DOCSLIB.ORG

16Th Church History Class

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
16Th Church History Class “Church History: Heroes, Heretics & Holy Wars” Sunday School Notes Rev. David R. Dorst Potomac Hills Presbyterian Church CLASS 16: Quakers, Methodists & The 2nd Great Awakening Someone asked about Salem Witch Trials in the last class: Salem, Massachusetts in 1692 & 93, around 200 people were accused of being witches, with 20 of them being put to death. It started with Reverend Parris’ daughters, who were 9 and 11, and had “fits” that they blamed on 3 women. Accusations and paranoia followed, and people were arrested, imprisoned and killed to keep the community safe. Eventually the Puritan father and son, Increase and Cotton Mather, pleaded that the courts not allow dreams and visions to be used as evidence. And Governor Phipp’s wife was questioned, so he started prohibiting new arrests, and soon pardoned everyone who was in prison. Within a decade the judges and courts declared the trials unlawful and confessed their error. 10 years after that they made restitution to the families of the victims. Now, to put this into context, between the 14th and 17th century in Europe, there were tens of thousands of supposed witches put to death in a “witchcraft craze,” according to Smithsonian magazine.1 QUAKERS George Fox (1624 – 1691) – English, wandered all over England to attend worship services, but came to the conclusion that all sects and groups were wrong, and that the outward elements of their worship – hymns, sermons, sacraments, creeds, etc. - hindered rather than helped. They needed to look for the “Inner Light” for inspiration; a capacity to recognize and accept God. Every person could understand and hear from God in the same way that the writers of Scripture did. The Spirit in our hearts should guide more than Scripture. He was arrested for heresy and disturbing public worship, spending a total of 6 years in prison (during Cromwell’s Protestant years). His followers, the “Society of Friends,” formed orderly, peaceful fellowships. They were called Quakers as an insult because their meetings were in silence until they trembled when the Spirit moved them to pray or speak. They were pacifists and lived simple lives, rejecting the fashions of the world. William Penn (1644 – 1718) – Englishman who had Anglican parents, but converted to being a Quaker as a young man. While working in Ireland, he was thrown into prison for his Quaker beliefs. When he went back to England (age 24) he wrote a tract that got him jailed in the Tower of London. He wrote No Cross No Crown, and was jailed several more times for his writings and preaching. Charles II owed his family a large debt, so William asked for a large tract of land in the new world. In 1681, at the age of 37, he was granted Penn’s Woods. Pennsylvania was a “holy experiment”, a refuge for many kinds of Christians. He made peace with the Native Americans there. He was governor of the state for 2 years, but then it was taken over by the governor of New York. He went back and forth to and from England for the last 25 years of his life. 1 Www.smithsonianmag.com/history/a-brief-history-of-the-salem-witch-trials-175162489/?no-ist METHODISTS John (1703 – 1791) and Charles (1707 – 1788) Wesley We talked last week about George Whitefield and the Holiness Club at Oxford University. John and Charles Wesley were sons of an Anglican clergyman, but were unconverted when they started the Holiness Club. In 1735 (John was 32), the brothers undertook a mission to Georgia, though they were still unconverted! They did not stay long, and John felt it was a failure- the ministry to Indians went poorly and the white colonists resented their rigid high church ways. On the boat ride back to England, John talked to a Moravian who told him he needed to experience the new birth of Christ. Back in England in 1738, Charles was converted reading Luther’s commentary on Galatians, and 3 days later John was converted listening to someone read Luther’s commentary on Romans! The brothers started preaching the gospel wherever they could in England; when Anglican churches closed their doors to them, they spoke in fields, hospitals, prisons, other public places. This was not done! The Church of England controlled all spiritual activities within its border, but Wesley went where they weren’t. The poor, who were not ministered to in the stuffy Anglican Church, were their main listeners and converts. Estimates that John traveled 250,000 miles on horseback all over England and Scotland to spread the gospel in 50 years – “All the world is my parish.” He would read and write sermons on horseback. He formed new believers into circuits and societies, essentially giving the form for the new denomination; though they did not want to break from Anglicanism- they just wanted reform (like Luther and the Catholic church). They had been called Methodists by their critics because of their strict “methods” and devotional exercises that brought holiness, and now that Methodism was shown in this organizing. Wesley took 3 new ideas that others had done first and organized them better: -outdoor evangelism (Whitefield & Howell Harris had done before) -small-group cells (Moravians had pioneered) -voluntary reform agencies against social ills like slavery & drinking & educating children The Methodist religion departed with Whitefield on Calvinism. John could not abide predestination. They focused much more on godly living than on doctrinal precision, even teaching that a Christian could be completely sanctified in this life. Charles is known as the greatest hymn writer in the English language- he wrote 8,989 hymns! Isaac Watts and Johann Sebastian Bach were contemporaries (from @1680 to @1750), pushing sacred music in new directions. Charles wrote “O For A Thousand Tongues” “And Can It Be?” “Hark The Herald Angels Sing,” “Come Thou Long-Expected Jesus” “Christ The Lord Is Risen Today, “Arise My Soul Arise” “Rejoice The Lord Is King,” among hundreds of others. 