Holocene Underkill

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Holocene Underkill COMMENTARY Holocene underkill Donald K. Grayson* Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 nthisissueofPNAS,Joneset al. However, not all were large: the short- vival well into the Holocene became (1) address an issue that has been faced skunk (Brachyprotoma), the Aztlan clear in 1976, when G. V. Morejohn with us, in one way or another, for hare (Aztlanolagus), and the diminutive (11) reported C. lawi bones in an ar- some 200 years. Around the year pronghorn (Capromeryx)weresmall,the chaeological site north of Santa Cruz, 1800,I French paleontologist Georges latter weighing no more than 15 kg. Al- California dated to between 5,400 and Cuvier established the reality of verte- though the timing of the losses is un- 3,800 14Cyearsago.Heestimatedthat brate extinction by using animals so clear, there is no reason to think that the extinction of this bird had occurred large that their future discovery on the any lasted significantly after Ϸ10,500 between 2,500 and 3,000 years ago. hoof was highly unlikely (2). Included 14Cyearsago,whereas16ofthemam- Jones et al. (1) now confirm that esti- on the list were some now known to mals are known to have existed beyond mate, presenting new radiocarbon dates have been late Pleistocene in age, in- 12,000 14Cyearsago.Some,however, showing the survival of Chendytes to cluding mammoth and mastodon. As cannot be shown to have survived the 3,000 14C, or Ϸ2,500 calibrated, years time went on, the list of extinct Ameri- last glacial maximum, some 22,000 to ago. Younger sites within what was once can and Eurasian mammals of this age 14 18,000 Cyearsago(7). Chendytes territory do not contain grew hand in hand with our understand- From the beginning, the fate of spe- Chendytes remains, suggesting that this ing of the geological deposits in which cies on islands has been critical to the date is likely to be very close to the the fossils were embedded. As this hap- overkill argument. Martin observed that pened, it became harder and harder to time of extinction in this area. understand why all of these extinctions The early literature on C. lawi under- standably focused on its morphology had occurred. Island extinctions in the Things became even more complex in and skeletal similarities and differences 1859, not because of the publication of Pacific were associated with other waterfowl and other flightless Darwin’s On the Origin of Species,but birds. Morejohn (11) speculated that the because that year also saw the recogni- with massive landscape bird likely bred on offshore islands tion that the animals had actually coex- where it would be relatively immune to isted with humans (3). Such coexistence modification. predation. This speculation was con- raised the possibility that the extinctions firmed with Daniel Guthrie’s report (12) had happened at least in part because of of both immature individuals and egg- shells in late Pleistocene sites on San human hunting. Soon after 1860 many in prehistoric island settings extinctions scientists agreed that people must have seemed to follow human colonization Miguel Island, one of California’s played some role in causing the losses. with great speed (moas in New Zealand, Channel Islands. So we now know that the bird sur- Pleistocene Overkill sloths in the Caribbean, flightless rails in Oceania); all seemed to have been vived until 2,500 years ago and that it During the ensuing century, it was gen- quickly doomed by the arrival of hu- nested on islands. We also know that erally thought that the extinctions were mans. Human hunters and naı¨ve prey coastal California, including its islands, most likely caused by a combination of could not, he argued, coexist in such has an archaeological record that ex- human predation and climate change. tends back into the latest Pleistocene All of that changed in 1967, with the settings: people arrived and extinction quickly followed. (13). The simple presence of a publication of a powerful paper by pa- Chendytes bone in the lowest level of leoecologist Paul S. Martin (4). Martin Chendytes lawi Daisy Cave, on San Miguel Island, dated observed that the North American ex- to 10,000 14Cyearsago,doesnotmean tinctions seemed to coincide with the The extinct flightless sea duck Chendytes lawi,discussedbyJoneset al. (1), pro- that it represents an animal hunted by first arrival of people here, a phenenomen people or even introduced into the site known as Clovis and dated to 11,000 14C vides an important counter-example. by them. However, it does show that (Ϸ13,000 calibrated) years ago, plus or Apparently most closely related to the people and the bird were at the same minus a few centuries (5). It was the eiders (Somateria)(8),C. lawi was de- place at the same time. In addition, the sudden arrival of human predators in fined by Loye Miller (9) in 1925 based Chendytes the Americas, he argued, that put an on two specimens from late Pleistocene fact that remains have been end to a diverse array of herbivores and deposits near Santa Monica, California. found at so many island and mainland the carnivores dependent on them, a He recognized it as a large species of archaeological sites, sometimes in great process that became known as ‘‘Pleisto- extinct waterfowl but because only leg number, strongly suggests that people cene overkill.’’ He soon argued that all elements were known, he could not tell were preying on them, although tapho- of this happened within a few hundred that it was flightless. That understanding nomic analysis of all of this material years, a ‘‘prehistoric blitzkrieg’’ (6). came in 1947 when Hildegarde Howard would be helpful. As Jones et al. (1) The loss of some 35 genera of North (10) announced the discovery of wing note, even the specimens from mainland American mammals toward the end of bones that showed the bird could the Pleistocene continues to be hotly not fly. debated. Most of the mammals involved For many years, it was widely as- Author contributions: D.K.G. wrote the paper. were huge: a ground sloth with the sumed that Chendytes had been lost to- The author declares no conflict of interest. height of a giraffe and the bulk of an ward the end of the Pleistocene, even See companion article on page 4105. elephant (Eremotherium)andabeaver though there were early reports of mate- *E-mail: [email protected]. the size of a black bear (Castoroides). rial from archaeological contexts. Sur- © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0801272105 PNAS ͉ March 18, 2008 ͉ vol. 105 ͉ no. 11 ͉ 4077–4078 sites likely reflect hunting activities on individualism’’ is the general rule, not turalists, but this is not quite true. Moas nearby islands. the exception. If that is the case, the were lost on both South and North Is- knotty problem of understanding the land, New Zealand, but most of South Holocene Underkill North American extinctions is not likely Island was too cold to support the tropi- This work establishes that people coex- to be solved until each species involved cal food plants so important elsewhere isted with, and fairly obviously preyed has been provided with its own history. in Oceania. However, island extinctions on, a flightless, ground-nesting bird for This process is well under way in Eur- in the Pacific were associated with mas- some 8,000 years. In the Greater Anti- asia, but has barely begun in North sive landscape modification, including lles, there is strong evidence that people America (19). burning and the introduction of exotic coexisted with ground sloths for 1,000 The intellectual history of Chendytes animals, most notably the Pacific rat years (14). We are thus now learning shows the pattern well. Once thought to (Rattus exulans)anddog.Thehuman that rapid extinction is not the only pos- have been part of a wave of Pleistocene arrival on islands in other parts of the sible outcome for such vulnerable spe- extinctions, it is now known to have world was also routinely associated with cies as flightless ducks and huge sloths, lasted well into the Holocene. The same significant habitat alteration. All agree even if it is a common one. We are also can be said for many other species, giant that it was not just human hunting that learning that late Pleistocene species deer and muskox in Eurasia, for in- contributed to species loss in island set- that became stranded on islands did not stance, and the North American vam- tings, but the many and varied impacts always require a human presence to end pire bat Desmodus stocki,allnowknown that people had on the landscape. For breeding populations of Chendytes their existence. Mammoths became ex- to have lasted into, and sometimes deep on the Channel Islands, one such addi- tinct on St. Paul Island in the Bering into, the Holocene (17, 20, 21). Al- tional impact is provided by the fox, Sea after 5,700 14Cyearsagoeven though it is unlikely that any of the Urocyon littoralis,seeminglyintroduced though people did not arrive there until North American genera involved in the by people by at least the middle Holo- historic times (15, 16). A similar event debate survived this long, it remains cene, before the bird’s extinction (ref. 23 occurred in Ireland and on the Isle of fully possible that substantial losses and T. Rick, personal communication). Man, where the giant deer Megaloceros occurred long before the 11,000 year 14 As Jones et al. (1) observe, dogs may was lost shortly after 11,000 Cyears date that has been the focus of the have played a role as well, as might the ago, again before people arrived (17).
