WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES BEST PRACTICES FOR WATERFRONT DESIGN IN CAMDEN,

HOW TO PROMOTE RESILIENCE, ECOLOGY, AND ACCESS AT THE WATER’S EDGE A WATERFRONT ALLIANCE PROGRAM

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OVERVIEW PG 2 INTRODUCTION PG 2 LOCAL CONTEXT FOR APPLYING WEDG BEST PRACTICES IN CAMDEN PG 3

Category 0 Site Assessment & Planning Assess site-wide social and ecological context and vulnerabilities PG 3 Develop and implement an equitable plan for community engagement PG 4

Category 1 Responsible Siting & Coastal Risk Reduction Avoid or reduce risk from coastal hazards PG 5

Category 2 Community Access & Connections Provide quality public access areas on the waterfront PG 8 Increase transportation access to the waterfront PG 8 Support diverse and sustainable maritime activity PG 9

Category 3 Edge Resilience Choose an appropriate edge strategy for the context and intended use PG 9

Category 4 Natural Resources Reduce and manage stormwater quantity PG 11

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PG 12

WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDLINES: CAMDEN ADDENUDUM 1 Overview In 2019, Cooper’s Ferry Partnership of Camden, New Jersey partnered with the Waterfront Alliance to apply WEDG® (Waterfront Edge Design Guidelines) principles in the Camden context for use in project design, and to develop a broader network of designers, engineers, developers, and community members engaged in shaping positive waterfront design outcomes in the broader Camden region. The following addendum was developed in partnership with an advisory committee of 25 stakeholders from engineering, design, planning, and community development, and aims to guide practitioners who are using WEDG to inform waterfront projects, policy, and community visionings in the Camden region.

Source: New Jersey Future

Source: New Jersey Economic Development Authority

Introduction Situated between the Delaware and Cooper Rivers and adjacent to , Camden has a rich water- front history. In the last several decades, Camden’s waterfront has been redefined by community priori- ties for enhanced educational and research opportunities, waterfront access and parks, and affordable housing. Amidst this reinvestment in Camden’s waterfronts, the Camden region is facing increased risks of flooding from storms like Hurricane Sandy and Irene. The following provides guidance for waterfront design professionals, as well as community leaders and public agencies, to ensure that the future of Cam- den’s waterfronts meet the highest standard for resilience, ecology, and access. This document should be used in concert with the WEDG manual, a voluntary rating system and set of guidelines developed by a cross-cutting field of experts to shift the market towards more resilient, ecologically-sound, and accessi- ble waterfront design.

2 WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM Local Context for Applying WEDG Best Practices in Camden This document provides guidance for designers, planners, developers, and engineers, as well as commu- nity leaders and public agencies, to ensure that the future of Camden’s waterfronts meet the highest stan- dard for resilience, ecology, and access.

0.2: Assess site-wide social and ecological context and vulnerabilities

Project leads should develop multi-disciplinary teams (as described in Credit 0.1) to conduct a site-wide analysis of the environmental, social, and economic factors which affect the site. The following should be considered in conjunction with Credit 0.2 and Appendix A of WEDG.

a) Local Laws The following references provide planning and environmental context for project teams to assess in the earliest phases of design. WEDG requires a multi-disciplinary project team (at minimum one of each: engineer, architect, and environmental professional) to conduct a series of initial assessments for understanding the social, environmental, and climatic context of the site. i) Planning and zoning1 a) FutureCAMDEN (2002 Masterplan) and 2018 Reexamination/Amendment Report can inform the city’s priorities for waterfront development and sustainability. b) Article XIX – XX of the zoning text provides requirements for Waterfront Zones. c) Article XXII – XXIII of the zoning text provides requirements for Conservation Overlay Zones. d) Ord. No. MC-3690 (Greenway Conservation Overlay Zone requirements). ii) Environmental regulations a) (State) New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) Coastal Areas permits will be required for in-water and waterfront projects. b) (State) New Jersey Stormwater Management Rules should be referred to to understand specifications for green infrastructure and other stormwater design components. Note that WEDG requires an analysis of climate change impacts on precipitation patterns. For more information see the “Methods” section of Appendix A in the WEDG Manual. c) (City) Ord. No. MC-4879 (Sustainability Ordinance) requires applicants for new development or modifications to existing development to complete an Environmental Impacts and Benefits Analysis, which documents all potential environmental ramifications of the project. The goal of the ordinance is to provide the Camden City Planning Board with an additional layer of information upon which to review a potential project.

