Series P-25, No. 407 October 10, 1968 ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF , 1966* [ (Report No.. 3)

(Estimates shown here are generally consistent with those published for metropolitan counties for July 1, 1965, shown in Current Population Reports, Series P-25, Nos. 371 and 378., They supersede the provisional metropolitan estimates for July 1, 1966, sh~wn in report No. 378)

This report presents estimates of the population Series P-25, Nos. 401 and 404. County estimates for July 1, 1966, for 1,107 counties in 11 selected for the two remaining States of New York and State.~. ) This i,s the ~hird in a series of re~or~s Wisconsin are still to be published. showmg.populatlon estImates for all the counties m the for July 1, 1966. These estimates A consolidated report to include 1966 county relate 'to the total resident population in each estimates for all States, together with a discussion county; that is, the civilian resident population plus on methodology, statistical summaries, and inter­ members of the Armed Forces stationed in the area. pretative text, is planned for publication later in Series P-25. The States covered in this report are: METHODOLOGY Alaska Illinois Montana Three methods are employed by the Bureau· of Indiana Nebraska the Census in developing current county estimates. Iowa Ohio They are (1) the Bureau's Component Method II, Kansas Texas which employs vital statistics to measure natural Michigan increase and school enrollment (or school census) data as a basis for measuring net migration; (2) Estimates are shown for July 1, 1966, for each a composite method, in which separate estimates county in these States, with the components of are prepared for different segments of the population change (births, deaths, and net migration) population using different types of current data for for the pe'riod since April 1, 1960. each group; and (3) a housing unit method, in which estimated changes in the number of occupied housing County estimates for 1966 for 37 States were units are used as the basis for estimating changes I published earlier in Current Population Reports, in population. * These estimates were prepared in the State and Local Population Estimates and Projections Branch, Population Division, in connection with a contractual arrangement to provide data for metropolit.an areas and count.ies to t.he following Federal agencies: the Office of Civil Defense, the Economic Development Ad­ ministration (Department of Commerce), the Office of Transportation Information Planning (Department of Transportation), and the Defense Communications Agency (Department of Defense).

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402,15 cents. Annual subscription (Series P-20, P-23, P-25, P-27, P-28 summaries, P-60, and P-65, combined), $8.50,­ foreign mailing, $11 .00. 2 The methodology used in developing current for States without being adjusted to group totals, estimates by these three methods is discussed, in which are independently rounded. Percentages are Series P-25, No. 371. A detailed step-by-step based on unrounded numbers. outline of Component Method II is presented in Series P-25, No. 339. FEDERAL-STATE COOPERATIVE PROGRAM For this report, all three methods were employed FOR LOCAL POPULATION ESTIMATES in developing estimates for metropolitan counties in all States, For all remaining counties, estimates were developed by Component Method II and the The estimates presented in this report are a Composite method only. The results of the two or "one-time" set of estimates prepared by the Bureau three methods were then averaged. of the Census as a by-product ofa larger project now under way for a number of Federal agencies. As a final step, the average estimates for the Preparation of corresponding annual postcensal counties in each State were summed and adjusted estimates for all the counties in the is not to an independent State total published in Current now part of the Census Bureau's program. In Population Reports, Series P-25, No. 380. Ad­ recognition of the widespread need for small-area ditional adjustments were made as needed in special population estimates of uniform quality from State population groups, such as college and institutional to State, the Bureau of the Census has been develop­ populations, since the regular estimating method­ ing a cooperative program with the States for the ology would not be expected to reflect fully any preparation and publication of county population large or unusual changes in these groups. estimates. The ultimate objective of the cooperative program is the development and publication of State­ Special estimates. for selected areas.--For a prepared county population figures, by preferred numbei--Ofareas~adartionaI data are available for methods, largely standardized for data input and use in the preparation of population estimates. Such methods mutually agreed upon by the States and the sources as special censuses conducted by the Bureau Bureau of the Census. of the ICensus since 1960, and censuses conducted by State or county governments have been drawn upon. ,Counties where estimates have been prepared The selection of methods will be made on the using these special data sources are footnoted in basis of a large-scale test and evaluation program the table. to be carried out when the 1970 Census results become available. To date (as of September 1, LIMIT AT IONS 1968) 40 States have agreed to participate in the program, working with the Census Bureau to A detailed discussion of the limitations of the achieve the goals described above. A listingof the various methods used in the preparation of metro­ States and the agencies designated by State politan county estimates and of the relationship governors to work with the Bureau of the Census of estimates prepared by each method to the on the technical aspects of the program is given in published average of methods is contained in report the appendix, 1 No. 371. A large proportion of the counties for which estimates are presented in this report, During this past year, several States have however, had a population under 20,000. The published county popUlation estimates in consul­ estimates for these smaller areas may not have as tation with the Bureau of the Census, using high a level of accuracy, on the average, as those methodology largely within the general framework for large metropolitan areas. of the goals of the Federal-State Cooperative Program. The State-prepared county estimates DEFINITIONS are contained in the following reports: Metropolitan counties are those counties in­ cluded in standard metropolitan statistical areas Population Estimates of Arizona as of July 1, (SMSA' s) as currently defined. A detailed explana­ 1967, Research and Reports Section, Unem­ tion of the criteria used in establishing SMSA's is ployment Compensation DiVision, Employ­ given in Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas, ment Security Commission of Arizona, Executive Office of the President, Bureau of the Phoenix, Arizona. Budget, 1967.

ROUNDING OF ESTIMATES lFor a more detailed description of the see, Meyer Zitter, "Federal-State Estimates presented in the tables contained in gram for Local Population Estimates," The Registrar this report have been rounded to the nearest and StatisticIan, U.S. Department of Health, Educa­ hundred for counties and to the nearest thousand tion and Welfare, Vo1. 33, No.1, . 3 Forrest H. Pollard," Preliminary Estimates In general, the State-prepared county population of the Population of Louisiana Parishes: figures differ only slightly from those contained in July 1, 1966," The Louisiana Economy, this report, and the pattern of population re­ Volume 1, No.1, , Division of distribution since 1960 is quite similar for both Business and Economic Research, School of sets. Small differences in the two sets of esti­ Business Administration, Louisiana Poly­ mates come about because of differences in data tec~nic Institute, Ruston, Louisiana. input, differences in the specific methods used in ! arriving at final "average" estimates, or as is the C. florace Hamilton, Estimates of the Popu,: case in Arizona, a difference in the total State latibn of North Carolina Counties, 1966 and population to which the county estimates were 1967, -Demographic Report H':1,May-[9-6S; adjusted. Statistical Service Center, Budget Division, State Department of Administration, Raleigh; and Carolina Population Center, University In later years, should the objectives of the of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Federal-State Cooperative Program for Local Pop­ Carolina. ulation Estimates be realized, the Bureau of the Census would publish State-prepared estimates Leonard M. Sizer, Estimates of the Popu­ similar to those published in the above-mentioned lation of West Virginra-Cot.iDtIe-i3;Jlil)TT; reports in lieu of preparing its own estimates. 1950-66, , Office of Research In all such instances, however, the sum of the C).nd Development, Center for Appalachian county estimates would be in agreement with the Studies and Development, West Virginia independently prepared State population estimates University, Morgantown, West Virginia. regularly published in this series of reports. 4

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1,1960. (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. state estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Popula'oion 1960 to 1966

and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Nurr.ber Pel'cent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census) ______~------+------+------~------!------4------+------

lILIcSKA" ...... ~_ 265,0~~_-=22~6~,=16~7~ ____~39~,~0~0=0_~ __~lL~71~,.1+ ____4~$L,0~0~0~ ___-=8L,00~~0~ ______-"=lc=.,~~ 1 ...... 32900 11,8';.2 1,000 8.8 2,000 700 -200 District 2 ...... "<100 4,181 900 22.1 600 300 600 District 3 ...... 7,000 6,690 400 5.3 1,200 300 -500 District 4 ...... 13,400 9,745 3,700 37.7 1,900 500 2,300 District 5 ...... 3,500 2,945 600 19.1 500 200 200 District 6 ...... 4,400 4,603 -200 -3.6 700 300 -600 District 7 ... ·...... 6,100 5,18S 900 17.0 800 200 200 District 8 ...... 97,800 82,S33 15,000 18.1 17,SOO 2,100 -700 District 9 ...... 2,300 2,956 -600 -21.2 1,00 200 -800 District 10 ...... 8,000 6,097 1,900 31.5 1,100 300 1,100 District 11 ...... 8,400 7,17/, 1,200 17.3 1,500 300 (Z) District ;';1.2 ...... S,300 6,OJ.l 2,300 38.5 800 200 1,600 District·'13 ...... 5,100 4,024 1,100 26.6 900 200 400 District '14 ...... 7,600 5,537 2,100 37.6 1,900 400 500 District, 15 ...... S ,100 6,398 1,700 26.2 1 500 300 500 District 16 ...... 47,200 45,031 2,100 4.7 10;100 1,200 -6,800 District 17 ...... 8,700 5,693 3,000 52.9 2,000 300 1,400 District 18 ...... 6,400 6,091 300 5.7 1,400 300 -700 4,400 3,128 1,200 39.1 1,100 200 300 Dist·s~ctI19 ...... 1,413,000 661,000 -48,000 ILLIrOIS ...... 10,786,OCO 10,081,158 7b5,000 7.0 69,900 68,467 1,500 2.1 8,600 5,500 -1,700 Adams ...... 2,100 1,600 -1,500 Alexander ...... 15,000 16,061 -1,100 -6.8 1,600 1,100 -900 Bond ...... 13,600 14,060 -500 -3.4 23,700 20,326 3,400 16.7 2,800 1,300 1,900 Boone* ...... -300 6,000 6,210 -200 -4.0 700 600 Brown ...... • (z) 38,900 37,594 1,300 3.6 4,200 2,800 Bureau ...... 700 400 200 Calhoun ...... 6,400 5,933 500 7.7 19,600 19,507 100 0.5 2,300 1,500 -700 Carroll ...... ; • -300 14,700 14,539 200 1.1 1,700 1,200 Cass ...... 16,800 5,600 6,600 Champaign* ...... 2150,300 132,436 17,800 13.5 4,600 3,000 -2,200 Christian ...... 36,600 37,207 -600 -1.6 1,700 1,400 -600 Clark ...... 16,300 16,5<\6 -300 -1.6 15,200 15,815 -600 -3.9 1,70C 1,200 -1,100 Clay ...... -500 25,500 24,029 1,500 6.3 3,500 1,500 Clinton ...... 4,800 2,900 1,600 Coles ...... 246,400 42,860 3,500 8.2 749,900 344,300 -135,300 Cook* .••...... •.•..•.•.••••••.•• ·• • 5,400,000 5,129,725 270,200 5.3 19,400 20,751 -1,300 -6.4 2,000 1,600 -1,800 Crawford ...... -100 10,200 9,936 300 2.8 1,100 700 Cumberland ...... 7,300 3,000 8,300 De Kalb ...... 264,200 51,714 12,500 24.2 -11.0 2,000 1,400 -2,500 De Witt ...... ·• 15,300 17,253 -1,900 -4.0 2,300 1,300 -1,800 Douglas ...... 18,500 19,243 -800 400,700 313,459 87,200 27.8 47,200 13,500 53,600 Du Page*, ...... -400 22,700 22,550 100 0.5 2,400 1,900 Edgar ...... 700 600 -1,000 Edwards ...... 7,100 7,940 -900 -11.0 23,700 23,107 600 2.5 3,500 1,600 -1,300 Effingham ...... -400 22,200 21,946 300 1.2 2,300 1,600 Fayette ...... 1,800 1,200 -400 Ford ...... 16,900 16,606 300 Ul (z) 3,500 3,800 300 Franklin ...... 39,300 39,281 (z) (Z) 0.1 4,700 3,400 -1,400 Fulton ...... 42,000 41,954 -100 7,700 7,638 100 1.1 1,000 700 Gallatin ...... -1,400 16,500 17,460 -900 -5.4 2,000 1,500 Greene ...... 3,000 1,400 1,700 Grundy ...... 25,600 22,350 3,200 14.5 10,010 -1,000 -9.6 900 900 -900 Hamilton ...... 9,000 300 25,400 24,574 800 3.4 2,600 2,000 Hancock ...... -900 5,100 5,879 -800 -13.8 600 500 Hardin ...... 1,000 600 -1,700 Henderson ...... 7,000 8,237 -1,300 -15.5 49,317 2,600 5.3 5,900 3,600 300 Henry* ...... 51,900 -100 35,200 33,562 1,700 5.0 4,000 2,200 Iroquois ...... 5,800 2,900 10,200 Jackson ...... 255,200 42,151 13,100 31.1 1,300 900 -500 Jasper ...... 11,300 11,346 -100 -0.6 -1,400 32,000 32,315 -400 -1.1 3,500 2,500 Jefferson ...... 100 18,400 17,023 1,400 8.2 2,300 1,100 Jersey ...... 3,100 1,600 -1,600 Jo Davi.ess ...... 21,700 21,821 -100 -0.4 ';.1 800 600 100 Johnson ...... 7,200 6,928 300 16.7 31,700 12,000 15,100 Kane*. _ ...... " ...... 243,000 208,246 34,800 298,400 92,063 6,400 6.9 12,400 4,900 -1,200 Kankakee ...... 2,900 1,000 4,200 Kendall ...... 23,700 17,540 6,200 35.3

See footnotes at end of table. 5

() ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change population 1960 to 1966 , !------,--- and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Number Percent Bir~h8 Deaths migration .' 1966 (census) ------...... ,..-

