DOCSLIB.ORG

Milimani High Court High Court Civil Division Virtual Cause List Monday, 8Th June 2020 Mbogholi Msagha J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Milimani High Court High Court Civil Division Virtual Cause List Monday, 8Th June 2020 Mbogholi Msagha J MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST MONDAY, 8TH JUNE 2020 MBOGHOLI MSAGHA J. AT 10:30 AM ONLINE NOTICE OF MOTION 1. MISC 417/2018 Waiganjo Wachira And Co. Advocates And Trident Insurance Company Limited Vs Boaz Chepkus Kiprop And Morris And Co Ltd 2. MISC 317/2018 Waiganjo Wachira & Co.advocates Vs Pacis Insurance Co Ltd MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST MONDAY, 8TH JUNE 2020 SERGON J. AT 9:30 AM ONLINE MENTION 1. MISC 308/2006 Mbigi Njuguna And Co Advocates Versus The Town Clerk City Council AT 9:40 AM ONLINE 2. CC 62/2020 Monaco Engineering Ltd Vs Gongo Ler AT 9:50 AM ONLINE 3. CA 71/2020 Car And General(trading) Limited Vs Marion Wairimu Muriithi&virginia Wacheke Muriithi And Peter Njeru AT 10:00 AM ONLINE 4. CA 444/2015 Ndanu Immy Mauta Vs Munyalo Marshall AT 10:15 AM ONLINE NOTICE OF MOTION 5. CA 733/2019 Sunny Hauliers Limited Vs Josphat Musyoka Mulindi AT 10:30 AM ONLINE 6. MISC 146/2020 Julius Mwanzia Mutunga Vs Veronicah Musyimi MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST MONDAY, 8TH JUNE 2020 GITHUA J. AT 10:00 AM ONLINE MENTION 1. CC 345/2004 China Jiangsu International Economic Technical Co-oporation Vs Fintel Limited Hillary Maina Thegeya NOTICE OF MOTION 2. CC 822/2007 Martha Wambui Vs Nairobi Star & Other 3. CC 361/2011 Tanad Transporters Ltd Vs Africa Merchant Assurance Company Ltd HEARING 4. CA 498/2018 Barclays Bank Of Kenya Vs Jane Wanjiku Nganga MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST MONDAY, 8TH JUNE 2020 B. THURANIRA JADEN J. AT 11:00 AM ONLINE MENTION 1. CC 512/2010 Edward Njoroge Murimi Vs The Standard Ltd 2. CC 96/2013 Brenda Nanguni Vs Mary Chebet Koskey Chumo & 4 Others 3. CC 261/2015 Alice Atieno Odera Vs Radio Africa Ltd & Another 4. CC 78/2019 Justice Aaron Ringera Vs Standard Ltd NOTICE OF MOTION 5. MISC 244/2018 Richard Githu Muturi Vs John Muasya Mitau 6. CC 43/2019 Madison Insurance Company Limited Vs Benjamin Amache Mbai MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST MONDAY, 8TH JUNE 2020 KAMAU J. AT 11:00 AM ONLINE MENTION 1. CC 170/2011 Alex M Gakuru Versus Safaricom Limited 2. CC 266/2015 Victoria Mwongeli Wambua Alias Mwongeli Wambua Vs Cfc Stanbic Bank Ltd 3. CA 7/2018 Bachu Industries Ltd Vs Patrick Katuva 4. CA 163/2018 Systemedia Technologies Ltd Vs Grace Matheka And Upstate Auctioneers And 2 Others 5. CA 674/2019 Samar Construction Company Limited Vs Dennis Mokamba Nyasani 6. CA 522/2019 Danson Matheka Kitunga And Onesmus Musyoki Mwindi Vs Henry Wafula Namasaka 7. CA 269/2019 David Kangethe Vs Dennis Myangincha Nyairo NOTICE OF MOTION 8. MISC 118/2020 George Warukenya Mucuku Vs Seah Wambui ORIGINATING SUMMONS 9. MISC 181/2020 In The Matter of Section 30, Lsk Act 2014 HEARING 10. CA 502/2018 Stephen Chege Vs Julius Ngala MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST MONDAY, 8TH JUNE 2020 NJUGUNA J. AT 11:00 AM ONLINE MENTION 1. CC 503/2013 Albert Cheboi And Ivy Chebiwott Vs. Insurance Regulatory Authority 2. CC 258/2018 Balaji (epz) Limited Vs Nairobi Water & Sewerage Co. Ltd 