Masaryk University Faculty of Arts

Department of English and American Studies

English Language and Literature

Bc. Veronika Majlingová

The Use of Space in Master’s Diploma Thesis

Supervisor: Bonita Rhoads, Ph. D.

2011 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography.

…………………………………………….. Author’s signature Acknowledgement I would like to thank my supervisor, Bonita Rhoads, Ph.D., for her kind help and valuable advice. I am particularly grateful for her swift feedback, which made finishing this thesis considerably easier. Table of Contents

1. Introduction...... 1

2. Gothic Origins – Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics and the Gothic Revival ...... 4

3. The Division of Literary Space ...... 13

4. The House ...... 20

5. The Castle ...... 32

6. The City ...... 40

7. Conclusion ...... 53

8. Bibliography...... 55

9. Résumé ...... 59

10. Resumé...... 61 1. Introduction "They told of dripping stone walls in uninhabited castles and of ivy-clad monastery ruins by moonlight, of locked inner rooms and secret dungeons, dank charnel houses and overgrown graveyards, of footsteps creaking upon staircases and fingers tapping at casements" — Susan Hill

Gothic fiction as a genre is very complex and not easy to define. For many decades it was derided by critics as worthless reading for the masses; however, it survived and evolved and finally rekindled the interest of scholarly circles. The complexity of the genre is evidenced by the many “Gothics” that have emerged in the academic discourse of recent decades. Fred Botting in his introduction to The Gothic

(2001) lists for example the eighteenth-century Gothic, Victorian Gothic, modern

Gothic, postmodern Gothic, female Gothic, postcolonial Gothic, queer Gothic, and .

In spite of this generic multiplicity, however, one of the first things that come to mind when one thinks about a proper Gothic story is the setting. Whether it is an eerie castle on the top of a hill in the middle of a stormy night, a haunted house, a gloomy dilapidated neighborhood in a busy city or a dead spaceship drifting in space, from its very beginnings, Gothic fiction is connected with the architectural spaces in which its narratives are set. Titles of Gothic novels are teeming with names of buildings: The

Castle of Otranto, The Castles of Athlin and Dunbayne, “The Fall of the House of

Usher”, Bleak House, to name just a few. It is also often the case that the setting of the story, a ruined castle, abbey, a haunted house, etc. is a character of its own, sometimes more important than some of the main characters.

Going deeper, one discovers that spatiality on various levels is an undeniable feature of Gothic fiction. The Gothic genre sets out to uncover the dark and twisted 1 corridors of human mind where all the terrible secrets lie hidden. It is inherently transgressive in that its main purpose is to disrupt the established order whether it is a social order, patriarchal order, or psychological restraints. The reason why the Gothic lasted so long, why it is so malleable is that it deals with the fundamental contradiction of human existence. It is the contradiction between the civilized and the barbaric, the realm of order and the realm of chaos, Our space and the space of the Other.

Human nature always strives for the one by excluding the other without realizing that they are uncannily dependent on each other. Manuel Aguirre writes that “[t]he thresholds which characters shun or violate, the boundaries behind which the enemy lurks, are essentially lines dividing domains of being: the human world closes itself to, and yet longs for, contact with an Otherworld it deems non-human, unreal, and evil” (“Closed Space” 3). This is manifested for example in that “a proper definition of a given thing in a given dimension requires reference to another dimension” (Ibid. 10), so in the myth of creation there are six days of doing completed by one day of non-doing and there is death to complete life. The role of Gothic is to point out the inevitable relationship of these two spheres by having characters transgress borders, forcing them to undergo a journey from their safe home to a place of evil and back. Gothic is about “blurring of metaphysical, natural, religious, class, economic, marketing, generic, stylistic, and moral lines” (Hogle 8-9), it brings the marginal into the centre. The aim of this thesis is to explore this Gothic spatiality in its various forms.

Although the adaptability and diversity of the Gothic causes the different genres of the Gothic to make use of space in innumerable ways, with regard to the scope of this thesis, the focus will be limited to four texts of British authors writing between the second half of the eighteenth century and the end of the nineteenth century. The origin of the Gothic novel as a historical form is usually dated between 1764 and 1820, the 2 years which saw the publication of Horace Walpole`s and Charles

Maturin`s Melmoth the Wanderer respectively. However, it is now clear that the Gothic novel lived on in various forms, adapting on to the new times and environments, of which especially interesting with regard to space is the burgeoning urban environment of the nineteenth century. For the sake of comparison, therefore, not only the “proper”

Gothic texts will be included in this thesis but also some examples from the later period.

In the first chapter we will look at the origins of the Gothic, at the aesthetics of the eighteenth-century Britain and the connection to the Gothic Revival in architecture.

The following chapter will be concerned with the division of literary space into three areas: the home, the residence of the hero/heroine, which is part of the everyday world, a safe place. Then there is the border or threshold and the anti-home, which is the realm of the Other, a place of chaos and evil, the abode of the villain. The rest of the thesis consists of three chapters and each chapter deals with an important setting of the Gothic fiction, a representative of one of the outlined areas of literary space: the house, the castle, and the city.

3 2. Gothic Origins – Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics and the Gothic Revival Gothic fiction emerged from a fusion of unique aspects of the eighteenth century. First, the heightened interest in England`s past, especially the mediaeval era brought to the architectural foreground looming cathedrals and mansions with labyrinthine structure, towers and gargoyles. Second, the changes in aesthetic feeling granted more importance to one`s personal sensibilities and imagination prepared ground for reveling in the sublime feeling evoked by the terrors that may be found lurking in such cathedrals and mansions. These changes happened partly as a reaction to the Enlightenment.

During the eighteenth century, the term “gothic” underwent significant changes of meaning and connotations. Originally, the term comes from the name of one of the

Germanic tribes, the Goths, who played an important role in the destruction of Rome.

Due to lack of written materials in subsequent periods and general confusion of terms,

“‘Gothic’ became a highly mobile term, remaining constant only in the way it functioned to establish a set of polarities revolving primarily around the concepts of the primitive and the civilized” (Punter 3). Gothic came to denote everything uncivilized, barbaric, in architecture all that is irregular and ugly, especially in comparison with the classical style. As Ruskin wrote: “when that fallen Roman, in the utmost impotence of his luxury, and insolence of his guilt, became the model for the imitation of civilized

Europe, at the close of the so-called Dark ages, the word Gothic became a term of unmitigated contempt” (Ruskin 6). In architecture, the opinion of the Gothic style began to change as part of the nationalist sentiments of the time: “As the Italians of the

Renaissance looked back to Rome, so the ‘Gothic Gentlemen’ set out to build for themselves structures in keeping with their own history” (Lang 254). Since the word

4 Gothic was connected with the Goths, it was also connected with Germanic tribes in general and therefore with the history of Britain: “the Gothic Revival was an English movement, perhaps the one purely English movement in the plastic arts” (Clark xix).

Although the style of building was not always called Gothic, there is certain evidence that the style as such had never really died out. For example, Kenneth Clark, in his

Gothic Revival mused, if it would not be more appropriate to speak of Gothic survival rather than revival. He wrote: “from 1600 to 1800 perhaps no year passed which did not see the building of some pointed arch and gabled roof, or the restoration of some crumbling tracery” (Clark 1); he also traced the continuation of the tradition, naming various buildings and pointing out the various ways in which the Gothic survived. One of these ways was the enthusiasm of the antiquarians, gentlemen mostly without professional education in architecture but completely absorbed by the romantic sensibilities of the time and who brought the style back from the brink of oblivion:

“This scholarly interest in archaeology, followed by a sentimental delight in decay, is the true source of the Revival” (Ibid.). Thus, the architectural style called, perhaps not correctly, the Gothic style, survived and experienced a rise to popularity, sometimes in surprising ways.

The term Gothic slowly found its way into discourses other than that of architecture and the meaning also began to change. At the turn of the eighteenth century it was still used negatively, for example Dryden wrote in 1697: “all that hath nothing of the ancient gust is called a barbarous or Gothic manner” (qtd. in Raškauskienė 11).

Even in 1711, Joseph Addison wrote in one of his essays for The Spectator: “I look upon these writers as Goths in poetry, who, like those in architecture, not being able to come up to the beautiful simplicity of the old Greeks and Romans, have endeavored to supply its place with all the extravagances of an irregular fancy” (Addison qtd. in 5 McIntyre 645). One of the early proponents of Gothic was Richard Hurd, who preceded

Ruskin in defending the architectural style and, like Addison, preceded Horace Walpole in connecting the term with literature in his The Letters on Chivalry and Romance, published in 1762. Here Hurd defends saying that the styles should not be compared but that every style should be judged by its own rules: “When an architect examines a Gothic structure by Grecian rules, he finds nothing but deformity.

But the Gothic architecture has its own rules, by which when it comes to be examined, it is seen to have its merit, as well as the Grecian” (Hurd 61). He further states: “The same observation holds of the two sorts of poetry” (Ibid.). Hurd attempts to rebuke criticism of the structure of Spenser`s Faerie Queene by pointing out that it has its own unity of design, which he calls Gothic and which is different from that of classical poems but equally valid nevertheless.

Then, in 1764, Horace Walpole published his The Castle of Otranto, in later editions subtitled a Gothic story, which is almost universally considered to be the first

Gothic novel, where the term Gothic acquired its new connotations of something terrifying and supernatural. The importance of Horace Walpole stems from the fact that in him is combined both the writer and the architect. He was among the enthusiasts interested in the Gothic style of architecture, mentioned by Kenneth Clark. However, their Gothic was not “real”, both in the sense that it is impossible to build medieval castle in the eighteenth century and also in the sense that they did not even try to reproduce the buildings truthfully. Instead, they appropriated different elements and applied them according to their tastes for completely different purposes and using different, often inappropriate materials:

They looked through prints and books more than at actual buildings, and helped themselves freely to whatever took their fancy and what they thought would fit in well. Tombs were turned into fireplaces, façades of 6 cathedrals became wall decorations, the vault of the Henry VII Chapel was echoed in the Gallery (of Strawberry Hill). (Lang 253)

One of the stranger manifestations of this superficial interest in Gothic as well as of the nascent consumerism was the popular trend to build fake medieval ruins as garden decorations. These ruins had nothing to do with the Gothic as architectural style, they were instead expression of romantic sensibilities and the nationalist need for continuous history even if it has to be imagined and the ruins bought. Gothic architecture eventually went its own way; it ceased to be just a plaything in the hands of amateurs and their work was criticized by professional architects such as James Essex or Edward James

Willson. In one of his criticisms, Wilson wrote about buildings like Strawberry Hill:

“True principles of taste have been sadly overlooked in many imitations of such buildings: showy compositions have been made up of parts indiscriminately copied from castles and churches, reduced to petty dimensions, stripped of their proper details”

(Willson qtd. in Lang 261). Willson wrote this in Specimens of Gothic Architecture

(published in 1821 and 1823), on which he collaborated with A.C. Pugin. His son

Augustus Welby Northmore Pugin and his grandson E. W. Pugin were both prominent figures in the Gothic Revival style and Neo-Gothic style respectively.

