DOCSLIB.ORG

Thesis, Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thesis, Dissertation OSTEOLOGY, PHYLOGENY, TAPHONOMY, AND ONTOGENETIC HISTOLOGY OF ORYCTODROMEUS CUBICULARIS, FROM THE MIDDLE CRETACEOUS (ALBIAN-CENOMANIAN) OF MONTANA AND IDAHO by L.J. Krumenacker A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana May 2017 ©COPYRIGHT by Laurel James Krumenacker 2017 All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my children, Elise and Shawn. You are everything to me and I will ALWAYS be here for you. The universe is full of wonderful unknowns. Find your own questions and seek the answers. Leave the world and the people you meet better than you found them. I love you. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Remember in “Jurassic Park” where the Tyrannosaurus eats a poorly dressed lawyer with thinning hair- that is the best scene… Despite all the opposition, I finished this PhD (and am working on cloning a T. rex). I am forever grateful to the people who walked me through these dark times: Cass Powell, you walked with me through the worst part of my life, being a true friend, helping me to find strength and worth in myself and reminding me how important it is to be active; thank you. Chancey Ringer, Liz Greenfield, Shardai Urdahl, Amanda Tebay, and all of FGHO, I genuinely wouldn’t have finished this degree without your patience, help, and friendship. Ash “Queen of Pine Bar” Ferguson, thanks for the encouragement and support. Thanks to my chair, Dr. Dave Varricchio, who helped me carve out a niche to work in the Cretaceous of Idaho, helped me learn to be a better scientist and writer, and who tirelessly helped me improve this work. Dr. Chris Organ and Dr. David Bowen provided valuable input and opportunities for improvement. Dr. Ted Dyman provided enjoyable learning in the field and input in all aspects of this project. Takuya Imai, Kelli Taddy, Eric Metz, and the crew of the Paleontology Field Course, thank you. Michael Holland, Bob Harmon, and Ellen Lamme, thank you for helping me in lab. Thanks to Haley Dunkel for friendship and employment for a large portion of my doctoral work. Steve Robison, Ali Abusaid, and Diane Wheeler provided permitting assistance while Leif Tapanila, Mary Thompson, and John Scannella allowed access to specimens. Josh Cotton provided awesome artwork for this dissertation and future publication. Thanks to Megan Maier for formatting help and Dan Lawver for computer help. iv FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Funding for this research from the Jurassic Foundation and the Montana State University Graduate School were instrumental in aspects of this research and are gratefully acknowledged. Many thanks to Bob Simon for his generous personal donation that facilitated numerous aspects of this research as well. v TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 Literature Cited ....................................................................................................................4 2. OSTEOLOGY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE NEORNITHISCHIAN DINOSAUR ORYCTODROMEUS CUBICULARIS FROM THE MIDDLE CRETACEOUS (ALBIAN-CENOMANIAN) OF MONTANA AND IDAHO..............................................................................................5 Contribution of Authors and Co-Authors .........................................................................5 Manuscript Information Page ...........................................................................................6 Abstract .............................................................................................................................7 Introduction .......................................................................................................................8 Geological Setting ...........................................................................................................10 Occurrence ......................................................................................................................11 Institutional Abbreviations ..............................................................................................12 Anatomical Abbreviations ..............................................................................................12 Terminology and Methodology ......................................................................................13 Systematic Paleontology .................................................................................................15 Description ......................................................................................................................18 Skull .......................................................................................................................18 Supraoccipital ............................................................................................19 Opisthotics and Exoccipital .......................................................................20 Basioccipital ...............................................................................................20 Prootic ........................................................................................................21 Basisphenoid and Parasphenoid .................................................................21 Laterosphenoid ...........................................................................................22 Premaxilla ..................................................................................................22 Maxilla .......................................................................................................23 Jugal ...........................................................................................................24 Supraorbital ................................................................................................25 Postorbital ..................................................................................................25 Frontal ........................................................................................................25 Quadrate .....................................................................................................26 Predentary ..................................................................................................26 Dentary .......................................................................................................27 Dentary Teeth.............................................................................................28 Axial Skeleton ........................................................................................................29 Cervical Vertebrae .....................................................................................29 Cervical Ribs ..............................................................................................30 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED Dorsal Vertebrae ........................................................................................31 Dorsal Ribs.................................................................................................33 Sacral Vertebrae .........................................................................................34 Caudal Vertebrae .......................................................................................35 Chevrons ....................................................................................................38 Ossified Tendons .......................................................................................38 Appendicular Skeleton ...........................................................................................40 Scapula .......................................................................................................40 Coracoid .....................................................................................................42 Humerus .....................................................................................................43 Ulna ............................................................................................................44 Radius ........................................................................................................44 Manus .........................................................................................................45 Ilium ...........................................................................................................46 Pubis ...........................................................................................................47 Ischium .......................................................................................................48 Femur .........................................................................................................49 Tibia ...........................................................................................................50 Fibula .........................................................................................................51 Tarsus .........................................................................................................51 Pes ..............................................................................................................52 Discussion .......................................................................................................................54 Phylogenetic Analysis and Review ........................................................................54
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS
    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
    [Show full text]
  • A Neoceratopsian Dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Mongolia And
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01222-7 OPEN A neoceratopsian dinosaur from the early Cretaceous of Mongolia and the early evolution of ceratopsia ✉ Congyu Yu 1 , Albert Prieto-Marquez2, Tsogtbaatar Chinzorig 3,4, Zorigt Badamkhatan4,5 & Mark Norell1 1234567890():,; Ceratopsia is a diverse dinosaur clade from the Middle Jurassic to Late Cretaceous with early diversification in East Asia. However, the phylogeny of basal ceratopsians remains unclear. Here we report a new basal neoceratopsian dinosaur Beg tse based on a partial skull from Baruunbayan, Ömnögovi aimag, Mongolia. Beg is diagnosed by a unique combination of primitive and derived characters including a primitively deep premaxilla with four pre- maxillary teeth, a trapezoidal antorbital fossa with a poorly delineated anterior margin, very short dentary with an expanded and shallow groove on lateral surface, the derived presence of a robust jugal having a foramen on its anteromedial surface, and five equally spaced tubercles on the lateral ridge of the surangular. This is to our knowledge the earliest known occurrence of basal neoceratopsian in Mongolia, where this group was previously only known from Late Cretaceous strata. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that it is sister to all other neoceratopsian dinosaurs. 1 Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York 10024, USA. 2 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, ICTA-ICP, Edifici Z, c/de les Columnes s/n Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain. 3 Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. 4 Institute of Paleontology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, ✉ Ulaanbaatar 15160, Mongolia.
    [Show full text]
  • Eubrontes and Anomoepus Track
    Sullivan, R.M. and Lucas, S.G., eds., 2016, Fossil Record 5. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 74. 345 EUBRONTES AND ANOMOEPUS TRACK ASSEMBLAGES FROM THE MIDDLE JURASSIC XIASHAXIMIAO FORMATION OF ZIZHONG COUNTY, SICHUAN, CHINA: REVIEW, ICHNOTAXONOMY AND NOTES ON PRESERVED TAIL TRACES LIDA XING1, MARTIN G. LOCKLEY2, GUANGZHAO PENG3, YONG YE3, JIANPING ZHANG1, MASAKI MATSUKAWA4, HENDRIK KLEIN5, RICHARD T. MCCREA6 and W. SCOTT PERSONS IV7 1School of the Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China; -email: [email protected]; 2Dinosaur Trackers Research Group, University of Colorado Denver, P.O. Box 173364, Denver, CO 80217; 3 Zigong Dinosaur Museum, Zigong 643013, Sichuan, China; 4 Department of Environmental Sciences, Tokyo Gakugei University, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8501, Japan; 5 Saurierwelt Paläontologisches Museum Alte Richt 7, D-92318 Neumarkt, Germany; 6 Peace Region Palaeontology Research Centre, Box 1540, Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia V0C 2W0, Canada; 7 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta 11455 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada Abstract—The Nianpanshan dinosaur tracksite, first studied in the 1980s, was designated as the type locality of the monospecific ichnogenus Jinlijingpus, and the source of another tridactyl track, Chuanchengpus, both presumably of theropod affinity. After the site was mapped in 2001, these two ichnotaxa were considered synonyms of Eubrontes and Anomoepus, respectively, the latter designation being the first identification of this ichnogenus in China. The assemblage indicates a typical Jurassic ichnofauna. The present study reinvestigates the site in the light of the purported new ichnospecies Chuanchengpus shenglingensis that was introduced in 2012. After re- evaluation of the morphological and extramorphological features, C.