3. CC 187/2019 Ceaser Wanjao Ngige And Karen Mwende Nduva Vs 4. CA 217/2019 Kellen Wariara Munene Vs Britam General Insurance Company Ltd NOTICE OF MOTION 5. CC 236/2011 N.k. Brothers Limited Vs. The Hon Attorney General & Another 6. CC 180/2011 Stephano Kimani Ngugi Versus Samuel Maina Njenga 7. CC 356/2014 Paul Makokha Okoti Versus Equity Bank Of Kenya Ltd 8. CC 262/2019 Yusuf Abdulrahman Nzibo Vs Hassan Ole Naado And Mohammed Aden Mahat And 1 Others MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST MONDAY, 8TH JUNE 2020 L. A. MUMASSABBA (DR) MENTION 1. CC 1260/2004 Gumchem K Limited Versus Young Traders Limited And Another 2. CC 45/2019 Alex Moseti Y/a Molly's Bar Vs Tourism Regulatory Authority & Another 3. CC 95/2019 Musee Mohamed Muse Limited Vs Zaam Industries Limited 4. CC 40/2019 Mark Lloyd Stephenson & Another Vs Michael G. Lynch CHAMBER SUMMONS 5. CC 30/2015 Francis Opiche Gonze T/a Plumcon East Africa Vs His Excellency The Ambassador Of Saudi Arabi TAXATION 6. MISC 449/2016 Owino & Co.advocates Vs Kithinji Kiragu & 3 Others 7. MISC 174/2019 Ngaywa, Ngigi, Kibet & Advocates Vs Invesco Assurance Company Limited 8. MISC 487/2019 Maina Njuguna & Associates Vs Invesco Assurance Company Limited 9. MISC 486/2019 Maina Njuguna & Associates Vs Invesco Assurance Company Limited 10. MISC 173/2019 Ngaywa, Ngigi & Kibet Advocates Vs Invesco Assurance Company Limited 11. MISC 102/2019 Maina Njuguna & Associates Vs Invesco Assurance Company Limited 12. MISC/784/2019 Okong'o Wandago & Co. Advocates Vs Invesco Assurance Company Limited MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST MONDAY, 8TH JUNE 2020 L.MBACHO (DR) MENTION 1. MISC 384/2015 Urgent Cargo Ltd Vs China Road & Bridges 2. CA 320/2016 Mercy Nduta Mwangi Vs Invesco Assurance Company Limited 3. CC 288/2018 Evans Oketch Mawere Vs Director Public Prosecutions And Attorney General And 2 Others 4. MISC 163/2019 Wamae & Alien Advocates Vs Madison Insurance Co. Ltd NOTICE OF MOTION 5. CA 602/2018 Odex Chemicals Limited And Bosco Munywoki Vs Peterson Ayora TAXATION 6. CA 66/2018 Aloona Industries Kenya Limited Vs Crown Beverages Limited 7. MISC 783/2019 Okong'o Wandago & Co. Advocates Vs Invesco Assurance Company Limited 8. MISC 785/2019 Okong'o Wandago & Co. Advocates Vs Invesco Assurance Company Limited 9. MISC 133/2020 T.m Kuria & Co. Advocate Vs Auto Industries Limited 10. MISC 134/2020 T.m Kuria & Co Advocates Vs Auto Industries Limited 11. MISC 135/2020 T.m Kuria & Co. Advocate And Auto Industries Limited Vs MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST MONDAY, 8TH JUNE 2020 NOTICE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE FOLLOWING HEARINGS ARE TAKEN OUT. PARTIES TO REQUEST FOR FRESH DATES ONLINE. 1. MISC 560/2007 Pamellah Charm Amadi Vs Baraza Limited T/a Kenya Television Network And Dr. Maxwell O Okonji And 1 Others 2. CC 153/2013 Rowland Cleopas Marende Vs The Attorney General 3. CC 261/2014 Lornah Sebiwot Kiplagat And Another Versus Isaac Omolo And Another 4. CC 285/2015 Albertus Lotter Sadie Vs Elsabe Viljoen Sadie 5. CC 274/2016 Dancan Ekwam Auren Vs. Inspector General Of Police And Attorney General 6. CC 204/2018 Halakhe D Waqo Vs Media Max Network Ltd & Another 7. CC 170/2019 Patience Kathikwa Wambua Vs Oscar Muema Muua And Ali Muhammed 8. CC 74/2016 Ambassador Zachary Muburi-muita