ILLINOIS--Continued -100 7,000 4,100 -3,000 Knox ...... 61,200 61,280 Ii1,600 293,656 49,300 44,M10 D,700 Lake* ...... 342,900 -8,200 110,800 -1,800 -1.6 14,000 7,600 La Salle ...... 109,000 1,)00 -300 18,600 18,5LrO 100 0.5 1,900 LaVlI'ence~ ...... • ...... 2,400 3,500 1+4,200 3S,749 5,500 14.1 4,400 Lee •••••.•••.•..•.•.••...•••••• ···•• • 300 0.7 e,,600 2,bOO -1,800 Livingston •••.••..•.••.••••.••••.•••• 40,600 40,31,1 2,100 6.2 3,500 2,}00 700 Logan ...... ·...... 235,800 33,656 2,700 9.2 3,200 2,;200 1,600 McDonough ...... 231,600 2S,92S 7,200 84,210 14,800 17.6 12,800 5,;-00 McHenry*· ...... 99,000 6,100 295,600 S3,877 11,800 14.0 11,300 5,600 MlCWUl1* ...... , ...... ~ " • "" .... -2,500 11S,257 6,100 5.2 15,SOO 7,100 acon* ...... " ...... ~ ... 124,400 M 1 5,600 12.8 4,800 3,800 4,600 Macoupin."" * ...... " .... " ...... "" .. "" 49,100 43,52 " 200 224,689 19,500 S.7 31,800 12,600 Madison1<,o V." ...... · ...... 2M,100 3,300 -1,600 39,200 39,349 -200 -0.5 4,700 Marion~ •• : ...... e ...... e ...... -400 -3.2 1,500 1,000 -1,000 Marsha11 ••.••••••••••.••••.••••••.••• 12,900 13,334 -600 15,193 100 0.4 1,SOO 1,200 MaSOTI ...... 15,300 -1,200 14,341 -900 -6.2 1,500 1,100 Massac ...... ;. .... " ...... 13,500 800 600 10,100 9,248 800 9.2 1,100 Menard ...... e ...... e ••• 1,300 700 18,600 17,149 1,400 8.3 2,000 Mercer .... 0, ...... 2,500 15,507 3,600 22.9 2,100 1,100 M 19,100 onroe •••L ...... ····· .. -1,100 31,244 -400 -1.3 3,500 2,SOO Montgomex:y ...... 30,900 2,600 (Z) 237,900 36,571 1,400 3.7 3,900 Morgan .. ! ...... -1,100 13,635 -500 -3.7 1,500 900 Moultrie; ••••••••••••.•••.••••.•••••• 13,100 2,400 2,300 43,200 3S,106 5,lDO 13.5 5,200 ogle ...... 6,500 3.4 26,600 12,200 -7,900 eoria* ...... " ...... 195,500 189,044 P 2,400 12.7 2,000 1,500 1,900 P erry ...... • .... 21,600 19,184 1,200 14,960 1,800 12.3 1,600 1,000 P iatt •••••••••.••.•••.••••.••• •••••• • 16,800 -1,300 20,552 -900 -4.3 2,100 1,700 Pike ...... 19,700 400 -200 3,SOO 4,061 -200 -5.7 300 P ope ...... •• .... -300 -3.0 1,300 1,000 -600 ulaski ...... 10,200 10,490 P -200 4,570 (z) -0.6 500 300 P utnam ...... 4,500 2,200 -300 31,000 29,988 1,000 3.3 3,400 Randolph ...... 400 2.3 2,100 1,300 -400 ichland ...... 16,700 16,299 R 12,900 S.6 21,200 9,500 1,300 Rock Island* ...... 163,900 150,991 -14,400 262,509 S,200 3.1 39,200 16,600 St Clair* ••••••.•••.••••••••..••• · •• 270,700 2,700 1,400 27,400 26,227 1,200 4.6 2,500 S aline ...... 12,800 8.S 20,700 10,800 2,900 Sangamon* ••.••••••••••••••.••••••••.• 159,400 146,539 -1,000 8,746 -900 -9.9 900 700 Se hnyler ...... 7,900 500 -700 5,900 6,377 -500 -7.2 800 So ott ...... • 400 1.9 2,500 1,900 -200 Shelby ...... 23,800 23,404 -300 -4.3 900 600 -700 Sf; 7,800 8,152 ark ...... • 5,200 11.2 6,100 3,200 2,300 Stepllenson ...... 51,400 46,207 -1,100 99,789 S,600 8.6 14,500 e,,700 Ta zewell* ...... 108,400 1,300 100 lS,OOO 17,645 300 1.9 1,600 Un ion ...... ~ ." ...... e ...... -5,500 96,176 -400 -0.4 12,100 7,000 Ve rmilion ...... " ...... " ...... 95,800 -1,300 14,047 -700 -5.1 1,600 1,100 Wa bash ...... · ... • .. • 13,300 1,600 -400 22,100 21,587 500 2.5 2,500 War ren ...... 500 3.5 1,300 1,200 400 sllington ...... 14,000 13,569 Wa -1,100 -5.5 1,800 1,300 -1,600 yne ...... • 18,000 19,008 "Ia -1,600 -8.4 1,800 1,600 -1,900 Wh ite ...... ••• 17,800 19,373 -2,000 59,S87 3,000 5.1 S,500 3,500 Wh iteside ...... 62,900 14,700 191,617 34,200 17.8 30,100 10,600 Wi 11* ...... ·•• .... • .. • 225,800 4,100 2,700 49,800 46,117 3,700 8.0 5,100 Wi 11iamson ...... 11.0 32,400 11,200 1,800 nnebago* •••.••.•.••..•••.•••••••••• 232,800 209,765 23,000 Wi 300 1.3 3,200 1,500 -1,400 Wo odford* ...... • 24,900 24,579 289,000 6.2 669,000 292,000 -88,000 INDIANA •••••••.••••••••••••••.••. 4,951,000 4,662,498 1,400 -1,400 25,400 24,643 SOO 3.1 3,600 Ad 8JJls ...... 30,700 13.2 36,300 13,000 7,400 Al len* ...... 262,900 232,196 4S,198 6,800 14.0 8,400 2,800 1,100 Ba rtholomew ...... 55,000 800' -1,500 11,100 11,912 -800 -7.1 1,500 Benton ...... 900 6.3 2,100 1,100 -100 B1 ac:krord ...... 15,700 14,792 400 27,543 2,000 7.4 3,500 1,900 Boone* ...... 29,600 400 500 7,900 7,024 900 12.9 800 Bro'WIl ...... -200 -1.4 1,900 1,200 -1,000 Gar roll ...... 16,700 16,934 -800 40,931 1,100 2.7 5,000 , 3,100 Gas s ...... 0" ...... 42,000 See footnotes at end of table. 6

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960··Conlinued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. state estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966 , .'- ! State and county April 1, Net July 1., 1960 Number Percent Births Deaths 1966 migration " (census) ------_. INDIANA--Continued 3,400 -1,100 Clark· ••••••.•••••••••.••••••.•••.•• 367,400 6~, 795 1+ ,600 7.3 9,100 2,500 2,100 -1,000 Clay* ...... 23,600 2.... ,207 -600 -2.4 30,300 30,765 -500 -1.7 3,800 2,400 -1,900 Clinton ...... 1,000 700 -300 Crawford ••••••.•••.•••••••.••••..••• 8,400 8,379 (z) -0.3 26,300 26,636 -300 -1.2 3,300 1,900 -1,700 Daviess .. ~ e • ~ • G ••• " ... " " .. '" • " • " • " " • " - " " 29,000 28,670',. 300 1.1 3,900 1,900 -1,700 Dea.:r.born x' .. " •• " •••••• " • " • " ••• " • ~ " " • " • 1/,00 100 Decatur ...... 21,700 20,019 1,700 8.3 3,100 30,300 28,271 2,100 7.3 3,800 2,100 400 De Kalb ••••.••••••.•.••••.•.••.••••• 6,500 700 Delaware' .•.•••••••••••.•••.•••••••• 2121,300 110,938 10,300 9.3 16,200 4,700 1,700 -1,100 Dubois ...... 29,400 27/+63 1,900 7.0 15,500 6,100 5,000 Ellffiart ...... 121,200 106,790 M.,400 13.5 24,600 24 ,45/, 100 0.5 3,400 1,600 -1,600 Fayette ...... 3,300 -1,300 Floydff ...... 353,800 51,397 2".00 ,.7 7,000 18,200 18,706 -500 -2.9 2,600 1,500 -1,600 Fotmtfiin ...... 2,100 1,100 -1,200 Franklin ...... 16,900 17,015 -100 -0.8 2,000 1,400 -1,600 Fulton ...... 16,000 16,957 -1,000 -5.8 3,600 2,400 -1,900 Gibson ...... 29,300 29,949 -700 -2.2 11,700 4,500 -3,100 Grant ...... 79,800 75,741 4,100 5.4 500 2.0 2,800 2,400 100 Green.e ...... o ...... 26,900 26,327 4,600 11.4 5,600 2,',00 1,400 ~amiJrtton* ...... 44,700 .... 0,132 1,,200 1,700 1,400 Hancock* ...... 30,600 26,665 3,900 14.7 20,000 19,207 800 4.0 2,500 1,200 -500 Harri~on ...... ,,' ...... 6,300 2,000 2,100 HendTJ.cks* ...... 47,300 40,896 6,LOO 15.6 6,400 3,000 (z) Henry ...... 52,300 48,899 3,400 7.1 78,300 69,509 8,800 12.7 11,700 3,900 1,100 Howard ...... 2,600 -800 Huntington ...... 34,800 33,814 1,000 3.0 4,400 32,300 30,556 1,800 5.8 4,300 2,000 -500 Jackson ...... 1,100 -2,400 " asper ...... 18,100 18,842 -700 -3.9 2,800 J 3,000 1,700 200; Jay ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••• 24,100 22,572 1,500 6.7 3,100 1,500 200 J efferson ...... 25,800 24,061 1,700 7.2 1,000 1,300 ennings ...... 19,700 17,267 2,500 14.3 2,200 J 7,500 2,700 1,100 ohnson* ...... " ...... 49,600 43,700', 5,900 13.6 J 4,800 3,300 -1,200 Kn ox ...... 41,700 41,561 200 0.5 46,800 40,373 6,400 15.9 5,700 2,700 3,400 Kosciusko ...... 3,000 1,100 -300 agrange ...... 19,000 17,380 1,600 9.3 L 2.1 79,400 26,000 -42,800 L ake* ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 523,900 513,269 10,600 10.5 13,500 5,800 2,200 L a Porte ...... 105,100 95,111 10,000 37,700 36,564 1,200 3.2 4,800 2,700 -900 L awrence ...... 17,800 7,400 -1,600 Madison* ...... 134,600 125,819 8,800 7.0 697,567 48,100 6.9 109,800 43,200 -18,500 11 arion* ...... 0 ...... 745,700 4,100 2,000 -2,200 arsha11* ...... 32,400 32,443 -100 -0.2 M 1,800 700 -1,000 Martin ...... 10,700 10,600 100 0.7 6,400 2,500 -1,400 and ...... 40,600 38,000 2,600 6.7 Mi 35.5 9,500 2,800 14,300 11 onree;'" ...... 280,300 59,225 21,000 0.4 4,200 2,300 -1,700 Montgomery ...... 32,200 32,009 100 39,000 33,875 5,200 15.3 5,700 2,000 1,400 Morgan* ...... 800 -700 ewton •••••.••••••.••••.•••••••••••• 11,400 11,502 -100 -0.5 1,400 N 4.3 3,700 2,100 -400 Noble ...... 29,400 28,162 1,200 500 300 -300 hio ...... 4,100 4,165 (z) -1.2 o -3.8' 2,200 1,300 -1,500 Or a,nge ...... 16,200 16,877 -600 400 12,100 11,400 700 5.8 1,300 1,000 w en ...... G' ••••••• 1,300 -1,100 p 14,200 14,800', -600 -4.0 1,700 arke ...... 2,600 1,100 -300 p erry ...... 18,400 17,232 1,200 6.7 J.,400 1,200 -1,300 p ike ...... 11,800 12,797 -1,000 -8.2 9,100 3,000 9,100 p orter* ...... 75,500 60,279 15,200 25.2 2,400 1,300 700 osey ...... 321,000 19,214 1,800 9.5 P -7.1 1,600 900 -1,700 Pulaski ...... 11,900 12,837 -900 24,900 24,927 (z) -0;1 2,800 1,700 -1,100 Putnam ...... 3,600 2,100 200 ndo1ph ...... 30,000 28,434 1,600 5.6 Ra 2,700 1,500 -1,500 Ripley ...... 20,300 20,641 -300 -1.4 21,200 20,393 800 3.8 2,500 1,500 -200 Rush ...... 30,000 13,500 -16,500 Joseph* ...... 238,700 238,614 100 (z) St 2,700 900 -700 ott •••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 15,800 14,643 1,100 7.8 Be 4,900 2,300 600 ShelbY* ...... 37,300 34,093 3,200 9.5 16,600 16,074 500 3.1 1,900 1,200 -200 Spe ncer ...... 2,600 1,300 200 St·arke ...... 19,400 17,911 1,500 8.5 See footnotes at end of table. \ i

7

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. state estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

st~te and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 NUIf,ber Percent Births Deaths migra·tion 1966 (census)

INDIANA--Continued 2,400 1,300 -300 Steuben ...... lB,OOO 17,lB4 BOO 4.'7 2,100 1,900 -1,300 Su1livan* ...... 20,600 21,721 -1,J.oO -5.1 6,300 7,092 -800 -11.2 800 600 -1,000 Switzerland ...... 4,600 3,900 Tippecanoe* ...... , 2102,500 89,122 13,400 15.0 14,100 1,900 1,100 1,00 Tipton ...... 17,000 15,856 1,100 7.2 800 500 -300 Union ...... 6,600 6,457 100 1.5 164,600 165,794 -1,200 -0.'7 21,100 10, '700 -11,600 Vanderburgb* ...... 1,600 -1,600 Vermillion* ...... 16,100 17,683 -1,600 -8.9 1,'700 13,200 8,'700 --4,300 Vigo* ...... 2108,600 10B,1,58 200 0.1 4,600 2,200 100 Wabash ...... 35,100 32,605 2,500 7.6 900 600 -300 Warren ...... 8,700 8,545 100 1.5 2,900 1,600 -100 Warrick* ...... 24,BOO 23,577 1,200 5.2 2,300 1,200 -100 Washington ...... 18,800 17,819 1,000 5.5 7B,600 74,039 4,600 6.2 10,600 4,900 -1,100 Wayne ... ' ...... 2,800 1,400 1,200 Wells ...... 23,900 21,220 2,700 12.5 2,500 1,400 -400 White ...... 20,400 19,709 700 3.4 2,500 1,400 400 Whitley ...... : ...... 22,500 20,954 1,500 7.4 363,000 180,000 -lBO, 000 IOWA ...... 2,760,000 2,757,537 3,000 0.1 -900 l 10,300 10,893 -600 -5.8 1,200 800 Adai:r ••• ...... 800 600 -1,100 Adams •• : ...... _...... 6,600 7,468 -900 -12.0 15,000 15,982 -1,000 -6.0 2,100 1,200 -2,000 A11amakee ...... 1,500 -700 Appenoo13e ...... _ ...... 15,600 16,015 -500 -2.9 1,800 1,200 '700 -1,300 Audubon ...... 10,100 10,919 -800 -'7.4 2,900 1,600 -3,100 Benton •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 21,600 23,422 -1,800 -7.7 18,800 6,500 -8,000 Black Hawk* ...... 2126,800 122,482 4,300 3.5 2,700 2,100 -3,300 Boone ...... 225,300 28,037 -2,700 -9.'7 2,700 1,200 -1,500 Bremer ...... ,/ ...... " ...... 21,100 21,108 -100 -0.3 3,000 1,400 -1,500 Buchanan ...... 222,500 22,293 200 0.9 20,700 21,189 -400 -2.1 2,300 1,400 -1,400 Buena Vista ...... 1,100 -700 Butler ...... 17,'700 17,467 200 1.2 2,000 1,700 1,100 -1,500 Calhoun ...... 15,000 15,923 -900 -5.8 3,600 1,400 -2,000 Carroll ...... 23,600 23,431 200 0.9 2,100 1,400 -1,800 Cass ...... 16,800 17,919 -1,100 -6.1 17,600 1'7,'791 -200 -1.1 1,900 1,100 -1,000 Cedar ...... 3,200 -5,000 Cerro Gordo ...... 4'7,800 49,894 -2,100 -4.2 6,100 2,200 1,100 -2,100 Cherokee ...... 21'7,600 18,598 -1,000 -5.2 2,100 1,000 -1,400 Chickasaw ...... 14,800 15,034 -300 -1.8 800 '700 -300 Clarke •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8,000 8,222 -200 -3.0 2,200 1,100 -1,700 Clay ...... 1'7,900 18,504 -600 -3.4 -2,000 2,600 1,600 -2,900 Clayton ...... 20,000 21,962 -9.0 300 7,200 3,700 -3,200 Clinton ...... 55,400 55,060 0.6 2,500 1,200 -400 Crawford ...... 19,500 18,569 900 4.8 2,800 1,800 -900 Dallas • .'...... 24,200 24,123 100 0.5 -'700 -7.2 900 700 -900 Davis ...... 8,500 9,199 -3.6 900 900 -400 Decatur ...... 10,200 10,539 -400 3.4 2,800 1,100 -1,000 Delaware ...... 19,100 18,483 600 5,900 3,100 -1,800 Des Moines ...... 45,600 44,605 1,000 2.2 ~ -500 -4.3 1,100 900 -1,100 Dickinson ...... 12,000 . 12,574 87,500 80,048 7,400 9.3 14,~00 5,200· -1,500 Dubuque* ...... -1,600 14,200 14,8'71 -700 -4.6 1,800 900 Enunet ...... •• 3,600 1,900 -2,500 Fayette ...... 2'7,'700 28,581 -900 -3.0 300 1.2 2,900 1,400 -1,200 Floyd ...... 21,400 21,102 -9.0 1,600 900 -2,100 Franklin ...... 14,100 15,4'72 -1,400 -6.0 1,000 800 -800 Fremont ...... • .. 9,700 10,282 -600 -1,100 -'7.7 1,600 1,000 -1,700 Greene ...... 13,300 14,379 -0.8 1,600 800 -900 Grundy ...... 14,000 14,132 -100 12,800 13,607 -800 -6.0 1,400 1,000 -1,100 Guthrie ...... 2,300 1,300 -600 Hamilton ...... 20,500 20,032 500 2.4 -4.3 1,700 900 -1,500 Hancock ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 14,000 14,604 -600 0.6 2,400 1,700 _600 Hardin ...... 22,700 22,53.3 100 -9;1 1,900 1,400 -2,100 Ha:r"rison ...... 16,000 17,600 -1,600 6.7 1,900 1,400 '700 Henry ...... 19,400 18,18'7 1,200 -8.2 1,500 900 -1,700 Howard ...... 11,'700 12, '734 -1,000 -300 -2.6 1,600 900 -1,100 Humboldt ...... 12,800 13J 156 -400 1,000 700 -700 Ida ...... 9,900 10,269 -3.9 -100 -0.3 1,900 I 1,100 -900 Iowa ...... 16,300 16,396

