220 Koleopt. Rdsch. 87 (2017) Koleopterologische Rundschau 87 221–228 Wien, September 2017

References ABDULLAH, M. & QADRI, N.-N. 1970: The Staphylinidae, Coleoptera of Pakistan. Part III. A key to the genera and species of the Piestinae, Osoriinae, Pseudopsinae and , with descriptions of Anotylus erythrinus nom.n. and the new genera, subgenera and species from Karachi. – Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial male of A. liliputanus (BERNHAUER, 1936) Research 13: 114−131. BERNHAUER, M. & SCHUBERT, K. 1911: Staphylinidae II (pars 29), pp. 87–190. – In Junk, W. & Schenk- (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae) ling, S. (eds.): Coleopterorum Catalogus, Volume V. − Berlin: W. Junk, 988 pp. Gy. MAKRANCZY BRINCK, P. & RUDEBECK, G. 1955: Chapter II. List of localities investigated by the Swedish expedition to Southern Africa in 1950-1951, pp. 62−100. – In Hanström, B., Brinck, P. & Rudebeck, G. (eds.): South African Life (Results of the Lund University Expedition in 1950-1951). Abstract Vol. 1. − Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 518 pp. Anotylus erythrinus nom.n. (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae) is proposed as a replacement CAMERON, M. 1920: New species of Staphylinidae from India. – The Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine name for Oxytelus rufotestaceus CAMERON, 1929: 444, a junior secondary homonym of Oxytelopsis 56: 141−148. rufotestacea CAMERON, 1925: 176. Oxytelus rufotestaceus is redescribed and a lectotype is designated for it. A very similar species, Anotylus liliputanus (BERNHAUER, 1936) previously known only from CAMERON, M. 1930: The fauna of British India including Ceylan and Burma. Coleoptera. Staphylinidae. its female holotype is redescribed based on a male specimen. For both redescriptions photographs of Vol. I. − London: Taylor and Francis, xvii + 471 pp. the habitus, as well as sculpture and other details are provided; terminalia and male genitalia are CAMERON, M. 1941: Description of new Staphylinidae (Coleopt.)–3. – Proceedings of the Royal Entomo- depicted by line drawings. logical Society of London (Series B, ) 10 (8): 142−147. e Key words: Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Oxytelinae, Anotylus, taxonomy, lectotype, Oriental Region, FAUVEL, A. 1904: Staphylinides exotiques nouveaux. 2 Partie (1). – Revue d’Entomologie (Caen) 23: Malaysia, Philippines. 76−112. FAUVEL, A. 1907: Voyage de M. Ch. Alluaud dans l’Afrique Orientale. Staphylinidae. – Revue d’Ento- mologie 26: 10−70. Introduction HERMAN, L.H. 1970: Phylogeny and reclassification of the genera of the rove- subfamily Oxy- The synonymization of Anotylus THOMSON, 1859 with Oxytelopsis FAUVEL, 1895 (MAKRANCZY telinae of the World (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). – Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural 2006) resulted in a number of homonymies, which were left untreated because most taxa History 142 (5): 343−454. involved were then unknown to the author and, as it turned out later, a couple of replacements HERMAN, L.H. 2001: Catalog of the Staphylinidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). 