Roport No. SA-31 Public Disclosure Authorized This report may not be published nor may it be quoted as representing the views of the Bank Group. The Bank Group does not accept resporisibility for the accuracy or completeness of the report.
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Public Disclosure Authorized
A JOINT STUDY
WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
EFFECTIVE DEMAND FOR FERTILIZERS IN INDIA Public Disclosure Authorized
March 27, 1972 Public Disclosure Authorized
Prepared by: W. B. Donde - Government of India Dorris D. Brown - IBRD
ABBREVIATIONS
N - NITROGEN IN ANY FORM p _ PHOSPHATE OR P205
ICAR - INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IARS - INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATISTICS
IADP - INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE DISTRICT PROGRAMME
HYV - HIGH YIELDING VARIETY (SEEDS)
Kgs - KILOGRAMS
M.TONS - METRIC TONS
FAI - FERTILIZER ASSOCIATION OF INDIA
Rs 7.50 - US$1.00 as used in this report
I N D I A
EFFECTIVE DEHAND FOR FERTMIIZERS IN INDIA
Table of Contents Page
PREFACE i - ii
SUMKARY
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Characteristics of Demand for Fertilizers 7
Chapter 3 Projection of Fertilizer Demand 16
Chapter 4 Conclusions and Observations 23
Annexes
Annex 1 The Available Data
Annex 2 Consumption of Fertilizers N and P by Districts and States - Tables I to XIX
Annex 3 Fertilizer Projection by Districts - Tables I to XVI
PREFACE
This study on Effective Demand for Fertilizers in India originated with the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, as a part of its work of appraising the economic feasibility of investment proposals for India's rapidly expanding fertilizer industry. The Government of India welcomed the study and arranged participation in it as a joint endeavor. The Ministry of Food and Agriculture constituted an Advisory Committee to work with the joint team for planning and guiding the study. The study was initiated in August 1969 and completed in May 1971.
The State Departments of Agriculture provided the data on fertilizer consumption in each district each year from 1959-60 to 1968-69. The Directo- rate of Economics and Statistics in the Ministry of Food, Agriculture, C.D. and Cooperation provided the time series data in area under crops, irrigated area and farm harvest prices. The metearological office, Poona supplied the district data on normal rainfall and its variability. And the experts at the State and Central levels gave valuable information regarding probable changes in irrigation and new agricultural technology. The statistical work and computer operations were performed by the staff at the Indian Institute of Agricultural Research Statistics under the direction of Dr. Daroga Singh.
The report is based on the available district data, projected ferti- lizer demand, district by district, up to 1973-74 and for the States and the Nation for 1978-79. The actual consumption for the first two years, 1969-70 and 1970-71, falls well within reasonable limits of statistical error for these years. This gives some confidence in the validity of the projection method and reasonable hope that the actual consumption in future years would also not be very different from the projected figures. All the same, the authors of the report have recognized the limitations of the projection model used and have suggested continuation of the study with special emphasis on the factors influencing demand for fertilizers. The data compiled for each district during the study could be updated every year and supplemented with other information as needed for analysis of fertilizer demand and other agri- cultural development issues.
In a study of this type one becomes indebted to a large number of participants in India and in the Bank. A special word of appreciation is due the staff of the Directorate of Economics and Statistics for their work in compiling the data, and Dr. Daroga Singh and his staff at the Indian Institute of Agricultural Research Statistics provided major assistance in the development of the conceptual design, the testing of statistical models and the operation of the computer. Special thanks are due D. L. Ralhan, 3. K. Raheja, and K. S. Krishnan of the IARS and V. V. P. Rao of the Directorate of Economics and Statistical Division for their unstinted Bfforts. Within the Bank, Ben King, Bong Suh Lee and Arun Shourie assisted Ln the conceptual design and review. Many others assisted with various phases - ii - of the work. A special word of appreciation is due each one. However, the authors take full responsibility for the results.
W. B. Donde - Economist, Directorate of Economics and Statistics Ministry of Food and Agriculture C.D. and Cooperation New Delhi, India
Dorris D. Brown - Agricultural Economist International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Washington, D.C. SUMMARY
i. In this study the characteristics of demand for fertilizers were investigated and the results used to project demand for nitrogen (N) and phosphate (P) by districts through 1973/74 and by States and for all-India for 1978-79. The 1973/74 projected demand of 2.4 to 2.9 million tons of N and 1.2 to 1.5 million tons of P is similar to and supports the Fourth Plan targets. The sale of 4.0 to 5.2 million tons N and 2.0 to 2.6 million tons P was projected for 1978/79. These numbers may be compared with sales of 1.2 million tons N and 0.4 million tons P in 1968/69. The projections exceed probable domestic production by 0.5 to 0.9 million tons of each nutrient each year during the decade; this amount would need to be imported. These projections are sensitive to assumptions regarding a continued increase in the use of HYV seeds, added irrigated area and favorable cost-price relation- ships. The projections for P based as they are on an assumed ratio of 2 N to 1 P are subject to a wider range of estimating error. State and district projections are more sensitive than the national projections to changes in the assumptions and weights used.
ii. Projections were based on a close examination of the factors that influenced changes in sales during the ten years up to 1968/69. During this period demand was influenced most by the cultivator's previous experience from the use of fertilizers (the learning process) and the area irrigated and planted to selected crops known to have consumed most of this material. These factors explained 70 to 90 percent of the changes in demand. Other factors, not measurable with the available data and assumed to be important, included the availability and use of agricultural credit, market and transport facilities and promotional efforts. iii. The above factors were used to project demand for N plus P for each district, after making appropriate assumptions regarding changes in their growth rates. Inherent in these assumptions were the investments needed and time required to expand irrigation resources, develop and adopt new techno- logies, increase the availability of agricultural power-and expand the agri- cultural input and commodity marketing systems. It was assumed that cost/ benefit relationships would be about the same as observed during 1967 to 1969. In some districts assumptions included improvements in agricultural credit and transportation resources. iv. For this study, time series agricultural data for each district were assembled. It is suggested that these data be up-dated each year and supple- mented by additional information as needed to continue the study of demand for fertilizers. Factors such as multiple cropping and application of ferti- lizers to crops not usually fertilized would change the values of independent variables in the future. Particularly, a technological break-through in respect to paddy, pulses, oilseeds and cotton among the specified crops would change the projections, as the past influence for some of these crops on ferti- lizer demand had been low or insignificant. The dry farming program is yet another area which would make a difference in future demand. Further studies should concentrate on the farm business unit to determine the factors influencin6 the cultivator's expenditure for fertilizers. Also the role of agricultural credit, market facilities, promotion activities, and transportation resources may be delineated. Assemblying and analyzing the data each year would provide guidance in achieving fertilizer targets and plan objectives and would be most rewarding for the future of Indian agriculture.
Chapter I - INTRODUCTION
1.01 The role of fertilizers as an important input needed to achieve increased agricultural production has been fully established and accepted. Growth in agricultural output depends largely on the quantities of fertili- zers used with each crop in combination with water from irrigation and rainfall, seed, and other inputs. 1.02 Capital investment in India's fertilizer industry exceeded Rs. 5600 million ($ 750 million) in. 1969. Capital required for the proposed expansion of the industry over the next five to ten years exceeds this amount. In- vestors in the industry are concerned about the probable demand for the nation and also for each market region served by each factory engaged in the manufacture and sale of fertilizer materials. The returns to capital invested in each factory and the industry are substantially reduced if ferti- lizers are produced and marketed below about 80 percent of plant capacity.
1.03 Using a pragmatic approach, this study projects demand for fertili- zers, district by district, and year by year to 1973-74 and then for 1978-79. Government and fertilizer industry planners and investors would be the major users of these projections. In the 10 years ending with 1968-69, sales of nitrogen (N) had expanded at 27 percent per year while sales of phosphate (P) had expanded at 31 percent per year. In this study some of the factors that influenced these changes have been identified, weighted and used to estimate future sales. The study of demand for potash fertilizer haB not been included because of inadequate data. 1.04 This chapter summarizes fertilizer dmand studies and projections of other investigators. Characteristics of demand are reliewed in chapter II. Methods used to project demand for N and P are explained and three projections are given in chapter III. The implications of these results for development planners and investors are given in chapter IV. The annexes contain detailed information regarding the data collected, details of district-wise sales of N and P from 1959-60 through 1968-69 and district projections through 1973-74.
Results of Earlier Investigations 1.05 Investigations of demand for fertilizers y districts, States or regions in India have been made by others. Donahue!/in 1966 projected expected district demand for 1970-71 on the basis of area in each crop and the proportion of the recommeqoed application rate it was anticipated that cultivators would use. Brown- in 1965 estimated fertilizer demand by dis-
1/Donahue, R. 0. Fertilizer EBxpected to be Used in India in 1970-71 by Districts, Crops and Regions as of April 1, 1966. The Ford Foundation, New Delhi, April 1, 1966. 2 Brown, D. D. Estimates of Fertilizer Demand for India. The Ford Foundation, New Delhi, April 1, 965. -2-
tricts and years to 1970-71 by the use of a trend extension technique ad- justed for ad hoc judgement of probable changes in irrigated area, crop pattern and crops response. Demand in recent years was considerably above Brown's estimates and considerably below Donahue's. The effect on demand of the upwiard shift in crop response resulting from the introduction of new crop varieties, the increase in irrigated area and the rapid increase in commodity prices were under-estimated by Brown and overestimated by Donahue.
1.06 Desai 3/Jin 1969 projected demand for nitrogen fertilizer by the use of a two step model that included area under each crop and the rate of application per unit of area in each crop. Two rates of application were assumed; the first based on observed rates for each crop in each State, and the second based on the use of nitrogen at near the economic optimum rate. As background for this approach Desai used survey data to analyze factors influencing fertilizer use by cultivators. His cost-benefit proxy was the ratio of the weighted average price of nitrogen in each State in the current year to the weighted average price of crops for the previous year. In general, his approach was based on the diffusion rate of growxth in demand as reflected by the historical experience before the introduction of the more responsive varieties of wheat and other cereal crops.
1.07 &Tell g in 1969 estimated the amount of fertilizers needed to achieve alternative agricultural production targets by use of an additive model based on yardsticks of production of each input. To achieve a 24 million metric ton increase in foodgrains, the quantity of fertilizers re- quired was calculated as a residual after deducting added production as- sumed for the probable increase in area irrigated and area under high yielding variety crops. Varying rates of crop responses were assumed for each added unit of a mixture of four parts nitrogen, two parts phosphate and one part potash. The method did not consider the effect of inter- action of inputs or of changes in the rate of application of'fertilizer by cultivators in response to possible changes in costs, crop prices and other factors.
1.08 Donde V in his 1969 study which is summarized in Table 1.1, esti- mated the elasticity of demand for nitrogen fertilized at three levels of
2 Desai, G.M. Growth of Fertilizer Use in Indian Agriculture - Past Trends and Future Demand, Occasiornal Paper No. 2h, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA - July, 1969. 4/ Ewell, R India's Fertilizer Reouirements during the 1970's. A Report to the Ministry uf Food, Agriculture, CoimauniLy Development and Cooperation, Government of India, New Delhi, The Ford Foundation, New Delhi, June, 1969.
5/ Donde, W.B. Market andc Real Prices of Fertilizers and Impact of Price Chanaes on Fertil`:-cr ConsiIxrntion and Production of Crops. Directorate of ;conomics and Statistics, llinistry of Food and Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, India, 1969. (Published in Agricultural Situation in India, Aug. 1970). -3-
Table 1 .1 - 07'ITIU1*i AND rECOiUl'qENDED Rt.TFS, COST-PRICE RATIOS AND }'RICE iQASIICITY OF DUi?LUND FOR N.
Optimum PAtes l/ Recommended Rate 2/ Recornenc1ed Ralt Kgs N Cost-Price Elas- Kgs N Cost-Price Eias- Kgs N Cost- E1asti- Crop per ha Ratio tici- per ha Ratio tici- per ha Price city Kgs ty Kgs 2/ ty Ratio Kgs ty Kgs .. / ty Kgs Paddy HYV 142 3.17 0.28 100 6.51 0.81 50 10-55 2.62 Paddy Local 42 3.17 0.25 40 3.83 0.32 20 9.92 1.63 }"heat HYV Irr. 164 2.52 0.22 100 7.02 1.01 50 10.50 3.02 Wheat Local Irr. 52 2.52 0.14 48 4.16 0.25 24 12.57 1.-9 Wheat Local Not irr. 40 2.52 0.30 25 5.62 1.06 12 8.28 3.12 Maize HYV 256 3.50 0.54 100 7.42 2.97 50 8.67 6.93 Maize Local 50 3.50 0.20 142 6.27 0.43 21 13.62 l.C6 Bajra HYV 152 2.78 0.82 60 4-83 3.63 30 5.50 8.26 Bajra Local 45 2.78 0.29 30 5.99 0.96 15 9.11 2.52 Jowar Local 48 3.24 0.37 36 5.35 0.81 18 8.67 2.61
1/ Optimuim rates cf anDlication were calculated from the fortilizcr rpro6uc iden function giverl the market price of N (1969-70) and of the produce price (196U-69)
2/ As recommendcd by the Department of Agriculture.
3/ Kilograms of added crop output required to equate the cost of one Kg of N. application per hectare for high yielding and local varieties of cereal crops under irrigated and unirrigated conditions. Donde assumed that demand for nitrogen fertilizer depends prinarily on the profitability of its use as determined by the crop's responsiveness, cost of fertilizer and other inputs and produce prices. These factors adjusted to the area and crop pattern determine sales in a district. The dimensions of these parameters change over time with the introduction and use of more fertilizer responsive crop varieties, improvement in farm management practices, the use of and interactions with other inputs, changes in relative prices and costs and the availability of fertilizers and credit. The study concludes that:
Shifts in demand for nitrogen were relatively elastic to changes in real prices at the recommended and one-half recomrnmended rates of applying N;
Cultivators in the early stages of adopting the use of fertilizer are more likely to respond to an increase in the cost-price relationship by not using any fertilizer. Likewise they are more likely to in- crease the use of fertilizer with a decrease in its cost relative to the price of foodgrains, or the introduction of more fertilizer responsive varieties;
The calculated economic optimum, agronoinic recommended and one-half recommended rates of application per hectare for each crop as aiven in Table 1 are considerably above their recent average rates of application, indicating the probability of increased demarni for N under the conditions specified in the analysis.
1.09 In 1968, a committee of econg ists drawn from member companies of the Fertilizer Association of India_/ developed projections of demand for fertilizers up to 1973-7 4 by the use of four different methods. Their straight line projection represented the extension of the c-mpound growth rate in demand for nitrogen, phosphate and potassium for the five years, 1963-64 to 1967-68. The population-nutrition method of forecasting as- sumed a 2.5 percent per annum growth in population and a foodgrains re- quirement of 18 ounces per day per person. These data were used to de- termine targets for foodgrains and other commodities. A ratio ranging from 8.9 up to 13.5 kgs foodgrain output for each 1 kg of fertilizer input was used to estimate fertilizer requirements. A third projection was based on a crop area and recommended rate approach while their fourth projection was based on "needs" to achieve a 5 percent annual growth rate in agricul- tural production over the 1967i-68 base. The results of their study are given in Table 1.2.
6/ The Fertilizer Association of India. Report on the Development of the Fertilizer Industry During the Fourth Plan Period, August, 198. -5-
Table 1.2 - FOURTH PLAN PROJECTION OF DEMAND FOR FERTILIZERS IN MILLION TONS NUTRIENTS.
1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74
Fertilizer Association Committee 1/
Straight Line Method N 1.54 1.98 2.55 3.28 4.22 P 0.63 0.88 1.21 1.68 2.32 K 0.25 0.33 0.44 0.58 0.77
Population Nutrition N 2.02 2.34 2.60 2.85 3.07 Basis p 1.01 1.17 1.30 1.42 1.53 K 0.50 0.59 0.65 0.71 0.77
Area Crop Approach N 1.92 2.36 2.80 3.23 3.68 P 1.03 1.32 1.61 1.19 2.20 K 0.68 0.93 1.18 1.42 1.67
Needs - Agr. Growth N 1.90 2.34 2.77 3.16 3.54 Rate P 0.95 1.17 1.38 1.58 1.77 K 0.47 0.59 0.69 0.79 o.88 gorkin Group N 1.70 2.00 2.78 3.22 3.73 Fourth Pc nP- 0.60 0.80 1.20 1.44 1.74 K 0.30 0.40 0.82 0.95 1.11
Sources:
1/ Report on,the Development of the Fertilizer Industry During the Fourth Plan' Period. The Fertilizer Association of India, New Delhi, Augutst 1968.
2/ Working Group Report on Fourth Plan. Fertilizer Requirements, Governmentfof.-India, Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Cooperation and Panchayat Raj, New Delhi, 1968. - 6 -
1.10 Targets for fertilizer use as ported in the Fourth Plan7/were calculated by a Fertilizer Working Group within the Ministry of Food and Agriculture. The committee estimated the future requirements of fertilizers by taking into consideration the probable area under each crop, the most probable rates of nutrient application for the various crops and the per- centage of the area likely to be covered by fertilizer applications. The rate of fertilizer application per hectare for various crops, both under irrigated and unirrigated conditions, were based on fertilizer recommen- dations, the scientific data wailable, probable developments in research, and an assumed rate of acceptance by cultivators. The requirements of fertilizers based on these considerations were estimated at 3.73 million tons of nitrogen, 1.74 million tons of phosphate and 1.11 million tons of potassium in 1973-74. In arriving at this requirement, the area under high yielding varieties was assumed to be 24.30 million hectares on which 160 kgs of NPK nutrients per hectare would be applied. All the area in irrigated cereal and oilseed crops would be fertilized and in the case of other irrigated crops, 75 percent of the area under pulses, sugarcane and cotton and 50 percent of the area under the remaining crops would also receive ferti- lizer. In the case of unirrigated crops, the area assumed to be covered by fertilizer application was 40 percent for cereals, 50 percent for sugarcane and cotton, 25 percent for pulses, 30 percent for oilseeds and 70 percent for jute. Their projections are also given in Table 1.2.
1.11 It should be clear that most of these projections are based on "need" or "requirement" to achieve production targets. Except for Desai's proxy fertilizer cost-crop harvest price ratio and Donde's fertilizer cost cereal grain price elasticities very little in the realm of economics of demand for fertilizers has been investigated. Fertilizer industry marketers are interested in the "needs" type of projection. However, the economic viability of a fertilizer factory or of the industry depends on market demand. A clearer understanding of the factors that influence market demand would help improve the accuracy of market forecasts and serve as a useful analytical tool.
- Fourth Five Year Plan 1969-74. Planning Commission, Government of India, 1ew Denth.
-/Working Group Report on.,Fourth Plan. Fertilizer-Requirements, Government of India, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, New Delhi, 1968. -7
Chapter 2 - CHARACTERISTICS OF DEMAND FOR FERTILIZERS
2.01 The demand for fertilizer, measured as its application per hectare or as the aggregate tons consumed in a igion, advances over time at alternating low and high rates of gain, a net decrease in demand is seldom observed for any extended time. These alternating rapid and less rapid increases in demand have been observed in a number of countries. In India overall consumption of fertil- izers moved from 170,000 tons of N plus P in 1959 to 690,000 tons in 1965. Consumption then increased to over 2.0 million tons by 1970-71. Slower rates of increase then set in when additions to the area irrigated and the adoption of new technology slowed down in response to changes in economic gains from the use of more fertilizers.
2.02 Shifts in demand are believed to be associated with shifts in costs and benefits of farming. Costs of farming may change asa result of adjustments in the combination of inputs sauch as the introduction of more fertilizer responsive varieties, added irrigation resources, new technologies in the fertilizer industry that reduce the cost of fertilizers, improvements in the managerial skills of the cultivator and other factors like credit, availability cf supplies, markets and transport facilities. Benefits may shift because of changes in yield and crop prices, adjustments in cropping pattern, reduotion in the cost of inputs, and other factors. Factors that improve cost-benefit relation- ships tend to get concentrated in a consecutive span of years during which cultivators increase their use of fertilizers in an attempt to readjust to a shift in the economic optimum rate of application. Eventually the impact of these factors stabilizes as equilibrium is approached and the growth in demand for fertilizers is at a slower pace.
2.03 For the purpose of thisstudy all available and relevant data were assembled, district by district, for the 1959-60 to 1968-69 years. Data available and their sources are indicated below. Annex 1 gives a more detailed description of each i-tem and the methods used to compile the ten-year time series used.
1. Net consumption of nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers State Department of Agriculture
2. Area, 30 crops Directorate of Economics and Statistics Ministry of Food, Agr. C.D. & Cooperation Production, 3. 30 crops It" I It 4. Irrigated area, 30 crops " " " I " "
5. District harvest prices, 30 crops " " " " " " 6. 50 years' (1901-1950) average rain- fall for 4 seasons and the mean an- nual average with their coeflcients of variability Meteorological Office, Poona
7. Crop response data ICAR and State Government Model Agronomic Experiments and IARS field crop cutting data in IADP districts. -8-
Information regarding changes in the use of agricultural credit, rural transportation, extension service and other factors believed to influence demand for fertilizers were not available on a district time- series basis.
