DOCSLIB.ORG

SFRA Main June 17.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SFRA Main June 17.Pdf Reading Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment On behalf of: Project Ref: 27560/4001 | Rev: FIRST ISSUE | Date: June 2017 Office Address: Caversham Bridge House, Waterman Place, Reading, Berkshire RG1 8DN T: +44 (0)118 950 0761 +44 (0)118 959 7498 E: [email protected] Reading Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Contents Glossary ................................................................................................................................................. 6 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Borough Setting ............................................................................................................. 9 1.2 SFRA Scope and Structure ........................................................................................... 9 1.3 Outputs of the SFRA ................................................................................................... 10 1.4 A Proactive Approach – Reduction in Flood Risk ....................................................... 10 1.5 A Living Document ...................................................................................................... 10 1.6 Disclaimer .................................................................................................................... 10 2 Study Area ................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Geographical Location ................................................................................................ 12 2.2 Topography ................................................................................................................. 13 2.3 Watercourses and Catchments ................................................................................... 14 2.4 Geology ....................................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Growth of Reading Borough ........................................................................................ 15 2.6 Future Development Implications ................................................................................ 16 3 Approach and Methodology ..................................................................................................... 18 3.1 Objectives of SFRA ..................................................................................................... 18 3.2 Data Collection ............................................................................................................ 18 3.3 Integration of Flood Risk Documentation .................................................................... 23 4 National Planning Policy .......................................................................................................... 25 4.1 Overview of National Planning Policy.......................................................................... 25 4.2 National Planning Policy (NPPF), 2012 ...................................................................... 25 4.3 NPPF Planning Practice Guidance, updated April 2015 ............................................. 25 4.4 Flood Risk Regulations, 2009 ..................................................................................... 25 4.5 Flood and Water Management Act, 2010 ................................................................... 26 4.6 Water Framework Directive, 2000 ............................................................................... 26 4.7 River Basin Management Plan –Thames River Basin District, updated 2015 ............ 27 4.8 Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan, 2009 ................................................... 28 4.9 Flood Risk Assessments: Climate Change Allowances, 2016 .................................... 28 5 Local Planning Policy ............................................................................................................... 30 5.1 Reading Core Strategy ................................................................................................ 30 5.2 Reading Central Area Action Plan (RCAAP) ............................................................... 31 5.3 Sites and Detailed Policies Document (January 2015) ............................................... 31 J:\27560 RBC LLFA support\4002 - Reading 1 SFRA\wp\Report\27560_4001_Reading SFRA_rmf_June17.docx Reading Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 5.4 Revised Sustainable Design and Construction SPG (July 2011) ............................... 31 5.5 Reading’s Climate Change Strategy 2013-2020 (Sept 2013) ..................................... 32 6 Sources of Flood Risk .............................................................................................................. 33 6.1 Sources of Flooding..................................................................................................... 33 6.2 Fluvial (River) Flooding ............................................................................................... 34 6.3 Surface Water Flooding ............................................................................................... 42 6.4 Flooding from Impounded Bodies of Water (Reservoirs and Canals) ......................... 43 6.5 Groundwater Flooding ................................................................................................. 47 6.6 Sewer Flooding ............................................................................................................ 48 7 Flood Defences .......................................................................................................................... 50 7.1 Types of Flood Defences ............................................................................................ 50 7.2 Green Park Flood Management Strategy (GPFMS) ................................................... 50 7.3 RBC Asset Register..................................................................................................... 52 8 Historic Fluvial Flooding Records ........................................................................................... 53 8.1 Historic Fluvial Flood Events ....................................................................................... 53 8.2 Thames and Kennet Lock Records ............................................................................. 