Instructions for Form 720 (Rev. January 2016)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Instructions for Form 720 (Rev. January 2016) Userid: CPM Schema: Leadpct: 100% Pt. size: 9.5 Draft Ok to Print instrx AH XSL/XML Fileid: … ons/I720/201601/A/XML/Cycle03/source (Init. & Date) _______ Page 1 of 22 16:37 - 18-Feb-2016 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Department of the Treasury Instructions for Form 720 Internal Revenue Service (Rev. January 2016) Quarterly Federal Excise Tax Return Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless Arrow shafts (IRS No. 106). For calendar year 2016, the otherwise noted. tax on arrow shafts continues to be $.49 per arrow shaft. Future Developments Reducing your excise tax liability, For federal income tax For the latest information about developments related to purposes, reduce your section 4081 excise tax liability by the Form 720 and its instructions, such as legislation enacted amount of excise tax credit allowable under section 6426(c) after they were published, go to www.irs.gov/form720. and your section 4041 excise tax liability by the amount of your excise tax credit allowable under section 6426(d), in What's New determining your deduction for those excise taxes or your cost of goods sold deduction attributable to those excise Suspension of section 4191 medical device tax (former­ taxes. ly IRS No. 136). The medical device tax no longer applies to sales for two years beginning January 1, 2016, through Inland waterways fuel use tax (IRS No. 64) increase. December 31, 2017. For information on the tax for sales The rate increased to $.29 per gallon for fuel used after before January 1, 2016, see T.D. 9604 and Notice 2012-77. March 31, 2015. See Inland waterways fuel use tax (IRS No. 64), later. Alternative liquid fuel and compressed natural gas (CNG) gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE) and diesel gal­ Exported gasoline blendstocks. Claims for exported lon equivalent (DGE). For sales or uses of fuel after gasoline blendstocks taxed at $.001 per gallon are made on December 31, 2015, for taxation under section 4041, Schedule C, line 15b. Continue to use line 1b to make claims liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) has a GGE of 5.75 pounds or for exported gasoline blendstocks taxed at $.184 per gallon. 1.353 gallons of LPG, liquefied natural gas (LNG) has a DGE Electronic filing. You can electronically file Form 720 of 6.06 pounds or 1.71 gallons of LNG, and CNG has a GGE through any electronic return originator (ERO), transmitter, of 5.66 pounds or 123.57 cubic feet of CNG. See Alternative and/or intermediate service provider (ISP) participating in the fuel (IRS Nos. 112, 118, and 120–124), and Line 6. IRS e-file program for excise taxes. For more information on Nontaxable Use of Alternative Fuel, later. e-file, visit the IRS website at www.irs.gov/efile. Biodiesel, renewable diesel mixture, alternative fuel, Federal tax deposits made by electronic funds transfer. and alternative fuel mixture credits. The section 6426 Generally, you must use electronic funds transfer to make credits and section 6427 payments for biodiesel, renewable federal tax deposits, such as deposits of employment tax, diesel mixtures, alternative fuel, and alternative fuel mixtures excise tax, (for exceptions, see Payment of Taxes, later), and are extended retroactively to January 1, 2015, and through corporate income tax. Generally, electronic funds transfers 2016. See Schedule C. Claims, later. are made using the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System Alternative liquid fuel GGE and DGE claim rates. For (EFTPS). If you do not want to use EFTPS, you can arrange sales or uses of fuel after December 31, 2015, LPG has a for your tax professional, financial institution, payroll service, claim rate (or GGE) of 5.75 pounds or 1.353 gallons of LPG; or other trusted third party to make deposits on your behalf. LNG has a claim rate (or DGE) of 6.06 pounds or 1.71 EFTPS is a free service provided by the Department of gallons of LNG. Treasury. To get more information about EFTPS or to enroll in Use of international air travel facilities (IRS No. 27). For EFTPS, visit www.eftps.gov or call 1-800-555-4477. Also see calendar year 2016, the tax on the amount paid for Pub. 966, Electronic Federal Tax Payment System, A Guide international flights is $17.80 per person for flights that begin to Getting Started. or end in the United States. The tax continues to be $8.90 per person for domestic segments that begin or end in Alaska or Hawaii (applies only General Instructions to departures). See Air