Stem-Boring Caterpillars of Switchgrass in the Midwestern United States Jarrad R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stem-Boring Caterpillars of Switchgrass in the Midwestern United States Jarrad R Entomology Publications Entomology 5-2011 Stem-Boring Caterpillars of Switchgrass in the Midwestern United States Jarrad R. Prasifka United States Department of Agriculture, [email protected] Jennifer E. Buhay United States Department of Agriculture Thomas W. Sappington United States Department of Agriculture, [email protected] Emily A. Heaton Iowa State University, [email protected] Jeffrey D. Bradshaw FUonilvloerwsit ythi of sN aendbras akdda-Litinioncolnal works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ent_pubs See nePxat pratge of for the addiAtiongraicl aulturuthors al Science Commons, Animal Sciences Commons, Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Systems Biology Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ ent_pubs/210. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Entomology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stem-Boring Caterpillars of Switchgrass in the Midwestern United States Abstract Lepidopteran stem borers were collected from switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L., tillers showing symptoms of infestation at seven locations in Illinois and Iowa, with additional observations made on larval and adult activity. Blastobasis repartella (Dietz) (Coleophoridae), whose only known host is switchgrass, was common in plots grown for >5 yr, whereas the polyphagous stalk borer, Papaipema nebris (Guenée) (Noctuidae), was abundant in newly established (i.e., first- and second-year) switchgrass. Haimbachia albescens Capps (Crambidae) was collected from two locations in Illinois, making switchgrass the first known host for this species. Entry holes made by B. repartella and H. albescens were usually 1‐2 cm above the soil surface, precluding discrimination between these species based on external appearance of damage. Although P. nebris often entered stems within 5 cm of the soil surface, they also seemed to move between stems and were the only species entering stems at heights >15 cm. Adults of B. repartella were active on and above the switchgrass canopy by 2130 hours, with peak activity at ≈0230 hours. Activity of B. repartella adults seemed greatly reduced on one night with relatively cool temperatures and low wind speeds. Data from switchgrass and giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L., suggest P. nebris larvae move out of switchgrass during July in search of hosts with larger diameter stems, although by then hosts such as corn, Zea mays L., or Miscanthus spp. may have outgrown the potential for serious damage. However, switchgrass could contribute to greater adult populations of P. nebris if thick-stemmed hosts such as giant ragweed are not managed. Keywords herbivores, biomass, bioenergy, nocturnal activity, Chaetopsis sp. Disciplines Agricultural Science | Animal Sciences | Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology | Entomology | Systems Biology Comments This article is from Annals of the Entomological Society of America 104 (2011): 507, doi:10.1603/AN10183. Rights Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The onc tent of this document is not copyrighted. Authors Jarrad R. Prasifka, Jennifer E. Buhay, Thomas W. Sappington, Emily A. Heaton, Jeffrey D. Bradshaw, and Michael E. Gray This article is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ent_pubs/210 ARTHROPOD BIOLOGY Stem-Boring Caterpillars of Switchgrass in the Midwestern United States JARRAD R. PRASIFKA,1,2 JENNIFER E. BUHAY,1 THOMAS W. SAPPINGTON,1 EMILY A. HEATON,3 4 5 JEFFREY D. BRADSHAW, AND MICHAEL E. GRAY Energy Biosciences Institute, Institute for Genomic Biology, Room 1117, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 104(3): 507Ð514 (2011); DOI: 10.1603/AN10183 ABSTRACT Lepidopteran stem borers were collected from switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L., tillers showing symptoms of infestation at seven locations in Illinois and Iowa, with additional observations made on larval and adult activity. Blastobasis repartella (Dietz) (Coleophoridae), whose only known host is switchgrass, was common in plots grown for Ͼ5 yr, whereas the polyphagous stalk borer, Papaipema nebris (Guene´e) (Noctuidae), was abundant in newly established (i.e., Þrst- and second- year) switchgrass. Haimbachia albescens Capps (Crambidae) was collected from two locations in Illinois, making switchgrass the Þrst known host for this species. Entry holes made by B. repartella and H. albescens were usually 1Ð2 cm above the soil surface, precluding discrimination between these species based on external appearance of damage. Although P. nebris often entered stems within 5 cm of the soil surface, they also seemed to move between stems and were the only species entering stems at heights Ͼ15 cm. Adults of B. repartella were active on and above the switchgrass canopy by 2130 hours, with peak activity at Ϸ0230 hours. Activity of B. repartella