Emmy Noether in Erlangen and Göttingen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Emmy Noether in Erlangen and Göttingen Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen Ravi A. Rao School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 1 / 57 Abstract We give an overview of Emmy Noether's seminal works; and her contribution to the birth of modern algebra. We also give an indication of its influence in present day research. Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 2 / 57 Her name In 1809, the Tolerance Edict of Baden stated that the male head of every Jewish family who did not have a distinguishing heriditary surname was to assume one for himself and his children. Elias Samuel, the grandfather of Max Noether, was given the name N¨other.Max and his children used the spelling Noether, though his marriage documents still showed the official spelling as N¨other. Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 3 / 57 Erlangen Felix Klein (1849-1925) brought world fame to Erlangen with his inaugural lecture of 1872 explaining the significance of the concept of a group in geometry, now known as the \Erlangen Program". One of Felix Klein's friends and colleagues, Paul Gordan (1837-1912) was a colleague of Max Noether (1844-1921), whose daughter Emmy was to become Gordan's only doctoral candidate. It was only in 1904 that the University of Erlangen decided that women should be provided full access; and Emmy was accepted by Gordan (the King of Invariant Theory) to be his first student (at the age of 61). She finished her doctorate (no BA or MA in Math!) in the subject of Computational classical Invariant Theory in 1907. Her thesis ended with 331 formulas on invariants of ternary biquadratic forms! Her degree was awarded \summa cum laude" the highest distinction possible. Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 4 / 57 Noether's thesis Her thesis was on the construction of the system of forms for the ternary biquadratic form: Uber¨ der Bildung des Formensystems der tern¨aren biquadratischen Form (registered in Erlanger Universit¨atsschriften1907/08 number 202, dated June 2, 1908). This later appeared in Journal f¨urdie reine und angewandte Mathematik, 134, 1908, pg. 23-90. Emmy Noether herself later referred to her thesis, as well as to several consecutive paper on the theory of invariants, as \crap". She said it was a jungle of formulas { routine calculations. As a lecturer (unpaid) in Erlangen she began to study the work of Hilbert. Two students of Hilbert: E. Fischer (1875-1954) and Erhard Schmidt, were the successor of Gordan (who retired in 1910) at Erlangen, It was Fischer's influence that Emmy Noether made the definitive change from the purely computational method distinctly algorithmic approach represented by Gordan to the mode of thinking characteristic of Hilbert. Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 5 / 57 Noether invited to G¨ottingen In 1913 and 1914 Noether exchanged letters with David Hilbert and his G¨ottingensenior colleague Felix Klein discussing Einstein's Relativity Theory. Hilbert invited her in 1915 to come to G¨ottingenas a Lecturer; but this was opposed by the Humanities department. (What will the soldiers think if they come back from the war and be taught at the feet of a woman? Hilbert argued that: \Gentleman, the Senate is not a bathhouse; so I do not see why a woman cannot enter it. However, he did not succeed in convincing his colleagues. Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 6 / 57 Privatdozent in G¨ottingen Noether was so eager to join Hilbert's department in G¨ottingenthat, to overcome Hilbert's opponents, she agreed not to be formally appointed as a lecturer and to receive no pay. Her father continued supporting her financially (sadly her mother died in 1915) and the lectures she gave were advertised as lectures by Professor Hilbert, with assistance from Dr. E. Noether. It was only in 1922 that she was given a small salary, as a lecturer in algebra. She received the appointment as honorary Professor, as a result of Courant's efforts she received a so-called Lehraufirag, i.e. a small salary (200-400 marks per month) for her lectures; which required confirmation every year by the Ministry. Thus, after the death of Gordan, and with her brother Fritz, and E. Fischer drafted in the military, and the sudden death of her mother, Emmy moved to G¨ottingenat the end of April, 1915, when she received an invitation from Klein and HIlbert to substitute for the Privatdozenten- someone who had the right to teach without being on the paid staff of the university. Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 7 / 57 Noether's work Noether's Theorem had revolutionized physics. In 1919 the full force of her powerful mind turned towards pure mathematics. In this discipline, she was one of the principle architects of abstract algebra. Her name is remembered in many of its concepts, structures and objects, such as: Noetherian, Noetherian group, Noetherian induction, Noether normalization, Noether problem, Noetherian ring, Noetherian module, Noetherian scheme, Noetherian space, Albert{Brauer{Hasse{Noether theorem, Lasker{Noether theorem, and Skolem{Noether theorem. Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 8 / 57 Contd. Her work was pivotal in the fields of: mathematical rings she established the modern axiomatic definition of a commutative ring and developed the basis of commutative ring theory commutative number fields, linear transformations, noncommutative algebras { Hermann Weyl credited Noether with representations of noncommutative algebras by linear transformations, and their application to the study of commutative number fields and their arithmetics. Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 9 / 57 Steinitz paper on field theory In 1910 in Vol. 137 of Crelle, 167{309, there appeared a 134 page paper with the title Algebraische Theorie der K¨orper [Algebraic Theory of Fields] by Ernst Steinitz. Steinitz paper was the first time that an abstract algebraic structure was studied on the basis of its system of axioms. On the one hand the formal algebraic thinking, on the other hand the connection to set theory{these are the characteristics of the modern algebra of structures. Noether carried this program further in her works, Idealtheorie in Ringbereischen (1921) and Abstrakter Aufbau der Idealtheorie in algebraischen Zahl und Funktionenkorpern (1926). Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 10 / 57 Invariant Theory Three of Hilbert's fundamental contributions to modern algebra, Nullstellensatz, Basis Theorem, Syzygy Theorem, were first proved as lemmas in his Invariant Theory papers (1890, 1893). A polynomial f 2 C[X1;:::; Xn] is said to be symmetric if it is invariant under any permutation of the variables X1;:::; Xn i.e. f (X1;:::; Xn) = f (Xσ(1);:::; Xσ(n)), 8σ 2 Sn, the group of permutations on n-symbols. For instance, X "1 = X1 + ::: + Xn = Xi i "2 = X1X2 + X1X3 + ::: + X2X3 + ::: + Xn−1Xn Y = Xi Xj i<j Y "3 = Xi Xj Xk i<j<k ::: = ::: "n = X1X2 ::: Xn Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 11 / 57 Contd. are invariant under the action of Sn. These are called the elementary symmetric polynomials. Every symmetric polynomial f can be written uniquely as a polynomial f ("1;:::;"n) 2 C[X1;:::; Xn]. These fundamental invariants are algebraically independent. There is no non-zero syzygy. Let G be a subgroup of GLn(C), the general linear group. GLn(C) acts linearly on the variables X1;:::; Xn: t t If α 2 GLn(C), send (X1;:::; Xn) 7! α(X1;:::; Xn) , and f 7! f ◦ α. 0 1 Example: Let f = X 2 + 2X X , α = , so X 7! X , and 1 1 2 −1 0 1 2 2 X2 7! −X1, and f 7! X2 − 2X1X2. Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 12 / 57 The ring of invariants G C[X1;:::; Xn] = ff 2 C[X1;:::; Xn] j f = f ◦ γ; 8γ 2 Gg is the subring of C[X1;:::; Xn] consisting of polynomials which are invariant under every element of G. The following are some of the relevant questions about these rings: G • Finite Generation: Is C[X1;:::; Xn] generated by a finite set of generators? • Syzygies: What are (all) the relations between these generators? • Computational Algorithm: Can you give an algorithm to write down an arbitrary invariant as a polynomial in some fundamental invariants? Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 13 / 57 Noether's degree bound Hilbert's Finiteness Theorem showed that for finite groups G ⊂ GLn(C), G the ring of invariants C[X1;:::; Xn] has transcendence degree n over C and is finitely generated. Nagata (1959) gave examples to show that certain \exotic" linear groups do not have finitely generated invariant rings. (This meant that Hilbert's sixth problem had a negative solution in general.) In her last theorem proved in Erlangen, Noether (1916) gave an efficient version of Hilbert's theorem: Ravi A. Rao (TIFR) Emmy Noether in Erlangen and G¨ottingen 14 / 57 Contd. Theorem (Noether's degree bound) G The invariant ring C[X1;:::; Xn] if a finite natrix group G has a basis of n+jGj at most n invariants whose degrees are bounded above by jGj. This theorem has great impact on computational commutative algebra. More generally, Noether's theorem works if jGj is invertible in the base field; and so this has also led to active research in modular invariant theory. Ravi A.