1785 to the end of the second proved to be unnecessary (MAKRANCZY 2017). millennium. – Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 265: 1–4218. The species comprising the former Oxytelopsis recently got revised as the Anotylus cimicoides MAKRANCZY, Gy. 2006: Systematics and phylogenetic relationships of the genera in the Carpelimus species group, and although the name Oxytelopsis rufotestaceus CAMERON, 1925 is now group (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae). – Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis regarded as a synonym of Anotylus pseudopsinus (FAUVEL, 1895), the junior name still needs Hungarici 98: 29−119. replacement. MAKRANCZY, Gy. 2009: The genus Thinodromus Kraatz, 1857 in West-Central Africa (Coleoptera, Sta- phylinidae: Oxytelinae). – Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 101: 33−61. By study of the lectotype and available material a redescription is provided, together with a recently discovered male specimen of a rather similar (but not necessarily closely related) MAKRANCZY, Gy. 2013: Review of the southern African species of Thinodromus (Coleoptera: Staphy- species, Anotylus liliputanus (BERNHAUER, 1936), formerly known only from its female linidae: Oxytelinae). – Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 53 (1): 177−208. holotype. The extremely small size and relative lack of external diagnostic traits in these two MAKRANCZY, Gy. 2014: Review of the Thinodromus circulus species group (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, species necessitates their treatment and illustration of the male characters, allowing other similar, Oxytelinae). – Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 54 (2): 539−554. tiny and reddish-brown species to be distinguished from them. PUTHZ, V. 1971: Revision der afrikanischen Steninenfauna und Allgemeines über die Gattung Stenus Latreille (Coleoptera Staphylinidae) (56. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Steninen). – Annales du Musée The material is deposited in the Natural History Museum, London, UK (BMNH) and in the Field royal de l’Afrique Centrale, Tervuren (Sér. 8°). Sciences Zoologiques 187: vi + 376 pp. Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA (FMNH). Measurements are defined as follows: HW = head width with eyes; TW = head width at temples; PW = maximum width of pronotum; SW = SCHEERPELTZ, O. 1974: Coleoptera: Staphylinidae (exclus. Subfam. Paederinae, except pars min.), approximate width of shoulders; AW = maximum width of abdomen; HL = head length from pp. 43−394. – In Hanström, B., Brinck, P. & Rudebeck, G. (eds.): South African Animal Life (Results of the Lund University Expedition in 1950–1951). Vol. 15. − Lund: Berlingska Bok- front margin of clypeus to the beginning of neck at middle-line; EL = eye length; TL = length of tryckeriet, 532 pp. temple; PL = length of pronotum in the middle-line; SL = length of elytra from shoulder; SC = length of elytra from hind apex of scutellum; FB = forebody length (combined length of head, pronotum and elytra); BL = approximate body length. The genital preparation techniques are Dr. György MAKRANCZY Hungarian Natural History Museum, Baross u. 13, H – 1088 Budapest, Hungary ([email protected]) detailed in MAKRANCZY (2006). Drawing was done with a Jenalab (Carl Zeiss, Jena) compound microscope and drawing tube (camera lucida). For the colour habitus photographs a Nikon D4 camera with Mitutoyo PlanApo 10x/20x ELDW lens was used, and layers were combined with ZereneStacker. The verbal descriptions are based exclusively on the male specimens. 222 Koleopt. Rdsch. 87 (2017)

