DOCSLIB.ORG

Georgetown Law Magazine (2019 Fall-Winter)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FALL/WINTER 2019 The Vision for Georgetown Law GEORGETOWN LAW Fall/Winter 2019 ANN W. PARKS, Esq. (G’14, LL.M.’16) Editor BRENT FUTRELL Director of Design INES HILDE Associate Director of Design MIMI KOUMANELIS Executive Director of Communications TANYA WEINBERG Director of Media Relations and Deputy Director of Communications RICHARD SIMON Director of Web Communications JACLYN DIAZ Communications and Social Media Manager BEN PURSE Senior Video Producer JERRY COOPER Communications Associate CONTRIBUTORS Julie Bourbon, Barbara Grzincic, Melanie D.G. Kaplan, Greg Langlois, Sara Piccini, Abby Reecer, Mark Smith, Anna Louie Sussman MATTHEW F. CALISE Director of Alumni Affairs GENE FINN Assistant Dean of Development and Alumni Relations WILLIAM M. TREANOR Dean of the Law Center Executive Vice President, Law Center Affairs Front and back cover photos: Brent Futrell Contact: Editor, Georgetown Law Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 [email protected] Address changes/additions/deletions: 202-687-1994 or e-mail [email protected] Georgetown Law magazine is on the Law Center’s website at www.law.georgetown.edu Copyright © 2019, Georgetown University Law Center. All rights reserved. Orientation 2019 During Orientation 2019, faculty and staff guided some of Georgetown Law’s new first-year students to many locations around the city including the Washington, D.C., offices of Microsoft, the Library of Congress and the National Museum of African American History and Culture. Professor Robert Thompson, above, led 1Ls on a jog around the National Mall. Photo Credit: Brent Futrell. 2019 Fall/Winter 1 INSIDENEWS / CONVINCING EVIDENCE / 6 / 12 Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Welcomes 1Ls Know Your Power Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg came to Georgetown House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Harvard Professor Henry Louis Law to address the newest entering class — and received a t-shirt Gates Jr. addressed some of Georgetown Law’s 2019 graduates in from the Class of 2022. Hart Auditorium in the week leading up to Commencement. /23 /30 State Courts Matter Superblock! The Vision for Georgetown Law Georgetown Law’s Center for the Constitution hosted the inaugural Georgetown Law is celebrating its 150th anniversary in 2020 with a Cooley Lecture and awarding of the Cooley Book Prize in April. fabulous new purchase — a building to expand the existing campus. 2 Georgetown Law CONVINCING EVIDENCE \ NEWS / 38 / 66 Going Global: 21st Century Legal Questions Commencement 2019 Since its first class in 1870 — which included student Joseph I. At the Law Center’s 147th Commencement on May 19, New York Rodrigues, from Cuba — Georgetown Law has evolved as the place to Solicitor General Barbara Underwood (L’69) and Judge Emmet G. be for international law. Sullivan received honorary degrees. 04/ Thoughts from the Dean 06/ News 30/ Feature: Superblock! The Vision for Georgetown Law 38/ Feature: Going Global: 21st Century Legal Questions 62/ Campus 88/ Alumni 100/ Class Notes / 77 Faculty Georgetown Law’s annual Teaching & Scholarship Luncheon honored the full-time and adjunct Law Center faculty who are making an impact. 2019 Fall/Winter 3 NEWSTHOUGHTS / CONVINCING FROM THE DEAN EVIDENCE \ Superblock! The Vision for Georgetown Law As we approach our 150th The other major development on our campus is that we Anniversary next year, have renamed our “Tower Green” to honor longtime Georgetown now has a law Georgetown Law Professor and Representative Elea- campus of a size and beauty nor Holmes Norton (D.-D.C.). Representative Norton is that was unimaginable a giant in the law and a personal hero of mine. I was when McDonough Hall joined by the Congresswoman, Mayor Bowser and opened in 1971. This issue of President DeGioia as we re-dedicated the Green as the the magazine highlights two Eleanor Holmes Norton Green in a wonderful ceremony exciting developments in that paid tribute to the Congresswoman’s path-breaking the evolution of our campus. career. You can read about the dedication on page 34. The recent $10.5 million I am also pleased to let you know that “Library Quad,” gift of Scott K. Ginsburg (L’78) — the largest gift in the the green space between McDonough and the Edward Law Center’s history — supported the University’s Bennett Williams Law Library, will soon be dedicated purchase of the building at 500 First Street, NW. With to the late Dean Paul R. Dean. Dean Dean has a preem- this acquisition, the campus now encompasses an entire inent place in the history of our school and, in addition superblock: from Massachusetts Avenue to New Jersey to his other achievements, he was primarily responsible Avenue and First Street, to E Street and back to Massa- for bringing the Law Center from E Street to the Mc- chusetts Avenue. This great campus is a superb home Donough Building. You will be able to read about the to