INTRODUCTION to N-ADAPTIVE FUZZY MODELS to ANALYZE PUBLIC OPINION on AIDS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INTRODUCTION TO n-ADAPTIVE FUZZY MODELS TO ANALYZE PUBLIC OPINION ON AIDS W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy Florentin Smarandache Translation of interviews from Tamil by Meena Kandasamy February 2006 1 INTRODUCTION TO n-ADAPTIVE FUZZY MODELS TO ANALYZE PUBLIC OPINION ON AIDS W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy e-mail: [email protected] web: http://mat.iitm.ac.in/~wbv Florentin Smarandache e-mail: [email protected] Translation of interviews from Tamil by Meena Kandasamy February 2006 2 CONTENTS Preface 5 Chapter One SOME BASIC FUZZY MODELS WITH ILLUSTRATIONS 1.1 Fuzzy matrices and their applications 9 1.2 Definition and illustration of Fuzzy Relational Maps (FRMs) 16 1.3 Some basic concepts of BAM with illustration 20 1.3.1 Some basic concepts of BAM 22 1.3.2 Use of BAM Model to study the cause of vulnerability to HIV/AIDS and factors for migration 28 1.4 Introduction to Fuzzy Associative Memories (FAM) 35 Chapter Two ON A NEW CLASS OF N-ADAPTIVE FUZZY MODELS WITH ILLUSTRATIONS 2.1 On a new class of n-adaptive fuzzy models with illustrations 39 2.2 Some special n-adaptive models 49 Chapter Three USE OF 2-ADAPTIVE FUZZY MODEL TO ANALYZE THE PUBLIC AWARENESS OF HIV/AIDS 3.1 Study of the psychological and social problems the public have about HIV/AIDS patients using CETD matrix 52 3 3.2 Use of 2 adaptive fuzzy model to analyze the problem 72 Chapter Four PUBLIC ATTITUDE AND AWARENESS ABOUT HIV/AIDS 4.1 Introduction 77 4.2 Interviews 81 Chapter Five CONCLUSIONS 167 Appendix 1. Questionnaire 177 2. Table of Statistics 191 3. C-program for CETD and RTD Matrix 198 4. C-program for FRM 202 5. C-program for CFRM 207 6. C-program for BAM 212 FURTHER READING 215 INDEX 232 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 235 4 Preface “AIDS is not simply a physical malady, it is also an artifact of social and sexual transgression, violated taboo, fractured identity—political and personal projections. Its key words are primarily the property of the powerful. AIDS: Keywords – is my attempt to identify and contest some of the assumptions underlying our current ‘knowledge’. In this effort I am joined by many AIDS activists including people living with AIDS— Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome. “A syndrome is a pattern of symptoms pointing to a “morbid state” which may or may not be caused by infectious agents; a disease, on the other hand is, “any deviation from or interruption of the normal structure or function of any part, organ or system of the body that is manifested by a characteristic set of symptoms or signs and whose etiology, pathology and prognosis may be known or unknown”. In other words, a syndrome points to or signifies the underlying disease process(es), a disease on the other hand is constituted in and by those process(es). The syndrome AIDS, in other words, cannot be communicated nor can the opportunistic infections that constitute the syndrome be readily communicated to those with healthy immune systems. Misunderstanding AIDS for a disease is one of our cultures profoundest confusions of a signifier for a sign. We keep pushing the signifying chain toward that ultimate sign—our collective mortality. Diseases, we are taught are communicable. When AIDS is identified as disease many consequences follows -– not the least of which is wide spread public terror about “Catching” AIDS from people in public places or during casual contact. The communicability of AIDS was fixed in the public and medical memory by easy public health reports. AIDS was repeatedly compared to hepatitis B- virus since both appeared to be blood borne and sexually transmitted.” Jan Zita Grover writes so in his article on AIDS: Keywords in “The State of the Language” (1990) ed. Christopher Ricks and Leonard Michaels, Faber and Faber, London. In the same 5 book, in his article “Speaking in the Shadow of AIDS”, Wayne Koestenbaun says, “From the start, AIDS posed vocabulary difficulties. Even when AIDS is disclosed it means more than simply a sickness. The word AIDS implies sociological categories –– a population, an inclination, a failure, a primary affiliation, that is assumed to pave the way to sickness. The word AIDS thus becomes an accusation and an act of housekeeping, it clarifies the caste system of the culture it assaults. “When speaking of AIDS, words cease to offer documentation; words become the makers of fear and hesitation. It is not simple to interpret contradictory data to phrase each physical sensation or to calculate the nearness of death. Though AIDS, as we know it, is inseparable from the verbal and prejudicial structures that mantle it, it also contains elements of a more archaic, essential dialect, sounds of pain and phrases of regret. Because a