See footnotes at end of table. 8

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

and courrey April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Nurr.ber percent Births Deaths migratior.. 1966 (census)

IOWA--Continued 20,000 20,754 -800 -3.6 3,300 1,400 -2,.700 Jackson. & ...... ~ e ...... """ ...... 3'>,600 35,282 -700 -1.9 4,200 2,200 -2,700 Jasper" ...... 0 ...... Q" 0" ...... 1> ...... G 218,600 15,B18 2,800 17.5 1,900 1,100 2,000 Jefferson ...... It ...... " (> ...... Johnson ...... • 261,400 53,663 7,700 14.4 9,200 2,400 900 20,500 20,693 -200 -0.7 2,600 1,300 -1,400 Jones ...... e ...... III ...... • .. 14,500 15,492 -1,000 -6.3 1,700 1,300 •. 1,300 Keokuk ...... •••••• .. Kossuth ...... •••• 23,700 25,314 -1,600 -6.4 3,'>00 1,400 -3,600 42,800 M>,207 -1,400 -3.1 5,400 3,200 -3,500 Lee ...... •••• 152,000 136,899 15,100 11.0 22,300 7,800 600 Linn* ...... " .... " D ...... G ...... 11,800 10,290 1,500 15.0 1,200 800 1,100 Louisa ...... 0 ...... _ ...... I> .... . 10,100 10,923 -800 -7.4 1,100 1,000 -900 Lucas ...... ~ ...... " Lyon ...... ;' ...... 13,700 14,468 -800 -5.3 J.,800 800 -1,eOO 12,200 12,295 -100 -0.5 1,200 1,000 -300 Madison. '~: 0 ...... " ...... " ...... 22,100 23,602 -1,500 -6.5 2,400 1,800 -2,100 Mahaska.~ ...... • .. 25,100 25,886 -800 -2.9 2,900 1,800 -1,900 Marion •• ,...... 0 ...... a ...... Marshall ...... 37,400 37,984 -600 -1.5 4,900 2,600 -2,800 Mills ...... 212,500 l3,050 -600 -4.5 1,300 BOO -1,000 Mitchell ...... 13,700 14,043 -300 -2.5 2,000 1,000 -1,300 Monqn ....i' •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 12,000 13,916 -1,900 -14.0 1,400 1,100 -2,300 Monroe ...... 9,300 10,463 -1,200 -11.2 1,100 900 -1,300 l3,lOO 14,467 -1,400 -9.4 1,300 1,200 -1,500 Montgom~'ry ...... 35,000 33,e40 1,100 3.3 4,800 2,600 -1,100 Muscati~e ...... '" ...... O'Brien ...... 17,700 18,B40 -1,200 -6.3 2,300 1,200 -2,300 B,700 10,064 -1,400 -13.6 1,200 , 500 -2,100 Osoeola ... e. e ...... Page ...... 218,700 21,023 -2,300 -11.0 2,000 1,600 -2,700 Palo Alto ...... 13,900 14,736 -900 -5.9 1,900 1,000 -1,800 Plymouth ••••••• , ••••••• ,•••••••••••••• 24,500 23,906 600 2.5 3,000 1,400 -1,000 Pocahontas ...... l3,500 14,234 -800 -5.4 1,600 900 -1,500 Polk* ...... • 273,600 266,315 7,300 2.7 37,400 16,000 -1/,,100 B4,300 83,102 1,200 1.4 12,900 S,lOO -6,600 Pottawattamie* ...... co ...... Poweshiek ...... 17,300 19,300 -2,000 -10.2 2,300 1,300 -2,900 Ringgold ...... 6,600 7,910 -1,300 -16.6 700 600 -1,300 Sac ...... 15,600 17,007 -1,400 -B.l 1,900 1,200 -2,100 136,300 119,067 17,200 14.5 18,500 7,400 6,100 Scott* ...... I1 ...... • ••• Shelby ...... • .. 15,600 15,B25 -200 -1.2 2,100 1,000 -1,300 Sioux ...... 26,700 26,375 300 1.2 3,600 1,500 -l,BOO Story ...... 252,900 49,327 3,600 7.3 7,400 2,400 -1,400 Tama ...... 21,600 21,413 200 0.8 2,300 1,500 -700 Taylor ...... 9,400 10,2B8 -900 -8.6 800 900 -800 Union ...... l3,OOO 13,712 -700 -5.0 1,500 1,300 -900 8,900 9,77B -900 -9.1 1,100 900 -1,100 Van Buren ••••••••••••••• o ...... Wapello ...... • 42,700 46;126 -3,400 -7.4 5,200 3,200 -5,400 21,700 20,829 800 4.0 3,000 1,200 -900 Warren ... ~ / ...... Washington ...... IB,500 19,406 -900 -4.5 2,300 1,500 -1,700 B,200 9,800 -1,600 -15.8 800 900 -1,400 Wayne ...... • .. •• .. 46,000 47,BIO -l,BOO -3.7 6,800 3,200 -5,400 Webster ...... •••••• Winnebago ...... 13,800 13,099 700 5.7 1,400 900 200 20,300 21,651 -l,4C10 -6.3 2,800 1,300 -2,900 WiIID€shiek ...... It ...... 102,700 107,B49 -5,100 -4.B 14,600 7,100 -12,600 Woodbury* ...... ••• Worth •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9,100 10,259 -1,200 -11.4 900 700 -1,400 17,600 19,447 -1,900 -9.7 2,000 1,300 -2,700 Wright ...... : •••• •••• KANSAS ••• ...... 1------.-.:2:.>,~2:.:.7~5,1..':O::O:::0+_.::2::..,.::.17:.::B:!.,:::6=1l::...,1----9::.c7~,:::00::::0::...j--.:.:4~.4::....j--=2.::.8.:.!4,c::0:::0=0-l-_:::1:::3.::.4,!...:0::.::0:::0+ __-:::5~3,!...:0:.:0.::0 -1,300 15,300 16,369 -1,100 -6.8 1,700 1,400 Allen ...... ••• .. •••••• -1,000 8,200 9,035 -BOO -9.4 1,000 800 Anderson •• It ...... II It II .... e -900 20,800 20,898 -100 -0.6 2,500 1,'100 Atchison. It ..... It ...... ••• ...... • -BOO 8,200 8,713 -500 -5.7 900 600 Barber •• c c ...... ••• .. • .... • .. .. -100 -0.4 4,200 1,700 -2,700 Barton ...... •••• 32,200 32,36B .700 17,000 16,090 900 5.5 1,700 1,600 Bourbon ...... A ...... 3.8 1,200 1,200 400 Brown ...... •• .... • ...... 13,700 13,229 500 -900 -2.3 4,200 2,100 -2,900 Butler* ••••••••••••••••• • •• •••••••••• 37,500 38,395 (Z) 4,000 3,921 (z) 1.0 400 300 Chase ...... • .. •• ...... 400 600 -300 Chautauqua ...... 5,600 5,956 -400 -6.7 3.1 2,300 2,000 400 Cherokee ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 23,000 22,279 700 -100 -2.2 400 300 -200 Cheyenne ...... 4,600 I 4,708 -100 3,400 3,396 (z) 0.6 400 300 Clark •••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••• • 600 5.2 1,000 900 500 Clay ...... • •• •••• 11,200 10,675 See footnotes at end of table. 9

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960-·Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropol1.tan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Nurr,ber Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census) ------i!------f------+------+------1------1------"

KANSAS--Continued -.1,100 13,600 14,407 -800 -5.7 1,600 1,300 Cloud ...... , ...... 800 (z) 8,300 8,403 -100 -1. 5 700 -500 2,900 3,271 -400 -11.9 400 300 3,900 2,900 -3,600 Cowley ...... 35,200 37,861 -2,700 3,700 3,400 2,600 Crawford ...... , ...... 240,000 37,032 3,000 3.9 600 400 (z) Decatur ...... 6,000 5,778 200 2,400 1,600 -1,400 Dickinson ...... , ...... 20,900 21,572 -600 -3.0 7.1 1,100 flOO 300 .Doniphan ...... 10,300 9,574 700 5,800 2,300 4,600 Douglas •...... 251,900 43,720 8,200 18.7 -0.9 600 1,00 -200 Edwards ...... 5,100 5,118 (Z) -10.5 1,00 500 -400 Elk ...... ·.· . 4,500 5,048 -500 3,300 900 2,000 Ellis ...... 225,700 21,270 4/,00 20.8 12.8 700 700 900 Ellsworth ...... 8,700 7,677 1,000 13.4 2,800 800 200 Finney .. ;1 ...... ••.•...... 18,200 16,093 2,200 3,000 I,JOO -800 Ford ...... ··· . 21,800 20,938 900 4.3 2,200 1,700 400 Franklin ...... · . 20,500 19,548 900 4.8 22.9 6,600 1,200 1,000 Geary ...... •.... · . 35,400 28,779 6,600 -2.0 700 200 -500 Gave ...... ·· . 4,000 4,107 -100 -10.0 700 300 -1,000 Graham ...... •...... •....•..•.... 5,000 5,586 -600 1,000 18.1 900 200 200 Grant ...... ··•··· .. . 6,200 5,269 700 5,400 4,380 1,000 23.0 600 300 Gray ... J ...... -100 2,200 2,087 100 4.5 300 100 Greeley.·...... -1,300 10,000 11,253 -1,300 -11.2 1,000 1,000 Greenwood ...... 200 -600 2,700 3,144 -400 -12.6 400 Hamiltoh ...... •• ·· . -300 9,300 9,541 -200 -2.5 800 700 HB.-l"})er ••..••••.•..•••..•••.•.••••••. 200 27,500 25,865 l,600 E,,] 3,000 1,600 Harvey .•...... 500 3,800 2,990 800 26.4 400 100 Haskell ...•...... ·.··· . 300 200 -200 Hodgeman ...... 3,000 3)115 -100 -2.8 1,100 900 600 Jackson ...... '...... ·· .. 11,100 10,309 800 7.8 6.4 1,300 900 400 Jefferson ...... 12,000 11,252 700 600 -300 6,900 7,217 -300 -4.7 600 Jewell ...... • ·· . 31,700 191,100 143,792 47,300 32.9 21,000 5,400 Johnson* ...... ··· . -200 3,100 3,108 (Z) 0.3 400 200 Kearny...... •.. -400 9,900 9,958 (Z) -0.3 1,000 700 Kingman ...... -200 4,500 4,626 -200 -3.7 400 300 Kiowa ...... 800 28,100 26,805 1,300. 4.7 2,800 2,300 Labette ...... •..... ···· . -100 3,200 3,060 100 4.5 400 200 Lane ...... •...... ·•·· . 5,600 2,900 2,900 Leavenworth ....•...... •...... 5<1,200 48,524 5,700 11.7 -9.9 500 500 -600 Lincoln ...... ··· . 5,000 5,556 -600 400 5.2 600 800 500 Linn ...... ·.········ . 8,700 8,274 600 200 -500 Logan ...... 3,900 4,036 -100 -2.6 231,000 26,928 4,000 15.0 3,500 1,900 2,500 Lyon ...... •...... • ··· . 2,600 1,600 -600 McPherson ...... •...... 24,700 24,285 400 1.6 1.2 1,500 1,100 -200 Marion ...... ·.·· . 15,300 15,143 200 -7.6 1,600 1,300 -1,400 Marshall '. :' ...... •..•••.... 14,400 15,598 -1,200 -13.9 700 300 -1,100 Meade ...... 4,700 5,505 -800 219,400 19,884 -500 -2.5 2,000 1,400 -1,100 ...... 1,000 800 400 Mitchell...... •...•.•..•...•... 9,500 8,866 600 7.0 4,400 3,800 -5,400 Montgomery ...... •..... 40,300 45,007 -4,700 -10.4 600 500 200 Morris ...... · . 7,700 7,392 300 3.6 -100 3,600 3,354 200 6.8 500 200 Morton ...... ··· . -700 12,800 12,897 -100 -1.0 1,500 1,000 Nemaha ...... •...... •.... ···· •. -300 19,700 19,455 200 1.1 2,100 1,600 Neosho ...... •...... •....•... ·.· . -500 5,200 5,470 -300 -4.8 700 400 Ness ...... ···· . 800 600 1,000 Norton ...... •. 9,200 8,035 1,200 M.8 1,400 1,100 -700 Osage ...... 12,500 12,886 -400 -2.9 8.1 700 600 500 Osborne ...... •.... · .. ·· . 8,100 7,506 600 6,600 6,779 -200 -3.2 600 600 -300 Ottawa ...... •....•...... • ····· . -600 9,900 10,254 -300 -3.0 1,000 700 Pawnee ...... ····· . 900 600 -200 Phillips ...... •...... 8,800 8,709 100 1.3 -700 11,600 11,957 -400 -3.4 1,300 1,000 Pottawatomie .....•.....•...... -1,000 11,500 12,122 -600 -4.9 1,200 800 Pratt ...... •..•...... 300 -300 5,200 5,279 -100 -1. 5 600 Rawlins ...... •...... -400 62,400 59,055 3,300 5.7 7,400 3,700 Reno ...... ·.· . 800 800 -200 Republic ...... 9,600 9,768 -200 -1.6 (Z) 0.4 1,400 1,000 -400 Rice ...... •...... •. ·· .• ····· . 14,000 13,909