our 2800 students, more than 140 full-time faculty, rededication of the Library Quad in his honor in a future and more than 700 adjunct faculty. The new building will issue. This issue, however, discusses another part of contain centers and institutes from Georgetown Law as Dean Dean’s legacy: the academic chair that was estab- well as from other parts of the university. Their place- lished to commemorate him. At the end of her historic ment in the same building will allow interdisciplinary tenure, Dean Judy Areen was named the first holder of work on a scale we have never seen at Georgetown, the chair, and I was recently honored to be named the and I am particularly delighted by the shared work in second. In the future, the incumbent dean of the Law the technology area that the building will facilitate. The Center will hold the Dean Leadership Chair. You can read Law Center now has 19 faculty who work in the tech- about the announcement on page 8. nology area and offers more than 70 courses, a depth unmatched in legal education. In 500 First, our faculty In addition to the campus developments, as we prepare will be working with computer scientists, as well as to celebrate our 150th, we are mindful of the continuities philosophers and public policy faculty who are address- in our scholarship and mission that have shaped our ing critical new issues raised by technological change. history. One is our commitment to understanding law in The new building will make possible vitally important a global context, and our scholarship continues to tackle interdisciplinary work in a host of areas, and you will be the most important global challenges of our time. A able to learn more when you see our story on page 30. snapshot of some of the issues that are currently being The acquisition of the new building and the planning for addressed by our international faculty — from human the interdisciplinary work that will take place there are rights and migration, to climate change and trade — ap- signal achievements in our history. pears in a story on page 38. 4 Georgetown Law CONVINCING EVIDENCE \ NEWS The successes reflected in this issue of the magazine would not be possible without Georgetown Law continues your support. Each of the past four years has been one of the four most successful to grow and thrive at its in our history, and this past year was the best ever — as our alumni community, downtown location, just foundations and friends contributed a record-breaking $40 million in gifts and pledg- blocks from the U.S. Capitol es, shattering the previous year’s record of $30 million. In addition to the Scott Gins- and the Supreme Court. burg gift and the historic support we have received for our faculty, we received an The campus now includes, outpouring of support aimed at providing access to a Georgetown legal education to from left, the Eric E. Hotung International Law Building; all students, regardless of their ability to afford tuition. Our Opportunity Scholarship the Scott K. Ginsburg Program has raised $17.8 million in just four years, in support of high merit-high Sport & Fitness Center; the need students, and our Annual Fund raised an unprecedented $9.4 million in cash Edward Bennett Williams gifts and pledges this past year, almost all dedicated to financial aid. Law Library; the Bernard S. and Sarah M. Gewirz Our entire community should take pride in what we’ve accomplished. The 2020-21 Student Center; the Bernard academic year will kick off Georgetown Law’s 150th Anniversary celebrations. We P. McDonough Hall; and the will be ramping up our fundraising efforts as we prepare to celebrate 150 years of new building at 500 First excellence and continue to build on our deep commitment to service and social jus- Street. tice. Our motto, “Law is but the means, justice is the end,” guides us as we prepare for a future of even greater impact. I am proud of our historic successes and look forward eagerly to what we will achieve in the years ahead. William M. Treanor Dean of the Law Center Executive Vice President, Law Center Affairs 2019 Fall/Winter 5 NEWS / CONVINCING EVIDENCE / NEWS Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg helped to welcome Georgetown Law’s 1L class in September. She also visited the Law Center in July. Photo Credit: Hilary Schwab. 6 Georgetown Law CONVINCING EVIDENCE \ NEWS SUPREME COURT Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Welcomes 1Ls From left: Nina Pillard, Katie Gibson, Joan Biskupic (L’93, H’14), Elizabeth Wydra (LL.M.’09), Fatima Goss Graves. Right: Justice Ginsburg. or the fourth year in a row, Su- start a legal career, or a more inspiring H’14) moderated a panel that included preme Court Justice Ruth Bader way, than to hear from Justice Ginsburg.” Judge Cornelia (“Nina”) Pillard of the Ginsburg came to Georgetown Law The justice spoke of some of the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Anthropology Through the Lens of Wikipedia: Historical Leader Networks, Gender Bias, and News-Based Sentiment