2.04 The data for items 1 to 6, were assembled and computerized for a ten-year time series (1959-60 to 1968-69) for 271 districts in the following States:
Andhra Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Rajasthan Bihar Maharashtra Tamil Nadu Oujarat Mysore Uttar Pradesh Haryana Orissa West Bengal Kerala Punjab
For the States of Assam, Himachel Pradesh and JammNu-Kashmir, data were available for only a part of the ten-year series. The districts in these States were omitted frao the regression analysis. Annex 2, TablesI to X=X lists the detailed data regarding fertilizers used in each district. Data showing crop response to fertilizers were not available for the complete ten-year time series for any district. The details of response data were also not comparable over time and not available for all the crops. Under the circumstances, crop response data for a few districts and some crops were assembled and processed to examine their usefulness for analyzing the character- istics of fertilizer demand and for projecting demand in these districts. Fertilizer Consumption in Indian Districts, 1959-60 - 1968-69.
2.05 In 1968-69, less than 2.5 kgs of N plus P per hectare of gross crop land were used in 94 of 290 districts for which these data were assembled. The volume of consumption in these districts formed about 3 percent of the total amount of N and P used. The same group of districts had used 5.2 percent of the total N and 6.3 percent of the total P in 1959-60. The growth in the consumption of fertilizer in these districts was considerably lower than the average growth in the ten-year period in the country as a whole. At the other extreme 47 districts, where more than 22.5 kgs of N plus P were used per hectare in 1968- 69, consumed 46.5 percent of the N and 48.8 percent of the P. These districts had a higher rate of application in 1959-60 and increased this rate more rapidly than the average increase in the use of fertilizers in all the districts.
2.06 The N-P balance shifted from 3.7 N to 1.0 P in 1959-60 to 2.8 N to 1.0 P in 1968-69. The recormended ratio is about 2.0 N to 1.0 P. Beginning at a lower level of use, the demand for P increased more rapidly than for N. The frequency distribution of districts by fertilizer consumption per hectare of gross cropped area in 1959-60 and 1968-69 is given in Table 2.1.
2.07 The location of districts py the rate of application of fertilizers per hectare and changes in this rate lead to these general Dnclusions:
a) Districts with a low rate of application in 1959-60 and also a low rate in 1968-69 were located mostly in rainfall belts of less than 20 inches or more than 45 inches per year and with less than 10 percent of the gross crop area irrigated. The --dropping pattern concenraited on jowar, bajra, ragi, millets, pplses and cotton in the low rainfall districts; and on paddy in the high rainfall districts. Table 2.1 Frequency Distribution of Districts by Amount of N plus P Consumed per Hectare of Gross Crop Land-in 1968-69 and Amount of Fertilizer Used
No. of Kgs. N+P Used Amount Used in 1959-60 Amount Used in 1968-69 dis- per Hectare Gross tricts Crop Area in 1968-69 Nitrogen Phosphate Proportion N etrogn Phosphate Proportion Tons %of Tons of N to P Tons % of Tons of N to P total total total total
55 Under 1.00 1410 1.0 399 1.0 3.5 - 1 10531 0.9 5214 1.3 2.0 - 1
39 1.00 to 2.49 5797 4.2 1954 5.3 3.0 - 1 24957 2.2 7931 2.0 3.1 - 1
63 2.5 to 7.49 19304 14.1 3480 9.4 5.5 - 1 141762 12.5 40817 10.2 3.5 - 1
40 7.5 to 12.49 24349 17.8 3666 9.9 6.6- 1 137038 12.1 41649 10.4 3.3- 1
22 12.5 to 17.49 11610 8.5 3509 9.5 3.3 - 1 98788 8.7 42943 10.8 2-3 - 1
24 17.5 to 22. 49 18270- 13.4 4143 11.2 4.4 - 1 191284 16.9 65351 16.4 2.9 - 1
11 22.5 to 27.49 10877 8.0 2482 6.7 4.4 - 1 85987 7.6 40454 10.1 2.1 - 1
8 27.5 to 32.49 9572 7.0 3000 8.1 3.2 - 1 77909 6.9 24510 6.1 3.2 - 1
9 32.5 to 37.49 7061 5.2 524 1.4 13.5 - 1 99527 8.8 28609 7.2 3.5 - 1
10 37.5 to 50.0 9377 6.9 4928 13.3 1.9 - 1 102358 9.0 424 8 9 10.6 2.4 - 1
9 Over 50 19039 13.9 8910 24.1 2.1 - 1 160960 14.2 59174 14.8 2.7 - 1
290 Total: 136666 37003 3.7 - 1 1131101 399141 2.8 - 1 - 10 -
b) Districts that used fertilizers at low rates in 1959-60 and high rates in 1968-69 were generally located in the 25 to 45 inch rainbelt and a substantial proportion of the cropped land was irrigated. Crop patterns were usually wheat or paddy and one or more cash crops of jowar and baJra plus cotton.
c) Rates of fertilizers application per hectare tended to fit known soil types, weather characteristics, water resources, crop patterns and flow of cost-reducing technologies.
Factors such as the agrioultural and marketing resources appeared to be available in greater quantity in the districts with the higher rates of fertilizer application.
Parameters of Fertilizer Demand
2.08 Economic theory provides the hypothesis that demand for fertilizers, given the time to achieve equilibrium, would be at that level of use where the cost of the last unit of fertilizer applied on a farm unit would equal the value of added output. This study did not include the collection and analysis of data from representative farm opeining units in each district needed to test this hypothesis. However, an attempt was made to test it with the help of the crop response and IADP crop cutting data described in para- graph 2.03. 2.09 The economic°optimum rates of nitrogen application were calculated for paddy or wheat in Shahabad, Raipur and Thanjavur districts, using output price and cost data available from secondary sources. The results were then compared with actual demand for fertilizers. In Shahabad district, the actual rate of nitrogen application, at 3 kgs. per hectare in 1959-60 had increased to 12 kgs per hectare in 1968-69. During this same period of time the calculated economic optimum rate shifted from 14 kgs per hectare from 1959-60 through 1962-63 to 36 to 41 kgs for the last 3 years of the series. The observed rate of nitrogen utilization remained stationary at about 30 percent of the calculated economic optimum. In Raipur the observed rate ranged between h0 percent and 50 percent of the optimum, while in Thanjavur the observed rate increased from 40 percent of the calculated optimum up to 70 percent during the last 2 years of the series. 2.10 In each IADP district, the Institute of Agricultural Research Statistios assembled data for the response of paddy or wheat to N and P for both local and HYV varieties for the years of 1966-67 to 1968-69.. From 100 to 500 observations on cultivators' fields were available where the range in fertilizer applied was from 0-to over 160 kgs N as the only nutrient and also with 0 to over 80 kgs P. Random sampling techniques were used to select the farms and fields for the crop response tests. Crop-cutting methods were used to measure yields. The use of other inputs had been recorded but the quantities gad costs were not specified. These data were regressed for 15 paddy districts and 3 wheat districts to provide the typical parabolic crop response coefficients for N only and N plus P. The predicted increments in erop yield for 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 kgs of N without P and with one-half of this amount of P were computed. Total and incremental costs were obtained from other sources and compared with output values to determine the economic optimum rate of fertilizer u 2.11 A close relationship between the calculated economic optimum rate and the actual rate of N applied was observed only in 3 of the 15 districts: in West Godavari for late paddy, Thanjavur for early paddy and Ludhiana for wheat. The relationship between the calculated and actual rate used was not significant. In most cases the analysis showed that the use of P with N did not pay. This exercise indicated that either the data and analysis had failed to provide a true economic optimum rate for N and P or cultivators were using fertilizers uneconomically on their farms in these IADP districts. It may be noted that the effect of fertilizer use on net farm returns may be more in- fluential in determining demand for fertilizers than individual crop response information. The data were not adequate to test this hypothesis. 2.12 As a result of these case studies, it was concluded that attempts to use the available crop response data as a guide to the caloulation of an economic optimum rate of use and then projecting district-wide demand for fertilizers had only limited value for the purposes of this study. Demand and projections based on this approach would be highly sensitive to the numerous assumptions needed regarding crop responses under the various soil and water conditions n each district, weights to be given to each crop for applying the results to the district as a whole, probable input combinations and their costs and commodity prices. Besides this, the information would be available at the best for only 30 to 40 districts.
2.13 However, these case studies and the examination of other studies of the characteristics of fertilizer consumption helped to identify factors that appeared to have influenced demand for fertilizers. Experience gained from the use of fertilizers in previous years appeared to guide the cultivator in his decision of how much to apply per hectare the next year. Fertilizer con- sumption increased in districts where the area irrigated and the area planted to the higher value and more ferilizer responsive crops had increased sub- stantially. The amount of fertilizer used in any year appeared to be in- fluenced, in part, by local weather conditions. Studies on the acceptance of new technologies completed by the Agro-Economic Centres and the Programme Evaluation Organization showed that cultivators with small-size holdings used as much or more fertilizers and other inputs per unit of land when compared with cultivators operating larger farm units in the same village. Projection Model
2.14 The objective of this study is to project demand for N and P in each district by years through 1973-74. In reviewing the data it became clear that N and P were, in part, substitutable, one for the other; therefore, tons of N and P were combined. The district was considered as the basic land unit for the purpose of identifying and weighting the more sensitive faotors influencing demand for fertilizers. Ifiiplicit in this was the assumption that the aggregate of cultivators in a district respond similarly in their allocation and use of available production resources. The sum of these responses for each farm unit would be represented by the district data. The net cropped area for the district changed very little during the ten years under oonsideration. Within this - 12 - nearly constant "farm" size eaoh district had a discrete pattern of soil and weather resources, rainfall, crop pattern and area of each crop irrigated, crop prices and production costs, quantities of N and P used, crop responses to the use of fertilizers and other inputs, availability of capital, transport and market structure resources, and other factors that could conceivably influence the sum of all benefits obtained by cultivators from the use of fertilizers. It was assumed that this historioal experience and interacton within and between the above "set of movers" influenoed the amount of fertilizers used and when appropriately identified and weighted could be useful in projecting demand. However, as previously stated data were not available or adequate for some of these factors.
2.15 Using the district ten-year time series data described in paragraph 2.03, two equations were tested'to determine their suitability for predicting the quantity (Qt) of N plus P used each year. The equations were :
t - 1a+biFt-1 +b 2 IKt + b3 IRt + b4 UKt + b5 URt
Qt a + bi F 1 + b 2 Gt 1 + b3 IKt + b4 IRt 5 t 6 t where
Qt - Tbns of N plus P used in the district in year t. a = intercept value
Ft_i - The rupee expenaitures for N plus P used per hectare of specified crops in year t - 1
Gt_1 - The rupee value of output per hectare of specified crops in year t-1
IKt a The sum of the area irrigated for the following Kharif crops in year t rice Ougarcane dry ginger maize dry chilli black pepper jute coconut turmeric cotton
For Group VIII and IX districts the following crops were also included :
Jowar Ragi Bajra Groundnut
IRt - The sum of the area irrigated for the following Rabi crops in year t.
iWheat Potato Barley Tobacco UK, = The sum of the areanot irrigated for the crops listed under IKt
UR, = The sum of the area not irlrigated for the crops listed under !R..
2o16 The independent variable Ft I ia the rupee expenditure for N plus P per hectare of spoecified cr3pe the previou9 ynar. It explains the historical benefits ea;erienced by the cultivator from the use of these nutrients. The form is a simplified version of the diffusion rate or "learning curve" of the historical demand for fertilizers. bupee expenditures per hectare for fertilizers also reflected the effect of' a 35 percent price increase that occurred from 1960 to 1968-60% The independent variables UK, IK, UR and IR represent the unirrigat.ed anc irrigated area in specified kharif and rabi crops.. Ihe quantity of N pluo i used wv.A ars9umd to be a function of the area in 'these crops the current ye;P.r The identification of the specified kharif and rabi crops was based on, "eld survey studies conducted by IARS in the IADP districts and other cbtricts that used approximately 20 percent of the nrtional sales of fertilizers, from 196 4 -65 through 1967-68. These surveys show that 75 percent of the N and 84 percent of the P used in these districts were applied to paddy, wheat, maize and barley. Sugaroan and cotton received 11 and 5 percent, respectively of the N and 6 and 1-percent of the P in these districts. While the IARS surveys did not give details for their definition of "other crops" to which fertilizers were applied; jute, dry chilli, coconut, dry ginger, black pepper, turmeric, potato and tobacco are known to have received substantial quantities of fertilizers in the districts where they are important commercial crops. The crops specified received over 95 percent of the national total. However, in selected districts such orops as jowar, bajra, ragi, rapeseed, gram and groundnut were fertilized at relatively low rates per hectare. These crops were included in the list of selected crops for districts where they were important users of land.
2.17 Districts were classifI.ed into ten groups by predominant orop pattern, rainfall and its variability and rate of change in use of fertilizers per hectare of gross cropped area. One group included districts where only a trace of fertilizers had been used; it was eliminated from the statistical analysis. Equations (1)'and (2), operated on a linear cross-seotian basis were regressed on the pooled data for each group and for each district. The regression of equation (2) showed that G*-1 (gross value of output per hectare) was not a signifioant parameter. It was also co-linear with F i, the expenditures per hectare for fertilizers. Since equation (2) didu not improve the predictive value over equation (1), it was eliminated. 2.18 The results of regressing equation (1) on the pooled data for each group of districts are given in Table 2.2. This equation explained 77 percent to 91 percent of the changes in demand for N plus P for each group of districts, except group VIII where the proportion was 63 percent. In all cases, the value of the intercept was negative as expected. The coefficient value for area irrigated was positive and significant except for irrigated rabi crops in group IV and VIII where only a low proportion of rabi crops are planted. Coefficients - 14 - were highly significant in all cases except in those groups where there was only a minimum area change in kharif and rabi area irrigated or unirrigated. Next, the data for each district were regressed with equation (1). With only 9 observations and 3 degress of freedom, the results were statistically significant in over 80 percent of the districts where increase in fertilizer use had been rapid, explaining from 60 percent to 95 percent of the changes in demand from 1959-60 to 1968-69. Thus, equatimn (1) was accepted as statistically valid and consistent in predicting demand for fertilizers. It was used to project demand for.N and P by districts through 1973-74 as explained in the next chapter. - 15 -
Coefficients of Regression for Equation (1) Expressed as Table 2.2 Tons N Plus P Added Per Rupee Change In Ft_1 And Per 1000 Hectares Change In Eachi Type Of Crop Area.
a F Irri- Irri- Unirri- Unirri- Group and Kgs. N plus tK1 gated gated gated gated P Uso3d per ha. in 1968-69 Kharif Rabi. Kharif Rabi Area Area Area Area
Group I Pa)ddy Low - Below 2.4 Kgs
R .785 -W43 57.0oH* 4 9 F* 43.9-SRV 1.8Q* 3** S.E. 5.7 0.4 22.1 0.1 1.0
Group II Paddy I1ininum - 2.6 to 2.8 Kgs
R .795 - 675 98. 0 & 7. O** 908 3e4 _ON S.E . 6.b 0.6 3.3 0.3 1.5
Grolup III Paddy Moderate - 9.0 to 2.0 Kgs 2 12.2** 8, 1* -2,3 ~~~~~~~NS t 2 .843 - 1 3'j4 1o6o3-6.3 12.2x* 12.2** 8.1 - 2.3N S.Er. 6.3 0.9 2.6 1.4 3.5
Group IV Paddy Higfl - Over 20.0 Kgs R *.788 -2226 59.5E* 32.2,8* - 30.2** 21.1** 81.5** S .e. 5.o 2.2 9.9 5.3 141
Group V Wheat Low - Below 10.0 Kgs
R2 .908 -632 87-3** 9.5*HF 9.2&*F 3.5** 3.0 S.E. 4.7 1.1 1.3 0.5 0.5
Group VI Wlheat High - Above 10.0 Kgs R2 .906 -3421 178.2.,8F 9.9** 26.0 * 17.2** .4.6 iiS S.E. 7.4 3.7 3.6 4.4 4.7
Group VII yixed W-heat - Below 6.0 Kgs 2 ~~~~~~~~~NS R .787 -246 128.3i* 1.3 1.9* 1.1** 1.1* S.14. 7.O 1.0 0.5 0.1 o.5
Group VIII Other Crops - Low - Below 9.0 Kgs R' .628 -32.3 18'2.3 H. 16.1** 27.4 0.4 12.1* S.E. 19.9 3.5 21.4 0.6 4.8
Group IX Other Crops - High - Above 9.0 Kgs 2 'H 3"2.8NS kN R .776 -3417 264.9;H* 13+** 23.8 7.8** 1.7 16.3 3.4 19.4 1.0 7.7
."':-S Eli4-nL+ ata 99X level; i'Si,.i4 ficant at 954 level;n Ns NIot si-<.ifiC-t.. - 16 -
Chapter 3 - PROJECTIONS OF FERTILIZER DEMAND
3.01 Three projections of demand for N plus P were made for each of the 271 districts used in testing the validity of equation (1). Projections were also made on a subjective basis for the remaining districts and special users to obtain State and national totals each year from 1969-70 to 1973-74 and for 1978-79. The methods used in making each projection are explained below. The projected demand under the various alternatives are detailed in Table 3.2 for all-India.
PROJECTION I - TREND LINE EXTENSION
3.02 From 1959460 to 1968-69, the tons of N plus P used each year for all India had increased at the compound growth rate of 28 percent. The equation Qt- abt used to calculate this, explained 95 to 99 percent of the changes in demand when tested on the time series data for each district. Projection I, as given in Table 3.2, represents the extension of this trend to 1973-74. Its predictive accuracy depends, mostly on whether the factors that influenced demand during the past 10 years would continue to influence demand at the same compound rate during the next 5 years. The projection is presented here only as a reference for purposes of comparison with Projection II and Projection III described below.
PROJECTION II - ESTIMATING EQUATION
3.03 Demand for N plus P was projected to 1973-74 by applying the coefficients calculated for each variable in equation (1) to the ten year growth rates for them. ftoup-wise growth rates of fertiliser consumption and of the parameters in the equation are given in Table 3.1. Projection II assumes that the historical weights and growth rates of the past ten years for each parameter will continue without change for the next five years. The difference in values for Projections I and II are due to the differences in the projection models and their standard errors of estimate.
PROJECTION III - ADJUSTED EQUATION
3.04 The methodology used for this projection attempts to correct the weaknesses observed for Projections I and II. For Projection III the coeffi- cient value for Ft.l,, (fertilizer expenditures per hectare) calculated for each district was restrained so that its impact on the projected rate of applying N and P could not exceed the 1968-69 recommended rate for each crop. The histor- ical trends for irrigated areaunder selected kharif and rabi crops for each district were adjusted up or down on the basis of the anticipated Fourth Plan actions regarding construction of major and minor irrigation resources. Assump- tions were made regarding the probable flow of cost reducing technologies and continuation of favorable relative prices and costs that appeared to influence the cultivator's choice of crops and rate of application of fertilizers. Im- provements in market and transportation resources and in arrangements for financing the fertilizer industry and cultivators were assumed. The adjusted coefficients and growth rates for each district were then applied to the basic Tabla 3.1 - TEN-YEAR GROW.H RATES
(In % Change per year) Xharif Crops Rabi Crcops TONS Rupees@ Total Trrigated Unirrigated Total Irrigated lJnirriga-bed N+P Exp/Ha Area Area Area Area Area Area
NS iMS NS NS Group I 16.10** 17.76A* 0.37 0.59 0.33 _ 1.76 9.75:-> - 2 - Group ST~~S NS NS II 20.10**A 19.84** 0.78* 2.39* 0.19 1.72 7.61** 0.25 NS INS Group III 22.49i$* 22.36**- 0.38 0.95* - 0.16 2.18*,* 5-5l1A - 2.05* NS ,,-Troup DI AA 24.28 2h4.L0 *1.7 1.2G> 1.14A-A 1.44-* 1.91 * 0.70
Group V 34.92-2 A 34.10 -> 1.94** 5.55*-- 0.10- 0.32 6.98** - 3.22 -2^ VI Grou 36.!5** A 32.73*A 1.90** 3.68** 786-A72896* - 2.2 ._roup VII 35.09** 3L.114:4,t 1.hh 6.39 * 1a22** - 3.58* .34 - 7.16** NS I1 Grouzp VIII 34.50- 3h.3Vq 0.09 3429*4k 'rT0.12 - 2.01* 4.03** - 2 .93v3 Crozmp TX 331 .50-3-c 0.065 2.71)-* - O25 O6.52.- 3.2 2-
-C Ca1caThted at constant prices ---;,n-ficart. at 9 ievrA. - Si flnific.nt at . evel. I;.3,- .ct si.lificsnt. H - 18 -
data for that district to obtain the district projections. The technique represents the subjective judgement of the investigators; but the judgements made were supported by the analysis and observations regarding the nature of deiand for N and P in each district. This procedure calculated and projected t1e demand for N plus P for each of the 271 districts included in the computer oOi&ations.
3.05 To complete the anlysis it was necessary to separate the projected vaElues into their N and P components. Typical agronomic recommendations vary from a ratio of 3 or 2 parts N and 1 part P to 1 part N and 1 part P, depending on the soil type and crop pattern in each district. It was assumed that the ratio of N to P would adjust from its position as shown in the time series data and reach the technically recommended ratios by about 1973-74. The projected demand for N plus P for each district each year was separated into N and P on the basis of this assumption. The results are given in Annex 3, Tables 1 - 15.
