DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT Section 502, Title 14 California Code of Regulations MIGRATORY GAME BIRD HUNTING (WATERFOWL, COOTS, MOORHENS) February 19, 2020 STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE ANDandWILWildWILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................i LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................. iii LIST OF APPENDICES ......................................................................................................iv PROPOSED PROJECT ...................................................................................................... 5 STATE AND FEDERAL ROLES IN ESTABLISHING WATERFOWL HUNTING REGULATIONS ............................................................................................ 6 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION................................................................... 9 AREAS OF CONTROVERSY........................................................................................... 11 ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED ............................................................................................ 11 FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALANCY ........................................................................................ 11 SUBMITTING COMMENTS ON THE ED ........................................................................ 12 CHAPTER 1 - THE PROPOSED ACTION ...................................................................... 13 Background ................................................................................................. 16 Existing Conditions ..................................................................................... 21 Proposed Changes and Analysis............................................................... 28 POLICY CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................................... 30 POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ................................................................... 30 Effects of Habitat Degradation ................................................................... 31 Effects of Diseases, Pesticides, and Other Contaminants ....................... 32 Effects of Illegal Harvest............................................................................. 32 Effects of Subsistence Harvest .................................................................. 32 Effects of Harvest Outside the United States ............................................ 33 Effects of Major Development Projects ..................................................... 33 Effects on Listed Species ........................................................................... 33 Effects on Migratory Bird Habitats ............................................................. 34 Effects on Recreational Opportunities ....................................................... 34 Effects on Methods of Take and Impacts on Individual Animals.............. 35 Effects from Drought................................................................................... 35 Effects of Habitat Change .......................................................................... 47 Cumulative Impacts .................................................................................... 61 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................... 62 CHAPTER 2 – ALTERNATIVES ...................................................................................... 62 Alternative 1. No project – no change from the 2019-20 hunting regulations................ 62 Alternative 2. Reduced Season Lengths, Season Timing and Bag Limits..................... 63 Alternative 3. Elimination of all mechanically- and artificially-powered spinning wing decoys as a method of take. ...................................................................... 65 LITERATURE CITED ........................................................................................................ 67 i LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Summary of Alternatives and Their Impacts ....................................................... 6 Table 2. Proposed Season Dates and Bag Limits for 2020-21 ...................................... 13 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Waterfowl Zones in California ........................................................................... 15 Figure 2. Administrative Waterfowl Flyways .................................................................... 17 Figure 3. CA Breeding Population Estimates .................................................................. 42 Figure 4. Northeastern California Canada Goose Pair Survey....................................... 43 Figure 5. Waterfowl Mortality from Botulism .................................................................... 44 Figure 6. Waterfowl Mortality from Avian Cholera ........................................................... 45 Figure 7. CA Breeding Population Estimates for Mallards vs. Harvest .......................... 46 iii LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. 2019-20 Regulations Related to Migratory Waterfowl, Coot, Moorhen, and Snipe, Sections 502, 507, Title 14, California Code of Regulations .......A-1 Appendix B. Possible Effect of Climate Change Impacts on Waterfowl……………….B-1 Appendix C. Western Mallard and California Breeding Population Status .................. C-1 Appendix D. Pintail, Canvasback, and Scaup Population Status ................................ D-1 Appendix E. Additional Hunting Day Analysis ...............................................................E-1 Appendix F. Pacific Flyway Goose Population Status ................................................... F-1 Appendix G. Effects of Habitat Change Analyses ........................................................ G-1 Appendix H. Estimated Retrieved Harvest of Ducks and Geese in California............. H-1 Appendix I. Possible Effects of Spinning Wing Decoys in California ............................. I-1 iv SUMMARY On behalf of the California Fish and Game Commission (Commission), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) has prepared this environmental document (ED) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) in compliance with the Commission’s certified regulatory program (CRP) as approved by the Secretary for the California Natural Resources Agency (Public Resources Code, Section 21080.5; CEQA Guidelines Section 15251, subd. (b); California Code of Regulations Title 14 Section 781.5). This summary provides a brief description of the proposed project, project alternatives and summary of environmental impacts. PROPOSED PROJECT The project discussed in this document (the proposed project) involves modifications to the current waterfowl hunting regulations for the 2020-21 waterfowl hunting season. Specifically, the Department is proposing to: • Open the duck season on the second Saturday in October and close January 20 for the Northeastern Zone. This reduces the duck season length to 103 days from 105. • Open the duck season on the fourth Saturday of October and close January 31 for the Southern San Joaquin Valley, the Southern California, and the Balance of State zones. This reduces the duck season length to 100 days from 105. • Open the regular goose season on the fourth Saturday in October and close January 31 for the Southern San Joaquin Valley and the Southern California zones. This recommendation reduces the season length to 100 days from 105. • Designate two days as Veterans and Active Military Personnel Waterfowl Hunting Days (VAMP Days hereafter) for the Northeastern, Southern San Joaquin Valley, Southern California, and Balance of State zones. Designate two days as Veterans and Active Military Personnel Waterfowl Hunting Days (VAMP) for the Northeastern, Southern San Joaquin Valley, Southern California, and Balance of State zones. 5 STATE AND FEDERAL ROLES IN ESTABLISHING WATERFOWL HUNTING REGULATIONS Migratory birds are managed under the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of July 3, 1918 (40. Stat. 755:16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.), Federal regulations [50 CFR 20(K)(L)], as well as California statutes (Fish and Game Code sections 355 and 356) and regulations selected by the Commission. The regulations governing the take of migratory game birds in California are selected by the Commission and forwarded to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) each year. States (California) must set waterfowl hunting regulations within the federal frameworks established by the Service through the following generalized four-step process: 1. The Service, with assistance from the states, assesses the status of migratory game bird populations and establishes a set of regulation frameworks; 2. The Department recommends season dates and proposed changes to the Commission; 3. The Commission makes and forwards season selections to the Service regarding regulations for California; and 4. The Service and the State publish the final regulations. The Federal frameworks specify the outside dates, total number of hunting days, bag limits, shooting hours, and methods of take authorized for migratory game birds. The Department will recommend specific season dates and bag limits to the Commission that are within the federal frameworks. The Commission may not select more liberal season dates or bag limits than those set by the Federal frameworks. The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transcript for Tracks in the Snow by Wong Herbert Yee (Square Fish, an Imprint of Macmillan)
    Transcript for Tracks in the Snow by Wong Herbert Yee (Square Fish, an Imprint of Macmillan) Introduction (approximately 0:00 – 5:16) Hi everyone! It's Colleen from the KU Natural History Museum, and I am so excited for today's Story Book Science. I'm so excited to read the Book Tracks in the Snow. But while we wait, Because I want to give some opportunity for folks to join us, I want to ask you a question that's related to the Book. Now, when we look at the Book cover, we see the word tracks is in the title. So what are tracks? Well, tracks are markings or impressions that animals, including humans, can leave Behind. And they leave them Behind in suBstances like snow or dirt. Alright? So, these tracks can tell us about what animals are in an area. And we can use them to identify the animals. Okay? Now, what animals do you think we can identify By their tracks? We can definitely identify animals like cottontail rabBits and mallard ducks. So I have the tracks of a cottontail rabBit and a mallard duck. So I'm going to grab those. And this is the track of a cottontail rabBit. You can see it's very oval – oops – very oval in shape. And it's very long. So this is how we can identify a cottontail rabBit, looking for this really long oval shape. So I'm going to put this down. And now, we're going to look at the track of a mallard duck.
