House Actions

Committee Report CONSENT CALENDAR

February 6, 2018

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

REPORT OF COMMITTEE

The Committee on Judiciary to which was referred

HA 1,

AN ACT seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III. Having considered the same, report the same with the following recommendation that the bill OUGHT NOT TO PASS.

Rep. Jason Janvrin

FOR THE COMMITTEE

Original: House Clerk Cc: Committee Bill File COMMITTEE REPORT

Committee: Judiciary Bill Number: HA I Title: seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III. Date: February 6, 2018 , Consent Calendar: CONSENT Recommendation: OUGHT NOT TO PASS

STATEMENT OF INTENT

Part II, Article 73 of the New Hampshire Constitution provides that in a bill of address, "the cause for removal shall be stated fully and substantially in the address." This address does not meet that requirement. Therefore, the committee voted unanimously to recommend the address be deemed Ought Not To Pass.

Vote 17-0.

Rep. Jason Janvrin FOR THE COMMITTEE

Original: House Clerk Cc: Committee Bill File CONSENT CALENDAR

Judiciary HA 1, seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III. OUGHT NOT TO PASS. Rep. Jason Janvrin for Judiciary. Part II, Article 73 of the New Hampshire Constitution provides that in a bill of address, "the cause for removal shall be stated fully and substantially in the address." This address does not meet that requirement. Therefore, the committee voted unanimously to recommend the address be deemed Ought Not To Pass. Vote 17-0.

Original: House Clerk Cc: Committee Bill File

COMMITTEE REPORT

COMMITTEE:

BILL NUMBER: /14

TITLE: 74g - f A eli4L c'Y c>E3

/—--

DATE: CONSENT CALENDAR: YE19 NO

OUGHT TO PASS

MAJORITY REPORT

CONSENTCALENDAR

HA-1, seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III

RECOMMENDATION: OUGHT NOT TO PASS VOTE: 17-0

Article 73 of the State Constitution provides that in a House Address, "the cause for removal shall be stated fully and substantially in the Address" this address does not meet that requirement. Therefore, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend the Address be deemkUGHT NOT TO PASS.

Rep. Jason A. Janvrin

COMMITTEE VOTE: /7 -

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

• Copy to Committee Bill File • Use Another Report for Minority Report Rep. V -A-/i/K.) For the Committee Rev. 02/01/07 - Yellow Voting Sheets HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

EXECUTIVE SESSION on HA 1

BILL TITLE: seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III.

DATE: February 6, 2018

LOB ROOM: 208

MOTIONS: OUGHT NOT TO PASS Moved by Rep. Janvrin Seconded by Rep. Kenison Vote: 17-0

CONSENT CALENDAR: YES

Statement of Intent: Refer to Committee Report

Respectfullysubmitted

?0,0e,ig

Rep. Sandra B. Keans, Clerk

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

▪ EXECUTIVE SESSION on HA 1

BILL TITLE: seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III.

DATE: Ca- '42r °it

LOB ROOM: 208

MOTION: (Please check on, box) 4°- 111 OTP /Mt ITL ❑ Retain (Pt year) ❑ Adoption of Amendment # O Interim Study (2nd year) (if offered) ilA0- Moved by Rep., v 44/ Seconded by Rep. friC,44Sak) Vote: /

MOTION: (Please check one box)

❑ OTP ❑ OTP/A ❑ ITL 0 Retain (Pt year) 0 Adoption of Amendment # El Interim Study (2nd year) (if offered)

Moved by Rep. Seconded by Rep. Vote:

MOTION: (Please check one box)

❑ OTP ❑ OTP/A ❑ ITL ❑ Retain (Pt year) 0 Adoption of Amendment # 0 Interim Study (2nd year) (if offered)

Moved by Rep. Seconded by Rep. Vote:

MOTION: (Please check one box)

❑ OTP ❑ OTP/A ❑ ITL ❑ Retain (Pt year) ❑ Adoption of Amendment # O Interim Study (2nd rar) (if offered)

Moved by Rep. Seconded by Rep. Vote:

CONSENT CALENDAR: YES NO

Minority Report? Yes No If yes, author, Rep: Motion

21,-C Respectfully submitted: Rep Landra Keans, Clerk STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 1/29/2018 1:55:35 PM OFFICE OF THE HOUSE CLERK Roll Call Committee Registers Report 2018 SESSION

JUDICIARY CJ Bill #: i--1664••°1 Title: Q-kijCIt' 9146118j2" jat 'Z4)- \II-eat

PH Date: 01 l 17 .Zoig Exec Session Date: /

Motion: 6r 6 / 7Z1 S Amendment #:

MEMBER YEAS NAYS

Hagan, Joseph M. Chariman v Rouillard, Claire A. Vice Chairman v Hopper, Gary S. v Sylvia, Michael J. V Hull, Rthert- E,,vi r-r-c-ic t I Ka-CA-A I/ Wuelper, Kurt F. v Graham, Robert V. / Hynes, Dan v Janvrin, Jason A. 1 Leavitt, John A. OP Wall, Janet G. v Horrigan, Timothy 0. / Berch, Paul S. 1,/ Smith, Suzanne J. / Kenison, Linda B. v-

Keans, Sandra B. Clerk V DiLorenzo, Charlotte I. v Altschiller, Debra ,/ TOTAL VOTE:

Page: 1 of 1 SOMUITAI ULTEOH HA 1 seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III.

Statement of Chairman Hagan Regarding Procedure

The matter before this committee is a Bill of Address under Part II, Article 73 of the New Hampshire Constitution which provides, in relevant part:

The governor with consent of the council may remove any commissioned officer for reasonable cause upon the address of both houses of the legislature, provided nevertheless that the cause for removal shall be stated fully and substantially in the address and shall not be a cause which is a sufficient ground for impeachment, and provided further that no officer shall be so removed unless he shall have had an opportunity to be heard in his defense by a joint committee of both houses of the legislature.

This is a procedure akin to impeachment, but requires the House and Senate to each decide if they wish to proceed with the matter by appointing a joint committee to conduct a hearing with due process protections similar to a trial. Only after that hearing is concluded would the matter then go to the Governor and Council for the equivalent of a trial before them. Finally, the Governor and Council cannot remove the officer unless they find "reasonable cause," but not a cause which is a sufficient ground for impeachment (bribery, corruption, malpractice or maladministration in office).

Accordingly, with this process in mind, we will now hear from the sponsor and those supporting or opposing this bill of address. The committee will subsequently vote to recommend to the full House either Ought to Pass or Ought Not to Pass. The committee may not amend the bill of address. If the full House finds sufficient cause to move forward, then HA 1 will be sent to the Senate for consideration by that body. If the Senate concurs, then a joint committee will be formed to hear the evidence under oath from witnesses. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

PUBLIC HEARING ON HA 1

BILL TITLE: seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III.

