REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES
RFP No. PS20210234
Issue Date: March 31, 2021
Issued by: City of Vancouver (the “City”)
{00153432v27}
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART A – INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS ...... 1 1.0 THE RFP ...... 1 2.0 KEY DATES ...... 2 3.0 CONTACT PERSON ...... 2 4.0 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS ...... 3 5.0 CHANGES TO THE RFP AND FURTHER INFORMATION ...... 4 6.0 PROPOSED TERM OF ENGAGEMENT ...... 4 7.0 PRICING ...... 4 8.0 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS ...... 4 9.0 CITY POLICIES ...... 6 10.0 CERTAIN APPLICABLE LEGISLATION ...... 6 11.0 LEGAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ...... 6
PART B – SCOPE OF WORK...... 1
PART C – FORM OF PROPOSAL ...... 1 APPENDIX 1 LEGAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RFP ...... 3 APPENDIX 2 QUESTIONNAIRE ...... 9 APPENDIX 3 COMMERCIAL PROPOSAL ...... 17 APPENDIX 4 PROPONENT’S REFERENCES ...... 18 APPENDIX 5 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ...... 20 APPENDIX 6 DECLARATION OF SUPPLIER CODE OF CONDUCT COMPLIANCE ...... 21 APPENDIX 7 PERSONAL INFORMATION CONSENT FORM(S) ...... 22 APPENDIX 8 SUBCONTRACTORS ...... 23 APPENDIX 9 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO FORM OF AGREEMENT ...... 25 APPENDIX 10 CONFLICTS; COLLUSION; LOBBYING ...... 26 APPENDIX 11 PROOF OF WORKSAFEBC REGISTRATION ...... 27
PART D FORM OF AGREEMENT ...... 1
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page i REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART A – INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
SUMMARY
The City of Vancouver (“City”), as represented by its Board of Parks and Recreation (the “Park Board”) is seeking proposals from multi-disciplinary consultant teams (“Consultant”) led by a landscape architecture/urban planning firm to :
• Develop an overall strategy for Vancouver sport fields. This strategy includes a review and plan for existing and new sports fields and diamonds; • Develop an Outdoor Facility Allocation and Management Policy; • Develop a financial plan, including funding models, user fees and costing recommendations; • Provide an implementation plan, including short, medium and long-term action items; and • Lead and facilitate a multi-phased public engagement process.
PART A – INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS 1.0 THE RFP
1.1 Except where expressly stated otherwise in Appendix 1 of Part C of the Request for Proposals (“RFP”): (i) no part of the RFP consists of an offer by the city to enter into any contractual relationship; and (ii) no part of the RFP is legally binding on the city.
1.2 The City is interested in selecting an entity, which is not, by the terms hereof, barred from submitting a Proposal, and which does submit a Proposal (each such entity, a “Proponent”) with the capability and experience to efficiently and cost-effectively meet the objectives and requirements described in the RFP. The City currently expects to select such a Proponent and then enter into negotiations with that Proponent, which will conclude in the execution of a contract between the Proponent and the City (such a contract, an “Agreement”). However, the City may: (i) decline to select any Proponent; (ii) decline to enter into any Agreement; (iii) select multiple Proponents for negotiation; or (iv) enter into one or more agreements respecting the subject matter of the RFP with one or more Proponents or other entities at any time. The City may also terminate the RFP at any time.
1.3 The City currently intends that Proposals will be evaluated by the City in relation to their overall value, which will be assessed in the City’s sole and absolute discretion. In assessing value, the City expects to consider the factors described in Section 8.0 below, among others.
1.4 No bid security is required from Proponents in connection with the submission of Proposals because no Proposal will be deemed to be an irrevocable or otherwise binding legal offer by a Proponent to the City. The legal obligations of a Proponent that will arise upon the submission of its Proposal will be limited to the terms and conditions stated under the heading “Legal Terms & Conditions” in Appendix 1 to the Part C - Form of Proposal.
1.5 The execution of an Agreement may be contingent on funding being approved, and the relevant Proposal being approved, by the Vancouver City Council.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page A-1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART A – INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
1.6 The RFP consists of four parts, plus appendices:
(a) PART A – INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS: This part is intended to serve as a guide to the RFP process for Proponents.
(b) PART B – SCOPE OF WORK: This part describes the subject matter of the RFP, in respect of which the City invites Proposals.
(c) PART C – FORM OF PROPOSAL: This is the form in which the Proposal should be submitted.
(d) PART D - FORM OF AGREEMENT: This part contains a model Agreement (the “Form of Agreement”). Any Agreement resulting from the RFP is expected to be substantially in the form of the Form of Agreement.
2.0 KEY DATES
2.1 Potential Proponents should note the following key dates:
Event Time and Date Deadline for Enquiries 12:00 Noon on Monday April 19, 2021 Closing Time 3:00 pm on Tuesday April 27, 2021
2.2 All references to time in the RFP are references to the time in the City of Vancouver, as indicated in the electronic timestamp the Proposal receives upon delivery to the email address specified herein, which is in turn synchronized to Network Time Protocol (NTP) provided by the National Research Council of Canada adjusted to local Pacific Time Zone.
3.0 CONTACT PERSON
3.1 All enquiries regarding the RFP must be addressed to:
Harinder Kainth [email protected]
3.2 All enquiries must be made in writing and are to be directed only to the above contact person. In-person or telephone enquiries are not permitted. Any communication from potential Proponents to City staff other than the contact person regarding the content of this RFP may lead to disqualification of the Proponent from this RFP process, at the City’s sole discretion.