    [Show full text]
  • Ducks Nesting in Enclosed Areas and Ducks in the Pool
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ducks Nesting In Enclosed Areas and Ducks in the Pool After about 25 days of incubation, the chicks will hatch. Duck migration: The mother will lead her chicks to the water within 24 Mallards often migrate unless there is sufficient food hours after hatching. Keep children and pets away and water available throughout the year. Many from the family. migrating individuals spend their winters in the Gulf Coast and fly to the Northern U.S. and Canada in the Ducks in enclosed areas and in the pool: spring. For migrating Mallards, spring migration Your yard may be providing ducks with the ideal place begins in March. In many western states, Mallards are to build a nest. You may have vegetation and water present year-round. that provides them with resources to live and build a nest in hopes they will succeed in raising a brood. Male Mallard Tim Ludwick/USFWS Female Mallard Tim Ludwick/USFWS Territory and Breeding: Breeding season varies among individuals, locations, Here, we provide you with some suggestions when and weather. Mallards begin to defend a territory ducks have decided to make your yard a temporary about 200 yards from where the nesting takes place. home. They often defend the territory to isolate the female from other males around February-mid May. Mallards What to do to discourage nesting and swimming in build their nests between March-June and breed pools: through the beginning of August. These birds can be secretive during the breeding seasons and may nest in • When you see a pair of ducks, or a female quacking places that are not easily accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Name Spring Summer Fall Winter Greater White-Fronted Goose
    Illinois River NWFR Bird Checklist Legend: A = Abundant - Common species that is very numerous C = Common - Certain to be seen in suitable habitat U = Uncommon - May be present but not certain to be seen O = Occasional - Seen only a few times during season R = Rare - Seen at intervals of 2 to 5 years X = Extremely Rare - (Same as Accidental) * = Nesting species # = State threatened or endangered species Common Name Spring Summer Fall Winter Swans, Geese, and Ducks Greater White-fronted Goose O O O Snow Goose U U Ross's Goose R R Canada Goose * C C A U Cackling Goose U O O Mute Swan R R R Tundra Swan O U U Trumpeter Swan O O O Wood Duck * A A A O Gadwall U O C O American Wigeon C R C R American Black Duck C R C O Mallard * A A A C Blue-winged Teal * C U A R Cinnamon Teal R R Northern Shoveler C C Northern Pintail C R A O Green-winged Teal C O A R Canvasback C C O Redhead U U O Ring-necked Duck C C U Greater Scaup R O Lesser Scaup A C O Surf Scoter R R White-winged Scoter R R Black Scoter R R Long-tailed Duck R R Bufflehead U U O Common Goldeneye U U U Hooded Merganser * C O C O Common Merganser C O C Red-breasted Merganser O O Ruddy Duck C R C U Upland Game Birds Ring-necked Pheasant O O O O Wild Turkey * O O O O Northern Bobwhite * U U U U Loons, Grebes, Pelicans, and Cormorants Red-throated Loon R Common Loon O O Pied-billed Grebe * C O U Horned Grebe U U Eared Grebe R R Western Grebe R American White Pelican A A O Double-crested Cormorant A O A O Bitterns, Herons, and Vultures American Bittern # R R R Least Bittern * # R R R Great Blue
    [Show full text]
  • 4-H-993-W, Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Food Flash Cards
    Purdue extension 4-H-993-W Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Food Flash Cards Authors: Natalie Carroll, Professor, Youth Development right, it goes in the “fast” pile. If it takes a little and Agricultural Education longer, put the card in the “medium” pile. And if Brian Miller, Director, Illinois–Indiana Sea Grant College the learner does not know, put the card in the “no” Program Photos by the authors, unless otherwise noted. pile. Concentrate follow-up study efforts on the “medium” and “no” piles. These flash cards can help youth learn about the foods that wildlife eat. This will help them assign THE CONTEST individual food items to the appropriate food When youth attend the WHEP Career Development categories and identify which wildlife species Event (CDE), actual food specimens—not eat those foods during the Foods Activity of the pictures—will be displayed on a table (see Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Program (WHEP) Figure 1). Participants need to identify which contest. While there may be some disagreement food category is represented by the specimen. about which wildlife eat foods from the category Participants will write this food category on the top represented by the picture, the authors feel that the of the score sheet (Scantron sheet, see Figure 2) and species listed give a good representation. then mark the appropriate boxes that represent the wildlife species which eat this category of food. The Use the following pages to make flash cards by same species are listed on the flash cards, making it cutting along the dotted lines, then fold the papers much easier for the students to learn this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Bobcats/Town Forest