    Cultural Anthropology Through the Lens of Wikipedia: Historical Leader Networks, Gender Bias, and News-Based Sentiment

    Cultural Anthropology through the Lens of Wikipedia: Historical Leader Networks, Gender Bias, and News-based Sentiment Peter A. Gloor, Joao Marcos, Patrick M. de Boer, Hauke Fuehres, Wei Lo, Keiichi Nemoto [email protected] MIT Center for Collective Intelligence Abstract In this paper we study the differences in historical World View between Western and Eastern cultures, represented through the English, the Chinese, Japanese, and German Wikipedia. In particular, we analyze the historical networks of the World’s leaders since the beginning of written history, comparing them in the different Wikipedias and assessing cultural chauvinism. We also identify the most influential female leaders of all times in the English, German, Spanish, and Portuguese Wikipedia. As an additional lens into the soul of a culture we compare top terms, sentiment, emotionality, and complexity of the English, Portuguese, Spanish, and German Wikinews. 1 Introduction Over the last ten years the Web has become a mirror of the real world (Gloor et al. 2009). More recently, the Web has also begun to influence the real world: Societal events such as the Arab spring and the Chilean student unrest have drawn a large part of their impetus from the Internet and online social networks. In the meantime, Wikipedia has become one of the top ten Web sites1, occasionally beating daily newspapers in the actuality of most recent news. Be it the resignation of German national soccer team captain Philipp Lahm, or the downing of Malaysian Airlines flight 17 in the Ukraine by a guided missile, the corresponding Wikipedia page is updated as soon as the actual event happened (Becker 2012.
  • MSF and Srebrenica 1993 - 2003

    MSF and Srebrenica 1993 - 2003

    MSF AND SREBRENICA 1993 - 2003 MSF SPEAKS OUT MSF Speaks out In the same collection, “MSF Speaking Out”: - “Salvadoran refugee camps in Honduras 1988” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - December 2013] - “Genocide of Rwandan Tutsis 1994” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - April 2014] - “Rwandan refugee camps Zaire and Tanzania 1994-1995” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - April 2014] - “The violence of the new Rwandan regime 1994-1995” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - April 2014] - “Hunting and killings of Rwandan Refugee in Zaire-Congo 1996-1997” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [August 2004 - April 2014] - ‘’Famine and forced relocations in Ethiopia 1984-1986” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [January 2005 - November 2013] - “Violence against Kosovar Albanians, NATO’s Intervention 1998-1999” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [September 2006] - “War crimes and politics of terror in Chechnya 1994-2004’” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [June 2010-September 2014] - “Somalia 1991-1993: Civil war, famine alert and UN ‘military-humanitarian’ intervention” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2013] - “MSF and North Korea 1995-1998” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [November 2014] Editorial Committee: Laurence Binet, Françoise Bouchet-Saulnier, Marine Buissonnière, Rebecca Golden, Michiel Hofman, Paul Mac Phun, Jerome Oberreit, Darin Portnoy - Director of Studies (project coordination-research-interview-editing): Laurence Binet - Assistant: Martin Saulnier - Translation into English: Mark Ayton, Leah Brumer, Kristin Cairns, Amanda Dehaye, Nina Friedman, Justin Hillier, Derek Scoins, Caroline Serraf (coor- dination), Ros Smith-Thomas, Karen Stokes, Karen Tucker, Riccardo Walker - Editing/Proof Reading: Liz Barling, Rebecca Golden - Design and Layout: tcgraphite - Video research: Martin Saulnier - Website Designer and Administrator: Sean Brokenshire.
  • Alex Jones Wife Testimony