54 9 Overview of Flood Risk across Borough ................................................................................ 58 9.1 RBC Character Areas .................................................................................................. 58 9.2 Reading North – Caversham, Hemdean Bottom and Emmer Green .......................... 58 9.3 Central Reading ........................................................................................................... 60 9.4 Reading South/East – The Mount, Earley, Whitley and Whitley Wood ....................... 61 9.5 Reading West – Tilehurst and Southcote .................................................................... 63 10 Planning and New Development Considerations .................................................................. 65 10.1 Definition of NPPF Flood Zones .................................................................................. 65 10.2 Consideration of Climate Change ............................................................................... 66 10.3 Residual Risk of Flooding ............................................................................................ 69 10.4 Site Specific FRA Requirements ................................................................................. 70 10.5 EA Engagement .......................................................................................................... 71 11 Flood Risk Management - Planning ........................................................................................ 73 11.1 Sequential Approach to Locating Development .......................................................... 73 11.2 Flood Risk Vulnerability and Compatibility .................................................................. 73 11.3 Application of the Sequential Test ............................................................................... 75 11.4 Undertaking the Exception Test .................................................................................. 76 J:\27560 RBC LLFA support\4002 - Reading 2 SFRA\wp\Report\27560_4001_Reading SFRA_rmf_June17.docx Reading Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 12 Flood Risk Management - Design ............................................................................................ 77 12.1 Reducing Flood Risk through Design .......................................................................... 77 12.2 Sequential Approach ................................................................................................... 77 12.3 Ground Floor Levels .................................................................................................... 77 12.4 Building Design ............................................................................................................ 78 12.5 Floodplain Storage Capacity ....................................................................................... 79 12.6 Conservation of Flow Routes ...................................................................................... 80 12.7 Safe Access Arrangements
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RCC Summer 2011
    READING CYCLE Reading CAMPAIGN WORKING FOR A CYCLE FRIENDLY READING uk Cyclewww.readingcyclecampaign.org.Reading Summer 2011 No 113 Town Centre Changes Audited Attempting a right turn into Contents Queen Victoria Street – some wizardry may be required 1 Town Centre Changes 8 Annual Bike Census 2011 Audited Bird Racing The results of the Town Centre Audit, undertaken by the Reading 2 Campaign News 9 The Reading Cycle Forum Cycle Campaign, Reading CTC and 4 Other Cycling News 10 Contact Us Sustrans, are outlined in Campaign 6 Chairman’s Letter Campaign Diary News on page 2. CycleReading Summer 2011 1 Campaign News travelling along Garrard Street due to meeting is not scheduled until late confusion among road users. September. Workshops proposed by 3) Station Approach and Station Hill the council on specific issues, such as the difficulty in crossing Reading The unsigned and interim facilities for Bridge, were supposed to take place Campaign News cyclists are confusing and inadequate Reading Borough in May but never materialised. Minor and place cyclists in conflict with infrastructure improvements emanating Council (RBC) other road users and pedestrians. In from the cycle strategy that were due particular the marked facilities lead Town Centre Changes are for completion in 2009/10 languish in cyclists into the door opening zone of the ‘to do’ list. Audited taxis at the rank outside the station. Members of Reading Cycle Campaign, 4) Forbury Road / Blagrave Street In fact the most significant cycle Reading CTC and Sustrans undertook a related action undertaken in 2011 We have seen and had reported cycle audit of the new town centre seems to be the erection of ‘No repeated incidences of cyclists turning layout in May after concerns were Cycling’ signs along the Thames right who come into conflict with west- raised over the certain junctions.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Scoping Assessment
    Appendix G FLOOD RISK SCOPING ASSESSMENT New Thames Crossing east of Reading Flood Risk Scoping Assessment On behalf of: Wokingham Borough Council Project Ref: 37006/4001 | Rev: - | Date: October 2016 Office Address: Caversham Bridge House, Waterman Place, Reading, Berkshire RG1 8DN T: +44 (0)118 950 0761 F: +44 (0)118 959 7498 E: [email protected] Flood Risk Scoping Assessment New Thames Crossing east of Reading Document Control Sheet Project Name: New Thames Crossing east of Reading Project Ref: 37006/4001 Report Title: Flood Risk Scoping Assessment Doc Ref: - Date: October 2016 Name Position Signature Date Prepared by: Jodie Hall Assistant Modeller J. Hall Reviewed by: Richard Fisher Associate R.Fisher Approved by: Chris Downs Director of Water D.Walker For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved Peter Brett Associates LLP disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the Client and generally in accordance with the appropriate ACE Agreement and taking account of the manpower, resources, investigations and testing devoted to it by agreement with the Client. This report is confidential to the Client and Peter Brett Associates LLP accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. © Peter Brett Associates LLP 2016 \\pba.int\cbh\Projects\37006 3rd Thames ii Crossing\Env\37006 New Thames Crossing_Oct Draft for Issue\4.