Label data for types are listed verbatim, a backslash (\) separates labels, and a semicolon (;) separates lines. Text within square brackets ([…]) is explanatory and is not part of the original label text.

Anotylus erythrinus nom.n. Oxytelus rufotestaceus CAMERON 1929: 444 (preoccupied by Anotylus rufotestaceus (CAMERON 1925: 176)). Anotylus rufotestaceus: HERMAN 1970: 419, 2001: 1384. TYPE MATERIAL: Lectotype  (here designated): “Type [red margined disc, curator label] \ [small red rectangle] \ Perak \ O; rufotestaceus; Type [in maroon] Cam. \ M. Cameron.; Bequest.; B.M. 1955-147. \ Lectotypus; Oxytelus; rufotestaceus Cameron; des. Makranczy, 2017 \ Anotylus; erythrinus Makranczy, n. nov.; det. Makranczy, 2017” (BMNH). ADDITIONAL MATERIAL EXAMINED: MALAYSIA: Pahang, Bentong [approx. 03°31.5'N 101°54.5'E, 100 m], IV.1977, leg. L.E. Watrous (2 , BMNH). REDESCRIPTION: Measurements (in mm, male, n = 1): HW = 0.395; TW = 0.395; PW = 0.395; SW = 0.405; AW = 0.42; HL = 0.25; EL = 0.095; TL = 0.12; PL = 0.27; SL = 0.35; SC = 0.31; FB = 1.05; BL = 1.69; (females, n = 2): HW = 0.32 (0.32–0.325); TW = 0.30 (0.30–0.305); PW = 0.35 (0.35–0.355); SW = 0.36 (0.36–0.365); AW = 0.39 (0.38–0.40); HL = 0.22 (0.21– 0.22); EL = 0.08 (0.08–0.085); TL = 0.07 (0.07–0.075); PL = 0.23 (0.23–0.235); SL = 0.33 (0.33–0.335); SC = 0.30 (0.30–0.305); FB = 0.81 (0.80–0.81); BL = 1.43 (1.38–1.47). Habitus as in Fig. 1. Forebody moderately lustrous, covered with strong but somewhat smoothened micro- sculpture (head with disc in part finely rugulose microsculptured, almost dull), abdomen lacking microsculpture, more lustrous. Body reddish medium to light brown (head not or insignificantly darker), elytra very slightly darkening towards apex. Legs, antennae and mouthparts reddish me- dium to light brown, basal third of antennae and femora somewhat lighter. Head (male: Fig. 5, females: Figs. 6–7) with temples slightly dilating after moderately large but not so bulging eye, broadly rounded, yet somewhat angled; with extremely thin rim on anterior margin, clypeus very slightly projecting forward and truncate anteriorly, bordered by transverse semi-rectangular im- pression (epistomal suture) laterally and posteriorly, surface smooth and shiny. Supraantennal tubercles also shiny, moderately developed, anterior edge slightly obtuse-angled but broadly rounded. Microsculpture on vertex strong but indistinct (somewhat colliculate but sometimes areolate), rugulose on neck. Intra-ocular sulcus well developed, following outline of temples but before neck turning towards middle of disc on a short distance; inside sulcus impressed with ob- lique strigose microsculpture. Head with small bristles behind supraantennal tubercles (near anterior edge of eye) and on vertex near temples. Antenna (male) as in Fig. 2. Neck separated by a constriction, dorsally turning into an antero-medial impression. Pronotum inverse trapezoid, anterior and posterior corners sharply angled, disc indistinctly 5-sulcate, anterior and side margins slightly sinuate (almost straight) posterior margin gently curved. Rather prominent (thick) marginal bead on side appearing double-edged, with tiny bristles at anterior corners, at 2/5 of side length and before posterior corners. Surface roughly but indistinctly strigose and uneven in longitudinal midline with less prominent median furrow. Elytra with narrowly rounded shoulders, sides slightly dilating, gently curved (more posteriorly than anteriorly), hind margins almost straight with extremely thin marginal bead. Sutural ridges rather wide but smooth and flat, disc roughly rugose-punctate. Lateral longitudinal ridge stronger but not sharp. Legs moderately short, protibia without preapical constriction, with row of stronger spines, evenly spaced on apical part, pro- and mesotibia with several spinulose rows, metatibia also with longi- tudinal ctenidium of spinules in distal half. Abdomen with sides moderately arcuate, widest at segments III–IV, mesal paratergites moderately broad, posterior edge of tergite VII with thin palisade fringe, sternite VIII as in Fig. 9, segments IX–X with rhomboid fusion as in Fig. 10, tergite X as in Fig. 11, and aedeagus as in Figs. 12–13. 222 Koleopt. Rdsch. 87 (2017) MAKRANCZY: Anotylus erythrinus nom.n. and the male of A. liliputanus (STAPHYLINIDAE) 223

Label data for types are listed verbatim, a backslash (\) separates labels, and a semicolon (;) ETYMOLOGY: The Greek word “erythrinos” means reddish, used here in its Latinized form. separates lines. Text within square brackets ([…]) is explanatory and is not part of the original DISTRIBUTION: The species is only known from peninsular Malaysia (Perak, Pahang). label text.

