DOCSLIB.ORG

Competing with China in Southeast Asia: the Economic Imperative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Competing with China in Southeast Asia: the Economic Imperative COMPETING WITH CHINA IN SOUTHEAST ASIA: THE ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE JONATHAN STROMSETH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY demonstrate high standards and best practices in collaboration with key regional partners. As great power rivalry intensifies in Southeast Asia, China is increasingly achieving its strategic • Establish a regional center for strategic goals in the region through economic statecraft economic engagement: To galvanize — illustrated most vividly in its signature Belt and cooperation with allies and partners, Washington Road Initiative (BRI) — and economic factors are should appoint a special infrastructure envoy to playing a prominent role in shaping the choices of lead a new regional center at the U.S. embassy Southeast Asian leaders on policy issues that divide in Singapore. The center should be staffed Washington and Beijing. Security concerns will by representatives of the U.S. International continue to resonate within this decision-making Development Finance Corporation, U.S. Agency calculus, of course. Southeast Asian countries can for International Development, U.S. EXIM Bank, be expected to push back against Beijing (and be and U.S. Department of State. more open to U.S. policy positions) when they feel threatened by China, especially where territorial • Explore the costs and benefits of joining the integrity is concerned. These concerns will provide Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement a continuing opening for Washington in the security for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP): When domain. Yet, the security-centric paradigm that has the Trump administration withdrew from TPP long guided American thinking is an insufficient lens negotiations in January 2017, the United through which to view and understand the region. As States effectively ceded economic leadership Southeast Asia begins to recover from the COVID-19 to China in the Asia-Pacific. The U.S. should pandemic, the United States must also improve its explore returning to the TPP family, starting economic game in a region where China has come with Congressional hearings that examine the to dominate trade and tourism and is matching if costs and benefits, assess the impact on the not exceeding Japan in infrastructure investment. American workforce and middle class, and The objective shouldn’t be to confront BRI and identify possible areas for renegotiation. create a bifurcated region, imposing choices that could end up marginalizing the United States over • Deepen bilateral ties with emerging partners time, but to develop compelling alternatives and like Vietnam: Washington should establish then reengage China from a position of strength. a “strategic partnership” with Hanoi before the end of 2021. This would signal that U.S. To compete with China and sustain American relationships are innovative and growing in power and influence effectively, Washington should Asia and could facilitate broader development take the following steps to improve its economic cooperation in mainland Southeast Asia. A standing in the region: central component of the partnership should be expanding economic ties with a country • Operationalize infrastructure coordination expected to be the world’s fastest growing in Southeast Asia with allies and partners: economy this year, having controlled COVID-19 The U.S. should operationalize existing multi- with remarkable success. country platforms to facilitate infrastructure investments in the region. Washington shouldn’t • Revitalize and reframe foreign aid cooperation miss this opportunity to compete with China, with the region: The Trump administration produce benefits for American investors, and presented foreign aid and development as 1 COMPETING WITH CHINA IN SOUTHEAST ASIA: THE ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE a “Journey to Self-Reliance,” but today’s partners like Singapore and key emerging partners development needs increasingly emanate from such as Vietnam and Indonesia. Taken together, global governance challenges like pandemics the 10 countries that make up the Association of and climate change — challenges that require Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) boast the third multilateral solutions. Going forward, in part to largest population in the world at 650 million. In protect America’s economic future, the United addition, ASEAN is the fifth largest economy in the States should expand support for regional efforts world with a gross domestic product (GDP) of $2.8 addressing these urgent global challenges. trillion and the top destination for U.S. investment in the Indo-Pacific at $329 billion (more than the • Reengage China on select issues like climate United States has directed to China, Japan, South change: Washington should coordinate with Korea, and India combined). Almost 42,000 U.S. China to combat climate change in Southeast companies export to ASEAN countries, supporting Asia, a maritime region that is particularly about 600,000 jobs in the United States.1 vulnerable to global warming. The U.S. could work with Beijing to establish a multi-donor Yet, while the stakes are high, the region is trust fund at the World Bank, to which third confused about the objectives and focus of countries could apply for climate support, or U.S. policy. At a trilateral dialogue organized by simply encourage co-financing from regional Brookings in Singapore in late October 2019, development banks to address this issue. just before COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, experts from Southeast Asia asked tough and probing THE PROBLEM questions about U.S. Asia strategy in the context of escalating U.S.-China rivalry. Southeast Asian The U.S.