3.3 IF A POTENTIAL PROPONENT BELIEVES THAT THE CITY MAY BE UNABLE TO SELECT IT DUE TO A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BUT IS UNCERTAIN ABOUT THIS, THE POTENTIAL PROPONENT IS URGED TO CONTACT THE ABOVE-MENTIONED INDIVIDUAL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WITH THE RELEVANT INFORMATION SO THAT THE CITY MAY ADVISE THE POTENTIAL PROPONENT REGARDING THE MATTER.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page A-2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART A – INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
4.1 Proponents should submit their Proposals on or before the time and date specified in the bottom row of the table in Section 2.1 above (the “Closing Time”).
4.2 Each Proponent should submit its Proposal by email in accordance with the following:
• Subject of the file to be: PS20210234 - Sports Field Strategy Consultant Services – Vendor name.
• Document format for submissions:
o RFP Part C in PDF format – 1 combined PDF file,
o Appendix 3 (pricing tab) in Excel format, and;
o Any other attachments if necessary • Zip the files to reduce the size or email separately if needed.
• Send your submissions to [email protected]; do not deliver a physical copy to the City of Vancouver.
• Submitting the files via Drop box, FTP, or similar programs, is not acceptable.
4.3 To be considered by the City, a Proposal must be submitted in the form set out in Part C (the “Form of Proposal”), completed and duly executed by the relevant Proponent.
4.4 Amendments to a Proposal may be submitted via the same methods, at any time prior to the Closing Time.
4.5 Proposals are revocable and may be withdrawn at any time before or after the Closing Time.
4.6 All costs associated with the preparation and submission of a Proposal, including any costs incurred by a Proponent after the Closing Time, will be borne solely by the Proponent.
4.7 Unnecessarily elaborate Proposals are discouraged. Proposals should be limited to the items specified in Part C of the RFP.
4.8 The City is willing to consider any Proposal from two or more Proponents that wish to form a consortium for the purpose of responding to the RFP, provided that they disclose the names of all members of the consortium and all members complete and sign the first page of the Form of Proposal. Nonetheless, the City has a strong preference for Proposals submitted by a single Proponent, including a Proponent that would act as a general contractor and use subcontractors as required.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page A-3 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART A – INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
4.9 Proposals that are submitted after the Closing Time or that otherwise do not comply in full with the terms hereof may or may not be considered by the City and may or may not be returned to the Proponent, in the City’s sole discretion.
5.0 CHANGES TO THE RFP AND FURTHER INFORMATION
5.1 The City may amend the RFP or make additions to it at any time.
5.2 It is the sole responsibility of Proponents to check the City’s website at: http://vancouver.ca/doing-business/open-bids.aspx regularly for amendments, addenda, and questions and answers in relation to the RFP.
5.3 Proponents must not rely on any information purported to be given on behalf of the City that contradicts the RFP, as amended or supplemented in accordance with the foregoing Section 5.2.
6.0 PROPOSED TERM OF ENGAGEMENT
6.1 The term of any Agreement is expected to be for one year, with two (2) possible one (1)-year extensions.
7.0 PRICING
7.1 All prices quoted in any Proposal are to be exclusive of applicable sales taxes calculated upon such prices, but inclusive of all other costs.
7.2 Prices must be quoted in Canadian currency and fixed prices must be quoted for the full term of the Proponent’s proposed agreement.
7.3 For the avoidance of doubt, insurance, overhead, profit and all other similar costs are to be included in quoted prices.
8.0 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
8.1 The City may open or decline to open Proposals in such manner and at such times and places as are determined by the City.
8.2 The City currently intends that all Proposals submitted to it in accordance with the RFP will be evaluated by City representatives, using quantitative and qualitative tools and assessments, as appropriate, to determine which Proposal or Proposals offer the overall best value to the City. In so doing, the City expects to examine:
(i) financial terms, (ii) Proponents’ skills, knowledge, reputations and previous experience(s),in planning, design and delivery of sports fields, recreation planning and management, sports field standards and design, GIS mapping, irrigation, turf management, urban ecology, stormwater/green infrastructure, hydrology, presentation graphics and public engagement including experience(s) with the City (if any); (iii) Proponents’ capabilities to perform the City’s scope of work (as defined in Part B) as and when needed, (iv) quality and service factors, (v) innovation, (vi)
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page A-4 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART A – INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
environmental or social sustainability; and (vii) transition costs or challenges. Certain other factors may be mentioned in Part B or elsewhere in the RFP.
Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Weighting
Technical 65%
Financial 30%
Sustainability (Environmental and/or 5% Social)
Total 100%
8.3 The City will retain complete control over the RFP process at all times until the execution and delivery of an Agreement or Agreements, if any. The City is not legally obligated to review, consider or evaluate Proposals, or any particular Proposal, and need not necessarily review, consider or evaluate Proposals, or any particular Proposal in accordance with the procedures set out in the RFP. The City may continue, interrupt, cease or modify its review, evaluation and negotiation process in respect of any or all Proposals at any time without further explanation or notification to any Proponents.
8.4 The City may, at any time prior to signing an Agreement, discuss or negotiate changes to the scope of the RFP with any one or more of the Proponents without having any duty or obligation to advise the other Proponents or to allow the other Proponents to vary their Proposals as a result of such discussions or negotiations.
8.5 The City may elect to short-list Proponents and evaluate Proposals in stages. Short- listed Proponents may be asked to provide additional information or details for clarification, including by attending interviews, making presentations, supplying samples, performing demonstrations, furnishing technical data or proposing amendments to the Form of Agreement. The City will be at liberty to negotiate in parallel with one or more short-listed Proponents, or in sequence, or in any combination, and may at any time terminate any or all negotiations.
