DOCSLIB.ORG

2019/03/28 Statistical Yearbook(102)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE STATISTICAL YEARBOOK OF TAIWAN WATER CORPORATION 2013 No.36 Chengcing Lake Advanced water treatment plan TAIWAN WATER CORPORATION April 2014 Annual Important Performance Item Unit 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1.Capacity of Water Supply System M3/Day ……………… 2.Capacity of Water-Purification-Station M3/Day 1,552,559 1,802,000 2,439,390 2,731,112 2,921,834 3,187,036 3.Average Yield Per Day M3 1,176,321 1,265,741 1,332,205 1,513,115 1,791,415 1,996,937 4.Average Water Distributed Per Day M3 1,159,958 1,251,325 1,329,623 1,509,732 1,786,097 1,993,547 5.Average Water Sold Per Day M3 791,814 833,840 906,641 1,053,783 1,294,756 1,493,036 6.Yield M3 429,357,104 461,995,434 487,586,996 552,286,833 653,866,592 728,881,919 7.Distributed Water M3 423,384,502 456,733,547 486,641,970 551,052,131 651,925,230 727,644,563 8.Water Sold M3 289,012,366 304,351,457 331,830,538 384,630,881 472,585,950 544,957,993 9.Actual Meter-Readings M3 ……325,943,007 366,487,228 447,447,054 508,369,477 10.Percentage of Water Sold ％ 68.26 66.64 68.19 69.80 72.49 74.89 11.Percentage of Actual Meter Readings ％ ……66.98 66.51 68.63 69.87 12.Percentage of NRW(Non-Revenue Water) ％ ……………… Percentage of Water Losses ％ ……………… Percentage of Unbilled ％ ……………… Authorized Consumption 13.Administrative Population Person 13,212,945 13,431,137 13,688,930 13,908,275 14,127,946 14,376,247 14.Designed Population Person 6,248,858 6,780,700 7,616,810 8,300,890 8,927,215 9,503,965 15. Actual Population Person 5,421,559 5,690,158 6,333,404 7,077,380 7,809,240 8,332,582 16.Percentage of ％ 47.29 50.48 55.64 59.68 63.19 66.11 Designed Population Served 17.Percentage of ％ 41.03 42.37 46.27 50.89 55.28 57.96 Actual Population Served 18.Length of Distributing Pipes KM … 8,079 9,022 10,852 12,709 13,775 19.Water Consumption Charge Revenue Thousand NT$ 441,242 954,678 1,117,833 1,265,354 1,552,538 2,177,190 20.Households Connections Households 734,989 814,940 928,129 1,065,453 1,230,158 1,404,312 21.Number of Employees Person 4,839 5,179 5,210 5,304 5,338 5,423 22.Per Capita in Livelihood M3 62.490 68.767 67.128 66.489 69.771 71.314 Yearly Distributed Water 23. Per Capita in Livelihood M3 0.171 0.188 0.183 0.182 0.191 0.195 Daily Distributed Water 24.Per Capita in Livelihood M3 42.657 45.824 45.775 46.407 50.579 53.406 Yearly Water Consumption 25.Per Capita in Livelihood M3 0.117 0.126 0.125 0.127 0.139 0.146 Daily Water Consumption 26.Per Household in Livelihood NT$ … … 982 1,006 1,055 1,271 Yearly Water Charges 27.Per Household in Livelihood NT$ ……828488106 Monthly Water Charges 28.Per Capita in Livelihood NT$ 70 144 151 149 162 206 Yearly Water Charges 29.Per Capita in Livelihood NT$ 6 1213121417 Monthly Water Charges 30.Quantity of Water Sold Per Employee M3 59,726 58,766 63,691 72,517 88,532 100,490 31.Households Afforded Per Employee Households 152 157 178 201 230 259 32.Rate of Revenue ％ 93.59 93.34 97.54 98.06 97.95 98.21 33.Sales Per Employee NT$ 212,102 225,050 271,955 317,358 369,721 448,458 34.Earnings Per Employee NT$ -9,077 15,299 34,348 19,889 8,337 8,733 35.Unit Cost of Water Sold NT$/M3 2.29 2.55 2.91 3.44 3.56 3.55 36.Unit Price of Water Sold NT$/M3 1.96 2.64 3.30 3.32 3.28 3.27 