1WEDG does not supplant zoning. These references highlight local planning frameworks and regulations within the city of Camden which provide a basis for assessing the site context for this credit.

WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM 3 c) Opportunities for Partnership i) Resources to inform best practices for the following assessment methods from Appendix A: Risk and Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise and Storm Surge; Stormwater Quality; and Water Use and Wastewater Management. a) Camden Collaborative Initiative/ Camden SMART (Stormwater Management and Resource Training) provides resources for stormwater management policy and development, as well as green infrastructure training programs. 1) Key partners: City of Camden, Camden County Municipal Utilities Authority, Cooper’s Ferry Partnership, Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program, New Jersey Tree Foundation, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. See also, Preliminary Opportunities Analysis for areas vulnerable to flooding. ii) Relating to Employment Opportunities and stormwater assessments: a) PowerCorps is an AmeriCorps youth workforce development program that plays a key role in maintaining Camden’s green infrastructure installations including rain gardens, city and county parks, vacant lots, and stormwater inlets. 1) Key partners: Camden County Municipal Utilities Authority (CCMUA) and City of Camden. d) Additional Resources: Econsult. January 2019 i) The Positive Impacts of Investments in Camden, New Jersey, Social Determinants of Health. 0.3: Develop and implement an equitable plan for community engagement

WEDG requires projects to respond to the complex social and economic conditions at play in waterfront communities by soliciting input from diverse stakeholders in the design and management of the project. Successful projects develop equitable community engagement plans informed by existing city-led and community-driven priorities and seek diverse input as early as possible in the process. a) Additional Resources i) Green + Healthy Camden Decision Support Tool: Provides GIS data on riverine flooding and other planning, decision making, and park creation support to drive equitable green infrastructure implementation across Camden, with a focus on schools and public spaces. 1) Key Partners: The Trust for Public Land. b) Precedents

Case Study: Newark Riverfront Park

Source: Newark Riverfront Park

Overview Located on the Passaic River, Newark Riverfront Park is the result of decades of environmental justice activism and public-private collaboration to restore Newark’s neglected waterfront into a sustainable, accessible, and resilient public park. In 2008, the City of Newark launched Newark Riverfront

4 WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM Revival, an initiative of the Department of Economic Housing & Development, to revive the waterfront and ensure that the benefits of new development served its residents. As part of this effort, the City and Essex County partnered with the Trust for Public Land, Ironbound Community Corporation, Friends of Riverfront Park, and Newark Community Economic Development Corporation to build from community visions to create a fifteen-acre, waterfront park (source: City of Newark).

Project Team • Essex County, the City of Newark, The Trust for Public Land, Ironbound Community Corporation, Friends of Riverfront Park, Newark Community Economic Development Corporation (NCEDC), Trust for Public Land, James Corner Field Operations. Strategies Used • Identified key community stakeholders early in the process to help facilitate outreach and solicit diverse input on the design and management of the project. • Aligned with broader city goals and initiatives to serve Newark residents. • Managed barriers for diverse participation by creating fun and engaging opportunities for Newark residents to provide input, such as walking tours, boat tours, exhibitions, school presentations, and more. • Used public health and community needs data to inform the design, from providing much needed green and open space, to creating greenway connectivity for active and sustainable transportation (also relates to Credits 2.1 and 2.6). • Provides robust waterfront programming, including kayaking lessons and boat tours, as well as arts and cultural programming (also relates to Credit 2.3).

1.1: Avoid or reduce risk from coastal hazards

Camden experiences high flood and health risks due to low elevation, heavy rain, tidal flooding, and persistent problems relating to its aging combined sewage system, such as pipe breaks and combined sewer overflow. Low-lying neighborhoods such as Cramer Hill and the Central Waterfront District are particularly vulnerable to these risks. Project teams should prioritize flood risk reduction and stormwater management strategies (Credit 4.9) that mitigate the impact of increasing storm-based and tidal flooding.

a) Regulations2 i) Camden Requires compliance for all development (new construction and substantial improvements) in the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) 100-year floodplain (“Area of Special Flood Hazard”), including:

2Note: WEDG is not intended to supplant federal or local regulations. The provisions below provide context for reducing risk to flooding and coastal hazards based on local zoning and federal regulations. Credit 1.1 in WEDG exceeds these standards by requiring projects to incorporate additional elevation and structural stability measures based on future flood risk due to climate change. Methods for assessing site-specific risk and vulnerability to sea level rise and storm surge can be found in Credit 0.2 and Appendix A of the WEDG manual.

WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM 5 1) Compliance with FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) specifications for flood resistant building code, Appendix G. This applies both to owners of severely damaged or destroyed properties in the 100-year floodplain, and new construction of projects in (or partially in) the 100- year floodplain. Strategies for implementing Appendix G include: (a) Wet-floodproofing: allows for the passage of water within parts of the structure that are located below the flood elevation, while ensuring that the structure resists water loads. Wet-floodproofed areas can only be used as crawl space, or for parking, storage and access. (b) Dry-floodproofing: seals a building’s exterior walls to flood waters while ensuring that the building has the ability to resist water loads below the expected level of flooding. Only allowable for non-residential uses. 2) Flood Resistant Provisions of the International Codes® and ASCE 24 comply with and exceed minimum standards required by NFIP (Appendix G). ii) Philadelphia Title 14 Zoning and Planning, 14-704 Open Space and Natural Resources and ICC Building Codes: The City of Philadelphia does not have waterfront zoning specific to development in the floodplain, but it does require 50’ setbacks from the “top-of-bank for all watercourses. The City has begun planning for future climate impacts in Growing Stronger: Toward a Climate-Ready Philadelphia (2016), which provides the City’s first published sea level rise projections as well as an assesment of of vulnerabilities and preparation opportunities for municipal government. 1) Philadelphia’s floodplain management practices and building code are expected to be updated in mid-2020 to reflect more stringent measures against: (a) Infrastructure flooding (sea level rise and storms) (b) FEMA riverine, coastal, and precipitation-based flooding.

b) Incentives There are many incentives for investing in resilience, from short-term energy savings and marketing benefits, to longer-term benefits including loss avoidance and flood insurance premium reductions. Examples of emerging research on these incentives includes: i) In a case study provided by the Urban Land Institute, a residential property’s potential flood loss expectancy was estimated to be reduced from $10 million to $1 million by implementing resiliency measures, such as elevating mechanical equipment above the 500-year floodplain. A building without these resiliency measures would pay annual premiums ten times higher for flood insurance. ii) A study conducted by FM Global in 2018 showed that every dollar spent on hurricane protection can prevent $105 in business property loss and disruption.

c) Additional Resources i) Philadelphia Mayor’s Office of Sustainability. 2014. Useful Climate Information for Philadelphia: Past and Future. ii) Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. 2017. Environmental Resource Inventory. iii) Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. 2019. Coastal Effects of Climate Change in Southwestern : Provides low and high emission sea level rise projects for year 2100 as well as chronic flooding projections for year 2050 for Philadelphia, Bucks, and Delaware counties. It also provides “what’s at risk” in terms of infrastructure and property value.

d) Precedents i) CCMUA Wastewater Treatment Plant received funding from the Rockefeller Foundation to extend its microgrid to critical infrastructure in Camden, helpding to reduce power shortages and outages during major storms, flooding, and other emergencies. ii) American Water Headquarters integrates a high-performance mechanical system elevated above the floodplain. iii) Northwest Resiliency Park (Hoboken) was created to absorb up to one million gallons of stormwater through green infrastructure, including an underground retention tank that holds water and slowly releases it back into Hudson River after storms.

6 WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM Case Study: Philadelphia Navy Yard

Source: Robert A.M. Stern Architects Overview With a 1,000-acre footprint, nearly 200 historical buildings, and an active regional port, Philadelphia’s Navy Yard masterplan marks one of the region’s most critical resilience and maritime industrial projects. Since the project began in 2004, FEMA’s base flood elevation requirements have risen from 10 feet to 12 feet. Taking this change as well as future sea level rise conditions into account, the project team updated the masterplan to increase building elevations above FEMA’s required base flood elevations, raised road grades to slope away from the river, and improved on-site stormwater management. The plan also integrated the Philadelphia Water Department’s Green City, Clean Water plan by implementing green infrastructure within its Central Green District to serve broader local flood reduction needs (source: DVRPC).

