DOCSLIB.ORG

Malheur National Forest Land Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Malheur National Forest Land Management Plan United States Department of Agriculture Malheur National Forest Land Management Plan Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region 2018 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Accessibility: We make every effort to create documents that are accessible to individuals of all abilities; however, limitations with our word processing programs may prevent some parts of this document from being readable by computer-assisted reading devices. If you need assistance with any part of this document, please contact the Malheur National Forest at (541) 575-3000. Land Management Plan for the Malheur National Forest Grant, Harney, Baker, Malheur, and Crook Counties, Oregon Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Cooperating Agencies: Grant County, Oregon Harney County, Oregon Malheur County, Oregon Other Governments Involved: Burns-Paiute Tribe Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation State of Oregon Responsible Official: Jim Peña, Regional Forester USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region 1220 SW 3rd Avenue Portland, OR 97208 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Malheur National Forest 431 Patterson Bridge Road P.O. Box 909 John Day, OR 97845 (541) 575-3000 Websites: https://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/BlueMtnsPlanRevision http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/malheur/home Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose of the Land Management Plan .............................................................................................. 1 Legal Framework................................................................................................................................ 2 Best Available Science ....................................................................................................................... 3 Organization of the Forest Plan .......................................................................................................... 4 Forest Plan Components ..................................................................................................................... 5 Part 1—Vision ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Geographical Location ....................................................................................................................... 9 Roles and Contributions of the National Forests in the Blue Mountains ......................................... 12 Unique Physical and Biological Characteristics ........................................................................... 12 Social and Economic Characteristics ............................................................................................ 13 Management Challenges .................................................................................................................. 15 Social and Economic Expectations ............................................................................................... 16 Diverse Experiences ..................................................................................................................... 17 Transportation System .................................................................................................................. 17 Grazing ......................................................................................................................................... 17 Fire-adapted Ecosystems .............................................................................................................. 17 Invasive Species ........................................................................................................................... 18 Wildlife Habitat ............................................................................................................................ 18 Old Forest ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Watersheds and Aquatic Habitats ................................................................................................. 18 Wild Horses .................................................................................................................................. 20 Climate Change ............................................................................................................................ 20 Goals and Desired Conditions .......................................................................................................... 24 Goal 1: Promote Ecological Integrity ........................................................................................... 25 1.1 Watershed Function ........................................................................................................... 25 1.2 Species Diversity ............................................................................................................... 36 1.3 Federally Listed Species .................................................................................................... 39 1.4 Disturbance Processes ....................................................................................................... 41 1.5 Invasive Species ................................................................................................................ 46 1.6 Structural Stages ................................................................................................................ 47 1.7 Plant Species Composition ................................................................................................ 50 1.8 Stand Density .................................................................................................................... 53 1.9 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 55 1.10 Soil Quality...................................................................................................................... 56 1.11 Water Quality .................................................................................................................. 