See footnotes at end of table. 10

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL I, 1960··Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estima-"es are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change popula-oion 1960 to 1966

State and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Nmr.ber Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census)

KANSAS--Continued 6,300 1,600 -3,100 Riley ...... 243,600 L,1,914 1,600 3.9 1,100 600 -1,700 Rooks ...... 8,500 9,734 -1,200 -12.7 600 400 300 Hush ...... 6,700 6,160 500 8.6 1,200 700 (z) HusBell ...... 11,900 11,348 500 4.7 9,300 2,500 -22,500 Saline ...... ·.·· . 39,000 54,715 -15,700 -28.7 800 300 300 Sco·tt ...... ····· . 6,100 5,228 900 16.3 50,100 15,400 -21,800 Sedgwick* ...... 356,200 343,231 12,900 3.8 2,600 600 -1,700 Seward ...... •...... 16,100 15,930 200 1.1 22,900 7,900 -5,500 Shawnee* ...... 150,800 141 286 9,500 6.'7 500 200 400 Sheridan ...... 5,000 4;267 800 17.7 600 7,800 6,682 1,100 16.1 900 400 Sherman ...... •...... -100 7,800 7,776 (z) 0.4 700 600 Smith ...... _...... (Z) 7,500 7,451 (z) 0.4 600 600 . ,,- ...... -200 2,200 2,108 100 6.6 400 100 Stanton.. i; ...... (Z) 4,700 L,,400 300 7.4 500 200 Stevens ...:_ ...... • -2,500 23,500 25,316 -1,800 -7.0 2,500 1,800 Su:rnner ...••••....••.•••.••..•••..• · • 400 -1,400 Thomas ... : ...... 6,500 7,358 -900 -11.7 1,000 600 300 -900 Trego ...... 4,800 5,473 -700 -12.2 600 500 -100 Wabaunsee ...... 6,600 6,648 (z) -0.5 300 100 300 Wallace ...... 2,500 2,069 500 21. 9 ~ Jj 1,100 900 -100 Washington ...... 10,800 10,739 (z) 0.2 500 200 300 Wichita .. _: ...... 3,400 2,765 600 22.2 12,500 13,077 -600 -4.7 1,200 1,200 -600 5,100 5,423 -300 -6.4 400 500 -200 ~~;~~~~: :1::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 28,500 11,400 -8,900 Wyandotte* ...... 193,700 185,495 8,200 4.4 8.2 1,135,000 443,000 -47,000 MICHIGAN ..•...... • ···· . 8,468,000 7,823,194 644,000 6,352- (Z) -0.7 700 500 -300 Aleona ...... j ••••••••••• 6,300 700 -1,300 Alger .•...... •....••....• 8,300 9,250 -900 -9.9 1,100 8,000 3,600 -1,500 Allegan ...•...... •....•...•. 60,600 57,729 2,900 5.0 4,700 1,700 -2,300 Alpena ...... 29,200 2El,556 700 2.4 1,300 900 (z) Antrim ...... •...... · .• 10,700 10,373 400 3.5 9,600 9,860 -200 -2.4 1,200 800 -700 Arenac o ••••••••••••••••••• • •• •••• .. • • 1,000 600 200 Baraga ...... •.... 7,800 7,151 600 8.5 34,800 31,73El 3,100 9.7 4,300 2,000 800 Barry .•...... -4,900 112,300 107,042 5,200 4.9 16,000 5,900 Bay* ...... ···· . 1,000 600 -1,200 Benzie ...... " ...... 6,900 7,834 -900 -11.4 23,100 9,100 1,800 Berrien ...... 165,700 149,El65 15,800 10.6 4,100 2,300 1,000 Branch ...... •...... •. 37,700 34,903 2,800 8.0 19,300 7,900 -8,100 Calhoun ...... •...... 142,100 138,858 3,300 2.4 4,400 2,400 500 Cass ...... 39,500 36,932 2,500 6.9 2,000 1,100 -100 Charlevoix ...... 14,100 13,421 700 5.4 2,000 1,000 -700 Cheboygan ...... •.•.. 14,900 14,550 400 2.5 ~ 6,500 1,900 -400 Chippewa., ._•...... 36,800 32,655 4,100 12.6 1,800 900 400 Clare ...... •.... 12,900 11,647 1,300 11.2 6,200 2,100 2,700 Clinton* ...... · ... . 44,700 37,969 6,800 17.9 800 400 500 Crawford ...... 5,900 4,971 900 19.0 33,300 34,298 -1,000 -2.9 4,700 2,400 -3,300 Delta ...... -300 24,600 23,917 600 2.7 2,700 _ 1,800 Dickinson ...... 1,800 55,900 49,684 6,200 12.5 7,300 2,900 Eaton* ...... ····· . 1,200 -400 Emmet ...... •.... 16,500 15,904 600 3.9 2,200 63,600 18,500 2,700 Cenesee* ...... 422,100 374,313 47,800 12.8 1,300 800 100 Gladwin ...... · . 11,400 10,769 700 6.2 2,200 2,100 -3,800 Gogebic ...... 20,700 24,370 -3,700 -15.2 4,300 2,000 200 Grand T:raverse ...... 36,000 33,490 2,500 7.4 5.7 5,900 2,400 -1,400 Gratiot ...... •...... ···· . 39,100 37,012 2,100 4,600 2,400 -2,200 Hillsdale ...... ••...... 34,700 34,742 (Z) (Z) 3,200 -2,200 Houghton ...... •...... 34,300 35,654 -1,400 -3.8 4,000 4,700 2,400 -2,800 Huron .....•....•...... •. 33,500 34,006 -500 -1.4 33,700 10,500 12,400 Ingham* •...... - 2246,900 211,296 35,600 16.8 5,900 2,700 -3,600 Ionia ...... 42,700 43,132 -500 -1.0 4,400 1,100 3,300 losco ...... 23,100 16,505 6,600 40.0 1,600 1,500 -2,100 Iron ...... ·.··· . 15,200 17,184 -2,000 -11.6 9.3 5,100 1,800 (Z) Isabella ...... ···· . 238,600 35,348 3,300 18,200 7,800 -5,400 Jackson* ...... 2136,900 131,994 4,900 3.7 24,000 8,700 3,300 KalaJll8.zoo* ...... 2188,300 169,712 18,600 11.0 600 400 400 Kalkaska ....•...... •.. 4,900 4,382 600 12.6

See footnotes at end of table. 11

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

and county April 1, Net 1960 NUIf.ber Percent Births Deaths migra·tion (census)

MICHlGAN--Continued 363,lB7 28,000 7.7 55,800 20,700 -7,100 * ...... ~ ..•...... , .....• 391,200 300 -300 2,100 2,417 -400 -14.7 200 Keweenaw .•.••.••..••.••..•.• ·••••· •• 600 -300 5,100 5,338 -300 -5.1 600 Lake ...... ······· • 5,700 13.6 6,100 2,1,00 2,000 Lapeer¥ ...... · .. . 1+7,600 41,926 9,321 300 3.6 1,100 700 -100 Leelanau ...... •. · ... ········ . 9,700 -3,000 80,000 77,789 2,200 2.9 9,900 ',,700 Lenawee ...... 2,300 2,500 44,200 38,233 5,900 15.5 5,700 Livingston ...... 500 -1,1,.00 6,800 7,827 -1,000 -12.8 900 Luce ...... ······· . -800 -7.2 1,600 700 -1,700 Mackinac ...... 10,100 10,853 147,300 36.3 79,700 16,500 84,100 Macomb?(", .•.•..••..•....••..... ··••· . 3553,100 405,804 -500 19,600 19,042 600 2.9 2,600 1,500 Manistee ...... 20.7 9,300 3,500 5,BOO lo'zrquette ...... 267,800 56,151, 11,600 21,929 -300 -1.2 2,600 1,600 -1,300 Mason ...... · .. ········· . 21,700 3,300 225,800 21,051 4,800 22.6 2,900 1,400 Mecosta .. :' ...... •. , .. . -2,700 23,100 24,685 -1,600 -6.4 2,YOO 1,800 Menominee ~' ...... B,400 2,000 -2,300 Midland ...... 55,600 51,450 4,100 8.0 -10.3 800 500 -1,000 Missaukee,...... •...... •..•.•..•.. 6,100 6,784 -700 101,120 10,900 10.8 15,600 5,300 600 Monroe* ...... • 112,000 2,000 40,';.00 35,795 4,600 12.7 5,100 2,600 Montcalm ...... ···· .. . 3.9 500 400 100 Montrnoren,cy .••.••.•.•..••••••.•••••. 4,600 4,424 200 22,800 7,800 -12,800 Musk6gt:m*!...... 152,100 149,943 2,200 1.4 6.6 3,500 1,700 -200 Newaygo. " ...... •...... •..... 25,700 24,160 1,600 16.3 102,000 29,200 39,900 Oakland?("; ...•••••.••..• " •.•••.••••• 803,000 690,259 112,700 16,547 500 2.8 2,200 1,200 -500 Ocearla. oJ;. ••••••••••••••• o. 0 ••• 0 •••• • 17,000 9,680 400 4.6 1,200 800 (z) Ogewzw ...... •. 10,100 -600 10,600 10,584 (z) -0.1 1,400 800 Ontonagon ...... ••. -500 13,900 13,595 300 2.3 1,800 1,100 Osceola ...... ••...... • ···· . 300 400 4,100 3,447 600 18.2 500 Oscoda ...... •...... ·····•· . 9.0 1,300 500 -100 Otsego ...... ••...... •...... B,200 7,545 700 13,700 13.9 15,800 5,100 3,000 Ottawa* ...... •.• ···•· . 112,400 98,719 -2,000 12,100 13,117 -1,100 -8.0 1,800 BOO Presque Isle ...... •..... 700 700 8,100 7,200 900 12.2 800 Roscommon ••••••••••••••••••.• •••••• . 10,600 -600 210,200 190,752 19,400 10.2 30,600 Saginaw* ...... •...... •.•.... 15,000 7,100 -200 St. Clair ...... •.....•...... 114,900 107,201 7,700 7.2 42,332 3,000 7.2 5,800 3,000 200 St. Joseph ...... •.....•. 45,400 (z) 34,300 32,314 2,000 6.3 4,500 2,500 Sanilac ...... 1,200 700 -1,400 Schoolcraft ...... •...... 8,000 8,953 -900 -10.6 12.6 8,500 3,300 1,600 Shiawassee ...•..•...... •...• 60,200 53,446 6,700 11.1 6,300 2,900 1,400 Tuscola ...... · •.. 4B,100 43,305 4,800 4B,395 6,600 13.6 6,800 3,700 3,500 Van Buren ...... · •... 55,000 12,200 2203,800 172,440 31,300 18.2 26,300 7,200 Washtenaw* ...... -153,200 2,704,600 2,666,297 38,300 1.4 349,400 157,900 Wayne*· ...... •...... •....•.. 2,500 1,400 -lOO Wexford ...... 19,500 1B,466 1,000 5.4 244,000 5.6 568,000 308,000 -17,000 MISSOU~I ...... 4,564,000 4,319,813 2,600 1,600 700 Adair .. _ ...... •. - •.... 221,800 20,105 1,700 8.2 11,062 1,100 10.2 1,200 800 800 Andrew ...... 12,200 -400 9,000 9,213 -200 -2.4 900 700 Atchison ...... •...... •...... -1,700 25,900 26,079 -200 -0.8 3,300 1,800 Audrain ...... 2,100 1,700 100 Barry.•...... _ ...... •.. 19,400 18,921 500 2.5 11,1l3 -1,700 -15.5 900 1,000 -1,600 Barton ...... •...... •...... 9,400 500 16,300 15,905 400 2.6 1,500 1,600 Bates ...... •....•.. 1,400 10,000 8,737 1,200 14.3 700 900 Benton .•...... ··.· . 900 700 -800 Bollinger ...... •...... 8,600 9,167 -500 -5.8 25.2 8,800 3,100 8,200 Boone ...... ····· . 269,100 55,202 13,900 -1,800 92,800 90,581 2,200 2.5 11,700 7,700 Buchanan-){" ••.••••••••••••••••••• •• ••• 4,000 2,800 -500 Butler .. _ ...••.•.•..•...... 35.500 34,656 800 2.3 8,830 -300 -3.9 800 900 -200 CaldwelL ..•...... 8,500 BOO 25,600 23,858 1,700 7.2 2,600 1,600 Callaway ...... ••.... BOO 800 1,500 Camden ...... •.....••...... •.. 10,700 9,116 1,600 17.4 250,000 42,020 7,900 IB.9 5,100 2,700 5,500 Cape Girardeau ...... 1,300 1,300 (Z) Carroll ...... · .. . 13,900 13 ,84'1 (Z) 0.2 3,973 1,200 31.0 400 400 1,100 Carter ...... •...... · .. . 5,200 8,600 40,600 29,702 10,900 36.7 4,100 1,800 Cass-){" ••.•••••.•••••.•••••• ••••·•••• • -300 8,900 9,185 -300 -2.8 1,000 900 Cedar •...... •.•...... •. _.. _.•.. -1,500 11,100 12,720 -1,600 _12.6 1,100 1,200 Chari ton ...... • 1,300 900 1,100 Chris·tian ..•...... , ...... 13,SOO 12,359 1,400 -11. 7

See footnotes at end of table. 12

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

S~ate and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 NU\f,ber Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census)