Recommended publications
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 99, NUMBER 4 A CHECK-LIST OF THE FOSSIL BIRDS OF NORTH AMERICA BY ALEXANDER WETMORE Assistant Secretary, Smithsonian Institution (Publication 3587) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION JUNE 18, 1940 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 99, NUMBER 4 A CHECK-LIST OF THE FOSSIL BIRDS OF NORTH AMERICA BY ALEXANDER WETMORE Assistant Secretary, Smithsonian Institution (Publication 3587) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION JUNE 18, 1940 Z^t £ovi) i^a{fttnore (pnea BALTIMORE, MD., U. 8. A. A CHECK-LIST OF THE FOSSIL BIRDS OF NORTH AMERICA By ALEXANDER WETMORE Assistant Secretary, Smithsonian Institution Since publication of the last complete list of the fossil birds of North America, which appeared in the Fourth Edition of the Check- list of North American Birds of the American Ornithologists' Union in October 1931, there have been many changes and additions, both in species found only in fossil state and in modern forms recorded from Pleistocene and (rarely) earUer deposits. This information is widely scattered so that it seems pertinent now to gather it together and to present the entire list again for the use of all who may be interested. The material that follows is complete so far as records have come to attention to January 1940. In preparing this paper every species included has been checked carefully against the original records, and data pertaining to geologic distribution have been revised. As in the fourth edition of the A. O. U. Check-list, all modern forms for which there are fossil records have been included.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Extinctions on California's
    Flightless ducks, giant mice and pygmy mammoths: Late Quaternary extinctions on California’s Channel Islands Torben C. Rick, Courtney A. Hofman, Todd J. Braje, Jesu´ s E. Maldonado, T. Scott Sillett, Kevin Danchisko and Jon M. Erlandson Abstract Explanations for the extinction of Late Quaternary megafauna are heavily debated, ranging from human overkill to climate change, disease and extraterrestrial impacts. Synthesis and analysis of Late Quaternary animal extinctions on California’s Channel Islands suggest that, despite supporting Native American populations for some 13,000 years, few mammal, bird or other species are known to have gone extinct during the prehistoric human era, and most of these coexisted with humans for several millennia. Our analysis provides insight into the nature and variability of Quaternary extinctions on islands and a broader context for understanding ancient extinctions in North America. Keywords Megafauna; island ecology; human-environmental interactions; overkill; climate change. Downloaded by [Torben C. Rick] at 03:56 22 February 2012 Introduction In earth’s history there have been five mass extinctions – the Ordovician, Devonian, Permian, Triassic and Cretaceous events – characterized by a loss of over 75 per cent of species in a short geological time period (e.g. 2 million years or less: Barnosky et al. 2011). Although not a mass extinction, one of the most heavily debated extinction events is the Late Quaternary extinction of megafauna, when some two-thirds of large terrestrial mammalian genera (444kg) worldwide went extinct (Barnosky et al. 2004). Explanations for this event include climate change, as the planet went from a glacial to interglacial World Archaeology Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Verification and Reverification: Problems in Archaeofaunal Studies
    J. Ethnobiol. 6(1):9-18 Sunnner 1986 VERIFICATION AND REVERIFICATION: PROBLEMS IN ARCHAEOFAUNAL STUDIES AMADEO M. REA Curator of Birds and Mammals Natural History Museum Post Office Box 1390 San Diego, CA 92112 ABSTRACT.-Biological materials from archaeological excavations, particularly faunal remains, are of most lasting scientific value if they are properly handled, individually numbered, and adequately reported in published accounts. Archaeologists are urged never to put bones in plastic bags. Authors of faunal accounts are encouraged to publish reasons for their determinations, to mention comparative materials used, and to give individual identifying numbers and element descriptions with their proveniences to aid subsequent study and reverification. Knowledge of the local fauna enhances the validity of interpreta­ tions. Better appreciation of the culture and its particular technology would improve biologists' accounts. Archaeological bones have been used in reconstruction of past diets and environments. They are of use to both paleontologists and neontologists. A signifi­ cant contribution of biological materials is the demonstration of human-wrought modifica­ tions (particularly insular extinctions and extirpations) in species densities. Existing com­ parative osteological collections are weak in quantity and sometimes poor in quality; 820/0 of the world's ca. 9,000 bird species are represented by ten or fewer skeletons in museums worldwide. INTRODUCTION The very basis of science is empirical evidence. The taxonomic disciplines are based on specimen documentation, publicly available, subject to reverification. Ethnobiological studies are no exception. The biological specimens that a native consultant associates with her or his ethnotaxonomic identifications (voucher specimens, see Bye 1986),together with that person's critical comments, should be available to future workers once the research is published.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitogenomics Supports an Unexpected Taxonomic Relationship for the Extinct Diving Duck Chendytes Lawi and Definitively Places the Extinct Labrador Duck ⁎ Janet C
