DOCSLIB.ORG

“I Needed Help, Instead I Was Punished” Abuse and Neglect of Prisoners with Disabilities in Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“I Needed Help, Instead I Was Punished” Abuse and Neglect of Prisoners with Disabilities in Australia HUMAN “I Needed Help, RIGHTS Instead I Was Punished” WATCH Abuse and Neglect of Prisoners with Disabilities in Australia “I Needed Help, Instead I Was Punished” Abuse and Neglect of Prisoners with Disabilities in Australia Copyright © 2018 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-35706 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org FEBRUARY 2018 ISBN: 978-1-6231-35706 “I Needed Help, Instead I Was Punished” Abuse and Neglect of Prisoners with Disabilities in Australia Map .................................................................................................................................... i Terms ................................................................................................................................. ii Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 At-Risk of Abuse .......................................................................................................... 3 Sexual Violence ................................................................................................................. 3 Physical Violence ...............................................................................................................4 Bullying and Harassment ................................................................................................... 5 Solitary Confinement .......................................................................................................... 5 Lack of Adequate and Appropriate Services and Trained Staff ......................................... 6 Problematic Conditions of Confinement ........................................................................ 6 Looking Ahead ............................................................................................................ 7 Key Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 9 To State and Territory Governments .............................................................................. 9 To the Federal Government ........................................................................................... 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 10 I. Context .......................................................................................................................... 15 Overview of Prisons in Australia ................................................................................. 15 Overview of Prisons in Western Australia and Queensland ............................................ 16 Over-Imprisonment of At-Risk Populations .................................................................. 17 Over-Imprisonment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples ................................. 19 Over-Imprisonment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women with Disabilities ......... 23 Barriers to Justice ...................................................................................................... 25 Unfair Laws ............................................................................................................... 27 II. Life Behind Bars for People with Disabilities ................................................................. 29 Sexual, Physical, and Verbal Violence ......................................................................... 29 Sexual Violence ............................................................................................................... 30 Physical Violence ............................................................................................................. 33 Verbal Abuse ................................................................................................................... 34 Racism Against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Prisoners ......................................... 35 Bullying and Harassment ........................................................................................... 37 Solitary Confinement ................................................................................................. 39 Types of Solitary Confinement .......................................................................................... 43 III. Problematic Confinement Conditions for ...................................................................... 58 People with Disabilities .................................................................................................... 58 Overcrowding ............................................................................................................ 58 Lack of Accessibility .................................................................................................. 61 Physical Barriers .............................................................................................................. 61 Communication Barriers ................................................................................................... 65 Inadequate or Delayed Access to Medical Services ...................................................... 66 Lack of Proper Disability Assessment .............................................................................. 66 Delays in Medical Care ..................................................................................................... 67 Lack of Adequate Resources ............................................................................................ 69 Inadequate Training and Negative Staff Attitudes ........................................................ 71 Punitive Responses to Disability ....................................................................................... 71 IV. Legal Framework ......................................................................................................... 74 Key International Obligations ..................................................................................... 74 Right to Equality and Non-Discrimination .................................................................... 75 Rights of Women with Disabilities ............................................................................... 