DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at: www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. To File a Program Complaint If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at www.ascr.usda.gov/ complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, by fax (202) 690-7442 or email at [email protected]. Persons with Disabilities Individuals who are deaf, hard of hearing or have speech disabilities and you wish to file either an EEO or program complaint please contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339 or (800) 845- 6136 (in Spanish). Persons with disabilities who wish to file a program complaint, please see information above on how to contact us by mail directly or by email. If you require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) please contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). Cover photo: View of Angora Lakes looking north-east, with Lake Tahoe in the background. Credit – all photos, graphs and maps: U.S. Forest Service staff, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit may be duplicated for public use (not for profit) FINAL Land and Resource Management Plan – Appendices to the Plan & EIS Appendices Table of Contents Appendix A – Forest Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Plan………………………………………..A-1 Appendix B – Wild and Scenic River Evaluation…………………………………………………….B-1 B.1. Introduction and Background…………………………………………………………………………………B-1 B.2. LTBMU Wild and Scenic River Review………………………………………………………………………B-2 B3. Summary and Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………B-8 Appendix C – Evaluation of Areas for Potential Wilderness………………………………………C-1 C.1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………C-1 C.2. Overview of Areas Evaluated………………………………………………………………………………… C-2 C.3. Capability……………………………………………………………………………………………………………C-10 C.4. Availability…………………………………………………………………………………………………………C-41 C.5. Need for Wilderness……………………………………………………………………………………………C-43 C.6. Agency Recommendation……………………………………………………………………………………C-51 Appendix D – LTBMU Climate Change Trend Assessment……………………………………… D-1 I. Local trends in climate over the past century………………………………………………………… D-2 II. Regional trends over the last century linked to climate change…………………………………D-7 III. Future predictions………………………………………………………………………………………………D-13 IV. Literature Cited …………………………………………………………………………………………………D-18 Appendix E – LTMBU Species Diversity…………………………………………………………………E-1 E.1. Forest-wide Biological Concepts ……………………………………………………………………………E-1 E.2. Species Lists…………………………………………………………………………………………………………E-2 Appendix F – Social and Economic Assessment………………………………………………………F-1 F.1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………F-1 F.2. Study Area……………………………………………………………………………………………………………F-2 F.3. Background…………………………………………………………………………………………………………F-5 F.4. Social Conditions and Tends…………………………………………………………………………………F-7 F.5. Economic Conditions and Trends …………………………………………………………………………F-20 F.6. Unit Economic Contribution Analysis……………………………………………………………………F-36 F.7. Current Conditions of Forest Economic Contribution………………………………………………F-40 Appendix G – Timber Suitability Analysis………………………………………………………………G-1 G.1. Lands Generally Not Available for Timber Harvest (sec. 62.1) ………………………………………G-1 G.2. Lands Suitable for Timber Production (sec. 62.21) ………………………………………………………G-1 G.3. Other Lands Where Trees May Be Harvested for Multiple Use Values Other Than Timber Production (sec. 62.22) ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………G-1 G.4. Other Land Generally Suitable for Timber Harvest (sec. 62.22) ……………………………………G-2 G.5. Timber Sale Program Quantity (TSPQ) and Long-Term Sustained-Yield Capacity (LTSYC) (sec. 65.3) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………G-4 Appendix H – Comparison of Alternatives by Management Strategy………………………….H-1 Appendix I – Comparison of Alternatives by Objective…………………………………………….I-1 Appendix J – Alternative A Standards and Guidelines……………………………………………..J-1 Appendix K – Previous Decisions That Remain in Place…………………………………………….K-1 Appendix L – References Cited……………………………………………………………………………..L-1 Appendix M – Glossary of Acronyms and Terms……………………………………………………..M- 1 M.1. Abbreviations and Acronyms ………………………………………………………………………………M-1 M.2. Definition of Selected Acronyms …………………………………………………………………………M-2 M.3. Glossary of Terms………………………………………………………………………………………………M- 6 Appendices | TOC ■ i Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Appendix N – Response to Comments………………………………………………………………….N-1 N.1. Introduction and Process ……………………………………………………………………………………………N-2 N.2. Response to Comments………………………………………………………………………………………………N-5 N.3. Comments Received from Federal, State, Local Agencies, and Elected Officials ……………N-165 Appendix O– LTBMU Effects Analysis………………………………………………………………….O-1 O.1. The Unpredictability of Natural