21 we still have in the Trinity Hymnal. Songs were a huge key to the Methodist revival. You might have heard that John Wesley’s big negative (besides Arminian theology) was his poor efforts at being a good husband. He was married to a woman named Mary (nicknamed Molly), who had tried to travel with John for their first 2 years, but couldn’t handle it. She became very jealous for her husband’s time and attention, neither of which he was willing to give her. He wrote letters to women and spent time with those attached to his ministry, and she accused him of adultery constantly. Supposedly when John left to preach in Ireland, his parting words to her were: “I hope I shall see your wicked face no more.” Married for over 20 years, but she left him numerous times, and they were separated when she died; he didn’t find out until 4 days later.2 2 Wesley’s marriage info: http://thecripplegate.com/john-wesleys-failed-marriage/ But both of the Wesleys were amazing men. Only in his 70s did John stop travelling by carriage rather than horseback, and in his 80s he gave up preaching before dawn. Died at 88, with 40,000 followers in America and almost 80,000 in England. Francis Asbury (1745 – 1816) – the man who put American Methodism on the map. He came up in the Methodist meetings, appointed a full-time teacher by age 21. By age 26, John Wesley asked for volunteers to help “our brethren in America who have called aloud for help.” Asbury volunteered, so they sent him to Philadelphia. There were @600 Methodists in America when he arrived; over 45 years he preached all over the colonies despite poor health. He had to remain neutral and hide during the Revolutionary War, and because he never denounced the American side, he was accepted after the war. Asbury was an excellent organizer who had huge success in spreading Methodism even to the frontier. He became the first bishop of American Methodism (though Wesley didn’t want to use that term). At his death, there were over 200,000 Methodists. He had ordained over 4,000 Methodist preachers. BAPTISTS Baptists were often persecuted in the colonies. Roger Williams was banished from Massachusetts for being a Baptist; John Clarke , the “Father of Baptists in America” was arrested for preaching Baptist doctrine. Henry Dunster, the first president of Harvard, was forced to resign for being a Baptist. In Culpepper, VA, a mob beat a Baptist man, and later 4 Baptists were jailed for denying baptism to their children. The Great Awakening helped the Baptist Church, though. 2nd Great Awakening (see the chart on the back of the outline) In 1801 in Cane Ridge, Kentucky, thousands of people gathered to hear the gospel; loud prayers, sobs, shrieks, shouts, barking, jerking and twitching bodies happened. Thousands were converted. The 2nd Great Awakening had started, much more charismatic version, out in the frontier. The 2nd Awakening wasn’t all like that – some cults grew out of it, but also the Cumberland Presbyterian Church as some Presbyterians were awakened to evangelistic zeal. “The Awakening in the west was quite different from the Awakening in the east. The east, for instance, had the scholarly, erudite Jonathan Edwards carefully reasoning out the wrath of God and the need for reconciliation. The west had a band of frontier preachers with minimal seminary training, who would stand on the back of a wagon to persuade sinners to get right with God. It was a difference of style to be sure, but also of theology. The eastern revival was more Presbyterian, the western more Methodist; the east was more Calvinist, the west more Arminian; the east was more ecclesiastical, the west more individualistic.”3 Charles Finney (1792 – 1875) was a big figure in this Awakening.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Protestants, Quakers, and the Narrative of Religious Persecution in England
    DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal Volume 2 Article 1 2014 Protestants, Quakers, and the Narrative of Religious Persecution in England Shelby Lohr Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/discovery Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Lohr, Shelby (2014) "Protestants, Quakers, and the Narrative of Religious Persecution in England," DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal: Vol. 2 , Article 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31922/disc2.1 Available at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/discovery/vol2/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Quakers, Protestants, and the Narrative of English Religious Persecution In early modern England, religious intolerance reigned supreme. There was a pervading hostility towards religious groups that were not associated with the Church of England, and these dissenting religious groups were regularly persecuted for their differing views. While each sectarian group was unique, there are parallels that can be traced between the persecutions that occurred throughout this period. Among these 16 th - and 17 th -century dissenting groups are Protestants and Quakers, whose responses to persecution are strikingly similar. This essay seeks to trace the commonalities between these two religious groups, with the aim of gaining a more nuanced understanding of religious intolerance in a period hostile to religious nonconformity. First, it is imperative to understand the distinction between Protestants and Quakers as employed in this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • The Experience of Early Friends