77 Right to an Accessible Environment ............................................................................ 78 Right to Freedom from Exploitation, Violence and Abuse .............................................. 79 Right to Health .......................................................................................................... 79 Right to Liberty and Security of the Person .................................................................. 81 Key Domestic Obligations .......................................................................................... 82 Laws on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ................................................................ 82 Corrective Services Legislation ........................................................................................ 82 Detailed Recommendations .............................................................................................. 84 Recommendations for the Commonwealth ................................................................... 84 To the Federal Government .............................................................................................. 84 To the Parliament of Australia .......................................................................................... 84 Recommendations for State and Territory Governments ................................................ 84 To Ministers for Corrective Services ................................................................................. 84 To Commissioners of Corrective Services .......................................................................... 85 To Ministers of Health ..................................................................................................... 86 To Inspectors of Custodial Services ................................................................................. 86 To State Parliaments ........................................................................................................ 87 Additional Recommendations ........................................................................................... 88 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ 91 Map I HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | FEBRUARY 2018 Terms Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: The first inhabitants of Australia. The Australia government defines an Aboriginal person as “someone who: is of Aboriginal descent;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abolition K Draft
    Abolition K Draft This file is compiled by the NCDA Working group for the Novice packet, with help from NAUDL. Thanks to Michigan, CNDI and GDS for providing some of the cards in this file. Terminology Life without the possibility of Parole = LWOP Death In Prison = DIP ---1NC--- 1NC The aff is a superficial tweak to the criminal justice system that preserves its legitimacy and coopts the movement toward structural change. Karakatsanis 19 – founder and Executive Director of Civil Rights Corps; former civil rights lawyer and public defender with the Special Litigation Division of the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia; a federal public defender in Alabama, representing impoverished people accused of federal crimes; and co-founder of the non-profit organization Equal Justice Under Law, Alec, 3/28. “The Punishment Bureaucracy: How to Think About “Criminal Justice Reform”.” https://www.yalelawjournal.org/ forum/the-punishment-bureaucracy The emerging “criminal justice reform” consensus is superficial and deceptive. It is superficial because most proposed “reforms” would still leave the United States as the greatest incarcerator in the world. It is deceptive because those who want largely to preserve the current punishment bureaucracy—by making just enough tweaks to protect its perceived legitimacy—must obfuscate the difference between changes that will transform the system and tweaks that will curb only its most grotesque flourishes. Nearly every prominent national politician and the vast majority of state and local officials
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS in CORRECTIONAL PRACTICES Supplementary Contributions to the UN Universal Periodic Review
    ANNEX UNITED STATES HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN CORRECTIONAL PRACTICES Supplementary contributions to the UN Universal Periodic Review By NGO International CURE I. ACCESS TO THE COURTS (addendum) A report, titled “Lessons Not Learned,” by the Innocence Project, detailed 23 wrongful convictions in New York that have been overturned through DNA evidence. 1. Eyewitness misidentification played a role in 13 of the 23 wrongful convictions in New York that were overturned. 2. In 10 of the 23 cases in New York, innocent people falsely confessed or admitted to crimes that DNA later proved they did not commit. 3. Limited or unreliable forensic science played a role in 10 of the 23 wrongful convictions in New York that were overturned. II. CONTROL UNITS (addendum) Brain damage. Without sustained social interaction, the human brain may become as impaired as one that has incurred a traumatic injury. …One of the paradoxes of solitary confinement is that, as starved as people become for companionship, the experience typically leaves them unfit for social interaction.” (Atul Guwande, New Yorker, March 30, 2009) IV. MEDICAL CARE IN PRISONS (addendum) All inmates with substance use disorders should be provided evidence-based treatment and aftercare. We would then break even on this investment in one year if just over 10 percent of those receiving such services remained substance and crime free and employed. For each succeeding year that these inmates remained substance and crime free and employed, the nation would reap a huge economic benefit in reduced crime, lower arrest, prosecution, incarceration and health care costs, and economic benefits from employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice an Election Agenda for Candidates, Activists, and Legislators
