DOCSLIB.ORG

CONSULTATION on a Proposal for a New Act of Parliament to Transfer the Ownership and Management Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CONSULTATION On a Proposal for a New Act of Parliament to transfer the ownership and management of to a new Charity East coast mainline railway CLOSING DATE FOR RESPONSES: 30 AUGUST 2019 SUPPORTING PAPERS RESPONSES Can be found at By email to: [email protected] By post to: W O Boyes Clerk to the Churchwardens of Monken Hadley Church 45 Clifford Road Barnet, EN5 5PD http://www.monkenhadleycommon.net/consultation.html June 2019 Contents Part 1: Background ..................................................................................1 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................1 2 Location of the Common..................................................................................3 3 Physical description of the Common................................................................3 4 History of the Common....................................................................................4 5 Legal title to the Common................................................................................5 6 Finance and the Friends of Hadley Common....................................................6 7 The Management Plan .....................................................................................7 8 The Churchwardens' functions.........................................................................7 9 The Commoners as beneficiaries of the statutory trust ...................................8 10 The identity and registration of Commoners .................................................8 11 The functions of the Commoners under the 1777 Act .................................10 12 Rights of the Commoners and others...........................................................10 13 Public access, planning and conservation ....................................................11 14 The Rules......................................................................................................12 Part 2: The issues which need to be addressed ....................................13 15 The main issues ............................................................................................13 Part 3: Effecting change.........................................................................17 16 Mechanics of Change ...................................................................................17 17 Proposals for legislation: Transfer of ownership and management to a third party..................................................................................................................18 18 Proposals for legislation: other provisions ...................................................20 Part 4: Consultation questions and how to respond.............................21 19 Questions for consultees..............................................................................21 20 List of Consultees .........................................................................................22 21 How to Respond...........................................................................................23 22 Obtaining documents...................................................................................23 23 Closing Date of the Consultation..................................................................23 24 Next Steps ....................................................................................................23 Part 1: Background 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation is being carried out by the Management Committee1 of Monken Hadley Common (“the Common”2) on behalf of and with the full agreement of the Churchwardens of the Parish Church of Monken Hadley in the County of Middlesex ("the Churchwardens"3) which holds the Common in trust. 1.2 The purpose of this consultation is to seek views on proposals for a new Act of Parliament which would enable the ownership of the Common and the assets of the Churchwardens to be transferred to a new charity which would own and manage the Common for the benefit of the general public. 1.3 The Common was established by the Enfield Chase Act of 1777. One of the purposes of this Act was to divide up the Chase into smaller areas, including the Common. It is a complicated and almost unreadable document, made worse by the fact that only 9 of the 133 sections relate to the Common. The Act also included provisions about other land in the parishes of Enfield, Edmonton and South Mymms (as it was then spelt). Those provisions are not relevant to this consultation. “Le Roy le Veult” - “The King Wills it” King George 3rd’s Assent to the Enfield Chase Bill 1 "the Management Committee" - the committee elected in accordance with “the Rules” to be responsible for the management of “the Common” on behalf of “the Churchwardens” and to supervise the work of “the Curators”; “the Rules” are the Rules and Orders made from time to time under section 60 of the Enfield Chase Act of 1777, 17 Geo III c.17 (“the 1777 Act”) for the governance of the Common (the current Rules were made in 1981); and “the Curators” are the individuals responsible (under Rules 10 & 31) for its day to day management. 2 "the Common" - the land called MONKEN HADLEY COMMON, the title of which is registered at HM Land Registry under numbers AGL278910 & AGL359524, and broadly comprises: 1) land which is commonly known as HADLEY COMMON; plus 2) land which is commonly known as HADLEY WOODS; plus 3) certain small areas of land which are leased, and are not accessible to the public. 3 "the Churchwardens" - the “Churchwardens of the Parish Church of Monken Hadley in the County of Middlesex” which as a statutory corporation (not as individuals) is the present owner of the freehold of the Common, which it holds in trust, along with other assets, under the terms of sections 5 and 115 of the 1777 Act. Copies of the 1777 Act, the 1981 Rules and Orders and the Title Plans can be downloaded from the Consultation web page at http://www.monkenhadleycommon.net/consultation.html. 1 1.4 The Common changed a long time ago from being land used for the benefit of surrounding landowners for grazing and other rural activities. The illustrations herein are postcards from the first half of the 20th century. It is now a largely wooded area providing a vital habitat for flora and fauna on the edge of north London which is used for recreational purposes by the general public. It has public highways across it, and the East Coast mainline railway physically divides it as can be seen on the plan on the front of this document. 1.5 Unbeknown to those involved with the Common, the 1777 Act was repealed in 1978 on the recommendation of the Law Commission, who believed that it was redundant. After this was discovered in about 1990, the repeal was reversed by section 2 of the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1993. At that time, the Churchwardens and Management Committee considered the option of asking for a new Act of Parliament but it was not pursued as it was too complicated and costly and there would have been problems with validating intervening acts done by the Churchwardens during the period of the repeal. A petition for a new Act had also been considered in 1978 when the Churchwardens decided that they could no longer nor did they want to undertake the management of the Common but this was rejected at that time on the grounds of cost. 1.6 The fundamental issues which the Churchwardens want to address are, firstly, that the provisions of the 1777 Act and the Rules and Orders made under it are no longer appropriate for the proper management and use of the Common and, secondly, their wish to divest themselves of ownership of the Common. 1.7 The main provisions of the 1777 Act which relate to the Common are: Section 4 - the allotment of land to the Parish of Monken Hadley; Section 5 - the apportionment of 50 acres of the Monken Hadley Allotment to the incumbent of Monken Hadley Parish Church and 190 acres to the Churchwardens in trust for the persons specified; Section 6 - proviso for trees within 60 yards of the boundary of the Common; Section 11 - Pinfolds within the Chase to remain vested in His Majesty; [applies to all parts of the former Enfield Chase] Section 13 - allotments to be accepted as compensation in lieu of other rights; [applies to all parts of the former Enfield Chase] Section 60 - power to a make Rules and Orders; [applies to all parts of the former Enfield Chase] Section 70 - Bringing or defending legal proceedings in the name of the Churchwardens; [applies to all parts of the former Enfield Chase] Section 71 - provisions relating to gates etc.; [applies to all parts of the former Enfield Chase] Section 115 - incorporation of the Churchwardens [applies to all parts of the former Enfield Chase]. 2 1.8 The Churchwardens and the Management Committee have agreed that there should be a consultation to obtain the views of interested persons prior to depositing a Private Bill in Parliament to provide for the transfer of the ownership of the Common to a new charity, to provide for the partial repeal and amendment of the provisions of the 1777 Act that relate to the Common, and for related matters. 2 Location of the Common 2.1 The Common is a roughly wedge shaped tract of land about 2.5 km long running east south east from the village of Monken Hadley (Grid Ref: TQ250973) in the London Borough of Barnet; it tapers from about 0.5 km wide at the broadest point at the western end near to Monken Hadley Church to only about 50 metres at the eastern end at Games Road, Cockfosters (Grid
Recommended publications
  • Chipping Barnet Team Parish Profile