    artford onservation ommission H C C The Hartford Conservation Commission (HCC) invites you to The HCC became custodians of the Hartford Town Forest enjoy a hidden jewel, the Hartford Town Forest. What makes it (HTF) in 1997. We strive to balance three forestry so special? It is one of the largest parcels of undeveloped land objectives: in Hartford and is home to numerous animals from secretive amphibians to large mammals; even wide-ranging bear and • Forest Products: to sustainably grow and harvest moose pass through the forest. trees while respecting the natural communities • WildliFe: to provide and enhance diverse habitats for The Hartford Town Forest is a 423-acre parcel that abuts the native wildlife C 142-acre Hurricane Forest Wildlife Refuge (HFWR). Both • recreation: to promote recreation that will a) parcels are almost entirely forested and collectively contain ensure all users’ safety, and b) ‘tread lightly’ on the three old reservoirs, several miles of recreational trails, seasonal forest and its wildlife and permanent streams, varied topography, and diverse wildlife This newsletter focuses on the HTF. We’ll review what the O habitats. The Parks and Recreation Commission oversees the HFWR, with its recreation and wildlife protection focus. The HCC is doing to manage the HTF and what we can all do to HCC manages the more remote Hartford Town Forest. be good stewards of this special place. N 2010 HCC EvEnts CalEndar April 17, Saturday Vernal Pool Walk, 10:00 a.m. — noon, Hartford Town Forest* April 22, Thursday Earth Day, Kim Royar (VT Fish and Wildlife) Lecture on Bobcats and the Linking Lands Alliance S presents its Wildlife Habitat Map, 7 p.m., Vermont Institute of Natural Science (VINS), Quechee April 24–May 1 Green-Up Hartford Days, green-up bags available at Municipal Office* May 1, Saturday Green-Up Day/Arbor Day Celebration, 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Sauvie Island Bird Checklist Documents
    WATERFOWL S S F W Cooper’s Hawk* O O O O Pectoral Sandpiper O Northern Goshawk R R Sharp-tailed Sandpiper A Tundra Swan U R U C Red-shouldered Hawk A Stilt Sandpiper A Trumpeter Swan R R R R Red-tailed Hawk* C C C C Buff-breasted Sandpiper A Greater White-fronted Goose U R U O Swainson’s Hawk A A Ruff A A Snow Goose O O U Rough-legged Hawk O O U Short-billed Dowitcher U Ross’s Goose R Long-billed Dowitcher U U U O Ferruginous Hawk A A Emperor Goose R R American Kestrel* C C C C Common Snipe* U O U C Canada Goose* C U C C Merlin O O O O Wilson’s Phalarope O R O SYMBOLS Brant O O O Prairie Falcon R R R R Red-necked Phalarope O R O S - March - May Wood Duck* C C U U Peregrine Falcon # O O O Red Phalarope A A A S - June - August Mallard* C C C C Gyrfalcon A F - September - November American Black Duck A GULLS & TERNS S S F W W - December - February Gadwall* U O U U GALLINACEOUS BIRDS S S F W # - Threatened or Endangered Species Green-winged Teal C U C C Parasitic Jaeger A * - Breeds Locally American Wigeon C U C C Ring-necked Pheasant* U O U U Franklin’s Gull A A A A Eurasian Wigeon O O O Ruffed Grouse* O O O O Bonaparte’s Gull O R O R C - Common U - Uncommon O - Occasional Northern Pintail* C U C C California Quail* R R R R Ring-billed Gull C U U C R - Rare A - Accidental Northern Shoveler* C O C C Mew Gull U O O C Blue-winged Teal* R R R R RAILS, COOTS & CRANES S S F W California Gull C O U C LOONS & GREBES S S F W Cinnamon Teal* U C U O Herring Gull U O U Canvasback O O O Virginia Rail*
    [Show full text]
  • Using Predator Exclosures to Protect Ground Nests from Red Fox
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Human–Wildlife Interactions for 2007 Using predator exclosures to protect ground nests from red fox Ben C. West Utah State University Terry A. Messmer Utah State University Dominic C. Bachman Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hwi Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons West, Ben C.; Messmer, Terry A.; and Bachman, Dominic C., "Using predator exclosures to protect ground nests from red fox" (2007). Human–Wildlife Interactions. 136. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hwi/136 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human–Wildlife Interactions by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Human–Wildlife Confl icts 1(1):24–26, Spring 2007 Using predator exclosures to protect ground nests from red fox BEN C. WEST, Jack H. Berryman Institute, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5230, USA1 [email protected] TERRY A. MESSMER, Jack H. Berryman Institute, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5230, USA DOMINIC C. BACHMAN, Jack H. Berryman Institute, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5230, USA ABSTRACT: Nest predation often is cited as a primary cause for low recruitment and subsequent population decline of many ground-nesting bird species. In response, managers and researchers have developed a myriad of techniques to reduce rates of predation on ground nests.
