DOCSLIB.ORG

111111.25 1111,1.4 Iiiil1.6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. t 11,::' --:....,-----"'---,..... -~-, , . ... I, -~l_: :;:" National Criminal Justice Reference Service ---.. ----.... ···········1·· .... .1 ,; ·····.·1 "'j ))j This microfiche was produced from documents received for . '.. 1 mc. I' USIon .m the NCJRS data base . Since NCJRS cannotb exerCIse . d .6;1"I control over the physical condition of the docum~nts su mItie , the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution c~art on this frame may be used to evaluate the document qualIty. 1.0 ,1/1/2.5 2.2 II 1.1 111111.25 1111,1.4 IIIil1.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A Microfilming procedures used' to create this fiche comply with the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author(s) and do not represent the offi.cial position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice United States Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20531 I ~U_?l~?_ .. 1. • ;, Q ,.~, :. ' .. , 1\.".... ,,' ,'!':'f :",;, !!. q, ~~, II .' o ", rl' L .1 r 1.. "" SUPREME COURT DF NEW HAMPSHIRE . TABLE OF CONTENTS Honorable Edward J. Lampron, Chief Justice Honorable William. A. Grimes, Senior Associate Justice SECTION I OVERVIEW OF THE CREATION AND Honorable Maurice P. Bois, Associate Justice STRUCTURE OF THE COURT SYSTEM 1 Honorable Charles G. Douglas, III, Associate Justice SECTION II SUPREME COURT . 7 Honorable David A. Brock, Associate Justice T .L. SECTION III· SUPERIOR COURT 32 ~~~:;: JUDICIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE SECTION IV DISTRICT AND MUNICIPAL COURTS . 58 Honorable Charles G. Douglas, III, Associate Justice, SECTION V PROBATE COURT . 69 New Hampshire Supreme Court, Chairman ',C SECTION Honorable William A. Grimes, Associate Justice, VI JUDICIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE AND New Hampshire Supreme Court, Vice-Chairman THE PLAN FOR COURT IMPROVEMENT 79 Honorable Martin F. Loughlin, Chief Justice, New Hampshire Superior Court SECTION VII STATEMENT OF PURPOSES, STANDARDS AND PRIORITIES . .. 121 Honorable Aaron A. Harkaway, 0ustice, Nashua District Court SECTION VIII JUDICIAL BRANCH BUDGETING . 134 Honorable Edward J. McDermott, Justice, Hampton District Court U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice James E. Duggan, Visiting Associate Professor of Law, This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the Franklin Pierce Law Center person or organization originating it. Points of view or opInions stated in this document are those of the authors and do. not necessarily represent tile official position or poliCies of the National Institute of Honorable Thomas D. Rath, Justice. New Hampshire Attorney General Permission to reproduce this c~d material has been granted "V • CarlO. Randall, Esquire, New Hampshlre Supreme Court Clerk, Hillsborough County Superior Court to the Nati:mal Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). James A. Gainey r Administrative ,J~.ssistant to t.he Chief Ju"stice, Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ New Hampshire Supreme Court ;," sion of the ~ owner. Carroll F •. J-c:>nes, Esquire, Concord, New Hampshire o Q ·T ..I -=2_ 'J Q, , ( \ [ " 0 . Jr' [ I :'"-, I r "A Judiciary that discloses what it is doing 0" " ~J r and why it does it. L will breed understanding. Confidence based on understanding (~ \ is more enduring t;han confidence based on awe." u.s. Supreme Court Justice William o. Dou~las . ,.;;- o " J3ECTIO~ ,J: ,C ,-OvERVIEW. .,'OF .,,'. "THE, CREA~UIONAND"" With this in'mind the Supreme Court and its 6 L .S~RUCTUREO:FTHE'COURT SYSTEM Judicial Planning Committee present to the legislators .',' and public this first Annual Report. In it you will find an outline of your court system, an analysis of ,0 its problems and a plan for their solution. I hope ~, , ;. 0 0, you will find the information contained in this report 0' to be helpful and inteL;f".lsting. '= -0' . ,.1! .'1 :j ; . -". '" .. , 'J J"rr" o ' 'Up '" Edward J. Lampron [. Chief Justice -IT " 0 t, l~ , ,,' .'q L~, u' "" \~.. 1 , i) e* ,---- possible jail sentence is less than one year and a day. Miner CREATION OF THE COURTS, infract.ions, such as offenses against cit'j' ordinances or rrotor vehicle rules are called "violations," not crimes, and are punishable by a fine only. The New HaIDpshire Constitu.tion says'that the "judicial power of If the State shall be vested in the supreme court, a trial court .of Appeals may be made from decisions of the trial courts and govern­ { general jurisdictian knoon as the superior court, and such ICMer mental agencies to the New Hampshire Supreme Court. Appeals are made on courts as the'legislature may establish under Article 4th .of Part issues of law, such as a challenge of a trial judge's application of law 2. " Thus under Article 72-a .of Part 2, the Supreme and Superier to the facts