58 1.12 Landscape Patterns .......................................................................................................... 59 1.13 Special Plant Habitats ...................................................................................................... 61 1.14 Old Forest and Individual Old/Large Trees ..................................................................... 64 1.15 Snags and Down Wood ................................................................................................... 66 Goal 2: Promote Social Well-being .............................................................................................. 70 2.1 Scenery .............................................................................................................................. 70 2.2 Recreation .......................................................................................................................... 73 2.3 Hunting and Fishing .......................................................................................................... 77 2.4 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 81 2.5 Roads and Trails Access .................................................................................................... 82 2.6 Wildland-Urban Interface .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forests of Eastern Oregon: an Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann
    Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann United States Forest Pacific Northwest General Tecnical Report Department of Service Research Station PNW-GTR-578 Agriculture April 2003 Revised 2004 Joseph area, eastern Oregon. Photo by Tom Iraci Authors Sally Campbell is a biological scientist, Dave Azuma is a research forester, and Dale Weyermann is geographic information system manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 620 SW Main, Portland, OR 97205. Cover: Aspen, Umatilla National Forest. Photo by Tom Iraci Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, OR April 2003 State Forester’s Welcome Dear Reader: The Oregon Department of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service invite you to read this overview of eastern Oregon forests, which provides highlights from recent forest inventories.This publication has been made possible by the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program, with support from the Oregon Department of Forestry. This report was developed from data gathered by the FIA in eastern Oregon’s forests in 1998 and 1999, and has been supplemented by inventories from Oregon’s national forests between 1993 and 1996.This report and other analyses of FIA inventory data will be extremely useful as we evaluate fire management strategies, opportunities for improving rural economies, and other elements of forest management in eastern Oregon.We greatly appreciate FIA’s willingness to work with the researchers, analysts, policymakers, and the general public to collect, analyze, and distrib- ute information about Oregon’s forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Harney Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan
    Greater Harney Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan January 2020 Developed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Greater Harney Basin Local Advisory Committee with support from the Harney Soil and Water Conservation District Oregon Department of Agriculture Harney SWCD Water Quality Program 530 Highway 20 South 635 Capitol St. NE Hines, OR 97738 Salem, OR 97301 Phone: (541) 573-5010 Phone: (503) 986-4700 Website: oda.direct/AgWQPlans (This page is blank) Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms .................................................................................................................................... i Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Required Elements of Area Plans ......................................................................................................... iii Plan Content.................................................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Program ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water Quality Program and Applicability of Area Plans...... 1 1.2 History of the Ag Water Quality Program .............................................................................. 1 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Botany, Invasive Plants, Native Plants, Genetics
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest FY-16 Region Program Accomplishments Calochortus umpquaensis, Umpqua mariposa lily, is found only in the Umpqua River watershed of Botany southwestern OR. A big "anthophorid" bee is tucked into the flower. Invasive Plants Native Plants Genetics U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Designate Certain National Forest System Lands in the State of Oregon for Inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for Other Purposes
    97 H.R.7340 Title: A bill to designate certain National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Weaver, James H. [OR-4] (introduced 12/1/1982) Cosponsors (2) Latest Major Action: 12/15/1982 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: Failed to Receive 2/3's Vote to Suspend and Pass by Yea-Nay Vote: 247 - 141 (Record Vote No: 454). SUMMARY AS OF: 12/9/1982--Reported to House amended, Part I. (There is 1 other summary) (Reported to House from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs with amendment, H.Rept. 97-951 (Part I)) Oregon Wilderness Act of 1982 - Designates as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System the following lands in the State of Oregon: (1) the Columbia Gorge Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (2) the Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (3) the Badger Creek Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (4) the Hidden Wilderness in the Mount Hood and Willamette National Forests; (5) the Middle Santiam Wilderness in the Willamette National Forest; (6) the Rock Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (7) the Cummins Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (8) the Boulder Creek Wilderness in the Umpqua National Forest; (9) the Rogue-Umpqua Divide Wilderness in the Umpqua and Rogue River National Forests; (10) the Grassy Knob Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou National Forest; (11) the Red Buttes Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou
    [Show full text]
  • Stewardship Contracting on the Malheur National Forest
    Stewardship Contracting on the Malheur National Forest February 2018 In September 2013, a ten year stewardship contract was awarded to Iron Triangle to complete restoration work on the Malheur National Forest in eastern Oregon’s Blue Mountains. The contract was awarded largely in response to the imminent closure of a mill in the town of John Day, a local crisis that created an unlikely alliance of industry and environmentalists. Ultimately, state and federal government officials intervened to save the mill through an innovative stewardship contract. In order for the mill to remain operational, they needed assurance of a consistent and long term supply of wood. While stewardship contracts have been used by the Forest Service since 1999, this contract is significant for its ten year commitment and the benefit it brings to the local community. Implementation After sending out a request for proposals, when the mill was saved, new opportunities Malheur National Forest awarded a ten were created locally because the contract year Integrated Resource Service Contract could assure enough supply to sustain (IRSC) to Iron Triangle, a contractor based businesses Residents report an increase in out of John Day. Under the IRSC, Iron help wanted signs around the town of John Triangle implements approved thinning Day, and an estimated 101 new jobs were projects on the Malheur NF and sells the supported in the first year of the contract.2 logs to Malheur Lumber Company and other sawmills. Iron Triangle also Blue Mountain Forest Partners subcontracts part of the restoration work to local contractors such as Grayback Forestry After several years of informal conversation and Backlund Logging, who have done between environmentalists and the timber much of the pre-commercial thinning and industry, Blue Mountain Forest Partners (BMFP) was formed in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Historical Forest Conditions in a Diverse Inland Pacific
    Restoring historical forest conditions in a diverse inland Pacific Northwest landscape 1, 1 2 1 JAMES D. JOHNSTON, CHRISTOPHER J. DUNN, MICHAEL J. VERNON, JOHN D. BAILEY, 1 3 BRETT A. MORRISSETTE, AND KAT E. MORICI 1College of Forestry, Oregon State University, 140 Peavy Hall, 3100 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97333 USA 2Department of Forestry and Wildland Resources, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, California 95521 USA 3Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Colorado State University, 1472 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 USA Citation: Johnston, J. D., C. J. Dunn, M. J. Vernon, J. D. Bailey, B. A. Morrissette, and K. E. Morici. 2018. Restoring historical forest conditions in a diverse inland Pacific Northwest landscape. Ecosphere 9(8):e02400. 10.1002/ecs2.2400 Abstract. A major goal of managers in fire-prone forests is restoring historical structure and composition to promote resilience to future drought and disturbance. To accomplish this goal, managers require infor- mation about reference conditions in different forest types, as well as tools to determine which individual trees to retain or remove to approximate those reference conditions. We used dendroecological reconstruc- tions and General Land Office records to quantify historical forest structure and composition within a 13,600 ha study area in eastern Oregon where the USDA Forest Service is planning restoration treatments. Our analysis demonstrates that all forest types present in the study area, ranging from dry ponderosa pine-dominated forests to moist mixed conifer forests, are considerably denser (273–316% increase) and have much higher basal area (60–176% increase) today than at the end of the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent and Contemporary Foraging Practices of the Harney Valley Paiute
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1-1-1978 Recent and contemporary foraging practices of the Harney Valley Paiute Marilyn Dunlap Couture Portland State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Native American Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Couture, Marilyn Dunlap, "Recent and contemporary foraging practices of the Harney Valley Paiute" (1978). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 480. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECENT AND CONTEMPORARY FORAGING PRACTICES OF THE HARNEY VALLEY PAIUTE by MARILYN DUNLAP COUTURE A thesis suoolitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in ANTHROPOLOGY Portland State University @ r1arilyn Dunl ap Couture 1978 TO THE OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH: The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Marilyn Dunlap Couture presented 27 January 1978. Wayne Sut~les, Chairman Thomas M. Newman Byron ~ppert Daniel J. Scheans, He Sta udies and Research AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Marilyn Dunlap Couture for the Master of Arts in Anthropology presented 27 January 1978, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. Title: Recent and Contemporary Foraging Practices of the Harney Valley Paiute. Native plants still play an important part in the lives of some American Indians. This thesis describes recent foraging practices which persist among the Harney Valley Paiute, a group of Northern Paiute Indians which formerly occupied all of Harney Valley in southeastern Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • And White-Rot in Wood-Decay -Omics Data of Two Armillaria Species