    [Show full text]
  • Article (Refereed) - Postprint
    Article (refereed) - postprint Bowes, M.J.; Loewenthal, M.; Read, D.S.; Hutchins, M.G.; Prudhomme, C.; Armstrong, L.K.; Harman, S.A.; Wickham, H.D.; Gozzard, E. ; Carvalho, L. 2016. Identifying multiple stressor controls on phytoplankton dynamics in the River Thames (UK) using high-frequency water quality data. Crown Copyright © 2016 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This version available http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/513968/ NERC has developed NORA to enable users to access research outputs wholly or partially funded by NERC. Copyright and other rights for material on this site are retained by the rights owners. Users should read the terms and conditions of use of this material at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/policies.html#access NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Science of the Total Environment. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Science of the Total Environment (2016), 569-570. 1489-1499. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.239 www.elsevier.com/ Contact CEH NORA team at [email protected] The NERC and CEH trademarks and logos (‘the Trademarks’) are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Cholsey and Caversham: Impacts on Protected Landscapes
    Oxfordshire County Council Strategic Landscape Assessment of potential minerals working at Cholsey and Caversham: impacts on Protected Landscapes. February 2012 Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste LDF Landscape Study Contents 1 Aims and scope Background 1 Aims 1 Sites & scope 1 2 Methodology 2 Overview of Methodology 2 Assessment of landscape capacity 3 3 Policy Context 7 National Landscape Policy and Legislation 7 Regional policies 9 Oxfordshire policies 9 4 AONB plans and policies 11 Development affecting the setting of AONBs 11 Chilterns AONB policies and guidance 11 North Wessex Downs AONB policies and guidance 13 5 Cholsey 14 6 Caversham 24 7 Overall recommendations 33 Appendix 1: GIS datasets 34 Appendix 2:National Planning Policy Framework relating to 35 landscape and AONBs Appendix 2: Regional planning policies relating to landscape 37 Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste LDF Landscape Study Section 1. Aims and Scope Background 1.1 Oxfordshire’s draft Minerals and Waste Core Strategy was published for public consultation in September 2011. A concern was identified in the responses made by the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and North Wessex Downs AONB. This related to potential landscape impacts on the Protected Landscapes of minerals developments within two proposed broad areas for sand and gravel working at Cholsey and Caversham. This study identifies the nature of these impacts, and potential mitigation measures which could help reduce the impacts. 1.2 The impacts identified will refer both to the operational phase of any development, and restoration phases. Recommendations may help to identify potential restoration priorities, and mitigation measures. Aims 1.3 The aim of the study is to carry out an assessment of the potential landscape impacts of minerals development within two proposed areas for mineral working on the setting of Oxfordshire’s AONBs.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Blue Coat School
    BLHA Newsletter Chairman's Corner This will be the first Newsletter edited by John Chapman. I know he has many good ideas for its future, and would like to wish him well. As a well-known military historian, his servi- ces must be in great demand at present, so taking on this task cannot have been easy. Members of the committee are particularly keen to let the member societies know what the Association is doing, and what it can do for them. We want the Newsletter to be read as widely as possible by members of member societies. And we would like to hear what the societies are doing. There are around 40 of them, but we only hear regularly from about a dozen in the Newsletter. A recent change in the committee has been brought about by Elias Kupfermann volunteering his services. He