Vsthe Standard Group Ltd And 6 Others 9. CC 654/2007 James Kamau Mwaura Vs Apa Insurance Co. Ltd 10. CC 302/2016 Jacinta Ochieng Vs. Joe Sang & 3 Others 11. CC 978/2002 Pipeplastic Samkolit Kenya Ltd Vs African Broadcasting Corporation MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST TUESDAY, 9TH JUNE 2020 MBOGHOLI MSAGHA J. AT 10:30 AM ONLINE MENTION 1. CC 1655/1998 Florence Dali Agui & Another Vs East African Spectre Ltd & Another 2. CA 617/2006 Trishul Construction Co Lts Vs Timona Agal Johana 3. CA 250/2012 Elijah Gitari And Two Others Vs Ann Ngaru Waithaka 4. CA 71 2016 Caroline Wanjiku Maina Versus Eliud Mutungu And Another 5. CA 301/2017 Bob Morgan Services Ltd Vs Evans Ikomol 6. CA 71/2019 John Kabugo & Anne Wangechi Ngumba T/a Joan Packaging Accessories And Joan Packaging Limited Vs Equity Bank Limited 7. MISC 160/20 Bernard Mwaura Mwaniki Vs Meridian Acceptance Ltd NOTICE OF MOTION 8. MISC 638/2018 Maina Njuguna & Associates Vs Invesco Assurance Co. Ltd 9. MISC 127/2020 Samuel Wambugu Kahiga Vs. New Age Developers & Construction Company Limited And 3 Others MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST TUESDAY, 9TH JUNE 2020 SERGON J. AT 9:30 AM ONLINE MENTION 1. CA 656/2011 Mau West Limited Vs Kam Company Limited AT 9:40 AM ONLINE 2. CA 687/2017 Lucy Wanjiru Njonjo Vs Nephat Kuria Githaiga AT 9:50 AM ONLINE 3. CA 519/2018 Hagos Birikti Vs Evans Ihura And Evans Ihura Njoroge AT 10:00 AM ONLINE 4. MISC 186/2019 Maina Njuguna & Associates Vs Invesco Assurance Co. Ltd AT10:10 AM ONLINE 5. MISC 616/2019 Peter Njoroge Kamau Vs Mburu Mwangu Moses AT 10:20 AM ONLINE 6. CA 59/2020 Joseph Gathoga Kamau Vs George Mungai Kariuki AT 10:30 AM ONLINE NOTICE OF MOTION 7. CC 6054/1991 Haithar Haji Abdi Vs Southern Development Ltd AT 10:45 AM ONLINE 8. CA 455/2018 Seneca East Africa Limited Vs Isoe Sibwaga And Fred Makori Ondari AT 11:00 AM ONLINE 9. MISC 115/2020 Francis M. Mutua T/a Kamburu Service Station Vs Alex K. Inyangu T/a Ameli Inyangu & Partners And Swaran Singh Gharial And 1 Others AT 11:15 AM ONLINE 10. CC 62/2019 Monaco Engineering Ltd Vs Munywe Investment Lt AT 11:30 AM ONLINE HEARING 11. CA 233/2018 Kapa Oil Refineries Limited Vs Sherry Kyangu MILIMANI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION VIRTUAL CAUSE LIST TUESDAY, 9TH JUNE 2020 GITHUA J. AT 10:00 AM ONLINE MENTION 1. CC 27/2015 Nsejjere Sports Llc Vs Alla Kasavuli & Others 2. CA 558/2018 Brnard Kirui Kiptoo And Athiany Holdings Limited NOTICE OF MOTION 3. CC 13/2015 John Kinyanjui Njuguna Vs Group Company Secretary Ktda And Two Others 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Working Document for the Constitution of Kenya Review Commission on the Kadhi's Courts, Chief Kadhi and Kadhis
    WORKING DOCUMENT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA REVIEW COMMISSION ON THE KADHI'S COURTS, CHIEF KADHI AND KADHIS By Ahmed Issack Hassan, Commissioner, CKRC. ([email protected]) (www.ahmedissackhassan.com) The Commission’s Mandate The Constitution of Kenya Review Act provides that the objects and purposes of the constitutional review is to secure provisions therein, inter alia respecting ethnic and regional diversity including the right of communities to organize and participate in cultural activities and the expression of their identities and establishing a