    Chipping Barnet Team Parish Profile

    Chipping Barnet Team Parish Profile November 2013 Team Overview Location Chipping Barnet is a multi-layered collection of communities that does not reveal its true self at first, or second, glance. In civic and political terms, Barnet (of which Chipping Barnet is a part) is a borough on the northern edge of Greater London. Economically the population covers the socio-economic spectrum, from affluent Hadley and Arkley, to the deprived Whitings Hill and Dollis Valley Estate. The Parish of Chipping Barnet is situated at the extreme southern tip of St Albans Diocese, to the point where London diocese parishes exist between us and our cathedral. Culturally and socially, the church urban fund (www.cuf.org.uk) places us 289 out of the 339 parishes in the diocese, which puts us among the most deprived of parishes. We are ranked around 8000 out of the 13000 parishes in the UK - a “relatively deprived” parish in national terms. The Church Urban Fund identify lone parenthood and child poverty as the two key concerns, and, as mentioned within the individual church sections, we actively support the Chipping Barnet foodbank and the Winter Night Shelter scheme (which offers food and a place to sleep for homeless people throughout the winter months). The Team Rector has a significant civic role as well as the more usual pastoral activities. As well as sitting on the governing body of the two Queen Elizabeth Schools, there are ex-officio posts on the trustees of four locally endowed charities. For example, the Hyde Foundation owns the historic library building in the centre of the Barnet conservation area and has the disbursement of the rental on the property to support the education of young people who live within the boundary of the old parish of St John the Baptist and that of our neighbours in Monken Hadley.
  • The Early History of Man's Activities in the Quernmore Area