The fakeness of follies and buildings such as Walpole`s Strawberry Hill or

Beckford`s Fonthill Abbey can be found in the literary works as well. Walpole, for example, pretended to be only the translator of Otranto and he claimed, in proper spirit of antiquarianism, that the work was found “in the library of an ancient Catholic family in the north of England” and that it was an Italian text printed in gothic script, “in the black letter, in the year 1529” (Walpole 59) although he set the date of the origin even further back, in the time of the crusades. Actually, a lot about The Castle of Otranto is fake. As Jerrold Hogle writes, it is a “fake translation by a fake translator of a fake

7 medieval story by a fake author, the novel turns on a false nobleman unlawfully inheriting both title and property through a false will and attempting to secure a false lineage through nefarious schemes” (Hogle 23-5). A similar situation is apparent also in

Radcliffe`s stories which are almost always set in “exotic” southern countries and distant periods but the characters are very obviously contemporary and English:

[Radcliffe] may specify the date, 1658 or 1584; she may let her fancy play over frowning castles, Arcadian peasants, and the rigid life of Italian cloisters; but her heroine is always a young lady of eighteenth century England, irreproachable in manners, unrelenting in propriety, able to draw a little, sing a little, play a little, though as a concession to time she is given a lute instead of a piano. (McIntyre 651)

The reason for this is that these writers, the creators of almost all Gothic conventions, were not really concerned about historical faithfulness of their stories: “‘Gothic’ as a genre conscious of itself as such, originates, not in the feudal culture and customs to which it refers, but in eighteenth-century constructions and inventions, in fake origins”

(Botting 2). Through the works of these early authors, as through the amateurish architectonic efforts of people like Horace Walpole, Gothic became more than a style of architecture or a term from history; it became a symbol for expression of their concerns, fears and desires.

The eighteenth century, now known as the Age of Reason or Age of

Enlightenment, was “a time when enlightenment was seen as possible and the rational explanation of natural and human activities formed an agenda in the service of which most of the European intellectuals of the age worked” (Punter 7). However, underneath the uncompromising trust in all that is rational there slumbered the need for unrestrained imagination and emotions. We can see it for example in the philosophy of David Hume, who stated that “[r]eason alone cannot be a motive to the will, but rather is the slave of passions” (Stanford Encyclopedia); we can see it in Pope`s poetry, in his Essay on Man

8 he wrote: “On life`s vast ocean diversely we sail,/Reason the card, but passion is the gale” (Pope 66); most of all, we can see it in the various literary forms that originated in this century, such as the works of the Graveyard poets, the novel of sensibility and, of course, the Gothic novel. In this way, therefore, we can see the Gothic novel as part of a rebellious tendency against the excessive rationalization and order of the era, “in general it can be seen as one symptom of a widespread shift away from neoclassical ideals of order and reason, toward romantic belief in emotion and imagination” (Hume

282). As Horace Walpole wrote in the preface to the second edition of his Castle of

Otranto, “the great resources of fancy have been dammed up, by a strict adherence to common life” (Walpole 65) and so one of the main reasons behind his writing the story was to blend the “two kinds of romance, the ancient and the modern” (Ibid.), where the ancient, or medieval romance was full of the imagined, the supernatural.

The stress put on the imagination was in accord with the characteristics of the

Gothic buildings. Ruskin admiringly described Gothic style as a product of a builder who “smites an uncouth animation out of the rocks which he has torn from among the moss of the moorland, and heaves into the darkened air the pile of iron buttress and rugged wall, instinct with work of an imagination as wild and wayward as the northern sea” (Ruskin 9). The Gothic style fit perfectly the sensibilities of the time; its ruggedness and irregularity, signifying wildness and untamed natural force were stimulating the imagination much better than the smooth lines of the classical architecture: “the effects of a rugged and broken surface seem stronger than where it is smooth and polished” (Burke 100). The difference between these two styles and their effect on the observer is roughly parallel to the concepts of the sublime and the beautiful as described by Edmund Burke.

9 The concept of the sublime was one of the most influential concepts of the era`s aesthetics. Although it has its origins already in the writing of Longinus, it was brought to general attention in Edmund Burke`s A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our

Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, published in 1757. In it, Burke attempts to explain the indulgence in melancholy that was prevalent at the time; the feeling of pleasure derived from things that should be depressing or terrifying, such as ruins of buildings or steep cliffs. He famously wrote that pain and danger “are delightful when we have an idea of pain and danger, without being actually in such circumstances … Whatever excites this delight, I call sublime” (Burke 84). The sublime can be evoked in numerous ways, for example, by the authority of enormous power, such as that of God, it can be evoked by the seemingly infinite size, power and mystery of the nature, its mountains and seas. The sublimity of nature is used exceedingly in the descriptions of Gothic settings; in Ann Radcliffe`s novels, the nature is described almost exclusively to the purpose of evoking the sublime. Apart from natural forms and phenomena, Burke lists various other sources of the sublime, such as darkness, solitude, silence, or greatness of dimension such as “a tower an hundred yards high, or a rock or mountain of that altitude” (Burke 100). Apart from that, Burke writes that “[i]t is our ignorance of things that causes all our admiration, and chiefly excites our passions. Knowledge and acquaintance make the most striking causes affect but little” (Ibid. 91). The imagination works best when it is left alone, in the dark, with little to no information which brings us back to the conflict between the Gothic and the Enlightenment.

In order to rationally explain everything there is, the Enlightenment also sought to uncover all that was hidden. It was “not only a movement of illumination through reason but a movement of exposure, an effort to bring light to all the dark and secret places of European society” (Leithart, “Enlightenment and the Gothic”). Michel 10 Foucault said that the second half of the eighteenth century was haunted by “the fear of darkened spaces, of the pall and gloom which prevents the full visibility of things, men and truths” (qtd. in Cameron 31); the role of the Enlightenment was to destroy such spaces. However, it can be also said that “if there is nothing lurking in the darkness then illumination and exposure are pointless” (Leithart, “Enlightenment and the Gothic”) and the Gothic, therefore, became a representation of the reverse side of the Enlightenment:

“Gothic novels develop a whole fantasy-world of stone walls, darkness, hideouts and dungeons which harbor, in significant complicity, brigands and aristocrats, monks and traitors” (Foucalt qtd. in Cameron 31). Placing the stories in distant times and distant areas and the use of exaggeration and the supernatural allowed the authors of the Gothic genre to explore the dark spaces of human society, it gave them freedom to write about the anxieties of their dramatically transforming world: “Gothic, precisely insofar as because of its historical and geographical distancing it does not appear to represent a

‘real’ world, may in fact be delivering that world in an inverted form, or representing those areas of the world and of consciousness which are, for one reason or another, not available to the normal processes of representation” ( Punter 15). Although the Gothic is

“a genre that has over the centuries consistently depicted the transgression of natural and moral laws, aesthetic rules and social taboos” (Botting 1), doing so under the protective cover of fantasy secured it almost indefinite continuation.

It is clear that the histories of the Gothic architecture and the Gothic novel are intertwined. They have common origin in the social, cultural and political situation of the eighteenth century and buildings of various kinds keep populating the Gothic novels`s settings and titles even today. However, in its quest to explore all that is hidden or forbidden, the Gothic novel invested its edifices with symbolic power and so we have concepts such as the domestic sphere of the heroine, the castle as the villain`s symbol of 11 power, the house as an image of the human psyche, etc. In the following chapters, I will analyze some of these concepts while following the scheme of literary space divided into two parts, one that is known, rational, ordered and one that represents everything that is unknown, irrational and chaotic with the border as an important liminal space.

12 3. The Division of Literary Space The concept of division of the universe into two parts, realms or domains of which one is safe and familiar and the other is not has been around for some time.

Manuel Aguirre for example writes that it has been “theorized since the early twentieth century”, but it may as well be “as old as narrative and thought” (“Geometries of

Terror” 3). We can find it in various fields of study; it is perhaps most known in relation to the study of myths and fairytales in seminal works such as Vladimir Propp`s

Morphology of the Folktale (1928) and Joseph Campbell`s The Hero with a Thousand

Faces (1949), where Campbell describes the basic structure of a myth as follows: “A hero ventures forth from the world of common day into a region of supernatural wonder: fabulous forces are there encountered and a decisive victory is won: the hero comes back from this mysterious adventure with the power to bestow boons on his fellow man” (Campbell 23). The world of Gothic and everything that happens in it is based on this scheme:

Gothic can be said to postulate two zones: on the one hand, the human domain of rationality and intelligible events; on the other hand, the world of the sublime, terrifying, chaotic Numinous which transcends human reason (but which need not be the supernatural). These are separated by some manner of threshold, and plots invariably involve movement from one site to the other – a movement which, most often, is presented as a transgression, a violation of boundaries. (“Geometries of Terror” 2-3)

Yuri Lotman`s semiotic approach to literary space offers further insights. In Universe of the Mind (1990), Lotman also divides the space into two opposed areas divided by a boundary: “If the inner world reproduces the cosmos, then what is on the other side represents chaos, the anti-world, unstructured chthonic space, inhabited by , infernal powers or people associated with them” (Lotman 140)”. From the subjective viewpoint, it is also divided into I-They spheres: “the boundary can be defined as the outer limit of a first-person form. This space is ‘ours’, ‘my own’, it is ‘cultured’, ‘safe’,

13 ‘harmoniously organized’, and so on. By contrast ‘their space’ is ‘other’, ‘hostile’,

‘dangerous’, ‘chaotic’” (Lotman 131). Lotman also divides the characters into mobile and static ones: “characters can be divided into mobile ones who are free to move about the plot-space … and immobile ones who are in fact functions of that space” (Lotman

157). The mobile character is usually the hero or heroine who crosses the boundary and moves from one sphere to another. In Ann Radcliffe`s novels, for example, this scheme applies almost exactly: a young heroine is forced to leave her beautiful and serene home and she is transported into the other sphere, the castle (or convent), where she interacts with the villain. After numerous complications she successfully escapes and returns home, usually to marry the hero, her savior. Places and characters belonging to the individual spheres are depicted accordingly and we can usually infer the moral status of the characters from the description of the places they live in.

The line between the two spheres is no less important. Called the boundary, frontier, threshold or the limen, it is an area between two spaces “predominantly associated with provisionality, instability, intermediate forms; what lies between the known and unknown, or ‘other’” (Messent 23). The concept of liminality and the liminal phase originates with the French ethnographer and folklorist Arnold van Gennep and his work concerning rites of passage ceremonies. Gennep outlined “a tripartite pattern in ceremonies which accompany life crises such as birth, adoption, marriage, and death. The three stages of a rite of passage are separation, transition, and incorporation” (Gennep qtd. in Mobley 28). The transitional or liminal phase was subsequently elaborated upon by the British anthropologist Victor Turner who described the persons in transition as “betwixt and between the positions assigned and arrayed by law, custom, convention, and ceremonial” (Truner qtd. in Mobley 28).

14 Gothic characters usually become liminal heroes by leaving behind the world that is known to them, their families and friends or the social norms.

Aguirre makes another important contribution to the concept of liminality by proposing that the boundary is not just a line that is crossed but that the liminal area is a space that is actually part of the numinous sphere: “It appears that the distinction between a threshold and Other space may be an equivocal, if not a spurious one: for the threshold is a part of the Other” (“Geometries of Terror” 5, italics in original). While standing in a door or a passage to the other side, wondering if he should cross or not, the hero already is in the realm of the Other, for the threshold “is already that which it delineates and isolates, and becomes what it defines; or, to put it in different words: the

Other takes over and ‘colonizes’ its own frontiers” (Ibid.). The liminal space is therefore ambiguous, it separates the different spheres and at the same time it is the point of contact between them. It does not belong exactly to either of the two sides but as

Aguirre writes, in its characteristics it belongs more to the sphere of the Other. There are many places that are considered liminal and all these places “are figured as interstices: underneath, above, around the side of, parallel to, or in the fissures in established places and being” (Wisker 412). Such places can be deep woods, cemeteries, the tower and the catacombs or alternatively the attic and the basement; socially it is the margin of the city: “Less valued social groups are settled on the periphery” (Lotman 140) an example of which will be seen in the following analysis of

Bleak House.