37.Unit Profit/Loss from Sales NT$/M3 -0.33 0.09 0.39 -0.12 -0.28 -0.28 38.Return on Water Investment ％ -1.47 0.86 3.39 -0.93 -2.35 -2.77 Annual Important Performance Item Unit 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 39.Return on Equity ％ -0.56 2.48 4.86 2.34 0.89 0.88 40.Fixed Assets to Total Assets Ratio ％ 82.15 83.05 79.96 85.12 92.10 92.95 41.Total Liabilities to Total Assets Ratio ％ 27.02 40.10 44.63 46.17 50.58 50.33 42.Long-Term Liabilities to Total ％ 78.04 80.56 82.05 84.36 83.10 76.81 Liabilities Ratio 43.Net Worth Ratio ％ 72.98 59.90 55.37 53.83 49.42 49.67 44.Debt Ratio ％ 37.02 66.96 80.59 85.78 102.33 101.33 45.Fixed Ratio ％ 112.56 138.66 144.40 158.14 186.35 187.15 46.Total Assets Thousand NT$ 2,860,236 5,209,373 7,364,804 9,043,713 10,138,874 11,124,506 47.Total Liabilities Thousand NT$ 772,840 2,089,161 3,286,620 4,175,681 5,127,882 5,599,067 48.Owner's Equity Thousand NT$ 2,087,396 3,120,212 4,078,184 4,868,032 5,010,992 5,525,439 49.Operating Income Thousand NT$ -1,073 117,401 294,570 358,764 364,456 425,679 50.Net Income Thousand NT$ -11,600 64,516 175,003 104,695 43,822 46,326 51.Interest Expense Thousand NT$ 14,013 37,430 76,069 260,999 322,481 381,501 52.Salary and Wages Thousand NT$ 97,556 314,483 454,347 542,495 627,531 765,959 53.Inventories Thousand NT$ 174,962 238,983 283,663 282,041 255,392 310,125 54.Depreciation Thousand NT$ 47,614 136,630 166,906 189,422 245,927 358,102 55.Added Value Thousand NT$ 149,203 589,194 935,064 1,155,610 1,279,445 1,590,852 Annual Important Performance Item Unit 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1.Capacity of Water Supply System M3/Day ……………… 2.Capacity of Water-Purification-Station M3/Day 3,504,362 3,825,797 4,129,527 4,310,992 4,627,277 5,164,400 3.Average Yield Per Day M3 2,167,588 2,376,201 2,620,487 2,879,785 2,994,419 3,228,176 4.Average Water Distributed Per Day M3 2,139,073 2,338,304 2,581,957 2,825,223 2,961,489 3,223,382 5.Average Water Sold Per Day M3 1,593,830 1,765,926 1,968,508 2,172,566 2,308,452 2,481,354 6.Yield M3 793,337,387 867,313,209 956,477,657 1,051,121,564 1,095,957,410 1,178,284,418 7.Distributed Water M3 782,900,812 853,480,779 942,414,123 1,031,206,336 1,083,904,966 1,176,534,442 8.Water Sold M3 583,341,611 644,563,139 718,505,308 792,986,589 844,893,420 905,694,148 9.Actual Meter-Readings M3 538,833,841 584,738,935 644,062,391 712,132,591 756,904,884 814,598,239 10.Percentage of Water Sold ％ 74.51 75.52 76.24 76.90 77.95 76.98 11.Percentage of Actual Meter Readings ％ 68.83 68.51 68.34 69.06 69.83 69.24 12.Percentage of NRW(Non-Revenue Water) ％ ……………… Percentage of Water Losses ％ ……………… Percentage of Unbilled ％ ……………… Authorized Consumption 13.Administrative Population Person 14,724,219 14,965,033 15,178,104 15,370,200 15,569,154 15,744,145 14.Designed Population Person 10,306,802 10,811,124 11,440,126 11,955,171 12,495,006 12,829,896 15. Actual Population Person 8,964,510 9,565,168 10,229,216 10,711,112 11,165,311 11,526,359 16.Percentage of ％ 70.00 72.24 75.37 77.78 80.25 81.49 Designed Population Served 17.Percentage of ％ 60.88 63.92 67.39 69.69 71.71 73.21 Actual Population Served 18.Length of Distributing Pipes KM 15,439 18,056 20,574 21,911 23,763 25,452 19.Water Consumption Charge Revenue Thousand NT$ 2,759,421 3,044,027 4,504,856 