    The Early History of Man's Activities in the Quernmore Area

    I Contrebis 2000 The Early History of Man's Activities in the Quernmore Area. Phil Hudson Introduction This paper hopes to provide a chronological outline of the events which were important in creating the landscape changes in the Quernmore forest area. There was movement into the area by prehistoric man and some further incursions in the Anglo- Saxon and the Norse periods leading to Saxon estates and settled agricultural villages by the time of the Norman Conquest. These villages and estates were taken over by the Normans, and were held of the King, as recorded in Domesday. The Post-Nonnan conquest new lessees made some dramatic changes and later emparked, assarted and enclosed several areas of the forest. This resulted in small estates, farms and vaccaries being founded over the next four hundred years until these enclosed areas were sold off by the Crown putting them into private hands. Finally there was total enclosure of the remaining commons by the 1817 Award. The area around Lancaster and Quernmore appears to have been occupied by man for several thousand years, and there is evidence in the forest landscape of prehistoric and Romano-British occupation sites. These can be seen as relict features and have been mapped as part of my on-going study of the area. (see Maps 1 & 2). Some of this field evidence can be supported by archaeological excavation work, recorded sites and artif.act finds. For prehistoric occupation in the district random finds include: mesolithic flints,l polished stone itxe heads at Heysham;'worked flints at Galgate (SD 4827 5526), Catshaw and Haythomthwaite; stone axe and hammer heads found in Quernmore during the construction of the Thirlmere pipeline c1890;3 a Neolithic bowl, Mortlake type, found in Lancaster,o a Bronze Age boat burial,s at SD 5423 5735: similar date fragments of cinerary urn on Lancaster Moor,6 and several others discovered in Lancaster during building works c1840-1900.7 Several Romano-British sites have been mapped along with finds of rotary quems from the same period and associated artifacts.
  • Chipping Barnet Constituency Insight and Evidence Review

    Chipping Barnet Constituency Insight and Evidence Review

    Chipping Barnet Constituency Insight and Evidence Review 1 Contents 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................3 2 Overview of Findings ......................................................................................................................3 2.1 Challenges of an ageing & isolated population ......................................................................3 2.2 Pockets of relative deprivation...............................................................................................4 2.3 Obesity and Participation in Sport..........................................................................................4 3 Recommended Areas of Focus .......................................................................................................5 4 Summary of Key Facts.....................................................................................................................6 4.1 Population ..............................................................................................................................6 4.2 Employment ...........................................................................................................................6 4.3 Deprivation .............................................................................................................................6 4.4 Health .....................................................................................................................................7
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD

    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD

    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
  • COMBINED QUALITY and VALUE ASSESSMENT 2015 Avenue