feund by a jury. Cr.iminal convictions may be appealed by Courts are "constitutional" courts, which may only be changed by I1\ the defendant but only certain rulings in criminal cases may be appealed arrendment to the Constitution, while the District and Municipal by the prosecution. The Supreme Court of New Hampshire is in Concord Courts may be changed or ab::>lished by the Legislature. !?robate .:. r and consists of five judges. Unlike the trial courts, witnesses are Court is also a constitutional court under Article 80 of Part 2 .of '.' t rarely called upon to testify at the Supreme Court. The Suprem= Court the Constitution. .. may hear the attorneys for both sides and the attorneys also submit written analyses, Jmown as "briefs I II which support their argurrents. Generally, the opinions of the five Justices of the Supreme Court are THE IDBK OF OUR COURTS handed down approxi.rnately 30 to 60 days after they hear the oral argu­ ments. These opinions may affirm, reverse, or nodify the decisions .of the trial court .or agency. The Supreme Court may send the case back for Like ether court systems of .our COilll"try, the 'New Hampshire courts a new trial in the lower court or fer further decision in the govern­ were established to settle disputes between citizens and to hear mental ,agency. case.c;; involving cr.imes aga:inst the public. Consider the follCMing: JOM Q. and Mabel Citizen are.driving through dCMntcMn Concord. The decisions of the Supreme Court interpret the la\'l so as to set Suddenly I their vehicle is struck fran beh:ind by a drunken driver. standards that may be fellowed in future cases. All the Supreme Court The .i.npact sends John into the dash. He is hospitalized for b.ro decisians are published in a book called th~ New I§mpshire Reports. weeks, and his spouse receives a serious back injury that doctors ag-.cee will cause her pain the rest .of her life. A newly organized Sentence Review . Division .of Superior Court has been established fer review of s~tences set by judges in criminal cases. Fortunately for JOM Q. Citizen and his spouse, two sets .of rules This three-judge panel has the power to affinn, decrease or increase a have been established that will previde them with the means .of settling criminal's sentence to our state t s prison. their problems: (1) Civil law, which will alloo both JOM and Mabel to seek lOOney damages fran the drunken driver for the injuries they The ten Probate Courts in the State deal with estates, trusts, and received, and (2) Criminal law, the law that gives the State the wills as well as adeptions and related matters. The ten Probate Judges I authority to prosecute the drunken driver for his wrong.' Because opened approximately 8,600 new files in 1977. ignorance of the law is no excuse for its violation, the drunken driver is responsible for his actions; JOM and Mabel will have their "day in ( court" and the low will have .once again deroonstrated. its pcMer to THE! JUDICIARY influence human behavior and relatienships. , r Our civil law has developed from the Constitution, court decisions In New Hampshire all judges are nominated by the Governor and confinned in previous cases, arid fran the specific laws passed by the Legislc;ture. by the five-member ExecUtive CeunciL, By law, all judges must retire In civil actions a jury generally finds the facts, illlless the parties from the NeW Hampshire Court System at age seventy. All judges are to the actien decide to try the case in front of a judge only, and. the subject to a code of ethics, known as the Code of Judicial Conduct, that resulting IIOney awarded to the winning party is k:ncMn as a verdict. In is enforced by the State Supreme Court. ~he Judges of the Suprerre and certain cases, a verdict in dollars will be inadequate to cure the Superior Courts, as well as some District Court Judges, serve full time damage done .or continuing cla;mage, as in the case of the SIOOldering dump 'and may not maintain a law practice. whose srroke or smell drives a hcmecMIler out of his heme. In such circumstances, a Court exercises what is known as its "equity powers" and issues a "decree" which, in the exarr~le stated, would order the THE ADVERSARY SYSTEN manager of the dump to correct the situation. Criminal law is a.lnost entirely defined by statutes (laws passed by The court system in New Harrpshire, like ether American court systems our Legislature and signed by .our Governol\) although court decisions and the system in G1:eat Britain, utilizes the adversary system of justice. interpret the statutory law. Cr.iIres are divided ~to two categories: This system asStlI'CeS that two lawyers arguing the opposite point .of view (I) Felonies, where the penalty may be a state'pr~son sentence from one will establish tl}e facts and present the law involved in the case.
Recommended publications
  • Lco~[), Nrev~ Lham~Sfn~[E ]977 SUPREME COURT of NEW HAMPSHIRE Appoi Nted

