of research products and marks of recognition commitment to publishing in international, – 10 International Summer Courses There is a lack meaningful metric indicators for use and impact of academic legal publica- peer-reviewed journals in addition to other – Most downloaded UvA paper (60.000+) tions, and download figures are not fully reliable. Nevetheless, IViR staff researchers maintain forms of publications, i.e. monographs, edited – Most downloaded paper from UvA an active presence on platforms dedicated to provide optimal (open) access to academic books, book chapters, PhD theses, conference Repository dare research, such as ssrn, in addition to consequently maintaining an open repository of our papers, professional publications and publi- Selected indicators: research output on the IViR website and UvA’s dare publication database. cations aimed at the general public. In the Reports for policy making and expert opinions To IViR, peer recognition is a direct and emblematic reflection of the use and impact of reporting period IVIR staff produced 213 peer-reviewed publications (1.7 publication per fte Articles in professional journals its staff researchers’ publications. Official recognition in the form of prizes, honors and other per year), showing a clear upwards trend towards more publications in international peer-re- Annotations awards is such an indicator of peer recognition, particularly for early career researchers. Aside viewed journals. In 2012, peer-reviewed publications in national journals still outnumbered Outreach activities (e.g. workshops, lectures for general from collaborative research funding, personal research grants are also important marks of international publications, but since then this ratio was reversed. For example, the year 2015 audiences and exhibitions ) recognition of peers, since these are usually awarded after a rigorous and highly compet- generated 23 international peer reviewed publications and 11 national peer reviewed articles. Contributions to blogs and other social media itive international peer-selection process. Finally, invitations are significant marks of peer IViR publications have also appeared in several high ranking, non-legal international Contributions in the professional media recognition. These include invitations to give keynotes and invited talks; invitations to attend peer reviewed journals This is a direct reflection of IVIR’s ambition to further develop its Organization of workshops and other outreach activities scholarly workshops, symposia and roundtables all over the world; invitations to participate multi-disciplinary research strategy. For example, while in 2012 we published in only three targeting/involving (also) societal groups in European and international project consortia; visiting scholarships (both outgoing and non-legal journals, the number went up to nine in 2015, which marks a fifth (26 percent) of incoming); requests to act as reviewers and referees of publications, dissertations and research IVIRs overall peer-reviewed publications in that year. proposals; and memberships of editorial boards, scientific committees and expert groups, Over the reporting period 14 PhD theses were completed and subsequently published and academic assessment committees. (W. Steenbruggen, A. van Rooijen, W. Sakulin, H. Fischer, S. van Gompel, J. van Hoboken, A. Ramalho, E. Janssen, F. Zuiderveen Borgesius, J. Poort, A. Arnbak, L. Pessers, H. Hijmans, and Relevance to society C. Angelopoulos), in the form of books and/or journal publications. Two of these won prizes IVIR has a rich history of bringing legal scholarship to broader society, and ensuring its above the university and local level. For his thesis on ‘Search Engine Freedom’ J. van Hoboken research programmes identify and address societal challenges at home, in Europe and further received the Erasmus Research Prize 2014. F. abroad. Our commitment shows itself in the variety of ‘research products’ we provide to Zuiderveen Borgesius ’s thesis, ‘Behavioural societal groups. The peer-reviewed paper by A. Arnbak, Targeting: How to Regulate’, earned him the N. van Eijk and others, ‘Security Collapse René Cassin Thesis Prize of the International Research products for societal target groups in the https Market’, was downloaded Institute of Human Rights in 2015. IViR’s main research products for societal target groups are policy-oriented studies and over 60.000 times from the acm IViR continued its strategy of combining A peer-reviewed paper by A. Arnbak, N. van Eijk and others, reports for European and intergovernmental institutions, and the Dutch government. IViR’s archive. With 17.482 downloads, the excellent academic research with societal rele- ‘Security Collapse in the HTTPS Market’, was downloaded over policy-oriented reports and studies are often combined with invitation-only workshops for study ‘User-created content: supporting vance. For example, IViR’s influential report 60.000 times from the ACM archive. With 17.482 downloads, the policy makers, stakeholders and academics. This is usually accompanied by publications in a participative information society’ by for the European Commission on consumer study ‘User-created content: supporting a participative informa- professional journals and annotations. IViR research is also increasingly reported by way of N. Helberger and L. Guibault and others protection in relation to digital content tion society’ by Natali Helberger and Lucie L. Guibault et.al. was blogs and the social media. was the most downloaded document in contracts, co-written with UvA’s Centre for the most downloaded document in 2015 from the University of 2015 from the UvA’s open digital repos- the Study of European Contract Law (CSECL), Amsterdam’s open digital repository DARE. Use of research products and marks of recognition itory dare. A. Arnbak’s PhD thesis resulted in several peer-reviewed publications An important indicator of the use of our research by societal groups is the extent to which ‘Securing Private Communications’ and eventually was converted into a book IViR is approached during the formation stage of larger research consortia applying for will be the very first book published by volume in Kluwer’s Information Law Series, funding. Often this will include projects in cooperation with societal groups. Wolters Kluwer (Information Series) the organization of an international workshop Invitations to join advisory or steering boards of organizations and groups are other under a Creative Commons license. and various invitations to speak at interna- indicators of the usefulness of our research for societal groups, as are invitations to give tional conferences. lectures and trainings. Memberships of governmental, European or international advisory boards and of civil society advisory boards are other indicators of recognition by societal

7 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Open access IViR has a long-standing commitment for In 2011, S. van Gompel’s thesis on the open access publishing and an institutional history of formalities in international culture to make research output openly copyright law inspired a transatlantic available. Indeed, examining and solving the dialogue between leading copyright many legal and policy issues raised by open scholars in Europe and the U.S. in the access publishing and open data remains an form of a symposium in Amsterdam (7 important research topic of IViR scholarship. July 2012) and a major conference at UC The institute follows a three-tiered approach Berkeley (18-19 April 2013). Both events to open access publishing. First, the quality of were organized in cooperation with the the publication outlet, its thematic niche and Berkeley Centre for Law and Technology audience, and its actual open access policy are at UC Berkeley. all seen as relevant factors. Second, IViR staff regularly contributes to open access publications as reviewers, editorial members and scientific advisory board members. Third, since its very early days, IViR has pursued a policy of publishing nearly all its research output on its website, UvA’s dare publications database, and other semi-open scholarly platforms such as SSRN and academia.edu. Selected IViR publications are faring extremely well in open access. IViR staff is actively involved in editorial boards of established open access journals, or had an active role in setting up new such journals, such as the Journal of Information Policy (N. Helberger), Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law (jipitec) (L. Guibault), and the Internet Policy Review (N. Helberger). Open access journals in which IViR researchers have published include the Berkeley Journal of Law and Technology and International Journal for Law and Information Technology, among others.

Active role in contributing to, and stimulating the international academic debate Besides academic publishing, the organization of and participation in academic workshops, symposia and conferences are forms of engaging in the international academic debate, and one in which IVIR performed very well in the reporting period. IViR organized four international academic conferences, including the highly successful Information Influx conference (2014), and two editions of the Amsterdam Privacy Conference (apc 2013 and 2015), which has developed into one of the world’s leading multi-disciplinary conferences in the field of privacy and data protection. The large-scale multidisciplinary hera-funded ‘Of Authorship and Originality’ project, a collaboration between IViR, Cambridge University (cipil) and the University of Bergen (Info- Media Institute), not only produced multiple peer-reviewed publications and an open-access published book volume, but also a public conference organized by IViR in 2013. S. van Gompel’s groundbreaking thesis on formalities in copyright law inspired a trans- N. Helberger was awarded a Starting atlantic dialogue between leading copyright Grant of the European Research Council scholars in Europe and the United States (erc) for her research project “Profiling in the form of a symposium in Amsterdam and targeting news readers – impli- (2012) and a major conference at UC Berkeley cations for the democratic role of the (2013). Both were products of our ongoing digital media, user rights and public cooperation with the Berkeley Centre for Law information policy”. A Starting Grant and Technology of UC Berkeley. is a personal grant of 1.5 million euros In the reporting period IViR organized 42 meant to support talented researchers for international workshops (averaging six per a period of five years while they conduct year), spanning the entire range of topics of research. our research program: from national security and ‘big data’, to alternative compensation

8 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

On March 13, 2012, B. Hugenholtz delivered the Seventh Annual Inter- national Intellectual Property Lecture at Cambridge University (Emmanuel College), on ‘Fair Use in Europe: in Search of Flexibilities in Copyright’. On November 7, 2013, Bernt Hugenholtz gave the 2nd Annual Peter Jaszi Distin- guished Lecture at American University, Washington College of Law, on ‘Flexing Authors’ Rights’.

systems for copyright, open content and fundamental rights in a digital environment (cf. Appendices 2.10). With 75 speakers over the past seven years, the IViR Speakers Series was also very productive (cf. Appendices 2.10). The IViR Speakers Series is a venue for researchers and thinkers from different disciplines all over the world to present and discuss their research in an informal setting. Next to providing a platform for the presentation of new research ideas and forging an academic network, the speaker series has resulted in a number of new collaborations and research projects. IViR scholars were regularly invited to present their work at leading international conferences in our field, such as the annual Privacy Law Scholars Conference (George Washington U. & UC Berkeley), the annual Fordham Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference, the annual Computers, Privacy and Data Protection conference (cpdp), and many others.

Awards and personal research grants Prizes, honours and awards are not yet a common phenomenon in (information) law, and often confined to masters and PhD theses or early carrier researchers. IViR is proud of its students and young scholars who collected several awards during the reporting period (cf. Appendices 2.7). In addition to the prizes awarded to our PhD students mentioned above, two IViR students won national awards for best master thesis in the field of internet-related law. IViR research master student (currently PhD candidate) V. Breemen and A. Arnbak also won the award for best thesis of the University of Amsterdam in all disciplines. Personal research grants are an important measure of the success and peer recognition of individual researchers, and of IViR as a host organization. Between 2009 and 2015 institute staff were awarded a sizeable number of the much-coveted personal research grants (cf. Appendices 2.7).

–– Two nwo Veni grants, a highly competitive talent grant for young postdoctoral researchers from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (nwo) (S. van Gompel, N. Helberger) –– One nwo Top Talent grant to enable an excellent Young Researcher to write his PhD (B. van der Sloot) –– Three Marie Curie individual fellowships (K. Irion, B. Bodo, T. Margoni) –– One nwo Humanities in the European Research Area (HERA) grant, in collaboration with Cambridge Univ. and Univ. of Bergen (M. van Eechoud) –– One top Project Grant from nwo, one of the few existing nwo talent grants that is granted in recognition of the achievements of an entire research group (lead: B. Hugenholtz) –– One erc Starting Grant (N. Helberger)

9 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

All of these are highly competitive, with an average rate of success between 6 and 12 percent, and are only awarded for proposals that promise groundbreaking and innovative research to the top 10 percent of researchers, after a thorough peer-reviewed selection and interview process. In addition, several IViR researchers successfully applied for grants for visiting scholarships at renowned universities such as Harvard, Berkeley and Princeton.

Multidisciplinary, pioneering research As the list of personal grants also demonstrate, IViR has been very active in setting out, and securing funding for a number of pioneering research lines. A distinctive feature of many of these lines is their multidisciplinary character. For example, M. van Eechoud’s hera project queried how insights from literary theory, music studies, film/visual studies and other disciplines in the humanities can help articulate copyright norms that enable sustainable creative practices in the digital environment. B. van der Sloot’s Top Talent-financed PhD work integrates approaches towards privacy from law and virtue ethics. Hugenholtz’ top project on alternative compensation systems combines approaches from the legal and social sciences with economic analyses. N. Helberger’s erc-funded work on news media personalization cuts across information law, communications science and media studies. Groundbreaking research was done on the topic of file sharing. A 2009 interdisciplinary study by IViR, seo and tno (‘Ups and downs. Economic and cultural effects of file sharing on music, film and games’) generated substantial international attention and directly influ- enced policy making. Follow-up studies by Joost Poort et. al. showed important shifts in file sharing behavior. In 2015, IViR researchers C.W. Handke , B. Bodó , J.-J. Vallbé published the first results of a large-scale consumer survey on alternative copyright compensation schemes. According to the survey, a majority of Dutch consumers is willing to pay for the right to freely share copyright protected content. For recorded music only, such scheme could increase the welfare of rights holders and users in the Netherlands by over 600 million Euro per year. The survey is part of the institute’s multidisciplinary project Alternatives to Copyright Enforcement, funded by the nwo ‘top’ program.

In 2014, IViR entered into an institutional cooperation with the Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR), a world leader in its field, with a research initiative on ‘Personalised Communica- tions’ that was awarded substantial additional RPA funding from UvA. The joint initiative currently involves eight postdocs from legal studies and communications Personalized Communication sciences engaging in joint research on the A Joint Communication and Information implications of algorithms and Big Data Law Initiative on users, society and law. The group will soon be expanded with four other PhD candidates.

Active role in academic service and excellence IViR’s researchers take an active part in academic service, thus contributing to academic excellence to the benefit of the wider academic community. Across institutions, several IViR

10 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

senior staff members are on advisory boards of leading research institutes. They are also on the organization or scientific committees of the leading international conferences in the field. IViR staff and researchers can also be found on the editorial boards of all leading Dutch-language journals in our field and also on the boards of a range of international journals.1 As expert reviewers for e.g. the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (nwo), Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Flanders (fwo), Israel Science Foundation, Danish Science Foundation, Swiss Science Foundations and for a wide range of academic journals, IViR staff have also extensively contributed to the academic peer review process.

Societal relevance IVIR’s societal impact strategy has three prongs: to translate research into practice, to provide direct policy input, and to take part in public debate.

Translating research into (legal) practice This type of outreach activity is aimed Since 2009, sixteen new volumes – predominantly at (legal) professionals. Our authored by IViR researchers and reputed insights from research enable us to signal and international scholars – were published predict new developments in law that are of in the Information Law Series, a series clear benefit to a large range of professionals. of academic monographs and collections Means used are publications and events. IViR published by Kluwer Law International contributes articles, case comments and anno- (General Editor: B. Hugenholtz). tations to inform professionals on current developments in information law, both in the Netherlands and in Europe. IViR scholars also regularly write case comments in national and foreign legal (online) journals s.a. Nederlandse Jurisprudentie (the largest and most reputable Dutch case reporter). The institute also runs the specialist Kluwer Copyright Blog with a broad international readership. IViR (T. McGonagle) is a partner organisation of the European Audiovisual Observatory in Strasburg, France. This is a publication-oriented partnership, which includes conducting research and coordinating a network of national media law experts for the Observatory’s legal publications. IViR staff also play an active role in learned societies in the domain of information law, which bring together legal professionals and scholars. N. van Eijk chairs the Dutch Society of Media and Communications Law (vmc). M. van Eechoud is board member of the Dutch Data Protection Authority, the Copyright Society and Executive Committee member of ALAI, the international copyright society. B. Hugenholtz was until 2012 vice-chairman of the Dutch Copyright Society. IViR’s outreach activities include our successful international summer courses, and other post-graduate training activities, e.g. for the World Intellectual Property Organization (wipo). Since 2000, IViR organizes a one-week Annual Summer Course on International Copyright Law (cf. Appendices 2.10). From 2012, IViR also offers an Annual Summer Course on Privacy Law and Policy. Both courses are aimed at a mix of high-level professionals, government administrators and advanced scholars, and have received both commercial success and critical acclaim. The summer courses are not only important vehicles of sharing knowledge with society, but also help expand IViR’s ever growing international network. Both summer courses benefit from funding by the Open Society Foundations’ osf( ) information program, which enables participation by members of civil society, in particular from developing countries of the global South.

1 Including the Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and e-Commerce Law (JIPITEC), Journal of International Biotechnology Law, Common Core of European Private Law, Cahier de propriété intellectuelle, Re- view of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, Internet Policy Review, Journal of Information Policy, Journal of World Intellectual Property, Irish Human Rights Law Review, International Sports Law, IRIS, European Data Protec- tion Law Review, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, and Law, Governance and Technology Series.

11 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

The success of our student Clinic deserves special mention as it indicates the extent to B. Hugenholtz was the main initiator which we succeed in bridging three areas: of the high-profile ‘Wittem Group’, a research, teaching and knowledge transfer, group of European copyright scholars together, but also: how our activities can be that produced the European Copyright directly turned into benefit for start-ups. Code – a draft of a EU Copyright Law – in 2012. The Code is widely cited in policy Providing direct policy input documents and academic literature, and The most important, prong of our outreach plays a central role in the current debate strategy is to help inform policy-making by on possible unification of copyright in way of independent and critical policy-ori- Europe. ented research. We do this mainly through studies, events and hearings (Cf. Appendices 2.9 and 2.10). High on impact are studies on commission from governments and non-governmental organizations, national and international (30 commissioned projects). These include the Dutch ministries of Economic Affairs, Security and Justice and Education, Culture and Science, but also the European Commission, European Parliament, the Dutch presidency of the eu, the Council of Europe and wipo. The institute’s studies and reports are often very influential in that they have actually resulted in concrete legal and policy initiatives – imme- diate testimony of how IViR’s research is useful to society. We also pursue policy-oriented work independently of commissions. For example, in response to the public outcry over privacy infringements in the wake of the nsa scandals, a team of IVIR staff formulated standards for independent oversight and transparency of national intelligence services (2015). Another example is the hermes study in cooperation with the Hans Bredow Institut (Hamburg) on the future of European audiovisual regulation. Private sector funders like Google, RTL Group, Microsoft, and non-profits like Open Society Foundation, Surfnet and the sidn-fund see the importance of such independent work and are prepared to contribute funding. Organizing and participating in workshops and review sessions is part and parcel of the projects we do for the public sector (cf. Appendices 2.10). Examples include a seminar for policy makers of Dutch central government departments on legal aspects of public sector information re-use (organized with the Ministry of the Interior, 2015) and various workshops co-organized with the Dutch data protection authority as part of the Building Bridges initiative to further transatlantic policy dialogue on data protection. IViR staff are also regularly invited to hearings by parliamentary committees of the Dutch parliament and the European Parliament, e.g. on reform of the Dutch media act, on data protection and surveillance, on the allocation of frequencies for broadcasting and mobile communications and on cybersecurity. Likewise, staff is regularly invited to speak at events, in the reporting period they L. Guibault and C. Handke were both were hosted by the European Data Protection members of the Expert Group that Supervisor, European Parliament, the EU Pres- advised the European Commission on idency, the European Commission, various text and data mining, and co-authors of Dutch ministries and wipo. Expert opinion the Group’s final report. The 2014 report, also takes the form of written work, e.g. inter alia, recommends a special excep- McGonagle was rapporteur of the committee tion on data mining, which is expected of experts that prepared the draft Council of to be part of forthcoming amendments European Recommendation on the protection to the EU Copyright in the Information and safety of journalists (2015). Several IViR Society Directive. staff members testified before the national and European parliaments.

12 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

In public debate IViR actively takes part in the public debate in Dutch and foreign (news) media and public Anticipating the Snowdon revelations, a platforms. During the reporting period IViR 2012 IViR study on cloud computing and staff and researchers appeared more than 20 the U.S. Patriot Act by J. van Hoboken, times on Dutch television and radio in prime A. Arnbak and N. van Eijk triggered a time news broadcasts. CBS News interviewed global academic debate on how Euro- A. Arnbak on surveillance following the nsa pean data flows have become vulnerable scandal. IViR experts are also regularly inter- to security breach, as data are moved to viewed and quoted in the international press, U.S. controlled ‘clouds’. The study was also such as the New York Times (B. Hugenholtz on covered extensively in Dutch and foreign copyright terms, S. van Gompel on the Anne media. E. Dommering actively contrib- Frank diary dispute, N. van Eijk on security uted to the Dutch public debate on ‘hate and privacy after the Paris terrorist attacks), speech’ with several op-eds in leading the Financial Times (A. Arnbak on Snowden), newspapers. Der Spiegel and Wired (F. Zuiderveen Borge- sius on academics against mass surveillance). IViR produced over 110 contributions, in the form of articles, interviews, columns and op-eds, to the print media, many of which for leading national newspapers such as NRC, Volkskrant, Financieële Dagblad, Algemeen Dagblad, Trouw, and De Correspondent. In addition, researchers regularly contributed to blogs, such as the well-visited Kluwer Copy- right Blog (managing editor: L. Guibault) and other online media. IViR also regularly reached out to the general public by organizing and engaging in public discussion meetings. For example, in the reporting period IViR staff spoke atSpui25 , the university’s public debate program, four times (of which 12 times in 2015).

Case-studies

Case 1: The rise of the digital consumer: giving the user a place in information law IViR has for many years played a pioneering role in exploring the legal position of users on the interface between consumer law and data protection law, intellectual property law, media- and telecommunications law. In 2011, in collaboration with the faculty’s Centre for the Study of European Contract Law (cesecl) and an economic partner, IViR staff conducted extensive comparative research into consumer concerns and the state of legal protection. The results of the study fed directly into the drafting process of the EU Consumer Rights Directive (2011/83/eu), and several recommendations made their way into the directive. The study is also repeatedly mentioned in the explanatory memorandum accompanying the proposed Directive on Contracts for the Supply of Digital Content.

13 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Case 2: Copyright reform The institute plays a very influential role in shaping national and European copyright law and policy. IViR has produced several major and important studies and reports for the European Commission, including a highly critical assessment of the eu copyright ‘acquis’ that was published in Kluwer’s Information Law Series (2009). One of the study’s main conclusions was a call for unification, rather than more harmonization, of eu copyright law. This idea has been subsequently endorsed by the majority of legal scholars in Europe. In recent policy documents (e.g. the EC Communication on ‘modernizing copyright’ of December, 2015) the European Commission now unreservedly subscribes to this once controversial long-term vision. The new Dutch law on copyright contracts (enacted in 2015) is another example of IViR’s research slowly but surely having its impact on the law of copyright. The act lays down special provisions that protect creators and performing artists in their contractual dealings with intermediaries. Already in 2004, the Dutch government commissioned research by L. Guibault and B. Hugenholtz. Many of the IViR report’s recommendations eventually made their made into the law. For the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, B. Hugenholtz, L. Guibault and S. van Gompel prepared a report on extended collective licensing schemes (2014) as a solution to the prohibitive costs of clearing individual rights for large-scale digitization of cultural heritage. In October 2015, the Minister announced she will present a legislative proposal directly based on the findings of the study.

Case 3: Implementation of ‘cookie’ legislation In 2009, the eu legislative strengthened the ‘cookie’ provision of the e-Privacy Directive 2002/58/ec. Cookies are used to track user preferences and behaviour online. During the implementation phase the Dutch Telecommunications Regulator (opta) asked technology research institution tno and IViR (N. Helberger, B. van der Sloot, N. van Eijk) to conduct a study into the use of cookie technology in practice and the implications of the new rules for behavioural targeting. The findings brought to light shortcomings in the effectiveness of regulation and suggested reform. The reports’ submission to the Dutch parliament in 2011 fuelled an already lively public debate. Stakeholders in advertising, marketing and publishing publicly contested its findings. However, the Dutch Data Protection Authority shared the researchers’ concern over the use of tracking cookies without proper consent and made recommendations to the government. The stricter provision was eventually enacted in the Dutch Telecommunications Act.

1.6 Own assessment of quality, relevance and viability

As the previous sections demonstrate, the years 2009-2015 have been incredibly productive for IViR, and a general self-assessment therefore can only be very positive. In the course of the past seven years the institute’s “360 degree approach” towards research and valorization has generated both cutting-edge scholarly output and groundbreaking policy-oriented studies and reports, only a few highlights of which could be mentioned in this report. As the previous sections also illustrate, IViR’s research strategy towards increased multidisci- plinarity is clearly coming to fruition. The following self-assessment covers IViR’s research quality and relevance to society before turning to the viability of its research strategy in the future.

14 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Research quality During the reporting period IViR has produced a large volume of high-quality and high- impact scientific work, much of which has broken new ground. Judged against the performance indicators identified in 1.4, the results of IViR research, as summarized in section 1.5, are invariably high, not just in terms of traditional scientific publishing or in open content publishing, but in terms of overall scientific output, as measured by peer recognition and the other quality indicators. The more focused and coherent research strategy that IViR has pursued since the start of its current research program has undoubtedly contributed to this success. Much of IViR’s research output in the 2009-2015 period can be located within one of the six prioritized areas of research (the boundaries of IP, alternative compensation schemes, freedom of expression in the information age, regulating online intermediaries, informational privacy, accommodating the user in information law), and important scientific contributions have been made precisely in these prioritized areas. Importantly, most of IViR’s externally funded or commissioned research projects have led to peer-reviewed publications in national and – increasingly – international journals, although finding the time to convert studies and reports into published articles can sometimes be a challenge for IViR staff and researchers with an ongoing heavily charged research agenda. Another challenge is to strike the appropriate balance between national and international publications, and between writing articles and producing book chapters or even treatises. Defining an ideal publication strategy is yet another challenge in a field where objective means of measuring publication quality and impact are all but absent, and in times when scientific publishing is effectively being reinvented.

Relevance to society As Section 1.5 amply demonstrates, IViR research in the 2009-2015 period has had, and continues to have, a massive impact on the law and policies relating to the information society, both at the national and the European levels. The results of IViR are visible everywhere: in recent laws adopted (or about to be adopted) in the Netherlands, in new eu directives, in policy papers of the European Commission and the European Parliament, etc. IViR’s constant outreach to target groups (law makers, supervisory agencies, stakeholders, civil society), and to society at large, is also quantifiable in terms of its visibility in the news media, and in public discourse. The ever-growing relevance of IViR’s research field in the information-driven society continues the mutually beneficial engagement with societal stakeholders.

Viability Since IViR first put information law on the map in the 1980’s, the field has steadily grown and is now universally accepted as an academic legal discipline. With the information society constantly posing new legal challenges, the continued viability and vitality of the information law paradigm, and of the institute’s research program, are almost a given. As the institute’s results over the past seven years demonstrate, and the results of previous assessments confirm, IViR’s research program and its “360 degree approach” towards research and valorization are fully sustainable for the years to come.

Previous external assessments Previous external assessments (visitaties) of IViR’s research output and program (cf. Appen- dices 2.6) have, without exception, been extremely positive. In the 1995-2000 vsnu assessment the institute’s research output and program were awarded 4 (out of 5) points for academic quality, and 4-5 for (societal) relevance and sustainability/viability. The results of the 2001- 2008 assessment were even better: 4.5 for quality, productivity and relevance, and 4,25 for sustainability. Judged against IViR’s own prior performance, we believe that over the current reporting period (2009-2015) we have, yet again, made important advances, both in terms of research quality, social relevance, viability and multidisciplinary collaboration.

15 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

1.7 Relevant environmental factors and developments

Of course, the institute’s future is contingent upon various environmental factors, in particular those concerning internal and external financing. A number of strategies presented in both the Minister of Education’s Wetenschapvisie 20252 (Research Vision 2025) and UvA Instellingsplan 2015-20203 mash well with IViR’s 360º approach to research. The UvA strives to maintain a high public profile as a ‘research university’, and contribute to societal innovation. The university actively promotes multidisciplinary cooperation across research groups. This has helped IViR to successfully secure central university funding for a joint project with the Amsterdam School for Communications Research (ascor). In its Instellingsplan, the University commits itself to further develop the RPAs and make them the cornerstone of the university profile. This is in line with the Minis- try’s Research Vision 2025, which asks universities to strengthen their profiles. Of course, the RPA information law fits perfectly in the UvA’s ‘Information and Communication’ profile. IViR’s growth has helped to guarantee financial continuity, even in times of budgetary constraints on the part of the faculty and university. However, it inevitably comes with problems of scalability, ranging from finding adequate institute housing to offering suffi- ciently promising career paths – including tenure tracks – to newly hired (junior or senior) researchers. With direct university funding expected to decrease rather than grow in the years to come, the institute’s continuous growth raises the spectre of over-dependence on secondary and tertiary income. The increasing integration of researchers from non-legal disciplines adds complexity to these issues of human resource management. Until 2012 the institute could rely on a regular allocation of faculty-funded (employed) PhD positions to realize its (highly successful) PhD program. During this period, on average, five to seven PhD researchers were employed at IViR at any given time. Budget cuts at the faculty level, unfortunately, have put the allocation of faculty-funded PhD positions tempo- rarily on hold. The institute is successful in acquiring external funding, but opportunities are limited and cannot make up for this loss. The current focus in the eu and the Netherlands on innovation projects (eu’s Horizon 2020, the so-called ‘Topsectoren’ policy in the Netherlands) leaves little room for fundamental legal research. However, the focus of these programmes is predominantly on innovation and technology development, and legal/normative issues are often treated as merely incidental questions. IViR has recognized this and is investing time and resources to represent the interests of legal research in, for example, Horizon 2020 (L. Guibault, N. Helberger), but a more concerted and pro-active approach on the side of the Dutch law faculties would be needed. Nevertheless, there are Horizon 2020 domains (e.g. Joint Programme on Cultural Heritage4) in which interesting projects can be done. The continuation of the Marie Curie programme also offers opportunities. Whereas currently relevant national and eu research funding schemes are not geared towards legal research, the development of the Dutch ‘National Research Agenda’ (Nationale wetenschapsagenda),5 in which nwo partners with the Royal Academy of Sciences (knaw) and the Association of Universities (vsnu), has some promise for IViR. The initiative currently elaborates ‘routes’ that bring together clusters of questions raised in the public consultations of 2015. Among these are ‘routes’ that have a clear relation to our research agenda, such as ‘Responsible use of big data’. It is however still unclear to what extent the National Research Agenda will actually lead to substantial changes in the way funds are re-allocated across disciplines.

2 Ministerie van OCenW, Wetenschapsvisie 2025, Keuzes voor de toekomst (Vision on Science 2025, Choices for the Future), Den Haag 2015. 3 UvA Instellingsplan 2015-2020 Grenzeloos nieuwsgierig (University of Amsterdam Strategic Plan 2015-2020), Amsterdam 2015. 4 Cf. http://www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu 5 Cf. http://www.wetenschapsagenda.nl/?lang=en

16 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Institute housing has been an unstable external factor. During the reporting period the Institute had to move locations twice – in 2009 from its long-time Rokin location to the Oostindisch Huis, and early 2016 to its present location on the Binnengasthuis-terrein. 1.8 SWOT analysis and benchmark/positioning

Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats Unique expertise in a Lack of general or Consistent growth of Budget cuts at Faculty broad range of national field-specific legal the information society level may lead to and European informa- research funding constantly creates over-dependence on tion law-related issues. programs at European new challenges to the secondary and tertiary and national level. law, guaranteeing new income. Critical mass: IViR is research opportunities the largest research Faculty-funded PhD for many years to come. Inadequate central facility in the field program currently on funding for administra- of information law hold; new PhD posi- Norm setting in the tive support. in Europe. tions need to be exter- field of information law nally funded. will increasingly occur Growing demands of Rich experience with at European and inter- research bureaucracy inter- and multidisci- national level, creating (e.g. constant reporting plinary research collab- additional opportunities. and evaluations). orations. Trend towards Lack of tenured senior Excellent national, evidence-based policy staff positions makes European and interna- making generates it difficult to offer tional reputation and increasing demand for mid-carrier level staff track record – both in multi- and interdisci- long-term career academia and in society plinary research. perspective. at large; IViR is an established ‘brand’. National Science Agenda (Nationale Extensive international wetenschapsagenda) scientific network of may create new funding partner institutions and opportunities at correspondents. national level.

Well integrated in Research master pro- society, broad societal gram in Information network, high social Law offers unique relevance of research chances to attract program. excellent students Very motivated and across the Netherlands productive interna- and abroad, and scout tional research staff; promising PhD stimulating and open- candidates. minded research environment.

Excellent research infrastructure, including unique Docu- mentation Centre.

17 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Benchmarks The institute and its research program have no counterparts in the Netherlands. The Tilburg University’s Institute for Law, Technology and Society (tilt) focuses on legal-social issues related to technology (e.g. bio- and nanotechnology, neurotechnology and robotics) rather than on the information society, although there are certain common fields of interest, such as privacy. Outside the Netherlands, IViR has institutional and informal co-operations with research centers with partly corresponding research programs: Berkeley Center for Law and Tech- nology (UC Berkeley, U.S.), Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (Munich, DE), Information Law Institute (New York University, U.S.), Hans Bredow Institut for Media Research (Hamburg, DE), Leuven Centre for IT & IP Law (KU Leuven, BE), Berkman Center for Internet & Society (Harvard University, U.S.), Center for Internet and Society (Stanford University, U.S.); Annenberg School of Communications (University of Pennsylvania, U.S.), Norwegian Research Centre for Computers and Law (nrccl) (University of Oslo, NOR), Haifa Center for Law and Technology (University of Haifa Law School, ISR), Center for Intellectual Property and Information Law (cipil)(University of Cambridge, U.K.), Institute for Information Science and Media Studies (University of Bergen, NOR), Centre for Media, Data and Society (Central European University, HU), Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (European University Institute, IT), Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (hiig) (Berlin, DE), Law and Technology Center (Hong Kong University), and Oxford Internet Institute (University of Oxford, UK).

18 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Section II Appendices

2.1 Table describing the composition of the research unit

Research staff composition

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20154 Institute for Information Law Scientific staff1 6,77 6,54 7,77 8,66 7,97 7,97 7,83 Post-docs2 3,82 4,72 4,23 3,11 3,8 7,42 6,6 PhD students3 5,08 3,98 3,63 5,59 8,35 7,17 6,53 Total research staff 15,67 15,24 15,63 17,36 20,12 22,56 20,96 Support staff 2,23 2,23 2,23 2,34 2,54 2,52 2,26 Visiting fellows 0,25 0,64 0,56 0,04 0,12 0,37 0,73 Total staff 18,15 18,11 18,42 19,74 22,78 25,45 23,95

Note 1: Comparable with WOPI (=Wetenschappelijk Onderwijs Personeelsinformatie) categories HGL, UHD and UD; tenured and non-tenured staff. Note 2: Comparable with WOPI category Onderzoeker. Note 3: Standard PhD (employed) and Contract PhDs (externally or internally funded but not employed). Note 4: Vacancies excluded (2015).

19 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2.2 Table reflecting the publications output

Main categories of research output

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Institute for Information Law Refereed articles 16 21 34 35 24 29 33 Non-refereed articles1 17 14 20 21 30 17 16 Books (including reports) 9 12 31 19 14 18 21 Book chapters 14 9 14 23 22 17 18 PhD theses 1 2 1 1 0 3 5 Conference papers2 3 1 3 3 18 29 22 Professional publications3 56 70 100 106 86 71 72 Publications aimed at the general 8 3 10 8 12 29 19 public4 Other research output:5 169 221 214 244 269 534 505 * inaugural lectures & PhD defenses 1 2 2 1 0 5 3 * invited lectures/keynotes/ 87 120 117 141 165 207 219 presentations/workshops * editorships + peer reviewer/ 26 31 36 39 42 50 60 review activities * memberships 50 58 53 59 59 87 92 * PhD supervision & oppositions 5 10 6 4 3 12 13 * organisation & chairships NA NA NA NA NA 49 48 conferences/ workshops * media appearances NA NA NA NA NA 124 70 * citations NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Total publications (other research output excluded) 124 132 213 216 206 213 206

Note 1: Articles in journals that are non-refereed, yet deemed important for the field. Note 2: This category shows underreporting for the years 2009-2012. Note 3: Publications aimed at professionals in the public and private sector (‘professionele publicaties’ including annotations). Note 4: Also known as “populariserende artikelen”. Note 5: ‘Other research output’ includes the indicated subcategories. The new SEP-protocol was introduced in 2014. Therefore, only data on the years 2014 and 2015 are included about the categories ‘organisation & chairships conferences/workshops’ and ‘media appearances’. The activities in these subcategories over the period 2009-2013 should be in line with the reported years. The category ‘memberships’ shows underreporting for the years 2009-2011. No data are included on citations as no accurate information was available.

20 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2.3 Table indicating the research unit’s financing structure

Funding

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Institute for Information Law Funding: Direct funding¹ Research grants² Contract research³ Other4 Total funding Expenditure: Personnel costs Other costs Total expenditure

Note 1: Direct funding (basisfinanciering / lump-sum budget). Note 2: Research grants obtained in national scientific competition (e.g. grants from nwo and the Royal Academy). Note 3: Research contracts for specific research projects obtained from external organisations, such as industry, government ministries, European organisations and charitable organisations. Note 4: Funds that do not fit into the other categories. Note: The data in this table are subject to further verification, and do not include financial rewards for succesful PhD-thesis (approx. 90k each).

2.4 Five most important scientific publications and/or other scientific outputs in the past seven years

1. S.J. van Gompel, Formalities in Copyright Law: An Analysis of Their History, Rationales and Possible Future (Information Law Series no. 23, B. Hugenholtz, ed., Alphen aan den Rijn : Kluwer Law International 2011) 2. J.V.J. van Hoboken, Search engine freedom: On the implications of the Right to Freedom of Expression for the Legal Governance of Web Search Engines (Information Law Series no. 27, B. Hugenholtz, ed., Alphen aan den Rijn : Kluwer Law International 2012) 3. M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.), The Work of Authorship (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2014) 4. F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius, Improving privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting (Information Law Series no. 33, B. Hugenholtz, ed., Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, 2015) 5. C.W. Handke , B. Bodó , J-J. Vallbé, “Going means trouble and staying makes it double: the value of licensing recorded music online.” [2015] Journal of Cultural Economics, doi 10.1007/s10824-015-9251-8, 1-33

21 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2.5 Five most important societal publications and/or other societal outputs in the past seven years

1. M.M.M. van Eechoud, S.J. van Gompel, L. Guibault, N. Helberger, P.B. Hugenholtz, Harmonizing European Copyright Law: The Challenges of Better Lawmaking (Information Law Series no. 19, B. Hugenholtz, ed., Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2009) 2. N. Helberger, N.A.N.M. van Eijk, J. Poort, A. Huygen, “Ups and downs. Economic and cultural effects of file sharing on music, film and games” Report prepared for Dutch ministries of Education, Culture & Science (ocw), Security & Justice (V&J) and Economic Affairs (2009) 3. P.B. Hugenholtz M.R.F. Senftleben, “Fair use in Europe. In search of flexibilities” (2011), available on ssrn http://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1959554 4. N. Helberger, L. Guibault, B. van der Sloot, M.B.M. Loos, C. Mak, L. Pessers, K.J. Cseres & R. Tigner, “Analysis of the applicable legal frameworks and suggestions for the contours of a model system of consumer protection in relation to digital content contracts”, Report prepared for the European Commission (2011), L. Guibault, N. Helberger, B. van der Sloot, M.B.M. Loos, C. Mak, L. Pessers, Digital Consumers and the Law: Towards a Cohesive European Framework (Information Law Series no. 28, B. Hugenholtz, ed., Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2013) 5. J.V.J. van Hoboken, A.M. Arnbak, N.A.N.M. van Eijk, “Cloud Computing in Higher Education and Research Institutions and the USA Patriot Act”, Report commissioned by surf (2012)

22 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2.6 Previous external assessment reports

Rapport onderzoeksbeoordeling

Rechtsgeleerdheid 1995-2000

(december 2002)

UVA05 Universiteit Universiteit van Amsterdam Programma Instituut voor Informatierecht: Informatierecht (1995-2000) Programmaleider(s) Prof. mr. E.J. Dommering

Fte 2000 11,67 Beoordeling Academische Kwaliteit Onderzoek 4 Programma 4 Relevantie 4 - 5 Duurzaamheid/Vitaliteit 4 - 5

Het programma Informatierecht van het Instituut voor Informatierecht van de UvA heeft in zoverre een eigen karakter, dat het niet de technologie als ordenend principe heeft genomen, maar informatie als beschermwaardig goed. Door deze “technologieonafhankelijke benadering” heeft het programma zich al in de vorige beoordelingsperiode (VSNU 1996, p. 126) onderscheiden van ander, ook buitenlands onderzoek. Het onderzoek bestrijkt juridische aspecten van de productie, opslag, verspreiding en het gebruik van informatie. Terugkerende elementen zijn globalisering, private regulering en het vervloeien van scheidslijnen zowel tussen ‘oude’ en jongere media als tussen openbare en private communicatievormen.

Het programma heeft een kwalitatief sterke bezetting. De relevantie van het programma is evident. In de beoordelingsperiode is betrekkelijk veel derde geldstroom onderzoek uitgevoerd. Het programma wordt met een vier als goed gewaardeerd; het biedt duidelijk richting aan het onderzoek.

De kernpublicaties zijn in het algemeen van goede kwaliteit. Diverse van de kernpublicaties kunnen worden aangemerkt als belangrijke werken op het desbetreffende terrein. De boeken en bundels zijn vrijwel zonder uitzondering goed geordend en overzichtelijk. Vernieuwende aspecten zitten met name in de ordening van de inzichten en het volgen van de nieuwe ontwikkelingen van met name Ict en Internet. Enkele van de publicaties blijven iets te veel beschrijvend; sommige moeten eerder als vakliteratuur worden aangemerkt omdat ze alleen voor de rechtspraktijk relevant zijn maar geen nieuwe inzichten met zich meebrengen. Als vakliteratuur zijn ze wel van zeer goed gehalte. De systematische aandacht die binnen het Instituut voor informatierecht wordt besteed aan het telecommunicatierecht, heeft aan het einde van de verslag- periode geresulteerd in het toen verschenen23 “Handboek Telecommunicatierecht”, dat een complete behandeling van het Nederlandse telecommunicatierecht biedt. Het telecommunicatierecht maakt een stormachtige ontwikkeling door en biedt vele mogelijkheden voor academische pioniersarbeid. Het Instituut voor informatierecht maakt van deze mogelijkheden op zeer goede wijze gebruik. De relevantie van het onderzoek op dit terrein valt moeilijk te overschatten.

244 VSNU / Onderzoeksbeoordeling Rechtsgeleerdheid UVA05 Universiteit Universiteit van Amsterdam Programma Instituut voor Informatierecht: Informatierecht (1995-2000) Programmaleider(s) Prof. mr. E.J. Dommering

Fte 2000 11,67 Beoordeling Academische Kwaliteit Onderzoek 4 Programma 4 Relevantie 4 - 5 Duurzaamheid/Vitaliteit 4 - 5

De kernpublicaties zijn in het algemeen van goede kwaliteit. Diverse van de kernpublicaties kunnen worden aangemerkt als belangrijke werken op het desbetreffende terrein. De boeken en bundels zijn vrijwel zonder uitzondering goed geordend en overzichtelijk. Vernieuwende aspecten zitten met name in de ordening van de inzichten en het volgen van de nieuwe ontwikkelingen van met name Ict en Internet. Enkele van de publicaties blijven iets te veel beschrijvend; sommige moeten eerder als vakliteratuur worden aangemerkt omdativir self-assessment ze alleen voor report de rechtspraktijk (2009–2015) relevant zijn maar geen nieuwe inzichten met zich meebrengen. Als vakliteratuur zijn ze wel van zeer goed gehalte. De systematische aandacht die binnen het Instituut voor informatierecht wordt besteed aan het telecommunicatierecht, heeft aan het einde van de verslag- periode geresulteerd in het toen verschenen “Handboek Telecommunicatierecht”, dat een complete behandeling van het Nederlandse telecommunicatierecht biedt. Het telecommunicatierecht maakt een stormachtige ontwikkeling door en biedt vele mogelijkheden voor academische pioniersarbeid. Het Instituut voor informatierecht maakt van deze mogelijkheden op zeer goede wijze gebruik. De relevantie van het onderzoek op dit terrein valt moeilijk te overschatten.

Over de duurzaamheid en de relevantie van dit programma maakt de 244Commissie zich geen zorgen gezienVSNU de /voor Onderzoeksbeoordeling zichzelf sprekende Rechtsgeleerdheid relevantie van het onderwerp, de gestructureerde werkwijze van dit programma, de goede kwaliteit en de werfkracht die het programma heeft om additionele middelen aan te trekken. KWALITEIT & DIVERSITEIT

RECHTSWETENSCHAPPELIJK ONDERZOEK IN NEDERLAND

Rapport van de Evaluatiecommissie Rechtswetenschappelijk Onderzoek 2009

VSNU / Onderzoeksbeoordeling Rechtsgeleerdheid 245 UVA05 Universiteit Universiteit van Amsterdam Programma Instituut voor Informatierecht: Informatierecht (1995-2000) Programmaleider(s) Prof. mr. E.J. Dommering

Fte 2000 11,67 Beoordeling Academische Kwaliteit Onderzoek 4 Programma 4 Relevantie 4 - 5 Duurzaamheid/Vitaliteit 4 - 5

De kernpublicaties zijn in het algemeen van goede kwaliteit. Diverse van de kernpublicaties kunnen worden aangemerkt als belangrijke werken op het desbetreffende terrein. De boeken en bundels zijn vrijwel zonder uitzondering goed geordend en overzichtelijk. Vernieuwende aspecten zitten met name in de ordening van de inzichten en het volgen van de nieuwe ontwikkelingen van met name Ict en Internet. Enkele van de publicaties blijven iets te veel beschrijvend; sommige moeten eerder als vakliteratuur worden aangemerkt omdat ze alleen voor de rechtspraktijk relevant zijn maar ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015) geen nieuwe inzichten met zich meebrengen. Als vakliteratuur zijn ze wel van zeer goed gehalte. De systematische aandacht die binnen het Instituut voor informatierecht wordt besteed aan het telecommunicatierecht, heeft aan het einde van de verslag- periode geresulteerd in het toen verschenen “Handboek Telecommunicatierecht”, dat een complete behandeling van het Nederlandse telecommunicatierecht biedt. Het telecommunicatierecht maakt een stormachtige ontwikkeling door en biedt vele mogelijkheden voor academische pioniersarbeid. Het Instituut voor informatierecht maakt van deze mogelijkheden op zeer goede wijze gebruik. De relevantie van het onderzoek op dit terrein valt moeilijk te overschatten.

244 VSNU / Onderzoeksbeoordeling Rechtsgeleerdheid

KWALITEIT & DIVERSITEIT

RECHTSWETENSCHAPPELIJK ONDERZOEK IN NEDERLAND

Rapport van de Evaluatiecommissie Rechtswetenschappelijk Onderzoek 2009

25 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

5.1.3. Disciplines en vakgebieden 2 Productiviteit Informatierecht is een dynamisch veld, dat sterke interacties kent met sociale, 2.1 Aantal wetenschappelijke publicaties X 2.2 Aantal vakpublicaties X economische en technologische ontwikkelingen. Dat is de reden dat het instituut 2.3 Aantal overige resultaten X voortdurend in contact wil blijven met de praktische en sociale werkelijkheid van de 2.4 Aantal dissertaties X informatiemaatschappij. IViR-onderzoekers zijn van mening dat zij niet alleen academici zijn maar ook een sociale rol dienen te vervullen. 3 Relevantie 3.1 In relatie tot de wetenschap X X 3.2 In relatie tot de samenleving X X 5.1.4. Onderzoeksmethoden 3.3 In relatie tot de rechtspraktijk X X Hoewel de zelfstudie hierover weinig informatie verschaft, neemt de commissie aan dat het onderzoek wordt verricht in overeenstemming met de binnen de rechtswetenschap 4 Vitaliteit/haalbaarheid gebruikelijke onderzoeksmethoden. Uit de facultaire informatie blijkt dat het 4.1 In relatie tot de opzet van het programma X 4.2 In relatie tot personeel en financiën X rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek in toenemende mate wordt gericht op de vergelijking tussen 4.3 In relatie tot de leiding X systemen en niet tussen landen. De groeiende invloed van het Europese recht binnen het informatierecht is hier mede debet aan. Geregeld zou er ook sprake zijn van onderzoek met een interdisciplinair karakter.

5. INSTITUUT VOOR INFORMATIERECHT / INSTITUTE FOR 5.1.5. Kwantitatieve informatie INFORMATION LAW (IViR) De onderzoeksformatie van het instituut was als volgt: Programmaleiders: prof. dr. P.B. Hugenholtz, prof. dr. N.A.N.M. van Eijk en dr. 2006 2007 2008 M.M.M. van Eechoud. Hoogleraren 0,93 1,00 0,75 Ander vast WP 1,81 2,45 2,08 Promovendi 4,13 4,83 4,58 5.1. Korte beschrijving Overig tijdelijk WP 3,84 3,28 2,99 Totaal WP 10,71 11,56 10,40 5.1.1. Missie en probleemstelling Ondersteuning 1,27 0,90 1,51 Het Instituut voor Informatierecht (IViR) stelt zich ten doel bij te dragen aan de Totaal staf 11,98 12,46 11,91 ontwikkeling van het informatierecht tot een evenwichtig kader dat tegemoetkomt aan de behoeften van de informatiesamenleving. Informatierecht wordt daarbij omschreven als De inkomstenbronnen in de afgelopen drie jaar: 2006 2007 2008 het recht dat betrekking heeft op de productie, de marketing, het transport en het gebruik % K€ % K€ % K€ van informatieproducten en -diensten. Eerste geldstroom 36 353 49 466 39 350 Tweede geldstroom 5 46 6 60 5 49 Het IViR werd opgericht in 1986 en het heeft zich ontwikkeld tot een erkend zwaartepunt Contractonderzoek 59 575 45 431 56 546 Overige inkomsten 0 0 0 0 0 0 van onderzoek van faculteit en universiteit. Het heeft een eigen documentatiecentrum met Totaal inkomsten 974 957 975 eigen documentalisten en het biedt een eenjarige masteropleiding Informatierecht aan, evenals een tweejarige onderzoeksmaster op hetzelfde gebied. De leiding van het IViR wordt geadviseerd door een eigen Wetenschappelijke Adviesraad.

5.1.2. Opbouw en onderdelen In de periode 2005-2010 richt IViR zich in het bijzonder op een zevental onderwerpen: (1) het ontwikkelen van een algemene theorie van het informatierecht; (2) vrijheid van meningsuiting en andere communicatierechten; (3) privacybescherming; (4) intellectuele eigendomsrecht; (5) zakelijke communicatie; (6) overheidsinformatie; en (7) media en telecommunicatie.

305 306

26 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

305 306

27 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Kwantitatief werd de volgende output gerealiseerd: binnen de rechtswetenschap worden bestreken. Hoewel een substantieel deel van het 2006 2007 2008 onderzoek van IViR contractonderzoek is, blijken ook die publicaties wel degelijk bij te Wetenschappelijke publicaties dragen aan theorievorming, in het bijzonder de studies over het auteursrecht in opdracht Monografieën en handboeken 8 11 11 van de Europese Commissie. Ook de vier dissertaties in de periode 2006, 2007 en 2008 Dissertaties 2 1 1 Artikelen in gerefereerde tijdschriften 18 16 26 bevatten belangwekkende theoretische bijdragen. Artikelen in overige tijdschriften 20 23 21 Bundels en verzamelwerken (mits redactie) 4 0 3 De samenhang echter zou beter kunnen. De zeven vermelde onderzoeksonderwerpen Artikelen in bundels en andere verzamelwerken 7 10 28 lijken geen gedeelde probleemstelling te hebben en in die zin lijkt het programma uit Totaal 59 61 90 zeven afzonderlijke bouwstenen te bestaan. Daarbij zijn drie bouwstenen – vrijheid van Vakpublicaties meningsuiting en andere communicatierechten; intellectueel eigendomsrecht; en media Monografieën en handboeken 1 0 1 en telecommunicatie – aanzienlijk groter dan de ander vier. Onderzoek op het gebied van Bundels en verzamelwerken (mits redactie) 1 0 0 privacybescherming raakte enigszins onderbelicht door het vertrek van leidende Artikelen 24 18 27 onderzoekers. De leiding van het IViR nam en neemt actie. Annotaties 13 14 14 Totaal 39 32 42 Originaliteit staat wel hoog in het vaandel. Vanaf het begin heeft het IViR zich De volgende promoties kwamen tot stand: gekenmerkt door informatie en informatierecht centraal te stellen, dus los van de techniek waarmee die informatie wordt geproduceerd, op de markt gezet, getransporteerd of 2006 2007 2008 gebruikt. ICT speelt daarin uiteraard en rol en is een belangrijke bron van nieuwe vragen Aantal lopende promotieonderzoeken 10 7 7 Aantal afgeronde promoties 2 1 1 en problemen, maar het IViR heeft altijd een techniekonafhankelijk perspectief willen Waarvan medewerker van het instituut 2 1 1 hanteren. Die invalshoek is origineel en binnen en buiten Nederland uniek. Als strikt Waarvan niet-medewerker instituut 0 0 0 juridisch instituut is het niet verwonderlijk dat in het onderzoek de klassieke Duur afgerond promotieonderzoek 4,1 jaar 5,3 jaar 5 jaar rechtswetenschappelijke methoden domineren.

5.2. Beoordeling Ook samenwerking is een sterk punt. Het IViR beschikt over een zeer uitgebreid internationaal netwerk en er wordt structureel samengewerkt met gerenommeerde – soms 5.2.1. Kwaliteit: 4,50 zelfs leidende – buitenlandse onderzoekscentra. Binnen Nederland wordt vooral De door het IViR aangeleverde kernpublicaties zijn alle van uitstekende kwaliteit, doch samengewerkt met het Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society (TILT) en opvallend is wel dat 4 van de 8 betrekking hebben op een auteursrechtelijk onderwerp. binnen enkele multidisciplinaire samenwerkingsvormen. Het IViR heeft een Het aantal publicaties op het gebied van een algemene theorie van het informatierecht is aanhoudende stroom buitenlandse bezoekers, mede vanwege het eigen beperkt. Nagenoeg de helft van het aantal wetenschappelijke publicaties verschijnt in documentatiecentrum, en de IViR-staf wordt frequent uitgenodigd voor buitenlandse internationale tijdschriften en niet-Nederlandstalige boeken. Speciale vermelding verdient conferenties. het boek European Media Law van Van Castendyk, Dommering en Scheuer (2008), een artikelsgewijs commentaar van meer dan 1.300 pagina’s op de Europese mediawetgeving 5.2.2. Productiviteit: 4,50 op het gebied van radio en tv, een heus monnikenwerk. De productiviteit van het instituut is goed tot zeer goed. Er is gelet op het aantal fte onderzoek een groot aantal wetenschappelijke publicaties geleverd, het aantal Ook de andere output van het IViR wordt hoog gewaardeerd. Het instituut heeft een zeer vakpublicaties is zeer redelijk. Het aantal afgeronde promoties blijft achter, gelet op het uitgebreide portefeuille aan tweede en derdegeldstroomonderzoek. Opdrachten voor aantal lopende promotieonderzoeken. contractonderzoek kwamen van EU-instellingen, van diverse ministeries en van andere instellingen in binnen- en buitenland. Beleid is dat alle resultaten van contractonderzoek gepubliceerd worden, dan wel worden omgewerkt tot wetenschappelijke publicaties. Het instituut was zeer succesvol in het aantrekken van fondsen uit het NWO-programma IT en Recht (ITeR). Recentelijk werd een Veni-aanvraag gehonoreerd. De senior stafleden geven regelmatig les aan buitenlandse instellingen, zijn lid van de redacties van tijdschriften en participeren in nationale en Europese advieslichamen.

Zoals uit de missie van het IViR en uit de kernpublicaties blijkt, is het IViR-onderzoek voornamelijk juridisch en monodisciplinair van aard, zij het dat meerdere vakgebieden

307 308

28 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Zoals uit de missie van het IViR en uit de kernpublicaties blijkt, is het IViR-onderzoek voornamelijk juridisch en monodisciplinair van aard, zij het dat meerdere vakgebieden

307 308

29 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

5.2.3. Relevantie: 4,50 De wetenschappelijke relevantie blijkt uit de bijdrage van het IViR-onderzoek aan (rechtswetenschappelijke) theorievorming en doctrine. De maatschappelijke relevantie van het onderzoek is uitermate hoog, vooral vanwege het grote aantal rapporten en studies in opdracht van beleidsmakers. Veel van die rapporten hebben aantoonbare invloed gehad op internationale, Europese en nationale beleidsontwikkelingen. Er zijn nauwe banden met de rechtspraktijk, omdat ook daar bij voortduring nieuwe informatierechtelijke vragen en problemen opduiken.

5.2.4. Haalbaarheid/vitaliteit: 4,25 Recentelijk heeft het IViR het vertrek van een aantal bepalende hoogleraren weten op te vangen, mede omdat ervaren onderzoekers gereed stonden de leiding over te nemen. De recentelijk bevestigde erkenning als facultair en universitair zwaartepunt (centre of excellence) geeft vertrouwen voor de toekomst. Wat het informatierecht betreft: vast staat dat dit ook de komende jaren sterk in beweging zal blijven en dat de behoefte aan wetenschappelijke theorievorming, beleidsadvisering en praktijkadvies eerder groter zal worden dan kleiner. Het IViR lijkt een redelijke balans te vinden tussen enerzijds eerste, en anderzijds tweede en derde geldstroom. Echter, de meest gewichtige onzekerheid – ook erkend in de eigen SWOT-analyse – is de sterke afhankelijkheid van derdegeldstroominkomsten. Het verwerven daarvan legt een aanmerkelijk beslag op de tijd van de senior staf en de onderzoeksagenda wordt in belangrijke mate aangestuurd door vragen van beleid en niet door wetenschappelijke overwegingen.

5.2.5. Eindoordeel: 4,50

1. Kwaliteit 5 4 3 2 1 1.1 Wetenschappelijke publicaties X X 1.2 Vakpublicaties X 1.3 Overige resultaten X X 1.4 Bijdrage aan theorievorming en doctrine X 1.5 Onderlinge samenhang van programma X 1.6 Originaliteit, inhoudelijk en qua aanpak X 1.7 Samenwerking, internationalisering X

2 Productiviteit 2.1 Aantal wetenschappelijke publicaties X X 2.2 Aantal vakpublicaties X 2.3 Aantal overige resultaten X 2.4 Aantal dissertaties X X

3 Relevantie 3.1 In relatie tot de wetenschap X 3.2 In relatie tot de samenleving X 3.3 In relatie tot de rechtspraktijk X

4 Vitaliteit/haalbaarheid 4.1 In relatie tot de opzet van het programma X 4.2 In relatie tot personeel en financiën X 4.3 In relatie tot de leiding X

309

30 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2.7 Awards and individual research grants

Prizes, honors and awards

2009 ‘Alles onder controle?, over de invoering van de bewaarplicht voor telecommunicatie- gegevens’, Internet scriptieprijs (A. Arnbak) 2010 ‘Alles onder controle?, over de invoering van de bewaarplicht voor telecommunicatie- gegevens’, UvA scriptieprijs (A. Arnbak) 2011 First place (ex aequo) in the annual prize for the best publication of the year, Law Faculty of the University of Amsterdam, for the paper ‘Formalities in the digital era: an obstacle or opportunity?’ (S. van Gompel) 2012 Seventh Annual International Intellectual Property Lecture, 21 March 2012, Cambridge University (B. Hugenholtz) ‘Borrowing from the old to facilitate the new: the future of the library privilege in the digital world’, Victorine van Schaickprijs (V. Breemen). ‘Mobile Privacy: is there an app for that?’ Internet Scriptieprijs (E. Yildrim) 2013 2nd Annual Peter Jaszi Distinguished Lecture, 7 November 2013, American University Washington College of Law (B. Hugenholtz) Emerald Literati Award of Excellence (highly commended) for the paper ‘Clash of cultures - integrating copyright and consumer law’ (N. Helberger and L. Guibault) Emerald Literati Award of Excellence (highly commended) for the paper ‘Net neutrality and the value chain for video’ (P. Nooren, A. Leurdijk, N. van Eijk) ‘Borrowing from the old to facilitate the new: the future of the library privilege in the digital world’, UvA scriptieprijs (V. Breemen). ‘The Levy Runs Dry: A Legal and Economic Analysis of EU Private Copying Levies’ , 3rd place in the annual prize for the best publication of the year, Law Faculty of the University of Amsterdam (J. Poort and J. P. Quintais). Shuttleworth Foundation Flash Grant for the article ‘Not for Designers: On the Inadequacies of EU Design Law and How to Fix It’ (T. Margoni) 2014 Prize for Outstanding Publication by a Postgraduate Research Student for ‘The (Non) Convergence of Copyright Policy’, Law School, University of East Anglia, UK (S. Schroff) 2nd place in ATRIP Essay Competition 2014 for essay entitled ‘Beyond the Safe Harbours: Harmonising Substantive Intermediary Third Party Liability for Copyright Infringement in Europe’ (C. Angelopoulos) Erasmus Research Prize 2014 (J. van Hoboken) ‘Honorable mention’, University of Amsterdam Lecturer of the Year Election (T. McGonagle) 2015 Suggested nominee NIAS Fellowship by dean of law faculty (N. Helberger). René Cassin Thesis Prize, of the International Institute of Human Rights for the PhD thesis ‘Improving Privacy Protection in the Area of Behavioural Targeting’ (F. Zuiderveen Borgesius) LIBER Innovation Award for the paper ‘Is Europe falling behind in data mining? Copyright law's impact on data mining in academic research’ (L. Guibault, C. Handke and J.-J. Vallbé). ‘Error 52(2)(3)/101: Software as (Un)Patentable Subject Matter’, UvA scriptieprijs (3rd place) (Alexander de Leeuw)

31 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Individual research grants

2009 ‘Pluralisme 2.0’, Innovative Research Incentive Scheme (VENI), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), grant 140.608 EUR (N. Helberger) 2010 ‘Of Authorship and Originality (OOR)’, Humanities in the European Research Area (HERA), European Science Foundation (ESF), grant total 985.390 EUR, IViR share 354.800 EUR (M. van Eechoud) 2012 ‘Copyright in an Age of Access’, Top-subsidie, Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), grant 643.184 EUR (B. Hugenholtz) ‘Privacy as Virtue: towards an actor based approach to privacy regulation’, Toptalent, Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), grant 168.576 EUR (B. v.d. Sloot) 2013 ‘Normative aspects of filesharing’, Marie Curie individual fellowship, grant 143.757 EUR (B. Bodo) ‘Prohibition of general monitoring obligations’, Marie Curie individual fellowship, grant 45.000 EUR (T. Margoni) 2014 ‘Governing Digital Information’, Marie Curie individual fellowship, grant 185.000 EUR (K. Irion) 2015 ‘Tracking and targeting news readers’, European Research Council, grant 1.479.515 EUR (N. Helberger) ‘The challenge of evidence-based intellectual property law reform’, Innovative Research Incentive Scheme (VENI), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), grant 273.000 EUR (S. van Gompel)

32 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2.8 Publications output

2009 Refereed articles Author 1 ‘Patenting human embryonic stem cells in peril: the decision of the Enlarged Bostyn Board of Appeal in G 2/06’, BioScience Law Review 2009-10, p. 13-24. 2 ‘How biological is essentially biological? The referrals to the Enlarged Board of Bostyn Appeal G 2/07 and G 1/08’, EIPR 2009-11, p. 549-558. 3 ‘De “mening” van de overheid’, Mediaforum 2009-2, p. 52-56. Dommering 4 ‘Portretrecht en privacy’, AMI 2009-4, p. 142-144. Dommering 5 Reactie op de annotatie van S. Pinckaers bij het arrest van het Hof Amsterdam Dommering 29 januari 2009, AMI 2009-2, nr. 6, p. 64-68. 6 ‘Privacy als het zelfbeschikkingsrecht van de 21e eeuw’, Dommering Mediaforum 2009- 11/12, p. 382-384. 7 ‘Artikel 7 Grondwet en de richtlijn Audiovisuele mediadiensten’, Van Eijk Mediaforum 2009-3, p. 77. 8 ‘Twee is al veel’, Computerrecht 2009-3, p. 119. Van Eijk 9 ‘La “fabrication fictive” et la lutte contre la piraterie aux Pays-Bas’, Guibault Les cahiers de propriété intellectuelle 2009-1, p. 229-234. 10 ‘Wat is de belofte van een journalist waard? Vrijheid van nieuwsgaring Hins na het arrest Sanoma tegen Nederland’, Mediaforum 2009-5, p. 202-206. 11 ‘De kranten gaan deaud! Leve de journalistiek?’, Mediaforum 2009-9, p. 309. Van Hoboken 12 ‘Steun aan de pers. Permanent in ontwikkeling’, Mediaforum 2009-3, p. 78-86. Nieuwenhuis 13 ‘Parody in Trademarks and Copyright: Has Humour Gone Too Far?’, Cambridge Ramalho Student Law Review 2009-1, p.58-74. 14 ‘Silent Ethics in the Mobile Phone Sector? The Case of the “por qué no te Ramalho callas” Ringtone’, European Intellectual Property Review 2009-4, p. 218-221. 15 ‘Marks, Forfeiture and a Constitutional Conundrum’, World Trademark Review Ramalho 2009-18, p. 41-43. 16 ‘Portugal - Vorläufige Patentanmeldungen: Eine erfolgreiche Neuerung’, Ramalho GRUR International 2009-10, p. 882.

2009 Non-refereed articles Author 1 ‘Filtering the Internet for Copyrighted Content in Europe’, IRIS plus Angelopoulos (Supplement to IRIS) 2009-4. 2 EHRM 8 juli 2008, appl. 33629/06, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2009-36/37, Dommering nr. 371, p. 3667-3668 (de zaak Vajnai). 3 HR 15 mei 2009, appl. 11133/07, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2009-36/37, Dommering nr. 372, p. 3688-3689 (Vereniging tegen de Kwakzalverij). 4 EHRM 2 oktober 2008, appl. 36109/03, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2009-36/37, Dommering nr. 378, p. 3765-3766 (de zaak Leroy). 5 HR 16 juni 2009, appl. S 12748/07, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2009-36/37, Dommering nr. 371, p. 3773 (Rita Verdonk Affiche). 6 EHRM 16 juli 2009, appl. 15615/07, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2009-40, Dommering nr. 412, p. 4055-4058 (de zaak Féret). 7 EHRM 14 februari 2008, appl. 36207/03 en EHRM 29 juli 2008, appl. 22824/04, Dommering Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2009-46, nr. 520 en 521, p. 5161-5162 (de zaken Ivanova en Flux). 8 EHRM 28 april 2009, appl. 39311/05, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2009-46, Dommering nr. 522, p. 5166-5167 (de zaak Karakó).

33 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

9 524 EHRM 15 januari 2009, appl. 1234/05, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie Dommering 2009 Book chapters Author 2009-46, nr. 524, p. 5174-5175 (de zaak Reklos). 1 ‘Van Ja zuster, nee zuster naar “Discodans”: de lange weg naar commerciële Dommering 10 Commentaar op EHRM 3 april 2007 (Gaskin), HR 29 juni 2007 (Dexia), Dommering informationele privacy.’, in: D.J.G. Visser (red.) Commercieel portretrecht in: T.E. van Dijk e.a. (red.), Uitsprakenbundel Wet bescherming persoons- ’t Schaep met de 5 pooten, p. 259-273. gegevens, Den Haag: SDU uitgevers 2009, p 98-100, p. 525-534. 2 ‘De informatiedriehoek. Enige beschouwingen over de regulering van Dommering 11 ‘A Converged Regulatory Model for Search Engines?’, Magazine of the Society Van Eijk informatiestromen’, in: Hans Waalwijk & Jeroen Weterings (red.) Spreken for Computers and Law 2009-6, p. 1-3. is goud. Oraties en colleges van hoogleraren … en de archivistiek, Den Haag: 12 ‘Linear and non-linear audiovisual media services’, in: Ready, Set…Go?, Van Eijk Stichting Archiefpublicaties (SAP), Jaarboek 2008, p. 263-286. The Audiovisual Media Services Directive, IRiS special, European Audiovisual 3 ‘Een normatief kader voor het openbare islamdebat’, in: Polarisatie, bedreigend Dommering Observatory, p. 41-45. en verrijkend (redactie RMO), Amsterdam: Uitgeverij SWP 2009, p. 206-234. 13 ‘De Google Book-schikking: de wereldliteratuur gelicentieerd’, Hugenholtz 4 ‘Search Engines, the New bottleneck for Content Access’, in: B. Preissl, Van Eijk NJB 2009, nr. 42, p. 2754-2758. J. Haucap & P. Curwen (red.) Telecommunication Markets, Drivers and 14 Gezamenlijke noot onder HR 19 december 2003, NJ 2009, 548, p. 5482-5487 Hugenholtz Impediments, London: Springer, 2009, p. 141-157. (Buma/KaZaA). 5 (vertaald door J. Kyseľová i.s.m. T. Dobřichovský en L. Bednář) ‘Formality Van Gompel 15 HR 12 maart 2004, NJ 2009, 549, p. 5482-5487 (XS4ALL/Ab.fab). Hugenholtz v digitální éře: překážka nebo příležitost?’, in: Jan Kříž et al. (eds.) Aktuální otázky práva autorského a práv průmyslových - Current Problems of Copyright 16 HR 25 november 2005, NJ 2009, 550, p. 5482-5487 (Lycos/Pessers). Hugenholtz and Industrial Property, Praha/Prague: Univerzita Karlova, Nakladatelství 17 Hof van Justitie EG 29 januari 2008, C-275/06, NJ 2009, 551, p. 5482-5487 Hugenholtz Karolinum/Charles University, Karolinum Press 2009, p. 28-48. (Promusicae/Telefónica). 6 ‘Relationship between Copyright and Contract Law’, in Estelle Derclaye (ed.) Guibault Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2009. 2009 Books (including reports) Author 7 ‘Search Engine Law and Freedom of Expression: A European Perspective’, Van Hoboken in: K. Becker, F. Stalder (eds.) Deep Search. The Politics of Search Beyond Google, 1 IE Recht & Commentaar’, Ch. Gielen, D.W.F. Verkade (red.), Kluwer, 2009, Bostyn Innsbruck: Studienverlag & Transaction Publishers 2009, p. 85-97. artt. 2a, 3, 25, 53a, 53b, 53c Rijksoctrooiwet 1995. 8 ‘Copyright Without Frontiers: the Problem of Territoriality in European Hugenholtz 2 Harmonizing European Copyright Law: The Challenges of Better Lawmaking, Van Eechoud/ Copyright Law’, in: E. Derclaye (ed.) Research Handbook on the Future of EU Information Law Series 19, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International Hugenholtz/ Copyright, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2009, p. 12-26. 2009, 374 pp. Van Gompel/ 9 ‘Het Zwarte Schaep. Commercieel Portretrecht in de Periferie van het Recht Hugenholtz Guibault/ van de Intellectuele Eigendom’, in: D.J.G. Visser (red.) Commercieel portretrecht. Helberger 30 jaar ’t Schaep met de 5 pooten, Amsterdam: deLex 2009, p. 231-242. 3 Ups and downs. Economische en culturele gevolgen van file sharing voor muziek, Van Eijk/ 10 ‘Boekman’s Bedenkingen’, in: D.J.G. Visser (red.) Commercieel portretrecht. Kabel film en games, onderzoek door een consortium van TNO Informatie- en Helberger 30 jaar ‘t Schaep met de 5 pooten, Amsterdam: deLex 2009, p. 23-29. Communicatietechnologie, SEO Economisch Onderzoek en het Instituut Voor Informatierecht, in opdracht van de ministeries van OCW, EZ en 11 ‘Free expression and respect for others’, in: Y. Lange (red.) Living Together: a McGonagle Justitie, januari 2009, 142 pp. handbook on Council of Europe standards on media’s contribution to social cohesion, intercultural dialogue, understanding, tolerance and democratic 4 Analysis and Comments on the Montenegrin draft Law on Electronic Media, Van Eijk/ e.a. participation, Straatsburg: Raad van Europa 2009, p. 7-20. Raad van Europa, augustus 2009, 102 pp. 12 ‘Participation in democratic society’, in: Y. Lange (red.) Living Together: a McGonagle 5 Auteursrecht en Open leermiddelen, Amsterdam: Instituut voor Informatierecht Guibault handbook on Council of Europe standards on media’s contribution to social juni 2009, onderzoek in opdracht van Stuurgroep ‘Stimuleren Gebruik Digitaal cohesion, intercultural dialogue, understanding, tolerance and democratic Leermateriaal’, 20 pp. participation, Straatsburg: Raad van Europa 2009, p. 35-47. 6 Bewerking Belinfante/De Reede (eds.), Beginselen van het Nederlandse Hins/ e.a. e 13 ‘Representation of Minorities: Rights of Access’, in: Media and Human Rights, McGonagle staatsrecht, 16 druk, Deventer: Kluwer 2009, 397 pp. Londen: Clemens Nathan Research Centre 2009, p. 106-126. 7 Wie schrijft die blijft? De verhouding tussen uitgevers, redacteuren en hun Kabel/ e.a. 14 Intellectual Property and Social Justice, in A. Kakanowski & M. Narusevich Ramalho schrijvers bij wijzigingen in het beleid van een uitgeversconcern, Amsterdam: (eds.) Handbook of Social Justice, New York: Nova Publishers 2009, p. 245-256. Instituut voor Informatierecht 2009, 31 pp. 8 Analysis of Information provided by DH-MIN members on the Questionnaire McGonagle/ e.a. on the access of national minorities to new media in the information society, rapport in opdracht van Committee of Experts on Issues Relating to the 2009 PhD theses Author Protection of National Minorities, Raad van Europa, 9 maart 2009, 38 pp. 1 Public dimensions of private communications, 367 pp. Steenbruggen 9 Publiek dimensies van privé-communicatie, Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel Steenbruggen Uitgever 2009, 367 pp.

2009 Conference papers Author 1 Economic and Legal Aspects of File sharing in the Netherlands, conference Van Eijk/ Poort paper, Tilburg, 43 pp.

34 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2009 Conference papers Author 1 Economic and Legal Aspects of File sharing in the Netherlands, conference Van Eijk/ Poort paper, Tilburg, 43 pp.

35 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2 Regulating Cable: balancing between competition and public interest, Van Eijk 33 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 113, p. 6351-6352 (Ars Aequi 2009-12). Hins th paper, 20 European Regional ITS Conference Bahrein, 16 pp. 34 HvJ EG 1 juli 2008, Mediaforum 2009-1, nr. 1, p. 27-28, Hins 3 Universal Service and Disabled People, paper 20th European Regional ITS Van Eijk (Turco/Raad van de Europese Unie). Conference Bahrein, 26-28 oktober, 22 pp. 35 EHRM 14 april 2009, EHRC 2009-74, (Társaság a Szabadságjogokért/Hongarije). Hins 36 EHRM 10 maart 2009, Mediaforum 2009-4, nr. 11, p. 167-169, Van Hoboken 2009 Professional publications Author (Times Newspapers/United Kingdom). 1 ‘Filtering the Internet for Copyrighted Content in Europe’, IRIS plus Angelopoulos 37 HvJEG 10 februari 2009, Privacy & Informatie 2009-2, p. 86-88, Van Hoboken (Supplement to IRIS) 2009-4. (Ierland/Parlement en Raad). 2 DCB Newsletter, editie januari 2009, 25 pp. Bostyn 38 ‘Dutch torrent website Mininova has to remove all torrents for copyright Van Hoboken 3 524 EHRM 15 januari 2009, AMI 2009-5, nr. 18, p. 196-198 (de zaak Reklos). Dommering protected works’, IRIS 2009-9, p. 23. 4 Hof Amsterdam 14 april 2009, AMI 2009-5, nr. 19, p. 196-198 Dommering 39 ‘SatCab Revisited: The Past, Presence and Future of the Satellite and Cable Hugenholtz (Tirion/Sauaerbreij). Directive’, IRIS Plus 2009-8, p. 7-19. 5 ‘Nieuws en geheime informatie(bronnen): De Telegraaf tegen de AIVD’, Dommering 40 ‘Guy Vandenberghe had gelijk’, Editorial, Computerrecht 2009-3, nr. 91, p. 107. Hugenholtz Ars Aequi december 2009, p. 818-826. 41 Voorzieningenrechter Rechtbank ‘s-Gravenhage 7 september 2006, Hugenholtz 6 ‘Gefilterde Informatie is gecensureerde informatie’, in: M. Verhulst & Dommering AMI 2009-1, p.36-38 (Converse/Footwear). N. Huijbrechts (red.) Internet voor iedereen, 32 visies op internet, technologie 42 Gerechtshof Amsterdam 23 december 2008, AMI 2009-2, p.61-64 Hugenholtz en maatschappij, Amsterdam: XS4All, p. 42 -44. (Intersong Basart/Hans van Hemert). 7 Hof Den Bosch 14 oktober 2008, AMI 2009-1, p. 34-36 Van Eechoud 43 Rechtbank ‘s-Gravenhage 11 februari 2009), AMI 2009-5, p. 206-210 Hugenholtz (Michaud/Graham Packaging). (Wegener/Innoweb (Gaspedaal.nl). 8 Vzgr Rb. Amsterdam 12 februari 2009, AMI 2009-3, p. 101-105 Van Eechoud 44 EHRM 5 maart 2009, European Human Rights Cases 2009-5, p. 591-600, Kabel (Cassina SPA/Dimensione Direct Sales). (Hachette Filipacchi Automobile en Dupuy/Frankrijk). 9 Afdeling Bestuursrechtspraak Raad van State 29 april 2009, AMI 2009-6, Van Eechoud 45 EHRM 11 december 2008, Mediaforum 2009-3, nr. 6, p. 113-114, Kabel p. 235-237 (B&W Amsterdam /Landmark). (TV Vest As en Rogaland Pensjonistparti/Noorwegen). 10 Statement by European academics on the inappropriateness of imposing Van Eijk/ e.a. 46 Vrz. Rb. Haarlem 25 juli 2008, Intellectuele Eigendom & Reclamerecht (IER), Kabel increased internet regulation in the EU, 8 January 2009, 3 pp. 2009-1, nr. 6, p. 12-18, (Tele2/UPC). 11 An open letter to Google’s CEO, Eric Schmidt: Ensuring adequate security Van Eijk/ e.a. 47 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2009-1, p. 39-44. Mom in Google’s cloud based services, 16 juni, 6 pp. 48 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2009-2, p. 76-84. Mom 12 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 110, p. 6198-6199 (Ars Aequi 2009-3). Van Eijk 49 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2009-3, p. 122-128. Mom 13 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 111, p. 6249-6250 (Ars Aequi 2009-6). Van Eijk 50 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2009-4, p. 170-172. Mom 14 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 112, p. 6297-6298 (Ars Aequi 2009-9). Van Eijk 51 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2009-5, p. 211-220. Mom 15 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 113, p. 6352-6353 (Ars Aequi 2009-12). Van Eijk 52 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2009-6, p. 238-243. Mom 16 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2009-1, p. 32-34. Van Eijk/ e.a. 53 EHRM 31 maart 2009, EHRC 2009-7, p. 773-781, Nieuwenhuis 17 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2009-2, p. 84-86. Van Eijk/ e.a. (Sanoma Uitgevers B.V./ Nederland). 18 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2009-3, p. 144-143. Van Eijk/ e.a. 54 EHRM 16 juli 2009, EHRC 2009-10, p. 1150-1155, (Willem/Frankrijk). Nieuwenhuis 19 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2009-4, p. 178-181. Van Eijk/ e.a. 55 Hof Amsterdam 21 januari 2001, Mediaforum 2009-3, p. 131-133, Nieuwenhuis 20 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2009-5, p. 230-232. Van Eijk/ e.a. (Strafvervolging Wilders). 21 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2009-6, p. 265-268. Van Eijk/ e.a. 56 Bijdrage IRIS. Ramalho 22 ‘File sharing,dat doen we toch allemaal?’, BTG-Magazine 65, p. 18. Van Eijk 23 ‘Scrappy’s Electronics: niet goed, geld terug, BTG-Magazine 66, p. 14. Van Eijk 24 De bewaarplicht: politieke opportuniteit!’, BTG-Magazine 67, p. 23. Van Eijk 2009 Publications aimed at the general public Author 25 ‘Technologieneutraliteit: dit is geen frequentie’, BTG-Magazine 67, p. 14. Van Eijk 1 NRC Handelsblad 28 januari, Opiniepagina. Dommering 26 ‘Kantonrechtbank Leeuwarden 11 februari 2009’, Computerrecht 2009-3, Van Eijk 2 ‘De vrijheid van wat?’, De Groene Amsterdammer 6 maart, p. 18-21. Dommering p. 136-139 (BH 2709). 3 ‘Commissie Brinkman’, Opiniepagina, NRC Handelsblad 24 juni. Dommering 27 ‘Podium: Over verlenging beschermingsduur naburige rechten’, SENA Performers Van Gompel 4 ‘RVD Mediacode ‘, Opiniepagina, NRC Handelsblad 17 augustus. Dommering (magazine voor uitvoerende kunstenaars), jaargang 9, nr. 1, maart 2009, p. 12. 5 ‘Plasterk over Brinkman’, Socialisme & Democratie (S & D) 2009-10, p. 4-5. Dommering 28 Bijdrage IRIS. Van Gompel 6 ‘De archieven van het koninklijk huis’, Opiniepagina, NRC Handelsblad, Dommering 29 Bijdrage Kluwer Case Law (Chellomedia). Van Gompel 19 december. 30 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 110, p. 6197-6198 (Ars Aequi 2009-3). Hins 7 ‘De archieven van het koninklijk huis’, NRC expert blog, 19 december. Dommering 31 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 111, p. 6248-6249 (Ars Aequi 2009-6). Hins 8 ‘De veroordeelde rapper’, NRC Next 24 december. Dommering 32 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 112, p. 6296-6297 (Ars Aequi 2009-9). Hins

36 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

37 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2009 Inaugural lectures & PhD defenses Author 23 ‘Coordination of proceedings: lis pendens, multiple defendants’, workshop on Van Eechoud 1 Public dimensions of private communications (PhD defense). Steenbruggen the Draft Principles on Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property (CLIP) of the European Max Planck Research Group on Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property, Munich, 29 oktober. 24 ‘The impact of content regulation on mobile services’, The 2009 Wireless Van Eijk 2009 Invited lectures/keynotes/presentations/workshops Author Foresight Workshop, Stockholm, 26-27 januari. 1 ‘The unbearable pleasures of patenting in life sciences’, Seminar Biolegis, Bostyn 25 ‘Linear & Non-linear Services’, EAO/EMR Workshop on the transposition Van Eijk Brussel, 20 maart. and implementation of the AVMSD, Saarbrücken, 30-31 januari. 2 ‘The unbearable conundrum of patenting software’, Seminar Quaeso, Bostyn 26 ‘Dutch Media Law, Press Now’, Amsterdam, 3 februari. Van Eijk Antwerpen, 22 september. 27 ‘Filesharing:Juridische aspecten’, seminar Kennisland, Amsterdam, 14 april. Van Eijk 3 ‘Pharmaceutical inquiry of the European Commission: an overview of the Bostyn 28 (met J. Poort) ‘Economic and Legal Aspects of File sharing in the Netherlands’, Van Eijk results’, De Clercq, Brants & Partners annual Patent Seminar, 27 november. TILEC Workshop on Competition Policy and Regulation In Media Markets: 4 ‘Morality, stem cells and patent law: a poisonous cocktail?’, Tiss. EU Fifth Bostyn Bridging Law and Economics, Tilburg, 5 juni. International Workshop, 9-11 december. 29 ‘Over zoekmachines en meer…’, Vereniging voor Mededingingsrecht, Van Eijk 5 ‘Exclusieve rechten octrooihouder’, gastcollege Universiteit Antwerpen, Bostyn Amsterdam, 1 juli. 18 maart. 30 ‘Analysis and Comments on the Montenegrin Draft Law on Electronic Media’, Van Eijk 6 ‘Licentie-overeenkomsten en IE’, gastcollege KVIV cursus octrooibeleid, Bostyn Expertmeeting Raad van Europa/Europese Commissie, Podgorica, Montenegro, Antwerpen, 26 maart. 14 september. 7 ‘Octrooieerbare materie’, college Opleiding Nederlandse Octrooigemachtigden, Bostyn 31 ‘De crisis en het informatierecht: Crisis, what crisis?’, Alumnidag Faculteit der Van Eijk Utrecht, 18 mei. Rechtsgeleerdheid, 19 september. 8 ‘Open Source Software en licenties’, gastcollege KVIV cursus octrooibeleid, Bostyn 32 ‘Regulating Cable: balancing between competition and public interest’, 20th Van Eijk Antwerpen, 25 juni. European Regional ITS Conference Bahrein, 26-28 oktober. 9 ‘Patent protection of plants and plant material in Europe, the US and other Bostyn 33 ‘Universal Service and Disabled People’, 20th European Regional ITS Van Eijk countries in the world’, WIPO Master in IP, Turijn, 28 september. Conference, Bahrein, 26-28 oktober. 10 ‘Plant variety protection in Europe and the United States’, WIPO Master Course Bostyn 34 ‘Audiovisual Media Services and Jurisdiction, Accelerating Competitiveness Van Eijk in IP, Turijn, 28 september. in Infocommunications’: Regulatory Steps to be Taken in the Electronic 11 ‘Patent protection for human biotech inventions’, WIPO Master Course in IP, Bostyn Communications, Data Protection and Media Sectors’, Budapest, 25 november. Turijn, 29 september. 35 ‘Regulating Cable in the Netherlands, Accelerating Competitiveness in Van Eijk 12 ‘University inventions’, WIPO Master Course in IP, Turijn, 30 september. Bostyn Infocommunications’: Regulatory Steps to be Taken in the Electronic Communications, Data Protection and Media Sectors, Budapest, Hongarije, 25 13 ‘SPLT and global harmonization of substantive patent law rules’, WIPO Master Bostyn november. Course in IP, Turijn, 30 september. 36 ‘Implementatie van de Richtlijn Audiovisuele Mediadiensten’, Actualiteiten- Van Eijk 14 ‘IP for plants: biological or not, that is the question’, Conferentie WIPO, Genève, Bostyn special Mediarecht, Hoofddorp, 15 december. 1 oktober. 37 De AVMS Richtlijn, PAO college ‘Het nieuwe mediarecht’, Amsterdam, 17 april. Van Eijk 15 ‘De journalistieke kwaliteit van de publieke omroep in het internet tijdperk’, Dommering Nederlandse Publieke Omroep (NPO), Hilversum, 3 september. 38 Telecommunications Law, gastcollege EU Business Law, Universiteit van Van Eijk Amsterdam, 23 april. 16 ‘Persoonsgegeven als digitaal geld waarover de consument zelf moet kunnen Dommering beschikken’, XS4All symposium, Amsterdam, 10 september. 39 ‘Andere stemmen: het juristenveld’, FOBID Juridische Commissie: Bijeenkomst Van Gompel Massadigitalisering, Utrecht, 29 januari. 17 ‘16 Miljoen BNers. Bescherming van persoonsgegevens in het digitale tijdperk’, Dommering workshop over handhaving van dataprotectiewetten, NJCM jubileum congres, 40 ‘Massadigitalisering en collectief beheer’, jaarvergadering Stichting LIRA, Van Gompel Den Haag, 8 oktober (voorzitter). Minisymposium: Digitaal perspectief, Amsterdam, 6 juni. 18 ‘Toekomsttrends in het auteursrecht’, nationale auteursrecht congres 2009, Dommering 41 ‘Formalities in the digital era: an obstacle or opportunity?’, ALAI congress, Van Gompel Amsterdam, 16 oktober. From 1710 to Cyberspace: Celebrating 300 years of copyright and looking to its future, Londen, 14-17 juni. 19 (with S. Fung) ‘Legal and Technical Accessibility for Life Science Databases’, Dulong de Proceedings of the Second COMMUNIA Conference: Global Science & Rosnay 42 ‘Collective Administration and Reciprocal Agreements’, presentation given Guibault Economics of Knowledge-Sharing Institutions, Torino, 28/29/30 juni. during the Annual conference of the Association Européenne des Radios, Brussel, 12 februari. 20 (with S. Chen & A .Hyde) ‘Authorship, Licenses, and the Wiki Borg’, Wikimania Dulong de Conference, Buenos Aires, 28 september. Rosnay 43 ‘Limitations and exceptions in the digital field as approached within Directive Guibault 2001/29/EC’, National WIPO Seminar on Copyright Exceptions and 21 ‘Creative Commons licenses incompatibilities: when sharing needs to be Dulong de Limitations, Mangalia, Roemenië, 17 en 18 september. rationalized’, GikII 4th Edition, (Geek Law), University of Amsterdam, 18 Rosnay september. 44 ‘Exercise of public lending right in analogical and digital environments: Current Guibault status and prospects for evolution’, National WIPO Seminar on Copyright 22 ‘Getting the rights right at the EU level, Does the Public Sector Information Van Eechoud Exceptions and Limitations, Mangalia, Roemenië, 17 en 18 september. Directive Deliver?’, Accessing, Using, Reusing Public Sector Content and Data, Communia Workshop, London School of Economics, London, 26-27 maart. 45 ‘The Europeana Public Domain Charter’, DISH pre conference workshop on Guibault ‘Barriers to Adoption’, Den Haag, 8 december.