is well-known in Windsor, Maidenhead and Slough as a local historian, and I would like to welcome him. There are a number of jobs which need to be done, and I hope he soon finds his niche, and can be formally elected at the next A.G.M. Incidentally, I notice that the Constitution of the Association says that the officers and committee members should “normally” retire after five years. To my surprise, I find that I was first elected in 2009, so I’ve already done my five years! And as for most of the rest of the committee . It needs thinking about. I was pleased to be invited to present the Berkshire History Prize this year: please see the short report and photograph later in this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Purley Parish News
    PURLEY PARISH NEWS APRIL 2006 35P For the Church & Community of PURLEY ON THAMES ST. MARY THE VIRGIN PURLEY ON THAMES RECTOR Rev. Roger B. Howell The Rectory, 1 Westridge Avenue Purley on Thames CURATE Tel: 0118 941 7727 Rev. Jean Rothery Email: [email protected] "Oaklea", Tidmarsh Road Tidmarsh ORDAINED LOCAL MINISTER Tel: 0118 984 3625 Rev. Andrew Mackie 12 Church Mews CHURCHWARDENS Purley on Thames Lorna Herring Tel: 0118 941 7170 Tel: 0118 942 1547 CHURCH HALL BOOKINGS John Rothery Lorna Herring Tel: 0118 984 3625 Tel: 0118 942 1547 BAPTISMS, WEDDINGS AND FUNERALS All enquiries should be made to the Rector www.stmarythevirgin.fsnet.co.uk FROM THE RECTOR Dear friends, POST OFFICE BUSINESS I wrote last month about the proposal from the Department of Work and Pensions to remove the Card Account facility from Post Offices. A number of people from within the church community and the wider community of Purley have spoken to me about this œ expressing concern about the effects of such a withdrawal on our community life. I was glad to hear of that concern, but words of sympathy and concern alone are not enough. They will change nothing. What is needed is our action œ that has a real possibility to affect outcomes. So if you are concerned about the abolition of the Post Office Card Account, please do something to put that concern into action. Write to Martin Salter MP and ask him to sign the Early Day Motion tabled by Kate Hoey. (At the time of writing œ 9 March 263 MP's had signed it.) 1 THE RIGHT TO JUSTICE Whilst on this subject of words of concern becoming deeds of action, I would like to draw your attention to another matter of great importance.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1.1 Supplemental Data Summary - A4155 Flowing Springs
    2.1.1 Supplemental Data Summary - A4155 Flowing Springs Combined Option 1 & 2 Regrade and Gravity Wall Strategic Network • "The only impact for local service buses would be on the A4155: Carousel buses X80 service Monday-Saturday. Buses would need to divert via Binfield Heath/Dunsden Green" - Chris Spry's comments. •" Regarding the Playhatch area we have ATC 187 just south of the roundabout and have attached the weeks’ worth of flows from 2016 (AADT = 17603). North of the roundabout in 2010 we carried out a speed survey and the flows from this provide an AADT = 8359. Further along the A4155 just south of Henley we have a 2016 AADT = 10825. There are plenty of opportunities to loose vehicles between these two count sites (including Lower Shiplake) so the 2010 AADT is possibly a little low compared to what a 2016 survey would show but overall probably not too far out." - Richard Bowman's comments • "This is a significant route and a link road between the bridges crossing the river Thames particularly in this area that links to the Playhatch bridge on the B478 which takes large volumes of peak time traffic across the river Thames, if the A4155 were to close it would cause significant traffic problems in Henley and on Henley bridge in particular as well as having a major impact on the two river bridges in Reading. It’s closure would severely impact on bus routes in the area. " - Bob Eeles comments • 8000 AADT in 2015. See table 2.1.2; 2.1.3 Strategic Commercial – Impact • "A4155 – I am finding it difficult to see the location plan so cannot be sure of the to businesses, schools and impact of the closure.