Recommended publications
  • Inverse Galois Problem with Viewpoint to Galois Theory and It's Applications
    Vol-3 Issue-4 2017 IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396 INVERSE GALOIS PROBLEM WITH VIEWPOINT TO GALOIS THEORY AND IT’S APPLICATIONS Dr. Ajay Kumar Gupta1, Vinod Kumar2 1 Associate Professor, Bhagwant Institute of Technology, Muzaffarnagar,Uttar Pradesh, India 2 Research Scholar, Deptt. Of Mathematics, Bhagwant University, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India ABSTRACT In this paper we are presenting a review of the inverse Galois Problem and its applications. In mathematics, more specifically in abstract algebra, Galois Theory, named after Évariste Galois, provides a connection between field theory and group theory. Using Galois Theory, certain problems in field theory can be reduced to group theory, which is, in some sense, simpler and better understood. Originally, Galois used permutation groups to describe how the various roots of a given polynomial equation are related to each other. Galois Theory is the algebraic study of groups that can be associated with polynomial equations. In this survey we outline the milestones of the Inverse Problem of Galois theory historically up to the present time. We summarize as well the contribution of the authors to the Galois Embedding Problem, which is the most natural approach to the Inverse Problem in the case of non-simple groups. Keyword : - Problem, Contribution, Field Theory, and Simple Group etc. 1. INTRODUCTION The inverse problem of Galois Theory was developed in the early 1800’s as an approach to understand polynomials and their roots. The inverse Galois problem states whether any finite group can be realized as a Galois group over ℚ (field of rational numbers). There has been considerable progress in this as yet unsolved problem.
    [Show full text]
  • THE INVERSE GALOIS PROBLEM OVER C(Z)
    THE INVERSE GALOIS PROBLEM OVER C(z) ARNO FEHM, DAN HARAN AND ELAD PARAN Abstract. We give a self-contained elementary solution for the inverse Galois problem over the field of rational functions over the complex numbers. 1. Introduction Since the 19th century one of the foundational open questions of Galois theory is the inverse Galois problem, which asks whether every finite group occurs as the Galois group of a Galois extension of the field Q of rational numbers. In 1892 Hilbert proved his cele- brated irreducibility theorem and deduced that the inverse Galois problem has a positive answer provided that every finite group occurs as the Galois group of a Galois extension of the field Q(z) of rational functions over Q. It was known already back then that the analogous problem for the field C(z) of rational functions over the complex numbers indeed has a positive answer: Every finite group occurs as the Galois group of a Galois extension of C(z). The aim of this work is to give a new and elementary proof of this result which uses only basic complex analysis and field theory. The value of such a proof becomes clear when compared to the previously known ones: 1.1. Classical proof using Riemann's existence theorem. The classical proof (likely the one known to Hilbert) uses the fact that the finite extensions of C(z) correspond to compact Riemann surfaces realized as branched covers of the Riemann sphere C^, which ^ in turn are described by the fundamental group π1(D) of domains D = C r fz1; : : : ; zdg, where z1; : : : ; zd are the branch points.
    [Show full text]
  • A Representation Theory for Noetherian Rings
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 39, 100-130 (1976) A Representation Theory for Noetherian Rings ROBERT GORDON* AND EDWARD L. GREEN+ Department of Mathematics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 Department of Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania I9104 Communicated by A. W. Goldie Received October 28, 1974 The representation theory of artinian rings has long been studied, and seldommore intensely than in the past few years. However, with the exception of integral representationsof finite groups, there is no representation theory for noetherian rings even when they are commutative. Our aim in this paper is to develop such a theory. We attempt to pattern it after the known represen- tation theory of artinian rings. For this, we require a notion of indecom- posability different from the usual one; and we say that a module is strongly indecomposableif it is noetherian, and no factor by a nontrivial direct sum of submoduleshas lower Krull dimension than the module. Thus strongly indecomposablemodules are indecomposableand, by way of example, any uniform noetherian module is strongly indecomposable. Our first result states that some factor of a noetherian module by a direct sum of strongly indecomposablesubmodules has dimension less than the dimension of the module. This decomposition refines indecomposable noetherian modules, but we can say little about it without restricting the underlying ring. Thus we study, in Section 1, or-indecomposablemodules; that is, strongly indecomposablea-dimensional modules that have no nonzero submodule of dimension < cz. The resemblanceof these to indecomposable modules of finite length is analogousto that of a-critical modules to simple ones (see [8]).