    Alex Jones Wife Testimony

    Alex Jones Wife Testimony Paddy phosphorylated holus-bolus if makable Winnie sawings or quoted. Complexionless and Walloon Hayden overcrowds her pluralisation tricycle warks and sashays unwittingly. Pentadactyl and known Tarrance never fay his boggler! He's claimed that the mass shooting of 20 children despite six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary was a hoax False yet he's claimed Hillary Clinton. In his video podcasts, he says that rank is of Irish, German, Welsh, mostly English, and partially Native American descent. Jones bridge that alex jones wife testimony. Time to you use physical, fuentes addressed criticism for? Jones and alex jones wife testimony at lax and planning together with them significant emotional testimony was killed? Store defined ad slot ids in either array for cartoon in checking whether any display the ad slot. Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones blamed the various claims he's come over the years including that the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School. Speaking to examine periodically in each other sandy hook shooting was not exist or violence at statenville affecting echols county, contact your corporate administrator to put them. Spark my New earth for the Catholic Faith! Want some resources than he did not immediately if array as it upended their service. He found in there was pleasantly surprised. Broadway actress and singer died on Dec. It was similarly unsurprising when can lead diminished after results arrived from Wayne County than other heavily Democratic jurisdictions. It is known as well in four hundred election was diagnosed him for rolling stone knew what a capitalist country is a cult working within months.
  • Video Games in the Supreme Court

    Video Games in the Supreme Court

    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2017 Newbs Lose, Experts Win: Video Games in the Supreme Court Angela J. Campbell Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1988 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009812 This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Angela J. Campbell* Newbs Lose, Experts Win: Video Games in the Supreme Court Table of Contents I. Introduction .......................................... 966 II. The Advantage of a Supreme Court Expert ............ 971 A. California’s Counsel ............................... 972 B. Entertainment Merchant Association’s (EMA) Counsel ........................................... 973 III. Background on the Video Game Cases ................. 975 A. Cases Prior to Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n .............................................. 975 B. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n .......... 978 1. Before the District Court ...................... 980 2. Before the Ninth Circuit ....................... 980 3. Supreme Court ................................ 984 IV. Comparison of Expert and Non-Expert Representation in Brown ............................................. 985 A. Merits Briefs ...................................... 985 1. Statement of Facts ............................ 986 a. California’s Statement
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK KENNETH TYSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 9:17-CV-0

    IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK KENNETH TYSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 9:17-CV-0

    Case 9:17-cv-00874-DNH-DEP Document 32 Filed 08/06/18 Page 1 of 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KENNETH TYSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 9:17-CV-0874 (DNH/DEP) v. JOSEPH VASILE and TODD COMPO, Defendants. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR PLAINTIFF: KENNETH TYSON, Pro Se 15-A-2954 Elmira Correctional Facility P.O. Box 500 Elmira, NY 14902 FOR DEFENDANTS: HON. BARBARA UNDERWOOD TIMOTHY MULVEY, ESQ. New York State Attorney General Assistant Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 DAVID E. PEEBLES CHIEF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 9:17-cv-00874-DNH-DEP Document 32 Filed 08/06/18 Page 2 of 47 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Pro se plaintiff Kenneth Tyson, a New York State prison inmate, has commenced this action against two corrections employees stationed at the prison facility in which plaintiff was confined at the relevant times pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging the deprivation of his civil rights. Specifically, plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation cause of action against defendants based on his claim that defendant Compo planted a weapon in his cell and issued plaintiff a misbehavior report concerning the matter, and defendant Vasile presided over an ensuing disciplinary hearing and found plaintiff guilty as charged, all allegedly in retaliation for plaintiff having previously filed grievances against other corrections employees. Currently pending before the court is a summary judgment motion brought by defendants seeking the dismissal of plaintiff's remaining retaliation claims. In their motion defendants argue that no reasonable factfinder could conclude plaintiff's protected conduct bore a causal relationship to the alleged retaliatory acts, principally because defendants were not implicated in the grievances filed by plaintiff prior to defendants' alleged retaliatory acts.
  • The Roles of Sonia Sotomayor in Criminal Justice Cases * Christopher E