Conditions and Human Values Over Time…………………………O-2 O.2. The Analytical Methodology Employed in Chapter 3 of the EIS ………………………………………O-3 O.3. The Uncertainty and Risks Associated With Forecasting Environmental Effects…………………O-3 ii ▪ Table of Contents Revised LRMP – Appendices for the Forest Plan and FEIS Appendix A – Forest Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Forest Plan monitoring is an integral part of the adaptive management cycle that guides future management decisions and actions. Adaptive management includes defining measurable objectives, monitoring, learning and changing, and recognizing uncertainties that may affect achievement of objectives and achievement or maintenance of desired conditions. Periodic evaluations summarizing the monitoring results will be reviewed by the Forest Supervisor and other managers to determine if any changes are needed in management actions, or plan components. The Forest Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Plan is designed to measure the degree to which on- the-ground management is maintaining or making progress toward the Forest Plan desired conditions and objectives. This monitoring plan will test assumptions, track changes, and measure management effectiveness, primarily through status and trend monitoring and effectiveness monitoring. The monitoring plan provides a framework that will be supplemented by more specific monitoring plans and protocols. It will be adjusted as needed to respond to new information and unanticipated changes in conditions. The Forest Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Plan is a subset of the monitoring for the LTBMU. Additional, project-specific monitoring may be required for some projects, including monitoring required through regulatory permitting processes. While inventories and implementation monitoring are important and will continue to be implemented, they are generally not included in this monitoring plan because they only indirectly inform progress towards the Forest Plan desired conditions and objectives. Inventories describe how much or how many of a given resource is present, while implementation monitoring describes how well management direction and intent was followed in projects and activities. The LTBMU also participates in multiple broad-scale monitoring efforts. Some, but not all of these are included in the Monitoring Plan. For example, the LTBMU is an active partner in providing information to the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency for monitoring attainment of TRPA’s environmental thresholds through the tracking and reporting of the Environmental Improvement Program performance measures, but these activities are not included in the Monitoring Plan. The Monitoring Plan presented below describes the program area associated with the monitoring, monitoring questions, associated indicators or performance measures, a cross- reference to the plan component(s) being monitored, and the frequency of monitoring and reporting (annual or other time period). It also documents the source – (i.e. who does the monitoring) which may be the LTBMU, the Pacific Southwest Region, or a collaborative effort. Appendix A ■ A-1 Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Desired Conditions Indicator/Measure Monitoring Question(s) Responsible Agency Monitoring Time Frequency of Frequency of Frame Monitoring Reporting Air Quality: DC1 O3 injury to pine What is the status and trend of O3 injury to USFS (RO), TRPA Life
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Tahoe Geographic Response Plan
    Lake Tahoe Geographic Response Plan El Dorado and Placer Counties, California and Douglas and Washoe Counties, and Carson City, Nevada September 2007 Prepared by: Lake Tahoe Response Plan Area Committee (LTRPAC) Lake Tahoe Geographic Response Plan September 2007 If this is an Emergency… …Involving a release or threatened release of hazardous materials, petroleum products, or other contaminants impacting public health and/or the environment Most important – Protect yourself and others! Then: 1) Turn to the Immediate Action Guide (Yellow Tab) for initial steps taken in a hazardous material, petroleum product, or other contaminant emergency. First On-Scene (Fire, Law, EMS, Public, etc.) will notify local Dispatch (via 911 or radio) A complete list of Dispatch Centers can be found beginning on page R-2 of this plan Dispatch will make the following Mandatory Notifications California State Warning Center (OES) (800) 852-7550 or (916) 845-8911 Nevada Division of Emergency Management (775) 687-0300 or (775) 687-0400 National Response Center (800) 424-8802 Dispatch will also consider notifying the following Affected or Adjacent Agencies: County Environmental Health Local OES - County Emergency Management Truckee River Water Master (775) 742-9289 Local Drinking Water Agencies 2) After the Mandatory Notifications are made, use Notification (Red Tab) to implement the notification procedures described in the Immediate Action Guide. 3) Use the Lake Tahoe Basin Maps (Green Tab) to pinpoint the location and surrounding geography of the incident site. 4) Use the Lake and River Response Strategies (Blue Tab) to develop a mitigation plan. 5) Review the Supporting Documentation (White Tabs) for additional information needed during the response.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural History Of