8.6 The City may also require that any proposed subcontractors undergo evaluation by the City.
8.7 For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding any other provision in the RFP, the City has in its sole discretion, the unfettered right to: (a) accept any Proposal; (b) reject any Proposal; (c) reject all Proposals; (d) accept a Proposal which is not the lowest- price proposal; (e) accept a Proposal that deviates from the requirements or the conditions specified in the RFP; (f) reject a Proposal even if it is the only Proposal received by the City; (g) accept all or any part of a Proposal; (h) split the scope of
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page A-5 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART A – INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
work between one or more Proponents; and (i) enter into one or more agreements respecting the subject matter of the RFP with any entity or entities at any time. Without limiting the foregoing, the City may reject any Proposal by a Proponent that has a conflict of interest, has engaged in collusion with another Proponent or has otherwise attempted to influence the outcome of the RFP other than through the submission of its Proposal.
9.0 CITY POLICIES
9.1 The City’s Procurement Policy, Ethical Purchasing Policy and related Supplier Code of Conduct found at http://vancouver.ca/doing-business/selling-to-and-buying-from-the- city.aspx align the City’s approach to procurement with its corporate social, environmental and economic sustainability values and goals. They evidence the City’s commitment to maximize benefits to the environment and the community through product and service selection, and to ensure safe and healthy workplaces, where human and civil rights are respected. Each Proponent is expected to adhere to the supplier performance standards set forth in the Supplier Code of Conduct. The Ethical Purchasing Policy shall be referred to in the evaluation of Proposals, to the extent applicable.
9.2 The City’s Alcohol, Controlled Drugs and Medications Policy applies to all contractors doing work on behalf of the City and can be found at https://policy.vancouver.ca/ADMIN011.pdf . The policy is intended to set expectations regarding the use of alcohol, medication and controlled drugs that may render an employee unfit for work, impair performance or cause risk of harm to health and safety. The successful Proponent will be required to ensure compliance with the policy by its employees when doing work for the City.
10.0 CERTAIN APPLICABLE LEGISLATION
11.1 Proponents should note that the City of Vancouver is subject to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (British Columbia), which imposes significant obligations on the City’s consultants or contractors to protect all personal information acquired from the City in the course of providing any service to the City.
11.2 Proponents should note that the Income Tax Act (Canada) requires that certain payments to non-residents be subject to tax withholding. Proponents are responsible for informing themselves regarding the requirements of the Income Tax Act (Canada), including the requirements to qualify for any available exemptions from withholding.
11.0 LEGAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
12.1 The legal obligations of a Proponent that will arise upon the submission of its Proposal are stated in this Appendix 1 to the Form of Proposal. Except where expressly stated in these Legal Terms and Conditions: (i) no part of the RFP consists of an offer by the City to enter into any contractual relationship; and (ii) no part of the RFP is legally binding on the City.
POTENTIAL PROPONENTS MUST REVIEW THESE LEGAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page A-6 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
PART B – SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work stated in this Part B (collectively, the “Scope of Work”) IS current as of the date hereof, but may change or be refined in the course of the evaluation of Proposals or otherwise.
1. Introduction
The City of Vancouver (“City”), as represented by its Board of Parks and Recreation (the “Park Board”) is seeking proposals from multi-disciplinary consultant teams (“Consultant”) led by a planning or recreation management firm with experience in the planning, design and delivery of urban sports fields integrated with multi-use parks, schools and mixed use neighborhoods in dense urban environments. The project team must include staff or sub- consultants with experience in recreation planning and management, sport field standards and design, irrigation, turf management, urban ecology and public engagement. The successful Consultant will have prior experience leading similar projects of scope and complexity and will work closely with Park Board staff to:
• Develop an overall strategy for Vancouver sport fields (refer to Section 4). This strategy includes a review and plan for existing and new sports fields and diamonds; • Develop an Outdoor Facility Allocation and Management Policy; • Develop a financial plan, including funding models, user fees and costing recommendations; • Provide an implementation plan, including short, medium and long-term action items; and • Lead and facilitate a multi-phased public engagement process.
Acknowledgement Vancouver is situated on the unceded traditional territories of the Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh Nations. These First Nations have been stewards of these lands since time immemorial, and have used trails and corridors to travel across their territory to bring their communities together and manage resources. The Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation’s reconciliation goal is to decolonize the Park Board and seek truth as a foundation for reconciliation.
2. Purpose
The Park Board wants to improve the quality, quantity, use and access of its outdoor sport facilities and associated amenities in order to support a diverse range of field sport users with differing abilities and interests, including competitive athletes.
Following the Sport for Life - Long Term Development for Sport and Physical Activity Model (“LTD”) and recognizing the evolution and diversity of outdoor sports and sport organizations, the Park Board wishes to create a strategy that creates a clear and sustainable path that will deliver an optimal recreational and competitive outdoor sport field system. This system will prescribe the best way to prioritize equity in the delivery of high quality, safe and inclusive facilities. The system will also ensure the maintenance,
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
administration, allocation and pricing of these facilities are sustainable and reflective of the Park Board’s Mission to provide, preserve and advocate for parks and recreation to benefit all people, communities and the environment.
The Sport Field Strategy builds directly on VanPlay - Vancouver's Parks and Recreation Services Master Plan. Additionally, increasing access and participation in field sports for residents of Vancouver also supports the City of Vancouver Healthy City Strategy, and Sport for Life - Vancouver Sport Strategy, which are aimed at providing accessible, diverse and quality amenities and services that encourage participation to meet current and future needs.
3. BACKGROUND
Recreation in Vancouver has unique challenges and opportunities. Over 630,000 people live in just 114 square kilometers, making Vancouver the most densely populated city in Canada, with more than 5,400 people for every square kilometer. Additionally, Vancouver is one of the most ethnically diverse cities in North America, with over 50% of people having a first language other than english. Although Vancouver is known as having a very high quality of living, it is also one of Canada's most expensive cities to live in, mainly due to the high cost of real estate. These factors make Vancouver unique while also making planning, locating and resourcing recreation facilities more complicated.