    [Show full text]
  • Moorestown Township Environmental Resource Inventory
    APPENDIX C Vertebrate Animals Known or Probable in Moorestown Township Mammals Common Name Scientific Name Status Opossum Didelphis marsupialis Stable Eastern Mole Scalopus aquaticus Stable Big Brown Bat Eptesicus fuscus Stable Little Brown Bat Myotis lucifugus Stable Eastern Cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus Stable Eastern Chipmunk Tamias striatus Stable Gray Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Stable White-footed Mouse Peromyscus leucopus Stable Meadow Vole Microtus pennsylvanicus Stable Muskrat Ondatra zibethicus Stable Pine Vole Microtus pinetorum Stable Red Fox Vulpes vulpes Stable Gray Fox Urocyon cinereoargenteus Stable Raccoon Procyon lotor Stable Striped Skunk Mephitis mephitis Stable River Otter Lutra canadensis Stable Beaver Castor candensis Increasing White-tailed Deer Odocoileus virginianus Decreasing Source: NJDEP, 2012 C-1 Birds Common Name Scientific Name NJ State Status Loons - Grebes Pied-Billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps E Gannets - Pelicans - Cormorants Double Crested Cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus S Bitterns - Herons - Ibises American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus E Least Bittern Ixobrychus exilis SC Black Crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax T Green Heron Butorides virescens RP Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias SC Great Egret Ardea alba RP Geese - Swans - Ducks Canada Goose Branta canadensis INC Snow Goose Chen caerulescens INC American Wigeon Anas americana S Common Merganser Mergus merganser S Hooded Merganser Lophodytes cucullatus S Green-winged Teal Anas carolinensis RP Mallard Anas platyrhynchos INC Northern Pintail
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Wildlife Grant Final Report Makah Cougar and Bobcat Research Grant: F12AP00260
    Tribal Wildlife Grant Final Report Makah Cougar and Bobcat Research Grant: F12AP00260 Prepared by: Shannon Murphie and Rob McCoy 1 INTRODUCTION Mountain lions or cougars (Puma concolor) and bobcats (Lynx rufus) are both native mammals of the family Felidae. Mountain lions are large solitary cats with the greatest range of any large wild terrestrial mammal in the Western Hemisphere (Iriarte et al. 1990). Bobcats are also solitary cats that range from southern Canada to northern Mexico, including most of the continental United States. Both species are predators and as such play a prominent role in Native American mythology and culture due to their perceived attributes such as grace, strength, eyesight, and hunting ability. Similar to other Native American Tribes, predators have played a key role in the culture and ceremonies of the Makah people. Gray wolves (Canis lupus), black bear (Ursus americanus), cougars, and bobcats all are important components of Makah culture both historically and in contemporary times. For example, black bears and gray wolves both represented important clans in Makah history. Gray wolves exhibited cooperative behavior that provided guidelines for human behavior and “Klukwalle,” or wolf ritual, was a secret society that required a 6 day initiation period (G. Arnold, personal communication). Wolf hides were also used in dance and costume regalia. Bear hides were worn by men of status (Chapman 1994) and as regalia during whale hunts (G. Ray, personal communication). Cougars and bobcats play a smaller, but still important role in Makah history and contemporary culture. During naming ceremonies a Makah name is given which best reflects an individual, often an animal such as the mountain lion is used as it represents intelligence and power.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue-Winged and Green-Winged Teals, Are the Marshes, Swamps, and Ponds of Zero to Low Water Movement