3.06 As previously mentioned'only 271 of India's about 350 districts were included in the regression equation (1). The remaining districts were located mostly in Assam., Meghalaya, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and the Union territories plus the agencies representing the plantation crops of tea, coffee and rubber. Subjective judgement was used on a group-by-group basis to project demand for these districts and crops. These projections were added to those calculated for the 271 districts as described above for Projections I, II and III.
3.07 Most estimating equations project with increasing inaccuracy as time is extended into the future. Therefore, it was considered inappropriate to project demand on a district basis beyond 1973-74. To estimate demand in 1978-79 an ad hoc trend line method was used, based on actual and projected rates of growth in--demand for N and P from 1959-60 to 1973-74 on a State by State basis and for the;plantation crops. The general assumption was that from 1973-74 to 1978-79 demand would increase at a compound rate of 12 percent and ranging from 5 and 25-'percent among the States depending on assumptions made regarding the additions of irrigated area and the rate of application of fertilizers per hectare. SUMMARY OF PROJECTIONS 3.08 The all-India results for each projection are as follows:
Table 3.2 - PROJECTIONS OF DEMAND FOR FERTILIZER
(million metric tons)
Projection I Projection II Projection III Trend Estimating Equation Adjusted * N plus P N plus P N -P
1968/69 1.6 1969/70 1.9 1.8 1.2 to 1.5 0.5 to 0.6 1970/71 2.4 2.1 1.5 to 1.8 0.6 to 0.8 1971/72 3.1 2.7 1.7 to 2.1 0.7 to 1.0 1972/73 4.1 3.4 2.1 to 2.5 0.9 to 1.2 1973/74 5.2 4.4 2.4 to 2.9 1.1 to 1.5
1978/79 4.0 to 5.2 2.0 to 2.6
* Given as a range from low to high. The data given in Annex 3 represent the high projection. Table 3.3 - ADJTUSTED PROJECTION III, DEMAND FOR FERTILIZERS. BY STATES, INEIA
N Nitrogen, P - Phosphate (000 metric tons) 19o8-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 19737)4 1978-79 N P N P N P N P N P N P rt p And?.ra-- 218 70 268 89 326 113 386 141 450 170 515 206 c'Q5 433 A-.san 4 3 iu 3 5 3 5 4 6 4 6 5 18 10 EThEr t)44 12 56 17 69 23 83 31 99 4O 117 50 225 105 Cujarat 53 31 65 38 78 4? 94 59- 113 73 137 91 21.1 260 4r;a3 6 5 ; 10 68 25 86 22 106. 32 127 47 22k 90 Ker-2.C 39 25 8h 32 58 4o 63 h9 77 59 85 69 150 122 2*ad> ?r-desh 22 7 28 10 37 13 h6 18 58 24 71 32 177 80 .lr. cs r.tra 126 69 153 86 '185 106 221 130 260 161 305 196 538 316 ly.rore 62 21 75 28 89 37 106 h8 123 61 143 76 252 134 Crisf a 16 5 20 8 25 11 30 14 36 18 42 23 1052 57 i r:.-. 13) 30 16h 50 199 7h 2W2 102 295 132 34h1 163 505 240 -N_ .^ th3n 23 6 30 9 38 13 h9 20 64 28 86 39 165 75 ranl J1ada 103 35 122 50 2)4) 69 167 89 191 110 216 133 381 214 Utt;.r Fradesh 220 77 272 110 333 151 4r,C 739 485 256 565 324 990 276 't.'. rS.i 25 3 31 6 36 10 43 15 51 20 59 26 224 55 NHir3chei Pr.-desh I 1 h 2 ) 2 5 2 5 3 6 3 18 9 5 3 5 3 6 3 6 ) 7 4 8 24 12 De]hi 2 - 2 _ 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 5 2 G5_.<- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 Mlani-ur. Tripura, Nagaland 1 _ 1 _ 1 _ 1 _ 1 _ 1 - 3 1 Ycn-icherry1 1 1 - 1 - 1 _ 2 1 2 1 3 3 Te '--ard N.E. India 24 3 26 4 28 5 30 6 33 7 36 e )6 10 U?AS.- 9 3 10 3 11 h 12 4 '3 5 15 19 6 CrIfYEe Board 13 3 11, 4 15 4 17 4 18 5 20 6 26 8 1 -1 - 1 - -2 h~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~2-2 __ 263 1 Totals (High Range) 1,193 h13 1,L55 563 1,760 745 2,108 965 2,498 1,215 2,912 1,509 5155 262? 1,606 2,018 2,505 3,073 3,713 4,t421 7,777 (Low Range) 1,200 500 1,500 600 1,700 700 2,100 900 2,400 1,100 4C00 2000
'lo I - 20 -
33o9 The growth in demand for N and P as given by Projection III compares AiRth the actual compound rate of growth in these nutrients as follows:
i OWTH RATE (%) - ACTUAL N(%) P () .jF59 -60 to 1963-64 - 32 30 1 64-65 to 1968-69 24 31 T959-60 to 1968-69 27 31
GROWTrH RATE (%) - PROJECTION III Low Range High Range N (%) P (%) N (%) P (%) 1968-69 to 1973-74 (Upper Limit) 15 22 19 30 1973-74 to 1978-79 it 10 13 12 12 1968-69 to 1978-79 " 13 17 16 20
3.10 Projection III would provide about 18 kgs. N and 9 kgs. P per hectare of gross cropped land in 1973-74 and about 30 kgs. N and 15 kgs. P per hectare in 1978-79. If applied only to the area expected to be irrigated in 1973-74 and 1978-79, the projected amounts would provide for about 70 kgs. N and 35 kgs. P and 100 kgs. N and 50 kgs. P per hectare for the respective years. The pro- jected rates of application per irrigated hectare for 1973-74 are substantially below the current ecdthomic and agronomic fertilizer recommendations, thus supporting the assumption of a continued growth in demand.
3.11 The projections were completed in N.y 1970. Since that date, sales 'of N and P by states for 1969-70 and 1970-71 have been reported and are com- -%red with the projections as follows: - 21 -
Table 3.4- A COMPARISON OF 1969-70 AND 1970-71 SALES OF N AND P WITH PROJECTED DEMAND FOR FERTILIZERS ('000 metric tons)
High Range Actual as % of Actual Sales Projected Sales Projection 1969/70 1970/71 1969i70 1970/7 1969707o 1970/71 N P N P N P N P N P N P Andhra Pradesh 242 60 219 64 268 89 326 113 90 67 67 57 Assam 4 2 5 2 4 3 5 3 100 67 100 67 Bihar 70 27 75 18 56 17 69 23 125 159 109 78 Gujarat 65 39 106 53 65 38 78 47 100 103 106 113 Haryana 47 5 61 7 54 10 68 15 87 50 90 47 Himachel Pradesh 3 1 3 2 4 2 4 2 75 50 75 100 Kerala 20 13 26 14 48 32 58 40 42 41 45 35 Jammu Kashmir 3 1 3 1 5 3 6 3 60 33 50 33 Madhya Pradesh 34 15 51 25 28 10 37 13 121 150 138 192 Maharashtra 90 34 111 52 153 86 185 106 59 40 60 49 Mysore 87 31 93 37 75 28 89 37 116 111 104 100 Orissa 18 5 20 6 20 8 25 11 90 63 80 55 Punjab 147 21 175 31 164 50 199 74 90 42 88 42 Rajasthan 31 8 41 11 30 9 38 13 103 89 108 85 Tamil Nadu 148 42 173 72 122 50 144 69 121 84 120 10 Uttar Pradesh 306 99 291 75 272 110 333 151 113 90 87 50 West Bengal 34 11 45 9 31 6 36 10 110 183 125 90 Delhi 2 - 3 1 2 - 21 - - - - Goa - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 Manipuri-Tripura 1 - - - 1 - 1 - Pondicherry 3 - 3 - 1 - 1 - Tea Board N.E. 26 4 28 5 26 4 28 5 UPASI 10 3 11 4 10 3 11 4 Coffee Board 14 4 15 4 14 4 15 4 Rubber Board 1 - 1 - 1 - il -
Total ('000 t) 1,406 425 1,560 493 1,455 563 1,760 745 96 75 89 66
Low Range Projection 1,200 500 1,500 600 116 85 104 82
Sales of N for the nation were between the low and high ranges of demand each year. However, sales of P were 15 to 35 percent lower than projected. No pro- gress has been made toward achieving the assumed sales ratio of 1 part P to 2 parts N. Deviations above the projected sales were greatest for Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Mysore, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal. Deviations below pro- jections were greater than 20 percentage points in Adhra Pradesh, Himachel Pradesh, Kerala, Jammu-Kashmir, and Maharashtra. Current local rainfall, not included in the projection model, is believed to have influenced most of these - 22 -
geviations. In addition, local improvement in market outlets, credit services gpd transportation appeared to have benefitted fertilizer sales in the central -ndeastern states. On the whole, actual national sales for these two years gre consistent with expected deviations from the projection; State and district g-ales are expected to show wider deviations because of the limitations on .orecasting. Rough estimates of sales for the first six months of 1971-72 :indicate continued consistency within the ranges shown in Table 3.2 for N, but somewhat less than this for P. - 23 -
Chapter 4 - CONCLUSIONS AND OBSERVATIONS
The Projections-and Their Limits
4.01 In 1973-74 demand is expected to range between 2.4 and 2.9 million tons of N and between 1.1 and 1.5 million tons of P. By 1978-79, the demand is expected to range between 4.0 and 5.2 million tons of N and 2.0 and 2.6 million tons of P. These projections are sensitive to trends in cost-benefit relationship, continuous flow of cost-reduoing technology and continuous increase in area irrigated and planted to fertilizer-using crops. While not tested by the analysis, it is believed that improvements in market and trans- portation resources and in the availability of credit to cultivators and fertilizer traders would increase sales, particularly in those districts where the current rate of use of fertilizer per hectare is low and rainfall exceeds 20 inches per year. District sales are likely to be moat vulnerable to divergence from the projected demand as given in Annex 3. 4.02 As indicated by the data in Tables 2.2 and 1.1 the cultivator's experience from using fertilizers the previous year (I t-1) was a strong determinant of demand. This "learning" factor of demand measures the effect of experience gained from using fertilizers for the first time and the increase ih rate of application of N and P per hectare that flows from experience. In the future, the weight for this factor is expected to diminish in those dis- tricts where the rate of application per hectare reaches the economic optimum rate discounted for risk and uncertainty. However, at the level of current cost-benefit relationship the use of over 120 kgs. of N plus P appears to be economically feasible in over 100 districts where irrigation and rainfall resources are adequate. In about 75 additional districts, the economically feasible rate of application may exceed 90 kgs. N plus P per hectare. In 1968-69, cultivators in only 9 districts applied more than 50 kgs. N plus P per hectare and the rate exceeded 30 kgs. in only 28 districts. To achieve these economically feasible rates of fertilizer application would require an expansion in demand above the highest level projected for 1973-74.
4.03 During the 1960 decade growth in kharif and rabi area irrigated were important factors influencing demand for fertilizers in most districts. In most districts, net cropped area was constant; there was an increase in net and gross area irrigated and in crop intenaity. Achievements during the first two years of the Fourth Plan reflect a further increase in the rate of adding irrigation. This rate may or may not continue until 1978-79. However, there appears to be a strong movement to improve the quality of irrigation services for the full conmanded area. These actions should contribute to an increased demand for fertilizers.
4.04 Resources for research and extension education institutions have been increased and oriented for a more rapid development and communication to cultivators of new yield increasing and cost reducing agricultural technologies. New and more input responsive paddy varieties might become readily available for cultivator use. Research in oilseeds and pulses could produce new varieties that are more responsive to fertilizers. The adoption of a multiple cropping pattern on rainfed land has been given strong emphasis. Also price policies, - 24 -
reoriented toward production incentives during the late 1960 decade, are expected to continue in this direction during the 1970 decade. Any =ailure in the expected flow and adoption by cultivators of the new tech- fiologies, would likely shift demand in the opposite direction. bomestic Production of Fertilizer and Demand Projection
4.05 The volume of demand estimated in this study raises important questions regarding the probable availability of fertilizers from plants within the country and through imports. In Table 4.1 the estimated fertili- zer production in the different regions are compared with their corresponding projected demand (Projection III). In developing the supply data, the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals assumed that production at plants now in operation would equal 90 percent of their rated capacity, plants under construction were assumed to produce at 64 percent to 83 percent of their capacity and plants licensed for construction would produce an appropriate rate of their capacity in 1973-74 or 1978-79 as applicable. Production from fertilizer plants under consideration but not yet approved was not included. The minimum estimates of supply provided by the Bank's technical staff for fertilizers in India assumed a lower rate of operation and a slower start-up of new plants.
4.o6 The data indicate that demand for N and P would exceed production in the south and north zones, while in the west and east zones production would exceed demand. Fertilizer could be transported from these zones to help meet the deficit in the south and north regions. Transportation of processed fertilizers would be minimized if new factories were located in the north and south zones. If the fertilizer factories currently under consi- deration and with a combined capacity of over 1 million tons of N and 1 million tons of P were licensed and constructed within the next 5 years and operations for all plants averaged 90 percent of capacity, there would be no need for imports in 1978-79. However, this is not likely to be achieved. Until it is achieved, fertilizer imports would be needed to equate expected demand. Imports would range from 200,000 tons to 700,000 tons of N and 400,000 tons to 900,000 tons of P, depending on the levels of supply and demand at least through 1978-79.
4.07 Currently, it costs between Rs 3,000 and Rs 4,000 to add 1 ton of nitrogen production capacity to the fertilizer industry in India. Associated with this investment would be the investment costs for added transport and market storage and distribution facilities. Also, inherent in the achieve- ment of a demand for 6 to 8 million tons of N plus P in 1978-79 are the investment costs for adding irrigation resources and other associated inputs and the costs of expanding agricultural commodity marketing and processing facilities. Each of these added resource investments has a foreign exchange component, and in the case of most fertilizer factories there is a foreign exchange requirement for raw materials used for its manufacture. It is not the purpose of this study to estimate the needs for capital or managerial and technical skills required to achieve the indicated expansion of the fertilizer industry and of the agricultural sector in general. Attention is directed to the need for such studies and to the fact that much of the basic data has been assembled and prepared for such use. TABLE L.1
Ccm.warison oC Estimrated Demand and Probable Production by Sales Zones 1973-74 and 1968-79 (million metric tons)
Estimated Demand EstnMated: Domestic Prod. Surplus or Deficit 1973-7L 197F-79 19_73-74 197-79 1973-7LL 197-79 N P N P N P N P N P N P Fertilizer -Zor.s ;of- the Countr 7
East Zone 0.26 0.11 0.52 0.24 o.67 0.11 1.03 0.23 0.41 - 0.51 -0.01 North Zone 1.21 0.61 2.11 0.98 0.47 0.08 0.84 0.14 -0.74 -0.53 -1.27 -0.84 West Zone 0.44 0.29 0.78 0.48 0.49 0.21 1.20 0.73 0.05 -0.08 0.42 0.25 South Zone 1.00 0.50 1.74 0.92 0.55 0.28 1.42 0.62 -0.45 -0.22 -0.32 -0.30 Tota' for Nation 2.91 1.51 4.00 2.00 2.18 0.68 3.50 1.30 -0.73 -0.83 -0.66 -0-90 to to to to 5.15 2.62 4.49 1.72 Minimum Estimate 2.40 1.10 4.00 2.00 3.50 1.30 -0.22 -0.42 -0.50 -0.70 Range of Imports Needed 0.22 tons to 0.73 tons N plus 0.42 tons to 0.90 tons P per year
Sources for estimated production: data supplied to the World Bank mission by Indian Ministry Chemicals; of Petroleum and minimum estimates of domestic production supplied by Industrial Projects Department, IBRD.
1/ South Zone includes Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Mysore, and Tamil Nadu States; East Zone includes Assam, Bihar, West Bengal, and Orissa; North Zone inc'ludes Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Delhi; and West Zone includes Maharashtra, Guujarat, and Goa. - 26 -
The Role of Fertilizers and Future Studies
4.o8 The Fourth Plan set targets for the production of an additional 31 million tons of foodgraine and substantial increases in the production of oilseeds, cotton, fruits and vegetables and livestock products by 1973-74. At the yardstick rate of 10 units of additional foodgrain output per unit of added fertilizer input in the package of practices used, the 1973-74 projected demand, if achieved, would assure the added production of about 28 million tons of foodgrains. It would not necessarily assure achieve- ment of the other production targets. In 1978-79 the use of the projected 6 to 8 million tons of fertilizers would add 45 to 60 million tons to the 1968-69 output of foodgrains. By 1978-79, demand for foodgrains derived from the expected increase in population and real per capita incomes would require more than this volume of increased output. Therefore, to achieve these targets it is imperative to assure that the complex of factors that influence demand for fertilizers and output be achieved.
4.09 The role of fertilizers appears to be that of enabling the culti- vator to increase the economic return obtained by operating his farming business. Returns are optimized when fertilizers are used in the appropriate combination with HYV seeds, irrigation and other inputs under favorable cost- benefit situations. While this study has identified and weighted some of these factors associated with changes in demand, many other factors were observed, but for various reasons could not be evaluated. It may be assured that the weights derived from this study will change. Many questions remain ukanswered or only partially answered. The district time series data assembled for this study, if up-dated each year, and supplemented by the appropriate information could prove most useful for investigations of this type. The miaterial would also be useful for a number of other studies concerning agri- cultural development in India's districts. The follow-up of this study depends very much on the timely assembly of such data on a district by district basis. Most States would benefit by improving their data assembly and reporting procedures.
4.10 Future studies should attempt to analyze the economics of demand for fertilizers at the fam level. The factors that influence the proportion of cultivators that use fertilizer and their rate of use should be analyzed. The impact on demand of the availability and use of agricultural credit, market facilities and promotional efforts and transportation should be analyzed more carefully. Continuing studies of the type indicated here would be of value to planners and investors concerned with India's developing rural economy. ANNEX 1 Page 1
THE AVAILABLE DATA
1. Studies of economic demand for fertilizers are usually limited by the quantity and quality of available data. In this study data were compiled by districts and by years from 1959-60 to 1968-69 as follows from the sources indicated:
Items Sources
Net consumption of nitrogen and State Departments of Agriculture phosphate fertilizers
Area, 30 crops Directorate of Economics and Statistics Ministry of Food, Agr., C.D. and Cooperation
Production, 30 crops
Irri-ated area, 30 crops
District harvest prices, 30 crops 'l
50 years (1901-1950) average rainfall Meteorological Office, Poona for It seasons and the mean annual average with their coefficients of variability
Area by Crops: The data for crop area and irrigated area by crops, expressed in hectares, are generally collected by the method of complete enumeration by the Revenue Department officials at the village level. The area figures are broadly comparable over time subject to the change in the coverage of the estimates and method of estimates of various crops in different parts of the country during the reference period. The data for irrigated area refer to crops irrigated from all sources of irrigation including private wells, private tubewells and tanks.
ProducLion by Crops: The production of a commodity is estimated on the basis of random sample crop-cutting surveys for all foodgrain crops, sugarcane, cotton, groundnut, tobacco, potato, rapeseed and mustard, linseed, sesamum, jute and mesta. Generally the estimates of production are valid for the admi- nistrative unit of a district. For few crops, ad-hoc estimates of production are made. Production data are in metric tons for all crops, except sannhemp, mesta, jute and lint cotton, which are in bales, and coconut in 1000 nuts.
F'arm Hiarvest Prices: Farm harvest prices are collected from representative villages in each tehsil in the district by the officials of the Revenue Depart- ment. F'arm harvest prices are those at which the commodity is sold by the farmer in the village and relates to the specified harvest period. The price for the district is the simple arithmetical average of the tehail prices. Prices for sannhemp, mesta, jute and lint cotton are given in terms of 180 kilogram bales. Coconut prices are per 1000 nuts. All other prices are per quintal. ANN1EX 1 Pase 2
; t fall: The data for rainfall is collected by the Meteorological Depart- 4i6i6t from the Meteorological Stations located in differenb districts in the *ciWihtry and are measured in millimeters. The data were weighted where more tin one station was operated in a district. t&tilizer Sales: The District Agricultural Officer compiles data on -"irtilizer sales in each district on the basis of information received from the district cooperative marketing agencies and from private dealers. -These data included, for most districts the beginning inventory, stocks received, sales to cultivators and the closing inventory for each type of fertilizer material. Net sales were converted to metric tons of nutrients. In the case of Gujarat and Maharashtra the data supplied by the State Government related to sales by cooperative societies. These sales were revised upwards on a pro-rata basis to equate reported total sales including those made by the private sector.
Fertilizer Prices: The prices of pooled fertilizers per metric ton were fixed by the Government of India. For the purpose of the study, these were converted into prices per kilogram of nutrient, N or P, and averaged out separately for N and P in each year without any weights or adjustments. As weighted prices in each State did not differ significantly from the All-India simple average prices in different years, simple average prices were used for all districts.
:.Go,ps: The following crops covering 95 percent or more of the gross-cropped -Fea in each district were considered for the study.