    COMBINED QUALITY and VALUE ASSESSMENT 2015 Avenue

    COMBINED QUALITY AND VALUE ASSESSMENT 2015 Park Name Area Ward Hectarage Quality Value High/ Low Childs Hill Park Golders Green & Finchley Childs Hill 3.02 GOOD Good High/High Edgwarebury Park Hendon Edgware 15.95 GOOD Good High/High Golders Hill Park Golders Green & Finchley Childs Hill 14.50 EXCELLENT Good High/High Hendon Park Hendon West Hendon 11.87 GOOD Excellent High/High Heybourne Park Hendon Colindale 6.24 GOOD Good High/High Lyttelton Playing Field Golders Green & Finchley Garden Suburb 9.59 GOOD Fair High/High Malcolm Park Hendon West Hendon 1.90 GOOD Good High/High Mill Hill Park Hendon Mill Hill 18.66 GOOD Good High/High Oak Hill Park Chipping Barnet East Barnet 33.48 GOOD Good High/High Old Court House Recreation Ground Chipping Barnet Underhill 3.08 GOOD Good High/High Victoria Park Golders Green & Finchley West Finchley 7.53 GOOD Good High/High Avenue House Golders Green & Finchley Finchley Church End 4.32 GOOD Poor High/Low Cricklewood Playground Golders Green & Finchley Childs Hill 0.28 GOOD Fair High/Low Hampstead Heath extension Golders Green & Finchley Garden Suburb 30.27 GOOD Fair High/Low Arrandene Open Space Hendon Mill Hill 23.43 FAIR Good Low/High Ashbourne Grove OS Hendon Hale 0.16 FAIR Fair Low/High Barnet Gate Wood Chipping Barnet Underhill 7.89 FAIR Fair Low/High Barnet Hill Open Space Chipping Barnet Underhill 1.63 FAIR Fair Low/High Barnet Playing Field Chipping Barnet Underhill 12.37 FAIR Good Low/High Brent Green Open Space Hendon Hendon 0.29 FAIR Fair Low/High Brent Park Hendon Hendon 3.44 FAIR Good Low/High
  • The Story of a Man Called Daltone

    The Story of a Man Called Daltone

    - The Story of a Man called Daltone - “A semi-fictional tale about my Dalton family, with history and some true facts told; or what may have been” This story starts out as a fictional piece that tries to tell about the beginnings of my Dalton family. We can never know how far back in time this Dalton line started, but I have started this when the Celtic tribes inhabited Britain many yeas ago. Later on in the narrative, you will read factual information I and other Dalton researchers have found and published with much embellishment. There also is a lot of old English history that I have copied that are in the public domain. From this fictional tale we continue down to a man by the name of le Sieur de Dalton, who is my first documented ancestor, then there is a short history about each successive descendant of my Dalton direct line, with others, down to myself, Garth Rodney Dalton; (my birth name) Most of this later material was copied from my research of my Dalton roots. If you like to read about early British history; Celtic, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Normans, Knight's, Kings, English, American and family history, then this is the book for you! Some of you will say i am full of it but remember this, “What may have been!” Give it up you knaves! Researched, complied, formated, indexed, wrote, edited, copied, copy-written, misspelled and filed by Rodney G. Dalton in the comfort of his easy chair at 1111 N – 2000 W Farr West, Utah in the United States of America in the Twenty First-Century A.D.
  • Hendon Constituency Insight and Evidence Review

    Hendon Constituency Insight and Evidence Review

    Hendon Constituency Insight and Evidence Review 1 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Overview of Findings ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Deprivation and Employment ................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Increasing Diversity & Community Cohesion .......................................................................... 4 2.3 Health and Participation in Sport ............................................................................................ 4 3 Recommended areas of focus ...................................................................................................... 5 • Deprivation and Employment ......................................................................................................... 5 • Increasing Diversity & Community Cohesion .................................................................................. 5 • Health and Participation in Sport .................................................................................................... 5 4 Summary of Key Facts ..................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Population ..............................................................................................................................
  • Barnet Society