adults seemed greatly reduced on one night with relatively cool temperatures and low wind speeds. Data from switchgrass and giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L., suggest P. nebris larvae move out of switchgrass during July in search of hosts with larger diameter stems, although by then hosts such as corn, Zea mays L., or Miscanthus spp. may have outgrown the potential for serious damage. However, switchgrass could contribute to greater adult populations of P. nebris if thick-stemmed hosts such as giant ragweed are not managed. KEY WORDS herbivores, biomass, bioenergy, nocturnal activity, Chaetopsis sp. Perennial grasses such as switchgrass, Panicum virga- cluding insecticides, relative to annual food and feed tum L., are promoted as crops superior to corn, Zea crops (Hohenstein and Wright 1994, Hill et al. 2006). mays L., grain for sustainable production of plant bio- Some research has suggested switchgrass and other mass (Varvel et al. 2008). Biomass crops act as sources perennial grasses will require little or no management of alternative energy through the production of liquid for insect pests (Parrish and Fike 2005, Semere and fuels (e.g., ethanol) or direct combustion and conver- Slater 2007, Wang 2007). However, most food and feed sion to electricity. To meet national goals for renew- crops are consumed by hundreds of herbivorous in- able energy in the United States, the magnitude of sects, with a handful of species acting as signiÞcant land-use changes projected for perennial biomass pests. Given the small areas currently dedicated to crops (grasses and woody plants) has been estimated perennials such as switchgrass, it seems most accurate at 14Ð22 million ha (Perlack et al. 2005). Part of the to state that the identity of insect herbivores in bio- potential advantage in sustainability for perennial bio- mass crops and their effects on yields are simply un- mass crops is a reduced need for off-farm inputs, in- known (Mitchell et al. 2008). Increased research into the herbivorous insects of perennial biomass crops has revealed species that were previously undescribed Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication (Boe and Gagne´ 2010), described but without known is solely for the purpose of providing speciÞc information and does not host associations or other general biological informa- imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of tion (Prasifka et al. 2010), and well-known pests of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. food and feed crops (Bradshaw et al. 2010). 1 USDAÐARS, Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, Ames, IA 50011. A survey for one stem-boring caterpillar in switch- 2 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]. grass, Blastobasis repartella (Dietz) (Coleophoridae), 3 Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011. showed a species distribution that included at least 4 Panhandle Research and Extension Center, University of Ne- eight states in the north central United States (Prasifka braskaÐLincoln, Scottsbluff, NE 69361Ð4939. Ϸ 5 Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL et al. 2010). Although B. repartella only infested 4% 61801. of switchgrass tillers sampled across four states, there 508 ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 104, no. 3 are still reasons for concern. First, as insects that feed 93.777Њ W; Hinds, 42.067Њ N, 93.623Њ W; and Woodruff, almost exclusively inside plants, stem borers are pro- 41.986Њ N, 93.694Њ W) were located in the central part tected from most insecticides. Second, an orders-of- of the state within 15 km of each other. The plots were magnitude expansion of the area dedicated to switch- typically surrounded by turf (mowed), soybean [Gly- grass production could change the frequency with cine max (L.) Merr.], corn, and (at the Illinois sites) which B. repartella damages switchgrass tillers. Fi- the perennial biomass crop Miscanthus ϫ giganteus nally, because the survey for B. repartella revealed Greef and Deuter ex Hodkinson and Renvoize. larvae of two additional species of stem-boring lepi- Larval Collections From Switchgrass. By 29 April, dopterans, Haimbachia albescens Capps (Crambidae) larvae of B. repartella were present in new growth
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada
    Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada Vol. 40(1) Summer 2021 The Newsletter of the BSC is published twice a year by the In this issue Biological Survey of Canada, an incorporated not-for-profit From the editor’s desk............2 group devoted to promoting biodiversity science in Canada. Membership..........................3 President’s report...................4 BSC Facebook & Twitter...........5 Reminder: 2021 AGM Contributing to the BSC The Annual General Meeting will be held on June 23, 2021 Newsletter............................5 Reminder: 2021 AGM..............6 Request for specimens: ........6 Feature Articles: Student Corner 1. City Nature Challenge Bioblitz Shawn Abraham: New Student 2021-The view from 53.5 °N, Liaison for the BSC..........................7 by Greg Pohl......................14 Mayflies (mainlyHexagenia sp., Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae): an 2. Arthropod Survey at Fort Ellice, MB important food source for adult by Robert E. Wrigley & colleagues walleye in NW Ontario lakes, by A. ................................................18 Ricker-Held & D.Beresford................8 Project Updates New book on Staphylinids published Student Corner by J. Klimaszewski & colleagues......11 New Student Liaison: Assessment of Chironomidae (Dip- Shawn Abraham .............................7 tera) of Far Northern Ontario by A. Namayandeh & D. Beresford.......11 Mayflies (mainlyHexagenia sp., Ephemerop- New Project tera: Ephemeridae): an important food source Help GloWorm document the distribu- for adult walleye in NW Ontario lakes, tion & status of native earthworms in by A. Ricker-Held & D.Beresford................8 Canada, by H.Proctor & colleagues...12 Feature Articles 1. City Nature Challenge Bioblitz Tales from the Field: Take me to the River, by Todd Lawton ............................26 2021-The view from 53.5 °N, by Greg Pohl..............................14 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)
    Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015) By Richard Henderson Research Ecologist, WI DNR Bureau of Science Services Summary This is a preliminary list of insects that are either well known, or likely, to be closely associated with Wisconsin’s original native prairie. These species are mostly dependent upon remnants of original prairie, or plantings/restorations of prairie where their hosts have been re-established (see discussion below), and thus are rarely found outside of these settings. The list also includes some species tied to native ecosystems that grade into prairie, such as savannas, sand barrens, fens, sedge meadow, and shallow marsh. The list is annotated with known host(s) of each insect, and the likelihood of its presence in the state (see key at end of list for specifics). This working list is a byproduct of a prairie invertebrate study I coordinated from1995-2005 that covered 6 Midwestern states and included 14 cooperators. The project surveyed insects on prairie remnants and investigated the effects of fire on those insects. It was funded in part by a series of grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. So far, the list has 475 species. However, this is a partial list at best, representing approximately only ¼ of the prairie-specialist insects likely present in the region (see discussion below). Significant input to this list is needed, as there are major taxa groups missing or greatly under represented. Such absence is not necessarily due to few or no prairie-specialists in those groups, but due more to lack of knowledge about life histories (at least published knowledge), unsettled taxonomy, and lack of taxonomic specialists currently working in those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecological Potential of Plum Island, New York
    Biodiversity and ecological potential of Plum Island, New York New York Natural Heritage Program i New York Natural Heritage Program The New York Natural Heritage Program The NY Natural Heritage Program is a partnership NY Natural Heritage has developed two notable between the NYS Department of Environmental online resources: Conservation Guides include the Conservation (NYS DEC) and The Nature Conservancy. biology, identification, habitat, and management of many Our mission is to facilitate conservation of rare animals, of New York’s rare species and natural community rare plants, and significant ecosystems. We accomplish this types; and NY Nature Explorer lists species and mission by combining thorough field inventories, scientific communities in a specified area of interest. analyses, expert interpretation, and the most comprehensive NY Natural Heritage also houses iMapInvasives, an database on New York's distinctive biodiversity to deliver online tool for invasive species reporting and data the highest quality information for natural resource management. planning, protection, and management. In 1990, NY Natural Heritage published Ecological NY Natural Heritage was established in 1985 and is a Communities of New York State, an all inclusive contract unit housed within NYS DEC’s Division of classification of natural and human-influenced Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources. The program is communities. From 40,000-acre beech-maple mesic staffed by more than 25 scientists and specialists with forests to 40-acre maritime beech forests, sea-level salt expertise in ecology, zoology, botany, information marshes to alpine meadows, our classification quickly management, and geographic information systems. became the primary source for natural community NY Natural Heritage maintains New York’s most classification in New York and a fundamental reference comprehensive database on the status and location of for natural community classifications in the northeastern rare species and natural communities.