    [Show full text]
  • £1,150,000 an Elegant and Extended Four Bedroom Detached Family Residence, Built Approx
    PORTICO HOUSE, 1 MAPLEDENE CAVERSHAM HEIGHTS, READING, RG4 7DQ £1,150,000 An elegant and extended four bedroom detached family residence, built approx. 30 years ago by highly regarded J M Wakefield. Includes five reception rooms, 19ft kitchen/breakfast room & utility room and a double garage. Set in this fine cul de sac in this highly sought after Caversham Heights position, within 1 mile of Caversham centre & 2 miles from Reading train station. No onward chain. No.1 Prospect Street, Caversham, Reading, Berkshire RG4 8JB T 0118 946 1800 W www.farmeranddyer.com E [email protected] Portico House, 1 Mapledene (Continued) Page No 2 Printed 04/09/2020 DESCRIPTION An opportunity to acquire a fine Georgian-style four bedroom detached family home, built by highly reputable developers, J M Wakefield, that rarely frequent the market. Set in established and secluded grounds, whilst requiring some updating, the fittings remain of high quality with all the principle rooms enjoying a south-facing aspect, including high ceilings, an elegant reception hall and staircase, superbly appointed drawing room, orangery, dining room and study plus a side extension featuring a family room with a spiral staircase leading to a feature galleried library/studio. Complemented by a fine limed oak kitchen/breakfast room and four double bedrooms to the first floor and two bathrooms. There is also a detached double width garage and parking, together with attractive brickwork and iron-rail boundary enclosures resulting in a truly prestigious family home. SITUATION Caversham is situated just north of the River Thames, offering a vast array of shops, bars, restaurants, together with excellent schooling.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Abbey Revealed Conservation Plan August 2015
    Reading Abbey Revealed Conservation Plan August 2015 Rev A First Draft Issue P1 03/08/2015 Rev B Stage D 10/08/2015 Prepared by: Historic Buildings Team, HCC Property Services, Three Minsters House, 76 High Street, Winchester, SO23 8UL On behalf of: Reading Borough Council Civic Offices, Bridge Street, Reading RG1 2LU Conservation Plan – Reading Abbey Revealed Contents Page Historical Timeline ………………………………………………………………………………. 1 1.0 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………… 2 2.0 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 3.0 Understanding the Heritage 3.1 – Heritage Description ……………………………………………………………………… 5 3.2 – History ……………………………………………………………………………………… 5 3.3 – Local Context ……………………………………………………………………………… 19 3.4 – Wider Heritage Context ………………………………………………………………….. 20 3.5 – Current Management of Heritage ………………………………………………………. 20 4.0 Statement of Significance 4.1 – Evidential Value ………………………………………………………………………….. 21 4.2 – Historical Value …………………………………………………………………………... 21 4.3 – Aesthetic Value …………………………………………………………………………… 21 4.4 – Communal Value …………………………………………………………………………. 22 4.5 - Summary of Significance ………………………………………………………………... 24 5.0 Risks to Heritage and Opportunities 5.1 – Risks ………………………………………………………………………………………. 26 5.2 – Opportunities ……………………………………………………………………………… 36 6.0 Policies 6.1 – Conservation, maintenance and climate change …………………………………….. 38 6.2 – Access and Interpretation ……………………………………………………………….. 39 6.3 – Income Generation ………………………………………………………………………. 40 7.0 Adoption and Review 7.1 – General Approach
    [Show full text]
  • The Heights Primary School Which Will Be Presented for Consideration by the Charitable Trust That Owns Mapledurham Playing Fields
    The Heights School A new home for The Heights Welcome to our exhibition Thank you for coming to our exhibition. We are sharing our proposals for The Heights Primary School which will be presented for consideration by the charitable trust that owns Mapledurham Playing Fields. The proposals are for a non-selective, highly inclusive primary school for the Caversham Heights / Mapledurham area serving the needs of the local community. Following a thorough review of Mapledurham Playing Fields, the north corner of the playing fields has been identified as the most suitable location. This area of the site was selected following extensive surveying work undertaken to determine where the school can best be placed to minimise impact on users whilst maximising the benefits to the local community. Summary of Proposals ■ A