    [Show full text]
  • Patching and Galois Theory David Harbater∗ Dept. of Mathematics
    Patching and Galois theory David Harbater∗ Dept. of Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania Abstract: Galois theory over (x) is well-understood as a consequence of Riemann's Existence Theorem, which classifies the algebraic branched covers of the complex projective line. The proof of that theorem uses analytic and topological methods, including the ability to construct covers locally and to patch them together on the overlaps. To study the Galois extensions of k(x) for other fields k, one would like to have an analog of Riemann's Existence Theorem for curves over k. Such a result remains out of reach, but partial results in this direction can be proven using patching methods that are analogous to complex patching, and which apply in more general contexts. One such method is formal patching, in which formal completions of schemes play the role of small open sets. Another such method is rigid patching, in which non-archimedean discs are used. Both methods yield the realization of arbitrary finite groups as Galois groups over k(x) for various classes of fields k, as well as more precise results concerning embedding problems and fundamental groups. This manuscript describes such patching methods and their relationships to the classical approach over , and shows how these methods provide results about Galois groups and fundamental groups. ∗ Supported in part by NSF Grants DMS9970481 and DMS0200045. (Version 3.5, Aug. 30, 2002.) 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14H30, 12F12, 14D15; Secondary 13B05, 13J05, 12E30. Key words and phrases: fundamental group, Galois covers, patching, formal scheme, rigid analytic space, affine curves, deformations, embedding problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Right Ideals of a Ring and Sublanguages of Science
    RIGHT IDEALS OF A RING AND SUBLANGUAGES OF SCIENCE Javier Arias Navarro Ph.D. In General Linguistics and Spanish Language http://www.javierarias.info/ Abstract Among Zellig Harris’s numerous contributions to linguistics his theory of the sublanguages of science probably ranks among the most underrated. However, not only has this theory led to some exhaustive and meaningful applications in the study of the grammar of immunology language and its changes over time, but it also illustrates the nature of mathematical relations between chunks or subsets of a grammar and the language as a whole. This becomes most clear when dealing with the connection between metalanguage and language, as well as when reflecting on operators. This paper tries to justify the claim that the sublanguages of science stand in a particular algebraic relation to the rest of the language they are embedded in, namely, that of right ideals in a ring. Keywords: Zellig Sabbetai Harris, Information Structure of Language, Sublanguages of Science, Ideal Numbers, Ernst Kummer, Ideals, Richard Dedekind, Ring Theory, Right Ideals, Emmy Noether, Order Theory, Marshall Harvey Stone. §1. Preliminary Word In recent work (Arias 2015)1 a line of research has been outlined in which the basic tenets underpinning the algebraic treatment of language are explored. The claim was there made that the concept of ideal in a ring could account for the structure of so- called sublanguages of science in a very precise way. The present text is based on that work, by exploring in some detail the consequences of such statement. §2. Introduction Zellig Harris (1909-1992) contributions to the field of linguistics were manifold and in many respects of utmost significance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Mathematics in America, Peter Duren Et Ai., (Eds.), Vol
    Garrett Birkhoff has had a lifelong connection with Harvard mathematics. He was an infant when his father, the famous mathematician G. D. Birkhoff, joined the Harvard faculty. He has had a long academic career at Harvard: A.B. in 1932, Society of Fellows in 1933-1936, and a faculty appointmentfrom 1936 until his retirement in 1981. His research has ranged widely through alge­ bra, lattice theory, hydrodynamics, differential equations, scientific computing, and history of mathematics. Among his many publications are books on lattice theory and hydrodynamics, and the pioneering textbook A Survey of Modern Algebra, written jointly with S. Mac Lane. He has served as president ofSIAM and is a member of the National Academy of Sciences. Mathematics at Harvard, 1836-1944 GARRETT BIRKHOFF O. OUTLINE As my contribution to the history of mathematics in America, I decided to write a connected account of mathematical activity at Harvard from 1836 (Harvard's bicentennial) to the present day. During that time, many mathe­ maticians at Harvard have tried to respond constructively to the challenges and opportunities confronting them in a rapidly changing world. This essay reviews what might be called the indigenous period, lasting through World War II, during which most members of the Harvard mathe­ matical faculty had also studied there. Indeed, as will be explained in §§ 1-3 below, mathematical activity at Harvard was dominated by Benjamin Peirce and his students in the first half of this period. Then, from 1890 until around 1920, while our country was becoming a great power economically, basic mathematical research of high quality, mostly in traditional areas of analysis and theoretical celestial mechanics, was carried on by several faculty members.