    [Show full text]
  • F. S. Grevstad 1, M. S. Wecker 1, and D. R. Strong
    Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Invasive Spartina Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Management BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF SPARTINA 1 1 2 F. S. GREVSTAD ,M.S.WECKER , AND D. R. STRONG 1 Olympic Natural Resources Center, University of Washington, P.O. Box 1628, Forks, WA 98331; [email protected] 2 Department of Evolotion and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 Biological control using introduced natural enemies can be an effective approach to the long term control of widespread weeds. A biological control program against Spartina spp. is underway in Washington State, where more than 10,000 hectares (ha) of intertidal mudflat are affected by Spartina alterniflora and Spartina anglica. Releases of the planthopper Prokelisia marginata have been made into Willapa Bay each year since 2000 and into Puget Sound since 2003. Prior to introducing this insect, rigorous host specificity testing and a review by the Technical Advisory Group on Biological Control of Weeds confirmed that the risk to non-target plants was minute. Populations of the biocontrol agent were initially slow to establish and grow. However, early problems with high winter mortality have been remedied through a combination of improved release site selection and the use of cold-hardy east coast biotypes. At least two populations in Willapa Bay are well established and expanding. At a localized scale, we have measured 50 percent reductions of Spartina biomass and 90 percent reduction in viable seed set due to P. marginata. The full extent of the impact will only be known with time. While the use of biological control in California may pose a risk to the closely related native Spartina foliosa, it would be an excellent option in other other parts of the world where Spartina has invaded and where there are no closely related native Spartina species.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Plants for Development of Picturewinged Fly Pests of Maize
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01245.x Alternative plants for development of picture-winged fly pests of maize Gaurav Goyal1, Gregg S. Nuessly1*, Dakshina R. Seal2,GaryJ.Steck3, John L. Capinera4 & Kenneth J. Boote5 1Everglades Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS), University of Florida (UF), 3200 E. Palm Beach Rd., Belle Glade, FL 33430, USA, 2Tropical Research and Education Center, UF, IFAS, 18905 S.W. 280 St., Homestead, FL 33031, USA, 3Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, PO Box 147100, Gainesville, FL 32614, USA, 4Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF, IFAS, PO Box 110620, Gaines- ville, FL 32611, USA, and 5Agronomy Department, UF, IFAS, PO Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Accepted: 9 February 2012 Key words: Euxesta eluta, Euxesta stigmatias, Chaetopsis massyla, Poaceae, alternate hosts, sugarcane, corn, capsicum, Diptera, Ulidiidae, Zea mays Abstract Eleven species of picture-winged flies (Diptera: Ulidiidae: Lipsanini) have been reported attacking maize [Zea mays L. (Poaceae)] ears in the Americas. Four of these species are sweet corn pests in America north of Mexico: Chaetopsis massyla (Walker), Euxesta annonae (Fabricius), E. eluta Loew, and E. stigmatias Loew. Adults of these four species appear at the beginning of each season following maize-free periods, suggesting other plants act as food sources for maintenance and development of these flies. Studies were conducted in Florida, USA, to evaluate the suitability of several crop and non-crop plants commonly occurring near maize plantings as developmental hosts for these flies. Laboratory trials were conducted using laboratory colonies of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    Proceedings of the United States National Museum SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION • WASHINGTON, D.C. Volume 117 1965 Number 3520 A REVIEW OF THE GENUS HAIMBACHIA DYAR WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) %IIahn W. Capps^ The purpose of this paper is threefold : to redefine the moth genus Haimhachia; to correct several errors in the Dyar and Heinrich treat- ment in 1927 (Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 71, pp. 32-37) ; and to provide names for some undescribed species represented by material that has been in the collection of the U.S. National Museum for many years. All of the illustrations were prepared by Mr. A. D. Cushman, scientific illustrator