    THE KIRKWOOD INN THE CULTURAL HISTORY OF HELP PRESERVE THE PAST Kirkwood Station, as it was originally called, soon became a hostelry, post office and stagecoach Remember, as you explore the Kirkwood region you depot, which served many travelers through the are entering a historic area. You may find relics of KIRKWOOD Sierra in the late 1800's. In 2019, the Kirkwood the past and wonder how they got here. Inn celebrated its 155th year of friendly western hospitality. By leaving these items as you found them, you will CALIFORNIA leave in place clues that could help us answer these very questions. If you take artifacts home with you, or move them to other spots, you may destroy clues to the past. Every artifact is not merely something to be held and examined, it is also a piece of a puzzle which, when put together with other pieces, allows us to unravel the mysteries of the past. Please treat all historic and archaeological sites with care and respect when you visit them. The remains of prehistoric and historic cultures are a part of our Reno heritage. When artifacts are stolen and archaeological 80 Truckee 395 sites are destroyed, we lose important clues about the 80 89 Today the Inn is a popular restaurant and bar 50 Tahoe City past, forever. Strict laws protect artifacts and sites on Carson City located at Kirkwood’s entrance on Scenic California 50 Gardnerville state and Federal and Native American lands. Report 99 Auburn So. Lake Tahoe State Route 88. The Inn sits on the point where 49 88 395 80 89 violations to your local law enforcement or land 5 50 Alpine, Amador and El Dorado counties’ boundaries Placerville Sacramento 50 management agency.
    [Show full text]
  • LAKE TAHOE BASIN MANAGEMENT UNIT Travel Analysis Process
    LAKE TAHOE BASIN United States MANAGEMENT UNIT Department of Agriculture Forest Service Travel Analysis Process January 2012 Kjar, J. Craig. 2011. Travel Analysis Process. Boise, Idaho. Prepared for U.S. Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, South Lake Tahoe, California. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – Setting Up the Analysis ....................................... 1 Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 1 Scale ............................................................................................................................................ 1 How the Report Will be Used ..................................................................................................... 2 Roles of Specialists ..................................................................................................................... 2 Identification of Information Sources ......................................................................................... 2 Analysis Plan .............................................................................................................................. 3 Chapter 2 - Describing the Situation ....................................... 4 Existing Road System and Direction .......................................................................................... 4 Forest Highways and Scenic Byways ......................................................................................... 6 Forest Highways
    [Show full text]
  • ABOUT Donna GEPHART
    5EPTYUIORASDFGHK CALIFORNIA KIDS! Family Fun Guide • APRIL 2010 5EPTYUIORASDF Table of Contents Who Wrote That? Donna Gephart by Patricia M. Newman .....................page 6 Wordsearch: It’s Earth Day! ...............page 7 Make it Yourself! ................................page 8 The Book Report: Bed Time Stories by Connie Goldsmith ........................page 9 Summer Guide ..................... pages 15 –21 Calendar of Events ............. pages 26–28 Hubble D Blasts Off! ................... page 29 Parties! Parties! ..................... pages 30–31 www.valcomnews.com Publisher: George Macko General Manager: Kathleen Egan Contributing Writers: Connie Goldsmith, Patricia M. Newman Art Director: John Ochoa Junior Designer: Ryan Vuong Sales Manager: Patty Colmer Advertising: Marc Harris Distribution/Subscriptions: George Macko California Kids! is published monthly and distributed to more than 1,000 locations in the Sacramento Valley, including all of Sacramento County, and portions of Yolo (Davis and Woodland), Placer (Auburn, Newcastle, Rocklin and Roseville), El Dorado (Cameron Park, El Dorado Hills, Placerville), and Nevada (Grass Valley, Nevada City) counties. Subscriptions are available for $30/year. Mail prepaid check or money order to California Kids!, 2709 Riverside Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95818. Make sure to specify the person and address to which you wish issues to be mailed. Deadlines for advertising and calendar listings are the 25th of the month prior to publication. Calendar listings should be mailed to 2709 Riverside Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95818, faxed to (916) 429-9906, or e-mailed to [email protected]. Copyright 2010 by Valley Community Newspapers Inc., 2709 Riverside Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95818. Phone: (916) 429-9901. Fax: (916) 429- 9906. E-mail:[email protected]. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies Related to Wilderness Primitive Areas, 1967-1969
    Studies Related to Wilderness Primitive Areas, 1967-1969 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1261 This volume was published as separate chapters A-G UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. OS 75-605185 CONTENTS [Letters designate the separately published chapters] (A) Mineral resources of the Desolation Valley primitive area of the Sierra Nevada, California, by F. C. W. Dodge and P. V. Fillo. (B) Mineral resources of the Ventana primitive area, Monterey County, California, by Robert C. Pearson, Philip T. Hayes, and Paul V. Fillo. (C) Mineral resources of the Uncompahgre primitive area, Colorado, by R. P. Fischer, R' G. Luedke, M. J. Sheridan, and R. G. Raabe. (D) Mineral resources of the Mission Mountains Primitive Area, Missoula and Lake Counties, Montana, "by Jack E. Harrison, Mitchell W. Reynolds, M. Dean Kleinkopf, and Eldon C. Pattee. (E) Mineral resources of the Blue Range primitive area, Greenlee County, Arizona, and Catron County, New Mexico, by James C. Ratte", E. R. Landis, David L. Gaskill, and R. G. Raabe, with a section on Aeromagnetic interpretation, by Gordon P. Eaton. (F) Mineral resources of the San Juan primitive area, Colorado, by T. A. Steven, L. J. Schmitt, Jr., M. J. Sheridan, and F. E. Williams, with a section on Iron resources in the Irving Formation, by Jacob E. Gair and Harry Klemic. (G) Mineral resources of the Emigrant Basin primitive area, California, by E. W. Tooker, H. T. Morris, and Paul V. Fillo, with a section on Geophysical studies, by H.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction and Emplacement of Cretaceous Plutons in the Crystal Range, Southwest of Lake Tahoe, California
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Summer 2017 Construction and Emplacement of Cretaceous Plutons in the Crystal Range, Southwest of Lake Tahoe, California Brad Buerer San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Buerer, Brad, "Construction and Emplacement of Cretaceous Plutons in the Crystal Range, Southwest of Lake Tahoe, California" (2017). Master's Theses. 4837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.eyj9-3w7m https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4837 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONSTRUCTION AND EMPLACEMENT OF CRETACEOUS PLUTONS IN THE CRYSTAL RANGE, SOUTHWEST OF LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Geology San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Brad Buerer August 2017 © 2017 Brad Buerer ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled CONSTRUCTION AND EMPLACEMENT OF CRETACEOUS PLUTONS IN THE CRYSTAL RANGE, SOUTHWEST OF LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA by Brad Buerer APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY August 2017 Dr. Robert Miller Department of Geology Dr. Jonathan Miller Department of Geology Dr. Dave Andersen Department of Geology ABSTRACT CONSTRUCTION AND EMPLACEMENT OF CRETACEOUS PLUTONS IN THE CRYSTAL RANGE, SOUTHWEST OF LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA by Brad Buerer Three Cretaceous plutons are investigated to determine their construction and emplacement histories, focusing on magmatic foliation patterns and contact relationships with each other and with the Jurassic metasedimentary host rocks of the Sailor Canyon Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    Board of Directors Board Meeting Packet June 2, 2020 SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 2020 at 1:00 PM Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, effective March 31, 2020 and May 4, 2020, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at: https://youtu.be/CXk-sT1N2kg Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, June 1, at 3:00pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, June 1 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: https://zoom.us/j/92248099243.