    Lco~[), Nrev~ Lham~Sfn~[E ]977 SUPREME COURT of NEW HAMPSHIRE Appoi Nted

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. 6~N ~~~~'L~©DUCu~©u~ U(Q ll~HE ~£~"~rr»~~h\~lE (ot1l~u g~ U\]~V~ li"~A[~rr~s.~~Du 8 1.\ COU\!lCO~[), NrEV~ lHAM~Sfn~[E ]977 SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Appoi nted_ Frank R. Kenison, Chief Justice Apri 1 29, 1952 Edward J. Lampron, Senior Justice October 5, 1949 William A. Grimes, Associate Justice December 12, 1966 Maurice P. Bois, Associate Justice October 5, 1976 Charles G. Douglas, III, Associate Justice January 1, 1977 George S. Pappagianis Clerk of Supreme Court Reporter of Decisions li:IDdSlWi&iImlm"'_IIIII'I..a_IIIHI_sm:r.!!!IIIl!!!!__ g~_~= _________ t.':"':iIr_. ____________ .~ • • FE~l 2 ~: 1978 J\UBttst,1977 £AU • "1 be1.J..e.ve. tha..:t oWl. c.oWtt hM pWl-Oue.d a. -6te.a.dy c.OWl-Oe. tfvtoughoL1;t the. ye.aJlA, tha..:t U ha.6 pll.ogll.u-6e.d . a.nd a.ppUe.d the. pJUnuplu 06 OUll. law-6 -Ln a. ma.nne.ll. c.o Y!.-6-L-6te.r"t wUh the. pubUc. iMe.Il.Ut a.nd that aU the. jud-LuaJty w-L.U c..oJ1-ti.nue. to be, a. -6a.6e.guaJtd to the. .V,b eJr.;t,[u, 1l.e..6 po MibiJ!ft[u a.nd d-Lg nUy we. c.heJLU h. " Honorable Frank R. Kenison, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, liThe State of the Judiciary,1I 3 MAR 77 House Record, page 501.
  • Toledo City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. V. State Bd. of Edn., 146 Ohio St.3D 356, 2016- Ohio-2806.]

    Toledo City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. V. State Bd. of Edn., 146 Ohio St.3D 356, 2016- Ohio-2806.]