Transportation Taxes, later. Purpose of Form Section 4371(3) tax on foreign reinsurance premiums Use Form 720 and attachments to report your liability by IRS no longer applies. The 1% tax no longer applies to No. and pay the excise taxes listed on the form. If you report premiums paid on a policy of reinsurance issued by one a liability on Part I or Part II, you may be eligible to use foreign reinsurer to another foreign insurer or reinsurer, under Schedule C to claim a credit. the situations described in Rev. Rul. 2008-15. See Foreign Insurance Taxes, later. Who Must File Reminders See Patient-centered outcomes research fee (IRS Transportation of persons by air (IRS No. 26). For ! No. 133) in Part II for special rules about who must calendar year 2016, the tax on the amount paid for each CAUTION file to report the patient-centered outcomes research domestic segment of taxable air transportation continues to fee. be $4.00. You must file Form 720 if: Feb 18, 2016 Cat. No. 64240C Page 2 of 22 Fileid: … ons/I720/201601/A/XML/Cycle03/source 16:37 - 18-Feb-2016 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. You were liable for, or responsible for collecting, any of the Recordkeeping federal excise taxes listed on Form 720, Parts I and II, for a prior quarter and you have not filed a final return; or Keep copies of your tax return, records, and accounts of all You are liable for, or responsible for collecting, any of the transactions to show that the correct tax has been paid. Keep federal excise taxes listed on Form 720, Parts I and II, for the records to support all claims and all exemptions at least 4 current quarter. years from the latest of the date: See How To File for more information. The tax became due, You paid the tax, or When To File You filed a claim. You must file a return for each quarter of the calendar year as Penalties and Interest follows: If you receive a notice about a penalty after you file this return, reply to the notice with an explanation and we will Quarter covered Due by determine if you meet reasonable-cause criteria. Do not include an explanation when you file your return. Jan., Feb., Mar. April 30 Apr., May, June July 31 Trust fund recovery penalty. If communications, air transportation, and indoor tanning services taxes are July, Aug., Sept. October 31 collected but not paid to the United States Treasury or are Oct., Nov., Dec. January 31 willfully not collected, the trust fund recovery penalty may apply. The penalty is the full amount of the unpaid tax. The trust fund recovery penalty may be imposed on all If any due date for filing a return falls on a Saturday, persons who are determined by the IRS to be responsible for Sunday, or legal holiday, you may file the return on the next collecting, accounting for, and paying over these taxes, and business day. who acted willfully in not doing so. Send your return to the IRS using the U.S. Postal Service A responsible person can be an officer or employee of a or a designated private delivery service to meet the “timely corporation, a partner or employee of a partnership, an mailing as timely filing/paying” rule. See Private Delivery employee of a sole proprietorship, an accountant, or a Services, later. volunteer director/trustee. A responsible person may also include one who signs checks for the business or otherwise Floor stocks tax. Report the floor stocks tax on has authority to cause the spending of business funds. ozone-depleting chemicals (ODCs), IRS No. 20, on the return due by July 31 of each year. The tax payment is due Willfully means voluntarily, consciously, and intentionally. by June 30. See Floor Stocks Tax, later. A responsible person acts willfully if he or she knows the required actions are not taking place. Where To File Send Form 720 to: Additional Information You may find the following products helpful when preparing Department of the Treasury Form 720 and any attachments. Internal Revenue Service Pub. 510, Excise Taxes, contains definitions and Cincinnati, OH 45999-0009 examples that will help you prepare Form 720. Pub. 510 also contains information on fuel tax credits and refunds. Pub. 509, Tax Calendars, has deposit and payment due How To File dates for federal excise taxes listed in this publication. If you are not reporting a tax that you normally report, enter a Notice 2005-4 (fuel tax guidance), see 2005-2 I.R.B. 289, zero on the appropriate line on Form 720, Part I or II. Also, if available at www.irs.gov/irb/2005-02_IRB/ar14.html. you have no tax to report, write “None” on Form 720, Part III, Notice 2005-24 (sales of gasoline on oil company credit line 3; sign and date the return.