In cooperation with the Vancouver School Board (“VSB”), the Park Board wants to increase the supply of playing fields and diamonds to meet the needs of field sport users in the city, in line with Canada’s Sport for Life, long-term athlete development pathway to support equitable access to sport facilities for all residents. a. Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation
The Park Board is the only elected body of its kind in Canada. Formed in 1888 as a committee to manage the new Stanley Park, its history is almost as old as the city itself. It has exclusive possession, jurisdiction, and control of more than 230 public parks in Vancouver and 55 recreation facilities including 24 community centres, 14 pools, eight indoor ice rinks, six golf courses/pitch and putts, 164 playing fields, street trees, marinas, beaches, and a conservatory. The area governed by the Park Board includes 1360 ha or about 11% of all land within the City’s boundaries. The elected nature of the Park Board and the strength and focus of its mandate have resulted in an urban parks and recreation system that holds an enviable position worldwide. At the Park Board, we are committed to truth telling and continued learning. By acknowledging First Nations’ intricate understanding of the environment, we can improve our collective stewardship of the land, allowing people from all backgrounds to continue to experience and enjoy our cherished parks. b. Project Context
The project study area includes all Vancouver owned and managed parks as well as Vancouver School Board sites. Existing Sport Fields and Ball Diamonds are shown in Figure 1.0 and Figure 2.0.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
Figure 1. Park Board Sports Field Inventory
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-3 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
Figure 2. Ball Diamond Inventory
Through VanPlay, the Parks and Recreation Services Master Plan, the Park Board has identified the need for increased access to higher quality sport fields and ball diamonds. The VanPlay, Inventory and Analysis report identified 164 playing fields in our system, or one field per 3,827 people. The ball diamond and sports field asset targets developed through VanPlay in the Strategic Bold Moves report specifically identified a need to consider maintenance practices, increase the supply and renewal timeline of rectangular sport field facilities, and a need to increase the renewal timeline for ball diamonds.
VanPlay also identifies three strategic bold moves (equity, asset needs, and connectivity) that provides direction on the various opportunities to increase provision throughout the city including:
• Building new facilities, aligning projects with land development projects, park renewal projects, and capital planning; • Renewing existing facilities, matching the rates of renewal with the intensity of the use; • Building resilience into amenities considering climate change, natural hazards, increasing capacity and durability; • Repurposing where appropriate to respond to growth and change, ensuring amenities and spaces respond to shifting trends and needs; and
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-4 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
• Establishing and formalizing partnerships where public or private sector partners are better positioned to meet local, community and user group needs.
Grass Turf Fields There are currently 134 publicly accessible bookable rectangular grass fields in 40 Vancouver parks. These grass sport fields are used by a variety of sports, including organized football (tackle, touch, flag), cricket, field hockey, field lacrosse, rugby, soccer, track and field, ultimate frisbee, and volleyball.
The quality of Vancouver regulation size grass sport fields ranges greatly, from class A (as categorized in existing classification system) soccer fields, to mini-sport fields, to fields with numerous holes and divots. Some grass sites are well used by competitive teams, while others are primarily used for recreational games and/or practices.
Synthetic Turf Fields There are currently nine publicly accessible synthetic field locations in Vancouver. Six locations with nine fields in parks: Empire Fields Park (2), Trillium (2), Andy Livingston (2), Memorial South, Hillcrest, and Jericho Beach. Three Vancouver School Board (VSB) sites: Eric Hamber, Vancouver Technical and Kitsilano Secondary Schools and one facility at Point Grey Secondary/Kerrisdale Park which lies on both School Board and Park Board land. All fields, but two have permanent lighting (lighting at Hillcrest and Kitsilano Secondary expected later in 2021) and one new field is planned to come online in late 2021 or 2022.
The quality and type of Vancouver synthetic turf fields ranges greatly, from a mini field constructed in 2016 at Hillcrest, to a waterbased field and a ten year old surface with drainage issues at Andy Livingston. Some fields are primarily used for field hockey (Eric Hamber), whereas others support a variety of field sports.
There are also synthetic turf fields used by Vancouver residents and clubs at UBC, on Musqueam land, and outside Vancouver in Burnaby, and in Richmond amongst other municipalities that are not allocated by the Park Board.
Ball Diamonds There are currently 60 baseball diamonds and 67 softball diamonds in 57 parks in Vancouver. The diamonds and related facilities range in size and quality (from little league diamonds, to full size facilities at 90 foot, and some with 80 foot bases), and some have overlapping outfields.
Other fields – practice and gravel There are currently 12 all-weather (gravel) fields, which are used for various sports, in 9 parks. There are 57 grass fields in 41 parks that are appropriate for practice and/or sports camps.
There are also a number of permitted fields that are not intended or not suitable for sports use; these fields should be identified, assessed and proposed for removal and/or upgrade from the sport field and diamond inventory through the strategy.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-5 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
c. Current challenges for Vancouver sport fields
i. Seasons of play Vancouver recreational and competitive sporting seasons are unique to the rest of Canada as many field sports operate year round (e.g. soccer, ultimate). This schedule puts extra pressure on natural grass surfaces and complicates field bookings for multi-use and overlapping fields and diamonds.
ii. Field allocations Sports fields in Vancouver are currently allocated based on historical bookings and seasonal requirements. This process does not allow for adjustments due to new clubs, teams or sports, nor changing sizes or requirements of user groups. Current practices do not create equitable access and do not support other core principles articulated in VanPlay. Allocation practices for outdoor sport fields, arena facilities and pools should be aligned.