5,145,039 5,482,239 5,880,382 20.Households Connections Households 1,619,689 1,828,830 2,044,528 2,201,946 2,354,013 2,489,354 21.Number of Employees Person 5,951 6,410 6,654 6,751 6,815 6,971 22.Per Capita in Livelihood M3 72.256 74.866 78.319 81.481 82.515 87.759 Yearly Distributed Water 23. Per Capita in Livelihood M3 0.197 0.205 0.215 0.223 0.225 0.240 Daily Distributed Water 24.Per Capita in Livelihood M3 53.841 56.538 59.712 62.654 64.317 67.559 Yearly Water Consumption 25.Per Capita in Livelihood M3 0.147 0.155 0.164 0.172 0.176 0.185 Daily Water Consumption 26.Per Household in Livelihood NT$ 1,414 1,386 1,872 1,964 1,957 2,004 Yearly Water Charges 27.Per Household in Livelihood NT$ 118 116 156 164 163 167 Monthly Water Charges 28.Per Capita in Livelihood NT$ 246 256 364 396 405 426 Yearly Water Charges 29.Per Capita in Livelihood NT$ 20 21 30 33 34 35 Monthly Water Charges 30.Quantity of Water Sold Per Employee M3 98,024 100,556 107,981 117,462 123,976 129,923 31.Households Afforded Per Employee Households 272 285 307 326 345 357 32.Rate of Revenue ％ 98.75 98.76 99.22 99.24 98.72 99.03 33.Sales Per Employee NT$ 593,728 636,981 722,644 862,739 917,548 959,166 34.Earnings Per Employee NT$ 44,400 -16,248 6,512 78,294 54,497 59,683 35.Unit Cost of Water Sold NT$/M3 4.39 5.29 5.63 5.92 6.18 6.21 36.Unit Price of Water Sold NT$/M3 4.67 4.74 5.36 6.46 6.49 6.50 37.Unit Profit/Loss from Sales NT$/M3 0.28 -0.55 -0.27 0.54 0.31 0.29 38.Return on Water Investment ％ 2.56 -3.97 -1.54 2.68 1.44 1.22 Annual Important Performance Item Unit 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 39.Return on Equity ％ 4.08 -1.19 0.36 3.50 2.11 1.92 40.Fixed Assets to Total Assets Ratio ％ 90.44 91.23 89.71 92.89 93.28 96.57 41.Total Liabilities to Total Assets Ratio ％ 48.09 43.69 41.22 37.77 38.02 32.29 42.Long-Term Liabilities to Total ％ 82.56 77.90 84.83 81.15 87.71 85.56 Liabilities Ratio 43.Net Worth Ratio ％ 51.91 56.31 58.78 62.23 61.98 67.71 44.Debt Ratio ％ 92.65 77.60 70.13 60.70 61.35 47.68 45.Fixed Ratio ％ 174.25 162.03 152.62 149.27 150.50 142.62 46.Total Assets Thousand NT$ 13,214,905 17,755,860 23,156,492 26,722,119 29,814,378 35,935,219 47.Total Liabilities Thousand NT$ 6,355,537 7,757,993 9,545,614 10,094,053 11,336,113 11,602,302 48.Owner's Equity Thousand NT$ 6,859,368 9,997,867 13,610,878 16,628,066 18,478,265 24,332,917 49.Operating Income Thousand NT$ 877,872 567,815 715,010 1,326,357 1,359,826 1,356,684 50.Net Income Thousand NT$ 252,502 -99,974 42,430 528,487 369,925 410,140 51.Interest Expense Thousand NT$ 538,679 700,586 708,048 713,526 924,892 873,470 52.Salary and Wages Thousand NT$ 938,883 1,250,920 1,500,566 1,668,278 1,775,617 1,858,113 53.Inventories Thousand NT$ 504,891 802,970 781,811 723,576 478,667 411,996 54.Depreciation Thousand NT$ 465,575 585,648 719,302 909,935 1,060,778 1,212,200 55.Added Value Thousand NT$ 2,311,344 2,475,167 3,012,098 4,031,140 4,300,345 4,537,174 Annual Important Performance Item Unit 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1.Capacity of Water Supply System M3/Day ……………… 2.Capacity of Water-Purification-Station M3/Day 5,374,350 5,466,645 5,620,374 5,917,309 5,996,189 6,434,490
Recommended publications
  • An Expert-Based Assessment Model for Evaluating Habitat Suitability of Pond-Breeding Amphibians