    The Experience of Early Friends By Andrew Wright 2005 Historical Context The world of the early Friends was in the midst of radical change. The Renaissance in Europe had strengthened the role of science and reason in the Western world. The individual’s power to understand and make sense of reality on their own was challenging the authority of the Catholic Church. Until recently there had been only one church in Western Europe. Martin Luther’s “95 Theses” that critiqued the Catholic Church is generally seen as the beginning of the Reformation when western Christianity splintered into a plethora of various “protestant” churches. In order to fully understand the significance of the Reformation we must realize that political authority and religious authority were very closely aligned at this time in history. Political authority was used to enforce religious orthodoxy as well as to punish those who expressed unconventional views. Meditating on the intensity of feeling that many have today about issues like abortion or gay/ lesbian rights or end of life issues might begin to help us to understand the intensity of feeling that people experienced around religious issues during the Reformation. Many people felt like only the triumph of their religious group could secure their right to religious expression or save them from persecution. The notion of separation of church and state only began to become a possibility much later. The English Reformation and Civil War In England, the reformation developed a little later than in Germany and in a slightly different way. In 1534, King Henry VIII declared the Church of England independent of the Roman Catholic papacy and hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • From Plainness to Simplicity: Changing Quaker Ideals for Material Culture J
    Chapter 2 From Plainness to Simplicity: Changing Quaker Ideals for Material Culture J. William Frost Quakers or the Religious Society of Friends began in the 1650s as a response to a particular kind of direct or unmediated religious experience they described metaphorically as the discovery of the Inward Christ, Seed, or Light of God. This event over time would shape not only how Friends wor­ shipped and lived but also their responses to the peoples and culture around them. God had, they asserted, again intervened in history to bring salvation to those willing to surrender to divine guidance. The early history of Quak­ ers was an attempt by those who shared in this encounter with God to spread the news that this experience was available to everyone. In their enthusiasm for this transforming experience that liberated one from sin and brought sal­ vation, the first Friends assumed that they had rediscovered true Christianity and that their kind of religious awakening was the only way to God. With the certainty that comes from firsthand knowledge, they judged those who op­ posed them as denying the power of God within and surrendering to sin. Be­ fore 1660 their successes in converting a significant minority of other English men and women challenged them to design institutions to facilitate the ap­ proved kind of direct religious experience while protecting against moral laxity. The earliest writings of Friends were not concerned with outward ap­ pearance, except insofar as all conduct manifested whether or not the person had hearkened to the Inward Light of Christ. The effect of the Light de­ pended on the previous life of the person, but in general converts saw the Light as a purging as in a refiner’s fire (the metaphor was biblical) previous sinful attitudes and actions.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)
    An Introduction to The Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) Origins and Background The origins of the Society are found in the seventeenth century in England, a time when many were questioning the established beliefs of the age. George Fox (1625-1691) did not find answers to his questions in any of the churches of his day. Out of his searching came the spiritual message which swept a large part of the country and which resulted in the formation of the Religious Society of Friends. Friends witnessed to an Alternative Christianity quite distinct from the churches of the time. As a result they were persecuted both by Cromwell’s Puritan government and by the restored government of Charles II. Fox did not intend to start a new sect. He wanted to persuade the church to return to what it had been in the days of the Apostles. He proclaimed the early preaching of Peter (Acts 2,3) that Jesus, who had been present in the flesh, had risen from the dead and was now come in the Spirit, that Jesus acted in the hearts of his followers, purifying and empowering them. Pursuing Peter’s teaching, Fox called for a radical, egalitarian, spirit-filled Christianity that would not be oppressive of people on account of race, sex, or class. He maintained that the message of the early church had been lost when 1 the church became institutionalized and believed that he, and others with him, could stand in exactly the same state as Apostles, with the same power to teach, to heal, and to prophesy that the Apostles had.