of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, except figures l-2b, 6-9, and 25-30, which are those drawn by Miss E. T. Armstrong and used in the Dyar and Heinrich paper of 1927. All of the male genitalia are shown with the aedeagus removed and some with the left harpe, vinculum, gnathos, and uncus also removed. The figures with the vinculum are in ventral view; those of the removed left harpe depict a lateral view of the inner surface, and all of the aedeagi are in lateral view. In the female genitalia, the ovipositor and collar of the eighth segment are shown in lateral view; the ventral tonguelike projection from the collar and seventh segment are shown somewhat flattened to give a ventral or three-quarter view of the distal end of the projection and genital opening, but there are a few exceptions. ' Entomology Research Division, Agriculture Research Service, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands
    NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SCIENTIFIC SURVEY OF Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands VOLUME XI—Part 1 Insects of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands Diptera or Two-winged Flies—C. H. Curran CO a o CD- m NEW YORK: PaSLISHED BY THE ACADEMY 1928 QK 230 N 45 NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SCIENTIFIC SURVEY OF Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands VOLUME XI—Part 1 Insects of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands Diptera or Two-winged Flies— C. H. Curran NEW YORK: PCBHSHED BT THE ACADE.NU 1928 INSECTS OF PORTO RICO AXD THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DiPTERA OR Two-WINGED FlIES * By C. H. Cukrax CO^^TEXTS Page Introduction 4 Keys i Extent of the collection 5 Acknt)\vledgments 5 Key to families 6 Families represented hy specimens collected under the auspices of the New York Academy of Sciences 9 Tipulid;e (by Charles P. Alexander i 9 Blepha riceridre 9 Culicid.e ( by C. R. Twinn ) 10 C'hironomidtie 10 Mycetophilidfe 13 Sciarida' 15 Stratiomyida? 15 Tabanidne 18 Bomltyliida? 18 Asilid;e 22 Therevidse 24 Empididfe 25 Dolichopodidte (determined by M. C. Van Duzee ) 26 Syrphida^ 33 Phorid;!^ 43 Pipunculidfe 43 Chloropidse 44 Eiihydrida^ (determined in part by E. T. Cresson. Jr.) 58 1 )nis()philid!e "3 Agromyzidffi 64 Oehthiphilida> 66 Milichiid;e 66 Borboridfe 68 Trj'paneidiP 69 Sepsidfe '^4 Ortalida; 76 Sapromyzidaj 81 Lonchaeidse 85 *Tlu> publication of this paper lias been made possible through grants from the income of tlie John Strong Newberry Fund and from the general funds of the New York Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the RESTRUCTURING of ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS in RESPONSE to PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell a Dissertation Submitt
    THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell 1 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Winter 2019 © Adam B. Mitchell All Rights Reserved THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell Approved: ______________________________________________________ Jacob L. Bowman, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: ______________________________________________________ Mark W. Rieger, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: ______________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Charles R. Bartlett, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Jeffery J. Buler, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Wallace, Charles Reid. A
    ABSTRACT WALLACE, CHARLES REID. A Molecular and Morphological Analysis of Ulidiidae (Diptera: Tephritoidea). (Under the direction of Brian M. Wiegmann). Ulidiidae (Diptera: Tephritoidea) is a relatively small family of true flies, called the “picture-winged flies” for their patterned wings. Its relationship to the other members of Tephritoidea, and its monophyly, has been well established, through both morphological and molecular analysis. Its subfamilial relationships, however, have received limited molecular analysis, having had a significant cross-section of the family’s taxa represented in only two molecular studies (Galinskaya et al. 2014, Han and Ro 2016). The most contemporary treatment of the classification of the family is by Kamenev and Korneyev (2006), according to which the Ulidiidae is divided into two subfamilies (Otitinae, Ulidiinae), each of which is further delineated into tribes (Cephaliini, Myennidini, Otitini; Lipsanini, Pterocallini, Seiopterini, Ulidiini, respectively), with an additional incertae sedis group of genera within the Otitinae. These classifications are based