    [Show full text]
  • Integral Domains, Modules and Algebraic Integers Section 3 Hilary Term 2014
    Module MA3412: Integral Domains, Modules and Algebraic Integers Section 3 Hilary Term 2014 D. R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1997{2014 Contents 3 Noetherian Rings and Modules 49 3.1 Modules over a Unital Commutative Ring . 49 3.2 Noetherian Modules . 50 3.3 Noetherian Rings and Hilbert's Basis Theorem . 53 i 3 Noetherian Rings and Modules 3.1 Modules over a Unital Commutative Ring Definition Let R be a unital commutative ring. A set M is said to be a module over R (or R-module) if (i) given any x; y 2 M and r 2 R, there are well-defined elements x + y and rx of M, (ii) M is an Abelian group with respect to the operation + of addition, (iii) the identities r(x + y) = rx + ry; (r + s)x = rx + sx; (rs)x = r(sx); 1x = x are satisfied for all x; y 2 M and r; s 2 R. Example If K is a field, then a K-module is by definition a vector space over K. Example Let (M; +) be an Abelian group, and let x 2 M. If n is a positive integer then we define nx to be the sum x + x + ··· + x of n copies of x. If n is a negative integer then we define nx = −(jnjx), and we define 0x = 0. This enables us to regard any Abelian group as a module over the ring Z of integers. Conversely, any module over Z is also an Abelian group. Example Any unital commutative ring can be regarded as a module over itself in the obvious fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Emmy Noether: the Mother of Modern Algebra Reviewed by Benno Artmann
    Book Review Emmy Noether: The Mother of Modern Algebra Reviewed by Benno Artmann Emmy Noether: The Mother of Modern Algebra The author has to be M. B. W. Tent content with rather A. K. Peters, 2008 general information US$29.00, 200 pages about “abstract al- ISBN-13:978-1568814308 gebra” and has to reduce the few ab- The catalogue of the Library of Congress classifies solutely necessary this book as juvenile literature, and in this respect mathematical defini- it may serve its intentions well. Beyond that, a per- tions to the capabili- son not familiar with Emmy Noether’s (1882–1935) ties of advanced high life and the academic and political situations in school students, as in Germany in the years between 1900 and 1935 may the case of an “ideal” profit from the general picture the book provides on page 89. of these times, even though it may sometimes not One thing, how- be easy to distinguish between facts and fiction. ever, that could eas- The chapters of the book are: I, Childhood; ily be corrected is to II, Studying at the University; III, The Young be found on pages Scholar; IV, Emmy Noether at Her Prime Time in 105–106. Here the author reports that the stu- Göttingen; and V, Exile. dents were “shuffling their feet loudly” when the The book is not an historical work in the aca- professor entered the classroom and did so again demic sense. By contrast, and in agreement with in appreciation at the end of the lecture. Just the her intentions, the author creates a lively picture opposite is right, as the reviewer remembers from more in the sense of a novel—letting various actors his own student days: One stamped the feet at the talk in direct speech, as well as providing as many beginning and end, but shuffling the feet was a anecdotes as she could get hold of and inventing sign of extreme displeasure during or at the end stories that in her opinion fit into the general of the hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany
    Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany Individual Fates and Global Impact Reinhard Siegmund-Schultze princeton university press princeton and oxford Copyright 2009 © by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Siegmund-Schultze, R. (Reinhard) Mathematicians fleeing from Nazi Germany: individual fates and global impact / Reinhard Siegmund-Schultze. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-691-12593-0 (cloth) — ISBN 978-0-691-14041-4 (pbk.) 1. Mathematicians—Germany—History—20th century. 2. Mathematicians— United States—History—20th century. 3. Mathematicians—Germany—Biography. 4. Mathematicians—United States—Biography. 5. World War, 1939–1945— Refuges—Germany. 6. Germany—Emigration and immigration—History—1933–1945. 7. Germans—United States—History—20th century. 8. Immigrants—United States—History—20th century. 9. Mathematics—Germany—History—20th century. 10. Mathematics—United States—History—20th century. I. Title. QA27.G4S53 2008 510.09'04—dc22 2008048855 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Sabon Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ press.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 10 987654321 Contents List of Figures and Tables xiii Preface xvii Chapter 1 The Terms “German-Speaking Mathematician,” “Forced,” and“Voluntary Emigration” 1 Chapter 2 The Notion of “Mathematician” Plus Quantitative Figures on Persecution 13 Chapter 3 Early Emigration 30 3.1. The Push-Factor 32 3.2. The Pull-Factor 36 3.D.