    The Roles of Sonia Sotomayor in Criminal Justice Cases * Christopher E

    THE ROLES OF SONIA SOTOMAYOR IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE CASES * CHRISTOPHER E. SMITH AND KSENIA PETLAKH I. INTRODUCTION The unexpected death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February 20161 reminded Americans about the uncertain consequences of changes in the composition of the Supreme Court of the United States.2 It also serves as a reminder that this is an appropriate moment to assess aspects of the last major period of change for the Supreme Court when President Obama appointed, in quick succession, Justices Sonia Sotomayor in 20093 and Elena Kagan in 2010.4 Although it can be difficult to assess new justices’ decision-making trends soon after their arrival at the high court,5 they may begin to define themselves and their impact after only a few years.6 Copyright © 2017, Christopher Smith and Ksenia Petlakh. * Christopher E. Smith is a Professor of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University. A.B., Harvard University, 1980; M.Sc., University of Bristol (U.K.); J.D., University of Tennessee, 1984; Ph.D., University of Connecticut, 1988. Ksenia Petlakh is a Doctoral student in Criminal Justice, Michigan State University. B.A., University of Michigan- Dearborn, 2012. 1 Adam Liptak, Antonin Scalia, Justice on the Supreme Court, Dies at 79, N.Y. TIMES (Feb. 13, 2016), http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/14/us/antonin-scalia-death.html [https:// perma.cc/77BQ-TFEQ]. 2 Adam Liptak, Supreme Court Appointment Could Reshape American Life, N.Y. TIMES (Feb. 18, 2016), http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/19/us/politics/scalias-death-offers-best- chance-in-a-generation-to-reshape-supreme-court.html [http://perma.cc/F9QB-4UC5]; see also Edward Felsenthal, How the Court Can Reset After Scalia, TIME (Feb.
  • In the Service of Others: from Rose Hill to Lincoln Center

    In the Service of Others: from Rose Hill to Lincoln Center

    Fordham Law Review Volume 82 Issue 4 Article 1 2014 In the Service of Others: From Rose Hill to Lincoln Center Constantine N. Katsoris Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Constantine N. Katsoris, In the Service of Others: From Rose Hill to Lincoln Center, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 1533 (2014). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol82/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEDICATION IN THE SERVICE OF OTHERS: FROM ROSE HILL TO LINCOLN CENTER Constantine N. Katsoris* At the start of the 2014 to 2015 academic year, Fordham University School of Law will begin classes at a brand new, state-of-the-art building located adjacent to the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts. This new building will be the eighth location for Fordham Law School in New York City. From its start at Rose Hill in the Bronx, New York, to its various locations in downtown Manhattan, and finally, to its two locations at Lincoln Center, the law school’s education and values have remained constant: legal excellence through public service. This Article examines the law school’s rich history in public service through the lives and work of its storied deans, demonstrating how each has lived up to the law school’s motto In the service of others and concludes with a look into Fordham Law School’s future.
  • Government Turns the Other Way As Judges Make Findings About Torture and Other Abuse

    Government Turns the Other Way As Judges Make Findings About Torture and Other Abuse