Windows and doors are the most literal manifestations of the boundary and they are therefore significant symbols in the concept of liminality. Windows and doors are points of entrance and egress; they are the points of transgression from one sphere into another as well as contact points between these two spheres. The conventional image 15 concerning windows is a face (human, a ghost`s, etc.) looking into a room, startling the inhabitants. Famously, in Wuthering Heights, the ghost of Catherine seeks entrance into the house by scratching at the window and grasping the hand of the unfortunate sleeper through the broken pane. In this case, the window divides the sphere of the living from the sphere of the dead and at the same time it divides the past — the character of

Catherine is from the past of the narrative and it is in a child`s form as well — and the present, where Mr. Lockwood visits Wuthering Heights, hears the past of the story and sees its end.

The door, frequently used to induce fear by making grating sounds or opening and closing on its own, is also a frequent point of transgression. It can be a metaphorical transgression, for example in The Castle of Otranto, Matilda opens the door to

Theodore`s cell, thereby acting against the will of her father. Similarly, in The Italian,

Vivaldi enters Ellena`s house “unlocking a private gate, of which he had lately received the key” (Radcliffe 40) although he acts directly against his father`s wishes as well as against the wishes of his mother delivered in the form of a warning by a mysterious monk. The door is very important in The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The first chapter is notably entitled “Story of the Door” and a neglected door is thus a primary inducer of the whole plot. The story also ends with a door, or people breaking down the door to Jekyll`s cabinet which also makes it a literal transgression. On the whole, it can be said that “Dr. Jekyll`s story is the story of a door, or several doors”

(Frank 215) (see 4. The House).

The door is ambiguous; when locked, it can be perceived as a safety measure but also as an obstacle, it can keep the monsters out but at the same time imprison the heroine, and as Ellis says: “Any enclosed space seemed to me to present this paradox, which links the ‘safe’ sphere of home inseparably to its dark opposite, the Gothic 16 castle” (Ellis x). The ability to hide in an enclosed space is often welcomed but the advantage can quickly turn into trouble. Equally terrifying as a locked door is a door that cannot be locked at all which leaves the inhabitants vulnerable. Secret doors are also frequent plot elements in Gothic tales; they are a source of fear because they are out of control of the inhabitants and they can give the numinous access to an otherwise safe space of the locked room at any time. One such example can be found in The

Italian, when Ellena is kept prisoner in the decrepit house on the beach and the evil monk Schedoni plans to sneak up on her through a secret door and kill her with a dagger. On the other had, if the hero or heroine finds the secret door or passage, it can be helpful to their escape plans like in the case of Isabella in Otranto, where she escapes the castle through a secret trapdoor.

The places beyond boundaries are also inhabited by specific creatures which would be usually called monsters. K. A. Nuzum offers an interesting definition of a . According to his definition, monsters are liminal physically; they are “often displaying characteristics of more than one species … They are neither one thing nor the other. Their bodies are chaotic, incapable of complete definition, and, thus, resistant to our complete understanding or control” (Nuzum 207). Monsters are also liminal spatially; they live in places described above, such as dark woods, cemeteries, attics, etc., places “at the far limits of civilization, locations distant from out daily lives”

(Ibid.). Finally, monsters are liminal temporally. As with space, time has also its liminal zones, usually times of transition such as the transition between day and night

(twilight), or between old and new year (the New Year`s Eve). Nuzum divides time into historic/linear in which we live our everyday lives, then mythical time which is the time of repeated rituals such as Christmas, and liminal time, for example the teenage years.

Nuzum writes that “[a]lthough human beings live out their lives in all three of these 17 temporal realities, historic/linear, circular/mythic, and liminal/marginal time, monsters are limited to only two: mythic and liminal time. They cannot maintain their existence in history and must relinquish their hold on linear time” (Nuzum 210). That is why creatures like do not age — they do not exist in the linear time. Mr. Hyde is a creature fitting the description very well. People find him repulsive yet they cannot describe exactly what is it that is wrong with him: “He is not easy to describe. There is something wrong with his appearance; something displeasing, something downright detestable. I never saw a man I so disliked, and yet I scarce know why … No, sir; I can make no hand of it; I can`t describe him” (Stevenson 12). He is also neither wholly human, nor wholly ape but he possesses features of both. He lives in a bad part of the city, on the margin of society and enters Jekyll`s house through a separate back entrance. He is also temporally limited, at least at first; he can only come to life while the potion affects the man and he moves around usually at night. At the end of the story

Jekyll starts to loose control over Hyde, he no longer appears only in separate places and times, he appears anywhere and at will, finally taking over completely, however, he cannot survive in the non-liminal space and the story therefore ends by death of both entities.

Finally, we have to consider the Gothic genre itself as a liminal space, not only for the reason that it was for a long time marginalized by literary critics. As was already mentioned in the introductory chapter, the role of the Gothic is to deal with the anxieties of every period, to challenge the established order and explore all that is repressed:

“[e]xcess, disorder, and violation are innate to fictional fearful world of the Gothic”

(Sencindiver 4). In literature, Gothic is the rebel; already Walpole wrote about his

Otranto: “I did it in spite of the rules, the critics, and the philosophers” (Walpole 262).

The nature of Gothic is transgressive, even paradoxical; everything is combined at will: 18 the medieval with the contemporary, the rational and the supernatural; as Maggie

Kilgour writes:

[The Gothic] is always a boundary breaker which erodes any neat distinction between formats and modes, combining sentimentality and the grotesque, romance and terror, the heroic and the bathetic, philosophy and nonsense. This promiscuous generic cross-breeding is part of the gothic`s ‘subverting’ of stable norms, collapsing of ‘binary oppositions,’ which makes it appropriate for a postmodern sensibility. It appears to offer both a critique and an alternative to our Enlightenment inheritance: as it warns us of the dangers of repressing energies, natural, social, psychic, textual, or sexual, the gothic offers itself a means of expressing otherwise taboo forces. The gothic draws on the modern assumption that it is dangerous to bury things (which always return, as Pet Semetary shows); by bringing the unspoken to light, it acts as a potential corrective. (Kilgour 40-41)

From its very beginnings, Gothic became a literary space full of potential, where ordinary rules did not apply and where everything was possible. In the following chapters, I will analyze the three most important spaces in Gothic fiction: the house, the castle, and the city. With regard to the division of space as was outlined in this chapter, the space of the normal, everyday world is represented only scarcely, since the Gothic fiction is predominantly focused on the nature of the border and beyond. This homely sphere is therefore usually represented only in the form of the heroine`s house where she starts and ends her adventure. However, even the house is more often than not depicted in the form of a haunted house, which ceases to fulfill its function as the safe and normal place and becomes part of the numinous sphere, of which the castle and later the city are the primary examples.

19 4. The House The home is the most important place in human life and the house is therefore a very powerful symbol. As such, it is also one of the most important settings in Gothic fiction. There are two main appearances of the house: first is the safe haven, connected also to the ideal of domesticity and the house as the female sphere. In this case the main character, most often a female heroine, lives happily until she is forced by various circumstances or direct violence to leave the place and to deal with dangerous situations before being able to return. The other use is the haunted house, one of the trademark settings of Gothic tales. In the first case, the evil, the numinous is an exterior force and the hero/ine strives to keep it that way, while in the case of the haunted house the evil is contained inside the building, usually in the form of a past secret and it will not stop tormenting the inhabitants until the situation is resolved, often ending with the destruction of the building itself or the death of the inhabitants.

The house provides its occupants with shelter and stable, safe background. It is the means of standing up against the forces of the environment; it is the symbol of civilization triumphing over brute nature: “the house can be seen as the manifestation of man` s triumph over nature. Protected from the unpredictable and merciless workings of the latter, man can withstand and attempt to tame it” (Ronneburg 8). Audronė

Raškauskienė writes that in most of Radcliffe`s novels “the windows of the heroine`s room overlook onto nature with its sublime, beautiful and picturesque views”, in order to provide the heroine with “a feeling of expansion, of greatness and freedom”

(Raškauskienė 44) while she sits in her room (or cell). However, the image of a person sitting in a room and admiring the beauty of natural scenery also emphasizes the role of the house as a haven, as a triumph of man over nature. It evokes the feeling that one gets watching a snowstorm or a thunderstorm, while sitting in a warm and cozy room.

20 The feeling of the sublime, as Burke defined it, observing something that is potentially dangerous while being out of reach of the actual danger. The Italian`s Ellena, confined in the convent in mountains, finds a turret with a grandiose view of the surrounding nature, and surely enough, “[t]he consciousness of her prison was lost, while her eyes ranged over the wide and freely-sublime scene without” (Radcliffe 87). However, she was feeling a lot less calm, when she had to actually cross a feeble narrow bridge hanging over an abyss few days before.

The house is “the centre and focus of the world order” (Lotman 97). It is a sacred place from where evil and chaos are banished. It is common folk belief, for example, that evil spirits, demons, or the devil cannot enter someone`s house unless they are invited and we can find multiple instances of this belief in literary works. In

Goethe`s Faust, for example, the doctor has to invite Mephistopheles three times into his study; most famously, the classic Gothic monster, the , cannot enter a house without invitation. However, the safety of the house being in the hands of weak human beings, the evil forces usually find a way to cross its borders. Since the Gothic genre deals with various transgressions, its characters either issue the invitation or, more often, are themselves the source of the evil which leads Kate Ferguson Ellis to state that

“it is the failed home that appears on [the Gothic novel`s] pages, the place from which some (usually ‘fallen’ men) are locked out, and others (usually ‘innocent’ women) are locked in” (Ellis ix). In that case, the home ceases to fulfill its purpose of being the safe haven and becomes part of the numinous sphere, a house haunted either by ghosts or by its flawed inhabitants.

The home is a personal space: “[t]he House is one`s own space, a place that is familiar and at the same time enclosed and protected … This is the world of the human personality, a world that stands up to the elements and to anything which belittles and 21 denigrates the life of the individual” (Lotman 97). To furnish and decorate a house is a means to express one` s personality and the general outlook of a house is often used in literature to signify the goodness or villainy of the characters. For example, in The

Italian, the house where Ellena lives with her aunt is described thus: “From the style of their residence, [Vivaldi] imagined that they were persons of honorable, but moderate independence. The house was small, but exhibited an air of comfort and even of taste”

(Radcliffe 3). The house is modest yet elegant and beautiful as Ellena herself and is therefore a symbol of the morality of her character. On the other hand, “the morally corrupt [characters] see their homes as status symbols, which can be bought and sold and which, in their turn, mirror their owner`s hedonism and lack of taste” (Raškauskienė

40). So for example Mr. Tulkinghorn, the villain of Bleak House and otherwise an emotionless keeper of secrets, likes to indulge in drinking old wine which he keeps locked very carefully in a cellar under his gloomy mansion:

When he dines alone in chambers … he descends with a candle to the echoing regions below the deserted mansion, and heralded by a remote reverberation of thundering doors, comes gravely back encircled by an earthy atmosphere and carrying a bottle from which he pours a radiant nectar, two score and ten years old, that blushes in the glass to find itself so famous and fills the whole room with the fragrance of southern grapes. (Dickens 216)

Apart from the look and position of the house, further information about its inhabitants is provided by taking the house as a legal property. We can judge the owner by the way he treats his possessions: “what one owns and how one disposes of it says something about one`s character” (Frank 218) which is quite important in Jekyll and

Hyde, since the law, lawyers and wills are a significant part of the story. The incredibly reckless way in which Jekyll seeks to transfer his house and money on the untrustworthy Hyde is a source of embarrassment and worries for Jekyll`s lawyer, Mr.

Utterson. Jekyll`s will “offended him both as a lawyer and as a lover of the sane and 22 customary sides of life” (Stevenson 14) and so he keeps it hidden deeply in his safe, in its “most private part” (Ibid.) as “something shameful, something to be suppressed (if not repressed)” (Frank 218). The fact that Jekyll, otherwise an intelligent and respectable man, would be able to do such a thing, points Mr. Utterson to a flaw in

Jekyll`s character.