MISSOURI--Continued 8,725 -700 -8.2 1,000 700 -1,000 Clark"",,""""',., ..... · .. ····· . 8,000 8,1,00 105,300 117,1,,74 17,800 20.4 13,200 3,800 Clay,x ...... , ... , .... . 1,100 200 11,800 1l,588 200 1.8 1,100 Clinton. , .. , ... , ...... , ... " ..... " -100 243,500 40,761 2,800 6.8 5,200 2,400 Cole,." ... ,., .. " ... , .. ".,·.,,··· . -1,200 14,700 15,4/,8 -700 -4.6 1,700 1,200 Cooper., ...... ,., .. , .. , ....• , ..•.. · , 1,700 14,900 12,647 2,200 17.7 1,600 1,100 Crawford .•...... · .. ···· . 700 -400 7,200 7,577 -400 -4.7 700 Dade •.•... "., ... " ..... , .. ,,·,···· . $00 500 9,800 9,314 500 5.6 800 Dallas .. , ...• ' ...... , ... , .. ' ....• 300 9,502 200 2.3 900 1,000 Daviess ...... •...... , ..... ··.··,·· . 9,700 300 7,226 300 3.8 600 600 De Kalb ...... , ...... ········· .,. 7,500 900 1,600 12,200 10,445 1,700 16,7 1,100 Dent •.•..•...•.••..•••. ···•·•••··•• . 700 600 10,500 9,653 800 8.4 900 Douglas ...... , ...... , -9,400 32,100 39,139 -7,100 -18,1 5,000 2,700 Dunklin; " ...... , ...... •.....•. 2,500 50,900 44,566 6,300 14.2 6,900 3,100 Franldiri*, .. , , ...... •• 1,200 1,000 800 Gasconad,a ...... , ...... 13,300 12,195 1,100 8.7 -6.5 800 900 -500 Gentry ...... , ...•.. , ..•.. 8,200 8,793 -600 14,400 11.4 15,900 8,500 7,100 Greene*.' ...... ··· . 2140,700 126,276 -11.8 1,200 1,400 -1,200 Grundy ...... •.•..... , ...... • 10,800 12,220 -1,400 -13.1 1,000 1,100 -1,400 Harrison ...... 10,100 11,603 -1,500 -0.9 2,000 1,900 -300 Henry ..•....•..•...... • , ...•...•.. 19,000 19,226 -200 300 400 -100 Hic'f:ory!: •...... •.. , .•. , , ... , ...... 4,300 4,516 -200 -4.9 -21.4 700 800 -1,600 Holt.,.: ..... , .• "'" ,.', .•...... •.. 6,200 7,885 -1,700 -0.6 1,200 900 -400 Howard."., ...... , , ...... , ... ,"". 10,800 10,859 -100 2.8 2,500 1;700 -100 Howell:., ..•. ,.,. , ... ".,',.,., .. , .. 22,600 22,027 600 500 5.7 900 900 400 Iron, ..•.• " .. "., ... ,.,,··,·,····· . 8,500 8,041 622,732 19,100 3.1 91,000 42,900 -29,000 Jackson*, , , , . , , , .. , .... , , . , ... , .. , , . 641,800 (Z) 81,200 78,863 2,400 3.0 9,200 6,800 Jasper.,., .. , .. " .. ,: ...... " 11,500 85,400 66,377 19,000 28.6 11,000 3,600 Jefferson* ... , , ... , . , , , , . , , ...... 3,000 1,800 4,300 Johnson .. , .•...... : .. , . , .... , .. . 234,500 28,981 5,500 19.1 (z) 600 600 -100 Knox ..... , ...... , .... , ...... •. 6,500 6,558 -0.2 18,991 -300 -1.8 2,300 1,400 -1,200 Laclede ..• , ...... •. , ....•. , .••.... 18,600 900 26,800 25,274 1,600 6.2 2,600 2,000 Lafayette." ...•. , ... , ...... 2,400 2,000 1,600 Lawrence ...... 25,300 23,260 2,000 8.7 -1.1 1,200 900 -400 Lewis ...... ·.· . 10,900 10,984 -100 14,783 2,600 17.9 1,900 1,300 2,000 Lincoln ....•. , .•...... , ...•.. , ...•.. 17,400 300 16,800 16,815 -100 -0.4 1,400 1,700 Linn ...... , •....•.•• · .. ·•·• • 1,800 1,400 600 Livingston ...... 16,800 15,771 1,000 6.3 11,798 -500 -4.5 1,300 1,000 -BOO McDonald .•...•..•.•...... •..•.... , .. 11,300 600 16,900 16,473 400 2.7 1,500 1,600 Macon ...•...... •...... •.....•• 900 800 -300 , Madison ...... , ...•••...... 9,200 9,366 -200 -1.8 -1,300 6,300 7,282 -1,000 -14.0 700 500 Maries ...... -4,000 26,500 29,522 -3,100 -10.3 3,500 2,600 Marion ...... -100 5,500 5,750 -200 -3.9 400 600 Marcer .....•.....••...... •.. ·· . 1,100 300 14,700 13,800 900 6.6 1,700 Miller. " ••: ...... -3,900 18,500 20,695 -2,200 -10.4 3,200 1,500 ...... •.....•. -200 10,500 10,500 (z) -0.3 1,100 1,000 Moniteau ..•...... •. -400 10,400 10,688 -300 -3.0 1,000 900 Monroe ...... · . -400 10,800 11,097 -300 -3.0 1,300 1,100 Montgomery ..•.....•.... , .•..•...•... 900 800 300 Morgan .....•. , ....•. , ..•••••••.•••.. 9,800 9,476 400 3.8 5,100 1,900 -7,700 New Madrid ...•...... •...•.. 26,800 31,350 -4,500 -14.4 2,100 33,600 30,093 3,600 11.8 3,500 2,000 Newton. , . , . , . , .. , . , . , , • , , , ••. , ..••.. -200 222,800 22,215 500 2.4 2,500 1,800 Nodaway., ...... •... " ...••...... -400 9,600 9,845 -300 -3,0 900 800 Oregon ..... , •...... , ...•...•. , .. , .•• -800 10,700 10,867 -100 -1.4 1,400 700 Osage ...•...... ,.,····· •...... •• -900 6,000 6,744 -800 -11.4 600 500 Ozark ... , ...... , ...... • , .•. , . -9,200 32,200 38,095 -5,900 -15,4 5,900 2,600 Pemiscot •.....••...... • ··•····· . 2,000 1,000 -200 Perry, ...... , ..... , .. , .... , ...... 15,300 14,642 700 4.8 4,100 2,800 -4,000 Pettis .. , ... , , ...... , , .. , ... , .•..... 32,500 35,120 -2,600 -7.4 3,500 1,600 -400 Phelps ...... •...... •...•. 226,800 25,396 1,400 5.7 2,100 1,500 300 Pike, ..... , ... , ...... ,., .. · • 17,600 16,706 900 5.3 2,500 27,700 23,350 4,400 18.8 3,200 1,200 Platte* ...... •...... , ...•.•... · . 900 14,500 13,753 700 5.4 1,200 1,300 Polk ...... ,." ...... • ,., .• 7,100 55,400 46,567 8,900 19.1 2,900 1,100 Pulaski .• , .... , .. , .... , ...... , •... -200 6,700 6,999 -300 -3.6 700 700 Putnam ... , ...... , ...... 800 600 -1,000 Ralls ...... , ... , . , .... '•...... 7,300 8,078 -800 -9.4 2,300 2,200 -700 Randolph ...... 21,400 22,014 -600 -2.6

See footnotes at end of table. 13

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960··Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

State and county April 1, Net , Deaths 1960 Number Percent Births migration (census)

MISSOURI--Continued 1,400 -300 16,200 16,075 100 0.7 1,700 Ray ...... ····· .. ····· . 400 ,,00 5,600 5,161 500 9.1 500 Reynolds ...... ••.. 900 800 700 Ripley ...... • 9,900 9,096 BOO B.3 41.7 11,000 2,600 13,600 St. Charles* ...... 75,100 52,970 22,100 -',00 -4.5 700 BOO -300 St. Clair ...... ·.·. 8,000 8,421 4.1 4,100 2,800 300 St. Francois ...... 38,000 36 516 1,500 20.8 99,300 34,500 Bl,100 St. Louis-)(- ...... 849,500 703;532 146,000 -7.7 105,700 63,100 -100,500 St. Louis * ...... 692,100 750,026 -57,900 -1,00 -3.4 1,600 700 -1,300 Ste. Genevieve ...... 11,700 12,116 900 3.5 2,600 2,200 500 Saline ...... 26,000 25,148 500 100 5,100 5,052 (z) 0.5 500 Schuyler ...... •...... •.•... 600 -600 5,800 6,484 -700 -10.3 600 Scotland ...... 2,000 -1,400 34,400 32,748 1,600 4.9 5,100 Scott ...... •...... 900 500 300 7,800 7,0$7 700 10.2 800 900 -300 8,700 9,063 -400 ··4.1 ~~:~~;i;: :: : : : : : : :: :: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 3,600 1,900 -4,JOO StoddarCl ...... 26,800 29,490 -2,700 -9.1 1,000 12.6 1,000 600 600 Stone ...... 9,200 8,176 -300 -3.7 700 900 -100 Sullivan ...... 8,500 8,783 -100 -1.2 1,100 800 -400 Taney ...... •.•.• 10,100 10,238 -800 -4.4 2,000 1,300 -1,500 Texas ...... •.... 17,000 17,758 1,800 200 20,700 20,540 200 O.B 1,700 Ve:r;non·i············· ...... •...... 700 700 9,800 8,750 1,000 11.9 1,000 Warren.~ ...... •.... ··•······ . 1,000 -700 14,600 14,346 300 2.0 2,000 Washington ...... 800 BOO 9,600 B,63B 900 10.9 1,000 Wayne.,...... •.... 14.1 1,900 1,100 1,100 Webster ...... 15,700 13,753 1,900 -7.9 300 400 -300 Worth ...... 3,600 3,936 -300 -600 -4.1 1,600 1,200 -1,000 Wright ...... ··.· .... · . 13,600 14,183 4.0 99,000 41,000 -31,000 MONTAl\)A ...... •...... 702,000 674,767 27,000 600 200 7,800 7,194 600 8.1 1,000 Beaverhead ...... 700 200 11,600 10,007 1,600 16.2 2,100 Big Horn ...... •. · .. 600 -1,200 7,600 8,091 -500 -6.3 1,300 Blaine ...... 200 -500 2,400 2,804 -400 -13.5 300 Broadwater ...•...... •...... •...... 600 -700 7,700 8,317 -600 -7.2 800 Carbon ...... 200 -400 2,200 2,493 -300 -10.2 300 Carter •.•...... ··.······•·· . 9.8 13,700 3,900 -2,600 Oascade* ...... •...... 80,600 73,418 7,200 -7.9 800 400 -1,000 Chouteau ...... ••...•..•••.. 6,800 7,348 -600 -700 -5.0 1,800 BOO -1,600 Custer •...... ·•·· •..•.•..• 12,600 13,227 -400 -11.3 400 200 -600 Daniels ...... •...... •..•....• ··· . 3,300 3,755 500 -2,400 11,200 12,314 -1,100 -8.7 1,BOO Dawson ...... ············ . 1,100 -3,200 16,200 18,640 -2,500 -13.2 1,900 Deer Lodge ...... •..• 200 -100 4,400 3,997 400 9,5 600 Fallon ...... ······•····· . 1,000 -1,800 13,400 14,018 -700 -4.7 2,100 Fergus ...... •.•.... 4,400 2,200 2,300 Flathead ...... 37,500 32,965 4,500 13.6 10.3 3,600 1,400 400 Gallatin ...... •.. 228,700 26,045 2,700 -100 -6.8 200 100 -200 Gar:field ...... 1,800 1,981 800 6.7 2,400 700 -900 Glacier ...... •••...•.. 12,300 11,565 (z) 100 100 (z) Golden Valley ...... 1,300 1,203 4.1 -3.2 400 200 -200 Granite ...... 2,900 3,014 -100 900 -4,400 16,100 18,653 -2,500 -13.5 2,BOO Hill ...... ············ . 300 600 5,000 4,297 700 16.5 400 Jefferson ...... •...... 200 100 3,300 3,OB5 200 7.4 300 Judi th Basi!) ...... •.•...... 1,000 200 101·,200 13,104 1,100 8.2 1,800 Lake ...... · ...···· . 2,000 1,900 32,500 28,006 4,500 15.9 4,500 Lewis and Clark ...... •...... 400 100 -600 Liberty ...... 2,300 2,624 -400 -14.0 14.0 2,100 600 300 Lincoln ...... 14,300 12,537 1,BOO -10.7 400 100 -600 McCone ...... 3,000 3,321 -400 7.8 500 400 300 Madison ...... 5,600 5,211 400 -7.6 400 200 -400 Meagher ...... 2,400 2,616 -200 100 3,037 300 10.7 400 200 Mineral ...... 3,400 5,000 254,300 41,,663 9,600 21.6 7,100 2,500 Missoula ...... 500 400 -1,300 Musselshell ...... 3,700 4,888 -1,200 -24.5 -9.7 1,400 900 -1,800 Park4 ...... •.. 11,900 13,215 -1,300 -100 -6.4 100 100 ~100 Petroleum .....•...... •... · .. 800 B94 -9.4 900 400 -1,000 Phillips ...... 5,500 6,027 -600 -6.5 1,000 400 -1,100 Pondera ...... 7,200 7,653 -500 -5.2 300 100 -300 Powder River ...... •...... 2,400 2,485 -100

See footnotes at end of table. 14

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

state, and county April 1, Net July 1, Percent Births Deaths I 1960 NUlf.ber migration 1966 (census) ______-+______-+ ______,______~------4_------~------