    [Cite as Toledo City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. State Bd. of Edn., 146 Ohio St.3d 356, 2016- Ohio-2806.] TOLEDO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., APPELLEES, v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Toledo City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. State Bd. of Edn., 146 Ohio St.3d 356, 2016-Ohio-2806.] Constitutional law—Article II, Section 28 of the Ohio Constitution—School funding—Retroactivity clause does not protect political subdivisions— General Assembly has constitutional authority to adjust local school funding retrospectively. (No. 2014-1769—Submitted December 2, 2015—Decided May 4, 2016.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, Nos. 14AP-93, 14AP-94, and 14AP-95, 2014-Ohio-3741. _________________ KENNEDY, J. {¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal from the Tenth District Court of Appeals, we consider whether the General Assembly has the constitutional authority to retroactively reduce the amount of state funding allocated to local school districts and to immunize appellant State Board of Education of Ohio (“the department”) against legal claims by school districts seeking reimbursement for retroactive reductions in school-foundation funding. The department advances the following proposition of law: “The General Assembly has constitutional authority to adjust local school funding retrospectively.” We agree. {¶ 2} For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the Retroactivity Clause, Article II, Section 28 of the Ohio Constitution, does not protect political subdivisions like appellees Toledo City School District Board of Education, Dayton City School District Board of Education, and Cleveland Metropolitan School District Board of Education (“the boards”) that are created by the state to carry out SUPREME COURT OF OHIO the state’s governmental functions.
  • Senate the Senate Met at 2 P.M

    Senate the Senate Met at 2 P.M

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 161 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, JULY 27, 2015 No. 119 Senate The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was Republicans and Democrats continue ORDER OF BUSINESS called to order by the President pro to rally around a bipartisan, multiyear Mr. REID. Mr. President, I choose tempore (Mr. HATCH). highway measure that is fiscally re- not to speak today. So I would ask the f sponsible and will not raise taxes. Chair to announce the business of the The bill before us would streamline day. PRAYER regulations, advance research and in- The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- novation in transportation, modernize f fered the following prayer: infrastructure and transportation sys- RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME Let us pray. tems, and inject new accountability The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under Eternal God, incline Your ear and measures so Americans can get a bet- the previous order, the leadership time hear our prayer, for without Your pres- ter handle on how their tax money is is reserved. ence and power, our striving is in vain. actually being spent. Preserve us with Your loving provi- This multiyear bill also reverses the f trend of short-term temporary patches, dence, guiding us through each season HIRE MORE HEROES ACT OF 2015 of life’s sojourn. giving State and local Governments Lord, teach our lawmakers Your the certainty and the stability they The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under way, illuminating their path with the need to better plan road and bridge the previous order, the Senate will re- lamp and light of Your truth.
  • 9. Biographical Sketches

    9. Biographical Sketches

    Biographical Sketches WHITE MOUNTAIN BANK OF LANCASTER Officers, Directors, et al. Certain dates may be approximate BEDEL, Hazen • [White Mountain Bank of Lancaster • 1849: Incorporator for original charter] • Hazen Bedel was born in Haverhill on July 31, 1818, son of John Bedel and his second wife.1 When he was a year old he moved with his family north to the Indian Stream Territory, but the privations were so great that his mother and her thee children soon relocated to Haverhill, where Hazen, age five, lived with the Jacob Williams family, with whom he remained until age 10, in the meantime attending school. His father then returned, and the family moved to Bath, where Hazen was schooled for two more years. • Afterward he went to Montpelier, Vermont, and worked for two years at shoe making with his brother Moody. He then came back to Bath and made shoes there for two more years. An uncle in Lancaster then hired him as a clerk in the Sampson & Perkins store, where he remained for three years, at which time the concern failed. Hazen Bedell was placed in charge of winding down the business, which he did with great success. • In 1838, at age 20, he went to Colebrook and secured a position as a clerk for Frederick G. Messer (best known as a hat maker in Lancaster), In four years he gained a third interest as a partner in the business. In October 1844 he entered the merchandising trade on his own account in a building he had erected on Factory Road (later Pleasant St.), where he stayed until 1861, when he relocated in a large building he constructed on Main Street, with the Masonic Hall upstairs.
  • H. Doc. 108-222