As a personal space, home also serves as a source of consolation or courage in the face of the rough world outside. The heroine often remembers home to find the strength for awaiting battles. The absence of home leaves the character unable to find his way out of the realm of chaos as in the case of Jo who never knew his family and never had a proper home. He ends up roaming around the city plagued by hunger and disease, which finally kills him. In the case if imprisonment, the heroine sometimes attempts to create the feeling of domesticity at the place of her confinement. Ellena, locked in a bare cell of a nunnery, is nevertheless provided with some additional items, such as books. The natural thing for her to do is to tidy up the room and await her further fate: “Having arranged her books, and set her little room in order, she seated herself at a window, and, with a volume of Tasso, endeavored to banish every painful remembrance from her mind” (Radcliffe 92).

The home or the household is an especially important place in the female fiction as it is considered to be a female sphere and is connected with the cult of domesticity. In the eighteenth century, as the power of the aristocratic class was fading and the middle classes were on the rise, the ideal of domestic happiness was born, an ideal of home separated from workplace, home signifying wealth and respectability, a place of safety and comfort. The woman was simultaneously assigned to be the guardian of these values and excluded from anything else: “[the] conception of ‘domestic happiness’ emerged toward the end of the eighteenth century, as the middle-class home, distanced 23 in ideology and increasingly in fact from the place where money was made, became a

‘separate sphere’ from the ‘fallen’ world of work” (Ellis ix). The importance of the household even increased during the nineteenth century, in the Victorian period, which saw another Gothic revival, this time specifically in literature.

The house as the comfortable domestic space and the woman as its guardian became a symbol of respectability for the Victorians. The sentiments concerning the female role were expressed in Coventry Patmore`s now notorious poem “The Angel in the House”, however, they were more concisely articulated a few decades later by

Virginia Woolf who described the infamous Angel thus:

She was intensely sympathetic. She was immensely charming. She was utterly unselfish. She excelled in the difficult arts of family life. She sacrificed herself daily. If there was chicken, she took the leg; if there was a draught she sat in it--in short she was so constituted that she never had a mind or a wish of her own, but preferred to sympathize always with the minds and wishes of others. (Woolf 141)

The first and foremost role of a woman at that time was simply to be a good housekeeper and a good wife, which mostly amounted to the same thing. In Bleak

House, Esther Summerson is such an ideal housekeeper. One unusual thing about her is that she is actually writing her story in the book, which was not a typical occupation for women. Apart from that, however, Dicken`s sticks to the contemporary conventions in his depiction of the female characters.

Women in Bleak House are identified with the state of the houses they are responsible for. Esther, as well as the more traditional and older Mrs. Rouncewell are examples of good housekeeping, while Mrs. Jellyby is their opposite. Her case shows the terrible result that comes out of neglecting one`s house and family and devoting the energy to other enterprises. Her house is in terrible disorder, her husband is unhappy and her children are neglected and uneducated, worst of all, she did not have the time to

24 teach her oldest daughter how to be a proper wife. When one of Mrs. Jellyby`s companions angrily remarks that “the idea of woman`s mission lying chiefly in the narrow sphere of home was an outrageous slander on the part of her tyrant, man”

(Dickens 297), it sounds rather as a bitter critique of the women`s efforts considering the mess around them. The goodness of Esther`s character, on the other hand, can be literally compared to the outlook of a house that she is given as a marriage gift:

[A]s we went through the pretty rooms, out at the little rustic verandah doors, and underneath the tiny wooden colonnades garlanded with woodbine, jasmine, and honey-suckle, I saw in the papering on the walls, in the colors of the furniture, in the arrangement of all the pretty objects, MY little tastes and fancies, MY little methods and inventions which they used to laugh at while they praised them, my odd ways everywhere. (Dickens 608)

Oddly enough, her future home is called Bleak House, after the main Bleak House, one of the main settings of the story. Here is where Dickens subverts the trope of cozy little house vs. dangerous labyrinthine castle. In spite of the name and the traditionally gothic structure of the main house, these places are safely in the sphere of the everyday, the normal (see 6. The City).

Although the house continued to be the female domain, the Victorian era saw the appearance of another Gothic character connected to home: male bachelor, professional, a scientist, breaking the laws of God, science, or society; a character epitomized in the person of Dr. Jekyll. The house became this man`s castle, his private space protected from the scrutiny of the society and his most significant feature was his split personality; his double appearance – one for the private space, one for the public.

The kind of house this man inhabited was not separated into the sphere of domesticity and professional life: “the domesticity of this male world is different: social but not public, private without necessarily being personal … Stevenson depicts an in- between zone of professional work within the home” (Frank 219) and so the scene of 25 Jekyll`s cabinet combines “kettle singing its thin strain” and “nearer the fire, the things laid out for tea” with “glazed presses full of chemicals” (Stevenson 73). Significantly, apart from some minor appearances, women are completely absent from the novel. The house in the novel is not a place of comfort to be guarded by a female Angel, it is a place of privacy for the workings of the male mind.

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is significantly concerned with the notion of privacy as well as the “property`s significance to any understanding of subjectivity” (Frank 217).

There are lawyers, wills and documents that uncover the true story of Dr. Jekyll. The book begins with a chapter titled “A Story of the Door” and ends (excluding the two added letters) with a cry “Down with the door, Poole!” (Stevenson 73) from Mr.

Utterson, who was always the first to respect the right to privacy of his friend: “the novel seems to transgress the very boundaries it sets up: first producing the interiority that needs legal protection by showing its violation, then judging when such incursions into another`s private life may be justified” (Frank 217). The ancient belief that the house is the sacred space of its inhabitants that can be entered only by their permission, whether by other people or evil spirits thus evolved into an issue of the law. Cathrine O.

Frank in her analysis of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde employs the influential essay, The Right to Privacy (1890), by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis which explored the legal nature of individual`s privacy connected to the “familiar notion of the house as middle-class man`s equivalent to the castle” (Frank 216). They connected the right to privacy with property, tangible or intangible, thus delineating the personal private space of a person not only physically, but also “creating a metaphysical counterpart to the door, that is, an interior life inaccessible to others except by its possessor`s permission or desire” (Ibid.). The house, and everything that goes on inside it, is protected by a man`s right to privacy and his right to secure his reputation. 26 Reputation is a currency valued the most in the novel. Mr. Utterson uses it to threaten

Hyde after his incident with the girl, he says to Hyde that he will: “make his name stink from one end of London to the other” (Stevenson 8). In fact, the ultimate reason for

Jekyll`s experiments is to preserve his good name, while being able to indulge in his darker desires at the same time.

The double face goes back in Gothic fiction, for example, already Matthew

Gregory Lewis`s Ambrosio is outwardly a holy man, while privately he is a man swayed by perverse desires. However, the Victorian man was, more than ever before, aware of his duality: “Victorian man was haunted constantly by an inescapable sense of division. As rational and sensual being, as public and private man, as civilized and bestial creature, he found himself suitable to the occasion” (Saposnik 716). The period experienced a turn inward: “outward modes of perception were replaced by a new emphasis on introspection, the roots of which are to be found in Burke, and its culmination in Freud`s account of the unconscious” (Smith 1). The disturbing elements of Gothic genre, the numinous, ceased to be an external threat from which it is possible to escape to the safety of home. It became part of the hero, it became an enemy within and with the liminality internalized, the house ceased to be the comfortable place, the safe haven and source of courage for the heroine and it became an uncanny place.

A good part of Freud`s essay on the uncanny is concerned with the etymology of the words heimlich and unheimlich. The evolution of meaning of these words is important for the understanding of their complicated and ambiguous nature. Since heimlich means belonging to the house, familiar, homely (Freud 126), it would seem that unheimlich stands for the exact opposite – all that is unfamiliar. However, the word heimlich means also something that is concealed, kept hidden (Freud 129). The ambiguity of the word heimlich results in a strange situation: “among the various shades 27 of meaning that are recorded for the word heimlich there is one in which it merges with its formal antonym, unheimlich, so that what is called heimlich becomes unheimlich”

(Freud 132). From this mixture of meanings, then, emerges Freud`s definition of the unheimlich as “everything that was intended to remain secret, hidden away, and has come into the open” (Ibid.). The negative prefix un-, therefore, does not mean negation at all, it is “the indicator of repression” (Freud 151). The English equivalent of unheimlich — uncanny — retains the meaning of un/familiarity, however, it lacks the important second meaning of that which is connected to home. As Freud himself observes, German is one of the few languages which reflect the ambiguous, double nature of the house: “A house contains the familiar and congenial, but at the same time it screens what is familiar and congenial from view, making a mystery of it … What takes place within the four walls of a house remains a mystery to those shut out from it”

(Tatar 169). Thus, Jekyll`s house not only protects the owner`s privacy, it also contains and “hydes” the repressed side of Jekyll.

We have already seen that house can represent the character of its inhabitant. In the case of Jekyll and Hyde, the situation is more complex, because the spaces connected to these “two” people signify not only their difference but also their similarity, or common foundation. Jekyll`s house is described as an ancient and handsome house, a noble remnant among the rest which is decayed and let out instead of being occupied whole. The door of the house “wore a great air of wealth and comfort”, it is opened by “[a] well-dressed, elderly servant”, and the visitors are ushered into “a large, low-roofed, comfortable hall, paved with flags, warmed (after the fashion of a country house) by a bright, open fire, and furnished with costly cabinets of oak”

(Stevenson 24-25). Utterson also thinks of Jekyll as a man of good taste; overall, Dr.

28 Jekyll is a respectable, well-off man. However, Hyde also lives in a reasonably nice house:

In the whole extent of the house, which but for the old woman remained otherwise empty, Mr. Hyde had only used a couple of rooms; but these were furnished with luxury and good taste. A closet was filled with wine; the plate was of silver, the napery elegant; a good picture hung upon the walls, a gift (as Utterson supposed) from Henry Jekyll, who was much of a connoisseur; and the carpets were of many piles and agreeable in colour. (Stevenson 38)

In this respect, Jekyll and Hyde are the same. What separates them is the section of the city in which their houses can be found (see 6. The City).

The similarity of their homes points us to the fact that these two characters are in fact one person. Thus, the villain is no longer external; he is part of the self. Hyde represents “a creature ever present but submerged; not the evil opponent of a contentious good but the shadow self of a half-man” (Saposnik 717). In his theory that

“man is not truly one, but truly two” (Stevenson 95), Stevenson is a forerunner to

Freud`s theory of the structure of the psyche. Further still, his guess that “man will be ultimately known for a mere polity of multifarious, incongruous, and independent denizens” (Ibid.) predicts the fragmented self of postmodernity. The main conflict between the presentable Jekyll and the murderous Hyde, however, is still that of ego and id: “In Jekyll and Hyde subjectivity is fragmented and this relates to Freud`s idea of the subject split upon a conscious/unconscious divide” (Smith 168).

Already Hyde`s name suggests that he is something that has to be, or should have stayed, hidden. He is described as “ape-like” (Stevenson 34) and “troglodytic”

(Ibid. 24) which suggests something primitive, in the context of Darwinian evolution something animal that still slumbers in the deeper recesses of the human soul. However, the attempts to describe Hyde by the respectable men, a doctor and a lawyer, are actually quite unsuccessful. They also feel an unexplainable hatred for him: “[Their] 29 immediate, physical loathing foreshadows the later revelation that Hyde is more than a stunted figure of a man, that he is in truth an amoral abstraction” (Saposnik 723). He represents everything they all have to repress in their daily respectable lives.

When Hyde first appears in the story, he enters a sinister looking door: “The door, which was equipped with neither bell nor knocker, was blistered and disdained”

(Stevenson 6). The door is neglected and not very welcoming to visitors; apparently, whoever enters it, must have a key which Hyde indeed does. Incidentally, the door is revealed to be the back door to Jekyll`s house. As was already said, for Jekyll, reputation is everything and he is, therefore, deeply ashamed of any urges that are not consistent with his ideal image of himself: “Many a man would have even blazoned such irregularities as I was guilty of; but from the high views that I had set before me, I regarded and hid them with an almost morbid sense of shame” (Stevenson 94).