iii. Concerns about the health and safety of synthetic turf As mentioned above, there are nine synthetic turf field locations in parks and at secondary schools in Vancouver. In recent years when the Park Board has sought feedback from the public on expanding the supply of synthetic turf in the City, responses from residents have been highly polarized. Many residents want the Park Board to invest in synthetic turf fields to meet the growing demand for playing fields of dependable quality and consistent availability. Other residents have questioned the health and safety of these surfaces for both users and the environment.
iv. Current State of Maintenance and Operations Park Board maintenance and operations teams struggle to maintain the quality of natural turf in the City. Current use of grass fields is limited to 12-14 hours a week during the fall and winter wet seasons to lessen the risk of long term damage to fields. However, with the deliberate design, prioritized maintenance and management, there may be potential to increase the hours of play on some fields.
v. Fees, Charges and Cost Recovery The fees and charges collected from field users requires review. Existing rates do not correlate with the resources required to maintain the field and diamonds, and do not align with the rates charged by other municipalities for similar facilities.
vi. Current Delivery Partnerships The Park Board works with the Vancouver School Board and community organizations to maintain and upgrade existing sites for school and public use. These partnerships are often informal and create challenges for determining responsibilities and funding.
vii. Parkland Provision While Vancouver has more park space today than it did 25 years ago, the amount of park space per person (or what we call park provision) has declined by almost a third. With space at a premium, many competing demands on park space and an increasingly limited budget, the Park Board is struggling to keep up with
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-6 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
development and provide adequate recreation space to its growing population. There are local challenges facing parks that a system-wide plan cannot address. With increased and varied usership, meeting the needs of neighbourhoods will remain challenging.
viii. COVID-19 Impacts The COVID-19 Pandemic significantly affected the Board of Parks and Recreation service delivery and budgets throughout 2020 due to facility closures, reduced revenues and new COVID-19 requirements. As we have seen over the summer of 2020, park use increased dramatically and parks became a natural gathering place for many. The Sport Field Strategy will consider passive and active sport field use adaptations and provide recommendations balancing the needs of all park users. d. Relevant Park Board and City Plans and Policies
The strategy will be informed by (but not limited to) direction from existing plans and policies including:
i. VanPlay: Vancouver’s Parks and Recreation Services Masterplan (2019) Vancouver's Parks and Recreation Services Master plan represents a significant and defining moment for the Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation with a new commitment to equitable delivery of excellent parks and recreation opportunities in a connected, efficient manner that celebrates history of the land, place, and culture. The four reports represent a policy framework that puts equity, asset needs, and connectivity at the core of Park Board activities and decision-making. VanPlay provides the Sport Field Strategy with much of the necessary baseline information about the principles driving the strategy, the basic inventory information about the facilities and broad community input about how sport field facilities are planned, operated and maintained. https://vancouver.ca/parks-recreation-culture/vanplay-parks-and-recreation- strategy.aspx
ii. Park Board’s Reconciliation Mission, Vision and Values (2018) The Mission, Vision, and Values statement is the foundation for Reconciliation within the Park Board. The mission – to decolonize the Park Board – is an ambitious one, and has reframed much of the ongoing regular business of the Park Board. The mission, along with the vision and five grounding values, articulates an overarching, clear set of goals and values to ensure Reconciliation is carried out authentically and effectively across the organization. https://parkboardmeetings.vancouver.ca/2018/20180416/REPORT- PBReconciliationStrategies-TRCUpdate-20180416.pdf
iii. Turf and Horticulture Inventory (2016) This document provides a modern, comprehensive inventory of all horticultural and turf amenities in 225 parks, 3 municipal golf courses and 3 pitch and putts.
iv. Parks Washroom Strategy (2020)
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-7 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
Driven by the need for facility renewal, expected population and tourism growth, and changing service needs, the Park Board initiated a planning process to establish a long-term vision for washroom facilities in parks. Transformation of public washrooms is a significant undertaking, requiring time, commitment, and, most of all, capital and operating resources. The Parks Washroom Strategy (“the Strategy”) aims to create a system-wide plan to provide safe, clean, and accessible washroom facilities to enhance the park experience for all. This Washroom Strategy directly applies to fieldhouses and change rooms and how users access these safely and securely. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/parks-washroom-strategy.pdf
v. Biodiversity Strategy Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation (2016) The City’s Biodiversity Strategy aims to improve the health of Vancouver, the people and the creatures who inhabit it by increasing the amount and ecological quality of Vancouver’s natural areas to support biodiversity and enhance access to nature. It describes strategies to restore ecological function and protect priority habitats such as forests, wetlands, and shorelines as part of a city-wide ecological network, to change the Park Board’s operations to better support biodiversity, and to celebrate biodiversity as an important part of city life. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/biodiversity-strategy.pdf
vi. Urban Forest Strategy, (2014, updated 2018) The vision of the Urban Forest Strategy is to protect, plant, and manage trees to create a diverse, resilient, and beautiful urban forest on public and private lands across the city. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/urban-forest-strategy.pdf
vii. Track and Field Strategy (2019) The Track and Field Strategy, developed in partnership with the Vancouver School Board, provides recommendations under four themes: design and infrastructure, access and participation, programming and cooperation, and management and operations for Vancouver’s 14 existing facilities, and for future expansion. The strategy guides short-term and long-term investment, management, and programming at Vancouver’s track and field facilities. https://vancouver.ca/parks-recreation-culture/track-and-field-strategy.aspx
viii. People, Parks and Dogs Strategy (2017) The People, Parks and Dogs strategy provide policy to deliver well-planned and designed parks that accommodate park users with and without dogs. The strategy identifies designated sports fields as a less compatible use requiring a minimum setback distance of 50 to 75 metres or the use of secure fencing to delineate these two park uses. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/people-parks-dogs-strategy-report.pdf
ix. Sport for Life - Vancouver Sport Strategy (2008) The Vancouver Sport Strategy provides a roadmap for the way ahead in sport for all Vancouver residents and charts a course for a new approach to sport in our communities – Sport for Life. VSS marked the beginning of a process to define the