38 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

39 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

46 ‘The Ups and Downs of EU Copyright Harmonization: the Example of the Private Guibault 73 ‘Licentieer File Sharing!’, Vereniging voor Auteursrecht, Amsterdam, 23 oktober. Hugenholtz Copy Exception’, gastcollege, Jagiellonian University Cracow, Polen, 24 april. 74 ‘Media Concentration and the Authors’ Contractual Position’, International Hugenholtz 47 Summer Course on International Copyright Law, IViR, Amsterdam, 7-11 juli Guibault Authors Forum, Oslo, 20 oktober. (organisatie en colleges). 75 ‘Do not fear copyright! Documentary film making and freedom of expression Hugenholtz 48 ‘Introduction to Creative Commons Licences’, presentatie voor Third Annual Guibault in Europe’, InfoMedia Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen, 18 november. Meeting of the National Partners Initiative (NPI) en de Central Advisory 76 ‘Term Extension of Rights of Phonogram Producers and Performers’, Karels Hugenholtz Service on Intellectual Property, Den Haag, 4 september. Universiteit Praag, 23 april. 49 ‘Inleiding tot het auteursrecht’, gastcollege INHolland, Alkmaar, 9 september. Guibault 77 ‘Copyright Piracy on the Internet: Litigate, Legalize,License or Laissez-Faire?’, Hugenholtz 50 ‘Inleiding tot Creative Commons Licenties’, presentatie voor het SEO, Guibault Bucerius Law School, Hamburg, 9 oktober. Amsterdam, 14 december. 78 IViR Summer Course on International Copyright Law, Amsterdam, 5-9 juli. Hugenholtz 51 ‘Extending the term of protection for sound recordings – Some critical Helberger 79 ‘Merken’, mini-symposium ‘Werken, merken, media’, afscheidsymposium Kabel reflections’, Belgium ALAI, Brussels, 19 January. N. van Lingen, Gerechtshof te Amsterdam, 15 mei. 52 ‘Towards a Digital Consumer Agenda’, Keynote speaker, EU Consumer Helberger 80 ‘Auteursrecht en Amateurkunst’, conferentie ‘Auteursrecht in de Amateurkunst’, Kabel Conference, Stockholm, 4 november. Utrecht, 11 december. 53 Inleiding op themamiddag Wet openbaarheid van bestuur Amsterdam, Hins 81 ‘Auteursrecht en beeldende kunst’, gastcollege mastervak Kunst en Recht, Kabel Amsterdam, 12 juni. Amsterdam, 6 mei. 54 ‘Niets te verbergen..?’, Symposium Conflictbeslechting, 18 mei. Van Hoboken 82 ‘Omgaan met Privacy en gegevensbescherming in de praktijk’, Institute for Kabel 55 ‘Search Engines and Censorship. The Law and Politics of the Digital Horizon, Van Hoboken International Research, Amsterdam, 26 augustus (voorzitter). Hacking at Random’, International technology & security conference, 83 ‘Expert study of the replies to the Questionnaire on the access of national McGonagle/ e.a. Vierhouten, 13 augustus. minorities to new media in the information society’, 9e vergadering van 56 ‘Privacy in het publieke domein’, Opening Academisch Jaar 2009-2010, Van Hoboken Committee of Experts on Issues Relating to the Protection of National Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 31 augustus. Minorities (DH-MIN), Straatsburg, 2 april. 57 ‘Search Engine Censorship: New Metaphors for the Suppression of Findability’, Van Hoboken 84 ‘Representation of Minorities: Rights of Access’, conference ‘Freedom of McGonagle Gikii, Workshop on Technology, Law and Popular Culture, Amsterdam, Expression and the Media’, Clemens Nathan Research Centre i.s.m. City 19 september. University London en Centre for Freedom of the Media, Londen, 7 april. 58 ‘Search Engines and User Privacy: the Need for Legislative Reform’, Van Hoboken 85 ‘Multidimensionality in the Council of Europe’s approaches to “hate speech”: McGonagle conference ‘Society of the Query’, Amsterdam, 13 november. from East/West to present/future’, Panel I: Difficulties of Creating Freedom of 59 ‘Privacy en vrije toegang tot kennis en informative’, gastcollege Artez, 12 mei. Van Hoboken Speech and Freedom of the Media, conference ‘Beyond East and West’, Boedapest, 27 juni. 60 Expert, ‘Towards a future Internet workshop’, Oxford Internet Institute, Van Hoboken SMART 2008/0049, Brussels, 10 september. 86 ‘Quo vadis? An evaluation of the navigational potential of Council of Europe McGonagle standards’, Panel 2 – Politics, Policies and Practices, Diasporas, Migration and 61 Co-host and conference chair, Gikii, Workshop on Technology, Law and Van Hoboken Media: Crossing Boundaries, New Directions, European Communication Popular Culture, Amsterdam, 18-19 september. Research and Education Association i.s.m. Universiteit Utrecht, Nottingham 62 ‘Actualiteiten databankenrecht’, Congres ‘Juridische issues in de Media’ Hugenholtz Trent University en Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Utrecht, 6 november. Euroforum Houthoff Buruma, 12 maart. 87 Expert bijdrage, Seminar ‘Minority access to the media in Ukraine’, Office of the McGonagle 63 ‘Current Copyright Issues Relevant to European Consumers’, BEUC Workshop, Hugenholtz OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities, Den Haag, 7 december. Brussel, 19 maart. 64 ‘95 Reasons Why Term Extension is a Really Bad Idea’, AIPPI UK, Londen, 8 april. Hugenholtz 65 Diverse presentaties, WIPO Sub-Regional Seminar on Policy Options in the Hugenholtz 2009 Editorships & peer reviewer/review activities Author Application of Copyright Law, Singapore, 15-17 april. 66 ‘The Orphan Works Problem’, Second International Seminar on Information Hugenholtz 1 Co-editor en mede-oprichter Journal of International Biotechnology Law. Bostyn Law, Ionian University, Corfu, 25 juni. 2 Referent bij de inleiding van Henk Bos bij de bijeenkomst kenniskamer Privacy Dommering 67 ‘Owning Science. IPR’s as Impediments to Knowledge Sharing’, Communia Hugenholtz van het Rathenau Instituut, Den Haag, 17 december. Conference 2009, Turijn, 29 juni. 3 Lid van de redactieraad van Auteurs- en Mediarecht (A & M). Dommering 68 ‘©, PD & CC’, Europeana Plenary, Den Haag, 15 september. Hugenholtz 4 Redactielid AMI. Van Eechoud 69 ‘Freedom of information v. intellectual property’, 6th International Conference Hugenholtz 5 Medewerker Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Van Eechoud of Information Commissioners (ICIC) 2009, Oslo, 28 september. 6 Medewerker aan losbladige uitgave Intellectuele Eigendom, artikelsgewijs Van Eechoud 70 ‘The Googlification of Copyright. The GBS and its Consequences for Europe’, Hugenholtz commentaar. GikII Conference, Amsterdam, 17 september. 7 Referee, ITS Europe conference, Bahrein, 25-29 oktober. Van Eijk 71 ‘Towards a Coherent European Copyright Policy’, 1st European Information Hugenholtz 8 Redactie Computerrecht. Van Eijk SZummit, European parliament, Brussel, 14 oktober. 9 Medewerker Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht. Van Eijk 72 ‘Actuele Ontwikkelingen in het Europese en Internationale Auteursrecht’, Hugenholtz Nationaal Auteursrechtcongres, Amsterdam, 15 oktober. 10 Referee NWO. Van Eijk

40 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

41 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

11 Co-hoofdredacteur Kluwer European IP Cases. Guibault 19 Coördinator onderzoeksmaster Informatierecht. Guibault 12 Lid internationale redactie voor Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle (Canada). Guibault 20 Lid Begeleidingscommissie onderzoek businessmodellen, Digitaal Erfgoed Guibault 13 Correspondent voor Computer Law Review International (Duitsland) Guibault Nederland. 14 Editor en national reporter Common Core of European Private Law, University Guibault 21 Lid Studiegroep Implementatie van de AVMSD van de Vereniging voor Helberger of Torino (Boundaries of Information Property). Reclamerecht. 15 Reviewer ETRI (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute) Journal, Helberger 22 Lid Wetenschapscommissie FdR. Helberger ACM Computing Surveys en het Ethics and Information Technology Journal. 23 Lid Vereniging voor Auteursrecht, Vereniging voor Mediarecht. Helberger 16 Correspondent IRIS. Helberger 24 Commissariaat voor de Media, lid bezwaarschriftencommissie. Hins 17 Lid redactie Mediaforum. Hins 25 Nederlandse Publieke Omroep, lid bezwaarschriftencommissie. Hins 18 Lid redactie AMI, tijdschrift voor auteurs-, media- en informatierecht. Hugenholtz 26 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn Hins 19 General Editor Information Law Series (Kluwer Law International). Hugenholtz en Sport. 20 Lid van de Redactieraad van het Tijdschrift Privacy & Informatie. Kabel 27 Lid Commissie Handhaving Gedragscode SMS-dienstverlening. Hins 21 Hoofdredacteur van reclameboekboek.nl. Kabel 28 Bestuurslid Stichting Bits of Freedom. Van Hoboken 22 Externe examinator, M. Litt. Thesis: ‘The EU Legal Framework for McGonagle 29 Lid Commissie Auteursrecht, Ministerie van Justitie. Hugenholtz Broadcasting’, School of Law, Trinity College Dublin, Ierland, januari. 30 Vice-voorzitter Vereniging voor Auteursrecht. Hugenholtz 23 Redactielid IRIS. McGonagle 31 Lid Comité Exécutif ALAI. Hugenholtz 24 Redacteur (en plaatsvervangend eindredacteur) AMI, tijdschrift voor Mom 32 Vice-voorzitter Vaste Commissie Plagiaat (Buma-Stemra). Hugenholtz auteurs-, media- en informatierecht. 33 Lid Fachbeirat, Max-Planck-Institut für geistiges Eigentum, Wettbewerbs- und Hugenholtz 25 Medewerker aan losbladige uitgave Intellectuele eigendom, artikelsgewijs Mom Steuerrecht, München. commentaar (voor de onderdelen Auteurswet en Wet op de naburige rechten). 34 Plv. lid Senaat, Universiteit van Amsterdam. Hugenholtz 26 Redacteur Mediaforum. Nieuwenhuis 35 Plv. lid Universitaire Onderzoekscommissie, Universiteit van Amsterdam. Hugenholtz 36 Lid Drafting Committee, Wittem-groep (unificatie Europees auteursrecht). Hugenholtz 37 Bestuurslid van de Vereniging voor Reclamerecht. Kabel 2009 Memberships Author 38 Voorzitter van de Studiegroep Audiovisuele Commerciële Communicatie van Kabel 1 Lid Expertencommittee Europese Commissie en rapporteur ter evaluatie van Bostyn de Vereniging voor Reclamerecht. richtlijn 98/44/EG betreffende de wettelijke bescherming van biotechnologische 39 Voorzitter van de Stichting Weekbladpersgroep. Kabel uitvindingen. 40 Plaatsvervangend voorzitter van de Reclame Code Commissie. Kabel 2 Lid Commissie Auteursrecht. Dommering 41 Voorzitter van het College van Advies van de Stichting Ideële Reclame SIRE. Kabel 3 Lid Raad van Advies CBP. Dommering 42 Bestuurslid van de Stichting NES-Theater. Kabel 4 Voorzitter van de Stichting ‘My name is Spinoza’. Dommering 43 Voorzitter van de Commissie van Beroep van het NICAM (Kijkwijzer). Kabel 5 Lid van Max Planck Gesellschaft European Group on Conflicts of Laws in Van Eechoud 44 Bestuurslid van het Bureau van de Ligue Internationale du Droit de la Kabel Intellectual Property (CLIP). Concurrence. 6 Lid International Advice Body Spatial Data Infrastructure and Public Sector Van Eechoud 45 Lid van het Wetenschappelijke Comité van de Ligue Internationale du Droit de Kabel Innovation program (KU Leuven, Vrije Universiteit Brussel). la Concurrence. 7 Voorzitter Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht (VMC). Van Eijk 46 Voorzitter van de Geschillencommissie van het Bureau Kredietregistratie BKR. Kabel 8 Raad van toezicht Nederlandse Publieke Omroep (NPO). Van Eijk 47 Coördinator samenwerking met het European Audiovisual Observatory. McGonagle 9 Beirat Hans Bredow Institut, Hamburg, Duitsland. Van Eijk 48 Lid Opleidingscommissie Master rechtsgeleerdheid. Mom 10 Voorzitter commissie van beroep Pictoright. Van Eijk 49 Bestuurslid Stichting Auteursrechtmanifestaties. Mom 11 Beroepscommissie NL-Kabel. Van Eijk 50 Secretaris Stichting Fonds Victor Hugo. Mom 12 Juryvoorzitter Internet Scriptieprijs. Van Eijk 13 Advisory Committee, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg. Van Eijk 14 Expert Europese Commission, TAIEX programma. Van Eijk 2009 PhD supervision & oppositions Author 15 Expert Raad van Europa. Van Eijk 1 Promotor W. Steenbruggen, promotie 27 november. Dommering 16 Ad hoc deskundige, High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries, Copyright Van Gompel 2 Co-promotor W. Steenbruggen, promotie 27 november. Nieuwenhuis Subgroup, Brussel, 16 april. 3 Lid promotiecommissie W. Steenbruggen, promotie 27 november. Van Eijk 17 Secretaris Commissie Auteursrecht. Van Gompel 4 Lid promotiecommissie D. Stevens, Universiteit Leuven, promotie 30 november. Van Eijk 18 Lid Studiecommissie voor de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht van de Van Gompel Vereniging voor Auteursrecht. 5 Lid promotiecommissie J. Hoffmann, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Faculteit der McGonagle Maatschappij- en Gedragswetenschappen, promotie 10 december.

42 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

43 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2010 Refereed articles Author 1 ‘Legal, Economic and Cultural Aspects of File Sharing’, Van Eijk/ Poort/ Communications & Strategies 2010-77, p. 35-54. e.a. 2 ‘The Orphan Works Problem: The Copyright Conundrum of Digitizing Large- Van Gompel/ Scale Audiovisual Archives, and How to Solve It’, Popular Communication – Hugenholtz The International Journal of Media and Culture 2010-1, vol. 8, p. 61-71. 3 ‘Why Cherry Picking Never Leads to Harmonisation: The Case of the Guibault Limitations on Copyright under Directive 2001/29/EC’, Journal of Intellectual Property Information Technology and e-Commerce Law 2010-1, p. 55-66. 4 ‘User Generated Diversity: Some Reflections on How to Improve the Quality Helberger/ e.a. of Amateur Productions’, Communications & Strategies 2010-7, p. 55-77. 5 ‘Little Brother is Tagging You – Legal and Policy Implications of Amateur Data Helberger/ Controllers’, Computer Law Review International 2010-4, p. 101-109. Van Hoboken 6 ‘Computercriminaliteit en historisch besef’, Mediaforum 2010-10, p. 309. Hins 7 ‘Chronicle of the Netherlands. Dutch copyright law, 2001-2010’, Revue Hugenholtz Internationale du Droit d’Auteur (RIDA), 2010, No. 226, October, p. 280-349. 8 ‘Klokkenluiders, interne meldregelingen, anonimiteit en privacy’, Kabel/ e.a. Privacy & Informatie 2010-4, p. 179-182. 9 ‘Strafbaarstelling negationisme: geschiedschrijving via het recht?’, Korteweg Mediaforum 2010-3, p. 79-83. 10 ‘E-mail na de dood: juridische bescherming van privacybelangen’, Korteweg/ Privacy & Informatie 2010-5, p. 212-224. Zuiderveen/ Borgesius 11 ‘Feature Case Note - The Islamic Headscarf Dilemma: Leyla Şahin v. Turkey’, McGonagle Irish Human Rights Law Review 2010-1, p. 195-215. 12 ‘An Ode to Contextualisation: İ.A. v. Turkey’, Irish Human Rights Law Review McGonagle 2010-1, p. 237-251. 13 ‘A brave new media world? Een kritische blik op het nieuwe mediabeleid van de McGonagle/ Raad van Europa’, Mediaforum 2010-5, p. 146-156. e.a. 14 ‘Uitvoering in (strikt) besloten kring’, AMI 2010-3, p. 81-91. Mom 15 ‘Kunst in Straatsburg. Een analyse van de jurisprudentie van het EHRM’, Nieuwenhuis/ Mediaforum 2010-3, p. 70-78. e.a. 16 ‘Tussen grondrechtelijke vrijheid en parlementaire onschendbaarheid. Nieuwenhuis De vrijheid van meningsuiting van de parlementariër’, Tijdschrift voor Constitutioneel Recht 2010-1, p. 4-23. 17 ‘De verantwoordelijkheid voorbij: de ISP als verlengstuk van de overheid’, Van der Sloot Mediaforum 2010-5, p. 157-161. 18 ‘De privacyverklaring als onderdeel van een wederkerige overeenkomst’, Van der Sloot Privacy & Informatie 2010-3, p. 106-109. 19 ‘De amendementen van de Richtlijn Burgerrechten op de e-Privacyrichtlijn’, Van der Sloot/ Privacy & Informatie 2010-4, p. 162-172. Zuiderveen Borgesius 20 ‘De evaluatie van de Wet bescherming persoonsgegevens’, Privacy & Informatie Van der Sloot 2010-5, p. 224-236. 21 ‘Privacyrechten voor avatars: over normen en waarden in cyberspace’, Van der Sloot Privacy & Informatie 2010-6, p. 296-302.

2010 Non-refereed articles Author 1 ‘Product Placement in European Audiovisual Productions’, IRIS plus lead article Angelopoulos (Supplement to IRIS) 2010-3, p. 7- 21.

44 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2 EHRM 10 maart 2009, appl. 23676/03, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2010-10, Dommering nr. 109, p. 1075-1077 (Times/UK). 3 EHRM 6 mei 2003, appl.44306/98, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2010-17, Dommering nr. 207, p. 2029-2031 (Appelby/UK). 4 EHRM 11 december 2008, appl. 21132/05, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie Dommering 2010-17, nr. 208, p. 2039-2040 (TV Vest/Noorwegen). 5 EHRM 14 april 2009, appl. 37374/05, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie Dommering 2010-17, nr. 209, p. 2044-2046 (Társaság/Hongarije). 6 EHRM 1 juli 2008, appl. 58243/00, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2010-26, Dommering nr. 324, p. 3120-3121 (Liberty/VK). 7 EHRM 12 januari 2010, appl. 4158/05, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2010-26, Dommering nr. 325, p. 3030-3031 (Gillian en Quinton/VK). 8 EHRM 5 maart 2009, appl. 13353/05 en 26935/05, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie Dommering 2010-27, nr. 343 en 344, p. 3283-3284 (Hachette Fillipachi en Société de Conception de Press/Frankrijk). 9 EHRM 20 april 2010, appl. 18788/09, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2010-34, Dommering nr. 429, p. 4231-4233 (LePen). 10 ‘De dubbele moraal van het groepsbeledigen in cartoons’, Nederlands Dommering Juristenblad 2010-35, p. 2264-2269 (Essay 1800). 11 Gelijke behandeling, vrijheid van meningsuiting en de elektronische media. Notitie Hins/ e.a. ten behoeve van de Commissie Gelijke Behandeling, 15 februari 2010, 14 pp. 12 ‘The Digital Dividend: Opportunities and Obstacles’, in: S. Nikoltchev (ed.) Korteweg/ IRIS plus 2010-6, Switchover to the Digital Dividend, Straatsburg: European McGonagle Audiovisual Observatory 2010, p. 7-26. 13 ‘Book review: Dario Castiglione & Chris Longman (eds) The Language Question McGonagle in Europe and Diverse Societies: Political, Legal and Social Perspectives, Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd., 2007’, European Public Law 2010-2, p. 314-317. 14 ‘Juridische megalomanie, of over wat het recht vermag’, Scribe et Impera Van der Sloot 2010, 6 pp.

2010 Books (including reports) Author 1 Digitisation and Online Exploitation of Broadcasters’ Archives, IRIS Special, Angelopoulos/ Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory 2010, 80 pp. Van Gompel/ e.a. 2 Convergentie in regulering: Reflecties op elektronische communicatie, Dommering/ Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Den Haag, maart 2010, 37 pp. Van Eijk 3 Toegang tot telecom: Onderzoek naar de invulling van het nieuwe Europese kader Van Eijk/ voor de toegankelijkheid van telecommunicatiediensten voor gehandicapten, SEO Poort/ Economisch Onderzoek en het Instituut Voor Informatierecht, in opdracht van e.a. het ministerie van EZ, juli 2009/februari 2010, 79 pp. 4 Waarde commerciële radiovergunningen, SEO/IViR/TNO, in opdracht Van Eijk/ van het ministerie van EZ, april 2010, 91 pp. Poort/ e.a. 5 Op weg naar evenwicht, een onderzoek naar zorgplichten op het internet, IViR/ Van Eijk/ e.a. Leibniz Center for Law, onderzoek in opdracht van het WODC, juni 2010, 140 pp. 6 Digital content services for consumers. Report 1, report for the European Guibault/ Commission, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, december 2010, Helberger/ 429 pp. Van der Sloot/ e.a. 7 Hoofdstukken Grondrechten, Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri 2010, 231 pp. Hins/ Nieuwenhuis 8 Persvrijheidsmonitor Nederland 2009, Diemen: Uitgeverij AMB 2010, 152 pp. Hins/ e.a. 9 International Copyright. Principles, Law, and Practice, Second Edition, Hugenholtz/ e.a. New York: Oxford University Press 2010, ISBN 9780199737109, 592 pp.

45 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

10 Promoting cultural diversity in the Irish broadcasting sector: an assessment of McGonagle international standards and best practices with a view to their operationalisation in an Irish context, studie i.o.v. de Media Research Funding Scheme van de Broadcasting Authority of Ireland, april 2010, 104 pp. 11 The Software Interface between Copyright and Competition Law: A Legal Van Rooijen Analysis of Interoperability in Computer Programs, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2010, 291 pp. 12 Trademark Protection and Freedom of Expression: An Inquiry into the Conflict Sakulin between Trademark Rights and Freedom of Expression under European, German, and Dutch Law, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2010, 403 pp.

2010 Book chapters Author 1 ‘Recht op persoonsgegevens als zelfbeschikkingsrecht’, in: C. Prins e.a. (red.) Dommering 16 miljoen BN’ers? Bescherming van persoonsgegevens in het DigitaleTtijdperk, Leiden: NJCM-Boekerij (47) 2010, p. 83-99. 2 ‘Data, Information and Communications in 21st Century Europe: a conceptual Dommering framework’, in: Th. Kleist, A. Rossnagel & A. Scheuer (eds.) Europäisches und nationales Medienrecht im Dialog, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft 2010, p. 51-65. 3 ‘Les formalités sont mortes, vive les formalités! Copyright formalities and Van Gompel the reasons for their decline in nineteenth century Europe’, in: R. Deazley, M. Kretschmer & L. Bently (eds.) Privilege and Property: Essays on the History of Copyright, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers 2010, p. 157-206. 4 (met L. Guibault) ‘Collective Management in the European Union’, in Van Gompel D. Gervais (ed.) 2e dr. Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights, Alphen aan den Rijn : Kluwer Law International, 2010, p. 135-167. 5 ‘Formalities in the digital era: an obstacle or opportunity?’, in: L. Bently, Van Gompel U. Suthersanen & P. Torremans (eds.) Global Copyright: Three Hundred Years Since the Statute of Anne, from 1709 to Cyberspace, Cheltenham [etc.]: Edward Elgar 2010, p. 395-424. 6 ‘Plurality of Political Opinions and the Concentration of Media’, in: J.H.M. Hins van Erp en L.P.W. van Vliet (eds.) Netherlands Reports to the Eighteenth International Congress of Comparative Law, Washington − Antwerp − Oxford – Portland: Intersentia 2010, p. 469-494. 7 ‘Publieke media op internet: zorgplicht en concurrentievervalsing’, in: Laurens Hins Mommers e.a. (red.) Het binnenste buiten. Liber amicorum ter gelegenheid van het emeritaat van prof. dr. Aernout H.J. Schmidt, Leiden: E.M. Meijers Instituut 2010, p. 93-107. 8 ‘Limits, limitations and exceptions to copyright under the TRIPS Agreement’. Hugenholtz in: Carlos M. Correa (ed.) Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules. Intellectual property in the WTO, Vol. I, p. 319-342. 9 ‘Codes of Conduct and Copyright Enforcement in Cyberspace’, in: Irini A. Hugenholtz Stamatoudi (ed.) Copyright Enforcement and the Internet, Information Law Series, Vol. 21, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2010, p. 303-320.

2010 PhD theses Author 1 The software interface between copyright and competition law, 291 pp. Van Rooijen 2 Trademark protection and freedom of expression: An inquiry into the conflict Sakulin between trademark rights and freedom of expression under European, German and Dutch law, 403 pp.

46 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2010 Conference papers Author 1 ‘La place de l’auteur dans l’environnement numérique’, Proceedings of the 5th Guibault European Conference of the European Writers’ Council EWC Brussels, April 2010, p. 20-25.

2010 Professional publications Author 1 ‘European Commission: Communication on Opportunities and Challenges for Angelopoulos European Cinema in the Digital Era’, IRIS 2010-10, p. 8. 2 ‘European Commission: Report on the Challenges for European Film Angelopoulos Heritage’, IRIS 2010-9, p. 4. 3 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Télévision française 1 SA (TF1) v Angelopoulos Commission’, IRIS 2010-9, p. 3. 4 ‘European Commission: Laggard Member States Urged to Implement AVMS Angelopoulos Directive’, IRIS 2010-8, p. 4. 5 ‘Adoption of the Digital Economy Act 2010’, IRIS 2010-7, p. 100. Angelopoulos 6 ‘Dutch Court Says that Facilitating Downloading Qualifies as Making Angelopoulos Available’, IRIS 2010-7, p. 30. 7 ‘European Commission: New Digital Agenda Unveiled’, IRIS 2010-7, p. 4. Angelopoulos 8 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Joined Cases M6 and TF1 v. Angelopoulos Commission’, IRIS 2010-7, p. 3. 9 ‘Council of the EU: The Granada Ministerial Declaration on the European Angelopoulos Digital Agenda’, IRIS 2010-6, p. 2. 10 ‘European Commission: Commission Requests Information from Spain on New Angelopoulos Charge on Operators’, IRIS 2010-5, p. 4. 11 ‘European Commission: Ratification of the WCT and WPPT’, IRIS 2010-2, p. 2. Angelopoulos 12 ‘European Parliament: Telecoms Reform Adopted’, IRIS 2010-1, p. 7. Angelopoulos 13 ‘European Commission: Consultation on Creative Content Online’, Angelopoulos IRIS 2010-1, p. 6. 14 ‘European Parliament: Gallo Report Adopted by European Parliament’, K. Breemen IRIS 2010-10, p. 8-10. 15 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Recommendation on Intellectual Property Rights V. Breemen in the Digital Society’, IRIS 2010-10, p. 5-6. 16 ‘Ik surf, dus ik ben (er geweest)’, in: Spaink (red.) Wie is U?, Amsterdam: Dommering Nijgh & Van Ditmar/XS4All 2010, p. 47-56. 17 Hoge Raad, 30-10-2009, 08/00431, AMI 2010-2, p. 68-69 (Montis Design). Van Eechoud 18 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 114 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2010-3), p. 6403-6404. 19 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 115 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2010-6), p. 6465-6466. 20 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 116 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2010-9), p. 6513-6514. 21 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 117 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2010-12), p. 6564-6565. 22 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2010-1, p. 35-37. Van Eijk/ e.a. 23 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2010-2, p. 81-84. Van Eijk/ e.a. 24 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2010-3, p. 158-161. Van Eijk/ e.a. 25 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2010-4, p. 214-217. Van Eijk/ e.a. 26 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2010-5, p. 248-250. Van Eijk/ e.a.

47 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

27 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2010-6, p. 357-360. Van Eijk/ e.a. 28 ‘BEREC: op weg naar Europees toezicht’, BTG-magazine 2010-69, p. 14. Van Eijk 29 ‘De mythe van onbelemmerde toegang tot internet’, Van Eijk BTG-magazine 2010-70, p. 28. 30 ‘Déjà vu’, BTG-magazine 2010-71, p. 18. Van Eijk 31 ‘Toezichthouders: megalomaan of tailor made?’, BTG-magazine 2010-72, p. 28. Van Eijk 32 Analysis and Comments on the Radio and Television Corporation of Slovenia Van Eijk Act, the Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs (Media Unit) of the Council of Europe, Straatsburg, 6 december, 15 pp. 33 ‘European Commission: New Reflection Group on the Digital Dissemination of Van Gompel European Cultural Heritage’, IRIS 2010-6, p. 5. 34 Rb. Amsterdam 20 mei 2009, AMI 2010-2, p. 70-75, (Julio Iglesias & Jungle Aire Guibault Limited C.V./Sony BMG Music Entertainment). 35 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 114 (Ars Aequi 2010-3), p. 6402-6403. Hins 36 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 115 (Ars Aequi 2010-6), p. 6464-6465. Hins 37 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Katern 116 (Ars Aequi 2010-9), p. 6512-6513. Hins 38 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 117 Hins (Ars Aequi 2010-12), p. 6562-6564. 39 ECJ 16 December 2008, Case C-73/07, Common Market Law Review 2010- Hins 47, p. 215-233 (Tietosuojavaltuutettu/Satakunnan Markkinaporssi Oy and Satamedia Oy). 40 ABRvS 3 maart 2010, Mediaforum 2010-5, nr. 15, p. 181-184 (Moeders van Hins Srebrenica/Minister van Defensie). 41 ‘Kwallen in Domburg’, in: A. Schmidt, M. Linnartz en L. Mommers (red.) Aan Hins de Klaauw herkent met de leeuw. Opstellen ter gelegenheid van het afscheid van Franke van der Klaauw-Koops van eLaw@Leiden, Leiden: eLaw@Leiden 2010, p. 119-122. 42 ‘Het belang van privacy. Verwarring over het burgerrecht van de 21ste eeuw’, Van Hoboken (Voorbij privacy. Nieuwe opvattingen over het private en publieke domein), Open 2010-19. 43 Hoge Raad 19 juni 2009, AMI 2010-1, nr. 1, p. 12-18 (BUMA/ Chellomedia). Hugenholtz 44 Vz. Rb. Amsterdam 22 oktober 2009, AMI 2010-1, nr. 2, p. 18-24 Hugenholtz (Neij c.s./Brein). 45 College van Beroep 16 juli 2009, IER 2010-1, p. 140-146 Kabel (Pharma Nord/ Stichting KAG). 46 Rb. Breda 18 september 2009, AMI 2010-1, p. 24-29 Kabel (Hermans/Stichting Vredesduif). 47 ‘Committee of Ministers: Declaration on Measures to Promote Respect McGonagle of Article 10 ECHR’, IRIS 2010-3, p. 2. 48 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: New Recommendation on Respect for Media McGonagle Freedom’, IRIS 2010-3, p. 3. 49 ‘European Commission against Racism and Intolerance: New Country McGonagle Reports on Racism’, IRIS 2010-4, p. 3. 50 ‘Committee of Ministers: Reply to PACE Recommendation on PSB Funding’, McGonagle IRIS 2010-7, p. 2. 51 ‘Committee of Ministers: Recommendation Combating Discrimination on McGonagle Grounds of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity’, IRIS 2010-8, p. 3. 52 ‘European Commission against Racism and Intolerance: Growing Emphasis on McGonagle Internet Racism in New Country Reports’, IRIS 2010-9, p. 2. 53 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Potential Role for Media in Protection of Roma’, IRIS McGonagle 2010-10, p. 5.

48 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

54 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Texts Countering Discrimination on Basis of McGonagle Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity’, IRIS 2010-10, p. 6. 55 ‘European Parliament: Resolution on Journalism and New Media – McGonagle Creating a Public Sphere in Europe’, IRIS 2010-10, p. 11. 56 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2010-1, p. 33-36. Mom 57 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2010-2, p. 76-80. Mom 58 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2010-3, p. 110-112. Mom 59 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2010-4, p. 133-136. Mom 60 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2010-5, p.180-184. Mom 61 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2010-6, p. 219-222. Mom 62 ‘Wijziging van de Auteurswet en de Wet op de naburige rechten in verband met Mom de aanpassing van het auteurscontractenrecht’, Amendementen (‘mommificaties’) op voorontwerp wetsvoorstel. 63 Hof Amsterdam 23 november 2009, Mediaforum 2010-1, p. 22-24 Nieuwenhuis (Openbaar Ministerie/X). 64 EHRM 6 april 2010, EHRC 2010-6, p. 802-815 (Jokitaipale/Finland). Nieuwenhuis 65 Rb. Utrecht 22 april 2010, Mediaforum 2010-5, p. 179-181 (Openbaar Nieuwenhuis Ministerie/X). 66 ‘European Commission: Publication on Copyright’, IRIS 2010-1/3, p. 1-2 Ramalho 67 ‘European Parliament: Written Declaration 12/2010’, IRIS 2010-9/5, p. 1. Ramalho 68 Rb. Milaan 24 februari 2010, Mediaforum 2010-7/8, p. 263-268 Van der Sloot (De Leon & Vivi Down/Google). 69 Benelux-Gerechtshof 1 maart 1975, zaak A/74/1, in: Liber Amicorum Verkade Ludovic De Gryse, Brussel: Larcier 2010, p. 331-341 (Claeryn/Klarein). 70 Verslag VMC Studiemiddag behavioural targeting, Mediaforum 2010-10, Zuiderveen p. 323-326. Borgesius

2010 Publications aimed at the general public Author 1 ‘De toekomst van het informatierecht’, Ernst & Young Magazine 2010-1, p. 41. Dommering 2 KB en digitalisering van ‘foute’ kranten, NRC Handelsblad 25 augustus. Dommering 3 ‘Zwijgen is zilver, wraken is goud,’ De Groene Amsterdammer 4 november. Dommering

2010 Inaugural lectures & PhD defenses Author 1 The software interface between copyright and competition law (PhD defense). Van Rooijen 2 Trademark protection and freedom of expression: An inquiry into the conflict Sakulin between trademark rights and freedom of expression under European, German and Dutch law (PhD defense).

2010 Invited lectures/keynotes/presentations/workshops Author 1 ‘Het auteursrecht binnenstebuiten’, Schmidt Symposium, Leiden, 27 maart. Alberdingk Thijm 2 ‘Wetsvoorstel Geschillenbeslechting collectieve beheersorganisaties auteurs- en Alberdingk Thijm naburige rechten’, Studiedag Entertainment & Recht, Amsterdam, 8 april. 3 ‘Juridische aansprakelijkheid van hostingproviders’, SIDN Relatieda, Alberdingk Thijm Utrecht, 20 mei.

49 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

4 ‘Waarom Nederlanders niets van het thuiskopiestelsel begrijpen’, Alberdingk Thijm studiedag ALAI/BVA, Brussel, 28 mei. 5 ‘E-books: waarheen, waarvoor?’, netwerkbijeenkomst AIN&HIN, Alberdingk Thijm Amsterdam, 3 juni. 6 Keynote presentatie op SURF Onderwijsdagen, ‘Hoe sociaal is sociale media?’, Alberdingk Thijm Utrecht, 10 november. 7 Spreker op jaarvergadering Vereniging sport en recht, NOC NSF, Zeist, Alberdingk Thijm 11 november. 8 Spreker op Bibliotheektweedaagse, Maastricht, 10 december. Alberdingk Thijm 9 ‘Exclusieve rechten octrooihouder’, gastcollege Universiteit Antwerpen, Bostyn 18 maart. 10 ‘Octrooieerbare materie’, college Opleiding Nederlandse Octrooigemachtigden, Bostyn Utrecht, 17 mei. 11 ‘Patent protection for human biotech inventions’, WIPO Master Course in IP, Bostyn Turijn, 4 oktober. 12 ‘Patent protection of plants and plant material in Europe, the US and other Bostyn countries in the world’, WIPO Master in IP, Turijn, 5 oktober. 13 ‘Plant variety protection in Europe and the United States’, WIPO Master Course Bostyn in IP, Turijn, 5 oktober. 14 ‘University inventions’, WIPO Master Course in IP, Turijn, 6 oktober. Bostyn 15 ‘SPLT and global harmonization of substantive patent law rules’, WIPO Master Bostyn Course in IP, Turijn, 6 oktober. 16 ‘Convergentie in regulering’, Den Haag, 2 maart. Dommering/ Van Eijk 17 Inleiding op het symposium van de Stichting Media-Ombudsman Nederland, Dommering Den Haag, 17 maart. 18 Coreferent bij de inleiding ‘Citizenship, Democracy and Pluralism’ van Dommering Chantal Mouffe, getiteld Us and Them: over het spanningsveld tussen vrijheid en gelijkheid, Amsterdam, 1 oktober. 19 ‘Ontvlambaar erfgoed’, Over het digitaliseren en op internet zetten van Dommering omstreden bronnen (NSB kranten). De Mr. Boslezing georganiseerd door de Vrienden van de VU bibliotheek, Amsterdam, 14 oktober. 20 ‘De rechtstatelijke aspecten van polarisatie’, gastcollege, FORUM, Utrecht, Dommering/ e.a. 28 mei. 21 ‘Inleiding over portretrecht’, PAO-cursus ‘Image is everything’, Universiteit van Dommering Amsterdam, 23 september. 22 Forum over media en rechtspraak n.a.v. het proces Wilders, op het congres Dommering ‘Leve de rechtsstaat’, georganiseerd door Forum en Felix Meritis, Amsterdam, 19 november. 23 ‘Politieke processen’, gastcollege voor staf en studenten Faculteit der Dommering Rechtsgeleerdheid, Amsterdam, 10 december. 24 ‘Do we need a European copyright title in a Digital Europe?’, Annual Van Eechoud Conference of the Association of European Radios (AER), Brussels, 11 februari (keynote). 25 ‘Some thoughts on a Community Copyright’, British Copyright Council/Blaca Van Eechoud seminar European Copyright Law: Towards a Single European Copyright Act?, London, 9 maart. 26 ‘Contributory liability in the Netherlands’, CIPIL Conference 2010 Widening Van Eechoud the Net: Contributory Liability for Facilitating, Authorising and Inducing Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights, University of Cambridge, 13 maart.

50 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

27 ‘Multidisciplinary research into Authorship & Orginality’, HERA-OOR focus Van Eechoud workshop, Emmanuel College, Cambridge, 30 oktober. 28 ‘Adapting collective rights’ management’s rules to the new online environment?’, Van Eechoud Annual Conference Association of European Radios (AER), Brussels, 11 februari (panellist). 29 ‘Nummerbeleid in 2020: De rol van de overheid en het toezicht’, Nummerdag Van Eijk 2010, Leiden, 11 februari. 30 ‘Convergentie in regulering’, Den Haag, 2 maart. Van Eijk/ Dommering 31 ‘Schaarse publieke rechten’, ‘expert meeting, Amsterdam, 25 maart. Van Eijk/ Hins 32 ‘Legal, Economic and Cultural Aspects of File Sharing’, 25th Communications Van Eijk/ e.a. Policy Research Conference (EUROCPR), Brussel, 28 maart. 33 ‘Filesharing’, Europe and the Global Information Society Revisited: Developing a Van Eijk Network of Scholars and Agenda for Social Science Research on Cyber Security, Budapest, 6-8 juni. 34 ‘Dilemmas in Law: how to deal with Peer to Peer’, IEEE P2P 2010 Conference, Van Eijk Delft, 27 augustus (keynote). 35 ‘Regulating Duties of Care on the Internet’, 21th European Regional ITS Van Eijk Conference, Copenhagen, 14 september. 36 ‘Network neutrality: a Pandora’s box’, SCL 5th Annual Policy Forum, The Future Van Eijk of “Open”, London, 20 september (keynote). 37 ‘EU developments: Internet and E-Commerce’, Naspers Global Legal Van Eijk Conference, Praag, 15 oktober. 38 ‘The Dutch Perspective: Towards a Competitive Telco-Landscape’, FDP- Van Eijk Kommission für Internet und Medien, Amsterdam, 5 november. 39 ‘Content, Piracy and Copyright in the Digital Age’, SMIT debate, Brussel, Van Eijk 10 november (keynote). 40 ‘Duties of Care for Internet Service Providers’, Ecole Polytechnique-CNRS, Van Eijk Paris, 30 november. 41 ‘Duties of Care for Internet Service Providers’, Faculty seminar, Amsterdam, Van Eijk 8 december. 42 ‘Privacy, ondernemingen en het telecommunicatierecht’, PAO college ‘Privacy Van Eijk en onderneming’, Amsterdam, 21 april. 43 ‘Telecommunications Law’, gastcollege EU Business Law, Universiteit van Van Eijk Amsterdam, 29 april. 44 ‘Experiences with the implementation of the EC Directive AVMS in Europe, Van Eijk NICAM, Den Haag, 20 mei (moderator). 45 Workshop ‘Network Neutrality’, BEREC, Amsterdam, 29 september Van Eijk (moderator). 46 Roundtable workshop ‘Media diversity from the user perspective’, Van Eijk Amsterdam, 3 december (dagvoorzitter). 47 ‘Securing Rights For The Production Of Open Access Books’, OAPEN/ENCES Guibault workshop ‘Copyright and Open Access Book Publishing’, University of Amsterdam, 15 februari. 48 ‘Creative Commons and Scientific Publishing’, International Publishers Guibault Association Copyright Conference, Abu Dhabi, 28 februari - 1 maart. 49 ‘Taking Stock: What Did Member States Pick from the List of Art. 5 of Guibault the InfoSoc Directive?’, conference ‘Commons, Users, Service Providers - International Conference’, Leibnitz University, Hannover, 17-18 maart. 50 ‘La place de l’auteur dans l’environnement numérique’, Authors’ Rights in the Guibault Digital World, 5th European Creators’ Conference European Writer’s Council, Brussels, 15 april.

51 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

51 ‘Legal Framework’, Conference ‘New forms of collaborative production and Guibault innovation’, Georg-August Universität Göttingen, 7-8 mei. 52 ‘Putting cross-border licensing of works in context: The Europeana project’, Guibault Access to information: future knowledge organisations, Stockholm, 3-4 juni. 53 ‘Challenges to the use of Creative Commons Licences’, Society of Computer Guibault Law, Herbert Smith Lectures, London, 20 september. 54 ‘The Copyright Regime as the Backbone of Open Access’, Berlin8 Open Access Guibault Conference, National Science Library, Beijing, 25-27 oktober. 55 ‘Communia and the Future of the Public Domain in Europe’, Economies Guibault of the Commons, Amsterdam, 12 november. 56 ‘Is the Nordic Extended Collective Licensing System a Workable Solution Guibault for European Mass-Digitisation Projects?’, conference ‘Ny upphovsrätt – med fokus på avtalslicenser, sanktioner och praxis”, Swedish Copyright Society, Stockholm, 15 november. 57 ‘Limitations on Copyright’, college Summer Course on International Guibault Copyright Law, Amsterdam, 5 juli. 58 ‘Open Content Licensing’, college Summer Course on International Copyright Guibault Law, Amsterdam, 7 juli. 59 ‘Inleiding tot het auteursrecht’, gastcollege INHolland, Alkmaar, 7 september. Guibault 60 ‘Auteursrechtelijke beperkingen en het gebruik van beelden’, PAO-cursus Guibault ‘Image is everything’, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 23 september. 61 ‘Standardizing Consumer Information’, Leuven Consumer Day, Helberger Universiteit van Leuven, 2 maart. 62 ‘Taking the Active User Seriously – Policy Implications from the Helberger “Professionalisation” of UCC’, EuroCPR congres, Brussels, 30 maart. 63 ‘Little Brother is Tagging you’, voordracht ITS conference, Kopenhagen, Helberger 14 september. 64 ‘Towards a Digital Consumer Law Agenda’, FdR Faculty Series, Amsterdam, Helberger 13 oktober. 65 ‘The Audiovisual Consumer’, voordracht congres van het Swedish Consumer Helberger Network, Stockholm, 11 november. 66 ‘Audiovisual Consumer Information’, voordracht Veni Diversity Workshop, Helberger IViR, Amsterdam, 3 december. 67 Voordracht ten behoeve van de Commissie Grondwetsherziening, IViR, Hins Amsterdam, 15 februari. 68 ‘Persvrijheid en gelijkheidsbeginsel’, Commissie Gelijke Behandeling, Utrecht, Hins 16 februari. 69 ‘Frequentiebeleid en schaarse publieke rechten’, Vrije Universiteit, Hins Amsterdam, 25 maart. 70 Expertmeeting ‘Grondrechten in het digitale tijdperk’, Commissie Hins Grondwetsherziening, Den Haag, 3 juni. 71 ‘Grondrechten en internet’, Juridisch Congres Grotius, Leiden, 12 november. Hins 72 ‘Persvrijheid en privacy’, Studium Generale Universiteit Leiden, 4 februari. Hins 73 ‘Actualiteiten mediarecht’, Rotary Club Amsterdam, 29 maart. Hins 74 ‘Persvrijheidsmonitor 2009’, Den Haag, 3 mei. Hins 75 Bijdrage aan expertmeeting over toezicht op non lineaire diensten, Hins Commissariaat voor de Media, Hilversum, 15 juni. 76 ‘Recht op eer en goede naam’, gastcollege, Leids Juridisch Genootschap Leiden, Hins 30 juni. 77 ‘De Wob op de schop’, Instituut voor Informatierecht, Amsterdam, Hins 23 december.

52 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

78 ‘Open Content and Copyright. Allocating Rights between Academic Authors, Hugenholtz Publishers and Universities’, Symposium ‘Open Content and Academic Publishing: Challenges for the Future’, Amsterdam, 9 januari. 79 ‘Digitization and Authors’ Contracts’, symposium ‘Bland ettor, nollor & kära Hugenholtz återseenden. Om litteraturarvet och digitaliseringens möjligheter (Sveriges Författarförbund)’, Stockholm, 26 januari. 80 ‘Copyright and Territoriality in the EU’, European Parliament, Working Group Hugenholtz on Copyright, Brussel, 3 maart. 81 ‘The Story of the Tape Recorder and the History of Copyright’, Symposium Hugenholtz ‘Copyright and the Challenge of the New’, University of Queensland, Noosa (Queensland), 22-23 maart. 82 ‘Google Books and the Future of European Copyright Law’, ‘ACIPA Copyright’ Hugenholtz Seminar, Brisbane, 25 maart. 83 ‘Audiovisual Archives across Borders. Dealing With Territorially Restricted Hugenholtz Copyrights’, IViR/European Audiovisual Observatory Expert Workshop, Amsterdam, 24 april. 84 ‘Limitations in Trademark Law? Lessons from Copyright Law’, symposium Hugenholtz ‘Trademark Protection and Free Speech’, Institute for Information Law, Amsterdam, 27 april. 85 ‘Google Books and Copyright’, symposium ‘De Google Books Revolutie: Hugenholtz gevolgen voor cultuur, wetenschap en auteursrecht in Europa’, SPUI25, Amsterdam, 12 mei. 86 ‘Copyright Law and Artistic Freedom’, seminar ‘Who owns the art work?’, Hugenholtz Van Abbe Museum, Eindhoven, 14 mei. 87 ‘Juridische reality-check’, Het Grote Downloaddebat, De Balie, Amsterdam, Hugenholtz 27 mei. 88 ‘Exploitatie van media-archieven’, Houthoff Buruma Mediaseminar, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 1 juni. 89 ‘ACTA in Europe’, Conference ‘ACTA and the Public Domain’, American Hugenholtz University, Washington DC, 17 juni. 90 ‘Copyright and the Digital Environment: three main challenges’, Conference Hugenholtz ‘Books, music and film in a digital world - who pays the bill?’, Stockholm, 23 augustus. 91 ‘The European Commission’s term extension proposal: fair concern or fruit Hugenholtz of industry lobbying?’, ALAI Study Days 2010, Vienna, 10 september. 92 ‘Actuele ontwikkelingen in het Europese en internationale auteursrecht’, Hugenholtz Nationaal Auteursrechtcongres, Amsterdam, 17 oktober. 93 ‘Een wettelijke regeling van het auteurscontractenrecht: gaat het eindelijk Hugenholtz gebeuren?’, congres ‘Mediaproof’, Utrecht, 15 december. 94 ‘De ideale auteursrechtelijke regeling voor het Internet’, Brinkhof/XS4ALL Hugenholtz Symposium, Amsterdam 16 december. 95 ‘Copyright Piracy on the Internet: Litigate, Legalize,License or Laissez-Faire?’, Hugenholtz gastcollege CEIPI/Université de Strasbourg, 22 februari. 96 ‘Google Books and the Future of European Copyright Law’, gastcollege Karels Hugenholtz Universiteit Praag, 29 april. 97 ‘That Was The News ©’, lezing InfoMedia Institute, University of Bergen (UiB), Hugenholtz 16 juni. 98 Cursusleiding en diverse lesonderdelen, IViR Summer Course on Hugenholtz International Copyright Law, 5-9 juli. 99 ‘International Framework, college Summer Course on International Hugenholtz Copyright Law, Amsterdam, 4 juli.

53 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

100 ‘Database Protection’, Summer Course on International Copyright Law, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 6 juli. 101 ‘Massadigitalisering van beeld en geluid. Auteursrechtelijke problemen’, PAO- Hugenholtz cursus ‘Image is everything’, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 23 september. 102 ‘Nieuw auteurscontractenrecht’, Spreektafel Instituut voor Informatierecht, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 23 september. 103 ‘Actuele Ontwikkelingen in het Internationale Auteursrecht’, Hugenholtz PAO Actualiteiten Auteursrecht 2010, Leiden, 22 november. 104 ‘Wbp, Privacy & opsporing, Privacy & publicaties, Privacy & herstructurering’, Kabel inleiding op de PAO-cursus Privacy en de onderneming, Amsterdam, 21 april. 105 ‘Systeem van de Wbp’, inleiding op het congres ‘Privacy verzekerd van het Kabel Verbond van Verzekeraars’, Zeist, 2 juni. 106 ‘Reclameverboden in theorie, in praktijk en ingekaderd’, voorjaarsbijeenkomst Kabel Vereniging voor Reclamerecht Amsterdam, 12 april (voorzitter). 107 ‘Auteursrecht en beeldende kunst’, gastcollege Kunst en Recht, Amsterdam, Kabel 12 mei. 108 ‘Behavioral targeting’, gezamenlijke studiemiddag van de Vereniging voor Kabel Media- en Communicatierecht en de Vereniging voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam, 25 juni (voorzitter). 109 ‘Vergelijkende reclame’, bijeenkomst ‘Verboden vruchten van de IAA’, Kabel Amsterdam, 28 oktober. 110 Conferentie Privacy en gegevensbescherming, Institute for International Kabel Research, Maarssen, 17 november (voorzitter). 111 ‘Media freedom and the realisation of the right to freedom of expression’, McGonagle expert conference ‘The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives, Amsterdam, 23 april. 112 ‘Religion and hate speech – treacherous doctrinal terrain?’, Cardozo School McGonagle of Law & The Center for Media and Communication Studies, New York, 13 mei (panelist). 113 ‘Minorities and the media: participatory paradigms’, Minority Research McGonagle Network, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 29 oktober. 114 ‘The Regulation of Minority Language Media as a Vehicle for Language McGonagle Maintenance’, Living Languages in Bilingual Media Environments, University of Helsinki, Finland, 10 december. 115 ‘Freedom of expression and the media’, gastcollege International & McGonagle European Human Rights Law – Capita Selecta, Amsterdam, 15 februari. 116 ‘Joint WG2 and WG6 thematic seminars on fundamental rights and privacy McGonagle aspects of public sector information re-use’, LAPSI (Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information, Interdisciplinary Centre for Law and ICT, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 7-8 oktober (rapporteur). 117 ‘Problems of multimedia works’, Postgraduation Course in Intellectual Ramalho Property, Lisbon Law School, 2 juni. 118 ‘Intellectual property in the digital economy’; Creative expression – benefiting Ramalho from your copyright and using the copyright works of others’; ‘Looking good - The role of designs in branding’, Training of Trainers on Effective Intellectual Property Asset Management, World Intellectual Property Organization/Bin Rashid Establishment for SME Development, Dubai, 18-22 december. 119 ‘Towards a virtual legal paradigm’, op ITS congres, Copenhagen, Van der Sloot 14 september. 120 ‘Unlautere Geschäftspraktiken in den Niederlanden’, seminar ‘Lauterkeitsrecht’, Verkade Deutsche Richterakademie, Wustrau, 21 september.

54 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2010 Editorships & peer reviewer/review activities Author 1 Co-editor deel 17, 18 en 19 Information Technology & Law Series. Alberdingk Thijm 2 Co-editor en mede-oprichter Journal of International Biotechnology Law. Bostyn 3 Redactielid Auteurs- en Mediarecht (A & M). Dommering 4 Redactielid AMI. Van Eechoud 5 Medewerker Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Van Eechoud 6 Medewerker losbladige uitgave Intellectuele Eigendom, artikelsgewijs. Van Eechoud 7 Referent 1st PhD Seminar of the International Telecommunications Society, Van Eijk Copenhagen, 12-13 september. 8 Redactielid Computerrecht. Van Eijk 9 Medewerker Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht. Van Eijk 10 Referee 21th European Regional ITS conference, Copenhagen Van Eijk 14-16 september. 11 Referee Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek – Vlaanderen. Van Eijk 12 Co-hoofdredacteur Kluwer European IP Cases. Guibault 13 Redactielid AMI. Guibault 14 Redactielid Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology Guibault and e-Commerce Law (JIPITEC). 15 Redactielid Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle. Guibault 16 Redactielid www.juriscom.fr. Guibault 17 Correspondent Computer Law Review International (Duitsland). Guibault 18 Editor en national reporter – Common Core of European Private Law, Guibault University of Torino (Boundaries of Information Property). 19 Expert reviewer KU Leuven. Helberger 20 Redactielid Mediaforum. Hins 21 Redactielid AMI. Hugenholtz 22 General Editor Information Law Series (Kluwer Law International). Hugenholtz 23 Lid Editorial Board Journal of World Intellectual Property. Hugenholtz 24 Redactielid AMI. Kabel 25 Hoofdredacteur van reclameboek.nl. Kabel 26 Redactielid IRIS. McGonagle 27 Redacteur (en plaatsvervangend eindredacteur) AMI. Mom 28 Medewerker aan losbladige uitgave Intellectuele eigendom, artikelsgewijs Mom commentaar (voor de onderdelen Auteurswet en Wet op de naburige rechten). 29 Redactielid Mediaforum. Nieuwenhuis 30 Redactielid Revista Brasileira de Direito da Comunicação Social e Ramalho Liberdade de Expressão. 31 Redactielid Diritto Mercato Tecnologia. Ramalho

2010 Memberships Author 1 Lid Expertencommittee Europese Commissie en rapporteur ter evaluatie Bostyn van richtlijn 98/44/EG betreffende de wettelijke bescherming van biotechnologische uitvindingen. 2 Lid van AIPPI Nederland en België. Bostyn 3 Lid van LES Benelux. Bostyn 4 Lid Commissie Auteursrecht. Dommering

55 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

5 Raad van Advies CBP. Dommering 6 Member, Working Group on Open Government Data, Open Knowledge Van Eechoud Foundation, London, 2010-present. 7 Chair, Working Group 6 on Constitutional, Human Rights and Environmental Van Eechoud Perspectives, EC Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector. Information (LAPSI), NEXA Centre for Internet and Society, Politechnico di Torino, 2010-present. 8 Lid van Max Planck Gesellschaft European Group on Conflicts of Laws in Van Eechoud Intellectual Property (CLIP). 9 Lid International Advice Body Spatial Data Infrastructure and Public Sector Van Eechoud Innovation program (KU Leuven, Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 10 Member HERA Research Steering Committee ‘Humanities as a Source of Van Eechoud Creativity and Innovation’. 11 Voorzitter Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht (VMC). Van Eijk 12 Raad van toezicht Nederlandse Publieke Omroep (NPO). Van Eijk 13 Beirat Hans Bredow Institut, Hamburg, Duitsland. Van Eijk 14 Voorzitter commissie van beroep Pictoright. Van Eijk 15 Voorzitter Overleggroep Elektronische Communicatiediensten Van Eijk (Sociaal Economische Raad, SER). 16 Voorzitter Overleggroep Betaalde Informatiediensten Van Eijk (Sociaal Economische Raad, SER). 17 Beroepscommissie NL-Kabel. Van Eijk 18 Lid studiecommissieVereniging voor Reclamerecht. Van Eijk 19 Juryvoorzitter Internet Scriptieprijs. Van Eijk 20 Jurylid Big Brother Awards 2009. Van Eijk 21 Jurylid Omroepbedrijf van het jaar 2010. Van Eijk 22 Advisory Committee, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg. Van Eijk 23 Expert Raad van Europa Van Eijk 24 Facultaire adviescommissie allocatie onderwijsformaties. Van Eijk 25 Secretaris Commissie Auteursrecht. Van Gompel 26 Lid Studiecommissie voor de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht van de Van Gompel Vereniging voor Auteursrecht. 27 Lid Studiegroep Implementatie van de AVMSD van de Vereniging voor Helberger Reclamerecht. 28 Lid Wetenschapscommissie FdR. Helberger 29 Programmalid ITS. Helberger 30 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie Commissariaat voor de Media. Hins 31 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie Nederlandse Publieke Omroep. Hins 32 Lid Commissie Handhaving Mobiele diensten. Hins 33 Bestuurslid Stichting Bits of Freedom. Van Hoboken 34 Lid Commissie Auteursrecht, Ministerie van Justitie. Hugenholtz 35 Vice-voorzitter Vereniging voor Auteursrecht. Hugenholtz 36 Lid Comité Exécutif ALAI. Hugenholtz 37 Lid Advisory Committee, Center for Intellectual Property and Information Law Hugenholtz (CIPIL), Cambridge University. 38 Lid Academic Advisory Council, Bucerius Law School, Hamburg. Hugenholtz 39 Lid Adviesraad Bits of Freedom. Hugenholtz 40 Lid Adviesraad Dutch Directors Guild (DDG). Hugenholtz

56 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

41 Plv. lid Universitaire Onderzoekscommissie, Universiteit van Amsterdam. Hugenholtz 42 Bestuurslid van de Vereniging voor Reclamerecht. Kabel 43 Voorzitter van de Studiegroep Audiovisuele Commerciële Communicatie Kabel van de Vereniging voor Reclamerecht. 44 Voorzitter van de Stichting Weekbladpersgroep. Kabel 45 Plaatsvervangend voorzitter van de Reclame Code Commissie. Kabel 46 Voorzitter van het College van Advies van de Stichting Ideële Reclame SIRE. Kabel 47 Voorzitter van de Commissie van Beroep van het NICAM (Kijkwijzer). Kabel 48 Bestuurslid van het Bureau van de Ligue Internationale du Droit de la Kabel Concurrence. 49 Lid van het Wetenschappelijke Comité van de Ligue Internationale du Droit de Kabel la Concurrence. 50 Voorzitter van de Geschillencommissie van het Bureau Kredietregistratie (BKR). Kabel 51 Coördinator samenwerking met het European Audiovisual Observatory. McGonagle 52 Lid adviesraad redactiecommissie Irish Human Rights Law Review. McGonagle 53 Expertadviseur: Media Regulation in Portugal: The ERC’s Case, McGonagle onderzoeksproject, Mediascopio Research Centre, Department of Communications Science, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. 54 Expertadviseur: Bilingualism, Identity and the Media (onderzoeksproject)/ McGonagle Living Languages in Bilingual Media Environments, University of Helsinki, Finland. 55 Lid Opleidingscommissie Master rechtsgeleerdheid. Mom 56 Secretaris Stichting Fonds Victor Hugo. Mom 57 Lid Associação Portuguesa de Direito Intelectual. Ramalho 58 Lid Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Verkade

2010 PhD supervision & oppositions Author 1 Co-promotor J.C. Fischer, Eindhoven, promotie 30 september. Van Eijk 2 Lid promotiecommissie H.H. Kielman, Universiteit Leiden, promotie 14 april. Hins 3 Lid promotiecommissie R.Y.C. Ong, Universiteit Leiden, promotie 22 april. Hins 4 Promotor A. van Rooijen, promotie 5 maart. Hugenholtz 5 Lid promotiecommissie A. van Rooijen, promotie 5 maart. Dommering 6 Promotor W. Sakulin, promotie 27 april. Kabel 7 Lid promotiecommissie W. Sakulin, promotie 27 april. Guibault 8 Lid promotiecommissie A. van Rooijen, promotie 5 maart. Guibault 9 Lid promotiecommissie W. Sakulin, promotie 27 april. Hugenholtz 10 Lid promotiecommissie W. Sakulin, promotie 27 april. Dommering

57 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2011 Refereed articles Author 1 ‘Amended Directive Extends the Term of Protection for Performers Angelopoulos and Sound Recordings’, GRUR International 2011-11, p. 987-989. 2 ‘On the Regulator’s Plate: Exposure Diversity in a Changing Media K. Breemen/ Environment (Workshop Report and Highlights of an Expert Discussion)’, V. Breemen Journal of Information Policy 2011-1, p. 370-377. Helberger 3 ‘Een nieuw voorstel tot aanpassing van de Grondwet’, Computerrecht 2011-2, Dommering p. 52-55. 4 ‘The “principles governing charging” for re-use of public sector information’, Van Eechoud/ Informatica e Diritto, Fascicolo 1-2, 2011, p. 105-129. e.a. 5 ‘The exclusion of “public undertakings” from the re-use of public sector Van Eechoud/ information regime’, Informatica e Diritto, Fascicolo 1-2, 2011, p.147-152. e.a. 6 ‘The “Licensing” of public sector information’, Informatica e Diritto, Fascicolo Van Eechoud/ 1-2, 2011, p. 129-146. e.a. 7 ‘Blackberry blackout’, Mediaforum 2011-11/12, p. 321. Van Eijk 8 ‘Het richtlijnvoorstel verweesde werken: Een kritische beschouwing’, Van Gompel AMI 2011-6, p. 205-218. 9 The Regulation of Digital Content Contracts in the Optional Instrument Guibault/ of Contract Law’, European Review of Private Law 2011-6, p. 729-758. Helberger/ e.a. 10 ‘Brussels Memorandum of Understanding inzake digitalisering en online Guibault/ e.a. beschikbaarstelling van out-of-commerce boeken en tijdschriften’, AMI 2011-6, p. 221-229. 11 ‘The Netherlands: Darfurnica, Miffy and the right to parody!’, Guibault JIPITEC 2011-2 p. 236-238. 12 ‘Caution! You are now exercising editorial control! – Exploring initiatives Helberger to raise the quality of User Created News, and their legal side-effects’, Journalistica - Tidsskrift for forskning i journalistik 2011-1, p. 65-92. 13 ‘Standardizing consumer’s expectations in digital content’, Info 2011-13, Helberger p. 69-79. 14 ‘The beginnings of audiovisual consumer law – conceptual growing pains Helberger when integrating the consumer of audiovisual services into media and consumer law’, Europarärrslig Tijdskrift 2011-3, p. 520-541. 15 ‘Diversity Label: Exploring the potential and limits of a transparency approach Helberger to media diversghity’, Journal of Information Policy 2011-1, p. 337-369. 16 ‘Kroniek van het Nederlandse mediarecht 2006-2011’, Auteurs & Media Hins/ e.a. 2011-3, p. 287-305. 17 ‘De onduidelijke verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en Janssen/ discriminatie: Een analyse van de groepsbelediging en het haatzaaien’, Nieuwenhuis Mediaforum 2011-4, p. 94-104. 18 ‘Creative Commons licences and design: are the two compatible?’, Jasserand JIPITEC 2011-2, p. 131-142. 19 ‘Actieve openbaarmaking, bescherming van het privéleven en Kabel gegevens-bescherming, Privacy & Informatie 2011-1, p. 28-33. 20 ‘Feature case-note - Racist expression: a stress-test for freedom of political McGonagle debate’, Irish Human Rights Law Review 2011-2, 16 pp. 21 ‘Achtergrond en huidige betekenis van het verbod van voorafgaand verlof’, Nieuwenhuis Nederland Tijdschrift voor Mensenrechten 2011-36, p. 24-44. 22 ‘Makers over speerpunten. Opvattingen van makers en uitvoerend kunstenaars Poort/ e.a. over de speerpuntenbrief Auteursrecht 20©20’, AMI 2011-5, p.164-170. 23 ‘Portugal – what will the future of private copying levies be?’, GRUR Ramalho International 2011-11, p. 992.

58 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

24 ‘The European Union and ACTA - Or Making Omelettes without Eggs (Again)’, Ramalho Opinion, IIC 2011-1, p. 97-101. 25 Análise Económica da Proteção das Medidas Tecnológicas no Direito de Ramalho Autor: Uma Visão Portuguesa (The Law and Economics of Protecting Technological Measures in Copyright: a Portuguese Viewpoint), Direito da Comunicação Social e Liberdade de Expressão 2011-3, p. 107-133. 26 ‘De verantwoordelijkheid voorbij: de ISP op de stoel van de rechter’, Van der Sloot Tijdschrift voor Internetrecht 2011-5, p. 136-140. 27 ‘Public Sector Information & Data Protection: A plea for personal privacy Van der Sloot settings for the re-use of PSI’, Informatica e Diritto, Fascicolo 2011- 1/2, p. 219-236. 28 ‘De wegen van Google zijn ondoorgrondelijk: over Street View en dataprotectie’, Van der Sloot Privacy & Informatie 2011-4, p. 176-190. 29 ‘Three strikes you’re out. De bescherming van auteursrecht op het internet’, Van der Sloot AMI 2011-3, p. 84-94. 30 ‘Het plaatsen van cookies ten behoeve van behavioural targeting vanuit privacy- Van der Sloot perspectief’, Privacy & Informatie 2011-2, p. 62-70. 31 ‘Virtual Identity and Virtual Privacy: towards a Concept of Regulation by Anal- Van der Sloot o g y ’, eGov Präsenz 2011-1, p. 41-43. 32 Boekbespreking van W. Sakulin, ‘Trademark Protection and Freedom of Verkade Expression, An Inquiry into the Conflict between Trademark Rights and Freedom of Expression under European Law’ (diss. UvA 2010), Berichten Industriële Eigendom 2011-10, p. 317-318. 33 ‘De meldplicht voor datalekken in de Telecommunicatiewet’, Computerrecht Zuiderveen 2011-4, p. 209-218. Borgesius 34 ‘De nieuwe cookieregels: alwetende bedrijven en onwetende Zuiderveen internetgebruikers?’, Privacy & Informatie 2011-1, p. 2-11. Borgesius

2011 Non-refereed articles Author 1 EHRM 14 september 2010, Grand Chamber, appl. 38224/03, Nederlandse Dommering Jurisprudentie 2011-23/24, nr. 230, p. 2359-2361 (Sanoma/Nederland). 2 EHRM 9 april 2009, appl. 28070/06, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-33, Dommering nr. 331, p. 3335 (A/Noorwegen). 3 EHRM 16 april 2009, appl.,34438/04, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-33, Dommering nr. 332, p. 3343-3345 (England en Hanseid/Noorwegen). 4 EHRM 3 februari 2009, appl. 31276/05, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie Dommering 2011-34/35, nr. 345, p. 3497-3499 (Women on Waves/Portugal). 5 EHRM 27 juli 2010, appl. 4149/04, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-34/35, Dommering nr. 346, p. 3503-3506 (Akzu/Turkije). 6 EHRM 6 oktober 2009, appl. 27209/03, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie Dommering 2011-36/37, nr. 361, p. 3675 (Kulí en Rózycki/Polen). 7 HR 8 april 2011, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-42, nr. 449, Dommering p. 4563-4565 (Pretium/Tros). 8 HR 17 juni 2011, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-42, nr. 450, Dommering p. 4577-4579 (Arubaanse parlement). 9 HR 14 juni 2011, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-46, nr. 504, Dommering p. 5181-5182 (Maurice de Hond). 10 EHRM 5 oktober 2010, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-51, nr. 522, Dommering p. 5710-5712 (de zaak Köpke). 11 HR 9 september 2011, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-52, nr. 595, p. 6057-6059. Dommering

59 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

12 ‘Onafhankelijke autoriteit vraagt nieuwe inkadering’, NJB 2011- 44/45, p. 2987. Van Eijk 13 ‘Net Neutrality and Audiovisual Services’, IRIS Plus ‘Why Discuss Network Van Eijk Neutrality?’, 2011-5, p. 7-19. 14 ‘De auteursrechtelijke groeipijnen van Google’, Ars Aequi 2011-2, p. 91-97. Hugenholtz 15 Hof van Justitie EU 16 juli 2009, C-5/08, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-29/30, Hugenholtz nr. 288, (Infopaq); en Hof van Justitie EU 22 december 2010, C-393/09 Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-29/30, nr. 289, (BSA), p. 2890-2893. 16 Hof van Justitie EU 21 oktober 2010, zaak C-467/08, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie Hugenholtz 2011-47, nr. 509, (Padawan SL/SGAE); en Hof van Justitie EU 16 juni 2011, zaak C-462/09, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2011-47, nr. 510, (Stichting de Thuiskopie tegen Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH e.a.), p. 5217-5219. 17 ‘Media Literacy: No Longer the Shrinking Violet of European Audiovisual Media McGonagle Regulation?’, in: S. Nikoltchev (ed.), Media Literacy, IRIS plus 2011-3, p. 7-27. 18 ‘De koning is dood, lang leve Henk en Ingrid!’, NJB 2011-35, p. 2368-2369. Van der Sloot 19 ‘Je geld of je gegevens. De keuze tussen privacybescherming en gratis Van der Sloot internetdiensten’, NJB 2011-23, p. 1493-1496. 20 ‘WikiLeaks: te actief voor een webhoster, te passief voor een journalistiek Van der Sloot medium’, NJB 2011-12, p. 734-739.

2011 Books (including reports) Author 1 Open Content Licensing: From Theory to Practice, Amsterdam University Press Angelopoulos/ 2011, 296 pp. Guibault 2 Cross-border extended collective licensing: a solution to online dissemination Axhamn/ of Europe’s cultural heritage?, Onderzoek in opdracht van EuropeanaConnect, Guibault Instituut voor Informatierecht, Amsterdam, augustus 2011, 81 pp. 3 Report of the Netherlands for ALAI 2011 Study Days (Dublin), 16 pp. Van Eechoud/ Van Gompel/ Guibault/ Van der Sloot/ Hugenholtz 4 A bite too big: Dilemma’s bij de implementatie fan de Cookiewet in Nederland, Van Eijk/ TNO/IViR, in opdracht van OPTA, februari 2011, 85 pp. Helberger/ Van der Sloot/ e.a. 5 Digitaal gebonden, onderzoek naar de functionaliteit van een vaste prijs voor het Van Eijk/ Poort/ e-boek, SEO Economisch Onderzoek/IViR, in opdracht van het ministerie van Van der Sloot/ OCW, oktober 2011, 98 pp. e.a. 6 Audiovisuele mediadistributie, bottlenecks en beleid, TNO/IViR, onderzoek Van Eijk/ Van der in opdracht van het ministerie van OCW, december 2011, 157 pp. Sloot/ e.a. 7 Mediadiensten op aanvraag en audiovisuele commerciële communicatie, Van Eijk/ e.a. Studiegroep Audiovisuele Commerciële Communicatie van de Vereniging voor Reclamerecht, 48 pp. 8 Valuing Commercial Radio Licences, SEO discussion paper 63, 29 pp. Van Eijk/ Poort 9 Formalities in copyright law: An analysis of their history, rationales and Van Gompel possible future, Information law series 23, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2011, 346 pp. 10 Analysis of the applicable legal frameworks and suggestions for the contours of Guibault/ a model system of consumer protection in relation to digital content contracts, Helberger/ rapport voor de Europese Commissie, GD Sanco, juni 2011, 320 pp. Van der Sloot/e.a. 11 Report of the Netherlands, report for the Conference of the International Guibault/ e.a. Academy of Comparative Law, Washington D.C., 46 pp. 12 Fair use in Europe. In search of flexibilities, Amsterdam, november 2011, 30 pp. Hugenholtz/ e.a.

60 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

13 Digitalisering van audiovisueel materiaal door erfgoedinstellingen: Modellen Hugenholtz/ voor licenties en vergoedingen, onderzoek in opdracht van Beelden voor de Poort/ e.a. Toekomst/Nederland Kennisland, april 2011, 68 pp. 14 To what extent should on-line intermediaries (such as ISPs and operators Kabel/ of online market places) be responsible for the control or prohibition of unfair Van der Sloot/ competitive practices (in particular sales of products contrary to the law) e.a. carried out on their systems?, Dutch Report for the LIDC Congress in Oxford, 22-24 September, 41 pp. 15 Mediadiensten op aanvraag en audiovisuele commerciële communicatie, Kabel eerste rapport van de Studiegroep Audiovisuele Commerciële Communicatie van de Vereniging voor Reclamerecht. 16 ‘Minority Rights, Freedom of Expression and of the Media: Dynamics and McGonagle Dilemmas’, School of Human Rights Research Series, Vol. 44, Antwerpen, etc.: Intersentia 2011-oktober, 668 pp. 17 Over de grens van de vrijheid van meningsuiting, 3e druk, Ars Aequi Libri: Nieuwenhuis Nijmegen 2011, 400 pp. (geheel herziene druk). 18 Uitingsdelicten, 3e druk, Deventer: Kluwer 2011, 437 pp. (geheel herziene druk). Nieuwenhuis/e.a. 19 Sectorstudie vastgoedfinanciering, SEO-rapport 2011-43. Poort/ e.a. 20 Contractvervoer op de rit. Consequenties van marktwerking in het Poort/ e.a. contractvervoer, SEO-rapport 2011-39, 52 pp. .De schat van de stad. Welvaartseffecten van de Nederlandse musea, Poort/ e.a 21 Atlas voor Gemeenten, Utrecht. 22 Kassa of kaalslag. De maatschappelijke gevolgen van bezuinigingen op kunst Poort/ e.a. en cultuur. Deel 1: de podiumkunsten, Atlas voor Gemeenten, Utrecht. 23 De waarde van cultuur in cijfers, Atlas voor Gemeenten, Utrecht. Poort/ e.a. 24 Geen lid maar wel betrokken, SEO-rapport 2011-35. (Vertrouwelijk). Poort/ e.a. 25 Cultuur naar vermogen. Aard, gebruik en toepasbaarheid van generiek Poort/ e.a. instrumentarium voor ondersteuning van de Nederlandse cultuur, SEO-rapport 2011-32, 96 pp. 26 Grip op de grond. Marktverkenning luchtvrachtgrondafhandeling Schiphol, Poort/ e.a. SEO-rapport 2011-30. (Vertrouwelijk). 27 Kopersmacht bij afname gespreksopbouw naar 0800-nummers, SEO-rapport Poort/ e.a. 2011-18. 28 Wat er speelt. De positie van makers en uitvoerend kunstenaars in de digitale Poort/ e.a. omgeving, SEO-rapport 2011-17, 190 pp. 29 Addendum waarde commerciële radiovergunningen, SEO-rapport 2011-09, Poort/ e.a. 44 pp. 30 Ongeoorloofde mededinging, marktmacht en marktomstandigheden (Oratie), Verkade Amsterdam: DeLex 2011, 29 pp. 31 Misleidende en vergelijkende reclame (Monografieën BW, deel 49b), Deventer: Verkade Kluwer 2011, 128 pp.

2011 Book chapters Author 1 ‘Creative Commons and Related Rights in Sound Recordings: Are the Two Angelopoulos Systems Compatible?’, in: L. Guibault en C.J. Angelopoulos (eds.) Open Content Licensing: From Theory to Practice, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2011, p. 243-295. 2 ‘Moral rights in the Nordic countries’, in: Moral Rights, Davies en Garnett (eds.) Axhamn London: Thomson/Sweet & Maxwell 2011. 3 ‘Copyright Law in Sweden’, in: Copyright Throughout the World (looseleaf Axhamn publication), S. von Lewinski (ed.) Eagan, Minn.: Thomson/West 2011.