MONTANA--Continued 500 (Z) 7,400 7,002 400 6.1 900 PowelL ...... ·.······· . -400 2,100 2,318 -300 -11.3 200 100 Prairie ...... 1,400 14,100 12,341 1,800 14.6 1,300 1,000 Ravalli ...... , ...... -800 10,600 10,504 100 0.7 1;)00 700 Richland ...... -800 12,100 ll,731 400 3.2 2,000 800 Roosevelt ...... · .. · . -400 6,300 6,187 100 1.5 1,000 400 Rosebud ...... -500 6,800 6,880 -100 -1.2 900 500 Sanders ...... -700 6,100 6,458 -300 -5.1 800 400 Sheridan ...... 6,400 3,900 -2,600 Silver Bow ...... •..•...... 46,300 4,6,454 -200 -0.4 500 300 -900 Stillwater ...... 4,800 5,526 -800 -13.6 -400 3,000 3,290 -300 -10.0 300 300 ISwee t Gras s ...... -1,400 6,300 7,295 -1,000 -14.0 800 400 Teton ...... •...... •..... -1,500 6,800 7,904 -1,100 -13.7 800 4.QO Toole ...... _ ....• -300 1,200 1)345 -200 -12.2 200 100 2,000 22,200 17,080 5,200 30.2 4,000 800 ~~~~::.~: : :!;): : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :: : : 300 200 -300 Wheatland .. ; ...... 2,800 3,026 -300 -8.5 200 100 -100 l'Iilbaux ....' .....•...... •...... 1,700 1,698 0.5 11,100 3,900 -5,300 Yellowstone* ...... •...... 80,900 79,016 2.4 2.0 199,000 90,000 -80,000 NEBRASKA ...... •... 1,439,000 1,4ll,330 28,000 -300 30,100 28,944 1,100 3.9 3,400 2,000 Adams.). .. J...... 800 -1,900 8,700 10,176 -1,400 -14.0 1,200 Antelope .. ~ ...... (z) (Z) 700 680 (z) -0.2 100 Arthur .... ; ...... (z) -300 1,000 1,269 -200 -19.6 100 Banner ...."', ...... -200 900 1,016 -100 -12.2 100 (Z) Blaine ...... ··· . -1,400 8,200 9,134 -900 -9.8 1,200 700 Boone ...... ··· . -1,900 10,400 11,688 -1,300 -10.8 1,400 700 Box Butte ...... •...... •... ·· -500 4,200 4,513 -300 -7.2 500 300 Boyd ...... ••....••.•..••....•..... 400 600 5,200 4,436 800 17.5 600 Brown .....•...... •...... • ; ...... 3,300 1,800 1,600 Buffalo ...... •. 229,400 26,236 3,100 12.0 -1,200 -11.9 1,000 800 -1,400 Burt ...... ······· . 9,000 10,192 -13.2 1,200 800 -1,700 Butler ...... · .... · . 8,900 10,312 -1,400 -3.5 2,500 1,200 -1,900 Cass ...... •...... ··· •. 17,200 17,821 -600 -700 -5.1 1,900 700 -1,800 Cedar ...... ···· . 12,700 13,368 6.1 500 300 100 Chase ...... •...... 4,600 4,317 300 1,200 500 -1,400 Cherry ...... 7,500 8,218 -700 -8.3 1,800 600 -3,200 Cheyenne ...... 12,800 14,828 -2,000 -13.5 900 700 -400 Clay ...... 8,500 8,717 -200 -2.3 1,000 800 -200 Colfax ...... 9,600 9,595 (z) 0.3 1,600 800 -100 CUIDing ...... 13,100 12,435 700 5.4 1,800 1,200 -1,700 Custer ...... · . 15,400 16,517 -1,100 -6.6 12,000 12,168 -100 -1. 2 2,00.0 700 -1,400 Dakota* ...... • ··· . -400 9,600 9,536 (z) 0.2 1,100 700 Dawes ...... ··· . -600 20,200 19,405 800 4.3 2,600 1,200 Dawson ...... •..•...... •...... •• ·· . -600 2,700 3,125 -500 -15.0 300 200 Deuel ...... '." ...... •...... 800 600 -200 Dixon ...... 8,200 8,106 100 0.9 4,600 2,000 -1,100 Dodge ...... 34,000 32,471 1,500 4.6 59,400 21,000 -9,300 Douglas* ...... ••...... •...... 372,600 343,490 29 }lOO 8.5 300 200 -600 Dundy ...... ••. 3,100 3,570 -500 -12.7 -4.6 1,000 800 -600 Fillmore ...... ···· . 9,000 9,425 -400 400 -700 4,800 5,449 -700 -12.2 500 Franklin ...... ···· . -600 3,900 4,311 -400 -9.9 400 300 Frontier ...... -800 7,000 7,711 -700 -9.7 700 700 Furnas ...... -1,800 25,700 26,818 -1,100 -4.1 2,700 2,000 Gage ...... •...... -600 3,000 3,472 -500 -14.1 300 200 Garden ...... •.•... ······· . -300 2,500 2,699 -200 -6.0 300 200 Garfield ...... -700 1,800 2,489 -700 -26.8 200 100 Gosper ...... -200 900 1,009 -100 -6.4 200 100 Grant ...•...... · ... ········· . 600 400 -600 Greeley ...... •....•...... •. 4,200 4,595 -400 -7.9 2,300 6.5 5,000 2,500 -200 HalL ...... •...... ··.·•·•····• . 38,100 35,757 (z) 900 600 -300 Hamil ton ...... ••....•.. 8,700 8,714 (z) 5,081 -200 -3.5 400 400 -300 Harlan ...... ····· . 4,900 (z) 2,000 1,919 100 3.9 200 100 Hayes ...... •...•..••.•... -1,100 3,800 4,829 -1,000 -20.5 500 300 Hitchcock ...... •...... -1,500 13,300 13,722 -400 -3.1 1,900 900 Holt ...... ········ . 100 100 -200 Hooker ...... 1,000 1,130 -100 -12.0 3.1 800 400 -100 Howard ...... 6,700 6,541 200 1,100 1,000 -1,400 Jefferson ...... 10,400 11,620 -1,200 -10.7

See footnotes at end of table. 15

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change population 1960 to 1966

and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 NUTf,ber Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census) ------_._------

NEBll!\SKA--Con-l; Lm)()d 6,100 6,281 -200 -3.0 700 500 -300 Johnson ...... •...... 700 500 -300 Kearney ...... 6,500 6,580 -100 -1. 7 8,300 7,958 300 ~.1 1,200 400 -500 Keith ...... 200 100 -300 Keya Paha ...... 1,400 1,672 -JOO -15.2 1,300 300 -3,300 Kimball ...... 5,700 7975 -2,JOO -28.8 1,600 900 -100 Knox ...... ····.·· . 13,900 13;JOO 600 -4.6 2153,200 155,272 -2,100 -1.3 2/, ,600 8,2,00 -18,400 Lancasterx. , ...... •..... 1,700 -2,100 Lincoln ...... 28,400 28,491 -100 -0.4 3,700 100 100 -100 I,ogan ...... 1,000 1,108 -100 -'1.6 100 100 -300 Loup ...... 800 1,097 -300 -23.2 100 (z) -200 McPherson ...... 600 735 -100 -17.3 3,300 1,800 400 Madison ...... 27,000 25,12,5 1,900 7.5 Lf • Lt 1,000 600 -100 Merrick ...... 8,700 8,363 400 5,700 7,057 -1,300 -18.5 800 400 -1,700 700 2,00 -300 Nance .•.., ..•.....•.•..•....•••...••. 5,600 5,635 (z) 0.5 800 700 -900 Nemaha .. ; ...... _...... 8,300 9,099 -BOO -8.4 900 600 -100 Nuckolls ...... ·· . 8,400 8,217 100 1.8 1,800 1,200 -1,000 Otoe ...... · . 16,100 16,503 -400 -2.3 4,800 5,356 -500 -9.'1 400 500 -500 Pawnee ...... 200 -800 Perkins ...... 3,600 4,189 -600 -15.0 400 700 -900 Phel;ps . .I ...... 9,400 9,800 -400 -',.3 1,200 1,100 600 -800 Pierce ..~ ...... 8,400 8,722 -300 -3.2 1,200 -2,500 Platte ...... 23,900 23,992 -100 -0.5 3,700 7,200 7,210 (Z) 0.3 700 500 -200 Polk ..., •...... -1,600 Red Willow .. _ ...... 12,400 12,940 -500 -4.2 1,900 800 1,100 -300 Richardson ...... 13,800 13 ,903 -100 -0.4 1,400 200 -500 Rock ...... , ...... 2,200 -300 -13.3 300 ~~,~54 1,100 1,300 Saline ...... 13,900 J.o<::, .... 42 1,300 10.7 1,200 52,900 31,281 21,600 69.1 7,900 1,000 14,800 Sarpy* ...... , ...... •.... 2,100 -1,100 Saunders ...... · . 17,000 17,270 -300 -1. 5 1,200 5,000 1,900 -2,500 Scotts Bluff ...... - ...... ···· 34,400 33,809 600 1.7 12,600 13 ,581 -1,000 -7.0 1,500 900 -1,500 Seward ...... • -1,800 Sheridan ...... 7,700 9,049 -1,300 -14.5 1,000 600 4,700 5,382 -700 -12.1 700 400 -900 Sherman ...... •...... •...... 100 -300 Sioux ...... •...... 2,300 2,575 -200 -9.5 200 5,000 5,783 -SOO -14.0 600 300 -1,100 Stanton ...... 800 -500 Thayer ...... 8,600 9,118 -500 -5.5 800 100 -200 Thomas ...... 900 1,078 -200 -17.4 100 7,300 7,237 (Z) 0.2 1,200 500 -700 Thurston ...... 500 -900 Valley. _ ...... 5,900 6,590 -700 -10.8 700 -500 Washington ...... 12,100 12,103 (z) -0.3 1,300 800 500 -500 Wayne ...... •...... 210,000 9,959 100 0.5 1,100 5,800 6,224 -500 -7.4 600 500 -500 Webster ...... •.••.... -200 Wheeler ...... 1,100 1,297 -100 -11.4 100 100 -5.4 1,500 1,000 -1,200 York ... . j • • <> •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 13,000 13,724 -700 -83,000 OHIO ...... •...... • · • 10,364,000 9,706,397 658,000 6.8 1,339,000 598,000 -100 r Adams ...... _ ...... •.. 20,700 19,982 700 3.6 2,500 1,700 111,900 103,691 8,200 7.9 15,000 6,400 -400 Allen* ...... -1,800 Ashland ...... 39,300 38,771 600 1.5 5,000 2,600 94,700 93,067 1,600 1.8 12,000 6,300 -4,100 Ashtabula ...... ·· . 8,200 Athens ...... 257 800 46,998 10,800 23.0 5,800 3,200 Auglaize. _ ...... 36;600 36,147 500 1.3 5,000 2,400 -2,200 82,800 83,864 -1,100 -1.3 9,300 6,900 -3,400 Belmont* ...... -2,000 Brawn ...... 24,500 25,178 -700 -2.8 3,200 1,900 209,400 199,076 10,300 5.2 28,000 10,100 -7,500 Butler* ...... -500 Carroll ...... 21,600 20,857 700 3.3 2,500 1,400 (z) Champaign ...... 31,600 29,714 1,800 6.2 3,900 2,000 8,200 Clark* ...... _...... 149,400 131,440 17,900 13.6 18,100 8,400 1,500 Clermont·)oi- ...... , ...... 90,200 80,530 9,700 12.0 12,000 3,800 -1,000 Clinton ...... 31,200 30,004 1,200 4.0 4,300 2,200 106,600 107 ,004 -400 -0.4 13,300 7 500 -6,200 Columbiana ...... 700 Coshocton ...... 3"-,600 32,224 2,400 7.3 4,000 2;400 52,000 46,775 5,200 11.1 6,700 3,100 1,600 Crawford ...... •.....•...... •.. -27,300 Cuyahoga*-...... 1,732,000 1,647,895 84,200 5.1 216,400 104,900 2,300 Darke ...... 50,700 45,612 5,100 11.2 6,000 3,200 33,900 31,508 2,400 7.7 4,700 1,800 -500 .Defiance...... 600 Delaware-x ...... 38,900 36,107 2,700 7.6 1+ ,500 2,400

See footnotes at end of table. 16

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

St~te and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Number Percent Births Deaths m:i.gration 1966 (census)

OHIO---Continued 2/,00 75,700 68,000 7,700 n.3 9,900 4,600 Erie ...... 8,900 ';,000 400 Fairfield ••••••••••••••.•.•••••••••• 69,100 ~3,9~~ 5,200 8.1 500 3,100 1,700 -900 Fayette ••••••••••.•••••.•••••••••••• 25,200 "4,770 1.9 2775 900 682,962 92,900 13.6 107,800 38,400 23,600 Franklin* ...... _...... -1,500 30;300 29,301 1,000 3.3 4,1+00 1,900 Fulton ...... -1,900 25,400 26,120 -700 -2.8 2,900 1,700 Ga11ia. _ •••.•••••••••••••••••••••••• 5,600 58,100 47,573 10,500 22.1 7,300 2,300 Gaauga* ...... 8,700 ll2,600 94,642 17,900 19.0 13,100 3,800 Greene * ... ~ .... ~ ...... eo ...... " ...... 3,000 -2,800 37,400 38,579 -1,200 -3.2 (,,600 Guernsey ~ ...... ~ ...... e ...... 127,600 56 ,100 -21,900 Hamiltonx ...... 913,700 864,121 49,600 5.7 L"OOO 61,900 53,686 8,200 15.2 7,500 3,300 Hancock ...... -2,500 28,600 29,633 -1,000 -3./~ 3,700 2,200 Harclirl ...... GO ...... -2,000 16,600 17,995 -1,400 -? ~5 2,000 1,400 Ha:rrison, ...... -1,600 25,800 25,392 400 1.,!, 3,600 1,600 Henry ... 0k/ ...... G ...... 3,700 2,400 1,100 Highland;· ...... 32,100 29,716 2,400 8.0 2,700 1,500 900 Hocking. ;' ...... 22,300 20,168 2,100 10.4 3,700 1,300 -1,700 Holmes •• ; ...... 22,200 21,591 600 3.0 6,900 3,100 -600 Huron ...... 50,500 (,7,326 3,200 6.7 -1,200 -3.9 3,~·00 2,100 -2,500 Jackson ...... ~ .. .. 28,200 29,372 11,700 6,900 -5,100 Jefferson* ...... 98,900 99,201 -300 -0.3 200 40,900 38,808 2,100 5.3 4,700 2,800 Knox ... ) ...... 13,600 179,000 148,700 30,300 20.4 23,~00 6,700 La.ke* ••• ' ...... 3,800 -2,800 56,600 55,438 1,200 2.1 7,700 Law:rence 7(...... ~ ...... 6,400 103,500 90,242 13,300 14.7 12,800 5,900 Licking~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ',,300 2,600 -2,700 Logan ...... 33,800 34,803 -1,000 -3.0 11.4 33,600 11,500 2,600 Lorain* ...... 242,200 217,500 24,700 474,500 456,931 17,600 3.9 61,300 30,000 -13,700 Lucas* ...... -1,000 27,600 26,454 1,100 4.3 3,600 1,500 Madison ••.•••••••••••••••.•••••••••• -17,900 298,300 300,480 -2,200 -0.7 34,700 18,900 Mahomng* ...... 8,300 3,900 -1,300 Marion ...... 63,300 60,221 3,000 5.1 C 65,315 7,600 11.6 9;400 3,500 1,600 Medina~· ...... 72,900 -1,300 21,400 22,159 -700 -3.2 2,400 1,800 Meigs ...... 5,100 2,000 -2,100 Mercer ...... 33,500 32,559 900 2.9 72,901 8,500 11.6 9,900 4,600 3,200 Miami-~ ...... 81,400 700 15,268 1,500 9.7 2,100 1,200 Monroe ...... 16,800 300 527,080 49,400 9.4 77,500 28,400 Montgomery* ...... 576,400 700 12,747 1,100 8.6 1,400 1,000 Morgan ...... 13,800 500 21,100 19,405 1,700 8.5 2,500 1,300 Morrow ...... 10,700 5,700 -3,500 Muskingum ...... 80,700 79,159 1,500 1.9 M5.7 1,100 900 -800 Noble ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 10,400 10,982 -600 4,600 2,300 -3,200 ottawa ...... 34,300 35,323 -1,000 -2.8 12;6 2,500 1,100 700 Paulding ...... 18,900 16,792 2,100 27,864 500 1.9 3,600 2,200 -900 Perry ...... 28,400 (z) 39,000 35,855 3,200 8;9 5,100 1,900 Pickaway* ••••••••••••••••••• O' ...... -500 -2.4 2,700 1,200 -2,000 Pike •••• ;:...... 18,900 19,380 18,800 20.5 13 ,600 4,600 9,900 Portage* ...... 2ll0,600 91,798 1,900 4,100 1,900 -300 Preb1e* ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 34,400 32,498 5.9 2,900 5,100 1,800 -500 Putnam* ...... 31,200 28.331 10.3 10,000 16,400 6,600 200 Richland* ...... 127,800 117,761 8.5 1,900 8,400 3,600 -2,900 Ross ...... ;: ...... 63,100 61,215 3.0 56,486 1,500 2.7 8,000 3,700 -2,800 Sandusky ...... 58,000 -5,800 83,100 84,216 -1,100 -1.3 10,500 5,800 Scioto ...... -4,400 259,400 59,326 100 0.1 8,300 3,800 Seneca~ ...... -300 33,586 2,700 8.2 5,000 2,000 S'neroy ...... 36,300 -8,100 355,600 340,345 15,300 4.5 44,300 20,900 Stark* ...... -14,600 540,000 513,569 26,500 5.2 69,500 28,500 Summit* ...... -1,800 223,600 208,526 15,000 7.2 28,200 ll,400 Trumbull¥ ...... -2,700 78,100 76,789 1,300 1.7 9,600 5,500 Tuscarawas ...... " ..... a 0 ...... -1,000 22,853 200 0.9 2,800 1,600 Union ...... 23,100 -800 28,840 600 2.0 3,400 2,100 Van ltlert* ...... o ...... ,. 29,400 700 -1,000 9,800 10,274 -500 -4.5 1,300 Vinton ...... 10,600 3,000 7,400 Warren-x' ...... " ...... $0,600 65,711 14,900 22.7 51,689 4,600 8.8 6,800 3,700 1,400 Washington ...... 56,200 800 75,497 7,500 9.9 10,800 4,100 Wayne ...... 83,000 -900 31,300 29,968 1,300 ~ .• 3 4,300 2,100 Williams ...... 1,300 279,300 72,596 6,800 9.3 9,600 4,200 I-Iood* ...... 2,700 1,600 -1,100 Wyandot ...... 21,700 21,648 100 0.4