    [Show full text]
  • On Commutative Ekfn-Ring with Ascending Chain Condition on Annihilators
    International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 86 No. 5 2013, 871-881 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu AP doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v86i5.10 ijpam.eu ON COMMUTATIVE EKF N-RING WITH ASCENDING CHAIN CONDITION ON ANNIHILATORS Mohameth Alassane Ndiaye1, Cheikh Thi´ecoumba Gueye2 § 1,2Laboratoire d’Alg`ebre, de Cryptographie De G´eom´etrie Alg´ebrique et Applications (LACGAA) D´epartement de Math´ematiques et Informatique Facult´edes Sciences et Techniques Universit´eCheikh Anta Diop BP 5005 Dakar, SEN´ EGAL´ Abstract: We consider the class E of endo-noetherian modules, ie the modules M satisfying the ascending chain condition for endomorphic kernels: the chain Kerf1 ⊂ Kerf2 ⊂ · · · ⊂ Kerfn ⊂ · · · is stationary, where fi ∈ End(M). And let N be the class of noetherian modules. It is well known that every noetherian R-module M is endo-noetherian, but the converse is not true, so N ⊂ E. The aim of this work, is to characterize commutative rings for which E and N are identical. AMS Subject Classification: 13-XX Key Words: annihilator, Artinian, EKF N-ring, endo-noetherian, Hopfian, Noetherian, strongly Hopfian 1. Introduction The ascending chain condition is a mathematical property on orders, initially identified by Emmy Noether in 1921 [5] in the context of commutative algebra, and objects satisfying it are named noetherian in her honor. Noether showed that this ascending chain condition is equivalent to the non-existence of an infi- nite strictly increasing sequence of ideals. These rings named, noetherian rings, c 2013 Academic Publications, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Amalie (Emmy) Noether
    Amalie (Emmy) Noether Female Mathematicians By Ella - Emmy was born in 1882 and her father was a math professor at the University of Erlangen During her Life and that's one of the reason why she started to be interested in math - She couldn’t enroll in the college Erlangen because she was a woman but she did audit the classes. Also, when Emmy was on staff of Göttingen University but didn’t get paid to lecture like her male colleagues - At this time girls were only allowed University of Erlangen in Germany to go to "finishing school,” where they learn to teach. Emmy became certified to teach French and English but never did because she pursued mathematics. Emmay’s Accomplishments - Emmy Noether discovered the link between conservation laws and symmetries. Conservation laws is when a particular quantity must stay constant. For example, energy can’t be created or destroyed. Symmetries is the changes that can be made without changing the way the object looks or acts. For example, it doesn’t matter how you rotate or change the direction of a sphere it will always appear the same. - She also found noncommutative algebras which is when there is a specific order that numbers be multiplied to solve the equation. The Importance of her Accomplishments - The link between conservation laws and symmetries is called Noether’s Theorem. It is important because it gives us insight into conservation laws. Also, it is important because it shows scientists that repeating an experiment at different times won’t change the results. Timeline Left Germany to teach in America Received her Ph D Germany became an Born unsafe place to live for the college Erlangen a Jew like herself.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 INTRO Welcome to Biographies in Mathematics Brought to You From
    INTRO Welcome to Biographies in Mathematics brought to you from the campus of the University of Texas El Paso by students in my history of math class. My name is Tuesday Johnson and I'll be your host on this tour of time and place to meet the people behind the math. EPISODE 1: EMMY NOETHER There were two women I first learned of when I started college in the fall of 1990: Hypatia of Alexandria and Emmy Noether. While Hypatia will be the topic of another episode, it was never a question that I would have Amalie Emmy Noether as my first topic of this podcast. Emmy was born in Erlangen, Germany, on March 23, 1882 to Max and Ida Noether. Her father Max came from a family of wholesale hardware dealers, a business his grandfather started in Bruchsal (brushal) in the early 1800s, and became known as a great mathematician studying algebraic geometry. Max was a professor of mathematics at the University of Erlangen as well as the Mathematics Institute in Erlangen (MIE). Her mother, Ida, was from the wealthy Kaufmann family of Cologne. Both of Emmy’s parents were Jewish, therefore, she too was Jewish. (Judiasm being passed down a matrilineal line.) Though Noether is not a traditional Jewish name, as I am told, it was taken by Elias Samuel, Max’s paternal grandfather when in 1809 the State of Baden made the Tolerance Edict, which required Jews to adopt Germanic names. Emmy was the oldest of four children and one of only two who survived childhood.
    [Show full text]