61 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

4 ‘A decade after the birth of the biotech directive: Was it worth the trouble?’, Bostyn in: G. Ghidini, E Arezzo (eds) Biotechnology and Software Patent Law: A Comparative Review on New Developments, Cheltenham Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing 2011, p. 221-266. 5 ‘Friends or Foes? Creative Commons, Freedom of Information Law and the EU Van Eechoud Framework for Re-Use of Public Sector Information’ in: L. Guibault (ed.) Open Content Licensing: From Theory to Practice. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 2011. 6 ‘Verdeling van radiofrequenties’, in: F.J. van Ommeren, W. den Ouden en Van Eijk/ C.J. Wolswinkel eds.) Schaarse publieke rechten, Den Haag: Boom Juridische Hins Uitgevers 2011, p. 45-70. 7 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, geheel herzien hoofdstuk 14 in: E.H..Hondius en Van Eijk G.J. Rijken (red.) Handboek Consumentenrecht, 3e druk, Deventer: Paris 2011, p. 357-369. 8 ‘Ten geleide’, in: Chris Schriks, Canon van het uitgevers- en auteursrecht. Van Gompel Een route in vijftig data [1450-1950], Deventer: Kluwer 2011, p. XI-XIII. 9 ‘Owning the Right to Open Up Access to Scientific Publications’, in: L. Guibault Guibault en C.J. Angelopoulos (eds.) Open Content Licensing: From Theory to Practice, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2011, p. 137-167. 10 ‘Open Content Licensing from Theory to Practice - An Introduction’, in: L. Guibault Guibault en C.J. Angelopoulos (eds.) Open Content Licensing: From Theory to Practice, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2011, p. 7-20. 11 ‘Openbaarheid van documenten als grondrecht’, in: A.J. Nieuwenhuis, J.-H. Hins Reestman en C.M. Zoethout (eds.) Rechterlijk activisme. Opstellen aangeboden aan prof. mr. J.A. Peters, p. 109-120, Nijmegen 2011: Ars Aequi Libri. 12 ‘Een onbestemde haat’, in: A. Ellian e.a. (red.) Mag ik dit zeggen? Nieuwenhuis Beschouwingen over de vrijheid van meningsuiting, Boom Juridische Uitgevers: Den Haag 2011, p. 263- 286. 13 ‘De waarde van cultuur voor de stad’, Inleiding in: Atlas voor Gemeenten 2011. Poort/ e.a. 14 ‘Het bijstellen van een raamuitzetter, Nadere beschouwing over HR 31 mei Verkade 1991, NJ 1992, 391 na conclusie A-G Strikwerda’, in: Th.M. de Boer e.a. (red.) Strikwerda’s conclusies, Deventer: Kluwer 2011, p. 409-511.

2011 PhD theses Author 1 Formalities in Copyright Law: An Analysis of Their History, Rationales and Van Gompel Possible Future, 368 pp.

2011 Conference papers Author 1 ‘Cross-border extended collective licensing: a solution to online dissemination Axhamn/ of Europe’s cultural heritage?’, Post Conference Publication, Polish Presidency, Guibault European Commission, Competences in Culture, 18-20.07.2011, Warsaw, p. 461-463. 2 Duties of Care on the Internet, paper Telecommunications Policy Van Eijk/ and Research Conference (TPRC), Arlington, US, 36 pp. Jasserand/ e.a. 3 Online tracking: Questioning the power of informed consent, paper, ITS, Van Eijk/ 22nd European Regional ITS Conference Budapest, Hungary, Helberger/ 18-21 September, 18 pp. Van der Sloot/e.a.

62 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2011 Professional publications Author 1 ‘Council of the EU: Amended Directive Extends the Term of Protection for Angelopoulos Performers and Sound Recordings’, IRIS 2011-9, p. 6. 2 ‘European Commission: Letters of Formal Notice on the Implementation of the Angelopoulos Telecoms Package’, IRIS 2011-8, p. 7. 3 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union : VEWA v. Belgium’, IRIS 2011-8 , p. Angelopoulos 5-6. 4 ‘European Commission: Communication on a Single Market for Intellectual Angelopoulos Property Rights’, IRIS 2011-7, p. 5-6. 5 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Advocate General Cruz Villalón Angelopoulos Delivers Opinion on Scarlet v Sabam’, IRIS 2011-6, p. 3-4. 6 ‘European Commission: The Commission Finishes the Preliminary Analysis of Angelopoulos AVMS Implementation Measures’, IRIS 2011-5, p. 4-5. 7 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Advocate General Gives Opinion on Angelopoulos the Definition of Advertising’, IRIS 2011-5, p. 4. 8 ‘General Court: FIFA and UEFA v Commission’, IRIS 2011-3, p. 4. Angelopoulos 9 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Advocate General Kokott on Angelopoulos Territorial Exclusivity in the Transmission of Football Matc’, IRIS 2011-3, p. 3-4. 10 ‘European Parliament: Resolution on Public Service Broadcasting in the Digital Angelopoulos Era’, IRIS 2011-2, p. 5-6. 11 ‘European Commission: Commissioner Neelie Kroes on the Commission’s Angelopoulos Examination of the Hungarian Media Law’, IRIS 2011-2, p. 4. 12 ‘European Parliament: ACTA Resolution’, IRIS 2011-1, p. 6. Angelopoulos 13 ‘Copyright Law in Sweden’, in: Copyright Throughout the World (looseleaf Axhamn publication), S. von Lewinski (ed.) Eagan, Minn.: Thomson/West 2011. 14 ‘European Commission: Investigation into Alleged Anti-Competition Practices K. Breemen by Collective Rights Management Organisations Closed’, IRIS 2011-6, p. 5. 15 ‘Joint Statement of Three European Institutions against Racism and Related K. Breemen Intolerance’, IRIS 2011-5, p. 3. 16 ‘European Parliament: Resolution on Hungary’s Media Law’, IRIS 2011-4, p. 7-8. K. Breemen 17 ‘Europeana Sets out its Strategy for the Period 2011-2015’, IRIS 2011-4, p. 6-7. K. Breemen 18 ‘[NL]: Criminal Case against Suspected File-Sharers Declared Inadmissable’, K. Breemen IRIS 2011-3, p. 19-20. 19 ‘European Commission: Report on the Application of Directive 2004/48/EC’, K. Breemen IRIS 2011-3, p. 4-5. 20 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Preliminary Ruling in Dutch V. Breemen ‘Thuiskopie’-Case’, IRIS 2011-7, p. 4. 21 ‘European Commission: Commission Approves Danish Financing for Public V. Breemen Radio Channel FM4 and Public Service Broadcaster TV2’, IRIS 2011-6, p. 4-5. 22 ‘Dutch Media Authority Publishes Special Edition of Mediamonitor on Dutch V. Breemen Media’, IRIS 2011-5, p. 23. 23 ‘European Commission: Inquiry into Digitisation of European Cinemas Closed’, V. Breemen IRIS 2011-4, p. 6. 24 ‘European Commission of Human Rights: Opinion on Hungary’s Media V. Breemen Legislation’, IRIS 2011-4, p. 3-4. 25 ‘European Commission: Final Report of the Comité des Sages on Digitisation V. Breemen of European Cultural Heritage’, IRIS 2011-3, p. 6. 26 ‘Waar de Commissie Gelijke Behandeling al niet goed voor is’, NJB blog.nl. Dommering 27 ‘Another piece of the puzzle, or is it? CJEU on photographs as copyright works’, Van Eechoud Kluwer Copyright Blog, 7 december.

63 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

28 ‘How Television went digital in the Netherlands’, Open Society Foundation, Van Eijk/ Mapping Digital Media: reference series 2011-11, 19 pp. Van der Sloot 29 ‘File Sharing’, note geschreven op verzoek van het Europees Parlement, Van Eijk Committee on Legal Affairs, 2011, 23 pp. 30 ‘Netneutraliteit en ‘eyeballs’ in: Het glazen muiltje van, 29 visies op internet, Van Eijk technologie en maatschappij, XS4all, december 2011, p. 105-108. 31 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 118 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2011-3), p. 6621-6622. 32 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’ Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 119 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2011-6), p. 6688-6689. 33 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 120 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2011-9), p. 6749-6750. 34 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 121 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2011-12), p. 6813-6814. 35 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2011-1, p. 41-43. Van Eijk/ e.a. 36 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2011-2, p. 91-94. Van Eijk/ e.a. 37 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2011-3, p. 173-177. Van Eijk/ e.a. 38 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2011-4, p.232-235. Van Eijk/ e.a. 39 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2011-5, p. 270-273. Van Eijk/ e.a. 40 ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2011-6, p. 360-363. Van Eijk/ e.a. 41 ‘Hoe mensen keuzes maken’, BTG-magazine 2011-73, p. 16. Van Eijk 42 ‘Beter goed gejat, dan slecht verzonnen’, BTG-magazine 2011-74, p. 22. Van Eijk 43 ‘Netneutraliteit in Nederland’, BTG-magazine 2011-75, p. 18. Van Eijk 44 ‘Kritische infrastructuur kritisch bekeken?’, BTG-magazine 2011-76, 20 pp. Van Eijk 45 Hof van Justitie 18 maart 2010, C317/08-C320/08, Tijdschrift voor Consument- Van Eijk recht en handelspraktijken 2011-1, p. 24-25 (Alassini/Telecom Italia). 46 ‘About Network Neutrality 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0’, Computers & Law Magazine Van Eijk 2011-6, p. 1-4, (dit artikel is voor onderzoeksdoeleinden in het Russisch vertaald: О СЕТЕВОМ НЕЙТРАЛИТЕТЕ 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 И 4.0.) 47 ‘Opinion of the Advocate General of the ECJ in the Kampusch case (1): Van Gompel applicable exceptions and limitations’, kluwercopyrightblog.com, 3 mei. 48 ‘Opinion of the Advocate General of the ECJ in the Kampusch case (2): Van Gompel the notion of originality in photographs’, kluwercopyrightblog.com, 3 mei. 49 ‘The Commission’s Proposal for a Directive on Orphan Works’, Van Gompel kluwercopyrightblog.com, 14 juni. 50 ‘European Commission : European Commission Proposes a Directive on Van Gompel Orphan Works’, IRIS 2011-7, p. 5. 51 ‘Creative Commons Licences: What to Do with the Database Right?’, Guibault Computers and Law Magazine 2011- februari-maart, Vol 21, Iss 6. 52 ‘In Defence of a Fair Use Defence’, Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 10 maart. Guibault 53 ‘And the private copy war continues: news from the Dutch front!’, Guibault Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 4 mei. 54 ‘Dutch press exception revisited!’, Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 9 augustus. Guibault 55 ‘Washington Declaration on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest’, Guibault Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 8 september. 56 Hoofdstukken Grondrechten, 2e herziene druk. Nijmegen 2011: Ars Aequi Libri. Hins/Nieuwenhuis 57 Persvrijheidsmonitor Nederland 2010. Amsterdam 2011: Hins/ e.a. Persvrijheidsfonds en AMB. 58 ‘De Wob op de schop’, Ars Aequi 2011-5, p. 334-335. Hins

64 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

59 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 118, p. 6620-6621. Hins 60 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 119, p. 6687-6688. Hins 61 Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 120, p. 6748-6749. Hins 62 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 121, p. 6812-6813. Hins 63 ABRvS. 19 januari 2011, Mediaforum 2011-4, 11, p. 121-125 Hins (Stichting Ontmoetingsruimte De Linkse Kerk/B&W van Leiden). 64 EHRM. 10 mei 2011, EHRC 2011-8, 108, p. 1276-1292 Hins (Mosley/Verenigd Koninkrijk). 65 EHRM. 5 juli 2011, EHRC 2011-9, 129, p. 1539-1553 (Wizerkaniuk/Polen). Hins 66 Annotatie bij Reclame Code Commissie 23 november 2010, IER 2011-2, Kabel p. 135-145. 67 Vzr. Rb. Zwolle-Lelystad 14 juli 2010, AMI 2011-1, p. 32-36. Kabel 68 ‘Freedom of Expression and the Media: Standard-setting by the Council McGonagle/ e.a. of Europe’, IRIS Themes 2011, vi + 76 pp. (persoonlijke bijdragen: 23 pp.) + Bijlagen, 398 pp. 69 ‘Freedom of Expression and the Media: Standard-setting by the Council McGonagle/ e.a. of Europe’, IRIS Themes 2011, v + 63pp. (persoonlijke bijdragen: 40 pp.) + Bijlagen, 222 pp. 70 ‘Jersild and beyond’, Special Kevin Boyle Commemorative Issue, Essex Human McGonagle Rights Alumni Association News 2011-november, p. 16-18. 71 ‘Kevin Boyle – An Appreciation’, School of Human Rights Research Newsletter McGonagle 2011-1, Vol. 15, p. 16-17. 72 ‘European Commission against Racism and Intolerance: Calls for Media McGonagle (Self-) Regulation in New Country Reports’, IRIS 2011, p. 4-5. 73 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Underscoring the Protection of Journalistic Sources’, McGonagle IRIS 2011-4, p. 5-6. 74 ‘Human Rights Committee: New General Comment on Freedom of Expression’, McGonagle IRIS 2011-10, p. 1. 75 ‘Committee of Ministers: Recommendation on a New Notion of Media’, McGonagle IRIS 2011-10, p. 3-4. 76 ‘Committee of Ministers: Freedom of Expression, Information, Assembly and McGonagle Association with regard to Internet Domain Names’, IRIS 2011-10, p. 5. 77 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Democratic Impact of New Communication & McGonagle Information Technologies’, IRIS/IRIS Merlin Databank 1997-5/100. 78 ‘Committee of Ministers: Access to Official Documents’, IRIS/ IRIS Merlin McGonagle Databank 2002-3:0/102. 79 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: The Digital Divide and Education’, IRIS/IRIS Merlin McGonagle Databank 2003-1/102. 80 ‘Committee of Ministers: Right of Reply in New Media Environment’, McGonagle IRIS/IRIS Merlin Databank 2005-1:0/108. 81 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Press Freedom & Journalists in Conflict Zones’, McGonagle IRIS/IRIS Merlin Databank 2005-5/102. 82 ‘Committee of Ministers: Freedom of Expression and Information in New McGonagle Environment’, IRIS/IRIS Merlin Databank 2007-9:0/104. 83 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Texts Calling for Decriminalisation of Defamation’, McGonagle IRIS/IRIS Merlin Databank 2007-10/104. 84 ‘European Parliament: Resolution on Community Media in Europe’, IRIS/IRIS McGonagle Merlin Databank 2008-9:0/104. 85 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2011-1, p. 37-40. Mom 86 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2011-2, p. 68-72. Mom 87 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2011-3, p. 108-112. Mom

65 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

88 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2011-4, p. 147-152. Mom 89 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2011-5, p. 196-204. Mom 90 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2011-6, p. 239-242. Mom 91 ‘Kunstenaars wel blij maar niet geholpen met nieuwe Poort/ e.a. auteurscontractenrecht’, Me Judice 2011-4e jaargang, 8 september. 92 ‘De waarde van cultuur voor de stad’, Atlas voor Gemeenten 2011. Poort/ e.a. 93 ‘Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, Ramalho IRIS 2011-6, p. 1-5. 94 ‘A wolf in sheep’s clothing: the new Portuguese proposal on private copying Ramalho levies’, blog post, 12 mei. 95 ‘Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright Ramalho law on the planet’ (Mark Twain)?, blog post, 9 juli. 96 ‘What is a “work”? Apparently only fine art, Portuguese Appeals Court rules’, Ramalho blog post, 19 september. 97 ‘Winds of Change or Delusional Optimism?’, blog post, 22 november. Ramalho 98 ‘Privacy in het leven van ouderen’, Geron 2011-4, p. 53-55. Van der Sloot 99 ‘Autoriteit’, Scribe et Impera 2011-2, p. 8-10. Van der Sloot 100 Misleidende en vergelijkende reclame (Monografieën BW, deel 49b), Deventer: Verkade Kluwer 2011, 128 pp.

2011 Publications aimed at the general public Author 1 ‘Met het EHRM is niets mis’, De Volkskrant 11 april. Dommering 2 ‘De brandende maatschappelijke vragen voor het informatierecht’, Dommering De Groene Amsterdammer 19 april 3 ‘Newman en de omkering der waarden’, in: Laurens Dhaenens en Hilde Dommering van Gelder (red) Kunstkritiek, Leuven: Lannoo Campus 2011, p. 279. 4 ‘Bezuinigingsplannen op cultuur van staatssecretaris Zeilstra’, Dommering/ NRC Handelsblad 21 juni. e.a. 5 ‘De Wilders vrijspraak’, De Volkskrant 24 juni. Dommering 6 ‘De vragen na het vonnis. Rechterlijke vrijheid en de grenzen van de wet’, Dommering De Groene Amsterdammer 30 juni. 7 ‘De Brandende Kwestie’, Financiële Dagblad 29 oktober. Dommering 8 ‘De Wildersuitspraak en Don Quijote’, radiouitzending NCRV ‘Casa Luna’, Dommering 30 juni. 9 Interview Elsevier 21 mei. Dommering 10 ‘Zo erg is dat ontzamelen niet’, NRC Handelsblad 22 oktober. Poort / e.a.

2011 Inaugural lectures & PhD defenses Author 1 Formalities in Copyright Law: An Analysis of Their History, Rationales Van Gompel and Possible Future (PhD defense). 2 Misleading and Comparative Advertising (inaugural lecture), Verkade Amsterdam, 21 januari.

66 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2011 Invited lectures/keynotes/presentations/workshops Author 1 ‘The unbearable complications of agro food products’, Food, Innovating the Law Bostyn Conference, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, 14-15 oktober. 2 Inleiding over de Politieke cartoon bij de Vereniging Kunst, Cultuur & Recht, Dommering Stadsschouwburg Amsterdam, 8 april. 3 Inleiding over Kunst en vrijheid van meningsuiting in het bijzonder bij Dommering de politieke prent, de Balie Amsterdam, 8 juni. 4 ‘Inleiding over het privacyrecht’, gastcollege Engelstalige Honoursmaster, Dommering Universiteit van Amsterdam, 30 maart. 5 ‘‘Of Interfaces, snippets and sequences. Is the European Court of Justice Van Eechoud fragmenting or integrating the notion of copyright works?’. CIPIL Intellectual Property Seminar Series, University of Cambridge (UK), 24 november. 6 ‘Pivotal concepts long overlooked? The work and authorship in EU copyright Van Eechoud law’. Oxford Intellectual Property Invited Speaker Seminar Series. St Peters College, Oxford (UK), 27 oktober. 7 ‘Contemporary conceptual art’, (Theme: The Edge of Protection), ALAI 2011 Van Eechoud Study Days ‘Copyright - Boundaries and Interfaces’, Dublin, 30 juni. 8 ‘Of Authorship and Originality’, Beyond Copyright Workshop, Intellectual Van Eechoud Property Institute Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University London, 28 april. 9 ‘Copyright and the Lex Protectionis’, CIPIL Conference: Intellectual Property Van Eechoud and Private International Law, University of Cambridge, 12 maart. 10 ‘WG 6 Policy recommendations on fundamental rights - preliminary Van Eechoud observations’, LAPSI Conference, Institute for Information, Telecommunication and Media Law, Muenster, 28 januari. 11 Session chair: ‘Perceptions of authorship & creative collaboration in arts’, HERA Van Eechoud OOR Workshop Trends in Multiple Authorship: Empirical Studies and Legal Implications, Amsterdam 16 december. 12 Session chair: ‘The impact of the CLIP Principles on courts and arbitration’, Van Eechoud Conference by European Max Planck Research Group on Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property, Berlin 5 november. 13 Session chair : ‘Framing Recommendations in the Light of EU Law’, LAPSI Van Eechoud Conference, Warsaw, 19 oktober. 14 Session chair: ‘PSI Re-use: a Strategy for Enhancing Democracy’, LAPSI Van Eechoud Conference, Bocconi University, Milaan, 6 mei. 15 ‘Consent in het informatierecht’, Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research Van Eijk (APPR), Amsterdam, 7 februari. 16 ‘Mediadiensten op aanvraag en audiovisuele commerciële communicatie’, Van Eijk Vereniging voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam, 21 maart. 17 ‘File sharing’, Working Group on Copyright, Europees Parlement, Brussel, Van Eijk 30 maart. 18 ‘File sharing’, Greens/EFA Group, European Parliament, Straatsburg, 7 juni. Van Eijk 19 ‘Grenzen aan co/zelf-regulering’, Netherlands Internet Governance Forum, Van Eijk Den Haag, 10 juni. 20 ‘Netneutrality’, (keynote), Liberty Global Technology Summit, Amsterdam, Van Eijk 14 september. 21 ‘Online profiling: Questioning the power of informed consent’, 22nd European Van Eijk/ Regional ITS Conference, Budapest, 18-21 september. e.a. 22 ‘Models and conditions for public service media in a converging environment’, Van Eijk Conferentie Broadcasting in an Age of Commercialism, Middlesex University, London, 22 september. 23 ‘Duties of Care on the Internet’, Telecommunications and Policy Conference Van Eijk (TPRC), Arlington, US, 24 september.

67 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

24 ‘De Autoriteit Consument en Markt’, Alumnikring Faculteit Van Eijk der Rechtsgeleerdheid, Amsterdam, 7 oktober. 25 ‘Netneutraliteit, waar gaat het nu echt over?’, Symposium Internetscriptieprijs, Van Eijk Amsterdam, 13 oktober. 26 Dagvoorzitter ‘The Next Ten Years in Telecoms’, MCA-conferentie, Malta, Van Eijk 28 januari. 27 ‘Search Engines and Net Neutrality’, bijdrage Postgraduate Studies in Van Eijk ICT & Media Law programme, KU Leuven, Leuven, 17 februari. 28 ‘Eindgebruikersbelangen en universele dienst’, PAO ‘Het nieuwe Van Eijk Telecommunicatierecht’, Amsterdam, 14 april. 29 Deelnemer Panel ‘NLkabel Proeverij’, Den Haag, 11 mei. Van Eijk 30 ‘Telecommunications Law’, gastcollege EU Business Law, Universiteit van Van Eijk Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 28 april. 31 Voorzitter ronde tafel bijeenkomst ‘Round table on privacy’, Van Eijk Amsterdam, 20 mei. 32 Deelnemer kennisdebat ‘Wikileaks: tussen held & hype’, Universiteitsdag UvA, Van Eijk Amsterdam, 28 mei. 33 Dagvoorzitter ‘New Audiovisual Markets Regulated? Market innovation and Van Eijk the role of regulation in the Netherlands and Europe, Ministerie van OCW/ European Audiovisual Observatory, Hilversum, 16 juni. 34 Voorzitter studiemiddag VMC ‘Civielrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid van Van Eijk internet-dienstaanbieders’, Amsterdam, 24 juni. 35 ‘Internet en veiligheid’, gastcollege Economie van Publieke Belangen, Van Eijk Rijksacademie voor Financiën en Economie, Den Haag, 13 oktober. 36 Voorzitter ronde tafel bijeenkomst ‘Privacy and the current state of the Van Eijk discussion in Europe’, Amsterdam, 22 november. 37 ‘Diginotar: (falend) toezicht?’, VIRA/Grotius vervolgopleiding Informaticarecht, Van Eijk Amsterdam, 24 november. 38 Voorzitter (en organisator) studiemiddag VMC ‘De nieuwe cookieregulering Van Eijk toegepast’, Amsterdam, 25 november. 39 ‘Providing online access to art: the current legal framework in Europe’, Law and Van Gompel access to culture in the information society: questions and legal challenges, Barcelona: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 12 mei. 40 ‘Formalities in copyright law’, Spui25 op locatie: promovendimarathon, Van Gompel Universiteitsdag, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 28 mei. 41 ‘Orphan works as a special object’, panel session on limitations & exceptions for Van Gompel special subjects and objects, Global Congress on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest, Washington, DC: American University, 25-27 augustus. 42 ‘General challenges in collective rights management’, panel session on Van Gompel incentives, remuneration, and collective management, Global Congress on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest, Washington, DC: American University, 25-27 augustus. 43 ‘The supervision of collecting societies in Europe’, PICTFOR/Consumer Focus Van Gompel event: Copyright collecting societies: does the UK need minimum standards?, Londen: House of Parliament, 8 november. 44 ‘Is Extended Collective Licensing System a Solution for Cross border Mass- Guibault digitization Projects?’, guest lecture at Centre for International and Public Law (CIPL) and the Intellectual Property, Media and Internet Research Group (IPMIRG), Brunel Law School London (UK), 26 januari. 45 (met M. Loos, N. Helberger en C. Mak), ‘Digital Content Services for Guibault Consumers’, workshop in het kader van het EC Digital Content Services for Consumers project, Amsterdam, 25 februari.

68 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

46 ‘Working with licensing frameworks’, Global Interoperability and Linked Data Guibault Workshop, organized by Institute for Information Law, the Berkman Center and the Open Knowledge Commons, Amsterdam, 16-17 mei. 47 ‘Cross-Border Dissemination of Mass-Digitized Library Collections? eBooks: A Guibault New Era of Law’, Business and Society The Haifa Center for Law & Technology (HCLT) The Sagy Center for Internet Research University of Haifa in collaboration with The National Library of Israel,18-19 mei. 48 ‘Legal aspects of Linked Open Data’, presentatie tijdens het First Digital Agenda Guibault Assembly, Europese Commissie, Brussel, 16-17 juni. 49 ‘Extended Collective Licensing for mass-digitization projects’, Polish Presidency, Guibault Europese Commissie, Competences in Culture, Warsaw, 18-20 juli. 50 ‘The Public Domain and the Development Agenda’, presentatie tijdens het Guibault Global Congress on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest, American University, Washington DC, 26-27 augustus. 51 ‘Inleiding auteursrechten’, seminar Open Educational Resources en Guibault auteursrechten, georganiseerd door Surf Academy en CIER (Universiteit Utrecht), Utrecht, 30 september. 52 ‘Legal Aspects of Open Content’, presentatie tijdens het ‘e-InfraNet Workshop- Guibault The Open Agenda’, Noordwijk aan Zee, 27-28 oktober. 53 ‘Creative Commons as a licensing option’, IFRRO Business Models Forum and Guibault International Conferentie over Copyright, Schools and Higher Education, Ljubljana (Slovenia), 26 oktober. 54 ‘Classification of digital content as goods or services’, Consumer legislation for Guibault digital products - Bringing the EU consumer acquis in line with developments in the digital environment, Conferentie georganiseerd door de Europese Commissie Brussel, 16 november. 55 Summer Course on International Copyright Law, IViR, Amsterdam, 9-13 juli Guibault (organisatie en colleges). 56 Global Interoperability and Linked Data Workshop, Amsterdam, May 16-17 Guibault (co-organisatie en presentatie). 57 (met M. Loos, L. Guibault en C. Mak), ‘Digital Content Services for Consumers’, Helberger workshop in het kader van het EC Digital Content Services for Consumers project, Amsterdam, 25 februari. 58 ‘Standardizing Digital Consumer Expectations’, EuroCPR, Gent 29 maart. Helberger 59 ‘Diversity by Design’, Fordham Digital Diversity Workshop, 4 mei. Helberger 60 ‘From “Serving the Citizen” to “Empowering” the Consumer: Implications from Helberger the Changing Relation between Viewers and Producers of Audiovisual Content for Media Pluralism Policies’, Transforming Audiences 3, 1 en 2 september. 61 ‘Findings and Strategies: Digital Content Services For Consumers’, The Helberger Future of the Consumer Acquis, BEUC (Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs), Brussel, 8 september. 62 ‘Online profiling: Questioning the power of informed consent’, 22nd European Helberger/ Regional ITS Conference, Budapest, 18-21 september. e.a. 63 ‘Trust (?) Media Labels?’, 20th Anniversary ICRI, Leuven, 15 november. Helberger 64 ‘Diversity Labels: The Potential of an Information Approach to Improve Helberger Diversity of Exposure’, MEDIADEM Conference, Edinburgh, 9 december. 65 ‘Dag van Persvrijheid’, georganiseerd door Free Press Unlimited, het Hins Genootschap van Hoofdredacteuren, de Nederlandse Dagbladpers, de Nederlandse Vereniging van Journalisten en het Persmuseum, Amsterdam, 3 mei. 66 Voordracht bij ‘Debat persvrijheid in Europa’, georganiseerd door Stichting Hins Crea, Amsterdam, 31 mei. 67 Voordracht bij presentatie boek Peter Schouten ‘Trial by media’, georganiseerd Hins door uitgeverij Kluwer, Amsterdam, 17 juni.

69 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

68 Voordracht bij ‘Studiedag onrechtmatige perspublicaties’, georganiseerd door Hins Kluwer Opleidingen, Amsterdam, 13 oktober. 69 ‘The quest for accountability for search result selection and ranking, Van Hoboken 6-7 oktober, IMA Interdisciplinary Symposium, Knowledge machines between Liberty and Control, Hainburg, Oostenrijk. 70 ‘Wikileaks’, voordracht, interfacultair symposium, Faculteit der Van Hoboken Rechtsgeleerdheid, Universiteit van Amsterdam,17 maart. 71 ‘Wikileaks’, SPUI 25, ‘WikiLeaks, het ideaal van de democratie of een gevaar Van Hoboken voor de internationale stabiliteit?’, voordracht en debatavond , Universiteit van Amsterdam, 28 april. 72 ‘The Dynamics of Harmonization of Copyright at the European Level’, EIPIN Hugenholtz Congress, Europees Parlement, Straatsburg, 24-25 februari . 73 ‘The Google Books Settlement: The Largest Licensing Deal in the World’, Hugenholtz symposium The Google Books Revolution, InfoMedia Institute, Universiteit van Bergen (UiB), 21 maart. 74 ‘The Future of EU Copyright’, Det årlige opphavsrettskurset, Sandefjord Hugenholtz (Noorwegen), 25 maart. 75 ‘Digitaal erfgoed: liever een halve collectieve licentie in de hand dan een Hugenholtz miljoen toestemmingen in de lucht’, Houthoff Buruma Mediaseminar, Amsterdam, 19 mei. 76 ‘De Auteursrechtelijke Aspecten van Zoekmachines’, Vereniging voor Hugenholtz Auteursrecht (VVA), Amsterdam, 26 mei. 77 ‘Framing the Public Interest Agenda in Copyright’, key note, Global Congress Hugenholtz on IP and the Public Interest, Washington College, American University, Washington DC, 25 augustus. 78 ‘Unification of Copyright in the EU’, Conference on The European Copyright Hugenholtz Code (Wittem project), KU Leuven, 16 september. 79 ‘De Billijke Vergoeding in het Auteurscontractenrecht’, NORMA-congres, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 3 oktober. 80 ‘Fair Use in Europe. In Search of Flexibilities in EU Copyright Law’, Swedish Hugenholtz Copyright Society, Stockholm, 26 oktober. 81 ‘In © We Trust (?)’, ICRI 20th Anniversary Conference, KU Leuven, 15 november. Hugenholtz 82 ‘Using Copyright to Promote Access to Public Sector Information’, WIPO Hugenholtz Workshop on Using Copyright to Promote access to Information and Creative Content, Genève, 16 november. 83 ‘Plagiarism: (Moral and) Legal Aspects’, KNAW/ALLEA Symposium, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 14 december. 84 ‘Legal Protection of Databases in the EU’, CEIPI/Université de Strasbourg, Hugenholtz 18 januari. 85 ‘Unification of Copyright in the EU’, Faculty seminar, University of California Hugenholtz Irvine (UCI), 9 februari . 86 ‘Copyright Aspects of Search Engines’, Karels Universiteit Praag, 24 november. Hugenholtz 87 Summer Course on International Copyright Law, IViR, Amsterdam, 9-13 juli Hugenholtz (organisatie en colleges). 88 ‘Fair Use in Europe: In Search of Flexibilities in EU Copyright Law’, Faculty Hugenholtz Seminar UvA (PhD opleiding), Amsterdam, 30 november. 89 ‘Maatwerk cursus’, Stichting Reclame Code, Amsterdam, 9 juni. Kabel 90 ‘Jurisprudentielunch reclameboek.nl: Arresten HvJEG over de periode Kabel 11/2010-6/2011’, Amsterdam, 1 september. 91 ‘Van een korreltje zout tot miljoenenboetes. De professionalisering van de Kabel beoordeling van misleidende reclame’, Stichting Reclame Code, Amsterdam, 4 november.

70 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

92 Keuzevak ‘Privacy & Gegevensbescherming’, Masteropleiding Informatierecht, Kabel Amsterdam, 2010-2011. 93 ‘Bescherming tegen exploitatie van sportprestaties door derden’, Leergang Kabel Sport, Sportorganisatie & Recht, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 17 mei. 94 Chair Question B: ‘To what extent should online intermediaries (such as Kabel ISPs and operators of online market places) be responsible for the control or prohibition of unfair competitive practices (in particular sales of products contrary to the law) carried out on their systems?’, LIDC Congress 2011, Oxford, 22-24 september. 95 Voorzitter studiemiddag ‘Drie jaar oneerlijke handelspraktijken. Een Kabel tussenstand’, Vereniging voor Reclamerecht, Den Haag, 1 november. 96 ‘The United Nations and freedom of expression and information: critical McGonagle perspectives’ (Referent: Prof. Philip Alston), [Netherlands] School of Human Rights Research, Working Group on Human Rights, International Relations and Implementation, Universiteit Maastricht, ter gelegenheid van het uitreiken van de eredoktoraat van Prof. Alston, 20 januari. 97 ‘Kopersmacht bij afname gespreksopbouw naar 0800-nummers’, OPTA, Poort Den Haag, 26 april. 98 ‘File sharing: consumers, creators, welfare and business models’. Presentation Poort at Conference ‘Future of copyright in the digital era’, European Parliament, Brussel, 1 juni. 99 ‘Cultuur naar vermogen. Aard, gebruik en toepasbaarheid van generiek Poort/ e.a. instrumentarium voor ondersteuning van de Nederlandse cultuur’, Ministerie van OC&W, Den Haag, 4 juli. 100 ‘Contractvervoer op de rit. Consequenties van marktwerking in het Poort/ e.a. contractvervoer’, Presentatie voor KNV Werkgroep Contractvervoer, Hagestein, 8 november. 101 ‘The Digital Era: The Perspective of Creators and Performers’, Paper presented Poort/ e.a. at CIInd International Conference of the Applied Econometrics Assiciation (AEA), Luxembourg, 1-2 december. 102 Panel in debatbijeenkomst over Auteurscontractenrecht, DeLex, Amsterdam, Poort 8 september. 103 ‘From Whistleblower to Noisemaker’, Lecture for the Student Association, Van der Sloot Utrecht. 104 ‘Utopie en Privacy’, lecture and discussion with the Reformed Jews, Amsterdam. Van der Sloot 105 ‘Privacy, a liberal approach’ lecture for d66 youth department, Amsterdam. Van der Sloot 106 ‘Public Sector Information & Data Protection: A plea for personal privacy Van der Sloot settings for the re-use of PSI’ lecture at The European Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information (LAPSI) conference, Milan. 107 ‘Wikileaks: Klokkentoren, klokkenluider of Quasimodo?’ lecture and Van der Sloot discussion with Ko Colijn and Arjan el Fassed during the conference by the Nederlands Juristen Comité voor de Mensenrechten (NJCM), Den Haag. 108 ‘De aansprakelijkheid van internet intermediairs’, lecture at the conference Van der Sloot of the Vereniging voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam. 109 “Wikileaks’, lecture and discussion for IBAV, Amsterdam. Van der Sloot 110 ‘Internet en Privacy’, lecture at the national day for sociology, Utrecht. Van der Sloot 111 ‘Ubi Dubium, Ibi Libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom’, lecture Van der Sloot for the student organization of Groningen, Groningen. 112 ‘The re-use of Public Sector Information in the light of the Data Protection Van der Sloot Directive’, presentation for The European Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information (LAPSI) conference, Muenster. 113 ‘Online profiling: Questioning the power of informed consent’, 22nd European Van der Sloot/ Regional ITS Conference, Budapest, 18-21 september. e.a.

71 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

114 ‘Data protection’, debate with Joris van Hoboken, Ot van Dalen and Van der Sloot Jan Holvast, Amsterdam 115 ‘Debatcafé: Privacy’ lecture and discussion with Vincent Bohre from Privacy Van der Sloot First at the Breakin Walls Festival, Amsterdam. 116 ‘An interdisciplinary approach to privacy, speech for the Platform Van der Sloot Burgerrechten, Amsterdam. 117 ‘Data retention’, debate at the infosecurity congres, Utrecht. Van der Sloot

2011 Editorships & peer reviewer/review activities Author 1 Co-editor Information Technology & Law Series. Alberdingk Thijm 2 Co-editor en mede-oprichter Journal of International Biotechnology Law. Bostyn 3 Lid van de redactieraad van Auteurs- en Mediarecht (A & M). Dommering 4 Redactielid AMI, tijdschrift voor auteurs-, media- & informatierecht. Van Eechoud 5 Medewerker Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Van Eechoud 6 Medewerker aan losbladige uitgave Intellectuele Eigendom, artikelsgewijs. Van Eechoud Redactielid Computerrecht. Van Eijk 7 Medewerker Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht. Van Eijk 8 Referee, ITS Europe conference. Van Eijk 9 Referee diverse tijdschriften. Van Eijk 10 Redactielid AMI, tijdschrift voor auteurs-, media- & informatierecht. Van Gompel 11 Co-hoofdredacteur Kluwer European IP Cases. Guibault 12 Redactielid AMI, tijdschrift voor auteurs-, media- & informatierecht. Guibault 13 Lid redactie Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Guibault e-Commerce Law (JIPITEC) (Duitsland). 14 Lid internationale redactie Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle (Canada). Guibault 15 Lid internationale redactie de online juridische databank www.juriscom.fr. Guibault 16 Correspondent Computer Law Review International (Duitsland). Guibault 17 Editor en national reporter – Common Core of European Private Law. Guibault 18 ‘Media diversity from a user’s perspective’, editor special issue voor het Helberger Journal of Information Policy. 19 Reviewer Katholiek Universiteit Leuven. Helberger 20 Reviewer NWO. Helberger 21 Reviewer ETRI (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute) Journal, Helberger ACM Computing Surveys en het Ethics and Information Technology Journal. 22 Editorial Board Journal of Information Policy. Helberger 23 General Editor Information Law Series (Kluwer Law International). Hugenholtz 24 Lid Board of Editors, Journal of World Intellectual Property (JWIP). Hugenholtz 25 Redactielid AMI, tijdschrift voor auteurs-, media- & informatierecht. Kabel 26 Lid redactie Privacy & Informatie. Kabel 27 Peer-reviewer voor de tijdschriften European Public Law, European Journal McGonagle of Communication, en voor de Annual International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) Conference 2011 (Theme: Cities, Creativity, Connectivity) Law Section. 28 Redactielid IRIS. McGonagle 29 Redacteur IRIS Themes. McGonagle 30 Lid adviesraad redactiecommissie Irish Human Rights Law Review. McGonagle

72 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

31 Redacteur (en plaatsvervangend eindredacteur) AMI, tijdschrift voor Mom auteurs-, media- & informatierecht. 32 Medewerker aan losbladige uitgave Intellectuele eigendom, artikelsgewijs Mom commentaar (voor de onderdelen Auteurswet en Wet op de naburige rechten). 33 Referee TPE Digitaal. Poort 34 Redactielid redactiecommissie Revista Brasileira de Direito da Comunicação Ramalho Social e Liberdade de Expressão. 35 Redactielid Diritto Mercato Tecnologia. Ramalho

2011 Memberships Author 1 Lid Expertencommittee Europese Commissie en rapporteur ter evaluatie Bostyn van richtlijn 98/44/EG betreffende de wettelijke bescherming van biotechnologische uitvindingen. 2 Lid Commissie Mensenrechten (CMR) van de Adviesraad Internationale Dommering Vraagstukken van het Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. 3 Lid Raad van Advies CBP. Dommering 4 Lid van Max Planck Gesellschaft European Group on Conflicts of Laws Van Eechoud in Intellectual Property (CLIP). 5 Lid International Advice Body Spatial Data Infrastructure and Public Sector. Van Eechoud 6 Lid Committee Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property, International Law Van Eechoud Association (ILA). 7 Voorzitter Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht (VMC). Van Eijk 8 Lid Raad van toezicht Nederlandse Publieke Omroep (NPO). Van Eijk 9 Lid Beirat Hans Bredow Institut, Hamburg, Duitsland. Van Eijk 10 Member Organizing committee Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research Van Eijk (APPR). 11 Voorzitter commissie van beroep Pictoright. Van Eijk 12 Lid Beroepscommissie NLkabel. Van Eijk 13 Juryvoorzitter Internet Scriptieprijs 2011. Van Eijk 14 Jurylid Big Brother Awards 2010. Van Eijk 15 Member Advisory Committee, European Audiovisual Observatory, Van Eijk Strasbourg. 16 Lid Benoemingadviescommissie hoogleraar ‘ Internet Governance and Van Eijk Regulation’, VU, Amsterdam. 17 Lid Benoemingsadviescommissie hoogleraar ‘Staatsrecht’, UvA, Amsterdam. Van Eijk 18 Lid Benoemingsadviescommissie hoogleraar ‘Medienrecht und Öffentliches Van Eijk Recht einschließlich ihrer theoretischen Grundlagen’, Universität Hamburg, Fakultät für Rechtswissenschaft. 19 Secretaris Commissie Auteursrecht. Van Gompel 20 Lid Studiecommissie voor de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht van de Van Gompel Vereniging voor Auteursrecht. 21 Lid van Network for Digital Methods in the Arts and Humanities – Guibault NeDiMAH, werkgroep van de European Science Foundation. 22 Lid Studiegroep Implementatie van de AVMSD van de Vereniging voor Helberger Reclamerecht. 23 Lid Wetenschapscommissie FdR. Helberger 24 Lid programmacommissie International Telecommunications Society (ITS). Helberger 25 Lid Commissie Onderzoek prijs FdR. Helberger

73 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

26 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie Commissariaat voor de Media. Hins 27 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie Nederlandse Publieke Omroep. Hins 28 Lid Commissie Handhaving Mobiele diensten. Hins 29 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie ministerie van VWS (Den Haag). Hins 30 Voorzitter van de Raad van Bestuur Bits of Freedom. Van Hoboken 31 Lid Commissie Auteursrecht, Ministerie van Justitie. Hugenholtz 32 Vice-voorzitter Vereniging voor Auteursrecht. Hugenholtz 33 Lid Comité Exécutif Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI). Hugenholtz 34 Vice-voorzitter Vaste Commissie Plagiaat (Buma-Stemra). Hugenholtz 35 Lid Fachbeirat, Max-Planck-Institut für geistiges Eigentum, Wettbewerbs- und Hugenholtz Steuerrecht, München. 36 Lid Advisory Committee, Center for Intellectual Property and Information Hugenholtz Law (CIPIL), Cambridge University. 37 Bestuurslid van de Vereniging voor Reclamerecht. Kabel 38 Voorzitter van de Stichting Weekbladpersgroep. Kabel 39 Plaatsvervangend voorzitter van de Reclame Code Commissie. Kabel 40 Voorzitter van de Commissie van Beroep van het NICAM (Kijkwijzer). Kabel 41 Lid van het Wetenschappelijke Comité van de Ligue Internationale du Droit. Kabel 42 Voorzitter van de Geschillencommissie van het Bureau Kredietregistratie. Kabel 43 Bestuurslid van de Stichting Gasthuis Frascati. Kabel 44 Coördinator samenwerking met het European Audiovisual Observatory. McGonagle 45 Expertadviseur: Media Regulation in Portugal: The ERC’s Case, McGonagle onderzoeksproject, Mediascopio Research Centre, Department of Communications Science, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. 46 Expertadviseur: Bilingualism, Identity and the Media (onderzoeksproject)/ McGonagle Living Languages in Bilingual Media Environments (wetenschappelijke bundel: Nordicom, te verschijnen in 2011), University of Helsinki, Finland. 47 Lid Opleidingscommissie Master rechtsgeleerdheid. Mom 48 Lid Associação Portuguesa de Direito Intelectual. Ramalho 49 Coördinator Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research. Van der Sloot 50 Coördinator Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2012. Van der Sloot 51 Coördinator Intrafacultaire bijeenkomsten voor Actualiteitsverdieping Van der Sloot (www.ibav.nl). 52 Advocaat-generaal in buitengewone dienst bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden. Verkade 53 Lid Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Verkade

2011 PhD supervision & oppositions Author 1 Promotor S. van Gompel, promotie 16 maart. Hugenholtz 2 Member Doctorate Committee Hasan A Deveci, Queen Mary University Hugenholtz of London, School of Law (doctorate not granted). 3 Member Doctorate Committee Benjamin Farrand, European University Hugenholtz Institute, promotie 18 maart. 4 Lid van promotiecommissie S. van Gompel, promotie 16 maart. Guibault 5 Lid van promotiecommissie S. van Gompel, promotie 16 maart. Kabel 6 Lid van promotiecommissie S. van Gompel, promotie 16 maart. Verkade

74 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2012 Refereed articles Author 1 ‘Determining the Term of Protection for Films: When Does a Film Fall Angelopoulos into the Public Domain in Europe?’, IRIS Plus 2012-2, pp. 21. 2 ‘The Myth of European Term Harmonisation: 27 Public Domains for the Angelopoulos 27 Member States’, IIC 2012-5, p. 567. 3 ‘De zaak Scarlet/Sabam: naar een horizontale integratie van het auteursrecht’, Dommering AMI 2012-2, p. 49-53. 4 ‘Publicity Rights and Image’, boekbespreking van het gelijknamige boek van Dommering Gillian Black over commerciële portretrechten, Mediaforum 2012-11/12, p. 346-347. 5 ‘Along the Road to Uniformity - Diverse Readings of the Court of Justice Van Eechoud Judgments on Copyright Works’, JIPITEC 2012-1, p. 60-80. 6 (met A. Kur) ‘Internationaal privaatrecht in intellectuele eigendomszaken Van Eechoud – de ‘CLIP’ Principles’, NIPR 2012-2, p. 252-264. 7 ‘Universal Service and disabled people’, Telecommunications Policy 2012-36, Van Eijk/ Poort p. 85-95. 8 (met L. Kool & A. van der Plas) ‘Online tracking: questioning the power Van Eijk/ of informed consent’, info 2012-5, p. 57-73. Helberger/ Van der Sloot 9 ‘Netneutraliteit en cookies: Europa versus Verenigde Staten’ (editorial), Van Eijk Computerrecht 2012-4, p. 249. 10 (met M. Kerste) ‘Valuing commercial radio licences’, European Journal of Law Van Eijk/ Poort and Economics 2012-34, 23 pp. 11 (met J. Axhamn) Solving Europeana’s mass-digitization issues through Guibault Extended Collective Licensing? Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, 2011-6, p. 509-516. 12 (met N. Helberger) ‘Clash of Cultures – Integrating Copyright and Consumer Guibault/ L a w ’, Info 2012- 14, p. 23-33. Helberger 13 “Digital Copying and the Supply of Sound Recordings”, Information Economics Handke and Policy 2012-24(1), p. 15-29 (journal 5-year impact factor: 1.129). 14 (met J.V.J. van Hoboken) ‘(Fast)food for thoughts: de uitspraak van het Hof van Helberger Justitie in de Scarlet/Sabam-zaak’, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2012-2, p. 75-82. 15 Exposure Diversity as a Policy Goal, The Journal of Media Law 2012-4, p. 65-02. Helberger 16 ‘EVRM: algemene beginselen’, book review, TvCR 2012-3, p. 322-325. Hins 17 ‘Het recht op vergetelheid: een oud recht in een verkeerd jasje’, Hoboken P&I 2012-3, p. 126-127. 18 ‘Harmonisation or Unification of European Union Copyright Law’, Monash Hugenholtz University Law Review, Vol. 38, Nr. 1, p. 4-16. 19 ‘YouTube guilty but not liable for late removal of infringing material’, Jasserand Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2012- 7, p. 790-791. 20 De betekenis van het arrest Luksan/Van der Let voor het Nederlandse Kabel auteursrecht: Commentaar bij Hof van Justitie EU 9 februari 2012, C-277/10, AMI 2012-5, p. 195-201. 21 (met M. Perry) ‘Ownership in Complex Authorship: a comparative study of Margoni Joint Works’, European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) 2012-1, p. 22-32. 22 (met K.E.A. de Beer) ‘A brave new media world revisited. Een nog kritischer McGonagle blik op het nieuwe mediabeleid van de Raad van Europa’, Mediaforum 2012-11/12, p. 338-345. 23 (met T. Moring) ‘Minorities and the Media: Present, Probing and Pressing McGonagle Questions’, 9 European Yearbook of Minority Issues (2010), p. 369-376. 24 ‘Minorities and Online “Hate Speech”: A Parsing of Selected Complexities’, McGonagle 9 European Yearbook of Minority Issues (2010), p. 419-440.

75 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

25 ‘Laveren tussen persvrijheid en respect voor het privéleven: de jurisprudentie Nieuwenhuis van het EHRM’, Mediaforum 2012-1, p. 2-13. 26 ‘The protection of artistic expression under article 10 of the European Nieuwenhuis Convention on Human Rights’, Kunst und Recht 2012-3/4, p. 110-116. 27 ‘Een economische analyse van thuiskopiestelsels’, AMI 2012-6, p. 239-242. Poort 28 ‘Is secrecy the new black in IP?’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Ramalho 2012-5, p. 316-317. 29 ‘De nieuwe consumentenrechten in de Algemene verordening Van der Sloot gegevensbescherming: vergeten worden, dataportabiliteit en profilering’, Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht en handelsprakijken 2012-6, p. 250-259. 30 ‘Walking a Thin Line: The Regulation of EPGs’, JIPITEC 2012-2, p. 138-147. Van der Sloot 31 ‘Due Prominence in Electronic Programme Guides’, IRIS Plus 2012-5, p. 33-37. Van der Sloot 32 (met F. Zuiderveen Borgesius) ‘Google’s Dead End, or: on Street View and the Van der Sloot Right to Data Protection: An analysis of Google Street View’s compatibility with EU data protection law’, Computer Law Review International 2012-4, p. 103-109. 33 ‘De regulering van Elektronische ProgrammaGidsen: kiezen tussen exclusieve, Van der Sloot inclusieve en compenserende neutraliteit’, Computerrecht 2012-2, p. 109-119. 34 ‘Naar een pathologie van privacyschendingen, of over het doel dat de middelen Van der Sloot heiligt’, Privacy & Informatie 2012-2, p. 58-66. 35 (met S. Kulk) ‘Filtering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam Zuiderveen cases’, European Intellectual Property Review 2012- 11, p.791-795. Borgesius

2012 Non-refereed articles Author 1 ‘Patenting antibodies after HGS v Lilly: More questions raised than answered’, Bostyn CIPA Journal oktober 2012, p. 573-580. 2 EHRM 14 september 2010, appl.2668/07, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012- 4, Dommering nr. 32, p. 265-266 (Dink / Turkije). 3 HR 29 november 2011, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012-4, nr. 37, p. 354-356 Dommering (de columnist aan de studenten hogeschool, rolnr 10 / 01049). 4 EHRM 24 mei 2011, appl. 22918/08, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012-5, Dommering nr. 39, p. 364-265 (Mikkelsen en Christensen / Denemarken). 5 EHRM 21 juli 2011, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012-21/22, nr 282, Dommering p. 3109 (Heinisch / Duitsland). 6 EHRM 15 maart 2012, appl. 2034/07, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012-39, Dommering nr. 491, p. 5496-5497 (Mondragon). 7 EHRM 21 juli 2011, appl. 32184/04, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012-40, Dommering nr. 510, p. 5709-5710 (Cyprus). 8 EHRM 12 september 2011, appl. 28955/06, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie Dommering 2012-41, nr. 522, p. 5838-5840 (Sánchez / Spanje). 9 ‘Het bestuur als de tovenaarsleerling van ICT, Nederlands Juristenblad 2012-2, Dommering p. 109-115 (Essay 87). 10 ‘Property rights in personal data. A European perspective’, Maandblad voor Dommering Vermogensrecht (MvV) 2012-1, p. 22-26. 11 ‘Diginotar: Lessons to be learnt’, Ars Aequi 2012-2, p. 80-82. Van Eijk 12 ‘A Taxonomy of Empirical Research on Copyright – How Do We Inform Handke Policy?’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 2012-9(1), p. 47-92. 13 ‘Copyright and How to Promote Innovation in the Cultural Sector’, Boekman Handke 93, December 2012, p. 61-90. 14 Hof van Justitie EU 1 maart 2012, NJ 2012-31, nr. 433, p. 4928-4937 Hugenholtz (Football Dataco / Yahoo! UK).

76 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

25 ‘Laveren tussen persvrijheid en respect voor het privéleven: de jurisprudentie Nieuwenhuis 15 Hof van Justitie EU 24 november 2011, NJ 2012-37, nr. 479, p. 5395-5397 Hugenholtz van het EHRM’, Mediaforum 2012-1, p. 2-13. (Scarlet Extended / SABAM). 26 ‘The protection of artistic expression under article 10 of the European Nieuwenhuis 16 Hof van Justitie EU 16 februari 2012, NJ 2012-38, nr. 480, p. 5395-5397 Hugenholtz Convention on Human Rights’, Kunst und Recht 2012-3/4, p. 110-116. (SABAM / Netlog). 27 ‘Een economische analyse van thuiskopiestelsels’, AMI 2012-6, p. 239-242. Poort 17 HR 28 oktober 2011, NJ 2012-45, nr. 604, p. 6826-6828 Hugenholtz 28 ‘Is secrecy the new black in IP?’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Ramalho (Mag Instrument Inc / Edco Eindhoven). 2012-5, p. 316-317. 18 (met A.J. Nieuwenhuis) ‘De verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en Jansen/ 29 ‘De nieuwe consumentenrechten in de Algemene verordening Van der Sloot discriminatie in het Wilders-proces: een analyse van ‘het proces van de eeuw’, Nieuwenhuis gegevensbescherming: vergeten worden, dataportabiliteit en profilering’, NJCM-Bulletin 2012- 2, p. 177-207. Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht en handelsprakijken 2012-6, p. 250-259. 19 ‘The “Novelty” Requirements for Gene and Genetically-Modified Organisms Margoni 30 ‘Walking a Thin Line: The Regulation of EPGs’, JIPITEC 2012-2, p. 138-147. Van der Sloot Inventions and the Potential Benefits of a Peer-to-Patent System’, IIP Bulletin (Japanese Patent Office Official Bulletin) 2012-21, p. 16. 31 ‘Due Prominence in Electronic Programme Guides’, IRIS Plus 2012-5, p. 33-37. Van der Sloot 20 ‘Wie niet weg is, is gezien: Google Street View en privacybescherming’, Van der Sloot 32 (met F. Zuiderveen Borgesius) ‘Google’s Dead End, or: on Street View and the Van der Sloot Informatie 2012- september, p. 14-18. Right to Data Protection: An analysis of Google Street View’s compatibility with EU data protection law’, Computer Law Review International 2012-4, p. 103-109. 21 ‘Langs lijnen van geleidelijkheid: een jurisprudentieanalyse van Van der Sloot artikel 15 EVRM’, NTM/NJCM-Bulletin 2012-2, p. 208-229. 33 ‘De regulering van Elektronische ProgrammaGidsen: kiezen tussen exclusieve, Van der Sloot inclusieve en compenserende neutraliteit’, Computerrecht 2012-2, p. 109-119. 34 ‘Naar een pathologie van privacyschendingen, of over het doel dat de middelen Van der Sloot heiligt’, Privacy & Informatie 2012-2, p. 58-66. 2012 Books, including reports Author 35 (met S. Kulk) ‘Filtering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam Zuiderveen 1 (met J.V.J. van Hoboken, N.A.N.M. van Eijk en met medewerking van N.P.H. Arnbak/ cases’, European Intellectual Property Review 2012- 11, p.791-795. Borgesius Kruijsen) Cloud diensten in hoger onderwijs en onderzoek en de USA Patriot Van Hoboken/ Act, rapport in opdracht van SURF, september 2012, pp. 42. Van Eijk 2 (met R. van der Noll, S.J. van Gompel, L.Guibault, J. Weda, J.P. Poort en I. K. Breemen/ 2012 Non-refereed articles Author Akker) Flexible Copyright: The Law and Economics of Introducing and Open Van Gompel/ Norm in the Netherlands, rapport in opdracht van het Ministerie van Econo- Guibault/ Poort 1 ‘Patenting antibodies after HGS v Lilly: More questions raised than answered’, Bostyn mische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie, SEO-rapport nr. 2012-60, Amsterdam, CIPA Journal oktober 2012, p. 573-580. augustus 2012, pp. 73. 2 EHRM 14 september 2010, appl.2668/07, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012- 4, Dommering 3 (met R. van der Noll, V.E. Breemen, P.B. Hugenholtz, M. Brom en J.P. K. Breemen/ nr. 32, p. 265-266 (Dink / Turkije). Poort) Online uitlenen van e-books door bibliotheken. Verkenning juridische V. Breemen/ 3 HR 29 november 2011, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012-4, nr. 37, p. 354-356 Dommering mogelijkheden en economische effecten. SEO Economisch Onderzoek/IViR, Hugenholtz/ (de columnist aan de studenten hogeschool, rolnr 10 / 01049). Amsterdam, SEO-rapport nr. 2012-83, pp. 66. Poort 4 EHRM 24 mei 2011, appl. 22918/08, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012-5, Dommering 4 (met V.E. Breemen en P.B. Hugenholtz) Digitalisering van audiovisueel erfgoed: K. Breemen/ nr. 39, p. 364-265 (Mikkelsen en Christensen / Denemarken). Naar een wettelijke publieke taak, Onderzoek in opdracht van het Nederlands V. Breemen/ Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid, december 2012. Hugenholtz 5 EHRM 21 juli 2011, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012-21/22, nr 282, Dommering p. 3109 (Heinisch / Duitsland). 5 (met K. Janssen) LAPSI Policy Recommendations on Rights of Access to Public Van Eechoud Sector Information. Working Group 6- Constitutional, Human Rights and 6 EHRM 15 maart 2012, appl. 2034/07, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012-39, Dommering Environmental Perspectives, European Commission Thematic network on nr. 491, p. 5496-5497 (Mondragon). Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information, pp. 19. 7 EHRM 21 juli 2011, appl. 32184/04, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2012-40, Dommering 6 (met J.P. Poort, I. Akker, B. van der Sloot en P. Rutten) Digitally binding: Van Eijk/ Poort/ nr. 510, p. 5709-5710 (Cyprus). Examining the feasibility of charging a fixed price for e-books, Report Van der Sloot 8 EHRM 12 september 2011, appl. 28955/06, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie Dommering commissioned by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OC&W), 2012-41, nr. 522, p. 5838-5840 (Sánchez / Spanje). Amsterdam, maart, pp. 94 9 ‘Het bestuur als de tovenaarsleerling van ICT, Nederlands Juristenblad 2012-2, Dommering 7 (met M. Kerste, J. Weda, N. Rosenboom, T. Smits en J.P. Poort) Waarde Van Eijk/ Poort p. 109-115 (Essay 87). verlenging mobiele vergunningen, rapport in opdracht van het Ministerie 10 ‘Property rights in personal data. A European perspective’, Maandblad voor Dommering van Economische Zaken, Landbouw & Innovatie, SEO-rapport nr. 2012-75, Vermogensrecht (MvV) 2012-1, p. 22-26. Amsterdam, oktober, pp. 44. 11 ‘Diginotar: Lessons to be learnt’, Ars Aequi 2012-2, p. 80-82. Van Eijk 8 (met J. Weda, R. van der Noll, I. Akker, J.P. Poort en J. Leenheer) Digitale Van Gompel/ drempels: Knelpunten voor legaal digitaal aanbod in de creatieve industrie, Poort 12 ‘A Taxonomy of Empirical Research on Copyright – How Do We Inform Handke rapport in opdracht van het Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Landbouw Policy?’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 2012-9(1), p. 47-92. en Innovatie, SEO-rapport nr. 2012-41, pp. 136. 13 ‘Copyright and How to Promote Innovation in the Cultural Sector’, Boekman Handke 10 (met J. Esmeijer, T. McGonagle, B. van der Sloot e.a.) Making User Created Helberger/ 93, December 2012, p. 61-90. News Work, TNO Report, december 2012, pp. 130 (incl. bijlagen). McGonagle/ 14 Hof van Justitie EU 1 maart 2012, NJ 2012-31, nr. 433, p. 4928-4937 Hugenholtz Van der Sloot (Football Dataco / Yahoo! UK).

77 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

11 (met C. Mak) Towards identifying safe and fair contract terms and conditions Helberger for consumers and small firms using cloud computing services, An agenda, rapport voor de Europese Commissie, december 2012. 12 (met A.D. Belinfante, J.L. de Reede, L. Dragstra, N.S. Efthymiou en R. de Lange) Hins Bewerking van Beginselen van het Nederlandse staatsrecht, 17e druk, Deventer: Kluwer 2012, pp. 412. 13 met M. Groothuis en C. Wiersma) Persvrijheidsmonitor Nederland 2011, Hins Diemen: Uitgeverij AMB 2012, pp. 134. 14 Search Engine Freedom: On the implications of the right to freedom of expression Van Hoboken for the legal governance of Web search engines, Information Law Series, Vol. 27, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer law International 2012, pp. 412. 15 (met C.A. Jasserand) Using Copyright to Promote Access to Public Sector Infor- Hugenholtz/ mation: A Comparative Survey, Part III of a study commissioned by WIPO on Jasserand Using Copyright to Promote Access to Information and Creative Content, pp. 32. 16 (met P. Goldstein) International Copyright. Principles, Law, and Practice, Hugenholtz 3de druk, New York: Oxford University Press 2012, pp. 616. 17 (met J. Leenheer) Filesharing 2©12. Downloaden in Nederland, Poort IViR/CentERdata, Amsterdam/Tilburg, pp. 61. 18 (met B. Baarsma en N. Rosenboom) De impact van de omroep. Pilotstudie Poort voor het meten van de impact van en betrokkenheid bij de publieke omroep, SEO/IViR, Amsterdam, SEO-rapport nr. 2012-38, pp. 81. 19 On Peers and Copyright: Why the EU should consider collective management of Quintais P2P, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC), Bd. 14, Nomos, pp. 103. 20 Digital content services for consumers: Comparative analysis of the applicable Van der Sloot legal frameworks and suggestions for the contours of a model system of consumer protection in relation to digital content services, Report 1: Country reports, Centre for the Study of European Contract Law (CSECL) & Institute for Information Law (IViR), 2012, pp. 432.

2012 Book chapters Author 1 ‘Government Works’ in: P.B. Hugenholtz, A.A. Quaedvlieg en D.J.G. Visser Van Eechoud (eds.), A Century of Dutch Copyright Law. Auteurswet 1912-2012, Amsterdam: deLex 2012, p 141-175. 2 ‘Duties of Care on the Internet?’ in: R. Leukfeldt en W. Stol (eds.) Cyber Safety: Van Eijk an introduction, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing 2012, p. 267-279. 3 ‘Net Neutrality and Audiovisual Services’ in: M. Pice, S. Verhulst en L. Morgan Van Eijk (eds. ) Routledge Handbook of Media Law, New York: Routledge, December 2012, p. 523-538. 4 ‘Regulation of Market Power in a Converged and Connected Audiovisual Media Van Eijk Sector at National Level: the Netherlands’, Converged Markets – Converged Power? Regulation and Case Law, European Audiovisual Observatory, p. 133-138. 5 ‘The Press Exception in the Dutch Copyright Act’, in: D.J.G. Visser, P.B. Guibault Hugenholtz en A.A. Quaedvlieg (ed.), 100 Years Dutch Copyright Act, Amsterdam: Uitgeverij DeLex 2012, p. 443-475. 6 (met K. van ’t Klooster) ‘Report of the Netherlands’, in: R. Hilty and S. Nérisson Guibault (ed.), Balancing Copyright – a Survey of National Approaches, Berlin: Springer Verlag 2012, p. 677-717. 7 ‘Evaluating Directive 2001/29/EC in light of the digital public domain’, in: Guibault M. Dulong de Rosnay and J.C. De Martin (ed.), The Digital Public Domain: Foundations for an Open Culture, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers CIC Ltd. 2012, p. 61-79. 8 (met N. Helberger) ‘Clash of Cultures – Integrating Copyright and Consumer Guibault/ Law’, in: K. Donders (ed.), Policies for the Future Internet, Gent: EuroCPR Helberger Proceedings 2012, p. 149-171. 78 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

11 (met C. Mak) Towards identifying safe and fair contract terms and conditions Helberger 9 ‘Copyright and Culinary Creation’, in: J. F. Hovden en K. Knapskog (eds.), Hugenholtz for consumers and small firms using cloud computing services, An agenda, Hunting High and Low, Oslo: Spartacus/Scandinavian Academic Press 2012, rapport voor de Europese Commissie, december 2012. p. 750-756. 12 (met A.D. Belinfante, J.L. de Reede, L. Dragstra, N.S. Efthymiou en R. de Lange) Hins 10 ‘Harmonization or Unification of EU Copyright Law, in: J.L. Axhamn (ed.), Hugenholtz Bewerking van Beginselen van het Nederlandse staatsrecht, 17e druk, Deventer: Copyright in a borderless online environment, Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik Kluwer 2012, pp. 412. 2012, p. 189-204. 13 met M. Groothuis en C. Wiersma) Persvrijheidsmonitor Nederland 2011, Hins 11 ‘Copyright harmonisation in the digital age: looking ahead’, in: M-C Janssens Hugenholtz Diemen: Uitgeverij AMB 2012, pp. 134. en G. van Overwalle (eds.), Harmonisation of European IP Law. From European 14 Search Engine Freedom: On the implications of the right to freedom of expression Van Hoboken Rules to Belgian Law and Practice. Contributions in honour of Frank Gotzen, for the legal governance of Web search engines, Information Law Series, Vol. 27, Brussel: Bruylant/Larcier 2012, p. 55-71. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer law International 2012, pp. 412. 12 ‘Works of Literature, Science and Art’, in: P.B. Hugenholtz, A.A. Quaedvlieg en Hugenholtz 15 (met C.A. Jasserand) Using Copyright to Promote Access to Public Sector Infor- Hugenholtz/ D.J.G. Visser (eds.), A Century of Dutch Copyright Law. Auteurswet 1912-2012, mation: A Comparative Survey, Part III of a study commissioned by WIPO on Jasserand Amsterdam: deLex 2012, p. 19-41. Using Copyright to Promote Access to Information and Creative Content, pp. 32. 13 ‘The Story of the Tape Recorder and the History of Copyright Levies’, in: B. Hugenholtz 16 (met P. Goldstein) International Copyright. Principles, Law, and Practice, Hugenholtz Sherman en L. Wiseman (eds.), Copyright and the Challenge of the New, 3de druk, New York: Oxford University Press 2012, pp. 616. Information Law Series, vol. 25, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer International 2012, p. 179-196. 17 (met J. Leenheer) Filesharing 2©12. Downloaden in Nederland, Poort IViR/CentERdata, Amsterdam/Tilburg, pp. 61. 14 ‘The European Copyright Code. The Wittem Project’, in: T.-E. Synodinou (ed.), Hugenholtz Codification of European Copyright Law, Information Law Series, vol. 29, 18 (met B. Baarsma en N. Rosenboom) De impact van de omroep. Pilotstudie Poort Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2012, p. 339-354. voor het meten van de impact van en betrokkenheid bij de publieke omroep, SEO/IViR, Amsterdam, SEO-rapport nr. 2012-38, pp. 81. 15 ‘The roles of Material Transfer Agreements in genetics databases and Biobanks’, Margoni in: Pascuzzi and Izzo (eds.), Comparative Issues in the Governance of Research 19 On Peers and Copyright: Why the EU should consider collective management of Quintais Biobanks: Property, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and the Role of Technology, P2P, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC), Bd. 14, Nomos, pp. 103. Heidelberg: Springer 2012, p. 231-250. 20 Digital content services for consumers: Comparative analysis of the applicable Van der Sloot 16 ‘The Council of Europe’s standards on access to the media for minorities: A tale McGonagle legal frameworks and suggestions for the contours of a model system of consumer of near misses and staggered successes’, in: M. Amos, J. Harrison and L. Woods protection in relation to digital content services, Report 1: Country reports, (ed.), Freedom of Expression and the Media, Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Centre for the Study of European Contract Law (CSECL) & Institute for 2012, p. 111-140. Information Law (IViR), 2012, pp. 432. 17 ‘A Survey and Critical Analysis of Council of Europe Strategies for Countering McGonagle Hate Speech”, in: M. Herz and P. Molnar (ed.), Content and Context: Rethinking Regulation and Remedies for Hate Speech, New York: Cambridge University 2012 Book chapters Author Press 2012, p. 456-498. 18 (met P. Rutten) ‘Unauthorised file sharing’, in: R. Leukfeldt en W. Stol (eds.), Poort 1 ‘Government Works’ in: P.B. Hugenholtz, A.A. Quaedvlieg en D.J.G. Visser Van Eechoud Cyber Safety: an introduction, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing 2012, (eds.), A Century of Dutch Copyright Law. Auteurswet 1912-2012, Amsterdam: p. 143-155. deLex 2012, p 141-175. 19 (met P. Rutten) ‘File Sharing and its Impact on Business Models in Music’, Poort 2 ‘Duties of Care on the Internet?’ in: R. Leukfeldt en W. Stol (eds.) Cyber Safety: Van Eijk in: S. Allegrezza A. & Dubrocard (eds.), Internet Econometrics, New York: an introduction, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing 2012, p. 267-279. Palgrave Macmillan 2012, p. 197-233. 3 ‘Net Neutrality and Audiovisual Services’ in: M. Pice, S. Verhulst en L. Morgan Van Eijk 20 ‘Money Does Not Grow on Trees, It Grows on People: Towards a Model Van der Sloot (eds. ) Routledge Handbook of Media Law, New York: Routledge, December of Privacy as Virtue’, in: L. Guibault, N. Helberger, M. Loos, C. Mak, L. 2012, p. 523-538. Pessers (eds.), Digital Consumers and the Law. Towards a Cohesive European 4 ‘Regulation of Market Power in a Converged and Connected Audiovisual Media Van Eijk Framework, Deventer: Wolter Kluwer 2012, p. 149-175. Sector at National Level: the Netherlands’, Converged Markets – Converged 21 ‘From Data Minimization to Data Minimummization’, in: B. Custers, T. Calders, Van der Sloot Power? Regulation and Case Law, European Audiovisual Observatory, p. 133-138. B. Schermer & T. Zarsky (eds.), Discrimination and Privacy in the Information 5 ‘The Press Exception in the Dutch Copyright Act’, in: D.J.G. Visser, P.B. Guibault Society. Data Mining and Profiling in Large Databases, Heidelberg: Springer Hugenholtz en A.A. Quaedvlieg (ed.), 100 Years Dutch Copyright Act, 2012, p. 273-287. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij DeLex 2012, p. 443-475. 22 (met F. J. Zuiderveen Borgesius) ‘Google and Personal Data Protection’, Van der Sloot/ 6 (met K. van ’t Klooster) ‘Report of the Netherlands’, in: R. Hilty and S. Nérisson Guibault in: A. Lopez-Tarruella (ed.), Google and the Law. Empirical Approaches to Zuiderveen (ed.), Balancing Copyright – a Survey of National Approaches, Berlin: Springer Legal Aspects of Knowledge-Economy Business Models. Series: Information Borgesius Verlag 2012, p. 677-717. Technology and Law Series, Vol. 22, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press 2012, 7 ‘Evaluating Directive 2001/29/EC in light of the digital public domain’, in: Guibault p. 75-111. M. Dulong de Rosnay and J.C. De Martin (ed.), The Digital Public Domain: 23 ‘First-sale’ or exhaustion doctrine in The Netherlands’, in: P.B. Hugenholtz, A.A. Verkade Foundations for an Open Culture, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers CIC Ltd. Quaedvlieg, D.J.G. Visser (eds.), A century of Dutch Copyright Law, Amsterdam: 2012, p. 61-79. Delex 2012, p. 291-305. 8 (met N. Helberger) ‘Clash of Cultures – Integrating Copyright and Consumer Guibault/ Law’, in: K. Donders (ed.), Policies for the Future Internet, Gent: EuroCPR Helberger Proceedings 2012, p. 149-171. 79 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2012 PhD theses Author 1 Search Engine Freedom: On the implications of the right to freedom of expression Van Hoboken for the legal governance of Web search engines, pp. 384.

2012 Conference papers Author 1 Certificate Authority Collapse: Regulating Systemic Vulnerabilities in the Arnbak/ Van Eijk HTTPS Value Chain, Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, augustus 2012, pp. 31. 2 (met P. Nooren en A. Leurdijk) Intended and unintended effects of policy Van Eijk measures aimed at promoting net neutrality, paper, Gent, EuroCPR 2012, pp. 23. 3 ‘Behavioral Targeting: Legal Developments in Europe and the Netherlands’, Zuiderveen Position paper for the W3C Do Not Track Workshop, Berkeley, 26 november. Borgesius

2012 Professional publications Author 1 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union : Ruling on the Obligations of Online Angelopoulos Intermediaries’, IRIS 2012-1, p. 4. 2 ‘European Commission : Recommendation on the Digitisation and Online Angelopoulos Accessibility of Cultural Material and Digital Preservation’, IRIS 2012-1, p. 5-6. 3 ‘Dutch University Blocks BitTorrent Pre-Emptively Breaking New Net Angelopoulos Neutrality Law’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 28 maart. 4 ‘European Commission : Communication on a Coherent Framework for Angelopoulos E-Commerce and Online Services’, IRIS 2012-3, p. 7. 5 ‘High Court Issues Ruling on Satellite Decoder Case’, IRIS 2012-4 p. 18-19. Angelopoulos 6 ‘The Link Wars Rage on: France and Germany Consider Exclusive Right over Angelopoulos Snippets’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 26 oktober. 7 Open Knowledge Foundation Blog, The Myth of European Term of Protection Angelopoulos Harmonisation, 21 November, (Longer version available on OpenGLAM ). 8 Rb. ‘s-Gravenhage 11 januari 2012 , AMI 2012-3, p. 119-131 Arnbak (Brein / Ziggo & XS4ALL). 9 ‘Blocking The Pirate Bay: will the Dutch court ruling hold in appeal?’, Kluwer Arnbak Copyright Blog, 18 januari. 10 ‘NL-Netherlands: Dutch district court orders ISPs to block end-user access Arnbak to The Pirate Bay’, IRIS 2012-2, p. 21-22. 11 ‘Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly: Resolution and recommendation Arnbak on combating child abuse images’, IRIS 2012-2, p. 4-5. 12 ‘Majority of Dutch Providers to Block The Pirate Bay. Game Over or Next Level Arnbak in Copyright Wars?’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 18 mei. 13 ‘Een kijkje achter de schermen bij het VUmc’, Informail 2012-1, p. 15-18. K. Breemen 14 ‘EU Law and Fundamental Rights Preclude Requested Filtering Injunction K. Breemen against Hosting Provider’, IRIS 2012-3, p. 4-5. 15 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: EU Law and Fundamental Rights K. Breemen Preclude Requested Filtering Injunction against Hosting Provider’, IRIS 2012-3, p. 4. 16 ‘European Parliament: Resolution on the Recent Political Developments K. Breemen in Hungary’, IRIS 2012-4, p. 5. 17 Resolution on the Recent Political Developments in Hungary’, IRIS 2012-4, p. 5. K. Breemen 18 ‘Poland referred to the EU Court of Justice for not fully implementing the K. Breemen AVMS Directive’, IRIS 2012-8, p. 6.

80 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2012 PhD theses Author 19 ‘Tekenend voor rechtbankverslaggeving: ‘verdachte portretten’’, V. Breemen 1 Search Engine Freedom: On the implications of the right to freedom of expression Van Hoboken Informail 2012-1, p. 12-14. for the legal governance of Web search engines, pp. 384. 20 ‘Committee of Ministers: Declaration and Recommendation on Public Service V. Breemen Media Governance’, IRIS 2012-3, p. 4. 21 ‘Tussen Kunst en Recht’, 11 april. V. Breemen 2012 Conference papers Author 22 ‘Freedom of Expression Implications of Europe’s Proposed Right to be V. Breemen Forgotten’, presentatie panel ‘Right to be forgotten’, Amsterdam Privacy 1 Certificate Authority Collapse: Regulating Systemic Vulnerabilities in the Arnbak/ Van Eijk Conference, 8 oktober. HTTPS Value Chain, Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, 23 ‘Digitale bibliotheekactiviteiten bekeken door auteursrechtelijke bril’, V. Breemen augustus 2012, pp. 31. InformatieProfessional 2012-12, p. 34. 2 (met P. Nooren en A. Leurdijk) Intended and unintended effects of policy Van Eijk 24 Rb. Den Haag 21 december 2011, Mediaforum 2012-4, nr. 11, p. 135-141 Van Eechoud measures aimed at promoting net neutrality, paper, Gent, EuroCPR 2012, pp. 23. (PostNL & Cendris / Staat der Nederlanden). 3 ‘Behavioral Targeting: Legal Developments in Europe and the Netherlands’, Zuiderveen 25 Hof van Justitie van de EU 1 december 2011, AMI 2012-2, p. 66-75 Van Eechoud Position paper for the W3C Do Not Track Workshop, Berkeley, 26 november. Borgesius (Painer / Standard Verlags). 26 ‘Multiple defendants and territorial intellectual property rights: Painer revisits Van Eechoud Roche through Freeport’, Opinie, http://Conflict of Laws.net 9 februari. 2012 Professional publications Author 27 (met B. van der Sloot) ‘Must-carry Regulation: A Must or a Burden?’, Van Eijk IRIS plus 2012-5, p. 7-23. 1 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union : Ruling on the Obligations of Online Angelopoulos Intermediaries’, IRIS 2012-1, p. 4. 28 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 122 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2012-3), p. 6874-6875. 2 ‘European Commission : Recommendation on the Digitisation and Online Angelopoulos Accessibility of Cultural Material and Digital Preservation’, IRIS 2012-1, p. 5-6. 29 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 123 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2012-6), p. 6950-6951. 3 ‘Dutch University Blocks BitTorrent Pre-Emptively Breaking New Net Angelopoulos Neutrality Law’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 28 maart. 30 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 124 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2012-6), p. 7028-7029. 4 ‘European Commission : Communication on a Coherent Framework for Angelopoulos E-Commerce and Online Services’, IRIS 2012-3, p. 7. 31 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 125 Van Eijk (Ars Aequi 2012-6), p. 6950-6951. 5 ‘High Court Issues Ruling on Satellite Decoder Case’, IRIS 2012-4 p. 18-19. Angelopoulos 32 (met D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2012-1, p. 83-87. Van Eijk 6 ‘The Link Wars Rage on: France and Germany Consider Exclusive Right over Angelopoulos Snippets’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 26 oktober. 33 (met D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2012-2, p. 171-174. Van Eijk 7 Open Knowledge Foundation Blog, The Myth of European Term of Protection Angelopoulos 34 (met D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2012-3, p. 233-237. Van Eijk Harmonisation, 21 November, (Longer version available on OpenGLAM ). 35 (met D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2012-4, p. 311-314. Van Eijk 8 Rb. ‘s-Gravenhage 11 januari 2012 , AMI 2012-3, p. 119-131 Arnbak 36 (met D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2012-5, p. 371-373. Van Eijk (Brein / Ziggo & XS4ALL). 37 (met D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2012-6, p. 455-458. Van Eijk 9 ‘Blocking The Pirate Bay: will the Dutch court ruling hold in appeal?’, Kluwer Arnbak 38 ‘Datalekken: een reality check’, BTG-magazine 2012-77, p. 30. Van Eijk Copyright Blog, 18 januari. 39 ‘Politiek en mobiel gaan niet samen’, BTG-magazine 2012-78, p. 30. Van Eijk 10 ‘NL-Netherlands: Dutch district court orders ISPs to block end-user access Arnbak to The Pirate Bay’, IRIS 2012-2, p. 21-22. 40 ‘Wereldwijde domeinnaammoeheid’, BTG-magazine 2012-79, p. 38. Van Eijk 11 ‘Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly: Resolution and recommendation Arnbak 41 ‘Bruggen slaan’, BTG-magazine 2012-80, p. 30. Van Eijk on combating child abuse images’, IRIS 2012-2, p. 4-5. 42 Rechtbank ’s-Gravenhage (kort geding) 27 september 2011 Computerrecht Van Eijk 12 ‘Majority of Dutch Providers to Block The Pirate Bay. Game Over or Next Level Arnbak 2012-1, p. 40-41 (Gerechtsdeurwaarders & Notariaat / OPTA). in Copyright Wars?’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 18 mei. 43 Actie en reactie - Auteursrecht in het archiefveld’, Archievenblad 2012-8, p. 21-22. Van Gompel 13 ‘Een kijkje achter de schermen bij het VUmc’, Informail 2012-1, p. 15-18. K. Breemen 44 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 122, p. 6873-6874. Hins 14 ‘EU Law and Fundamental Rights Preclude Requested Filtering Injunction K. Breemen 45 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 123, p. 6949-6950. Hins against Hosting Provider’, IRIS 2012-3, p. 4-5. 46 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 124, p. 7026-7027. Hins 15 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: EU Law and Fundamental Rights K. Breemen 47 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 125, p. 7094-7095. Hins Preclude Requested Filtering Injunction against Hosting Provider’, IRIS 2012-3, p. 4. 48 HvJ EU 24 november 2011, EHRC 2012-3, nr. 35, C-70/10, Hins p. 373-379 (Scarlet Extended NV/SABAM). 16 ‘European Parliament: Resolution on the Recent Political Developments K. Breemen in Hungary’, IRIS 2012-4, p. 5. 49 ABRvS, 12 oktober 2011, Mediaforum 2012-2, nr. 4, zaak nr. 10/1129, Hins p. 59-61 (RTL/Minister van Algemene Zaken). 17 Resolution on the Recent Political Developments in Hungary’, IRIS 2012-4, p. 5. K. Breemen 50 ‘Intermediary classic decided in favor of intermediary’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, Van Hoboken 18 ‘Poland referred to the EU Court of Justice for not fully implementing the K. Breemen 29 mei. AVMS Directive’, IRIS 2012-8, p. 6.