    [Show full text]
  • Flavors” of Quakers in the U.S
    “Flavors” of Quakers in the U.S. Today It is hard to delineate clear cut branches of American Quakerism because different branches define themselves differently, and because there is much variation and overlap. You can sort Quakers in several ways: by our qualities and characteristics, by the major affiliating organizations we associate with, or by historical lineage (which group is an offshoot of which other group). These different ways of categorizing us will produce similar, but not identical groups. Following is a rough sorting. Liberal Friends Generally, liberal Friends practice unprogrammed worship, do not have formal clergy, and emphasize the authority of the Light Within. They value universalism, meaning they include members identifying with a variety of theological traditions, such as Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Wicca, and increasingly nontheism. You find them most often in the eastern and western parts of the U.S. and in college towns. There are two major groups of Liberal Friends: ● Those affiliated with Friends General Conference (see www.fgcquaker.org). These meetings ​ ​ often trace their roots back to the Hicksite side of the major division (see historic notes below) but there are other histories mixed in. FGC includes yearly meetings in the U.S. and Canada. ● Independent or Western Friends. Located mostly in the Western part of the United States, these Friends are sometimes called “Beanites,” because they trace their roots, to some degree, to the leadership of Joel and Hannah Bean, who came out of the Orthodox side of the major division, but parted ways. Independent Friends have no affiliating organization, but they do have a magazine, Western Friend (https://westernfriend.org).
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Face of Faith in Britain: How Should Quakers Respond? Part 2: the Spirituality of New Quakers
    The changing face of faith in Britain: How should Quakers respond? Part 2: The spirituality of new Quakers Francesca E. S. Montemaggi Q Logo - Berry - CMYK - Black Text.pdf 1 02.02.2015 01.27 pm C M Britain Yearly Meeting Y CM and Woodbrooke MY CY working in partnership CMY K Contents Preface 3 Summary of findings 4 Methodology 5 The spirituality of new Quakers 1. Discovering Quakerism 6 2. The religion andnon-religion of Quakers 7 3. Theological openness 9 4. Finding home 13 5. Members, attenders, and community 16 6. The prominence of silent worship 19 7. An ethical way of life 22 8. Quakers andChristianity 26 Conclusions 31 Bibliography 32 Appendix 1: Survey results 34 Appendix 2: British Quaker Survey 2013 results for those involvedfor less than three years 50 Part 2: The spirituality of new Quakers Preface The Quaker Committee for Christian & Interfaith Relations (QCCIR) is given the task of keeping Britain Yearly Meeting (BYM) informed of the various movements towards cooperation within the Christian church and opportunities for interfaith dialogue, and responds on their behalf to other Churches and faith communities (Quaker faith & practice 9.13). In the rapidly changing world in which we live, the religious landscape in which we operate is also continuously on the move. Becoming aware of this, QCCIR began to ask questions, such as: • How do Quakers fit into this changing religious landscape in Britain? • What are the implications for British Quakers? • What does it mean for the work of QCCIR now and in the future? Do we need to consider changing how we work, what we do or who we work with? These are big, open questions and QCCIR agreed to commission a piece of work that would help us along our way.
