A Practical Approach to Javascript Testing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Practical Approach to Javascript Testing Huy Trinh A Practical Approach to JavaScript Testing Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Bachelor of Engineering Information Technology Bachelor’s Thesis 16 November 2020 Abstract Author Huy Trinh Title A practical approach to JavaScript testing Number of Pages 48 pages Date 16 November 2020 Degree Bachelor of Engineering Degree Programme Information Technology Professional Major Mobile Solutions Instructors Kari Aaltonen, Principal Lecturer The purpose of this final year project is to analyze some most common types of testing in JavaScript application, namely Acceptance, System, Integration, and Unit testing. The use- cases and evaluation of each testing level in terms of benefits and costs are also ad- dressed. In addition, different JavaScript testing frameworks are studied with great atten- tion since it has an important effect on application testing. The use-case of this thesis is a React web application that is implemented in nearly all types of testing described in the thesis. These tests contributed greatly to the project since they allow developers to implement new features without breaking another. Furthermore, the project setup for testing and important test cases are also made available as an open- source for study purpose which can be found at https://github.com/HuyAms/testify In conclusion, this thesis demonstrates various types of JavaScript application testing and encourages developers to implement them on the software system to confidently deliver professional code and ensure the application is bug-free. Keywords JavaScript Testing, Testing Frameworks, Jest, Mocha, Jas- mine, React Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Theoretical background 3 2.1 Software quality 3 2.2 Role of testing 4 2.3 Software development and testing lifecycle 5 2.3.1 Waterfall methodology 6 2.3.2 Agile methodology 8 2.3.3 Traditional vs Agile Testing 10 3 Testing levels 12 3.1 Code Validation 13 3.2 Unit testing 14 3.3 Integration testing 15 3.4 System testing 16 3.5 Acceptance testing 18 4 JavaScript testing framework 19 4.1 Zero-config testing framework Jest 20 4.2 Fully-customizable testing framework Mocha 21 4.3 Behaviour-driven development testing framework Jasmine 21 5 Case study 23 5.1 Project summary 23 5.2 Project challenges 24 5.3 Technical solutions 25 5.4 Implementation 26 5.4.1 Testing tools 26 5.4.2 Static testing implementation 29 5.4.3 Unit testing implementation 34 5.4.4 Integration testing implementation 39 5.4.5 CI configuration 41 5.4.6 Acceptance testing implementation 42 5.5 Evaluation 42 6 Conclusion 44 References 45 List of Abbreviations API Application Programming Interface BDD Behavior Driven Development CD Continuous Development CI Continuous Integration DOM Document Object Model IDE Integrated development environment MVP Minimum Viable Product SDLC Software Development Lifecycle TDD Test Driven Development TMM Test maturity model TPI Test process improvement 1 1 Introduction The number of websites has increased significantly since the last decades. There were more than 1.94 billion websites on the world wide web in January 2019 (Lindsay 2019). In addition, numerous desktop applications have been shifted to web applications to cut down development, maintenance and distribution costs which are very high, especially when it comes to multiplatform applications. This trend leads to an increase in the num- ber of web applications over the last few years (Paul 2002.) See figure 1 below. Figure 1. Trend of programming language over the past 4 years (Coding Infinite, 2019) JavaScript is the most important language used for building a website in today’s Web 2.0 world. As illustrated in figure 1, it can be seen that the total usage of JavaScript increased dramatically for the past 5 years, from 2015 to 2019 (Coding Infinite, 2019.) JavaScript is by far the most popular programming language and this is because of the growth of JavaScript frameworks recently such as NodeJS. However, there is a lack of testing in various real-world JavaScript projects which makes a project unreliable to use and difficult to scale. Thus, this thesis focuses on addressing the problem by providing the basic knowledge of JavaScript testing. 