81 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

51 Recommendation on the Protection of Human Rights and Search Engines’, Van Hoboken IRIS 2012-5, p. 1-4. 52 ‘The Dutch case for flexibility’, in: I. Hargreaves en P. Hofheinz (ed.), Intellectual Hugenholtz Property and Innovation: A Framework for 21st Century Growth and Jobs, The Lisbon Council, Brussel, september 2012, p. 53-57. 53 ‘Downloaden: Niet verbieden, maar legaliseren’, Column, Mr. 2012-8/9, p. 28. Hugenholtz 54 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Exploitation rights of films directors’, Jasserand IRIS 2012-3, p. 5-6. 55 ‘European Commission: France’s plan to digitise its film heritage approved’, Jasserand IRIS 2012-5, p. 6-7. 56 ‘European Commission: First report on the application of the Audiovisual Jasserand Media Service Directive’, IRIS 2012-6, p. 6. 57 ‘Council of the EU: Conclusions on digitisation and online accessibility of Jasserand cultural and digital preservation’, IRIS 2012-7, p. 5-6. 58 European Commission: Spain asked to Stop Discriminations of non-Spanish Jasserand movies under the Catalan Law on Cinema’, IRIS 2012-8, p. 7. 59 ‘European Parliament: Vote against ACTA’, IRIS 2012-8, p. 7-8. Jasserand 60 ‘European Commission: Four Member States are Required to Provide Jasserand Information on the Implementation of the AVMS Directive’, IRIS 2012-9, p. 6-7. 61 ‘European Commission: Report on Telecommunication Market and Regulatory Jasserand Development’, IRIS 2012-9, p. 7. 62 ‘European Commission: Report on Promotion and Distribution of European Jasserand Works and Independent Productions’, IRIS 2012-9, p. 8. 63 ‘European Commission: Action against Belgium for Failure to Perform Jasserand Obligations in its Incorrect Transposition of the Must-Carry Broadcasting Obligation into National Law’, IRIS 2012-10, p. 4. 64 ‘CJEU: the Luksan case and the protection of film directors’, Kluwer Copyright Jasserand Blog, 24 februari. 65 ‘HADOPI hits once again the headlines’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 20 maart. Jasserand 66 ‘Jurisdiction issue over the sale of copyright-infringing CDs : a new referral to Jasserand the CJEU by the French Court of Cassation’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 4 mei. 67 ‘YouTube guilty but not liable ? some more precisions on the status of hosting Jasserand providers’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 18 juni. 68 ‘Proposal for a Directive on Collective Rights Management and (some) Multi- Jasserand territorial Licensing – Part I’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 19 juli. 69 ‘France: the Court of Cassation puts an end to the Notice and Stay Down Rule’, Jasserand Kluwer Copyright Blog, 14 augustus. 70 ‘France- Google can be ordered to filter words linking to online piracy websites, Jasserand Kluwer Copyright Blog, 3 september. 71 ‘France- Dailymotion heavily fined for the late removal of infringing content, Jasserand Kluwer Copyright Blog, 28 september. 72 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Exploitation rights of films directors’, Jasserand IRIS 2012-3, p. 5-6. 73 ‘Did anybody notice it? Active and passive hosting in Italian case law on ISP Margoni liability’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 11 mei. 74 ‘Re-use of bio-information: some rights reserved or full copyright?’, Margoni Waag Society bulleting BioArt Special Summer 2012, p. 7. 75 ‘Canada modernizes its Copyright Act (beyond the Canadian Copyright Margoni Modernization Act’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 21 augustus. 76 ‘A Keen Eye for Cultural Diversity’, School of Human Rights Research Newsletter McGonagle 2012-3, p. 7-8.

82 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

51 Recommendation on the Protection of Human Rights and Search Engines’, Van Hoboken 77 ‘Committee of Ministers: Continued Attention for Online Freedom of McGonagle IRIS 2012-5, p. 1-4. Expression, Assembly and Association’, IRIS 2012-2, p. 3-4. 52 ‘The Dutch case for flexibility’, in: I. Hargreaves en P. Hofheinz (ed.), Intellectual Hugenholtz 78 ‘European Commission against Racism and Intolerance: Recommendations McGonagle Property and Innovation: A Framework for 21st Century Growth and Jobs, The on Media and Internet in New Country Reports’, IRIS 2012-4, p. 4. Lisbon Council, Brussel, september 2012, p. 53-57. 79 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Protecting Freedom of Expression and Information McGonagle 53 ‘Downloaden: Niet verbieden, maar legaliseren’, Column, Mr. 2012-8/9, p. 28. Hugenholtz Online’, IRIS 2012-6, p. 3-4. 54 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Exploitation rights of films directors’, Jasserand 80 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Safeguarding Audiovisual Cultural Heritage’, McGonagle IRIS 2012-3, p. 5-6. IRIS 2012-8, p. 4. 55 ‘European Commission: France’s plan to digitise its film heritage approved’, Jasserand 81 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Media Provisions in New Texts on (Roma) McGonagle IRIS 2012-5, p. 6-7. Migrants and Refugees’, IRIS 2012-9, p. 4-5. 56 ‘European Commission: First report on the application of the Audiovisual Jasserand 82 ‘Advisory Committee National Minorities: Relationship between Minority McGonagle Media Service Directive’, IRIS 2012-6, p. 6. Languages and Media Clarified’, IRIS 2012-9, p. 5. 57 ‘Council of the EU: Conclusions on digitisation and online accessibility of Jasserand 83 ‘Mag EU-lidstaat in eigen land optreden tegen omroep die gevestigd is in McGonagle cultural and digital preservation’, IRIS 2012-7, p. 5-6. andere EU-lidstaat, in functie van de beteugeling van aanzet tot haat?’, Auteurs 58 European Commission: Spain asked to Stop Discriminations of non-Spanish Jasserand & Media 2012-1, p. 90-95 (Mesopotamia Broadcast en Roj TV / Duitsland). movies under the Catalan Law on Cinema’, IRIS 2012-8, p. 7. 84 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2012-1, p. 42-48. Mom 59 ‘European Parliament: Vote against ACTA’, IRIS 2012-8, p. 7-8. Jasserand 85 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2012-2, p. 81-84. Mom 60 ‘European Commission: Four Member States are Required to Provide Jasserand 86 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2012-3, p. 133-140. Mom Information on the Implementation of the AVMS Directive’, IRIS 2012-9, p. 6-7. 87 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2012-4, p. 180-184. Mom 61 ‘European Commission: Report on Telecommunication Market and Regulatory Jasserand 88 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2012-5, p. 224-228. Mom Development’, IRIS 2012-9, p. 7. 89 ‘Rechtspraak in het kort, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2012-6, p. 272-278. Mom 62 ‘European Commission: Report on Promotion and Distribution of European Jasserand Works and Independent Productions’, IRIS 2012-9, p. 8. 90 EHRM, 13 juli 2012, EHRC 2012-13/10, 16354/06, p.2334-2372 Nieuwenhuis (Mouvement Raëlien/ Suisse). 63 ‘European Commission: Action against Belgium for Failure to Perform Jasserand Obligations in its Incorrect Transposition of the Must-Carry Broadcasting 91 EHRM, 9 februari 2012, EHRC 2012-13/5, 1813/07, p.1062-1069 Nieuwenhuis Obligation into National Law’, IRIS 2012-10, p. 4. (Vejdeland / Norway). 64 ‘CJEU: the Luksan case and the protection of film directors’, Kluwer Copyright Jasserand 92 ‘Proposal for a Directive on Collective Rights Management and (some) Quintais Blog, 24 februari. Multi-territorial Licensing – Part I’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 19 juli. 65 ‘HADOPI hits once again the headlines’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 20 maart. Jasserand 93 ‘Proposal for a Directive on Collective Rights Management and (some) Quintais Multi-territorial Licensing – Part II’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 24 juli. 66 ‘Jurisdiction issue over the sale of copyright-infringing CDs : a new referral to Jasserand the CJEU by the French Court of Cassation’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 4 mei. 94 ‘Dr. Strangelaw or: How Portugal Learned to Stop Worrying and Love P2P’, Quintais Kluwer Copyright Blog, 25 oktober. 67 ‘YouTube guilty but not liable ? some more precisions on the status of hosting Jasserand providers’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 18 juni. 95 ‘Proposal for a Directive on Collective Rights Management and (some) Quintais Multi-territorial Licensing – Part I’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 19 juli. 68 ‘Proposal for a Directive on Collective Rights Management and (some) Multi- Jasserand territorial Licensing – Part I’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 19 juli. 96 ‘Ten years InfoSoc: a small note from a biased attendee to the conference’, Ramalho Kluwer Copyright Blog, 1 januari. 69 ‘France: the Court of Cassation puts an end to the Notice and Stay Down Rule’, Jasserand Kluwer Copyright Blog, 14 augustus. 97 ‘Is secrecy the new black in IP?’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 6 februari. Ramalho 70 ‘France- Google can be ordered to filter words linking to online piracy websites, Jasserand 98 ‘The Donner case: when EU law meets copyright law’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, Ramalho Kluwer Copyright Blog, 3 september. 2 april. 71 ‘France- Dailymotion heavily fined for the late removal of infringing content, Jasserand 99 Possible Referral of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) Ramalho Kluwer Copyright Blog, 28 september. to the Court of Justice of the European Union, IRIS 2012-4, p. 1-3. 72 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Exploitation rights of films directors’, Jasserand 100 ‘Murder they wrote – the Dutch kill ACTA’ , Kluwer Copyright Blog, 30 mei. Ramalho IRIS 2012-3, p. 5-6. 101 Privacy als empowerment: van pacificatiestrategie tot wapenwedloop, Van de Sloot 73 ‘Did anybody notice it? Active and passive hosting in Italian case law on ISP Margoni De Filosoof 2012-55, p. 15-16. liability’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 11 mei. 102 ‘Subjectieve verwijtbaarheid van internet intermediairs: enkele vragen’, Van der Sloot 74 ‘Re-use of bio-information: some rights reserved or full copyright?’, Margoni AMI 2012-3, p. 92-95. Waag Society bulleting BioArt Special Summer 2012, p. 7. 103 ‘De Occupy-beweging en het recht om niets te zeggen, of over Bartleby Van der Sloot 75 ‘Canada modernizes its Copyright Act (beyond the Canadian Copyright Margoni the scriveneer’, Informail 2012-1, p. 10-11. Modernization Act’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 21 augustus. 104 ‘Parliamentary Assembly - Texts on Personal Data on the Internet and Zuiderveen 76 ‘A Keen Eye for Cultural Diversity’, School of Human Rights Research Newsletter McGonagle Online Media’, IRIS 2012-2, p. 5-6. Borgesius 2012-3, p. 7-8. 105 (met M. Oostveen) ‘Amendment of the Telecommunications Act’, Zuiderveen IRIS 2012- 7, p.22-23. Borgesius

83 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

106 (met S. Kulk) Hof van Justitie 24 november 2011, Mediaforum 2012-3, Zuiderveen p. 93-100 (Scarlet / Sabam). Borgesius

2012 Publications aimed at the general public Author 1 ‘Mag een krant een foto plaatsen van een verdachte die eerder voluit op tv was?, Dommering NJ blog.nl, 5 april. 2 ‘Mag een krant een foto plaatsen van een verdachte die eerder voluit op tv was?, Dommering NRC-Handelsblad 5april. 3 ‘Is heimelijk fotograferen van naakt ontucht of alleen privacyschending?’, Dommering NJ blog.nl, 25 mei. 4 Samenvatting van ‘Is heimelijk fotograferen van naakt ontucht of alleen Dommering privacyschending?’, NRC Handelsblad 26 mei. 5 ‘Civielrechtelijke verantwoordelijkheid van Facebook in verband met de Dommering Project X rellen in Haren’, NRC Handelsblad 2 oktober. 6 ‘Mag je alles op internet beweren waar je zin in hebt’, NJ blog.nl, 22 november. Dommering 7 Samenvatting van ‘Mag je alles op internet beweren waar je zin in hebt’, NRC Dommering Handelsblad 22 november. 8 (met R. Leenes & M. Koning) NPO bakt niets van cookies, Twitter:@Fborgesius: Zuiderveen Onderzoeks gerelateerd nieuws, 22 oktober. Borgesius

2012 Inaugural lectures & PhD defenses Author 1 Regulatory aspects of search engines (PhD defense). Van Hoboken

2012 Invited lectures/keynotes/presentations/workshops Author 1 Voordracht seminar ‘Social Media & Recht’, Amsterdam, 28 juni. Alberdingk Thijm 2 ‘De juridische kant van sociale media’, voordracht sociale media evenement Alberdingk Thijm Netwerk Notarissen, Utrecht, 20 september. 3 ‘Privacy op internet’, voordracht webinar ‘Law at Web’, Amsterdam, Alberdingk Thijm 27 september. 4 ‘Aansprakelijkheid van ISP voor content’, voordracht op Grotius terugkomdag Alberdingk Thijm IT, Amsterdam, 29 november. 5 ‘Communications Security Governance’, IViR leestafel, Amsterdam, 20 januari. Arnbak 6 ‘Communications Security Governance’, Ph.D. Course, Universiteit van Arnbak Amsterdam, 22 februari. 7 ‘Verzuiling 2.0 door Twitter?’, Nationaal Twittergala, Amsterdam, 29 maart. Arnbak 8 ‘Datalekken - Hack de UvA!’, Universiteitsdag, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Arnbak 2 juni. 9 ‘Het wat, hoe en waarom van promoveren’, Introductiedag Eerstejaars, Arnbak Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 28 augustus. 10 (met N.A.N.M. van Eijk ) ‘Certificate Authority Collapse Regulating Arnbak the HTTPS Value Chain’, Berkman Center, Harvard University, 20 september. 11 ‘Certificate Authority Collapse Regulating the HTTPS Value Chain’, Arnbak Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, George Mason Law School, Arlington, USA, 22 september. 12 ‘Informatiebeveiliging bij de Overheid’, Week van de Inspiratie – Arnbak Belastingdienst, Amsterdam, 26 september.

84 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

106 (met S. Kulk) Hof van Justitie 24 november 2011, Mediaforum 2012-3, Zuiderveen 13 ‘Cybersecurity bij de overheid’, voordracht en paneldiscussie met Minister Arnbak p. 93-100 (Scarlet / Sabam). Borgesius Ivo Opstelten, Rob Bertholee (chef AIVD) en Erik Akerboom (Secr.-Gen. Ministerie van Defensie), Reuring Café, Den Haag, 20 November. 14 ‘Certificate Authority Collapse - Will the EU Succeed in Regulating HTTPS?’, Arnbak 29c3 Chaos Communication Conference, Hamburg, Germany, 28 december. 2012 Publications aimed at the general public Author 15 Reflections in the Dead Library’, Open Society Archives, Budapest, 12 april. Bodo 1 ‘Mag een krant een foto plaatsen van een verdachte die eerder voluit op tv was?, Dommering 16 ‘Pirate Libraries’, Conference on book digitization at the National Public Bodo NJ blog.nl, 5 april. Library, Budapest, 17 april. 2 ‘Mag een krant een foto plaatsen van een verdachte die eerder voluit op tv was?, Dommering 17 ‘PSB in the digital age’, Public, service, media conference, Budapest, 22 april. Bodo NRC-Handelsblad 5april. 18 ‘IP enforcement and its alternatives’, Media Hungary, Siófok, 9 mei. Bodo 3 ‘Is heimelijk fotograferen van naakt ontucht of alleen privacyschending?’, Dommering NJ blog.nl, 25 mei. 19 ‘Copy Culture, Media Piracy, and Shadow Libraries’, American University Bodo Washington College of Law, Washington DC, 27 september. 4 Samenvatting van ‘Is heimelijk fotograferen van naakt ontucht of alleen Dommering privacyschending?’, NRC Handelsblad 26 mei. 20 ‘Set the fox to watch the geese: voluntary, bottom-up IP regimes in piratical Bodo file-sharing communities’, Noon-time colloquium Annenberg School for 5 ‘Civielrechtelijke verantwoordelijkheid van Facebook in verband met de Dommering Communication, UPenn, Philadephia, 5 oktober. Project X rellen in Haren’, NRC Handelsblad 2 oktober. 21 ‘Hush, hush, it is a (pirate) library’, IIT Institute of Design, Chicago, Bodo 6 ‘Mag je alles op internet beweren waar je zin in hebt’, NJ blog.nl, 22 november. Dommering 20 november. 7 Samenvatting van ‘Mag je alles op internet beweren waar je zin in hebt’, NRC Dommering 22 ‘The future of libraries’, A Symposium on Internet-Driven Developments: Bodo Handelsblad 22 november. structural Changes and tipping points, Harvard University, 6-8 december. 8 (met R. Leenes & M. Koning) NPO bakt niets van cookies, Twitter:@Fborgesius: Zuiderveen 23 Is there a future for absolute product patent protection? SCRIPT Seminar, Bostyn Onderzoeks gerelateerd nieuws, 22 oktober. Borgesius University of Edinburgh, 9 maart. 24 BAAS Annual Conference 2012, 57th Annual Conference (British Association Bostyn for American Studies), Copyright in the digital age: a dinosaur in the 21st 2012 Inaugural lectures & PhD defenses Author Century? University of Manchester, 12 april. 25 Health claims and intellectual property rights: the haves and the have-nots, Bostyn 1 Regulatory aspects of search engines (PhD defense). Van Hoboken 4th Summer Academy on Global Food Law & Policy, Cadenabbia – Lake Como, Italy, 23-27 juli. 26 Lid Internationale visitatiecommissie van de Juridische Faculteit van Leuven Dommering 2012 Invited lectures/keynotes/presentations/workshops Author 19-21 september. 27 ‘Ever growing complexity of the information society’, presentatie op het Dommering 1 Voordracht seminar ‘Social Media & Recht’, Amsterdam, 28 juni. Alberdingk Thijm Amsterdamse Lunch seminar van de Rechtenfaculteit, Amsterdam, 3 oktober. 2 ‘De juridische kant van sociale media’, voordracht sociale media evenement Alberdingk Thijm 28 ‘Journalistieke privilege’, lezing voor de Amsterdamse Alumnivereniging van Dommering Netwerk Notarissen, Utrecht, 20 september. de Rechtenfaculteit van de UvA, Amsterdam, 5 oktober. 3 ‘Privacy op internet’, voordracht webinar ‘Law at Web’, Amsterdam, Alberdingk Thijm 29 ‘Videokunst en Privacy’, presentatie op de Privacyconferentie, Felix Meritis, Dommering 27 september. Amsterdam, 9 oktober. 4 ‘Aansprakelijkheid van ISP voor content’, voordracht op Grotius terugkomdag Alberdingk Thijm 30 ‘Internal market policies and competence in copyright’, IVIR-ACELG workshop, Van Eechoud IT, Amsterdam, 29 november. University of Amsterdam 20 april. 5 ‘Communications Security Governance’, IViR leestafel, Amsterdam, 20 januari. Arnbak 31 ‘The Role for Freedom of Information Laws in Open PSI, LAPSI/EVPSI Van Eechoud 6 ‘Communications Security Governance’, Ph.D. Course, Universiteit van Arnbak Conference, Open Public Sector Information: Time for a New Paradigm’, Amsterdam, 22 februari. University of Turin, 9 juli. 7 ‘Verzuiling 2.0 door Twitter?’, Nationaal Twittergala, Amsterdam, 29 maart. Arnbak 32 ‘The Emergent Framework: Challenges for legal science’, ESF Exploratory Van Eechoud 8 ‘Datalekken - Hack de UvA!’, Universiteitsdag, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Arnbak Workshop Articulate | Accentuate, Understanding the Emergent Regulatory 2 juni. Framework Governing Public Sector Data, University of Amsterdam, 8 november. 9 ‘Het wat, hoe en waarom van promoveren’, Introductiedag Eerstejaars, Arnbak Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 28 augustus. 33 ‘The Work Unbound: Versioning and the Unit Problem in Copyight’, HERA Van Eechoud Workshop Authorship Dynamics and the Dynamic Work, Faculty of Law, 10 (met N.A.N.M. van Eijk ) ‘Certificate Authority Collapse Regulating Arnbak University of Cambridge, 15 december. the HTTPS Value Chain’, Berkman Center, Harvard University, 20 september. 34 (met J.V.J. van Hoboken) ‘Online search and search advertising’, Workshop Van Eijk 11 ‘Certificate Authority Collapse Regulating the HTTPS Value Chain’, Arnbak on EU competition law & online search and search advertising, Brussel, Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, George Mason Law School, België, 16 maart. Arlington, USA, 22 september. 35 ‘New Media – Old Thinking? Requirements of a Modern Broadcasting and Van Eijk 12 ‘Informatiebeveiliging bij de Overheid’, Week van de Inspiratie – Arnbak Network Policy from an International Point of View’, DLM-Symposium 2012, Belastingdienst, Amsterdam, 26 september. Berlijn, Duitsland, 22 maart.

85 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

36 ‘DigiNotar: about trust and security’, keynote EuroCPR 2012 ‘Policies For Van Eijk The Future Internet’, Gent, België, 25 maart. 37 ‘Something about rules, regulation and the European media market’, Van Eijk Immovator workshop, Hilversum, 15 mei. 38 ‘Competition and Communication’, SCL 7th Annual Policy Forum 2012: Van Eijk “Brave New Worlds: Computer and Communications Law Reform”, London, UK, 14 september. 39 ‘Value chain’, 360o Expert Meeting on Convergent Regulation, Brussel, Van Eijk 18 september. 40 (met A.M. Arnbak) ‘Certificate Authority Collapse Regulating the HTTPS Van Eijk Value Chain’, Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, Cambridge, USA, 20 september. 41 (met A.M. Arnbak) ‘Certificate Authority Collapse Regulating the HTTPS Value Van Eijk Chain’, TPRC 2012, George Mason Law School, Arlington, USA, 22 september. 42 ‘15 jaar OPTA: waardeketens, innovatie en randvoorwaarden’, Regulation 3.0, Van Eijk OPTA, Den Haag, 11 oktober. 43 ‘Some European perspectives’, in re Books: A Conference on Law and the Van Eijk Future of Books, New York Law School, New York, USA, 26 oktober. 44 ‘Structural Change’, Symposium on Internet-Driven Developments: Van Eijk Structural Changes and Tipping Points, Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, Cambridge, USA, 6 december. 45 ‘Looking ahead: Reinstating formalities as a means for addressing some Van Gompel key challenges in today’s copyright law’, CEIPI public lecture series on ‘(Re)thinking Intellectual Property: Fundamental Questions and New Perspectives’, Strasbourg, 2 april. 46 ‘The orphan works chimera and how to defeat it: A view from across the Van Gompel Atlantic’, Orphan works & mass digitization: obstacles & opportunities, 16th annual BCLT/BTLJ symposium, Berkeley, 12-13 april. 47 ‘Fair remuneration for authors in the digital era: what are the fences?’, S&D Van Gompel Group Hearing on ‘The Copyright Challenge: Can Europe ensure that creators’ rights are collected and managed fairly?’, European Parliament, Brussels, 6 juni. 48 ‘The renewed interest in copyright formalities in the digital era’, IViR/BCLT Van Gompel workshop on ‘Copyright formalities’, Amsterdam, 7 juli. 49 (met R. van der Noll) ‘Flexibel Auteursrecht: Onderzoek naar een open norm Van Gompel in het Nederlandse Auteursrecht’, IViR/SEO Symposium Auteursrecht en Economie, Amsterdam, 16 oktober. 50 ‘Creativity v. copyright: is there a line to draw?’, S&D Group conference on Van Gompel ‘Copyright: what is broken, how to mend it?’, European Parliament, Brussels, 18 oktober. 51 ‘Object, subject en formaliteiten van het auteursrecht’, VVA ledenvergadering: Van Gompel Auteurswet in perspectief, verleden en actualiteit, Amsterdam, 9 november. 52 ‘The feasibility of (re)introducing formalities in copyright law’, werkbezoek Van Gompel Korea Copyright Commission aan het IViR, Amsterdam, 28 november. 53 ‘Bescherming van creatieve prestaties’, IEMES week ‘Hear, see, do, experience’, Van Gompel Fontys Academy for Creative Industries, Tilburg, 6 december. 54 ‘Has the Directive achieved its goals of harmonisation and greater legal Guibault certainty?’, CRIDS/IViR conferentie InfoSoc @ Ten - Ten Years after the EU Directive on Copyright in the Information Society: Looking Back and Looking Forward, European Parliament, 13 januari. 55 (met N. Helberger) ‘Clash of Cultures – Integrating Copyright and Consumer Guibault Law’, Policies for the Future Internet, EuroCPR, Gent, 25-27 maart. 56 ‘Europeana: Looking ahead’, conferentie Orphan Works & Mass-Digitisation: Guibault Obstacles and Opportunities, University of California at Berkeley, 12-13 april.

86 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

36 ‘DigiNotar: about trust and security’, keynote EuroCPR 2012 ‘Policies For Van Eijk 57 ‘Voluntary Licensing as means to Access Knowledge’, Conferentie ‘The Access Guibault The Future Internet’, Gent, België, 25 maart. Challenge In The 21st Century: Emerging Issues In Intellectual Property Laws 37 ‘Something about rules, regulation and the European media market’, Van Eijk And Knowledge Governance’, Bucerius Law School, Hamburg, Germany, Immovator workshop, Hilversum, 15 mei. 18-19 mei. 38 ‘Competition and Communication’, SCL 7th Annual Policy Forum 2012: Van Eijk 58 Norm Setting in Copyright Law, Copyright for Creativity workshop, Guibault “Brave New Worlds: Computer and Communications Law Reform”, London, Europese Parlament, Brussel, 30 mei. UK, 14 september. 59 ‘Open Access Licences and Copyright Law’, Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen Guibault 39 ‘Value chain’, 360o Expert Meeting on Convergent Regulation, Brussel, Van Eijk der Akademievorhaben Workshop der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu 18 september. Göttingen und der Union der deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften, “Elektronisches Publizieren”, Göttingen 7-8 oktober. 40 (met A.M. Arnbak) ‘Certificate Authority Collapse Regulating the HTTPS Van Eijk Value Chain’, Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, 60 ‘Exceptions and Limitations under European Union Law’, Copyright and the Guibault Cambridge, USA, 20 september. public interest, Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCAK), Kraków, Polen, 30 oktober. 41 (met A.M. Arnbak) ‘Certificate Authority Collapse Regulating the HTTPS Value Van Eijk Chain’, TPRC 2012, George Mason Law School, Arlington, USA, 22 september. 61 ‘Open Research Data:Under What Conditions?’, Göttinger Guibault Urheberrechtstagung, Georg August Universität Göttingen, 19 november. 42 ‘15 jaar OPTA: waardeketens, innovatie en randvoorwaarden’, Regulation 3.0, Van Eijk OPTA, Den Haag, 11 oktober. 62 ‘Introducing Flexibility in EU Copyright Law’, CEPS Digital Forum Task Force Guibault on Copyright in the EU Digital Single, Brussel, 13 december. 43 ‘Some European perspectives’, in re Books: A Conference on Law and the Van Eijk Future of Books, New York Law School, New York, USA, 26 oktober. 63 ‘Copyright and Its Effect on Different Types of Innovation’, presented at Handke the 17th Conference of the Association of Cultural Economics International, 44 ‘Structural Change’, Symposium on Internet-Driven Developments: Van Eijk Kyoto, 21-24 juni. Structural Changes and Tipping Points, Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, Cambridge, USA, 6 december. 64 Voordracht tijdens OECD workshop on consumers and digital products, Helberger Parijs, 23 april. 45 ‘Looking ahead: Reinstating formalities as a means for addressing some Van Gompel key challenges in today’s copyright law’, CEIPI public lecture series on 65 ‘Die neue Informationsordnung - brauchen wir ein konvergentes Helberger ‘(Re)thinking Intellectual Property: Fundamental Questions and New Medienkonzentrationsrecht?’, Symposium van het Hans Bredow Institut Perspectives’, Strasbourg, 2 april. & Landesmedienanstalt Hamburg Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg, 5 juni. 46 ‘The orphan works chimera and how to defeat it: A view from across the Van Gompel 66 ‘Doordraaiende camera’s: grenzen aan de journalistiek?’, voordracht symposium Hins Atlantic’, Orphan works & mass digitization: obstacles & opportunities, ‘Grenzen aan de Journalistiek’, Universiteit Leiden, 6 maart. 16th annual BCLT/BTLJ symposium, Berkeley, 12-13 april. 67 (met Tofik Dibi en Sophie van Bijsterveld) ‘Free Minders’, UvA Forumdiscussie Hins 47 ‘Fair remuneration for authors in the digital era: what are the fences?’, S&D Van Gompel ‘Grenzen aan de godsdienstvrijheid’, Amsterdam, 16 april. Group Hearing on ‘The Copyright Challenge: Can Europe ensure that creators’ 68 Toelichting bij het verschijnen van de derde Persvrijheidsmonitor Nederland, Hins rights are collected and managed fairly?’, European Parliament, Brussels, 6 juni. Nederlandse Vereniging van Journalisten, Stichting Persvrijheidsfonds e.a., 48 ‘The renewed interest in copyright formalities in the digital era’, IViR/BCLT Van Gompel Symposium ‘Internationale dag van de persvrijheid’, Amsterdam, 3 mei. workshop on ‘Copyright formalities’, Amsterdam, 7 juli. 69 Rapportage voor Nederland, conferentie ‘European Consultation on national Hins 49 (met R. van der Noll) ‘Flexibel Auteursrecht: Onderzoek naar een open norm Van Gompel security and right to information principles’, University of Copenhagen en Open in het Nederlandse Auteursrecht’, IViR/SEO Symposium Auteursrecht en Society Justice Initiative, Kopenhagen, 20 en 21 september. Economie, Amsterdam, 16 oktober. 70 ‘Vrijheid van de media en persoonsgegevens’, voordracht Kluwer Studiedag Hins 50 ‘Creativity v. copyright: is there a line to draw?’, S&D Group conference on Van Gompel ‘Onrechtmatige perspublicaties’, Amsterdam, 11 oktober. ‘Copyright: what is broken, how to mend it?’, European Parliament, Brussels, 71 ‘Persvrijheid en staatsgeheimen’, voordracht Vereniging Res Publica, Hins 18 oktober. Leiden, 3 december. 51 ‘Object, subject en formaliteiten van het auteursrecht’, VVA ledenvergadering: Van Gompel 72 ‘Internet en het recht om vergeten te worden’, voordracht externe bijeenkomst Hins Auteurswet in perspectief, verleden en actualiteit, Amsterdam, 9 november. staats- en bestuursrecht Universiteit van Amsterdam, 17 december. 52 ‘The feasibility of (re)introducing formalities in copyright law’, werkbezoek Van Gompel 73 ‘Net Neutraliteit en de Vrijheid van Meningsuiting’, OPTA, Den Haag, 9 februari. Van Hoboken Korea Copyright Commission aan het IViR, Amsterdam, 28 november. 74 ‘Search Engines ad EU Law: Unfair Rankings and Freedom of Expression’, Van Hoboken 53 ‘Bescherming van creatieve prestaties’, IEMES week ‘Hear, see, do, experience’, Van Gompel Urios Symposium, Utrecht, 20 februari. Fontys Academy for Creative Industries, Tilburg, 6 december. 75 ‘Zoekmachines en de Vrijheid van Meningsuiting’, Spreektafel, IViR, 24 februari. Van Hoboken 54 ‘Has the Directive achieved its goals of harmonisation and greater legal Guibault 76 ‘Making Social Networks Respect Privacy and Communications Freedoms’, Van Hoboken certainty?’, CRIDS/IViR conferentie InfoSoc @ Ten - Ten Years after the EU Unlike Us, Amsterdam, 8 maart. Directive on Copyright in the Information Society: Looking Back and Looking Forward, European Parliament, 13 januari. 77 ‘Online service providers and competition for big user data - a final blow to Van Hoboken privacy?, Privacy regulation, competition policy and innovation on the internet’, 55 (met N. Helberger) ‘Clash of Cultures – Integrating Copyright and Consumer Guibault Ministry of EL&I, CPB, TILEC, Den Haag, 13 maart. Law’, Policies for the Future Internet, EuroCPR, Gent, 25-27 maart. 78 ‘Search Engines – background, operations and context’, Workshop on EU Van Hoboken 56 ‘Europeana: Looking ahead’, conferentie Orphan Works & Mass-Digitisation: Guibault competition law & online search and search advertising, Brussels, 16 maart. Obstacles and Opportunities, University of California at Berkeley, 12-13 april.

87 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

79 ‘Search Engines, Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression: A Van Hoboken Transatlantic Comparison’, Symposium: Intermediary Liability in the Digital Age, Haifa University, Israel, 16 mei. 80 ‘Het recht op vergetelheid’, debat met S. Nas (CBP) o.l.v. B. Van der Sloot, Van Hoboken Universiteitsdag UvA, Amsterdam, 2 juni. 81 ‘Cloud Computing & USA Patriot Act’, Privacy & de cloud: de stand van zaken, Van Hoboken SURFnet, Utrecht, 26 juni. 82 ‘Search Engines and Privacy: Users and Targets’, Evening Panel with Claudia Van Hoboken Diaz, Andy McStay and Joss Wright, COSIC Interdisciplinary Privacy Course, KU Leuven, 27 juni. 83 ‘The Right to be Forgotten and the Media Exception in the Proposed Data Van Hoboken Protection Regulation’, European Parliament Hearing on Data Protection for the Digital Age, Brussel, 28 juni. 84 ‘The Digital Civil Rights Movement and the Privacy Engineering Community’, Van Hoboken Rump Session, PETS 2012, Vigo, Spanje, 12 juli. 85 ‘Search engines and intermediary liability: A comparison of different Van Hoboken approaches and their implications for the right to freedom of expression’, International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) Conference, Universiteit van Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, Zuid-Afrika, 16 juli. 86 ‘Freedom of Expression Implications of Europe’s Proposed Right to be Van Hoboken Forgotten’, International Association for Media and Communication Research 87 (IAMCR) Conference, Universiteit van Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, Zuid-Afrika, 16 juli. 88 ‘Zoekmachines, de publieke informatievoorziening en de vrijheid van Van Hoboken meningsuiting: bestaande zorgen in een nieuwe context’, lezing Ministerie van OC&W, Den Haag, 18 september. 89 ‘Privacy in the Information Society: the Right to be forgotten’, chair of panel Van Hoboken with Paul Bernal, Jef Ausloos, Tjeerd Schiphof and Vicky Breemen, Amsterdam Privacy Conference, 8 oktober. 90 ‘Behavioural Targeting & Privacy’, chair of panel with Alessandro Acquisti, Van Hoboken Chris Hoofnagle et al., Amsterdam Privacy Conference, 8 oktober. 91 ‘The right to be forgotten seen from the perspective of our right to remember: Van Hoboken freedom of expression safeguards in a converging information environment, ‘Right to be Forgotten: Ethical Considerations’, EC Joint Research Centre, Ispra, 12 november. 92 ‘Google Search and Government Interference: on concerns about, and a Van Hoboken regulatory agenda for search media informed by the right to freedom of expression’, Fundamentals of Media and Communications Policy, CEU, Budapest, 20 november. 93 ‘Internet Intermediaries & Freedom of Expression: Concerns, Research & Van Hoboken Regulatory Agenda in Europe’, Presentation for a delegation of Chinese Judges, IViR, 3 december. 94 ‘Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression’, contribution to Symposium Van Hoboken on Internet-Driven Developments: Structural Changes and Tipping Points, Berkman Center, Harvard, 8 december. 95 ‘Is Harmonization a Good Thing? The Case of the Copyright Acquis’, Hugenholtz Conference European Methods in IP, University of Oxford, 7 januari. 96 ‘Harmonization or Unification of Copyright in the EU?’, Conference Hugenholtz InfoSoc @ Ten, Brussels, European Parliament, 13 januari. 97 ‘Mededeling aan het publiek’ in art. 3 Auteursrechtrichtlijn, Vereniging Hugenholtz voor Auteursrecht, Amsterdam, 20 januari. 98 ‘Plagiarism versus Copyright. The Rise of Rights in Reputation’, 13th EIPIN Hugenholtz Congress, Munich, 4 februari.

88 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

79 ‘Search Engines, Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression: A Van Hoboken 99 ‘The Need for Flexibility in Copyright’, Conference Towards flexible copyright?, Hugenholtz Transatlantic Comparison’, Symposium: Intermediary Liability in the Digital Ministry of Justice, The Hague, 10 februari. Age, Haifa University, Israel, 16 mei. 100 ‘Fair Use in Europe: in Search of Flexibilities in Copyright’, Seventh Annual Hugenholtz 80 ‘Het recht op vergetelheid’, debat met S. Nas (CBP) o.l.v. B. Van der Sloot, Van Hoboken International Intellectual Property Lecture, Emmanuel College, Cambridge Universiteitsdag UvA, Amsterdam, 2 juni. University,13 maart. 81 ‘Cloud Computing & USA Patriot Act’, Privacy & de cloud: de stand van zaken, Van Hoboken 101 ‘Copyright in Europe: 20 Years Ago, Today and What the Future Holds’, Hugenholtz SURFnet, Utrecht, 26 juni. 20th Annual Fordham IP Conference, New York, 13 april. 82 ‘Search Engines and Privacy: Users and Targets’, Evening Panel with Claudia Van Hoboken 102 ‘Flexible Copyright. The Need for Fair and Open Norms in Copyright to Foster Hugenholtz Diaz, Andy McStay and Joss Wright, COSIC Interdisciplinary Privacy Course, Creation and Innovation Online’, Conference Intellectual Property Online: KU Leuven, 27 juni. Economic Models and Legal Aspects. Russian and Global Experience, Moscow, 83 ‘The Right to be Forgotten and the Media Exception in the Proposed Data Van Hoboken 17 april. Protection Regulation’, European Parliament Hearing on Data Protection for 103 ‘Copyright Harmonization: Looking Ahead’, International Conference in Hugenholtz the Digital Age, Brussel, 28 juni. honour of Frank Gotzen, KU Leuven, 7 juni. 84 ‘The Digital Civil Rights Movement and the Privacy Engineering Community’, Van Hoboken 104 ‘Bescherming van programmagegevens na Football Dataco’, Houthoff Buruma Hugenholtz Rump Session, PETS 2012, Vigo, Spanje, 12 juli. Mediaseminar, Amsterdam, 7 juni. 85 ‘Search engines and intermediary liability: A comparison of different Van Hoboken 105 ‘Fair Use in Europe: in Search of Flexibilities in Copyright’, Norwegian Hugenholtz approaches and their implications for the right to freedom of expression’, Copyright Society, Oslo, 18 juni. International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) 106 ‘Flexible Copyright’, 5th International Conference on Information Law and Hugenholtz Conference, Universiteit van Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, Zuid-Afrika, 16 juli. Ethics 2012, Corfu, 30 juni. 86 ‘Freedom of Expression Implications of Europe’s Proposed Right to be Van Hoboken 107 ‘An Agenda for EU Copyright Reform’, Lisbon Council IP Summit, Brussel, Hugenholtz Forgotten’, International Association for Media and Communication Research 10 september. 87 (IAMCR) Conference, Universiteit van Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, Zuid-Afrika, 16 juli. 108 ‘Intellectual Property v. Open Access’, Open University Skolkovo, Moscow, Hugenholtz 29 oktober. 88 ‘Zoekmachines, de publieke informatievoorziening en de vrijheid van Van Hoboken meningsuiting: bestaande zorgen in een nieuwe context’, lezing Ministerie van 109 ‘Het bijzondere Nederlandse filmrecht’, Studiemiddag Vereniging voor Kabel OC&W, Den Haag, 18 september. Auteursrecht, Amsterdam, 25 mei. 89 ‘Privacy in the Information Society: the Right to be forgotten’, chair of panel Van Hoboken 110 ‘A legal analysis of Gene Patents in Canada’, GAP-M Law and Biology seminar Margoni with Paul Bernal, Jef Ausloos, Tjeerd Schiphof and Vicky Breemen, Amsterdam series, University of Western Ontario, Canada, 10 februari. Privacy Conference, 8 oktober. 111 ‘Gene patents in comparative patent law’,TIPSA 2012 - Transatlantic Intellectual Margoni 90 ‘Behavioural Targeting & Privacy’, chair of panel with Alessandro Acquisti, Van Hoboken Property Academy, Trento, Italy, 2-7 juni. Chris Hoofnagle et al., Amsterdam Privacy Conference, 8 oktober. 112 ‘Design rights and Creative Commons Licenses’, Open Knowledge Conference Margoni 91 ‘The right to be forgotten seen from the perspective of our right to remember: Van Hoboken Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland, 18-22 september. freedom of expression safeguards in a converging information environment, 113 ‘Dati aperti e ricerca scientifica’, CRUI (Conferenza Rettori Universita’ Italiane), Margoni ‘Right to be Forgotten: Ethical Considerations’, EC Joint Research Centre, Universita’ Trasferimento della conoscenza e diritto d’autore dell’era digitale, Ispra, 12 november. Rome, Italy, 17-18 oktober. 92 ‘Google Search and Government Interference: on concerns about, and a Van Hoboken 114 ‘Use and reuse of research data: licences’, OpenAIRE Conference Margoni regulatory agenda for search media informed by the right to freedom of ‘Enlightenment in the Knowledge Society: From Pilot to Service’, Goettingen, expression’, Fundamentals of Media and Communications Policy, CEU, Germany, 21-22 november. Budapest, 20 november. 115 ‘Authorship Dynamics and the Dynamic Work’, Workshop HERA, University Margoni 93 ‘Internet Intermediaries & Freedom of Expression: Concerns, Research & Van Hoboken of Cambridge Faculty of Law, UK, 15 december. Regulatory Agenda in Europe’, Presentation for a delegation of Chinese Judges, 116 ‘Time to temp the IGOs? Sources of chilling effect in international policies McGonagle IViR, 3 december. on new media’, Chilling Effect Symposium georganiseerd door Queen Mary, 94 ‘Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression’, contribution to Symposium Van Hoboken University of London en Universiteit Gent, London, 20 maart. on Internet-Driven Developments: Structural Changes and Tipping Points, 117 ‘Freedom of expression, the media and minorities’, Human Rights, States and McGonagle Berkman Center, Harvard, 8 december. Identities in Transition: Legal Issues in Central and Eastern Europe, Research 95 ‘Is Harmonization a Good Thing? The Case of the Copyright Acquis’, Hugenholtz Group Eastern European History and Eastern European Studies, Faculty of Conference European Methods in IP, University of Oxford, 7 januari. Humanities, University of Amsterdam, 11 mei. 96 ‘Harmonization or Unification of Copyright in the EU?’, Conference Hugenholtz 118 ‘Free speech, hate speech and social media’, Gewenste en ongewenste diversiteit McGonagle InfoSoc @ Ten, Brussels, European Parliament, 13 januari. in sociale media, User Empowerment in a Social Media Culture (EMSOC) 97 ‘Mededeling aan het publiek’ in art. 3 Auteursrechtrichtlijn, Vereniging Hugenholtz Project, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (i.s.m. KU Leuven (ICRI) en Universiteit voor Auteursrecht, Amsterdam, 20 januari. Gent), Brussel, 1 juni. 98 ‘Plagiarism versus Copyright. The Rise of Rights in Reputation’, 13th EIPIN Hugenholtz 119 Invited Commentator on Prof. Neil Richards’ paper, ‘The Perils of Social McGonagle Congress, Munich, 4 februari. Reading’, Comparative Perspectives on Privacy and Media Law Conference, Clare College, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 27 juni.

89 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

120 ‘The troubled relationship between free speech and racist hate speech: the McGonagle ambiguous roles of the media and internet’, Expert Paper, Day of Thematic Discussion “Racist Hate Speech” (28 augustus 2012), UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, 81st Session, 6-31 augustus. 121 “‘Education’s End’ or Public Service Media’s Future?”, presentatie workshop McGonagle Public Service Media and Exposure Diversity, IViR, Amsterdam, 28 september. 122 ‘Freedom of expression and the European Convention on Human Rights: McGonagle a brief exploration of selected issues’, Media and Law Training for Delegation of Chinese Judges, IViR/International Center for Communication Development (Hong Kong) and Internews China, Amsterdam, 3 december. 123 ‘The right of national minorities to freedom of expression in the digital age: McGonagle thematic issues and normative developments’, presentatie workshop IViR i.s.m. the Office of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities, Amsterdam, 7 december. 124 (met J. Weda) ‘Windows or opportunities: Digital obstacles for the audiovisual Poort industries’, Creative with IP event, Amsterdam, 30 augustus. 125 (met J. Leenheer) ‘Filesharing 2©12’, Symposium Auteursrecht en Economie, Poort Amsterdam, 16 oktober. 126 Panel in debatbijeenkomst ‘De toekomst van het boek’, Academische Club, Poort Amsterdam, 1 november. 127 Panel in conferentie ‘What Constitutes Evidence for Copyright Policy?’, Poort Bornemouth University, 8 november. 128 ‘Brein vs. Hydra; het blokkeren van websites’, Symposium Poort Auteursrechthandhaving op Internet, Amsterdam, 22 november. 129 ‘PSI-personal privacy settings’, LAPSI, Brussel, 23 januari. Van der Sloot 130 ‘DNA en persoonsgegevens’, Vrijbit, Utrecht, 28 januari. Van der Sloot 131 ‘Brein v. Ziggo en Xs4all’ Amsterdamse Innovatie Motor, Amsterdam, Van der Sloot 7 februari. 132 ‘Internet en de rechtsstaat’, ANS en JFV, Nijmegen, 9 februari. Van der Sloot 133 ‘Street view and object identification’, Cogimund project, Leuven, 20 april. Van der Sloot 134 ‘Privacy en de kunst cartografie’, Montesquieu stichting, Den Haag, 6 september. Van der Sloot 135 ‘Behavioural targeting’, PechaKucha Computers, Privacy and Data Protection Zuiderveen Conference Brussels, 25 januari. Borgesius 136 ‘The Ecosystem of Online Audience Buying’, Unlike Us conference, Zuiderveen Amsterdam, 8 maart. Borgesius 137 ‘Behavioural targeting & Audience buying’, presentatie bij College Bescherming Zuiderveen Persoonsgegevens, Den Haag, 12 maart. Borgesius 138 ‘Behavioural targeting, How to regulate?’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference, Zuiderveen 8 oktober. Borgesius 139 Speech at the European Parliament: Interparliamentary Committee meeting: Zuiderveen The reform of the EU Data Protection framework - Building trust in a digital Borgesius and global world, 10 oktober. 140 ‘Behavioural targeting - How to regulate? Privacy Research Group’, Zuiderveen New York University, 17 oktober. Borgesius 141 ‘Behavioural targeting - How to regulate?’, Syracuse University, Syracuse, Zuiderveen 25 oktober. Borgesius 142 ‘Behavioral Targeting: Legal Developments in Europe and the Netherlands’, Zuiderveen W3C Do Not Track Workshop, Berkeley, 26 november. Borgesius

90 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

120 ‘The troubled relationship between free speech and racist hate speech: the McGonagle 2012 Editorships & peer reviewer/review activities Author ambiguous roles of the media and internet’, Expert Paper, Day of Thematic 1 Co-editor Information Technology & Law Series. Alberdingk Thijm Discussion “Racist Hate Speech” (28 augustus 2012), UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, 81st Session, 6-31 augustus. 2 (met A.B. Ramalho (ed.)) Crossroads of Intellectual Property: the Intersection of Angelopoulos Intellectual Property and other Fields of Law, New York: Nova Publishers 2012, 121 “‘Education’s End’ or Public Service Media’s Future?”, presentatie workshop McGonagle 171 pp. Public Service Media and Exposure Diversity, IViR, Amsterdam, 28 september. 3 Co-editor en mede-oprichter Journal of International Biotechnology Law. Bostyn 122 ‘Freedom of expression and the European Convention on Human Rights: McGonagle a brief exploration of selected issues’, Media and Law Training for Delegation 4 Lid van de redactieraad van Auteurs- en Mediarecht (A & M). Dommering of Chinese Judges, IViR/International Center for Communication Development 5 Redactielid AMI Tijdschrift voor Auteurs- Media en Informatierecht. Van Eechoud (Hong Kong) and Internews China, Amsterdam, 3 december. 6 Medewerker Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Van Eechoud 123 ‘The right of national minorities to freedom of expression in the digital age: McGonagle 7 Medewerker aan losbladige uitgave Intellectuele Eigendom, artikelsgewijs Van Eechoud thematic issues and normative developments’, presentatie workshop IViR commentaar. i.s.m. the Office of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities, Amsterdam, 7 december. 8 Redactielid Computerrecht. Van Eijk 124 (met J. Weda) ‘Windows or opportunities: Digital obstacles for the audiovisual Poort 9 Medewerker Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht. Van Eijk industries’, Creative with IP event, Amsterdam, 30 augustus. 10 Referee Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek - Vlaanderen, (FWO). Van Eijk 125 (met J. Leenheer) ‘Filesharing 2©12’, Symposium Auteursrecht en Economie, Poort 11 Referee ITS Europe conference. Van Eijk Amsterdam, 16 oktober. 12 Referee diverse tijdschriften. Van Eijk 126 Panel in debatbijeenkomst ‘De toekomst van het boek’, Academische Club, Poort 13 Redactielid AMI, tijdschrift voor auteurs-, media- & informatierecht. Van Gompel Amsterdam, 1 november. 14 Co-hoofdredacteur Kluwer European IP Cases. Guibault 127 Panel in conferentie ‘What Constitutes Evidence for Copyright Policy?’, Poort Bornemouth University, 8 november. 15 Lid redactie Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Guibault e-Commerce Law (JIPITEC) (Duitsland). 128 ‘Brein vs. Hydra; het blokkeren van websites’, Symposium Poort Auteursrechthandhaving op Internet, Amsterdam, 22 november. 16 Lid internationale redactie Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle (Canada.) Guibault 129 ‘PSI-personal privacy settings’, LAPSI, Brussel, 23 januari. Van der Sloot 17 Lid internationale redactie de online juridische databank www.juriscom.fr Guibault (Frankrijk). 130 ‘DNA en persoonsgegevens’, Vrijbit, Utrecht, 28 januari. Van der Sloot 18 Correspondent Computer Law Review International (Duitsland). Guibault 131 ‘Brein v. Ziggo en Xs4all’ Amsterdamse Innovatie Motor, Amsterdam, Van der Sloot 7 februari. 19 Editor en national reporter – Common Core of European Private Law, Guibault University of Torino (Boundaries of Information Property). 132 ‘Internet en de rechtsstaat’, ANS en JFV, Nijmegen, 9 februari. Van der Sloot 20 Board of Editors of the Review for Economic Research on Copyright Issues (RERCI). Handke 133 ‘Street view and object identification’, Cogimund project, Leuven, 20 april. Van der Sloot 21 Expert Reviewer Katholiek Universiteit Leuven. Helberger 134 ‘Privacy en de kunst cartografie’, Montesquieu stichting, Den Haag, 6 september. Van der Sloot 22 Expert Reviewer NWO. Helberger 135 ‘Behavioural targeting’, PechaKucha Computers, Privacy and Data Protection Zuiderveen Conference Brussels, 25 januari. Borgesius 23 Expert Reviewer FWO. Helberger 136 ‘The Ecosystem of Online Audience Buying’, Unlike Us conference, Zuiderveen 24 Editorial Board Journal of Information Policy (international, peer-reviewed Helberger Amsterdam, 8 maart. Borgesius open access Publication). 137 ‘Behavioural targeting & Audience buying’, presentatie bij College Bescherming Zuiderveen 25 Reviewer voor Journal of Information Policy en Fordham University Press. Helberger Persoonsgegevens, Den Haag, 12 maart. Borgesius 26 General Editor Information Law Series (Kluwer Law International). Hugenholtz 138 ‘Behavioural targeting, How to regulate?’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference, Zuiderveen 27 Lid Board of Editors, Journal of World Intellectual Property (JWIP). Hugenholtz 8 oktober. Borgesius 28 Vaste annotator (auteursrecht), Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Hugenholtz 139 Speech at the European Parliament: Interparliamentary Committee meeting: Zuiderveen 29 Redactielid AMI, tijdschrift voor auteurs-, media- & informatierecht. Kabel The reform of the EU Data Protection framework - Building trust in a digital Borgesius and global world, 10 oktober. 30 Redactielid Privacy & Informatie. Kabel 140 ‘Behavioural targeting - How to regulate? Privacy Research Group’, Zuiderveen 31 Redactielid IRIS. McGonagle New York University, 17 oktober. Borgesius 32 Redacteur IRIS Themes. McGonagle 141 ‘Behavioural targeting - How to regulate?’, Syracuse University, Syracuse, Zuiderveen 33 Lid adviesraad redactiecommissie Irish Human Rights Law Review. McGonagle 25 oktober. Borgesius 34 Redacteur (en plaatsvervangend eindredacteur) AMI, tijdschrift voor auteurs-, Mom 142 ‘Behavioral Targeting: Legal Developments in Europe and the Netherlands’, Zuiderveen media- en informatierecht. W3C Do Not Track Workshop, Berkeley, 26 november. Borgesius 35 Medewerker aan losbladige uitgave Intellectuele eigendom, artikelsgewijs Mom commentaar (voor de onderdelen Auteurswet en Wet op de naburige rechten). 36 Referee TPE Digitaal. Poort 37 Redactielid redactiecommissie Revista Brasileira de Direito da Comunicação Ramalho Social e Liberdade de Expressão.

91 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

38 Redactielid Diritto Mercato Tecnologia. Ramalho 39 Redactielid Berichten Industriële Eigendom (BIE). Tsoutsanis

2012 Memberships Author 1 Bestuurslid Stichting Admiraal Van Kinsbergenfonds (onbezoldigd). Arnbak 2 Lid Expertencommittee Europese Commissie en rapporteur ter evaluatie van Bostyn richtlijn 98/44/EG betreffende de wettelijke bescherming van biotechnologische uitvindingen. 3 Lid Commissie Mensenrechten (CMR) van de Adviesraad Internationale Dommering vraagstukken van het Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. 4 Lid Raad van Advies CBP. Dommering 5 Bestuurslid Vereniging voor Auteursrecht (Dutch Copyright Society). Van Eechoud 6 Lid Comité Exécutif Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI). Van Eechoud 7 Lid Association of Teachers and Researchers in Intellectual Property Law (ATRIP). Van Eechoud 8 Coördinator subcommittee ‘initial ownership’, International Law Association Van Eechoud Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law. 9 Coördinator LAPSI Working Group on Constitutional, Human Rights and Van Eechoud Environmental Perspectives. 10 Lid (in loco) Universitaire Onderzoek Commissie (UOC) Van Eechoud Universiteit van Amsterdam. 11 Voorzitter Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht (VMC). Van Eijk 12 Lid Raad van toezicht Nederlandse Publieke Omroep (NPO). Van Eijk 13 Lid Beirat Hans Bredow Institut, Hamburg, Duitsland. Van Eijk 14 Voorzitter commissie van beroep Pictoright. Van Eijk 15 Lid Beroepscommissie NLkabel. Van Eijk 16 Juryvoorzitter Internet Scriptieprijs 2012. Van Eijk 17 Jurylid Big Brother Awards 2011. Van Eijk 18 Member Advisory Committee, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg. Van Eijk 19 Lid Beirat Institut für Europäisches Medienrecht, (EMR), Saarbrücken, Duitsland. Van Eijk 20 Voorzitter overleggroep Betaalde informatiediensten en overleggroep Van Eijk Elektronische Communicatiediensten (SER). 21 Secretaris Commissie Auteursrecht. Van Gompel 22 Lid Studiecommissie voor de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht Van Gompel van de Vereniging voor Auteursrecht. 23 Lid van Network for Digital Methods in the Arts and Humanities – NeDiMAH, Guibault werkgroep van de European Science Foundation. 24 Lid van Göttingen Centre for Digital Humanities Academic Advisory Board. Guibault 25 Member of the Creative Board Thüringen. Handke 26 Program Director of the Master Cultural Economics and Entrepreneurship Handke at Erasmus University Rotterdam. 27 Representing the department of Arts and Culture Studies at Erasmus University Handke Rotterdam in Werkgroep Toetsen, producing: an overview of teaching and examination procedures of the department and the faculty; recommendations on how to evolve examination methods and the syllabus of programs taught in the faculty. 28 Selection committee for the Master in Cultural Economics and Handke Entrepreneurship (CEE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam. 29 Evolutionsökonomischer Ausschuss des Vereins für Socialpolitik (elected member). Handke

92 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

38 Redactielid Diritto Mercato Tecnologia. Ramalho 30 Lid Wetenschapscommissie FdR. Helberger 39 Redactielid Berichten Industriële Eigendom (BIE). Tsoutsanis 31 Lid programmacommissie International Telecommunications Society (ITS). Helberger 32 Connect Advisory Group (CAF), European Commission, DG Connect. Helberger 33 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie Commissariaat voor de Media. Hins 2012 Memberships Author 34 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie Nederlandse Publieke Omroep. Hins 1 Bestuurslid Stichting Admiraal Van Kinsbergenfonds (onbezoldigd). Arnbak 35 Lid Commissie Handhaving Mobiele diensten. Hins 2 Lid Expertencommittee Europese Commissie en rapporteur ter evaluatie van Bostyn 36 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie ministerie van VWS (Den Haag). Hins richtlijn 98/44/EG betreffende de wettelijke bescherming van biotechnologische 37 Voorzitter van de Raad van Bestuur Bits of Freedom. Van Hoboken uitvindingen. 38 Lid Commissie Auteursrecht, Ministerie van Justitie. Hugenholtz 3 Lid Commissie Mensenrechten (CMR) van de Adviesraad Internationale Dommering 39 Lid Comité Exécutif Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI). Hugenholtz vraagstukken van het Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. 40 Vice-voorzitter Vaste Commissie Plagiaat (Buma-Stemra). Hugenholtz 4 Lid Raad van Advies CBP. Dommering 41 Lid Fachbeirat, Max-Planck-Institut für geistiges Eigentum, Hugenholtz 5 Bestuurslid Vereniging voor Auteursrecht (Dutch Copyright Society). Van Eechoud Wettbewerbs- und Steuerrecht, München. 6 Lid Comité Exécutif Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI). Van Eechoud 42 Lid Advisory Committee, Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law, Hugenholtz 7 Lid Association of Teachers and Researchers in Intellectual Property Law (ATRIP). Van Eechoud Cambridge University. 8 Coördinator subcommittee ‘initial ownership’, International Law Association Van Eechoud 43 Lid IP Advisory Committee, Bucerius Law School, Hamburg. Hugenholtz Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law. 44 Lid Adviesraad, Bits of Freedom. Hugenholtz 9 Coördinator LAPSI Working Group on Constitutional, Human Rights and Van Eechoud 45 Lid Adviesraad, Dutch Directors Guild. Hugenholtz Environmental Perspectives. 46 Lid Advisory Board, Electronic Frontier Foundation. Hugenholtz 10 Lid (in loco) Universitaire Onderzoek Commissie (UOC) Van Eechoud Universiteit van Amsterdam. 47 Lid Algemeen Bestuur, Stichting Reprorecht. Hugenholtz 11 Voorzitter Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht (VMC). Van Eijk 48 Bestuurslid van de Vereniging voor Reclamerecht. Kabel 12 Lid Raad van toezicht Nederlandse Publieke Omroep (NPO). Van Eijk 49 Voorzitter van de Stichting Weekbladpersgroep. Kabel 13 Lid Beirat Hans Bredow Institut, Hamburg, Duitsland. Van Eijk 50 Plaatsvervangend voorzitter van de Reclame Code Commissie. Kabel 14 Voorzitter commissie van beroep Pictoright. Van Eijk 51 Voorzitter van de Commissie van Beroep van het NICAM (Kijkwijzer). Kabel 15 Lid Beroepscommissie NLkabel. Van Eijk 52 Voorzitter van de Geschillencommissie van het Bureau Kredietregistratie BKR. Kabel 16 Juryvoorzitter Internet Scriptieprijs 2012. Van Eijk 53 Expertadviseur: Media Regulation in Portugal: The ERC’s Case, McGonagle onderzoeksproject, Mediascopio Research Centre, Department of 17 Jurylid Big Brother Awards 2011. Van Eijk Communications Science, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. 18 Member Advisory Committee, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg. Van Eijk 54 Expertadviseur: Bilingualism, Identity and the Media / Living Languages in McGonagle 19 Lid Beirat Institut für Europäisches Medienrecht, (EMR), Saarbrücken, Duitsland. Van Eijk Bilingual Media Environments, onderzoeksproject, coördinatoren: prof. Tom 20 Voorzitter overleggroep Betaalde informatiediensten en overleggroep Van Eijk Moring en prof. Charles Husband, University of Helsinki, Finland. Elektronische Communicatiediensten (SER). 55 Geassocieerd lid (senior), School of Human Rights Research. McGonagle 21 Secretaris Commissie Auteursrecht. Van Gompel 56 Lid, United Nations Human Rights Committee Reflection Group, set up under McGonagle 22 Lid Studiecommissie voor de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht Van Gompel the auspices of the School of Human Rights Research as an expert (closed) van de Vereniging voor Auteursrecht. forum for Prof. Cees Flinterman in the context of his work as a member of the Committee. 23 Lid van Network for Digital Methods in the Arts and Humanities – NeDiMAH, Guibault werkgroep van de European Science Foundation. 57 Lid, Advisory Committee to the Dutch branch of UNESCO on the Netherlands’ McGonagle input into the Council of UNESCO’s International Programme for the 24 Lid van Göttingen Centre for Digital Humanities Academic Advisory Board. Guibault Development of Communication (IPDC). 25 Member of the Creative Board Thüringen. Handke 58 Lid Opleidingscommissie Master rechtsgeleerdheid. Mom 26 Program Director of the Master Cultural Economics and Entrepreneurship Handke 59 Lid Associação Portuguesa de Direito Intelectual. Ramalho at Erasmus University Rotterdam. 27 Representing the department of Arts and Culture Studies at Erasmus University Handke Rotterdam in Werkgroep Toetsen, producing: an overview of teaching and examination procedures of the department and the faculty; recommendations 2012 PhD supervision & oppositions Author on how to evolve examination methods and the syllabus of programs taught in 1 Promotor J. van Hoboken, promotie 23 maart. Van Eijk the faculty. 2 Lid van promotiecommissie J. Sluijs, Universiteit van Tilburg, promotie 20 Van Eijk 28 Selection committee for the Master in Cultural Economics and Handke december. Entrepreneurship (CEE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam. 3 Lid van promotiecommissie J. van Hoboken, promotie 23 maart. Helberger 29 Evolutionsökonomischer Ausschuss des Vereins für Socialpolitik (elected member). Handke 4 Lid van promotiecommissie J. van Hoboken, promotie 23 maart. Dommering

93 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2013 Refereed articles Auteur 1 ‘Beyond the Safe Harbours: Harmonising Substantive Intermediary Liability Angelopoulos for Copyright Infringement in Europe’, Intellectual Property Quarterly 2013-3, p. 253-274. 2 ‘Resolving the patentability of plants produced by an essentially biological Bostyn process conundrum: Squaring the circle?’, EIPR 2013-7, p. 383-396. 3 ‘Patentability of plants: at the crossroads between monopolising nature and Bostyn protection technological innovation?’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 2013-3/4, p. 105-149. 4 ‘Rights of Access to Public Sector Information’, Masaryk University Journal Van Eechoud of Law and Technology 2013-3, p. 471-499. 5 ‘De grensoverschrijdende inbreuk: Daad, plaats en norm na Football Dataco Van Eechoud & Pinckney’, AMI 2013-6, p. 169-178. 6 ‘The Orphan Works Chimera and How to Defeat It: A View From Across Van Gompel the Atlantic’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2013-3, vol. 27, p. 1347-1378. 7 ‘Quality, merit, aesthetics and purpose: An inquiry into EU copyright law’s Van Gompel eschewal of other criteria than originality’, Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur (RIDA) 2013-236, p. 100-295. 8 ‘On the prospects of raising the originality requirement in copyright law: Van Gompel Perspectives from the Humanities’, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 2013-3, vol. 60, p. 387-443. 9 ‘Digital Content Contracts for Consumers’, Journal of Consumer Policy 2013-36, Guibault/ p. 37-57. Helberger 10 ‘Audiovisual Works and the European Directive on Certain Permitted Uses Guibault/ of Orphan Works’, IRIS plus 2013-5 - Audiovisual Heritage 2.0, p. 41-48. Oostveen 11 ‘De journalistieke exceptie en de bescherming van persoonsgegevens: laveren Hins tussen twee grondrechten’, Mediaforum 2013-4, p. 98-104. 12 ‘Copyright in Europe: Twenty Years Ago, Today and What the Future Holds’, Hugenholtz Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 2013-2, Vol. 23, p. 503-524. 13 ‘Hosting providers’ liability: Cour de Cassation puts an end to the notice Jasserand and stay down rule’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2013-3, p. 192-193. 14 ‘Public sector information and Audiovisual Archives” in Audiovisual Heritage Jasserand 2.0’, IRIS Plus 2013-5, p. 7-21. 15 ‘Not for Designers: On the Inadequacies of EU Design Law and How to Fix It’, Margoni JIPITEC 2013-3, p. 225-248. 16 ‘User-generated Content and Audiovisual News: The Ups and Downs of an McGonagle Uncertain Relationship’, IRIS plus 2013-2, p. 7-25. 17 ‘Tussen verdachtmaking en vergetelheid, grondrechtelijke grenzen aan de Nieuwenhuis berichtgeving over misdrijven’, Mediaforum 2013-3, p. 70-79. 18 ‘The Levy Runs Dry: A Legal and Economic Analysis of EU Private Copying Poort/Quintais Levies’, JIPITEC 2013- 4 (3), p. 205-224. 19 ‘Perspectives of creators and performers on the digital era’, New Media & Poort Society, published online 21 November. 20 ‘The Empire Strikes Back: CISAC beats Commission in General Court’, Journal Quintais of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2013-8 (9), p. 680-683. 21 ‘Dr. Strangelaw, or How Portugal Learned to Stop Worrying and Love P2P’, Quintais Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2013- 8 (3), p. 193-196. 22 Proposal for a Directive on collective rights management and (some) multi- Quintais territorial licensing, European Intellectual Property Review 2013-2, p. 65-73. 23 ‘Privacy and Piracy in Cyberspace: Justice for All’, Journal of Intellectual Tsoutsanis Property Law and Practice 2013-12, Vol. 8, p. 952-956.

94 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

24 Behavioral Targeting: A European Legal Perspective, IEEE Security & Privacy Zuiderveen 2013-1, p. 82-85. Borgesius

2013 Non-refereed articles Author 1 EHRM 7 februari 2012, appl. 40660/08 en 39954/08), Nederlandse Dommering Jurisprudentie 2013, nrs 250, 251, p. 2935-2936 (Von Hannover II/Springer). 2 EHRM 12 november 2012, appl. 39315/06), Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2013, Dommering nr 253, p. 2945-2946 (Telegraaf/AIVD). 3 HR 1 maart 2013, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2013, 28, p. 3760-3762 Dommering (Van Hees/De Limburger). 4 HR 26 maart 2013, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2013, 294, afl. 23/24, Dommering p. 3318 (Stegeman). 5 EHRM 14 februari 2012, appl. 7094/06), Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2013, 484, Dommering afl. 45, p. 5571-5572 (Romet/ Nederland). 6 EHRM 9 februari 2012, appl. 1813/07), Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2013, 550, Dommering afl. 51, p. 6411-6412 (Vedjeland/ Zweden). 7 ‘Het derde voorstel voor een ‘technisch neutrale’ wijziging van artikel 13 Gw’, Dommering Ars Aequi 2013, p. 378-385. 8 ‘De door het recht bestuurde wereld is altijd virtueel geweest’, Nederlandse Dommering Juristenblad 2013- 19, nr. 1206, p. 1266-1272. 9 ‘Netherlands’, in: P. Geller (ed.) International Copyright Law & Practice, New Van Eechoud York: Matthew Bender (losbladig). 10 ‘The Diginotar Case: Internet Security is No Abstract Matter’, Computers & Law Van Eijk Magazine of SCL 2013-6, p. 1-2. 11 ‘Copyright Reform for Growth and Jobs: Modernising the European Copyright Hugenholtz Framework’, Policy brief, Lisbon Council, Brussels, 2013, pp. 16. 12 Hof van Justitie EU 1 december 2011, zaak C-145/10, NJ 2013-7, nr. 66, p. 776-778. Hugenholtz 13 Hof van Justitie EU 3 juli 2012, zaak C-128/11 (UsedSoft / Oracle International), NJ Hugenholtz 2013-11, nr. 118, p. 1346-1349 (Eva-Maria Painer/Standard VerlagsGmbhH e.a.). 14 Hof van Justitie EU 9 februari 2012, zaak C-277/10, NJ 2013-16, nr. 196, Hugenholtz p. 2255-2258 (Martin Luksan / Petrus van der Let). 15 Hof van Justitie EU 15 maart 2012, zaak C-135/10 (Società Consortile Hugenholtz Fonografici/Marco del Corso) en Hof van Justitie EU 15 maart 2012, zaak C-162/10 (Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Limited/Ierland), NJ 2013-16, nrs. 197 en 198, p. 2273-2276. 16 Hof van Justitie EU 2 mei 2012, zaak C-406/10, NJ 2013-22, nr. 270, Hugenholtz p. 3160-3161 (SAS Institute Inc./World Programming Ltd.). 17 Hoge Raad 23 november 2012, NJ 2013-32/33, nr. 381, p. 4244-4245 Hugenholtz (Stichting Leenrecht/Vereniging Van Openbare Bibliotheken). 18 Hof van Justitie EU 1 december 2011, NJ 2013-38/39, nr. 408, p. 4615-4617 Hugenholtz (Koninklijke Philips Electronics/Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company e.a. en Nokia Corporation/Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs). 19 Hof van Justitie EU 7 maart 2013, NJ 2013-42, nr. 444, p. 5088-5089 Hugenholtz (ITV Broadcasting Ltd e.a./TVCatchup Ltd). 20 Hoge Raad 22 februari 2013 (Stokke/H3 Products), NJ 2013-46, nr. 501, Hoge Hugenholtz Raad 12 april 2013 (Stokke/Fikszo), NJ 2013-46, nr. 502, Hoge Raad 12 april 2013 (Hauck/Stokke), NJ 2013-46, nr. 503, p. 5896-5900. 21 Hoge Raad 29 maart 2013 NJ 2013-46, nr. 504, p. 5927-5929 (Broeren / Duijsens). Hugenholtz 22 ‘Critical views on the French approach to ‘net neutrality’’, Journal of Internet Jasserand Law 2013-9, p. 18-28.

95 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

23 ‘Régime français de la responsabilité des intermédiaires techniques’, Les Cahiers Jasserand de propriété intellectuelle October 2013- 3, Vol. 25, p. 1133. 24 ‘Deep pockets, packets, and safe harbours’, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Margoni Resolution 2013-vol. 74, no. 6, p. 1195-1216. 25 ‘Media Literacy: No Longer the Shrinking Violet of European Audiovisual McGonagle Media Regulation?’, Media Law & Policy 2013- Issue 20.2, p. 187-212. 26 ‘Tussen feit en fictie, of over het recht om te trouwen en een gezin te stichten: een Van der Sloot jurisprudentieanalyse van artikel 12 EVRM’, NJCM-Bulletin 2013-3, p. 361-380. 27 ‘Tussen beeld en werkelijkheid: het verschil tussen de traditionele kartografie en Van der Sloot Google Street View’, Geo-Info 2013-3, p. 4-6. 28 ‘Comparison of Patent Claim Construction between Netherlands and Germany Tsoutsanis on Basis of AGA v. Occlutech’, World Intellectual Property Report 2013-6, p. 32-34. 29 ‘Trade mark applications in bad faith: righting wrong in Denmark and why the Tsoutsanis Benelux is next’, Berichten Industriële Eigendom 2013, p. 254-260. 30 ‘Segmentação Comportamental, Do Not Track e o desenvolvimento jurídico Zuiderveen europeu e holandês’ (Behavioral Targeting, Do Not Track, and European and Borgesius Dutch Legal Developments), poliTICs 2013-14, p. 9-22.

2013 Books (including reports) Author 1 Open Source Cultures, Budapest: Budapesti Kommunikációs Fősikola, pp. 288. Bodo 2 Youtube onder de loep: Is er plaats voor UGC platforms in de veilige havens K. Breemen/ van de e-commerce richtlijn?, Amsterdam: deLex 2013, pp. 112. V. Breemen 3 Waarde verlenging mobiele vergunningen. Update: uitkomst veiling en Van Eijk/ Poort verlengingsprijzen, SEO Economisch Onderzoek/IViR, Amsterdam, SEO- rapport nr. 2013-06, pp. 56. 4 Digital Consumers and the Law: Towards a Cohesive European Framework Guibault/ (Information law series, 28), Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International Helberger/ 2013, pp. 284. Van der Sloot 5 Innovationsprozesse im Kontext des Urheberrechts - Konzept und Machbarkeitsstudie, Handke rapport voor de German federal Expert Commission on Research and Innovation (EFI), Berlin, 2013. 6 Making User Created Content Work, rapport Stimuleringsfonds voor de Pers, Helberger/ pp. 130. Van der Sloot/ McGonagle 7 Form matters: informing consumers effectively, rapport, BEUC, pp. 51. Helberger 8 Online Personal Data Processing and the EU Data Protection Reform, Brussels: Irion Centre for European Policy Studies 2013, pp 97. 9 The Council of Europe against online hate speech: Conundrums and challenges, McGonagle Expert paper, Doc. No. MCM 2013(005), the Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Media and Information Society, 10 How to address current threats to journalism?: The role of the Council of Europe McGonagle in protecting journalists and other media actors, Expert paper, Doc. No. MCM 2013(009), the Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Media and Information Society. 11 Actuele waarde van kavel A7, SEO Economisch Onderzoek/IViR, Amsterdam, Poort SEO-rapport nr. 2013-78, pp. 80. 12 Actuele waarde van kavel A7, Methodedocument t.b.v. marktconsultatie door Poort ministerie van EZ, SEO Economisch Onderzoek/IViR, Amsterdam, SEO- rapport nr. 2013-45, pp. 26. 13 European Union Competence in the Field of Copyright, Report Commissioned Ramalho by the UK Intellectual Property Office, August 2013, p. 1-14.

96 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

14 LAPSI Policy Recommendation n. 4: Privacy and Personal Data Protection, Van Eechoud LAPSI Working Group 2: Privacy Aspects of PSI.

2013 Book chapters Author 1 ‘Maris, Wanftidè, tuftamara en Wilders: enige tegenwerpingen’, in: Frans Jacobs Dommering & Dorien Pressers (red) Stof en Blik, Opstellen, aangeboden aan Cees Maris van Sandelingenambacht, Amsterdam juni 2013, p. 21-29. 2 ‘Féret en daarna’, in: M.J. Geus e.a. (red) Vijfentwintig jaar Mediaforum, een blik Dommering vooruit via de achteruitkijk spiegel, Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel 2013, p. 160-168. 3 (with A. Peukert) ‘Coordination of proceedings’, in: European Max Planck Van Eechoud Group on Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property, Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property: The CLIP Principles and Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 193-222. 4 ‘RTL-Véronique: toegang commerciële omroep tot de Nederlandse Van Eijk markt’, in: M. Geus e.a. (red) 25 jaar Mediaforum. Een vooruitblik door de achteruitkijkspiegel, Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel Uitgever 2013, p. 9-14. 5 (with T. Margoni) ‘Introduction’, in: L. Guibault & A. Wiebe (eds) Safe to be Guibault Open – Study on the protection of research data and recommendations for access and usage, Goettingen: University Press 2013, p. 13-16. 6 (with N. Dietrich, T. Margoni, K. Siewicz & A. Wiebe) ‘Possible forms of legal Guibault protection: An EU legal perspective’, in: L. Guibault & A. Wiebe (eds) Safe to be Open – Study on the protection of research data and recommendations for access and usage, Goettingen: University Press 2013, p. 19-91. 7 (with T. Margoni) ‘Analysis of licensing issues’, in: L. Guibault & A. Wiebe Guibault (eds) Safe to be Open – Study on the protection of research data and recommendations for access and usage, Goettingen: University Press 2013, p. 143-160. 8 (with T. Margoni & G. Spindler) ‘Conclusions and Recommendations’, in: L. Guibault Guibault & A. Wiebe (eds) Safe to be Open – Study on the protection of research data and recommendations for access and usage, Goettingen: University Press 2013, p. 161-165. 9 ‘Licensing Research Data under Open Access Conditions under European Law’, Guibault in: D. Beldiman (ed) Information and Knowledge: 21st Century Challenges in Intellectual Property and Knowledge Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2013, p. 63-93. 10 (with E. Dekker) ‘From Austria to Australia’, in: M. Boumans & M. Klaes (eds) Handke Mark Blaug Rebel with Many Causes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2013, p. 225-244. 11 (with R. Towse) ‘Introduction’, in: R. Towse & C. Handke (eds) Handbook on the Handke Digital Creative Economy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013, p. 1-8. 12 ‘Empirical evidence on copyright’, in: R. Towse and C. Handke (eds) Handbook Handke on the Digital Creative Economy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013, p. 249- 261. 13 ‘De toegang tot overheidsinformatie’, in: M. Geus e.a. (red) 25 jaar Mediaforum, Hins een blik vooruit via de achteruitkijkspiegel 25 jaar rechtspraak media- en communicatierecht, Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel 2013, p. 151-159. 14 ‘The dynamics of harmonization of copyright at the European level’, in: Hugenholtz C. Geiger (ed) Constructing Intellectual Property. Achievements and New Perspectives, Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar 2013, p. 273-291. 15 ‘Is Harmonization a Good Thing? The Case of the Copyright Acquis’, in: A. Ohly Hugenholtz & J. Pila (eds) The Europeanization of Intellectual Property Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013, p. 57-73.

97 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

16 ‘The Governance of Network and Information Security in the European Union: Irion The European Public-Private Partnership for Resilience (EP3R)’, in: J. Krüger, B. Nickolay, S. Gaycken (eds) The Secure Information Society. Ethical, Legal and Political Challenges, Berlin: Springer 2013, p. 83-116 . 17 ‘Handeldrijvende middenstand tegen Grijpgraag Grootkapitaal: markt intern Kabel Verlag GmbH en Klaus Beermann tegen Bondsrepubliek Duitsland’, in: M. Geus e.a. (red) 25 jaar Mediaforum. Een vooruitblik door de achteruitkijkspiegel, Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel 2013, p. 15-24. 18 ‘Kleurige kleertjes of wereldleed: het is maar wat je ziet’, in: M. Balk (red) Recht Kabel voor gewone mensen, aangeboden aan mr. J.A.J. Peeters bij zijn afscheid van de Rechtbank Amsterdam op 24 mei 2013, Amsterdam: Iusius 2013, p. 159-168. 19 ‘The roles of Material Transfer Agreements in genetics databases and Biobanks’, Margoni in: G. Pascuzzi, U. Izzo & M. Macilotti (eds) Comparative Issues in the Governance of Research Biobanks: Property, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and the Role of Technology, Heidelberg: Springer 2013, p. 231-250. 20 ‘Open design? 3D printing and open license’, in: B. van den Berg, S. van der Margoni Hof & C. Mair (eds), 3D printing: Destiny, dream or doom?, Leiden: Leiden University Press 2013, p. 39-61. 21 ‘The State and beyond: activating (non-)media voices’, in: H. Sousa e.a. (red) McGonagle Media Policy and Regulation: Activating Voices, Illuminating Silences, p. 187-198. 22 ‘Copyright Levies’, in: R. Towse & C. Handke (ed) Handbook of the Digital Poort Creative Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2013, p. 235-246.

2013 Conference papers Author 1 (met H. Asghari & M. van Eeten) Security Economics in the HTTPS Value Chain, Arnbak/ paper peer-reviewed and presented at WEIS 2013, Washington, 3 juni, pp. 35. Van Eijk 2 Obscured by Clouds or How to Address Governmental Access to Cloud Data Arnbak/ From Abroad, draft paper presented at Privacy Law Scholars Conference 2013, Van Eijk/ Berkeley, United States, 6-7 juni, pp. 35. Van Hoboken 3 Conceptualizing Communications Security: A Value Chain Approach, draft Arnbak paper presented at TPRC41, the 41st Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, George Mason University School of Law, Arlington, VA, 27-29 september, pp. 22. 4 Set the Fox to Watch the Geese: Voluntary IP Regimes in Piratical File-Sharing Bodo Communities, Annual Conference of the International Communication Association: Challenging Communications Research, pp. 28. 5 Voluntary, Bottom-up IP Regimes in Piratical File-Sharing Communities, Bodo MiT8: public media, private media, pp. 28. 6 The Economics of Copyright Compensation Schemes for Digital Use, unpublished Bodo/ Handke/ conference paper presented at the SERCI Annual Congress 2013, Paris, 8-9 juli, Quintais/ Vallbé pp. 27. 7 (with N. Petit) Patent=Monopoly: A Legal Fiction, SSRN-id2373471, pp. 19. Bostyn 8 Regulation of the print media: an analysis of the trend towards re-regulation as Brody indicated by recent European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence and inqui- ries into freedom of the press, Irish Society of Comparative Law Annual Confer- ence, 24-25 mei. 9 Re-regulation of the print media: implications on press freedom [The Constitu- Brody tion of the Public Sphere: the post-Leveson Landscape- WG Hart Legal Work- shop, 24-25 juni. 10 Net Neutrality: the Netherlands, paper presented at ‘Net Neutrality and Internet Van Eijk Traffic Management in the Smart Media Era: Current Issues and Future Direc- tions, 10th Annual International Conference Center for Law & Public Utilities College of Law/School of Law, Seoul National University, Honolulu, United States, 8 november, pp. 29.

98 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

11 (with R. Chalmers Hoynck van Papendrecht, M. Hemmer, L.Kamp, W. Pors, Van Gompel F.van Velsen & D. Visser) Q235: Term of copyright protection, report of the Dutch Group to the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI), april 2013, pp. 7. 12 Conceptualizing a user generated news exception, abstract accepted at 3rd Van Gompel/ Global Congress on IP and the Public Interest, Kaapstad, 11-13 december. Guibault/ Helberger 13 Freedom of expression and the Dutch cookie-wall, conference paper accepted Helberger at MIT 8 Public Media Private Media Conference, Boston, 3-5 mei. 14 Promoting exposure diversity – an information consumer law approach, paper Helberger voor ECREA-CLP workshop on Communication & Media Policy in Europe: Assessing the Past, Setting Agendas for the Future, Manchester, UK, 25-26 oktober. 15 Free speech, hate speech and social media: the jostling of legal issues, McGonagle Background/ Issues Paper, ‘ Right-Wing Extremism and Hate Crime: Minorities under Pressure in Europe and Beyond’, Expert conference, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Oslo, 14-15 mei 2013, pp. 11. 16 (with J. Leenheer, J. van der Ham & C. Dumitru) Baywatch: two Approaches Poort to Measure the Effects of Blocking Access to The Pirate Bay, Working Paper 20-08-2013. 17 Consent to Behavioural Targeting in European Law - What are the Policy Zuiderveen Implications of Insights from Behavioural Economics?, conference paper Borgesius or Privacy Law Scholars Conference (PLSC), 6-7 juni, Berkeley. 18 Data Protection Law and Consent to Behavioural Targeting through a Be- Zuiderveen havioural Economics Lens, Working paper for Nudging in Europe, Liège, Bel- Borgesius gium, 12-13 december, p.1-58.