    SOLUTIONS 2018 CRIMINAL JUSTICE AN ELECTION AGENDA FOR CANDIDATES, ACTIVISTS, AND LEGISLATORS by Lauren-Brooke Eisen and Inimai Chettiar Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that works to reform, revitalize – and when necessary defend – our country’s systems of democracy and justice. At this critical moment, Brennan Center is dedicated to protecting the rule of law and the values of Constitutional democracy. We focus on voting rights, campaign finance reform, ending mass incarceration, and preserving our liberties while also maintaining our national security. Part think tank, part advocacy group, part cutting-edge communications hub, we start with rigorous research. We craft innovative policies. And we fight for them – in Congress and the states, the courts, and in the court of public opinion. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S JUSTICE PROGRAM The Brennan Center’s Justice Program seeks to secure our nation’s promise of “equal justice for all” by creating a rational, effective, and fair justice system. Its priority focus is to reduce mass incarceration while keeping down crime. The program melds law, policy, and economics to produce new empirical analyses, craft innovative policy solutions, and advance legislative and litigation efforts to advance this critical goal. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S PUBLICATIONS Red cover | Research reports offer in-depth empirical findings. Blue cover | Policy proposals offer innovative, concrete reform solutions. White cover | White papers offer a compelling analysis of a pressing legal or policy issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Mass Incarceration: Ideas from Today’S Leaders
    AUTHORS INCLUDE: CORY BOOKER SHERROD BROWN JULIÁN CASTRO TA-NEHISI COATES ALICIA GARZA KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND KAMALA HARRIS SHERRILYN IFILL VA N JONES AMY KLOBUCHAR JARED KUSHNER BETO O’ROURKE RASHAD ROBINSON TOPEKA K. SAM BERNIE SANDERS ELIZABETH WARREN Ending Mass Incarceration: Ideas from Today’s Leaders EDITED BY Inimai Chettiar AND Priya Raghavan FOREWORD BY NAACP President Derrick Johnson BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Ending Mass Incarceration: Ideas from Today’s Leaders Edited by Inimai Chettiar and Priya Raghavan Associate Editor Adureh Onyekwere © 2019. Other than the essay entitled ”Start by Ending the Failed War on Drugs,” this book is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution-NoDerivs-NonCommercial” license (see http://creativecommons.org). It may be reproduced in its entirety as long as the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is credited, a link to the Center’s web pages is provided, and no charge is imposed. The book may not be reproduced in part or in altered form, or if a fee is charged, without the Center’s permission. The essay “Start by Ending the Failed War on Drugs” is reprinted with permission from the Houston Chronicle and the author. Table of Contents FOREWORDS Michael Waldman President, Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law ..............................vii Derrick Johnson President and CEO, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People .............................xi IDEAS FROM TODAY’S LEADERS 1. Pass the Next Step Act Cory Booker, U.S. Senator from New Jersey ......................... 1 2. Provide Fair Wages for All Sherrod Brown, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report in English
    HUMAN “It’s Like We’re Always RIGHTS in a Prison” WATCH Abuses Against Boys Accused of National Security Offenses in Somalia “It’s Like We’re Always in a Prison” Abuses Against Boys Accused of National Security Offenses in Somalia Copyright © 2018 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-35744 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org FEBRUARY 2018 ISBN: 978-1-6231-35744 “It’s Like We’re Always in a Prison” Abuses Against Boys Accused of National Security Offenses in Somalia Glossary .............................................................................................................................. i Map ................................................................................................................................... ii Summary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Report
    Human Rights Defense Center 2012 Annual Report Contents Notable Developments 1 PLN – The Magazine 1 Book Distribution 2 Book Sales 2 Book Publishing 3 PLN and HRDC Websites 3 HRDC Staff 3 HRDC Board of Directors 4 Advocacy Work 6 Media Coverage 11 Litigation 15 New Cases Filed in 2012 15 Prior Cases Still Pending in 2012 17 Cases Resolved in 2012 19 Amicus Briefs 20 Other Activities 21 Campaign for Prison Phone Justice 21 CCA Shareholder Resolutions 22 Private Prison Information Act 23 Collaboration and Affiliations 23 Looking Forward: Goals for 2013 24 Human Rights Defense Center Annual Report 2012 [1] Notable Developments The Human Rights Defense Center, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1990, is the par- ent organization of Prison Legal News (PLN). Throughout 2012, in cooperation with Media Action Grassroots Network (MAG-Net) and Working Narratives, HRDC co-coordinated the national Campaign for Prison Phone Justice, which seeks just and equitable rates for phone calls made by prisoners. The Campaign focused on pres- suring the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to take action on the “Wright Petition,” which would cap the cost of exorbitant interstate prison and jail phone calls. The Wright Petition has languished before the FCC since 2003; however, the Campaign’s extensive advocacy efforts led the FCC to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in December 2012. HRDC received financial support from the Open Society Institute, the Sonya Staff Foundation and the Irvin Stern Foundation in 2012. Foundation support and individual donations make up approximately 15-20% of HRDC’s annual budget, with the remainder coming from PLN subscrip- tions, book sales and advertising revenue, plus HRDC’s litigation project.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to Senate Inquiry Into Mental Health 2005 by Justice Action 18 May 2005