Project Team • Philadelphi a Authority for Industrial Development, Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation (PIDC), Liberty Property Trust, Synterra Partners, Robert A.M. Stern Architects, Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates, Pennoni Associates.

Strategies Used • Conducted a sitewide assessment of risk and vulnerabilities to sea level rise and flooding hazards to inform the resilience approach (also related to Credit 0.2). • Incorporated sea level rise projections into building elevation and side-wide measures to enhance structural resiliency.

WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM 7

2.1: Provide quality public access areas on the waterfront

Waterfront public access provides numerous community benefits, from public health to increased stewardship. WEDG requires a certain amount of the waterfront lot to be publicly accessible and shaped by community priorities (per Credit 0.3). This guidance, as well as the references below, can help guide the design of waterfront public space in lieu of waterfront zoning.

a) Local Laws i) Zoning and building code: There are no mandatory waterfront public access, or design standards for public access areas required through zoning in Camden. However, publicly funded waterfront greenspace must be publicly accessible, for example through grants made by New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s (NJDEP) Green Acres program or Camden County’s Open Space Preservation Trust Fund. ii) New Jersey Public Access Law: Requires new and existing development on tidal waters to provide public access in accordance with state regulations. b) Initiatives i) Green Schoolyards: An initiative of the Trust for Public Land to transform hardtop school yards into sustainable play spaces that are open to the public outside of classroom hours. c) Additional Resources ii) Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. 2015. Camden County Bicycling & Multi-Use Trails Plan: Chapter 4 provides design standards and references for greenways. d) Precedents i) Cooper’s Poynt Waterfront Park: 5-acre Cooper’s Poynt Waterfront Park opened in 2019 on the site of the former . The park reconnects residents to their waterfront, providing a half-mile waterfront multi-purpose trail, a playground and grassy lawns to play, all within feet of the . The project was a partnership between the North Camden community, Save Our Waterfront, Cooper’s Ferry Partnership, the City of Camden, and the NJ Economic Development Authority. ii) Phoenix Park: Located in the section of Camden, Phoenix Park is a 5.3- acre park that provides direct water access for stewardship activities and and habitat through restored living shorelines. 2.4: Increase transportation access to the waterfront

WEDG encourages the use of ferries and more sustainable transportation access and connectivity for urban waterfronts. Currently, the RiverLink Ferry connects Wiggins Park Marina to Penns Landing in Philadelphia. While there are efforts to increase ferry access in Camden, land-based strategies may be optimal in the interim for ensuring transportation to the waterfront.

a) Local Laws i) Zoning and building code: Ferry landings (and other water-dependent uses) are allowed MW-1 Mixed Waterfront Zones (Article XIX, 577-121). ii) Other regulations: In addition to NJDEP Coastal Permit Program and Coastal Zone Management Rules (NJAC 7:7.A), Waterfront Development Individual Permits are necessary for installation of docks, piers, jet-ski ramps, boat lifts, and bulkheads. b) Initiatives i) Increased ferry service (RiverLink) between Camden and Philadelphia (proposed). 1) Key partners: Delaware River Waterfront Corporation, Cooper’s Ferry Partnership, Delaware River Port Authority, Camden County. ii) Glassboro Camden Line (proposed) would increase light rail service for the Camden region (Camden and Gloucester Counties). 1) Key Partners: Federal Transit Administration, Delaware River Port Authority, Port Authority Transit Corporation, New Jersey Transit.

8 WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM 2.8: Support diverse and sustainable maritime activity

Designing in-water access features, like piers, to accommodate a range of maritime uses maximizes opportunities for educational, cultural, historical, and commercial/industrial uses on the waterfront. WEDG encourages features which support diverse, sustainable maritime activity, and requires a series of hydrodynamic and engineering assessments to inform the design of these features as part of Credit 0.2. These assessments help ensure the safety and longevity of in-water features. Teams should consult the resources below in addition to conducting their own hydrodynamic assessments.

a) Local Laws (see Credit 2.4) b) Precedents: i) Battleship New Jersey Museum & Memorial provides educational tours celebrating the naval history of the vessel and waterfront, and engages the veteran community. For large historic vessels like this that are moored over a long period of time, electrical and sewage connections are critical. Other resilient features of the pier’s design include protection for up to winds up to 150 mhw, siting the pier at an angle to the current, emergency lighting, and a mooring system that uses an anchoring chain. ii) Paulsboro Marine Terminal is a major new port on the Delaware River, with over 850 feet of berths and water depths of 40+ feet to accommodate larger vessels. c) Additional Resources i) Delaware River Basin Commission: provides hydrological and water quality information, including annual reports on precipitation patterns, streamflow, groundwater, and salinity (also useful for Credit 2.4).