Foodgrains Cash crops
1. Rice 12. Groundnut 23. Potato 2. Jowar 13. Nigar seed 24. Dry chiliies 3. Maize 14. Linseed 25. Sunflower 4. Bajra 15. Sesamum 26. Turmeric 5. Ragi 16. Rapeseed 27. Coconut 6. Wheat 17. Castorseed 28. Dry ginger 7. Barley 18. Sannhemp 29. Black pepper 8. Gram 19. Mesta 30. Cotton 9. Tur 20. Jute 10. Other pulses 21. Tobacco 11. Small millets 22. Sugarcane
ADJUSTnMTS AND ASSEMBLING OF THE DATA
2. After scrutiny of the available data, estimates were made for missing values so as to make the data comparable between districts and over the entire time period. ANNEX 1 page 3
A yrops: Area figures were converted into hectares for the entire 10 year period. In those few cases where district data were not available but State totals were available, the State totals were allocated to the districts on the basis of adjacent years for which district figures were available.
Irrigated Area by Crops: In the case of the districts where irrigated data bycrops werenotavaiable for 1967-68 and 1968-69, the estimated area figures for these years w',re arrived at after taking into account (a) proportion of crop area irrigated in previous years and (b) by following guidelines provided by the respective States which indicated the districts where irrigated area had increased substantially in the last two years. Where irrigated area was found to exceed the area under the crop concerned, irrigated area was made proportional to the area under the orop. In the case of Kerala and Orissa, State totals only for irrigated area by crops were available but district- wise data were not available. In 1.erala 75 percent of the irrigated area was for rice and sugarcane. In the case of Orissa State, rice and sugar- cane accounted for 90 percent of the irrigated area under all crops. Following the guidelines provided by the Kerala and Orissa State Departments and taking into account the data by districts for the latest year available the area irrigated for sugarcane and rice crops only were allocated each district each year.
Production by Crops: In twhose few canes wXhere production data were not available the district estimates were made following the same procedure as was adopted for the estimation of area figures. In the case of paddy, production is in terms of rice.
Harvest Prices: In those cases where the district values were missing, the State average farm harvest prices were substituted for the relevant commodities. In the case of some crops like sannhemp, mesta, dry chillies, dry ginger, turmeric, etc. district farm barvest prices or State farm harvest prices were not available. The fara harvest prices in the adjoining states or wholesale prices of these commodities during the peak harvest period were used for the districts where these commodities were relevant in agricultural production.
3. Data were assembled and computerized for a ten-year time series (1959-60 to 1968-69) for 279 districts in the following states
Andhra Pradesh Iladhya Pradesh Rajasthan Bihar Nqharashtra Tamil Nadu Gujarat Iysore Uttar Pradesh Haryana Orissa West Bengal Kerala Punjab
It was necessary to combine data for five sets of districts that had been bifurcated since 1959-60, i.e., Ambala-Rupar as Ambala in Haryana; Sangrur- Jind as Sangrur in Punjab; Sriganganagar and Hamrmangarh as Ganganagar in Rajasthan; Salem and Dharmpuri as Salem in Tamil Nadu and Surat and Bulsar as Surat in Gujarat. For the states of Assam, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu-Kashmir and for hilly districts of U.P. data were available for only a part of the ten year series. Districts in these states were omitted from the regression analysis but included in the national projections. ANNEX 1 page 4
DATA ON CROP RESPONSES
Crops responses to alternative rates of fertilizer applications ,Qere available for paddy and wheat and in scme cases for maize, jowar and bajra from the following sources :
a. I.C.A.R. fertilizer trials-on cultivator's fields ... since 1959 for 20 crops and in 60 to 170 districts in different years. The cultivators practices are not changed in these trials except for the application of fertilizer. Not replicated.
b. I.C.A.R. Model Agronomic Experiments ... for 5 cereal crops in 34 to 48 centres for different years since 1956. These are replicated controlled experiments with all inputs except fertilizers assumed to be constant.
c. I.C.A.R. Coordinated Improvement Projects ... by crop variety, density of stand and fertilizer application rates since 1966- 67. These are replicated controlled experiments.
d. State government trials ... on experiment station fields and cultivator's fields. Similar in design to (a) or (c) above.
e. I.A.R.S. IADP composite field trials ... from 1962-63 for rice, wheat and maize, by crop variety. Not replicated and in most cases the control plot is on another cultivator's field.
The data do not include detailed information qn irrigation, amount and cost of associated inputs used and other factors that affect the marginal response of a crop to fertilizer application. ANDHRAP04LAD8S - CONSUMPTIONOF N. P. ANDK BY DISTRICT FROM1959/60 TO 1970/71 (Metric To. Nutrients)
District I1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71 Adi1.b.d N 137 206 150 137 403 673 806 744 1.653 2,206 p 30 38 40 -1,750 2,200 35 16 22 189 06 - 49 545 K 160 310 73 Mti*it.pu 491 609 407 941 1,255 4,653 1,666 2,035 -6,278 p1 27 34 36 4,989 6,355 3,520 60 88 161 169 265 1.062 793 780 K 920 177 CRitt-o N 727 583 835 1,272 1.964 2,714 2,056 p 290 306 4,555 5,501 4.559 5.910 6,650 398 578 507 661 717 1,733 1,275 2,260 1 1,830 2,330 366 C.dd.psh N681 660 1,334 1,637 1,933 2.3 ,663 2,160 5,300 15,787 p 456 590 609 931 989 6,090 6,410 714 691 217 1,100 - 2,291 2,130 2,900 K 406 K. Godan-I N 2,906 1,933 571 6,253 7.581 8459 7,903 P 906 - 1171 1208 1.27 1,3 -12,037 14,236 20,113 19,500 15,090 .9 ,1 ,3 ,1 4,462 6,020 3,550 K Concu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1,038 N 3:314 2,436 6,403 14,602 17,6170 15,663 10.284 P 2,454 13,257 22,420 30.603 43,110 35.785 3.175 3,2075 5,561 6,016 4,115 2.656 6,209 6 6,132 11,603 10,670 10,725 4,311 Hyd-rb.d N, 471 304 273 1,042 1,303 067 967 P 70 90 1,233 4,712 6,160 6,005 6,690 93 573 791 164 620 620 1,183 K 3,121 1,545 1,665 1,263 K-i-cgaoa N 571 789 767 1,397 7,031 4.326 1.023 4,134 6.160 6,296 5,575 10.815 P 90 116 121 340 253 399 446 451 782 1,859 540 1.360 K ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~236 Kh-cman N 320 605 301 612 793 1,557 1,241 1,969 P 51 67 69 2,086 2,655 3,910 5,330 147 176 480 781 234 457 B08 K 790 2,10 630 Krishna N 2,679 4.2~19 2,956 6.663 9.21 9,12 7.003 F 3491 4.513 l0,092 271,755 29,306 37,025 18,775 4.655 5573 59:926 6,363 4,4870 5,330 K 7560 10.091 8,550 7,9 2,16,2 K-...ncl N 611 650 1,088 1656 3,920 3,013 3,901 4,351 P 601 770 003 8,62 20,293 148090 16,010 1486 2,053 3,470 1,256 1,0694359 9,5935 7,800 K 8,740 1.669 Nohbubno-gr N 746 916 532 1.001 1,350 5,377 1,493 2,106 6,101 P 31 40 5,1281 5,140 6,720 43 276 105 733 255 347 1,063 1711 K 685 1,060 480 mnd.k N658 427 651 1,020 1.465 1,707 21,666 P 35 42 3,390 3,294 3,803 5,210 4,750 47 152 115 - 64 586 153 776 597 K 590 1555 131 Wng-nd. 163 316 328 697 1,151 1.501 1.321 2,432 3,823 3,989 5,520 596 P24 33 3510 119 357 501 297 K 726 955 1,830 2460 577 Ni..sh.d N 5,8004 3.329 3.793 4,053 5,79 8.618 7,01 7,701 11,470 12,525 15,325 16755 P450 501 2,726 2,294 791 ,391 1,0783599 K 3,45 5.6 ,9,2 400 Scllor N 642 900 1.292 2.279 4,627 4,1240 2,290 3 ,577 7.590 P 430 555 573 797 935 6,999 7,600 10,470 1197 730 1.040 1,166 2,016 2,570 3,600 K 1,125 Srlkaknloc N 1.456 784 1,739 2.,73! 2,935 4,284 2,052 P 0 9 5,463 3,6P3 3,264 5.000 6,710 It 7 27 0 602 1,014 520 O 496 575 610 1644 Visakhap.rnan N 1,363 1.1172 1.504 2,812 1,594 4,551 2,463302913,0308,0 ,2 P 52 40 45 / 22 653 1030 1,516 606 328 080 1,600 K ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~29 Oc-rang N1 364 1,343 620 1.03] 1,037 2,957 2,069 2,793 5,263 6,024 F 115 149 154 8520 9,330 2014 244 735 908 347 1,060 2,201 K 2,170 3,060 358 W. Godsn-i N 3,6 2.0 .0 0401,1 50206419,064 19,762 29,852 36,250 22,130 P 1944 2,.514 2,592 91,94 2,070 5,2'59 3,173 4,375 K 4,076 8,750 5,96'5 5,560 2,283 'e
DTSTRICT N 25,49 24,020 37.324 43,9607624 141 69.15 107,203 4 TOTALS P91155 1491 544 162,006 2,7,7667 242,866 210,630 n 2,0 25,290 292624,'387 32,077 42,059 70,168 0209,1 K ars21/i927 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~17,800 ASSA2M - COI.STTI''"ON OF N_ P, AND f BY DISTPQCT F '01f p59- 60 TO 1908-9 M1etri Tons -utrlar.tl Dis rIc' 1959-60 1960-61 1961-62 1962-63 19653-6 196Z-65 1965-60 1966-67 1967-68 -__ p-__
Cachar N 2 4 6 1G 27 143 379 122 2060j P 1 2 9 o 19 123 554 121 l6ES 2
3ar-an3e ;N - . - . 2 3i 14zT 54 102 178 241 P _ _ 2 3 24 32 111 91 137 2)3
Garc, Hills N _ - 3 - 2 3 4 24 60 108 F - - 5 1 2 32 7 20 20
G a! para N 3 5 7 12 37 32 135 126 244 459 P 1 1 3 7 11 37 83 53 156 2 l
K ;ilI.S ls - - - 4 3 115 257 137 256 235 ,
p _ _ - 53 56 369 453 401 324 5i1
Yamrup N _ 1 4 33 29 23 132 254 535 9c; P _ 1 4 6 20 37 160 136 160 27 2
La-:hi-,Lipur N 4 3 li 13 19 146 76 119 20G0 p 2 3 6 8 9 35 66 iO 157 2 (c'
,.--^:-er & JNC K - 1 3 2 5 10 9 27 101 182
.ilIls*_ _ _- 1 1 - . 2 10 18 20 34
i:.._:o . _s N _ - 2. 1 2. 71 9 _ 4 P - - - - - 1 2 __-
.c;, .: - ,-2 5 5 56 63 519 177 166 278 502 p _ _ 1 1. 20 f3 152 86 1 3144 228
.' ,S '.-.?.- _ I- 2 f1l 37 100 160 . 178 219 39'-
- - 2 6 9 47 .118 114 179 304
.- 11 23 4$5 1°99 350 1163 1344 1430 2523 42264 ,? 4z ;-3iz a 3J 91 - 173 .856 1716 1150 14535 2452 ANNEX 2 Table 3 BIHAR - CONSUMPTION OF N, P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 TO 1970/71
(Metric Ton Nutrients)
1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71 District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 674 1,198 952 2,111 Bhagalpur N 257 257 284 314 339 537 549 311 1,429 P 41 40 47 48 47 99 141 82 287 40 107 181 K 44 40 25
2,029 3,639 3,989 10,842 Champaran N 332 555 394 630 1,312 1,640 2,096 1,930 6,154 P 282 607 405 606 1,092 1,359 815 663 1,626 640 2,768 K 547 440 284 397
1,133 2,677 3,253 3,578 Darbhanga N 224 366 357 481 721 1,119 1,421 775 965 841 P 142 157 177 203 286 460 450 207 348 1,006 K 167 167 122 396
87 131 276 92 Dhanbad N 31 34 29 51 52 84 106 28 46 P 21 23 21 33 35 51 55 37 80 64 20 K 7 b 13 10
2,481 5,473 4,647 7,765 Gaya N 1,221 1,515 1,909 2,121 2,065 2,758 3,436 701 1.781 p 46 98 138 57 203 374 451 188 1,699 236 422 1,074 K 307 354 165
494 712 592 437 Hazaribagh N 140 220 232 263 417 360 458 371 238 124 p 64 104 104 163 345 177 122 117 387 28 K 115 54 46 412
1,299 2,505 2,723 3,368 Monghyr N 483 469 482 652 715 1,205 938 519 927 P 49 51 57 67 85 187 79 100 482 295 472 K 91 128 125 235
1,181 2,243 2,759 4,250 Muzaffapur N 243 319 369 502 2,220 1,287 1,649 745 1,098 P 198 248 199 248 389 611 330 386 750 287 622 K 202 178 128 232
176 240 196 164 Palamau N 80 103 147 151 96 209 173 75 54 P 18 28 43 41 30 33 35 22 43 18 15 K 14 12 14 20
5,177 8,992 6,191 11,621 Patna N 3,333 3,452 4,333 4,741 5,121 5,461 5,786 388 2,125 P 165 270 391 255 367 570 550 432 753 220 180 1,663 K 326 356 281
494 2,096 1,700 1,412 Purnea N 42 65 81 67 75 115 266 875 587 p 22 4 53 35 41 67 76 228 804 286 337 K 31 40 88 163 860 1,076 971 1,236 Ranchi N 221 321 341 400 550 729 890 358 743 P 56 68 82 108 215 380 308 221 692 152 384 K 245 240 249 192 300 926 885 937 N 16 28 15 33 33 70 118 Saharsa 171 571 689 P 14 24 13 25 21 47 64 583 281 367 K 26 72 90 227
871 1,091 867 1,592 Santhal N 181 139 208 204 324 721 959 66 386 223 587 Parganas P 54 39 54 63 135 279 259 280 110 272 K 211 202 145
2,823 3,681 5,181 6,495 Saran N 440 620 558 1,061 1,741 2,444 3,232 1,185 2,972 P 143 264 162 209 50'. 851 665 734 1,292 315 1,851 K 558 , 488 371 245
5,814 8,143 7,961 14,330 Shahabad N 1,309 1,786 769 3,671 3,019 3,787 4,805 3,038 6,346 p 76 192 702 1,296 972 1,271 973 627 3,429 277 1,078 K 462 353 240 229
328 342 295 275 Singhbhum N 94 96 105 104 140 208 268 202 189 p 72 46 60 62 79 155 188 122 298 23 36 28 K 34 55 44
26,221 46,165 43,438 70,405 District N 8,647 10,346 10,613 15,446 18,940 22,734 27,150 4,403 14,350 12,352 26,692 Totals p 1,463 2,263 2,708 3,519 4,843 6,971 5,561 4;,209 12,166 K 3,387 3,187 2,430 3,557
March 21, 1972 ANNEX 2 Table 4 GUJARAT - CONSUMPTION OF N. P. AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 TO 1970/71
(Metric Ton Nutrients)
District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71
Ahmedabad N 365 406 314 845 141 994 2,150 3,511 3,265 3,855 4,320 P 90 100 152 126 93 529 1,055 1,504 1,410 1,656 975 K
Amreli N 314 349 80 423 416 1,007 998 1,999 2,642 4,653 535 P 350 394 591 1,161 1,504 1,953 1,543 2,646 2,822 3,727 595 K
Banaskantha N 75 83 71 252 3 464 803 1,004 924 1,455 1,610 P 18 20 29 48 9 435 316 452 232 487 510 K
Baroda N 1,340 1,489 2,814 2,736 3,266 4,536 3,344 7,109 5,744 4,913 7,270 P 241 268 402 441 434 1,392 1,174 1,503 1,750 1,177 2,965 K
Bhavnagar N 185 205 488 471 591 1,075 1,811 1,857 2,079 2,655 3,675 P 421 468 703 1,541 880 1,823 1,236 2,099 1,955 2,827 3,000 K
Broach N 270 299 562 897 1,379 1,282 1,282 2,874 2,233 2,069 3,010 P 37 42 64 31 275 701 378 409 1,302 1,176 2,535 K
Jamnagar N 36 40 26 68 207 464 832 1,479 1,494 2,198 2,255 P 212 236 353 423 879 972 944 1,580 2,132 2,204 2,635 K
Junagadh N 117 130 400 901 ,65 2,064 1,993 2,912 2,520 2,781 5,890 P 675 750 1,126 1,821 2,285 2,831 1,511 4,145 4,962 4,829 3,870 K
Kaira N 2,268 2,520 2,820 4,119 3,237 6,341 4,742 12,218 11,111 10,216 14,370 P 180 201 304 320 424 1,576 1,512 1,372 2,105 2,407 1,070 K
Kutch N 5 6 36 53 77 84 164 358 260 702 785 P 3 4 7 12 12 20 12 67 60 88 165 K
Mehsana N 440 492 517 850 489 1,127 1,916 2,208 3,007 3,271 4,150 P 13 15 23 56 87 226 230 532 375 392 445 K
Panchmahals N 170 194 473 180 254 484 403 745 952 798 1,105 P 11 14 21 8 57 136 67 218 72 123 355 K
Rajkot N 116 128 266 417 412 1,732 2,173 3,945 3,390 5,940 5,970 P 599 666 998 1,103 1,618 4,141 2,256 5,110 4,935 6,586 7,445 K