2 Building a website with JavaScript remains a challenging task, especially when the web- site is scaled frequently. There are various factors that make website development a demanding task. The biggest challenge of web development is to support various brows- ers with different versions. JavaScript code that runs correctly on Safari may break on Internet Explorer (IE), Google Chrome or Firefox browsers (Hazem Saleh, 2013.) Sec- ondly, developers normally have to produce a low-cost software in a short time while ensuring the software quality. This is because software quality has a huge impact on many factors of our daily lives from personal security, health, safety to national economy (Kshirasagar et al, 2018.) This thesis aims to demonstrate some common levels of JavaScript testing such as Ac- ceptance testing System testing, Integration testing, and Unit Testing. Moreover, these testing levels are analyzed in terms of its costs and benefit. Three most popular testing frameworks are also studied in this thesis. The case study of this thesis is a web application built with ReactJS used by a company providing a sustainable heat exchanger solution. The main objective of the project is to design and implement a product configuration and quoting tool for sales and engineers which enables error-free quoting with a minimal amount of manual steps. The main focus of the developer is to build a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) web application that con- nects to the existing configuration tool. It is worth noting that this application is built based on the company’s specific needs, therefore, there is no existing web-app solution like this before. This configuration tool requires a high level of accuracy for building a physical product, therefore, the application must work correctly as expected. As a result, testing plays an important role in this project as it helps the company to manufacture the product with great confidence. The ultimate goal is to apply the theory to this real-world project, to investigate and understand which important features of the application should be cov- ered by tests since it would be expensive and unrealistic to test all the features. In addi- tion, setting up testing in a JavaScript web-application will also be studied in detail. 3 2 Theoretical background This chapter provides the definition of software quality and also emphasizes the im- portance of testing in software development. Four types of testing including Unit, Integre- ation, System and Acceptance testing are also addressed in depth. 2.1 Software quality There are various answers to “What is software quality?” since it is a complex concept which depends highly on the context. According to David Garvin who published the arti- cle “What Does Product Quality Really Mean?” in 1984, software quality is defined into four major domains. These domains are economics which focuses on making profits, philosophy focusing on definitions, marketing focusing on customer satisfaction, and management which focuses on the specification and the process of creating a product (Cortney, 2014.) There are Transcendental, User, Manufacturing, Product, and Valued- Based perspective which are described as follows: - Transcendental View: This defines quality as something which can be recognized but really hard to define. In this view, the quality of the product is judged based on subjective opinion and the ability to determine that can only be developed from experience. - User View: According to this approach, user satisfaction is used to measure the quality of a product or service. The essential question to ask when using this approach to eval- uate the product quality is “Does the product satisfy user expectations or preference?” - Product View: This is also known as the product-based approach in which the quality is understood as the inner qualities of a product. To give a better understanding of this perspective, Garvin defined eight specs to measure a product quality including conform- ance, durability, aesthetics, performance, features, reliability, serviceability, and per- ceived quality. It is worth noting that the dimensions depend on the product inherent characteristics. - Manufacturing View: Under this perspective, the conformance to the product specifi- cation decides the quality of a product rather than personal preferences. Thus, any dif- ferences from the pre-defined specification of a product reduce the product quality. 4 - Value-based View: Quality, from this view, depends on how much it costs to manufac- ture a product and how much a user is willing to pay for this product. The quality of a product is determined in terms of its costs and benefits. Therefore, a product with high quality is not the one performing the best (Paul et al, 2014.) The concept of software quality in terms of measurable scores was first well studied in the mid-1970s. There are two types of quality known as quality criteria and a quality factor which were first well studied by McCall, Richards, and Walters. Quality criteria represent quality factors that are related to software development. Modularity could be seen as a great example. Modularity is a part of software architecture which allows de- velopers to put various small components into one module system. Therefore, it helps improve the maintainability of the software product. On the other hand, a quality factor refers more to system behavior. There are various factors which can be considered to be under this type of quality, for example, reliability, efficiency, testability, and reusability (Kshirasagar et al, 2018.) To give a better understanding of the quality factor, an example of reliability could be addressed. In general, a software system with high reliability must do what they are supposed to do and it must perform the tasks without any problems.