Recommended publications
  • Review of the Energy Taxation Directive
    BRIEFING Implementation Appraisal Review of the Energy Taxation Directive This briefing is one of a series of implementation appraisals produced by the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) on the operation of existing EU legislation in practice. Each briefing focuses on a specific EU law that is likely to be amended or reviewed, as envisaged in the European Commission's annual work programme. Implementation appraisals aim at providing a succinct overview of publicly available material on the implementation, application and effectiveness to date of specific EU law, drawing on input from EU institutions and bodies, as well as external organisations. They are provided by the Ex-Post Evaluation Unit of EPRS to assist parliamentary committees in their consideration of new European Commission proposals, once tabled. SUMMARY With the adoption of the European Green Deal (EGD) in December 2019, the EU signed up for the transition to a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy with no net emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) in 2050 and economic growth decoupled from resource use. As a medium- term target towards the 'net zero' long-term goal, the EU committed to an increased climate ambition of at least 55 % in GHG emission reductions by 2030, as endorsed by the European Council in December 20201 and reconfirmed in the recent agreement reached by Parliament and Council on the European Climate Law.2 Among many other measures, this will require effective carbon pricing and the removal of fossil fuel subsidies. In this context, well-designed taxes play a direct role by sending the right price signals and providing the right incentives for sustainable practices of producers, users and consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Regulating the Climate Impacts of Aviation
    www.oeko.de Options for regulating the climate impacts of aviation Commissioned by Stiftung Klimaneutralität Berlin, 21 May 2021 Authors Contact [email protected] Anne Siemons www.oeko.de Dr. Lambert Schneider Nora Wissner Head Office Freiburg Friedhelm Keimeyer P. O. Box 17 71 Sabine Gores 79017 Freiburg Jakob Graichen Street address Merzhauser Straße 173 Vanessa Cook (translation) 79100 Freiburg Phone +49 761 45295-0 Öko-Institut e.V. Office Berlin Borkumstraße 2 13189 Berlin Phone +49 30 405085-0 Office Darmstadt Rheinstraße 95 64295 Darmstadt Phone +49 6151 8191-0 Options for regulating the climate impacts of aviation Table of contents 1 Aviation in the context of the goal of climate neutrality 4 2 Current regulatory framework and options for action 6 2.1 Energy tax 6 2.1.1 Current regulatory framework 6 2.1.2 Options for action 7 2.2 Value added tax 8 2.2.1 Current regulatory framework 8 2.2.2 Options for action 10 2.3 Aviation tax 11 2.3.1 Current regulatory framework 11 2.3.2 Options for action 12 2.4 EU Emissions Trading System 16 2.4.1 Current regulatory framework 16 2.4.2 Options for action 17 2.5 CORSIA 19 2.5.1 Current regulatory framework 19 2.5.2 Options for action 21 3 Recommendations 22 4 Outlook 23 List of references 26 3 Options for regulating the climate impacts of aviation 1 Aviation in the context of the goal of climate neutrality Aviation is the most environmentally damaging mode of transport and contributes substantially to global warming.