Sabarkantha N 205 228 550 208 106 375 572 1,388 1,371 972 3,100 P 4 5 8 21 135 189 221 387 827 455 1,065 K
Surat-Bulsar N 730 813 2,618 1,693 2,036 3,713 4,593 6,094 5,480 5,441 3,630 P 288 320 479 542 626 1,157 632 1,259 2,192 2,270 3,805 K
Bulsar N 2,463 P 1,500 K
Surendranagar N 3 4 82 48 22 82 256 615 644 667 1,000 P 18 21 32 31 24 117 148 274 397 268 705 K
District N 6,639 7,386 12,117 14,161 13,201 25,904 28,032 50,377 47,116 52,586 65,140 Totals P 3,160 3,524 5,293 7,686 9,342 18,198 13,235 23,557 27,528 30,672 38,995
March 21, 1972 PARYANA - CONSUMPTION OF N, P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 TO 1970/71
(Metric Ton Nutrient)
District 1959/6Q[. 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71
Ambala-Rupar N 4731 84.4 1,024 1,919 3,132 3,188 3,245 7,163 9,686 6,472 8,226 ,P j;:4 25 43 93 132 256 280 329 881 1,696 911 1,187 K . 14 56 229 452 292 367
Gurgaon N 209 289 312 489 804 1,431 1,448 1,409 3,625 3,375 3,816 4,528 P 5 9 7 11 18 32 36 34 113 380 217 552 K 37 100 131 198
Hissar N 232 366 565 903 2,217 3,354 3,057 2,825 6,376 7,595 10,494 12,146 P 1 2 8 36 68 102 63 63 227 683 957 1,273 K 15 65 173 386 403
Jind N 1,993 2,734 p 140 192 K 64 138
Karnal N 548 618 916 867 1,843 3,365 3,355 4,128 10,604 16,661 19,842 27,304 p 10 7 61 68 145 259 259 215 788 2,966 2,488 3,128 K 100 259 587 815 978 Mohindergarh N 42 72 120 129 206 488 339 419 766 691 896 1,062 P 5 1 2 4 2 14 7 5 4 12 24 42 K 2 13 19 18
Rohtak i 392 556 758 676 1,470 2,656 2,461 1,760 3,239 4,511 3,487 4,972 P 6 6 13 24 48 51 49 63 122 335 383 486 K 14 38 91 93 126
District N 2,060 ?,374 3,515 4,088 8,459 14,426 13,848 13,786 31,773 42,519 47,000 60,972 lotals P 46 50 134 236 413 714 694 709 2,135 6,072 5,120 6,860 R K 185 629 1,416 1,800 2,228 i,iarch 11, 1972 KERALA - CONSUMPTION OF N, P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 TO 1970/71
Metric Ton Nutrients
District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71
Alleppy N 1,446 1,053 2,112 2,506 2,538 2,506 3,225 4,143 6;395 4,834 2,930 p 692 616 2,627 2,603 2,215 2,965 3,400 24775 3,945 2,904 2,166 K 1,020 1,151 24173 3,612 3,285 1,854
Cannanore N 332 462 650 684 1,189 1,300 1,326 1,712 2,779 1,481 1,438 P 74 326 576 586 1,014 1,258 1,437 1,423 2,200 1,346 1,201 K 624 383 1,259 2,342 1,030 817
Ernakulam N 479 568 697 959 1,203 1,528 1,990 1,931 3,227 2,329 1,872 P 200 828 844 1,203 1,284 1,623 1,839 1,649 2,473 2,058 1,550 K 428 542 1,310 2,249 1,691 1,088
Kottayam N 835 874 1,810 2,191 2,518 4,253 4,273 8,860 4,488 10,218 2,768 P 488 653 2,377 2,299 2,258 4,366 4,678 5,880 3,543 6,510 2,204 K 1,283 749 5,827 3,835 6,977 2,172
Kozhikode N 175 292 432 800 969 1,421 2,390 7,384 2,712 7,050 1,695 p 166 395 510 861 960 1,637 2,538 4,383 2,548 4,327 1,587 K 391 518 4,396 1,945 4,437 930
Palghat N 835 914 1,813 2,335 2,633 3,353 3,241 4,642 7,507 4,772 4,198 p 214 339 1,679 1,378 1,529 1,967 1,715 1,530 2,286 1,478 1,021 K 647 788 1,066 1,792 1,076 685
Quilon N 454 482 480 830 1,027 1,718 2,144 3,584 4,o48 3,308 1,360 IP 223 4,31 710 930 1,0f.,4 2,306 1,847 2,218 2,121 2,420 967 K 326 469 2,271 2,478 2,366 882
Trichur N 353 531 662 989g 1,285 1,886 2,152 2,521 3,494 2,886 2,308 1' 203 680 945 1,076 1,316 2,281 1,925 1,989 2,629 2,157 1,467 K 872 646 2,o86 3,153 2,025 1,197
Trivandrum N 229 320 384 422 460 871 1,076 1,155 2,107 2,050 1,458 P 164 414 375 440 561 858 1,287 1,029 1,746 1,550 1,052 K 522 856 742 1,596 1,216 662
District N 5,138 5,496 9,140 11,716 13,822 18,836 21,717 35,932 36,758 38,928 20,027 Totals 1' 2,424 4,702 10,643 11,376 12,121 19,261 20,666 23,376 23,493 25,250 13,215 K; 6,113 6,102 21,130 23,oo4 24,103 10,287
March 25, 1972 MIADHYAPRADESH- CONSUMPTION OF N. P. AND0K BY DISTRICT FROM1959/60 TO 1970/71 409NN1X 2 (Metric Ta. Natniects) Table 7
District 1959/69 1960/61 DM61/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1966/69 1969/70 1970/71
B.l.ghat N 271 361 309 329 371 448 527 297 631 423 1,307 275 P 67 59 67 78 70 114 196 222 142 120 275 352 K ------114 1,197 16 23 31
Baster N 29 21 22 37 66 86 124 245 202 94 247 379 P 7 4. 7 16 27 29 75 105 26 222 84 g0 K ------1 6 6 - 30 2.9
B.ta1 N 41 68 63 81 94 141 262 217 231 269 318 463 P 16 10 15 32 47 71 90 69 99 40 134 146 K ------2 35 19 28 113
Bhittd N 66 83 81 113 100 57 251 166 169 257 530 681 P 6 3 2 3 3 12 15 30 1ll 30 14-4 154 K ------91 21 19
Bilsap-r N 815 768 923 893 1,154 1,451 1,407 2.334 1,721 2,489 3,374 5.093 P 41 38 31 37 38 182 434 298 355 342 597 1,476 K ------2 5 326 35 34 116
Chitat.rp-r N 7 12 17 45 63 80 101 164 721 425 720 1,174 P 1 2 4 12 23 42 42 98 531 200 530 800 K ------5 23 2 236 313 218
Chi.d.a-r N 90 73 89 97 211 199 257 199 214 370 550 749 P 17 14 21 19 50 75 129 154 160 138 225 294 K------4 13 - 53 52 59
Dem-it N 33 21 19 42 47 47 41 01 53 70 85 144 P 10 7 6 19 29 38 34 22 23 24 37 89 K ------2 5 8 71
Darti N 5 7 5 15 22 41 62 29 18 51 1.20 191 P 3 2 1 3 4 13 16 11 14 11 42 61 K ------2 10 23
Dcuas N 18 10 15 27 49 98 125 84 99 91 217 432 P 2 1 3 6 18 27 57 37 58 105 185 415 K ------2 35 23 25 71
Dite N 65 72 71 103 156 202 450 549 277 431 470 1,095 P 7 27 28 42 62 82 247 148 80 100 184 534 K ------4 13 15 52 40 152
Oa-g N 988 882 1.001 1,270 1,339 1,239 1,919 1,375 1,516 3,042 4,277 4,593 P 36 52 51 00 132 225 475 292 207 456 820 2.002 K ------2 36 201 44 40 152
Ga.. N 13 20 21 31 23 84 60 24 52 200 162 259 P 4 9 9 6 7 20 23 13 21 27 73 121 K------4 5 36 26
Gweli-r N 124 138 130 105 127 313 282 200 453 521 600 B00 P 17 20 20 12 34 37 43 59 72 41 128 2644 K ------4 9 31 7 4
Hcsihacgebsd N 37 39 32 55 73 88 120 155 133 106 772 560 P 9 12 7 58 18 20 29 51 133 41 143 100 K ------10 4 11 234 144
Icdcre N 61 32 21 45 107 180 150 174 316 535 995 1,830 P 19 7 7 21 34 61 67 87 142 140 504 940 K------7 22 4 11 198 3044
Jebalp-r N 57 104 28 65 127 530 105 175 181 385 515 480 P 26 23 9 18 31 150 54 84 36 183 153 2644 K ------8 8 8 50 67 42
,Thab.a N 13 30 19 59 112 101 225 204 85 139 42 84 P 5 6 67 10 33 69 77 53 45 99 38 10 K ------9 5 25 25 7 3
Khiand.c N 329 406 384 411 649 1,111 1,442 1,568 457 857 2,229 3,086 (E. Ntia) P 39 37 49 52 100 273 252 250 204 147 84 253 K ------17 23 43 107 47 178
Kh-egoac N 304 330 336 418 601 972 1,309 1,222 025 620 1,775 2,441 (W1. Nicir) P 39 61 95 135 249 551 473 412 272 297 440 905 K ------.. 31 44 40 220 747
Macdie N 26 37 46 48 96 36 151 33 82 136 174 154 P 2 4 0 10 13 34 43 40 65 34 40 15 K ------11 '
Meadea.r N 56 38 42 55 235 303 56B 536 404 791 1,335 2.177 P 11 12 32 166 311 486 1,272 920 1,144 1,453 2,27 3,44'8 K ------12 115 55 104 91 272-
Mar... N5 84 92 199 145 192 357 376 573 142 1,155 '1,01 P 8 12 18 36 28 40 64 79 174 136 2770 84 K - -- - 61 54 58 Si
N-ricghpar N 71 50 37 44 56 68 87 113 317 221 273 636 P 16 10 8 16 5 21 13 28 93 81 125 756 K------10 35 29 38 40
P.-n N 12 7 7 38 24 23 4 18 26 38 115 179 P 3 4 3 8 6 11 15 19 25 29 79 79 K ------5 13 10
Raig-hi N 245 241 261 293 428 410 446 581 313 453 870 1,481 P 12 18 39 63 107 170 787 225 155 343 405 835 K ------1 127 21 41
Raip-r N 1,199 1,107 1,735 1,633 1,626 2,756 2,906 7,977 2,920 4,871 6,5353 8,614 P 74 97 349 513 750 1,402 1,899 777 653 664 3,004 4,296 K ------0 80 154 74 88 246
Rai... N 47 26 52 69 99 134 81 36 23 50 147 284 P 21 14 9 34 42 63 42 21 89 144 90 188 K ------46 41 MADHYAPRADESH - CONSUMPTICNOF N, P. AND K BY DISTRICT FROM1959/60 10 1970/71 (Metric Ton Nutrients)
District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1952/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67- 1967/68 1968/69 16i 1970/71
Rajgarh N 9 12 18 34 50 57 61 98 56 55 122 341 P 2 2 5 10 24 68 54 58 34 32 64 204 K , - - - 10 8 - 12 60 138
Ratlam N 77 67 66 97 165 469 198 163 276 272 660 1,328 P 11 8 24 42 48 93 199 196 272 275 503 960 K ------6 - 18 46 103
Rewa N 18 23 17 38 76 184 124 180 100 484 427 725 P 6 5 2 11 29 216 50 59 64 76 247 455 K ------4 5 1 10 35 54
Sagar N 22. 14 24 42 78 83 125 82 69 109 116 296 P 12 4 10 17 42 68 80 40 51 66 61 171 K ------1 3 16 31 37 73
Satna N 9 14 12 43 49 333 256 199 151 95 270 763 P 4 5 3 8 16 - 84 49 69 86 203 543 K ------1 2 7 32 26 36
Sehore N 250 170 116 260 280 640 448 200 391 627 627 1,426 P 48 12 8 46 48 13 130 80 143 66 299 437 Ks - _ - - - - - 51 16 32 122 132
Seoni N 26 36 32 40 59 103 63 126 137 92 150 231 P 5 5 5 6 11 34 27 40 23 44 55 79 I; ------5 2 26 21 21
ShaSdol X 13 13 10 41 37 67 43 130 53 61 56 92 P 2 3 1 3 10 2 12 47 27 15 33 57 K ------3 8 13 8 4 4
Shajapur N 32 29 28 66 55 84 98 93 84 96 293 817 P 6 8 8 21 34 84 119 86 114 194 288 730 K - - - _ - - - - - 60 36 71
Shivp-ri N 11 7 11 49 31 51 61 58 52 204 200 313 1' 8 4 6 11 10 20 21 24 32 23 95 146 K ------5 7 15 38 25
Sidhi N 16 14 13 52 52 39 55 88 16 56 46 74 l1 5 5 4 8 11 1 20 35 33 35 30 61 K; ------5 - 7 3 1
SurgKj: 12 8 18 35 41 53 80 69 79 130 210 258 p 2 1 2 14 15 23 40 25 40 169 115 100 :: ------61 67 46
Tik.agarh X 28 28 40 54 147 193 i86 458 725 904 1,090 1,791 P 5 3 3 7 25 63 80 267 823 367 828 1,037 K _ _ - - - - 13 132 383 282 426 410
U; lais N 37 28 48 57 55 75 128 118 192 90 696 1,330 P 6 7 17 24 23 16 67 60 83 177 408 1,080 K ------7 - 23 130 259
Vidisha N 15 7 5 18 33 29 41 29 16 6 45 102 P 6 2 1119 12 13 15 14 24 13 28 53 K K------14 26
District Totals S 5,653 5.547 6,316 7,566 9.488 13,933 15,794 15,977 15,719 21,591 34,200 51,317 P 646 639 1,079 1,762 2,669 5,232 7,461 5,692 6,965 7,283 14,500 25,139 K 113 775 1,733 1,778 2,907 4,102
-Z 5) MAHARASHTRA- CONSUMPTION OF N. P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM1959/60 TO 1970/71 ANNEX 2
(Metric Ton Nutrients)Tal
District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 192/63~ 1963/66 1964/65 1956 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969L70 1970/71
Ahmednagar N 900 987. 1,316 1,541 1,697 5,375 1,262 2,938 6,714 14,596 5,670 7,094 P 417 417 417 521 543 923 1,181 1,085 3,357 8,426 1,653 2,358 K 1,284 1,704
Akola N 600 655 874 486 569 2,276 602 3,569 4,130 4,180 3,173 3,917 P 140 140- 140 175 182 719 584 418 2,565 1,961 1,458 1,682 K 881 1,187
Amratvati N 400 436 582 786 783 2,880 1:,014 2,844 1,926 1,164 2,409 3,237 '' 195 195 195 244 254 633. 501 487 963 566 1,407 2,086 .K 1,181 1,619
Aurangabad N 200 225 300 249 296 1,091 1,195 3,567 5,177 3,717 3,740 4,719 P 73 73 73 91 95 223 365 423 2,588 2,424 1,011 2,612 K 901 1,267
Bhandara, N '350 380 506 46 794 860 477 725 2,416 816 2,486 3,097 P 175 182 182. 22 254 565 393 861 861 401 1,050 1,681 K 1,011 1,404
Blir N 6 10 14 25 211 83 766 2,645 736 1,032 1,787 2,31.1 P 0 0 0 4, 67 0 220 178 154 244 1,310 1,964 K 691 1,110
Buldana N 525 576 768 838 1,198 4,243 1,357 3,302 6,137 7,128 3,180 4,010 P 162 288. 294 367 383 1,094 1,522 474 3,068 2-,6o6 1,180 1,786 K 1,191 1,617
Chanda N 125 136 181 163 332 724 536 2,103 1,344 866 3,074 3,810 P 62 65 65 81 106 244 390 614 614 502 i,086 1,688 *K 1,024 1,425
Dhulia N 675 715 953 1,170 1,660 1,796 1,422 2,859 5,832 8,484 4,188 5,218 P 138 358 408 510 531 308 791 460 2,916 587 1,277 1,9 K 1,200 1,719
Jalgaon N 900 955 .,274 2,302 3,722 5,465 1,961 3,492 8,030 13,730 4,811 5,934 P 450 478 *637 1,143 1,191 1,066 687 530 4,015 6,382 1,974 2,702 K 1,090 1,485
Kolaba N 525' 569 759 326 715 1,402 2,188 2,791 1,750 3,679 2,386 2,929 P 130 130' 130 163 229 51 242 1,043 1,043 2,325 677 2,382 K 930 1,247
Kolhapur N 2,4oo0 2,531 ,375 2,553 6,819 5,916 3,699 4,458 6,039 1-1,332 5,614 7,189 K 1,021 1,021 ,021 1,276 2,182 650 2,63 1187 3,019 9,060 2,001 2,892 K ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2,1511,614 Nagpur N 75 91. 122 323 409 982 1,190 2,295 3,665 1,603 3,045 3,891 P 37 45 61 126 131 558 801. 751 751 801 1,076 1,679 K .. 1,150 1,520
Nanded if 75 .83 11.1 153 271 479, 1,067 1,968 1,425 1,392 2,162 2,809 P .37 41 55 76 .87 731 295 426 426 696 1,358 2,014 K 773 1,422
Nasik N 275 317 .,756 1,881 2,712 3,384 2,512 4,906 7,086 12,182 4,298 5,389 P 138' 158 666 833 868 503 709 939 3,205 2,974 1,360 1,859 K .. .1,110 1,506
Osmanabad 1? 100 120 160 341 240 968 627 2,055, 2,724 3,928 2,781 3,517 P 50 '59 59 74 77 119. 571 530 1,141 1,687 1,384. 2,119 *K 730 1,093
Parhhani N 20' 39 42 64 160 530 1,040 2,571 1,842 2,613 3,275 4,109 P 0 15 21 32 51 232 818 264 921 1,027 1,441 2,066 * K . ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5511,370 Poona .8' 525 568 757 1,554 1,041 2,737 2,013 5,820 5,293 2,767 9,377 9,849 5 162 184 256 320 333 1,579 1,554 .1,559 4,246 1,646 1,659 2,364 K .1,461 1,754
Ratnagiri N 300 319 423 430 54o 1,243 687 2,879 2,122 3,331 2,743 3,369 P 133 133 133 166 173 661 764 1,332 1,332 2,235 1,019g 1,614 K ' ' ~~~~3 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~721,037 Sangli 11 675 706 942 1,163 1,905 2,227 2,289 29,669 4,211 5,102 3,861 4,817 'P 3371 353 . 465 581 638 707 1,234 1,215 2,105 3,501 1,893 2,609 K .1,181 1,479
Satar& N 350 375 500 579 1,061 .2,654 2,385 .2,455 3,407 6,213 4,054 5,076 P 151 151 . 151 189 340 1,176 1,233 1,562 1,703 3,6896 1,544 2,474 K ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1,2711,589
Sholapur -if 425 485. 647 389 . 674 613 *788 1,855 2,318 5,870 3,733 4,714 .P -155 155 155 194 216 260 469 230 1,159 93 ',809) 2,494 'K - . - ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~1,2813,668 Trhanea N 275 304 4206 367 654 1,572 1,697 1,915 4,281 2,971 ,0 321 K 13i4 4 83 209 274. 247 1,152 1,152 2,197 752 1,294 K Sso~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~51,167 wardba N 25 3,5 47 393 236 629) 404 1,904 1,232 1,550 2,523 3,217 p 0 ~~17. 23 41 43 213 309 144 314 2,269 976 1,569
Yeoltmal N 150 172 229 182 280 1,915 423 3,077 1,338 6,052 3,009 3,797 p 6 69 69 86 90 672 '413 441 441 4,365 i,4cO 209L6 K ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1,2031,627
District N 18.876 12.780 17,044 18,714 28,969 52.044 33.651 71,758 94.175 126,298 89,934 111,238 Totals ~~P4.370 4.873 5.822 7.704 9.273 14.159 18,356 18.305 44.059 68.744 33,963 91,973 K ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~26,71735,856
*N and P data allbeated for 1967/68 and 1968/69; P data satinatedfar 1959/60 to 1963/64.