    Submission to Senate Inquiry into Mental Health 2005 By Justice Action 18 May 2005 Justice Action makes this submission largely adressing one term of reference only (see below). We appreciate that the urgent issues of Human Rights and other abuses including institutionalisation and the use of force, and the lack of progress on Burdekin are being examined by the Committee. Justice Action is a volunteer organisation without formal funding focussing on prison issues. We are always stressed for resources, and our priority must also be assisting our members in and out of prison, we submit additional relevent materials trusting that the Commitee will take up suggestions we have made in our work on these exact same topics prior to this Inquiry, such as in our Submissions regarding NSW Mental Health, which discuss issues within all the terms of reference of this Committee's Inquiry. Justice Action Position Statement on Mental Health Policy: Justice Action believes that there are several serious failings in the way public policy addresses mental illness in our society, the most serious being as follows: - The endemic institutionalisation of those designated as mentally ill, whether that institutionalisation is carried out within the framework of a criminal justice or public health response to those so designated. - The lack of a public voice in Australia for those who have been designated as mentally ill and the delegitimisation (and pathologisation) of their viewpoints by professional and political authorities. - The abuse of psychiatric medication for the behavioural management of those designated as mentally ill, both in institutions and the community, and the lack of access by sufferers to well informed, noncoercive choice of therapeutic and support options.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice-Roadmap-2021.Pdf
    1 We are criminal justice and immigration justice advocates, directly impacted people, legal service providers, and faith leaders who stand united in the belief that this is a critical moment in our country’s history, one that requires our state’s leaders to have moral clarity and take unequivocal action. New York must decarcerate jails and prisons and ensure the basic human dignity and core constitutional and human rights of all New Yorkers. The Justice Roadmap is a legislative agenda designed to address the harms caused by the deeply entangled criminal legal and immigration systems. For far too long, our state has failed to provide New Yorkers with affordable housing, quality healthcare and robust educational and economic opportunities. Instead, New York has built and metastasized systems of criminalization and incarceration. False and racist labels of criminality are used to justify dehumanizing conditions and treatment, deny basic rights, permanently exile individuals from their communities through incarceration and deportation, and further target and extract resources from economically-distressed communities. These systems operate through violent policy, structure, and culture to oppress and criminalize Black and brown people, families and communities. Now is the time for change. In the 2020 elections, New Yorkers have given the Legislature a mandate to make bold and progressive change. Our movements have been showing up all year, taking to the streets to express our outrage at the status quo and demand change. New Yorkers are still confronting the active, existential threat of the COVID-19 pandemic, and will be dealing with its economic and health impacts for years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • EMI Resource Toolkit
    The Multifaith Initiative to End Mass Incarceration Resources & Action Toolkit CONVENED BY WELCOME JUNE 2019 Dear Friends, Welcome to Atlanta! And welcome to Ebenezer Baptist Church, the spiritual home of Martin Luther King Jr. We are America’s freedom church! My colleagues at Ebenezer, Auburn Theological Seminary and The Temple—particularly the Rev. Dr. Katharine Rhodes Henderson and the Rev. John Vaughn, Rabbi Peter Berg and Rabbi Lydia Medwin— are grateful for your active participation at this first convening of the multifaith movement to end mass incarceration. For reasons ethical and personal, dismantling the systemic injustice of mass incarceration has long been my prophetic passion. Accordingly, I conceived of this conference about four years ago. But its realization is the collective product of principled collaboration, courageous conversations and hard work over the course of the last 18 months. That is why I want to express my profound gratitude to our co-conveners and holy co-conspirators at Auburn and The Temple, our sponsors and partners and the many members of our planning committees who have helped us to define our goals and shape the events of these exciting three days. Please be clear: This is only the beginning of a multiyear commitment to bring together people of faith and moral courage to address our collective witness to one of the central and most consequential moral issues of our time. Warehousing nearly 25 percent of the world’s prison population, the United States of America—the land of the free—is the incarceration capital of the world. Our jail and prison population has increased—sometimes while crime was decreasing—a whopping 500 percent in the past 40 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoners of Conscience in the United States, 1980-2013
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE 1-1-2015 Privileged Resistance: Prisoners of Conscience in the United States, 1980-2013 Anya Stanger Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Stanger, Anya, "Privileged Resistance: Prisoners of Conscience in the United States, 1980-2013" (2015). Dissertations - ALL. 310. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/310 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact surface@syr.edu. ABSTRACT This dissertation tells the story of modern anti-war prisoners of conscience in the United States—people who are incarcerated for six months or more as a result of nonviolent resistance. It explores how they intentionally use and learn about their own privilege in solidarity actions that land them in the belly of the imperial beast; the prison. It traces the lives of forty three such prisoners of conscience, from discernment of action through release, to show how “who they are” (in terms of their visible identities and private senses of self) impacts their experiences, the ways they are understood, and their own interpretations of their actions. The story that emerges is about what it feels like to resist the state with your body, how “whose body” matters in the shaping, interpretation, and efficacy of resistance, and what white, financially stable, well educated, Christian U.S. citizens learn about their own positionality through living for months and years in America’s jails and prisons.