    An Expert-Based Assessment Model for Evaluating Habitat Suitability of Pond-Breeding Amphibians

    sustainability Article An Expert-Based Assessment Model for Evaluating Habitat Suitability of Pond-Breeding Amphibians Shin-Ruoh Juang 1, Szu-Hung Chen 2 and Chen-Fa Wu 1,* 1 Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 Department of Ecosystem Science & Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel./Fax: +886-4-2285-9125 Academic Editor: Iain Gordon Received: 8 November 2016; Accepted: 10 February 2017; Published: 16 February 2017 Abstract: Farm ponds are important habitats for amphibians, birds, and other wildlife. In Taiwan, artificial ponds were originally created on farmlands for irrigation purposes and the needs of the domestic water supply. Although pond creation is a typical farming practice, it also provides habitats for pond-breeding amphibians. Thus, it is essential to understand the current status of habitats and their vulnerability regarding urgent conservation needs for target species. Günther’s frog (Hylarana guentheri), a pond-breeding amphibian, has a high sensitivity towards surrounding environmental changes, and can be used as an indicator species to assess habitat suitability. The purpose of this study is to establish a systematic framework to assess the habitat suitability of pond-breeding amphibians by using Günther’s frog as a pilot-study species. First, we collected frog survey data from Chiayi, Taiwan, from winter 2013 to spring 2015, and investigated the present status of the environmental conditions around the ponds. Next, expert questionnaires and the fuzzy Delphi method were applied to establish the hierarchical evaluation criteria regarding the habitat suitability assessment.
  • Gelasimus Splendidus Stimpson, 1858 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae), a Valid Species of Fiddler Crab from the Northern South China Sea and Taiwan Strait

    Gelasimus Splendidus Stimpson, 1858 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae), a Valid Species of Fiddler Crab from the Northern South China Sea and Taiwan Strait

    Zootaxa 3490: 30–47 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7717229C-362F-4E19-A055-09D637B9D425 Gelasimus splendidus Stimpson, 1858 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae), a valid species of fiddler crab from the northern South China Sea and Taiwan Strait HSI-TE SHIH1,4, PETER K. L. NG2, KINGSLEY J. H. WONG3 & BENNY K. K. CHAN3 1Department of Life Science, National Chung Hsing University, 250, Kuo Kuang Road, Taichung 402, Taiwan 2Tropical Marine Science Institute and Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore 3Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan 4Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The fiddler crab, Uca splendida (Stimpson, 1858) has been synonymized under Uca crassipes (White, 1847) since Crane (1975). Studies of specimens from the Hong Kong type locality and adjacent areas of China, Taiwan and Vietnam show that U. splendida is a valid species, with a characteristic suite of carapace and gonopod features as well as a distinct cytochrome oxidase I (COI) signature. Genetic work shows that U. splendida belongs to a well-supported clade and is the sister species of U. crassipes. The distribution of U. splendida is restricted to continental East and continental Southeast Asia, in contrast to the oceanic distribution of U. crassipes. Both species, however, are sympatric in Penghu Islands, western Taiwan and Dongsha Island (=Pratas Island). Key words: Uca splendida, U. crassipes, U. chlorophthalmus, South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, cytochrome oxidase I, taxonomy Introduction Uca crassipes (White, 1847) is a common broad-fronted species of fiddler crab distributed widely in the western and central Pacific Ocean and the eastern margin of the Indian Ocean (Crane 1975).