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-8 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
City’s relationship with people who lead, volunteer, and participate in sport programs, events, facilities and key stakeholder involved in sport. http://vancouver.ca/files/cov/Vancouver-Sport-Strategy.pdf
x. Rain City Strategy (RCS) and Integrating Blue-Green Systems Planning (2019) The City’s Integrated Rainwater Management Plan (IRMP) (2016) focuses on rainwater management and restoring the role of urban watersheds to support urban and natural ecosystems. The Rain City Strategy, an evolution of the City’s IRMP, has a vision that Vancouver’s rainwater is embraced as a valued resource for our communities and natural ecosystems. The strategy has three goals around improving and protecting Vancouver’s receiving water quality. It also has objects in water harvest and re-use, increasing green area, urban heat mitigation, and diverting water from the pipe system. RCS, approved unanimously by Council in November 2019, expands on the City’s IRMP with a renewed focus on valuing rainwater as a resource and goals around water quality, resilience, and livability through healthy urban ecosystems. The plan, with an outlook to 2050, will guide the application of sustainable urban rainwater management in future community and infrastructure planning, policy development, capital planning, design standards, operations and maintenance procedures, and asset management programs. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/rain-city-strategy.pdf
xi. Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (2012, updated 2018) Primary objectives include:
1.1: Minimize rainfall related flooding and associated consequences; 4.1: Minimize per capita water consumption; 4.1.1 Primary Action: Water Conservation; 4.2: Minimize morbidity and mortality during heat waves; 5.1: Increase resilience of the built environment to future climate conditions; and 5.2: Increase the long-term health and vigour of urban forests, green spaces and trees. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/Vancouver-Climate-Change-Adaptation-Strategy- 2012-11-07.pdf
xii. Climate Emergency Response, 2019 Vancouver declared a climate emergency and committed to reduce emissions locally. In the Climate Emergency Response, two of the six big moves are related to transportation, including:
• Walkable complete communities: by 2030, 90 per cent of people live within an easy walk/roll of their daily needs; and • Safe and convenient active transportation and transit: accelerate the existing sustainable transportation target by 10 years, so that by 2030, two thirds of trips in Vancouver will be by active transportation and transit. https://council.vancouver.ca/20190424/documents/cfsc1.pdf
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-9 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
xiii. Healthy City Strategy (2014) The Healthy City Strategy is a long-term, integrated plan comprised of 13 long- term goals for the well-being of the City of Vancouver and its people, including ambitious targets to reach by 2025. Guided by a vision of A Healthy City for All, a city where together we are creating and continually improving the conditions that enable all of us to enjoy the highest level of health and well-being possible. http://council.vancouver.ca/20141029/documents/ptec1_appendix_a_final.pdf
xiv. Additional active Park Board and City planning projects There are ongoing large planning efforts that may influence this Strategy: VanPlan, Broadway Plan, John Henry Park Master Plan, Marpole Community Centre Schematic Plan, NEFC Master Plan and Active Transportation Plan.
4. SCOPE OF WORK AND DETAILED REQUIREMENTS
The Sport Field Strategy will consider strategic partnerships between the Park Board, VSB and community organizations in upgrading and maintaining existing sites for school and public use in a way that supports city-wide equity. The new Sport Field Strategy will include a 10-year implementation plan for field sport facilities, use and access. The strategy will create a vision and a focused policy framework that centres equity, inclusion and access, reconciliation and resiliency to guide the Park Board in supporting field sports in Vancouver, including renewing, expanding and maintaining quality sports fields, ball diamonds, and facilities. The following work program is currently divided into separate phases and tasks, subject to the successful proponent’s own work program and the availability of funding.
PHASE 1 - Background and Analysis
1.1 POLICY & LITERATURE REVIEW Review relevant internal documents and external precedents. Internal Park Board and City of Vancouver documents that must be reviewed as part of this project include, but are not limited to the previous section d – Plans and Polices. The Consultant will also conduct in-depth precedent research into policies, service levels and best management practices for sports fields, ball diamonds, and facilities in other comparable cities. The research should include examples that direct the location, design, service level, partnerships, and other targets from similar-sized municipalities and cities in Canada and the USA that face similar challenges (changing demographics, land availability, land costs, etc.). The Consultant will summarize the applicable precedents and their relevance to the project, benchmarking or comparing Vancouver to these examples.
1.2 FIELD SPORTS TRENDS AND PARTICIPATION IN VANCOUVER As a key component of the Sport Field Strategy, it is necessary to understand the state of existing facilities, current users and demographics and trends that will likely impact future demand and needs in Vancouver. The Consultant will:
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-10 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
• Identify participation in field sports and trends/changes over time; • Identify specific participation trends and needs in sport related new Canadians, Indigenous peoples, and the different ethnic populations that are underserved in Vancouver; • Identify barriers and systems impacting sport participation in Vancouver, including socio-demographic influences and accessibility/inclusion influences; • Assess alignments and gaps when applying the principles of the Canadian Sport for Life Long Term Development for Sport and Physical Activity Model; • Identify and assess latent and future demand for sport participation in Vancouver; • Identify citizen and stakeholder (sport user groups) expectations, perceptions and priorities regarding current and future recreation facilities and service provision in Vancouver; • Identify and assess community based organizations providing field sport participation opportunities; • Identify and assess expectations and priorities of provincial, national and international sport organization governing bodies which could have impact on community based organizations; • Assess utilization of sport fields in Vancouver; • Determine existing participation rates, (e.g. participants per capita; age; gender) by sport/activity and existing service standards (e.g. facilities per capita) by sport/activity; • Determine level of under or over supply of facility based on participation trends/usage -for unstructured usage only – the Standard of Play being developed as part of the OFAMP will be the new method of determining under/over supply for LSOs; • Identify issues, needs, challenges, strengths, gaps and opportunities facing sports facilities in Vancouver predicted over the life of the plan; • Highlight the trends in existing sports, as well as emerging sports in British Columbia/Metro Vancouver and implications for Vancouver; • Summarize projected changes to leisure patterns in British Columbia and potential impacts to the Vancouver context; • Identify trends in COVID-19 impacts, now and implications for the future; and • Qualify and quantify where possible, existing and desired access to sport fields for pick-up and leisure use.