    [Show full text]
  • February 26, 2021 President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. the White House 1600
    Officers February 26, 2021 Chair Judith L. Lichtman National Partnership for Women & Families Vice Chairs President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Derrick Johnson NAACP The White House Farhana Khera Muslim Advocates 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Thomas A. Saenz Mexican American Legal Washington D.C. 20050 Defense and Educational Fund Secretary Fatima Goss Graves National Women's Law Center Treasurer Lee A. Saunders American Federation of State, Dear President Biden, County & Municipal Employees Board of Directors Kimberly Churches On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition charged by AAUW Alphonso B. David its diverse membership of more than 220 national advocacy organizations to promote and Human Rights Campaign Rory Gamble protect civil and human rights in the United States, and the 110 undersigned organizations, International Union, UAW Jonathan Greenblatt we urge you to take swift action to protect the health and safety of incarcerated individuals Anti-Defamation League Mary Kay Henry during the COVID-19 pandemic and request a meeting to discuss the issues outlined below Service Employees International Union Damon Hewitt in more detail. Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Sherrilyn Ifill NAACP Legal Defense and While the pandemic jeopardizes everyone’s safety, incarcerated individuals are much more Educational Fund, Inc. David H. Inoue likely to be people with disabilities or to have pre-existing health conditions, making them Japanese American Citizens League Benjamin Jealous exceptionally vulnerable due to overcrowding, unsanitary prison conditions, and a lack of People for the American Way Derrick Johnson access to quality healthcare services.1 Though the COVID-19 vaccine is a critical NAACP Virginia Kase advancement, distribution to incarcerated populations will take precious time, and League of Women Voters of the United States correctional medical experts expect participation rates will be low because the Bureau of Samer E.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice & Public Safety
    CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY 1 SPRING 2021 ISSUE 011 CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY HARVARD KENNEDY SCHOOL Criminal Justice & Public Safety Reimagining Rights & Responsibilities in the U.S. 2 CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY Reimagining Rights & Responsibilities in the United States: Criminal Justice & Public Safety Carr Center for Human Rights Policy Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University February 10, 2021 John Shattuck Carr Center Senior Fellow; Former US Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor; Professor of Practice, Fletcher School, Tufts University Mathias Risse Lucius N. Littauer Professor of Philosophy and Public Administration; Director for the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy The authors’ institutional affiliations are provided for purposes of author identification, not as indications of institutional endorsement of the report. This report is part of a Carr Center project on Reimagining Rights and Responsibilities in the United States, directed by John Shattuck. The project has been overseen by a faculty committee chaired by Mathias Risse, with the collaboration of Executive Director Sushma Raman, and the support of the Carr Center staff. This research paper was drafted by Rahaf Safi (RA). The authors are grateful to Michael Blanding and Mayumi Cornejo for editing, and Alexandra Geller for editorial and design. Cover image by Donald Tong. CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY 1 Table of Contents 2. Overview 3. Main Elements of the Criminal Justice System 7. Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
    [Show full text]