DATE: January 17, 2018

LOB ROOM: 208 Time Public Hearing Called to Order: 2:00 p.m.

Time Adjourned: 2:25 p..m.

Committee Members: Reps. Hagan, Rouillard, Keans, Hopper, Sylvia, Hull, Wuelper, R. Graham, Hynes, Janvrin, Leavitt, Suzanne Smith, Wall, Horrigan, Berch, Kenison, DiLorenzo and Altschiller

Bill Sponsors: Rep. Brewster

TESTIMONY

* Use asterisk if written testimony and/or amendments are submitted.

Chairman Hagan read a statement re procedure to remove Judge.

Rep. Michael Brewster, prime sponsor Introduced the House Address to the committee. Brought this on behalf of Joe Haas.

*Joseph Haas, Concord, NH, representing self HA 1 is driven by New Hampshire Supreme Court Case 2011-0490. He submitted four (4) documents: Case No. 2011-0490; HA 1 exhibit #1 of 7; history behind HA 1; detailed information for House Address 1. Basically Judge O'Neill ignored/set aside RSA 529:16 and/or RSA 529:18 explicity. After being informed of the failure to comply with these posting requirements, Judge O'Neill conducted a bench trial when Mr. Haas had asked for a jury trial. Judge O'Neill will fully refused to recognize official posting that proved Mr. Haas case..2017 Mr. Haas had HJR 2 file to recover $7, 500 lose.

Respectfully submitted,

Rep. Kurt Wuelper, Acting Clerk

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

PUBLIC HEARING ON HA 1

BILL TITLE: seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III.

DATE: /-1 2 — Z-o I

ROOM: 208 Time Public Hearing Called to Order: a °Oa P.44

Time Adjourned:

(please circle if present)

Committee Members: Reps. Hagan, Rouillard, Hopper, Sylvia, Hull, Wuelper, R. Graham, Hynes, Janvrin, Leavitt, Wall, Horrigan, Berch, Kenison, DiLorenzo, Mulligan, Altschiller and Keans

Bill Sponsors: Rep. Brewster

TESTIMONY

* Use asterisk if written testimony and/or amendments are submitted.

* thin /414114 ireli-et 57-AtemeAff Pirotebkge Aetnatie p B beaus-frock Rieo w,j4T 44s ei0 i3ekp4-C1 0C /1144-5 4445.1 AA( is cfrivfeo by AU4ce c 2 go n-01/90„ stkbwi;y-reS Pvccor- driaimar 00-ce- Alo, 'loft- / go ; !4A1E gitdh- ‘1 C 7 5 hio-apl ict°4 NA! tbarr;:(1 ,,;)‘0 Ctvz litetsatidge.551 B se` DIY TvtAite- /Qt.( 1( Afuok-eStrArik 79i4 5 ag leo err-di en- 4 C .-ceel,trelrLy nere(Z Jab" /it)Clawree 9 ?ix -C-4:)-(Lir-20 Corrra ty too-IL tetti-e- tit-41:17 ieer4e$4440:r /wit/ eenatAztee Abvi-e.,6,-tvdtQA4644/t. thr.21,4_,

-Li egad 42-- .14-ettp- b'iti' e di:14c* gacissS tecty-yerig °CALA' poS77 >-kisr Athogte mg /1/MS e it 562_ 02617 4As ha Mrit--2- Pt ke_ct _n_e_tadett_ 076-60 kDst- Aucllupsai HA 1 seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III.

Statement of Chairman Hagan Regarding Procedure

The matter before this committee is a Bill of Address under Part II, Article 73 of the New Hampshire Constitution which provides, in relevant part:

-rue 1/16/2018 10:28 PM

Sent Items

[email protected] ;

Dick Marple ; Dan Itse ; Smith, Paul ;

To: The House Judiciary Committee:

Dear Members:

Here is a copy & paste plus relay by forward of what I tried to get filed as my Article 32 Petition last Fall 2017, but that ran into the "run-around" at Legislative Services of the people there said to see the House Clerk Paul Smith, who showed Representative Brewster and me, in his office, some memorandum of law by Attorney Chuck Douglas that resulted in not an Article 14 "complete" dealing with the wrongs done to me by those people, but that because only one is still working for the State of that of down to the Article 73 removal process. I just thought that you would like this HISTORY of HOW the H.A.1 gets to your committee for the Public Hearing tomorrow afternoon at 2:00 p.m.

The e-mail that I sent to you all of last Friday, January 12th@ 10:23 p.m. entitled: "Detailed info for House Address 1. . .." that made reference to the 289+ page APPENDIX I went over this afternoon and to STAPLES I went to copy what this boils down to is: / are these exhibits to send to you also by the electronic in a few minutes.

The 1.) cover of APPENDIX No. 2011-0491 at The N.H. Supreme Court

2.) The July 1 + 7, 1993 "RETURN OF SERVICE" showing on aid to bottom line: "FOR THE SUM OF ONE SILVER DOLLAR ($1.00) that I paid at the first auction (#1 of 2), to compare to NO "Return of Service" for the 2nd auction, of just the "Posting" notes of: "11/1/93" [ * ] see below;

3.) The first page of the judge's 7-page ORDER;

4.) page 3 of 7 of the ORDER. See last sentence at bottom of page = "Therefore, the Court VACATES its prior finding that Plaintiff purchased the real property." The purchaser in the 2nd auction being the Sheriff's Sale bidder who bid $7,500 for a then assessed at about $175,000 building on land at 7&9 North Main Street in Ashland, N.H.;

5.) the signed ODER on page 7 of 7 by James D. O'Neill, III, "Presiding Justice" on "3/14/96";

6.) My co-defendant "MOTION FOR DISCOVERY" of "Monday, April 18th, 1994" that was never answered. What happened was that I called the Sheriff's Office to TRY to get the PROOF of HOW posted by eirher RSA Ch. 529 for the real estate or by R.S.A. Chapter 528 for the corporate interest. Sheriff Charlie Barry was always "out-to- lunch". Finally I did get a telephone call from Deputy Sheriff Paul Leavitt that I could visit the office to see the file as Charlie was on vacation and him in charge, with my reply of: thanks, but that of not only to "see" the file", but to be able to photocopy pages therefrom that I did and that's what I found for:

https://outlook.live.com/owa/?path=/mail/search/rp 1/5 1/16/2018 Mail - [email protected] 7.) [ * ] the "Posting" of: "11/1/93" in two places by RSA Ch. 529:20 for the real estate...