-led security system has underpinned participants said the United States should better regional peace and stability in East Asia for decades. define the goal of U.S. Asia policy today: Is it to China is now challenging this system as it woos reestablish preeminence, construct a new balance American allies like Thailand and the Philippines, of power, preserve the rules-based order, or seeks to reorient Asia’s security architecture in its some combination of these elements? They said favor, and takes aggressive steps to enforce its far- strategic competition should be a means to an end, reaching territorial claims in the South China Sea. not an end in itself. They also felt U.S. policy was At the same time, China is increasingly achieving too concentrated on defense and security, to the its strategic goals in Southeast Asia through detriment of diplomacy and development, allowing economic statecraft or the use of economic tools China to fill the soft power vacuum and capture the to achieve foreign policy goals. Starting in 2018, narrative through BRI.2 the Trump administration launched some new economic initiatives with allies and partners under U.S. economic engagement with the 10 ASEAN its Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) strategy, but countries remains substantial. The United States so far these efforts pale in comparison to China’s exports about $75 billion in goods and $31 financial might and growing economic integration billion in services to ASEAN on an annual basis. with the region. Meanwhile, U.S. efforts to brand Washington disburses over $800 million annually BRI as “predatory economics” or “debt-trap in foreign assistance to ASEAN countries, as diplomacy” have failed to resonate with Southeast well.3 This includes support for the new Mekong- Asian countries. The COVID-19 pandemic has only U.S. Partnership, successor to the Lower Mekong increased the policy challenges for Washington as Initiative (LMI) that lasted from 2009 to 2020. China recovers faster from the outbreak, reinforcing Under the new partnership, launched in September its already advantaged economic position and 2020, the U.S. will contribute about $150 million advancing its strategic goals as a result. to support the autonomy, economic independence, and sustainable growth of Mekong partner America’s economic challenge countries, with $33 million of this total coming from the existing Asia Enhancing Development Growth Much is at stake for U.S. foreign policy and American through Energy (EDGE) initiative.4 interests in the region. Southeast Asia not only includes two U.S. allies, but also important security 2 COMPETING WITH CHINA IN SOUTHEAST ASIA: THE ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE Under FOIP, the Trump administration also took the stage of planning, feasibility study, tender, or steps to expand its efforts in the infrastructure currently under construction, Indonesia currently domain. In late 2018, it joined Japan and leads the list at $93 billion, followed by Vietnam Australia to form the Trilateral Partnership for and Malaysia at $70 billion and $34 billion, Infrastructure Investment in the Indo-Pacific respectively.9 to promote sustainable infrastructure based on high standards. Subsequently, it partnered China is also developing new sub-regional with Tokyo in launching the Japan-U.S. Mekong initiatives, such as the Lancang-Mekong Power Partnership, or JUMPP, with an initial U.S. Cooperation (LMC) mechanism, to coordinate BRI commitment of $29.5 million, and created the projects and advance its economic and political Blue Dot Network with Japan and Australia, a multi- ambitions in mainland Southeast Asia. Established stakeholder initiative designed to evaluate and in 2015 among the six countries that comprise certify nominated infrastructure projects based the Greater Mekong Subregion (Cambodia, on high quality standards and principles.5 Yet, China, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam), few concrete projects have resulted from these the LMC promotes cooperation across
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greater China: the Next Economic Superpower?
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Murray Weidenbaum Publications Government, and Public Policy Contemporary Issues Series 57 2-1-1993 Greater China: The Next Economic Superpower? Murray L. Weidenbaum Washington University in St Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/mlw_papers Part of the Economics Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Recommended Citation Weidenbaum, Murray L., "Greater China: The Next Economic Superpower?", Contemporary Issues Series 57, 1993, doi:10.7936/K7DB7ZZ6. Murray Weidenbaum Publications, https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/mlw_papers/25. Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy — Washington University in St. Louis Campus Box 1027, St. Louis, MO 63130. Other titles available in this series: 46. The Seeds ofEntrepreneurship, Dwight Lee Greater China: The 47. Capital Mobility: Challenges for Next Economic Superpower? Business and Government, Richard B. McKenzie and Dwight Lee Murray Weidenbaum 48. Business Responsibility in a World of Global Competition, I James B. Burnham 49. Small Wars, Big Defense: Living in a World ofLower Tensions, Murray Weidenbaum 50. "Earth Summit": UN Spectacle with a Cast of Thousands, Murray Weidenbaum Contemporary 51. Fiscal Pollution and the Case Issues Series 57 for Congressional Term Limits, Dwight Lee February 1993 53. Global Warming Research: Learning from NAPAP 's Mistakes, Edward S. Rubin 54. The Case for Taxing Consumption, Murray Weidenbaum 55. Japan's Growing Influence in Asia: Implications for U.S. Business, Steven B. Schlossstein 56. The Mirage of Sustainable Development, Thomas J. DiLorenzo Additional copies are available from: i Center for the Study of American Business Washington University CS1- Campus Box 1208 One Brookings Drive Center for the Study of St.