democratic government that respects human rights - (Section 3(e) & (b). Further, under Section 5(b) of the Act, the organs of the review shall ensure that the review process accommodates the diversity of the Kenyan people including socio-economic status, race, ethnicity, gender, religious faith, age, occupation, learning, persons with disability and the disadvantaged. The Commission is also mandated to seek views on and make recommendation to the judiciary and the legal systems of Kenya. Chapter 5 of the Constitution of Kenya guarantees the protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of every person. Section 78 guarantees the freedom of thought, religion and conscience and Section 82 prohibits discrimination of any person on account of inter alia his or her religious beliefs. The Current Status of the Kadhi’s Courts, Chief Kadhi and Kadhis The Kadhi's Court, Chief Kadhi and Kadhis are Constitutional offices established under Section 66 of the Constitution of Kenya. A Kadhi is strictly speaking a judicial officer, judge or magistrate presiding over an Islamic Court, called the Kadhi's Court, where Islamic law or Sharia is applied and subject to the jurisdiction of the Court all the parties who appear before the Court are those that profess the Muslim/ Islamic faith.
    [Show full text]
  • KPDA Media Weekly Review Report As at 14 2021
    KPDA Media Weekly Review Report as at 14th May 2021 CEO DE-BRIEF 2021 UN-HABITAT SCROLL OF HONOUR CALL FOR NOMINATIONS The UN-Habitat Scroll of Honour Award was launched in 1989 and is one of the most prestigious human settlements awards. The award acknowledges initiatives which have made outstanding contributions in the field of Human Settlements, Provision of affordable, accessible and adequate housing, developing and improving human settlements and the quality of urban life to leave no one behind. Nominations guidelines for the award can be accessed at https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2021/04/scroll-of-honour-guidelines-2021.pdf and https://unhabitat.org/call-for-nominations-of-the-2021-scroll-of-honour. Take note that the deadline for receiving nominations via the online form is Sunday, 8th August 2021. OPEN FOR APPLICATION! PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION PROGRAMME "INNOVATION FOR CHANGE IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT" AT LUND UNIVERSITY, SWEDEN Lund University has proudly opened the application process for the second edition of Public Sector Innovation programme Innovation for Change in Public Transport. The programme is carried out with financial support from the Swedish Institute (SI). This year, the programme targets international professionals from Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda and contributes to innovation in the public sector and support the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. The programme aims to empower individuals representing the actors in public as well as private organizations so that they can work together for a renewal of public transport systems and thereby contribute to sustainable cities and communities. Take the opportunity and apply for the programme here.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania of 1977