    Barnet Society

    CAMPAIGNING FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY SINCE 1945 THE INSIDE: Page 6 I Whalebones relief Page 7 I Café society Barnet Page 8 I You’re so vane Society Page 9 I The way we were SPRING 2021 | £1 Page 11 I Tudor Park plea of Barnet. Teams of battlefield archaeologists, including volunteers from Barnet Museum, conducted extensive metal-detecting searches and excavations in fields and woodland around Kitts End Lane and Wrotham Park. At the start of the project in 2015, Mr Foard joined metal detectorists who searched one of the fields between Kitts End Lane and the St Albans Road. Some artefacts were recovered but they failed to find military archaeology that linked the site Mystery remains over definitively to the battle. Volunteers at Barnet Museum, exactly where the 1471 under the direction of Sam Battle of Barnet took place Wilson, cleaned and recorded all the various items that were found. However, most of the The Battle of Where? objects recovered were modern “junk”. report into the Glenn Foard, Reader in Military The report’s four-year project Archaeology at the University of conclusion is that the to discover the site Huddersfield, led the 2015-18 Barnet slight scatter of finds – of the 1471 Battle of battlefield project, which was and the discovery of round ABarnet explains why a team of funded by the Hadley Trust. ▲ Top, the shot by other metal detectorists military historians still cannot Their 116-page report explores recently in previous years – suggests the provide answers to the mystery the many historic accounts of the cleaned main action of the confrontation monument surrounding the precise location battle and compares and contrasts at Hadley between the forces of Edward IV of an epic confrontation during this data with the latest experiences Highstone to and Warwick the Kingmaker lay the Wars of the Roses, writes Nick in battlefield archaeology and the the battle.
  • St. John's Presbyterian Church, Kensington...100 0

    St. John's Presbyterian Church, Kensington...100 0

    1863 B 8. d. St. Peter’s and St. Paul’s, Streatham ............ 49 0 0 METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL SUNDAY Wanstead Parish Church .................. 28 0 0 FUND. Christ Church. Wanstead .............. 38 0 0 St. George’s Chapel, Albemarle- street ............ 41 0 0 60 0 0 Christ Church, Southgate .................. St. James’s, Muswell Hill .................. 54 0 0 46 0 St. Hill .................. 0 THE is a continued record of some of the George’s. Perry following St. Andrew’s. Westminster ......... I........ 55 0 0 41 0 0 amounts that have been received in aid of the St. Paul’s, Camden-square .................. principal 26 0 0 St. Matthew’s, West Kensington Park ............ Fund to the time of to on The 24 0 0 up going press Thursday. St. Saviour’s, Denmark Park ............... 21 0 0 total sum then amounted to £36,000. At the corresponding St. Mark’s, Lewisham , .................. Christ Church and St. Barnabas’, North Finchley... ... 22 0 0 period last year the total was £31,000 :- Carmelite Church, Kensington ............... 30 0 0 £E s.a. d.d!. Catholic Apostolic Church, Maida Hill............ 20 0 0 Christ Church, Lancaster-gate (including additions) ... 1317 0 0 Stamford-hill Congregational Church ............ 92 0 0 an 1233 0 0 0 St. Michael’s, Chester-square (including additional B8) Stanmore Parish Church .................. 50 0 St. Jude’s, South Kensington ............... 557 00 St. Stephen’s, Gloucester-road ............... 99 0 0 St. Paul’s, Onslow-square .................. 360 00 Christ Church. Newgate-street ............... 50 0 0 with St. 291 00 24 0 0 .St. Paul’s, Knightsbridge, Mary’s.
  • Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau Area Framework All London Green Grid

    Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau Area Framework All London Green Grid

    All Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau London Area Framework Green Grid 11 DRAFT Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 9 Area Description 10 Strategic Context 11 Vision 14 Objectives 16 Opportunities 20 Project Identification 22 Clusters 24 Projects Map 28 Rolling Projects List 34 Phase One Early Delivery 36 Project Details 48 Forward Strategy 50 Gap Analysis 51 Recommendations 52 Appendices 54 Baseline Description 56 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA11 Links 58 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA11 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg . Cover Image: View across Silver Jubilee Park to the Brent Reservoir Foreword 1 Introduction – All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology Introduction Area Frameworks Partnership - Working The various and unique landscapes of London are Area Frameworks help to support the delivery of Strong and open working relationships with many recognised as an asset that can reinforce character, the All London Green Grid objectives.
  • Subject Monken Hadley Conservation Area