    H. Doc. 108-222

    SEVENTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1801, TO MARCH 3, 1803 FIRST SESSION—December 7, 1801, to May 3, 1802 SECOND SESSION—December 6, 1802, to March 3, 1803 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—March 4, 1801, to March 5, 1801 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—AARON BURR, of New York PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—ABRAHAM BALDWIN, 1 of Georgia; STEPHEN R. BRADLEY, 2 of Vermont SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—SAMUEL A. OTIS, of Massachusetts DOORKEEPER OF THE SENATE—JAMES MATHERS, of New York SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—NATHANIEL MACON, 3 of North Carolina CLERK OF THE HOUSE—JOHN H. OSWALD, of Pennsylvania; JOHN BECKLEY, 4 of Virginia SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—JOSEPH WHEATON, of Rhode Island DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—THOMAS CLAXTON CONNECTICUT James Jackson Daniel Hiester Joseph H. Nicholson SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Thomas Plater James Hillhouse John Milledge 6 Peter Early 7 Samuel Smith Uriah Tracy 12 Benjamin Taliaferro 8 Richard Sprigg, Jr. REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE 13 David Meriwether 9 Walter Bowie Samuel W. Dana John Davenport KENTUCKY MASSACHUSETTS SENATORS Roger Griswold SENATORS 5 14 Calvin Goddard John Brown Dwight Foster Elias Perkins John Breckinridge Jonathan Mason John C. Smith REPRESENTATIVES REPRESENTATIVES Benjamin Tallmadge John Bacon Thomas T. Davis Phanuel Bishop John Fowler DELAWARE Manasseh Cutler SENATORS MARYLAND Richard Cutts William Eustis William H. Wells SENATORS Samuel White Silas Lee 15 John E. Howard Samuel Thatcher 16 REPRESENTATIVE AT LARGE William Hindman 10 Levi Lincoln 17 James A. Bayard Robert Wright 11 Seth Hastings 18 REPRESENTATIVES Ebenezer Mattoon GEORGIA John Archer Nathan Read SENATORS John Campbell William Shepard Abraham Baldwin John Dennis Josiah Smith 1 Elected December 7, 1801; April 17, 1802.
  • Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School Fall 11-12-1992 Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Earman, Cynthia Diane, "Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830" (1992). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8222. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8222 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOARDINGHOUSES, PARTIES AND THE CREATION OF A POLITICAL SOCIETY: WASHINGTON CITY, 1800-1830 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Cynthia Diane Earman A.B., Goucher College, 1989 December 1992 MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the Master's and Doctor's Degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Libraries are available for inspection. Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author. Bibliographical references may be noted, but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission. Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work. A library which borrows this thesis for use by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions.
  • MIDNIGHT JUDGES KATHRYN Turnu I