3.1: Choose an appropriate edge strategy for the context and intended use; and 3.2: Maintain or emulate natural shoreline shape

Soft shorelines have many benefits—from enhancing habitat, to providing educational and stewardship opportunities, to reducing the impacts of flooding. Local shorelines in Philadelphia and Camden range from mudflats, to fringe wetland, to pebble/sand bottom to hardened and rip-rap. Natural and living shoreline edge conditions can be found along the Delaware at Petty’s Island, as well as forested riparian edges along the Cooper River. Teams should consult the resources below in addition to conducting their own hydrodynamic assessments to inform the shoreline edge design. a) Local Laws Permitting falls under NJDEP’s Coastal Zone Management (CZM) authority i) Permit 17 (NJAC 7:7-6.17) should be sought for minor stabilization/erosion control. ii) Permit 24 (NJAC 7:7-6.24) is required for most shoreline projects. It is intended to increase habitat creation, restoration, and enhancement of living shoreline activities. b) Initiatives and Incentives i) Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs), designated by NJDEP, are environmentally beneficial projects that developers can choose to develop in exchange for settling an enforcement action. ii) The Nature Conservancy’s Living Shorelines Grant Program: Grant range from $10,000 to $50,000 for design, permitting, or construction of a living shoreline project. c) Additional Resources i) WEDG Appendix B: Shoreline Stabilization Decision-Making. ii) Living Shorelines Engineering Guidelines, Stevens Institute (2016). d) Precedents

WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM 9 Case Study: Lardner’s Point Park

Source: Claire Schmidt/ PlanPhilly (via NPR WHYY)

Overview Lardner’s Point Park, a five-acre park located at the base of the Tacony Palmyra Bridge in Philadelphia, is one of the region’s first living shoreline projects and a model for resilient parks. Shoreline restoration efforts included removing and remediating the existing, hardened edge in order to restore its natural slope and shape. New freshwater high and low marshes were restored, and existing native trees were preserved to stabilize the edge. Not only does the project increase ecology and resilience in an area exposed to frequent flooding, the restored living shoreline also provides much needed public access and educational/stewardship opportunities (source: Riverfront North Partnership).

Project Team • Riverfront North Partnership, BioHabitats.

Strategies Used • An assessment of the site’s existing ecological conditions and intended uses informed the strategy for restoring the shoreline edge (also relates to Credit 0.2). • Manmade edges were removed in order to restore the shoreline to its natural condition, with more gradual slopes and shoreline contours allowing for wetland and native plant restoration (also relates to Credit 4.1). Where stabilization was needed on the south end of the park, nature-based features were used (live branch layering) to stabilize the toe of the slope at the high tide line. • Project contributes to the regional East Coast Greenway plan (Credit 2.6).

Incentives • Funded through the Pew Charitable Trust’s Flood Prepared Communities project. • While no such permit exists, the project brought forward discussion and advocacy for a federal Army Corps permit to allow developers to implement soft shorelines.

10 WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM CATEGORY 0 SITE ASSESSMENT & PLANNING

4.9: Reduce and manage stormwater quantity

Scoring for this credit is based on either percentile storm if excess stormwater primarily drains into the water or an Intensity Duration Frequency (IDF) curve-based storm event if excess stormwater primarily drains into municipal stormwater and sewer infrastructure. See Appendix A in WEDG for methods and NOAA Atlas 14 for local data (Moorestown and Mt. Ephraim are the closest stations). Historically, most sites in the Camden region have tied into the municipal system. However, new initiatives (like Camden SMART) and regulations are incentivizing developers to use green infrastructure to meet higher standards for mitigating the impacts of combined sewer overflow and runoff into local waterbodies.