solely on morphological analysis, and there remain multiple outstanding questions of the placement and monophyly regarding the tribes or several large, diverse, or enigmatic genera. Here, using the next-generation sequencing method of anchored hybrid enrichment, I investigate the phylogeny of Ulidiidae with particular attention paid to the constituency and monophyly of hypothesized tribes, monophyly of the two sub-families, and placement of genera. Through maximum likelihood analysis, my results establish strong support for the separation of Ulidiidae into two monophyletic subfamilies, but challenges the assignment of Myennidini to the Ulidiidae, and potentially of Seiopterini to the Ulidiinae. It additionally suggests the paraphyly of the tribe Pterocallini with respect to both Myennidini and Lipsanini, but supports the monophyly of all other tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Suspected Or Known Species on Patuxent Research Refuge
    Appendix A. USFWS USFWS Tree Swallow Suspected or Known Species on Patuxent Research Refuge Appendix A. Suspected or Known Species on Patuxent Research Refuge Table A-1. Suspected or Known Bird Species on Patuxent Research Refuge 1 2 Rank Rank 3 6 5 4 Heritage Heritage Status Refuge E Refuge Status & E on on T & Natural 7 Natural T 30 Common Name Scientific Name Breeding Seasons State BCR Global State Federal WATERBIRDS American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus G4 S1 S2B I Yr M S1N Anhinga Anhinga anhinga Sp Belted Kingfisher Megaceryle alcyon Yr B Black‐crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax G5 S3B S2N SpSF M Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis SpF Common Loon Gavia immer G5 S4N SpF Double‐crested Cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus Yr Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus G5 S4B SpSF H Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias G5 S4B S3 Yr B S4N Great Egret Ardea alba G5 S4B SpSF Green Heron Butorides virescens Yr B Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus G5 S4N SpF H Least Bittern Ixobrychus exilis G5 S2 S3B I SpS B M Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea G5 S3B SpSF M Pied‐billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps G5 S2B S3N Yr B Red‐necked Grebe Podiceps grisegena Sp Snowy Egret Egretta thula G5 S3 S4B SpSF M White Ibis Eudocimus albus SF Yellow‐crowned Night Nyctanassa violacea G5 S2B SpF M Heron WATERFOWL American Black Duck Anas rubripes G5 S4B S5N Yr B HH American Coot Fulica americana SpFW American Wigeon Anas americana SpFW M Blue‐winged Teal Anas discors SpSF Bufflehead Bucephala albeola SpFW H Canada Goose Branta canadensis Yr ? Canvasback Aythya valisineria G5 S3 S4N SpF
    [Show full text]
  • UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Estimating effect of augmentative biological control on grain yields from individual pearl millet heads Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/23d7n9z8 Journal Journal of Applied Entomology, 138(4) ISSN 0931-2048 Authors Baoua, IB Amadou, L Oumarou, N et al. Publication Date 2014 DOI 10.1111/jen.12077 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California J. Appl. Entomol. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Estimating effect of augmentative biological control on grain yields from individual pearl millet heads I. B. Baoua1, L. Amadou1, N. Oumarou1, W. Payne2, J. D. Roberts3, K. Stefanova3 & C. Nansen3 1 Institut de Recherches Agronomiques du Niger (INRAN) CERRA de Maradi, Maradi, Niger 2 Norman E. Borlaug Institute for International Agriculture Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, USA 3 School of Animal Biology, The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia Perth, WA, Australia Keywords Abstract Habrobracon hebetor, Heliocheilus albipunctella, IPM, Niger, Pearl millet Pearl millet is the principal staple food crop in large portions of Western Sub-Sahelian Africa and the millet head miner (Heliocheilus albipunctella) Correspondence is one of its most devastating insect pests. Since 2006, augmentative mass Christian Nansen (corresponding author), releases of the larval ectoparasitoid, Habrobracon hebetor, have been con- School of Animal Biology, The UWA Institute ducted in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger as part of minimizing pearl millet of Agriculture, The University of Western grain losses imposed by millet head miners. These ongoing mass releases Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. are based on low-cost mass-rearing of both host larvae and parasitoids.
    [Show full text]