    Subject Monken Hadley Conservation Area

    SUB-COMMITTEE CHIPPING BARNET AREA ENVIRONMENT DATE AND TIME TUESDAY, 21 NOVEMBER 2006 AT 7.00PM VENUE THE TOWN HALL, THE BURROUGHS, HENDON, NW4 4BG TO: MEMBERS OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE (Quorum 3) Chairman: Councillor Olwen Evans Vice-Chairman: Councillor Wendy Prentice Councillors: Fiona Bulmer Lynne Hillan Mukesh Depala Caroline Margo Marina Yannakoudakis Substitutes: Terry Burton Brian Coleman Sachin Rajput Kate Salinger Bridget Perry Andreas Tambourides Daniel Webb Janet Rawlings, Acting Democratic Services Manager Democratic Services contact: Chidi Agada, tel. 020 8359 2037 Public Affairs contact: Emer Coleman, tel. 020 8359 7794 FACILITIES FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES The Town Hall has access for wheelchair users including lifts and toilets. If you wish to let us know in advance that you will be attending the meeting, please telephone Chidi Agada on 020 8359 2037. People with hearing difficulties who have a text phone, may telephone our minicom number on 020 8203 8942. Town Hall Hendon NW4 4BG i ORDER OF BUSINESS Item Title of Report Contributors Page Nos. No. 1. MINUTES 2. ABSENCE OF MEMBERS 3. DECLARATION OF MEMBERS’ PERSONAL AND PREJUDICIAL INTERESTS 4. PUBLIC SPEAKING ARRANGEMENTS 5. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME Council Functions No Items Executive Functions Report of the Cabinet Member for Environment and Transport 6. Highway Maintenance Works Programme in the HET 1 – 7 Chipping Barnet Area – 2007/2008 1st Quarter Schemes Report of the Cabinet Member for Planning and Environmental Protection 7. Monken Hadley Conservation Area: Report on final draft HPES 8 – 95 of Conservation Area Character Appraisal Statement following public consultation 8. ANY OTHER ITEMS THAT THE CHAIRMAN DECIDES ARE URGENT Fire / Emergency Evacuation Procedure If the fire alarm sounds continuously, or if you are instructed to do so, you must leave the building by the nearest available exit.
  • Appendix 1 Draft Greenspace Capital Investment Strategy , Item 14

    Appendix 1 Draft Greenspace Capital Investment Strategy , Item 14

    Environment Committee: 08 November 2016 Implementation of the Parks and Open Spaces Strategy Appendix 1: Draft Greenspaces Capital Investment Programme The proposed Greenspaces Capital Investment Programme amounts to £105m over a 5-10 year period (transformational schemes will have longer timescales due to funding, e.g. Brent Cross and Heritage Parks projects), detailed throughout this document. This is proposed to be delivered through a split of 56% developer funding, 22% grant funding and 22% LBB Capital Funding (mainly borrowing), and meaning that 78% of the total cost of the programme is to be funded through external sources of funding. The table shows the proposed approach to investment in open spaces to maximise the strategic benefit and funding opportunity from Council investment through both the development reserve and other capital funding (mostly borrowing, but some specific capital receipts). In most cases borrowing proposals have been linked to assets such as pavilions or roads/footpaths, but in a few places the shift towards ‘Natural Capital Accounting’ adopted through the Open Spaces Strategy may need to be utilised to support proposed borrowing. Site Description/Comments Total cost S106 Dev. Grants LBB Reserve Capital Existing Capital Colindale Parks (Transformational 12,000,000 150,000 8,350,000 3,500,000 0 Programme Investment) Targeted Small Scale Investments 622,000 189,000 0 18,000 415,000 SUB -TOTAL 12,622,000 339,000 8,350,000 3,518,000 415,000 Proposed 15,115,00 Regeneration and Growth Areas 36,800,000 6,900,000 9,110,000 5,675,000 ‘Transformationa 0 l’ Capital Development Areas 8,500,000 7,800,000 600,000 100,000 0 Investments Sports Hubs 14,450,000 3,950,000 4,950,000 2,300,000 3,250,000 Heritage Parks 10,973,000 0 2,070,000 5,175,000 3,728,000 26,865,00 14,520,00 16,685,00 12,653,00 SUB-TOTAL 70,723,000 0 0 0 0 Site Description/Comments Total cost S106 Dev.