... that I tendered the $7,500 in the form of two bank checks of: $5000 and $2000 each plus five (5) $100 bills = $500; = the $7,500 by RSA Ch. 529:26 for redemption to the bidder's attorney but that as I've already explained it TAKEN as they said it was NOT the real estate that was sold, but that of the corporate interest, but then WHERE were these two additional posters? supposed to be done by the "shall" word of a mandatory requirement by RSA Ch. 528:16 and service of process upon the corporate clerk, Dick Townsend of Barrington in Strafford County. Only then of thereafter of "thereupon" these two events can the bidder be en-TITLEd to the rents. In the judge's eye, two wrongs make a right! that ought not to be. And ought not to be thus his suspension of the laws of thus against Article 29 of the N.H. Bill of Rights and a violation of his RSA Ch. 92:2 to Article 84 oath of office.

So please to find fault and recommend to the Senate too and eventually to the G&C of at least one of them to start the RSA Ch. 4:1 remov proces so that I can take this finding of wrong-doing to the next steps.

Thank you in advance, oe Joseph S. Haas, P. 0. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 413: 438-3820 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at Hotmail dot corn ; charged with "Champerty" / but that really be "free commercial speech" by Vol. 400 MAss. Reports, footnote #7 Beineke case (1987) and the Adkins Plumbing & Heating case on Spring 1992 here in N.H. that was given to me by the former Chairman here of Robert Rowe, with much thanks. cc: State Rep. Dick Marple who helped me file my 2nd and 3rd Article 32 Petition (after the 1st one by State Rep. Roland E. Hemon of Dover, R.I.P who put his seat @ down by mistake instead of his House Rule 36 District number), and State Rep. Dan Itse who corrected me that the word: ought in Article 29 is not just "should", but that of a "duty" as I found this definition in the condensed version of The "Oxford English Dictionary" at the local library here in Gilmanton, in Belknap County.

From: Joseph S. Haas Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 12:21 PM To: Dick Marple Subject: Petition of Joseph S. Haas:

Petition of Joseph S. Haas:

NOW COMES the Article 12 inhabitant, Joseph Sanders Haas, Jr. of Gilmanton in Belknap County and complains to The General Court (both House & Senate) here in the state of New Hampshire by way of first filing with the House by the House Rule 36 endorsement of a State Representative, Michael A. Brewster of Pittsfield with his signature and District Number 21 for Merrimack County and outlines such petition as an earnest entreaty as follows: of not only " zealous:" being "diligent. " = " constant in effort to accomplish something; attentive and persistent in doing anything: " but " sincerely zealous " = " free of deceit, hypocrisy, or falseness; earnest: " and: " genuine; real: " in that it has taken ever since the reign of House Speaker Donna Sytek here of when this was first written up in an Article 32 Petition by then State Rep. Roland E. Hemon of Dover, the President of our V.O.C.A.L.S., Inc. group, including Mike Brewster and myself plus 18 others = the 20 of us including two other State Reps of Paul Taylor and Bill McCann. It Sytek who told me in 1995 that then House Member Peter Hoe Burling would look into it, but that of I was never told IF he ever did nor was there a Report of such back to her, of never to me until I took the subsequent House Speaker Gene Chandler to the Ethics Committee to where he said that Roland had put his seat # down instead of his district number, and so resulting in a new and revised Article 32 Petition as signed with https://outiook.live.com/owa/?path./mail/search/rp 2/5 1/16/2018 Mail - [email protected] district numbers by Dick Marple of Hooksett, Lars Christianson of Hudson, and Henry McElroy of Nashua, N.H. Bu''.: that that went nowhere too with neither Chandler, Doug Scammon nor Terri Norelli as House Speakers too. Then when Bill Burns became House Speaker it was Seth Cohn to the rescue from Canterbury for that district that included Boscawen for where my homestead was and still is, in that his "plate was full" one year he said and so to only one petition allowed by him of thus onto only the U.S. Census case of having to put this petition as before and now on the back burner for the time being, of likewise getting same no-where fast by Norelli again, and onto The Jasper I call him of House Speaker Shawn Jasper having had his Legislative Services Office change my petitions into HRs and Hills of sending by House Rule 4 to two separate committees of the Judiciary and Finance of their excuses were that they did not want to "investigate" these two judges and two Article 82 Court Clerks, and that the Senate was not accepting any such Resolutions from The House by their Senate Rule 3-26 on page 11 of 17, and the latest Article 32 Petition likewise reduced by Legislative Services down to only a repeat of an HR before of to House Legislative Administration of needing the evidence of such against then N.H. Supreme Court Clerk Howard J. "Howie" Zibel [ * ] (on the Tax Sale case) of but for the fact that N.H. Supreme Court Judge Jim Bassett of Canterbury never got back to the Judicial Council for a Report since in January 2016 (last year) he was told to merely talk it over with his associates, of now looking into an LSR to HB to deal with this of to subject The Council in RSA Ch. 494:7 to that of the RSA Ch. 541-A:1-41 Administrative Procedure Act for Rules! and more. So ends this of the history as in that part of our Declaration of Independence that reads: "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. " of me experiencing similar injuries and usurpations [ wrongful seizures ] here, of both that of my person and home, of the unlawful taking of myself to behind bars at the Grafton County Jail in North Haverhill, N.H. and being unlawfully and illegally evicted from my home:

1.) First of the home of my apartment and office of the corporation of 1/3rd of the commercial block with store and tenants on the first and second floors of this 3-story building in Ashland, of me on the 3rd floor who had won a Tax Sale case in 1988 and wondering how many more people were getting screwed in Petitions to Quiet Title too, and so went exploring for Missing Heirs to land and mineral rights but was charged with Champerty of buying up in res, when in actuality of it was in rem of my finder fee agreements with the heirs of when I'd find an heir, like if of four in an estate I'd ask if they'd like for me to be like the 5th heir for a 1/5th or 20% amount and thus lead onto the sale of their inheritance for one dollar and other valuable consideration, of so that I could contest in court that of some 3rd party wanting to have the court to like rule that a diligent search was conducted by the Guardian At Litem, by not finding their names of a surname search in the local phone book and calling it Article 14 "complete" that I found was hogwash! in that of not checking in with the records of in the Probate Court of where I'd find them listed and contacted of that what was supposed to be a contact like from the Town Tax Collector too of notice and an opportunity to be not only read but heard in a hearing but not of thus having violated their right of procedural due process of law, to either contest it themselves, hire an attorney, or deed to me under these conditions.