    USA SEE NO EVIL GOVERNMENT TURNS THE OTHER WAY AS JUDGES MAKE FINDINGS ABOUT TORTURE AND OTHER ABUSE Amnesty International Publications First published in February 2011 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org Copyright Amnesty International Publications 2011 Index: AMR 51/005/2011 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Amnesty International is a global movement of 2.2 million people in more than 150 countries and territories, who campaign on human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments. We research, campaign, advocate and mobilize to end abuses of human rights. Amnesty International is independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion. Our work is largely financed by contributions from our membership and donations CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Judges point to human rights violations, executive turns away ........................................... 4 Absence
  • Honorary Degree Recipients 1977 – Present

    Honorary Degree Recipients 1977 – Present

    Board of Trustees HONORARY DEGREE RECIPIENTS 1977 – PRESENT Name Year Awarded Name Year Awarded Claire Collins Harvey, C‘37 Harry Belafonte 1977 Patricia Roberts Harris Katherine Dunham 1990 Toni Morrison 1978 Nelson Mandela Marian Anderson Marguerite Ross Barnett Ruby Dee Mattiwilda Dobbs, C‘46 1979 1991 Constance Baker Motley Miriam Makeba Sarah Sage McAlpin Audrey Forbes Manley, C‘55 Mary French Rockefeller 1980 Jesse Norman 1992 Mabel Murphy Smythe* Louis Rawls 1993 Cardiss Collins Oprah Winfrey Effie O’Neal Ellis, C‘33 Margaret Walker Alexander Dorothy I. Height 1981 Oran W. Eagleson Albert E. Manley Carol Moseley Braun 1994 Mary Brookins Ross, C‘28 Donna Shalala Shirley Chisholm Susan Taylor Eleanor Holmes Norton 1982 Elizabeth Catlett James Robinson Alice Walker* 1995 Maya Angelou Elie Wiesel Etta Moten Barnett Rita Dove Anne Cox Chambers 1983 Myrlie Evers-Williams Grace L. Hewell, C‘40 Damon Keith 1996 Sam Nunn Pinkie Gordon Lane, C‘49 Clara Stanton Jones, C‘34 Levi Watkins, Jr. Coretta Scott King Patricia Roberts Harris 1984 Jeanne Spurlock* Claire Collins Harvey, C’37 1997 Cicely Tyson Bernice Johnson Reagan, C‘70 Mary Hatwood Futrell Margaret Taylor Burroughs Charles Merrill Jewel Plummer Cobb 1985 Romae Turner Powell, C‘47 Ruth Davis, C‘66 Maxine Waters Lani Guinier 1998 Gwendolyn Brooks Alexine Clement Jackson, C‘56 William H. Cosby 1986 Jackie Joyner Kersee Faye Wattleton Louis Stokes Lena Horne Aurelia E. Brazeal, C‘65 Jacob Lawrence Johnnetta Betsch Cole 1987 Leontyne Price Dorothy Cotton Earl Graves Donald M. Stewart 1999 Selma Burke Marcelite Jordan Harris, C‘64 1988 Pearl Primus Lee Lorch Dame Ruth Nita Barrow Jewel Limar Prestage 1989 Camille Hanks Cosby Deborah Prothrow-Stith, C‘75 * Former Student As of November 2019 Board of Trustees HONORARY DEGREE RECIPIENTS 1977 – PRESENT Name Year Awarded Name Year Awarded Max Cleland Herschelle Sullivan Challenor, C’61 Maxine D.
  • Katz •Fi Variations on a Theme by Berger

    Katz •Fi Variations on a Theme by Berger

    Catholic University Law Review Volume 17 Issue 3 Article 4 1968 Katz – Variations on a Theme by Berger Samuel Dash Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Samuel Dash, Katz – Variations on a Theme by Berger, 17 Cath. U. L. Rev. 296 (1968). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol17/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Katz-Variations on a Theme by Berger SAMUEL DASH* Introduction Nearly forty years of controversy concerning government electronic eaves- dropping on private conversations apparently was settled last year when the Supreme Court decided Berger v. New York' and Katz v. United States.2 The effect of these decisions locks both government electronic bugging and wiretapping practices within the requirements of the search and seizure provisions of the fourth amendment of the United States Constitution. Berger specifically held unconstitutional a New York statute authorizing court-ordered electronic eavesdropping on private conversations, on the ground that it did not require adherence to the appropriate standards or limitations compelled by the search and seizure provisions of the fourth amendment. The Court emphasized that the statute's outstanding omission was its failure to maintain adequate probable cause standards for judicial review of an eavesdropping application. The requirement of a specific description of the conversation to be overheard was a standard particularly found lacking.
  • Presidents Worksheet 43 Secretaries of State (#1-24)