Anotylus liliputanus (BERNHAUER, 1936) Anotylus erythrinus nom.n. Oxytelus (Anotylus) liliputanus BERNHAUER 1936: 85. Oxytelus rufotestaceus CAMERON 1929: 444 (preoccupied by Anotylus rufotestaceus (CAMERON 1925: 176)). Anotylus liliputanus: HERMAN 1970: 418, 2001: 1366. Anotylus rufotestaceus: HERMAN 1970: 419, 2001: 1384. TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype : “Los Banos [14°10'N 121°13'E]; Luzon \ Philippinen; coll. Boettcher; don. TYPE MATERIAL: Lectotype  (here designated): “Type [red margined disc, curator label] \ [small red rectangle] Staudinger \ liliputanus; Brnh. Typ.[us] un.[icus] \ liliputanus; Bernh. Typus; unic. Anotylus \ Chicago NHMus; M. \ Perak \ O; rufotestaceus; Type [in maroon] Cam. \ M. Cameron.; Bequest.; B.M. 1955-147. \ Lectotypus; Oxytelus; Bernhauer; Collection \ Anotylus; liliputanus Bn \ Holotype; teste A. Westrich 2015; GDI Imaging Project \ rufotestaceus Cameron; des. Makranczy, 2017 \ Anotylus; erythrinus Makranczy, n. nov.; det. Makranczy, 2017” Photographed; Kelsey Keaton 2015; Emu Catalog \ FMNHINS; 3048518; Field Museum; Pinned” (FMNH). (BMNH). ADDITIONAL MATERIAL EXAMINED: ADDITIONAL MATERIAL EXAMINED: PHILIPPINES: Laguna Prov., Mt. Makiling, ca. 4 km SE Los Baños [approx. 14°08.5'N 121°13'E, 430 m], MALAYSIA: Pahang, Bentong [approx. 03°31.5'N 101°54.5'E, 100 m], IV.1977, leg. L.E. Watrous (2 , 7.V.1977, leg. L.E. Watrous, berlese, rotten figs (1 , FMNH). BMNH). REDESCRIPTION: Measurements (in mm, male, n = 1): HW = 0.36; TW = 0.35; PW = 0.36; REDESCRIPTION: Measurements (in mm, male, n = 1): HW = 0.395; TW = 0.395; PW = SW = 0.36; AW = 0.40; HL = 0.24; EL = 0.085; TL = 0.105; PL = 0.26; SL = 0.33; SC = 0.30; 0.395; SW = 0.405; AW = 0.42; HL = 0.25; EL = 0.095; TL = 0.12; PL = 0.27; SL = 0.35; SC = FB = 0.86; BL = 1.64; (female, n = 1): HW = 0.28; TW = 0.265; PW = 0.30; SW = 0.32; AW = 0.31; FB = 1.05; BL = 1.69; (females, n = 2): HW = 0.32 (0.32–0.325); TW = 0.30 (0.30–0.305); 0.35; HL = 0.21; EL = 0.07; TL = 0.06; PL = 0.21; SL = 0.30; SC = 0.28; FB = 0.71; BL = 1.24. PW = 0.35 (0.35–0.355); SW = 0.36 (0.36–0.365); AW = 0.39 (0.38–0.40); HL = 0.22 (0.21– Habitus as in Fig. 3. Forebody with very moderate, greasy lustre (mostly finely but strongly mi- 0.22); EL = 0.08 (0.08–0.085); TL = 0.07 (0.07–0.075); PL = 0.23 (0.23–0.235); SL = 0.33 crosculptured), abdomen more lustrous. Head reddish medium to dark brown (darker in im- (0.33–0.335); SC = 0.30 (0.30–0.305); FB = 0.81 (0.80–0.81); BL = 1.43 (1.38–1.47). Habitus as pressions mediad supraantennal tubercles, lighter along anterior edge), pronotum light to in Fig. 1. Forebody moderately lustrous, covered with strong but somewhat smoothened micro- medium brown. Elytra anteriorly medium brown at shoulders, mediad and posteriorly slightly sculpture (head with disc in part finely rugulose microsculptured, almost dull), abdomen lacking darkening. Abdomen mostly medium brown, dark brown in transverse impressions behind basal microsculpture, more lustrous. Body reddish medium to light brown (head not or insignificantly ridges. Legs, antennae and mouthparts light brown. Head (Fig. 8) with eyes moderately large but darker), elytra very slightly darkening towards apex. Legs, antennae and mouthparts reddish me- not particularly bulging, temples on anterior 1/3 straight then rounded; with extremely thin rim dium to light brown, basal third of antennae and femora somewhat lighter. Head (male: Fig. 5, on anterior margin, clypeus slightly sinuate anteriorly, bordered by tiny anterior emarginations females: Figs. 6–7) with temples slightly dilating after moderately large but not so bulging eye, and transverse oval impression (epistomal suture) laterally and posteriorly, surface insignifi- broadly rounded, yet somewhat angled; with extremely thin rim on anterior margin, clypeus very cantly microsculptured. Tips of supraantennal tubercles also shiny, moderately developed, slightly projecting forward and truncate anteriorly, bordered by transverse semi-rectangular im- anterior edge slightly obtuse-angled