The condition also being that they/ of the plaintiffs wanting to quiet title thought up this Champerty Charge, of the offense at common law * / case-law WAS on-the-books until the Spring of 1992 with the Adkins Plumbing & Heating case but then done-away with since although never reasoned for such I did find out from my antique store tenants of Frank & Ellen Height of Six Flags in Campton that of who gave me that BOSTON HERALD newspaper story in the 24 Sept. 1989 @ page 16 [ or 16 Sept.1989 @ page 24] that of Bounty Hunter Bill Devine in Boston, of having spent over a quarter million dollars in attorney fees he told me over the phone one day to win his right of Free Commercial Speech in Vol. 400 MASss. Reports, footnote #7 for the Beineke case in 1987 that I was claiming equal rights to of up here in the boonies as compared to him buying ocean-front property on Nantucket Island, and at his 50% PLUS expenses BELIEVE IT OR NOT!

https://outlook.live.com/owa/?path=/mail/search/rp 3/5 1/16/2018 Mail [email protected] So when two land developers built three houses on five acres of land in Canaan, N.H. and THEN wanted to quiet title they advertised in the newspaper once a week for three consecutive weeks in the LEGAL NOTICE section that of: an "all-y all-y in-come free" like in the game of hide and seek, of for any and all heirs and successors in interest to file an Appearance AND written Answer by the 1st Tuesday of whatever month being The Return Day or forever lose their rights that's when I did both Appear and Answer, but that then "they" with their attorney did think-up this Champerty Charge of telling the court that I CAUSED this litigious strife when it was actually THEM who advertised to cause the starting of this case. That of which tie-up in court they had to sell at a loss of $30,000 later since the first prospective buyer could not wait and moved to Florida of thus charging me that dollar amount and me claiming my right to a trial by jury as is supposed to be a guarantee by Article 20 of our N.H. Bill of Rights (in part the First of the N.H. Constitution) but DENIED by Judge Robert E.K. Morrill and so that lead to two Sheriff's Sales, the first of which I was the only bidder paying one silver dollar but voided and so a 2nd one held at which time the bidder asked of what was really being sold here in the basement of the building at the Sheriff's Office (Tammy Jo Clifford, Deputy) and the answer was NOT the real estate (as RSA Ch. 529:20 posted) BUT that of my corporate interest, BUT that of when I asked AFTER the payment (see below) in the case of by Motion for Discovery of then WHERE be the two additional posters as required by the statute (RSA Ch. 528:16) I never got an answer and neither from the Sheriff Barry who did REFUSE to open his file folder for me, of such negativity repeated by his successor Doug Dutile who one day was on vacation and I got a call from Deputy Paul Leavitt that I could come in to look at the file AND copy it of that I did of it showed to verify that the auction was posted by RSA Ch. 528:16 for the real estate of which I had tendered the $7,500 for its RSA Ch. 528:26 redemption in the form of two bank checks of: $5000 + 2000 plus five(5) one ($100) hundred dollar bills to the bidder's attorney in Plymouth at his office there on Main Street / downtown, 2nd floor, but that he did turn over to the court and that hearing held at which time the Judge James D. O'Neill, Ill did in effect:

violate Article 29 of the N.H. Constitution, Part the First & Bill of Rights in that ONLY the Legislature ought, as by duty upon them ONLY, can suspend the laws! of he ignored BOTH that of the posting AND the :18 service upon the corporate Clerk (Dick Townsend in Barrington in Strafford County) that NEVER occurred nor happened either, but that upon these two nothings the :19 something of not only an en-TITLE-ment was established by the court of NOT only the rents but the entire building too. A Declaration Decree issued also in suspension of the law of RSA Ch. 498:5-d being 3 1/3 months AFTER such prohibition put in there by Roland Hemon in 1996 to take effect on January 1„ 1997 by Chapter Law 76:1. But that two wrongs do NOT make a right, but supposedly did of allowed in this case for which this Judge O'Neill ought to be RSA Ch. 4:1 removed [ RSA Ch. 92:2 "forthwith dismissed] as de- commissioned from who had commissioned him was Governor Sununu, the father John when James was his legal counsel and wanted to become a judge, and so getting over to:

2. that of it was Judge Peter W. Smith of Littleton who advised Assistant County Attorney George Waldron to criminally prosecute me for violation of Rule 95-b indirect criminal contempt of court for filing yet another Appearance and Answer in a mineral rights case after being told NOT to assert my right of free speech that they had labelled Champerty, of me beyond a preference to that of a conviction of conscience of to do what be right anyway of insisting AGAIN in a different case now of the same right of to that of a trial by jury since Champerty is an offense at common law and the Seventh (7th) Amendment is supposed to guarantee this right AND that of N.H. Article 20 also since the value in dispute is OVER $1,500 in dollar amount, but that the judge AGAIN decided to suspend yet another law: that of Articles 22 + 23, Part 2, N.H. Constitution that of contempt be limited to only up to ten (10) days of put on the book of into the constitution at a time when the trial courts were under the General Court of since branched out to become a third and supposedly co-equal branch of government and see also RSA Ch. 625:6 in the CRIMINAL Code in that: " — No conduct or omission constitutes an offense unless it is a crime or violation under this code or under another statute. " and so RSA Ch. 95-b not being UNDER the Code but along side it of to Article 73-a of: " The rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law. " of see also Articles 4 + 72-a too. So instead of following the law, he did-away with it and let over-ride the law, of the Federal custom or policy of that of it a "petty" offense of not allowing an individual the right of a trial by jury but only a bench trial when the punishment for such an offense be LESS than a 6-month sentence, and so to the 5 months, 29 days sentence against me of which by RSA Ch. 651:18 "good time" credits for good behavior I"only" had to spend 20 https://outlook.live.com/owa/?path=/mail/search/rp 4/5 1/16/2018 Mail - [email protected] days per 30-day month x 6 = 120 days, but still 110 days OVER the lawful limit! and ALL actually wrong since by the Sherar v. Cullen case and more: nobody can be punished for asserting their rights as guaranteed by the constitution, of thus leading onto a possible Title 42 Section 1983 action in the U.S. District court as the way to go since I've learned that although there is supposed to be an RSA Ch. 93-B:1 and 1-a faithful performance bond for victims of when a judge and/or court clerk does wrong, like in Robert B. Muh, Court Clerk having retired to Littleton, of he never sent the notice of hearing to a party of record: the corporate clerk who did file BOTH an Appearance AND Answer in the case and NEVER dis-Appeared nor withdrew, as such withdrawal would then be a Nihil Dicit, aka a Decree Pro Confesso, but declared such anyway, of so-be-it we said of per the Douglas v. Douglas case of 1999 of thus over to the claimed Damage Hearing, per the "In equity proceedings" paragraph of that case, but that we never got such and so the damages against me and us continue to this day, of I quote from The Declaration of Independence again of this time: " Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. " so that after all these wherefores above, it now to the Therefore of:

Therefore my petition being that of would The General Court please 0

(A) FIND that these two judges did unlawfully suspend the laws of that resulted in the damages to me in both that of the theft of my freedom and housing and that of the theft of both the land and building plus rents to both me as the landlord for the corporation and the corporation too, so that such finding can be entered into the United States District court to get a judgment from which the Insurance Company will have a damage claim against The State from which to pay me for in my individual status and as the landlord for the corporation and the corporation itself of to see to it that it lead to a liberare or release of the land and building of the real estate to deliver, transfer or hand-over from the bidder and/or successors in interest to the bidder of other(s) having accepted a QuitClaim Deed from such but which claims are based on fraud and so the fraud hereby exposed and verified for to release the property back to the true owner like what the British did by their release of their forts along the Great Lakes after we Americans won the War of 1812. &

(B ) FIND that both Court Clerks did unlawfully violate that of what is supposed to be the procedural due process of law rights to us inhabitants too, reference that of not processing the "Notice of Errors" to the judges by Zibel and not sending out the Notice of Hearing by Muh.