    [Show full text]
  • 15,000 Monterey Pines Threatened P
    Volume 43, Number 2, 2004 www.ventana.sierraclub.org M AGAZINE OF THE V ENTANA C HAPTER OF THE S IERRA C LUB APR,OUTINGS MAY, JUN Robin Way 15,000 Monterey pines threatened p. 4 Explore, enjoy and protect the planet hile it is the intent of The Ventana to print articles that reflect the position Wof the Ventana Chapter, ideas CHAPTER CHAIR expressed in The Ventana are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Sierra Club. Articles, graphics Thank you for working for Mountains we are opposing a destructive destructive individual projects such as and photographs are copyrighted by the the environment timber harvest permit which threatens subdivisions in and around Elkhorn authors and artists and may be reprinted only water quality for Lompico residents. Slough, a huge open pit mining quarry with their permission. lub volunteers are actively In Monterey County the General involved in protecting the biotic near Chualar, the 1050-unit housing pro- DEADLINES FOR SUBMISSIONS Plan Update (GPU) has consumed thou- ject proposed for Marina Heights, the All materials for publication must be received and scenic resources of the mag- C sands of hours of our members’ time Seaside Highlands, and Pebble Beach by the deadlines listed in The Ventana publica- nificent central coast. Throughout Santa tion schedule (see below). No exceptions. over the last four years as we work to Company’s plans to severely damage Cruz and Monterey County, conserva- educate politicians, the press, and SUBMISSIONS FORMAT tion efforts and monitoring by Group rare native Monterey Pine forest habitat Please limit articles to 800 words; letters to Monterey residents about the impor- in Del Monte Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Absence of Population Structure Across Elevational Gradients Despite Large Phenotypic (Poecile Gambeli) Variationinmountainchickadees(Poecile Gambeli)
    Absence of population structure across elevational rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org gradients despite large Research phenotypic variation Cite this article: Branch CL, Jahner JP, in mountain chickadees Kozlovsky DY, Parchman TL, Pravosudov VV. 2017 Absence of population structure across elevational gradients despite large phenotypic (Poecile gambeli) variationinmountainchickadees(Poecile gambeli). R. Soc. open sci. 4: 170057. Carrie L. Branch, Joshua P.Jahner, Dovid Y. Kozlovsky, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170057 Thomas L. Parchman and Vladimir V. Pravosudov Department of Biology and Graduate Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Max Fleischmann Agriculture Building, Received: 25 January 2017 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, USA Accepted: 16 February 2017 CLB, 0000-0003-1769-5040 Montane habitats are characterized by predictably rapid Subject Category: heterogeneity along elevational gradients and are useful for Biology (whole organism) investigating the consequences of environmental heterogeneity for local adaptation and population genetic structure. Food- caching mountain chickadees inhabit a continuous elevation Subject Areas: gradient in the Sierra Nevada, and birds living at harsher, behaviour/ecology/genetics high elevations have better spatial memory ability and exhibit differences in male song structure and female mate preference Keywords: compared to birds inhabiting milder, low elevations. While elevation gradient, mountain chickadee, high elevation birds breed, on average, two weeks later genetic structure, local adaptation than low elevation birds, the extent of gene flow between elevations is unknown. Despite phenotypic variation and indirect evidence for local adaptation, population genetic analyses based on 18 073 single nucleotide polymorphisms Author for correspondence: across three transects of high and low elevation populations Carrie L.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C: Evaluation of Areas for Potential Wilderness