See footnotes at end of table. 17

ESTIMA TES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. S·tate estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966 --1------and county April 1, 1, Net 1960 Nurr.ber Percent Births Deaths migration (census) ---- 1------1---- 1,50".,000 506,000 169,000 TEXAS ...... • 10,7/,7,000 9,579,677 1,167,000 12.2 1,00 28,162 1,400 5.0 3,300 2,300 An derson ...... e .. 29,600 13,e·50 -1,400 -10.3 1,700 300 -2,700 Androws ...... · ... · .... 12,100 1,.,900 48,300 39,814 8,500 21.2 5,900 2,400 An gelina ...... 400 400 7,900 7,006 900 12.5 900 Aransas .. " .... e " ...... e ...... " .. -400 6,200 6,1l0 100 1.0 800 300 Areher-x· ...... e ...... (z) 1,966 (z) 1.0 200 200 Armstrong ...... 2,000 -300 20,400 18,828 1,500 8.1 2,900 1,000 Atascosa" ...... e ...... 300 14,300 13,7"17 600 e·.1 1,1,.00 1,100 Austin ...... e .. e-" " ...... " .. " .. ~ ...... 1,600 400 (3) ailey ••.••••••••••••••••.••••••••••• J.CJ,300 9,090 1,200 12.9 B 500 11.9 1,00 300 e·OO Bandera ...... ,.,400 3,892 -900 16,600 16,925 -300 -1.9 2,100 1,500 B 400 ~200 5,900 5,893 (z) 0.7 700 B:;i~~~: :~~'~ :: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : -2,400 24,600 23,755 900 3.7 4,400 1,100 Bee •...... ' ...... e ...... & .... 9/,.,097 25,500 27.1 20,300 4,600 9,900 Bell. •.•• , ...... 119,600 22,000 797,200 687,151 110,000 16.0 121,600 33,600 Bexar¥ ..•••• "" ...... • .. •• .. ,,··· (z) 0.7 400 300 (z) laneo ...... 3,700 3,657 B 200 21.7 100 (Z) 200 orden.o ...... • ...... 1,300 1,076 B 700 6.2 800 J.,OOO 900 B 1l,500 10,809 59,971 5,800 9.7 8,200 3,800 1,400 B~~i~::::I::: 65,800 :::::: ::::::::: ::: :::::: 76,204 17,800 23.3 11,400 3,000 9,400 Braz.oria¥~ ...... oo ...... 94,000 700 251,000 44,895 6,100 13.6 7,600 2,200 Br azo~ ... ~ ...... 100 7,200 6,4Je 800 12.6 1,000 300 Brews"ter."." ...... · ..... • .. • • -200 3,700 3,577 100 3 .. 9 500 200 Briscoe ...... 0 ...... " ...... • -1,200 8,700 8,609 100 0.9 1,600 400 Brooks ...... 1,200 26,700 24,728 1,900 7.8 2,800 2,100 BrO'Wll ... 0 ...... ~ ...... " ...... 900 -1,200 10,300 11,177 -900 -8.1 1,200 Bu rleson ...... " ...... • ...... 700 800 10,400 9,265 1,200 12.6 1,lQO Bur net ...... ••••• .. 300 1.9 2,200 1,300 -600 Ca lawell ...... ••• .. ••• 17,500 17,222 2,700 16.4 3,200 600 100 Ca Thoun ...... "" ...... 19,300 16,592 1,900 23.8 800 600 1,800 Ca l1ahan ...... 9,800 7,929 -24,100 151,600 151,098 500 0.3 31,000 6,400 Ca merOD* ...... " ...... •• .. • .. • ...... 100 1.0 1,100 600 -400 Camp...... 7,900 7,849 7,781 -300 -3.5 1,000 300 -1,000 Ca rsOD ...... " ...... 7,500 -600 24,100 23,496 600 2.5 2,800 1,600 Ca ss ...... "" .. " ...... 1,900 12,300 8,923 3,400 37.7 1,800 300 Ca stro ...... 800 1l,900 10,379 1,600 14.9 1,300 500 Ch ambers" ...... " ... 200 34,400 33,120 1,300 4.0 3,400 2,300 Ch erokee ...... " .. oo.oo ...... " ...... • ...... 900 700 -1,400 ildress ...... 7,200 8,421 -1,200 -14.5 Ch -400 -4.5 700 600 -500 Clay ...... 8,000 8,351 7,400 6,417 1,000 15.1 1,200 300 (z) Co chran ..... 0 ...... -700 3,000 3,589 -600 -17.3 300 200 Co ke ...... -1,000 11,600 12,458 -800 -6.8 1,200 1,100 Co leman .. ,.~...... 8,300 52,900 41,247 11,700 28.3 6,400 2,900 Co l1in* ...... "' ...... -900 5,800 6,276 -500 -8.1 900 500 Co llingsworth ...... -700 18,700 18,463 200 1.3 2,100 1,200 Co lorado ...... 0 ...... 1,100 22,500 19,844 2,700 13.6 2,700 1,100 Co mal ...... "' ...... "''' ...... 1,100 1,200 1,900 Coman ehe ...... 13,700 1l,865 1,900 15.6 -0.5 400 200 -200 Coneho ...... 3,700 3,672 (z) -0.5 2,600 1,600 -1,100 Coo ke ...... 22,e.00 22,560 -100 32.2 3,600 1,100 5,300 Coryell •••••••••••••••••••••••.•..••• 31,700 23,961 7,700 (z) 600 300 -300 Cot tle ...... e·,200 e.,207 -1.1 4,699 -700 -14.3 600 200 -1,100 Crane ..... e .... e •• o ...... 4,000 -100 -2.7 800 200 -700 Oro ckett ...... 4,100 e., 209 10.6 2,300 600 -600 Cro sby ...... 1l,400 10,Je7 1,100 2,794 700 26.5 700 100 200 Cu]. berson ...... 3,500 -200 6,500 6,302 200 3.9 800 400 Pallam ••••••.•••••••••••••••.••••.••• 100,100 1,163,300 951,527 211,800 22.3 158,700 e.7,000 Dallas* ...... -2,900 19,500 19,185 400 1.9 4,200 900 Daw son ...... · .... • .. · ... 3,200 700 5,200 Dea f Smith ...... 20,900 13,187 7,700 5f!. 7 1,000 17.4 400 500 1,100 Delta •...... •.••. , •..•..••..•..•••••• 6,900 5,860 16,000 267,600 47,.432 20,200 42.5 6,800 2,700 Denton* ...... '" 2,600 1,600 -700 DeW).·tt •...... ••.••.••.•.•.•••••.••• 21,000 20,683 300 1.5 -400 -7.1 600 400 -600 Die kens ...... 4,600 4,963 600 6.2 1,800 500 -700 Dimmit ...... ·• 10,700 10,095 -7.6 400 400 -300 Don ley...... 4,100 4,449 -300 -1.5 2,200 600 -1,800 Duv a1. ..••..••••••..•.••.•••••••••••• 13,200 13,398 -200 -6.0 1,500 1,800 -900 Eas tland ...... 18,400 19,526 -1,200

See footnotes at end of table. 18

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Conlinued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Nurr.ber Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census)

'l'EXAS--Continued 13,800 2,800 -8,600 93,500 90,995 2,500 2.8 Ec'tor* •...... " ..... ",,············· . 600 27.3 4CiO 100 400 2,900 2,317 -1,300 Edwards ...... ·· .. •· ...... 43,395 1,700 3.9 6,000 3,100 El1i.s* •....•• " ...... ~ ..•..•.. 45,100 -111,200 314,,070 33,200 10.6 63,500 12,100 347,300 1,500 2,200 El Paso~· .....• " ...... ".·,,·,,········· 218,200 16,236 2,000 12.2 1,300 Erath ...... •.•...... • ··•·•·•·•·•·· . 2,200 1,900 -2,500 19,100 21,263 -2,200 -10.3 Falls ..•..•...... •.•.. ·····•·•···•• . 2,100 2,000 -2,600 21,400 23,880 -2,500 -10.3 Fann.in ...... , •...... •... , ..•..• "" .. . 1,600 1,800 -2,000 18,300 20,38', -2,100 ·-10.5 Fayette ...... 200 2.2 1,000 500 -300 8,000 7,865 400 Fisher .... " .•.... " ..... ·······,,····· . 12,369 2,100 17.0 2",00 700 Floyd ..•.•••••.....•..• ·······•··•·• . 14,500 200 -600 2,600 3,125 -500 -15.3 400 Foard .•....•....•.••... ···········,,· . 7,800 19.4 7,300 2,000 2,500 Fort BeJil,d* ...•....•..•...•....•..•... 48,400 40,527 -100 5,101 -100 -1.3 400 400 FrarJ.:::lii;l' ...... " ...... 5,000 -600 12,525 -700 -5.6 1,000 1,100 Freestone ...... •....•. " •. " •..... 11,800 600 700 12,200 10,112 2,100 20.9 2,000 Frio ...•••.•••••...•..• · ••• •••••••·• • 1,300 10.3 2,100 500 -300 Gaines ..•. " .•••...• " ••..•...... •.. 13,500 12,267 6,800 140,364 20,000 1',.3 20,800 7,600 Galveston* •...... ••.•••••.•. " ••••••. 160,400 400 -1,200 6,000 6,611 -600 -8.7 1,000 Garza ...... " .•.••.•• ·,,······ .. • • 1,600 15.5 1,000 800 1,400 11,600 10,048 (z) -100 gi~~~~~t~::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : 1,100 1,118 -100 -5.5 100 -300 -5.0 700 400 -600 5,200 5,429 200 Goliad,' ...... •• .... ·•• . 17,845 900 5.0 2,200 1,400 Oonzal"s ....•....•.•••••••.••...••••. 18,700 1,400 -6,100 27,800 31,535 -3,800 -12.0 3,700 Gray ...... ···••· 4,900 6.7 9,500 5,200 600 Grayson* •...•.•..•••.•.•••••.•.•• ·•• . 77,900 73,043 (z) 69,436 5,300 7.6 9,200 4,000 Cregg ...... 74,,700 1,100 -1,100 12,000 12,709 -700 -5.3 1,500 Grimes ...... ··••••··•••· . 4,700 16.4 4,300 1,700 2,200 Guadalupe* ...... " ...... 33,800 29,017 2,100 36,798 7,500 20.4 7,200 1,800 Hale ...... ' ...... 44,300 600 -700 7,000 7,322 -300 -4.0 1,000 HalL •.•..•••..•• ····•·•··••••···••· . -200 -2.9 600 800 (z) Hamilton ...... · ••• 8,200 8,488 800 12.3 1,000 200 (Z) 7,000 6,208 -800 Hansford ..•.••.•.••...•••.•..• ···••· • 8,275 -400 -5.3 1,000 700 Hardeman ..•.•.•.•.•••••.•.• ···•·•••· . 7,800 1,300 3,700 30,500 24,629 5,900 24.0 3,600 Hardin ...... · .. •• • 293,600 23.6 ,209,200 60,000 144,400 1,536,800 1,243,158 -6,100 Harris~· ...•.•.•...... •··••····••·· • 45,594 -3,800 -8.3 5,100 2,800 Harrison ...... ·•••· . 41,800 (Z) 2,171 100 5.1 300 100 Hartley ...... 2,300 800 -1,400 10,400 11,174 -800 -7.1 1,400 HaskelL ••...... •....•.• · •• ••·••·•· . 6,500 32.7 3,200 1,100 4,400 226,500 19,934 -100 Hays ...... •·· 3,185 100 2.3 400 200 HemphilL ...... · .. . 3,300 1,800 2,800 25,400 21,786 3,600 16.6 2,700 Henderson •••.•.••••...•.••••..•• · .. ·· . -6,800 180,904 23,800 13.2 37,600 7,000 Hidalgo* •..••.•••.•..••.•.•.•.•• •··• . 204,700 -800 23,650 -1,000 -4.3 2,100 2,300 22,600 900 -2,600 HilL ••••.••••.•• ·••·•·•·•·•••••·•·• . 23,000 22,340 600 2.9 .4,100 Hockley •.,' .••..•••....•...•..••..••... -200 -3.4 500 500 -200 5,300 5,443 1,100 Hood .•.••••.•••.••.••.• ·•••··•••··•· . 18,594 1,400 7.7 1,900 1,500 Hopkins ...... 20,000 1,300 -1,500 18,500 19,376 -900 -4.7 1,900 ...... · .. ··· . 2,800 7.0 7,300 1,700 -2,700 42,900 40,139 -500 Howard ...•.•..•.•••.••. •••·••·•••·•· . 3,343 -100 -3.0 500 100 Hudspeth ...... ··• .. 3,200 2,900 3,800 244,800 39,399 5,400 13.7 4,500 Hunt ..•.•••.•....••••• ·•··•·•·••···· • -6,500 -19.0 4,100 1,100 -9,500 Hutchinson •••..••••••••.•••••••..••.. 27,900 34,419 -100 1,183 -100 -7.7 100 100 Irion ...... •.•.•.....•.••• ·•·•···••• . 1,100 500 -600 6,900 7,418 -500 -6.5 600 Jack ...... · .. •·• .. •·• .. -600 -4.5 1,800 700 -1,700 Jackson .....•••••••.•...•.•.•.•..•••. 13,400 14,040 22,100 5,100 23.3 3,300 1,300 3,100 Jasper .... , ...... 27,200 -200 1,600 1,582 (z) -1.2 300 100 Jeff Davis ...... · 0.8 34,000 11,800 -20,200 Jefferson* ...... , ...... 247,600 245,659 1,900 -400 -8.9 800 200 -1,000 Jim Hogg ...... 4,600 5,022 3.4 6,100 1,500 -3,500 Jim Wells ••.••.•••.•...•.•.••..•••... 35,700 34,548 1,200 5,100 14.7 4,,100 2,500 3,500 Johnson'J(·, .••••••••.••••••.•••••••• •· • 39,800 34,720 19,299 700 3.4 2,300 1,400 -300 Jones* ..•...... •.•....••• ··•· .. ·•••·· . 20,000 -1,400 15,100 14,995 100 0.4 2,400 900 Karnes ...... " ••••...•••• ·•·••· .. ···•• • 29,931 1,500 5.0 3,900 2,200 -100 Kaufman* ...... ·.··········· . 31,400 500 6,600 5,889 700 12.2 700 500 KendalL .•.•....•.••..•.•. ··••·•••· .. -100 -10.3 100 (z) -200 Kenedy ....••.•.•.•••...•.•.•••.• ·••• . 800 88', 1,727 200 n.5 200 100 100 Kent ••....••••..•••.•.• ····•·•·••·•• . 1,900 3,000 20,400 16,800 3,600 21.2 1,900 1,300 Kerr .•....•.•....••.... ···•·•··•••·· . 3,943 800 19.6 600 300 500 Kimble ...... •··•·· . 4,700