However, the problem with Jekyll is that he is not satisfied with repression of the

“lower elements in [his] soul” (Stevenson 97), he wants to get rid of them completely and when he does not succeed, he starts to exploit the situation to enjoy himself and keep his name untainted at the same time. Pretence is not enough for him and he goes too far: “Mere disguise is never sufficient for his ambition and his failure goes beyond hypocrisy, a violation of the physical and metaphysical foundations of human existence” (Saposnik 721). By this transgression, Jekyll creates Hyde, an embodiment of everything dark inside him. But he does not banish him from his life, Hyde is always invited in Jekyll`s house, he has the key to the back door.

Only after Hyde commits an irreversible crime, a murder, Jekyll tries to go back to his normal life. He locks himself inside his respectable house and breaks the key to the back door: “with what willing humility, I embraced anew the restrictions of natural life! with what sincere renunciation, I locked the door by which I had so often gone and 30 come, and ground the key under my heel” (Stevenson 112). Thus he tries to rebuild the barrier, to restore the division between the normal and the liminal that was disturbed.

However, the line is no longer reparable, no door or potion can control the process of transgression any longer; in the end, the two entities collapse which is signified by

Jekyll`s inability to discern between the first and third person in his final letter.

Henry Jekyll is an articulation of the anxiety of his age, of the self-imposed restrictions under which his repressed desires, his weaknesses strive to break through.

When he describes his first feelings after transformation, he says: “I felt younger, lighter, happier in body; within I was conscious of a heady recklessness, a current of disordered sensual images running like a mill-race in my fancy, a solution of the bonds of obligation, an unknown but not an innocent freedom of the soul” (Stevenson 98). It is the bonds of obligation that torment his life; he is a “cry of Victorian man from the depths of his self-imposed underground” (Saposnik 721).

The house is one of the most frequent settings of Gothic fiction and it can have different forms and uses. It can be an important female sphere for the heroine in Gothic romances, it can be a haunted space subverting the patriarchal trope of house as a female sphere as is the case in Charlotte Perkins Gilman`s short story “Yellow

Wallpaper” (1892). In some cases, especially in the later period, it can become the middle-class, urban version of a sinister castle. The original Gothic castle is the subject of the next chapter.

31 5. The Castle The castle, together with a monastery/ a convent is a primary setting of the anti- home sphere in classic Gothic novels and therefore it will be the subject of the following chapter. However, there are some exceptions which should be mentioned.

Firstly, already Clara Reeve, Walpole`s contemporary, made an important change in the

Gothic setting: “Clara Reeve made an invention which was to become an essential ingredient of all tales of horror – not only an old castle could function as a setting for a

Gothic novel but also any other ruined building could serve this purpose”

(Raškauskienė 51). It was an important decision and one can assume that this is one of those inventions that secured the Gothic genre its longevity. However, whether it is a proper castle, monastery, or any ruined building, there are features and purposes that all these places, as representations of the numinous sphere, share.

Another exception is that sometimes, the castle can be, similarly as the house, an ambiguous place. In these cases it is a place of terror for some, but it can be a home for others, especially in classic Gothic where stories were set in times when people actually lived their everyday lives in castles: “[The castle] is also, paradoxically, a site of domesticity, where ordinary life carries on even while accompanied by the most extraordinary and inexplicable of events” (Punter 261). The room of the heroine can be found in a peaceful rural cottage as well as in a castle ruled by villainous lord and haunted by vengeful spirit as is the case of Matilda in The Castle of Otranto. However, usually, it is a place where the heroine is kept against her will after being kidnapped from her idyllic home and it stands in direct opposition to it:

The gigantic size of the castle is opposed to smallness of heroine`s home, its labyrinthine confusion stands in opposition to the elegant and tasteful arrangement of her home, dark and dim castles replace cheerful and full of sunshine homes, the feeling of constant danger and lack of security in the castles is contrasted with the feeling of safety in heroine`s home. (Raškauskienė 54) 32 This is the kind of castle that will be out primary concern.

As was already said in chapter 2, the Gothic castle was adopted to the genre because its confusing structure and size, its obscurity helped to express the fears of the eighteenth century, caused by the breakup of some of the old values and certainties, especially the old aristocracy and religion: “the ruined castles and abbeys are graphic symbols of the disintegration of a stable civilization; their underground reaches are the hiding places for all those forces which cannot stand the light of day” (Durant 524). We also said that the Gothic genre was a reaction to the Enlightenment and that it predominantly dealt with the irrational and the repressed. An anti-home place such as the castle with its asymmetrical structure is a representation of this irrationality. It is a mysterious place where ordinary natural laws and social norms do not apply. Monsters appear here, whether in the form of evil humans or agents of the supernatural, real or imagined. The numinous sphere represents everything that is neglected or unsatisfactorily explained rationally: “this world is increasingly lacking in explanatory values: in a world of reason, it is no use to argue that if a man massacred his family he must have been mad, for this very explanation undermines the solidity of the world of reason” (“Closed Space” 110). In order to deal with experiences and feelings that cannot be answered rationally, the Gothic authors used supernatural elements: “The intrusion of the supernatural into the world of depravity allows … to explain its malevolence. In the fallen world, there are forces which reason cannot explain: the true authority of reason which had restrained vice has been lost” (Durant 524). The physical structure of the anti-home places reflects their status as the expression of the irrational.

A place like this “tends to have an irregular, asymmetrical shape; its geometry is uncanny, whether because of an actual distortion of the whole or because a part of it

33 remains unknown” (“Closed Space” 92). These places tend to have labyrinthine structure, secret rooms and passages, or generally weird structure like the “masterpiece of architectural misdirection” (Jackson 106) in Shirley Jackson`s The Haunting of Hill

House, where the house`s “every angle is slightly wrong” (Ibid. 105).

Apart from their asymmetrical structure, castles have other qualities that make them a favorite setting for a tale of fear. In the past, in the medieval era, castles were built for one purpose – to increase the power of the medieval lords and help them control lands and people around them. The castle retained its position as a symbol of power and control in the Gothic tale which makes it an excellent example of the awe- inspiring sublime: “I know of nothing sublime, which is not some modification of power” (Burke 94). Another feature of the castle was its isolation, usually on the top of a hill, sometimes separated from the rest of the area by a moat and a drawbridge. Once a person entered it, he/she was at the mercy of the castle`s owner and master. The feeling of awe before power, the isolation, together with the confusing structure of castles put those that enter them, often unwillingly, in a state of mind that is only too quick to access all the deepest fears and repressions: “This architectural space is integral to the psychological machinations of Gothic fiction, and is used to invoke feeling of fear, awe, entrapment and helplessness in characters and readers alike” (Raškauskienė 50).

Although the castle is usually interpreted as a symbol of patriarchal oppression of the female heroine, it can really represent anything we fear, worry about, or repress: “The castle delineates a physical space which will accept many different projections of unconscious material” (Holland 282).

One of the important features of the anti-home place in the novels is the near impossibility of escape. If we compare how long it takes for a heroine to get into the castle and how long it takes her to escape from it, it is usually comparison of few 34 sentences, maybe pages to numerous chapters. On physical level, the difficulty of escape stems from the power and isolation of the castle, on the metaphorical level it emphasizes the impossibility of escaping from the psychological aspects the anti-home sphere represents. To increase the suspense, to evoke the fear and despair of inescapable situation, the labyrinthine structure of the castle is a great advantage for the writer, however, other, illusionary, distortions are used as well, such as the seeming prolongation of a space that the character has to overcome: “I thought I never should have been able to reach her room” (Radcliffe 42), cries Ellena`s terrified servant in The

Italian. In The Castle of Otranto, Isabella flees from Manfred`s inappropriate proposal and although no space distortions are used, the escape is nevertheless prolonged and futile. First she runs through the “lower part of the castle [which] was hollowed into several intricate cloisters” (Walpole 82), then she manages to open a secret trapdoor and follow a secret passage into a nearby church. She does not feel safe there, so she runs into the woods and into a cave complex. Her escape is then interrupted by the arrival of

Theodore and then a knight who turns out to be Isabella`s father. He is wounded which forces Isabella to return to the castle with him; it also puts her back to her initial situation and renders all her escape efforts futile.

In The Italian, the prolongation device is used extensively and in great detail.

For several chapters, the action is stalled to a great degree in order to create dramatic tension and to evoke the numinous character of the environment. Among the techniques that are used to stall the action Aguirre lists the following: lengthened perspectives, constant interruptions, frequent waits, reiterated actions and action segments, doubts, suspicions and arguments which freeze action or question its value, breaking up of space into smaller units, thus creating a version of the Zeno`s paradox, and throwing back the action by creating regressive chains (Aguirre 9-10). Not only the characters 35 move through seemingly never ending alleys and corridors but also the whole sequence of action is written in a way that makes it for the reader next to impossible to reach the conclusion.

It starts when Ellena, held against her will in a convent, publicly refuses to become a nun and thus brings the abbess`s wrath upon herself. She is warned by a friendly nun that the abbess plans to lock her up in the ultimate prison: “Within the deepest recesses of our convent, is a stone chamber, secured by doors of iron, to which such of the sisterhood as have been guilty of any heinous offence have, from time to time, been consigned” (Radcliffe 125). This threat forces her to agree to the escape planned by Vivaldi which she previously doubted because she did not want to feel forced to marry him. This is also the point at which the original first volume ends, being an example of a “paratextual interruption creating a threshold across the flow of the reading” (“Geometries of Terror” 7).

In the next volume, then, the actual escape starts. Ellena, masked by a veil, descends some stairs into a hall, where a celebration is taking place. Here she waits for

Vivaldi. When he finally appears, he does not talk to her, he gives her a paper with information, which she unfortunately drops. Fearing discovery, she waits a long time until she can take the paper. When she finally returns with the paper into her chamber, she accidentally extinguishes the lamp and finds herself in a terrible situation, where she possesses the instructions but is unable to read them. After several hours, then, she is in exactly the same position in which she was at the beginning of the chapter. Fortunately, the friendly nun, Olivia, appears with another lamp and the escape can begin anew.

They again descend the stairs, repeating the same action as previously. On their way, they even meet the Abbess who luckily fails to recognize Ellena. They cross the hall, and before they open the door to the garden, again an inquisitive nun appears and fails 36 to cause any trouble. They again and again open a door, go through a space, have to stop, continue, open a door and so on. This technique of constructing the plot creates an illusion of the action going on forever without actually advancing at all.

Continuing on their way, Ellena and Olivia have to cross the garden and get to the gate. Ellena, however, starts to crumble under the pressure and her strength leaves her. She has to stop several times and exclaims repeatedly “O, if my strength should fail before I reach it!” (Radcliffe 132) and again, she is susceptible to the illusion of the escaping end of her journey: “the gate seemed to mock her approach, and to retreat before her” (Ibid.). When they finally get to the gate, Vivaldi is still waiting with a monk-guide and they can continue the escape, which is at this point only halfway through. They go through a long cypress alley, then a church which is enormous and lighted in a way that makes it look even bigger. The dying lamps serve only “to mark the distances in the long perspective of arches, rather than to enlighten the gloomy solitude” (Radcliffe 135). Through a side door they go to the court from where they approach a rock with a cave in it. In the cave there is a secret door behind which they find a secret tunnel. At this point they probably crossed every door and every possible space there is to cross — normal doors, side doors, secret doors, stairs, corridors, a hall, a garden, a church, a court, a cave, a secret passage — and naturally, they are increasingly nervous and distrustful of the monk that leads them. They argue with him but that is just another stalling: “A point is reached where language itself operates as merely one more obstacle, for while they argue they stand still” (“Geometries of Terror”

9). After they finally reach the end of the passage, the monk discovers that a new lock was made on the gate and he does not possess the key which is the end of their hopes.