Yours truly, Joseph S. Haas, mailing address• P 0 Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 413: 438- 3820 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at Hotmail dot com

Endorsed by: State Representative, District No.

RECEIPT:ed by of Legislative Services on day September , 2017 @ : o'clock a.m. / p.m.

https://outlook.live.com/owa/?path=fmail/search/rp 5/5 1/16/2018 rfid.O. Mail - [email protected] Exhibit #1 of 7 (with more info) 1 .A4 s

( Joseph S. Haas

Tue 1/16/2018 11:40 PM

To [email protected] , df f, r.or a Dick Marple ; Dan Itse ; Smith, Paul ; G&C Exec. Sec. Joanne Ruell ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; G&C #4-b ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

g 1 attachments (152 KB)

HA1-1.pdf;

Attachment: 152 KB

Here's Exhibit #1 of 7.

A copy also going to The G&C ahead of time for when this HA1 passes both the House & Senate for at least one of them there to do the RSA Ch. 4:1 Petition for Removal.

What I think happened was that Charlie Barry, the Grafton County Sheriff posted by the RSA Ch. 529 for the real estate (only 2 postin6withIN the town need by :20) for which I had up to a year to :26 redeem the $7,500 bid price, as compared to only three (3) months redemption if by the RSA Ch. 528 corporate interest, but that not a problem either since with the rents at almost $2,000 a month x 3 months = $6,000 all I needed was $1,500 more to equal the $7,500.

I paid $30,000 on Sept. 14, 1978 for this 3-story building [ old "First National" Grocery Store with 2 stores ("Vintage Fret" guitar store, and Brenda's Clothing Store) 5 apartments and a 3rd floor lodge hall] (10% down of the $3,000) with a 1st bank mortgage with FIRST BANK (in Center Harbor) of $18,000 at 12% back then for commercial rate [ Jimmy Carter "Stagflation" Reagan called it), plus a $9,000 2nd mortgage from the seller.

In 1979 I deeded to the Corporate Cathedral that got started on 7-1-77 (7 January 1977) on Black Mountain / east side of Loon Mountain in Lincoln, N.H. for The Cathedral of the Beechwoods, Inc. - this was at the time of the Kirby J. Hensley, "Universal Life Church" movement out in Modesto, California, of his way of attacking the corruption of the I.R.S. that I found out later he was right to some degree because when Joe Stella came from the IRS office in Portsmouth with his side-kick Frank Lungareli they wanted their cut, but then when Martin J. "Red" Beckman came-to-town (as they say) of actually the entire state running for President of the United States I bought his book to contest the M.83-50-D (for Shane Devine, Chief Justice) case against me at the U.S. District Court in Concord, N.H. that I won on several grounds like: no delegation of authority letter, no O.M.B. # (Office of Management and Budget) and that an apartment building is NOT a business, BUT an investment. My employer in Maine had already paid "Uncle Sam" his cut from my job over there. I used the unemployment for the closing costs. (0 )

Also in 1979 by paternal grandmother died leaving my brothers and me plus my half sister (my father was married before) each over $100,000 each as our inheritance, that I put some of it into the building to not be a "slum lord" but to fix it up with: new sewer line - (the old one froze in the winter with shit backed up into the basement due

https://outlook.live.com/owa/?path=/mail/sentitems/rp 1/2

1/16/2018 Mail - [email protected] to the telephone company cracking the pipe and never fixed), storm windows, the ladder-type fire escape out back from the 3rd floor upgraded to a step-down for the Masons & Rebekahs, upgrades of the apartments, (fuses to circuit breakers) and the old grocery ramp out in the two-car open garage to the back of the store taken out an upgraded from dirt to tar, but I should have done cement, since one tenant's motorcycle kick-stand without a wooded plate to rest it on dug into the tar.

In 1980 I read Rose & Milton Friedman's best-selling book, entitled: "Free to Choose" and Chapter 5 about "Vouchers", plus also saw their award winning TV series by the same name on the PBS-TV. Their summary was: WHY fund everybody in the school system when only the poor "need" the subsidization. A brilliant conclusion by them? Hardly. Just an update to the old of going back to the same info in the Brentwnnci_Schno case in Vol. 55 NH REPORTS 503 @ page 504, in paragraph #2 of 1875, the same year as the Morsel! case of 1875 at the U.S. Supreme Court that I found years later in my Sheriff's Sale case against me. And with Nathan Clifford from Rumney, N.H. one of the U.S. Supreme Court judges.

But back to the Town Tax Sale first was that I had thus over-paid my/our property taxes, but that the bank kept getting letters from the Town and they paid them anyway of that was BEFORE the clauses in all bank mortgages now of to keep the property taxes current even if unlawful (as in the State-Wide Property Tax, re: my case #16-CV- 61 at The Merrimack County Superior Court) and so I paid-off the bank to get-rid of them, and with the dispute, thought that the Town would take me to court, but instead did this Tax Deed crap of calling it title, when it really be as a so-called creditor of only up to an equal half (or Moiety Title) of the estate / RSA Ch. 480:1-9 and 511:2 of little good did that claim be in the court!