1.3 SITE AND FACILITY INVENTORY ASSESSMENTS Conduct site visits to all sport fields to assess and report on site conditions, class, attributes, level of use, suitability and service gaps to determine a category for each field (as defined by playability, suitability to host special events and tournaments and other criteria to be developed). This will require both visual, desktop and possibly GIS assessments and mapping (refer to Appendix 1 at end of Part B) for full list of inventory gaps).
Unique features of the individual sites should be noted for their impact (positive or negative) on the use of the site, for example:
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-11 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
• Accessibility (para-sport and community); • Size and layout standards (i.e. level of training/competition, age of users) ; • Sports the fields support (e.g. ultimate Frisbee, soccer, rugby, softball, baseball, field hockey, etc.); • Connections to neighbourhood amenities (e.g. community centres); • Site amenities (e.g. lighting, utilities, type of backstop, washrooms, water and electrical access, scoreboards, etc.); • Identification of existing partnership models for service delivery and associated agreements governing same (e.g. sport groups operating fieldhouses, sport groups delivering maintenance, VSB/PB operating agreements, etc.); • Summary of applicable industry benchmarks (e.g. service standards), by sport/activity, which the Park Board could adopt or build upon; • Evaluate if existing municipal standards for outdoor facilities (i.e. dimensions, maintenance, and quality) are adequate to address industry standards, user needs, tournament play, safety, etc.; • Best practices in sport and leisure facility provision, including: o Partnership models, including shared use (e.g. schools, partnerships with neighbouring municipalities, sponsorships, user groups); o Service delivery models (e.g. multi-field sport complexes); o Land resources (e.g. hydro corridors); o General facility design (e.g. innovative playing surfaces, lighting, multi- purpose facilities, amenities for players and spectators); o Facility use and access (e.g. schedules and permits, tournaments); o Maintenance (e.g. schedules, programs); o Turf Management Best Practices by field type including topics such as General Management Practices; Water Management Practices; Nutrient and Soil Management Practices; and Pest and Pesticide Management Practices.; and • Conduct a soil analysis test (which identifies % of sand/ fines or % of sand, silt, clay, etc.) for each field to help determine what classification a field should be categorized and to aid in understanding ongoing maintenance requirements and which fields need upgrading in the future.
The Park Board will provide the Consultant all available relevant data and documents (refer to Appendix 1 and the end of Part B) related to these sites at the time of the literature review. The Consultant’s facility assessments should include a life cycle assessment. This work will inform recommendations regarding renewal or replacement of facilities, service standards, facility classifications, user fees, special event eligibility. The facility site assessment will optimally integrate user studies and user surveys, conducted on site at the busiest times (e.g. after school) to identify potential optimal use for both user groups and the general public. Any building assessments will be visual only. The assessments should classify each site into a service class/type, as well as describe the service level and condition (summarized in a matrix). Proposals should outline the number and duration of events and methodology for user studies and surveys. An Asset Management Study is currently being conducted for all non- building Parks Board assets and findings of this study are anticipated to be complete by the summer of 2021 which will inform this component of the project.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-12 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
1.4 OPTIMUM SERVICE LEVELS VanPlay, Vancouver’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan, outlines asset targets for Field Sports and Ball Diamonds, including improving the overall quality and increasing the hours of play for organized groups. Specifically, VanPlay outlines ball diamond asset targets to increase the hours of play by 25% as well as improve the overall quality of existing ball diamonds. For field sports, VanPlay sets a target to increase the available hours of play by 25% and to increase the number of Grade A or higher, turf fields by 15% (pending recommended field reclassification this target may need to be modified).
The Consultant is expected to propose optimum service levels for sport fields for each type of sport (e.g. rugby, cricket, soccer, softball, baseball, etc.), aligned with VanPlay asset targets, recommendations, and asset needs. Base these recommendations on an evaluation of existing facility use and with stakeholder actual and predicted demand. Compare supply needs to optimal service levels and identify the gaps/deficiencies in current supply to meet optimal service levels by each type of sport.
a. Data Analysis – Analyze 2015 to 2020 site rentals data and school use (where applicable, e.g. VanTech, Point Grey Secondary), with support from Park Board and Vancouver School Board staff.
b. Context Scan – Review and summarize the permitted hours local sports fields and ball diamonds users are accessing in the Lower Mainland to meet their current needs. This will include reviewing the price differential between PB facilities and outside Vancouver facilities, including UBC.
c. Gap Analysis – Using the collected baseline data, literature review, context scan, your understanding of current trends and opportunities and the demonstrated needs of each sport group as defined through the OFAMP process, provide a gap analysis for sport fields in Vancouver. The Consultant will provide a snapshot of current use of sport fields, ball diamonds, and facilities in comparison to demonstrated need by each stakeholder group as defined in the OFAMP process.