March u, 1972
ANNEX 2 Table 9 MYSORE - CONSUM=TON OF N, P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 TO 1970/71 (Metric Ton Nutrients) District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/6 1926 1963/64 1964/65 1956 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70o 1970/71
BaLngalore N 816 1,296 1,202 1,474 1,753 1,974 2,613 3,744 3,044 4,644 5,703 6,677 P 125 150 210 285 370 350 350 707 804 3,364 2,098 2,182 K 2 30 669 1,063 1,447
Belgaums N 664 1,054 1,312 1,744 2,830 3,469 2,114o 3,744 5,499 4,121 7,480 8,585 P 300 400 500 700 980 1,090 1,090 2,179 2,476 1,556 2,270 3,220 K 65 269 1,036 1,203
Bellary N 774 1,229 1,762 2,692 3,588 3,454 2,692 3,976 4,155 5,926 7,901 8,698 P 500 600 780 1,030 1,473 1,637 1,637 3,274 1,244 821 3,061 3,573 K 15 174 1,037 1,384
Bidar N 64 102 146 178 357 395 666 654 1,11i4 1,181 1,199 1,677 P 30 40 50 6s 250 286 286 572 650 351 325 611 K 52 23 3 57 382
Bijapur N 52 82 126 190 271 555 745 843 1,033 2,021 2,272 2,874 p 20 40 68 90 140 226 226 452 514 472 657 1,500 K 34 260 450
Chikmiaglur N 184 292 217 441 510 812 659 496 734 1,051 2,809 2,649 P 10 10 28 35 38 42 42 84 96 692 1,324 1,557 K 3 962 811 1,562
Chitradurga N 236 374 348 518 511 1,571 1,458 2,247 2,863 4,329 7,914 9,165 P 100 125 150 200 260 638 638 1,276 1,450 727 4,075 4,357 K 14 136 1,030 2,221
Coorg N 253 401 217 273 265 391 582 54o 436 324 1,523 1,780 P 10 10 20 20 30 32 32 65 76 457 916 1,159 K 61.2 604 1,725
Dharwar N 122 194 474 484 598 1,597 983 1,613 2,154 2,371 3,181 4,693 p 5o 100 180 242 300 518 518 1,037 1,178 1,144 1,4o1 971 K 19 72 323 320
Gulbarga N 69 109 123 200 326 773 767 377 542 446 1,038 1,212 p 30 30 45 63 90 104 104 208 236 305 235 133 K 2 189 70 106
Hassan N 368 548 455 543 711 1,135 722 919 1,045 1,515 3,618 4,380 p 50 60 75 95 135 149 149 297 338 859 917 2,174 K 6 214 670 1,025 1,745
Kolar N 267 424 414 1,047 1,502 2,749 1,997 2,183 2,345 L,925 3,682 3,723 P io 150 200 460 650 713 73 7131 59 79 1,7 K 2-5 171 593 1,051
Mandya N 1,433 2,274 3,052 7,439 7,996 7,660 9,139 9,631 10,633 12,539 9,55' 10,472 P 600 750 1,090 1,744 3,513 2,025 1,990 3,726 5,810 4,185 2,433 2,198 K 107 300 463 609 1,161 4,300 2,701 1,970 1.035 1,435
l8ysore N 244 388 676 965 1,774 1,635 1,397 2,246 2,069 4,100 4,525 4,302 p 70 90 125 140 200 213 213 427 486 344 1,673 1,953 K 6 320 823 1,028 2,519
N. Kanara N 62 99 68 60 66 151 528 365 374 623 346 816 P 20 20 34 30 33 72 72 144 164 226 2`2 472 K ~~~ ~~~22_ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~24L180
Raichur if 377 598 990 1,151 1,661 2,037 3,473 4,530 4,294 5,560 9',600 8,047 P 175 250 325 420 600 671 671 1,142 1,298 1,350 4,109 3,972 K 23 142 1,053 1,512
Shimoga N 236 374 345 344 317 1,100 909, 1,889 2,091 2,591 6,338, 5,177 P 75 75 90 120 160 306 306 612 696 1,325 ,005 2,597 K ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~12 1,7Li' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~482,063
S. Kanara N 323 512 263 275 845 914 1,126 1,949 1,298 1,771 3872 4,205 P 25, 30 36 50 70 75 75 151 172 605 1,4(65 1,3 K ~ ~~~~~~~3,067~ ~~~~~~1,200 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~53,215 Tasikur N 328 520 471 535 860 2,021 1,369 1,579 2,022 2,034 3,940 3,013 P 40 60 75 95 135 152 152 304 346 798 1,022 1,147 K 25 215 522 733
District N 6,872 10,906 12,992 17,937 26.329 35,085 33,026 38,832 47,745 62,072 87,000 92,510 Totals P 2,330 3,090 4,081 5,884 9,427 9,299 9,264 17,370 18.844 20.670 31,000 37,500 K 98 8 372 12,514 14,050 26.080
*District Data for N in 1959/60 pro-rated from State totalJ. District Data for P for all years except 1968/69 allocated to district on the basis of guidelines provided and within the total P distributed each year. March 11, 1972 ORISSA - CONSUMPTION OF N, P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 TO 1970/71
(Metric Ton Nutrients)
District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71
Balasore N 61 141 230 161 159 260 372 532 670 658 518 699. P 28 13 16 15 16 33 12 57 214 127 37 240 K 34 11 35 32 56 136
Bolangir N 39 64 60 214 92 206 93 179 332 593 625 651 P 7 21 33 66 38 37 - 14 63 307 378 271 323 K 5 17 19 98 57 97 517
Cuttack N 1,623 1,408 1,003 844 1,263 1,545 1,613 2,704 3,365 4,211 4,083 4,586 P 47 20 48 163 180 186 170 611 428 1,004 740 819 K 136. 199 247 317 204 892 434
Dhenkanal N 37 93 45 42 77 114 36 270 301 246 274 269 p 8 9 7 10 13 34 5 121 128 125 94 97 K 1 10 41 92 71 98 94
Ganjaia N 2,242 1,343 1,994 2,253 2,223 2,634 2,640 4,172- 3,783 4,261 4,796 3,738 P 78 66 174 134 140 384 313 586 842 799 272 298 K 59 21 239 207 292 169 158
Kalahandi N 15 28 22 34 23 59 105 87 121 201 65 142 p 2 5 9 10 7 15 14 35 104 120 38 73 K 2 7 18 26 7 27 37
Keonjhar N 23 34 14 33 34 18 44 132 130 136 58 106 P 6 9 4 8 19 15 19 110 128 72 35 74 K 10 10 10 18 10 10 22
Koraput N 223 305 63 157 242 241 339 700 823 930 500 779 P 2 21 12 14 51 101 79 426 607 381 174 279- K 58 108 142 253 164 i4o 223
Miayurbhanj N 12 26 31 34 48 69 58 252 312 255 136 176 P 5 11 17 23 37 76 11 209 348 84 86 106 K 30 50 140 68 42 70
Phulbani N 12 27 16 18 44 27 68 76 117 240 50 82 p U 3 12 7 2 13 31 51 115 140 25 29 K 17 9 25 58 65 20 22
Phri N 389 554 577 786 653 700 797 1,190 1,782 1,749 1,765 1,819 P 8 11 17 22 36 72 48 136 208 926 317 580 K 44 69 95 137 152 903 266
Sambalpur II 97 216 209 394 697 1,088 1,600 2,446 2,154 2,321 4,874 7,023 P 81 55 108 338 331 656 394 1,590 1,770 751 2,640 2,454 K 153 181 290 473 337 485 439
Sundargarh N 20 45 21 24 40 40 48 72 122 147 60 235 P 21 19 14 19 14 41 22 88 166 86 44 132 K 14 17 33 69 56 22 37
District N 4,793 4,284 4,285 5,034 5,595 7,009 7,837 12,881 14,037 15,961 17,804 20,315 Totals P 304 263 471 829 884 1,663 1,132 4,083 5,365 4,993 4,773 5,504 K 499 712 1,220 1,923 1,515 2,961 2,095
iarch 11, 1972 PUNJAB - CONSUMPTION OF N, P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 T0 1970/71
(Metric Ton Nutrients) District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 196F/69 1969Z7 1970/71 Amritsar N 302 80 394 1,135 2,322 3,708 3,525 4,213 9,293 14,498 21,200 24,979 P 12 10 23 54 126 225 233 339 1,651 3,854 2,500 3,096 K 28 25 236 1,105 1,320 843 Bhatinda N 953 -326- 810 1,702 2,683 3,858 3,693 3,899 10,174 13,640 12,300 16,172 p 6 5 18 69 65 99 109 109 502 1,809 700 2,012 K 19 150 782 120 375 Ferozepur N 732 360 1,491 3,690 6,248 9,099 7,309 8,140 14,823 24,962 23,700 29,065 P 12 14 40 95 126 216 189 330 1,599 4,551 2,400 4,032 K 17 86 524 1,306 603 1,062
Gurdaspur N 118 74 319 775 1,422 2,447 2,405 2,392 5,645 8,449 10,4o0 13,224 P 11 11 20 37 55 131 156 170 1,035 1,394 1,000 1,360 K 11 26 231 607 603 322
Hoshiarpur N 639 323 934 1,774 1,894 3,256 3,511 3,214 5,855 7,502 7,900 8,195 P 2 13 53 125 130 217 241 325 1,294 2,091 800 1,176 K 63 85 460 509 360 543 Jullundar N 697 455 1,430 2,173 3,038 4,948 4,669 5,678 11,096 14,924 15,200 18,472 p 15 26 71 122 166 313 461 660 1,886 3,476 2,403 3,408 K 83 166 603 1,384 840 1,425 Kapurthala N 104 59 264 431 635 1,221 1,400 1,875 3,223 3,950 4,703 6,o74 P 3 10 1 43 76 189 225 304 542 1,236 803 936 K 21 31 115 539 420 270 Ludhiana N 641 548 1,851 2,442 3,365 5,478 8,714 8,685 12,251 20,073 18,403 22,316 P 3 26 265 376 919 1,146 1,162 1,448 4,180 6,976 5,800 9,176 K 195 216 682 2,051 840 957
Patiala N 233 235 464 756 1,324 2,523 2,497 3,091 7,287 11,376 14,403 15,697 p 10 4 39 71 121 323 252 431 1,243 2,640 2,403 2,364 K 15 46 239 781 600 455
Ropar N 3,800 4,078 P 640 868 K 240 147 Sangrur-Jind N 257 373 909 1,529 2,520 4,430 4,477 3,611 8,449 14,305 14,803 16,494 p 8 10 21 57 90 193 184 237 729 2,520 1,603 2,972 K 11 2 133 987 420 609
District N 4,676 2,531 8,866 16,407 25,451 40,876 42,200 43,798 88,096 133,679 146,800 174,766 Totals P 82 129 551 1,049 1,874 3,132 3,212 4,353 14,661 30,547 21,040 31,400 444 702 3,370 10,001 6,360 7,008
1Harcb 11, 1972 RLAJ8ASTHAN- CONSUMPTION OP N. P. AND1K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 To 1970/71 ANNEX 2 (Metric T.n Nutrients) Ta-ble 12
District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71
Ajoar N 29 34 145 94 64 174 117 185 497 120 163 385 P 10 1 4 12 6 6 20 29 69 20 20 68 K ------7 29 8 12 28
Al-a N4 27 28 134 136 284 402 532 843 1,787 1,121 1.277 3,677 P 5 5 26 21 44 36 59 88 252 96 194 549 K ------317 285 19 100
A.opg-rh (R.C.P.) N ------3,056 - P ------1,072- K ------9
Ennevara ~~~N 56 9 45 36 143 182 86 135 104 202 163 538 P 13 3 7 3 12 9 8 30 22 31 46 77 K ------41 19 15 16 24
Same ~~~~~N 10 10 2 14 13 26 30 74 88 102 15 97 P 2 1 1 6 1 4 3 16 75 13 9 25 K ------16 .
Shar-tp.r N 85 21 103 154 210 614 344 486 550 658 1,319 1,760 P 3 4 10 12 28 81 40 89 173 169 387 510 K ------66 57 20
Bhilusr. N 57 - 79 166 180 374 495 539 604 767 1,110 1.957 P I 4 6 32 62 76 94 214 244 410 498 K ------5 89 84 111 145
Bikane. N - - - - -7 57 2 20 30 -- P - - - - - 2 6 - 23 8 - - K 5
B.ndi N 51 44 259 80 137 296 256 247 392 801 916 1,784 P 16 14 280 15 38 67 40 57 177 233 209 346 K ------38 70 65 55 98
Chtittorg-th N 65 - 52 95 108 292 411 462 557 1,071 2,601 2,970 P 12 - 7 39 84 - 274 286 414 1,279 1,631 1,954 K------8 50 173 119 190
Churn N I 1 1 -- - 37 4 8 P------18 - 5 K------29 - 2
D.urgap.r N 1 10 32 - - 47 206 40 116 43 81 96 P 1 1 5 - - 2 20 5 86 17 s0 36 K ------22 7 4 00
J.Ts-o N 15 31 44 34 122 182 148 126 163 182 319 P - 1 4 17 10 22 6 20 20 52 316 100 K ------5 1 23 4 11
Jalp-r N 20 22 130 249 320 327 325 1,040 717 684 933 1,661 P 1 7 48 100 326 298 161 119 206 187 197 576 K ------37 26 66
Jai.lsaer N - - . - 75 -- 2 1--
K ------4 --
Jhal... r N 7 14 20 28 38 108 134 171 68 125 387 593 P 2 4 0 11 21 46 128 60 39 55 147 335 K ------7 17 30 40
Jh.Jhnj... N 9 19 06 27 19 44 91 73 123 244 251 372 P - 1 1 2 1 3 4 19 19 40 56 39 K - - - - - . - - 19 00 12 21
Jcdhpur N 30 5 7 27 30 23 116 179 135 67 168 691 P 5 0 1 5 10 10 48 36 32 28 53 266 K ------6 1 6 8 40
Kota N 89 32 36 130 275 1,386 500 716 5,600 2,729 3,693 6,090 P 23 4 15 30 131 . 216 260 850 1,459 1,909 3,330 K ------15 092 265 607 750
Nagoor 0 4 26 1 14 10 35 23 45 98 76 420 002 P 3 3 - 6 5 15 8 12 - 15 80 31 K ------9 5 2 3
Pali N 4 62 238 312 157 447 688 1,474 1,289 085 478 1,287 P 12 8 5 72 38 160 343 10 428 318 94 780 K ------20 20 23 7 lanai Mudh.por N 79 115 371 221 235 321 330 580 738 1,464 2,000 967 P 34 004 94 256 213 204 ill 90 243 188 150 128 K ------15 19 50 Il 2
Sikar N 4 7 22 34 53 98 135 135 169 178 228 236 P i 2 1 5 8 4 10 71 26 36 19 K ------23 2 14 12
Sirohi N 17 14 19 96 62 072 286 332 378 321 360 529 P I 1 1 3 4 32 50 94 046 52 lOS 328 K ------13 29 7 12 22
Ganganagar N 404 308 496 1,388 2,561 4,233 4,010 5,377 6,931 10,279 5,854 8,684 P 16 99 25 55 148 - 176 400 780 1,085 354 602 K ------107 102 100 264 140
Hau-aga-h Ni - - - - - 3,454 3,463 P ------~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~427597 K ------~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2021
Tank N 36 51 6 168 96 167 182 190 210 157 1,018g 285 P 3 3 - 35 20 34 22 20 79 11 198 27 K ------42 10 23 5
Uduip.r N 94 45 171 99 159 354 448 423 883 820 1,220 2,065 P 16 44 17 9 22 35 58 96 360 182 343 566 K ------5 42
District Totals N 1,187 886 2,443 3,623 5,167 10,326 9,884 13,916 79,120 23.045 31.431 45,616 P 181 313 565 718 1,199 1,144 1,781 1,948 4,802 5,846 8.213 11,700 K 260 1,069 1,300 1,500 1,821 TAMIL NADU - CONSUMPTION OF N, P. AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 TO 1970/71
- (Metric Ton Nutrients) District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71 Chingleput N 1,945 2,015 2,316 2,503 2,810 7,216 -6,931 6,415 -5,130 7,734 13,962 17,336 P 512 6oo 800 -1,130 1,139 2,471 3,226 4,839 2,328 3,239 4,907 7,462 - K - 2,665 4,712. Coimbatore N 2,253 2,334 2,682 10,246 14,827 11,693 11,522 12,110 .,'t88 - 14,853-- -17,123 27,679 -p--- 680 -- 797~- 1,063 2,252 r;823 3;846 5,946 8,919 - 5,673 5,544- 4,347 10,430 K 5,023 9,354
; -N 1,838 1,628 P 443 810 - K 381 341
Kanyakumari N 300 310 357 897 1,49k 1,778 1,539 2,356 1,836 1,302 2,402 4,4o0 P 11 13 17 33 `137 83 41- 60. 127 - 170 1,800 K 131 1,000
Madurai N 1,145 1,186 1,363 2,679 4,163 5,282 6,088 4,667 8,380 - 7,790- 7,776 13,595 P 187 220 293 325 356 1,187 1,465 2,197 1,441 2,010 1,953 5,703 K 826 3,585 Nilgiris N 76 78 90 55 52 36 51 68 661 222 2,126 2,393 P 257 301 401 337 -48i 505 439 610 1,378 458 2,646 3,482 K - 1,352 1,754 N. Arcot N 2,170 2,248 2,584 4,731 4,251 6,489 6,916 6,617 7,183 9,074 - 16,876 15,375- P 297 349 465 669 906 2,179 2,477 3,715 2,455 2,307 4,789 5,659 K - 4,15o 3,940 Ramianathpuram N 1,018 1,054 1,212 2,801 3,998 5,385 5,636 4,943 4,735 2,608 7,481- 7,927 P 20 23 31 46 78 503 91 120 242 625 654 1,892 K 883 1,132 Salem- N 1,097 1,136 1,306 2,220 2,893 7,004 4,374 6,541 7,267 8,951 6,503 7,575 Dharmapuri P 70 82 110 207 240 1,168 1,716 2,574 2,445 2,522 1,590 3,262 K 579 2,135 S. Arcot N 2,050 2,123 2,441 3,102 4,727 8,087 6,116 5,180 8,838 16,120 24,753 21,415 P 141 166 221 5o6 770 5,672 5,166 7,749 3,186 6,184 6,311 8,295 K 5,736 7,767 Thanjavur 14 4,421 4,579 5,263 9,099 7,298 8,472 11,366 17,446 21,141 16,713 24,500 23,208 P 1,755 2,056 2,742 3,266 3.356 3,272 3,276 4,914 5,418 5,107 7,148 12,889 K 6,633 5,403 Tiruchirpalli N 1,153 1,194 1,373 2,035 1,261 9,826 8,184 7,940 7,630 11,242 12,981 18,766 P 946 1,108 1,478 1,363 1,606 3,221 3,898 5,847 2,865 4,410 4,920 7,504 K 3,041 5,949 Tirurielvelli N 2,031 2,103 2,418 4,426 5,652 5,374 3,611 6,446 7,467 6,7o9 9,552 11,400 P 183 214 286 139 297 869 901 1,351 1,588 1,833 1,719 2,891 1 1,483 4,110
District N 19,659 20,360 23,403 44,794 53,366 76,642 72,334 80,729 97,756 103,318 147,873 172,697 Totals P 5,059 5,929 7,909 10,273 11,o89 24,976 28,642 42,895 29,146 34,545 41,597 72,079 K 32,883 51,182
* State level reported sales for Nl and F were allocated to districts for 1959/60, 1960/61 and 1967/68. Plon-pool sales were added to pool sales in 1967/68 and 1968/69.