So when we of the corporation with our Corporate Attorney Chris(topher) D. Dye of Bradford, Vermont (since retired to Plainfield, N.H.) won the quitclaim deed with stipulation to docket markings (of never to attack the title ever again) from the Town, I kept on seeing these LEGAL NOTICES in the newspapers (once a week for three consecutive weeks) of these Petitions to Quiet Title, and so thought to help out others being screwed too, like Missing Heirs to get them a share of their inheritance. Two land developers built three house on five acres of land in Canaan and THEN found out that the heirs were never notified by the Town Tax Collector for a violation of their procedural due process of law rights, and so I wrote them all to say: contest it yourself, hire an attorney, or deed to me for $1.00 and other valuable consideration, like if four heirs, make me like the 5th heir for a 20% (1/5th) finder's fee. In court somebody had posted the property FOR SALE within a 20-year time frame so no "adverse possession" and then they thought up this Champerty B.S., but that as won in MAss. by Biull Devine, Bounty J Ay Hunter in Boston (re: the BOSTON HERALD of 24Sept. page 17 (o(17 Sept. page 24) of 1989 is how I found out about my equal rights with thanks to Frank and Helen Height (of The Six Flags Park in Campton), my antique store tenants. And the rest they say is history. Bill Devine, the Bounty Hunter of ocean-front property on Nantucket who charged 50% PLUS expenses and on the phone to me one day told me that he spent $114 million in attorney fees to win his case. So why do I have to re-invent the wheel! I thanked him "very" much for the wood lots here and mineral rights like over by The Ruggles Mine. Cr--(7).1 Yours truly, - - Joe Haas 14

P.S. Chris' father, John Sununu, had O'Neill as his legal counsel who appointed him to be a judge. They call him "No Deal "O'Neill" of I guess good on real criminal cases, but from what I encountered of a lousy judge in this CIVIL matter. So yeah, fire him and then hire him back but limit to the criminal cases so that I can lien his salary for the wrong he has done to me. (C) ) RSA Ch. 91-A of supposed to be bonded for faithful performance of duty.

https://outlook.live.com/owa/?path./mail/sentitems/rp 2/2 1/12/2018 [email protected] Detailed info for House Address 1 against Judge O'Neill for violating the Article 29 law of not to suspentiRSA Ch. 528:16+:18 in my case but giving an RSA 528:19 en-TITLE-ment ANYway! f1/2-1 1411-45 14 el

Joseph S. Haas

Fri 1/12/2018 10:23 PM

To: [email protected] ;

Cc:[email protected] ; Vara, James ; [email protected] , [email protected] ; G&C Exec. Sec. Joanne Ruell ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; G&C #4-b ; [email protected] ;

To: "House Judiciary Secretary: Nancy Cossette Phone: 271-3184 Researcher: Jim Cianci Location: LOB 208 Committee Members: Email Committee Members Chairman: Joseph Hagan(r) Bills Currently in Committee V. Chairman: Claire Rouillard(r) Bills Originally Referred to Committee Clerk: Sandra Keans(d) Mailing list of Committee Members • listen to Committee Hearings' Gary Hopper (r) Michael Sylvia (r) Robert Hull (r) Kurt Wuelper (r) Robert Graham (r) Dan Hynes (r) Jason Janvrin (r) John Leavitt (r) Janet Wall (d) Timothy Horrigan (d) Paul Berch (d) Linda Kenison (d) Charlotte DiLorenzo (d) Debra Altschiller (d) Brian Sullivan (d)

htto://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.asox?code=H10

RE: Vol. 40 HOUSE RECORD No. 2 of today: Friday, January 12th, 2018 @ page 7 of 29: " WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17" "JUDICIARY, Room 208, LOB " " 2:00 p.m. HA 1, seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, Ill. Executive session on pending legislation may be held throughout the day, time permitting, from the time the committee is initially convened. "

HAl Title: seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III. Session Year 2018 G-Status: HOUSE Bill Docket House Status: IN COMMITTEE Bill Status Bill TextfHTMLJ fPDF1 Senate Status: Next/Last Comm: HOUSE Judiciary Next/Last Hearing: 01/17/2018 at 02:00 PM LOB Room 208 hftps://outiook.live.com/owa/?path=/mail/sentitems/rp 1/9 1/12/2018 Mail [email protected]

htto://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/ 11

AN ADDRESS seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III.

The house of representatives and senate in general court convened, under part 2, article 73 of the New Hampshire constitution, satisfied that the public good requires that Judge James D. O'Neill, III of the New Hampshire superior court should no longer hold and retain his office and that there is reasonable cause for his removal, respectfully address and request the governor, with the advice and consent of the council, to remove him from office. The cause for removal of Judge James D. O'Neill, III is that he brought his office and the judiciary into disrepute, exceeded his constitutional authority, abused his discretion, and perpetrated a fraud on the people of New Hampshire by violating part I, article 29 of the New Hampshire constitution which states that only the legislature has the power to suspend the laws, and RSA 528:16, 528:18, and 528:19, relating to the levy of executions on real estate.

1.) httns://www.nh.gov/constitution/judicial.html for Article 73 see also RSA Ch. 4:1 at: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.usksa/html/1/4/4-1.htm 2.) https://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html for Article 29 ; 3.) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-LIV.htm for RSA Ch. 528: 16,18 + 19; compare RSA Ch. 529:20 + 26. & htto://caselaw.findlaw.com/nh-supreme-court/1465056.html the "In equity proceedings... " paragraph plus: RSA Ch. 498:5-d at: httn://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LI/498/498-5-d.htm for " Decrees. — " and the " 1996, 76:1, eff. Jan. 1, 1997. " update by State Rep. Roland E. Hemon, of Dover, R.I.P., who was the President of our V.O.C.A.L.S., Inc. back then with 3 State Reps and 17 more of us including Rep. Mike Brewster and myself Victims of a Corrupt American Legal System, Inc.

Dear Members:

I just heard of this scheduling from Rep. Brewster at 4:xx p.m. this afternoon and now see it on-line too, and told him that I would gather the evidence together from the over 289 page APPENDIX in the Case No. 2011-0491 at the N.H. Supreme Court to copy and show in context by presenting you all with one of the two corporate copies of the APPENDIX when I meet with you next Wednesday afternoon.

In the meantime I just flipped-through and put paper clips on certain pages of interest that of for what I do indicate here for both in the B. general and the A. specific, of I'll start with the latter first: :

A.1. Def. App. 000160-167 Bent & Johnsen v. Stevens Heirs, Transcript 88-E-11 on MOTION FOR CONTEMPT, @ page 166: "This case is continued, to be reassigned after August 22. We will have some conclusion to this case, and the other two, at some point in time. But it will not be today. The transcript is being prepared so that your remarks will be there for whoever the judge is the next time." Peter W. Smith (of Littleton), Presiding Justice, since deceased from this Tue., July 1st, 1997 hearing;