but broadly rounded. Microsculpture strong but fine colli- pression (epistomal suture) laterally and posteriorly, surface smooth and shiny. Supraantennal culate, more strigose postero-laterally, turning rugulose on neck. Intra-ocular sulcus poorly tubercles also shiny, moderately developed, anterior edge slightly obtuse-angled but broadly developed, from inner edge of eye following outline of temples but vanishing well before neck; rounded. Microsculpture on vertex strong but indistinct (somewhat colliculate but sometimes inside sulcus microsculpture somewhat stronger but not significantly different. Head with rather areolate), rugulose on neck. Intra-ocular sulcus well developed, following outline of temples but large bristles behind supraantennal tubercles (near anterior edge of eye) and on vertex near before neck turning towards middle of disc on a short distance; inside sulcus impressed with ob- temples. Antenna (male) as in Fig. 4. Neck separated by a constriction, dorsally turning into a lique strigose microsculpture. Head with small bristles behind supraantennal tubercles (near medial/antero-medial impression. Pronotum posteriorly constricting semi-rectangular, anterior anterior edge of eye) and on vertex near temples. Antenna (male) as in Fig. 2. Neck separated by corners somewhat sharp but superficially appearing as narrowly rounded, sides and posterior a constriction, dorsally turning into an antero-medial impression. Pronotum inverse trapezoid, margin slightly curved, posterior angles broadly rounded, disc indistinctly sulcate but besides anterior and posterior corners sharply angled, disc indistinctly 5-sulcate, anterior and side median furrow only two nearby parallel sulci discernible. Rather prominent (thick) marginal margins slightly sinuate (almost straight) posterior margin gently curved. Rather prominent bead on side appearing double-edged, with smaller bristles at anterior corners, lager ones at 2/5 (thick) marginal bead on side appearing double-edged, with tiny bristles at anterior corners, at of side length and even larger ones near posterior corners. Surface finely but distinctly strigose 2/5 of side length and before posterior corners. Surface roughly but indistinctly strigose and on entire disc. Elytra with moderately rounded shoulders, sides dilating, gently curved, hind uneven in longitudinal midline with less prominent median furrow. Elytra with narrowly rounded margins almost straight with thin marginal bead. Sutural ridges moderately thin, smooth and flat, shoulders, sides slightly dilating, gently curved (more posteriorly than anteriorly), hind margins disc rugulose-punctate. Lateral longitudinal ridge consisting a few stronger protruding strigae. almost straight with extremely thin marginal bead. Sutural ridges rather wide but smooth and Legs moderately short, protibia with slight preapical constriction bordered by a few stronger flat, disc roughly rugose-punctate. Lateral longitudinal ridge stronger but not sharp. Legs spines, pro- and mesotibia with several spinulose rows, metatibia also with longitudinal moderately short, protibia without preapical constriction, with row of stronger spines, evenly ctenidium of spinules in distal half. Abdomen with sides moderately arcuate, widest at segments spaced on apical part, pro- and mesotibia with several spinulose rows, metatibia also with longi- III–IV, mesal paratergites moderately broad, posterior edge of tergite VII with rather (evenly) tudinal ctenidium of spinules in distal half. Abdomen with sides moderately arcuate, widest at wide palisade fringe, sternite VIII as in Fig. 14, tergite IX as in Fig. 15, tergite X as in Fig. 16 segments III–IV, mesal paratergites moderately broad, posterior edge of tergite VII with thin and aedeagus as in Figs. 17–18. palisade fringe, sternite VIII as in Fig. 9, segments IX–X with rhomboid fusion as in Fig. 10, tergite X as in Fig. 11, and aedeagus as in Figs. 12–13. DISTRIBUTION: This species is known only from the Philippines (southern Luzon). 224 Koleopt. Rdsch. 87 (2017)