Recommended publications
  • Rekstrarhandbók
    Vorönn 2017 T-404-LOKA, Lokaverkefni Rekstrarhandbók Ingþór Birkir Árnason Jan Hinrik Hansen Logi Guðmann Þorgrímur Jónasarson Kennari: Hallgrímur Arnalds Leiðbeinandi: Sigurjón Ingi Garðarsson Prófdómari: Símon Óttar Vésteinsson 12. maí 2017 Efnisyfirlit 1 Framendi 3 1.1 Dependencies 3 1.2 Uppsetning 3 1.3 Keyrsla 3 1.4 ESLint 4 1.5 Stílar 5 1.5.1 BEM - Block Element Modifier 5 1.5.2 StyleLint 5 1.5.3 Gulp task 5 2 Bakendi 6 2.1 Dependencies 6 2.2 Uppsetning 6 2.3 Handhægar upplýsingar 8 2.3.1 Admin aðgangur 8 2.3.2 Postman 8 2.4 PHPUnit 8 2.5 Documentation 9 3 Forritunarreglur 9 3.1 Almennar reglur 9 3.2 VueJS 9 3.3 CSS 10 3.4 PHP - Laravel 11 2 1 Framendi Framendinn er skrifaður í Vue.js með vue-webpack-boilerplate (https://github.com/vuejs-templates/webpack) sem grunn. ​ ​ 1.1 Dependencies Til þess að geta keyrt framendann er nauðsynlegt að hafa node og node package manager (npm). Hægt er að sækja node.js ásamt npm á Node.js heimasíðunni (https://nodejs.org/en/). ​ ​ 1.2 Uppsetning 1.) Sækja git repository-ið. git clone https://github.com/toggi737/Lokaverkefni_vue.git 2.) Setja upp nauðsynleg dependencies í gegnum npm. npm install 3.) Búa til dev.env.js skrá sem að inniheldur stillingar fyrir þína vél. Nauðsynlegt er að búa til dev.env.js skrá undir config möppunni sem að inniheldur upplýsingar um þann API sem að þú vilt nota. Það er hægt að gera með því að keyra cp dev.env.js.example dev.env.js í config möppunni.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning React Functional Web Development with React and Redux
    Learning React Functional Web Development with React and Redux Alex Banks and Eve Porcello Beijing Boston Farnham Sebastopol Tokyo Learning React by Alex Banks and Eve Porcello Copyright © 2017 Alex Banks and Eve Porcello. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Published by O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472. O’Reilly books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use. Online editions are also available for most titles (http://oreilly.com/safari). For more information, contact our corporate/insti‐ tutional sales department: 800-998-9938 or [email protected]. Editor: Allyson MacDonald Indexer: WordCo Indexing Services Production Editor: Melanie Yarbrough Interior Designer: David Futato Copyeditor: Colleen Toporek Cover Designer: Karen Montgomery Proofreader: Rachel Head Illustrator: Rebecca Demarest May 2017: First Edition Revision History for the First Edition 2017-04-26: First Release See http://oreilly.com/catalog/errata.csp?isbn=9781491954621 for release details. The O’Reilly logo is a registered trademark of O’Reilly Media, Inc. Learning React, the cover image, and related trade dress are trademarks of O’Reilly Media, Inc. While the publisher and the authors have used good faith efforts to ensure that the information and instructions contained in this work are accurate, the publisher and the authors disclaim all responsibility for errors or omissions, including without limitation responsibility for damages resulting from the use of or reliance on this work. Use of the information and instructions contained in this work is at your own risk. If any code samples or other technology this work contains or describes is subject to open source licenses or the intellectual property rights of others, it is your responsibility to ensure that your use thereof complies with such licenses and/or rights.
    [Show full text]
  • React.Pdf Email: [email protected] Twitter: @Mark Volkmann Github: Mvolkmann Website
    Say “No” to Complexity! Mark Volkmann, Object Computing, Inc. http://ociweb.com/mark/MidwestJS/react.pdf Email: [email protected] Twitter: @mark_volkmann https://github.com/mvolkmann/react-examples GitHub: mvolkmann Website: http://ociweb.com/mark Copyright © 2015-2016 by Object Computing, Inc. (OCI) All rights reserved Intro. Meaning behind the talk title - 2 kinds of complexity other frameworks state management approaches: thunks, sagas, epics, effects, GraphQL, Relay, Falcor, ... Why are the slides so dense? Copyright © 2015-2016 by Object Computing, Inc. (OCI) React All rights reserved 2 What is OCI? Software development (on-site and off-site), consulting, and training Home of Grails, “An Open Source high-productivity framework for building fast and scalable web applications” Open Source Transformation Services helping clients move from commercial to open source software Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) DevOps Copyright © 2015-2016 by Object Computing, Inc. (OCI) React All rights reserved 3 Overview ... Web app library from Facebook As of 8/6/16, React was reportedly used by Airbnb, Angie’s List, http://facebook.github.io/react/ Atlasssian, BBC, Capitol One, Clash of Focuses on view portion Clans, Codecademy, Coursera, Docker, Dropbox, Expedia, Facebook, Feedly, not full stack like other frameworks such as AngularJS and EmberJS Flipboard, HipChat, IMDb, Instagram, Intuit, Khan Academy, Lyft, New York use other libraries for non-view functionality Times, NFL, NHL, Netflix, Paypal, some are listed later Periscope, Reddit, Salesforce, Squarespace, Tesla Motors, Twitter, “One-way reactive data flow” Uber, Visa, WhatsApp, Wired, Wolfrum UI reacts to “state” changes Alpha, Wordpress, Yahoo, Zendesk, and many more. not two-way data binding like in AngularJS 1 Source: https://github.com/facebook/ what triggered a digest cycle? react/wiki/Sites-Using-React should I manually trigger it? easier to follow flow of data events -> state changes -> component rendering Copyright © 2015-2016 by Object Computing, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Npm Packages As Ingredients: a Recipe-Based Approach