  • Cloud Gate Dance Theatre of Taiwan Formosa Sunday, February 25, 2018 2:00 Pm

    Cloud Gate Dance Theatre of Taiwan Formosa Sunday, February 25, 2018 2:00 pm Photo: Liu Chen-hsiang 45TH ANNIVERSARY SEASON 2017/2018 Great Artists. Great Audiences. Hancher Performances. Cloud Gate Dance Theatre of Taiwan Formosa 關於島嶼 CONCEPT / CHOREOGRAPHY LIN HWAI-MIN HANCHER AUDITORIUM, IOWA CITY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2018, 2:00 PM This tour is made possible in part by grants from the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). EXCLUSIVE NORTH AMERICAN TOUR REPRESENTATION RENA SHAGAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 180 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10024 Tel: ++1-212-873-9700 Fax: ++1-212-873-1708 www.shaganarts.com CLOUD GATE DANCE THEATRE OF TAIWAN No. 36, Lane 6, Sec. 1, Zhongzheng Rd., Tamsui District New Taipei City 25175, Taiwan Tel:++886-(0)2-2629-8558 Fax: ++886-(0)2-2629-8775 www.cloudgate.org.tw Formosa CONCEPT / CHOREOGRAPHY LIN HWAI-MIN RECITATION CHIANG HSUN MUSIC KAIJA SAARIAHO GÉRARD GRISEY LIANG CHUN-MEI SANGPUY KATATEPAN MAVALIYW LIGHTING DESIGN LULU W.L. LEE COSTUME DESIGN APU JAN PROJECTION DESIGN CHOU TUNG-YEN AND VERY MAINSTREAM STUDIO VIDEOGRAPHY CHANG HAO-JAN (HOWELL) PREMIERE NOVEMBER 24, 2017 NATIONAL THEATER, TAIPEI, TAIWAN CO-PRODUCTIONS NATIONAL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER - NATIONAL THEATER & CONCERT HALL, TAIWAN, R.O.C. NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG CENTER FOR THE ARTS (WEIWUYING), TAIWAN, R.O.C. SADLER’S WELLS, LONDON, UK THÉÂTRE DE LA VILLE – PARIS, FRANCE CAROLINA PERFORMING ARTS, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, USA MOVIMENTOS FESTWOCHEN DER AUTOSTADT IN WOLFSBURG, GERMANY In the 16th century, gazing out from the decks of ships sailing off the coast of southern China, Portuguese sailors saw it: a great green mass, thick with mountains and trees, rising from the sea.
  • Directory of Head Office and Branches Foreword

    Directory of Head Office and Branches Foreword

    Directory of Head Office and Branches Foreword I. Domestic Business Units 20 Sec , Chongcing South Road, Jhongjheng District, Taipei City 0007, Taiwan (R.O.C.) P.O. Box 5 or 305, Taipei, Taiwan Introduction SWIFT: BKTWTWTP http://www.bot.com.tw TELEX: 1120 TAIWANBK CODE OFFICE ADDRESS TELEPHONE FAX Department of 20 Sec , Chongcing South Road, Jhongjheng District, 0037 02-23493399 02-23759708 Business Taipei City Report Corporate Department of Public 20 Sec , Gueiyang Street, Jhongjheng District, Taipei 0059 02-236542 02-23751125 Treasury City 58 Sec , Chongcing South Road, Jhongjheng District, Governance 0082 Department of Trusts 02-2368030 02-2382846 Taipei City Offshore Banking 069 F, 3 Baocing Road, Jhongjheng District, Taipei City 02-23493456 02-23894500 Branch Department of 20 Sec , Chongcing South Road, Jhongjheng District, Fund-Raising 850 02-23494567 02-23893999 Electronic Banking Taipei City Department of 2F, 58 Sec , Chongcing South Road, Jhongjheng 698 02-2388288 02-237659 Securities District, Taipei City Activities 007 Guancian Branch 49 Guancian Road, Jhongjheng District, Taipei City 02-2382949 02-23753800 0093 Tainan Branch 55 Sec , Fucian Road, Central District, Tainan City 06-26068 06-26088 40 Sec , Zihyou Road, West District, Taichung City 04-2222400 04-22224274 Conditions 007 Taichung Branch General 264 Jhongjheng 4th Road, Cianjin District, Kaohsiung 0118 Kaohsiung Branch 07-2553 07-2211257 City Operating 029 Keelung Branch 6, YiYi Road, Jhongjheng District, Keelung City 02-24247113 02-24220436 Chunghsin New Village

  • Cycling Taiwan – Great Rides in the Bicycle Kingdom

    Great Rides in the Bicycle Kingdom Cycling Taiwan Peak-to-coast tours in Taiwan’s top scenic areas Island-wide bicycle excursions Routes for all types of cyclists Family-friendly cycling fun Tourism Bureau, M.O.T.C. Words from the Director-General Taiwan has vigorously promoted bicycle tourism in recent years. Its efforts include the creation of an extensive network of bicycle routes that has raised Taiwan’s profile on the international tourism map and earned the island a spot among the well-known travel magazine, Lonely Planet’s, best places to visit in 2012. With scenic beauty and tasty cuisine along the way, these routes are attracting growing ranks of cyclists from around the world. This guide introduces 26 bikeways in 12 national scenic areas in Taiwan, including 25 family-friendly routes and, in Alishan, one competition-level route. Cyclists can experience the fascinating geology of the Jinshan Hot Spring area on the North Coast along the Fengzhimen and Jinshan-Wanli bikeways, or follow a former rail line through the Old Caoling Tunnel along the Longmen-Yanliao and Old Caoling bikeways. Riders on the Yuetan and Xiangshan bikeways can enjoy the scenic beauty of Sun Moon Lake, while the natural and cultural charms of the Tri-Mountain area await along the Emei Lake Bike Path and Ershui Bikeway. This guide also introduces the Wushantou Hatta and Baihe bikeways in the Siraya National Scenic Area, the Aogu Wetlands and Beimen bikeways on the Southwest Coast, and the Round-the-Bay Bikeway at Dapeng Bay. Indigenous culture is among the attractions along the Anpo Tourist Cycle Path in Maolin and the Shimen-Changbin Bikeway, Sanxiantai Bike Route, and Taiyuan Valley Bikeway on the East Coast.
  • No. Area Post Office Name Zip Code Telephone No. Address Same Day