2013 Professional publications Author 1 Bijdrage aan: C. Eradus, H. Brouwer & M. Veraart (red) Bodem kort geding, Alberdingk Thijm bundel aangeboden aan mr. S.A. Rullmann bij haar afscheid van de rechtbank Amsterdam, Amsterdam: Rechtbank Amsterdam. 2 ‘Google: ‘We made history in a very good way for the citizens of France’, Alberdingk Thijm Kluwer Copyright Blog, 21 februari. 3 ‘CJEU Advocate General sides with Google in data protection dispute’, Alberdingk Thijm Kluwer Copyright Blog, 3 juli. 4 ‘UK Supreme Court Asks CJEU Whether the Internet is Legal’, Alberdingk Thijm Kluwer Copyright Blog, 8 juli. 5 ‘U.S. Citizenship and N.S.A. Surveillance – Legal Safeguard or Practical Arnbak Backdoor?’, Freedom to Tinker, 15 oktober. 6 ‘When an Ethnographer met Edward Snowden’, Freedom to Tinker, 18 oktober. Arnbak 7 ‘The 2008 Liberty Case: An Authoritive Ruling on Snowden’s Disclosures’, Arnbak Freedom to Tinker, 30 oktober. 8 ‘NSA Strategy 2012-16: Outsourcing Compliance to Algorithms, and What to Arnbak Do About It’, Freedom to Tinker, 25 november. 9 ‘The Politics of the EU Court Data Retention Opinion: End to Mass Arnbak Surveillance?’, Freedom to Tinker, 13 december. 10 (with Ch. Gielen & F. Verkade (red)) IE Recht & Commentaar, Kluwer 2013, Bostyn artt. 2a, 3, 25, 53a, 53b, 53c Rijksoctrooiwet 1995 (losbladig). 11 Review of the Balance of Competences - Intellectual Property Law, submission of Bostyn evidence to the UK government, pp. 36. 12 ‘Can e-lending land itself a spot under the public lending right?’, Kluwer K. Breemen/ Copyright Blog, 4 maart. V. Breemen

99 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

13 ‘No permit required for Fox Entertainment Group’s Acquisition of Dutch K. Breemen Soccer Broadcasting Rights’, IRIS 2013-3, p. 16-17. 14 ‘Tariffs for supervising on-demand services introduced into Dutch Media V. Breemen Regulation’, IRIS 2013-3, p. 17. 15 ‘BAI Launches New Code of Fairness, Objectivity and Impartiality in News Brody and Current Affairs’, IRIS 2013-5, p. 32. 16 ‘Call for Annual EU Monitoring of National Media Laws’, IRIS 2013-6, p. 7. Brody 17 ‘Scheme for Finance Digitisation and Extensions of Terrestrial TV Network in Brody Spain Incompatible with EU State Aid Rules’, IRIS 2013-7, p. 5. 18 ‘Resolution on National Security and Access to Information’, IRIS 2013-10, p. 3. Brody 19 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 126 (Ars Aequi 2013-3), Van Eijk p. 7167-7169. 20 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’ Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 127 (Ars Aequi 2013-6), Van Eijk p. 7232-7233. 21 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’ Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 128 (Ars Aequi 2013-6), Van Eijk p. 7303-7305. 22 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’ Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 129 (Ars Aequi 2013-6), Van Eijk p. 7374-7375. 23 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2013-1, p. 71-73. Van Eijk 24 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2013-2, p. 123-125. Van Eijk 25 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2013-3, p. 170-173. Van Eijk 26 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2013-4, p. 231-234. Van Eijk 27 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2013-5, p. 269-272. Van Eijk 28 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2013-6, p. 334-337. Van Eijk 29 ‘Ut ken net?’, BTG-Magazine 2013-81, p. 31. Van Eijk 30 ‘Over koekjes en muren’, BTG-Magazine 2013-82, p. 34. Van Eijk 31 ‘De zakelijke gebruiker, een juridische fictie’, BTG-Magazine 2013-83, p. 33. Van Eijk 32 Europees Hof van Justitie 27 juni 2013 (Machtigingsrichtlijn in Malta en Van Eijk Frankrijk), Computerrecht 2013-6, p. 302-307. 33 Hof van Justitie EU 21 juni 2012, C-5/11, AMI 2013- 3, p. 118 (Donner). Van Gompel 34 Vzr. Rb Amsterdam 5 juli 2013, AMI 2013-5, p. 164 (TMG). Van Gompel 35 Hof Den Haag 16 juli 2013, AMI 2013-6, nr. 13, p. 197-203 Van Gompel (Erven Endstra / Nieuw-Amsterdam c.s.). 36 ‘Book Review: Jacques de Werra (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Guibault Property Licensing’, JIPITEC 2013- 3, Vol. 4, p. 249-252. 37 ‘Playing Catch 22 with the Public Domain’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 30 januari . Guibault 38 ‘Private copying levy: The aftershocks of Padawan’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, Guibault 17 september. 39 ‘First Blog Poll: Orphan works and cultural heritage institutions’, Kluwer Guibault Copyright Blog, 25 september. 40 ‘Poll Results on the Orphan Works Directive and Extended Collective Guibault Licensing’, Kluwer Copyright Blog,19 november. 41 Hof van Justitie 3 juli 2012, ‘Verkauft ist verkauft; wiederholen ist gestohlen’, Helberger Reflecties op de UsedSoft-uitspraak van het Europese Hof, Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht & Handelspraktijken 2013-2, p. 91-96 (UsedSoft / Oracle). 42 (met Q.R. Kroes) ‘Mediawet 2008 (Uittreksel)’, in: P.C. Knol & G.-J. Zwenne Hins (red.), Tekst & Commentaar Telecommunicatie- en Privacyrecht, vierde druk, Deventer: Kluwer 2013, p. 679-719. 43 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 2013-126, p. 7166-7167. Hins 44 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 2013-127, p. 7231-7232. Hins

100 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

45 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 2013-128, p. 7302-7303. Hins 46 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 2013-129, p. 7372-7373. Hins 47 ‘Mag een krant lezers oproepen om ervaringen met een bedrijf te melden?’, Hins NJB blog 5 november. 48 EHRM 22 november 2012, Mediaforum 2013-1, nr. 1, p. 25-30 Hins (De Telegraaf e.a. / Nederland). 49 Vzr. Rb. Overijssel 30 augustus 2013 en 2 oktober 2013, Mediaforum Hins 2013-11/12, nrs. 29 en 30, p. 284-287 (Pretium / Wegener). 50 ‘Fair Use in Europe’, Communications of the ACM 2013-5, p. 26-28. Hugenholtz 51 ‘Plagiarism and Copyright’, 3rd Faculty Research Newsletter, Faculty of Law, Hugenholtz University of Amsterdam, April 2013. 52 ‘France: Part of law on private copying levy is unconstitutional’, Kluwer Jasserand Copyright Blog, 28 januari. 53 ‘European Parliament: Adoption of Resolution on Protecting Children in the Jasserand Digital World’, IRIS 2013-1, p. 3. 54 ‘European Commission: Report of the High Level Group on Media Freedom Jasserand and Pluralism in the European Union’, IRIS 2013-2, p. 4-5. 55 ‘European Commission: Communication on Access to On-Line Content’, Jasserand IRIS 2013-2, p. 5. 56 ‘European Commission: Adoption of New Guidelines for Fast Broadband’, Jasserand IRIS 2013-2, p. 5-6. 57 ‘European Commission: Implementation Report on the Film Heritage Jasserand Recommendation’, IRIS 2013-2, p. 6. 58 ‘European Commission against Racism and Intolerance: Media Provisions Jasserand in Report on Ireland’, IRIS 2013-4, p. 3-4. 59 ‘European Commission against Racism and Intolerance: Media Provisions in Jasserand the Conclusions on the Implementation of Recommendations in Respect of Austria’, IRIS 2013-4, p. 4. 60 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Live Streaming of TV Programmes Jasserand Constitutes a Communication to the Public’, IRIS 2013-4, p. 4-5. 6 ‘European Commission: Joint Communication on European Neighbourhood Jasserand Policy’, IRIS 2013-5, p. 6-7. 62 ‘European Parliament: Adoption of the Revision of the Public Sector Jasserand Information Directive’, IRIS 2013-8, p. 8. 63 Hof Den Haag 21 mei 2013, AMI 2013-4, p. 146-147 Kabel (Jacob Stobbe / Adrina Produkties). 64 Vzr Rb. Groningen 17 mei 2013, AMI 2013-4, p. 146 Kabel (Efraïm Milikowski / Gemeente Groningen). 65 Hof van Justitie van de EU 18 oktober 2012, Intellectuele Eigendom & Reclame- Kabel recht 2013-3, nr. 31, p. 273-281 (Purely Creative Ltd. e.a. / Office of Fair Trading). 66 Case C 521/11, Amazon v. Austro-Mechana, 11 July 2013, IRIS 2013-9, p. 1-2. Margoni 67 (met F.J. Cabrera Blázquez (red.) i.s.m. D. Voorhoof) ‘Freedom of Expression, McGonagle the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights’, IRIS Themes 2013-Vol. III, pp. 403. 68 ‘OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities: Guidelines on Societal McGonagle Integration Identify Important Role of Media’, IRIS 2013-2, p. 1-7. 69 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: State of Media Freedom in Europe’, IRIS 2013-3, McGonagle p. 1-2. 70 ‘European Parliament: Press and Media Freedom in the World’, IRIS 2013-7, McGonagle p. 1-6. 71 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Resolution on Popular Protest and Freedom McGonagle of Assembly, Media and Speech’, IRIS 2013-8, p. 1-4.

101 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

72 ‘Parliamentary Assembly: Request for Monitoring of Hungary – Media McGonagle Provisions’, IRIS 2013-8, p. 1-5. 73 ‘Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination: New General McGonagle Recommendation Combating Racist Hate Speech’, IRIS 2013-10, p. 1-7. 74 ‘Vrijheid van meningsuiting’, in: J. Gerards e.a. (red), Grondrechten, Nijmegen: Nieuwenhuis Ars Aequi Libri 2013, p. 69-102. 75 ‘Vrijheid van vereniging, vergadering en betoging’, in: J. Gerards e.a. (red), Nieuwenhuis Grondrechten, Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri 2013, p. 103-128. 76 ‘Vrijheid van meningsuiting, groepsbelediging en haatzaaien’, in: M.Geus Nieuwenhuis e.a. (red) Een vooruitblik door de achteruitkijkspiegel, Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel Uitgever 2013, p. 142-150. 77 ‘European Commission: Private Copying Recommendations Following Quintais Stakeholder Mediation’, IRIS 2013-3, p. 1-6. 78 ‘EU: Private Copying Recommendations fall in January’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, Quintais 4 februari. 79 ‘General Court: Partial Annulment of the Commission Decision Finding Anti- Quintais Competitive Conduct on the part of Copyright Collecting Societies’, IRIS 2013- 5, p. 1-3. 80 ‘The Empire Strikes Back: CISAC beats Commission in General Court’, Kluwer Quintais Copyright Blog, 23 april. 81 (met (W. v Kyocera e.a.) ‘On copyright levies, printers, plotters and personal Quintais computers’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 10 juli (also published on the Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance (ACELG) Blog). 82 ‘EU: Playing Sherlock, or spotting copyright consequences in patent cases’, Ramalho Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2 mei. 83 ‘The EU mandate to negotiate the TTIP: should copyright be an outcast?’, Ramalho Kluwer Copyright Blog, 21 mei. 84 Hoge raad 25 mei 2012, ‘Octrooien, tussen letter en geest’, Berichten Industriële Tsoutsanis Eigendom 2013-12, Vol. 2, p. 64-70 (AGA v Occlutech). 85 Tekst en Commentaar Intellectuele Eigendom - Commentaar op Tsoutsanis Oppositieprocedure Benelux (Ch. Gielen, F. Verkade, D. Visser, eds), Kluwer publishers 4th edition 2013, p. 270-283. (also appeared as eBook). 86 Hof Arnhem 18 september 2012, ‘Komt een vrouw bij de dokter’, Mediaforum Tsoutsanis 2013-5, nr. 13, p. 136-139 (A / B & Stichting Slachtoffers latrogene Nalatigheid).

2013 Publications aimed at the general public Author 1 ‘Een Blauwdruk voor Cyber Security’, Het Financieele Dagblad 4 October. Arnbak 2 ‘Europeans Warn for ‘Unchecked’ Access to Cloud Data’, Wall Street Journal 19 Arnbak June. 3 ‘Wilt u totale informatie’, De Groene Amsterdammer 26 June. Dommering 4 ‘Zelfs privé is niet privé als het op Facebook staat’, Trouw 13 January, geciteerd. Van Eijk ‘Stammenstrijd om bestuursrechtelijk supercollege’, Mr. 2013-3, p. 24-31, geciteerd. ‘Machtige markmeester wil geen `softie’ zijn’, Het Financieele Dagblad 3 April, geciteerd. ‘Wie films downloadt, loopt een risico’, De Volkskrant 2 May. 5 ‘Voor nationale veiligheid moeten privacywetten wijken’, Trouw 2 juni, geciteerd. Van Eijk ‘Voor nationale veiligheid moeten privacywetten wijken’, Trouw 12 June (citation). 6 ‘Nostalgische gevoelens over KPN niet van deze tijd’, Het Financieele Dagblad Van Eijk 27 August. ‘Risico’s verkoop KPN onderzocht’, Het Financieele Dagblad 2 September (citation). ‘Techniek wint het van de wet’, NRC 2 November (citation).

102 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

7 ‘KPN krijgt 1 miljoen boete’, De Volkskrant 21 November (citation). Van Eijk 8 ‘Achtergrond Waar ligt de grens voor foute opmerkingen op tv?’, NRC 22 Van Eijk November (citation). 9 ‘De datadrift van de AIVD’, ‘Geheim overleg met hackers van de NSA’, Van Eijk ‘AIVD hackt internetfora, ‘tegen wet in’, NRC/NRCNEXT 30 November (citation). 10 ‘Zelfs privé is niet privé als het op Facebook staat’, Trouw 13 January (cita- Van Eijk tion).‘Stammenstrijd om bestuursrechtelijk supercollege’, Mr. 2013-3, p. 24-31 (citation). ‘Machtige markmeester wil geen `softie’ zijn’, Het Financieele Dagblad 3 April (citation). ‘Wie films downloadt, loopt een risico’, De Volkskrant 2 May. 11 ‘Voor nationale veiligheid moeten privacywetten wijken’, Trouw 2 June (citation). Van Eijk ‘Voor nationale veiligheid moeten privacywetten wijken’, Trouw 12 June (citation). 12 ‘Nostalgische gevoelens over KPN niet van deze tijd’, Het Financieele Dagblad 27 Van Eijk August. ‘Risico’s verkoop KPN onderzocht’, Het Financieele Dagblad 2 September (citation). ‘Techniek wint het van de wet’, NRC 2 November (citation). 13 ‘KPN krijgt 1 miljoen boete’, De Volkskrant 21 November (citation). Van Eijk 14 ‘Achtergrond Waar ligt de grens voor foute opmerkingen op tv?’, Van Eijk NRC 22 November (citation). 15 ‘De datadrift van de AIVD’, ‘Geheim overleg met hackers van de NSA’, ‘AIVD Van Eijk hackt internetfora, ‘tegen wet in’, NRC/NRCNEXT 30 November (citation). 16 ‘Doellijntechnologie’, in: J. Baijens (red), Het Beste Idee van 2013, Tilburg: Hugenholtz Uitgeverij De Wereld 2013. 17 ‘Een lekke website is een gevaar voor zijn omgeving’, Het Financieele Dagblad Poort (Outlook – Dossier Cyber Security) September, p. 40-42. 18 ‘Vaagheid Endstra-tapes is irrelevant’, NRC 10 August. Tsoutsanis

2013 Invited lectures/keynotes/presentations/workshops Author 1 ‘IE en Internet’, Congres IE voor Bedrijfsjuristen, Amsterdam, 28 May. Alberdingk Thijm 2 ‘Update privacy en reclame’, Nationaal Reclamerecht Congres, Kluwer, Huizen, Alberdingk Thijm 13 December. 3 ‘The Actor-Based Value Chain: Values, Stakeholders, Vulnerabilities, Regulation’, Arnbak CPDP conference 2013 Building the Digital Fortress: A Toolkit for Cybersecurity, Privacy Platform of the European Parliament, Brussels, 23 January. 4 (met N. van Eijk) ‘Certificate Authority Collapse Regulating the HTTPS Value Arnbak Chain?’, UC Berkeley TRUST Seminar, Berkeley, 31 January. 5 (met J. van Hoboken) ‘Het Wolkje aan de Lucht’, Jaarcongres Vereniging Arnbak Privacyrecht, Maarssen, 21 March. 6 ‘PRISM: Obscured by Clouds or the Dark Side of the Moon?: How to Address Arnbak Governmental Access to Cloud Data from Abroad’, E.U. Mission to the U.S. Washington D.C., 10 June. 7 ‘Het maatschappelijke debat na PRISM – vijftig open vragen over privacy’, Arnbak Big Brother Awards, Amsterdam, 29 August. 8 ‘The Question Lawyers Don’t Ask: Can Law Address Total Transnational Arnbak Surveillance’, EPFL Congress on Privacy & Surveillance, Zurich, 1 October. 9 ‘Conceptualizing Communications Security’, CITP Luncheon Series, Princeton Arnbak University, 3 October. 10 ‘The Actor-Based Value Chain: Values, Stakeholders, Vulnerabilities, Regulation’, Arnbak CPDP conference 2013 Building the Digital Fortress: A Toolkit for Cybersecurity, Privacy Platform of the European Parliament, Brussels, 23 January. 11 ‘Ethiek & Cybersecurity’, TU Delft, gastcollege Ethische aspecten van Arnbak Informatica, Delft, 14 M arch.

103 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

12 ‘Balancing Of Fundamental Rights In Online Copyright Enforcement’, Bodo Computers, Privacy and Data Protection Conference: Reloading Data Protection, Brussel, 23-25 January. 13 ‘Knowledge, Culture and Science as Commons’, Economics and the Commons Bodo Conference, Berlijn, 22-24 May. 14 ‘The social support of Alternative Compensation Schemes’, Copycamp, Warsaw, Bodo 1 October. 15 ‘Revisiting Alternative Compensation Schemes – an interdisciplinary approach’, Bodo 3rd Global Congress on IP and the Public Interest, Cape Town, 9-13 December. 16 ‘Innovation, technology transfer, PPP’s: an overview of the issues’, gastcollege Bostyn Universiteit Maastricht, 26 April. 17 ‘Patenting biotech inventions: Human biotech and morality’, gastcollege aan de Bostyn Université de Liège, 14 May. 18 ‘Patenting biotech inventions: Plant materia’, gastcollege aan de Université de Bostyn Liège, 14 May. 19 Interventie bij de workshop ‘Sports organizers rights and their management in Dommering the field of media’, Amsterdam, 3 June. 20 Panellid in het Privacydebat georganiseerd door Adformatie, naar aanleiding van Dommering het boek van Peter Oltshoorn, Privacy bestaat niet, Amsterdam, 25 October. 21 ‘Convergentie in theorie en praktijk’, referent op de VMC bijeenkomst, Dommering Amsterdam, 15 November. 22 ‘Legal perspectives and findings of HERA Of Authorship and Originality Van Eechoud Research Programme’, MusDig Conference: Intellectual Property, Cultural Commons and Ontological Politics, University of Oxford, UK, 12 January.. 23 ‘Voices near and far – Digital authorship and creativity debates in law’, HERA Van Eechoud OOR Conference Creativity That Counts?, University of Amsterdam, 26 April. 24 ‘The Curse of Berne’, ATRIP Conference 2013, Is intellectual property a lex Van Eechoud specialis?, University of Oxford, 23-26 June. 25 ‘Introducing PSI rules in the cultural sector: a blessing or a curse?’, LAPSI 2.0 Van Eechoud conference The new PSI directive: what’s next?, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 24 October. 26 ‘Licensing transparancy. Intellectual property in the hands of governments’, Van Eechoud Trento University and WIPO Conference Open Data in Transition: Intellectual Property, Competition Policy and Regulatory Issues, Trento, Italy, 19 December. 27 ‘Connecting with the world’, Panel Discussion, Create Launch Conference, Van Eechoud University of Glasgow, 1 February. 28 Chair session ‘Mandating data availability and open licenses: costs and Van Eechoud enforcement’, ‘Second Open Economics Workshop, MIT Sloan School of Management’, Cambridge Mass., 12 June. 29 Chair ‘The impact of the new directive on PSI re-use in Europe’, LAPSI 2.0 Van Eechoud conference: ‘The new PSI directive: what’s next?, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 24 October. 30 (met A. Arnbak) ‘Certificate Authority Collapse Regulating the HTTPS Value Van Eijk Chain?’, UC Berkeley TRUST Seminar, Berkeley, 31 January. 31 ‘Tussen recht en beleid’, Afscheidssymposium Herman Hofenk, Den Haag, Van Eijk 7 February. 32 Panelist ‘Hateful speech – ban, tolerate or challenge?’, OSCE-conference Van Eijk Internet 2013 Shaping policies to advance Media freedom, Wenen, 14 February. 33 ‘Feeling secure (or not)’, TLPC-conference Future of Data Protection: Great Van Eijk Expectations, Istanbul, 5 April. 34 ‘Overheid en media’, NJCM-seminar Persbreidel in Nederland? Over de Van Eijk gespannen verhouding tussen overheid en media, Den Haag, 25 April. 35 ‘Some remarks on institutional aspects’, OSCE Human Dimension Seminar, Van Eijk Warschau, 15 May.

104 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

36 ‘The “investment ladder” in Theory and Practice’, conferentie Israel’s Van Eijk Telecommunications Policy – From Theory to Practice, The Haifa Center for Law & Technology, Haifa, 22 May. 37 ‘Certificate Authority Collapse: Regulating the HTTPS Value Chain?’, Law and Van Eijk Ttech seminar, The Haifa Center for Law & Technology, Haifa, 23 May. 38 ‘Exploring new policy options’, conferentie Il diritto d’autore online: Modelli Van Eijk a confront AGCOM, Rome, 24 May. 39 ‘Nieuwe regels, nieuwe uitdagingen: over continuïteit en veiligheid, Seminar Van Eijk Computerrecht, VU, Amsterdam, 17 June. 40 ‘Net Neutrality: the Netherlands’, Net Neutrality and Internet Traffic Van Eijk Management in the Smart Media Era: Current Issues and Future Directions, 10th Annual International Conference Center for Law & Public UtilitiesCollege of Law/School of Law, Seoul National University, Honolulu, 8 November. 41 ‘To find and to be found’, Bertelsmann Law Symposium, Berlin, 22 november. Van Eijk ‘Obscured by Clouds’, INTUG/BTG-meeting, Schiphol Rijk, 26 November. 42 ‘Alles van waarde is weerloos’, ECP-Seminar The Value of our Digital Identity, Van Eijk Den Haag, 12 December. 43 ‘Exploring new policy options’, conferentie Il diritto d’autore online: Modelli Van Eijk a confront AGCOM, Rome, 24 May. 44 Moderator panel ‘Balancing of Fundamental Rights in Online Copyright Van Eijk Enforcement’, CPDP-conference, Brussels, 24 January. 45 ‘EU Telecommunication Law’, gastcollege EU competition Law and Regulation: Van Eijk Capita 2013, Amsterdam, 28 February. 46 Moderator Expert Workshop ‘Promoting European Works in On-demand Van Eijk Audiovisual Services’, IViR/EAO, Amsterdam, 18 March. 47 Dagvoorzitter Expert Workshop ‘Sports organizers’ rights and their Van Eijk management in the field of media’, IViR/Asser, Amsterdam, 3 June. 48 Voorzitter round table ‘Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression’, Van Eijk IViR/ICRI, Amsterdam, 28 June. 49 ‘Telecommunicatie en actualiteiten’, post academische cursus Academievoor Van Eijk Overheidsjuristen & Wetgeving, Den Haag, 18 November. 50 Moderator NSA: vadertje staat beschermt u wel?, Spui 25, Amsterdam, 27 Van Eijk november. ‘Patriot Act & Co’, post academische cursus Grotius Academie, Amsterdam, 12 December. 51 ‘Patriot Act & Co’, post academische cursus Grotius Academie, Amsterdam, Van Eijk 12 December. 52 ‘History and purposes of copyright formalities: A European perspective’, Van Gompel Reform(aliz)ing Copyright for the Internet Age?, 17th annual BCLT/BTLJ symposium, Berkeley, 18 April. 53 ‘Judging originality: Copyright law’s peculiar notion of creative work’, Creativity Van Gompel that Counts? HERA Of Authorship and Originality Project Public Conference, Amsterdam, 26 April. 54 ‘Making copyright law more research-friendly: Fair use and flexible limitations’ Van Gompel (keynote), seminar on How Could Copyright Law Support Research on Language and Literature?, Kone Foundation, Helsinki, 9 December. 55 ‘Copyright and Access to Cultural Heritage: Challenges for Digitization and Van Gompel the Orphan Works Problem’, WIPO/CEIPI Advanced Training Course on the Legal, Administrative and Economic Aspects of Intellectual Property, CEIPI, Straatsburg, 13 June. 56 ‘Legal aspects of Open Access scientific publishing’, MedOANet Guibault EuropeanWorkshop & UMinho Open Access Seminar, Minho University, Braga, Portugal, 6-8 February. 57 ‘Creative Commons Licenses version 4.0 and scientific publishing’, ‘CC-BY Guibault workshop, Wellcome Trust, London, 2 May.

105 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

58 ‘Creative Commons Licenses version 4.0 and scientific publishing’, Guibault ‘Implementing Open Access Funders’ policies’, London, 23 May. 59 (met Manon Oostveen) ‘European cross-border rights clearance’, 2nd Europeana Guibault Workshop, Luxembourg, 14 June. 60 ‘Open Access and Scientific Publishing’, AWT, Den Haag, 27 August. Guibault 61 ‘Europeana and CC0 for Metadata’, Metadata workshop, University of California Guibault at Berkeley, Berkeley, 5-8 September. 62 ‘Legal aspects of text and data mining’, presentatie voor ‘Prefect Swell’ Guibault workshop on text and data mining, Liber Europe, London, 27 September. 63 ‘Conclusions and Guidelines of Safe to be open report’, 4th OpenAIRE Guibault workshop - Legal and Sustainability Issues for Open Access Infrastructures, Vilnius, 5 November. 64 ‘Creative Commons Licenses for scientific reporting’, SpotOn London 2013: Guibault Open, Portable, Decoupled – How should Peer Review change?, British Library, London, 8 November. 65 ‘Orphan Works and Cultural Heritage’, IP and Competition Seminar Series, Guibault Bocconi University, Milan, 2 December. 66 ‘The long and winding road of the Netherlands towards an open norm in Guibault copyright law’, Global IP Congress, Kaapstad, 11-13 December. 67 ‘Legal aspects of text and data mining’, League of European Research Guibault Universities, Gent, 18 December. 68 Summer Course on International Copyright Law, IViR, Amsterdam, 8-12 July. Guibault 69 Voordracht tijdens Society for Economic Research on Copyright Issues Annual Handke Congress, Paris, 8 July. 70 ‘Empirical Work on Copyright - Some Implications for Copyright Flexibility’, Handke Workshop on Empirical Study of the Social and Economic Benefits of Copyright Flexibilities, American University College of Law, Washington DC, 26 September. 71 ‘Ownership of digital information’, keynote presentation at panel for the Helberger UNESCO WSIS+10 event, Parijs, 26 February. 72 Discussant voor paper van C. Marsden and I. Brown, Regulating Code: Helberger Towards Prosumer Law?, EuroCPR 2013, Brussel, 21-22 March. 73 ‘Freedom of expression and the Dutch cookie-wall’, MIT 8 Public Media Helberger Private Media Conference, Boston, 3-5 May. 74 ‘Cookie Walls in the Public Marketplace of Ideas, The place of public service Helberger broadcasting’, University of York, 4 July. 75 ‘Creating a Data Ecosystem Centred on the Individual: Context and Policy’, Helberger invited panellist at expert roundtable, in association with IIC 2013 Annual Conference, International Institute of Communications, Londen, 11 October. 76 ‘Promoting exposure diversity – an information consumer law approach’, Helberger ECREA-CLP workshop on Communication & Media Policy in Europe: Assessing the Past, Setting Agendas for the Future, Manchester, 25-26 October. 77 ‘Setting the scene: Challenges to better informed users in social networks’, Helberger keynote voor ICRI-IViR-HBI workshop Unraveling the Transparency Chain, Leuven, 6 December. 78 ‘De rol van de media in integriteitskwesties’, staatsrechtconferentie, Vrije Hins Universiteit, Amsterdam, 13 December. 79 ‘Persvrijheid en nationale veiligheid’, cursus deLex, Amsterdam, 16 May.. Hins 80 ‘Persvrijheid en privacy’, gastcollege Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen, Hins Leiden, 6 November. 81 ‘Openbaarheid van bestuur’ cursus ten behoeve van stafjuristen UvA Hins

106 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

82 ‘Journalistieke ethiek en rechtsbescherming’, cursus Kluwer te Amsterdam, Hins 3 October. 83 (met A.M. Arnbak) ‘Het Wolkje aan de Lucht’, Jaarcongres Vereniging Van Hoboken Privacyrecht, Maarssen, 21 March. 84 ‘Copyright issues regarding file sharing’, AIPPI-symposium, Zeist, 13 March. Hugenholtz 85 ‘Van Den Zeer Langen Doodschstrijd der Zoogeheeten Geschriftenbescherm’, Hugenholtz symposium ‘Dansen op het graf van de geschriftenbescherming’, Amsterdam, 3 April. 86 ‘Alternatieven voor een Downloadverbod’, Jonge Socialisten Symposium Hugenholtz ‘Downloadverbod’, Utrecht, 12 April 87 Panel discussie, ‘What role for intellectual Property Rights in the Transatlantic Hugenholtz Trade and Investment Partnership?’, Europees Parlement, Brussel, 15 May. 88 ‘Op weg naar het Auteursparadijs: De wet Auteurscontractenrecht is a.s.’, Hugenholtz Stichting Entertainment Groep, Amsterdam, 15 May. 89 ‘Flexible Copyright’, C4C Warsaw Event, 24 May. Hugenholtz 90 ‘Modernising the EU Copyright Framework. An Agenda for EU Copyright Hugenholtz Reform’, Lisbon Council High-Level Roundtable Brussels, 29 May. 91 ‘Nieuwe Openbaarmakingsvormen in het Auteursrecht’, Houthoff Buruma Hugenholtz Mediaseminar, 6 june. 92 ‘A Digital Copyright (Law) for a Digital Society’, Conference ‘The Future of Hugenholtz Music Licensing’, Vienna, 21 June. 93 ‘Negen jaar CC-NL’, Creative Commons Seminar ‘De toekomst van open’, Hugenholtz Den Haag, 25 September. 94 ‘In Search of Author’s Paradise: The Dutch Bill on Author’s Contracts’, LIRA/ Hugenholtz CISAC Writers and Directors Worldwide, Amsterdam, 3 October. 95 ‘Toekomstig Auteursrecht en –Beleid’, Masterclass Netpolitiek, Kennisland, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 28 October. 96 ‘Flexing Authors’ Rights. How copyright laws outside the US can become more Hugenholtz flexible’,2nd Annual Peter Jaszi Distinguished Lecture, American University, Washington College of Law, 7 November. 97 ‘Flexible Copyright. Can EU authors’ right accommodate fair use?’, Southern Hugenholtz California IP Professors’ and UCLA Entertainment, Media, and Intellectual Property Colloquium Workshop, UCLA School of Law, 10 November. 98 ‘Rechten voor Regisseurs’, DDG/VEVAM-avond over auteursrecht, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 27 November. 99 ‘Flexible Copyright’, gastcollege Karelsuniversiteit Praag, 24 October. Hugenholtz 100 ‘Actualiteiten Europees Auteursrecht’, gastcollege PAO Leiden, 25 November. Hugenholtz 101 Commentator, Kluwer/Google Copyright Event with John Adams Institute, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 8 December. 102 ‘Bescherming van kunst door middel van het auteursrecht? Onmogelijk, Kabel onvoordelig, onnodig en onwenselijk?!’, LRM Conferentie Recht en Kunst, Utrecht, 12 April. 103 ‘Nederlandse rechtspraak over vergelijkende reclame sinds de implementatie Kabel van de Richtlijn’, Stichting Reclame Code, Amsterdam, 18 April. 104 ‘De Media exceptie’, gastcollege keuzevak Privacy en Gegevensbescherming, Kabel Masteropleiding IViR, Amsterdam, 24 April. 105 ‘Nederlandse rechtspraak over vergelijkende reclame sinds de implementatie van Kabel de Richtlijn’, Jurisprudentielunch Reclameboek, De Balie, Amsterdam, 30 May. 106 ‘Reclamerecht’, gastcollege Informatierecht, Masteropleiding IViR, Amsterdam, Kabel 19 November.

107 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

107 ‘Open Design: a Law & Technology Perspective’, Copyright and Public Interest: Margoni Some Interdisciplinary Perspectives Trento, Tuesday, University of Trento, Italy, 14 May. 108 ‘ISPs liability in comparative law’, Kirby Seminars – University of New South Margoni Wales – Australia, 10 July. 109 ‘Design rights and Open Design’, Gikii Conference, Bournemouth University, Margoni UK, 15 September 110 Invited presenter ‘Legal aspects of research data’, Oct 2013 E-Science Margoni and research data – CNR – Rome, 25 October. 111 ‘Licensing in research and scientific data’, OpenAIRE Plus Conference, Margoni Vilnius – Lithuania – 12 November. 112 ‘Creative Commons Licences and Open Design’, Paper presentation, Margoni University of Leiden, 14/15 November. 113 ‘Open access in research data’, OECD TIP Conference: Open Science and Margoni Open Data, OECD, Paris, 12 December. 114 Open Research Data and IP: A Comparative View’, WIPO/University of Trento Margoni Conference, Trento, 19 December. 115 ‘Online Intermediary liability in the ECJ case la’, gastcollege University of Margoni Trento, 15 December 116 Commentator, ‘Intercultural dialogue and integration of minorities in the wider McGonagle society’, Expert Meeting on Minorities, Media and Intercultural Dialogue: Opportunities and Challenges, European Centre for Minority Issues, Flensburg, Germany, 18-19 January. 117 ‘Freedom of expression, minorities and digital media: the methodological McGonagle strategies and challenges of multi-disciplinary and user-oriented approaches’, Keynote (Respondent: D. Voorhoof), Human Rights Integration (Inaugural) Training – Adopting a users’ perspective in human rights research, Faculty of Law, Universiteit Gent, 23 January. 118 ‘European Hate Speech Regulation: Towards New Frontiers’, Faculty McGonagle Colloquium, Rutgers School of Law-Camden, New Jersey, 11 April. 119 ‘Public debate 2.0: European soul-searching about the future role of the media’, McGonagle Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 29 May. 120 ‘Lessons for or from Leveson? A critical examination of the Council of Europe’s McGonagle new (half- baked) notion of media’, The Constitution of the Public Sphere: the post-Leveson Landscape, W.G. Hart Legal Workshop, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London, 24 June. 121 ‘The dove-tailing of public service media and media literacy into critical civic McGonagle engagement’, Media Education Research Section, Session: Media Literacy Studies as Social Practice, ‘Crises, ‘Creative Destruction’ and the Global Power and Communication Orders’, International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) Annual Conference, Dublin City University, 27 June. 122 ‘Open journalism: Relational problems and promiscuous solutions?’, Keynote, McGonagle Inaugural staff retreat, Office of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Vienna, 4 July. 123 ‘Project Media Regulation in Portugal: the ERC’s Case’, Media Policy and McGonagle Regulation: Activating Voices, Illuminating Silences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, 18 July (panellist). 124 ‘The State and beyond: activating (non-)media voices?’, Media Policy and McGonagle Regulation: Activating Voices, Illuminating Silences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, 19 July. 125 ‘Revision of the European Convention on transfrontier television’, Committee McGonagle on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Paris, 4 September (invited expert).

108 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

126 ‘Freedom of Expression ‘on the Move’’ Session, Words of Violence: Freedom of McGonagle expression, conflict dynamics, and the media, Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM), Universiteit Utrecht, 26 October (commentator). 127 ‘Multi-stakeholder dialogue: How do we address the current threats to McGonagle journalism?’, the Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Media and Information Society, ‘Freedom of Expression and Democracy in the Digital Age: Opportunities, Rights, Responsibilities’, Belgrado, 7 November (invited expert). 128 ‘Traditional media muscled aside by Internet? Roles in conflicts’, Amsterdam McGonagle Student Association of International Law, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 11 February. 129 ‘Freedom of Expression of Minorities in a Digital Age’, Panel session, Internet McGonagle 2013: Shaping Policies to Advance Media Freedom, OSCE Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media, Vienna, 14-15 February (designer and moderator). 130 ‘Freedom of expression and the Internet’, Expert Presentation to OSCE meeting McGonagle with the Asian Contact Group (involving delegations of OSCE participating States and delegations of Asian Partners for Co-operation), Vienna, 15 February. 131 ‘Hate Speech and New Technologies’, gastcollege Annenberg-Oxford Media McGonagle Policy Summer Institute, Oxford University, 26 June. 132 ‘Media Education Policies in Evolution: Shaping the Agenda, ‘Crises, ‘Creative McGonagle Destruction’ and the Global Power and Communication Orders’, International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) Annual Conference, Dublin City University, 27 June (moderator). 133 ‘European legal standards on hate speech – is there an acquis?’, The Hate Factor in McGonagle Political Speech: Where do responsibilities lie?, Council of Europe & Polish Ministry of Administration and Digitization, Warsaw, 18-19 September (moderator). 134 ‘De waarde van flexibiliteit voor de gebruiker’, Werkconferentie ‘Flexibel Poort Auteursrecht’, Amsterdam, 23 April. 135 ‘The economic value of flexibility vs. exceptions and limitations’, Workshop on Poort ‘Empirical Study of the Social and Economic Benefits of Copyright Flexibilities’, American University, Washington, 26 September. 136 (with J. Weda) ‘Elvis is Returning to the Building: Evidence for a Decline in Poort Illegal File Sharing’, World Social Science Forum (WSSF) 2013, Montreal, 14 October. 137 (met J. Weda) ‘Transformation of Creativity: Perspectives of Creators and Poort Performers on the Digital Era’, World Social Science Forum (WSSF) 2013, Montreal, 15 October. 138 ‘Industry Analysis on Copyright Exceptions & Limitations: Europe’, Poort International Copyright Conference 2013, Seoul, 26 November . 139 ‘Verlenging GSM-licenties tegen de achtergrond van een veiling’, Poort CPB Beleidsseminar, Den Haag, 24 January. 140 (met J. Leenheer) ‘Downloaden uit legale en illegale bron: de stand van zaken’, Poort MLB Lunch, Ministerie van OCW, Den Haag, 23 May. 141 ‘Enforcement of copyright in the digital environment’, workshop on ‘Copyright Ramalho and Related Rights Protection and Enforcement in the Digital Environment’, organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the State Intellectual Property Service of Ukraine (SIPSU), Yalta, Oekraïne, 16 September. 142 ‘Emergent licensing modalities for the distribution of creative materials on Ramalho the Internet’, workshop on ‘Copyright and Related Rights Protection and Enforcement in the Digital Environment’, organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the State Intellectual Property Service of Ukraine (SIPSU), Yalta, Oekraïne, 17 September.

109 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

143 ‘The role of internet intermediaries in the distribution of digital contents Ramalho protected by copyright’, workshop on ‘Copyright and Related Rights Protection and Enforcement in the Digital Environment’, organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the State Intellectual Property Service of Ukraine (SIPSU), Yalta, Oekraïne, 18 September. 144 ‘Google Street View’, Privacy symposium, Universiteit Leuven, 27 March. Van der Sloot 145 ‘Privacy as virtue’, College van Bestuur UvA, 10 September. Van der Sloot 146 ‘Data Protectie 2.0’, Alumni themadag FDR, 11 September. Van der Sloot 147 ‘Private v. Publieke belangen in privacyzaken’, Privacy symposium: Senex Van der Sloot Captiosus, 25 October. 148 ‘Data Protection 2.0’, Alumni UvA, 9 November. Van der Sloot 149 ‘Privacy als grondrecht’, Soroptimisten, Amsterdam, 10 December. Van der Sloot 150 ‘Privacy as virtue’, gastcollege Zomerschool wederkerigheid, Van der Sloot Barchem, 27 August. 151 ‘Anti-piracy enforcement on the internet’, Irdeto APF Security Forum, Tsoutsanis Amsterdam, 17 April. 152 ‘Protecting TV-formats’, Seminar for Film & TV Industry, London, 23 September. Tsoutsanis 153 ‘Protecting Intellectual Property with Provisional Measures: Latvia and beyond Tsoutsanis - the EU toolkit and the NL experience’, AIPPI Congress of the Latvian Group, Riga, 31 October. 154 ‘Drafting License Agreements’, Certified Course for Dutch Association of Patent Tsoutsanis Attorneys, Jaarbeurs Utrecht, 18 April. 155 ‘European Intellectual Property Law – introduction’, Summer Course of the Tsoutsanis Academy of European Law (ERA), Trier, 1 July. 156 Presentatie voor Commissie voor Veiligheid en Justitie Tweede Kamer Zuiderveen (Rondetafelgesprek Dataprotectie, Tweede Kamer 23 January). Borgesius 157 Moderator Panel ‘Balancing of fundamental rights in online copyright Zuiderveen enforcement’, Computers, Privacy & Data Protection, Brussel, 23-25 January. Borgesius 158 Presentatie: ‘What’s wrong with data protection?: Conference ‘Data collection Zuiderveen for behavioural targeting’, presentatie voor Europees Parlement, Brussel, Borgesius 31 January. 159 Presentatie PI Lab, Digital Security group, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Zuiderveen 1 March. Borgesius 160 ‘What are the policy implications of behavioural economics insights?’, Zuiderveen Presentatie BACT Seminar, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 1 March. Borgesius 161 Presentation: Consent to Behavioural Targeting in European Law – What are Zuiderveen the Policy Implications of Insights from Behavioural Economics?, Privacy Law Borgesius Scholars Conference (PLSC), Berkeley, Verenigde Staten, 6-7 June. 162 Consent in data protection law, Presentatie Oxford Internet Institute, Zuiderveen workshop on privacy in mobile datasets, Oxford,18 June. Borgesius 163 ‘Nudging in Europe, (Data Protection Law and Consent to Behavioural Targeting Zuiderveen through a Behavioural Economics Lens)’, Liège, Belgium, 12-13 December. Borgesius 164 Panel member ‘Internet weet alles - privacy op internet’, Jonge Democraten Zuiderveen Amsterdam (D66) een discussieavond over actuele thema’s, Amsterdam, Borgesius 12 February. 165 ‘Behavioural Targeting & Law’, gastcollege Privacy seminar, Nijmegen, 1 March. Zuiderveen Borgesius

2013 Editorships & peer reviewer/review activities Author 1 Co-editor en mede-oprichter Journal of International Biotechnology Law. Bostyn

110 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2 Peer reviewer Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe (JEMIE). K. Breemen 3 Peer reviewer Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe (JEMIE). Brody 4 Lid van de redactieraad van Auteurs- en Mediarecht (A&M) Dommering 5 Redactielid AMI (Tijdschrift voor Auteurs- Media en Informatierecht). Van Eechoud 6 Medewerker Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Van Eechoud 7 Medewerker aan losbladige uitgave Intellectuele Eigendom, artikelsgewijs Van Eechoud commentaar. 8 Redactielid Computerrecht. Van Eijk 9 Medewerker Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht. Van Eijk 10 Referee, ITS Europe conference. Van Eijk 11 Referee NWO. Van Eijk 12 Referee diverse tijdschriften. Van Eijk 13 Redactielid AMI (Tijdschrift voor Auteurs-, Media- & Informatierecht). Van Gompel 14 (with A. Wiebe (ed)) Safe to be open: Study on the protection of research data Guibault and recommendations for access and usage, OpenAIRE+, Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2013, pp. 168. 15 Advisor World Blind Union at the WIPO Diplomatic Conference for the Guibault conclusion of a Treaty for the Blind and Visually Handicapped, Marrakech, 16-26 June. 16 Co-hoofdredacteur Kluwer European IP Cases. Guibault 17 Reporter Kluwer copyright blog. Guibault 18 Redactielid Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Guibault e-Commerce Law (JIPITEC). 19 Lid internationale redactie voor de online juridische databank www.juriscom.fr. Guibault 20 Correspondent Computer Law Review International (Duitsland). Guibault 21 Editor and national reporter Common Core of European Private Law, University Guibault of Torino. 22 (with R. Towse (eds)) Handbook of the Digital Creative Economy, Cheltenham: Handke Edward Elgar 2013, pp. 441. 23 Reviewer Journal of Information Policy. Helberger 24 Lid Editorial Board Journal of Information Policy. Helberger 25 Lid redactie Mediaforum. Hins 26 Referent m.b.t. bevordering Jonathan Griffiths tot Reader Queen Mary, Univer- Hugenholtz sity of London. 27 Referent m.b.t. toekenning 2013 ‘Impact Connection Award’ van het Social Hugenholtz Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Canada) aan Prof. Michael Geist (University of Ottawa). 28 Referent m.b.t. bevordering Dr. Stefan Bechtold tot Full Professor, ETH Zürich. Hugenholtz 29 Review op verzoek van FWO (Research Foundation Flanders) van onder- Hugenholtz zoeksvoorstel ‘Copyright remuneration under EU legal framework’. 30 General Editor Information Law Series (Kluwer Law International). Hugenholtz 31 Member Board of Editors Journal of World Intellectual Property (JWIP). Hugenholtz 32 Vaste annotator (auteursrecht) Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Hugenholtz 33 Contributor Kluwer Copyright Blog. Hugenholtz 34 Editor Kluwer European IP Cases. Hugenholtz 35 Redactielid AMI, (Tijdschrift voor Auteurs-, Media- & Informatierecht). Kabel 36 Redactielid Privacy & Informatie. Kabel 37 Editorial Board Member International Journal on Advances in Security. Margoni

111 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

38 Redactielid Spui25. McGonagle 39 Redactielid IRISkø. McGonagle 40 (with S. Nikoltchev) Oprichter en redacteur IRIS Themes(reeks e-boeken McGonagle uitgegeven door het European Audiovisual Observatory). 41 Redacteur Mediaforum. Nieuwenhuis 42 Redactielid Berichten Industriële Eigendom (BIE). Tsoutsanis

2013 Memberships Author 1 Lid Expert committee Europese Commissie en rapporteur ter evaluatie van Bostyn richtlijn 98/44/EG betreffende de wettelijke bescherming van biotechnologische uitvindingen (nieuw mandaat sinds november 2013). 2 Lid Raad van Advies CBP (until June). Dommering 3 Bestuurslid Vereniging voor Auteursrecht (Dutch Copyright Society). Van Eechoud 4 Lid Comité Exécutif Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI). Van Eechoud 5 Lid Association of Teachers and Researchers in Intellectual Property Law (ATRIP). Van Eechoud 6 Coördinator subcommittee ‘initial ownership’, International Law Association Van Eechoud Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law. 7 Coördinator LAPSI Working Group on Constitutional, Human Rights and Van Eechoud Environmental Perspectives. 8 Lid (in loco) Universitaire Onderzoek Commissie (UOC) Universiteit van Van Eechoud Amsterdam. 9 Voorzitter Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht (VMC). Van Eijk 10 Lid Raad van toezicht Nederlandse Publieke Omroep (NPO). Van Eijk 11 Lid Beirat Hans Bredow Institut (HBI), Hamburg. Van Eijk 12 Voorzitter begeleidingscommissie WODC-project Anoniem melden online. Van Eijk 13 Member Organizing committee Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research (APPR). Van Eijk 14 Voorzitter commissie van beroep Pictoright. Van Eijk 15 Lid Beroepscommissie NLkabel. Van Eijk 16 Voorzitter jury Internet Scriptieprijs. Van Eijk 17 Member Advisory Committee, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg. Van Eijk 18 Lid Beirat Institut für Europäisches Medienrecht, (EMR), Saarbrücken. Van Eijk 19 Voorzitter overleggroep Betaalde informatiediensten en overleggroep Van Eijk Elektronische Communicatiediensten (SER). 20 Secretaris Commissie Auteursrecht. Van Gompel 21 Voorzitter Studiecommissie voor de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht Van Gompel van de Vereniging voor Auteursrecht. 22 Lid van High Level Expert Group on Standardization, European Commission. Guibault 23 Lid van Advisory Group e-Infrastructure, Horizon2020, European Commission. Guibault 24 Lid van Network for Digital Methods in the Arts and Humanities – NeDiMAH, Guibault werkgroep van de European Science Foundation. 25 Lid van Göttingen Centre for Digital Humanities Academic Advisory Board, Guibault Göttingen. 26 Lid van Academic Advisory Board, Nexa Center for Internet and Society, Torino. Guibault 27 Lid van Advisory board, Open Data Commons, U.K. Guibault 28 Lid Connect Advisory Group (CAF), European Commission, DG Connect Helberger (a High Level Expert Group that advices the European Commission, DG Connect, on the future Horizon 2020 funding program).

112 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

29 Lid EU Internet of Things High Level Expert Group. Helberger 30 Lid EU Cloud Computing Expert Group. Helberger 31 Lid programma-committee EuroCPR. Helberger 32 Lid wetenschappelijk committee International Telecommunications Society (ITS). Helberger 33 Lid wetenschapscommissie FdR. Helberger 34 Lid sub-commissie maatschappelijk relevantie en valorisatie FdR. Helberger 35 Lid sub-commissie NWO onderzoekstalent FdR.. Helberger 36 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie Commissariaat voor de Media. Hins 37 Lid bezwaarschriftencommissie Nederlandse Publieke Omroep. Hins 38 Lid Commissie Auteursrecht, Ministerie van Justitie. Hugenholtz 39 Lid Comité Exécutif Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI). Hugenholtz 40 Vice-voorzitter Vaste Commissie Plagiaat (Buma-Stemra). Hugenholtz 41 Lid Fachbeirat, Max-Planck-Institut für geistiges Eigentum, Wettbewerbs- und Hugenholtz Steuerrecht, München. 42 Lid Advisory Committee, Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law, Hugenholtz Cambridge University. 43 Lid IP Advisory Committee, Bucerius Law School, Hamburg. Hugenholtz 44 Lid Adviesraad Bits of Freedom. Hugenholtz 45 Lid Adviesraad Dutch Directors Guild. Hugenholtz 46 Lid Advisory Board Electronic Frontier Foundation. Hugenholtz 47 Bestuurslid van de Vereniging voor Reclamerecht. Kabel 48 Voorzitter van de Stichting Weekbladpersgroep. Kabel 49 Plaatsvervangend voorzitter van de Reclame Code Commissie. Kabel 50 Voorzitter van de Commissie van Beroep van het NICAM (Kijkwijzer). Kabel 51 Voorzitter van de Geschillencommissie van het Bureau Kredietregistratie BKR. Kabel 52 Lid Facultaire opleidingscommissie voor Nederlandstalige masters. McGonagle 53 Lid Facultaire scriptieteam. McGonagle 54 Lid adviesraad redactiecommissie Irish Human Rights Law Review. McGonagle 55 Expertadviseur: Media Regulation in Portugal: The ERC’s Case, onderzoeks- McGonagle project, coördinatoren: prof. Helena Sousa et al., Mediascopio Research Centre, Department of Communications Science, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. 56 Geassocieerd lid (senior), School of Human Rights Research. McGonagle 57 Lid United Nations Human Rights Committee Reflection Group, set up under McGonagle the auspices of the School of Human Rights Research as an expert (closed) forum for Prof. Cees Flinterman in the context of his work as a member of the Committee. 58 Co-ordinator Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research. Van der Sloot 59 Expert in the selection of a large research grant for the European Commission, Zuiderveen as part of the FP-7 ICT call. Borgesius

2013 PhD supervision & oppositions Author 1 Member doctoral committee M. Boonk, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, defense Van Eijk 30 October. 2 Member doctoral committee M. Poel, Technische Universiteit Delft, defense 5 Van Eijk November. 3 Member doctoral committee E. Neppelenbroek, RU Groningen, Hugenholtz defense 27 June.

113 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2014 Refereed articles Author 1 ‘Are blocking injunctions against ISPs allowed in Europe? Copyright Angelopoulos enforcement in the post-Telekabel EU legal landscape’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2014-9 (10), p. 812-821. 2 ‘Hacktivism 1-2-3: how privacy enhancing technologies change the face Bodo of anonymous hacktivism’, Internet Policy Review 2014-4, Vol. 3. 3 Ontmoeting en debat’. Bibliotheekwet versus Auteurswet in het digitale domein’, V. Breemen AMI 2014-5, p. 139-145. 4 ‘Hergebruik herschikt’, Mediaforum 2014-4, p. 106-109. Van Eechoud 5 De consument in het telecommunicatierecht: een update’, Tijdschrift Van Eijk voor Consumentenrecht en handelspraktijken 2014-2, p. 77-84. 6 ‘Net Neutrality in the Netherlands, Journal of Law & Economic Regulation Van Eijk 2014-1, vol.7, p. 146-162. 7 ‘Copyright Formalities in the Internet Age: Filters of Protection or Facilitators Van Gompel of Licensing’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2014-28, p. 1425-1458. 8 (with W. Olieslagers) ‘Het proceskostenrisico in IE-zaken: Een empirisch Van Gompel onderzoek naar toepassing van de indicatietarieven’, AMI 2014-5, p. 133-138. 9 ‘Naschrift: Over vorm en inhoud gesproken’, AMI 2014-2, p. 55-56. Van Gompel 10 ‘Het Wetsvoorstel open overheid in het licht van artikel 10 EVRM, Hins Mediaforum 2014-4, p. 110-113. 11 (with T. Jusić) ‘International Assistance and Media Democratization in the Irion Western Balkans: A Cross-National Comparison’, Global Media Journal 2014-4(2), p. 1-29. 12 ‘Voorbaat of vermoeden? De rol van artikel 45d Auteurswet: Kanttekeningen Kabel bij het arrest NORMA/NLkabel’, AMI 2014-3, p. 73-77. 13 (with P. Keller, A. Tarkowski & K. Rybicka) ‘Reuse of Public Sector Information Margoni in Cultural Heritage Institutions’, IFOSS Law Review 2014-1, Vol. 6, p. 1-10. 14 ‘Freedom of Expression of Minorities in a Digital Age: Staking Out a New McGonagle Research Agenda’, Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe (JEMIE) 2013-4, Vol. 12, p. 1-15 (published in 2014). 15 Vrijheid van meningsuiting en onwaarheden’, Mediaforum 2014-6, p. 158-164. Nieuwenhuis 16 (with M. Kerste) ‘Setting licence fees for renewing telecommunication spectrum Poort based on an auction’, Telecommunications Policy 2014-38, p. 1085-1094. 17 (with J. Leenheer, J. van der Ham & C. Dumitru) ‘Baywatch: Two approaches Poort to measure the effects of blocking access to The Pirate Bay’, Telecommunications Policy 2014-38, p. 383-392. 18 ‘Privacy as human flourishing: could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen Van der Sloot privacy protection in the age of Big Data?’, JIPITEC 2014-3, p. 230-244. 19 ‘Between fact and fiction: an analysis of the case-law on Article 12 of the Van der Sloot European Convention on Human Rights’, Child and Family Law Quarterly 2014-4, p.397-420. 20 ‘Do data protection rules protect the individual and should they? Van der Sloot An assessment of the proposed General Data Protection Regulation’, International Data Privacy Law 2014-4, p. 307-325. 21 ‘Privacy in the Post-NSA Era: Time for a Fundamental Revision?’, Van der Sloot JIPITEC 2014-1, p. 2-11. 22 ‘Trade mark applications in bad faith: righting wrong in Denmark and why the Tsoutsanis Benelux is next’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 2014 Vol. 9, No. 2 p. 118-122. 23 ‘Why Copyright and Linking can Tango’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law Tsoutsanis and Practice 2014-6, Vol. 9, p. 495-509.

114 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

24 Finding Vredo pat.pending, The Dutch Supreme Court decision on ‘escitalopram’ Tsoutsanis in: Lundbeck v Tiefenbacher et al., Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 2014-8, Vol. 9, p. 644-649 25 Finding Vredo pat.pending, The Dutch Supreme Court decision on Tsoutsanis ‘escitalopram’ in: Lundbeck v Tiefenbacher et al., Berichten Industriële Eigendom 2014-2, p. 41-45. 26 (with J. Magre & M. Tomàs) ‘Moving to Suburbia? Effects of Residential Mobility Vallbé on Community Engagement’, Urban Studies (2014) 27 ‘Problem Representation on the Fringe of Institutions’, Proceedings of the Vallbé European Conference on Social Intelligence (ECSI-2014), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2014, Vol. 1283, p. 250-261. 28 (with S. Kulk) ‘Google Spain v. González: Did the Court Forget About Freedom Zuiderveen of Expression?’, European Journal of Risk Regulation 2014-3, p. 380-398. Borgesius 29 (with H. Asghari & M. van Eeten) ‘Security Collapse in the HTTPS Market’, Arnbak/ Communications of the ACM 2014-10, p. 47-55; also published in ACM Van Eijk Queue – Security 2014-8, Vol. 12, 23 September.

2014 Non-refereed articles Author 1 Review of a chapter in: A. Ghezzi, A. Pereira & L. Vesnic-Alujevic (eds.) V. Breemen The Ethics of Memory in a Digital Age. Interrogating the Right to be Forgotten, Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2014. 2 Noot bij EHRM 9 februari 2012, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2014, 550, Dommering Aflevering 51, p. 6403-6412 (Vedjeland e.a./Zweden). 3 Noot bij EHRM 13 juli 2012, appl. 16345/06, Grand Chamber), Nederlandse Dommering Jurisprudentie 2014, 319, p. 4074-4075 (Raëlien/Zwitserland). 4 Noot bij EHRM 18 december 2012, appl. 3111/10), Nederlandse Jurisprudentie Dommering 2014, 320, Aflevering 31, p. 4086-4087 (Yildirim/Turkije). 5 Noot bij HR 28 mei 2013, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2014, 350, Dommering Aflevering 34/35, p. 4450-4451. 6 Noot bij HR 7 maart 2013, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 2014, 379, Dommering Aflevering 40, p. 4816-4818. 7 Political Advertising Bans and Freedom of Expression’, 27 Greek Public Fahy Law Review 2014-37, p. 226-228. 8 ‘Copyright, technology and the exploitation of audiovisual works in the EU’, Guibault/ IRIS plus ‘The Influence of New Technologies in Copyright’ 2014-4, p. 9-24. Quintais 9 ‘The freedom to conduct a business and the right to receive information for free’, Hins Annotation to ECJ 22 January 2013, case C-283/11, Sky Österreich GmbH/ Österreichischer Rundfunk, CML Review 2014-2, p. 665-677. 10 (with I. Rubinstein) ‘Privacy and Security in the Cloud: Some Realism About Van Hoboken Technical Solutions to Transnational Surveillance in the Post-Snowden Era’, Maine Law Review, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-46, p. 488-533. 11 The Google Spain/Costeja Decision, CJEU 13 May 2014, C-131/12, Van Hoboken European Human Rights Cases 2014-186, issue 9, nr. 28. 12 (with M. Granger) ‘The Court of Justice and the Data Retention Directive in Irion Digital Rights Ireland: Telling Off The EU Legislator and Teaching a Lesson in Privacy and Data Protection’, European Law Review 2014-6, p. 835-850. 13 ‘Pressing social need; op zoek naar het dringende karakter van de Nieuwenhuis maatschappelijke Behoefte’, NTM/NJCM-Bulletin 2014-1, p. 7-23. 14 ‘Welcome to the jungle, of over de aansprakelijkheid van internet intermediairs Van der Sloot voor privacyschendingen in Europa’, SEW-Tijdschrift voor Europees en Economisch Recht 2014-10, p. 420-431.

115 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

15 ‘Privacy in het post NSA-tijdperk: tijd voor een fundamentele herziening?’, Van der Sloot Nederlands Juristenblad 2014-17, 89, p. 1172-1179. 16 ‘De NSA affaire en de grenzen van de macht’, Filosofie & Praktijk 2014-2, p. 49-66. Van der Sloot 17 ‘New Forms of Commercial Communications and Data Protection Law’, IRIS Zuiderveen Special - New forms of commercial communications in a converged audiovisual Borgesius sector, p. 67-76.

2014 Books, including reports Author 1 Het internet, een wereldwijde vrije ruimte met begrensde staatsmacht, Dommering Adviesraad Internationale Vraagstukken (AIV), Den Haag: AIV 2014, 72 pp. 2 De Lokroep van open data, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 2014, 21 pp. Van Eechoud 3 D2.2 – Position paper access to data, (external report), Brussels: EC Thematic Van Eechoud Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information (LAPSI). 4 (with M. Caspers, S. Eskens, S. van Velze et al) D2.1 – Good practices collection Van Eechoud on access to data, (external report), Brussels: EC Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information (LAPSI), co-ordinating author. 5 (with S. Hugelier, K. Janssen, C. dos Santos et al) D4.1 – Good practices on Van Eechoud Institutional embedding and enforcement, (external report), Brussels: EC Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information (LAPSI). 6 (with R. Polčák, J. Harašta, M. Myška e.a.) D3.1 – Best Practices in Intellectual Van Eechoud Property,(external report), Brussels: EC Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information (LAPSI). 7 (with M. van Eeten & M. Mueller) The Internet and the State: A Survey of Key Van Eijk Developments, Achtergrondstudie RMO, Den Haag, 42 pp. 8 Extended collective licensing: panacee voor massadigitalisering?, Onderzoek Van Gompel/ in opdracht van het Ministerie van OCW, Amsterdam: Instituut voor Hugenholtz/ Informatierecht 1 September 2014, 90 pp. Guibault 9 Legal aspects of open science and open data, (internal report), Paris: Guibault/ Organisation of Economic Development and Cooperation, 40 pp. Margoni 10 Report on The effectiveness of licensing systems for clearing content for Europeana Guibault use, (internal report), The Hague: Europeana, 51 pp. 11 (with I. Hargreaves, P. Valcke & B. Martens) Standardisation in the area of Guibault/ innovation and technological development, notably in the field of Text and Data Mining, (external report), Luxembourg: European Commission, 80 pp. Handke 12 (with M. Ledger, S. Svensson & E. Fejzulla) The Independence and Functioning Irion of the Audiovisual Media Authority in Albania, Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, Amsterdam/Brussels/Budapest/Tirana, October, http://www.indireg.eu/wp- content/uploads/AMA/Indireg-AMA-Report- Nov11.pdf, 108 pp. 13 Study on The digitisation of cultural heritage: originality, derivative works and Margoni (non) original photographs, 69 pp. 14 (with B. van Rompuy) The protection of sports rganisers’s rights in the EU, study Margoni commissioned by the European Commission, Brussels, 207 pp. 15 The role of regional media as a tool for building participatory democracy, Van Eijk/ Council of Europe Congress of Local and Regional Authorities (Current Affairs McGonagle Committee, Rapporteur: Mr. J. van den Hout, Doc. No. CG/ACT (26)6, 11 June 2014), 50 pp. 16 (with M. Kerste & W. Rougoor) Waardering verlenging 2100 MHz-vergunningen, Poort methodedocument t.b.v. Consultatie door ministerie van EZ, SEO Economisch Onderzoek/IViR, Amsterdam, SEO-rapport 2014-69, 40 pp. 17 (with J. Leenheer) Alleen maar nette mensen: Consumentenonderzoek Poort Downloadgedrag Films, CentERdata/IViR, Tilburg/Amsterdam, 38 pp.

116 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

18 Frameworks for Modeling Cognition and Decisions in Institutional Environments: Vallbé A Data-Driven Approach, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London: Springer Verlag 2014, 232 pp.

2014 Book chapters Author 1 ‘Set the fox to watch the geese: voluntary, bottom-up IP regimes in piratical Bodo file-sharing communities’, in: Fredriksson (ed) Piracy: Leakages from Modernity, Sacramento (CA): Litwin Books, p. 241-264. 2 ‘The unbearable complications of patenting plants’, in: M. Tallacchini, F. Leonini, Bostyn M. Ferrari (eds.) Innovating Food, Innovating the Law. An interdisciplinary approach to the challenges in the agro-food sector, Tricase: Libellula Edizioni 2014, p. 296-330. 3 ‘De Mediawet moet op de schop. Pleidooi voor een platformwet’, in: Afstemmen Dommering op cultuur, Publieke omroep in een crossmediaal landschap, Boekman, nr. 98, Amsterdam: Boekmanstichting 2014, p. 23-29. 4 ‘Digitale Grondrechten’, in: De Gids, 200 jaar Grondwet, (177), 2014-2, Dommering Amsterdam: De Groene Amsterdammer 2014, p. 20-21. 5 ‘Adapting the Work’, in: M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.) The Work of Authorship, Van Eechoud Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 2014, p. 145-175. 6 ‘Voices Near and Far – Introduction’, in: M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.) The Work Van Eechoud of Authorship, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 2014, p. 7-18. 7 ‘Netherlands’ in: P. Geller & L. Bently (eds.) International Copyright Law & Practice Van Eechoud 8 ‘Creativity, autonomy and personal touch: A critical appraisal of the CJEU’s Van Gompel originality test for copyright’, in: M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.) The Work of Authorship, Amsterdam: University Press 2014, p. 95-143. 9 Collective Rights Management Directive’, in: I. Stamatoudi & P. Torremans (eds.) Guibault Copyright Law in the European Union, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2014, p. 696-796. 10 ‘De rol van de media in integriteitskwesties: het internationale perspectief’, Hins in: S.C. Loeffen, S.A.J. Munneke, A.R. Neerhof & A.E. Schilder (red.) Integriteit in politiek en bestuur: de (on)mogelijkheden van het recht, Oisterwijk: Wolf Productions 2014, p. 209-221. 11 ‘Norsk-nederlandsk vennskap’, in: D.G. Schartum a.o. (eds.) Hugenholtz Jon Bing: en hyllest = a tribute, Oslo: Gyldendal 2014, p. 366-373. 12 (with M. Ledger) ‘Measuring independence: Approaches, limitations and a new Irion ranking tool’, in: W. Schulz, P. Valcke & K. Irion (eds.) The Independence of the Media and Its Regulatory Agencies. Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context, Bristol: Intellect Publishing 2014, p. 139-165. 13 (with R. Radu) ‘Delegation to Independent Regulatory Authorities in the Media Irion Sector: A Paradigm Shift through the Lens of Regulatory Theory’ in: W. Schulz, P. Valcke & K. Irion (eds.) The Independence of the Media and Its Regulatory Agencies. Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context, Bristol: Intellect Publishing 2014, p. 15-53. 14 ‘Open Government Data in Public Sector Information’, in: A. Pradi, A. Rossato (eds) Margoni Beni Comuni Digitali, Editoriale Scientifica, Trento: Quaderni 2014, p. 115-146. 15 ‘Public Service Media and Cultural Diversity: European Regulatory and McGonagle Governance Frameworks’ in: K. Horsti, G. Hultén & G.Titley (eds.) National Conversations: Public Service Media and Cultural Diversity in Europe, Bristol: Intellect Books 2014, p. 61-82. 16 ‘The State and beyond: activating (non-)media voices’, in: H. Sousa et al (eds.) McGonagle Media Policy and Regulation: Activating Voices, Illuminating Silences, Braga: Communication and Society Research Centre, University of Minho 2014, p. 187-198.

117 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

17 (with A. Ramalho) ‘International Free and Open Source Software – Portugal’, Quintais/ in: Y. van den Brande, S. Coughlan & T. Jaeger (eds.) The International Free and Ramalho Open Source Software Law Book, Munich: Open Source Press 2014, p. 283-324.

2014 PhD theses Author 1 The Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking. Ramalho A Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization (dissertation Universiteit van Amsterdam), 275 pp. 2 Faith in public debate: an inquiry into the relationship between freedom Janssen of expression and hate speech pertaining to religion and race in France, the Netherlands and European and international law, (dissertation Universiteit van Amsterdam), 687 pp. 3 Improving privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting, Zuiderveen (dissertation Universiteit van Amsterdam), 488 pp. Borgesius

2014 Conference papers Author 1 (with S. Goldberg) Loopholes for Circumventing the Constitution: Unrestrained Arnbak Bulk Surveillance on Americans by Collecting Network Traffic Abroad, Telecommunications Policy Research Conference (TPRC) 42, Washington DC; 13 September HotPETS’14, Amsterdam, 7 July. 2 Any Colour You Like: the History (and Future?) of E.U. Communications Security Arnbak Policy, research paper for: Conceptualizing Communications Security, IViR/ Berkman Center Rountable, Harvard University, 18 April. 3 Shadow libraries, pirate archivists, 2nd Thematic Conference on Knowledge Bodo Commons, NYU School of Law, 5-7 September. 4 ‘Legalizing file-sharing: is this a real alternative?, 5th Vienna Music Business Bodo/Handke/ Research Days, Vienna, 1-3 October. Quintais/Vallbé 5 Mapping the supply and demand in digital scientific pirate libraries, 2014 Bodo annual congress of the Society for Economic Research on Copyright Issues, Barcelona, 10-11 July. 6 The value of online licenses of copyright works, 2014 annual congress of the Bodo/Handke/ Society for Economic Research on Copyright Issues, Barcelona, 10-11 July. Vallbé 7 The value of online licenses for recorded music, Information Influx International Bodo/Handke/ Conference, Amsterdam, 2-4 July. Vallbé 8 The History and Development of a Scientific Shadow Library, 6th Annual Bodo workshop of the International Society for the History and Theory of Intellectual Property, Uppsala, 2-4 July. 9 ACS adoption in the Dutch market, Copyright 4 Innovation, The Hague, Bodo/Handke/ 8 September. Vallbé 10 Mass-digitization and the ‘dream’ of universal access, panel report of session K. Breemen ‘Mass-digitization and the conundrum of online access’ at the Information Influx Conference, Amsterdam, 2-4 July, p. 1-3. 11 United in diversity – The future of the public mission, panel report of the V. Breemen Information Influx Conference, Amsterdam, 2-4 July. 12 Work Package Three Interim Report: Establishing Links to Learning, research paper Fahy/ for iLINC: The European Network of Law Incubators, November 5, 2014, p. 1-21. Van Eechoud 13 Establishing Links to Learning, paper presented at the iLinc Best Practices Event, Fahy University of Amsterdam, 30-31 October, p. 1-21. 14 (with D. Voorhoof) A Review of the European Court’s Freedom of Expression Fahy Cases in 2013, paper presented at the Columbia University Freedom of Expression Expert Group Meeting, New York City, 25-26 February, p. 1-11.

118 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

15 (with K. Karppinen & E. Bozdag) Pop the filter bubble: Exposure Diversity as Helberger a Design Principle for Search and Social Media, conference paper accepted at ECREA 2014, Lisbon, 12-15 November. 16 Form matters: informing consumers effectively, conference paper accepted at Helberger EuroCPR 2014, Brussels, 24-25 March. 17 (with K. Kleinen-von-Koenigsloew & R. van der Noll) Convergence, Information Helberger intermediaries and media pluralism, mapping the legal, social and economic issues at hand: a quick scan, Amsterdam. 18 The European Approach to Privacy, Telecommunications Policy Research Van Hoboken Conference, available at SSRN. 19 Some Deeper Truths about ‘European Privacy Law’: on the Unappreciated Van Hoboken Diversity and the Clash of Policy Rationales at the EU level, Privacy Law Scholars Conference. 20 Your digital home is no longer your castle: How cloud computing transforms Irion the (legal) relationship between individuals and their digital assets, European Communication Conference 2014, Lisbon, 12-15 November, 27 pp. 21 Tomorrow’s news: bright, mutualized and open’, panel report, Information McGonagle/ Influx International Conference, 3 pp. Oostveen 22 A Shifting copyright Zeitgeist: Alternative Compensation Models for Digital Quintais Content Sharing, (working paper), Transatlantic Workshop on Intellectual Property Research, ETH Zurich, 14 January. 23 Private Copying and Downloading from Unlawful Sources, 23 October, Quintais Institute for Information Law Research Paper No. 2014-03. 24 Legalizing File-Sharing: An Idea Whose Time Has Come – Or Gone?, report from Quintais the Information Influx International Conference, 1 October. 25 (with N. Casellas) What’s the Cost of e-Access to Legal Information? A composite Vallbé indicator, Doing Business Research Conference: Past, Present, and Future of Business Regulation, Washington D.C.: World Bank. 26 Mapping the supply and demand in digital scientific pirate libraries, 2014 annual Vallbé congress of the Society for Economic Research on Copyright Issues, Barcelona, 10-11 July. 27 Measuring the Judicial Power of Regions: A Judicial Regional Authority Index, Vallbé Joint Sessions of the European Consortium of Political Research (ECPR), University of Salamanca, 10-15 April. 28 Defending privacy: empowerment and protection, for W3C World Wide Web Zuiderveen Consortium Workshop on Privacy and User–Centric Controls, Trust and Borgesius Privacy for Web Applications, Berlin, 20–21 November, pp. 4. 29 Behavioural Sciences and the Regulation of Privacy on the Internet, Institute Zuiderveen for Information Law Research Paper No. 2014-02. Borgesius

2014 Professional publications Author 1 ‘Filtering away infringement: copyright, injunctions & the role of ISPs’, Angelopoulos Kluwer Copyright Blog, 23 July. 2 ‘CJEU in UPC Telekabel Wien: A totally legal court order…to do the impossible’, Angelopoulos Kluwer Copyright Blog, 3 April. 3 ‘Court of Justice of the European Union: Papasavvas v O Fileleftheros’, Angelopoulos IRIS 2014-9, p. 1-4. 4 ‘A New Governance Model for Communications Security?’, expert panel report: Arnbak Princeton University, 5 December. 5 ‘Loopholes for Circumventing the Constitution, the NSA Statement, and Arnbak Our Response’, Princeton University, 11 July.

119 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

6 ‘Will Greenwald’s New Book Reveal How to Conduct Warrantless Bulk Arnbak Surveillance on Americans from Abroad?’, Freedom to Tinker, Princeton University, 12 May. 7 ‘Historic E.U. Net Neutrality Win Shows Maturing Digital Rights Advocacy’, Arnbak Freedom to Tinker, Princeton University, 3 April. 8 ‘9 Problems of Government Hacking: Why IT-Systems Deserve Constitutional Arnbak Protection’, Freedom to Tinker, Princeton University, 20 February. 9 ‘ECHR Fast-Tracks Court Case on PRISM and TEMPORA (and Arnbak VERYANGRYBIRDS?)’, Freedom to Tinker, Princeton University, 29 January. 10 ‘Signing Mass Surveillance Declarations and Petitions: Should Academics Arnbak Take a Stance?’, Freedom to Tinker, Princeton University, 3 January. 11 ‘Hackerek a totális kiberháború korában HVG EXTRA’, Business 9 2014-3, p. 78. Bodo 12 ‘Hermész kora’, Könyves magazin 2014-2, p. 16. Bodo 13 ‘Hiba csúszott a másolásba’, Magyar Narancs 2014-44, sz. (2014.10.30.) Bodo 14 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi KwartaalSignaal 2014-133, p. 7655-7657. K. Breemen/ V. Breemen 15 Annotation of Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C-201/13, 3 Sep- K. Breemen tember 2014 (Deckmyn/Vandersteen), European Human Rights Cases (EHRC) 2014-12, 249, p. 657-662. 16 ‘Dutch legislator proposes two bills on the protection of journalistic sources’, K. Breemen IRIS 2014-10, p. 19-20. 17 ‘European Commission Consultation on Copyright Review’, IRIS 2014-1, p. 8. V. Breemen 18 ‘Court applies Google Spain: no right to be forgotten for convicted criminal’, V. Breemen IRIS 2014-10, p. 19. 19 ‘Consternatie bij de afdeling Vermiste en Gevonden Telefoons’, Mediaforum Van Daalen 2014-5, p. 133 20 Noot bij EHRM 10 januari 2013, AMI 2014-2, p. 57-59 (Ashby Donald c.s./ Dommering Frankrijk). 21 HvJ EU 3 april 2014, (Hof van Justitie EU C-387/12 (Hi Hotel/Spoering)), Van Eechoud AMI 2014-4, p. 117-120. 22 Vzr. Rb. Den Haag 24 februari, (SDC Verifier/Femto Engineering), AMI 2014-5, Van Eechoud p. 169-173. 23 ‘Om niet te vergeten’, Mediaforum 2014-6, p.157. Van Eijk 24 ‘The proof of the pudding is in the eating’, Internet Policy Review, 10 February. Van Eijk 25 ‘Mass surveillance: the Dutch state of denial’, Open Democracy, 16 May. Van Eijk 26 ‘Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi, Kwartaalsignaal 2014-130, Van Eijk p. 7442-7443. 27 ‘Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi Kwartaalsignaal 2014-131, Van Eijk p. 7517-7518. 28 ‘Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi KwartaalSignaal 2014-132, Van Eijk p. 7593-7595. 29 ‘Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht’, Ars Aequi KwartaalSignaal 2014-133, Van Eijk p. 7657-7658. 30 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2014-1, p. 50-54. Van Eijk 31 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2014-2, p. 115-120. Van Eijk 32 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2014-3, p. 201-204. Van Eijk 33 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2014-4, p. 260-264.. Van Eijk 34 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2014-5, p. 2014-294. Van Eijk 35 (with D. Stevens) ‘Telecommunicatie’, Computerrecht 2014-6, p. 364-367. Van Eijk

120 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

36 ‘Summary of Responses to Green Paper on ‘Fully Converged Audiovisual World’ Fahy Published’, 19 (9) IRIS: Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual Observatory 2014-7, p. 7. 37 19 (9) “New Industry Guidelines for Online Child Protection,” IRIS: Legal Fahy Observations of the European Audiovisual Observatory 2014-1, p. 1. 38 ‘Imposing Costs on Newspaper in Successful Source-Protection Case Fahy Did Not Violate Article 10’, Strasbourg Observers, 17 November. 39 ‘A Lesson for Applicants: Don’t Agree to a Relinquishment to the Grand Fahy Chamber’, Strasbourg Observers, 4 July. 40 (with D. Voorhoof) ‘German Court Injunction Banning Political Leaflet Fahy Violated Article 10’, Strasbourg Observers, 21 May. 41 ‘Reintroducing Copyright Formalities: Controversies and Challenges’, Van Gompel The Copyright & New Media Law Newsletter 2014-2, vol. 18, p. 7-9. 42 Vzr. Rechtbank Rotterdam 25 april 2014 (DLVS/Amvest), AMI 2014-5, p. 174-175. Van Gompel 43 ‘Trouver le diamant dans la mine de données ou les implications juridiques de Guibault l’exploration de données’, Documentaliste-Sciences del’Information 2014-2, p. 23-25. 44 ‘Developing the User Perspective in the Plurality Dialogue’, Media Policy Helberger Project Blog, LSE. 45 (with J. van Hoboken) ‘The Math behind Your “Wall”: Who’s Governing the Helberger/ Algorithms that Shape our Lives?’, Media Policy Project Blog, LSE, 11 June. Van Hoboken 46 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi KwartaalSignaal 2014-130, p. 7441-7442. Hins 47 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi KwartaalSignaal 2014-131, p. 7515-7517. Hins 48 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi KwartaalSignaal 2014-132, p. 7592-7593. Hins 49 EHRM 1 juli 2014, no. 56925/08, A.B. /Zwitserland, EHRC 2014-9, 207, Hins p. 539-542. 50 ‘Google Edit voor People Search: gevolgen van recht op vergetelheid’, Van Hoboken Informatie Professional 2014-7, p. 16-19. 51 ‘Follow the Money! Ownership & Financial Transparency should be a Irion Media Policy Standard’, Media Policy Project Blog, LSE, 30 April. 52 ‘The challenges of government use of cloud services for public service delivery’, Irion The Policy & Internet Blog, Oxford Internet Institute, 24 February. 53 Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam, 27 augustus 2014 (LIRA/UPC), AMI 2014-6, p. 208. Kabel 54 Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 20 mei 2014, (Telegraaf/NPO), AMI 2014-5, Kabel nr. 14, p.164-168. 55 Annotatie bij Hof Arnhem-Leeuwarden 12 november 2013, Kabel (Gemeente Groningen/ Milikowski), AMI 2014-1, p. 36. 56 (Stilzwijgende) licenties in het filmauteursrecht, Annotatie bij Rb. Rotterdam 13 Kabel november 2013 (Rijneke/Stichting Rotterdam Media Fonds) en Rb. Amsterdam 18 september 2013 (Holierhoek/NTR), AMI 2014-1, p. 34-35 . 57 Case C-131/12 Google Spain/ Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de datos Margoni (case summary), IRIS 2014-6, p. 1-3. 58 Rapporteur’s Conclusions, Seminar and Inter-regional Dialogue on the Protection McGonagle of Journalists: Towards an effective framework of protection for the work of journalists and an end to impunity, 3 November 2014, Strasbourg, 15 pp. 59 ‘Council of Europe: Ministerial Conference on Freedom of Expression and McGonagle Democracy in the Digital Age’, IRIS 2014-2, p. 1-3. 60 ‘Committee of Ministers: Protection of whistleblowers’, IRIS 2014-7, p. 1-3. McGonagle 61 ‘Committee of Ministers: Declaration on protection of journalism and McGonagle safety of journalists and other media actors’, IRIS 2014-7, p. 1-4. 62 ‘Committee of Ministers: Human Rights Guide for Internet Users’, McGonagle IRIS 2014-8, p. 1-5.

121 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

63 ‘Council of the European Union: Human rights guidelines on free expression McGonagle on- and offline’, IRIS 2014-8, p. 1-8. 64 EHRM 16 januari 2014 (Tierbefreier/Duitsland), EHRC 2014-4, p. 230-233. Nieuwenhuis 65 HR 18 april 2014 (Martijn), Mediaforum 2014-6, p.183-184. Nieuwenhuis 66 (with A. de Leeuw) ‘No more downloading from unlawful sources?’, Quintais Kluwer Copyright Blog, 12 May. 67 (with A. de Leeuw) ’Downloading from Unlawful Sources. Reflections following Quintais the Villalón Opinion on Aci Adam and Others’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 27 February. 68 ‘Strafrechtadvocaten e.a. / de staat’, Mediaforum 2014-11/12, p. 307-309. Van der Sloot 69 EHRM 2013, October 10, (64569/09: Delfi AS/Estland), EHRC 2014-1, p. 14. Van der Sloot 70 ‘Nooit meer stamppot’, Advocatenblad Start 2014-2, 2014-October, p. 27. Tsoutsanis 71 (with E. Brouwer) ‘Inzage in de minuten van de asielprocedure: persoons- Zuiderveen gegevens of geen persoonsgegevens?’ (Uitspraak van de maand: HvJEU, Y.S. Borgesius en M. en S. tegen Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel, C-141/12 en C-372/12), Asiel & Migrantenrecht 2014-7, p. 299-302.