    npm Packages as Ingredients: a Recipe-based Approach Kyriakos C. Chatzidimitriou, Michail D. Papamichail, Themistoklis Diamantopoulos, Napoleon-Christos Oikonomou, and Andreas L. Symeonidis Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept., Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece fkyrcha, mpapamic, thdiaman, [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: Dependency Networks, Software Reuse, JavaScript, npm, node. Abstract: The sharing and growth of open source software packages in the npm JavaScript (JS) ecosystem has been exponential, not only in numbers but also in terms of interconnectivity, to the extend that often the size of de- pendencies has become more than the size of the written code. This reuse-oriented paradigm, often attributed to the lack of a standard library in node and/or in the micropackaging culture of the ecosystem, yields interest- ing insights on the way developers build their packages. In this work we view the dependency network of the npm ecosystem from a “culinary” perspective. We assume that dependencies are the ingredients in a recipe, which corresponds to the produced software package. We employ network analysis and information retrieval techniques in order to capture the dependencies that tend to co-occur in the development of npm packages and identify the communities that have been evolved as the main drivers for npm’s exponential growth. 1 INTRODUCTION Given that dependencies and reusability have be- come very important in today’s software develop- The popularity of JS is constantly increasing, and ment process, npm registry has become a “must” along is increasing the popularity of frameworks for place for developers to share packages, defining code building server (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Means Nested Providers from the Real Client. for Example P->[email protected] Means That P2 Is the P’S Provider and P Is the Real Client’S Provider
    real client = the client package that we executed the release’s test. -> means nested providers from the real client. For example p->[email protected] means that p2 is the p’s provider and p is the real client’s provider. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) [email protected] changed a key in its code, that did not introduce an error, but it became incompatible with babel-eslint. The escope is not a babel-eslint’s provider. This error was fixed by [email protected], when its providers claimed that it should be fixed in babel-eslint. ● Issue in babel-eslint ● Issue in escope ● Pull-request in babel-eslint ● Fixed by provider babel-eslint, which is the provider of the real client. ● Category: incompatible providers version. 2) the real client has grunt-jslint->jslint@>=0.3.4 as its providers. The [email protected] started to use ES6 and moved all of ES5’s code to another file. The [email protected] did a downgrade in the jslint’s version. Specifically, the grunt-jslint uses the array JSLINT.error, which was moved to another file. jslint is a provider of grunt-jslint, and grunt-jslint is a provider of real client. ● Downgrade of jslint ● [email protected] diff ● [email protected] changelog ● Fixed by provider as client grunt-jslint, which is the client of jslint. ● Category: Feature change. 3) the real client has the [email protected] as its provider. The babel-preset-es2015-rollup has the babel-preset-es2015 as its provider, that is introducing an error.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Reproducbility of NPM Packages
    Investigating the Reproducbility of NPM packages Pronnoy Goswami Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Engineering Haibo Zeng, Chair Na Meng Paul E. Plassmann May 6, 2020 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Empirical, JavaScript, NPM packages, Reproducibility, Software Security, Software Engineering Copyright 2020, Pronnoy Goswami Investigating the Reproducbility of NPM packages Pronnoy Goswami (ABSTRACT) The meteoric increase in the popularity of JavaScript and a large developer community has led to the emergence of a large ecosystem of third-party packages available via the Node Package Manager (NPM) repository which contains over one million published packages and witnesses a billion daily downloads. Most of the developers download these pre-compiled published packages from the NPM repository instead of building these packages from the available source code. Unfortunately, recent articles have revealed repackaging attacks to the NPM packages. To achieve such attacks the attackers primarily follow three steps – (1) download the source code of a highly depended upon NPM package, (2) inject mali- cious code, and (3) then publish the modified packages as either misnamed package (i.e., typo-squatting attack) or as the official package on the NPM repository using compromised maintainer credentials. These attacks highlight the need to verify the reproducibility of NPM packages. Reproducible Build is a concept that allows the verification of build artifacts for pre-compiled packages by re-building the packages using the same build environment config- uration documented by the package maintainers. This motivates us to conduct an empirical study (1) to examine the reproducibility of NPM packages, (2) to assess the influence of any non-reproducible packages, and (3) to explore the reasons for non-reproducibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Building-Frontend-Pipeline Short