    Buckner, et al. Published in Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution, 122:102-109. 2018 Mitogenomics supports an unexpected taxonomic relationship for the extinct diving duck Chendytes lawi and definitively places the extinct Labrador Duck ⁎ Janet C. Bucknera, Ryan Ellingsona, David A. Goldb, Terry L. Jonesc, David K. Jacobsa, a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States b Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States c Department of Social Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 9340, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Chendytes lawi, an extinct flightless diving anseriform from coastal California, was traditionally classified as a sea Biodiversity duck, tribe Mergini, based on similarities in osteological characters. We recover and analyze mitochondrial Anatidae genomes of C. lawi and five additional Mergini species, including the extinct Labrador Duck, Camptorhynchus Ancient DNA labradorius. Despite its diving morphology, C. lawi is reconstructed as an ancient relictual lineage basal to the Labrador duck dabbling ducks (tribe Anatini), revealing an additional example of convergent evolution of characters related to Mitochondrial genome feeding behavior among ducks. The Labrador Duck is sister to Steller’s Eider which may provide insights into the California paleontology Duck evolution evolution and ecology of this poorly known extinct species. Our results demonstrate that inclusion of full length mitogenomes, from taxonomically distributed ancient and modern sources can improve phylogeny reconstruc- tion of groups previously assessed with shorter single-gene mitochondrial sequences. 1. Introduction an extended study by Livezey (1993) suggested placement in the eider genus Somateria.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Anseriform Genus and Species from the Nebraska Pliocene
    A NEW ANSERIFORM GENUS AND SPECIES FROM THE NEBRASKA PLIOCENE LESTER L. SHORT AMONGavian fossilson loan to me from the University of Nebraska State Museumis the tarsometatarsusof a goose-likeanseriform bird from the early Plioceneof Nebraska. The tarsometatarsushas somefeatures of geeseand swans,and of the anatinetribe Tadornini,but it alsotends somewhattoward the Cairinini in someof its features. Comparisonwith extant and fossilAnseriformes in the American Museum of Natural History and the United States National Museum and a study of the literature have convincedme that this tarsometatarsusrepresents an undescribed speciesthat is sufficientlydistinct to warrant placementin a new genus. I thank the authoritiesof the above-mentionedmuseum for their help in conductingmy studies.I am gratefulto CharlesG. Sibley,who originally borrowedthe fossil,for permissionto studyit. It is a pleasureto acknowl- edgethe aid of C. B. Schultzfor the loan of the material, and H. B. Gundersonof the Universityof NebraskaState Museumfor usefulinfor- mationconcerning the fossil. The use and potential importance of stereophotographyin avian paleontologyhas beendiscussed by Cracraft (1968: 3-4). I hope the stereophotographsreproduced here will facilitatecomparisons by avian paleontologists. Heteroehen, new genus Type of genus.--Heterochenpratensis, new species. Diagnosis.--Anseriformtarsometatarsus, near the size of Anser anser, and characterizedby: trochleaenot spreadgreatly as in modern swans, geeseand sheldrakes;outer surfacegently curving toward distal end
    [Show full text]
  • A Giant Anseriformes of the Neogene of The
    Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on January 11, 2017 The extreme insular adaptation of Garganornis rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org ballmanni Meijer, 2014: a Research giant Anseriformes of the Cite this article: Pavia M, Meijer HJM, Rossi Neogene of the MA, Göhlich UB. 2017 The extreme insular adaptation of Garganornis ballmanni Meijer, 2014: a giant Anseriformes of the Neogene of Mediterranean Basin the Mediterranean Basin. R. Soc. open sci. 1 2 4: 160722. Marco Pavia , Hanneke J. M. Meijer , Maria Adelaide http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160722 Rossi3 and Ursula B. Göhlich4 1Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Museo di Geologia e Paleontologia, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso 35, 10125 Torino, Italy Received: 20 September 2016 2Department of Natural History, University Museum, University of Bergen, Postboks Accepted: 5 December 2016 7800, 5007 Bergen, Norway 3Soprintendenza archeologia, belle arti e paesaggio dell’Abruzzo, Via degli Agostiniani 14, 66100 Chieti, Italy 4Department of Geology and Paleontology, Natural History Museum Vienna, Subject Category: Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria Earth science MP, 0000-0002-5188-4155 Subject Areas: palaeontology New skeletal elements of the recently described endemic giant anseriform Garganornis ballmanni Meijer, 2014 are presented, coming from the type-area of the Gargano and from Scontrone, Keywords: southern and central Italy, respectively. The new remains fossil bird, Anseriformes, flightlessness, represent the first bird remains found at Scontrone so far, and insular gigantism, Miocene, Italy another shared element between these two localities, both part of the Apulia-Abruzzi Palaeobioprovince. The presence of a very reduced carpometacarpus confirms its flightlessness, only previously supposed on the basis of the very large size, while Author for correspondence: the morphologies of tarsometatarsus and posterior phalanges Marco Pavia clearly indicate the adaptation of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Chendytes, a Diving Goose from the California Pleistocene (With Drawings)
    July, 1925 145 CHENDYTES, A DIVING GOOSE FROM THE CALIFORNIA PLEISTOCENE WITH SET OF DRAWINGS By LCYE MILLER OME MONTHS ago Dr. Frank C. Clark of Santa Monica, California, placed in my hands for description, a small collection of bird bones which he had S accumulated while collecting invertebrate remains from a Pleistocene deposit just north of Santa Monica. This exposure is presumably part of the Upper San Pedro horizon of Ralph Arnold (M em. Calif. Acad. Sci., III, 1903), although a check of the invertebrate fauna has not been carefully made. The accumulation is typical littoral marine such as is exposed at the lumber yard, one .of Arnold’s collecting stations. The matrix is heterogeneous sand and gravel laid down in shallow water, rich in molluscan remains and containing water-worn specimens of numerous verte- brates. The bird remains here discussedhave all undergone change in composition comparable to those specimens taken at the lumber yard in San Pedro. The organic matter appears to have entirely disappeared, leaving the specimens very porous and highly absorbent like unglazed pottery. Much mineral matter seems to have been laid down within the tissue and the specimensclink together with a vitreous sound; but the larger cavities have not been filled by crystals. At least three speciesof birds are represented in the collection, only two of which are determinable. One of these two still survives ‘as a common member of the local avifauna, the Farallon Cormorant. The other speciesis of especial interest as repre- senting a gigantic species of diving anserine, heretofore unknown to science.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins and Antiquity of the Island F0 0000000000 65535 F 0000075452
    Quaternary Research 71 (2009) 93–98 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yqres Origins and antiquity of the island fox (Urocyon littoralis) on California's Channel Islands Torben C. Rick a,⁎, Jon M. Erlandson b,c, René L. Vellanoweth d, Todd J. Braje e, Paul W. Collins f, Daniel A. Guthrie g, Thomas W. Stafford Jr. h a Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. 20013-7012, USA b Museum of Natural and Cultural History, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403-1224, USA c Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1218, USA d Department of Anthropology, California State University, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA e Department of Anthropology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, USA f Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, CA 93105, USA g Joint Science Department, Claremont Colleges, Claremont, CA 91711-5916, USA h Stafford Research, Inc., 200 Acadia Avenue, Lafayette, CO 80026, USA article info abstract Article history: The island fox (Urocyon littoralis) is one of few reportedly endemic terrestrial mammals on California's Received 16 February Channel Islands. Questions remain about how and when foxes first colonized the islands, with researchers Available online 18 January 2009 speculating on a natural, human-assisted, or combined dispersal during the late Pleistocene and/or Holocene. A natural dispersal of foxes to the northern Channel Islands has been supported by reports of a few fox bones Keywords: from late Pleistocene paleontological localities. Direct AMS 14C dating of these “fossil” fox bones produced Island fox dates ranging from ∼6400 to 200 cal yr BP, however, postdating human colonization of the islands by several Urocyon littoralis Animal translocation millennia.