    [Show full text]
  • Quakers Simplicity
    History of the simplicity time strict adherence to plainness was abandoned. testimony in Britain In 1911 and 1919 London Yearly Meeting discussed the simplicity testimony with greater confidence, but not until 1959 did a book of In the past simplicity was associated with a discipline include Margaret Fox’s plea that, rather puritanical or priggish show of ‘plainness’, so than adopting a mere costume of simplicity, ‘it is Friends today are cautious about our simplicity more fit for us to be clothed with God’s Eternal testimony and what it may mean to embrace it. Spirit and clothed with his Eternal Light’. Quakers and Early Friends were persecuted and imprisoned, The testimony of outward simplicity began as a protest and many died for their conviction that against the extravagance and snobbery which marked English society in the 1600s. In whatever forms this all people can be guided directly by God, protest is maintained today, it must still be seen as a by ‘the Christ within’, by their inner light. testimony against involvement with things which tend simplicity Living in the spirit was, for them, expressed to dilute our energies and scatter our thoughts, reducing in the simplicity of their faith and practice. us to lives of triviality and mediocrity. In less than 40 years 60,000 people became ‘Faith and practice’, North Carolina Yearly Quakers; they risked everything for that direct Meeting (Conservative), 1983 communion with God. When they celebrated *An old name for compilations which Quakers publish at intervals for mutual guidance. In Australia Yearly the light within themselves, and opened Meeting we have a book about Quaker faith and prac- themselves to the light of others, they saw the tice entitled this we can say (2003) and a Handbook of need to live simply and truthfully as equals.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Belief in the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers): a Response to the Claim That British Friends Are Post-Christian
    CHRISTIAN BELIEF IN THE RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS (QUAKERS): A RESPONSE TO THE CLAIM THAT BRITISH FRIENDS ARE POST-CHRISTIAN By Katharine A. Mellor A dissertation submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of Master of Philosophy The Graduate Institute for Theology and Religion School of Historical Studies The University of Birmingham October 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 x.1.Introductory Definitions 2 x.1.1. Definition of Members and Attenders 2 x.1.2. Comments on Insider Research 3 Chapter One: Quaker and Christian Identity: Origins of the Current Debate 5 1.1. Background of Quaker Theology 5 1.2. Official Quaker Documents 7 1.3. The Modern Debate 8 Chapter Two: Academic Attempts to Uncover the Nature of Quaker Belief 11 2.1. Surveys of Belief 11 2.2. Dandelion’s and Rutherford’s Questionnaire Design 12 2.3. Dandelion’s and Rutherford’s Aims 12 2.4. Dandelion’s and Rutherford’s Definition of Christian and 13 Question Phrasing 2.4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Duke University and the Methodist Tradition1
    ,... ____________________________mm ___ _,, ____ _ ' ' Methodist History, 42:3 (April 2004) I' '· DUKE UNIVERSITY AND THE METHODIST TRADITION1 WILLIAM E. PIKE Ever since William F. Buckley, Jr.'s 1951 work, God and Man at Yale, a debate has raged openly in the United States and beyond regarding the "sec­ ularization'' of once-Christian institutions of higher learning. Proponents of universities free of church ties have argued that religion hinders the free' exchange of ideas, the growth of scientific research, and the open expression of differing student personalities. Critics of secularization feel thatby shed­ ding years of Christian tradition, universities go adrift without a moral com­ pass or a true appreciation for the historical pillars upon which they were founded . ., As with so many of its counterparts, Duke University faces these ques- tions. Undoubtedly once a solidly Christian school .:... and in particular a Methodist school - it now exhibits the characteristics of a modem, secular university. Its solid ties to the church amount to an overtly Christian divini ... ty school, with a decisive United Methodist bent, and a traditional, informal , · tie between the university Board of Trustees and the North Carolina Annual Conferences of United Methodism. This paper explores to some degree the journey the school has taken to this point, and also asks the important ques­ tion, Is Duke still a United Methodist university? I In its earliest days the institution which would someday become known as Duke was operated mainly by Christians, and more specifically, by Methodists. However, that does not mean it was automatically a Methodist institution. Indeed, for some years during its early history it was not offi..