2014 Publications aimed at the general public Author 1 ‘Wat eeuwen van spam ons leren over cybersecurity’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 31 December. 2 ‘De unieke sleutel tot onze digitale informatie’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 25 November. 3 ‘Deltaplan voor online privacy & beveiliging’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 28 October. 4 ‘Stortvloed regels moet beveiliging internet verbeteren’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 30 September. 5 ‘Cybersecurity dekmantel voor digitale boterberg’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 29 August. 6 ‘Eerste hulp bij datalekken’, Security.nl, 31 March. Van Daalen 7 ‘De massale opslag van telecomgegevens is ongeldig verklaard. Van Daalen Wat betekent dat?’, De Correspondent 9 April. 8 ‘Tien tips voor privacyvriendelijke securitylogs’, Security.nl, 28 April. Van Daalen 9 ‘Google moet links gaan verwijderen. Wat betekent dat?’, Van Daalen De Correspondent 15 May. 10 ‘Vijf beveiligingsmaatregelen die het CBP eist’, Security.nl, 5 September. Van Daalen 11 ‘Wat zijn redelijke beveiligingsmaatregelen eigenlijk (niet)’, Van Daalen Security.nl, 29 september. 12 ‘CBP over legacy-systemen: tijdelijk in quarantaine’, Security.nl, 23 December. Van Daalen 13 ‘Bescherm je cliënten tegen de staat, versleutel je mail’, Van Daalen NRC Handelsblad 22 December. 14 ‘Schilder schendt al snel auteursrecht’, De Volkskrant 18 February. Dommering 15 ‘Nederland veel te gemakkelijk met weggeven van privacy’, opiniepagina Dommering/ NRC Handelsblad 11 April; tevens verschenen op Netkwesties, 11 April. Van Eijk 16 ‘Regering slaat onwettig onze data op: Bij opslag van kentekens en Dommering/ internetverkeer negeert de regering het Europese Hof’, opiniepagina NRC Van Eijk Handelsblad 26 November; tevens verschenen op Netkwesties, 26 November . 17 ‘Straks verwijdert Google alle oude informatie’, opiniepagina Dommering NRC Handelsblad 17 May’. 18 ‘Meningsuiting of oproep tot terreur: waar ligt de grens?, Het Parool 23 August. Dommering

122 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

19 ‘Handboek blijft splijtzwam, Het Parool 26 August. Dommering/ Van Eijk/ Nieuwenhuis 20 ‘Liever een betere rente dan korting op een tuinbankje’, Opiniepagina Van Eijk Trouw 14 maart. 21 ‘Hof negeert uitingsvrijheid’, commentaar bij L. Moerel ‘Google maakt het Van Eijk middel erger dan de kwaal door te melden dat er iets is verwijderd’. 22 ‘Google maakt het middel erger dan de kwaal door te melden dat Van Eijk er iets is verwijderd’, Netkwesties, 2 September. 23 ‘Geef de auteurs hun kabelvergoeding terug’, Trouw 23 May. Hugenholtz 24 Declaration ‘Academics Against Mass Surveillance’, Oostveen academicsagainstsurveillance.org. 25 ‘De staat moet privacy echt gaan beschermen’, Het Parool 15 maart. Van der Sloot 26 (Folkert van der Graaf) 1 op straat, Radio 1, 11 June. Van der Sloot 27 ‘Jurist is zelden betrokken’, NRC Handelsblad 17 June. Tsoutsanis 28 ‘Ontwikkeling innovatierecht blijft achter bij ambities’, Tsoutsanis Het Financieele Dagblad 21 June. 29 ‘Als u niet akkoord gaat met deze onleesbare privacyvoorwaarden, Zuiderveen klik toch maar op OK’, De Correspondent 26 June. Borgesius

2014 Inaugural lectures & PhD defenses Author 1 De lokroep van open data (inaugural lecture), Amsterdam, 23 May. Van Eechoud 2 Media and Users: Towards a new Balance (inaugural lecture), Helberger Amsterdam, 19 September. 3 The Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking. Ramalho A Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization (PhD defense). 4 Faith in public debate: an inquiry into the relationship between freedom Janssen of expression and hate speech pertaining to religion and race in France, the Netherlands and European and international law (PhD defense). 5 Improving privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting (PhD defense). Zuiderveen Borgesius

2014 Invited lectures/keynotes/presentations/workshops Author 1 ‘Beyond the Safe Harbours: Substantive Third Party Intermediary Liability for Angelopoulos Copyright in Europe’, presentation at workshop entitled ‘Secondary liability of hosting Internet Service Providers in the European Union’, Maastricht University, 8 September. 2 ‘Their Users’ Keepers? Harmonising Intermediary Liability for Third Party Angelopoulos Copyright Infringement in Europe’, presentation at 6th International Conference on Information Law and Ethics (ICIL 2014), Thessaloniki, 30-31 May. 3 ‘How to Build a Public Domain Calculator’, presentation at Workshop ‘The Angelopoulos Public Domain Calculators’, Bournemouth University, UK, 11 April. 4 ‘Digitization, Public Domain & Informational Monopolies’, Bournemouth Angelopoulos University, UK, 10 April. 5 Speaker at the NYU Security Seminar, New York, 22 April. Arnbak 6 ‘Cyberlaw’, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 10 April (guest Arnbak lecture).

123 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

7 ‘DigiNotar: Wargaming Information Security’, workshop Berkman Center, 16 Arnbak January (presentation). 8 ‘Surveillance.01-USA art show in the Made in NY Media Center by IFP’, Dumbo, Arnbak Brooklyn, 5 April (panelist). 9 ‘Governments pwn the web: why IT-systems deserve constitutional protection’, Arnbak Berkman Luncheon Series, Berkman Center, 18 February, (speaker). 10 Cyber Dialogue, University of Toronto, 2 April. Arnbak 11 Cyberscholars Workshop series, Yale/MIT/Harvard workshop, Jan-May, 21 Arnbak March (speaker). 12 ‘Het Nieuwe Privacyrecht’, PAO, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 15 May. Arnbak 13 ‘Cyberintelligence en Publiek Belang’, expertbijeenkomst Eerste Kamer, Den Arnbak Haag, 6 May. 14 ‘Shadow libraries, The Post Digital Scholar Conference’, Leuphana University, Bodo 12-14 November. 15 ‘Supply and demand in scholarly book publishing’, The interaction between Bodo legal and pirated books sales workshop, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, 14 October. 16 ‘Alternative Compensation Schemes’, Copyright 4 Innovation, The Hague, 8 Bodo September. 17 ‘Shadow libraries’, Re:publica conference, Berlin, 6-8 May. Bodo 18 EPO’s proceedings 2/3: EPC regulations and EPO’s approach on patentability: Bostyn exclusions of patentability – approach for software and pharmaceutical products – assessment of novelty (disclaimer) and of inventive step (problem- solution approach), CEIPI IP Summer School, Strasbourg, 4 July (lecture). 19 ‘Intervenant au colloque: Breveter les gènes ? Les défis de la politique Bostyn européenne’, Haut Conseil des biotechnologies, Paris, 29 April. 20 Docent Opleiding Nederlandse Octrooigemachtigden. Bostyn 21 ‘Actualiteiten Auteursrecht: Bibliotheken en Archieven’, PAO Leiden, V. Breemen 7 November. 22 Academic workshop on internet takedown research at the University Van Daalen of Berkeley, 2 May (expert invited). 23 Roundtable on right to be forgotten and Google/Spain for the Vereniging Van Daalen voor Media- en Communicatierecht, Amsterdam,21 November (speaker). 24 (with N. van Eijk, F. Zuiderveen Borgesius & B. van der Sloot) PAO course Van Daalen on Privacy and Data Protection Law, Amsterdam, 15 May. 25 (with P. Ducheine) Amsterdam IT Circle (IT-managers from a group of Van Daalen companies in the Amsterdam region) on information security and the law, 26 September (lecture). 26 ‘United in diversity – The Future of the public mission’, Information Influx Dommering International Conference, Amsterdam, 4 July (panelist). 27 ‘Who owns the World Cup?’, Information Influx International Conference, Dommering Amsterdam, 4 July (panelist). 28 ‘Hof van Justitie aan het Werk’, KNAW Amsterdam, Werkbegrip: werk Van Eechoud en bewerking, Studiemiddag Vereniging voor Auteursrecht, Amsterdam, 7 February. 29 ‘Re-Use Door Openers’, LAPSI final conference Untangling the issues Van Eechoud surrounding Open Data, Brussels, 28 November. 30 ‘IPR en internet’, PAO Actualiteiten auteursrecht Universiteit Leiden, Van Eechoud 17 november. 31 ‘Project Hermes’, expert workshop project Hermes, Brussels, 17 March. Van Eijk 32 ‘Oneerlijke handelspraktijken en privacy’, congres ‘Elektronisch Handelsrecht’, Van Eijk Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Handelsrecht, KNAW, Amsterdam, 11 April.

124 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

33 ‘Incentives for Communications Security’, Berkman-IViR roundtable on Van Eijk ‘conceptualizing communications security’, Cambridge, 18 April. 34 ‘Security economics in the HTTPS Value Chain’, Computer Science and the Van Eijk Law-seminar, CTIC/Penn Law, UPenn, United States, 13-14 May. 35 ‘National Security, Sweeping up the pieces’, conferentie ‘Law Enforcement and Van Eijk Free Speech in the Information Ecosystem’, Haifa University, Haifa, 12 June. 36 ‘Smart Cities: Things that matter’, Fordham Law Alumni Association, European Van Eijk Chapter, Amsterdam, 28 June. 37 (with W. Schulz) ‘The Future of European Audio-Visual Regulation in the Face Van Eijk of Convergence: The Hermes Project’, Brussels, 4 November. 38 ‘Telecommunications Law and Net Neutrality’, gastcollege EBLC, University Van Eijk of Amsterdam, 13 March. 39 ‘Auccountability in the information Privacy Context’, expert Workshop, Leuven, Van Eijk 13 November (respondent). 40 ‘Protecting EU fundamental rights on internet, in particular privacy, expert Van Eijk Seminar University of Amsterdam, 27 October (chair). 41 Workshop ‘Enhancing Accountability in Government Access to Private-Sector Van Eijk Data’, Center for Information Policy Research/Indiana University/ervasive Technology Institute, London, 30 May. 42 ‘Netneutraliteit’, PAO ‘Het Nieuwe Privacyrecht’, Amsterdam, 15 May. Van Eijk 43 Organiser PAO ‘Het Nieuwe Privacyrecht’, Amsterdam, 15 May. Van Eijk 44 ‘The Role of ISP’s in public and private surveillance’, Summer Course on Privacy Van Eijk Law and Policy, Amsterdam, 9 July (chair expert panel). 45 Workshop ‘Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives; Van Eijk Comments on Helen Nissenbaum: Respect for Context as a Benchmark for Privacy Online: What it is and isn’t, NIAS, Wassenaar, 15 January. 46 ‘The role of regional media as a tool for building participatory democracy’, Van Eijk Current Affairs Committee of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Strasbourg, 25 March. 47 ‘Gebruik klantgegevens door banken’, Rondetafelgesprek Tweede Kamer, Van Eijk Den Haag, 21 May. 48 ‘Internet en recht: netneutraliteit en zoekmachines’, Honour Van Eijk Studentenvereniging, Utrecht, 27 May. 49 (with H. Doorenspleet) ‘Fixed Line developments in the Netherlands’, Van Eijk ITS-Europe, Brussels, 24 June. 50 ‘Public policy issues and Technology Implications for Cable Operators in Van Eijk Europe’, Cablelabs European Strategy Retreat, Amsterdam, 8 October. 51 ‘The Netherlands: Broadband’, MaCCI & CTIC Telecommunications Confer- Van Eijk ence 2014 ‘U.S. and European Broadband Deployment: What Do the Data Say?’, Mannheim, 22 October. 52 ‘Building bridges: the EU-US privacy debate’, VNO/NCW, Den Haag, 5 November. Van Eijk 53 ‘Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research’, meeting with Norwegian DPA, IViR, Van Eijk Amsterdam, 7 November. 54 ‘Telecommunicatierecht I’, Academie voor wetgeving, Den Haag, 24 November. Van Eijk 55 ‘Telecommunicatierecht II’, Academie voor wetgeving, Den Haag, 1 December. Van Eijk 56 ‘Jurisdiction over data stored in European cloud data centres and cross-border Van Eijk law enforcement access to data’, round table Microsoft, Brussels, 10 September (expert invited). 57 ‘Big Data, Veiligheid en Privacy’, WRR expert-bijeenkomst, Den Haag, 15 July. Van Eijk 58 ‘Google en het recht om vergeten te worden’, VMC Studiemiddag, Amsterdam, Van Eijk 21 November (chair).

125 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

59 ‘Ideas for Change with Simon Davies’, Spui25, Amsterdam, 3 December (chair). Van Eijk 60 Brainstormsessie Privacy Bridges, IViR, 3 December (chair). Van Eijk 61 ‘New Forms of Commercial Communications’, workshop EAO/EAI, Van Eijk Saarbrücken, 4 April (chair). 62 (with D. Voorhoof) ‘A Review of the European Court’s 2013 Term’, paper Fahy presented at the Columbia University Freedom of Expression Expert Group Meeting, New York City, 25-26 February. 63 Columbia University Freedom of Expression Expert Group Meeting, Fahy New York City, 25-26 February. 64 ‘Creatieve keuzes’, Wetenschappelijk programma VvA ledenvergadering: Van Gompel Werk en bewerking, Amsterdam, 7 February. 65 ‘Internationale aspecten’, guest lecture for the Bachelor course Auteursrecht, Van Gompel Faculty of Law, University of Leiden, 6 May. 66 ‘Recent Case Law of the Court of Justice of the EU’, Summer Course Van Gompel International Copyright Law, Amsterdam, 8 July. 67 (with J.P. Poort) ‘Downloadverbod & auteursrechtelijke vraagstukken’, Van Gompel Ziggo workshop on Net Neutrality, Download Ban, and Data Retention, Institute for Information Law, Amsterdam, 30 June. 68 ‘Mass-digitization and (extended) collective licensing: the way forward?’, Van Gompel ARCHIVIA 14 conference, Ars Electronica Festival, Linz, Austria, 6-7 September. 69 ‘Faustian Perspective on Digitization: Making a Deal with the Devil’, University Guibault of Bournemouth, 10 April. 70 ‘The Challenges to collective management of copyright in Europe’, University Guibault of Copenhagen, 7 March. 71 ‘Contracts and copyright: A focus on exceptions and extended collective Guibault licensing’, Strasbourg, 13 August. 72 ‘Economie et protection de l’oeuvre numérique en évolution’, Université Guibault Lumière Lyon 2, 26 June. 73 ‘La gestion collective étendue et obligatoire du droit d’auteur: Quelles Guibault applications? Quelles opportunités?’, Université de Strasbourg, 20 June. 74 ‘Exceptions and Limitations on Copyright’, Summer Course International Guibault Copyright Law, Amsterdam, 10 July. 75 ‘Fair use in support of mash-ups, remixes and other transformative uses Guibault in Europe’, Warsaw, 7 November. 76 Privé kopie’, PAO Actualiteit Auteursrecht, Universiteit Leiden, 17 November. Guibault 77 ‘Research Data Policy and Text and Data Mining’, LERU Seminar on Open Guibault Scholarship, Brussels, 6 June. 78 ‘Legal Issues of Open Access’, Organisation pour la Coopération et le Guibault Développement Economique, Global Forum on Responsible Business Conduct, Paris, 19 June. 79 ‘Copyright aspects of Text and Data Mining’, Copyright4Innovation, Guibault Buitenhof, The Hague, 8 September. 80 ‘Overcoming barriers to the digitization and dissemination of newspapers’, Guibault British Library, Europeana Newspaper, London, 30 September. 81 ‘Open Access and Scientific Publishing – II’, Lunch lezing - Bureau Guibault Kennistransfer, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 23 January. 82 User Empowerment, Observatory workshop, Strasbourg, 10 December. Helberger 83 Transparency in Social Networks, EMSOC Closing Conference, Brussels, Helberger 20 November (keynote). 84 Diversity-sensitive design of search engines, ECREA 2014, Lisbon, 15 November. Helberger

126 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

85 Making transparency work, ECREA 2014, Lisbon, 14 November. Helberger 86 So informiert sich die Gesellschaft, Hamburger Mediensymposium, Hamburg, Helberger 11 June. 87 Merely facilitating or actively stimulating diverse media choices? – Public Helberger service media at the cross-road, Social Media and the Transformation of Public Space, KNAW, Amsterdam, 18 June. 88 Big Data and legal research, ASCoR Big Data Spring Colloquium, Amsterdam, Helberger 22 April. 89 Privacy Law Scholars Conference, Washington, 5-6 June. Helberger 90 Grundversorgung 2.0, Zentrum Digitale Kulturen (CDC), Leuphana University, Helberger Lueneburg, 21 May. 91 Wie entstehen Regeln im Netz?, iRights Symposium, Berlin, 20 May. Helberger 92 Public Domain and Democracy in the digital Age, Upsala, 18 September. Helberger 93 Workshop of the European Magazine Media Association, Paris, 13 November. Helberger 94 Conference on ‘International Regulatory Trends on Personal Data Protection’, Van Hoboken Santiago, Chile, 14 November (keynote). 95 ‘A European Perspective on Extraterritorial Surveillance through US-based Van Hoboken internet services’, panel on U.S. Surveillance and Human Rights, International Law Weekend, New York, 24 October. 96 ‘The Right to Be Forgotten Judgment in Europe: Taking Stock and Looking Van Hoboken Ahead’, Privacy Research Group, New York University, 8 October. 97 ‘The European Approach to Privacy’, Telecommunications Policy Research Van Hoboken Conference 2014, Arlington, VA, 13 September. 98 Information Influx Conference, ‘The Algorithmic Public: What Normative Van Hoboken Framework for New Media’s & Automation?’, Amsterdam, 3 July. 99 ‘The European Approach to Privacy’, paper presented at Privacy Law Scholars Van Hoboken Conference 2014, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., 6 June. 100 ‘Surveillance, Technology and Business’, Wilson Center Event on Surveillance Van Hoboken Security and Trust, Washington D.C., 4 June. 101 ‘Data & Algorithms, Freedom & Accountability’, Lecture for the Erasmus Van Hoboken Research Prize Award Ceremony, Dutch Royal Academy of Sciences, Amsterdam, 12 May. 102 (with S. Guerses) ‘Political Crypto: National Security Agendas, Law and the Van Hoboken Making of Cryptography’, Infrastructures of Empire Conference, Steinhardt Department for Media, Culture and Communications, New York University, 26 April. 103 ‘Dead Ends and New Beginnings: Transatlantic Policy Dynamics Relating to Van Hoboken Transnational Cloud Surveillance’, Symposium on Big Data and Border Flows, Trade Agreements & Foreign Relations, Yale Law School, New Haven, 6 April. 104 ‘Some Realism about Technical Solutions to Transnational Surveillance’, Van Hoboken Maine Law Review 2014 Privacy Symposium, Portland, Mainem, 21 February. 105 ‘Government Access to the Cloud’, Panelist, Computers Privacy and Data Van Hoboken Protection 2014, Brussels, 24 January. 106 Discussant, The History of the Copyright Wars (Peter Baldwin), Columbia Van Hoboken University, New York, 5 November. 107 ‘How Should Regulators Conceptualize Communications Security?’, participant Van Hoboken roundtable, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University, New York, 18 April. 108 ‘Protecting Human Rights in the Age of Surveillance’, roundtable organized Van Hoboken by the Center for Democracy & Technology and the American University Washington College of Law Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law, Washington D.C., 29 January (invited).

127 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

109 ‘Taking Data to the Street, A Year-Long Study With Street and its Data’, Van Hoboken CPDP 2014, side-event, organized by Microsoft Research, Brussels, 23 January (discussant). 110 ‘Restructuring the Economic Rights’ (paper Ole-Andreas Rognstad), Hugenholtz “Grillen”, Universiteit van Oslo, 28 January (commentator). 111 ‘Flexible Copyright in Europe. Can Authors’ Right Accommodate Fair Use?’, Hugenholtz Fordham IP Conference, New York, 24 April. 112 ‘Nordic Light on the Database Right’, Jon Bing Memorial Seminar, Hugenholtz Universiteit van Oslo, 30 April. 113 ‘Openingstoespraak’, Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, Hugenholtz 2 July. 114 ‘Filtering away infringement: copyright injunctions & the role of ISPs’, Hugenholtz Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 3 July. 115 ‘Legalizing filesharing: an idea whose time has come, or gone?, Information Hugenholtz Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 4 July (moderator panel). 116 ‘Who owns the World Cup?’, Information Influx International Conference, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 4 July (moderator panel). 117 ‘Moral Rights v. Free Speech’, ALAI-congres, Brussel, 17-19 September. Hugenholtz 118 ‘European Copyright Law: the EU’s Digital Agenda’, Munich Intellectual Hugenholtz Property Law Centre, München, 14-16 January. 119 ‘Inleiding databankenrecht’, seminar Netwerk Auteursrechten Informatiepunt, Hugenholtz KNAW, Amsterdam, 15 April. 120 ‘Something Completely Different: Europe’s Sui Generis Database Right’, Hugenholtz Conference “Intellectual Property on the Internet: Is there Life Outside of the Big Three?”, Victoria University of Wellington (Nieuw-Zeeland), 16-18 November. 121 (with S. van Gompel) organisation of the IViR Summer Course on International Hugenholtz Copyright Law, Amsterdam, 7-11 July. 122 ‘International Framework’, Summer Course International Copyright Law, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 7 July. 123 ‘Database protection’, Summer Course International Copyright Law, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 9 July 124 ‘Actualiteiten Europees Auteursrecht’, PAO Leiden, 25 November. Hugenholtz 125 ‘Recent Developments in EU Copyright Law’, ELSA Summer Law School, Hugenholtz Católica- universiteit, Lisbon, 24 July. 126 ‘Auteurscontractenrecht: de stand van zaken’, Eurosonic/Noorderslag- Hugenholtz conferentie, Groningen, 17 January. 127 ‘Modernising the EU Copyright Framework’, S&D Conference IP Rights: Hugenholtz A Tool for Jobs & Growth?, Europees Parlement, Brussel, 30 January. 128 ‘De voors en tegens van het downloadverbod’, symposium Europa uit de kunst Hugenholtz (PvdA Europees Parlement), Amsterdam, 18 June. 129 ‘Copyright: If I could change just one thing …’, Baker & McKenzie/WIPO, Hugenholtz Kings College, Londen, 7 October. 130 Cursus Auteursrecht, Stichting Juridische Samenwerking Nederland-Suriname, Hugenholtz Paramaribo, 31 March-4 April. 131 ‘Do We Need EU Copyright Reform?’, EPO/WIPO-congres IP Essentials for Hugenholtz EU Officials, Brussel, 10 December. 132 ‘Your digital home is no longer your castle: How cloud computing transforms Irion the (legal) relationship between individuals and their digital assets’, European Communication Conference 2014, Lisbon, 12-15 November. 133 ‘Accountability unchained: Bulk Data Retention, Preemptive Surveillance and Irion Transatlantic Data Protection’, paper presentation at the ECPR Standing Group on Regulatory Governance Conference, Barcelona, 25-27 June.

128 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

134 ‘Your digital home is no longer your castle: How cloud computing transforms Irion the (legal) relationship between individuals and their digital assets’, IViR Speektafel, University of Amsterdam, 11 April. 135 ‘Your digital home is no longer your castle: How cloud computing transforms Irion the (legal) relationship between individuals and their digital assets’, The TILT Seminar, University Tilburg, 23 April. 136 ‘Your digital home is no longer your castle: How cloud computing transforms Irion the (legal) relationship between individuals and their digital assets’, The Media and Change Discussion Series, CMCS, Central European University, Budapest, 29 April. 137 ‘(Distributive) Justice v. Privacy – the uneasy trade off in copyright debates’, Irion 7th International Conference Computer Privacy and Data Protection Conference (CPDP), Brussels, 22-24 January (panelist). 138 ‘An Update on European Privacy Law and Policy’, Summer Course Privacy Law Irion and Policy, Amsterdam, 7 July. 139 ‘Assessing de facto independence of NRAs and the accountability puzzle’, invited Irion keynote speaker, 40th EPRA meeting, Tbilisi, 9-11 October. 140 ‘Indicators for formal and actual independence of regulatory bodies in the media Irion sector’, Council of Europe Regional Conference Indicators for Independence of Media Regulatory Bodies, Tirana, 6-7 March (keynote). 141 ‘Praktijk, effecten en regulering van embedded advertising’, bijeenkomst Kabel Vereniging voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam, 25 maart (chair). 142 Privacy & Gegevensbescherming symposium, Amsterdam, 21 May (chair). Kabel 143 ‘Handelspraktijken en reclame. Recente Europese rechtspraak en toekomstige Kabel regelgeving’, Stichting Reclame Code, Amsterdam, 8 April and 15 May. 144 ‘Handelspraktijken en reclame. Recente Europese rechtspraak en toekomstige Kabel regelgeving’, Jurisprudentielunch Reclameboek, Amsterdam, 4 June. 145 ‘Copyright and Design rights interface’, The Pan European IP Summit – Premier Margoni Cercle, Brussels, 4 December. 146 ‘Öriginality in EU copyright law: an example of judicially driven harmonization?’, Margoni Bocconi University, Milan, 24 October. 147 ‘Digitising the public Domain’, EPIP 9th conference – European Parliament, Margoni Brussels, 3 September 148 Internship for society, ‘IP in life sciences’, minor University of Leiden, Margoni 20 November. 149 ‘Europeana Awareness and the digitization of cultural heritage’, Open Margoni Knowledge Foundation conference, Berlin, 15 July. 150 ‘Bio-Fiction Festival – Museum of National History’, seminar on IP in Margoni Bio-fiction, Vienna (invited speaker). 151 ‘Rethinking duties and responsibilities: new tensions, impasses and detentes McGonagle for freedom of expression’, ECREA Bi-annual conference, Communication for Empowerment: Citizens, Markets, Innovations (Communication Law & Policy Section), Lisbon, 13 November. 152 ‘The implementation of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive by national McGonagle regulatory authorities – national responses to regulatory challenges’, Information Influx Conference, Young Scholars session, Amsterdam, 2 July (commentator). 153 ‘The Unlovable Press: Lessons for the European Court of Human Rights, The McGonagle Unlovable Press: Conversations with Michael Schudson’, Centre for Media and Journalism Studies, University of Groningen, 16 June. 154 ‘Rethinking freedom of expression in a new media ecosystem’, International McGonagle and European Human Rights Law - Capita Selecta, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, 16 April (guest lecture).

129 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

155 ‘Rights and responsibilities redux: time to rethink, repurpose or reinvent?’, McGonagle The Challenges of Citizen Journalism: Technology and the Law, Programme in Comparative Media Law and Policy, University of Oxford, 14 January. 156 Seminar and Inter-regional Dialogue on the Protection of Journalists: Towards McGonagle an effective framework of protection for the work of journalists and an end to impunity, Strasbourg, 3 November (rapporteur). 157 ‘Regulatory directions for open journalism: beaten tracks or new trails?’, McGonagle OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, 2nd Expert Meeting, Vienna, 22 September. 158 ‘Hate Speech – Old Enemy, New Battles’, European Platform of Regulatory McGonagle Authorities (EPRA), 39th Meeting, Budva, Montenegro, 6 June. (keynote). 159 Round Table on Safety of Journalists: From Commitment to Action, Council McGonagle of Europe Media and Information Society Division, Strasbourg, 19 May (rapporteur). 160 ‘The craft(ing) of open journalism: selected legal principles’, Open journalism McGonagle and the open road ahead, OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Expert Meeting, Vienna, 5 May. 161 Senior Judge, Monroe E. Price Media Law Moot Court Competition McGonagle (International rounds), Programme in Comparative Media Law and Policy, University of Oxford, 2 April. 162 (with J. Weda) ‘Elvis is Returning to the Building: Understanding a Decline Poort in Unauthorized File Sharing’, 9th Annual Conference of the EPIP Association, Brussels, 4 September. 163 ‘The consequences of digitisation for the content industries’, CLICKNL Poort Drive Conference Business Innovation, Eindhoven, 22 October. 164 (with S. van Gompel) ‘Downloadverbod & auteursrechtelijke vraagstukken’, Poort Ziggo workshop on Net Neutrality, Download Ban, and Data Retention, Institute for Information Law, Amsterdam, 30 June. 165 ‘International Copyright Law’, International Intellectual Property Law Course, Quintais Masters of International Business Law (IBL), University of Leiden, 30 April (lecture). 166 ‘Openlaws Project’, Amsterdam, 4 September (Panel presentation & discussion). Salamanca 167 ‘Untangling the issues surrounding Open Data ‘, LAPSI 2.0 Final Conference, Salamanca Brussels, 28 November. 168 ‘Big Data and the WRR’, IViR leestafel, Amsterdam, 28 November. Van der Sloot 169 ‘Code Red in Rome’, surveillance and privacy panel, Rome, 19 November. Van der Sloot 170 ‘Big Data en privacy’, UvA met Noorse DPA, Amsterdam, 7 November. Van der Sloot 171 ‘Privacy and Intentions’, Private spaces, Passau University, Passau, 16 October. Van der Sloot 172 ‘Privacy en schade’, Spui25, Amsterdam, 13 October. Van der Sloot 173 ‘Big Data and privacy’, seminar by Linnet Taylor, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Van der Sloot 10 September. 174 ‘Do privacy and data protection rules protect groups and shouldthey’, Van der Sloot Oxford-UvA workshop on group privacy, Amsterdam, 8 September. 175 ‘Privacy en Big Data’, Clingendael Instituut, Den Haag, 28 August. Van der Sloot 176 ‘Privacy, informatierecht en de wetenschap’, informatiedag introductie- Van der Sloot studenten Universiteit van Amsterdam, 26 and 27 August. 177 ‘Actieplan Privacy’, TNO en PI Lab, Den Haag, 26 May. Van der Sloot 178 ‘De nieuwe Verordening Gegevensbescherming’, PAO cursus, Amsterdam, 15 May. Van der Sloot 179 ‘Op zoek naar Utopia: privacy in het post-NSA tijdperk’, Spui25 AA lezing, Van der Sloot Amsterdam, 10 april. 180 ‘The Future of Big Data, Equality and Privacy. Unknown’, University Leiden, Van der Sloot 14 June.

130 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

181 ‘Data Protection, a new approach’, TA3M, Amsterdam, 21 April. Van der Sloot 182 ‘Do Data Protection Rules protect the individual and should they?’, Van der Sloot EuroCPR, Brussels, 24 and 25 March. 183 ‘The end of consumer privacy rights: towards a model of privacy as a virtue’, Van der Sloot EuroCPR, Brussels, 25 March. 184 ‘Privacy as virtue’, Passau Privacy Conference, Passau, 16 October. Van der Sloot 185 ‘Regulation of behavioral targeting’, participant workshop, Amsterdam, 23 July. Van der Sloot 186 ‘Privacy en Gegevensbescherming’, Amsterdam, 21 May (panelist privacy). Van der Sloot 187 ‘Wat mag wel en wat mag niet’, HvA workshop, Amsterdam, 25 November. Van der Sloot 188 ‘Openbaarheid-privacy’, workshop 1, HvA Amsterdam, 6 November. Van der Sloot 189 ‘Openbaarheid-privacy’, workshop 2, HvA Amsterdam, 6 November. Van der Sloot 190 ‘Privacy and individual harm’, amnesty international, Amsterdam, 29 October. Van der Sloot 191 ‘Right to be forgotten’, archivarissen, Amsterdam, 25 September. Van der Sloot 192 ‘Privacy en Big Data’, avond Big Data door SViR en econometrie, Amsterdam, Van der Sloot 20 May. 193 ‘Privacy in de medische sector’, Huisartsenvereniging LOVAH, Utrecht, Van der Sloot 10 January. 194 ‘Privacy in de medische Sector’, Huisartsenvereniging LOVAH, Leiden, 2 April. Van der Sloot 195 ‘Why Copyright and Linking Can Tango: the Svensson case’, Fordham IP Tsoutsanis Conference, New York, 25 April (invited speaker). 196 ‘Cost-awards in IP cases’, Post graduate ‘advanced’ course on copyright law, Tsoutsanis Leiden Law School, 11 November (panelist). 197 ‘Empirical (Legal) Research: Theories, hypotheses and data’, Master’s course Vallbé Methods of Legal Research, Research Master Public International Law, Amsterdam, 10 December (guest lecture). 198 ‘Behavioural targeting, Behavioural economics & law’, European Consumer Zuiderveen Summit, Brussels, 1 April. Borgesius 199 ‘Behavioural targeting & data protection law’, New forms of commercial Zuiderveen communications in a converged audiovisual sector, Saarbrucken, 4 April. Borgesius 200 ‘Comparative Research On Consumer Privacy Attitudes And Knowledge’, Zuiderveen CPDP Computers, Data Protection Law and Privacy, Brussels, 23 January Borgesius (panel moderator). 201 ‘Behavioural targeting - If you cannot control it, ban it’, IViR Influx Conference, Zuiderveen Amsterdam, 3 July (invited presentation/panelist). Borgesius 202 ‘The history, context and background of European Data Protection Law: the Zuiderveen legal framework and institutions’, Internet Privacy and Data Protection, Law Borgesius and Digital Technologies, Leiden, 8 October (guest lecture). 203 ‘Territorial scope of EU Data Protection Law’, Internet Privacy and Data Zuiderveen Protection, Law and Digital Technologies, Leiden, 29 October (guest lecture). Borgesius 204 ‘Data subject rights and controller obligations, including regarding profiling’, Zuiderveen Internet Privacy and Data Protection, Law and Digital Technologies, Leiden, Borgesius 12 November (guest lecture). 205 ‘Improving privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting’, Zuiderveen Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research, Amsterdam, 1 December. Borgesius 206 ‘Het nieuwe privacyrecht’, PAO, Amsterdam, 15 May (lecture). Zuiderveen Borgesius 207 ‘Broodje Kennis’, Spui25, Amsterdam, 4 November. Zuiderveen Borgesius

131 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2014 Editorships & peer reviewer/review activities Author 1 Reviewer First Monday. Bodo 2 Member Editorial Board Journal of International Biotechnology Law. Bostyn 3 Member Editorial board Auteurs- en Mediarecht (A&M) Dommering 4 Editor The Work of Authorship, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 2014, Van Eechoud 278 pp. 5 Member Editorial board Dutch copyright journal AMI (Tijdschrift voor Van Eechoud Auteurs-, Media- & Informatierecht). 6 Contributor Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Van Eechoud 7 Reviewer Telecommunications Policy. Van Eijk 8 Member Editorial board Computerrecht. Van Eijk 9 Permanent contributor Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht & handelspraktijken. Van Eijk 10 Editor IRIS : Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual Observatory. Fahy 11 Member Editorial board IRIS – Legal Observations of the Fahy European Audiovisual Observatory . 12 Member Editorial board Dutch copyright journal AMI (Tijdschrift voor Van Gompel Auteurs-, Media- & Informatierecht). 13 National editor, ‘Netherlands’, Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Van Gompel ed. by L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org. 14 Editor Kluwer European IP Cases. Guibault 15 Editor Kluwer Copyright Blog. Guibault 16 Co-editor Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Guibault e-Commerce Law (JIPITEC). 17 Member Editorial board Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle. Guibault 18 Member Editorial board www.juriscom.fr. Guibault 19 Correspondent Computer Law Review International. Guibault 20 Editorship special issue International Journal of Communication. Helberger 21 Member Editorial board Journal of Information Policy. Helberger 22 Member Editorial board Mediaforum. Helberger 23 Reviewer Journal of Information Policy, Telecommunications Policy. Helberger 24 General Editor Information Law Series (Kluwer Law International). Hugenholtz 25 Member Editorial board Journal of World Intellectual Property (JWIP). Hugenholtz 26 Annotator (copyright law) Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Hugenholtz 27 Editor Kluwer European IP Cases. Hugenholtz 28 Editor Kluwer Copyright Blog. Hugenholtz 29 Reviewer research proposal for the Research Council of KU Leuven. Hugenholtz 30 (with W. Schulz & P. Valcke (eds.)) The Independence of the Media and Its Irion Regulatory Agencies.Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context, in: N. Carpentier & F. Heinderyckx (eds.) ECREA Book Series, Bristol: Intellect Publishing 2014, 381 pp. 31 Member editorial board International Data Privacy Law, Oxford Journals. Irion 32 Member Editorial board Tijdschrift Privacy & Informatie. Kabel 33 Member Editorial board Dutch copyright journal AMI Kabel (Tijdschrift voor Auteurs-, Media- & Informatierecht). 34 Member Editorial board International Sports Law Journal. Margoni 35 Member Editorial board International Journal on Advances in Security. Margoni

132 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

36 Guest editor special issue ‘Freedom of expression of minorities in the digital age’, McGonagle Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe (JEMIE) 2013-4, Vol. 12 (published in 2014). 37 Reviewer Minority Rights Group International – State of the World’s Minorities McGonagle and Indigenous Peoples 2014. 38 Reviewer Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights . McGonagle 39 Reviewer Script-ed – A Journal of Law, Technology & Society. McGonagle 40 Member Editorial board IRIS – Legal Observations of the European McGonagle Audiovisual Observatory. 41 Originator and General Editor IRIS Themes (e-book series published McGonagle by the European Audiovisual Observatory). 42 Member Editorial board Mediaforum. Nieuwenhuis 43 Reviewer Telecommunications Policy. Poort 44 Reviewer Information & Communications Technology Law journal. Van der Sloot 45 Member Editorial Board Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. Tsoutsanis 46 Member Editorial board Berichten Industriële Eigendom. Tsoutsanis 47 Member Editorial board Law, Governance and Technology Series, Springer Verlag. Vallbé 48 Member Editorial board Journal of Catalan Intellectual History. Vallbé 49 Reviewer for the European Conference on Social Intelligence (ECSI-2014). Vallbé 50 Peer reviewer International Data Privacy Law, November 2014. Zuiderveen Borgesius

2014 Memberships Author 1 Member European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Bodo Rights expert group. 2 Member National Copyright Expert Council, Hungary. Bodo 3 Chair Expert Committee at the European Commission on the development and Bostyn implications of patent law in the field of biotechnology and genetic engineering. 4 Board member EDRi, European umbrella organisation of digital rights Van Daalen organisations in Europe. 5 Member committee Mensenrechten (CMR) Adviesraad Internationale Dommering Vraagstukken, Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken 6 Chair Raad van Curatoren Stichting Media Ombudsman. Dommering 7 Co-ordinator subcommittee ‘initial ownership’, International Van Eechoud Law Association Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law. 8 Co-ordinator LAPSI 2.0 Working Group on Access and Data protection. Van Eechoud 9 Member Advisory Board College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens Van Eechoud (Dutch Data Protection Authority). 10 Member Board Vereniging voor Auteursrecht (Dutch Copyright Society). Van Eechoud 11 Member Executive Committee Association Littéraire et Artistique Van Eechoud Internationale (ALAI). 12 Member Association of Teachers and Researchers in Intellectual Property Van Eechoud Law (ATRIP). 13 Member Advisory Committee Hans Bredow Institut (HBI). Van Eijk 14 Member Advisory Committee Institut für Europäisches Medienrecht (EMR). Van Eijk 15 Chair judging-committee Internetscriptieprijs. Van Eijk 16 Chair begeleidingscommissie WODC-project ‘ Online Anoniem Melden’. Van Eijk

133 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

17 Member Advisory Committee European Audiovisual Observatory (ADCO). Van Eijk 18 Member Committee NL-Kabel. Van Eijk 19 Member Supervisory Board NPO. Van Eijk 20 Member Council of Advisors on Privacy and Civil Liberties (PCAP), Palantir. Van Eijk 21 Chair Committee Pictoright. Van Eijk 22 Chair overleggroep Betaalde Informatiediensten, SER. Van Eijk 23 Chair Vereniging voor Media en Communicatierecht (VMC). Van Eijk 24 Member Kenniskring Commissie van Toezicht betreffende de Van Eijk Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdiensten (CTIVD). 25 Ad hoc expert Ministerie OCW ‘Beleidsdoorlichting Mediabeleid 2010-2013’. Van Eijk 26 Member Expert Group Columbia University Global Freedom of Expression. Fahy 27 Chair Studiecommissie voor de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht (Study Van Gompel group on the history of copyright) of the Vereniging voor Auteursrecht (Dutch copyright organisation, VvA). 28 Member Jury Nationaal Appelconcours (Moot court), Gerechtshof Van Gompel ’s-Gravenhage (Court of Appeals of The Hague), 14 March. 29 Secretary Commissie Auteursrecht (the Dutch Copyright Committee). Van Gompel 30 Board member Vereniging voor Intellectuele Eigendom (the Dutch group Van Gompel of the AIPPI, Association Internationale pour la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle). 31 Member appointment committee Karlsruhe Universität, KIT/ FIZ W3 professor, Guibault Karlsruhe. 32 Member Advisory board, Göttingen Centre for Digital Humanities, Guibault University of Göttingen. 33 Member Advisory board, Nexa Center for Internet and Society, Guibault University of Torino. 34 Member Network for Digital Methods in the Arts and Humanities – Guibault NeDiMAH, werkgroep van de European Science Foundation. 35 Member Expert Group Standardization, European Commission. Guibault 36 Member Advisory Group e-Infrastructure, Horizon2020, European Guibault Commission. 37 Member Advisory board, Open Data Commons, England. Guibault 38 Member Appointment Committee for the position of a Professor Helberger of Law and Technology at the Tallinn Law School. 39 Member program committee of EuropCPR. Helberger 40 Member scientific committee ITS. Helberger 41 Member EC Connect Advisory Forum (High Level Expert Group). Helberger 42 Member EC Cloud Computing Expert Group. Helberger 43 Member Media Ombudsman. Helberger 44 Member Wetenschapscommissie. Helberger 45 Member FdR Ethics Committee. Helberger 46 Member best publication FdR 2014. Helberger 47 Member Dean Committee. Helberger 48 Member Program Committee Computers, Privacy and Data Protection 2014, Van Hoboken 22-24 January. 49 Chair Board of Directors, Bits of Freedom Van Hoboken 50 Member Programme Advisory Council, CREATe, the RCUK Centre for Hugenholtz Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy.

134 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

51 Member Advisory Committee, Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Hugenholtz Law, Cambridge University. 52 Member IP Advisory Committee, Bucerius Law School, Hamburg. Hugenholtz 53 Member Committee Auteursrecht, Ministerie van Justitie. Hugenholtz 54 Co-founder European Copyright Society. Hugenholtz 55 Member Focusgroep Programma, Commissie Toekomstverkenning Mediabestel, Hugenholtz Raad voor Cultuur. 56 Deputy justice, Gerechtshof Arnhem. Hugenholtz 57 Vice-chair Vaste Commissie Plagiaat (Buma-Stemra). Hugenholtz 58 Member Advisory Board Bits of Freedom. Hugenholtz 59 Member Advisory Board Dutch Directors Guild. Hugenholtz 60 Member Advisory Board Electronic Frontier Foundation. Hugenholtz 61 Member scientific committee of the Annual Privacy Forum 2014, Athens. Irion 62 Member expert group of the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom, Irion Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies, European University Institute (EUI), Florence. 63 Member International Advisory Board of Privacy International, London. Irion 64 Member International Advisory Board of the Electronic Privacy Information Irion Center (EPIC), Washington D.C. 65 Member EDRi expert group on the EU data protection reform. Irion 66 Member Council of Europe Expert to assess the formal and de facto Irion independence of the Albanian media regulatory authority (AMA). 67 Board member Vereniging voor Reclamerecht. Kabel 68 Chair Stichting Weekbladpersgroep. Kabel 69 Deputy chair Reclame Code Commissie. Kabel 70 Chair Commissie van Beroep NICAM (Kijkwijzer). Kabel 71 Chair Geschillencommissie Bureau Kredietregistratie (BKR). Kabel 72 Member Marie Curie Alumni Association. Margoni 73 Nexa Internet and Society Center (University of Turin) – Non resident Fellow. Margoni 74 Member European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Margoni Rights expert group. 75 Member Policy for Intellectual Property Association. Margoni 76 Member Euromedia Research Group. McGonagle 77 Senior researcher (Netherlands) School of Human Rights Research. McGonagle 78 Member United Nations Human Rights Committee Reflection Group, McGonagle School of Human Rights Research. 79 Member Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht Studiecommissie McGonagle Bronbescherming. 80 Member Advisory Committee to the Dutch branch of UNESCO on the McGonagle Netherlands’ input into the Council of UNESCO’s International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC). 81 Rapporteur Council of Europe’s Committee of Experts on protection McGonagle of journalism and safety of journalists (MSI-JO). 82 Registered as expert in the Economics of IP, European Commission. Poort 83 Lid Adviesraad Auteursrechtdebat (IE-Forum). Poort 84 Member Portuguese Bar Association (Qualified Lawyer). Quintais 85 Member review committee of the young scholars programme Van der Sloot of the Information Influx International Conference. 86 Scientific Committee APC2015. Van der Sloot

135 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

87 Member program committee: ‘W3C World Wide Web Consortium Workshop Zuiderveen on Privacy and User–Centric Controls, Trust and Privacy for Web Applications’, Borgesius Berlin, 20–21 November.

2014 PhD supervision & oppositions Author 1 Co-supervisor and member of the committee N. Kapetanaki, ULB, Brussels, Bostyn defense 10 March. 2 Promotor E. Janssen, defense 9 September. Van Eijk 3 Promotor F .Zuiderveen Borgesius, defense 17 December. Van Eijk 4 Member doctoral committee A. Schmidt, TuDelft, defense 3 January. Van Eijk 5 Member doctoral committee A. Ramalho, defense 8 January. Guibault 6 Member doctoral committee E. Vasamae, Tallin University, Estland, Guibault defense 28 August. 7 Member doctoral committee F. Zuiderveen-Borgesius, defense 17 December. Helberger 8 Member of doctoral committee F. Zuiderveen Borgesius, defense 17 December. Van Hoboken 9 Co-promotor A. Ramalho, defense 10 January. Hugenholtz 10 Member doctoral committee D. Duivenvoorde, defense 3 July. Kabel 11 Member doctoral committee F. Zuiderveen Borgesius, defense 17 December. Kabel 12 Co-supervisor E. Janssen, defense 9 September. Nieuwenhuis

2014 Organisation & chairships conferences/workshops Author 1 (with B. Hugenholtz) ‘Filtering away infringement: copyright, injunctions Angelopoulos & the role of ISPs’, Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 3 July (organiser panel). 2 Conceptualizing Communications Security, IViR/Berkman Center Arnbak Rountable, Harvard University, 18 April. 3 (with K. de Beer, A. Dobbelsteen, M. van Eechoud, S. van Gompel , L. Guibault Arnbak & N. Helberger) organisation of Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 2-4 July. 4 ‘Behind the Scenes of the Internet: a Critical Engineering NETworkshop’, Arnbak IViR, Amsterdam, 5-8 July. 5 (with J. Quintais) ‘Legalizing file-sharing: an idea whose time has come – Bodo or gone?’, Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 4 July (organiser panel). 6 ‘(Distributive) Justice Vs. Privacy – The Uneasy Tradeoff In Copyright Bodo Debates’ Computers, Privacy and Data Protection Conference , Brussels, 23 January (panel chair and organiser). 7 (with A. Arnbak, K. de Beer, A. Dobbelsteen, S. van Gompel, L. Guibault, Van Eechoud N. Helberger & J. van Hoboken) organisation of Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 2-4 July (conference director). 8 ‘Accountability and the public sector data push’, Information Influx International Van Eechoud Conference, Amsterdam, 4 July (panel organiser and moderator). 9 (with M. de Vries, C. Sappa & F. van den Boom) ‘Links and Losses: How Do Van Eechoud Legal Frameworks Interact’, Panel at LAPSI final conference Untangling the issues surrounding Open Data: Brussels, 28 November (panel organiser). 10 (with C. Sappa) Open laws LAPSI joint workshop ‘Open Legal Data for Europe’, Van Eechoud University of Amsterdam, 4 September. 11 (with M. Senftleben) ‘Werkbegrip: werk en bewerking’, Studiemiddag Van Eechoud Vereniging voor Auteursrecht, KNAW, Amsterdam, 7 February.

136 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

12 (with J. Cummins, N. van Eijk & V. Sijstermans) ‘iLinc Best Practices Event Van Eechoud European Network of Law Incubators’, Amsterdam, 30-31 October. 13 Privacy Bridges Project, workshops in: Amsterdam, 27-29 April; Van Eijk Washington, 21-22 October; Brussels, 9-10 December (co-organiser). 14 Workshop on ‘Online tracking: developing an international consensus Van Eijk for consumer protection and privacy online’, IViR/Berkeley, Brussels, 11-12 February (co-organiser). 15 Expert workshop project Hermes, Brussels, 17 March (co-organiser). Van Eijk 16 Workshop on Group Privacy, University of Amsterdam, 8-9 September. Van Eijk 17 (with J. Cummins, M. van Eechoud & V. Sijstermans) ‘iLinc Best Practices Van Eijk Event European Network of Law Incubators’, Amsterdam, 30-31 October. 18 ‘Netneutraliteit, download verbod en dataretentie’, Ziggo, 30 June. Van Eijk 19 (with A. Arnbak, K. de Beer, A. Dobbelsteen, M. van Eechoud, L. Guibault, Van Gompel N. Helberger & J. van Hoboken) organisation of Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 2-4 July. 20 ‘Mass-digitization and the conundrum of online access’, Information Van Gompel Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 3 July (panel organisor). 21 ‘Global information flows and the nation state’, Information Influx Van Gompel International Conference, Amsterdam, 4 July (panel organisor). 22 (with B. Hugenholtz) ‘IViR Summer Course on International Copyright Law’, Van Gompel Amsterdam, 7-11 July (organiser). 23 (with A. Arnbak, K. de Beer, A. Dobbelsteen, M. van Eechoud, S. van Guibault Gompel, N. Helberger & J. van Hoboken) organisation of Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 2-4 July. 24 ‘Information Influx Young Scholars Competition’, Information Influx Guibault International Conference, Amsterdam, 3 July (organiser). 25 ‘Rights in the mix’, Information Influx International Conference (panel organiser). Guibault 26 ‘Mass-digitization and the conundrum of online access’, Information Influx Guibault International Conference (panel organiser). 27 3rd Europeana Licensing Workshop Luxembourg, 20-21 November. Guibault 28 (with A. Arnbak, K. de Beer, A. Dobbelsteen, M. van Eechoud, S. van Helberger Gompel, L. Guibault & J. van Hoboken) organisation of Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 2-4 July. 29 ‘Big Breakfast with Joseph Turow’, Amsterdam, 2 July (co-organiser workshop). Helberger 30 ‘The algorithmic public: towards a normative framework for Helberger automated media’, Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 3 July (panel organiser). 31 (with T. McGonagle) ‘United in diversity? –The future of the public mission’, Helberger Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 4 July (panel organiser). 32 (with A. Arnbak, K. de Beer, A. Dobbelsteen, M. van Eechoud, S. van Van Hoboken Gompel, L. Guibault & N. Helberger) organisation of Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 2-4 July. 33 ‘Big Brother is Back’, Information Influx International Conference, Van Hoboken Amsterdam, 4 July (co-organiser panel). 34 ‘The Algorithmic Public: What Normative Framework for New Media’s & Van Hoboken Automation?’, Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 4 July (co-organiser panel). 35 ‘The myth of users’ empowerment and how future law and policy can be Irion better informed’, European Communication Conference 2014, Lisbon, 12-15 November (chair). 36 ‘Who owns the World Cup’, Information Influx International Conference, Margoni Amsterdam, 4 July (organiser panel).

137 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

37 ‘Rights in the mix’, Information Influx International Conference, Margoni Amsterdam, 3 July (organiser panel). 38 ‘More legal protection for sports events: a safe bet?’, Asser Institute, Margoni The Hague, 14 May (organiser seminar). 39 ‘Tomorrow’s news: bright, mutualized and open?’, Information Influx McGonagle International Conference, Amsterdam, 3 July (panel organiser and moderator). 40 (with N. Helberger) ‘United in diversity? – the future of the public mission’, McGonagle Information Influx International Conference, Amsterdam, 4 July (panel organiser). 41 (with S. Davies, N. van Eijk e.a.) ‘Spui25’, Amsterdam, 3 December. Van der Sloot 42 ‘Big Data en Privacy’, UvA met Noorse DPA, Amsterdam, 7 November. Van der Sloot 43 Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015 (organiser/co-ordinator). Van der Sloot 44 (with L. Taylor & L. Floridi) panel Group Privacy (organiser/co-ordinator). Van der Sloot 45 Campaigning principles - Simon Davies (organiser/co-ordinator). Van der Sloot 46 ‘Behavioural targeting - If you cannot control it, ban it’, IViR Influx Zuiderveen International Conference, Amsterdam, 3 July (co-organiser panel). Borgesius 47 ‘Big Breakfast with Joseph Turow’, Amsterdam, 2 July (co-organiser workshop). Zuiderveen Borgesius 48 ‘The regulation of behavioural targeting’, Amsterdam, 23 July (organiser Zuiderveen workshop). Borgesius 49 Privacy Bridges Project, workshops in: Amsterdam, 27-29 April; Washington, Zuiderveen 21-22 October; Brussels, 9-10 December (co-organiser). Borgesius

2014 Media appearances Author 1 ‘Dutch data protection regulator investigations into Facebook and Google’, Arnbak RTL Late Night, 16 December. 2 ‘Nederland als internetdokter tussen cybergrootmachten: Faciliteer een veilige Arnbak en vrije IT-infrastructuur passend bij onze structurele culturele, economische en politieke belangen’, Het Financieele Dagblad 20 May. 3 ‘Legal loopholes could allow wider NSA surveillance, researchers say’, Arnbak CBS News, 30 June (interview). 4 ‘Americans as ‘vulnerable’ to NSA surveillance as foreigners, despite Fourth Arnbak Amendment’, ZDnet, 30 June (interview). 5 ‘Loopholes In U.S. Law Could Make It Easier For NSA Surveillance’, Arnbak Boston radio, 30 June (interview). 6 ‘Scholars warn of NSA loopholes’, Boston Globe, 10 July (paper co-authored Arnbak with S. Goldberg), (interview). 7 ‘Government can exploit loopholes for warrantless surveillance on Americans’, Arnbak Network World, 30 June, (interview). 8 ‘How Traffic Shaping Can Help the NSA Evade Legal Oversight’, Schneier on Arnbak Security, 1 July (citation). 9 ‘Security collapse in the HTTPS Market’, Slashdot, 26 September. Arnbak 10 ‘Economic Failures of HTTPS Encryption’, Schneier on Security, 28 November. Arnbak 11 ‘Security collapse in the HTTPS Market’, Reddit, 26 September. Arnbak 12 ‘Overheid moet kaders durven stellen technologische ontwikkeling’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 14 January (interview). 13 ‘Klokkenluiden: terugvechten is oké’, Het Parool 21 June. Arnbak 14 ‘Google moet resultate wissen’, De Volkskrant 14 May. Arnbak

138 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

15 ‘Twijfels over cyberdiefstal door Russische bende; ‘het had meer weg Arnbak van goede marketingcampagne’’, Het Financieele Dagblad 11 August. 16 ‘Grote twijfel aan ‘enorme datadiefstal’’, ANP, 11 August. Arnbak 17 ‘Lezing Al Gore op UT over duurzaamheid’, Twentsche Courant 4 October. Arnbak 18 ‘De Oplossers: Cybercrime’, Vrij Nederland 6 December. Arnbak 19 ‘Piraterie oder Notwendigkeit?’, Schattenbibliotheken, irights.info. Bodo 20 ‘Schattenbibliotheken: Piraterie oder Notwendigkeit?’, Laborjournal, Bodo 2014-10 (ePaper). 21 ‘Digital Leben’, Österreichischer Rundfunk, 20 October. Bodo 22 ‘Das Wesen der Schattenbüchereien’, dctv, 19 May. Bodo 23 ‘EU-hof: richtlijn opslag metadata is onrechtmatig’, Van Daalen NRC Handelsblad 8 April (quoted). 24 ‘Google/Spain’, NOS Journaal, 13 May (interview). Van Daalen 25 ‘Google/Spain’, NOS op 3, 13 May (interview). Van Daalen 26 ‘Google/Spain’, RTL Nieuws, 13 May (interview). Van Daalen 27 ‘EU-hof: zoekmachines moeten resultaten verwijderen bij privacy-inbreuk’ Van Daalen Tweakers, 13 May (quoted). 28 ‘Privacy and security’, FunX, 14 May (interview). Van Daalen 29 ‘Hoe ABN Amro weet dat jij een buggy nodig hebt’, Van Daalen De Correspondent 20 June (quoted). 30 ‘Politie en inlichtingendiensten kunnen via een achterdeur bij gegevens Van Daalen van de Belastingdienst’, De Correspondent 30 September (quoted). 31 ‘Informatie over jihadverdachten was via Google te vinden’, Van Daalen De Volkskrant 19 November (quoted). 32 ‘Online surveillance cameras’, RTL Nieuws, 20 November (interview). Van Daalen 33 ‘Future of net neutrality for CCTV America’, 24 November (video debate). Van Daalen 34 ‘Facebook’s privacy policy’, BNR, 3 December (interview). Van Daalen 35 ‘Dit zijn de virtuele stalkers van uw kind’, De Correspondent 19 December Van Daalen (quoted). 36 ‘Privacy aspects of a black box in cars’, EditieNL, 30 December (interview). Van Daalen 37 ‘Wetenschappers keren zich tegen macht geheime diensten’, NRC Handelsblad 3 Van Eijk January (commentaar). 38 ‘Amsterdamse academici protesteren tegen privacyschending’, Het Parool 4 Van Eijk January (commentaar). 39 ‘Verklaring wetenschappers tegen verzamelen persoonlijke gegevens’, Folia 4 Van Eijk January (commentaar). 40 (with F. Zuiderveen Borgesius) ‘Wetenschappers versus macht Van Eijk inlichtingendiensten’, Tros radio nieuwsshow, 4 January. 41 ‘Wetenschap versus de geheime dienst’, NTR De kennis van nu, 9 January. Van Eijk 42 ‘Kamerleden hebben boter op hun hoofd wat betreft afluisterpraktijken’, Van Eijk NOS radio 1, 6 February. 43 ‘Minister Plasterk en de inlichtingendiensten’, Nieuwsuur, 8 February. Van Eijk 44 ‘Privacy hoort thuis in de boardroom: Hoe ga je om met consumentendata?’, Van Eijk Tijdschrift voor Marketing 2014-1/2, p. 19-21 (interview). 45 ‘Facebook wil internet voor iedereen’, Nieuwsuur, 4 March. Van Eijk 46 ‘Betalingen iets heel persoonlijks’, De Telegraaf 11 March (commentaar). Van Eijk 47 ‘Plan ING juridisch haalbaar, maar ondoordacht’, Nederlands Dagblad Van Eijk 11 March (commentaar). 48 ‘European Ruling On Removing Google Links May Leave A Mess’, Van Eijk National Public Radio (NPR), USA, 16 May (interview).

139 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

49 ‘In Europe, Google Stumbles Between Free Speech And Privacy’, Van Eijk National Public Radio (NPR), USA, 14 July (interview). 50 ‘Inzake onpartijdigheid (synthesenota)’, VRT, 23 May and 15 December Van Eijk (interview). 51 (with D. Voorhoof) ‘German Court Injunction Banning Political Leaflet Fahy Violated Article 10’, Strasbourg Observers 20 May, 2014 reposted on Inforrm’s Blog, 23 May. 52 ‘Neue Rahmenbedingungen für die Zugänglichmachung des kulturellen Erbes’, Van Gompel panel discussion about the legal framework conditions and the possibility of their improvement in the digital information society, Radio FRO 105,0 (Freier Rundfunk Oberösterreich), 7 September. 53 ‘Archivia 14’, FROzine, Radio FRO 105,0 (Freier Rundfunk Oberösterreich), Van Gompel 9 September (interview). 54 ‘Personaliseren sites leidt tot manipulatie’, Het Financieele Dagblad Helberger 29 november (interview). 55 ‘Hoe voorkom je technostress’, De Oplossers- 6, Vrij Nederland 25 October. Helberger 56 (with B. Roessler) ‘Wantrouw de overheid!’, Folia 2014-14/15, p. 20-23. Helberger 57 A. De Haes, ‘Nederlandse rechter trekt eigen lijn bij vergeetrecht: terecht?’, Van Hoboken Computerworld 22 September. 58 A. White, ‘Google vague at right-to-be-forgotten roadshow’, Bloomberg News, Van Hoboken 12 September. 59 D. Truijens, ‘Will Europe’s ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Actually Hurt the Web? Van Hoboken We Asked an Expert’, interview with Vice/Motherboard, 22 May. 60 J. Fontanella-Khan, ‘Data protection agencies gain power from Google defeat’, Van Hoboken Financial Times 14 May. 61 Parliament of Albania Press Release, ‘Speaker of Parliament, Mr. Ilir Meta Irion participates in the round table ‘The independence and functioning of Audiovisual Media Authority of Albania, an assessment using INDIREG methodology’, 25 November. 62 (with D. Hirsch) ‘Privacy law in the U.S. and Europe: University of Amsterdam Irion Summer Course explores current issues’, Lexology blog, 21 August. 63 ‘How Open Journalism is influencing media freedom’, OSCE Representative on McGonagle Freedom of the Media Open Journalism Resources, Interview/webcast, 4 April. 64 ‘Radio 1 Journaal’, NPO 1 (Nederlandse Publieke Omroep), 3 January (interview). Oostveen 65 H. Modderkolk, ‘Wetenschappers keren zich tegen macht geheime diensten’, Oostveen NRC Handelsblad 3 January. 66 T. van der Kolk, ‘Ruim 250 academici tekenen verklaring tegen afluisteren’, Oostveen De Volkskrant 3 January. 67 T. Thijs, ‘Wetenschappers willen macht geheime diensten een halt toeroepen’, Oostveen De Morgen 3 January. 68 ‘Academici: toezicht op burgers gaat te ver’, De Telegraaf 3 January. Oostveen 69 ‘Academici privacy: Toezicht op burgers gaat te ver’, Het Parool 3 January. Oostveen 70 ‘Verklaring wetenschappers tegen verzamelen persoonlijke gegevens’, Oostveen Folia 4 January . 71 ‘Más de 250 académicos de todo el mundo claman contra el espionaje Oostveen masivo a la ciudadanía’, Heraldo.es, 3 January. 72 ‘Más de 250 académicos de todo el mundo demandan fin al espionaje masivo’, Oostveen La Jornada 3 January. 73 ‘Amsterdamse academici protesteren tegen privacyschending’, Oostveen Het Parool 4 January. 74 ‘Academici privacy: toezicht op burgers gaat te ver’, Algemeen Dagblad 3 January. Oostveen 75 ‘Academics band together to plead for online privacy’, Gigaom, 3 January. Oostveen

140 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

76 ‘Academici tegen massale surveillance’, Datapanik.org, 3 January. Oostveen 77 ‘Signing Mass Surveillance Declarations and Petitions: Should Academics Oostveen Take a Stance?’, AxelArnbak.nl/freedom-to-tinker.com, 3 January. 78 ‘Academics and authors stand against mass surveillance’, EDRI, 15 January. Oostveen 79 ‘Academics Against Mass Surveillance’, The n-Category Café, 8 January. Oostveen 80 ‘Academics Call for End to Mass Surveillance’, Threatpost.com, 3 January. Oostveen 81 ‘Academics around the world protest against mass surveillance’, Hackread.com, Oostveen 6 January. 82 ‘Alles weggeven, dat doen we niet meer’, NRC Handelsblad 15 July. Poort 83 ‘(Over overname Beats door Apple) …’, Trouw 10 May. Poort 84 ‘Downloadverbod: wat maakt het uit?’, NRC Handelsblad 16 April. Poort 85 ‘De piratenbaai is weer open voor gratis films en muziek’, Poort NRC Handelsblad 29 January. 86 ‘Binnenhalen die series, The Pirate Bay doet ’t weer’, NRC.Next, 29 January. Poort 87 ‘Censorship is no cure for piracy’, torrentfreak.com, 6 February. Poort 88 ‘Rechter beëindigt blokkade Pirate Bay’, De Volkskrant 29 January. Poort 89 ‘Terug van nooit weggeweest’, Spits 29 January. Poort 90 ‘Nederlandse providers moeten The Pirate Bay niet meer blokkeren’, Poort Het Nieuwsblad 28 January. 91 ‘Providers hoeven The Pirate Bay niet meer te blokkeren’, Poort NRC Handelsblad 28 January. 92 ‘Dutch court strikes down pirate bay block ruling it is disproportionate Poort ineffective harming entrepreneurial freedom’, techdirt.com, 28 January. 93 ‘Dutch court find Pirate blocks ineffective, ends it ‘, news.idg.no, 28 January. Poort 94 ‘The pirate bay blockade lifted in holland,wired.co.uk , 28 January. Poort 95 ’Isps no longer have to block the pirate bay dutch court rules’, Poort torrentfreak.com, 28 January. 96 ‘Dutch court rules in favor of unblocking Pirate Bay as ban ‘ineffective’’, Poort rt.com, 28 January. 97 H. Modderkolk, ‘Wetenschappers keren zich tegen macht geheime diensten’, Zuiderveen NRC Handelsblad 3 January. Borgesius 98 T. van der Kolk, ‘Ruim 250 academici tekenen verklaring tegen afluisteren’, Zuiderveen De Volkskrant 3 January. Borgesius 99 T. Thijs, ‘Wetenschappers willen macht geheime diensten een halt toeroepen’, Zuiderveen De Morgen 3 January. Borgesius 100 ‘Academici: toezicht op burgers gaat te ver’, Zuiderveen De Telegraaf 3 January. Borgesius 101 ‘Academici privacy: Toezicht op burgers gaat te ver’, Zuiderveen Het Parool 3 January. Borgesius 102 ‘Verklaring wetenschappers tegen verzamelen persoonlijke gegevens’, Zuiderveen Folia 4 January. Borgesius 103 ‘Más de 250 académicos de todo el mundo claman contra el espionaje Zuiderveen masivo a la ciudadanía’, Heraldo.es, 3 January. Borgesius 104 ‘Más de 250 académicos de todo el mundo demandan fin al espionaje masivo’, Zuiderveen La Jornada 3 January. Borgesius 105 ‘Academici privacy: toezicht op burgers gaat te ver’, Zuiderveen Algemeen Dagblad 3 January. Borgesius 106 ‘Academics band together to plead for online privacy’, Zuiderveen Gigaom, 3 January. Borgesius

141 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

107 ‘Academici tegen massale surveillance’, Datapanik.org, 3 January. Zuiderveen Borgesius 108 ‘Amsterdamse academici protesteren tegen privacyschending’, Zuiderveen Het Parool 4 January. Borgesius 109 ‘Signing Mass Surveillance Declarations and Petitions: Should Academics Zuiderveen Take a Stance?’, AxelArnbak.nl/freedom-to-tinker.com, 3 January. Borgesius 110 ‘Academics and authors stand against mass surveillance’, Zuiderveen EDRI, 15 January. Borgesius 112 ‘Academics Against Mass Surveillance’, The n-Category Café, 8 January. Zuiderveen Borgesius 113 ‘Academics Call for End to Mass Surveillance’, Threatpost.com, 3 January. Zuiderveen Borgesius 114 ‘Academics around the world protest against mass surveillance’, Zuiderveen Hackread.com, 6 January. Borgesius 115 ‘Wissenschäftler protestieren gegen Totalüberwachung’, Zuiderveen SpiegelOnline, 3 January (interview). Borgesius 116 ‘Hundreds of academics protest against mass-surveillance’, Zuiderveen Wired UK, 3 January. Borgesius 117 Uitgebreide discussie over ‘Academics Against Mass Surveillance’, Zuiderveen Tros Nieuwsshow (radio), 4 January. Borgesius 118 ‘EU high court strikes down metadata collection law’, Zuiderveen Ars Technica, 8 April (interview). Borgesius 119 ‘Gratis af te halen bij Marktplaats: persoonsgegevens van derden’, De Zuiderveen Correspondent 30 May (interview). . Borgesius 120 K. van Tuil, ‘Mag niet: Marktplaats deelt IP-adressen en NAW-gegevens’, Zuiderveen Webwereld, 30 May. Borgesius 121 ‘Marktplaats schendt privacy’, Ouderenjournaal, 31 May. Zuiderveen Borgesius 122 ‘Waarom hebben we een beveiligde smartphone nodig?’, Knack (Belgium), Zuiderveen 5 March (interview). Borgesius 123 ‘Wetgeving moet online privacy meer beschermen’, Folia 8 December (interview). Zuiderveen Borgesius 124 ‘Nederlandse websites schenden massaal de privacywet’, NRC Handelsblad Zuiderveen 17 March (interview). Borgesius 125 C‘Ook Studio 100 stalkt uw kind online’, Datapanik.org, 23 December Zuiderveen Borgesius

142 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2015 Refereed articles Author 1 ‘Sketching the Outline of a Ghost: the Fair Balance between Copyright and Angelopoulos Fundamental Rights in Intermediary Third Party Liability’, INFO 2015-6, p. 72-96. 2 ‘Piracy vs privacy–the analysis of Piratebrowser’, International Journal of Bodo Communication 2015-9 (online publication). 3 ‘Going means trouble and staying makes it double: the value of licensing Bodo/Handke/ recorded music online’, Journal of Cultural Economics 2015, p. 1–33. Vallbé 4 ‘Tien privacytrends van 2014’, Mediaforum 2015-2, p. 50-54 Van Daalen 5 ‘Making access to government data work’, Masaryk U. J.L. & Tech. 2015-2, p. 61-84. Van Eechoud 6 (with R. de Beer & A. de Leeuw) ‘Kruisende wegen: Auteursrecht in het Van Eechoud wetsvoorstel Open Overheid’, AMI 2015-3, p. 75-83. 7 ‘De Wob krijgt een broertje: Wet hergebruik van overheidsinformatie’, Van Eechoud Mediaforum 2015-2, p. 49. 8 (with & J. Gray) ‘Open Data, Privacy, and Fair Information Principles: Towards Van Eechoud/ a Balancing Framework’, Berkeley Technical Law Journal (accepted for Zuiderveen publication in Vol 30, issue 3), 46 pp. Borgesius 9 ‘Dataretentie: Beter ten halve gekeerd dan ten hele gedwaald’, Mediaforum Van Eijk 2015-3, p. 93. 10 ‘Digital fixation: the law and economics of a fixed e-book price’, International Van Eijk/ Journal of Cultural Policy 2015, pp. 18. Poort 11 ‘Keena v Ireland and the Protection of Journalistic Sources’, Irish Journal of Fahy European Law 2015-2, vol. 19. 12 ‘Op weg naar een wettelijk stelsel van extended collective licensing voor Van Gompel/ massadigitalisering?’, AMI 2015-4, p. 93-102. Hugenholtz 13 ‘Cultural Heritage Online? Settle It in the Country of Origin of the Work’, Guibault JIPITEC 2015-3, vol. 6, p. 173-191. 14 (with K. Kleinen-von Königslöw & R. van der Noll) ‘Regulating the new Helberger information intermediaries as gatekeepers of information diversity’, INFO 2015- 17, p. 50-71. 15 ‘Merely Facilitating or Actively Stimulating Diverse Media Choices? Public Helberger Service Media at the Crossroad’, International Journal of Communication 2015-9, p. 1324-1340. 16 ‘Your Digital Home is No Longer Your Castle: How Cloud Computing Transforms Irion the (Legal) Relationship between Individuals and Their Personal Records’, International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2015-23 (4), p. 348-371. 17 ‘Het enige Nederlandstalige handboek over mediarecht’, Mediaforum 2015-6, Kabel p. 210-213. 18 ‘Themanummer: openbaarheid van publiek bekostigde informatie en Kabel het auteursrecht’, AMI 2015-3, p. 65-67. 19 ‘Private Copying and Downloading from Unlawful Sources’, International Quintais Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2015-46 (1), p. 66-92. 20 (with M. Kerste) ‘Valuing commercial radio licences’, European Journal of Law Poort/ and Economics 2015-39 (2), p. 331-353. Van Eijk 21 (with I. Akker, P. Rutten & J. Weda) ‘Perspectives of creators and performers Poort on the digital era’, New Media & Society 2015-5, Vol. 17, p. 666–690. 22 (with J. Weda) ‘Elvis Is Returning to the Building: Understanding a Decline in Poort Unauthorized File Sharing’, Journal of Media Economics 2015-28 (2), p. 63-83. 23 ‘Veranderingen in de telecommarkt: consolidatie en differentiatie’, Mediaforum Poort 2015-6, p. 205-209. 24 ‘Billijke vergoeding in recht en economie’, AMI 2015-6, p. 157-161. Poort 25 ‘Welcome to the Jungle: the Liability of Internet Intermediaries for Privacy Van der Sloot Violations in Europe’, JIPITEC 2015-3, p. 211-228.

143 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

26 ‘How to assess privacy violations in the age of Big Data? Analysing the Van der Sloot three different tests developed by the ECtHR and adding for a fourth one’, Information & Communication Technology Law 2015-1, p. 74-103. 27 ‘Privacy as personality right: why the ECtHR’s focus on ulterior interests might Van der Sloot prove indispensable in the age of Big Data’, Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 2015-80, p. 25-50. 28 ‘Do privacy and data protection rules apply to legal persons and should they? A Van der Sloot proposal for a two-tiered system’, The Computer Law & Security Review 2015-1, p. 26-45. 29 ‘Back to black: justice.cn’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice Tsoutsanis 2015-10, p. 725. 30 ‘Personal Data Processing for Behavioural Targeting: Which Legal Basis?’, Zuiderveen International Data Privacy Law 2015-3, vol. 5, p. 163-176. Borgesius 31 (With S. Kulk) ‘Freedom of Expression and ‘‘Right to Be Forgotten’’ Cases in the Zuiderveen Netherlands after Google Spain’, European Data Protection Law Review 2015-2, Borgesius p. 113-124. 32 ‘Informed Consent: We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy’, IEEE Security & Zuiderveen Privacy (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) 2015-2, vol. 13, Borgesius p. 103-107. 33 (with E. Brouwer) ‘Access to Personal Data and the Right to Good Governance Zuiderveen during Asylum Procedures after the CJEU’s YS and M. and S. judgment Borgesius (C-141/12 and C-372/12)’, European Journal of Migration and Law 2015-7, p. 259-272.

2015 Non-refereed articles Author 1 ‘Burgers tegen Plasterk: het Nederlandse staartje van de Snowden-saga’, Van Daalen Ars Aequi 2015-4, p. 287-293. 2 ‘Rechtspraak en agenda’, AMI 2015-2, p. 62-63 (editor). Van Gompel/ Van Eechoud 3 ‘Rechtspraak, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2015-6, p. 185-189 (editor). Van Gompel/ Van Eechoud 4 ‘Les aléas du livre numérique aux Pays-Bas’, Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle Guibault 2015-3, vol. 27, p. 1199-1205. 5 ‘Public service media and exposure diversity – introduction to special issue’, Helberger International Journal of Communication 2015-Vol 9. 6 Hoge Raad 14 juni 2013 (Cruijff / Tirion Uitgevers & De Jong), NJ 2015-13, Hugenholtz nr. 112, p. 1273-1308. 7 EHRM 10 januari 2013 (Ashby Donald c.s. / Frankrijk), NJ 2015-14, nr. 121, Hugenholtz p. 1367-1373. 8 Gezamenlijke noot Hof van Justitie van de EU 15 januari 2015 (Ryanair Ltd/ Hugenholtz PR Aviation en Hoge Raad 17 januari 2014 (Ryanair Ltd / PR Aviation BV), NJ 2015-34/35, nr. 303-304, p. 3665-3667. 9 Hoge Raad 28 maart 2014, (Norma/NLKabel), NJ 2015-42, nr. 365, p. 4822-4825. Hugenholtz 10 (with L. Morganti & A. Renda) ‘Guest editorial: New intermediaries Irion in the hyperconnected society’, INFO 2015-6, p. 3-7. 11 ‘Het prinsesje onder de grondrechten’, Privacy & Informatie 2015-6, p. 215. Kabel 12 ‘Economisch bewijsmateriaal voor het informatierecht’, Nederlands Juristenblad Poort 2015-90, p. 494-495. 13 ‘Van openbaarheid naar hergebruik van overheidsinformatie: Of een vaarwel Van der Sloot aan het sociaal contract’, NJB 2015-36, p. 2537-2543. 14 ‘Privacybescherming online kan beter: De mythe van geïnformeerde Zuiderveen toestemming’, NJB 2015-14, p. 878-883. Borgesius

144 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

26 ‘How to assess privacy violations in the age of Big Data? Analysing the Van der Sloot 15 (with S. Kulk) ‘De implicaties van het Google Spain-arrest voor de vrijheid Zuiderveen three different tests developed by the ECtHR and adding for a fourth one’, van meningsuiting’, Tijdschrift voor Mensenrechten 2015-1, p. 3-19. Borgesius Information & Communication Technology Law 2015-1, p. 74-103. 16 ‘New Forms of Commercial Communications and Data Protection Law’, Zuiderveen 27 ‘Privacy as personality right: why the ECtHR’s focus on ulterior interests might Van der Sloot in: M. Cappello (ed), IRIS special 2015, p. 67-76. Borgesius prove indispensable in the age of Big Data’, Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 2015-80, p. 25-50. 28 ‘Do privacy and data protection rules apply to legal persons and should they? A Van der Sloot proposal for a two-tiered system’, The Computer Law & Security Review 2015-1, 2015 Books (including reports) Author p. 26-45. 1 Exceptions and limitations to copyright for libraries, archives and education and Van Gompel/ 29 ‘Back to black: justice.cn’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice Tsoutsanis research institutions, AIPPI Group Report Q246 (Netherlands), Amsterdam, V. Breemen/ 2015-10, p. 725. 18 May 2015, 16 pp. e.a. 30 ‘Personal Data Processing for Behavioural Targeting: Which Legal Basis?’, Zuiderveen 2 Ten standards for oversight and transparency of national intelligence services, Eskens/ Van International Data Privacy Law 2015-3, vol. 5, p. 163-176. Borgesius IViR 2015, 60 pp. Daalen/ Van Eijk 31 (With S. Kulk) ‘Freedom of Expression and ‘‘Right to Be Forgotten’’ Cases in the Zuiderveen 3 Internet, a global free space with limited state control, pp. 72, Adviesraad Dommering Netherlands after Google Spain’, European Data Protection Law Review 2015-2, Borgesius Internationale Vraagstukken (AIV), Den Haag: AIV 2015 (Engelse vertaling p. 113-124. van het in 2104 gepubliceerde rapport). 32 ‘Informed Consent: We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy’, IEEE Security & Zuiderveen 4 (with E. Kannekens & S. Sluiter) National Report The Netherlands Van Eechoud/ Privacy (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) 2015-2, vol. 13, Borgesius ‘Renumeration for the Use of Works. Exclusivity vs. Other Approaches’, Salamanca p. 103-107. ALAI Conference, Bonn 18-20 June, 22 pp. 33 (with E. Brouwer) ‘Access to Personal Data and the Right to Good Governance Zuiderveen 5 Open laws Report No. D1.2.d5 – The Netherlands, Case Study, Open laws Van Eechoud/ during Asylum Procedures after the CJEU’s YS and M. and S. judgment Borgesius project EC DG Justice, 32 pp. Salamanca (C-141/12 and C-372/12)’, European Journal of Migration and Law 2015-7, 6 (with W. Schulz) Study on the Future of European Audiovisual Regulation, Van Eijk p. 259-272. Hamburg/Amsterdam, October, 74 pp. 7 (with D. Weitzner, I. Rubenstein e.a.) Privacy Bridges: EU and US Privacy Van Eijk Experts In Search of Transatlantic Privacy Solutions, Amsterdam/Cambridge, 2015 Non-refereed articles Author October, 50 pp. 8 (with TNO/ECORYS) Digital platforms: an analytical framework for Van Eijk 1 ‘Burgers tegen Plasterk: het Nederlandse staartje van de Snowden-saga’, Van Daalen indentifying and evaluating public options, Delft/Amsterdam, December, 76 pp. Ars Aequi 2015-4, p. 287-293. 9 Council of Europe Defamation Study, Report for the Council of Europe, 27 pp. Fahy/ McGonagle 2 ‘Rechtspraak en agenda’, AMI 2015-2, p. 62-63 (editor). Van Gompel/ Van Eechoud 10 (with Europe Economics) Remuneration of authors and performers for the use Van Gompel/ of their works and the fixations of their performances, study prepared for the Guibault/ 3 ‘Rechtspraak, actualiteiten en agenda’, AMI 2015-6, p. 185-189 (editor). Van Gompel/ European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, Salamanca Van Eechoud Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 258 pp. 4 ‘Les aléas du livre numérique aux Pays-Bas’, Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle Guibault 11 (with J.-F. Canat in collaboration with E. Logeais) Study on Copyright Guibault 2015-3, vol. 27, p. 1199-1205. Limitations and Exceptions for Museums, Study prepared for the World 5 ‘Public service media and exposure diversity – introduction to special issue’, Helberger Intellectual Property Organisation, Geneva, SCCR/30/2, 140 pp. International Journal of Communication 2015-Vol 9. 12 De Rechtspositie van de Audiovisuele Maker binnen de Publieke Omroep, Hugenholtz 6 Hoge Raad 14 juni 2013 (Cruijff / Tirion Uitgevers & De Jong), NJ 2015-13, Hugenholtz onderzoek in opdracht van de Raad voor Cultuur, Amsterdam, juli, 14 pp. nr. 112, p. 1273-1308. 13 Extending the SatCab Model to the Internet, study commissioned by BEUC, Hugenholtz 7 EHRM 10 januari 2013 (Ashby Donald c.s. / Frankrijk), NJ 2015-14, nr. 121, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 26 October, 17 pp. p. 1367-1373. 14 (with P. Cavaliere & D. Pavli) Comparative study of best European practices of Irion 8 Gezamenlijke noot Hof van Justitie van de EU 15 januari 2015 (Ryanair Ltd/ Hugenholtz online content regulation, Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, August. PR Aviation en Hoge Raad 17 januari 2014 (Ryanair Ltd / PR Aviation BV), 15 Faith in public debate, on freedom of expression, hate speech and religion in Janssen NJ 2015-34/35, nr. 303-304, p. 3665-3667. France & the Netherlands, Cambridge: Intersentia Publishing Ltd 2015, 637 pp. 9 Hoge Raad 28 maart 2014, (Norma/NLKabel), NJ 2015-42, nr. 365, p. 4822-4825. Hugenholtz 16 Freedom of expression: still a precondition for democracy?’, Conference report, McGonagle 10 (with L. Morganti & A. Renda) ‘Guest editorial: New intermediaries Irion Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 24 pp. in the hyperconnected society’, INFO 2015-6, p. 3-7. 17 Draft Recommendation CM/Rec(2015)__ of the Committee of Ministers to McGonagle 11 ‘Het prinsesje onder de grondrechten’, Privacy & Informatie 2015-6, p. 215. Kabel member states on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and 12 ‘Economisch bewijsmateriaal voor het informatierecht’, Nederlands Juristenblad Poort other media actors’, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 20 October, 16 pp. 2015-90, p. 494-495. 18 (with A. Brody, P. Leerssen, T. Margoni & J. van Hoboken) Study of Angelopoulos/ 13 ‘Van openbaarheid naar hergebruik van overheidsinformatie: Of een vaarwel Van der Sloot fundamental rights limitations for online enforcement through self-regulation, Hins/Hugenholtz/ aan het sociaal contract’, NJB 2015-36, p. 2537-2543. commissioned by Open Society Foundations, IViR, 2015, 91 pp. Van Daalen/ McGonagle 14 ‘Privacybescherming online kan beter: De mythe van geïnformeerde Zuiderveen toestemming’, NJB 2015-14, p. 878-883. Borgesius

145 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

19 (with M. Kerste & W. Rougoor) Waarde verlenging 2100 MHz-vergunningen, Poort SEO Economisch Onderzoek/IViR, Amsterdam, SEO-rapport nr. 2015-33, 48 pp. 20 Europeana Sounds and Copyrights: The Need for and Challenges in Licensing Schroff Archival Materials, report for Europeana Sounds project, 22 December, 97 pp. 21 Improving Privacy Protection in the Area of Behavioural Targeting Zuiderveen Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2015, 414 pp. Borgesius

2015 Book chapters Author 1 ‘Hacktivism 1-2-3: how privacy enhancing technologies change the face of Bodo anonymous hacktivism’, in: I. Bassarak, B. Fecher, S. Friesike, J. Hofmann, H. Leisterer, B. Lück, L. Wunderlich (eds.), encore, Berlin: Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society 2015, p. 60-75. 2 ‘The common paths of piracy and samizdat’, in: V. Parisi (ed.), Samizdat. Bodo Between Practices and Representations, Budapest: Institute for Advanced Study, Central European University 2015, p. 19-35. 3 ‘Libraries in the Post-Scarcity Era’, in: H. Porsdam (ed.), Copyrighting Creativity, Bodo Aldershot: Ashgate 2015, p. 75-92. 4 ‘Patenting personalised medicine and human rights’, in: P. Torremans (ed.), Bostyn Intellectual Property and Human Rights, Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2015, p. 725-782. 5 ‘Netherlands’, in: P. Geller & L. Bently (eds.), International Copyright Law Van Eechoud & Practice (loos-leaf), New York: Matthew Bender 2015. 6 ‘Open data values: Calculating and monitoring the benefits of public sector Van Eechoud information re-use’ in: Th. Dreier e.a. (eds.), Informationen der öffentlichen Hand - Zugang und Nutzung, Baden: Nomos 2015. 7 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, in: E. Hondius & G. Rijken (eds.), Handboek Van Eijk Consumentenrecht: Een overzicht van de rechtspositie van de consument, Parijs 2015, p. 309-324. 8 ‘Collective Management in the European Union’, in: D. Gervais (ed.), Collective Van Gompel/ Management of Copyright and Related Rights (third edition), Alphen a/d Rijn: Guibault Kluwer Law International 2015, p. 139-174. 9 ‘Fitting the bill: FOSS and alternative copyright licensing in the Netherlands’, in: Guibault/ A. Metzger (ed.), Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) and other Alternative Salamanca License Models - A Comparative Analysis of the Main Legal Issues (us Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law), Zug (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing AG 2015, p. 311-338. 10 (with T. Margoni) ‘Legal aspects of open access to publicly funded research’, Guibault in: Enquiries into Intellectual Property’s Economic Impact, Paris, OECD, DSTI/ ICCP(2014)17/CHAP1/FINAL, p. 373-414. 11 ‘Media Pluralism Policies from the User Perspective’, in: P. Valcke, M. Sükösd Helberger & R. Picard (eds.), Media Pluralism and Diversity, Concepts, Risks and Global Trends, Hampshire: Palgrave 2015, p. 325-340. 12 ‘Accountability unchained: Bulk data retention, preemptive surveillance, and Irion transatlantic data protection’ in: M. Rotenberg, J. Horwitz, & J. Scott (eds.), Visions of Privacy in a Modern Age, New York: New Press 2015, p. 78-92. 13 (with P. Valcke) ‘Cultural diversity in the digital age: EU competences, Irion policies and regulations for diverse audio-visual and online content’, in: E. Psychogiopoulou (ed.), Cultural Governance and the European Union, Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2015, p. 75-90. 14 ‘The development of freedom of expression and information within the UN: McGonagle leaps and bounds or fits and starts?’, in: T. McGonagle & Y. Donders (eds.), The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015, p. 1-51.