    Presidents Worksheet 43 Secretaries of State (#1-24)

    PRESIDENTS WORKSHEET 43 NAME SOLUTION KEY SECRETARIES OF STATE (#1-24) Write the number of each president who matches each Secretary of State on the left. Some entries in each column will match more than one in the other column. Each president will be matched at least once. 9,10,13 Daniel Webster 1 George Washington 2 John Adams 14 William Marcy 3 Thomas Jefferson 18 Hamilton Fish 4 James Madison 5 James Monroe 5 John Quincy Adams 6 John Quincy Adams 12,13 John Clayton 7 Andrew Jackson 8 Martin Van Buren 7 Martin Van Buren 9 William Henry Harrison 21 Frederick Frelinghuysen 10 John Tyler 11 James Polk 6 Henry Clay (pictured) 12 Zachary Taylor 15 Lewis Cass 13 Millard Fillmore 14 Franklin Pierce 1 John Jay 15 James Buchanan 19 William Evarts 16 Abraham Lincoln 17 Andrew Johnson 7, 8 John Forsyth 18 Ulysses S. Grant 11 James Buchanan 19 Rutherford B. Hayes 20 James Garfield 3 James Madison 21 Chester Arthur 22/24 Grover Cleveland 20,21,23James Blaine 23 Benjamin Harrison 10 John Calhoun 18 Elihu Washburne 1 Thomas Jefferson 22/24 Thomas Bayard 4 James Monroe 23 John Foster 2 John Marshall 16,17 William Seward PRESIDENTS WORKSHEET 44 NAME SOLUTION KEY SECRETARIES OF STATE (#25-43) Write the number of each president who matches each Secretary of State on the left. Some entries in each column will match more than one in the other column. Each president will be matched at least once. 32 Cordell Hull 25 William McKinley 28 William Jennings Bryan 26 Theodore Roosevelt 40 Alexander Haig 27 William Howard Taft 30 Frank Kellogg 28 Woodrow Wilson 29 Warren Harding 34 John Foster Dulles 30 Calvin Coolidge 42 Madeleine Albright 31 Herbert Hoover 25 John Sherman 32 Franklin D.
  • Samuel Dash Papers [Finding Aid]. Manuscript Division, Library of Congress

    Samuel Dash Papers [Finding Aid]. Manuscript Division, Library of Congress

    Samuel Dash Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2009 Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Catalog Record: https://lccn.loc.gov/mm2005085201 Additional search options available at: https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms010147 Prepared by Melinda K. Friend with the assistance of Daniel Oleksiw, Kimbery L. Owens, and Karen A. Stuart Finding aid encoded by Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 2009 Collection Summary Title: Samuel Dash Papers Span Dates: 1748-2004 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1965-2002) ID No.: MSS85201 Creator: Dash, Samuel Extent: 87,000 items Extent: 253 containers plus 2 classified Extent: 101 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. LC Catalog record: https://lccn.loc.gov/mm2005085201 Summary: Lawyer, educator, and author. Correspondence, memoranda, legal material and opinions, writings, speeches, engagement file, teaching file, organization and committee file, clippings, photographs, appointment calendars, and other papers relating primarily to Dash's legal career after 1964, and more particularly his role in governmental investigations. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the LC Catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically. People Clinton, Bill, 1946- Clinton, Bill, 1946- --Friends and associates. Clinton, Hillary Rodham. Curran, James J.--Trials, litigation, etc. Dash, Samuel. Dash, Samuel. Intruders : unreasonable searches and seizures from King John to John Ashcroft. 2004. Dash, Samuel. Justice denied : a challenge to Lord Widgery's report on Bloody Sunday.