    MIDNIGHT JUDGES KATHRYN Turnu I

    [Vol.109 THE MIDNIGHT JUDGES KATHRYN TuRNu I "The Federalists have retired into the judiciary as a strong- hold . and from that battery all the works of republicanism are to be beaten down and erased." ' This bitter lament of Thomas Jefferson after he had succeeded to the Presidency referred to the final legacy bequeathed him by the Federalist party. Passed during the closing weeks of the Adams administration, the Judiciary Act of 1801 2 pro- vided the Chief Executive with an opportunity to fill new judicial offices carrying tenure for life before his authority ended on March 4, 1801. Because of the last-minute rush in accomplishing this purpose, those men then appointed have since been known by the familiar generic designation, "the midnight judges." This flight of Federalists into the sanctuary of an expanded federal judiciary was, of course, viewed by the Republicans as the last of many partisan outrages, and was to furnish the focus for Republican retaliation once the Jeffersonian Congress convened in the fall of 1801. That the Judiciary Act of 1801 was repealed and the new judges deprived of their new offices in the first of the party battles of the Jeffersonian period is well known. However, the circumstances surrounding the appointment of "the midnight judges" have never been recounted, and even the names of those appointed have vanished from studies of the period. It is the purpose of this Article to provide some further information about the final event of the Federalist decade. A cardinal feature of the Judiciary Act of 1801 was a reform long advocated-the reorganization of the circuit courts.' Under the Judiciary Act of 1789, the judicial districts of the United States had been grouped into three circuits-Eastern, Middle, and Southern-in which circuit court was held by two justices of the Supreme Court (after 1793, by one justice) ' and the district judge of the district in which the court was sitting.5 The Act of 1801 grouped the districts t Assistant Professor of History, Wellesley College.
  • Dilemma of the American Lawyer in the Post-Revolutionary Era, 35 Notre Dame L

    Dilemma of the American Lawyer in the Post-Revolutionary Era, 35 Notre Dame L

    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 35 | Issue 1 Article 2 12-1-1959 Dilemma of the American Lawyer in the Post- Revolutionary Era Anton-Hermann Chroust Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Anton-Hermann Chroust, Dilemma of the American Lawyer in the Post-Revolutionary Era, 35 Notre Dame L. Rev. 48 (1959). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol35/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DILEMMA OF THE AMERICAN LAWYER IN THE POST-REVOLUTIONARY ERA Anton-Hermann Chroust* On the eve of the Revolution the legal profession in the American colonies,' in the main, had achieved both distinction and recognition. It had come to enjoy the respect as well as the confidence of the people at large. This is borne out, for instance, by the fact that twenty-five of the fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence, and thirty-one of the fifty-five members of the Constitutional Convention were lawyers. Of the thirty-one lawyers who attended the Constitutional Convention, no less than five had studied law in England.2 The American Revolution itself, directly and indirectly, affected the legal profession in a variety of ways. First, the profession itself lost a considerable number of its most prominent members; secondly, a bitter antipathy against the lawyer as a class soon made itself felt throughout the country; thirdly, a strong dislike of everything English, including the English common law became wide- spread; and fourthly, the lack of a distinct body of American law as well as the absence of American law reports and law books for a while made the administra- tion of justice extremely difficult and haphazard.
  • History of the New Hampshire Federal Courts

    History of the New Hampshire Federal Courts

    HISTORY OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE FEDERAL COURTS Prepared by the Clerk’s Office of the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire - 1991 1 HISTORY OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE FEDERAL COURTS TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE & ACKNOWLEDGMENT .......................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 7 THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT ................................................................................ 11 Time Line for the Circuit Court and Related Courts ................................................................ 19 JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ......................................................................................... 20 John Lowell ............................................................................................................................... 20 Benjamin Bourne ...................................................................................................................... 21 Jeremiah Smith.......................................................................................................................... 21 George Foster Shepley .............................................................................................................. 22 John Lowell ............................................................................................................................... 23 Francis Cabot Lowell ...............................................................................................................
  • 524 Page 400 Cont (259) State of New Hampshire, Rockingham