A.2 as based upon the WRONG by Judge Rbt. E.K.Morrill BEFORE that as spelled out in my attempt at an Article 32 petition against him AND this Judge O'Neill, plus 2 Court Clerks, (see below for the copy & paste of that), and so going back to Morrill's un-lawful suspension of RSA Ch. 498:5-d too in not furthering this over to for a trial by jury as was marked on The Appearance forms and that Def. App. 000185-186 Decree (see it also at Def. App. 000203-204 and Def. App. 000233-234 ) that was 3 1/3 months AFTER the prohibition! of it was then and still in the now of State Legislator Sandra Keans of Rochester who was on that then House Judiciary Committee on Roland Hemon's HB for this RSA 498:5-d update, of chaired by then Robert "Bob" Lockwood of Canterbury, of R.I.P. to him, of Roland never showed up, and I got 30-minutes to talk to and with the committee to change the "shall" word to a "may", since a party MAY waive their right to a trial by jury, but do not have to! Thus such a violation being against N.H. https://outlook.live.com/owa/?path=/mail/sentitems/rp 2/9 1112/2018 Mail [email protected] Articles 20 + 29, plus the Seventh (7th) Amendment to the United States Constitution, and for that of see also Def. App. 000109 of the Wed., July 10, 1994 MEMO OF LAW, in footnote #2 of 2: "Eckstein v. Downing, 64 NH 248-260 (Merrimack County, December, 1886) @ page 259: 'equity has always existed as a part of the common law in New Hampshire' (with two cases cited): ." / 7th Amendment: " In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, .... https://en.wikipedia.ore/wiki/Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution ; and N.H. Article 20: ".. . trial by jury. This method of procedure shall be held sacred, A.3. The 3-page ORDER of James D. O'Neil, III in 88-E-011 of April 7th, 1992 reads in Def. App./ 000061-63 here that of: "the Grafton County Sheriffs Department" (actually an elected "office") to "take on execution and sell at public action all of the legal AND beneficial interests that the said defendant Joseph S. Haas now holds in the Cathedral of the Beechwoods, Inc." (with emphasis ADDed) See Def. App. 000262 for more info in paragraph #4 about the use of this "Department" word.

Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution ... en.wildpedia.org

The Seventh Amendment (Amendment VII) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. This amendment codifies the right to a jury trial in certain ...

B.1. This A.3. Order is because as indicated in both Def. App. 000072 and 000075 being Doc. No. 57 in 88-E-011 of this was AFTER I was the one and only bidder at the first auction of paying one silver dollar to Deputy Sheriff Tammy Jo Clifford, it was Judge Robert E.K. Morrill who wrote on "10-6-93" for "to levy upon any legal OR beneficial interest" since I had already hypothicated-away such as indicated here (with emphasis ADDed for just one with the "or" word, and NOT that of "both" with the "and" word that did not exist, but went forward with such anyway, and more wrongs as will be mentioned soon. The herein for this instrument as indicated in my OBJECTION in 88-E-011 of Thu., July 29, 1993 in Def. App. 000071 = "see also the copy of the enclosed: 'TRUST & HYPO'thecation indicating that whatever 'beneficial' AND 'legal' interests I had, if any, have been either transferred or pledged away."

B.2 So from B.1 above, Deputy Sheriff Sheryl L. Labee did NOT post per RSA Ch. 528 for personal property (as opposed to real estate by 529) BUT did ONLY go by 529 of to post two of the "NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE" (Def. App. 000076) in the Town Hall (on Highland Street) and at Bob's "Shur Fine Market" (on North Main Street, directly across from the building) as she did indicate on the Nov. 1, 1993 "RETURN OF SERVICE" on Def. App. 000074. The statute on personal property by 528:16 requires more than just the RSA Ch. 529:20 " ... posted at two of the most public places in the town in which the property is situate, thirty days before the sale. " [ htto://www.gencourt.state.nh.usksa/html/LIV/529/529-20.htm ] to that of 528:16 =" ... and shall be posted at one or more public places in the town where the sale is to be, and in two adjoining towns, thirty days before the sale. " at: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LIV/528/528-16.htm to TRY to get MORE bidders and so for MORE $money of maybe to Article 14 "complete"ly satisfy the $40,789.37 unlawful (against free commercial speech, of NOT "Champerty) judgment derived at by the "arbitrary"! See A.3 above for in Def. App. 000063. The actual receipts of "RECEIVED OCT 28 1993" and marked: "Exhibit B" at both Def. App. 000218 and 000245; and likewise my Monday, https://outloolclive.com/owanpath=/mail/sentitems/rp 3/9 1/12/2018 Mail - [email protected] April 18th, 1994, A.D. "MOTION FOR DISCOVERY" of for both: (a) " the R.S.A. Chapter 382-A:2-201 'Memorandum of Sale' " and (b) proof of any comply"ance with RSA Ch. 528 of the section :16 two additional posters "in two adjoining towns", that of which motion can be found on both Def. App. 000220 and 000247.

Sorry for not keeping the A+ B separate, but this a work-in-progress of I tried to separate the general from the specific in detail to just get down to brass tacks, as they say, of next I guess to:

A.4. The 7-page ODER of Judge James D. O'Neill, Ill of "3/14/96" in 94-E-035 of Brian J. Shedd, the bidder v. Haas and • • Corporate Cathedral in Def. App. 000176-182 where at 178 bottom line: "the Court VACATES its prior finding that Plaintiff purchased the real property."

A.5 So back to A.1 above of the Judge Smith transcript of hearing and at Def. App. 000166 to be exact for on line #5 of the "two checks" mentioned but not that of the dollar amounts of: (1) the $5,000 check cut from The 'Primary Bank" on the Heights in Concord [ now "People's United" there] and (2) the $2,000 check from The "Pemigewasset National Bank" in Plymouth, and (3) the "$500 in cash" being the five one ($100) hundred dollar bills, all of which were tendered to Attorney Bill Hopkins of Plymouth, in his 2nd floor office by me back then for the RSA Ch. 528:26 as annotated redemption [ htto://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LIV/529/529-26.htm since the pressure was on me to pay rent! to the bidder or be evicted! and so the tender of for such since there were no RSA Ch. 528:16 posters, nor were there any 528:18 service by Deputy Sheriff upon the corporate clerk, Richard D. "Dick" Townsend, in Barrington, in Strafford County [ R.I.P. / widow Sylvia, the Clerk now] [ http://www.gencourt.state.nh.usksa/html/LIV/528/528-18.htm ] but any-way of none of these of it was Judge O'Neill who did threaten me in court that if I did not then and there sign these two checks, to in-effect be STOLEN that I would be thrown into jail! And so like what Samual Adams, one of our "Founding Fathers" said, (and my Mother too to some degree of that the pen is supposed to be mightier than the sword, of I had learned my lesson of to be beaten down, but still fight for my rights of thus NOT to pre-vent, BUT to get that what be stolen re-turned and with damages) that of: " "If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." https://www.goodreads.comiquotes/287o3s-if-vou-love-wealth-greater-than-liberty-the-tranquilitv-of

Quote by Samuel Adams: "If you love wealth greater than ... www.goodreads.com

Samuel Adams —'If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in ...