    Building a Frontend Pipeline Nathaniel T. Schutta @ntschutta Ah JavaScript! It used to be so simple right? 1,500 line main.js. Our apps aren’t like that anymore though are they? JavaScript is a first class citizen now. Modern applications are many thousands of lines of JavaScript. We incorporate many libraries and frameworks. https://mobile.twitter.com/joeerl/status/930774515512201216 NPM all the things. JavaScript itself is evolving. Browsers are still an issue… The struggle is real. What do we do about it? Why do we need a pipeline at all? Not your older sister’s web apps. No longer a few thousands lines of JavaScript and jQuery. Adhoc approach can’t keep up with the complexity of modern JS apps. Apply the level of discipline to the frontend that we use on the backend. Linters to ensure our code doesn’t fall prey to common errors. Unit tests to ensure our changes didn’t break anything. Bundlers to minimize asynchronous requests to our servers. Transpilers so we can leverage ES6 in older browsers. Task runers to help tie it all together. JavaScript usage has exploded. Number one language on GitHub? Yep. Not a new phenomena either. We cannot afford to treat JavaScript as a one off. The same engineering discipline we use on “server side” code must apply. Of course for many of us, JavaScript *is* our server side language too! More than a few options. Try and clear some of that up today. Linters. Certain mistakes can be caught automatically. Static code analysis. Find bad patterns. Check style adherence.
    [Show full text]
  • To Complexity!
    Say “No” to Complexity! Mark Volkmann, Object Computing, Inc. Email: [email protected] Twitter: @mark_volkmann GitHub: mvolkmann Website: http://ociweb.com/mark https://github.com/mvolkmann/react-examples Copyright © 2015-2016 by Object Computing, Inc. (OCI) All rights reserved What is OCI? New home of Grails, “An Open Source high-productivity framework for building fast and scalable web applications” Open Source Transformation Services, IIoT, DevOps offsite development, consulting, training handouts available (includes Grails sticker) Copyright © 2015-2016 by Object Computing, Inc. (OCI) React All rights reserved 2 Overview ... Web app library from Facebook As of 1/2/16, React was reportedly used by Airbnb, Atlasssian, Capitol http://facebook.github.io/react/ One, Codecademy, Coursera, Dropbox, Focuses on view portion Expedia, Facebook, Firefox, Flipboard, HipChat, IMDb, Instagram, not full stack like other frameworks such as AngularJS and EmberJS Intuit, Khan Academy, NHL, Netflix, use other libraries for non-view functionality Paypal, Reddit, Salesforce, Squarespace, Tesla Motors, New York Times, Twitter, some are listed later Uber, WhatsApp, Wired, Wordpress, “One-way reactive data flow” Yahoo, Zendesk, and many more. Source: https://github.com/facebook/ UI reacts to “state” changes react/wiki/Sites-Using-React not two-way data binding like in AngularJS 1 Facebook uses React more than what triggered a digest cycle? Google uses Angular. should I manually trigger it? easier to follow flow of data from events to state changes to component rendering Copyright © 2015-2016 by Object Computing, Inc. (OCI) React All rights reserved 3 ... Overview Can use in existing web apps that use other frameworks start at leaf nodes of UI and gradually work up, replacing existing UI with React components Defines components that are composable whole app can be one component that is built on others Components get data to render from “state” and/or “props” Can render in browser, on server, or both ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Hat Build of Node.Js 14 Node.Js Runtime Guide
    Red Hat build of Node.js 14 Node.js Runtime Guide Use Node.js 14 to develop scalable network applications that run on OpenShift and on stand-alone RHEL Last Updated: 2021-05-27 Red Hat build of Node.js 14 Node.js Runtime Guide Use Node.js 14 to develop scalable network applications that run on OpenShift and on stand-alone RHEL Legal Notice Copyright © 2021 Red Hat, Inc. The text of and illustrations in this document are licensed by Red Hat under a Creative Commons Attribution–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license ("CC-BY-SA"). An explanation of CC-BY-SA is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ . In accordance with CC-BY-SA, if you distribute this document or an adaptation of it, you must provide the URL for the original version. Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Red Hat, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the Shadowman logo, the Red Hat logo, JBoss, OpenShift, Fedora, the Infinity logo, and RHCE are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux ® is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries. Java ® is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates. XFS ® is a trademark of Silicon Graphics International Corp. or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. MySQL ® is a registered trademark of MySQL AB in the United States, the European Union and other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Packer: an Opinionated Framework for Using 'Javascript'