146 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

19 (with M. Kerste & W. Rougoor) Waarde verlenging 2100 MHz-vergunningen, Poort 15 ‘Positive obligations concerning freedom of expression: mere potential or McGonagle SEO Economisch Onderzoek/IViR, Amsterdam, SEO-rapport nr. 2015-33, 48 pp. real power?’, in: O. Andreotti (ed.), Journalism at risk: Threats, challenges 20 Europeana Sounds and Copyrights: The Need for and Challenges in Licensing Schroff and perspectives, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing 2015, p. 9-35. Archival Materials, report for Europeana Sounds project, 22 December, 97 pp. 16 ‘Privacy van consumenten’, in: E. Hondius & G. Rijken (eds.), Handboek Zuiderveen 21 Improving Privacy Protection in the Area of Behavioural Targeting Zuiderveen Consumentenrecht: Een overzicht van de rechtspositie van de consument, Borgesius Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2015, 414 pp. Borgesius Zutphen: Paris 2015, p. 483-497. 17 ‘Behavioural Sciences and the Regulation of Privacy on the Internet’, in: A.-L. Zuiderveen Sibony & A. Alemanno (eds.), Nudging and the Law - What can EU Law learn Borgesius from Behavioural Sciences?, Oxford: Hart Publishing 2015, p. 179-207. 2015 Book chapters Author 18 ‘Legal chapter for the ‘Personal Data and Privacy’, report for Ofcom, p. 12-20. Zuiderveen 1 ‘Hacktivism 1-2-3: how privacy enhancing technologies change the face of Bodo Borgesius anonymous hacktivism’, in: I. Bassarak, B. Fecher, S. Friesike, J. Hofmann, H. Leisterer, B. Lück, L. Wunderlich (eds.), encore, Berlin: Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society 2015, p. 60-75. 2015 PhD’s theses Author 2 ‘The common paths of piracy and samizdat’, in: V. Parisi (ed.), Samizdat. Bodo Between Practices and Representations, Budapest: Institute for Advanced Study, 1 Securing Private Communications - Protecting Private Communications Arnbak Central European University 2015, p. 19-35. Security in EU Law: Fundamental Rights, Functional Value Chains and Market 3 ‘Libraries in the Post-Scarcity Era’, in: H. Porsdam (ed.), Copyrighting Creativity, Bodo Incentives (dissertation Universiteit van Amsterdam), 380 pp. Aldershot: Ashgate 2015, p. 75-92. 2 Empirical Evidence for Policy in Telecommunication, Copyright & Broadcasting Poort 4 ‘Patenting personalised medicine and human rights’, in: P. Torremans (ed.), Bostyn (dissertation Universiteit van Amsterdam), 287 pp. Intellectual Property and Human Rights, Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law 3 The evolution of the inventiveness requirement (dissertation Universiteit van Pessers International 2015, p. 725-782. Amsterdam), 333 pp. 5 ‘Netherlands’, in: P. Geller & L. Bently (eds.), International Copyright Law Van Eechoud 4 The European Union as a Constitutional Guardian of Internet Privacy and Hijmans & Practice (loos-leaf), New York: Matthew Bender 2015. Data Protection: the Story of Article 16 TFEU (dissertation Universiteit van 6 ‘Open data values: Calculating and monitoring the benefits of public sector Van Eechoud Amsterdam), 668 pp. information re-use’ in: Th. Dreier e.a. (eds.), Informationen der öffentlichen 5 The liability of online intermediairies for copyright infringement (dissertation Angelopoulos Hand - Zugang und Nutzung, Baden: Nomos 2015. Universiteit van Amsterdam), 370 pp. 7 ‘Telecommunicatierecht’, in: E. Hondius & G. Rijken (eds.), Handboek Van Eijk Consumentenrecht: Een overzicht van de rechtspositie van de consument, Parijs 2015, p. 309-324. 2015 Conference papers Author 8 ‘Collective Management in the European Union’, in: D. Gervais (ed.), Collective Van Gompel/ Management of Copyright and Related Rights (third edition), Alphen a/d Rijn: Guibault 1 New Data Security Requirements and the Proceduralization of Mass Arnbak/ Kluwer Law International 2015, p. 139-174. Surveillance Law after the European Data Retention Case, Amsterdam Zuiderveen 9 ‘Fitting the bill: FOSS and alternative copyright licensing in the Netherlands’, in: Guibault/ Law School Research Paper, 2015-41, 23 October, 40 pp. Borgesius/ A. Metzger (ed.), Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) and other Alternative Salamanca 2 Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door - User preferences on digital cultural distribution, Bodo/Vallbé/ License Models - A Comparative Analysis of the Main Legal Issues (us paper presented at the 10th Annual European Policy for Intellectual Property Quintais/Handke Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law), Zug (Switzerland): conference, Glasgow, 2-3 September. Springer International Publishing AG 2015, p. 311-338. 3 Legal Challenges of reconciling open data policy and data protection interests, Van Eechoud 10 (with T. Margoni) ‘Legal aspects of open access to publicly funded research’, Guibault Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Amsterdam, 24 October. in: Enquiries into Intellectual Property’s Economic Impact, Paris, OECD, DSTI/ 4 Establishing Links to Learning, paper presented at the iLinc Best Practices Event, Fahy ICCP(2014)17/CHAP1/FINAL, p. 373-414. Berlin, 18-19 May, 5 pp. 11 ‘Media Pluralism Policies from the User Perspective’, in: P. Valcke, M. Sükösd Helberger 5 ‘Is Europe Falling Behind? Copyright’s Impact on Data Mining in Academic Guibault/Handke/ & R. Picard (eds.), Media Pluralism and Diversity, Concepts, Risks and Global Research’, Birgit Schmidt, Milena Dobreva (eds.), New Avenues for Electronic Vallbé Trends, Hampshire: Palgrave 2015, p. 325-340. Publishing in the Age of Infinite Collections and Citizen Science: Scale, Openness 12 ‘Accountability unchained: Bulk data retention, preemptive surveillance, and Irion and Trust - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Electronic transatlantic data protection’ in: M. Rotenberg, J. Horwitz, & J. Scott (eds.), Publishing 2015, Malta, 1-2 September, p. 120-130. Visions of Privacy in a Modern Age, New York: New Press 2015, p. 78-92. 6 (with K. Kleinen-Von Königslöw & R. van der Noll) Media Diversity and new Helberger 13 (with P. Valcke) ‘Cultural diversity in the digital age: EU competences, Irion information intermediaries: a critical view on an uncritical discourse, EuroCPR policies and regulations for diverse audio-visual and online content’, in: 2015, Brussels, 23-24 March. E. Psychogiopoulou (ed.), Cultural Governance and the European Union, 7 Policy implications from algorithmic profiling and the changing relationship Helberger Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2015, p. 75-90. between newsreaders and the media, FACE Conference, Helsinki, 9-10 April. 14 ‘The development of freedom of expression and information within the UN: McGonagle 8 (with J. Möller, D. Trilling & C. de Vreese) Should we worry about filter bubbles? Helberger/Bodo/ leaps and bounds or fits and starts?’, in: T. McGonagle & Y. Donders (eds.), An interdisciplinary inquiry into self- and pre-selected personalised communi- Zuiderveen The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical cation, Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Amsterdam, 24 October, 16 pp. Borgesius Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015, p. 1-51.

147 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

9 Though shall read diverse! – ‘Oh yeah?’, Social media platforms and media Helberger pluralism (obligations), Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Amsterdam, 25 October. 10 Profiling and Targeting Consumers in the Internet of Things – A New Challenge Helberger for Consumer Protection, Digital Revolution, Münster, 2 October. 11 Your Digital Home is No Longer Your Castle: How Cloud Computing Transforms Irion the (Legal) Relationship between Individuals and Their Personal Records, Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Amsterdam, 24 October. 12 Your digital home is no longer your castle: How cloud computing transforms Irion the (legal) relationship between individuals and their digital assets, IT Law Conference, Irish Centre for European Law (ICEL), Trinity College Dublin, 26 June. 13 Big Data: Reined in Through Data Protection?, Amsterdam Privacy Oostveen Conference 2015, Amsterdam, 23-26 October, 22 pp. 14 Big Data: Reined in Through Data Protection?, Law and Governance in the Oostveen Digital Era, Netherlands Institute for Law and Governance third annual PhD Forum, Amsterdam, 20 October, 22 pp. 15 Alternative Compensation Models for Large-Scale Non-Commercial Online Quintais Uses, paper presented at ALAI International Congress – 50 Years of the German Copyright Act: Remuneration for the Use of Works – Exclusivity vs. Other Approaches, Bonn, 18-20 June, 8 pp. 16 Knocking on Heaven’s Door - User Preferences on Digital Cultural Distribution, Quintais/Handke/ working paper (submitted for publication), 24 pp. Bodo/Vallbé 17 ‘著作権法における厳格さの変化(1880 年-2010年 (The Evolution of Schroff Copyright Stringency (1880-2010))’, Japan Foundation, Osaka, 16 March. 18 (with J. Street & D. Laing) Regulating the CMOs: How, Why and with What Schroff Effect, The Economics of Creativity and Competition: New Markets 19 (with J. Gray) Open Data, Privacy, and Fair Information Principles: Towards a Zuiderveen Balancing Framework, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper 2015-46, pp. 47; Borgesius/ Institute for Information Law Research Paper 2015-04, 47 pp. Van Eechoud 20 Online Price Discrimination and Data Protection Law, conference paper Zuiderveen Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper Borgesius 2015-32, pp 21; Institute for Information Law Research Paper 2015-02, 21 pp. 21 (with A. McDonald) Do Not Track for Europe, conference paper, TPRC 43rd Zuiderveen Research Conference on Communications, Information and Internet Policy, Borgesius Washington, 26 September, 43 pp. 22 (with J. van Hoboken) Protecting e-Privacy in the Digital Age – On the Scope of Zuiderveen Electronic Communication Privacy Rules: Data, Services or Values’, EuroCPR Borgesius conference, Brussels, March, 21 pp.

2015 Professional publications Author 1 ‘Delfi v Estonia: ISPs and the freedom to impart information’, Angelopoulos blogpost The IPKat, 24 June. 2 Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door - User preferences on digital cultural distribution, Bodo/ Handke/ paper presented at the Vienna Music Business Research Days, Vienna, Quintais/ Vallbé 2-3 October. 3 ‘Central and Eastern Europeans in the pirate libraries’, Bodo Visegrad Insight 2015-1, p. 7. 4 ‘Pirate libraries - A central and eastern European perspective’, Bodo Eurozine, 2015-8 (28), 5 pp. 5 ‘Piratenbibliotheken en hun rol in de kenniseconomie’, Bodo Informatie Professional 2015-6, p. 16-20.

148 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

6 ‘Mediarecht’, KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi 2015-134, p. 7733-7735. K. Breemen/ V. Breemen 7 ‘Mediarecht’, KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi 2015-135, p. 7805-7808. K. Breemen/ V. Breemen 8 ‘Mediarecht’, KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi 2015-136, p. 7897-7882. K. Breemen/ V. Breemen 9 ‘Mediarecht’, Ars Aequi KwartaalSignaal 2015-137, p. 7947-7949. K. Breemen/ V. Breemen 10 (with S. van Velze, R. Wouda & S. Yakovleva) Symposium on Alternative Caspers/ Compensation Schemes for Digital Copyright Summary Report, report from Quintais the ACS Symposium on 11 July. 11 Establishing a Start-up Law Clinic in Law School: A Practical Guide, iLINC Van Eechoud/ report, iLINC ICT Law Incubators Network, EC, 12 pp. Fahy 12 Establishing a Start-up Law Clinic in Law School: 10 Practical Tips, iLINC Van Eechoud/ report, iLINC ICT Law Incubators Network EC, 2 pp. Fahy 13 ‘Students going cross-border for start-ups’, iLINC Law Incubator Policy Brief Van Eechoud 2015, 3 pp. 14 Rb. Amsterdam 10 juni 2015 (Pictoright/Stadsarchief Rotterdam), Van Eechoud AMI 2015-5, p. 140-145. 15 HvJEU 22 januari 2015, C-441/13 (Hejduk/EnergieAgentur NRW), Van Eechoud ECLI EU:C:2015:2, AMI 2015-2, p. 62. 16 Gerechtshof Den Haag 22 september 2015 (KG), ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:2592 Van Eechoud (SDC Verifier/FEMTO Engineering), AMI 2015-6, p. 168-187. 17 Hof van Justitie (Vierde kamer) 22 januari 2015, ECLI:EU:C:2015:27, zaak Van Eechoud C-419/13 (Allposters/Pictoright), AMI 2015-6, p. 169-173. 18 Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht, KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi 2015-137, Van Eijk p. 7949-7950. 19 Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht, KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi 2015-136, Van Eijk p. 7882-7883. 20 Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht, KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi 2015-135, Van Eijk p. 7808-7809. 21 Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht, KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi 2015-134, Van Eijk p. 7735-7736 22 Dutch Parliament (Tweede Kamer), written contribution to roundtable Van Eijk/ on data retention Vaste commissie voor Veiligheid en Justitie, 29 January. Dommering 23 Dutch Parliament (Eerste Kamer), written contribution for expertmeeting on Van Eijk medialaw reform wijziging Mediawet voor het toekomstbestendig maken van de publieke mediadienst. 24 Clinical Legal Education: A Review of the Literature, iLINC report, Fahy/ iLINC ICT Law Incubators Network EC, 13 pp. Van Eechoud 25 Establishing Links to Learning, iLINC report, iLINC ICT Law Incubators Fahy/ Network, EC, 22 pp. Van Eechoud 26 ‘Protestor’s arrest and conviction for disobeying a police order violated Fahy Article 11’, Strasbourg Observers, 11 October. 27 ‘Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner’, IRIS 2015-10, p. 4. Fahy 28 ‘Bundeskommunikationssenat’, IRIS 2015-10, p. 5. Fahy 29 ‘Consultation on platforms and online intermediaries’, IRIS 2015-10, p. 5. Fahy 30 ‘Programme featuring instructions on contraceptive use did not violate Fahy broadcasting code’, IRIS 2015-10, p. 14. 31 ‘Complaint from government health authority over RTÉ investigative Fahy programme rejected’, IRIS 2015-10, p. 14.

149 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

32 ‘Statement of Objections to UK broadcaster and major films studios’, Fahy 58 ‘IViR Survey Shows Public Support for Legalizing Digital Content Sharing Quintais IRIS 2015-9, p. 1. through Alternative Compensation System’, Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 1 July. 33 ‘Consultation on electronic communications networks and services’, Fahy 59 ‘Everything you always wanted to know about private copying but were Quintais IRIS 2015-9, p. 2. afraid to ask (Case C-463/12 Copydan Båndkopi v Nokia Danmark A/S)’, 34 ‘Advocate General considers newspaper website containing video Fahy Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 16 March. not covered by AVMS Directive’, IRIS 2015-8, p. 3. 60 ‘Maatschappelijke waarde van bibliotheken in €?’, BiebtoBieb.nl, 25 May. Poort 35 ‘European Commission for Democracy through Law: Opinion on media Fahy 61 ‘De geheime dienst: an offer you can’t refuse’, Ars Aequi, 2015-3, p. 172-173. Van der Sloot legislation in Hungary’, IRIS 2015-7, p. 3. 62 ‘Editorial’, European Data Protection Law Review 2015-4, p. 255-257. Van der Sloot 36 ‘Review of designated free-to-air sporting events’, IRIS 2015-6, p. 22. Fahy 63 ‘Editorial’, European Data Protection Law Review 2015-3, p. 161-163. Van der Sloot 37 ‘Broadcaster breached impartiality rules in news reports on Ukraine’, Fahy 64 ‘Editorial’, European Data Protection Law Review 2015-2, p. 91-96 Van der Sloot IRIS 2015-5, p. 15. 65 ‘Book Review: Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law’, European Data Van der Sloot 38 ‘Resolution on Media Freedom and Public Service Broadcasting Funding’, Fahy Protection Law Review 2015-2, p. 148-150. IRIS 2015-4, p. 2. 66 ‘Book review: Reforming European Data Protection Law’, European Data Van der Sloot 39 ‘Resolution on Media Freedom and Paris Attacks’, IRIS 2015-3, p. 3. Fahy Protection Law Review 2015-1, p. 85-87. 40 ‘Article 29 Working Party issues guidelines on implementation of Fahy 67 Annotatie Coty v. Stadtsparkasse, European Human Rights Cases 2015-10, nr. 188, p Van der Sloot Google Spain judgment’, IRIS 2015-2, p. 3. 68 Annotatie (ECtHR 25358/12), European Human Rights Cases 2015-5, nr. 95 Van der Sloot 41 ‘Reply to Parliamentary Assembly’s Call to Revise the European Fahy (Paradiso & Campanelli/Italië). Convention on Transfrontier Television’, IRIS 2015-1, p. 2. 69 Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi Van der Sloot 42 Rb. Den Haag 23 september 2015 (Eiser/Prime Sportsgear), Van Gompel AS/Estland)’, European Human Rights Cases 2015-9, nr. 172. AMI 2015-6, p. 187-188. 70 ‘Belgian Court Tells Facebook to Stop Tracking Non-Members’, Internet Policy Oostveen/ 43 ‘Veni project on legal pragmatism in intellectual property lawmaking’, Van Gompel Review, News Section blog post, 15 November. Zuiderveen ARILS newsletter 20 January. Borgesius 44 ‘Our Blogpoll on a Text & Data Mining Exception: the results are in…’ Guibault 71 ‘Online prijsdiscriminatie: nieuwe regels nodig?’, Versvak blog post, 29 October. Zuiderveen Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 6 December. Borgesius 45 Blogpoll: towards a Text & Data Mining exception in EU copyright law?, Guibault 72 Co-author of Meijers Committee, letter to the Vaste Commissie voor Veiligheid Zuiderveen Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 7 September. en Justitie Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, 9 June. Borgesius 46 ‘Back on the Green Road: How Imperative are Imperative Rules?’ Guibault Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 19 April. 47 ‘Flexibility. Is it all a matter of methodology and assumptions?’ Guibault Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 14 April. 2015 Publications aimed at the general public Author 48 ‘Almost there! In Support of the Green Road to Dutch Science!’ Guibault 1 ‘Safe Harbor 2.0 gedoemd te mislukken’, Het Financieele Dagblad 4 November. Arnbak Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 9 April. 2 ‘Principe-akkoord EU en VS over opslaan gebruikersdata’, Arnbak 49 ‘The Delfi-decision of the European Court of Human Rights – Missed Helberger NOS Journaal, 27 October. opportunity and wrong signal’, MON – Mediamonitor (the blog of the Stichting 3 ‘Datatransport – Hof EU nog steeds niet volwassen’, Arnbak Mediaombudsman), 2 July. Het Financieele Dagblad 7 October. 50 ‘Dirk en Pippi’, Nederlands Juristenblad 2015- afl. 24, p. 1603. Hugenholtz 4 ‘Afluisterwet is juridische gatenkaas’,Het Financieele Dagblad 9 September. Arnbak 51 (with Franziska Bohm e.a.) Amicus curiae brief to the attention of the Irion 5 ‘Maak de makers van software aansprakelijk’, Het Financieele Dagblad 12 August. Arnbak Hungarian Constitutional Court in the case Dojcsák v Telenor, 15 March. 6 ‘Europa gaat te traag met beleid voor versleuteling’, Arnbak 52 (with Electronic Privacy Information Center) Comments of the Electronic Irion Het Financieele Dagblad 15 July. Privacy Information Center (EPIC) to the federal trade Commission in Remedy Study ‘Assessment of the FTC’s Prior Actions on Merger Review and Consumer 7 ‘Lobby in Europa zorgt voor absurd internetbeleid’, Arnbak Privacy’, 17 March. Het Financieele Dagblad 17 June. 53 (with S. Eskens & M.-P. Granger) Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 8 april 2014 Irion 8 ‘Software is ook bij bitcoin altijd politiek’, Het Financieele Dagblad 20 May. Arnbak (Digital Rights Ireland / Ierse Ministers en Attorney General, Mediaforum 9 ‘Internet der dingen zwaar beveiligen’, Het Financieele Dagblad 22 April. Arnbak 2015-3, p. 112-117. 10 ‘Nederlandse polder als model voor regulering internet’, Arnbak 54 ‘Cloud services made in Europe after Snowden and Schrems’, Op-ed Internet Irion Het Financieele Dagblad 25 March. Policy Review, 25 October. 11 ‘Neem heft in eigen hand na hack Gemalto’, Het Financieele Dagblad 25 February. Arnbak 55 ‘Venture into the future of privacy’, ELSA Synergy Magazine 2015-57, p. 28-31. Irion 12 ‘Emotie domineert verstand na aanslagen in Parijs’, Arnbak 56 ’IE vincit omnia? Opsporing in de particuliere sector’, annotatie bij Vzr Rb. Den Kabel Het Financieele Dagblad 28 January. Haag 5 oktober 2015 en 6 november 2015 (Brein/Google), AMI 2015-6,, p. 176-180. 13 ‘Facebook mag onze gegevens niet meer zomaar in Amerika opslaan. Van Daalen 57 (with O. Volgenant) ‘Journalistieke bronbescherming blijft een aandachtspunt’, McGonagle Wat zijn hiervan de gevolgen?’, De Correspondent 7 October. Persvrijheidsmonitor over 2014, Villamedia May 2015, p. 52-56.

150 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

58 ‘IViR Survey Shows Public Support for Legalizing Digital Content Sharing Quintais through Alternative Compensation System’, Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 1 July. 59 ‘Everything you always wanted to know about private copying but were Quintais afraid to ask (Case C-463/12 Copydan Båndkopi v Nokia Danmark A/S)’, Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 16 March. 60 ‘Maatschappelijke waarde van bibliotheken in €?’, BiebtoBieb.nl, 25 May. Poort 61 ‘De geheime dienst: an offer you can’t refuse’, Ars Aequi, 2015-3, p. 172-173. Van der Sloot 62 ‘Editorial’, European Data Protection Law Review 2015-4, p. 255-257. Van der Sloot 63 ‘Editorial’, European Data Protection Law Review 2015-3, p. 161-163. Van der Sloot 64 ‘Editorial’, European Data Protection Law Review 2015-2, p. 91-96 Van der Sloot 65 ‘Book Review: Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law’, European Data Van der Sloot Protection Law Review 2015-2, p. 148-150. 66 ‘Book review: Reforming European Data Protection Law’, European Data Van der Sloot Protection Law Review 2015-1, p. 85-87. 67 Annotatie Coty v. Stadtsparkasse, European Human Rights Cases 2015-10, nr. 188, p Van der Sloot 68 Annotatie (ECtHR 25358/12), European Human Rights Cases 2015-5, nr. 95 Van der Sloot (Paradiso & Campanelli/Italië). 69 Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi Van der Sloot AS/Estland)’, European Human Rights Cases 2015-9, nr. 172. 70 ‘Belgian Court Tells Facebook to Stop Tracking Non-Members’, Internet Policy Oostveen/ Review, News Section blog post, 15 November. Zuiderveen Borgesius 71 ‘Online prijsdiscriminatie: nieuwe regels nodig?’, Versvak blog post, 29 October. Zuiderveen Borgesius 72 Co-author of Meijers Committee, letter to the Vaste Commissie voor Veiligheid Zuiderveen en Justitie Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, 9 June. Borgesius

2015 Publications aimed at the general public Author 1 ‘Safe Harbor 2.0 gedoemd te mislukken’, Het Financieele Dagblad 4 November. Arnbak 2 ‘Principe-akkoord EU en VS over opslaan gebruikersdata’, Arnbak NOS Journaal, 27 October. 3 ‘Datatransport – Hof EU nog steeds niet volwassen’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 7 October. 4 ‘Afluisterwet is juridische gatenkaas’,Het Financieele Dagblad 9 September. Arnbak 5 ‘Maak de makers van software aansprakelijk’, Het Financieele Dagblad 12 August. Arnbak 6 ‘Europa gaat te traag met beleid voor versleuteling’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 15 July. 7 ‘Lobby in Europa zorgt voor absurd internetbeleid’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 17 June. 8 ‘Software is ook bij bitcoin altijd politiek’, Het Financieele Dagblad 20 May. Arnbak 9 ‘Internet der dingen zwaar beveiligen’, Het Financieele Dagblad 22 April. Arnbak 10 ‘Nederlandse polder als model voor regulering internet’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 25 March. 11 ‘Neem heft in eigen hand na hack Gemalto’, Het Financieele Dagblad 25 February. Arnbak 12 ‘Emotie domineert verstand na aanslagen in Parijs’, Arnbak Het Financieele Dagblad 28 January. 13 ‘Facebook mag onze gegevens niet meer zomaar in Amerika opslaan. Van Daalen Wat zijn hiervan de gevolgen?’, De Correspondent 7 October.

151 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

14 ‘De niet aangetoonde noodzaak van dataretentie’, Opinie, De Volkskrant 6 mei. Dommering/ Van Eijk 15 ‘Onvoldoende waarborgen in het kader van nationale veiligheid’, Dommering/ NJB blog, 9 December Van Eijk 16 ‘Open data Privacy’, Opinie & Debat, NRC Handelsblad 29 August, p. 4. Van Eechoud 17 ‘Waarom geldt het briefgeheim niet voor kabelverkeer?’, NRC Handelsblad Van Eijk/ 19 February; also published in Netkwesties, 13 March. Van Daalen 18 ‘Privacy en Big Data staan op gespannen voet’, Versvak.nl, 26 October. Oostveen 19 (with B. van Breda) ‘Internet of Things: bespied door je koelkast?’, Oostveen Blind – online interdisciplinair tijdschrift, 22 december.

2015 Inaugural lectures & PhD defenses Author 1 Empirical Evidence for Policy in Telecommunication, Poort Copyright & Broadcasting (PhD defense). 2 Communications Security: Regulating Convergence in Complex Markets Arnbak (PhD defense). 3 The evolution of the inventiveness requirement (PhD defense). Pessers

2015 Invited lectures/keynotes/presentations/workshops Author 1 ‘Sketching the Outline of a Ghost: The Fair Balance between Copyright and Angelopolous Fundamental Rights in Intermediary Liability’, EuroCPR, Brussels, 24 March (invited presentation). 2 ‘Developing Eurocopytort: the European Harmonisation of Intermediary Angelopolous Liability for Third Party Copyright Infringement’, Roundtable Discussion on “The European Harmonisation of Intermediary Accessory Liability for Online Copyright Infringement: at the Intersection of Tort Law and Fundamental Rights”, Institute for Information Law, Amsterdam, 13 April (presentation). 3 VIRA/Grotius vervolgopleiding Informaticarecht, Amsterdam, 26 November Arnbak (invited lecture). 4 ‘#Cybersecurity: What’s the plan?’, LIBE Committee Hearing Speaker, Arnbak Brussels, 3 June (presentation). 5 ‘Protecting online privacy by enhancing IT security and strengthening EU IT Arnbak capabilities’, Brussels, 8-9 December. 6 ‘Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door - User preferences on digital cultural distribution’, Bodo Vienna Music Business Research Days, Vienna, 2-3 October, (presentation of accepted paper). 7 ‘Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door - User preferences on digital cultural distribution’, Bodo 10th Annual European Policy for Intellectual Property conference, Glasgow, 2-3 September (presentation of accepted paper). 8 ‘Empirical research on cultural black markets’, SURFsara e-science day, Bodo Amsterdam, 15 December (invited presentation). 9 ‘The future of libraries, International conference on digital heritage and Bodo strategies for heritage institutions (DISH15)’, Rotterdam, 7 December (invited presentation). 10 ‘Book Piracy in the STM domain: opportunities for publishers’, MarkMonitor Bodo Seminar: Digital Piracy – New Threats, New Remedies, London, 5 November (lecture). 11 ‘Alternative Compensation schemes, empirical evidence’, VVA: Dutch Bodo Association for Copyright Law, Amsterdam, 30 October (invited presentation).

152 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

14 ‘De niet aangetoonde noodzaak van dataretentie’, Opinie, De Volkskrant 6 mei. Dommering/ 12 ‘Private Copying Exemption: Rightsholders and Remuneration’, Bodo Van Eijk Musictank & University of Westminster, London, 25 June (lecture). 15 ‘Onvoldoende waarborgen in het kader van nationale veiligheid’, Dommering/ 13 ‘Alternative compensation schemes’, Re:publica conference, Berlin, Bodo NJB blog, 9 December Van Eijk 6-8 May (presentation of accepted paper). 16 ‘Open data Privacy’, Opinie & Debat, NRC Handelsblad 29 August, p. 4. Van Eechoud 14 ‘Shadow libraries’, SPUI25, University of Amsterdam, 10 February Bodo 17 ‘Waarom geldt het briefgeheim niet voor kabelverkeer?’, NRC Handelsblad Van Eijk/ (guest lecture). 19 February; also published in Netkwesties, 13 March. Van Daalen 15 ‘Voluntary IP regimes among copyright pirates’, Ethics of Copying conference, Bodo 18 ‘Privacy en Big Data staan op gespannen voet’, Versvak.nl, 26 October. Oostveen Center for Interdisciplinary Studies (ZiF), University of Bielefeld, Germany 6-9 October (invited presentation). 19 (with B. van Breda) ‘Internet of Things: bespied door je koelkast?’, Oostveen Blind – online interdisciplinair tijdschrift, 22 december. 16 ‘Empirical research on cultural black markets’, SURFsara e- science day, Bodo Amsterdam 15 December (invited presentation). 17 ‘Recent developments in biotech patenting’, University of Liège, 30 April. Bostyn 18 ‘EPO’s approach on patentability: exclusions of patentability – approach for Bostyn 2015 Inaugural lectures & PhD defenses Author software and pharmaceutical products – assessment of novelty (disclaimer) 1 Empirical Evidence for Policy in Telecommunication, Poort and of inventive step (problem-solution approach)’, CEIPI IP Summer School, Copyright & Broadcasting (PhD defense). Strasbourg, 3 July (invited lecture). 2 Communications Security: Regulating Convergence in Complex Markets Arnbak 19 ‘Second medical indication patents and enforcement issues’, Annual Patent Bostyn (PhD defense). Law Seminar, De Clercq & Partners, Sint-Martens-Latem, 27 November (presentation). 3 The evolution of the inventiveness requirement (PhD defense). Pessers 20 ‘Patent protection for plants and plant variety protection for plant varieties’, Bostyn conference organised by CIOPORA, Venlo, 3 December (presentation). 21 ‘Healthcare Innovation: Regulation and Society’, University of Sheffield, Bostyn 2015 Invited lectures/keynotes/presentations/workshops Author 29 June (invited lecture). 1 ‘Sketching the Outline of a Ghost: The Fair Balance between Copyright and Angelopolous 22 ‘The (lack of) inventive step in software and biotech inventions’, Symposium Bostyn Fundamental Rights in Intermediary Liability’, EuroCPR, Brussels, 24 March Institute for Information Law, Amsterdam, 19 December (presentation). (invited presentation). 23 Opleiding Nederlandse Octrooigemachtigden (lecture). Bostyn 2 ‘Developing Eurocopytort: the European Harmonisation of Intermediary Angelopolous 24 ‘Protecting traditional cultural expressions – Copyright tensions and human K. Breemen Liability for Third Party Copyright Infringement’, Roundtable Discussion on rights opportunities?’, VI Multidisciplinary Meeting on Indigenous Peoples “The European Harmonisation of Intermediary Accessory Liability for Online (EMPI VI), University of Ghent, 10 June (invited paper presentation). Copyright Infringement: at the Intersection of Tort Law and Fundamental Rights”, Institute for Information Law, Amsterdam, 13 April (presentation). 25 ‘Digital libraries, digital law? A tale of copyright challenges and chances’, V. Breemen International conference What do we lose when we lose a library?, Leuven, 3 VIRA/Grotius vervolgopleiding Informaticarecht, Amsterdam, 26 November Arnbak 11 September (abstract accepted and presentation). (invited lecture). 26 ‘Google/Spanje arrest van het HvJEU over het “recht op vergeten”’, Dommering 4 ‘#Cybersecurity: What’s the plan?’, LIBE Committee Hearing Speaker, Arnbak Spui25, Amsterdam, 19 January (panelist). Brussels, 3 June (presentation). 27 ‘Privacy by analogy: lessons from copyright law and environment law, Dommering 5 ‘Protecting online privacy by enhancing IT security and strengthening EU IT Arnbak consumer protection law and compliance with financial regulations’, 8th CDCP capabilities’, Brussels, 8-9 December. conference ‘Data Protection on the Move’, Brussels, 21 January 6 ‘Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door - User preferences on digital cultural distribution’, Bodo (invited presentation). Vienna Music Business Research Days, Vienna, 2-3 October, (presentation of 28 ‘Big Data, informatie-overvloed en de publieke taak’, Spui25, Amsterdam, Dommering accepted paper). 11 February (panelist). 7 ‘Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door - User preferences on digital cultural distribution’, Bodo 29 Intermediary Liability Roundtable, Institute for Information law, Amsterdam, Dommering 10th Annual European Policy for Intellectual Property conference, Glasgow, 13 April (discussant). 2-3 September (presentation of accepted paper). 30 Bijeenkomst voor vertegenwoordigers van ministeries, bedrijfsleven en de Dommering 8 ‘Empirical research on cultural black markets’, SURFsara e-science day, Bodo internetwereld over het AIV rapport Internetvrijheid en het WRR rapport Amsterdam, 15 December (invited presentation). De publieke kern van Internet, Instituut Clingendael, Den Haag, 18 September 9 ‘The future of libraries, International conference on digital heritage and Bodo (presentation). strategies for heritage institutions (DISH15)’, Rotterdam, 7 December 31 ‘Applicable law – initial ownership issues’, Seminar on Intellectual Property Van Eechoud (invited presentation). and Private International Law, WIPO, Geneva, 16 January (presentation). 10 ‘Book Piracy in the STM domain: opportunities for publishers’, MarkMonitor Bodo 32 ‘Open Data in European Intellectual Property Law’, seminar, Faculty of Law, Van Eechoud Seminar: Digital Piracy – New Threats, New Remedies, London, 5 November Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) University of (lecture). Cambridge, 12 March (lecture). 11 ‘Alternative Compensation schemes, empirical evidence’, VVA: Dutch Bodo 33 ‘Sharing data sharing norms’, Open Access Week Symposium Connecting Van Eechoud Association for Copyright Law, Amsterdam, 30 October (invited presentation). Data for Research, VU, Amsterdam, 19 October (keynote).

153 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

34 ‘Comparative Approaches: Privacy Law and Public Health Law’, 19th Annual Van Eechoud BCLT/BTLJ Symposium ‘Open Data: Addressing Privacy, Security, and Civil Rights Challenges, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, 17 April (panelist). 35 Ius Commune Research Master Class, University of Amsterdam, Van Eechoud 25 June (expert). 36 ‘Juridische Grondslagen van Open Data’, Congres ‘Platform Open Van Eechoud Raadsinformatie’, ’s-Gravenzande, 27 November (keynote). 37 Congres ‘Platform Open Raadsinformatie’, ’s-Gravenzande, Van Eechoud 27 November (panelist). 38 ‘Juridische Aspecten van Hergebruik’, Congres Ministerie van Binnenlandse Van Eechoud Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties ‘Grenzeloos hergebruik, Hergebruik en Open data beleid in het licht van toegang, privacy, intellectuele eigendom en mededinging’, The Hague, 4 June (presentation). 39 ‘Mededinging, databankenrecht & hergebruik’, Congres Ministerie van Van Eechoud Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties ‘Grenzeloos hergebruik, Hergebruik en Open data beleid in het licht van toegang, privacy, intellectuele eigendom en mededinging’, The Hague, 4 June (session co-chair (with Stef van Gompel)). 40 ‘Standards for oversight and transparency’, NATO CCD COE and INSCT Van Eijk conference ‘Human Rights in Cyberspace’, Tallin, 1-2 October (presentation). 41 ‘Standards for oversight and transparency in national security regulation’, Van Eijk conference ‘The Algorithmic State: Cyber Challenges to Democracy’, University of Haifa, Israel, 10-12 December (presentation/panelist). 42 ‘Who best watches the watchers?, CPDP 2015, Brussels, 21-23 January (panelist). Van Eijk 43 ‘Datalocalisation: an opportunity or threat to a truly digital Europe?, Van Eijk HostingCon Europe 2015, Amsterdam,22-23 S eptember (panelist). 44 ‘Big data in het hoger onderwijs: wat mag er?’, University of Amsterdam, Van Eijk 10 March (presentation). 45 ‘Mass surveillance: the Dutch state of denial’, CPDP 2015, Brussels, Van Eijk 23 January (moderator). 46 ‘Net neutrality as a tool to guarantee free flow of information’, EMR/ERA Van Eijk Annual Conference on European Media Law, Brussels, 28 May (presentation). 47 ‘Digitale opsporingswetten’: naar een normatieve benadering’, Van Eijk NViVR- najaarsvergadering, 17 November (presentation). 48 ‘The Future of European Audio-Visual Regulation in the Face of Convergence: Van Eijk The Hermes Project’, Ministry OCW, The Hague, 10 February (presentation). 49 Contribution to roundtable on data retention 29 January, Vaste commissie Van Eijk/ voor Veiligheid en Justitie, Dutch Parliament (Tweede Kamer), (invited). Dommering 50 Workshop ‘Privacy in the Internet of Things’, Rathenau Institute, San Francisco, Van Eijk 12 November (expert invited). 51 Contribution to expertmeeting on medialaw reform (wijziging Mediawet voor Van Eijk het toekomstbestendig maken van de publieke mediadienst), Dutch Parliament (Eerste Kamer), (expert). 52 Introductory panel, 37th international conference of data protection and privacy Van Eijk commissioners, Amsterdam, 28 October (panelist). 53 PLSC, Berkeley, 4-5 June (invited). Van Eijk 54 Workshop ‘Open data & Privacy’, Amsterdam, 6 February (expert invited). Van Eijk 55 CEPS Ideas LAB 2015, Brussels, 26-27 February (expert invited). Van Eijk 56 Workshop Tilt, The Hague, 31 March (expert invited). Van Eijk 57 ‘Internet governance’, WRR study The Hague, 31 March (panelist). Van Eijk 58 Workshop ‘Conversations in Privacy’, Facebook, Dublin, 3-4 July (expert invited). Van Eijk 59 ‘Transatlantic interoperability of privacy: the national security and law Van Eijk enforcement perspective’, IViR Summer Course on Privacy Law and Policy, Amsterdam, 10 July (lecture).

154 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

34 ‘Comparative Approaches: Privacy Law and Public Health Law’, 19th Annual Van Eechoud 60 Telecommunicatierecht I, Academie voor Overheidsjuristen, The Hague, Van Eijk BCLT/BTLJ Symposium ‘Open Data: Addressing Privacy, Security, and Civil 30 November (lecture). Rights Challenges, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, 17 April (panelist). 61 Telecommunicatierecht II, Academie voor Overheidsjuristen, Van Eijk 35 Ius Commune Research Master Class, University of Amsterdam, Van Eechoud The Hague, 14 December (lecture). 25 June (expert). 62 Privacy studies: ‘Law’, Minor program, Amsterdam, 16 September (lecture). Van Eijk 36 ‘Juridische Grondslagen van Open Data’, Congres ‘Platform Open Van Eechoud 63 ‘Pauw Academy: drones in de journalistiek’, project University Groningen, Van Eijk Raadsinformatie’, ’s-Gravenzande, 27 November (keynote). Amsterdam, 17 April (panelist). 37 Congres ‘Platform Open Raadsinformatie’, ’s-Gravenzande, Van Eechoud 64 ‘Privacy & gegevensbescherming’, mini-symposium IViR, Amsterdam, Van Eijk 27 November (panelist). 26 May (presentation). 38 ‘Juridische Aspecten van Hergebruik’, Congres Ministerie van Binnenlandse Van Eechoud 65 ‘Iedereen in het vizier? Nieuwe bevoegdheden voor de geheime diensten’, debat Van Eijk Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties ‘Grenzeloos hergebruik, Hergebruik en Open data organized by Bits of Freedom and Amnesty International, Humanity House, beleid in het licht van toegang, privacy, intellectuele eigendom en mededinging’, The Hague, 25 August (lecture/panelist). The Hague, 4 June (presentation). 66 Workshop ‘Media diversity’, Future Media Lab, Berlin, 27 January (expert invited). Van Eijk 39 ‘Mededinging, databankenrecht & hergebruik’, Congres Ministerie van Van Eechoud Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties ‘Grenzeloos hergebruik, Hergebruik 67 ‘Net Neutrality and Media’, ANGA-conference, Cologne, 10 June (keynote). Van Eijk en Open data beleid in het licht van toegang, privacy, intellectuele eigendom en 68 ‘10 Standards of oversight and transparency for national intelligence services’, Van Eijk mededinging’, The Hague, 4 June (session co-chair (with Stef van Gompel)). InterCommunity 2015, Amsterdam, 8 July (lecture). 40 ‘Standards for oversight and transparency’, NATO CCD COE and INSCT Van Eijk 69 ‘Strengere verplichtingen en meer handhaving: slechts utopie-denken en Van Eijk conference ‘Human Rights in Cyberspace’, Tallin, 1-2 October (presentation). schijnzekerheid?, NautaDutilh/Foxit seminar, 10 September (lecture). 41 ‘Standards for oversight and transparency in national security regulation’, Van Eijk 70 ‘No-nonsense regulering’, seminar NL-Kabel, Amsterdam, 5 February Van Eijk conference ‘The Algorithmic State: Cyber Challenges to Democracy’, (presentation). University of Haifa, Israel, 10-12 December (presentation/panelist). 71 ‘Digital Platforms, An analytical framework for identifying and evaluating Van Eijk 42 ‘Who best watches the watchers?, CPDP 2015, Brussels, 21-23 January (panelist). Van Eijk policy options’, Preparatory working party council of ministers European 43 ‘Datalocalisation: an opportunity or threat to a truly digital Europe?, Van Eijk Union, Brussels, 19 November (presentation). HostingCon Europe 2015, Amsterdam,22-23 S eptember (panelist). 72 Council of Europe Conference ‘Freedom of expression: still a precondition Fahy 44 ‘Big data in het hoger onderwijs: wat mag er?’, University of Amsterdam, Van Eijk for democracy?’, Strasbourg, 13-14 October (invited Resource Speaker). 10 March (presentation). 73 ‘‘Lose it to use it’: freeing orphan works from proprietary shackles’, CIPIL Van Gompel 45 ‘Mass surveillance: the Dutch state of denial’, CPDP 2015, Brussels, Van Eijk Annual Spring Conference 2015: Intellectual Property: Use it or Lose it?, 23 January (moderator). Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 7 March (presentation). 46 ‘Net neutrality as a tool to guarantee free flow of information’, EMR/ERA Van Eijk 74 ‘Pragmatism in Dutch copyright history: A short introduction to the Dutch Van Gompel Annual Conference on European Media Law, Brussels, 28 May (presentation). section of the Primary Sources project’, CREATe Symposium on Copyright History and Policy, Re-launch of Digital Archive on Primary Sources on 47 ‘Digitale opsporingswetten’: naar een normatieve benadering’, Van Eijk Copyright (1450-1900), University of Glasgow, 27 March (presentation). NViVR- najaarsvergadering, 17 November (presentation). 75 ‘Niet-gebruik en onvoldoende exploitatie’, panel discussion, Symposium Van Gompel 48 ‘The Future of European Audio-Visual Regulation in the Face of Convergence: Van Eijk Wet Auteurscontractenrecht, Amsterdam, 3 September (panelist). The Hermes Project’, Ministry OCW, The Hague, 10 February (presentation). 76 ‘Recent Case Law of the Court of Justice of the EU’, Summer Course Van Gompel 49 Contribution to roundtable on data retention 29 January, Vaste commissie Van Eijk/ International Copyright Law, Amsterdam, 9 July (lecture). voor Veiligheid en Justitie, Dutch Parliament (Tweede Kamer), (invited). Dommering 77 ‘Toelichting bij Q246: Exceptions and limitations to copyright protection for Van Gompel 50 Workshop ‘Privacy in the Internet of Things’, Rathenau Institute, San Francisco, Van Eijk libraries, archives and educational and research institutions’, AIPPI meeting, 12 November (expert invited). The Hague, 22 April (presentation). 51 Contribution to expertmeeting on medialaw reform (wijziging Mediawet voor Van Eijk 78 ‘ECL & andere collectieve oplossingen’, Seminar Ministerie van Onderwijs, Van Gompel het toekomstbestendig maken van de publieke mediadienst), Dutch Parliament Cultuur en Wetenschap, Collectieve oplossingen bij het toegankelijk maken (Eerste Kamer), (expert). van digitaal cultureel erfgoed, The Hague, 23 April (presentation). 52 Introductory panel, 37th international conference of data protection and privacy Van Eijk 79 ‘Hergebruik Overheidsinformatie en Intellectueel Eigendom’, Congres Ministerie Van Gompel commissioners, Amsterdam, 28 October (panelist). van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties, Grenzeloos hergebruik? 53 PLSC, Berkeley, 4-5 June (invited). Van Eijk Hergebruik en Open data beleid in het licht van toegang, privacy, intellectuele 54 Workshop ‘Open data & Privacy’, Amsterdam, 6 February (expert invited). Van Eijk eigendom en mededinging, The Hague, 4 June (presentation). 55 CEPS Ideas LAB 2015, Brussels, 26-27 February (expert invited). Van Eijk 80 Sessie Mededinging, databankenrecht & hergebruik, Congres Ministerie van Van Gompel Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties, Grenzeloos hergebruik? Hergebruik 56 Workshop Tilt, The Hague, 31 March (expert invited). Van Eijk en Open data beleid in het licht van toegang, privacy, intellectuele eigendom en 57 ‘Internet governance’, WRR study The Hague, 31 March (panelist). Van Eijk mededinging, The Hague, 4 June (session co-chair (with M. van Eechoud)). 58 Workshop ‘Conversations in Privacy’, Facebook, Dublin, 3-4 July (expert invited). Van Eijk 81 ‘Text and Data mining – Meer ruimte in het bestaande systeem?’, Vereniging Guibault 59 ‘Transatlantic interoperability of privacy: the national security and law Van Eijk voor Auteursrecht ledenvergadering ‘Uitleg van beperkingen’, Amsterdam, enforcement perspective’, IViR Summer Course on Privacy Law and Policy, 13 February (presentation) Amsterdam, 10 July (lecture).

155 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

82 ‘Making Private Copies in the Cloud: Yes, No, Maybe?,’ Seminar ‘Private Use in Guibault EU Copyright Law’, Faculty of Law and Administration of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poznan (Poland), 19 May (presentation). 83 ‘Individual Licensing Models and Consumer Protection’, paper presented Guibault at The Sixth Conference on ‘European and Asian Intellectual Property: Exploring Sensible Mechanisms of Paying for Copyright Owners’, Institutum Iurisprudnetiae, Academia Sinica & Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Taipei (Taiwan) 11-12 June (presentation). 84 ‘Is Europe Falling Behind? Copyrights’s Impact on Data Mining in Academic Guibault Research’, LIBER Conference – London, 23-25 June (accepted abstract). 85 ‘Is Europe Falling Behind? Copyrights’s Impact on Data Mining in Academic Guibault Research’, ELPuB Conference – Valletta (Malta) 1-2 September (accepted paper). 86 ‘Mass Digitization of Cultural Heritage Collections from a European Copyright Guibault Law Perspective’, Copyright Conference ‘Open Access to Cultural Collections’, National Library of Israel, Jerusalem (Israel), 6-7 September (presentation). 87 ‘EU initiatives on Digital Archives and Libraries – A Copyright Perspective’, Guibault Conference ‘Access to Digital Archives and Libraries through Cross Border Collective Rights Management of Copyright’, National Library of Sweden, Stockholm, 5-6 November (presentation). 88 ‘Extended Collective Licensing of Archives and Libraries in a Cross Border Guibault Context’, Conference ‘Access to Digital Archives and Libraries through Cross Border Collective Rights Management of Copyright’, National Library of Sweden, Stockholm, 5-6 November (presentation). 89 ‘Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Museums’, presentation at Guibault the Standing Committee for Copyright and Related Rights, World Intellectual Property Organisation, SCCR 31, Geneva, 9 December (presentation). 90 ‘Auteursrecht en wetenschappelijke publicaties’, Hoge School van Amsterdam, Guibault 23 April (presentation). 91 ‘Introduction on important topics in the current legal framework of (European) Guibault copyright legislation’, presentation Creative Europe Desk/Dutch Culture, Amsterdam, 18 September (presentation). 92 ‘Remuneration of authors and performers in the European Union’, C IAM Guibault Congress ‘Focuses on Fair Trade Music, Building a United Front for Creators’, Siena, 14-15 October (presentation). 93 ‘Is Europe Falling Behind in Data Mining?’, presentation at Science Europe, Guibault Brussels, 27 October (presentation). 94 (with K. Kleinen-Von Königslöw & R. van der Noll) ‘Media Diversity and new Helberger information intermediaries: a critical view on an uncritical discourse’, EuroCPR 2015, Brussels, 23-24 March (presentation of accepted abstract). 95 ‘Policy implications from algorithmic profiling and the changing relationship Helberger between newsreaders and the media’, FACE Conference, Helsinki, 9-10 April (presentation). 96 (with F. Zuiderveen Borgesius, J. Möller, D. Trilling, B. Bodo & C. de Vreese) Helberger ‘Should we worry about filter bubbles? An interdisciplinary inquiry into self- and pre-selected personalised communication’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Amsterdam, 24 October (presentation of accepted abstract). 97 “Though shall read diverse!” – “Oh yeah?” Social media platforms and media Helberger pluralism (obligations), Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Amsterdam, 25 October (presentation). 98 ‘Profiling and Targeting Consumers in the Internet of Things – A New Helberger Challenge for Consumer Protection, Digital Revolution’, Münster, 2 October (presentation). 99 PAO course of the Florence School of Regulation, Florence, 12 February Helberger (guest lecture).

156 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

82 ‘Making Private Copies in the Cloud: Yes, No, Maybe?,’ Seminar ‘Private Use in Guibault 100 ‘Personalisation in the news media’, Future Media Lab Annual Conference Helberger EU Copyright Law’, Faculty of Law and Administration of Adam Mickiewicz ‘Media Diversity in the Digital Age’, Brussels, 20 January (presentation). University in Poznań, Poznan (Poland), 19 May (presentation). 101 ‘Digital platforms: the new gatekeepers of information diversity’, expert Helberger 83 ‘Individual Licensing Models and Consumer Protection’, paper presented Guibault workshop at the European Parliament, “Digital Platforms: Helping or hurting at The Sixth Conference on ‘European and Asian Intellectual Property: media pluralism?”, Brussels, 29 September (presentation). Exploring Sensible Mechanisms of Paying for Copyright Owners’, Institutum 102 Expert Meeting organised by the German Federal Ministry of Education, Helberger Iurisprudnetiae, Academia Sinica & Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Internet Institute, Berlin, 20 April (expert invitation). Competition, Taipei (Taiwan) 11-12 June (presentation). 103 ‘Zin en onzin van handhaving’, Noorderslag-seminar, Groningen, Hugenholtz 84 ‘Is Europe Falling Behind? Copyrights’s Impact on Data Mining in Academic Guibault 16 January (presentation). Research’, LIBER Conference – London, 23-25 June (accepted abstract). 104 ‘Parody and Copyright. Has Deckmyn Solved the Conundrum?’, Norsk Hugenholtz 85 ‘Is Europe Falling Behind? Copyrights’s Impact on Data Mining in Academic Guibault Opphavsrettsforeningen, Oslo, 11 February (presentation). Research’, ELPuB Conference – Valletta (Malta) 1-2 September (accepted paper). 105 ‘User-Generated Content na Deckmyn’, Vereniging voor Auteursrecht, Hugenholtz 86 ‘Mass Digitization of Cultural Heritage Collections from a European Copyright Guibault Amsterdam, 13 February (presentation). Law Perspective’, Copyright Conference ‘Open Access to Cultural Collections’, National Library of Israel, Jerusalem (Israel), 6-7 September (presentation). 106 ‘De zaak Tuymans: een deontologische kwestie’, Akademie van Kunsten, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 19 February (presentation). 87 ‘EU initiatives on Digital Archives and Libraries – A Copyright Perspective’, Guibault Conference ‘Access to Digital Archives and Libraries through Cross Border 107 Workshop ‘Understanding IP, Engaging With Its Future’, CIPIL 10th Anniversary Hugenholtz Collective Rights Management of Copyright’, National Library of Sweden, Celebration Workshop, Cambridge University, 7 April (commentator). Stockholm, 5-6 November (presentation). 108 ‘Breadcrumbs from Brussels and Leftovers from Luxembourg: The Diminishing Hugenholtz 88 ‘Extended Collective Licensing of Archives and Libraries in a Cross Border Guibault Role of the Member States’ Courts in IP Cases’, Fordham Intellectual Property Context’, Conference ‘Access to Digital Archives and Libraries through Cross Law Institute Twenty-Third Annual Conference on International Intellectual Border Collective Rights Management of Copyright’, National Library of Property Law & Policy, University of Cambridge, 9 April (presentation). Sweden, Stockholm, 5-6 November (presentation). 109 ‘Reconstructing Rights. Rethinking Copyright’s Economic Rights in a Time Hugenholtz 89 ‘Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Museums’, presentation at Guibault Of Highly Dynamic Technological And Economic Change’, EPIP Conference, the Standing Committee for Copyright and Related Rights, World Intellectual Glasgow, 2-3 September (presentation of joint research project). Property Organisation, SCCR 31, Geneva, 9 December (presentation). 110 ‘De Rechtspositie van de Audiovisuele Maker binnen de Publieke Omroep’, Hugenholtz 90 ‘Auteursrecht en wetenschappelijke publicaties’, Hoge School van Amsterdam, Guibault Raad voor Cultuur, Den Haag, 22 September (presentation). 23 April (presentation). ‘Auteursrecht op tuinontwerp’, Studiemiddag over auteursrecht op Hugenholtz 91 ‘Introduction on important topics in the current legal framework of (European) Guibault tuinontwerpen, Hortus Botanicus, Amsterdam, 23 October (presentation). copyright legislation’, presentation Creative Europe Desk/Dutch Culture, 111 ‘Making the Digital Single Market work for copyright: how to deal with Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 18 September (presentation). territorial restrictions online?’, AIPPI conferentie ‘Internet and Copyright 92 ‘Remuneration of authors and performers in the European Union’, C IAM Guibault Law in the European perspective’, Milaan, 4 November (presentation). Congress ‘Focuses on Fair Trade Music, Building a United Front for Creators’, 112 ‘Copyright in the EU Digital Single Market. The End of Territoriality?’, Hugenholtz Siena, 14-15 October (presentation). ZEW, Universiteit van Bonn, 14 December (lecture). 93 ‘Is Europe Falling Behind in Data Mining?’, presentation at Science Europe, Guibault 113 ‘Copyright in the EU Digital Single Market. Towards fair(er) remuneration Hugenholtz Brussels, 27 October (presentation). of authors and performers?’, Madrid, 16 December (lecture). 94 (with K. Kleinen-Von Königslöw & R. van der Noll) ‘Media Diversity and new Helberger 114 ‘European Copyright Law: the EU’s Digital Agenda’, Munich Intellectual Hugenholtz information intermediaries: a critical view on an uncritical discourse’, EuroCPR Property Law Centre, München, 7-9 January (lecture). 2015, Brussels, 23-24 March (presentation of accepted abstract). 115 Magister Lvcentinvs, Universiteit van Alicante, 4-6 May (lectures). Hugenholtz 95 ‘Policy implications from algorithmic profiling and the changing relationship Helberger 116 ‘Introduction to IP Law’, ELSA Summer School, Amsterdam, 16 July (lecture). Hugenholtz between newsreaders and the media’, FACE Conference, Helsinki, 9-10 April (presentation). 117 ‘Copyright in the EU Digital Single Market. Towards unification?’, Universiteit Hugenholtz van Stockholm, 21 November (lecture). 96 (with F. Zuiderveen Borgesius, J. Möller, D. Trilling, B. Bodo & C. de Vreese) Helberger ‘Should we worry about filter bubbles? An interdisciplinary inquiry into self- 118 ‘De nieuwe Wet auteurscontractenrecht’, Rechtbank Amsterdam, Hugenholtz and pre-selected personalised communication’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference 26 May (presentation). 2015, Amsterdam, 24 October (presentation of accepted abstract). 119 ‘Actualiteiten Europees Auteursrecht’, PAO Leiden, 2 November (lecture). Hugenholtz 97 “Though shall read diverse!” – “Oh yeah?” Social media platforms and media Helberger 120 ‘International Framework’, Summer Course International Copyright Law, Hugenholtz pluralism (obligations), Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 6 July (lecture). 25 October (presentation). 121 ‘Database protection’, Summer Course International Copyright Law, Hugenholtz 98 ‘Profiling and Targeting Consumers in the Internet of Things – A New Helberger Amsterdam, 10 July (lecture). Challenge for Consumer Protection, Digital Revolution’, Münster, 2 October 122 ‘Your digital home is no longer your castle: How cloud computing transforms Irion (presentation). the (legal) relationship between individuals and their digital assets’, ICEL IT Law 99 PAO course of the Florence School of Regulation, Florence, 12 February Helberger Conference, Irish Centre for European Law (ICEL), Dublin, 26 June (keynote). (guest lecture). 123 ‘EU Data Protection and Consumer Cloud Computing’, Conference ‘Privacy & Irion Innovation International’, University of Hong Kong, 8 June (keynote).

157 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

124 Conference ‘The European Communications Policy Research (EuroCPR)’ Irion “New intermediaries in the hyperconnected society”, Brussels, 23-24 March (discussant Privacy Law Scholars Conference (PLSC)). 125 Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, 26 October (discussant PLSC). Irion 126 ‘Artikel 11 lid 2 EU Grondrechten Handvest en reclame’, Studiemiddag Kabel Vereniging voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam, 17 March (presentation) 127 ‘De betekenis van het EU Handvest voor commerciële reclame’, Studiemiddag Kabel Vereniging voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam, 17 March (chair). 128 ‘Reclame en oneerlijke handelspraktijken. Europese ontwikkelingen ’, Stichting Kabel Reclame Code, Amsterdam 13 April (presentation). 129 ‘Hollandse flexibiliteit: Het auteursrechtelijk persoonlijkheidsrecht’, Amsterdams Kabel Juridische Genootschap, Amsterdam 21 april (presentation). 130 ‘Reclame en oneerlijke handelspraktijken. Europese ontwikkelingen’, Kabel Jurisprudentielunch Reclameboek, De Balie, Amsterdam 23 april (presentation). 131 ‘FYI? Big Data, informatie-overvloed en de toekomst van de publieke taak’, McGonagle Spui25, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 11 February (co-organizer (with N. Helberger & V. Breemen)) and moderator). 132 Inaugural International Media Law, Policy & Practice Conference and McGonagle Moot Court Competition, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, 8 April (coordinator). 133 ‘Legal perspectives on privacy’, Special paper session, Amsterdam Privacy McGonagle Conference 2015, 26 October (panel organiser (with B. van der Sloot)) and moderator). 134 ‘The Council of Europe and the rule of law: from preambular presence to McGonagle practical application’, Rule of law and human rights symposium, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, 2 June (invited presentation). 135 ‘Grensgebieden van de vrijheid van meningsuiting’, Vereniging voor Media- en McGonagle Communicatierecht Studiemiddag, Amsterdam, 12 June (presentation). 136 Roundtable ‘Intermediary Liability’, IViR, Amsterdam, 13 April (expert invited). McGonagle 137 ‘Positive free speech: rationales, methods and implications’, LSE Law and McGonagle Communications Network, London School of Economics, London, 7-8 May (expert invited). 138 ‘Rethinking freedom of expression and information in the digital age’, McGonagle The European Law Students’ Association (ELSA) Summer Law School on Information Law, Amsterdam, 13 July (lecture). 139 ‘Safety of journalists: a SWOT analysis of international and regional human McGonagle rights law’, Session: Safety of Journalists, Conference - Journalists’ Safety, Media Freedom and Pluralism in Times of Conflict, Office of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Vienna, 15 June (presentation). 140 ‘Draft Recommendation on the protection of journalism and safety of McGonagle journalists and other media actors’, Council of Europe Steering Committee on Media and Information Society (CDMSI), 8th Meeting, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 18 June (presentation). 141 ‘Freedom of expression versus xenophobia, racism and incitement to crime McGonagle and terrorism: where are the boundaries?’, Workshop 8 – Radicalisation, Octopus Conference: Cooperation against Cybercrime, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 18 June (presentation). 142 General Rapporteur, ‘Freedom of expression: still a precondition for McGonagle democracy?’, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 13-14 October (presentation: preliminary conclusions). 143 ‘The dilemma between privacy and security’, the Dutch United Nations Oostveen Students Association, Amsterdam, 17 February (presentation). 144 ‘Behind the Algorithm’, BètaBreak seminar, Faculty of Science, Oostveen University of Amsterdam, 15 April (panel member).

158 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

124 Conference ‘The European Communications Policy Research (EuroCPR)’ Irion 145 ‘Big data and Privacy’, Master course ‘Big data and Business Analytics’, Oostveen “New intermediaries in the hyperconnected society”, Brussels, 23-24 March Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, (discussant Privacy Law Scholars Conference (PLSC)). 23 April (lecture). 125 Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, 26 October (discussant PLSC). Irion 146 ‘Privacy and Freedom of Speech’, ELSA Amsterdam Summer Law School Oostveen 126 ‘Artikel 11 lid 2 EU Grondrechten Handvest en reclame’, Studiemiddag Kabel on Information Law, Amsterdam, 13 July (lecture). Vereniging voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam, 17 March (presentation) 147 ‘The concept of privacy in a technological reality’, Felix and Sophie, Oostveen 127 ‘De betekenis van het EU Handvest voor commerciële reclame’, Studiemiddag Kabel Philosophical Café Amsterdam, 15 November (presentation). Vereniging voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam, 17 March (chair). 148 ‘Privacy and Big Data’, Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research, Oostveen 128 ‘Reclame en oneerlijke handelspraktijken. Europese ontwikkelingen ’, Stichting Kabel University of Amsterdam, 23 November (presentation). Reclame Code, Amsterdam 13 April (presentation). 149 ‘Reconstructing rights, Reconstructing Copyright’s Economic Rights’, Poort th 129 ‘Hollandse flexibiliteit: Het auteursrechtelijk persoonlijkheidsrecht’, Amsterdams Kabel 10 Annual Conference of the EPIP Society, Glasgow, 3 September (panelist). Juridische Genootschap, Amsterdam 21 april (presentation). 150 ‘Digital fixation: The law and Economics of a fixed e-Book price’, Poort th 130 ‘Reclame en oneerlijke handelspraktijken. Europese ontwikkelingen’, Kabel 10 Annual Conference of the EPIP Society, Glasgow, 3 September Jurisprudentielunch Reclameboek, De Balie, Amsterdam 23 april (presentation). (presentation accepted paper). 131 ‘FYI? Big Data, informatie-overvloed en de toekomst van de publieke taak’, McGonagle 151 ‘De welvaartswaarde van de publieke omroep’, Ministerie van OCW, Poort Spui25, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 11 February (co-organizer (with N. 6 October, Den Haag (presentation). Helberger & V. Breemen)) and moderator). 152 ‘Digital Single Market for creative content’, Digital Assembly, 18 June, Poort 132 Inaugural International Media Law, Policy & Practice Conference and McGonagle Riga, Letland (panelist). Moot Court Competition, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, 8 April 153 ‘De waarde van openbare bibliotheken’, Colloquium ‘Maatschappelijke Poort (coordinator). Opbrengst van de Bibliotheek’, 18 March, Utrecht (presentation). 133 ‘Legal perspectives on privacy’, Special paper session, Amsterdam Privacy McGonagle 154 ‘Thuiskopie – toelichting op het Nederlandse stelsel en overwegingen t.a.v. Poort Conference 2015, 26 October (panel organiser (with B. van der Sloot)) and professioneel gebruik’, Hoorzitting Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers, moderator). 3 March, Brussel (presentation). 134 ‘The Council of Europe and the rule of law: from preambular presence to McGonagle 155 ‘Models for (alternative) compensation systems’, Vereniging voor Auteursrecht Quintais practical application’, Rule of law and human rights symposium, Faculty of Law, ledenvergadering, Amsterdam, 30 October (presentation). University of Amsterdam, 2 June (invited presentation). 156 ‘Alternative compensation models for large- scale non-commercial uses’, Bonn, Quintais 135 ‘Grensgebieden van de vrijheid van meningsuiting’, Vereniging voor Media- en McGonagle Germany, ALAI International Congress 2015 – 50 years German Copyright Communicatierecht Studiemiddag, Amsterdam, 12 June (presentation). Act, 18 June (presentation). 136 Roundtable ‘Intermediary Liability’, IViR, Amsterdam, 13 April (expert invited). McGonagle 157 ‘Alternative compensation models for large-scale non-commercial uses’, Quintais 137 ‘Positive free speech: rationales, methods and implications’, LSE Law and McGonagle 2015 IViR Symposium ‘Alternative Compensation Systems for Digital Communications Network, London School of Economics, London, 7-8 May Copyright’, Amsterdam, 11 July (presentation) (expert invited). 158 ‘The “real thing”. Perspective of a PhD Candidate in Law, Empirical legal Quintais 138 ‘Rethinking freedom of expression and information in the digital age’, McGonagle research: from “great idea” to “doing the real thing”’, ACLE/IViR/CSECL The European Law Students’ Association (ELSA) Summer Law School Seminar, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, 28 May (presentation). on Information Law, Amsterdam, 13 July (lecture). 159 ‘Amsterdam Intermediary Liability Roundtable’, IViR, Amsterdam, Quintais 139 ‘Safety of journalists: a SWOT analysis of international and regional human McGonagle 13 April (expert invited). rights law’, Session: Safety of Journalists, Conference - Journalists’ Safety, 160 ‘Europeana Sounds 2015: The Future of Historic Sounds’, Paris, 2 October (panelist). Schroff th Media Freedom and Pluralism in Times of Conflict, Office of the OSCE 161 Workshop ‘4 Europeana Licensing’, Luxembourg, 26-27 November (invited). Schroff Representative on Freedom of the Media, Vienna, 15 June (presentation). 162 Worksop ‘Europeana Sounds’, Paris, 30 September 2015- 1 October (discussant). Schroff 140 ‘Draft Recommendation on the protection of journalism and safety of McGonagle journalists and other media actors’, Council of Europe Steering Committee 163 ‘Is Privacy Research Neutral?’, PI lab, Privacy as Opportunity, Utrecht, Van der Sloot on Media and Information Society (CDMSI), 8th Meeting, Council of Europe, 11 December (presentation and debate). Strasbourg, 18 June (presentation). 164 ‘Privacy and the Internet of Things’, Rathenau Instituut & De Nederlandse Van der Sloot 141 ‘Freedom of expression versus xenophobia, racism and incitement to crime McGonagle ambasade San Fransisco, Workshop Privacy in the IoT, San Francisco, and terrorism: where are the boundaries?’, Workshop 8 – Radicalisation, 12 November (short presentation and workshop participant). Octopus Conference: Cooperation against Cybercrime, Council of Europe, 165 ‘Toekomstbestendig gebruik van Big Data (round II)’, RIEC/LIEC dag, Van der Sloot Strasbourg, 18 June (presentation). Utrecht, 29 October (presentation and moderator). 142 General Rapporteur, ‘Freedom of expression: still a precondition for McGonagle 166 ‘Toekomstbestendig gebruik van Big Data (round I)’, RIEC/LIEC dag, Van der Sloot democracy?’, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 13-14 October Utrecht, 29 October (presentation and moderator). (presentation: preliminary conclusions). 167 ‘What is wrong with balancing?’, international workshop ‘A balanced data Van der Sloot 143 ‘The dilemma between privacy and security’, the Dutch United Nations Oostveen protection in the EU: conflicts and possible solutions, Maastricht University Students Association, Amsterdam, 17 February (presentation). Brussels, 19 October (lecture). 144 ‘Behind the Algorithm’, BètaBreak seminar, Faculty of Science, Oostveen 168 ‘Privacy en gegevensuitwisseling in wijkteams De mogelijkheden en moeilijkheden Van der Sloot University of Amsterdam, 15 April (panel member). in de praktijk’, Medilex, Amersfoort, 14 October (introduction and moderator).

159 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

169 ‘Privacy en gegevensbescherming’, Jaarlijks uitje Ondernemingsraad Ministerie Van der Sloot van Algemene Zaken, Zoetermeer, 29 September (lecture). 170 ‘Privacy en Surveillance’, Opening Academic Year Surveillance Studies, Van der Sloot Amsterdam, 23 September (lecture). 171 ‘Privacy in de wetenschap’, Introductie eerstejaars rechten UvA, Van der Sloot Amsterdam, 27 August (presentation). 172 ‘Privacy in de wetenschap, Introductie eerstejaars rechten UvA, Van der Sloot Amsterdam, 26 August (presentation). 173 ‘Privacy en technologie discussion’, Z-festival, Amsterdam, 15 August (moderator). Van der Sloot 174 ‘Data Protection under ECtHR’, Summer School Radboud University Nijmegen, Van der Sloot 7 July (lecture). 175 ‘Privacy as societal interest, European Congress of Epidemiology’, Maastricht, Van der Sloot 26 June (presentation). 176 ‘Veiligheid vs. Privacy’, Afscheidsbijeenkomst College voor de Rechten Van der Sloot van de Mens, Utrecht, 12 June (presentation). 177 ‘Privacy and cultural diversity’, Universiteitsdag, at Oudemanhuispoort Van der Sloot in Amsterdam, 6 June (moderator). 178 ‘Hergebruik en Privacy (1)’, Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken, ‘Grenzeloos Van der Sloot Hergebruik?’, Den Haag, 4 June (presentation and debate). 179 ‘Hergebruik en Privacy (2)’, Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken, ‘Grenzeloos Van der Sloot Hergebruik?’, Den Haag, 4 June (presentation and debate). 180 ‘Rechtsnormen en individuele rechten’, Book presentation: Smart Van der Sloot Technologies…, Den Haag, 12 May (co-referaat bij Mireille Hildebrandt ). 181 ‘Big Data, Open Data en Privacy’, Gemeente Amsterdam, ‘Data en privacy: Van der Sloot op zoek naar wat wél werkt!’, Amsterdam, 19 March (lecture and discussion). 182 ‘Welcome to the Jungle’, Beveiligingsconferentie SURFcert & SURFibo, Van der Sloot Maastricht, 13 February (lecture and panel discussion). 183 ‘The end of the human rights framework’, CPDP, Brussels, 23 January Van der Sloot (lecture and panel discussion). 184 ‘Privacy and Big Data’, UvA + HAI Europe, Workshop: privacy and healthcare, Van der Sloot Amsterdam, 14 January (presentation). 185 ‘Privacy en Veiligheid (round 1)’, Studiedag Directie Constitutionele Zaken Van der Sloot en Wetgeving, Ministerie Binnenlandse Zaken, Gouda, 8 January (presentation and moderator). 186 ‘Privacy en Veiligheid (round 2)’, Studiedag Directie Constitutionele Zaken Van der Sloot en Wetgeving, Ministerie Binnenlandse Zaken, Gouda, 8 January (presentation and moderator). 187 Workshop on Big Data and Privacy, BYTE project, CPDP, Brussels, Van der Sloot 22 January (expert invited). 188 ‘After showing of Citizen4’, Spui25, Amsterdam, 17 June (panelist). Van der Sloot 189 ‘Above the law: vrijheid van ondernemerschap en reclame’, Seminar in honor Tsoutsanis of Prof J. Kabel, Dutch Advertising Law Association, Amsterdam, 17 March (presentation). 190 ‘Privacy and the Sharing Economy’, Offerhauskring Workshop, Zuiderveen Amsterdam, 13 November (presentation). Borgesius 191 ‘Price Discrimination and Data Protection Law’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference, Zuiderveen 24 October (presentation). Borgesius 192 ‘Taking Trust Seriously in Privacy Law’ by N. Richards and W. Hartzog, Privacy Zuiderveen Law Scholars Conference Europe, Amsterdam, 26 October (discussant). Borgesius 193 ‘Consumer Profiling and Behavioural Targeting in the Internet of Things’, ERA Zuiderveen Annual Conference on European Consumer Law, Academy of European Law, Borgesius Trier, 15 October (presentation).

160 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

169 ‘Privacy en gegevensbescherming’, Jaarlijks uitje Ondernemingsraad Ministerie Van der Sloot 194 ‘Challenges Faced in the Digital Single Market’, ERA Annual Conference on Zuiderveen van Algemene Zaken, Zoetermeer, 29 September (lecture). European Consumer Law, Academy of European Law, Trier, 15 October Borgesius 170 ‘Privacy en Surveillance’, Opening Academic Year Surveillance Studies, Van der Sloot (panel chair). Amsterdam, 23 September (lecture). 195 ‘Data Management for Research Data’, University of Amsterdam, 13 October Zuiderveen 171 ‘Privacy in de wetenschap’, Introductie eerstejaars rechten UvA, Van der Sloot (presentation). Borgesius Amsterdam, 27 August (presentation). 196 ‘Overview of My Research’, NSF-NWO 2015 Privacy Workshop (US National Zuiderveen 172 ‘Privacy in de wetenschap, Introductie eerstejaars rechten UvA, Van der Sloot Science Foundation & Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research), Borgesius Amsterdam, 26 August (presentation). Washington, 2 October (presentation). 173 ‘Privacy en technologie discussion’, Z-festival, Amsterdam, 15 August (moderator). Van der Sloot 197 (with A.McDonald) ‘Do Not Track for Europe’, TPRC 43rd Research Conference Zuiderveen on Communications, Information and Internet Policy, Washington, Borgesius 174 ‘Data Protection under ECtHR’, Summer School Radboud University Nijmegen, Van der Sloot 26 September (presentation). 7 July (lecture). 198 ‘Personalised Communication’, Launch Personalised Communication project, Zuiderveen 175 ‘Privacy as societal interest, European Congress of Epidemiology’, Maastricht, Van der Sloot Amsterdam, 24 September (presentation). Borgesius 26 June (presentation). 199 ‘Price Discrimination & Data Protection Law’, PI.lab, The Hague, 4 September Zuiderveen 176 ‘Veiligheid vs. Privacy’, Afscheidsbijeenkomst College voor de Rechten Van der Sloot (presentation). Borgesius van de Mens, Utrecht, 12 June (presentation). 200 ‘Can Consumer Law Help to Protect Online Privacy?’, Conference International Zuiderveen 177 ‘Privacy and cultural diversity’, Universiteitsdag, at Oudemanhuispoort Van der Sloot Association of Consumer Law, Amsterdam, 29 June (presentation). Borgesius in Amsterdam, 6 June (moderator). 201 ‘Improving Privacy Protection in the Area of Behavioural Targeting’, Privacy & Zuiderveen 178 ‘Hergebruik en Privacy (1)’, Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken, ‘Grenzeloos Van der Sloot Innovation – In Pursuit of Right Incentives Conference, Hong Kong University, Borgesius Hergebruik?’, Den Haag, 4 June (presentation and debate). 8 June (presentation). 179 ‘Hergebruik en Privacy (2)’, Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken, ‘Grenzeloos Van der Sloot 202 ‘Big Data and Discrimination’, Rule of Law and Human Rights Seminar, Zuiderveen Hergebruik?’, Den Haag, 4 June (presentation and debate). Amsterdam Research Institute for Legal Studies, University of Amsterdam, Borgesius 180 ‘Rechtsnormen en individuele rechten’, Book presentation: Smart Van der Sloot 2 June (presentation). Technologies…, Den Haag, 12 May (co-referaat bij Mireille Hildebrandt ). 203 ‘Regulating Cross-Border Data Transfers in the Proposed GPDR’, European Zuiderveen 181 ‘Big Data, Open Data en Privacy’, Gemeente Amsterdam, ‘Data en privacy: Van der Sloot Data Protection Law Review Workshop: International Data Exports, Brussels, Borgesius op zoek naar wat wél werkt!’, Amsterdam, 19 March (lecture and discussion). 7 May (panel chair). 182 ‘Welcome to the Jungle’, Beveiligingsconferentie SURFcert & SURFibo, Van der Sloot 204 ‘Open Data, Privacy, and Fair Information Principles’, 19th Annual BCLT/ Zuiderveen Maastricht, 13 February (lecture and panel discussion). BTLJ Symposium, Open Data: Addressing Privacy, Security, and Civil Rights Borgesius 183 ‘The end of the human rights framework’, CPDP, Brussels, 23 January Van der Sloot Challenges, Berkeley, 17 April (presentation). (lecture and panel discussion). 205 (with J. van Hoboken) ‘Protecting e-Privacy in the Digital Age – On the Scope Zuiderveen 184 ‘Privacy and Big Data’, UvA + HAI Europe, Workshop: privacy and healthcare, Van der Sloot of Electronic Communication Privacy Rules: Data, Services or Values’, EuroCPR Borgesius Amsterdam, 14 January (presentation). Conference, Brussels, 23 March (presentation). 185 ‘Privacy en Veiligheid (round 1)’, Studiedag Directie Constitutionele Zaken Van der Sloot 206 ‘The EU-US Interface: Is It Possible?’, CPDP Computers, Data Protection Zuiderveen en Wetgeving, Ministerie Binnenlandse Zaken, Gouda, 8 January Law and Privacy Conference, Brussels, 21 January (panel moderator). Borgesius (presentation and moderator). 207 ‘Actualiteiten privacyrecht’, PAO, 30 October (lecture). Zuiderveen 186 ‘Privacy en Veiligheid (round 2)’, Studiedag Directie Constitutionele Zaken Van der Sloot Borgesius en Wetgeving, Ministerie Binnenlandse Zaken, Gouda, 8 January 208 ‘Behavioural Targeting & EU law’, European Law Students’ Association Summer Zuiderveen (presentation and moderator). Law Course, Amsterdam, 14 July (lecture). Borgesius 187 Workshop on Big Data and Privacy, BYTE project, CPDP, Brussels, Van der Sloot 209 Workshop to develop a Digital Competences Framework for consumers, Zuiderveen 22 January (expert invited). European Commission/DG JUSTICE/Consumer Afffairs Directorate, Brussels, Borgesius 188 ‘After showing of Citizen4’, Spui25, Amsterdam, 17 June (panelist). Van der Sloot 14-15 December (expert invited). 189 ‘Above the law: vrijheid van ondernemerschap en reclame’, Seminar in honor Tsoutsanis 210 ‘Price Discrimination and Data Protection Law’, European Data Protection Zuiderveen of Prof J. Kabel, Dutch Advertising Law Association, Amsterdam, 17 March Supervisor, Brussels, 17 November (presentation). Borgesius (presentation). 211 ‘Profiling and its Challenges to Fundamental Rights’, Meijers Committee Zuiderveen 190 ‘Privacy and the Sharing Economy’, Offerhauskring Workshop, Zuiderveen Expert Meeting, hosted by Sophie in ‘t Veld, European Parliament, Brussels, Borgesius Amsterdam, 13 November (presentation). Borgesius 17 November (presentation). 191 ‘Price Discrimination and Data Protection Law’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference, Zuiderveen 212 ‘Price Discrimination & Fair Information Principles’, EPIC Electronic Privacy Zuiderveen 24 October (presentation). Borgesius Information Center, Washington, 30 September (presentation). Borgesius 192 ‘Taking Trust Seriously in Privacy Law’ by N. Richards and W. Hartzog, Privacy Zuiderveen 213 Session ‘Profiling’, Bits of Freedom, 23 September (exper invited). Zuiderveen Law Scholars Conference Europe, Amsterdam, 26 October (discussant). Borgesius Borgesius 193 ‘Consumer Profiling and Behavioural Targeting in the Internet of Things’, ERA Zuiderveen 214 ‘De mythe van geïnformeerde toestemming: online privacybescherming kan Zuiderveen Annual Conference on European Consumer Law, Academy of European Law, Borgesius beter’, Dutch Privacy Law Association, Utrecht, 13 May (presentation). Borgesius Trier, 15 October (presentation).