purpose built school which meets the needs of the local community and addresses a rising demand for primary school places. ■ A two-storey design which aims to minimise the footprint area. ■ Enhancement of existing facilities. ■ Improved access to playing fields. ■ Using less than five per cent of Mapledurham Playing Fields. The new site will include a multi-use games area for the school and the community to share. ■ Site chosen with strong support from the local community as seen from the results of the council consultation. www.anewhomefortheheights.com The Heights School About us The Heights Primary The Heights is a Government funded, non-selective, highly inclusive primary school for the Caversham Heights / Mapledurham area. The school opened in September 2014 with two reception classes and a Year 1 class The Heights’ Motto in response to an increasing need Achieving for primary school places in West Success Caversham.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RIVER THAMES a Complete Guide to Boating Holidays on the UK’S Most Famous River the River Thames a COMPLETE GUIDE
    THE RIVER THAMES A complete guide to boating holidays on the UK’s most famous river The River Thames A COMPLETE GUIDE And there’s even more! Over 70 pages of inspiration There’s so much to see and do on the Thames, we simply can’t fit everything in to one guide. 6 - 7 Benson or Chertsey? WINING AND DINING So, to discover even more and Which base to choose 56 - 59 Eating out to find further details about the 60 Gastropubs sights and attractions already SO MUCH TO SEE AND DISCOVER 61 - 63 Fine dining featured here, visit us at 8 - 11 Oxford leboat.co.uk/thames 12 - 15 Windsor & Eton THE PRACTICALITIES OF BOATING 16 - 19 Houses & gardens 64 - 65 Our boats 20 - 21 Cliveden 66 - 67 Mooring and marinas 22 - 23 Hampton Court 68 - 69 Locks 24 - 27 Small towns and villages 70 - 71 Our illustrated map – plan your trip 28 - 29 The Runnymede memorials 72 Fuel, water and waste 30 - 33 London 73 Rules and boating etiquette 74 River conditions SOMETHING FOR EVERY INTEREST 34 - 35 Did you know? 36 - 41 Family fun 42 - 43 Birdlife 44 - 45 Parks 46 - 47 Shopping Where memories are made… 48 - 49 Horse racing & horse riding With over 40 years of experience, Le Boat prides itself on the range and 50 - 51 Fishing quality of our boats and the service we provide – it’s what sets us apart The Thames at your fingertips 52 - 53 Golf from the rest and ensures you enjoy a comfortable and hassle free Download our app to explore the 54 - 55 Something for him break.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Report by the Director of Environment
    COMMITTEE REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENT CULTURE & SPORT READING BOROUGH COUNCIL ITEM NO. 13 PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE : 06 March 2013 Ward : Whitley App No.: 12/01430/FUL Address: Burghfield Landfill site, Island Road. Proposal: Development of a Leachate Treatment Plant. Applicant: CEMEX UK Materials Limited Date valid: 09 October 2012 Minor Application: 8-week target decision date: 04 December 2012 26-week target decision date: 09 April 2013 RECOMMENDATION: GRANT planning permission subject to the following conditions and informatives: Conditions to include: 1. TL1 – Full 3 years. 2. AP1 – Development as per approved plans. 3. M2 – Details to be submitted. 4. Detailed landscaping proposals to be submitted to be submitted and approved prior to first use. 5. Landscape and ecological management plan to be submitted to be submitted and approved prior to first use. 6. Development shall not be brought into use until parking and turning space has been provided. 7. No development shall commence until a Construction Method Statement (CMS) has been submitted to and approved by the local planning authority. The CMS shall include measures to deal with: - Vehicle parking; - Loading and unloading of plant and materials; - Storage of plant and materials; - Erection and maintenance of security hoarding; - Wheel washing facilities; - Measures to control the deposition of dirt/mud on surrounding roads; - Details of Footpath/Road closures needed during construction; - Traffic management needed during construction, and - Times, routes and means of access for construction traffic. 8. No development shall commence until details of external lighting measures have been submitted to and approved by the local planning authority.
    [Show full text]