person with AIDS facing isolation or eviction may hide the disease and because the syndrome first achieved notoriety among gay men, AIDS—as guilty secret—has been linked, like homosexuality itself, to unspeakability. “In the era of Silence = Death, sly or shy signs cease to be revolutionary, even if they promise to save lives. Though AIDS remains closely associated with silence what is finally, silent about it? Michel Foucault, who died of AIDS, gave us a theoretical framework to explain how private language and life are webbed by public forces. We may think we control words, as if they were neutral transparently instrumental but language is larger than our efforts to wrangle it into reflecting our desires. Think of all the words spent in the name of AIDS—preventing it, fearing it, spreading our ignorance around like music. AIDS may present us with an excuse for declaring our alienation from public language and yet the suffering and sorrow we have learned to call “AIDS” only shows how our bodies are veined by coursing powers that seems too remote but is nearby… Because language is multiple the word ‘AIDS’ always means more and differently than we intend. “There is no possibility of an independently elected language every word is stained by community AIDS may seem to have little to do with subjects and verbs; but it has everything 6 to do with the acts that depend on language—renting an apartment, hiring a lawyer, voting… The syndrome may not have a will or a mission but it has been imprinted with the directives and prejudices of the societies where it flourishes; so AIDS like hunger, like wars is a affair of money and its transport, a matter of unjust circulation.” Michael Callen, in the article on “AIDS: The Linguistic Battlefield” writes, “The language of AIDS depends upon many presumptions, piled one upon another like a house of cards when you happen to doubt a particular pre-assumption often the entire superstructure collapses making communication difficult if not impossible. Three commonly used terms, which betray no evidence of the enormously complex; presumptions encoded within them are the cause the AIDS virus and HIV disease! … Houses of HIV-infected children have been burned down. There are people currently in jail and others under trial for being HIV antibody positive and having sex without telling their partners. In Cuba, HIV antibody positive individuals are quarantined for life.” We have mainly given these short excerpts of three persons mainly to see how we can make some changes in our society so that the stigma that the term HIV/AIDS holds is at least lessened, if not made to entirely disappear. A public debate on AIDS is virtually absent because it is viewed as something that only affects ‘others’—people who deviate from the existing ‘moral’ codes of society such as gays, sex workers, intravenous drug users and so on. Its virulent spread among the entire population (including the heterosexual community) has become a major cause for concern. Persons with AIDS have faced isolation and discrimination and AIDS itself has been constantly viewed with hostility and fear. Panic and an unhealthy silence have been the two extreme reactions of public hysteria over AIDS. Any person who is affected with AIDS is immediately labeled ‘characterless.’ Widespread advertisements have to a great extent increased the awareness levels. But social acceptance of the disease has not been similarly forthcoming. A recent survey estimated that 57% of Indian women are aware of AIDS. This clearly shows that there is a vast rural population of women who are simply unaware of the existence of AIDS or the information of how it 7 spreads. Thus it becomes imperative for NGOs and governmental agencies to extend awareness programmes to rural areas. Thus we have to build a bridge between public and patients (who are in fact and in actuality not divided entities but merely consider themselves so). We have interviewed 101 people from all walks of life and we have carefully analyzed their feelings using 2 adaptive fuzzy model. There are many fuzzy models like Fuzzy matrices, Fuzzy Cognitive Maps, Fuzzy relational Maps, Fuzzy Associative Memories, Bidirectional Associative memories and so on. But almost all these models can give only one sided solution like hidden pattern or a resultant output vector dependent on the input vector depending in the problem at hand. So for the first time we have defined a n-adaptive fuzzy model which can view or analyze the problem in n ways (n ≥ 2). Though we have defined these n- adaptive fuzzy models theorectically we are not in a position to get a n-adaptive fuzzy model for n > 2 for practical real world problems. We have used the 2-adaptive fuzzy model having the two fuzzy models, fuzzy matrices model and BAMs viz. model to analyze the views of public about HIV/ AIDS disease, patient and the awareness program.