161 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

215 ‘Privacy, Democratie en Economie: hoe verandert data de verhouding tussen Zuiderveen overheid en burger?’, Amsterdam, 12 May (panelist). Borgesius 216 ‘De betekenis van het EU Handvest voor het gebruik van consumentengegevens Zuiderveen ten behoeve van gepersonaliseerde reclame’, studiemiddag van de Vereniging Borgesius voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam, 17 March (presentation). 217 ‘Het recht om vergeten te worden’, Spui 25 Amsterdam, 19 January (panelist). Zuiderveen Borgesius 218 ‘Price Discrimination and Data Protection Law’, European Data Protection Zuiderveen Supervisor, Brussels, 17 November (presentation). Borgesius

2015 Editorships & peer reviewer/review activities Author 1 Peer reviewer for Journal of European Integration. Bodo 2 Peer reviewer for First Monday. Bodo 3 Peer reviewer for International Journal of Communication. Bodo 4 Member editorial Board Journal of International Biotechnology Law. Bostyn 5 Redactieraad van Auteurs- en Mediarecht (A & M). Dommering 6 Member Editorial board of the Dutch copyright journal AMI Van Eechoud (Tijdschrift voor Auteurs-, Media- & Informatierecht). 7 Contributor Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Van Eechoud 8 Reviewer NWO (various programmes). Van Eechoud 9 Reviewer Telecommunications Policy. Van Eijk 10 Reviewer paper proposal ITS-Europe. Van Eijk 11 Reviewer The Hague Institute for Global Justice Working Paper Series Van Eijk Peer Reviewer Form. 12 Reviewer papers PLSC-Europe, Amsterdam Van Eijk 13 Reviewer Papers Weis 2015, TuDelft. Van Eijk 14 Reviewer of an article for the Utrecht Journal of International and European Law. Van Gompel 15 Reviewer of an article for the Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Van Gompel Technology and Electronic Commerce Law (JIPITEC). 16 Reviewer fellowship application, Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study Van Gompel in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NIAS). 17 Reviewer of research project proposal for internal funding at University Van Gompel of Luxembourg. 18 Member of the editorial board of the Dutch copyright journal AMI Van Gompel (Tijdschrift voor Auteurs-, Media- & Informatierecht). 19 National editor, ‘Netherlands’, Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Van Gompel ed. by L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org. 20 Co-hoofdredacteur van Kluwer European IP Cases Reporter / Guibault Kluwer copyright blog. 21 Co-editor of the Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology Guibault and Electronic Commerce Law (JIPITEC). 22 Correspondent Computer Law Review International. Guibault 23 Reviewer International Journal of Intellectual Property Management (IJIPM). Guibault 24 Reviewer of book manuscript for Oxford University Press. Guibault 25 Member international editorial board Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle. Guibault 26 Member international editorial board: online legal database www.juriscom.fr. Guibault 27 Editorial board Mediaforum. Helberger 28 Editorial board Journal of Information Policy. Helberger

162 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

215 ‘Privacy, Democratie en Economie: hoe verandert data de verhouding tussen Zuiderveen 29 Editorial board Internet Policy Review. Helberger overheid en burger?’, Amsterdam, 12 May (panelist). Borgesius 30 Reviewer for Info, Journal of Information Policy, Telecommunications Policy. Helberger 216 ‘De betekenis van het EU Handvest voor het gebruik van consumentengegevens Zuiderveen 31 (With M. Buri) Editor of special issue ‘Public Service Media and Exposure Helberger ten behoeve van gepersonaliseerde reclame’, studiemiddag van de Vereniging Borgesius Diversity’, International Journal of Communication 2015-Vol. 9. voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam, 17 March (presentation). 32 Reviewer FWO, VUB, Danish Science Foundation. Helberger 217 ‘Het recht om vergeten te worden’, Spui 25 Amsterdam, 19 January (panelist). Zuiderveen Borgesius 33 Review onderzoeksvoorstel op verzoek Israel Science Foundation (ISF). Hugenholtz 218 ‘Price Discrimination and Data Protection Law’, European Data Protection Zuiderveen 34 General Editor Information Law Series (Kluwer Law International). Hugenholtz Supervisor, Brussels, 17 November (presentation). Borgesius 35 Lid Board of Editors Journal of World Intellectual Property (JWIP). Hugenholtz 36 Vaste annotator (auteursrecht) Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Hugenholtz 37 Reviewer Law, Governance and Technology Series, Springer publishers. Irion 2015 Editorships & peer reviewer/review activities Author 38 Reviewer Int’l Data Privacy Law, Oxford Journals. Irion 1 Peer reviewer for Journal of European Integration. Bodo 39 Reviewer Int’l Journal of Law and Information Technology, Oxford Journals. Irion 2 Peer reviewer for First Monday. Bodo 40 Reviewer Journal of Information Policy. Irion 3 Peer reviewer for International Journal of Communication. Bodo 41 Reviewer of the Dutch National Science Foundation (NWO). Irion 4 Member editorial Board Journal of International Biotechnology Law. Bostyn 42 (with L. Morganti & A. Renda) ‘New intermediaries in the hyperconnected Irion society’, Info 2015-6. 5 Redactieraad van Auteurs- en Mediarecht (A & M). Dommering 43 Member editorial board Tijdschrift Privacy & Informatie. Kabel 6 Member Editorial board of the Dutch copyright journal AMI Van Eechoud (Tijdschrift voor Auteurs-, Media- & Informatierecht). 44 Member editorial board Tijdschrift voor Auteursrecht, Media- en Informatierecht. Kabel 7 Contributor Nederlandse Jurisprudentie. Van Eechoud 45 Reviewer European Journal of Communication. McGonagle 8 Reviewer NWO (various programmes). Van Eechoud 46 Editorial Board Member IRIS – Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual McGonagle Observatory. 9 Reviewer Telecommunications Policy. Van Eijk 47 Originator and General Editor IRIS Themes (e-book series published McGonagle 10 Reviewer paper proposal ITS-Europe. Van Eijk by the European Audiovisual Observatory). 11 Reviewer The Hague Institute for Global Justice Working Paper Series Van Eijk 48 Invited peer reviewer for European Data Protection Law Review. Oostveen Peer Reviewer Form. 49 Reviewer of an article for the Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Quintais 12 Reviewer papers PLSC-Europe, Amsterdam Van Eijk Technology and Electronic-Commerce Law (JIPITEC). 13 Reviewer Papers Weis 2015, TuDelft. Van Eijk 50 General editor European Data Protection Law Review. Van der Sloot 14 Reviewer of an article for the Utrecht Journal of International and European Law. Van Gompel 51 Associate editor book reviews European Data Protection Law Review. Van der Sloot 15 Reviewer of an article for the Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Van Gompel 52 Reviewer European Data Protection Law Review. Van der Sloot Technology and Electronic Commerce Law (JIPITEC). 53 Reviewer International Review of Law, Computers and Technology. Van der Sloot 16 Reviewer fellowship application, Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study Van Gompel in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NIAS). 54 Reviewer International Data Privacy Law journal. Van der Sloot 17 Reviewer of research project proposal for internal funding at University Van Gompel 55 Reviewer Laws journal. Van der Sloot of Luxembourg. 56 Reviewer Computer Law & Security Review. Van der Sloot 18 Member of the editorial board of the Dutch copyright journal AMI Van Gompel 57 Member editorial board of Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. Tsoutsanis (Tijdschrift voor Auteurs-, Media- & Informatierecht). 58 Member editorial board of Berichten Industriële Eigendom. Tsoutsanis 19 National editor, ‘Netherlands’, Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Van Gompel 59 Member editorial board of Tijdschrift voor Computerrecht. Zuiderveen ed. by L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org. Borgesius 20 Co-hoofdredacteur van Kluwer European IP Cases Reporter / Guibault 60 Editorial board member European Data Protection Law Review. Zuiderveen Kluwer copyright blog. Borgesius 21 Co-editor of the Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology Guibault and Electronic Commerce Law (JIPITEC). 22 Correspondent Computer Law Review International. Guibault 2015 Memberships Author 23 Reviewer International Journal of Intellectual Property Management (IJIPM). Guibault 24 Reviewer of book manuscript for Oxford University Press. Guibault 1 Chair Expert Committee European Commission on the development and Bostyn implications of patent law in the field of biotechnology and genetic engineering. 25 Member international editorial board Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle. Guibault 2 Member Advisory Board Bits of Freedom. Van Daalen 26 Member international editorial board: online legal database www.juriscom.fr. Guibault 3 Member Advisory Board SIDN Fonds. Van Daalen 27 Editorial board Mediaforum. Helberger 4 Chair Raad van Curatoren Stichting Media Ombudsman. Dommering 28 Editorial board Journal of Information Policy. Helberger

163 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

5 Member Association Teachers and Researchers in Intellectual Property Law Van Eechoud (ATRIP). 6 Co-ordinator subcommittee ‘initial ownership’, International Law Association Van Eechoud Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law. 7 Member board Vereniging voor Auteursrecht (VvA, Dutch Copyright Society). Van Eechoud 8 Member Executive Committee Association Littéraire et Artistique Van Eechoud Internationale (ALAI). 9 Member Advisory Board College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens Van Eechoud (Dutch data protection authority). 10 Member Commissie Auteursrecht (Copyright Advisory Council, Van Eechoud Ministry of Justice). 11 Member Hans Bredow Institut, Hamburg. Van Eijk 12 Member Institut für Europäisches Medienrecht, Saarbrücken. Van Eijk 13 Member Advisory Committee, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg. Van Eijk 14 Chairman Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht (VMC). Van Eijk 15 Correspondent Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht. Van Eijk 16 Advisory Board Personalized Communications. Van Eijk 17 Advisory Board project ‘Open Data’. Van Eijk 18 Organizing Committee Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research. Van Eijk 19 Program Committee Personalised Communication. Van Eijk 20 Chair Advisory Committee project ‘Prioriteiten en e-Justice Van Eijk grensoverschrijdend verkeer’, ministerie WODC. 21 Member Program Committee Privacy Law Scholars Conference Europe. Van Eijk 22 Chair Internetscriptieprijs. Van Eijk 23 Co-chair Privacy Bridges-project, IViR/MIT (Massachusetts Institute Van Eijk of Technology). 24 Member Ethics Committee, Law Faculty, University of Amsterdam. Van Eijk 25 Member knowledge circle Commissie van Toezicht Van Eijk op de Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdiensten (CTIVD). 26 Member Ziggo Advisory Council. Van Eijk 27 Member Appeals Board NL-Kabel. Van Eijk 28 Chair Appeals Board Pictoright. Van Eijk 29 Member Council of Advisors on Privacy and Civil Liberties Palantir. Van Eijk 30 Voorzitter overleggroep betaalde informatiediensten SER. Van Eijk 31 Chair Stichting Weekbladpers. Van Eijk 32 Memebr Editorial Board IRIS: Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual Fahy Observatory. 33 Member Columbia University Global Freedom of Expression Expert Group. Fahy 34 Chair Studiecommissie voor de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht Van Gompel (Study group on the history of copyright) of the Vereniging voor Auteursrecht (VvA, Dutch copyright organisation). 35 Secretary Commissie Auteursrecht (Dutch Copyright Committee). Van Gompel 36 Board Member Vereniging voor Intellectuele Eigendom (Dutch group of the AIPPI, Van Gompel Association Internationale pour la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle). 37 Member appointment committee: Karlsruhe Universität, professorship at KIT/ Guibault FIZ level W3. 38 Member Advisory Group e-Infrastructure, Horizon2020, European Commission Guibault 39 Member Advisory Group Science With and For Society, Horizon2020, Guibault European Commission.

164 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

5 Member Association Teachers and Researchers in Intellectual Property Law Van Eechoud 40 Member Academic Advisory Board, Nexa Center for Internet and Society, Guibault (ATRIP). Politecnico di Torino, Italy. 6 Co-ordinator subcommittee ‘initial ownership’, International Law Association Van Eechoud 41 Member Scientific Committee of the Florence School of Regulation, EUI. Helberger Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law. 42 Review Committee International Communication Association. Helberger 7 Member board Vereniging voor Auteursrecht (VvA, Dutch Copyright Society). Van Eechoud 43 Member Scientific committee EuroCPR. Helberger 8 Member Executive Committee Association Littéraire et Artistique Van Eechoud 44 Member Scientific committee PLSC Europe. Helberger Internationale (ALAI). 45 Member Future Media Minds, a think tank initiative of the Future Media Lab Helberger 9 Member Advisory Board College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens Van Eechoud (upon invitation). (Dutch data protection authority). 46 Member Advisory Committee German Federal Ministry of Education and Helberger 10 Member Commissie Auteursrecht (Copyright Advisory Council, Van Eechoud Research on the future German Internet Institute, March-May, Berlin Ministry of Justice). (upon invitation). 11 Member Hans Bredow Institut, Hamburg. Van Eijk 47 Renewed appointment as a member of the DG Connect Advisory Forum, Helberger 12 Member Institut für Europäisches Medienrecht, Saarbrücken. Van Eijk High Level Expert Group for the European Commission. 13 Member Advisory Committee, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg. Van Eijk 48 Member Curatorium Mediaombudsman (upon invitation). Helberger 14 Chairman Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht (VMC). Van Eijk 49 Substitute Member Universitaire Onderzoeks Commissie (UOC) University Helberger 15 Correspondent Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht. Van Eijk of Amsterdam. 16 Advisory Board Personalized Communications. Van Eijk 50 Member Scientific Committee, Law Faculty, University of Amsterdam Helberger 17 Advisory Board project ‘Open Data’. Van Eijk 51 One of the three founding member Ethics Committee, Law Faculty, Helberger University of Amsterdam. 18 Organizing Committee Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research. Van Eijk 52 Member Committee to define a profile for the new dean, Law Faculty, Helberger 19 Program Committee Personalised Communication. Van Eijk University of Amsterdam. 20 Chair Advisory Committee project ‘Prioriteiten en e-Justice Van Eijk 53 Member VENI-commissie NWO/MAGW 2015. Hugenholtz grensoverschrijdend verkeer’, ministerie WODC. 54 Member Commissie Auteursrecht, Ministerie van Justitie. Hugenholtz 21 Member Program Committee Privacy Law Scholars Conference Europe. Van Eijk 55 Co-founder, European Copyright Society. Hugenholtz 22 Chair Internetscriptieprijs. Van Eijk 56 Vice-voorzitter Vaste Commissie Plagiaat (Buma-Stemra). Hugenholtz 23 Co-chair Privacy Bridges-project, IViR/MIT (Massachusetts Institute Van Eijk of Technology). 57 Member Advisory Council, CREATe, the RCUK Centre for Copyright and New Hugenholtz Business Models in the Creative Economy. 24 Member Ethics Committee, Law Faculty, University of Amsterdam. Van Eijk 58 Member Advisory Committee, Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Hugenholtz 25 Member knowledge circle Commissie van Toezicht Van Eijk Law, Cambridge University. op de Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdiensten (CTIVD). 59 Member IP Advisory Committee, Bucerius Law School, Hamburg. Hugenholtz 26 Member Ziggo Advisory Council. Van Eijk 60 Member Advisory Committee, Dutch Directors Guild. Hugenholtz 27 Member Appeals Board NL-Kabel. Van Eijk 61 Member Advisory Board, Electronic Frontier Foundation. Hugenholtz 28 Chair Appeals Board Pictoright. Van Eijk 62 Member Scientific Advisory Board, Computer Privacy and Data Protection Irion 29 Member Council of Advisors on Privacy and Civil Liberties Palantir. Van Eijk (CPDP) International Conference, Brussels. 30 Voorzitter overleggroep betaalde informatiediensten SER. Van Eijk 63 Member Programme Committee, ‘Under Observation: Synergies, benefits Irion 31 Chair Stichting Weekbladpers. Van Eijk and trade-offs of eHealth and surveillance’, TILTing Perspectives 2015, 32 Memebr Editorial Board IRIS: Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual Fahy University of Tilburg, 22-23 April. Observatory. 64 Member Scientific Advisory Board, 2015 Annual Privacy Forum on Irion 33 Member Columbia University Global Freedom of Expression Expert Group. Fahy ‘Privacy Enhancing Technologies’, Luxembourg, 7 and 8 October. 34 Chair Studiecommissie voor de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht Van Gompel 65 Member Scientific Advisory Board, Privacy Law Scholars Conference Irion (Study group on the history of copyright) of the Vereniging voor Auteursrecht (PLSC) at APC2015, Amsterdam, 26 October. (VvA, Dutch copyright organisation). 66 Member Scientific Advisory Board, 2015 International Workshop on Privacy Irion 35 Secretary Commissie Auteursrecht (Dutch Copyright Committee). Van Gompel Engineering (IWPE’15), Co-located with 36th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 21 May, San Jose, (US). 36 Board Member Vereniging voor Intellectuele Eigendom (Dutch group of the AIPPI, Van Gompel Association Internationale pour la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle). 67 Member Advisory board to the impact assessment of new legislative proposal Irion of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive commissioned by European 37 Member appointment committee: Karlsruhe Universität, professorship at KIT/ Guibault Commission and executed by Visionary Analytics, Vilnius (LT). FIZ level W3. 68 Member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Electronic Privacy Information Irion 38 Member Advisory Group e-Infrastructure, Horizon2020, European Commission Guibault Center (EPIC), Washington DC. 39 Member Advisory Group Science With and For Society, Horizon2020, Guibault 69 Board member Vereniging voor Reclamerecht. Kabel European Commission.

165 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

70 Chair Reclame Code Commissie. Kabel 71 Chair Commissie van Beroep NICAM (Kijkwijzer). Kabel 72 Chair Geschillencommissie Bureau Kredietregistratie (BKR). Kabel 73 Member The Euromedia Research Group. McGonagle 74 Senior Researcher School of Human Rights Research. McGonagle 75 Member Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht Studiecommissie McGonagle Bronbescherming. 76 Member Advisory Board, Information Law and Policy Centre, Institute of McGonagle Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London. 77 Rapporteur of the Council of Europe’s Committee of Experts on protection McGonagle of journalism and safety of journalists (MSI-JO). 78 Member Advisory Committee to the Dutch branch of UNESCO on the McGonagle Netherlands’ input into the Council of UNESCO’s International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC). 79 Registered as expert in the Economics of IP, European Commission. Poort 80 Member of Adviesraad Auteursrechtdebat. Poort 81 Fellow CREATe Honorary Economics. Poort 82 Board Member of European Policy for Intellectual Property Association. Poort 83 Member of Portuguese Bar Association (Qualified Lawyer). Quintais 84 Member Program committee of the PPLE at the University of Amsterdam. Van der Sloot 85 Member Curriculum committee of the master Data Science at the University Van der Sloot of Amsterdam. 86 Member Scientific committee of the Privacy Law Scholars Conference Van der Sloot Amsterdam. 87 Member Advisory board Code Red. Van der Sloot 88 Member of the Meijers Committee, Standing Committee of Experts on Zuiderveen European criminal, migration, refugee, privacy, non-discrimination and Borgesius constitutional law. 89 Co-founder of the Empirical Legal Studies Initiative (in cooperation with Zuiderveen the Institute for Information Law and the Amsterdam Center for Law & Borgesius Economics). 90 Member Scientific committee Privacy Law Scholars Conference Europe. Zuiderveen Borgesius 91 Member Scientific committee conference ‘Privacy & Innovation – In Pursuit Zuiderveen of Right Incentives’, Hong Kong University. Borgesius 92 Member of the Privacy Steering Group of the Personalised Communication Zuiderveen Project. Borgesius

2015 PhD supervision & oppositions Author 1 Co-promotor L.Pessers, defense 18 December. Bostyn 2 Member doctoral committee L. Pessers, defense 18 December. Dommering 3 Member doctoral committee D. Simone, doctoral viva (D. Phil), examinor Van Eechoud (with Dr. D. Gangjee), University of Oxford, defense 30 January 4 In-loco member doctoral committee A. Arnbak, defense 25 November. Van Eechoud 5 Promotor A. Arnbak, defense 25 November. Van Eijk 6 Promotor J. Poort, defense 18 February. Van Eijk 7 Promotor H. Hijmans, committee agreement on 22 December, Van Eijk defense 5 February 2016.

166 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

70 Chair Reclame Code Commissie. Kabel 8 Member doctoral committee R. Hoenkamp, 17 April. Helberger 71 Chair Commissie van Beroep NICAM (Kijkwijzer). Kabel 9 Member doctoral committee H. Hijmans, committee approval on 22 December, Helberger 72 Chair Geschillencommissie Bureau Kredietregistratie (BKR). Kabel defense 5 February 2016. 73 Member The Euromedia Research Group. McGonagle 10 Member doctoral committee Carina Jacobi, University of Vienna and Helberger Amsterdam, committee agreement Deecember, defense 22 January 2016. 74 Senior Researcher School of Human Rights Research. McGonagle 11 Co-supervisor A. Arnbak, defense 25 November. Helberger 75 Member Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht Studiecommissie McGonagle Bronbescherming. 12 Promotor L. Pessers, defense 18 December. Hugenholtz 76 Member Advisory Board, Information Law and Policy Centre, Institute of McGonagle 13 Member doctoral committee L. Pessers, defense 18 December. Verkade Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London. 77 Rapporteur of the Council of Europe’s Committee of Experts on protection McGonagle of journalism and safety of journalists (MSI-JO). 2015 Organisation & chairships conferences/workshops Author 78 Member Advisory Committee to the Dutch branch of UNESCO on the McGonagle Netherlands’ input into the Council of UNESCO’s International Programme 1 ‘The European Harmonisation of Intermediary Accessory Liability for Online Angelopoulos for the Development of Communication (IPDC). Copyright Infringement: at the Intersection of Tort Law and Fundamental Rights’, Roundtable Discussion on “The European Harmonisation of 79 Registered as expert in the Economics of IP, European Commission. Poort Intermediary Accessory Liability for Online Copyright Infringement: at 80 Member of Adviesraad Auteursrechtdebat. Poort the Intersection of Tort Law and Fundamental Rights”, 13 April, Institute 81 Fellow CREATe Honorary Economics. Poort for Information Law, Amsterdam (presentation and organizer). 82 Board Member of European Policy for Intellectual Property Association. Poort 2 IViR Symposium on ‘Alternative Compensation Systems for Digital Copyright’, Bodo Amsterdam, 11 July (conference organizer and panel chair). 83 Member of Portuguese Bar Association (Qualified Lawyer). Quintais 3 (with N. Helberger & T. McGonagle) ‘FYI? Big Data, informatie, overload en de V. Breemen 84 Member Program committee of the PPLE at the University of Amsterdam. Van der Sloot toekomst van de publieke taak’, Spui25, Amsterdam, 11 February (presentation). 85 Member Curriculum committee of the master Data Science at the University Van der Sloot 4 (with J. Gray & F. Zuiderveen Borgesius) ‘When Open Data Meets Personal Van Eechoud of Amsterdam. Data’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference, University of Amsterdam, 24 October 86 Member Scientific committee of the Privacy Law Scholars Conference Van der Sloot (panel organizer). Amsterdam. 5 (with J. Gray & F. Zuiderveen Borgesius) Workshop ‘Reconciling Fair Van Eechoud 87 Member Advisory board Code Red. Van der Sloot Information Principles and Open Data policies’, University of Amsterdam, 88 Member of the Meijers Committee, Standing Committee of Experts on Zuiderveen 6 February (co-organizer). European criminal, migration, refugee, privacy, non-discrimination and Borgesius 6 (with P. Blok) ‘De wens van de consument: een alternatief vergoedingsmodel Van Eechoud constitutional law. voor digitale content?’, Studiemiddag Vereniging voor Auteursrecht, 89 Co-founder of the Empirical Legal Studies Initiative (in cooperation with Zuiderveen Amsterdam, 30 October (presentation). the Institute for Information Law and the Amsterdam Center for Law & Borgesius 7 (with Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties & B. van der Van Eechoud Economics). Sloot) Congres ‘Grenzeloos hergebruik. Hergebruik en Open data beleid in het 90 Member Scientific committee Privacy Law Scholars Conference Europe. Zuiderveen licht van toegang, privacy, intellectuele eigendom en mededinging’, The Hague, Borgesius 4 June (co-organizer). 91 Member Scientific committee conference ‘Privacy & Innovation – In Pursuit Zuiderveen 8 First Privacy Law Scholars Conference in Europe (PLSC-Amsterdam), Van Eijk of Right Incentives’, Hong Kong University. Borgesius Berkeley La/University of Amsterdam, 26 October (co-organizer). 92 Member of the Privacy Steering Group of the Personalised Communication Zuiderveen 9 Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015 (APC2015), Amsterdam, Van Eijk Project. Borgesius 23-26 October (co-organizer). 10 Expert Seminar on protecting EU fundamental rights on internet, Amsterdam, Van Eijk 27 October (co-organizer). 11 Workshop ‘Transparancy & Oversight’, Institute for Information Law, Van Eijk 2015 PhD supervision & oppositions Author Amsterdam, 10 May (organizer). 1 Co-promotor L.Pessers, defense 18 December. Bostyn 12 Studiemiddag VMC, Amsterdam, 12 June (chair). Van Eijk 2 Member doctoral committee L. Pessers, defense 18 December. Dommering 13 Studiemiddag VMC, Amsterdam, 20 November (chair). Van Eijk 3 Member doctoral committee D. Simone, doctoral viva (D. Phil), examinor Van Eechoud 14 (with B. Hugenholtz) ‘IViR Summer Course on International Copyright Law’, Van Gompel (with Dr. D. Gangjee), University of Oxford, defense 30 January Amsterdam, 6-10 July (co-organizer). 4 In-loco member doctoral committee A. Arnbak, defense 25 November. Van Eechoud 15 Workshop ‘4th Europeana Licensing’, Luxembourg, 26-27 November Guibault 5 Promotor A. Arnbak, defense 25 November. Van Eijk (co-organizer). 6 Promotor J. Poort, defense 18 February. Van Eijk 16 The Hague Declaration on Access to Facts, Data and Ideas for Knowledge Guibault Discovery in the Digital Age, launched 6 May (co-author). 7 Promotor H. Hijmans, committee agreement on 22 December, Van Eijk defense 5 February 2016. 17 (with G. Dari-Mattiacci & J. van der Weele) Empirical Legal Studies Initiative Helberger/ (ELSI), University of Amsterdam (founding member). Zuiderveen Borgesius

167 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

18 (with G. Dari-Mattiacci & J. van der Weele) ELSI Lunch Talk: Dr. Roberto Helberger/ Galibiati, (Sciences Po, Paris), Incarceration policy and reoffending: insights Zuiderveen from empirical economics, University of Amsterdam, 2 December (organizers). Borgesius 19 (with J. Pierson & T. Poel) ‘Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015’, University Helberger of Amsterdam, 23-26 October (coordinator of the stream Personalized Communication and the Transformation of the Public Sphere). 20 ‘Personalised Communication’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Helberger University of Amsterdam, 24 October (moderator panel). 21 ‘Profiling and Targeting in the News Sector’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference Helberger 2015, University of Amsterdam, 25 October 2015 (moderator panel). 22 Launch Event Personalised Communication, University of Amsterdam, Helberger 24 September (co-organizer). 23 ‘The European Harmonisation of Intermediary Accessory Liability for Online Hugenholtz Copyright Infringement: at the Intersection of Tort Law and Fundamental Rights’, Intermediary Liability Roundtable, University of Amsterdam, 13 April (chair). 24 ‘Alternative Compensation Systems for Digital Copyright’, IViR Symposium, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 11 July (chair). 25 ‘Extending the Satellite and Cable Model to the Internet’, European Political Hugenholtz Strategy Centre, Copyright and Innovation Dinner Meeting, Europese Commissie, Brussel, 28 September (chair). 26 ‘Patent warming - is the inventive step analysis to blame?’, symposium, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 19 December (chair). 27 ‘New intermediaries in the hyper connected society’, European Communications Irion Policy Research (EuroCPR) conference, 23-24 March, Brussels (co-organizer). 28 ‘End-users at the mercy of the cloud and the future role of public policy’, Irion Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, 23-26 October (panel organizer). 29 ‘Privacy by analogy: Lessons from copyright law, environmental law, consumer Irion protection law and financial regulations’, 8th International Conference Computer Privacy & Data Protection (CPDP), Brussels, 21-23 January (panel organizer). 30 ‘IViR Summer Course on on Privacy Law and Policy’, Amsterdam, Irion 6-10 July (organizer). 31 ‘EU Grondrechten Handvest en reclame’, Studiemiddag Vereniging Kabel voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam 17 March (chair). 32 ‘FYI? Big Data, informatie-overvloed en de toekomst van de publieke taak’, McGonagle SPUI 25 Lezing i.s.m. IViR/Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 11 February (co-organizer (with N. Helberger & V. Breemen)) and moderator). 33 Inaugural International Media Law, Policy & Practice Conference and Moot Court McGonagle Competition, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, 8 April (co-ordinator). 34 ‘Legal perspectives on privacy’, Special paper session, Amsterdam Privacy McGonagle Conference 2015, 26 October (panel organizer (with B. van der Sloot)) and moderator). 35 ‘Hate speech: the complexities of criss-crossing borders’, Panel 3: Hate Speech, McGonagle Indecent Speech, Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression, Annenberg-Oxford Media Policy Summer Institute 2015, University of Oxford, 1 July (panel organizer and moderator). 36 (with B. Hugenholtz & B. Bódo) ‘Symposium On Alternative Compensation Quintais Systems for Digital Copyright’, Amsterdam, 11 July (co-organizer). 37 ‘The Battle for Copyright Enforcement; Markets, Deterrence and Human Quintais Rights’, Institute for Information Law, Amsterdam, 27 March (organization of the presentation by Floris Kreiken). 38 Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Amsterdam, 23-26 October Van der Sloot (conference co-ordinator).

168 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

18 (with G. Dari-Mattiacci & J. van der Weele) ELSI Lunch Talk: Dr. Roberto Helberger/ 39 24th-28th APPR meeting, Amsterdam, 23 November (organizer). Van der Sloot Galibiati, (Sciences Po, Paris), Incarceration policy and reoffending: insights Zuiderveen 40 Privacy and cultural diversity, Universiteitsdag, at Oudemanhuispoort Van der Sloot from empirical economics, University of Amsterdam, 2 December (organizers). Borgesius in Amsterdam, 6 June (organizer). 19 (with J. Pierson & T. Poel) ‘Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015’, University Helberger 41 Code Red event, Amsterdam, 1 June (organizer). Van der Sloot of Amsterdam, 23-26 October (coordinator of the stream Personalized Communication and the Transformation of the Public Sphere). 42 ‘Political Behavioural Targeting’, ‘CPDP Conference’, Brussels, Zuiderveen 27 January (panelist). Borgesius 20 ‘Personalised Communication’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Helberger University of Amsterdam, 24 October (moderator panel). 43 (with J. Gray, M. van Eechoud) ‘When Open Data Meets Personal Data’, Zuiderveen Amsterdam Privacy Conference, University of Amsterdam, 24 October Borgesius 21 ‘Profiling and Targeting in the News Sector’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference Helberger (panel organizer). 2015, University of Amsterdam, 25 October 2015 (moderator panel). 44 (with Prof. Galbiati) ‘Empirical Legal Studies Seminar’, Amsterdam, Zuiderveen 22 Launch Event Personalised Communication, University of Amsterdam, Helberger 9 December (co-organizer). Borgesius 24 September (co-organizer). 45 (with J. Gray & M. van Eechoud) Workshop ‘Reconciling Fair Information Zuiderveen 23 ‘The European Harmonisation of Intermediary Accessory Liability for Online Hugenholtz Principles and Open Data policies’, University of Amsterdam, 6 February Borgesius Copyright Infringement: at the Intersection of Tort Law and Fundamental (co-organizer). Rights’, Intermediary Liability Roundtable, University of Amsterdam, 13 April (chair). 46 ‘Price Discrimination, Good or Bad?’, Amsterdam Privacy Conference, Zuiderveen 25 October (panelist). Borgesius 24 ‘Alternative Compensation Systems for Digital Copyright’, IViR Symposium, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 11 July (chair). 47 ‘Nudging Legally - on the checks and balances of behavioural regulation’, Zuiderveen Prof. Alberto Alemanno, Institute for information Law, Amsterdam, Borgesius 25 ‘Extending the Satellite and Cable Model to the Internet’, European Political Hugenholtz 11 January (organizer). Strategy Centre, Copyright and Innovation Dinner Meeting, Europese Commissie, Brussel, 28 September (chair). 48 ‘Het recht om vergeten te worden’ Spui25 Amsterdam, 19 January Zuiderveen (panelist and organizer). Borgesius 26 ‘Patent warming - is the inventive step analysis to blame?’, symposium, Hugenholtz Amsterdam, 19 December (chair). 27 ‘New intermediaries in the hyper connected society’, European Communications Irion Policy Research (EuroCPR) conference, 23-24 March, Brussels (co-organizer). 2015 Media appearances Author 28 ‘End-users at the mercy of the cloud and the future role of public policy’, Irion 1 K van den Heuvel, ‘To block or not to block? The Dutch blocking Angelopoulos Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, 23-26 October (panel organizer). injunction saga continues…’, Kluwercopyrightblog.com, 20 December. 29 ‘Privacy by analogy: Lessons from copyright law, environmental law, consumer Irion 2 J Enser, ‘New Year, Free Scream…’, The 1709 Blog, 2 February. Angelopoulos protection law and financial regulations’, 8th International Conference Computer Privacy & Data Protection (CPDP), Brussels, 21-23 January (panel organizer). 3 S Lachaussée, ‘La réforme du droit d’auteur’, LesEchos.fr, 28 June. Angelopoulos 30 ‘IViR Summer Course on on Privacy Law and Policy’, Amsterdam, Irion 4 ‘Law and Media Round Up’, Inforrm’s Blog, 29 June. Angelopoulos 6-10 July (organizer). 5 ‘Die Kulturindustrien können von den Filesharing-Communities lernen’, Bodo 31 ‘EU Grondrechten Handvest en reclame’, Studiemiddag Vereniging Kabel iRights.info, 26 March. voor Reclamerecht, Amsterdam 17 March (chair). 6 ‘Kutatók gerillaforradalma zajlik a szabadon hozzáférhető tudásért’, Bodo 32 ‘FYI? Big Data, informatie-overvloed en de toekomst van de publieke taak’, McGonagle [Researchers’ guerilla revolution for open access knowledge], 444.hu, 12 March. SPUI 25 Lezing i.s.m. IViR/Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid, Universiteit van 7 ‘Europese Commissie vertrouwt op nieuw EU-verdrag data-uitwisseling’, Van Daalen Amsterdam, 11 February (co-organizer (with N. Helberger & V. Breemen)) NPO Radio 1, 6 October (quotes). and moderator). 8 ‘Gegevens Europese internetgebruikers niet zomaar naar VS’, Van Daalen 33 Inaugural International Media Law, Policy & Practice Conference and Moot Court McGonagle BNR.nl & BNR Radio, 6 October (quotes). Competition, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, 8 April (co-ordinator). 9 ‘Privacybescherming in VS onvoldoende – Meer waarborgen voor Van Daalen 34 ‘Legal perspectives on privacy’, Special paper session, Amsterdam Privacy McGonagle EU-data vereist’, Tweakers.net, 6 October (quotes). Conference 2015, 26 October (panel organizer (with B. van der Sloot)) 10 ‘Data Transfer Pact Between U.S. and Europe Is Ruled Invalid’, Van Daalen and moderator). The New York Times 6 October (quotes). 35 ‘Hate speech: the complexities of criss-crossing borders’, Panel 3: Hate Speech, McGonagle 11 ‘Dit gebeurt er met jouw gegevens op servers in de VS’, RTLZ.nl, Van Daalen Indecent Speech, Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression, Annenberg-Oxford 5 October (quotes). Media Policy Summer Institute 2015, University of Oxford, 1 July (panel organizer and moderator). 12 ‘Makkelijker protesteren tegen privacyschending’, NOS.nl, 6 October (quotes). Van Daalen 36 (with B. Hugenholtz & B. Bódo) ‘Symposium On Alternative Compensation Quintais 13 ‘Onderzoek: onvoldoende toezicht op AIVD en MIVD’, Security.nl, Van Daalen Systems for Digital Copyright’, Amsterdam, 11 July (co-organizer). 23 July (quotes). 37 ‘The Battle for Copyright Enforcement; Markets, Deterrence and Human Quintais 14 ‘Wet voor geheime diensten niet waterdicht’, Nederlands Dagblad 23 July (quotes). Van Daalen Rights’, Institute for Information Law, Amsterdam, 27 March (organization 15 ‘Kabinet geeft inlichtingendienst vrij spel’, Joop.nl, 23 July (quotes). Van Daalen of the presentation by Floris Kreiken). 16 ‘AIVD krijgt in wetsvoorstel toegang tot al uw dirt’, GeenStijl.nl, 23 July Van Daalen 38 Amsterdam Privacy Conference 2015, Amsterdam, 23-26 October Van der Sloot (report mentioned). (conference co-ordinator).

169 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

17 ‘Inlichtingendiensten te vrij in nieuw wetsvoorstel’, De Volkskrant 23 July (quotes). Van Daalen 18 ‘Toezicht op Nederlandse geheime diensten moet beter’, NU.nl, 23 July (quotes). Van Daalen 19 ‘Onderzoekers: onvoldoende toezicht op inlichtingendiensten’, tweakers.net, Van Daalen 23 July (quotes). 20 ‘Nieuwe bevoegdheden AIVD in strijd met mensenrechten’, Radio 1, Van Daalen 23 July (interview). 21 ‘Slechte controle op veiligheidsdiensten’, BNR, 23 July (interview). Van Daalen 22 ‘Data Transfer Pact Between U.S. and Europe Is Ruled Invalid’, Van Daalen The New York Times 6 October (quotes). 23 ‘Europe, Shaken by Paris Attacks, Weighs Security With Privacy Rights’, Van Eijk The New York Times 18 November (citations). 24 ‘De oplossers: hoe krijgen we Sepp Blatter weg?’, Vrij Nederland 20 May (quotes). Van Eijk 25 KRO/NCRV (on Fifa-scandal) , Radio 1, 27 May (interview). Van Eijk 26 Kritiek op plan Achmea om privégegevens te delen’, Nederlands Dagblad Van Eijk 2 October (quotes). 27 ‘Sancties VS tegen cybercrime’, Het Financieele Dagblad 2 September (quotes). Van Eijk 28 ‘Stop de verzameldrift van Big Data’, Nieuwsshow NPO1, 9 May (interview). Van Eijk 29 ‘Rechter heeft gesproken. Wat gebeurt er nu met de bewaarplicht?’, NOS.nl, Van Eijk 11 March (quotes). 30 ‘Dutch Offer Preview of Net Neutrality’, The New York Times 26 February (quotes). Van Eijk 31 ‘Gechipt worden voor je werk’, NRC Next 19 February (quotes). Van Eijk 32 ‘Krijgt Google straks een miljardenboete?’, NOS.nl, 15 April. Van Eijk 33 ‘Brede coalitie vraagt visie privacybescherming Ard van der Steur’, Van Eijk visieopprivacy.nl, 2 April (Signing declaration). 34 ‘Inlichtingenwet Plasterk op losse schroeven na uitspraak Europees Hof’, Van Eijk NU.nl, 8 October (quotes). 35 ‘VS en EU naderen elkaar over privacybescherming’, Trouw 21 October Van Eijk (interview/quotes). 36 ‘Experts: privacybescherming internetter kan veel beter’, Van Eijk NOS Journaal/NOS.nl, 21 October. 37 ‘Privacy Bridges-project’, BNR-radio, 21 October (interview). Van Eijk 38 ‘Safe harbour: afnemers cloud-diensten moeten zich beraden op strategie’, Van Eijk it-executive.nl, 10 October. 39 ‘Eén set regels voor gehele waardeketen’, NL-Kabel, Mediarecht, Van Eijk 20 January (interview). 40 ‘Oproep samenhangende visie privacy’, BNR Radio, 2 April (interview). Van Eijk 41 ‘Ook bij Van der Steur bungelt privacy onderaan’, Mr.-online, 7 April. Van Eijk 42 ‘Malicious online messages and the law’, The Irish Times 24 July. Fahy 43 ‘Geoblocking en de Europese plannen voor een digitale interne markt’, Van Gompel NPO 1 NOS journaal (18:00 & 20:00), 5 May. 44 ‘Anne Frank Gains “Co-Author” in Copyright Move’, The New York Times Van Gompel 14 November, p. A3 (New York edition). 45 ‘Ruzie over rechten dagboek Anne Frank’, De Volkskrant 17 November, p. 15. Van Gompel 46 ‘Anne Frank: Strijd om rechten dagboek gaat door’, Trouw 31 December, p. 4. Van Gompel 47 ‘View from the top – Handke et al. – Evidence shows strong copyright rules Guibault deter academic data mining’, Research Europe, 16 July (comment). 48 Joris Zwetsloot, ‘Digitaliseren Nederlands erfgoed 25 miljoen te duur Materiaal Guibault nog niet beschikbaar voor publiek’, De Volkskrant 19 March (interview). 49 ‘Nieuws à la carte, about the changing role of het social media user’, Helberger Het Parool 2 January (interview).

170 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

17 ‘Inlichtingendiensten te vrij in nieuw wetsvoorstel’, De Volkskrant 23 July (quotes). Van Daalen 50 Lance Farell, ‘Losing your rights in a legal cloud’, ScienceNode.org, Irion 18 ‘Toezicht op Nederlandse geheime diensten moet beter’, NU.nl, 23 July (quotes). Van Daalen 9 November (citation). 19 ‘Onderzoekers: onvoldoende toezicht op inlichtingendiensten’, tweakers.net, Van Daalen 51 Center for Law and Democracy, ‘Independent Regulation of the Media’, Briefing Irion 23 July (quotes). Note Series on Freedom of Expression, Briefing note 4 out of 12 (citation). 20 ‘Nieuwe bevoegdheden AIVD in strijd met mensenrechten’, Radio 1, Van Daalen 52 Gillian Oliver and Steve Knight, ‘Storage is a Strategic Issue: Digital Preservation Irion 23 July (interview). in the Cloud’, D-Lib Magazine 2015-March/April, Vol. 21 (citation). 21 ‘Slechte controle op veiligheidsdiensten’, BNR, 23 July (interview). Van Daalen 53 Marc Rotenberg, ‘22 Thinkers Working to Combat Our Increasingly Terrifying Irion Surveillance State’, alternet.org, 27 May (citation). 22 ‘Data Transfer Pact Between U.S. and Europe Is Ruled Invalid’, Van Daalen The New York Times 6 October (quotes). 54 Danielle Kehl, ‘Surveillance Costs: The NSA’s Impact on the Economy, Internet Irion Freedom & Cybersecurity’, New America, Policy Paper 2014 (citation). 23 ‘Europe, Shaken by Paris Attacks, Weighs Security With Privacy Rights’, Van Eijk The New York Times 18 November (citations). 55 ‘Freedom of expression: new opportunities and challenges’, Council of Europe, McGonagle ‘The Hows and Whys: Freedom of Expression, a Human Right’, Council of 24 ‘De oplossers: hoe krijgen we Sepp Blatter weg?’, Vrij Nederland 20 May (quotes). Van Eijk Europe website, October (interview). 25 KRO/NCRV (on Fifa-scandal) , Radio 1, 27 May (interview). Van Eijk 56 ‘WeTransfer krijgt wel erg veel geld’, Trouw 19 February. Poort 26 Kritiek op plan Achmea om privégegevens te delen’, Nederlands Dagblad Van Eijk 57 ‘Met Popcorn in je eigen bios’, Het Parool 18 February. Poort 2 October (quotes). 58 ‘Popcorn Time in Nederland het populairst’, xgn.nl, 26 January. Poort 27 ‘Sancties VS tegen cybercrime’, Het Financieele Dagblad 2 September (quotes). Van Eijk 59 ‘Illegale Popcorn Time nergens zo populair als in Nederland’, Trouw 22 January. Poort 28 ‘Stop de verzameldrift van Big Data’, Nieuwsshow NPO1, 9 May (interview). Van Eijk 60 Item on court case about blocking access to The Pirate Bay, Sveriges Radio, Poort 29 ‘Rechter heeft gesproken. Wat gebeurt er nu met de bewaarplicht?’, NOS.nl, Van Eijk 27 November (interview). 11 March (quotes). 61 ‘Covers op Spotify = cashen’, 3FM, 24 September (interview). Poort 30 ‘Dutch Offer Preview of Net Neutrality’, The New York Times 26 February (quotes). Van Eijk 62 ‘De stelling: De maatschappelijke waarde van bibliotheken is niet in Poort 31 ‘Gechipt worden voor je werk’, NRC Next 19 February (quotes). Van Eijk geld uit te drukken’, Durf! E-zine, 1 June. 32 ‘Krijgt Google straks een miljardenboete?’, NOS.nl, 15 April. Van Eijk 63 ‘Hoelang blijft Spotify gratis?’, Radio 1, 14 March (interview). Poort 33 ‘Brede coalitie vraagt visie privacybescherming Ard van der Steur’, Van Eijk 64 ‘Lek Suwinet’, Radio program Argos, Radio 1, 20 June (commentator). Van der Sloot visieopprivacy.nl, 2 April (Signing declaration). 65 (Wilmer Heck), ‘Hoe gaat de EU je privacy echt beschermen?’, Van der Sloot 34 ‘Inlichtingenwet Plasterk op losse schroeven na uitspraak Europees Hof’, Van Eijk NRC Handelsblad 15 September (citation). NU.nl, 8 October (quotes). 66 ‘The impact of 3D printing’, BNR Nieuws Radio, 28 October (interview). Tsoutsanis 35 ‘VS en EU naderen elkaar over privacybescherming’, Trouw 21 October Van Eijk (interview/quotes). 67 ‘Data: het nieuwe goud - gezondheidsapps’, NPO 3, Zembla, 2 December Zuiderveen (interview). Borgesius 36 ‘Experts: privacybescherming internetter kan veel beter’, Van Eijk NOS Journaal/NOS.nl, 21 October. 68 ‘Data: het nieuwe goud – datahandelaren , NPO 3, Zembla, 2 December Zuiderveen (interview). Borgesius 37 ‘Privacy Bridges-project’, BNR-radio, 21 October (interview). Van Eijk 69 ‘Google veegt uw lei niet snel schoon’, Trouw 14 May (interview). Zuiderveen 38 ‘Safe harbour: afnemers cloud-diensten moeten zich beraden op strategie’, Van Eijk Borgesius it-executive.nl, 10 October. 70 ‘Het mijnenveld van het informatierecht’, Mr. 2015-5 (interview). Zuiderveen 39 ‘Eén set regels voor gehele waardeketen’, NL-Kabel, Mediarecht, Van Eijk Borgesius 20 January (interview). 40 ‘Oproep samenhangende visie privacy’, BNR Radio, 2 April (interview). Van Eijk 41 ‘Ook bij Van der Steur bungelt privacy onderaan’, Mr.-online, 7 April. Van Eijk 42 ‘Malicious online messages and the law’, The Irish Times 24 July. Fahy 43 ‘Geoblocking en de Europese plannen voor een digitale interne markt’, Van Gompel NPO 1 NOS journaal (18:00 & 20:00), 5 May. 44 ‘Anne Frank Gains “Co-Author” in Copyright Move’, The New York Times Van Gompel 14 November, p. A3 (New York edition). 45 ‘Ruzie over rechten dagboek Anne Frank’, De Volkskrant 17 November, p. 15. Van Gompel 46 ‘Anne Frank: Strijd om rechten dagboek gaat door’, Trouw 31 December, p. 4. Van Gompel 47 ‘View from the top – Handke et al. – Evidence shows strong copyright rules Guibault deter academic data mining’, Research Europe, 16 July (comment). 48 Joris Zwetsloot, ‘Digitaliseren Nederlands erfgoed 25 miljoen te duur Materiaal Guibault nog niet beschikbaar voor publiek’, De Volkskrant 19 March (interview). 49 ‘Nieuws à la carte, about the changing role of het social media user’, Helberger Het Parool 2 January (interview).

171 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

172 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2.9 Reports and studies of societal relevance

2009 (N. van Eijk, N. Helberger et al.) Ups and downs. Economic and cultural effects of file sharing on music, film and games (authorised translation), onderzoek door een consortium van TNO Informatie- en Communicatietechnologie, SEO Economisch Onderzoek en het Instituut Voor Informatierecht, in opdracht van de ministeries van OCW, EZ en Justitie, February, 128 pp. (N. van Eijk, N. Helberger et al.) Ups and downs. Economische en culturele gevolgen van file sharing voor muziek, film en games, onderzoek door een consortium van TNO Informatie- en Communicatietechnologie, SEO Economisch Onderzoek en het Instituut Voor Informati- erecht, in opdracht van de ministeries van OCW, EZ en Justitie, January, 142 pp. (N. van Eijk & S. Bašić Hrvatin) Analysis and Comments on the Montenegrin draft Law on Electronic Media, Council of Europe, 102 pp. (T. McGonagle & T. Moring) Analysis of Information provided by DH-MIN members on the Questionnaire on the access of national minorities to new media in the information society, rapport in opdracht van Committee of Experts on Issues Relating to the Protection of National Minorities (DH-MIN), Raad van Europa, 9 maart, Doc. No. DH-MIN(2009)003, 38 pp. 2010 (E. Dommering & N. van Eijk) Convergentie in regulering: Reflecties op elektronische communicatie, Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Den Haag, March, 37 pp. (N. van Eijk, J. Poort, K. Janssen & I. Akker), Toegang tot telecom: Onderzoek naar de invulling van het nieuwe Europese kader voor de toegankelijkheid van telecommunicatiediensten voor gehandicapten, SEO Economisch Onderzoek en het Instituut Voor Informatierecht, in opdracht van het ministerie van EZ, juli 2009/February, 79 pp. (N. van Eijk, J.P. Poort, B. van den Ende, P. Rutten e.a.) Waarde commerciële radiovergunningen, SEO/IViR/TNO, in opdracht van het ministerie van EZ, April, 91 pp. (N. van Eijk, T. van Engers, C. Wiersma, C.A. Jasserand & W. Abel), Op weg naar evenwicht, een onderzoek naar zorgplichten op het internet, IViR/Leibniz Center for Law, onderzoek in opdracht van het WODC, June, 140 pp. ((N. van Eijk, T. van Engers, C. Wiersma, C.A. Jasserand & W. Abel) Moving Towards Balance, a study into duties of care on the internet, IViR/Leibniz Center for Law, onderzoek in opdracht van het WODC, June/October, 128 pp. (N. van Eijk), Analysis and Comments on the Radio and Television Corporation of Slovenia Act, the Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs (Media Unit) of the Council of Europe, Strasburg, 15 pp. (L. Guilbaut, C. Mak, M.B.M. Loos, N. Helberger, B. van der Sloot, L. Pessers, A.S. Kadouch & D. Baidoo) Digital content services for consumers. Report 1, report for the European Commission, Amsterdam, December, 429 pp. (A.W. Hins & G.J. Zwenne) Gelijke behandeling, vrijheid van meningsuiting en de elektronische media. Notitie ten behoeve van de Commissie Gelijke Behandeling, 15 February, 14 pp. (T. McGonagle) Promoting cultural diversity in the Irish broadcasting sector: an assessment of international standards and best practices with a view to their operationalisation in an Irish context, study for the Media Research Funding Scheme of the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland, April, 104 pp. 2011 (J.L. Axhamn & L.Guibault) Cross-border extended collective licensing: a solution to online dissemination of Europe’s cultural heritage?, Research commissioned by EuropeanaConnect, Amsterdam, 81 pp. (N. van Eijk, L. Kool, A. van der Plas, N. Helberger & B. van der Sloot) A bite too big: Dilem- ma’s bij de implementatie fan de Cookiewet in Nederland, TNO/IViR, commissioned by OPTA, February, 85 pp. (N. van Eijk, J. Poort, I. Akker, P. Rutten & B. van der Sloot) Digitaal gebonden, onderzoek naar de functionaliteit van een vaste prijs voor het e-boek, SEO Economisch Onderzoek/ IViR, in opdracht van het ministerie van OCW, October, 98 pp.

173 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

(N. van Eijk, A. Leurdijk, O. Nieuwenhuis, T. Bachet, P. Nooren & B. van der Sloot) Audiovisuele mediadistributie, bottlenecks en beleid, TNO/IViR, onderzoek in opdracht van het ministerie van OCW, December, 157 pp. (N. van Eijk) File Sharing, briefing note for the European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs, 23 pp. (N. Helberger, L. Guibault, B. van der Sloot, M.. Loos, C. Mak, L. Pessers, K.. Cseres & R. Tigner) Analysis of the applicable legal frameworks and suggestions for the contours of a model system of consumer protection in relation to digital content contracts, Report prepared for the European Commission. 2012 (J. van Hoboken, N. van Eijk & N. Kruijsen) Cloud diensten in hoger onderwijs en onderzoek en de USA Patriot Act, rapport in opdracht van SURF, September, 42 pp. (R. van der Noll, S. van Gompel, L. Guibault, J. Weda, J. Poort & I. Akker) Flexible Copyright: The Law and Economics of Introducing an Open Norm in the Netherlands, rapport in opdracht van het Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie, SEO-rapport nr. 2012-60, Amsterdam, August, 73 pp. (V. Breemen & B. Hugenholtz) Digitalisering van audiovisueel erfgoed: Naar een wettelijke publieke taak, Onderzoek in opdracht van het Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid, December. (J. Poort, I. Akker, B. van der Sloot & P. Rutten) Digitally binding: Examining the feasibility of charging a fixed price for e-books, Report commissioned by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OC&W), Amsterdam, 94 pp. (M. Kerste, J. Weda, N. Rosenboom, T. Smits & J. Poort) Waarde verlenging mobiele vergunningen, rapport in opdracht van het Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Landbouw & Innovatie, SEO-rapport nr. 2012-75, Amsterdam, October, 44 pp. (S. van Gompel, J. Weda, R. van der Noll, I. Akker, J. Poort & J. Leenheer) Digitale drempels: Knelpunten voor legaal digitaal aanbod in de creatieve industrie, rapport in opdracht van het Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie, SEO-rapport nr. 2012-41, 136 pp. (N. Helberger & C. Mak) Towards identifying safe and fair contract terms and conditions for consumers and small firms using cloud computing services, An agenda, Report for the European Commission, December. (B. Hugenholtz & C. Jasserand) Using Copyright to Promote Access to Public Sector Informa- tion: A Comparative Survey, Part III of a study commissioned by WIPO on Using Copyright to Promote Access to Information and Creative Content, 32 pp. 2013 (C. Handke) Innovationsprozesse im Kontext des Urheberrechts - Konzept und Machbar- keitsstudie, report for the German Federal Expert Commission on Research and Innovation (EFI), Berlin.. (N. Helberger) Form matters: informing consumers effectively, report commissioned by BEUC, 51 pp. (K. Irion & G. Luchetta) Online Personal Data Processing and the EU Data Protection Reform, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies 2013, 97 pp. (T. McGonagle) The Council of Europe against online hate speech: Conundrums and challenges, Expert paper, Doc. No. MCM 2013(005), the Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Media and Information Society. (T. McGonagle) How to address current threats to journalism?: The role of the Council of Europe in protecting journalists and other media actors, Expert paper, Doc. No. MCM 2013(009), the Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Media and Information Society (A. Ramalho) European Union Competence in the Field of Copyright, Report Commissioned by the UK Intellectual Property Office, August, p. 1-14.

174 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2014 (S. van Gompel, B. Hugenholtz & L. Guibault) Extended collective licensing: panacee voor massadigitalisering?, Onderzoek in opdracht van het Ministerie van OCW, Amsterdam: Instituut voor Informatierecht 1 September, 90 pp. (N. van Eijk, M. van Eeten & M. Mueller) The Internet and the State: A Survey of Key Developments, Achtergrondstudie RMO, Den Haag, 42 pp. (N. van Eijk m.m.v. J. Poort) Waarde verlenging 2,1 GHz-vergunningen, onderzoek naar de mogelijkheden voor hergebruik van de methodiek uit het rapport ‘Waarde verlenging mobiele vergunningen’, IViR, Amsterdam, 19 pp. (M. van Eechoud) D2.2 – Position paper access to data, (external report), Brussels: EC Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information (LAPSI). (M. van Eechoud, M. Caspers, S. Eskens, S. van Velze e.a.) D2.1 – Good practices collection on access to data, (external report), Brussels: EC Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information (LAPSI). (M. van Eechoud, S. Hugelier, K. Janssen, C. dos Santos et al) D4.1 – Good practices on Institutional embedding and enforcement, (external report), Brussels: EC Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information (LAPSI). (M. van Eechoud, R. Polčák, J. Harašta, M. Myška e.a.) D3.1 – Best Practices in Intellectual Property,(external report), Brussels: EC Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information (LAPSI). (T. McGonagle) Study on the digitisation of cultural heritage: originality, derivative works and (non) original photographs, 69 pp. (T. McGonagle) Rapporteur’s Conclusions, Seminar and Inter-regional Dialogue on the Protection of Journalists: Towards an effective framework of protection for the work of journalists and an end to impunity, 3 November, Strasbourg, 15 pp. (M. Oostveen & F. Zuiderveen Borgesius) Declaration ‘Academics Against Mass Surveil- lance http://academicsagainstsurveillance.org, co- initiator of declaration with over 1000 signatories. (L. Guibault & T. Margoni) Legal aspects of open science and open data, (internal report), Paris: OECD, 40 pp. (L. Guibault) Report on the effectiveness of licensing systems for clearing content for Europeana use, (internal report), The Hague: Europeana, 51 pp. (L. Guibault, C. Handke, I. Hargreaves, P. Valcke & B. Martens) Standardisation in the area of innovation and technological development, notably in the field of Text and Data Mining, (external report), Luxembourg: European Commission, 80 pp. (K. Irion, M. Ledger, S. Svensson & E. Fejzulla) The Independence and Functioning of the Audiovisual Media Authority in Albania, Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, Amsterdam/Brussels/Budapest/Tirana, October. (T. Margoni & B. van Rompuy m.m.v. N. van Eijk) Study on the protection of sports organ- isers’s rights in the EU, Study commissioned by the European Commission, Brussels, 207 pp. (N. van Eijk & T. McGonagle) The role of regional media as a tool for building participatory democracy, Council of Europe Congress of Local and Regional Authorities (Current Affairs Committee, Rapporteur: Mr. J. van den Hout, Doc. No. CG/ACT (26)6, 11 June), 50 pp. (J. Poort, M. Kerste & W. Rougoor), Waardering verlenging 2100 MHz-vergunningen, methodedocument t.b.v. Consultatie door ministerie van EZ, SEO Economisch Onderzoek/IViR, Amsterdam, SEO-rapport 2014-69, 40 pp. 2015 (S. Eskens, O. van Daalen & N. van Eijk) Ten standards for oversight and transparency of national intelligence services, IViR, 60 pp. (N. van Eijk, R. Fahy, Ecorys & TNO) Digital platforms: an analytical framework for indentifying and evaluating public options, ministry of Economic, November, 76 pp. (N. van Eijk, R. Fahy, Ecorys & TNO) Digitale Platformen: een analytisch kader voor het identificeren en evalueren van beleidsopties, rapport voor het ministerie van Economische Zaken, 9 November, 5 pp.

175 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

(K. Irion, F. Bohm et al) ‘Amicus curiae brief to the attention of the Hungarian Constitu- tional Court in the case Dojcsák v Telenor’, 15 March, available at http://tasz.hu/files/tasz/ imce/2015/amicus_brief_hungary_data_retention_law_ac_final.pdf (K. Irion & Electronic Privacy Information Center) ‘Comments of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) to the federal trade Commission in re: Remedy Study “Assess- ment of the FTC’s Prior Actions on “Merger Review and Consumer Privacy”, FTC File No. P143100, 17 March, available at https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_ comments/2015/03/00008-93523.pdf. (J. Poort, M. Kerste & W. Rougoor) Waarde verlenging 2100 MHz-vergunningen, SEO Economisch Onderzoek/IViR, Amsterdam, SEO-rapport 2015-33, 48 pp. (F. Zuiderveen Borgesius) Legal chapter for the Personal Data and Privacy report for Ofcom (the UK communications regulator). (F. Zuiderveen Borgesius) Co-author of Meijers Committee, letter to the Vaste Commissie voor Veiligheid en Justitie Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal (Security and Justice Committee of the Dutch Parliament), 9 June. (E. Dommering) Internet, a global free space with limited state control, 1-72, Adviesraad Internationale Vraagstukken (AIV), Den Haag: AIV 2015. (M. Eechoud & O. Salamanca) Open laws Report No. D1.2.d5 – The Netherlands, Case Study, Open laws project EC DG Justice, 32 pp. (W. Schulz & N. van Eijk) Study on the Future of European Audiovisual Regulation, Final report of HERMES project, Hamburg/Amsterdam, October, 74 pp. (N. van Eijk, D.J. Weitzner, I. Rubenstein et al) Privacy Bridges: EU and US Privacy Experts In Search of Transatlantic Privacy Solutions, Amsterdam/Cambridge, October, 50 pp. (R. Fahy and T. McGonagle) Council of Europe Defamation Study, Report for the Council of Europe, 27 pp. (Europe Economics, S. van Gompel, L. Guibault & O. Salamanca) Remuneration of authors and performers for the use of their works and the fixations of their performances, Final report, A study prepared for the European Commission, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 258 pp. (L. Guibault, J.-F. Canat & E. Logeais) Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Museums, Study prepared for the World Intellectual Property Organisation, Geneva, SCCR/30/2, 140 pp. (B. Hugenholtz) De Rechtspositie van de Audiovisuele Maker binnen de Publieke Omroep, onderzoek in opdracht van de Raad voor Cultuur, Amsterdam, July, 14 pp. (B. Hugenholtz) Extending the SatCab Model to the Internet, study commissioned by BEUC, Amsterdam, 26 October, 17 pp. (K. Irion, P. Cavaliere & D. Pavli) Comparative study of best European practices of online content regulation, Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, Amsterdam/Edinburgh/ Tirana, August. (T. McGonagle) Draft Recommendation CM/Rec(2015)__ of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and other media actors, MSI-JO(2014)11, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 20 October, 16pp. (drafted in capacity of Rapporteur, Council of Europe Committee of Experts on protection of journalism and safety of journalists (MSI-JO)). (T. Mc Gonagle, C. Angelopoulos, A. Brody, A.W. Hins, P.B. Hugenholtz, P. Leerssen, T. Margoni, O. van Daalen & J. van Hoboken) ‘Study of fundamental rights limitations f or online enforcement through self-regulation’, commissioned by Open Society Foundations, IViR, 91 pp. (S. Schroff)Europeana Sounds and Copyrights: The Need for and Challenges in Licensing Archival Materials, Report for Europeana Sounds, 22 December.

176 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2.10 IViR events (2009-2015)

IViR Speaker Series 2009 Machiel Bolhuis & Alistair Verney (Google), New Business Models on Internet, 13 March 2009

Aernout Nieuwenhuis (University of Amsterdam), State aid and the press, 24 April 2009 Ashwin van Rooijen (Institute for Information Law), The Software Interface between Copyright and Competition Law, 19 June 2009 Fred von Lohmann (Electronic Frontier Foundation), Fair Use Principles for User Generated Video Content , 10 July 2009 Jochen Peter (Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)), Youth and pornography on the Internet, 28 August 2009 Wilfred Steenbruggen (Institute for Information Law), Public dimensions of private communications, 18 September 2009 Douwe Korff (London Metropolitan University),The Data-Tsunami: a Threat to Democratic Society?, 16 October 2009 Helen Darbishire (Access Info Europe), Key aspects of the Council of Europe’s adopted Convention on Access to Official Documents, 20 November 2009 Volker Grassmuck (University of Sao Paulo & Humboldt University Berlin), The Content Flat Rate, 13 December 2009 2010 Hans Fischer (Institute for Information Law), Technical and Legal Aspects of Communications Network Traffic Data, 15 January 2010 Eva Lievens (Catholic University Leuven), How to reconcile the use of alternative regulatory instruments with the legal framework: a case-study of the protection of minors against harmful content, 12 February 2010 James Mathis (Department of Public International Law and European Law (UvA)), WTO TRIPS and Regional Trade Agreements, 19 March 2010 Jean-Claude Guédon (University of Montreal), The History of the Internet, 9 April 2010 Wolfgang Sakulin (IViR), Trademark Protection and Freedom of Expression: An Inquiry into the Conflict between Trademark rights and Freedom of Expression under European, German and Dutch Law, 23 April 2010 Martin Senftleben (Free University Amsterdam), Towards Information Monoliths in Intel- lectual Property Law? - The Continuous Expansion of Trademark Protection, 28 May 2010 Eric Goldman (Santa Clara University), Reputational Systems, 1 June 2010 Paul de Hert (Tilburg University), Responsibilities in the Information Society: a human rights perspective?, 18 June 2010 Catherine Jasserand and Bart van der Sloot (IViR), Three Strikes Law,27 August 2010 Bernt Hugenholtz (IViR), A New Law on Authors’ Contracts for the Netherlands, 24 September 2010

Feer Verkade (Institute for Information Law), Misleading and Comparative Advertising, 22 October 2010 Annemarie Beunen (National Library of the Netherlands/Leiden University), Newspapers of the Dutch National Socialist Movement (NSB): online or not? Aspects of penal law, copyright law and privacy law, 19 November 2010

177 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Joe Karaganis (Social Science Research Council, New York), Media Piracy in Emerging Economies, 30 November 2010 Wouter Hins (University of Amsterdam, Leiden University), Revising the Freedom of Information Act, 23 December 2010

2011 Stef van Gompel (IViR), Formalities in Copyright Law: An Analysis of Their History, Rationales and Possible Future, 18 February 2011

Johan Axhamn (Institute for Information Law), Extended collective license – a feasible solution for digitization and online dissemination of Europe’s cultural heritage via Europeana?, 18 March 2011 Cees Maris (University of Amsterdam), Freaky Justice, 15 April 2011 Marietje Schaake (European Parliament), Lobby forces in Brussels, 20 May 2011 Roy Baker (Macquarie University Sydney), The psychology of speech regulation, 17 June 2011 Ian Brown (Oxford Internet Institute), Privacy Politics in the UK, 21 June 2011 Sam Ricketson, Authorship and the meaning of a ‘work’ in international and national copyright law, Amsterdam, 6 July 2011 Kristina Irion (Central European University Budapest), Government Cloud Computing and the Policies of Data Sovereignt, 8 July 2011 Tal Zarsky (University of Haïfa), Prediction, Discrimination and Privacy, 23 September 2011 Hermineke van Bockxmeer (Ministry of Education, Culture and Science), Digital Agenda, 11 November 2011

Ejan Mackaay (University of Montréal), What L&E can do for IP research, 16 December 2011 2012 Joris van Hoboken (IViR), Search Engine Freedom: On the implications of the right to freedom of expression for the legal governance of Web search engine, 24 February 2012 3 PhD students (Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR)), Sophie Boerman Het effect van waarschuwingen voor product placement in TV-programma’s, Lotte Willemsen Brand communication op review websites en in social network sites, Ewa Maslowka Custom made communicatie en privacy, 30 March 2012 Gert Wabeke (Corporate security department of KPN), corporate security in communications: reflection on sector specific regulatory frameworks and its developments,27 April 2012 Marco Ricolfi (University of Turin)Public Sector Information as Open Data. Access, Re-Use and the Third Innovation Paradigm, 25 May 2012 Stef van Grieken (University of Groningen (RuG)), Government as a platform, a way of organizing government that better fits the our information age, 15 June 2012 Gerald Spindler (University of Göttingen), Recent Developments of Liability of Internet Intermediaries, 29 June 2012 Alexander Tsoutsanis (ÌViR/ DLA Piper), Prior Art – the IP Fear Factor, 14 September 2012 Maria Bottis (Ionian University, Greece), Right to be Forgotten, 26 October 2012 José van Dijck (Comparative Media Studies (UvA)), The Culture of Connectivity. A Critical History of Social Media, 23 November 2012

Lucie Guibault, Thomas Margoni, Stef van Gompel (IViR), Public Domain, presentations for the Korean Copyright Office, 28 November 2012

Media/Freedom of Speech, presentation for a delegation of the Chinese Supreme Court, 3 December 2012

178 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

2013 Yvonne Donders, (International Human Rights and Cultural Diversity UvA)), Human Rights Law and Cultural Diversity: How Law does not solve everything, 25 January 2013 Paul de Bijl (Competition & Regulation department at the CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis), What have we learned? New Directions for Telecommunications Policy, 22 February 2013 Volker Grassmuck (Leuphana University of Lueneberg), The Content Flat Rate Revisited, 15 April 2013

Richard Rogers (New Media & Digital Culture (UvA)) Digital Methods, 24 May 2013 Peter Jaszi (American University Washington College of Law), Notes toward an introduction to core concepts in copyright, 19 June 2013 Frank Huysmans (Humanities Faculty, department Media & Culture (UvA)), De openbare bibliotheek: persoonlijke ontwikkeling faciliteren in de 21e eeuw, 13 September 2013 Joost Poort (IViR), Industry Analysis on Copyright Exceptions & Limitations, 22 November 2013 2014 Manon Oostveen + Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius (IViR), Home-grown petition: Academics Against Mass Surveillance, 24 January 2014 Christian Handke (IViR/Erasmus University), The (formal) Economics of Copyright Compensation Systems, 21 March 2014 Kristina Irion (IViR), Governing Digital Information (GODINO): Users’ control and sovereignty over unplicized digital information in the European, 11 April 2014 Florencia Marotta-Wurgler (New York University), The Anatomy of Privacy: An Empirical Examination of Privacy Policies, 17 June 2014 Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius (IViR), Improving Privacy Protection in the area of Behavioral Targeting, 24 October 2014 Pep Vallbé (IViR), Who wants what, how, and for how much? An empirical assessment of ACS scheme preferences in the Dutch cultural market, 21 November 2014 2015 Joost Poort (IViR), Empirical Evidence for Policy in Telecommunication, Copyright & Broadcasting, 30 January 2015 Alberto Alemanno (Hautes Etudes Commerciales Paris and New York University), Nudging Legally - on the checks and balances of behavioural regulation, 11 February 2015 Ronan Fayhe (IViR) Freedom of expression and the chilling effect, 20 March 2015 Tarlach McGonagle (IViR) The Council of Europe and the safety of journalists: hardening the edges of ‘soft law, 17 April 2015 Michael Madison (University of Pittsburgh), Governing Knowledge Commons, 29 May 2015 Jonathan Gray (Director of Policy and Research at Open Knowledge and researcher Univer- sity of London, UvA and Columbia University), Digital Methods, Legal Research and Public Policy - How might emerging tools and methods for the study of new media present new opportunities for legal and public policy research? , 20 November 2015

179 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Honorary Doctorate 8 January 2010: Lawrence Lessig (Stanford University)

Inaugurals 18 January 2011: Feer Verkade, Misleading and Comparative Advertising 23 May 2014: Mireille van Eechoud, De lokroep van open data 19 September 2014: Natali Helberger, Media and users: towards a new balance

PhD Defenses 1 December 2009: Wilfred Steenbruggen, Public dimensions of private communications 5 March 2010: Ashwin van Rooijen, The Software Interface between Copyright and Competition Law 27 April 2010: Wolfgang Sakulin, Trademark Protection and Freedom of Expression: An Inquiry into the Conflict between Trademark rights and Freedom of Expression under European, German and Dutch Law 16 March 2011: Stef van Gompel, Formalities in Copyright Law: An Analysis of Their History, Rationales and Possible Future 23 March 2012: Joris van Hoboken, Regulatory aspects of search engines 8 January 2014: Ana Ramalho, The Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking. A Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization 9 September 2014: Esther Janssen, Faith in public debate: an inquiry into the relationship between freedom of expression and hate speech pertaining to religion and race in France, the Netherlands and European and international law 17 December 2014: Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, Improving privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting 18 February 2015: Joost Poort, Empirical Evidence for Policy in Telecommunication, Copyright & Broadcasting 25 November 2015: Axel Arnbak, Communications Security: Regulating Convergence in Complex Markets 18 December 2015: Lodewijk Pessers, The evolution of the inventiveness requirement 5 February 2016 Hielke Hijmans, The European Union as a Constitutional Guardian of Internet Privacy and Data Protection: the Story of Article 16 TFEU 22 April 2016 Christina Angelopoulos, The liability of online intermediaries for copyright infringement

180 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Conferences, symposia, (expert)workshops 2009 Gikii-4 Conference, in cooperation with OII, Oxford University and SCRIPT, University of Edinburgh; Institute for Information Law, Amsterdam, 17-18 September 2009

2010 Symposium on Open Content and Academic Publishing, in cooperation with Creative Commons NL, Amsterdam, 9 January 2010

Expert Workshop in cooperation with Amsterdam University Press on Copyright and Open Access book publishing, Amsterdam, 15 February 2010 Workshop Grondrechten in het digitale tijdperk revisited, Amsterdam, 15 February 2010 Introduction seminar IViR & ASCoR, Amsterdam, 26 February 2010

Symposium Software Interoperability , Copyright and Competition Law, Amsterdam, 5 March 2010

Experts conference in cooperation with ACIL on The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information, Amsterdam, 23 April 2010 Experts workshop in cooperation with European Audiovisual Observatory on Digitisation and Online Exploitation of Broadcasters’ Archives, Amsterdam, 24 April 2010 Roundtable workshop on Trademark and Freedom of Expression, Amsterdam, 27 April 2010

Focus Workshop, 30 October 2010, Cambridge (UK)

VENI workshop on Media pluralism from the user perspective, Amsterdam, 3 December 2010

2011 Roundtable workshop in cooperation with Google Benelux on Google and Privacy, Amsterdam, 20 May 2011

Symposium on Data Protection Governance, Amsterdam, 20 June 2011 HERA Workshop on Production Studies, 26 June 2011, Bergen (NO) Academic workshop in cooperation with Free University Amsterdam on Fair Use in Europe, Amsterdam, 17 September 2011

Roundtable in cooperation with Google on Privacy, Amsterdam, Academic Club, 22 November 2011

HERA Workshop on Trends in Multiple Authorship: Empirical Studies and Legal Implications, Amsterdam, 16 December 2011 Global Experts Network meeting in cooperation with American University Washington College of Law on Limitations and Exceptions in National Law Reform, Amsterdam, 19 and 20 December 2011

2012 Symposium in cooperation with UC Berkeley on Copyright formalities, Amsterdam, 7 July 2012 Conference in cooperation with the Dutch copyright Organisation on A Century of Dutch Copyright Law, Amsterdam, 31 Augustus 2012 Joint roundtable-workshop in cooperation with the World Trade Institute, University of Bern will on Public Service Media and Exposure Diversity, Amsterdam, 28 September 2012 Amsterdam Privacy Conference (APC 2012), Amsterdam, 7-10 October 2012

Conference on Auteursrecht en economie, Amsterdam, 16 October 2012 HERA Workshop on Notions of and conditions for authorship and creativity in media production, 2 November 2012, Bergen (No)

181 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

ESF Exploratory Workshop on Articulate | Accentuate Understanding the Emergent Regulatory Framework Governing Public Sector Data, Amsterdam, 8-9 November 2012 Expert workshop The right of national minorities to freedom of expression in the digital age, Amsterdam, 7 December 2012

HERA Workshop on Authorship Dynamics and the Dynamic Work, 15 December 2012, Cambridge (UK)

2013 Workshop in cooperation with ILA (Illinois Library Association) on Intellectual Property and Private International Law, Amsterdam, 15-16 March 2013 Expert workshop in cooperation with the European Audiovisual Observatory and with the support of the Institute of European Media Law, Saarbrücken on Promoting European Works in On-demand Audiovisual Services, Amsterdam, 18 March 2013 Symposium in cooperation with Berkely Center for Law and Technology on Reform(aliz)ing Copyright for the Interner Age?, Berkeley, 18-19 April 2013 HERA Public conference in cooperation with the University of Bergen and University of Cambridge on Creativity that counts?, Amsterdam, 26 April 2013 Expert workshop in cooperation with ASSER Institute Centre for International and European Law on Sports organizers’ rights and their management in the field of media, Amsterdam, 3 June 2013 Roundtable in cooperation with Interdisciplinary Centre for Law and ICT (ICRI), KU Leuven on Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression, Amsterdam, 28-29 June 2013 2014 Expert Meeting in cooperation with MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Boston on Privacy Bridges: in search of pragmatic and practical privacy solutions, Amsterdam, 28-29 April 2014 Information Influx: Institute for Information Law International Conference, Amsterdam, 2-4 July 2014 Conference in cooperation with LAPSI 2.0 (The European Thematic Network on Legal Aspects of Public Sector Information) and Open Laws on Open Legal Data for Europe, Amsterdam, 4-5 September 2014

Expert seminar on Protecting EU fundamental rights on internet, in particular privacy, Amsterdam, 27 October 2014 In cooperation with Queen Mary University of Londen iLinc Best Practices event, Amsterdam, 30-31 October 2014

2015 Workshop on Open Data & Privacy, Amsterdam, 6 February 2015 Workshop on Intermediary Liability, Amsterdam, 13 April 2015 Workshop on Standards for transparency and oversight in national security regulation, Amsterdam, 21 May 2015

Workshop on Alternative Compensation Systems for Digital Copyright, 11 July 2015 In cooperation with ASCoR Launch Personalised Communication project, Amsterdam, 24 September 2015

Amsterdam Privacy Conference (APC 2015), Amsterdam, 23-26 October 2015 Workshop on Inventive Step Standard in Patent Law, Amsterdam, 19 December 2015

182 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Public debate – Spui 25 12 May 2010 De Google Books revolutie: gevolgen voor cultuur, wetenschap en auteursrecht in Europa, with Bernt Hugenholtz 19 March 2013 De toekomst van de sociale media, discussion with Joris van Hoboken (IViR) 22 April 2013 The politics of privacy and the privacy of politics: Voter surveillance in western democracies, with Colin Bennet (University of Ontario) and Joris van Hoboken (IViR), organized by the Amsterdam Platform for Privacy Research 27 November 2013 NSA: vadertje staat beschermt u wel? Discussion with Nico van Eijk and Christiaan Alberdingk Thijm 10 March 2014 Privacy in het post-NSA tijdperk: tijd voor een fundamentele wijziging? In samenwerking met het Koninklijk Concert-gebouworkest, Bart van der Sloot (IViR) 13 October 2014 Hoe veilig zijn jouw naaktfoto’s? Discussion with Bart van der Sloot (IViR) 4 November 2014 Broodje Kennis met Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius (IViR) 3 December 2014 Simon Davies on strategies for privacy advocacy, followed by a debate with Geert Lovink, Daphne van der Kroft (Bits of Freedom) and Dirk Poot (Pirate Party). 17 January 2015 Het recht om vergeten te worden, Egbert Dommering and Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius 10 February 2015 Knowledge for Lunch: Pirate Libraries, Balázs Bodó (IViR) 11 February 2015 FYI? Big Data, informatie-overvloed en de toekomst van de publieke taak, Egbert Dommering, Frank Huysmans, Charles Jeurgens, organised by Natali Helberger, Tarlach McGonagle, Vicky Breemen 17 June 2015 Citizenfour: documentaire over NSA-klokkenluider Edward Snowden, discussion with Bart van der Sloot (IViR)

183 ivir self-assessment report (2009–2015)

Organisation of workshops for stakeholders, policy makers, etc 2009 IViR Annual Summer Course on International Copyright Law, 6-10 July 2019 Privacy en onderneming, PAO Course, 21 April 2010 2010 IViR Annual Summer Course on International Copyright Law, 5-9 July 2010 Image is everything: beeldgebruik vanuit informatierechtelijk perspectief, PAO course, 23 September 2010 2011 Het nieuwe telecommunicatierecht, PAO course, 14 April 2011 IViR Annual Summer Course on International Copyright Law, 4-8 July 2011 2012 IViR Annual Summer Course on International Copyright Law, 9-13 July 2012 IViR Annual Summer Course on Privacy Law and Policy, 9-13 July 2012 2013 IViR Annual Summer Course on International Copyright Law, July 2013 IViR Annual Summer Course on Privacy Law and Policy, July 2013 2014 Roundtable ‘Netneutraliteit, download verbod en dataretentie’, 30 June 2014 IViR Annual Summer Course on International Copyright Law, 7-11 July 2014 IViR Annual Summer Course on Privacy Law and Policy, 7-11 July 2014 2015 Congres Grenzeloos hergebruik. Hergebruik en Open data beleid in het licht van toegang, privacy, intellectuele eigendom en mededinging, with Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties, Bart van der Sloot, The Hague, 4 June 2015 IViR Annual Summer Course on International Copyright Law, 6-10 July 2014 IViR Annual Summer Course on Privacy Law and Policy, 6-10 July 2014 Expert Seminar on protecting EU fundamental rights on internet, Amsterdam, 27 October 2015

Workshop Transparency and Oversight, IViR, Amsterdam, 10 May 2015 Personalized Communication – a Joint Communication & Information Law Initiative, expert meeting with Natali Helberger (IViR), OCW, Den Haag, 20 February 2015 Symposium On Alternative Compensation Systems for Digital Copyright, Amsterdam, 11 July, 2015 Actualiteiten privacyrecht, PAO Course, 30 October 2015

184