    Package ‘packer’ August 14, 2021 Title An Opinionated Framework for Using 'JavaScript' Date 2021-08-14 Version 0.1.1 Description Enforces good practice and provides convenience functions to make work with 'JavaScript' not just easier but also scalable. It is a robust wrapper to 'NPM', 'yarn', and 'webpack' that enables to compartmentalize 'JavaScript' code, leverage 'NPM' and 'yarn' packages, include 'TypeScript', 'React', or 'Vue' in web applications, and much more. License MIT + file LICENSE Encoding UTF-8 RoxygenNote 7.1.1 Imports fs, usethis, jsonlite, htmlwidgets, cli, assertthat, rprojroot, rstudioapi URL https://github.com/JohnCoene/packer, https://packer.john-coene.com BugReports https://github.com/JohnCoene/packer/issues Suggests testthat, covr, golem NeedsCompilation no Author John Coene [aut, cre] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6637-4107>) Maintainer John Coene <[email protected]> Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2021-08-14 12:40:02 UTC R topics documented: add_plugin_clean . .3 add_plugin_eslint . .3 add_plugin_html . .4 add_plugin_prettier . .4 add_plugin_workbox . .4 apply_react . .5 1 2 R topics documented: apply_vue . .5 are_minified . .6 bundle . .6 checks . .7 engine . .7 engine_console . .8 jsdoc . .8 make_library . .9 mockup . .9 npm_console . 10 npm_fix . 10 npm_install . 10 npm_outdated . 11 npm_run . 11 npm_update . 11 put_precommit_hook . 12 put_recommended . 12 put_rprofile_adapt . 12 scaffold_ambiorix . 13 scaffold_extension . 14 scaffold_golem . 15 scaffold_input . 16 scaffold_leprechaun . 17 scaffold_output . 17
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Node.Js Secrets & Tips for Professionals
    Node.js CompleteComplete Tips & Secrets for Professionals Node.js Tips & Secrets for Professionals 200+ pages of professional hints and tricks Disclaimer This is an unocial free book created for educational purposes and is GoalKicker.com not aliated with ocial Node.js group(s) or company(s). Free Programming Books All trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners Contents About ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Getting started with Node.js ............................................................................................................ 2 Section 1.1: Hello World HTTP server ........................................................................................................................... 3 Section 1.2: Hello World command line ....................................................................................................................... 4 Section 1.3: Hello World with Express .......................................................................................................................... 5 Section 1.4: Installing and Running Node.js ................................................................................................................. 6 Section 1.5: Debugging Your NodeJS Application ...................................................................................................... 6 Section 1.6:
    [Show full text]
  • Webpack React Eject Rescripts
    Webpack React Eject Rescripts Rummy Gino sometimes concertina his meritocracies publicly and paste so disadvantageously! Furthermost and Linnean Ignacius demobilized while Burman Hartwell spile her illumination metonymically and sliver crossways. Zachary fine designedly. Facebook documentation on the property is here. Much like the programming language Ruby, Python was designed to be easily read by programmers. You have to add it to your tailwind config. The script will also run npm install inside the project directory, which will download any additional dependencies. Do firebase encrypt the data on transit as well as. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. Now you have learned how to build an NW. Different minds, different talents. Join the conversation Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Tailwind CSS reset and utility classes, and your custom CSS below. Snapshot testing is a feature of Jest that automatically generates text snapshots of your components and saves them on the disk so if the UI output changes, you get notified without manually writing any assertions on the component output. What about Babel or Webpack configurations? Then you can use both variations. Likewise, you can use Angular, Vue, React, or any other frontend framework for your desktop application. In the real world, we usually have to modify default webpack config for custom needs such as themes. CRA team to hide the config from whe user. See the section about running tests for more information. We should be teaching our kids how to code. Webpack dev server to proxy requests intended for our API server.
    [Show full text]