    No. Area Post Office Name Zip Code Telephone No. Address Same Day

    Zip Same Day Flight No. Area Post Office Name Telephone No. Address Code Cutoff Time* 1 Yilan Yilan Jhongshan Rd. Post Office 26044 (03)9324-133 (03)9326-727 No. 130, Sec. 3, Jhongshan Rd., Yilan 260-44, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 13:30 2 Yilan Yilan Jinlioujie Post Office 26051 (03)9368-142 No. 100, Sec. 3, Fusing Rd., Yilan 260-51, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 12:10 3 Yilan Yilan Weishuei Rd. Post Office 26047 (03)9325-072 No. 275, Sec. 2, Jhongshan Rd., Yilan 260-47, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 12:20 4 Yilan Yuanshan Post Office 26441 (03)9225-073 No. 299, Sec. 1, Yuanshan Rd., Yuanshan Township, Yilan County 264-41, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 11:50 5 Yilan Yuanshan Neicheng Post Office 26444 (03)9221-096 No. 353, Rongguang Rd., Yuanshan, Yilan County 264-44, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 11:40 6 Yilan Yilan Sihou St. Post Office 26044 (03)9329-185 No. 2-1, Sihou St., Yilan 260-44, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 12:20 7 Yilan Jhuangwei Post Office 26344 (03)9381-705 No. 327, Jhuang 5th Rd., Jhuangwei, Yilan County 263-44, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 12:00 8 Yilan Yilan Donggang Rd. Post Office 26057 (03)9385-638 No. 32-30, Donggang Rd., Yilan 260-57, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 12:10 9 Yilan Yilan Dapo Rd. Post Office 26054 (03)9283-195 No. 225, Sec. 2, Dapo Rd., Yilan 260-54, Taiwan (R.O.C.) 11:40 10 Yilan Yilan University Post Office 26047 (03)9356-052 No.1, Sec.
  • Website : the Bank Website

    Website : the Bank Website

    Website : http://newmaps.twse.com.tw The Bank Website : http://www.landbank.com.tw Time of Publication : July 2018 Spokesman Name: He,Ying-Ming Title: Executive Vice President Tel: (02)2348-3366 E-Mail: [email protected] First Substitute Spokesman Name: Chu,Yu-Feng Title: Executive Vice President Tel: (02) 2348-3686 E-Mail: [email protected] Second Substitute Spokesman Name: Huang,Cheng-Ching Title: Executive Vice President Tel: (02) 2348-3555 E-Mail: [email protected] Address &Tel of the bank’s head office and Branches(please refer to’’ Directory of Head Office and Branches’’) Credit rating agencies Name: Moody’s Investors Service Address: 24/F One Pacific Place 88 Queensway Admiralty, Hong Kong. Tel: (852)3758-1330 Fax: (852)3758-1631 Web Site: http://www.moodys.com Name: Standard & Poor’s Corp. Address: Unit 6901, level 69, International Commerce Centre 1 Austin Road West Kowloon, Hong Kong Tel: (852)2841-1030 Fax: (852)2537-6005 Web Site: http://www.standardandpoors.com Name: Taiwan Ratings Corporation Address: 49F., No7, Sec.5, Xinyi Rd., Xinyi Dist., Taipei City 11049, Taiwan (R.O.C) Tel: (886)2-8722-5800 Fax: (886)2-8722-5879 Web Site: http://www.taiwanratings.com Stock transfer agency Name: Secretariat land bank of Taiwan Co., Ltd. Address: 3F, No.53, Huaining St. Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei City 10046, Taiwan(R,O,C) Tel: (886)2-2348-3456 Fax: (886)2-2375-7023 Web Site: http://www.landbank.com.tw Certified Publick Accountants of financial statements for the past year Name of attesting CPAs: Gau,Wey-Chuan, Mei,Ynan-Chen Name of Accounting Firm: KPMG Addres: 68F., No.7, Sec.5 ,Xinyi Rd., Xinyi Dist., Taipei City 11049, Taiwan (R.O.C) Tel: (886)2-8101-6666 Fax: (886)2-8101-6667 Web Site: http://www.kpmg.com.tw The Bank’s Website: http://www.landbank.com.tw Website: http://newmaps.twse.com.tw The Bank Website: http://www.landbank.com.tw Time of Publication: July 2018 Land Bank of Taiwan Annual Report 2017 Publisher: Land Bank of Taiwan Co., Ltd.
  • The History and Politics of Taiwan's February 28