a) Local Laws i) Projects should refer to the following environmental regulations in the earliest stages of design to understand stormwater and water quality requirements. 1) NJDEP New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) Rules NJAC. 7:14A are required for sites with direct drainage into local waterbodies. 2) NJDEP Stormwater Management Rules NJAC 7:8 provide stormwater management design and performance standards for new development. 3) Clean Stormwater and Flood Reduction Act (2019): Allows Camden and other New Jersey municipalities the ability to create stormwater utilities and establish fees for runoff. b) Initiatives i) Green City Clean Waters is an initiative of the City of Philadelphia and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reduce stormwater runoff and pollution impacts through green infrastructure and other land-based initiatives. ii) Camden SMART provides resources for designers and engineers who want to build green infrastructure on site, including technical assistance for design and implemetation of stormwater systems. iii) Projects in Camden and Gloucester can apply for free street trees through New Jersey Tree Foundation Urban Airshed Reforestation Program. iv) Rutgers Water Resources Program can serve as a resource to help identify and address community water resources issues using sustainable and practical science- based solutions in New Jersey. c) Additional Resources i) For technical specifications of New Jersey’s green infrastructure requirements, see: 1) New Jersey Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. 2) New Jersey Dept. of Agriculture’s Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Standards. 3) Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program. d) Precedents i) Camden SMART green infrastructure projects, including Baldwin’s Run Daylighting.

WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM 11 Acknowledgments Roland Lewis, CEO and President of the Waterfront Alliance Sarah Dougherty, Program Manager and author of this report

The Waterfront Alliance thanks the members of the WEDG Camden Advisory Committee for their invaluable contributions to inform the Addendum and the ongoing development of WEDG. The Waterfront Alliance extends a special thanks to Cooper’s Ferry Partnership, who partnered with the Waterfront Alliance to complete this project. In particular, we would like to thank:

Sarah Bryant, Director of Community Initiatives

Additionally, we thank Decker Design, Inc. for the WEDG marketing and communication design.

WEDG Camden Advisory Committee Members

Don Baugh, Upstream Alliance Felisha Reyes-Morton, Camden City Council Kevin Becica, Camden County Doug Robbins, AECOM Claudia Bitran, Kitchen & Associates Scott Schreiber, CCMUA John Brady, Independence Seaport Museum Laura Slutsky, Urban Land Institute Sarah Bouboulis, Partnership for the Deleware Estuary Kaitie Sniffen, Independence Seaport Museum Marni Burns, Olin Studio Fred Stine, Delaware Riverkeeper Network Linda Cairnes, Center for Aquatic Sciences John Theobald, Kitchen & Associates Michael Camerlengo, STV Joe Thomas, City of Camden Jim Cummings, Urban Promise Keith L. Walker, City of Camden Michael Dannemiller, NV5 Angela Wenger, Center for Aquatic Sciences Sheila Davis, Camden City Council James Winckowski, CME Associates Danielle Denk, The Trust for Public Land Terry Wood, Kroc Center Richard Feldmann, Camden Shipyard & Maritime Lizzie Woods, Delaware River Waterfront Corporation Museum Marissa Wolfe, Camden County Department of Parks Mark Gallagher, Princeton Hydro Leah Yasenchak, BRS Kathleen Grady, Temple University Robert Graff, DVRPC Alison Hastings, DVRPC Deborah Italiano, Sustainable Jersey City Andy Johnson, William Penn Foundation Keyleigh Kern, AECOM Aaron Kelly, James Corner Field Operations Andy Kricun, formerly Camden County Municipal Utilities Authority (CCMUA) Peter Kroll, CCMUA Jonathan Latko, Cooper Grant Neighborhood Association Matthew Leconey, Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program Andrew Levecchia, CCIA Josh Lippert, City of Philadelphia Matt Ludwig, NV5 Rosa Mannion, NV5 Betsy McBride, UrbanPromise Maggie McCann, Camden County Parks Brian McPeak, PS&S Meishka L. Mitchell, Cooper’s Ferry Joseph Raday, Pennoni Atiq Rahman, Drexel University Julia Raskin, New Jersey Conservation Foundation

12 WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM 13 14 WATERFRONT EDGE DESIGN GUIDELINES: CAMDEN ADDENDUM