    [Show full text]
  • Caudipteryx As a Non-Avialan Theropod Rather Than a Flightless Bird
    Caudipteryx as a non−avialan theropod rather than a flightless bird GARETH J. DYKE and MARK A. NORELL Dyke, G.J. and Norell, M.A. 2005. Caudipteryx as a non−avialan theropod rather than a flightless bird. Acta Palaeontolo− gica Polonica 50 (1): 101–116. Caudipteryx zoui is a small enigmatic theropod known from the Early Cretaceous Yixian Formation of the People’s Re− public of China. From the time of its initial description, this taxon has stimulated a great deal of ongoing debate regarding the phylogenetic relationship between non−avialan theropods and birds (Avialae) because it preserves structures that have been uncontroversially accepted as feathers (albeit aerodynamically unsuitable for flight). However, it has also been pro− posed that both the relative proportions of the hind limb bones (when compared with overall leg length), and the position of the center of mass in Caudipteryx are more similar to those seen in extant cusorial birds than they are to other non−avialan theropod dinosaurs. This conclusion has been used to imply that Caudipteryx may not have been correctly in− terpreted as a feathered non−avialan theropod, but instead that this taxon represents some kind of flightless bird. We re− view the evidence for this claim at the level of both the included fossil specimen data, and in terms of the validity of the re− sults presented. There is no reason—phylogenetic, morphometric or otherwise—to conclude that Caudipteryx is anything other than a small non−avialan theropod dinosaur. Key words: Dinosauria, Theropoda, Avialae, birds, feathers, Yixian Formation, Cretaceous, China. Gareth J.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Overkill and North American Mammalian Extinctions
    AN44CH03-Meltzer ARI 29 September 2015 10:49 Pleistocene Overkill and North American Mammalian Extinctions David J. Meltzer Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2015. 44:33–53 Keywords The Annual Review of Anthropology is online at Clovis, megafauna, hunting, extinction, climate change, ancient DNA anthro.annualreviews.org This article’s doi: Abstract 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013854 Clovis groups in Late Pleistocene North America occasionally hunted several Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2015.44:33-53. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Copyright c 2015 by Annual Reviews. now extinct large mammals. But whether their hunting drove 37 genera of Access provided by Southern Methodist University on 10/22/15. For personal use only. All rights reserved animals to extinction has been disputed, largely for want of kill sites. Overkill proponents argue that there is more archaeological evidence than we ought to expect, that humans had the wherewithal to decimate what may have been millions of animals, and that the appearance of humans and the disappearance of the fauna is too striking to be a mere coincidence. Yet, there is less to these claims than meets the eye. Moreover, extinctions took place amid sweeping climatic and environmental changes as the Pleistocene came to an end. It has long been difficult to link those changes to mammalian extinctions, but the advent of ancient DNA, coupled with high-resolution paleoecological, radiocarbon, and archeological records, should help disentangle the relative role of changing climates and people in mammalian extinctions. 33 AN44CH03-Meltzer ARI 29 September 2015 10:49 INTRODUCTION Paleontologist Alfred Romer was perplexed.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Islands National Park Archaeological
    CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK ARCHAEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Authors Todd J. Braje Julia G. Costello Jon M. Erlandson Michael A. Glassow John R. Johnson Don P. Morris Jennifer E. Perry Torben C. Rick Compiler and Editor Michael A. Glassow Channel Islands National Park, Department of the Interior December 2010 Table of Contents List of Tables . iii List of Figures . iii Chapter 1. Introduction Environmental Context of Channel Islands National Park . 1.1 Changes in Archaeological Research and Resource Management since 1975 . 1.6 Significance of Cultural Resources within the Park . 1.7 Organization of the Volume . 1.8 Acknowledgements . 1.10 Chapter 2. Prehistory and History Prehistory . 2.1 History . 2.34 Chapter 3. Chumash Islanders at European Contact Introduction . 3.1 Culture History from Initial Contact through the Last Aboriginal Occupation . 3.1 Historic Chumash Rancherías . 3.6 Population Estimates . 3.15 Marriage and Family Patterns . 3.16 Sociopolitical Organization . 3.18 Conclusion . 3.19 Chapter 4. Prehistoric Archaeological Resources on Santa Barbara Island Status of Resource Inventories . 4.1 Project Descriptions . 4.3 Chapter 5. Prehistoric Archaeological Resources on Anacapa Island Status of Resource Inventories . 5.1 Project Descriptions . 5.3 Chapter 6. Prehistoric Archaeological Resources on Santa Cruz Island Status of Resource Inventories . 6.1 Project Descriptions . 6.9 Chapter 7. Prehistoric Archaeological Resources on Santa Rosa Island Status of Resource Inventories . 7.1 Project Descriptions . 7.3 Chapter 8. Prehistoric Archaeological Resources on San Miguel Island Status of Resource Inventories . 8.1 Project Descriptions . 8.6 1.1 Chapter 9. Historic Archaeological Resources in Channel Islands National Park Status of Resource Inventories .
    [Show full text]
  • PHYLOGENY and EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY of MODERN SEADUCKS (ANATIDAE: MERGINI)L
    The Condor97:233-255 0 The Ccaper OrnithologicalSociety 1995 PHYLOGENY AND EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF MODERN SEADUCKS (ANATIDAE: MERGINI)l BRADLEY C. LIVEZEY Section of Birds, CarnegieMuseum of Natural History, 4400 ForbesAvenue, Pittsburgh,PA 15213-4080 Abstract. Phylogenetic relationships of modem seaducks(Me&i) were investigated using a cladistic analysis of 137 morphological characters.The analysis produced a single tree (consistencyindex = 0.692, excludingautapomorphies) with complete resolutionof the relationshipsamong the 25 taxa recognized. Phylogeneticinferences include: (1) the eiders (Polystictaand Somateria) constitutea monophyletic group and are the sister-groupof other Mergini; (2) the remaining generic groups of Mergini, sequencedin order of increasingly close relationship, are Histrionicus,Melanitta + Camptorhynchus,Clangula, Bucephala + Mergellus.Lophodytes, and Mergus;(3) Somateria is monophyletic with S. jischerithe sister- group of its congeners;(4) the black scoters(Melanitta nigra-group)are the sister-groupof other scoters;(5) the Bufflehead (Bucephalaalbeola) is the sister-groupof the goldeneyes (B. clangufaand B. islandica);and (6) relationshipsamong mergansersare as presentedby Livezey (1989). Bootstrappingrevealed that the placement of the Smew as the sister-group of the goldeneyesis only weakly supported,and ancillary analysesrevealed that this place- ment is only one step shorter than its reduction to a trichotomy with the goldeneyesand mergansers(including Lophodytes).A phylogenetic classification of modem seaducksis
    [Show full text]