    [Show full text]
  • Review Of" the Transformation of American Quakerism: Orthodox Friendsy 1800-1907" by TD Hamm
    Swarthmore College Works Religion Faculty Works Religion 7-1-1989 Review Of "The Transformation Of American Quakerism: Orthodox Friendsy 1800-1907" By T. D. Hamm J. William Frost Swarthmore College Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-religion Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation J. William Frost. (1989). "Review Of "The Transformation Of American Quakerism: Orthodox Friendsy 1800-1907" By T. D. Hamm". Pennsylvania Magazine Of History And Biography. Volume 113, Issue 3. 483-485. https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-religion/103 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1989 BOOK REVIEWS 483 McPherson describes ably), Stowe's book provides a feminist critique of a society corrupted by an industrializing nation controlled by male values. All these questions derive from a professional perspective which empha­ sizes the power of social, cultural, and institutional contexts to shape human choices. But McPherson knowingly chose the other path, emphasizing hu­ mans shaping their world. The result is a superb traditional retelling of the nation's most important public experience. Historians interested in alter­ native stories can set their contributions alongside McPherson's and be assured that they are in the best of company. University of Kansas PHILLIP S. PALUDAN The Transformation of American Quakerism: Orthodox Friends, 1800-1907. By THOMAS D. HAMM. (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana Uni­ versity Press, 19 8 8. xvii, 2 61 p. Appendixes, bibliography, index.
    [Show full text]
  • Books About Quakers
    Books about Quakers This is a short list of publications we recommend for newcomers or people interested in finding out about Quakers. You can find all of these titles and many more at QuakerBooks of FGC. For a first introduction: Letters to a Fellow Seeker: A Short Introduction to the Quaker Way by Steve Chase. (Introduces the Quaker way to a newcomer in language that is personal and gentle, while offering powerful inspiration through stories.) Being a Quaker: A Guide for Newcomers, by Geoffrey Durham. (A personal account of what it was like for the author to discover Quakers and get to know them. A very good explanation from a British perspective, which is mostly similar to the U.S.) Silence and Witness: The Quaker Tradition by Michael Birkel. (This book interweaves a discussion of modern Quaker principles with quotations from early Quaker writers.) Listening to the Light: How to Bring Quaker Simplicity and Integrity into our Lives by Jim Pym. (This is another personal account by a British Friend. The author came to Quakers from a Buddhist background and offers a broad perspective.) www.fgcquaker.org Quaker Resources | 1 For more on meeting for worship: Encounter with Silence: Reflections from the Quaker Tradition by John Punshon. (A small, rich, and readable book on Quaker worship. The writer speaks personally from his own experience as a Christian Friend.) Four Doors to Meeting for Worship by William Taber. (This pamphlet describes the different levels on which we prepare for and experience silent worship. A good guide to deep and authentic worship.) For an overview of Quaker testimonies: An Introduction to Quaker Testimonies by American Friends Service Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quaker Doctrine of the Holy Spirit
    Quaker Religious Thought Volume 1 Article 2 1-1-1959 The Quaker Doctrine of the Holy Spirit Howard H. Brinton Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt Part of the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Brinton, Howard H. (1959) "The Quaker Doctrine of the Holy Spirit," Quaker Religious Thought: Vol. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt/vol1/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quaker Religious Thought by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Brinton: The Quaker Doctrine of the Holy Spirit ether doctrines. “This,” says William Penn, “is the root of the goodly tree of doctrines that grew and branched out fiorn it.” Experience of the Divine Spirit was. expected by many per The Quaker Doctrine of the Holy Spirit sons in various sects and groups in England during the early Cromwellian period because this experience was seen to have been the event of first importance in the early Christian move HOWARD H. BRINTON ment. The Bible was then for the first time widely read in Eng land. Its impact was enormous. Many longed to say with Paul, The Society of Friends arose from an immediate, living ex “We have received not the spint of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the perience of the Holy Spirit. This was not a new discovery. It things that are freely given to us of God” (I Cor.
    [Show full text]