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    v^ Official Journal of the Biology Unit of the American Topical Association 10 Vol. 40(4) DINOSAURS ON STAMPS by Michael K. Brett-Surman Ph.D. Dinosaurs are the most popular animals of all time, and the most misunderstood. Dinosaurs did not fly in the air and did not live in the oceans, nor on lake bottoms. Not all large "prehistoric monsters" are dinosaurs. The most famous NON-dinosaurs are plesiosaurs, moso- saurs, pelycosaurs, pterodactyls and ichthyosaurs. Any name ending in 'saurus' is not automatically a dinosaur, for' example, Mastodonto- saurus is neither a mastodon nor a dinosaur - it is an amphibian! Dinosaurs are defined by a combination of skeletal features that cannot readily be seen when the animal is fully restored in a flesh reconstruction. Because of the confusion, this compilation is offered as a checklist for the collector. This topical list compiles all the dinosaurs on stamps where the actual bones are pictured or whole restorations are used. It excludes footprints (as used in the Lesotho stamps), cartoons (as in the 1984 issue from Gambia), silhouettes (Ascension Island # 305) and unoffi- cial issues such as the famous Sinclair Dinosaur stamps. The name "Brontosaurus", which appears on many stamps, is used with quotation marks to denote it as a popular name in contrast to its correct scientific name, Apatosaurus. For those interested in a detailed encyclopedic work about all fossils on stamps, the reader is referred to the forthcoming book, 'Paleontology - a Guide to the Postal Materials Depicting Prehistoric Lifeforms' by Fran Adams et. al. The best book currently in print is a book titled 'Dinosaur Stamps of the World' by Baldwin & Halstead.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Early Cretaceous Wonthaggi Formation (Strzelecki Group)
    Journal of Paleontology, 93(3), 2019, p. 543–584 Copyright © 2019, The Paleontological Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 0022-3360/19/1937-2337 doi: 10.1017/jpa.2018.95 New small-bodied ornithopods (Dinosauria, Neornithischia) from the Early Cretaceous Wonthaggi Formation (Strzelecki Group) of the Australian-Antarctic rift system, with revision of Qantassaurus intrepidus Rich and Vickers-Rich, 1999 Matthew C. Herne,1,2 Jay P. Nair,2 Alistair R. Evans,3 and Alan M. Tait4 1School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale 2351, New South Wales, Australia <ornithomatt@ gmail.com> 2School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia <[email protected]> 3School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia <[email protected]> 4School of Earth, Atmosphere & Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia <[email protected]> Abstract.—The Flat Rocks locality in the Wonthaggi Formation (Strzelecki Group) of the Gippsland Basin, southeastern Australia, hosts fossils of a late Barremian vertebrate fauna that inhabited the ancient rift between Australia and Antarc- tica. Known from its dentary, Qantassaurus intrepidus Rich and Vickers-Rich, 1999 has been the only dinosaur named from this locality. However, the plethora of vertebrate fossils collected from Flat Rocks suggests that further dinosaurs await discovery. From this locality, we name a new small-bodied ornithopod, Galleonosaurus dorisae n.
    [Show full text]
  • New Heterodontosaurid Remains from the Cañadón Asfalto Formation: Cursoriality and the Functional Importance of the Pes in Small Heterodontosaurids
    Journal of Paleontology, 90(3), 2016, p. 555–577 Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/16/0088-0906 doi: 10.1017/jpa.2016.24 New heterodontosaurid remains from the Cañadón Asfalto Formation: cursoriality and the functional importance of the pes in small heterodontosaurids Marcos G. Becerra,1 Diego Pol,1 Oliver W.M. Rauhut,2 and Ignacio A. Cerda3 1CONICET- Museo Palaeontológico Egidio Feruglio, Fontana 140, Trelew, Chubut 9100, Argentina 〈[email protected]〉; 〈[email protected]〉 2SNSB, Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, LMU München, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, Munich 80333, Germany 〈[email protected]〉 3CONICET- Instituto de Investigación en Paleobiología y Geología, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Museo Carlos Ameghino, Belgrano 1700, Paraje Pichi Ruca (predio Marabunta), Cipolletti, Río Negro, Argentina 〈[email protected]〉 Abstract.—New ornithischian remains reported here (MPEF-PV 3826) include two complete metatarsi with associated phalanges and caudal vertebrae, from the late Toarcian levels of the Cañadón Asfalto Formation. We conclude that these fossil remains represent a bipedal heterodontosaurid but lack diagnostic characters to identify them at the species level, although they probably represent remains of Manidens condorensis, known from the same locality. Histological features suggest a subadult ontogenetic stage for the individual. A cluster analysis based on pedal measurements identifies similarities of this specimen with heterodontosaurid taxa and the inclusion of the new material in a phylogenetic analysis with expanded character sampling on pedal remains confirms the described specimen as a heterodontosaurid. Finally, uncommon features of the digits (length proportions among nonungual phalanges of digit III, and claw features) are also quantitatively compared to several ornithischians, theropods, and birds, suggesting that this may represent a bipedal cursorial heterodontosaurid with gracile and grasping feet and long digits.