March 11, 1972
ANNX 2
UTrAR PRA213S - C0NBWXPTIONOF N. P. AND K BY DISTRICT FROM1959/6o To l9o/71 Table 14
(Metric Ton Nutrients)
District 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966 1967/68 1968/6 1997 1970/71
Agra Diviejo Agra N- 227 265 118 311 717 897 716 774 2,036 2,744 3,483 4,195 P 28 34 35 37 63 88 55 93 592 914 1,291 1,180 K 2 299 575 763 765 7,4121 7,128 Al.igarh N 184 281 24L2 300 1,.761 3,232 4,'502 3,838 5,604 4,832 P 32 30 36 97 192 492. 483 441 867 1,863 3,013 2,206 K 184 787 818 1,323 1,173 Ete.b .N 561 54 571 784 1,239. 142 148 ,50 ,77 3,566 4,632 1,1 1,019 P .41 .92 -. 95 49 *69 ~ 62 231 714 890 913 K .289 792 679 715
MaLinpuri N '414 349' 304 595 984 1,444 1,265 1,147 2,095 3,413 4,733 5,040 P 6 *68 10 43 70 68 .59 70 656 856 798 956 'K .277 744 821 690
M4athura N '78 169 137 148 560 994 983 670 1,878 2,515 3,348 3,395 P 108' 22, 24 34 38 75 62 108 415 665 760 952 315 466 K .', 146 347
Allehaba,i Division' 7,030 Allababad N 1,040 997 849 1, 388 2,055 2,937 2,668 1,436 888 4,546 8,797 PK 5 32 7 176 176 , 303 204 163 170 1,670 1,715 1,752 K P-~~ ~~~87 ~~~605 ~ ~~~~~~~1833 988 2,408 3,382 3,922 4,735 Etawah N ' 324 417 . 84 352 809 §43 884 1,946 P 85 '28 14 84 132 137 93 110 1,032 1,236 951 887 K ~~~ ~~~~365 ~~~~608 ~~~~375 ~~~~~~13442 7,420 10,079 10,355 FarTUk,habad N .2,090 2,693 1,911 2,463 3,174 4,4,8 4,185 4,003 6,339 P 32. 106 85 144 228 319 728 376 .1,580 2,322 1,655 1,561 1,381 1,160 1,238 K .,89 703 1,306 2,330 2,369 Fateh~~urN . 95 77 -198 207 465 570. 409 458 2,496 P 5 7 15 50 .41 177 27 33 996 221 432 564 K ~~~ ~~~~369 ~~~~128 ~~~~235 ~~~~~~13420
KaDpu N '524 745 506 1,217 1,153 1,591 917 1,247' 3,744 4,453 6,636 5,384 P 47 62 35 65 119, 73 110 103 881 1,287 1,404 1,279 K .. 50 419 722 681 786
Bar-eilly Division Bareilly N -7i3 662 605 924 1,279 1,776 1,553 1,582 2,338 .3,285 6,159 ~ ',722 P 27 17 28 69 80 1.20 77 115 714 976 1,452 1,898 K 388 736 1,214 1,C45 3,004 7,318 6,712 Bijnor N . 630 816 423 696 1,312 2,033 2,136 2,248 4,509 P 42. 111 124 108 217 136 130 285 1,000 1,175 1,997 1,708 K. .5 540 622 861 905
Budaun N 493 876 172 603 1,426 2,079' 1,778 1,657 3,103 4,505 7,06 5,930 P 37 115 14 49 124 144 223 377 0W 1,284 1,915 1,134 K . .,5 332 877 1,259 678 8,535 12,826 9,977, Moradabad ..N 10it3' 1,009,' 1,185 1,266 3,145 3,535 3,385 3,425 6,073 2,238 3,411 1,770 P ' 37 22 94 236 266 267 322 279 1,583 K . ~~ ~~~~489 ~~~~923 ~~~~~~1,592 ~~~~~~9940 PilibhitN 226 222 2~~ ~~4126 '67~4 ' 903 781 798 1,146 2,245 3,863 4,3336 P 15 15 21 .32. 66 82 86 60 332 394 1,117 833 501 K . ' ., ~~~ ~~~~127 ~~~~480 ~~~351 ~ ~~~33
Rampur* N 357 342 356 387 1,043 1,175 803 1,008 1,609 2,753 4,565 5,163 .P 19 7 .30 15 .55 94 70 187 587 960 1,480 1,876 K 4 354 547 947 851
Shahjahanpi~r. N 368 255 325 338 ' 7 50 999 811 657 1,611 2, 71 4,820 4,381 P 222 17 14 34 57 58. 64 '111 354 744 1,140 965 K i 6 133 467 665 653
Faizabed'- lvision . Bahraich N 41 ~ 101 150 187 439 843 . 597 416 1,045 2,134 2,,849 3,494 P 25 . 20 30, 68 95 1.67 140 1:08 383 1,013 1,281 1,307 K. . ' 254 714 703 86'3
Bara Nanki. N 769 725 1,152 1,669 2,095 3,064 2,077 2,i55 4,284 8,564 10,454 8,349 P 20 102 85 112. 112 142 129 116 809 2,621 3,073 1,708 K '7 , 467 1,906 2,571 1,353 6,258 10,396 12,734 9,669 Faizab&d ~ i 696 833 91, '1,409 2,085. 2,9o8 2,508 2,436 P 36 20 44 127 . 320 235 221 280 1,276 3,190 4,261 2,409 K .36 877 2,168 2,954 1,814
Gonda .N 196 216 206 414 1,001 1,437 1,601 1,401 3,504 9,418 12,561 8,339 P .42 41 45 112 106 146 .172 171 817 3543 5,636 3,070
Pratap'garh N 167 287 .349 356 513 *644 764 764 1,242 2,659 3,969 3,431 P NA 102 38. 126 98 .69. 66 65 409 997 1,621 1,144 K 12 297 767 1,000 818
Sultanpur N .239. 297 145 ' 437 857 1,347 951 927 2,186 4,265 6,521 4,779 P 19 91 6 54 102 85 80 92 534 1,496 2,398 1,460 K 34 274 897 1.448 1.06='3 ANNEX( 2 UTTAR PRADESP -_CONSUMPTION OF N, P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 TO 1970/71 Table 14 Palge 2 Metric Ton Nutrients)
District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/6 ;1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71
Gorakhpur Division !;
Azsmgarh N 19 8 24 751 1,457 2,313 2,785, 1,977 30534 4,165 7,340 6,466 P 14 46 , 29- 188 265 292 210 108 858 2,339 2,797 1,462 K I 34 , 394 i,o62 1,557 955 Basti N 698 640 567 893 1,498 3,186 2,598 2,179 7,688 12,563 15,744 13,773 P 174 1,948 3,814 5,198 3,546 K . ; 85 835 2,372: 2,859 2,016
Deoria N 854 875 983 1,134 2,315 3,989 2,625' 3,772 7,803 9,543 11,779 13,230 P 81 98 , 92 204 320 299 340 422 2,064 3,733 5,395 3,672 XK, .. ; . I . 118 722 2,216 2,626 2,476
Grsakhpur N 867 692 846 1,526 2,577 3,316 2,374 2,366 5,974 9,621 12,996 12,123 P 60 174 204 277 421 367 303 295 1,355 3,892 3,939 3,o84 K 20 833 1,980 1,570 1,548
J'hansi Division
Banda N 54 22 23 58 235 .638 403 348 316 465 662 674 P 15 9 11 34 87 I 112 168 97 134' 287 326 358 K 35 37 101 133 169
Jalaun N 73 141 114 90 364 455 779 . 771 1,435 1,729 2,621 2,367 P 8 64 49 73 75 66 126 194 543 682 1,099 987 K 23 76 135 216 246
Jhansi N .34 3 4 33 402 408 327 .274 601 576 1,135 1,079 P 32 416 3 45 68 65 60 79 265 262 475 326 K _ 10. 136 165 221 228
Lucknow Dvision . , -
Hsardoi N' 286. 348 247 270 561 1,193 1,105 1,197 1,729 1,797 3,515 3,241 P .7 17. 19 -99 142 148 112 104 407 452 651 517 K. 20 143 289 466 394
Khieri N 419 518 490 ,2 620 942 1,802 1,486 1,244 1,337 2,363 3,590 4,187 P, 30. 273 85 35 . 137 177 . 4i 169 1 531 791 1,272 1,061 ,K . 20. 201 316 603 562 Lucknow N 365 438 500 "1,l79 , 780 827. 647 819 1,813 1,827 3,121 3,681 P 21 :19 19' 76 108 65 '50. 51 276 285 366 932 K . . 13 111 153 192 300
Rai Bareli N 129 142 . 162 308 615 648 728 755 2,104 1,871 2,778 2,528 P 8 18 63 65 120 109 93 92 335 480 646 528 K . 71 2941 264 468 420
Sitapuri N 175 418 593 1,216 1,214 1,084 1,110 1,017 898 2,283 3,962 4,249 P 18 16 31 67 115 79 148 58 168 484 724 723 K ' 99 188 355 362
Unnao N 135 142. 94 169 378 704 637 614 903 i,147 1,511 2,107 P 4 11 . 29 :35 61 1'1 60 64 65 198 255 307 446 K , ' I 14 106 180 237 438 Meerut Division
BGilandshahr N 732 783 1,332 1,159 2,304 3,068 3,241 2,692 6,174 11,257 11,104 10,239 Pt 68 15 72 165 288 290 268 361 2,163 3,976 5,000 3,442 K . | . : 180 891 .1,417 1,668 1,544
Dehra Dun N 85 1 110 132 150 206 312 . 247 -227 25 596 1,071 756 P '8. 8 11 ' 13 44 52 43 ' 35 147 169 246 230 16 102 101 123 128
Meerut N 2,709 2,741 2,495 2,855 3,162 5,220 5,307 3 151 6,16 6,56 1,392 PK 6 20 0 276 '671.. 776 , 459 413 1,731 6,310 6,586 5,584 K ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 86 796 2,026 2,631 2,4~67 Muzaffasrnagar N 1,597 1,784 1,299 1,535 . 3,136 4,053 4,356 3,835 7,137 10,883 12,156 13,695 P 112 88 130 136 267 354 387 386 2,133 3,113 3,701 3,234 83 367 1,203 1,410 1,704
Sahshranpur N 745 1,003 1,147 .1,165 2,018 3,143 3,390 2,737 4,269 7,054 1,371 ' 10,745 P 22 17 14 34 57 293 262 233 1,460 2,481 3,502 K' . ~~~ ~~~~684 ~~~~600 ~~~~~~1,487 ~1-l.533 ~~~58 UTrAR PRADESH - CONSUMPTION OF N, P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60.TO 1970/71
(Metric Ton-Nutrients)
District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 .1962/63 1963/64 i964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71
Nanital and Hill. Districts N 326 527- 355 407 667 1,297 1,097 1,560 1,119 3,698. 7,666 7,807 P 51 19 -49 215 263 352 - 363. 245 - 1,016 2,823 2,534 2,098- K_ 142 97 899 1,493 1,174
Varanasi Division
Ballia N 129 151 2i6 242 522 717 833 692 1,381- 2,580 4,086 2,948 P 23 70 49 96 134 147 136 -52 404 1,192 1,746 827 K . 9 176 854 1,076 663
Ghazipur N NA 383 - 5o4 805 1,158 1,535 1,780 1,116 1,386 2,371 3,449 3,1114 p 43 40 63. 96 - 153 201 200 188 458 1,183 1,574 1,009 K 10 298 1,007 1,009 719
Jaunpur N 605- 578 50 1,259 1,789 3,053 2,214 1,498 3,-321 4,459 7,709 5,572 P 31 48 215 472 582 569 406 345 1,239. 1,817 2,819 1,347 K . 147 790 1,231 1,998 1,124 l4irzapur Ji 392 365 301 440 650 980 813 557 925 1,215 2,257 2,122 P 13 48 44 19 183 146 130 814 312 553 699 754 17 153 468 514 567
'/aranasi Jl 827 939 641 1,738 2,119 2,920 2,319 1,740 3,174 5,010 7,733 8,1o8 P 36 34 84 190 364 414 285 256 893 1,786 3,015 1,471 1143 783 1,830 2,422 1,348
DISTRICT N 23,759 26,982 24,473 36,857 60,893 88,815 84,677 73,950 142,235 220,115 306,001 291,425 iTOLVA1S 1 1,589 2,343 2,379 5,094 8,143 9,541 8,783 9,451 38,785 76,974 98,583 74,507 d e I K 2.523 18.489 41.617 54.784 44.608 mQ (D131
I'iarch 13, 1972
WEST BENGAL- CONSUMPTION OF N, P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 TO 1970/71
(Metric Ton Nutrients)
District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71
Bankars N 699 408 575 358 720 1;665 956 1,098 1,485 1,132 1,700 3,709 p 215 190 239 230 304 516 377 48 317 153 1,176 531 K 756 499
Birbhum N 1,234 754 1,154 680 1,365 2,304 2,588 3,378 5,439 3,863 3,960 5,953 P 506 193 264 322 555 620 453 1,016 1,891 590 1,425 1,157 K 785 727
Burdwan N 2,541 1,969 2,975 2,682 4,270 5,698 8,382 5,660 7,138 5,134 6,796 7,686 P 863 688 953 1,701 2,032 3,495 2,551 440 1,585 504 1,573 1,583 K 1,279 1,591
Cooch Behar N 193 140 340 130 160 130 120 194 123 1,120 115 112 P 68 132 174 145 218 218 218 12 56 140 85 29 K 126 69
Darjeeling N 151 163 444 123 241 323 192 170 50 68 376 328 p 71 68 97 127 200 220 220 8 27 16 68 24 K 57 29
Hooghly N 1,600 2,585 3,258 1,869 1,977 6,226 2,336 3,042 4,169 3,158 7,877 6,893 P 620 809 1,134 1,483 1,832 4,384 3,200 605 1,621 665 2,576 2,495 K 4,498 2,541
Howrah N 271 430 621 580 621 498 314 486 1,112 351 743 1,313 p 113 338 458 567 694 265 193 22 136 85 271 229 K 309 239
Jalpaiguri N 231 69 252 60 77 143 176 337 66 116 197 283 p 81 53 60 55 74 74 74 4 36 25 43 19 K 63 21
Malda N 203 219 322 62 277 364 658 696 884 88 628 1,243 P 48 45 63 35 39 13 9 56 280 30 166 231 K 146 374
Midnapore N 1,126 1,094 1,644 1,255 1,993 1,768 1,892 1,841 2,039 1,648 3,381 4,456 p 618 614 829 1,109 1,317 1,131 826 59 298 119 1,314 787 K 398 710
Murshidabad N 975 637 958 563 908 1,180 1,876 1,604 2,610 3,906 2,705 2,713 P 239 242 323 350 494 370 270 74 238 112 552 456 K 467 445
Nadia N 434 389 578 232 208 458 780 670 932 730 2,312 2,616 P 57 156 211 60 112 202 147 54 135 88 760 427 K 720 298
Parganas N 805 1,552 2,544 1,611 1,870 2,655 3,274 2,438 3,101 3,345 2,474 5,224 P 189 561 759 791 968 987 721 293 986 384 1,543 929 K 829 680
Purusia N 46 137 188 57 94 163 163 169 60 71 1,867 737 p 29 [75 170 58 63 631 63 9 34 34 388 116 K 262 93
W. Din.ajpur N 244 [33 326 81 61 279 290 372 473 552 322 1,231 P 95 31 42 37 54 40 29 24 91 163 103 77 K 123 99
District N 10,753 10,679 16,179 10,343 14,842 23,854 23,906 22,155 29,681 25,282 35,453 44,497 Totals P 3,812 4,243 5,776 7,070 8,956 12,032 9,351 2,724 7,731 3,108 12,043 9,090 K 10,819 8.415
March 21, 1972 JAMMU-KASHMIR - CONSUMPTION OF N, P, AND K BY DISTRICT FROM 1959/60 TO-1970/71
(Metric Ton Nutrients)
District 1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 _.1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71
Anantnag N 2,192 1,664 794 1,199 P 1,095 1,017 251 384 K 319 441 61 129
Baramulla N 1,360 1,323 -826 659 p 329 908 110 115 K 110 574 78 58
Duda N 99. 47 42 30 P 18 12 6 8 K 7 4 7 555 Janmmu N 1,846 281 333 P 734 101 97 182 K 230 36 26 31
Kathua N 908 _62 85 187 P 396 34 67 124 K 98 12 54 24
Leh N -24 30 p 12 16 K 6 8
Poonch- N 127 347 37 30 Rajouri P 26 173 9 3 K 17 169 3 2
Srinagar N 667 946 555 592 p 128 453 77 242 K -28 268 38 31
Udhamapur N 105 33 35 32 P 44 25- 13 13 K 22 14 13 9
District N 449 544 649 820 1,008 1,439 1,814 3,329 7,189 4,696 2,731 3,314 Totals P 2,840 2,816 642 1,087 K 845 1,524 283 299
March 11, 1972 EERTILIE CONSNUMPTIONBY STATES 1959/60 TO 1970/71
('000 Metric Tons Nutrients)
1959/60 1960/61 1961/62 1962/63 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/70 1970/71 States N P N P N P N P B P N P N P N P N P N P N P
Andhra Pradeah 25.9 11.5 24.0 14.9 37.3 15.4 65.1 22.9 87.6 25.3 101.4 29.2 69.2 24.4 107.2 32.1 162.9 42.1 217.7 70.2 242.9 6o.4 218.6 63.6 Bihar 8.6 1.5 10.3 2.3 lo.6 2.7 15.4 3.5 18.9 4.8 22.7 7.0 27.2 5.6 26.2 4.4 46.2 14.4 43.4 12.4 70.4 26.7 63.6 18.0 Gujarat 6.6 3.2 7.4 3.5 12.1 5.3 14.2 7.7 13.2 9.3 25.9 18.2 28.0 13.2 50.4 23.6 47.1 27.5 52.6 30.7 65.1 39.0 io6. 53.0 Haryana 2.1 NA 2.4 .1 3.5 .1 4.1 .2 8.5 .4 14.4 .7 13.8 .7 13.8 .7 31.8 2.1 42.5 '6.1 47.0 5.1 61.o 6.9 Kerala 5.1 2.4 5.5 4.7 9.1 i0.6 11.7 11. 4 13.8 12.1 18.8 19.3 21.7 20.7 35.9 23.4 36.8 23.5 38.9 25.3 20.0 13.2 26.0 14.o Madhya Pradesh 5.7 .6 5.5 .6 6.3 1.1 7.6 1.8 9.5 2.7 13.9 5.2 15.8 7.5 16.o 5.7 15.7 7.0 21.6 7.3 34.2 i145 51.3 25.1 Maharashtra 10.9 4.4 12.8 4.9 17.0 5.8 18.7 7.7 29.0 9.3 52.0 14.2 33.7 18.4 71.8 18.3 - 94.2 44.i 126.3 68.7 89.9 34.o 211.2 52.0 Mysore 6.9 2.3 10.9 3.1 13.0 4.1 17.9 25.9 26.3 9.4 35.1 9.3 33.0 9.3 38.8 17.4. 47.7 18.8 62.1 20.7 87.0 31.0 92.5 37.5 Orissa 4.8 .3 4.3 .3 4.3 .5 5.0 .8 5.6 .9 7.0 1.7 7.8 1.1 12.9 4.1 14.0 5.4 i6.o 5.0 17.8 4.8 20.3 5.5 Punjab 4.7 .1 2.5 .1 8.9 .6 16.4 1.0 25.5 1.9 40.9 3.1 42.2 3.2 43.8 4.4 88.1 14.7 133.7 30.5 146.8 21.0 174.7 31.4 Rajasthan 1.2 .2 .9 .3 2.4 .6 3.6 .7 5.2 1.2 10.3 1.1 9.8 1.8 13.9 1.9 18.1 4.8 23.0 5.8 31.4 8.2 4o.6 11.7 Tamil Nadu 19.7 5.1 20.4 5.9 23.4 7.9 44.8 10.3 53.4 11.1 76.6 25.0 72.3 28.6 80.7 42.9 97.8 29.1 103.3 34.5 147.9 41.6 172.7 72.1 Uttar Pradesh 23.8 1.6 27.0 2.3 24.5 2.4 36.9 5.1 60.9 8.1 88.8 9.5 84.7 8.8 74.0 9.5 142.2 38.8 22o.1 77.0 306.0 98.6 291.4 74.5 West Bengal lo.8 3.8 10.7 4.2 16.2 5.8 10.3 7.1 14.8 9.0 23.9 12.0 23.9 9.4 22.2 2.7 29.7 7.7 25.3 3.1 35.5 12.0 44.5 9.1
TOTAL 136.7 37.0 144.6 47.3 188.7 62.8 271.8 86.1 372.2 105.5 531.9 155.6 483.2 152.4 607.5 190.9 872.3 279.9 1,126.5 397.2 1341.9 41o.1 1,474.4 474.4
Himachal Pradesh NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.2 .6 1.6 .5 2.9 .4 4.4 .8 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 Jammu and Kashmir NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7.2 2.8 4.7 2.8 2.7 o.6 3.3 1.1 Assam NA NA NA NA NA NA .2 .1 .4 .2 1.2 .9 1.3 1.7 1.4 1.2 2.3 1.4 4.3 2.5 4.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 Delhi NA NA NA NA .2 NA .2 NA .3 NA .3 .1 .7 .1 1.0 .3 1.5 .7 2.1 .2 2.0 NA 3.0 1.0 Goa NA NA NA NA NA NA .4 NA .5 .2 .5 .2 .6 .1 1.2 1.3 .6 .9 .4 .1 NA NA 1.0 NA Manipur, Tripura, Nagaland NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA .1 NA .3 .1 .5 .1 .4 .2 .4 .2 .7 .2 1.0 NA NA NA Pondicherry NA NA NA NA .5 NA .7 NA .8 .1 .7 .1 .7 .1 .9 .2 1.9 .9 .7 .1 3.0 NA 3.0 NA Tea Board (N.E. India) NA NA NA NA 15.9 NA 13.9 NA 22.4 NA 17.7 NA 19.9 7.7 19.0 .1 19.9 NA 24.0 3.2 26.o 4.o 28.0 5.0 U.P.A.S.T. NA NA NA NA 9.9 NA 4.3 NA 7.8 NA 6.8 NA 10.2 NA 11.1 NA 9.2 NA 11.9 .3 10.0 3.0 11.0 4.0 Coffee Board NA NA NA NA 11.2 NA 8.8 NiA 6.6 NA 6.3 NA 7.7 NA 12.9 NA 1.7 KA 15.7 .3 14.o 4.o 15.0 4.o Rubber Board NA NA NA NA 1.0 NA 1.6 NA 1.3 NA 1.5 NA i.4 NA 1.7 NA .1 NA 1.3 NA 1.0 NA 1.0 NA
GRAND TOTAL 136.7 37.0 144.6 47.3 227.4 62.8 301.9 86.2 412.4 i06.0 567.2 157.0 527.4 162.8 658.7 194.7 920.0 287.2 1,96.7 4107.7 14so8.6 424.7 L547.7 493.5
NA - Not Available Totals may not tally due to rounding of data Estimates were used for soe of the states in 1970/71
5 x
Projection III - Andhra Pradesh Districts - Demand For Fertilizers
N = Nitrogen, P - Phosphate Metric Tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District N P N P N P N P N P N P
Adilabad 22 5 27 7 32 10 39 13 47 18 54 22 Anantapur 50 8 60 11 71 18 85 26 99 35 114 46 Chittoor 46 22 59 28 74 35 90 45 109 54 131 65 Cuddapah 158 23 185 35 216 48 247 70 285 95 329 127 E. Godavari 201 45 250 55 309 68 365 82 420 98 470 119 Guntur 306 116 378 147 463 184 546 222 623 267 703 309 Hyderahad 62 31 76 38 96 45 112 56 129 65 147 73 Karirnnagar 63 19 75 24 89 30 106 37 125 46 148 58 Khanmman 26 8 33 10 40 13 50 17 58 22 69 27 Krishna 294 101 363 128 445 160 525 194 603 229 681 265 Kurnool 203 95 247 115 296 139 356 167 426 201 506 246 Mahbubnagar 51 17 63 21 77 29 93 39 112 46 132 58 Medak 38 6 45 8 53 11 62 15 72 20 83 28 Nalgonda 40 9 52 13 65 18 81 22 99 27 118 33 Nizamabad 125 57 155 71 192 87 227 104 263 120 300 136 Nellore 70 20 88 27 107 37 130 48 156 60 184 76 Srikakulan 33 5 42 8 51 12 61 18 72 24 83 32 Visakhapatnam 30 1 39 5 50 7 61 9 73 13 86 17 Warangal 60 23 72 29 86 35 102 43 123 52 145 65 W. %ldavari 298 87 367 113 447 145 524 179 602 212 671 255
State Total 2176 701 2676 893 3259 1131 3862 1106 4496 1701 515 205i
I:3 Mr Projection I.;I - Assam DistrictS- Demand For Fertilizers
N = Nitrogen, P - Phosphate (00 Metric tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District N P N P N P N P N P N P
Cachar 4 3 4 3 5 3 5 4 6 4 6 5 Darrang 4 2 4 3 5 3 5 4 6 4 6 5 Garo Hills 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Goalpara 5 2 5 2 5 3 6 3 6 4 7 4 K & J Hills 4 6 5 6 5 7 6 7 6 8 8 8 Kamrup 10 3 10 4 11 4 11 5 12 6 13 7 Lakhimpiir 4 3 4 3 5 3 5 3 5 4 6 4 Mikert N.C. Hills 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Milo Hills 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - Nowgang 5 2 5 3 6 3 6 4 7 4 7 5 Sibsagar 4 3 5 3 5 3 5 4 6 4 6 5
State Total 43 24 45 29 51 31 53 36 58 40 63 4 Projection lII - Bihar Districts - Demand For Fertilizer N = Nitrogen, P = Phosphate (00 Metric tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District N P N P N P N P N P N P