    [Show full text]
  • China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States
    Order Code RL32688 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States Updated April 4, 2006 Bruce Vaughn (Coordinator) Analyst in Southeast and South Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Wayne M. Morrison Specialist in International Trade and Finance Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States Summary Southeast Asia has been considered by some to be a region of relatively low priority in U.S. foreign and security policy. The war against terror has changed that and brought renewed U.S. attention to Southeast Asia, especially to countries afflicted by Islamic radicalism. To some, this renewed focus, driven by the war against terror, has come at the expense of attention to other key regional issues such as China’s rapidly expanding engagement with the region. Some fear that rising Chinese influence in Southeast Asia has come at the expense of U.S. ties with the region, while others view Beijing’s increasing regional influence as largely a natural consequence of China’s economic dynamism. China’s developing relationship with Southeast Asia is undergoing a significant shift. This will likely have implications for United States’ interests in the region. While the United States has been focused on Iraq and Afghanistan, China has been evolving its external engagement with its neighbors, particularly in Southeast Asia. In the 1990s, China was perceived as a threat to its Southeast Asian neighbors in part due to its conflicting territorial claims over the South China Sea and past support of communist insurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Copper Hoards Problem: a Technological Angle
    The Copper Hoards Problem: A Technological Angle Received 14 June 1969 D. P. AGRAWAL I. THE PROBLEM HE Copper Hoards are difficult to define. Copper artifacts discovered from sites as distant as Shalozan in the northwest, Bhagrapir in the east and Kallur in the south T have all been lumped together under the designation, "Copper Hoards." Tool types also are equally varied: they include socketed axes, trunnion axes, flat celts, anthropomorphs, rings, and harpoons, among others. The problem of definition is further compounded by the fact that all these finds are unstratified, and they have no association with other artifacts. The earliest discoveries were reported by V. A. Smith (1905, 1907). R. Heine-Geldern (1936) equated them with the Indo-Aryan culture on the basis of typological considerations alone. He proposed that the trunnion axes came from Transcaucasia, the axe-adze from the Danube and the antennae sword from the Koban region. He surmised that these artifacts came to India through Persia around 1200-1000 B.C. In this equation he was at first supported by S. Piggott (1944), but subsequently the latter proposed that they were perhaps the relics of the Harappan refugees (Piggott 1950). In a brilliant analysis, B. B. Lal (1951) pointed out that the trunnion axe, the Fort Monroe sword, the socketed axe-adze and the axe had a westerly distribution, whereas the harpoon, the barcelt and the anthropomorph were confined to the Doab and never occurred west of it. But undeterred by Lal's criticism, Heine-Geldern repeated (1956) his arguments and declared that the Copper Hoard-Aryans, coming from the West, invaded India between 1200 and 1000 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pivot in Southeast Asia Balancing Interests and Values
    WORKING PAPER The Pivot in Southeast Asia Balancing Interests and Values Joshua Kurlantzick January 2015 This publication has been made possible by a grant from the Open Society Foun- dations. The project on the pivot and human rights in Southeast Asia is also sup- ported by the United States Institute of Peace. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, busi- ness executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with CFR members to discuss and debate major in- ternational issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy is- sues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do East and Southeast Asian Cities Differ from Western Cities? a Systematic Review of the Urban Form Characteristics
    sustainability Article How do East and Southeast Asian Cities Differ from Western Cities? A Systematic Review of the Urban Form Characteristics Tzu-Ling Chen 1,*, Hao-Wei Chiu 2,3 and Yu-Fang Lin 4 1 Department of Urban Development, University of Taipei, Taipei 11153, Taiwan 2 Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University, New Taipei 23741, Taiwan 4 Department of Landscape Architecture, National Chiayi University, Chiayi 60004, Taiwan; v.yfl[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-02-2871-8288 (ext. 3110) Received: 11 February 2020; Accepted: 17 March 2020; Published: 19 March 2020 Abstract: The Fifth Assessment Report released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR5) revealed that the scale of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Asian cities is similar to those from developed economies, which are driven predominantly by economic growth. Due to variations in geographic and climatic contexts, culture and religion, living style and travel behavior, governance and institutions, and a wide range of density and land use mixes, there are significant variations in urban form patterns across Western and Asian cities. This paper uses a systematic review, which is a critical interpretive synthesis methodology, to review keywords of studies related to urban form among East and Southeast Asian cities. From 3725 records identified through database searching, 213 studies were included in qualitative analysis. The results show that, although the population density in built-up areas is higher, annual population density is declining significantly in East and Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Monsoon Extremes and Society Over the Past Millennium on Mainland Southeast Asia