    [Show full text]
  • Mongolian Geoscientist 50 (2020) 2-10
    Yun, Mongolian Geoscientist 50 (2020) 2-10 https://doi.org/10.5564/mgs.v50i0.1325 Mongolian Geoscientist Original article A Carcharodontosaurid tooth from the Hasandong Formation (Lower Cretaceous) of South Korea Chan-gyu Yun1,2* 1Vertebrate Paleontological Institute of Incheon, Incheon 21974, Republic of Korea 2Biological Sciences, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea *Corresponding author: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: A large tooth of theropod dinosaur that was recovered from the Hasandong Received 04 April, 2020 Formation (Lower Cretaceous; Aptian-Albian) in Daedo island, Hadong Couty, South Gyeongsang Province of South Korea is redescribed. Although the tooth was Accepted 12 May, 2020 misidentified as a "Prodeinodon"-like megalosaurid theropod at the first time, detailed comparisons with known theropod dentition anatomy strongly indicate that this tooth belongs to an Acrocanthosaurus-like basal carcharodontosaurid theropod. This referral is supported by its combination of large size, ovoid-shaped cervix outline, mesial carina that does not reach the cervix, labially displaced distal carina and large number of denticles. This tooth is different from other carcharodontosaurid teeth from the same formation in several anatomical aspects (e.g., smaller overall size, presence of transverse lines adjacent to the distal carina, presence of interdenticular sulci in distal carina, denticle densities, crown basal ratio), indicating that carcharodontosaurid diversity in the Early Cretaceous of Korea could have been higher, although these differences may represent positional or individual variations. The presence of Acrocanthosaurus-like theropod teeth (e.g., "Prodeinodon", "Wakinosaurus") from early Cretaceous deposits (Valanginian-Cenomanian) of South Korea, Japan, Mongolia and China indicates that North American Acrocanthosaurus atokensis possibly represents a form that immigrated from the Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • A. K. Rozhdestvensky HISTORY of the DINOSAUR FAUNA of ASIA
    A. K. Rozhdestvensky HISTORY OF THE DINOSAUR FAUNA OF ASIA AND OTHER CONTINENTS AND QUESTIONS CONCERNING PALEOGEOGRAPHY* The distribution and evolution of dinosaur faunas during the period of their existence, from the Late Triassic to the end of the Cretaceous, shows a close connection with the paleogeography of the Mesozoic. However these questions were hard to examine on a global scale until recently, because only the dinosaurs of North America were well known, where during the last century were found their richest deposits and where the best paleontologists were studying them — J. Leidy, E. Cope, O. Marsh, R. Lull, H. Osborn, C. Gilmore, B. Brown, and later many others. On the remaining continents, including Europe, where the study of dinosaurs started earlier than it did in America, the information was rather incomplete due to the fragmentary condition of the finds and rare, episodic studies. The Asian continent remained unexplored the longest, preventing any intercontinental comparisons. Systematic exploration and large excavations of dinosaur locations in Asia, which began in the last fifty years (Osborn, 1930; Efremov, 1954; Rozhdestvenskiy, 1957a, 1961, 1969, 1971; Rozhdestvenskiy & Chzhou, 1960; Kielan-Jaworowska & Dovchin, 1968; Kurochkin, Kalandadze, & Reshetov, 1970; Barsbold, Voronin, & Zhegallo, 1971) showed that this continent has abundant dinosaur remains, particularly in its central part (Fig. 1). Their study makes it possible to establish a faunal connection between Asia and other continents, correlate the stratigraphy of continental deposits of the Mesozoic, because dinosaurs are reliable leading forms, as well as to make corrections in the existing paleogeographic structure. The latter, in their turn, promote a better understanding of the possible paths of distribution of the individual groups of dinosaurs, the reasons for their appearance, their development, and disappearance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ontogeny and Distribution of Countershading in Colonies of the Naked Mole-Rat (Heterocephalus Glaber)