    BirdWalk Newsletter 1.29.2017 Walk Conducted by: Perry Nugent Newsletter Written by: Jayne J. Matney Photo right by Cary McDonald Blue-winged Teal male with duckweed beak and chest followed by female partner Photo below by Chuck Fuhrman Two Green-winged Teal males This week will be the first in a series of articles covering the ducks of Magnolia Plantation. Most of our duck population is not of permanent residences. Instead, they migrate in for wintering and migrate out for breeding. The males are called “drakes” and the females are called “hens”. Some of these ducks are considered “dabblers”, which means they eat primarily along the surface of the water chewing or filtering from the surface and rarely dive, while others are the “divers”, which do just that-they dive head first into the water for feeding. Dabbling ducks will occasionally dive for food or to escape predators. Photo above left by Chuck Fuhrman Blue-winged Teal Photo above right by Perry Nugent Green-winged Teal The Blue-winged Teal, Anas discors, (above left) and the Green-winged Teal, Anas crecca, (above right) will be discussed this week. They are in the category of dabblers; both species primarily feed off of aquatic plants and seeds from the surface of the water and small larvae, insects, and crustaceans that may be found there as well. Apparently, egg laying females may feed mostly on animal rather than plant during those special times. Both species are small comparatively to other types of ducks, rest out of the water on stumps, rocks and broken branches, and are fast in flight.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Waterfowl Population Status Survey
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Waterfowl Population Status, 2019 Waterfowl Population Status, 2019 August 19, 2019 In the United States the process of establishing hunting regulations for waterfowl is conducted annually. This process involves a number of scheduled meetings in which information regarding the status of waterfowl is presented to individuals within the agencies responsible for setting hunting regulations. In addition, the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register to allow public comment. This report includes the most current breeding population and production information available for waterfowl in North America and is a result of cooperative eforts by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS), various state and provincial conservation agencies, and private conservation organizations. In addition to providing current information on the status of populations, this report is intended to aid the development of waterfowl harvest regulations in the United States for the 2020–2021 hunting season. i Acknowledgments Waterfowl Population and Habitat Information: The information contained in this report is the result of the eforts of numerous individuals and organizations. Principal contributors include the Canadian Wildlife Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, state wildlife conservation agencies, provincial conservation agencies from Canada, and Direcci´on General de Conservaci´on Ecol´ogica de los Recursos Naturales, Mexico. In addition, several conservation organizations, other state and federal agencies, universities, and private individuals provided information or cooperated in survey activities. Appendix A.1 provides a list of individuals responsible for the collection and compilation of data for the “Status of Ducks” section of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Ibastoryspring08.Pdf
    irds find Maine attractive for many of the same reasons we do—the state offers a unique blend of landscapes spanning from mountains to the sea, with forests, grasslands, rivers, marshes, and long coastlines in between. B Where we find beautiful places to hike and kayak, camp and relax, birds find the habitat they need for their survival. But while Maine’s diverse habitats serve an important role for over IBAs 400 bird species—some threatened, endangered, or of regional conservation in concern—the state’s not immune to a growing list of threats that puts these birds at further risk. Habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation due to development, toxins such as mercury and lead, oil spills on the coast and Maine inland waters, and climate change are top among them. BY ANDREW COLVIN In the face of these threats, a crucial step in conserving Maine’s birds is to identify the areas of the state that are most important for breeding, wintering, and migration. After several years of working toward that goal, Maine Audubon Lists Maine Audubon has recently completed the first phase of its Important 22 of the Most Important Bird Areas (IBA) program, identifying 22 areas across Maine that are vital Places in Maine for Vulnerable Birds to state—and even global—bird populations. HANS TOOM ERIC HYNES Eight of the rare birds used to identify IBAs in Maine (clockwise from left): Short-eared owl, black-throated blue warbler, least tern, common moorhen, scarlet tanager, harlequin duck, saltmarsh sharp-tailed sparrow, and razorbill. MIKE FAHEY Important
    [Show full text]