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA OF 1977 CHAPTER 2 OF THE LAWS ________ 2005 The following is the official Revised version in English of “KATIBA YA JAMHURI YA MUUNGANO WA TANZANIA YA MWAKA 1977”. This revised edition of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania incorporates and consolidates all amendments made therein by the Constituent Assembly in 1977 up to the 14 th Amendment of 2005 and it is printed and published under section 4 of the Laws Revision Act Chapter 4. 2 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (CAP. 2) ARRANGEMENT OF CONTENTS Article Title PREAMBLE CHAPTER ONE THE UNITED REPUBLIC, POLITICAL PARTIES, THE PEOPLE AND THE POLICY OF SOCIALISM AND SELF RELIANCE PART I THE UNITED REPUBLIC AND THE PEOPLE 1. Proclamation of the United Republic. 2. The territory of the United Republic. 3. Declaration of Multi-Party State. 4. Exercise of State Authority of the United Republic. 5. The Franchise. PART II FUNDAMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY 6. Interpretation. 7. Application of the provisions of Part II. 8. The Government and the People. 9. The pursuit of Ujamaa and Self-Reliance. 10. [Repealed]. 11. Right to work, to educational and other pursuits. PART III BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES The Right to Equality 12. Equality of human beings. 13. Equality before the law. The Right to Life 14. The right to life. 15. Right to personal freedom. 16. Right to privacy and personal security. 17. Right to freedom of movement. 3 The Right to Freedom of Conscience 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Kidero's Time to ·Deliver After Petition Dismissed Judges Say the Joined Other Jubilant Support- Ers in Relishing the Verdict
    SATURDAY NATION 8 I National News August 30, 2014 ( '-!to' COURTS I Election dispute had dragged on for 18months .THE BRIGHT AND BEAUTIFUL IWe'vemade it! Kidero's time to ·deliver after petition dismissed Judges say the joined other jubilant support- ers in relishing the verdict. Court of Appeal Dr Kidero said the petition had been a distraction for the entertained an 18 months it lasted. incompetent appeal "The moment for delivery of my pre-election promises to Nairobi residents has finally BY VINCENT AGOYA dawned," he said outside the @1"O}'agoya court. [email protected] Mr Waititu was also in court, but conspicuously alone. This airobi Governor was in stark contrast to earlier JENNIFER MUlRURl1 NATION' Evans Kidero can now proceedings that culminated Froin right, Ms Claris Leparkiras, Ms Lennah Nyanchama, Mr Mercy Njeri and Ms Elizabeth Yimba- N breathe easy and serve in the nullification of Dr Ki- ine during the 51st graduation at the University .of Nairobi yesterday. They were conferred with city residents with undivided dero's victory at the Court of . Bachelors of Science degrees in Wildlife Management and Conservation. attention after the Supreme' Appeal when he used to be Court reaffirmed his election escorted by Nairobi Senator yesterday. Mike Sonko and a crowd of The court set aside a ruling chanting supporters. made by two appellate judges Yesterday. it was Dr Kidero Why youth join terror gangs which had invalidated the vic- and the ODM supporters who tory of Dr Kidero and Deputy thronged the streets of the BY NATION REPORTER more rigorous action in dealing liances all over the world and Governor Jonathan Mueke.