    microorganisms Article Hallmarks of Basidiomycete Soft- and White-Rot in Wood-Decay -Omics Data of Two Armillaria Species Neha Sahu 1,2, Zsolt Merényi 1, Balázs Bálint 1, Brigitta Kiss 1, György Sipos 3,4 , Rebecca A. Owens 5 and László G. Nagy 1,6,* 1 Biological Research Center, Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, 6726 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] (N.S.); [email protected] (Z.M.); [email protected] (B.B.); [email protected] (B.K.) 2 Doctoral School of Biology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, 6726 Szeged, Hungary 3 Research Center for Forestry and Wood Industry, Functional Genomics and Bioinformatics Group, University of Sopron, 9400 Sopron, Hungary; [email protected] 4 Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland 5 Department of Biology, Maynooth University, W23 F2H6 Kildare, Ireland; [email protected] 6 Department of Plant Anatomy, Institute of Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Wood-decaying Basidiomycetes are among the most efficient degraders of plant cell walls, making them key players in forest ecosystems, global carbon cycle, and in bio-based industries. Recent insights from -omics data revealed a high functional diversity of wood-decay strategies, especially among the traditional white-rot and brown-rot dichotomy. We examined the mechanistic bases of wood-decay in the conifer-specialists Armillaria ostoyae and Armillaria cepistipes using tran- scriptomic and proteomic approaches. Armillaria spp. (Fungi, Basidiomycota) include devastating pathogens of temperate forests and saprotrophs that decay wood. They have been discussed as white-rot species, though their response to wood deviates from typical white-rotters.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography and Host Range of Armillaria Gallica in Riparian Forests of the Northern Great Plains, USA
    Received: 28 August 2020 | Revised: 7 November 2020 | Accepted: 18 November 2020 DOI: 10.1111/efp.12663 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Phylogeography and host range of Armillaria gallica in riparian forests of the northern Great Plains, USA Brandon C. Alveshere1 | Shawn McMurtrey2 | Patrick Bennett3 | Mee-Sook Kim4 | John W. Hanna5 | Ned B. Klopfenstein5 | James T. Blodgett6 | Jared M. LeBoldus2,7 1Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Connecticut, Abstract Storrs, CT, USA Root disease pathogens, including Armillaria, are a leading cause of growth loss and 2 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, tree mortality in forest ecosystems of North America. Armillaria spp. have a wide Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA 3USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, host range and can cause significant reductions in tree growth that may lead to mor- Forest Health Protection, Missoula, MT, USA tality. DNA sequence comparisons and phylogenetic studies have allowed a better 4 USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest understanding of Armillaria spp. taxonomic diversity. Genetic sequencing has facili- Research Station, Corvallis, OR, USA tated the mapping of species distributions and host associations, providing insights 5USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID, USA into Armillaria ecology. These studies can help to inform forest management and are 6 USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain essential in the development of disease risk maps, leading to more effective man- Region, Forest Health Protection, Rapid City, SD, USA agement strategies for Armillaria root disease. Armillaria surveys were conducted on 7Department of Forest Engineering, publicly owned lands in North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska, U.S.A. Surveyed Resources, and Management, Oregon State stands consisted of riparian forests ≥0.4 hectares in area.
    [Show full text]
  • Armillaria the Genus Armillaria Armillaria in North Contains About 40 Species of America
    2006 No. 3 The many facets of Armillaria The genus Armillaria Armillaria in North contains about 40 species of America. Fortunately, important wood-rot fungi which physical features do are widely distributed across the separate some of the world. Their basic behaviour is species, and the fairly similar, because all the species well documented invade plant roots and cause a geographical ranges of progressive white rot. For this the mushrooms help reason, all these fungi were at one to separate others time grouped into a single species, The classic Armillaria mellea; however, they Honey Mushroom, are now separated based on Armillaria mellea, morphology, physiology, turns out to be pathogenicity, and geographical limited mostly to distribution. eastern North Since so many species of America, so the Armillaria look alike, mycologists Honey Mushrooms we have “mated” Armillaria species in collect and eat in the lab. They grow two species, in Alberta are not a single Petri dish and observe the Armillaria mellea, resulting reaction once the two but one or two other expanding colonies meet in the species of Armillaria. middle of the dish. They discovered that some Honey Morphology Mushrooms would take to one Cap: 3-15 cm, convex another, while others turned up to broadly convex or Photo courtesy: Martin Osis their fungal noses at the idea of plane in age; the margin often pairing up. Thus, using the arched at maturity; dry or tacky; vaguely radially arranged. “biological species concept” (in color extremely variable, but Gills: Attached or slightly basic terms, if they cannot mate, typically honey yellow; smooth, or decurrrent, nearly distant; whitish, they belong to separate species), we with a few tiny, dark scales sometimes bruising or discolouring now define ten species of concentrated near the centre and darker.
    [Show full text]
  • Laminated Root Rot in a Western Washington Plantation: 8-Year Mortality and Growth of Douglas-Fir As Related to Infected Stumps, Tree Density, and Fertilization
    United States Department of Laminated Root Rot in a Western Agriculture Washington Plantation: 8-Year Forest Service Mortality and Growth of Douglas- Pacific Northwest Research Station Fir as Related to Infected Stumps, Research Paper PNW-RP-569 Tree Density, and Fertilization November 2006 Richard E. Miller, Timothy B. Harrington, Walter G. Thies, and Jeff Madsen The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795- 3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
    [Show full text]