Figs. 1–4: Anotylus erythrinus (1–2) and A. liliputanus (3–4): 1, 3) habitus (); 2, 4) antenna (). 224 Koleopt. Rdsch. 87 (2017) MAKRANCZY: Anotylus erythrinus nom.n. and the male of A. liliputanus (STAPHYLINIDAE) 225

Figs. 5–8: Anotylus erythrinus  (5), and  (6–7), A. liliputanus  (8): head and pronotum; the lighting Figs. 1–4: Anotylus erythrinus (1–2) and A. liliputanus (3–4): 1, 3) habitus (); 2, 4) antenna (). used in Figs. 5–6 differs from the lighting used for Figs. 7–8. 226 Koleopt. Rdsch. 87 (2017)

Figs. 9–13: Anotylus erythrinus (): 9) sternite VIII; 10) segments IX–X; 11) tergite X; 12) aedeagus, lateral view, 13) same, frontal view. Scale bar = 0.075 mm for 12–13, 0.10 mm for 9, 0.11 mm for 10–11. 226 Koleopt. Rdsch. 87 (2017) MAKRANCZY: Anotylus erythrinus nom.n. and the male of A. liliputanus (STAPHYLINIDAE) 227

Figs. 9–13: Anotylus erythrinus (): 9) sternite VIII; 10) segments IX–X; 11) tergite X; 12) aedeagus, Figs. 14–18: Anotylus liliputanus (): 14) sternite VIII; 15) tergite IX; 16) tergite X; 17) aedeagus, lateral lateral view, 13) same, frontal view. Scale bar = 0.075 mm for 12–13, 0.10 mm for 9, 0.11 mm for 10–11. view, 18) same, frontal view. Scale bar = 0.06 mm for 17–18, 0.10 mm for 14–16. 228 Koleopt. Rdsch. 87 (2017)

Acknowledgements I am indebted to Harald Schillhammer (Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Austria) for his help with the colour photos. Alfred F. Newton (FMNH) is thanked for his continuous help with taxonomic issues. I am grateful to Margaret K. Thayer (FMNH), James H. Boone (FMNH) and Maxwell V.L. Barclay (BMNH) for the loan of the material.

References BERNHAUER, M. 1936: Die Staphyliniden der Philippinen (Gattung Oxytelus). – The Philippine Journal of Science 61 (1): 81−87. CAMERON, M. 1925: New Staphylinidae from the Dutch East Indies. – Treubia 6 (2): 174−198. CAMERON, M. 1929: New Staphylinidae from the Malay Peninsula. – Journal of the Federated Malay States Museums 14 (3–4): 436−452. HERMAN, L.H. 1970: Phylogeny and reclassification of the genera of the rove-beetle subfamily Oxy- telinae of the World (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). – Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 142 (5): 343−454. HERMAN, L.H. 2001: Catalog of the Staphylinidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). 1785 to the end of the second millennium. – Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 265: 1–4218. MAKRANCZY, Gy. 2006: Systematics and phylogenetic relationships of the genera in the Carpelimus group (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae). – Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 98: 29−119. MAKRANCZY, Gy. 2017: Review of the Anotylus cimicoides species group (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae). – Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 63 (2): 143–262.

Dr. György MAKRANCZY Hungarian Natural History Museum, Baross u. 13, H – 1088 Budapest, Hungary ([email protected])