    [Show full text]
  • Paralegal Support Network
    The Paralegal’s Handbook Paralegal Support Network Table of Contents Chapter 1: How to Use this Handbook Chapter 2: The Role of the Paralegal Worker Chapter 3: Law and Society Chapter 4: Institutions for the Implementation of the Law Chapter 5: The Constitution Chapter 6: Human Rights Chapter 7: Democracy Chapter 8: Elections Chapter 9: Governance Chapter 10: Gender and Development Chapter 11: Gender-based Violence Chapter 12: Employment and Labour Relations Chapter 13: Claims Arising from Personal Harm Chapter 14: Business Relations and Contracts Chapter 15: Land Law Chapter 16: Family Relations and Succession Chapter 17: Crimes Chapter 18: Court Procedures Chapter 19: Dispute Resolution and Conflict Management Chapter 20: Community Mobilization Chapter 21: Children and the Law Chapter 22: Environment and Natural Resource Management Chapter 23: Human Rights Institution Building Chapter 1 How to Use This Handbook Why the Handbook? This handbook has been developed by the Paralegal Support Network (PASUNE). The handbook was developed in fulfillment of the mandate of PASUNE. PASUNE as a network of leading human rights organizations involved in paralegal training has been working towards standardizing the content and methods of training paralegals in Kenya. As part of that process in the year 2003 it developed a curriculum for community paralegal workers. The curriculum has been very useful in ensuring that all organizations involved in paralegal training cover an agreed set of issues in the process of training and that the eventual trainees are of a certain quality. The curriculum however only highlights the areas to be covered. The substance is to be filled during the actual training.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Assessment Kenya 2016.Pdf
    GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT KENYA: JANUARY 2013 – JULY 2016 Kenya: Governance Assessment GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT Kenya: January 2013 – July 2016 Roland Ebole and Morris Odhiambo1 1 Introduction This report focuses on politically significant developments in Kenya from 2013, when the country held its first general elections under the 2010 constitution. The constitution is considered to have markedly enhanced protection of basic rights, significantly constrained executive power, and provides limited devolution of powers across 47 newly created county governments.2 In 2013, Kenya held its first general election under the 2010 constitution. Kenyans cast their votes for president, national and county-level representatives, female representatives to the National Assembly, and governors. With 50.5% of the vote, Uhuru Kenyatta of the National Alliance (TNA), backed by the Jubilee Alliance, won the presidency. His opponent, Raila Odinga of the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), backed by the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (CORD), was second with 43.7%. The election of governors and local assemblies strengthened the position of county governments. Female representatives to the National Assembly were elected in all 47 counties3 while 16 more were nominated to the Senate.4 Following the vote, CORD and a civil society organization (CSO) challenged the outcome of the presidential election at the Supreme Court,5 which had only 14 days to consider their petition under the constitution.6 Moreover, the pay scale for members of parliament set by the Salaries and Remuneration Commission was rejected by legislators, forcing the SRC to approve higher salaries.7 Implementation of the constitution and additional reforms continued, including the vetting of police officers by the National Police Service Commission (NPSC) and scrutiny of judges and magistrates by the Judges and Magistrates Vetting Board (JMVB).
    [Show full text]
  • The BBI Judgment and the Invention of Kenya
    The BBI Judgment and the Invention of Kenya Ambreena Manji 2021-05-22T18:15:05 On 13 May 2021, the Constitutional and Human Rights Division of the High Court of Kenya delivered its judgment in David Ndii and Others vs The Attorney General and Others, widely referred to as the BBI judgment. The judgment has led to a flurry of analysis. All commentators have included in their analyses reflections on how the court was attentive to history, specifically Kenya’s constitutional history since independence in 1963. Indeed, the court found in this history a guide to the people’s intentions in ‘bequeathing themselves’ [para 469, 472, 473] the 2010 Constitution. The court reasoned that although ‘there is no clause in the Constitution that explicitly makes any article in the Constitution un-amendable’: “…the scheme of the Constitution, coupled with its history, structure