    [Show full text]
  • DOWNSTREAM OIL THEFT Global Modalities, Trends, and Remedies
    Atlantic Council GLOBAL ENERGY CENTER DOWNSTREAM OIL THEFT Global Modalities, Trends, and Remedies Dr. Ian M. Ralby DOWNSTREAM OIL THEFT Global Modalities, Trends, and Remedies Dr. Ian M. Ralby ISBN: 978-1-61977-440-7 Cover photo: Reuters/Rafael Marchante. Donkeys cross the closed border between Morocco and Algeria carrying petrol in Beni Drar, near Oujda, November 26, 2007. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The author is solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. January 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We extend a special thanks to SICPA for the generous support for this initiative, without which this report would not have been possible. This report was produced by I.R. Consilium LLC in conjunction with the Atlantic Council. Dr. Ian M. Ralby was the lead author, with contributing authorship by Rohini Ralby and Dr. David Soud. Dr. Ian Ralby, founder and CEO of I.R. Consilium, is a recognized expert in international law, maritime security, and the interdiction of transnational crime. He is a leading authority on the regulation, governance, and oversight of private security companies, having been involved in national and international efforts to develop accountability and standards for the private security industry. In addition, he is widely regarded as an expert on maritime security, both in developing national maritime strategy and in devising legally-grounded functional responses to emerging maritime threats. Dr. Ralby’s work frequently involves energy-related matters, both on land and offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Travel, Life-Style, Energy Use and Environmental Impact
    Air travel, life-style, energy use and environmental impact Stefan Kruger Nielsen Ph.D. dissertation September 2001 Financed by the Danish Energy Agency’s Energy Research Programme Department of Civil Engineering Technical University of Denmark Building 118 DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby Denmark http://www.bvg.dtu.dk 2001 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document Report BYG DTU R-021 2001 ISSN 1601-2917 ISBN 87-7877-076-9 Executive summary This summary describes the results of a Ph.D. study that was carried out in the Energy Planning Group, Department for Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, in a three-year period starting in August 1998 and ending in September 2001. The project was funded by a research grant from the Danish Energy Research Programme. The overall aim of this project is to investigate the linkages between energy use, life style and environmental impact. As a case of study, this report investigates the future possibilities for reducing the growth in greenhouse gas emissions from commercial civil air transport, that is passenger air travel and airfreight. The reason for this choice of focus is that we found that commercial civil air transport may become a relatively large energy consumer and greenhouse gas emitter in the future. For example, according to different scenarios presented by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), commercial civil air transport's fuel burn may grow by between 0,8 percent a factor of 1,6 and 16 between 1990 and 2050. The actual growth in fuel consumption will depend on the future growth in airborne passenger travel and freight and the improvement rate for the specific fuel efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • “Covidair” Ready for Climate Protection Landing?
    “CovidAir” ready for climate protection landing? A case study of Austrian Airline’s CSR response referring to climate protection in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic DIPLOMA THESIS International Economic and Business Studies Assoz.-Prof. Dr. Esther BLANCO Department of Public Finance The University of Innsbruck School of Management Submitted by Ruth MACHREICH, BSc 01441696 Innsbruck, October 2020 Abstract In order to contain the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus borders were closed worldwide, forcing the airline industry to a global standstill. This study is a case study of Austrian Airline’s CSR response referring to climate protection in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the focus was on the Austrian Airlines, the Balance sustainability report of its parent company Lufthansa Group was examined for a qualitative content analysis. This included a closer look at the chapter on climate and environment and its most important environmental goals, initiatives and measures. The filtered out measures were further completed by the environmental measures, introduced by the Austrian government as a part of the COVID-19 financial rescue package for the Austrian Airlines, and the respective additions and changes were discussed. In addition, an expert interview with Ulla Rasmussen from the VCÖ was conducted and gives the opportunity to better classify the changes triggered by COVID-19 to improve climate protection inside the aviation. The linking of financial subsidies with ecological measures showed the commitment to climate protection and the awareness of both, the Austrian Government and the approving Austrian Airlines that an even more active role for climate protection and a sustainable aviation industry is essential today.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing an Air Ticket Tax in Switzerland: Estimated Effects on Demand
