RESPONSE COMMENTS FORUM WARDS PARISHES OFFICER POP MKC FROM SUGGESTION RECOMMENDATION 2001 CLLRS (OFFICER COMMENT) Cllr Paul White Basis of current pilot. Danesborough Danesborough , , , Continue the current pilot 6490 2 , arrangements Possibility of including Walton Park Cllr. Bert Tapp Doesn’t agree with the Hanslope Park , , Hanslope Continue the current pilot 4330 1 (verbal) new political arrangements arrangements, but will be involved in the pilot for Hanslope Park Ward Cllrs I. Henderson, Forum shouldn’t Newport Pagnell Newport Pagnell Continue the current pilot 16050 4 E.Henderson, duplicate the work of the North & Newport arrangements D.McCall, NP Town Town Council Pagnell South Council Cllr P.Seymour Suggested an Forum Olney, Ouse Valley & Olney, Ouse Stoke Ravenstone Offer a Forum for the rural 12590 4 with all rural wards in Valley & , , , North parishes and wards in this part of the Borough Sherington Crawley, , Astwood & , north east MK exc. Sherington, & Filgrave, Weston Newport Pagnell c.f. School Organisation Underwood, Olney, Warrington, , Plan , & Newton Could replace exisiting Blossomville, consultative assembly Moulsoe Parish Held on a 6 monthly Sherington Sherington Moulsoe, , Chicheley, See above Council basis Hardmead, Astwood, Lathbury, Sherington, Gayhurst North Crawley ..willing to participate in See above Parish Council a Forum, but it shouldn’t add to the burden of paperwork Lavendon Parish .. will consider the See above Council proposal once the Boundary Commission Review is complete Emberton Parish .. has an established See above Council liaison meeting with Olney, prefers a rural grouping, has mixed views on the question

There is no common position on the make-up for Forums in the ‘city’ area Cllr Christine Tilley MK City North , Stantonbury & Offer a Forum for the 28610 6 Linford North, wards and parishes in MK Linford South City (North)

D:\IServ Files\2001-02b\enl_Report_324_ANNEXATOFITEM15.doc RESPONSE COMMENTS FORUM WARDS PARISHES OFFICER POP MKC FROM SUGGESTION RECOMMENDATION 2001 CLLRS (OFFICER COMMENT) Stantonbury Parish Proposes a Forum with Parishes of Stantonbury See above Council Stantonbury, Bradwell Bradwell & New and Bradwell (NB Would spilt the Ward of ) Bradwell Parish Proposes a Forum with Parishes of Bradwell, Gt. Bradwell, Bradwell, Central , Campbell Offer a Forum for the 38110 11 Council Bradwell, Gt. Linford and Linford & Stantonbury , Park, wards and parishes in MK Stantonbury (Would mean that Nth Woughton, Part City (Central) area of CMK was Loughton Park represented by a different Forum) Calverton Parish Group with other parish Calverton Group with MK City West Meeting meetings or rural areas Requires more MK City West Stony Stratford, Stony Stratford, Wolverton & Greenleys, Offer a Forum for the 25,754 7 Town Council information before taking Wolverton & Bradwell Abbey, Calverton wards and parishes in Mk a decision Bradwell Abbey City (West)

Campbell Park Local discussion rather MK City Central Campbell Park, Bradwell, , Campbell See MK City (Central) Parish Council than co-option, concerns Bradwell, Pt. Park, Woughton Forum above over erosion of elected Loughton Park, representative Woughton responsibilities

Central Milton Proposed either themed See above Keynes Parish groups; e.g.a Rural Council Assembly, or a Market Towns Assembly, or a Forum based on CMK and adjoining estates

Shenley Brook End Would in principle MK City (South West) Part Loughton Loughton, , Shenley Offer a Forum for the 29350 7 Parish Council participate in a Forum Park, Emerson Church End wards and parishes in MK but believes the area Valley Furzton City (South West) covered needs to be focused

Loughton Parish Considers assemblies MK City (South West) Part Loughton Loughton, Shenley Brook End, Shenley See above Council not necessary preferring Park, Emerson Church End delegation to parishes, Valley Furzton but if the scheme proceeds to group Shenley Brook End, and Loughton

D:\IServ Files\2001-02b\enl_Report_324_ANNEXATOFITEM15.doc RESPONSE COMMENTS FORUM WARDS PARISHES OFFICER POP MKC FROM SUGGESTION RECOMMENDATION 2001 CLLRS (OFFICER COMMENT) Woughton Parish proposes a Forum of Parishes of Woughton, Woughton, Woughton, Simpson and & Fenny See MK City (Central) Council Woughton, Simpson and Simpson and Bletchley Fenny Stratford, Stratford (see proposals for MK City South Forum above Bletchley & Fenny & Fenny Stratford and Eaton below) Stratford (splits the Bletchley Manor, Walton areas & Campbell Park Park in a different Forum) Cllr. K. Wilson Proposed either Woughton & Woughton Woughton & Campbell Park See MK City (Central) Woughton alone or Campbell Park Forum above combined with Campbell Park, also that Cabinet members should be invited to attend Tyringham & Against the proposal as Tyringham & Filgrave it would represent more Filgrave meetings Cllr. R. Edwards The impact on resources and workload needs to be taken into account

PARISHES WHERE NO REPRESENTATIONS WERE RECEIVED Bletchley & Fenny MK City South Denbigh, Eaton , Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Offer a Forum for the 36550 9 Stratford, West Manor, Fenny wards and parishes in MK Bletchley Stratford City (South) Whaddon, Broughton & Milton MK City East Walton Park Broughton & Milton Keynes, Kents Hill & Offer a Forum for the ward 16120 3 Keynes, Kents Hill Monkston, Walton and parishes in MK City & Monkson, Walton (East)

D:\IServ Files\2001-02b\enl_Report_324_ANNEXATOFITEM15.doc