They return to a chamber they found in the secret passage while the monk goes away in search of another exit. They wait and their suspicions and doubts increase, while Ellena 37 starts to realize that the secret chamber is remarkably similar to the chamber of death in which she was destined to perish and that while they thought they were escaping, they were actually going to the deepest recesses of the convent. At the end, however, an old monk appears out of nowhere and opens the gate for them so they can finally escape the convent.

The various techniques used to suspend the conclusion of action put the characters forever into a liminal space, a space consisting solely of thresholds they have to cross. It is an environment of terrible structure, “[i]t suspends the causal order; it defers the attainment of human purposes and renders action purposeless … this environment is presented as terrifying because it does violence to the expected order of things, makes action seem futile and escape impossible, and seems associated with a vast inhuman power for obstruction and control” (“Geometries of Terror” 10). In chapter three we stated that the liminal area is actually part of the numinous, or anti- home sphere. In this case, the liminal sphere is multiplied to the extent that it becomes the numinous sphere.

The castle is frequent setting of Gothic novels and an important embodiment of the numinous. It is a symbol of power of its master and the fall from power or extinction of the male line is often accompanied by a literal ruination of the castle. Its isolation, confusing structure and gloomy atmosphere make the characters confront their deep- seated fears and emotions. The hostility of the environment is increased by the fact that it has supernaturally firm grasp on its victims and all the anxieties are combined into one obstructive force from which it is almost impossible to break away. The next chapter will study these elements on the urban equivalent of the Gothic castle – the city.

It may seem that after a successful period at the end of the eighteenth and beginning of the nineteenth century, the Gothic genre lost its prominence and was 38 regarded as “a form of novel unfashionable and largely moribund since the mid-1820s when the last great Gothic novel of the old stamp, Charles Maturin`s Melmoth the

Wanderer (1826), made its appearance” (Kitson 163). What happened, actually, was not extinction but evolution of the genre which allowed it to return with a force when another century neared its end. The Gothic novel was not abandoned; it was taken up and adapted to different environments and for different purposes. In America, for instance, Edgar Allan Poe did a great deal for the Gothic by bringing psychological terror into it. In Britain, one of the most important advancements in the genre was its adaptation to the urban environment.

39 6. The City With the city, we move firmly into the Victorian period with its renewed interest in the Gothic genre. Each era has its own anxieties which can be explored and dealt with through the Gothic. Thus, the early, or classic Gothic novels were largely set in the past as a reaction to the rising empire and nationalism, its villains were aristocrats and church officials in connection to the decline of these two institutions and the novels dealt with issues such as technological progress, rising middle-class, and the position of woman in the increasingly important domestic sphere. On the other hand, the Gothic written a century later dealt with the anxieties of people on the way to modernity. Its stories are usually set in the present, and the issues dealt with concern the decline of the empire, limits of science, problems of urbanization and life in the metropolis, and the overall uncertainty that is typical for the modern era, the “burgeoning instability of the fin-de-siècle and its attending angst” (Floyd 150) which includes the questioning of the nature and stability of the self.

In Victorian Gothic the castle as the sphere of the numinous ceased to have its lure, with some important exceptions such as the (1897). The paramount element in the lives of the Victorians became the city, especially London: “London could serve as the locus classicus of Victorian behaviour. An enigma composed of multiple layers of being, its confines held virtually all classes of society conducting what were essentially independent lives” (Saposnik 717). With its structure and demography and with its various socio-political and cultural issues, London stimulated the imagination of Gothic writers. In this chapter, I will take a closer look at two important examples of Victorian Gothic – Bleak House and the already mentioned The

Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

40 Bleak House presents a very important step in the process of transformation of the classic Gothic conventions into the urban environment. Although “critics have placed it in the Gothic literary tradition less often than earlier works” (Pritchard 432), everything in Bleak House has connection to classic Gothic novels; the conventions are either used directly as a reference points or they are adapted superbly to the era of the metropolis with the view of social critique. One of the more obvious hints that the book is a Gothic novel is its very title, which follows the Gothic tradition of putting names of buildings in the titles: “That Bleak House has special links with Gothic tradition is suggested not only by the gloomy adjective ‘bleak’ but also by the fact that this is

Dickens's only novel with a house as its title” (Ibid. 434).

As was already mentioned, part of the book is written as a classic Gothic story to provide a contrast to the subversion. This part concerns the two main buildings, the titular Bleak House and, of course, the aristocratic mansion of Chesney Wold. Bleak

House is described as “an old-fashioned house with three peaks in the roof … one of those delightfully irregular houses where you go up and down steps out of one room into another, and where you come upon more rooms when you think you have seen all there are, and where there is a bountiful provision of little halls and passages, and where you find still older cottage rooms in unexpected places” (Dickens 44-46). The house is constructed in a labyrinthine way. As the description continues, the reader is taken through numerous doors and endless intertwined corridors, where “you might, if you came out at another door (every room had at least two doors), go straight down to the hall again by half-a-dozen steps and a low archway, wondering how you got back there or have ever got out of it” (Ibid. 47). Such a house would be the perfect setting for a traditional Gothic tale. However, not much happens here, except maybe for the stroke of fever, which, however, originated in the city. In fact, Bleak House is really a safe haven, 41 a domestic space which is only emphasized by the later Bleak House 2.0, which becomes Esther`s family paradise.

Chesney Wold is a traditional Gothic aristocratic mansion with perhaps every

Gothic element there is: “It was a picturesque old house … with gable and chimney, and tower, and turret, and dark doorway, and broad terrace-walk, twining among the balustrades” (Dickens 175). It even has a mausoleum and a Ghost Walk, a terrace with a legend connected to it, where steps of a dead female ancestor are heard on rainy nights and which appears when there is bad luck in the family. Chesney Wold and its inhabitants, the Deadlocks, represent the fading aristocratic class and the house is mostly connected with the character of Esther, being a place of family mystery:

“mysterious, concealed parentage is one of the most firmly established Gothic plot motifs, and the search for origins, identity, and family is common in Gothic fiction”

(Pritchard 447). Esther`s storyline is a conventional Gothic one; she is an innocent female character, an orphan, who has to housekeep her way through various perils while discovering her origins and gaining a handsome and brave husband with whom she can live happily ever after. In the process of uncovering the family secrets, traditional means are used such as finding secret documents and recognizing a portrait which goes back to

The Castle of Otranto`s picture of Alfonso.

The length of the book is also filled with various other Gothic scenes, for example, at one point, Mr. Tulkinghorn visits a mysterious lodger of whom the other inhabitants claim that he had sold his soul to the devil and who lives in a dingy room on the second floor of a filthy rags and bottle shop. “Mr. Tulkinghorn with a nod goes on his way. He comes to the dark door on the second floor. He knocks, receives no answer, opens it, and accidentally extinguishes his candle in doing so” (Dickens 96). This leaves him in darkness, not knowing what he will find in the room he just entered. We find 42 very similar scene in The Castle of Otranto, when we follow Isabella through the catacombs under the castle. She stands before a door from which someone observed her a second ago and she is not sure if it is a friend or foe: “she approached the door that had been opened; but a sudden gust of wind that met her at the door extinguished her lamp, and left her in total darkness” (Walpole 83). She, also, is left alone in the darkness, not knowing what awaits her behind the opened door.

An important shift is made, however, between the classic Gothic and the urban

Gothic, when the main area where the horrors take place is moved to the center of life – the metropolis. Former Gothic tales reveled in isolated rural settlements or distant exotic places, places beyond the border of the normal and ordinary where anything could happen. The Gothic of Bleak House, on the other hand, deals with the here and now, with the metropolis itself becoming a numinous place: “Bleak House grows out of

Dickens`s perception that the remote and isolated country mansion or castle is not so much the setting of ruin and darkness, mystery and horror, as the great modern city: the

Gothic horrors are here and now” (Pritchard 435-6). Dickens conveyed this fact by adapting almost every detail characteristic of Gothic stories to the landscape of the city.

Thus, the darkness and gloom of a Gothic castle is replaced by the London smog: “the streets were so full of dense brown smoke that scarcely anything was to be seen”

(Dickens 20); the sickly taper is turned into flickering gas-lamps, the ever present smoke becomes “the London ivy” (Ibid. 90), and “the legal neighbourhood there hangs, like some great veil of rust or gigantic cobweb” (Ibid. 184). Most important elements, however, are the main villain – the Chancery system, and the supernatural manifestation of repressed injustice – the poor neighborhood haunting the inhabitants with its diseases.

43 Ruskin, the proponent of the Gothic architecture, favored the style because of the connection he saw between the art and the socio-political circumstances of the first half of the nineteenth century, especially the industrial progress and increasing consumerism. Ruskin feared that the industrialized, progress-obsessed outlook popular in the nineteenth century “ultimately leads to a barren and dehumanized society in which the moneyed classes are totally oblivious to the sufferings of the industrial urban poor” (Farahbakhsh 182). The two important things for Ruskin were harmony of man with nature, and the imagination, or personal freedom of expression: “since the Gothic style permits and even demands the freedom, individuality, and spontaneity of its workers, it both represents a finer, more moral society and means of production and also results in greater architecture than the Renaissance style, which enslaves the working man” (Ibid.). For Ruskin, the seeming imperfection of Gothic architecture was a symbol of individual freedom and value of the craft of individual hands as opposed to the mechanized manufacture that fragmented the human experience and made people into robots, working on the same parts again and again, without knowing the whole. It is the beginning of creation of complex systems governing the world that no one individual is able to grasp. Dickens also expressed his criticism of this on several occasions, for example, Little Dorrit has the famous Circumlocution Office. In the case of Bleak

House, it is the Chancery system.

The High Court of Chancery, an institution “that had for centuries set the rules governing the inheritance (or loss) of middle-class wealth” (Heady 316) is not a new establishment; throughout the years it grew into monstrous proportions and it destroys everything it comes into contact with. The Chancery is often described in language of architecture, for example Mr. Kenge, one of its main representative, is described as saying something while “gently moving his right hand as if it were a silver trowel with 44 which to spread the cement of his words on the structure of the system and consolidate it for a thousand ages” (Dickens 600). Mr. Kenge and all the other employees of the

Chancery are like building blocks of the system and their work consists in building impenetrable walls around the cases: “

[S]ome score of members of the High Court of Chancery bar ought to be—as here they are—mistily engaged in one of the ten thousand stages of an endless cause, tripping one another up on slippery precedents, groping knee-deep in technicalities, running their goat-hair and horsehair warded heads against walls of words and making a pretence of equity with serious faces. (Dickens 2)

Moreover, the proceedings of the Court are described as a labyrinth and a “monstrous maze”, which makes it the real source of the Gothic horror.

In fact, the lawyers working in the Chancery, especially Mr. Vholes, are the vampires of urban Gothic. Almost every mention of Mr. Vholes is accompanied by the word lifeless or bloodless, he is “always looking at the client as if he were making a lingering meal of him with his eyes” (Dickens 387) and when he knocks on his desk, “it sounds as hollow as a coffin” (Ibid. 388). The lawyers and the Chancery system itself is sucking money as well as sanity, happiness and life energy out of its victims. Even worse, the transcendental quality of the system, its lack of human approach, makes it impossible to battle. The Chancery is the enemy, who is always part of the numinous and by Aguirre` s definition, the numinous signifies “that which transcends the rational, that which by human definition lies beyond our conceptions of morality and reason: the awesome, the awful, the wholly Other” (“Closed Space” 3). There is no one person that can be blamed for the evil, or applied to for mercy. It is something being created by humans but transcending them at the same time: “The system! I am told on all hands, it`s the system. I mustn`t look to individuals. It`s the system. I mustn`t go into court and

45 say, ‘My Lord, I beg to know this from you – is this right or wrong?’” (Dickens 153), cries one of the unhappy victims of the Chancery.