    Appendices for the FEIS Appendix C: Evaluation of Areas for Potential Wilderness Introduction This document describes the process used to evaluate the wilderness potential of areas on the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit (LTBMU). The March 2009 inventory conducted according to Forest Service Handbook 1909.12, Chapter 70, 2007 is the basis for this evaluation. The LTBMU was evaluated to determine landscape areas that exhibited inherent basic wilderness qualities such the degree of naturalness and undeveloped character. In addition to the wilderness qualities an area might possess, the area must also provide opportunities and experiences that are dependent on and enhanced by a wilderness environment and area boundaries that could be managed as wilderness. It was determined that areas adjacent to existing wilderness and existing Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs) were areas were most likely to have the characteristics described above. Other areas around the basin exhibited some of the required characteristics but not enough to be qualified for a congressional wilderness designation. Six areas were identified and evaluated. The analysis is based on GIS mapping of existing wilderness and inventoried roadless area polygon data, adjusted based on local knowledge. Three tests were used—capability, availability, and need—to determine suitability as described in Forest Service Handbook 1909.12, Chapter 70, 2007. In addition to the inherent wilderness qualities an area might possess, the area must provide opportunities and experiences that are dependent on and enhanced by a wilderness environment. The area and boundaries must allow the area to be managed as wilderness. Capability is defined as the degree to which the area contains the basic characteristics that make it suitable for wilderness designation without regard to its availability for or need as wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Survey: Scientists Find Variety of Species, Page 3
    Award winning! Bat survey: Scientists find variety of species, page 3 Winter 2014 Bi-state compact to preserve Tahoe STEPS TOWARD REVITALIZATION turns 45 years old Staff Report Redevelopment projects expected to aid environment, economy The partnership between California and Nevada that created the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency By Devin Middlebrook (TRPA) turned 45 years old in Tahoe Regional Planning Agency December 2014 and is approaching a half-century of progress in the protection and restoration of Lake Lake Tahoe’s communities have struggled Tahoe and its treasured environment. for decades from environmental, economic, and President Richard Nixon signed social pressures. The advent of Native American the bi-state compact to create the gaming throughout Northern California drove TRPA on Thursday, Dec. 18, 1969. massive casino job losses, which were compounded Nixon’s signature in the Oval Office followed the compact’s ratification by the recent recession. To many, a visible clue by Congress, approval by both was the number of run-down or vacant buildings states’ legislatures, and signatures of around the Lake. Many of these buildings were former governors Ronald Reagan in constructed in the 1960s, prior to the Tahoe Regional California and Paul Laxalt in Nevada. Planning Agency being established, during a period U.S. Sen. Alan Bible (D-Nev.) of rampant growth with a lack of development introduced legislation to approve the bi-state compact in Congress. Bible regulations. Fifty years later, as the recession took called Nixon’s signature of the bill hold, the Region looked tired and in disrepair. “the best news possible for those Times are changing.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Revised Land and Resource Management Plan
    United States Department of Agriculture Draft Revised Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Service Pacific Southwest Volume III – Region DEIS and Draft Plan Appendices R5-MB-241C June 2012 Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Cover photo: Eagle Falls Trail located on National Forest System lands on Lake Tahoe’s southwest shore. The trailhead and parking lot kiosk, across US Highway 89 from the Emerald Bay overlook, offer information about hiking into Desolation Wilderness, looking westward toward Eagle Lake, a popular short, but steep, hike (less than half an hour). Credit – all photos, graphs and maps: U.S. Forest Service staff, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit may be duplicated for public use (not for profit) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
    [Show full text]