    Introducing an Air Ticket Tax in Switzerland: Estimated Effects on Demand E4S White Paper 2021 - 2 Introducing an Air Ticket Tax in Switzerland: Estimated Effects on Demand E4S White Paper Philippe Thalmann, Fleance Cocker, Pallivathukkal Cherian Abraham, Marius Brülhart, Nikolai Orgland, Dominic Rohner, Michael Yaziji June 2021 © Enterprise for Society (E4S), 2021 E4S acknowledges financial support from the University of Lausanne, IMD, and EPFL. This White Paper was prepared by the Environmental Policy platform of the Enterprise for Society Center (E4S), The members of the platform are: Marius Brülhart, Pierre-Marie Glauser, Rafael Lalive, Dominic Rohner, Simon Scheidegger, Mathias Thoenig (all UNIL-HEC), Ralf Boscheck, Michael Yaziji (IMD), Philippe Thalmann, and Gaetan de Rassenfosse (EPFL). Cover photo by Amarnath Tade, downloaded from Unsplash. Introducing an Air Ticket Tax in Switzerland: Estimated Effects on Demand | E4S White Paper | 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 7 2 The contribution of air travel to global warming ........................................................................ 9 2.1 Full climate impact of aviation ............................................................................................ 9 2.2 Climate impact of Swiss air
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy Tax Directive
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 14.7.2021 COM(2021) 563 final 2021/0213 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE restructuring the Union framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (recast) (Text with EEA relevance) {SEC(2021) 663 final} - {SWD(2021) 640 final} - {SWD(2021) 641 final} - {SWD(2021) 642 final} EN EN EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL • Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The taxation of energy products and electricity plays an important role in the area of climate and energy policy. The harmonized rules set under the Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity ("Energy Taxation Directive" or "ETD") aim to ensure the proper functioning of the Internal Market. However, since the adoption of the ETD, the underlying climate and energy policy framework changed radically and the Directive is no longer aligned with current EU policies. Furthermore, the ETD is no longer ensuring a proper functioning of the internal market. The proposal for recasting is part of the European Green Deal ("EGD") and of the Fit for 55 legislative package, as it focuses on environmental and climate issues to support the Commission’s commitment to tackling environmental-related challenges and achieve the EU’s domestic greenhouse gas emissions reductions objectives and air pollution reduction. The EGD launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate ambition and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Tax Policy Beyond the Tax Ratio for the EU As Core Element of a “Fiscal Union”
    Sustainable Tax Policy beyond the Tax Ratio for the EU as core element of a “Fiscal Union” Paper submitted for the Conference “Toward A Genuine Economic and Monetary Union” at the Austrian National Bank, September 10-11, 2015 Margit Schratzenstaller Austrian Institute of Economic Research Arsenal Objekt 20 A-1030 Vienna Austria [email protected] Work in progress – please do not circulate! Abstract Altogether, currently tax theory and tax policy are addressing partial aspects of sustainability, but do not adopt an integrated perspective. The paper outlines the objectives of a sustainable tax policy which may contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy aiming at smart, inclusive and sustainable growth. It then identifies those areas of tax policy where the attempts to create a European Single Market and the mobility of goods, services, capital and people require some co-ordination of tax policy in the EU to close sustainability gaps in tax policy. Of particular relevance are the containment of company tax competition and profit shifting; the creation of a framework to effectively enforce environmental and sin taxes in EU member states; and options to introduce EU taxes. Thus the paper tries to bring together aspects of a EU tax policy supporting the Europe 2020 strategy and the debate about a “Fiscal Union” as suggested in the report “Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union” presented by the presidents of the European institutions and others in December 2012, which remains very vague concerning the area of taxation. 1
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Taxes: Recent Developments in Tools for Integration
    Environmental issues series No 18 Environmental taxes: recent developments in tools for integration November 2000 Layout: Brandenborg a/s Legal notice The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission or other European Communities institutions. Neither the European Environment Agency nor any person or company acting on behalf of the Agency is responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int) ISBN: 92-9167-261-0 © EEA, Copenhagen, 2000 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Denmark Printed on recycled and chlorine-free bleached paper European Environment Agency Kongens Nytorv 6 DK-1050 Copenhagen K Denmark Tel: +45 33 36 71 00 Fax: +45 33 36 71 99 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.eea.eu.int Contents Preface......................................................................................... 5 Summary...................................................................................... 7 1. Recent developments in the use of green taxes........... 7 1.1. Increase in the use of environmental taxes......... 7 1.2. New areas for environmental taxation are emerging ....................................................... 8 1.3. Dynamic developments in large EU countries..... 8 1.4. Almost no progress at EU level........................... 8 1.5. Accession countries play a valuable role............. 8 2. Effectiveness of environmental taxes ............................ 8 2.1. Evidence of effectiveness is increasing ............... 8 2.2. Combined measures and policy packages may be helpful ..................................................... 9 2.3. Ecological tax reforms serve multiple objectives 9 3. Taxes and the integration of environment into sector policies........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annex to the European Citizens' Initiative Ending the Kerosene Tax