Another quality that makes the Court of Chancery a numinous place is the fact that it puts its clients into a state of perpetual expectation with almost hypnotic power.

As one of its victims, Miss Flite says: “There`s a cruel attraction in the place. You

CAN`T leave it. And you MUST expect” (Dickens 350). As with the seemingly never ending escape described in The Italian, the Chancery suits only go through further and further proceedings that stall the overall process and postpone the verdict indefinitely.

The “vast inhuman power of obstruction”, the Chancery, keeps Richard Carstone, its main victim in the book, in a sort of limbo where all action is futile: “Everything postponed to that imaginary time! Everything held in confusion and indecision until then!” (Dickens 371). Richard`s false beginnings in various professions may be seen as stalling the action of his own life, he cannot fully devote his energies to anything while he waits for the suit to conclude and he compares his life to an unfinished house: “If you were living in an unfinished house, liable to have the roof put on or taken off – to be from top to bottom pulled down or built up – tomorrow, next day, next week, next month, next year – you would find it hard to rest or settle” (Dickens 368). Escape is impossible, because the case will be never closed and even when it finally is, nobody gets anything out of it, because the costs consumed all the property involved, exactly as when Ellena and Vivaldi finally traverse the last passage only to find the final gate closed.

While the Chancery system keeps the clients stuck in a liminal place, the property in question is also decaying. Mr. Jarndyce explains that the Bleak House used to be a ruin as a result of the lengthy suit proceedings: “the place became dilapidated, the wind whistled through the cracked walls, the rain fell through the broken roof, the 46 weeds choke the passage to the rotting door” (Dickens 68). But while he was able to repair the house, he describes another such property that was not so lucky – the terrible slum of Tom-all-Alone`s:

[A] street of perishing blind houses, with their eyes stoned out, without a pane of glass, without so much as a window-frame, with the bare blank shutters tumbling from their hinges and falling asunder, the iron rails peeling away in flakes of rust, the chimneys sinking in, the stone steps to every door (and every door might be death's door) turning stagnant green, the very crutches on which the ruins are propped decaying. (Dickens 68)

If the Chancery is the main villain of this novel, then Tom-all-Alone`s is its hidden crime, which haunts the rest of the city and its population.

Here, horror is produced not by decaying corpses but by decaying mankind, slowly being rotted by famine and disease, squirming in the grip of poverty:

[T]hese tumbling tenements contain, by night, a swarm of misery. As on the ruined human wretch vermin parasites appear, so these ruined shelters have bred a crowd of foul existence that crawls in and out of gaps in walls and boards; and coils itself to sleep, in maggot numbers, where the rain drips in; and comes and goes, fetching and carrying fever and sowing … evil in its every footprint. (Dickens 156)

It is no longer the isolated mansion that lies in ruins; the place of terror has moved to the margins of the city and these ruins cannot be viewed in a romantic way. They are not ruins of nostalgic past that can be admired or even bought for garden decoration.

They are ruins of the present, signifying the misery and destruction of many lives lived at the moment. When Jo, the sweeper boy, dies, Dickens addresses the reader thus:

“Dead, your Majesty. Dead, my lords and gentlemen. Dead, right reverends and wrong reverends of every order. Dead, men and women, born with heavenly compassion in your hearts. And dying thus around us every day” (Dickens 459). This is no longer an artificially produced horror taking place in an exotic location for the feeling of the sublime, it is a cry for social reform.

47 While Dickens`s novel is more focused on the social and political layer of the city, the social injustice, the inadequacy of government or the issue of excessive bureaucracy, Robert Louis Stevenson focuses more on the cultural problems, especially the separation of the private sphere of home and the acted appearance in public. While the houses in Jekyll and Hyde are important symbols of the division and unity in

Jekyll`s mind, the city is no less important in portraying the Victorian multiplicity.

In this context, one more parallel can be drawn between the Gothic fiction and the architecture with which it has common roots – the structure of the narrative:

Gothic narratives often take their form from the style of Gothic architecture and landscape gardening with an overall unity masked by digressions, detours, and prolixity. They are frequently told through multiple narrators with no comforting third person authorial presence, and they are usually distanced from the reader by a series of narrative frames. (Kitson 165)

For example, Dickens` s Bleak House is written partly in the past tense and from the subjective perspective of Esther, while the other part is told in the present tense by an unknown third-person narrator. While Esther`s narrative is more or less consistent with her conventional Gothic storyline, the role of the third-person narrator is to provide critique of the events that are beyond Esther`s perspective and which for her are the source of her Gothic experience. The aim of the complicated narrative technique is to challenge the reader as the novel challenges contemporary conventions: “It is with such disjunction that this genre generates in the reader a semblance of the spiritual, psychological, and even physical anxiety of its characters” (Floyd 150). Dr. Jekyll and

Mr. Hyde is told by multiple narrators, who are less and less reliable. It also starts with an omniscient narrator; however, the mystery is uncovered in an epistolary form. The two letters retell the story first from the subjective perspective of Dr. Lanyon who could not bear the shock of discovery and died; and finally in the form of a confession from

48 the damaged mind of Dr. Jekyll. This kind of narrative keeps the reader in a state of increasing tension, drawing him deeper and deeper into the twisted mind of the main character. It also gives the reader the information in bits and pieces, leaving him rambling around as Hyde wanders around London.

The city in Jekyll and Hyde retains its Gothic-castle dimness and labyrinthine qualities. The city is constantly covered in fog: “[a] great chocolate-coloured pall”

(Stevenson 36), and the play of light getting through at various angles combined with the glow of streetlamps creates a gloomy atmosphere reminiscent of a cathedral:

Mr. Utterson beheld a marvellous number of degrees and hues of twilight; for here it would be dark like the back-end of evening; and there would be a glow of a rich, lurid brown, like the light of some strange conflagration; and here, for a moment, the fog would be quite broken up, and a haggard shaft of daylight would glance in between the swirling wreaths. The dismal quarter of Soho seen under these changing glimpses, with its muddy ways, and slatternly passengers, and its lamps, which had never been extinguished or had been kindled afresh to combat this mournful re-invasion of darkness, seemed, in the lawyer's eyes, like a district of some city in a nightmare. (Stevenson 36)

As far as its construction is considered, we can take a look at how it was described by

Thomas De Quincey in his Confessions of an English Opium-Eater, published in 1821:

[S]ometimes in my attempts to steer homewards, upon nautical principles, by fixing my eye on the pole-star, and seeking ambitiously for a north-west passage, instead of circumnavigating all the capes and head- lands I had doubled in my outward voyage, I came suddenly upon such knotty problems of alleys, such enigmatical entries, and such sphynx’s riddles of streets without thoroughfares, as must, I conceive, baffle the audacity of porters and confound the intellects of hackney-coachmen. I could almost have believed at times that I must be the first discoverer of some of these terræ incognitæ, and doubted whether they had yet been laid down in the modern charts of London. (De Quincey 62-3)

De Quincey could compare himself to a sailor in unknown waters. Dickens, some thirty years later also described the city as a confusing labyrinth of streets, alleys and blocks of houses where one could stumble upon virtually anything and we can imagine that with increasing population the labyrinth grew still bigger. In this huge city, there were 49 people of all classes living together but divided at the same time. It was London

“teeming with vice while concurrently responsive to religious persuasion” (Saposnik

718). According to Saposnik, London was the “macrocosm of the necessary fragmentation that Victorian man found inescapable” (Ibid.) and it represented the

“division-within-essential-unity” (Ibid.) which is the issue at heart of Jekyll and Hyde.

As was already mentioned in chapter four, the defining quality of good and evil characters ceased to be the distinction between tastefully decorated, cozy little home and the cold and enormous castle; important became rather the position of the abode in the city, the respectable part in the centre, or the dingy, poorer parts on its margin. In

Bleak House, this distinction was predominantly made from the position of social criticism; in Jekyll and Hyde, the position taken is from the perspective of the well-off middle class. Although Jekyll and Hyde live in similarly well furnished houses, these are in very different parts of the city. While Jekyll`s is in the respectable part, Hyde lives in Soho, in a place covered by a veil of fog and consisting of “a dingy street, a gin palace, a low French eating-house, a shop for the retail of penny numbers and twopenny salads, many ragged children huddled in the doorways, and many women of different nationalities passing out, key in hand, to have a morning glass” (Stevenson 37). While

Dr. Henry Jekyll lives in the respectable center of society, Hyde is on its margin, surrounded by dirt, poverty, and excessive indulgence of forbidden desires. However, the image of the state of the neighborhood is not intended as a critique of social injustice, it is a depiction of social degradation, of vice personified.

As was already said, the characters of Jekyll and Hyde are, apart from Richard

Enfield, all male professionals. There are two doctors and one lawyer, Mr. Utterson. Mr.

Utterson is, in contrast with Bleak House`s vampire-like evil lawyers, the staple of moral strength and humanness. He is a true English gentleman and as such, he seeks to 50 protect the reputation of his friend, Dr. Jekyll, since reputation is the most valuable thing a Victorian man can possess.

Various aspects of the story make it so terrifying, however, a significant part of the terror comes from the “unnerving notion, that Hyde exists due to the transgression of an English gentleman” (Floyd 152). It takes place in London, because “it best represents the center of the normative Victorian world” (Saposnik 715). In this context, we can see Hyde not only as a representation of Jekyll`s baser instincts but also as a embodiment of everything about the lower classes that the respectable Victorians feared: “[T]he perverse and inimical Hyde serves on a psychological level as a manifestation of the possible darkness within all men, and on a cultural level as an emblem of what Victorians feared in ‘irrational’ imperial subjects and ‘ill-bred’ lower classes” (Floyd 153). While Jekyll has a long line of professional degrees after his name, Hyde has no actual occupation; Jekyll is a Dr., while Hyde is only Mr.

Even more terrifying is the notion that there is something in the respectable men that could degrade them into the people they feared. Jekyll`s house, for example, lies in a part of the city described as follows: “Round the corner from the by-street, there was a square of ancient, handsome houses, now for the most part decayed from their high estate and let in flats and chambers to all sorts and conditions of men: map-engravers, architects, shady lawyers, and the agents of obscure enterprises” (Stevenson 24). As the neighborhood is decaying from its former respectability, so a person could easily fall from the high estate, because “Hyde is socially other to Jekyll, and yet he is the same because he represents Jekyll`s tabooed desires” (Smith 170). The fast supernatural transformation of Jekyll into Hyde is terrifying and it is enough of a shock to kill Dr.

Lanyon. However, the slow degradation of Jekyll is even more terrifying. At the beginning of the story, he is described as “a large, well-made, smooth-faced man of 51 fifty, with something of a slyish cast perhaps, but every mark of capacity and kindness”

(Stevenson 29), while some thirty pages later we witness a wreck of a man sitting in the window, one minute with a smile on his face, the other with “an expression of such abject terror and despair, as froze the very blood of the two gentleman below” (Ibid.

58). Thus, not only Jekyll`s house is divided into respectable rooms for dinner parties and a gloomy backyard laboratory where he brings out his inner demon; the whole city has an upper and a lower part and through the whole story runs the idea of degradation.

The whole reliability of the narrative deteriorates as the mind of Dr. Jekyll deteriorates and the respectable neighborhoods are falling apart as the society inevitably heads for the worst at the turn of a new century.

52 7. Conclusion The purpose of this thesis was to explore the spatiality of the Gothic fiction in its various forms. Starting from its beginnings, it was shown that the literary genre`s origin is intertwined with the Gothic Revival in architecture in the eighteenth century.

Although there is naturally no real parallel between the architectural and the literary production, there are certain aspects common to both arts, especially stemming from the reaction to the dominating rationalism and social transformations of the era. We followed the genre to the Victorian period when the genre regained its former popularity and underwent further transformations.