    The History and Politics of Taiwan's February 28

    The History and Politics of Taiwan’s February 28 Incident, 1947- 2008 by Yen-Kuang Kuo BA, National Taiwan Univeristy, Taiwan, 1991 BA, University of Victoria, 2007 MA, University of Victoria, 2009 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of History © Yen-Kuang Kuo, 2020 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee The History and Politics of Taiwan’s February 28 Incident, 1947- 2008 by Yen-Kuang Kuo BA, National Taiwan Univeristy, Taiwan, 1991 BA, University of Victoria, 2007 MA, University of Victoria, 2009 Supervisory Committee Dr. Zhongping Chen, Supervisor Department of History Dr. Gregory Blue, Departmental Member Department of History Dr. John Price, Departmental Member Department of History Dr. Andrew Marton, Outside Member Department of Pacific and Asian Studies iii Abstract Taiwan’s February 28 Incident happened in 1947 as a set of popular protests against the postwar policies of the Nationalist Party, and it then sparked militant actions and political struggles of Taiwanese but ended with military suppression and political persecution by the Nanjing government. The Nationalist Party first defined the Incident as a rebellion by pro-Japanese forces and communist saboteurs. As the enemy of the Nationalist Party in China’s Civil War (1946-1949), the Chinese Communist Party initially interpreted the Incident as a Taiwanese fight for political autonomy in the party’s wartime propaganda, and then reinterpreted the event as an anti-Nationalist uprising under its own leadership.
  • Different Patterns in Ranking of Risk Factors for the Onset Age of Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Urban and Rural Areas in Eastern Taiwan

    Different Patterns in Ranking of Risk Factors for the Onset Age of Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Urban and Rural Areas in Eastern Taiwan

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Different Patterns in Ranking of Risk Factors for the Onset Age of Acute Myocardial Infarction between Urban and Rural Areas in Eastern Taiwan Hsiu-Ju Huang 1,†, Chih-Wei Lee 1,2,†, Tse-Hsi Li 3 and Tsung-Cheng Hsieh 1,4,* 1 Institute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan; [email protected] (H.-J.H.); [email protected] (C.-W.L.) 2 Department of Physical Therapy, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan 3 School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11041, Taiwan; [email protected] 4 Doctoral Degree Program in Translational Medicine, Tzu Chi University and Academia Sinica, Hualien 97004, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the difference in ranking of risk factors of onset age of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between urban and rural areas in Eastern Taiwan. Data from 2013 initial onset of AMI patients living in the urban areas (n = 1060) and rural areas (n = 953) from January 2000 to December 2015, including onset age, and conventional risk factors including sex, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and body mass index (BMI). The results of multiple linear regressions analysis showed smoking, obesity, and dyslipidemia were early-onset reversible Citation: Huang, H.-J.; Lee, C.-W.; Li, risk factors of AMI in both areas. The ranking of impacts of them on the age from high to low was T.-H.; Hsieh, T.-C.
  • Post-Disaster Reconstruction Laws and Indigenous Adaptive Strategies in Taiwan: Focusing on Post-Typhoon Morakot Reconstruction

    Post-Disaster Reconstruction Laws and Indigenous Adaptive Strategies in Taiwan: Focusing on Post-Typhoon Morakot Reconstruction