    Annex to the European Citizens’ Initiative Ending the kerosene tax exemption Our European Citizens’ Initiative aims at starting to tax aviation fuel (kerosene) for domestic and intra-European flights. ‘Aviation is a major source of CO2 emissions, increasing its emissions by 21% within Europe in the last three years, and is predicted to continue to grow’ (Transport & Environment, 2019)1. If Europe is to meet its climate targets, action is needed to be taken and tax policy has a key role to play. However, to date, all aviation fuel used in Europe has been tax exempt and cumbersome rules under the VAT Directive results in airline tickets are being exempt from this. These subsidies to the aviation sector create incentives for consumers to increasingly use the most carbon-intensive transport mode and less greener alternatives, and fail to incentivize the aviation sector to cut its emissions. I. Setting the scene a) Increase in flights number in Europe ‘In 2016, the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) published an aviation demand growth forecast for the coming decades. The ICAO demand forecast considers 59 global route groups for which a forecast is made in terms of the growth in passenger km and cargo tone-km. The forecast for Intra EU flights (both domestic and international) shows an annual demand increase of 2.5% for passenger demand up to 2030. For EU departing flights with destinations outside the EU, the annual passenger demand growth varies between route group, with an average demand growth of 3.2% per year’ (van Velzen, TAKS, 2018)2. b) Negative externalities of planes ‘Aviation is responsible for over 13% of EU transport CO2 emissions and is expected to account for over 16% of the EU’s liquid fossil fuel demand by 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Study: Taxing Aviation Fuel in Europe. Back to the Future?
    Taxing Aviation Fuel in Europe. Back to the Future? Report prepared by Bill Hemmings and expert contributors Eckhard Pache, Peter Forsyth, Gabriela Mundaca, Jon Strand and Per Kågeson. March 2020 Contents Chapter 1 - Executive Summary ........................................................... 2 Joint Conclusions ................................................................................... 3 Expert findings ...................................................................................... 4 Taxing aviation fuel in a broader context. (Per Kågeson) ................................ 6 Chapter 2 - Introduction and background (Bill Hemmings) .......................... 8 A brief history of fuel taxation .................................................................. 9 Domestic fuel taxation outside the EU ........................................................ 10 Chapter 3 - Taxing Aviation Fuel in Europe (legal summary Dr. Eckhard .............. Pache) ......................................................................... 11 Chapter 4 - Fuel taxation in the EU (Bill Hemmings)................................ 17 Chapter 5 - Economic Impacts of Fuel Taxation (Dr Peter Forsyth) ............. 25 Chapter 6 - European Aviation: How should it be Taxed? (Gabriela Mundaca ...............& Jon Strand)............. .................... .............................. 40 Chapter 7 - Tax aviation fuel in Scandinavia? (Dr Per Kågeson) ................. 49 ANNEX I - Taxing Aviation Fuel in Europe (main study, Dr Eckhard Pache) . 51 ANNEX II
    [Show full text]
  • The Example of a European Carbon-Based Flight Ticket Tax
    H2020-EURO-SOCIETY-2014 MAY 2016 Sustainability-oriented EU Taxes: The Example of a European Carbon-based Flight Ticket Tax Alexander Krenek, Margit Schratzenstaller Austrian Institute of Economic Research Arsenal Objekt 20 A-1030 Vienna, Austria [email protected] [email protected] The FairTax project is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 2014-2018, grant agreement No FairTax 649439 2 FairTax WP-Series No.1 Sustainability-oriented EU Taxes: The Example of a European Carbon-based Flight Ticket Tax Abstract Taxing the aviation sector at the EU level and using the resulting revenues to reduce Member States’ contributions to finance the EU budget presents itself as a huge opportunity not only to decrease carbon emissions effectively, but also to reform the EU system of own resources. The aviation sector is a small but fast growing emitter of carbon dioxide. The failed attempts of several EU Member States to introduce a flight ticket tax and the pressure on those EU Member States still levying such a tax clearly demonstrate the limits of national aviation taxation. Assigning any kind of taxes on flight tickets to the EU level would greatly reduce the tax enforcement problems inherent to mobile tax bases and put a stop to harmful tax competition between EU Member States. A double dividend, consisting of a reduction of CO2 on the one side and a boost for the economy on the other side, is a likely scenario if additional tax revenues are spent in the right way. Therefore, in this paper it is proposed that all revenues from a European carbon-based ticket tax should be used to reduce contributions of Member States to the EU budget.
    [Show full text]