    Quaternary Science Reviews 95 (2014) 1e19 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Invited review Monsoon extremes and society over the past millennium on mainland Southeast Asia Brendan M. Buckley a,*, Roland Fletcher b, Shi-Yu Simon Wang c, Brian Zottoli d, Christophe Pottier e a Tree-Ring Laboratory, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, USA b Department of Archaeology, University of Sydney, NWS 2006, Australia c Utah Climate Center, Department of Plants, Soils and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA d Ecole française d’Extrême-Orient (EFEO), Paris, France e Ecole française d’Extrême-Orient (EFEO), Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre, 20, Boromarachachonani Road, Taling Chan, Bangkok 10170, Thailand article info abstract Article history: The early 21st century has seen vigorous scientific interest in the Asian monsoon and significant Received 21 June 2013 development of paleo-proxies of monsoon strength. These include the Monsoon Asian Drought Atlas e a Received in revised form 700-year, gridded reconstruction of hydroclimate derived from 327 tree ring records e and several long 20 April 2014 speleothem records from China and India. Similar progress has been made on the study of monsoon Accepted 22 April 2014 climate dynamics through re-analysis data products and General Circulation Model diagnostics. The story Available online has emerged of a variable monsoon over the latter
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Foundations of Eastern and Western Thought
    Comparative Foundations of Eastern and Western Thought Daniel Memmi UQAM Montreal, QC, Canada [email protected] Abstract: Modern science and technology originated in Western Europe within a specific culture, but they have now been adopted and developed by several Eastern countries as well. We analyze the features of Western culture that may explain the rise of modern science with its associated economic development. A comparative analysis of Eastern cultures will then help us evaluate how far could contemporary science be successfully integrated within very different cultures. In this way, we try to estimate the importance of the cultural framework for the development of science and technology. “East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet” (Kipling) Prologue I usually live in Montreal, a North-American city with a somewhat European atmosphere. Though known for ferociously cold winters, it is in many ways a typical example of Western urban life: a grid-like design in most of the city, a narrower layout in the historical center, but on the whole streets are straight and wide, with clearly marked pavements, and crossing each other at right angles. Buildings are laid out along the streets like a marching army. The general impression is of open, easily navigable space, because the city design is so obvious. But I now write this in an older neighborhood (with a rather dilapidated look) of a middle-size Japanese town, where I have been living for some time. The place is 1 bewildering for a Westerner: the layout seems essentially haphazard. Dwellings and buildings are thrown together in a jumble without any discernible plan, traditional houses mixing with more recent apartment buildings, small stores and workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar: the Key Link Between
    ADBI Working Paper Series Myanmar: The Key Link between South Asia and Southeast Asia Hector Florento and Maria Isabela Corpuz No. 506 December 2014 Asian Development Bank Institute Hector Florento and Maria Isabela Corpuz are consultants at the Office of Regional Economic Integration, Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. In this paper, “$” refers to US dollars. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Florento, H., and M. I. Corpuz. 2014. Myanmar: The Key Link between South Asia and Southeast Asia. ADBI Working Paper 506. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: http://www.adbi.org/working- paper/2014/12/12/6517.myanmar.key.link.south.southeast.asia/ Please contact the authors for information about this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • HST 363: History of Premodern East Asia
    1 HST 363 Dr. Yixin Chen Fall 2014 Office: MO 230 Class Hours: TR 11:00–12:15 Office Hours, TR 12:30-2 Classroom: MO 206 History of Premodern East Asia COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course surveys East Asian history from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century, with emphasis on the development of Chinese and Japanese civilizations. It pursues following themes: the founding of Chinese culture; the making of Chinese bureaucratic state and gentry society; the rise of Ming-Qing commercialized economy; the growth of Japanese culture; the establishment of Japanese shogunate system and feudal society, and the role of Korea in East Asia. It tries to show how Chinese and Japanese in traditional times developed their social, political, religious and cultural values that continue to define their people’s worldviews today. For detailed course objectives and learning goals, please refer to http://uncw.edu/hst/learninggoals.html. This course adopts Patricia Ebrey and Anne Walthall, Pre-Modern East Asia to 1800: A Cultural, Social, and Political History as the main textbook. The other supplementary readings are used for class discussions on in-depth understanding of the East Asian history and for students to write essays. The course combines lectures, readings, discussions, and visual materials. Although no extensive background knowledge is presumed, students should be aware that the required readings include a large number of unfamiliar names and terms. TEXTBOOKS (AVAILABLE AT THE BOOKSTORE): Patricia Ebrey and Anne Walthall. Pre-Modern East Asia to 1800: A Cultural, Social, and Political History Arthur Waley. Three Ways of Thought in Ancient China Robert Van Gulik.