We outlined the basic scheme according to which the spatiality works in this literary genre and we looked at the major examples of space and their significance using several Gothic novels. As was said in the introduction, there are many subgenres of

Gothic fiction and some of them may have added an idiosyncratic space or its utilization. Further analysis would be possible also concerning examples of modern

Gothic that deal with new anxieties such as the artificiality of modern existence.

However, the spaces analyzed in this thesis — the house, the castle, and the city — are the most frequent ones and although they may be adapted to different environments and different ideologies (such as feminist or postcolonial), their basic characteristics as described here remain largely the same.

The novels used for the present analysis were all chosen for their significant contribution to the genre, especially regarding space. The Castle of Otranto is, of course, important as the official pioneer of the genre and it was here that the Gothic castle was first endowed with all the basic elements of the Gothic atmosphere. The

Italian is a work by Ann Radcliffe, who actually popularized the Gothic genre. As an author of romantic female characters, she also contributed to the binary opposition of

53 the heroine`s home and the villain`s castle. And although her works teem with textbook sublime castles, The Italian has a convent instead which is a change from Otranto.

Charles Dickens`s Bleak House is a significant adaptation of the classic Gothic conventions on the modern urban environment, virtually turning the city into a version of the Gothic castle with all its threats. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde written by Robert Louis Stevenson at the end of the nineteenth century is an expression of the anxieties of the people experiencing the demise of an era. Stevenson psychologizes the Gothic story similarly as Edgar Alan Poe did with “The Fall of the

House of Usher” some fifty years earlier, and anticipating Freud he connects certain parts of the house and the whole city to the conscious and unconscious part of the human mind.

It was perhaps successfully proven that spatiality is a major feature of Gothic literature and it is an element that is predominantly used to fulfill the role of Gothic – to bring out that what is repressed, to challenge in this way the established order and to give vent to the anxieties of a specific period. The genre achieves this transgressivness by creating liminal heroes and heroines; it establishes spaces that represent different values and has the heroes cross the borders between them. Moreover, on another level it also uses various literary techniques to increase the tension in order to evoke in the reader emotions similar that the characters may experience on their adventures.

54 8. Bibliography Aguirre, Manuel. Closed Space: Horror Literature and Western Symbolism.

Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990. Print.

Aguirre, Manuel. “Geometries of Terror: Numinous Spaces in Gothic, Horror and

Science Fiction.” Gothic Studies. 10.2 (2008): 1-17. Web. 17 October 2010.

Botting, Fred. The Gothic. Cambridge: The English Association, 2001. Print.

Burke, Edmund. A Vindication of Natural Society; An Essay on the Sublime and

Beautiful; Political Miscellanies. London: Henry G. Bohn, 1854. Print.

Cameron, Ed. The Psychopathology of the Gothic Romance: Perversion, Neurosis and

Psychosis in Early Works of the Genre. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company,

Inc., 2010. Print.

Campbell, Joseph. The Hero With a Thousand Faces. 3rd ed. Novato, Calif.: New World

Library, 2008. Print.

Clark, Kenneth. The Gothic Revival: An Essay in the History of Taste. Harmondsworth:

Penguin Books, 1964. Print.

Cohon, Rachel. “Hume`s Moral Philosophy.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

(Fall 2010 Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). 27 August 2010.

Web. 7 March 2011.

De Quincey, Thomas. Confessions of an English Opium Eater. London: Bibliolis

Books, 2010. Print.

Dickens, Charles. Bleak House. London: Bradbury and Evans, 1853. Print.

Durant, David. “Ann Radcliffe and the Conservative Gothic.” Studies in English

Literature, 1500-1900 22.3 (1982): 519-530. Web. 3 March 2011.

Ellis, Kate Ferguson. The Contested Castle: Gothic Novels and the Subversion of

Domestic Ideology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989. Print.

55 Farahbakhsh, Alireza. “Social Protest Trough Architecture: Ruskin`s ‘The Nature of

Gothic’ as an Embodiment of His Artistic and Social Views.” The Midwest

Quarterly 52.2 (2011): 182-191. Web. 12 March 2011.

Floyd, William David. “‘Ludicrous Accoutrement’: The Threat of Gothic Instability in

Stevenson`s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.” Journal of the Georgia Philological

Association (2008): 149-155. Web. 23 March 2011.

Frank, Cathrine O. “Privacy, Character, and the Jurisdiction of the Self: A ‘Story of the

Door’ in The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.” English Language

Notes 48.2 (2010): 215-224. Web. 8 April 2011.

Heady, Emily. “The Polis`s Different Voices: Narrating England`s Progress in

Dickens`s Bleak House.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 48.4 (2006):

312-339. Web. 13 March 2011.

Hogle, Jerrold E. The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, 2002. Print.

Holland, Norman N., and Leona F. Sherman. “Gothic Possibilities.” New Literary

History 8.2 (1977): 279-294. Web. 3 April 2011.

Hume, Robert D. “Gothic Versus Romantic: A Revaluation of the Gothic Novel.”

PMLA 84.2 (1969): 282-290. Web. 8 March 2011.

Hurd, Richard. The Letters on Chivalry and Romance. London, 1762. Print.

Jackson, Shirley. The Haunting of Hill House. New York: Penguin Books, 1987. Print.

Kilgour, Maggie. “Dr. Meets Dr. Freud.” American Gothic: New

Interventions in a National Narrative. Eds. Robert K. Martin, and Eric Savoy.

Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1998. 40-57. Print.

Kitson, Peter J. “The Victorian Gothic.” A Companion to the Victorian Novel. Eds.

56 Kenneth Womack, and William Baker. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2002.

163-177. Print.

Lang, S. “The Principles of the Gothic Revival in England.” Journal of the Society of

Architectural Historians 25.4 (1966): 240-267. Web. 13 February 2011.

Leithart, Peter J. “Enlightenment and the Gothic.” Leithart.com. 7 September 2006.

Web. 4 April 2011.

Lotman, Yuri. Univese of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Trans. Ann

Shukman. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990. Print.

McIntyre, Clara F. “Were the ‘Gothic Novels’ Gothic?” PMLA 36.4 (1921): 644-67.

Web. 25 February 2011.

Messent, Peter. “American Gothic: Liminality in Thomas Harris`s Hannibal Lecter

Novels.” The Journal of American Culture 23.4 (2000): 23-35. Web. 14

February 2011.

Mobley, Gregory. Samson and the Liminal Hero in the Ancient Near East. New York:

T & T Clark, 2006. Print.

Nuzum, K.A. “The Monster`s Sacrifice – Historic Time: The Uses of Mythic and

Liminal Time in Monster Literature.” Children`s Literature Association

Quarterly 29.3 (2004): 207-221. Web. 3 April 2011.

Pope, Alexander. An Essay on Man. London, 1811. Print.

Pritchard, Allan. “The Urban Gothic of Bleak House.” Nineteenth-Century Literature

45.4 (1991): 432-452. Web. 20 February 2011.

Punter, David, and Glennis Byron. The Gothic. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing,

2004. Print.

Radcliffe, Ann. The Italian, Or the Confessional of the Black Penitents: A Romance.

Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing, 2010. Print. 57 Raškauskienė, Audronė. Gothic Fiction: The Beginnings. Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo

Universitetas, 2009.

Ronneburg, David. The House as Gothic Element in Anglo-American Fiction (18th –

20th Century). Norderstedt, Germany: GRIN Verlag, 2002. Print.

Ruskin, John. On Art and Life. New York: Penguin Books, 2005. Print.

Saposnik, Irving S. “The Anatomy of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.” Studies in English

Literature, 1500-1900 11.4 (1971): 715-731. Web. 10 April 2011.

Sencindiver, Susan Yi. “Fear and Gothic Spatiality.” Århus : Akademiet for

Æstetikfaglig Forskeruddannelse, 2010. p. 1-38. Web. 21 March 2011.

Smith, Andrew. Gothic Radicalism: Literature, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis in the

Nineteenth Century. London: MacMillan Press, 2000. Print.

Walpole, Horace. The Castle of Otranto: A Gothic Story, and, The Mysterious Mother:

A Tragedy. Ed. by Frederick S. Frank. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press,

2003. Print.

Wisker, Gina. “Crossing Liminal Spaces: Teaching the Postcolonial Gothic.” Pedagogy

7.3 (2007): 401-425. Web. 2 April 2011.

Woolf, Virginia. “Professions for Women.” Selected Essays. Ed. David Bradshaw.

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 140-145. Print.

58 9. Résumé This thesis is concerned with the spatiality of Gothic fiction. With regard to the scope of the thesis, the genre is limited to four British authors writing between the middle of the eighteenth century and the end of the nineteenth century. In this way, a comparison can be made between the early or classic Gothic novels and later, Victorian novels.

The thesis starts with a chapter providing general information on the origin of the Gothic genre in the eighteenth century with emphasis on the connection of the literary Gothic to the Gothic Revival in architecture. The next chapter outlines a theory of the division of literary space as posited by various authors, notably Yuri Lotman and

Manuel Aguirre. According to this theory, the literary space is divided into two spheres, the sphere of the everyday life, and the sphere of the Other. These two spheres are divided by a border, a liminal zone. The characters of the Gothic fiction move from one sphere into another, transgressing the border.

Each of the remaining chapters deals with an important Gothic space, belonging to one of the two spheres. These spaces are the house, the castle and the city. Each chapter is concerned with the significance of the particular space for the genre, as well as with the transformation of the space between the two periods. Evidence is provided using the four primary novels which are all important additions to the genre, especially in terms of the use of space.

The Castle of Otranto is the originator of the genre and it features most of the

Gothic elements, especially the Gothic castle. The Italian is an example of female

Gothic, establishing the contrast between the home of the heroine and the castle of the villain. Bleak House is important in its adaptation of classic Gothic conventions to the

59 urban environment and The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde continues in this environment, adding an example of a psychological use of the house.

60 10. Resumé Diplomová práce se zabývá prostorovostí gotických románů. S ohledem na rozsah této práce byl výběr románů omezen na díla čtyř britských autorů, tvořících od půlky osmnáctého století do konce devatenáctého století. Takto je možné srovnat rané, nebo klasické gotické romány a pozdější romány z viktoriánského období.

Práce začíná kapitolou, která poskytuje základní informace o původu gotického románu v osmnáctém století s důrazem na spojitost literární gotiky s neogotickým hnutím v architektuře. Další kapitola načrtává teorii rozdělení literárního prostoru podle různých autorů, především Juriho Lotmana a Manuela Aguirreho. Podle této teorie se literární prostor rozděluje na dvě sféry, sféru každodenního života a sféru Jinakosti.

Tyto dvě sféry jsou odděleny hranicí, mezní zónou. Postavy gotických románů se pohybují z jedné zóny do druhé a překračují při tom hranici.

Každá z následujících kapitol se zaobírá jedním z důležitých gotických prostorů, patřících do jedné, nebo druhé sféry. Tyto prostory jsou dům, zámek a město. Každá kapitola rozebírá důležitost příslušného prostoru pro gotickou literaturu jako i změnu, kterou prostor prošel mezi dvěma obdobími. Tvrzení je vždy podloženo důkazy ze čtyř primárních děl a všechna díla jsou pro svůj žánr významným přispěním, zvlášť co se týče využití prostoru.

Otrantský zámek (The Castle of Otranto) je původcem gotického románu a obsahuje většinu gotických prvků, především gotický zámek. Ital (The Italian) je příkladem ženské gotiky a nastoluje kontrast mezi příbytkem hrdinky a zámkem padoucha. Ponurý dům (Bleak House) je důležitou adaptací klasických gotických prvků na městské prostředí. V tomto prostředí pokračuje i Podivný případ Dr. Jekylla a pana

Hyda (Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde), který je navíc příkladem psychologického využití domu.

61