    524 Page 400 Cont (259) State of New Hampshire, Rockingham

    524 Page 400 cont (259) State of New Hampshire, Rockingham: Chichester March 11, 1795 At a legal Annual meeting of the Inhabitants of the Town of Chichester met according to notification Date of warrant July 20, 1795 1. Deacon Abraham chosen moderator of said meeting Page 401 2. The votes were brought in for a Governor as follows: John Gilman – 63 3. The Votes were brought in for a Councillor for the County of Rockingham as follows James Sheaf – 56 4. The votes were brought in for a Senator for the fourth District as follows: Michael McClary– 61 5. The votes were brought in for a recorder of Deeds for the County of Rockingham as fol- lows: James Gray – 57 6. The votes were brought in for a County Treasurer as follows: Oliver Peabody– 48 7. Voted to Except the Selectmens accounts 8. Capt Edmund Leavitt, Joshua Lane, Mr Moses Seavey Chosen Selectmen for the Ensuing year 9. The Constables Office Venued and struck off to William Hook who is to pay 10 shillings and 6 pencce for the priviledge of his office and William Edmunds is Accepted by the Town as bondsman for him 10. Voted the Collectors office Vendued and struck of to Joseph Dow who is to Receive 5 pounds 13 shillings for his Service And Lieut John Hilyard is Accepted by the Town for a Dondsman for him Page 402 11. Lt Joshua Lane and Mr Josiah Drake Chosen Tythingmen for the Curant year 12. Lieut John Hilyard,Dea Abraham True, Ens Benjamin Jackson Chosen for a Committee of Audit 13.
  • Dimension III: Habeas Corpus As an Instrument of Checks and Balances Eric M

    Dimension III: Habeas Corpus As an Instrument of Checks and Balances Eric M

    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 2016 Habeas Corpus in Three Dimensions: Dimension III: Habeas Corpus as an Instrument of Checks and Balances Eric M. Freedman Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Eric M. Freedman, Habeas Corpus in Three Dimensions: Dimension III: Habeas Corpus as an Instrument of Checks and Balances, 8 Ne. U. L. Rev. 251 (2016) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/1153 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOL. 8 NO. 2 NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY LAWJOURNAL Habeas Corpus in Three Dimensions Dimension III: Habeas Corpus as an Instrument of Checks and Balances Eric M. Freedman Siggi B. Wilzig Distinguished Professor of Constitutional Rights, Maurice A. Deane School of Law, Hofstra University ([email protected]); B.A. 1975, Yale University; M.A. 1977, Victoria University of Wellington (New Zealand); J.D. 1979, Yale University. This article is copyrighted by the author, Eric M. Freedman, who retains all rights thereto. Permission is hereby granted to nonprofit institutions to reproduce this work for educational use, provided that copies are distributed at or below cost and identify the author and this publication. I am solely responsible for the contents of this piece, including certain deviations from the forms prescribed by The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (Columbia Law Review Ass'n et al.
  • (435) State of New Hampshire, Rockingham

    (435) State of New Hampshire, Rockingham

    Page 600 (433 & 434 missing) (435) State of New Hampshire, Rockingham: Chichester August 29, 1808 at a Legal meeting of the Inhabitants of the Town of Chichester met agreeable to Notification Date of warrant August 13, 1808 1Abraham True Esq Chosen moderator to Govern Sd Meeting 2 The votes were Given for five Persons to Represent this state in the Congress of United States are as follows: for Clemont Storer– 61, Daniel M Durrel Esq– 61, Jedediah Smith Esq– 61, Francis Gardner Esq– 61, Charles Cutts Esq–?, Nathaniel A Haven Esq– 44, William M? Esq– 44, James Wilson Esq– 44, John C Chamberlain Esq– 24, Daniel Blaisdell Esq–44 Page 601 1. Voted to lay out a road agreeable to the third article in the warrant on the reserve between the fourth division from Gilmanton Road so-called to Simeon Rings land 2. Voted the lay out a road on the reserve between lots No 23 & 25in the second range and first division from Job Griffin House to the range from there to No 32in the first range and same division 3. Voted Asa Lane and Enoch tilton agents to see against Silk that just cyan mason has commenced Moses Seavey, Town Clerk (436) A Return of a Road We the subscriber selectmen for the town of Chichester being requested by a number of the inhabitants the same to lay out a road on the second range beginning at the Center Road in said Chichester from their running north 41° west 366 rods to the corner of Thomas Hooks lot No 32 Said road to come off the south easterly side of the spotted and number trees We have also this day laid out a road on a reserve