    J. Zool., Lond. (2001) 253, 351±357 # 2001 The Zoological Society of London Printed in the United Kingdom The ontogeny and distribution of countershading in colonies of the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber) Stanton Braude1*, Deborah Ciszek2, Nancy E. Berg3 and Nancy Shefferly4 1 International Center for Tropical Ecology at UMSL and Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, U.S.A. 2 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, U.S.A. 3 Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, U.S.A. 4 Oakland Community College, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, U.S.A. (Accepted 22 February 2000) Abstract Most naked mole-rats Heterocephalus glaber are countershaded, with purple-grey dorsal but pale pink ventral skin. The exceptions to this coloration pattern are uniformly pink, and include newborn pups, most queens and breeding males, and very old animals. Countershading begins to appear at 2±3 weeks of age and begins to disappear at c. 7 years of age. Countershading may provide camou¯age when young naked mole-rats are above ground attempting to disperse. Therefore, reproductives and older workers may lose this coloration once they are unlikely to leave the burrow. Alternative hypotheses for pigmentation that we considered include: thermoregulation, and protection from abrasion or from damaging ultraviolet radiation. These hypotheses are not necessarily mutually exclusive, but do lead to different predictions regarding the development of pigmentation and which colony members should be countershaded. Key words: Heterocephalus glaber, naked mole-rat, countershading, adaptive coloration INTRODUCTION and tail, rows of brushes between the toes, and scattered bristles (Thigpen, 1940; Daly & Buffenstein, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • North-Central Montana
    Petrology of the Eagle Sandstone, Bearpaw Mountains Area, North-Central Montana By DONALD L. GAUTIER INVESTIGATIONS OF SHALLOW GAS RESERVOIRS IN THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1521 Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. Depart1Tl£nt of Energy Composition and burial history of an important conventional shallow methane reservoir in the northern Great Plains UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data . Gautier, Donald L. Petrology of the Eagle Sandstone, Bearpaw Mountains area, north-central Montana. (Investigations of shallow gas reservoirs in the northern Great Plains) (Geological Survey Bulletin 1521) Bibliography: p. 52 1. Sandstone-Montana-Bearpaw Mountains region. 2. Gas, Natural-Geology­ Montana-Bearpaw Mountains region. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: Geological Survey Bulletin 1521. QE75.B9 no. 1521 [QE471.15.S25] 557.3s 81-607963 [552'.5] AACR2 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Absuact:---------------------------------------------------- 1 In~uction------------------------------------------------- 2 ~~un~--------------------------------------------- 4 Acknowledgments-------------------------------------- 5 Geologic Setting----------------------------------- 6 Hydrocarbons in the Eagle Sandstone------------------------ 8 Lithology----------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Basal Ornithischia (Reptilia, Dinosauria)
    A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE BASAL ORNITHISCHIA (REPTILIA, DINOSAURIA) Marc Richard Spencer A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2007 Committee: Margaret M. Yacobucci, Advisor Don C. Steinker Daniel M. Pavuk © 2007 Marc Richard Spencer All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Margaret M. Yacobucci, Advisor The placement of Lesothosaurus diagnosticus and the Heterodontosauridae within the Ornithischia has been problematic. Historically, Lesothosaurus has been regarded as a basal ornithischian dinosaur, the sister taxon to the Genasauria. Recent phylogenetic analyses, however, have placed Lesothosaurus as a more derived ornithischian within the Genasauria. The Fabrosauridae, of which Lesothosaurus was considered a member, has never been phylogenetically corroborated and has been considered a paraphyletic assemblage. Prior to recent phylogenetic analyses, the problematic Heterodontosauridae was placed within the Ornithopoda as the sister taxon to the Euornithopoda. The heterodontosaurids have also been considered as the basal member of the Cerapoda (Ornithopoda + Marginocephalia), the sister taxon to the Marginocephalia, and as the sister taxon to the Genasauria. To reevaluate the placement of these taxa, along with other basal ornithischians and more derived subclades, a phylogenetic analysis of 19 taxonomic units, including two outgroup taxa, was performed. Analysis of 97 characters and their associated character states culled, modified, and/or rescored from published literature based on published descriptions, produced four most parsimonious trees. Consistency and retention indices were calculated and a bootstrap analysis was performed to determine the relative support for the resultant phylogeny. The Ornithischia was recovered with Pisanosaurus as its basalmost member.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]