See ~ootnotes at end of table. 19

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966 state and county April 1, Net j July 1, 1960 Nurr,ber Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 ( census)

l'EXAS--Continued 600 640 (z) -4.8 (2) (z) -100 King ...... , .•...... ,·,····, . 400 200 -200 Kinney ., ... , ...... ,., ...... , .. 2,500 2,452 100 2.3 5,900 1,100 -4,100 Kleberg, , ... , .... , .... , . , , , ...... 230,700 30,052 700 2.3 -900 -11.7 1,000 500 -1,500 YJ1ox ••••••••••••••••••• • ••••• ••••••• • 6,900 7,857 36,500 34,234 2,300 6.7 4,300 2,900 900 Lamar ...... ········ . 3,900 1,100 -l,SOO Lamb ...... 22,BOO 21,896 900 4.3 5.9 1,100 700 100 Lampasas ...... 10,000 9/,18 600 1,000 300 La Salle ...... 5,500 5,972 -4"00 -7.1 19,600 20,174 -600 -3.0 2,000 1,500 Ievaca ...... ············· . -200 -2.3 800 700 Lee ...... ········· . 8,700 8,949 1,000 800 -500 Leon ...... 9,600 9,951 -300 -3.1 4,300 1,900 -2,500 Liberty* ...... 31,600 31,595 (z) -0.1 20,413 J.,800 fl. 9 1,700 1,700 1,900 22,200 -700 3,000 3,406 -400 -12.5 400 200 t~;:~~~~,~ ~ ~ ~ :: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1,000 400 -400 Live Oak; ...... , ...... 8,100 7,846 300 3.2 6,500 5,240 1,300 24.0 500 500 1,200 Llano ...... ············· . (2) (z) -100 Loving ...... 100 226 -100 -40.4 2190,500 156,271 34,300 21. 9 31,600 6,400 9,100 Lubbock* ...... · . 2,100 600 -2,900 !:'ynn .... ,....•...•..•.• , .•...••.•..••. 9,500 10,914 -1,400 -12.S 1,000 11.5 1,000 700 700 McC\i;l.locp ...... 9,800 8,815 700 0.4 20,500 9,200 -10,600 McLennan.>< ...... ····.··· ...... 150,BOO 150,091 (2) 1.7 100 100 (2) McMullen ...•...... 1,100 1,116 14.9 SOO 600 BOO Madison!;...... •.•...•....•...... • 7,SOO 6,749 1,000 8,049 -400 -4.4 900 600 -700 Marion •...... •...... 7,700 -100 5,600 5,0("\ 500 9.8 900 200 Martin ...... ············· . 400 4,100 3, 400 9.6 400 300 Mason .••••..••••.•.••.•.• •···•··•··• . 18.8 4,100 1,500 2,200 Matagorda ...... · . 30,600 25, 4,800 4,600 32.0 4,300 600 1,000 Maverick ...... •...... f •••••••••••••• 19,200 14, 2,000 10.4 2,700 1 000 300 Medina ...... 20,900 18,/U4 -'200 2, )64 100 4.8 300 100 Menard ...... ············· . 3,100 67,717 -1,000 -1.5 9,600 2,000 -8,700 Midland*, ...... 66,700 -2,700 20,200 22 >63 -2,100 -9.3 2,300 1,700 Milam ... , ...... ··················· • 4;',67 200 5.1 300 400 300 Mills ....•....•...•.... ············· . 4,700 11,255 -500 -4.2 1,700 700 -1,500 Mitchell ...... •... ··.·········· . 10,800 (Z) 15,100 14,893 200 1.4 1,500 1,300 Montague ...... •..... ······· . 24.1 3,200 1,600 4,900 Montgomery* ...... •..•.... 33,300 26,839 6,500 14,773 -400 -2.4 1,800 400 -1,700 Moore ...... ·.············· . 14,400 12,576 -500 -3.6 1,400 700 -1,200 Morris ...... ·.··.············· . 12,100 -400 2,600 2,870 -300 -10.1 400 200 Motley ...... ·.····· . 18.2 3,500 2,000 3,600 Nacogdoches ...... •...... 233,200 28,046 5,100 -300 -0.8 3,400 2,700 -1,000 Navarro ...... ············· . 34,200 34,423 10,372 600 5.4 1,300 600 -100 Newton ...... 10,900 -1,800 lS,300 18,963 -600 -3.4 2,400 1,200 Nolan ...... • ··········•········ . 221,573 15,000 6.8 39,200 B,900 -15,300 Nueces*. i.~• •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 236,500 5.1 1,600 400 -700 Ochiltree ...... 9,900 9,380 500 1,928 600 32.4 300 100 400 ...... ············· . 2,600 60,357 4,200 6.9 9,500 2,500 -2,800 Orange* ...... 64,500 2,300 24,500 20,516 4,000 19.6 3,200 1,500 Palo Pinto ...... •...... ········ 3.0 1,600 1,000 (2) Panola ...... 17,400 16,870 500 11.9 2,400 1,600 2,000 Parker ...... 25,000 22,880 2,700 600 11,300 9,583 1,700 18.1 1,600 400 Parmer ...... ···················· . 11,957 600 4.7 2,100 500 -1,100 Pecos .•••...... •.. ··•·········· • 12,500 -200 14,300 13,S61 400 2.9 1,700 1,100 Polk .••...•..•..... ······•·········· . 115,5S0 5,800 5.0 IB ,500 5,200 -7,500 Potter"" ...... •...... 121,300 -400 5,600 5,460 200 2.8 900 300 Presidio ...... 19.4 200 300 700 Rains ...... 3,600 2,993 600 33,913 18,000 53.2 5,000 1,100 14,100 Randall~ ...... ······· . 251,900 3,7S2 -600 -17.0 400 100 -1,000 Reagan ...... ·.······· . 3,100 -300 1,900 2,079 -200 -7.B 300 100 ReaL ...... •.... ··················· . 15,682 800 5.1 1,700 1,300 400 Red River ...... ·············· 16,500 700 -3,400 16,SOO 17,644 -900 -4.9 3,300 Reeves ...... ··.··············· . -1.3 1,600 500 -1,200 Refugio ... , ...... · . 10,SOO 10,975 -100 -200 -14.0 100 100 -200 Roberts ...... •...... ··:···· • 900 1,075 16,157 -1,600 -9.7 2,000 1,200 -2,400 Robertson ...... 14,600 (2) 6,200 5,87S 300 5.5 800 400 Rockwa11* ...... ·.·.········· . -300 -2.2 1,800 1,000 -1,100 Runnels ...... ······• . 14,700 15,016 36,421 -1,000 -2.7 4,000 2,500 -2,500 Rusk ...... ········•···• . 35,400 See footnotes at end of table. 20

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960"Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Number Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census)

TEXAS--Continued 500 -200 7,500 7,302 200 2.7 1,000 Sabine ...... ·.··········· ...... 500 -700 7,500 7,722 -200 -2.6 1,000 San Augustine ...... , ...... 400 -500 5,900 6,153 -300 _I,,] 600 San .Jacinto ...... '...... 2,000 -900 50,200 45,021 5,200 H.6 H,200 San Patricio¥·...... ·.·· ..... 500 400 6,900 6,381 500 8.2 700 San Saba ...... ············ . 2.5 300 100 -100 Schleicher ...... 2,900 2,791 100 -2,900 ··14.2 2,500 900 Scurry ...... ·· ...... 17,500 20,369 -22.9 300 300 Shackelford ...... 3,100 3,990 -900 20,4.79 800 4·.1 2,600 1,600 -200 Shelby ...... ····· ...... 21,300 900 2,605 1,100 40.8 300 100 Sherman ...... ············ . 3,700 5,000 1,000 94,300 86,350 7,900 9.2 11,900 .3 .0 200 200 100 ~~:~;~~ i .. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 2,700 2,577 100 (z) 17,137 2,800 16.2 3,500 700 Starr ...... 19,900 -800 8,885 -700 -7.6 900 '100 Stephens:: ...... 8,200 200 1,177 200 20./, 100 100 Sterling ...... ······· . 1,400 (Z) 3,100 3,017 100 2.6 300 200 Stonewan ...... ····· . -100 4,000 3,738 300 7.2 500 200 Sutton ...... ··········· .. 600 500 12,600 10,607 2,000 18.6 2,100 Swisher ...... ··········· ., 60,000 11.1 79,300 27,600 8,300 Tarrant7<" ...... 598,500 538,495 2.3 16,200 4,300 -9,500 Taylo":"·)...... 103,400 101,078 2,300 100 -600 2,200 2,600 -400 -17.2 300 Terrell; ...... 800 -800 17,800 16,286 1,600 9.5 3,200 Terry ...... ·· .. ····•··· . 200 200 3,000 2,767 200 8.6 300 Throckmi

Z Less than 50 or 0.05 percent. IDetail shown for 19 election established since 1960 Census. 2Adjusted to reflect changes in college and/or institutional population since 1960. 3Consistent with special census or State or COUIlty census taken since 1960. 4Includes that part of Yellowstone National Park in Montana. () APPENDIX

STATE-DESIGNATED AGENCIES AGREEING TO WORK TOWARD A FEDERAL STATE COOPERATIVE PROGRAM FOR LOCAL POPULATION ESTIMATES

(Pdrticipating States as of July 1968. Asterisk (*) represents coordinating agency as opposed to agency carrying out technical phases of program)

State Official agency State

Arizona...... Unemployment Compensation Division Michigan. . . • . • • . • • . State Bureau of the Budget* Employment Security Commission Budget Division Post Office Box 6123 Lewis Cass Building Phoenix, Arizona 85005 Lansing, Michigan 48913 Center for Health Statistics Arkansas...... Industrial Research and Extension Center Michigan Department of Public Health Uni versHy of Arkansas 3500 North Logan Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Lansing, Michigan 48913 California ...... Population Research Unit State Department of Finance Minnesota •••• " ..... " Vi tal Statistics Division State Department of Health Sacramento, Oali.fornia 95814 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Oolorado ....•.....• State Budget Office Mississippi .... " ••.. Department of Sociology and Rural Lif e State Oapitol Mississippi State University Denver, Oolorado 80203 Drawer C State College, Mississippi 39762 ~ela,,!are .•..•.•..•. State Planning Office Thomas Oollins Building 530 South DuPont Highway Missouri. " " " " " " " " " " Administrative Services Section Office of Comptroller and Budget Director Dover, Delaware 19901 Post Office Box 809 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Florida •.•.••.••••• Bureau of Economic and Business Research College of Business Administration Nebraska •..••••...• Nebraska Dept. of Economic Development* Uni versi ty of Florida • Gainesville, Florida 32601 Division of State and Urban Affairs Post Office Box 94666, State Capitol Lincoln, Nebraska 68508 Georgia ...... State Planning Bureau 116 Mitchell Street, S. W. Bureau of Business Research Atlanta, Georgia 30303 The University of Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska 68508 Illinois .••••.•..•• Bureau of Public Health Statistics Department of Public Health 300 East Monroe Street Nevada ... """" ",,"." "" Bureau of Business and Economic Research University of Nevada Springfield, Illinois 62706 Reno, Nevada 89507 Iowa. • •• . • • • • • • . . • • Office of State Planning and Programming State Capitol New Hampshire •••••• Office of Planning and Research Des Moines, Iowa 50219 Department of Hesources and Economic Development Kansas...... Division of State Plans Coordination State House Annex State Department of Economic Development Concord, New Hampshire 03301 State Office Building Topeka, Kansas 66612 New Jersey...... Department of Conservation and .,." Kentucky. • • • • • •. • • . Kentucky Program Development Office Economic Development Post Office Box 1889 Capitol Building Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Frankfort, Kentucky 40601

Louisiana. . • • • .. . • . . Division of Business and Economic Research New Mexico ••••••••• Bureau of Business Research School of Business Administration University of New Mexico Louisiana Polytechnic Institute Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 Post Office Box 1796, Tech Station Ruston, Louisiana 71270 New york...... Office of Planning Coordination* Room 229, State Capitol Maine. .••••• •••.••• State Department of Health and Welfare Albany, New York 12201 State House Augusta, Maine 04330 State Health Department 84 Holland Avenue Maryland...... • Division of Biostatistics Albany, New York 12201 State Department of' Health 301 West Preston Street North Carolina ••••• Budget Division* Baltimore, Maryland 21201 State Department of Administration Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Massachusetts. .••• . Bureau of Research and Statistics Department of Commerce and Development Carolina Population Center 150 Causeway Street University of North Carolina Boston, Massachusetts 02202 Ohapel Hill, Nor"oh Carolina 27514

21 22

STATE-DES!GNATED AGENCIES AGREE!NG TO WORK TOWARD A FEDERAL STATE COOPERATIVE PROGRAM FOR LOCAL POPULATION ESTIMATES··Continued

(Participating States as of July 1968. Asterisk (*) represents coordinating agency as opposed to agency carr,ying out technical phases of program)

Official agency Official agency

Oklahoma •.• Bureau of Business, Research utah ...... Utah Dc;oaI'tment of Development Services·)'. ." University of Oklahoma State Norman, Oklahoma 73069 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 and Analysis Section Department of Employment Security Oregon...... ••••• Centw' for Population Research and Census 1'14 Social Hall Avenue Portland State College Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 610· Montgomer,y Street (P.O. Box 751) Portland, Oregon 97207 Vermont .... ~ ... • 0. Division of Public Health Statistics State Department of Health Pennsylvania. '. . • • • • State Planning Board 115 Colchester Avenue Post Office Box 191 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120

Virginia ... ". e & 0". Bureau of and Economic Research University Rhode Island...... Statewide Planning Program Lambeth House Suite 300 Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 36 Kennedy Plaza Providence, Rhode Island 02903 Washington...... Population and Research Division Planning and Affairs Agency Olympia, Washington 98501 South Carolina..... Office of the State Auditor Post Office Box 11333 West Virginia ••••• West Virginia Department of Cornmerce* Columbia, South Carolina 29211 State Capitol Charleston, West Virginia 25303

South D~kota .•••••• Division of Vital Statistics Agricultural Experiment Station State Department of Health West Virginia University Pierre, South Dakota 57501 Morgantown, West Virginia 26505

Wisconsin...... ••• State Board of Health •••••••••• Tennessee State Planning Commission* State Office Building Division of State Planning Madison, Wisconsin 53701 C2-208 Central Services Building Nashville, Tennessee 37219 Wyoming...... •••• Division of Business and Economic Research College of Commerce and Industr,y Center for Business and Economic Research University of Wyoming University of Tennessee Box 3925, University Station Knoxville, Termessee 37916 Laramie, Wyoming 83070