    [Show full text]
  • Unions Help Increase Wealth for All and Close Racial Wealth Gaps by Aurelia Glass, David Madland, and Christian E
    Unions Help Increase Wealth for All and Close Racial Wealth Gaps By Aurelia Glass, David Madland, and Christian E. Weller September 6, 2021 The United States faces large wealth divides, particularly by race and ethnicity. The median white family has about 10 times the wealth of the median Black family and more than eight times the wealth of the median Hispanic family.1 Wealth is also much more unequally distributed than income, with the top 5 percent of families hold- ing about 250 times as much wealth as the median family.2 Unions play a key role in redressing these large wealth gaps. They increase wealth for all households—no matter their race or ethnicity—and tend to provide larger increases for Black and Hispanic households than for white households. Unions help households by raising incomes, increasing benefits, and improving the quality and stability of jobs.3 All these things lead to both direct and indirect increases in wealth. When workers earn more money through union contracts, for example, they are able to set aside more of their paychecks and enjoy the additional tax incentives that come with saving.4 Moreover, benefits such as pension plans grow wealth, while others such as health or life insurance reduce the amount union members need to spend from their own savings during periods of illness or income loss. This helps cushion families’ savings against downturns like the recent COVID- 19-induced recession, and additional savings can be put toward a child’s college education or the purchase of a home.5 Finally, strong union
    [Show full text]
  • East Asian Integration Towards an East Asian Economic Community
    ADBI Working Paper Series EAST ASIAN INTEGRATION TOWARDS AN EAST ASIAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY Christopher M. Dent No. 665 February 2017 Asian Development Bank Institute Christopher M. Dent is a professor of international political economy at the University of Leeds, United Kingdom. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. ADB recognizes “China” as the People’s Republic of China; “Hong Kong” as Hong Kong, China; and “Korea” as the Republic of Korea. Suggested citation: Dent, C. M. 2017. East Asian Integration Towards an East Asian Economic Community. ADBI Working Paper 665. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/east-asian-integration-towards-east-asian-economic- community Please contact the authors for information about this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Intellectual Origins of the Eurasian Union Project
    2 The Intellectual Origins of the Eurasian Union Project Stephen Blank The Eurasian Economic Union and its component Customs Union comprise Vladimir Putin’s “flagship” policies.1 But these organizations are merely the latest iteration of an increasingly crystallized Russian policy aspiration dating back to the collapse of the Soviet Union. As Jeffrey Mankoff recently observed, “In one form or another, re-integrating the states of the former Soviet Union has been on Russia’s agenda almost since the moment the Soviet Union col- lapsed.”2 Arguably, Russia has never reconciled itself to losing an empire. The reintegration program that is proceeding under Putin in fact began under Boris Yeltsin’s leadership, notwithstanding the fact that the Commonwealth of Inde- pendent States (CIS) was first thought of as “divorce court” for former Soviet Republics. Furthermore, these organizations are not the only elements of Putin’s reintegra- tion plan. The overall project has always had a military dimension, namely the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) that grew out of the 1992 Tashkent Collective Security Treaty (CST).3 And the leitmotif of all these plans has not just been economic or military integration, but equally crucially, the privileging of Russian sovereignty over that of CIS countries, a hallmark of neo-imperial and sphere of influence policies. Russian leaders do not refrain from admitting this openly. In August 2008, immediately after the war in 1 Iwona Wisniewska, Eurasian Integration: Russia’s Attempt at the Economic Unification of the Post-Soviet Area, OSW Studies: Centre for Eastern Studies, Warsaw, 2013. 2 Jeffrey Mankoff, Eurasian Integration: the Next Stage, Central Asia Policy Brief, Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, 2013, p.
    [Show full text]