and nature creates an ineluctable and unmistakable conclusion that the power to amend the Constitution is substantively limited. The structure and history of this Constitution makes it plain that it was the desire of Kenyans to barricade it against destruction by political and other elites… the Kenyan Constitution was one in which Kenyans bequeathed themselves in spite of, and at times, against the Political and other elites. Kenyans, therefore, were keen to ensure that their bequest to themselves would not be abrogated through either incompatible interpretation, technical subterfuge, or by the power of amendment unleashed by stealth.” [para 473] The court’s reliance on history in part explains the excitement the judgment has generated. Commentators have pointed out that the basic structure doctrine elaborated by the court rests on the foundations of Kenyan history.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights and Commentary from Dentons
    Insights and Commentary from Dentons The combination of Dentons and Hamilton, Harrison & Mathews (Kenya) oers our clients access to 9000+ lawyers in 167 locations and 73 countries around the world. This document was authored by representatives of Hamilton, Harrison & Mathews prior to our combination's launch and continues to be oered to provide clients with the information they need to do business in an increasingly complex, interconnected and competitive marketplace. ISSUE: 04 THE LEGAL CONNECTION AUG 2017 WITH HERE IS WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT: THE UPCOMING KENYAN ELECTIONS ON THE 8TH AUGUST A. THE KENYAN ELECTION PROCESS 1. On Tuesday, 8 August 2017, the Kenyan general elections will be held in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 7 of the Constitution of Kenya. 2. There are different elective posts, which will be under the jurisdiction of different courts as follows: a. The Supreme Court • The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine issues related to the Presidential election. • Any person may file a petition in the Supreme Court to challenge the election of the President-elect within seven days after the date of the declaration of the results of the election. • The Supreme Court shall hear and make a final determination of the petition within fourteen days, and no right of appeal is available to any party. If the Supreme Court annuls the election of the President-elect, a fresh election shall be held within sixty days after the determination. b. The High Court • The High Court has the jurisdiction to determine disputes in relation to: i.
    [Show full text]
  • Nairobi City County HIV Fast Track Report (2015)
    Nairobi City County HIV Fast Track Report 2015 Foreword Only a decade ago, Nairobi had a population of about two million. Today, this number has doubled. While the country’s capital is an expanding and dynamic hub, drawing people from across the country, the region and the world, and generating opportunities for innovation, the rapid growth of urban areas such as Nairobi also brings particular issues in terms of preventing and managing diseases such as HIV. People living in large and growing cities like Nairobi face specific risks, which increase their vulnerability to HIV infection. These risks include high mobility, a concentration of susceptible groups, such as drug users and sex workers, and high numbers Dr. Evans Kidero, Governor, of people residing in informal, slum settlements – especially Nairobi City County youth. With this in mind, on 1 December 2014, Nairobi joined 13 other cities around the world in signing the Paris Declaration – a key part of the global Fast-Track Cities: Ending the AIDS Epidemic campaign. The declaration commits its signatories to undertake concrete steps to end AIDS by 2030. We chose to be involved in this work – part of a broader effort to achieve the Fast Track Targets – because we understood that if we did not intensify our work to end AIDS, we risk losing the battle against the disease thus ultimately compromising our aspirations for socio-economic progress moving forward. Nairobi City County has, over the last year, mounted an exceptional response, with support from the national government and its partners, including the UN Joint Team on HIV.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Research Paper Uhuru Kenyatta Vs. The