Thus there you have it, of what was stolen from me was NOT only this $7,500, BUT also my landlord right to collect the rents (of about $2,000 a month) from tenants at this building of corporate owned, and so my incorporate-r https://outlook.live.com/owa/?pathgmail/sentitems/rp 4/9 1/12/2018 Mail [email protected] interest therein as one of the five incorporate-r-s in Lincoln, N.H. on 7-1-77 [January 7, 1977] my seat on the Bthard of Directoes, and as one of the officers/ my Ashland phone # was 603-968-7177, PLUS that of having my liberty TAKEN / stolen away from me too as I've indicated below. So to PLEASE proceed to what? have a finding here in the House and THEN the Senate? I thought it is supposed to be by an Article 73 joint meeting of an " address of both houses of the legislature " of what? after each Judiciary Committee does advice their body to act upon it? of then to go joint? This is NOT a bill. It was supposed to be an Article 32 Petition, but has been water-ed down to a mere "request" that what? one of the Executive Councilors does present an RSA Ch. 4:1 petition to the G&C? for his removal? and then what? to re-hire, so that I can lien his salary for a part of the damages? since his Article 36 retirement is an Un- Touchable.

Here are some more pages of interest:

C.1 Constructive Fraud: the place was supposedly sold for less than a nickel (5-cents) on the dollar / 5%! See CLAIM TO VACATE THE SALE 88-E-011 of Tue., June 23, 1994 and the "MEMORANDUM OF LAW" at Def. App. 000078-79, and repeated on pages 000111-112 and 000154-155 plus: 000174-175. Plus see also for the 1995 N.H. case of Mortgage Co. v. Green of when fraud was found at the 38.5% amount; compared to when Federal Judge Yakos in the James Belt of Alstead, N.H. case of his property returned to him by the Tax Collector's sale of 25% of value, and when I visited the Federal Archives for his case on Trapello Road in Waltham, MAss. found that Texas Sheriff Sale case therein of the I think it was 32.5 % of almost 1/3rd of it a finding of fraud.

C.2 Not only this judge, but that other Judge Richard E. Galway, Jr. for in-the-KNOW too of who did KNOW that what they were doing was WRONG! and that as spelliied out in my "MOTION TO RECONSIDER" of Fri., Oct. 4th, 1996 on Def. App. 000141 (see it repeated on page 000150) they both KNEW that not only were they in violation of Article 29 of to suspend the RSA Ch. 528:16+18 but allow the bidder to collect the RSA Ch. 528:19 rents ANYway http://www.gencourt.state.nh.usksa/html/LIV/528/528-19.htm " 528:19 Purchaser's Rights. — The purchaser shall thereupon (then of AFTER the doings of :16 + :18) be entitled [ en-TITLE-d ] to such shares or interest, and the income or dividends which have become due thereon since the attachment, and to such certificates as are the usual evidence of the shares or interest of a proprietor in the corporation." ] of in both their minds" "two wrongs make a right", but since Galway is retired of thus it only against O'Neill.

Yours truly, Joseph S. Haas, P. 0. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 413: 438-3820 (cell phone), e- mail: JosephSHaas at Hotmail dot com

footnotes:

1.) See below for a Decree Pro Confess (re: Nihil Dicit too) and the ANSWER by Corp. Clerk Townsend in 94-E-035 of Wed., June 29th, 1994 at Def. App. 000173, and; 2.) The "MORE MEMO OF LAW" in 94-E-035 by me in Def. App. 000201 = " ' ... a pro confesso... decree cannot be taken while an answer remains on file.' City of Biloxi v. Lowery, 179 Miss. 364, 175 So. 200." (May 24, 1917). ; 3.) The Galway ORDER in 94-E-035 of 4/11/96 at Def. App. 000194 of: "... A DAMAGE HEARING MAY BE SCHEDULED AT ANY TIME BY THE PLAINTIFF WITH NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANTS." of notice how he deviated away from the Douglas case [ htto://caselaw.findlaw.com/nh-supreme-court/1465056.html ] "In equity proceedings... " paragraph for THE Damage Hearing called for by ANY party! not LIMIT-ed as it was in my case by Galway! 4.) INDEX 94-E-035 Document #54. "01/023/96 - Haas' Claim for Theft of Homestead" in Def. App. 000179; see also what I did write about this on Tue., January 12th, 1999 @ _:_ p.m. exactly 19 years ago to the day! "[after Rep. Liz Hager's homestead speech in Representatives Hall, supposedly based upon Mary Brown's NH Senate Bill # .] " to copy this at 100% to staple to my signed copy of this computer printout. And to give to A.G. Gordon MacDonald to PLEASE present it to The Donald when you meet with him at The National Attorneys General Meeting this month on what we/ with your Chief of Staff James Vera and I talked about of the Marco Rubio Florida Homestead statute to nationalize like in the Morsel! case of 1875: "Morsell v. First National Bank. (full text) :: 91 U.S. 357 (1875) " at: https://supreme.iustia.com/cases/federal/us/91/357/case.html " The lien arose from the power to issue a https://outlook.live.com/owa/?path=/mail/sentitems/rp 5/9 1/12/2018 Mail [email protected] writ of elegit. ", for only a Moiety Title [ https://en.wikipedia.orewiki/Moiety title ] with one of the U.S. Supreme Court judges back then of Nathan Clifford [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan Clifford ] from Rumney, N.H.

Nathan Clifford - Wikipedia enmildpedia.org

Nathan Clifford (August 18, 1803 — July 25, 1881) was an American statesman, diplomat and jurist, whose career culminated in a lengthy period of service as an ...

correction to petition: of it Bill O'Brien, not Bill Burns, (below) my old-timer friend from Amherst, N.H. , R.I.P.

From: Joseph S. Haas Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 12:21 PM To: Dick Marple Subject: Petition of Joseph S. Haas:

Petition of Joseph S. Haas: paonpoim se fug HA 1 - AS INTRODUCED

2018 SESSION 18-2286 04/01

HOUSE ADDRESS ./

AN ADDRESS seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill III.

SPONSORS: Rep. Brewster, Merr. 21

COMMITTEE: Judiciary

ANALYSIS

This house address seeks the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III.

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics. Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.] Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

HA 1 - AS INTRODUCED 18-2286 04/01

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Eighteen

AN ADDRESS seeking the removal from office of superior court judge James D. O'Neill, III.

1 The house of representatives and senate in general court convened, under part 2, article 73 of 2 the New Hampshire constitution, satisfied that the public good requires that Judge James D. 3 O'Neill, III of the New Hampshire superior court should no longer hold and retain his office and 4 that there is reasonable cause for his removal, respectfully address and request the governor, with 5 the advice and consent of the council, to remove him from office. The cause for removal of Judge 6 James D. O'Neill, III is that he brought his office and the judiciary into disrepute, exceeded his 7 constitutional authority, abused his discretion, and perpetrated a fraud on the people of New 8 Hampshire by violating part I, article 29 of the New Hampshire constitution which states that only 9 the legislature has the power to suspend the laws, and RSA 528:16, 528:18, and 528:19, relating to 10 the levy of executions on real estate.