    Post-disaster Reconstruction Laws and Indigenous Adaptive Strategies in Taiwan: Focusing on Post-Typhoon Morakot Reconstruction Yung-hua Kuo PhD Candidate, School of Law, University of Washington Abstract This paper examines and analyzes how the Taiwanese government and indigenous peoples responded to and recovered from natural disaster impacts, as well as their considerations and relating issues. In August 2009, the heavy rainfall of Typhoon Morakot triggered serious floods and mudslides throughout southern Taiwan and damaged many indigenous communities. After the disaster, the Taiwanese government rushed to adopt land conservation and relocation as major reconstruction methods. By designating risky lands as “Special Zones” and “Safety Doubtful Zones,” the government restricted land use and relocated a large number of indigenous people from their homelands in the mountains to the lowlands. The land zoning and relocation process was criticized as hurried, careless, and limited local participation. The relocated indigenous people also have faced legal, cultural, economic difficulties associated with displacement. In response to the official reconstruction policy, the Taiwanese indigenous peoples implemented multiple strategies to adapt to the environment changed by the disaster: relocation, reconstruction, and return. Although each adaptive strategy had advantages and disadvantages, the indigenous communities adopted the strategies according to their specific contexts. The flexible adaptive strategies are more likely to help the affected indigenous people recover from natural disaster impacts by applying their unique culture and traditional knowledge. I. Background: An Unexpected Disaster of Typhoon Morakot On the early morning of August 9th, 2009, a massive landslide occurred in a mountainous region of Kaohsiung Municipality, Taiwan. The large quantity of mud instantly buried the entire Xiaolin village and killed 491 people.
  • [カテゴリー]Location Type [スポット名]English Location Name [住所

    [カテゴリー]Location Type [スポット名]English Location Name [住所

    ※IS12TではSSID"ilove4G"はご利用いただけません [カテゴリー]Location_Type [スポット名]English_Location_Name [住所]Location_Address1 [市区町村]English_Location_City [州/省/県名]Location_State_Province_Name [SSID]SSID_Open_Auth Misc Hi-Life-Jingrong Kaohsiung Store No.107 Zhenxing Rd. Qianzhen Dist. Kaohsiung City 806 Taiwan (R.O.C.) Kaohsiung CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Misc Family Mart-Yongle Ligang Store No.4 & No.6 Yongle Rd. Ligang Township Pingtung County 905 Taiwan (R.O.C.) Pingtung CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Misc CHT Fonglin Service Center No.62 Sec. 2 Zhongzheng Rd. Fenglin Township Hualien County Hualien CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Misc FamilyMart -Haishan Tucheng Store No. 294 Sec. 1 Xuefu Rd. Tucheng City Taipei County 236 Taiwan (R.O.C.) Taipei CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Misc 7-Eleven No.204 Sec. 2 Zhongshan Rd. Jiaoxi Township Yilan County 262 Taiwan (R.O.C.) Yilan CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Misc 7-Eleven No.231 Changle Rd. Luzhou Dist. New Taipei City 247 Taiwan (R.O.C.) Taipei CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Restaurant McDonald's 1F. No.68 Mincyuan W. Rd. Jhongshan District Taipei CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Restaurant Cobe coffee & beauty 1FNo.68 Sec. 1 Sanmin Rd.Banqiao City Taipei County Taipei CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Misc Hi-Life - Taoliang store 1F. No.649 Jhongsing Rd. Longtan Township Taoyuan County Taoyuan CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Misc CHT Public Phone Booth (Intersection of Sinyi R. and Hsinsheng South R.) No.173 Sec. 1 Xinsheng N. Rd. Dajan Dist. Taipei CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Misc Hi-Life-Chenhe New Taipei Store 1F. No.64 Yanhe Rd. Anhe Vil. Tucheng Dist. New Taipei City 236 Taiwan (R.O.C.) Taipei CHT Wi-Fi(HiNet) Misc 7-Eleven No.7 Datong Rd.
  • Forensic Investigation of Typhoon Morakot Disaster: Nansalu and Daniao Village Case Study

    Forensic Investigation of Typhoon Morakot Disaster: Nansalu and Daniao Village Case Study

    NCDR 102-T28 Forensic Investigation of Typhoon Morakot Disaster: Nansalu and Daniao Village Case Study Hui­Hsuan Yang, Su­Ying Chen, Sung­Ying Chien , and Wei­Sen Li 2014.05 Contents CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... I TABLES. ....................................................................................................................... II FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... III ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. IV I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 II. TYPHOON MORAKOT DISASTER ......................................................................... 2 III. REVIEWING POSSIBLE CAUSES OF MORAKOT IMPACTS: ..................................... 4 (I) METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS .............................................................................................. 4 (II) PHYSIOGRAPHIC FACTORS ................................................................................................ 4 (III) DISASTER MITIGATION ................................................................................................... 4 (IV) DISASTER RESPONSE ..................................................................................................... 6 IV. RESEARCH APPROACH ......................................................................................