    1 Major Research Paper Uhuru Kenyatta vs. The International Criminal Court: Narratives of Injustice & Solidarity Stefanie Hodgins Student Number: 5562223 Supervisor: Professor Rita Abrahamsen University of Ottawa Graduate School of Public and International Affairs Date: July 23rd, 2015 2 Abstract The intent of this paper is to explore the dominant narratives used by Uhuru Kenyatta to discredit the legitimacy of the International Criminal Court within Kenya and Africa. Using a framing analysis as a theoretical approach, this paper identified four primary arguments, which pertained to issues of neo-colonialism, sovereignty, ethnic polarization, and national reconciliation. This paper argues that these arguments supported narratives of injustice and solidarity and were evoked by Kenyatta in order to mobilize a domestic and regional support base throughout the course of his trial at The Hague. This paper examines how these narratives were used in the context of the 2013 Kenyan election and at Kenyatta's various appearances at the African Union. Overall, this analysis offers new insights into the effectiveness of global criminal justice and considers the importance of addressing local perceptions and realities. 3 Table of Contents 1.0 - Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 - Theoretical and Methodological Approach ..................................................................................... 7 3.0 - Kenya's 2007-08 Post-Election
    [Show full text]
  • Education: Kenya Faces Big Challenges
    The SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT REPORT THE PARTNERSHIP PROVISIONS FOR PEACE OF NEW LAW ON STATE PROJECT FUNDED LEnhancingink governance for all APPOINTMENTS BY THE EU — PAGES 14 & 19 — PAGES 15 - 18 APRIL 2011 Issue No. 078 Kshs 40/= Illegal tuition Nepotism ripe in local Rachuonyo rice farmers hampering FPE councils — MPs get state support —Pg. 3 —Pg. 12 —Pg. 25 Biting poverty affects +HOSÀQG.LPDWKL³0DX Kenya, ADB sign major PAGES education in North Kenya Mau veterans tell Queen loan agreement ON OTHER —Pg. 8 —Pg. 20 —Back Page CDF looting deepens By MUSA RADOLI BEST PERFORMER WORST PERFORMER ORE than Kshs.400 Million allo- cated to 28 constituencies during MWKH¿QDQFLDO\HDUFDQQRW be accounted for. An audit of the funds by the National Taxpayers Association (NTA) has ranked Ugenya constituency among the worst performing constituencies in the management and usage of the funds with losses run- ning to more than 50 per cent. However, the best performing constituency out of the twenty-eight audited was Rift Valley’s Tin- deret, which recorded the least amount of losses due to misuse compared to the rest. Others rated highly included Matuga, Kilome, Bura, and Makueni. Leading in the pack of worst performers included Ugenya with losses amounting to 52.5 per cent, Bu- mula 50 per cent, Kanduyi 48 per cent, Msambweni 38 per cent and Lamu East 37.5 per cent. 7KHUHYHODWLRQVZHUHPDGHZKHQWKH17$RI¿- cially launched its National CDF and Local Authori- ties Transfer Fund (LATF) Citizens Report Cards &56 DQQXDO UHSRUW ¿QGLQJV EDVHG RQ WKH VRFLDO audits conducted in the twenty-eight constituencies beginning January last year to determine how the de- volved funds from the two national kitties were used in the targeted areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Judicial Independence in Malawi
    Politics of Judicial Independence in Malawi Freedom House Report prepared by Rachel Ellett, PhD Contents List of Acronyms 3 Acknowledgments 4 Executive Summary 5 Summary Assessment Table 8 Part I: Introduction 12 A Report Structure 12 B Methodology 12 C Background to the Study 13 D Politics and the Malawian Judiciary 1993-2013 16 Part II: Assessing Judicial Independence in Malawi 26 A Scope of Judicial Power 26 B Differentiation and Separation of Powers 29 C Internal Institutional Safeguards 36 D Transparency 48 E External Institutional Support 50 Part III: Analysis of Judicial Interference 55 A Manipulation of Personnel 56 B Institutional Assaults 56 C Personal Attacks on Judges 59 D Budget Manipulation Resources/Remuneration 62 E Attempted Co-option of Judges 63 Conclusion 64 Annex I: Summary of Existing Policy Reports on the Courts and Rule of law in Malawi 65 Endnotes 68 2 List of Acronyms AFORD Alliance for Democracy CILIC Civil Liberties Committee DPP Democratic Progressive Party HRCC Human Rights Consultative Committee MBC Malawi Broadcasting Corporation MCP Malawi Congress Party MEC Malawi Electoral Commission MLS Malawi Law Society PP People’s Party NDA National Democratic Alliance UDF United Democratic Front 3 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the many individuals who gave their time and consent to sit down for extensive one-on-one interviews in Johannesburg and Blantyre. These frank and detailed conversations generated significant insight and detailed and specific information, without which this report would be substantially diminished. Additionally I’d like to recognize the logistical and editorial support of the Freedom House Johannesburg and Washington DC offices and in particular the collegiality and support of Cathal Gilbert and Juliet Mureriwa.
    [Show full text]