Bhagalpur 10 3 13 4 16 5 19 7 23 9 27 12 Champaran 40 19 53 26 67 33 83 41 100 51 120 61 Darbhanga 33 9 43 13 54 17 66 22 80 28 96 33 Dhanbad 3 - 3 1 4 1 5 2 6 2 6 3 Gaya 46 7 59 12 73 17 88 24 104 32 122 41 Hazaribagh 6 2 8 3 10 4 13 5 15 7 18 9 Monghyr 27 5 35 8 43 12 51 17 61. 22 73 26 Muzaffapur 28 7 36 10 46 13 57 16 69 20 83 24 Palamau 2 1 3 1 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 3 Patna 62 4 77 7 92 13 107 23 122 36 137 52 Purnea 17 9 22 12 28 15 36 18 44 22 54 25 Ranchi 10 3 13-: 5 16 6 20 8 25 10 30 13 Saharsa 9 6 12 7 16 9 19 11 23 14 28 17 Santhal Parganas 9 2 11 3 14 4 18 5 22 7 26 10 Saran 52 12 64 17 78 24 94 32 112 41 132 51 Shahabad 80 30 100 41 121 55 145 72 170 94 200 117 Singhbhum 3 2 4 2 5 3 6 4 8 5 10 6
State Total 437 121 5 172 686 233 831 309 989 402 i 503
c.lz Projection III Gujgrat Districts - Demand for Fertilizer§
N = Nitrogen, P = Phosphate (00 Metric tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 Districts N P N P N P N P N P N P
Ahmedabad 38 17. 45 22 52 28 63 34 72 44 83 56 Amreli 47 37 57 45 68 54 81 66 96 80 114 -. Banaskantha 97 14 5 19 7 25 10 32 14 42 20 56 27 Baroda 49 12 5.8 16 68 21 79 28 90 38 104 50 Bhavnagar 27 28 33 34 40 40 48 48 57 58 69 69 Broach 21 12 25 15 30 20 36 26 43 32 51 39 Jamnagar 22 22 .27 27 34 34 43 42 51 51 61 61 Junagadh 28 48 36 57 45 66 55 78 67 93 80 112 Kaira 102 24 120 34 139 45 154 57 183 70 220 Kutch 84 7 1 9 2 11 3 14 5 18 7 24 10 Mehsana 33 4 42 7 55 11 72 17 96 25 123 40 Panchmahals 8 1 10 2 13 3 17 5 21 Rajkot 8 27 12 59 66 76 76 91 92 lo9 110 131 132 158 158 Sabarkantha 10 4 14 5 19 7 25 9 33 12 42 19 Surat-Bulsar 54 23 66 28 79 34 94 41 112 50 Surendranagar 135 60 7 3 8 4 11 6 14 8 20 10 27 13
Gujarat (Totals) 526 307 645 381 780 474 936 588 1,132 730 1-;3714 907 Projection III - Haryana DistrictS- Demand For .I'ertilizers
N = Nitrogen, P = Phosphate (00 iMetric tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 N P N P N P N P N P N P Ambala-Rupar 97- 17 123 25 154 35 189 50 226 Gurgaon 34 4 43 7 70 252 100 Hissar 55 13 72 20 94 30 76 7 99 12 122 45 Karnal 130 20 172 30 228 45 166 30 210 45 298 71 Mohindergarh 257 70 311 100 370 140 7 - 9 1 11 407 200 Rohtak 1 13 4 16 6 20 45 3 60 5 78 10 lo 100 18 130 30 171 45 Haryana (Totals) 425 61 544 95 685 149 857 222 1064 321 1,270 471 Projection III - Kerala DistrictS- Demand For Fertlizers
N - Nitrogen, P = Phosphate (00 Metric Tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-7h District N P N P N P N P N P N P Alleppy 48 29 58 38 70 49 81 60 92 71 103 82 Cannanore 15 13 18 17 22 21 26 25 30 30 3h 3h Ernakulam 23 21 28 26 34 33 40 h40 6 h6 53 52 Kottayam 102 65 128 80 156 100 180 125 203 150 221 180 KozhiKode 71 h8 88 60 107 75 121 95 135 115 150 135 Palghat i8 15 57 21 67 29 79 35 88 is 96 54 Quilon 33 24 41 30 51 37 60 is 69 52 77 60 Trichur 29 22 36 27 is 33 53 39 61 45 69 52 Trivandrum 20 16 25 20 31 24 37 28 i2 3i i7 39
Kerala. (Totals) 389 253 479 319 582 hOl 677 491 766 587 850 688 Projection III - Madhya Pradesh DistrictS- Demand For Fertilizers
N = Nitrogen. P = Phosphate (00 TMetric tons)
1968_-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 Districts N. P N P N P N P N P N P
Balaghat 4 1 5 2 6 3 8 3 10 4 12 6 Bastar 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 3 5 3 6 4 Betul 3 - 3 1 4 2 5 2 7 3 9 4 Bhind 3 - 3 1 4 1 5 2 7 2 8 4 Bilaspur 25 3 33 5 40 8 47 12 55 17 63 24 Chattarpur 4 2 6 3 8 3 10 5 14 7 19 9 Chindwara 4 1 5 2 7 2 9 3 12 4 16 6 Damoh 1 - 1 - 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 Datia 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 2 1 Dewas 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 4 2 6 2 Dhar 4 1 5 2 7 3 9 4 12 5 16 7 Durg 30 5 39 7 49 10 60 13 72 17 84 23 Guna 2 - 2 1 3 1 4 1 6 2 7 3 Gwalior 5 1 6 2 8 3 10 4 14 5 18 8 Hoshangabad 1 - 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 4 2 Indore 5 2 6 3 9 4 12 5 16 7 21 10 Jabalpur 4 2 5 3 7 3 9 4 13 5 17 7 Jhabua 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 4 3 Khandwa (E. Nimar) 9 2 10 3 12 4 14 6 16 8 18 10 Mandla 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 4 2 Mandsaur 8 14 16 14 24 16 33 20 44 27 60 36 Morena 2 1 3 1 3 2 5 2 6 3 9 4 Narsingpur 2 1 3 1 3 2 5 2 7 3 9 4 Panna - - 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 2 1 Raigarh 7 3 8 4 10 5 13 6 16 8 20 10
9'0cIm*
. . Madhya Frad*e,s h DistrictS
196b-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District N P N P N P N P N P N P
Raipur 49 7 61 12 74 19 88 28 102 39 117 52 Raisen 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 4 2 6 2 Rajgarh 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 Ratlam 3 2 5 2 7 3 9 4 12 5 16 7 Rewa 5 1 6 2 8 2 9 3 11 4 12 6 Sagar 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 5 3 Satna 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 4 2 5 3 Sehore 6 1. 7 2 10 3 13 4 16 7 21 10 Seoni 1 - 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 Shahdol 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 Shajapur 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 3 6 3 8 4 Shivpuri 2 - 2 1 3 1 4 2 5 2 7 3 Sidhi 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 Surguja 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 3 6 4 Tikamgarh 9 4 12 5 16 7 21 10 29 13 39 18 Ujjain 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 6 3 8 4 Vidisha ------1 - 1 - West Nimar 6 3 7 4 9 5 11 7 13 8 15 10 Madhva Pradesh (Totals) ),IsR 71 84 Qq 15 238 71_ 323
rI1Q Projection III - Maharashtra DistrictS- Demand For Fertilizers
N = Nitrogen, P = Phosphate (00 Metric tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District N P N P N P N P N P N P
Ahmednagar 146 84 180 loo 216 120 253 150 300 184 351 230 Akola. 42 20 51 25 63 32 79 41 92 50 log 61 Amravati 11 6 14 7 18 9 22 11 27 13 31 17 Aurangabad 37 24 46 30 59 36 72 46 84 58 98 72 Bhandara 8 4 11 5 15 6 18 8 22 10 27 13 Bhir 10 3 13 4 16 5 20 7 25 9 30 12 Buldana 71 26 83 36 94 48 U10 61 128 77 150 96 Chanda 9 5 12 6 16 7 20 9 24 12 30 15 Dhulia 85 58 104 70 126 83 151 100 180 120 215 146 Jalgaon 137 64 161 84 188 106 219 133 259 164 305 202 Kolaba 37 23 45 30 55 37 63 46 73 54 84 60 Kolhapur 113 91 140 114 174 139 206 165 240 1go 270 219 Nagpur 16 8 19 11 24 13 30 16 35 20 41 26 Nanded 14 7 17 9 21 11 26 14 31 17 37 21 Nasik 122 30 140 44 163 58 185 81 212 107 244 138 Osmanabad 39 17 47 22 59 28 70 38 82 48 96 60 Parbhani 26 11 32 13 38 18 46 24 56 29 66 35 Poona 28 16 35 20 43 25 54 31 64 38 74 48 Ratnagiri 33 23 42 27 53 32 64 37 74 43 84 49 Sangli 51 35 64 41 76 50 90 61 109 72 130 87 Satara .62 37 76 44 go 54 108 65 128 80 152 98 Sholapur 59 9 68 16 79 26 93 38 107 50 124 63 Thana 30 22 39 25 51 28 61 33 70 39 79 45 Wardha 15 23 22 25 30 29 40 34 45 40 60 46 Yeotmal 60 44 74 53 88 64 110 72 133 36 161 102
Maharashtra (Totals) 1,261 690 1,535 861 i,855 1,064 2,210 1,321 2.603 1,610 3,o48 1,961
zrD.2e^v0Tl - vyIsore DistrictS- Deinand For Fertilizers
IN = Mitrogen, P = Phosphaate (OC M,ietric tons)
1,96o-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 D strict . N P N P N P N P N P 6~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bangalore 46 34 57 40 70 47 85 55 101 67 122 80 Belga,m. 41 16 49 21 59 28 73 36 85 Bellary 46 100 57 59 8 69 13 79 20 90 28 104 38 118 52 Bidar 12 3 15 4 18 6 22 8 Bi.japur 25 10 30 13 20 5 24 7 28 10 34 14 40 18 Chikamagalur 46 23 10 7 13 9 17 11 21 13 26 16 Chittradurga 31 19 43 8 50 12 58 16 67 22 77 29 Coorg 89 39 3 5 5 5 7 5 9 6 11 Dharwar 7 14 9 24 11 30 13 36 18 45 23 53 28 64 33 Gulbarga 5 3 6 3 8 4 10 4 12 Hassan 14 7 15 9 19 11 24 14 29 18 35 22 41 27 Kolar 49 6 57 10 65 15 iMandya 74 23 84 32 96 43 125 42 150 58 176 80 203 101 229 124 255 146 M&sore 41 8 50 13 60 19 72 26 84 35 97 45 N. Kanara 6 3 8 4 10 4 12 5 14 Raichur 6 17 8 56 13 66 20 79 28 94 39 110 50 127 64 Shimoga 26 13 33 17 41 22 49 28 59 S. Kanara 35 70 43 18 6 22 8 28 10 34 13 41 16 Tumkur 48 20 20 8 25 10 31 13 37 18 43 23 51 28 Mysore (Totals) 691 208 748 278 894 370 i,o6o 480 1,233 1,430 756 Projection III - Orissa District5- Demand For Fertilizers
N = Nitrogen, P= Phosphate (00 Metric tons)
p 1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District N P N P N P N P N P N P
Balasore 7 1 8 3 10 3 13 4 16 5 19 7 Bolangir 6 4 8 5 10 6 13 7 17 9 21 11 Cuttack 42 10 52 17 62 26 73 36 86 47 100 59 Dhenkanal 2 1 3 2 4 2 6 2 7 3 8 4 Ganjam 43 8 52 15 -61 23 72 34 85 44 99 55 Kalahandi 2 1 3 1 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 3 Keonjhar 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 4 2 5 2 Koraput 9 4 12 5 16 6 20 8 25 10 30 13 Mayurbhanj 2 1 3 1 4 2 5 2 6 3 7 3 Phulbani 3 1 4 1 5 2 5 3 6 h 8 4 Puri 18 9 24 12 29 16 36 20 44 24 53 29 SambalpuLr 23 8 30 11 36 16 43 21 52 26 61 33 Sundargarh 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 4 2 5 3
Orissa (Totals) 159 50 203 75 247 106 297 142 358 181 423 226 Pro.jection III - Punjab DistrictS- Demand For Fertilizers
N = Nitrogen, P = Phosphate (00 Metrlc tons)
196S-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District. i p N P N P N P N P N P Amritsar 145 39 174 64 211 94 257 Bhatinda 128 312 165 364 204 136 18 166 35 197 60 231 287 Ferozepur 93 115 338 140 250 45 319 65 401 90 499 120 Gurdaspur 612 155 718 195. 84 14 100 28 119 45 141 65 Hoshiarpur 170 86 197 108 75 21 90 35 108 52 132 69 159 90 184 Jullundar 1h9 113 35 177 62 211 95 258 128 310 168 359 210 Kapurthala 40 12 48 19 60 26 73 36 88 47 101 59 Ludhiana 201 70 247 105 305 145 372 195 453 250 532 305 Patiala 114 26 136 46 162 71 198 96 240 125 279 155 Sangrur-Jind 143 25 179 40 220 60 260 93 320 118 375 145 Punjab (Totals) 1,337 305 1,636 499 1,994 738 2,421 1,023 2,951 1,319 3,447 1634 Projection III - Rajasthan DistrictS- Demand For Fertilizers
N = Nitrogen, P = Phosphate (00 Metric tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District N P N P N P N P N P N P
Ajmer 1 - 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 Alwar 11 1 14 2 18 4 22 7 28 10 37 15 Banswara 2 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 2 7 3 Barmer 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 2 - 2 - Bharatpur 6 2 8 3 11 4 14 6 18 8 24 11 Bhilwara 8 2 10 4 13 5 16 8 21 11 27 16 Bikaner - - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - Bundi 8 3 11 3 14 5 19 7 25 10 32 15 Chittorgarh 11 12 18 14 25 17 35 22 47 30 65 40 Churu 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - Durgapur - - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 2 1 Jalore 2 - 2 1 3 1 3 2 5 2 6 3 Jaipur 7 2 9 3 12 4 15 6 19 9 25 12 Jaisalbmer ------Jhalwar 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 6 2 Jhunjhunu 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 4 1 Jodhpur 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - Kotah 27 15 36 20 49 27 66 36 90 48 124 62 Nagaur 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - Pali 9 3 12 4 15 6 19 9 25 13 32 19 Sawai Madhopur 15 2 18 4 22 7 28 11 35 17 47 24 Sikar 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 1 2 1 2 1 Sirdhi 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 2 6 3 8 4 Ganganagar 103 11 131 21 165 41 212 6 6 275 103 366' 140 Tonk 2 - 2 - 2 1 3 1 3 2 5 2 Udaipur 8 2 10 3 13 5 16 S 21 11 2o 15
Rajasthan (Totals) 31 58 298 87 383 133 4 s )o 642 8 :5- 8S
C A Projection III - Tamil Nadu DistrictS- Demand For Fertilizers
N = Nitrogen, P - Phosphate (00 Metric tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District N P N P N P N P N P N P
Chingleput 77 33 92 45 109 59 126 74 143 89 158 105 Coimbatore 149 55 176 78 206 107 233 139 262 168 294 195 Kanyakumari 13 3 16 5 19 7 22 9 25 13 30 16 Madurai 78 20 92 33 109 48 129 64 151 84 177 105 Nilgiris 2 5 3 5 4 6 5 7 6 8 7 9 N. Arcot 91 23 110 36 130 52 155 70 183 90 212 116 Ramanathpuram 26 6 32 11 39 16 46 22 54 29 62 37 Salem-Dharmapuri 90 25 103 37 117 50 135 66 156 85 181 S. 108 Arcot 161 62 190 87 224 118 263 143 297 173 330 205 Thanjavur 167 51 194 77 227 107 260 137 293 167 326 197 Tiruchirpalli 112 44 134 61 158 82 180 105 203 127 225 150 Tirunelvelli 67 18 81 28 96 40 114 55 134 71 156 90 Tamil Nadu (Totals) Tg,2 3 503 1,38 692 1,668 891 1,9O7-158 1n33
Pro.le ion I-l - Uttar Pradesh District>- Demand. -or Fertilizers
= :7trogen, P = Phosphate ( 00 Metric tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 D-s r--t N P N P N P N P N P N P
Meerut DivisLon Dehra Dinm 6 2 7 3 9 4 10 6 12 8 14 10 Saharanpur 71 25 89 35 .111 48 136 64 165 83 187 108 Muzaffarnagar 109 31 134 48 165 68 212 82 252 112 283 150 Meerut 162 63 204 88 254 120 316 155 384 200 440 255 Bulandshahr 112 40 140 58 175 78 216 103 266 130 309 162
Agra Division Aligarh 48 19 60 27 74 37 90 50 109 65 125 82 Mathura 25 7 32 11 41 17 53 25 70 35 95 47 Agra 27 9 35 14 46 20 61 28 82 40 105 58 Mainpuri 34 9 41 14 51 20 63 27 74 37 83 49 Etah 36 9 46 14 54 20 66 28 78 38 88 50
Bareilly Division Bareilly 33 10 39 15 47 21 56 28 66 36 78 45 Bijnor 45 12 56 18 69 26 82 37 98 50 113 63 Budaun 43 13 55 20 68 28 83 38 100 50 115 64 Moradabad 86 22 106 35 129 51 157 70 189 92 218 117 Shahjahanpur 23 7 29 11 39 16 52 22 69 30 92 42 Pilibhit 22 9 27 13 33 17 40 22 47 28 55 35 Rampur 27 10 34 14 43 19 53 25 64 33 71 44
Kumaun Division Nainital 37 28 49 36 61 47 78 59 99 71 117 85
Allahabad Division Farrukhabad 74 23 94 33 116 46 142 62 171 82 196 105 Kanpur 44 13 56 19 70 26 85 35 102 47 115 63 Etawah 34 12 43 17 54 23 66 31 79 41 90 53 Fatehpur 13 2 16 4 19 7 22 10 26 13 30 16 Projection III - Uttar Pradesh DistrictS
N = Nitrogen, P = Phosphate ,(00 Metric tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District N P N P N P N P N P N P
Allahabad 45 17 55 25 66 33 80 43 95 54 111 68
Jhansi Division Jhansi 6 2 8 3 10 5 13 7 18 10 24 13 Jalaun 17 7 22 10 30 14 39 20 51 28 69 38 Hamirpur 5 2 7 2 9 2 12 4 15 6 20 10 Banda 5 3 7 3 10 4 12 6 16 9 21 12
Lucknow Division Lucknow 18 3 22 5 27 8 32 12 39 16 45 20 Unnao 11 3 14 5 18 7 23 11 30 16 40 23 Rai Bareli 19 5 23 8 28 12 33 16 35 21 46 26 Sitapur- 23 5 29 8 38 12 50 18 63 28 80 43 Hardoi 18 4 23 7 30 11 39 16 50 24 66 34 Kheri 24 8 30 12 39 18 51 26 68 36 92 48
Faizabad Division Faizabad 104 32 124 45 144 64 164 83 184 102 205 121 Gonda 94 35 116 50 141 66 176 80 237 104 238 135 Bahraich 21 10 27 15 33 20 40 2 4' 32 58 38 Sultanpur 43 15 53 21 64 28 77 37 .2 46 109 57 Pratapgarh 27 10 33 14 40 19 47 25 56 32 65 40 Bara Banki 86 26 102 37 122 49 142 62 162 76 176 92
Gorakhpur Division Gorakhpur 96 39 116 52 137 70 156o -- 1 195 129 Deoria 95 37 115 50 136 68 15 6 5C 12¾ 195 123 Basti 126 38 149 55 176 75 202 -- 252 141 Azangar h r 42 23 53 30 65 39 79, 11515 7( 210 V s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:-- N, Projection III - Uttar Pradesi: DistrictS
N= :itrc_en P = Phosphate ,SO Metric Tons)
1965-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 Dzr c. N PP N P N P P N P
Varanasi Division Varanasi 50 l8 61 26 74 35 88 46 105 58 124 72 Mirzapur 12 6 15 8 19 11 23 14 28 17 33 21 Jaunpur 45 18 55 25 67 33 81 43 96 55 113 68 Ghazipur 24 12 29 16 36 21 44 26 53 32 62 40 Ballia 26 12 32 16 39 21 47 27 56 34 66 42 Hill Districts -Almora 2 2 3 1 3 2 3 2 4 2 4 2 ChamolI 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 Ganhwal 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pithoragarh 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 Tehrigarhwal 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 Uttarkashi 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 Uttar Pradesh (Totals) 2,202 769 2,719 1,101 3,332 1,512 4,051 1,986 4,850 2,563 5,646
WV.
Projection III - West Bengal DistrictS- Demand For Fertilizers
N = Nitrogen, P a Phosphate (00 Metric
1960-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973- 7 4 Distriet- --N, -~P N P N P N P N P N P
Bankara 11 2 13 4 16 6 20 7 24 9 28 11 Birbhum 39 6 46 11 54 17 64 24 74 33 84 44 Burdwan 51 5 62 10 72 18 84 27 98 37 112 50 Cooch Behar 11 2 13 4 16 5 20 6 24 8 28 11 Darjeeling 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 2 1 Hooghly 31 7 38 11 45 16 53 23 62 30 71 39 Howrah 3 1 4 2 5 2 6 3 7 4 8 5 Jalpaiguri 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 Malda 1 - 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 Midnapore 17 1 20 3 24 6 30 7 38 9 46 12 Murshidabad 39 1 48 5 58 10 69 15 80 23 93 30 Nadia 7 1 9 2 11 3 13 4 15 6 19 8 Parganas 33 4 4i 8 49 14 57 21 65 30 74 40 Purulia 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 W. Dinaspur 6 1 8 2 9 3 11 4 14 5 16 7
West Bengal (Totals) 252 32 305 64 363 103 433 145 509 198 589 262 Projection III - Other Users-Demand For Fertilizers N = Nitrogen, P = Phosphate (00 Metric tons)
1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 District N P N P N P N P N P N P
Himachel Pradesh 4. 1 4 2 4 2 5 2 5 3 6 3 Jammu-Kashmir 5 3 5 3 6 3 6 4 7 4 8 4 Delhi 2 - 2 - 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 Goa 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Manipur, Tripuna-Nagaland 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - Pondicherry 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 2 1 2 1 TeaBoard N. E. India 24 3 26 4 28 5 30 6 33 7 36 8 UPASI 9 3 10 3 11 4 12 4 13 5 15 5 CoffegBoard 13 3 14 4 15 4 17 4 18 5 20 6 Rubber Board 1 -1 - 1 - 2 - 2 - -
Totals 61 14 65 17 70 20 77 22 84 27 95 29