Further analysis is required to determine demand, latent demand, caliber, suitability for types of play, competition level, distribution, condition, maintenance and the ratio of sports fields/softball pitches to regulation-sized diamonds/sports fields.
d. Develop Classification System – Develop a City-wide system to classify sports fields based on their primary use/sport, scales of competition, condition and quality. Compare to similar classification systems in other municipalities and provide an analysis. Identifying which fields are suitable for special event use will also be part of the classification system.
e. Field and diamond design standard (to include amenities) and building specifications based on a review of International, National and Provincial Sport Organization specifications in addition to a review of best practices from other
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-13 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
municipalities and experts. Based on these new standards, recommend a schedule of upgrades to existing grass sport fields and diamonds.
f. Regulation and enforcement guidelines for the sports fields throughout the City to ensure that they are being utilized by the appropriate users. Prepare high level recommendations of best practices from other municipalities, ideas on how to educate users on appropriate use of fields, field supervision and support.
1.5 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
The Consultant will engage the public and incorporate public feedback on the draft recommendations for desired service level, service delivery, field use allocation, facility fees and charges, environmental and human health impacts of proposed facilities and materials, and locations for new/upgraded fields and diamonds into the final strategy. This will include both a focused engagement with stakeholders and a broader public engagement process. The Consultant will develop and implement a Public Engagement and Outreach Plan and summarize each phase of the engagement process, in addition to a final consultation summary report. The Park Board Communications group and project team will lead a small brand development process for the project.
Advisory Group: With direction from the Project Management Team, the Consultant will assemble a City-wide Stakeholder Advisory Group and facilitate stakeholder engagement throughout the project (minimum of five meetings). We anticipate that the Advisory Group will include representatives from user groups including sports field and ball diamond organizations with existing or potential use of Vancouver facilities, Vancouver Field Sport Federation (“VFSF”), VSB staff, Sport BC, athletes with disabilities, and other interest groups, as well as representative(s) of the general community.
Stakeholders: Stakeholder engagement will specifically support development of facility classifications and standards of play (through the OFAMP process) provide valuable data, insights, experience and guidance to the project on user needs, user experience and changes in specific sports. One-on-one meetings may be required for some organizations with limited capacity to meet.
Public: Engagement with the broader public will increase awareness of the project and provide key insight into broad preferences, interests, concerns and opportunities related to sports and leisure. The Consultant will employ a range of engagement methods to maximize public input.
A broader public engagement component is required to gather feedback on new and upgraded facilities, and on the broader recommendations of the strategy including asset targets, sustainability goals and recommendations around high interest topics
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-14 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
such as synthetic turf playing fields. The following tasks are required as part of this broader engagement.
• Coordinate the engagement process with the Project Management Team (e.g. critical path, deliverables); • Lead process to engage Vancouver’s diverse residents, including those whose first language is not English. For example provide materials in differing formats and languages (e.g. Chinese and Punjabi), as reflective of the communities being consulted as required; • Liaise with Park Board Communications staff that supports public engagement through existing social media channels and on-line engagement tools; • In collaboration with Park Board and City communications and engagement teams, develop innovative approaches, on-line tools, social media, and in- person public engagement methods to reach as many people as possible; • Lead the development, sourcing, and printing of all consultation materials (notification, web copy, images, signage, presentation boards, discussion guides, maps, etc.); • Develop surveys to get early input and feedback on areas of focus for the strategy and later test support for the recommendations in the draft strategy. The Consultant will provide hard copies; the City website will host the online survey; • In addition to the surveys noted above the Consultant will conduct a statistically-sound quantitative telephone survey of the City of Vancouver residents. The primary objective of the research will be to assess Vancouver residents’ opinion toward sports fields throughout the City. The calling area for this study will consist of the city of Vancouver proper. The quantitative study will consist of 400 random sample interviews with a margin of error of +/-4.9% 19 times out of 20. The survey will be developed to collect information such as:
• Who we are serving and who we are missing; • What types of activities people are engaging; • When and how are people engaging in field sports; • What are barriers to participation; • What are user needs and challenges; • What are priorities for improvements; and, • What do people value about Vancouver’s sports fields?
• Facilitate at least six events targeted at the general public following all COVID- 19 City safety protocols and Provincial Guidelines; and
• Park Board staff working with First Nations representatives will use existing channels to solicit feedback on the Sport Field Strategy from First Nations. While First Nations consultation is outside the Consultant’s scope for this project the Consultant will be responsible for incorporating this feedback into the consultation summaries and final Sport Field Strategy.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-15 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
Public engagement process milestones are not prescribed in this RFP (other than some highlevel proposed milestones in Table 2. Project Phases and Timeline). It is the Consultant’s responsibility to recommend an innovative plan and timeline as part of their RFP submission, which is to be reconfirmed at project start-up after award of contract.
PHASE 2 - Preliminary Strategy Development
2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND HUMAN HEALTH ASSESSMENT The Consultant will research and assess the environmental and human health impacts for playing field surface materials, including grass and various types of synthetic turf. This report should consider the full lifecycle impacts of the various surfacing options, and comprise a literature review and analysis along with expert interviews and case study analysis. Specifically, the assessment must evaluate grass and the various types of both the synthetic turf (base layers and ‘blades’), and infill material available, considering the climate of Vancouver, maintenance and operational needs. This evaluation will use a defensible methodology to evaluate surface material options, and identify those that best meet the Park Board’s needs. Consideration and comparison both synthetic turf and grass turf must be considered. At a minimum, the following topics should be included in the analysis:
a. Environment
• Rainwater – capture, filtration, drainage, retention, infiltration, leachate/contamination. Include a side by side comparison with grass; • Sustainability – life cycle, replacement; and • Ecosystem services: o Habitat potential/services, including impact/benefit to ecosystem, biodiversity, and habitat; chaffer beetle impact. o Carbon – captured vs emitted; difference in carbon emissions over 10 year period from maintenance. b. Health • Benefits of sport; • Reports on carcinogens and other toxins (e.g., lead); • Migration of infill materials; • Heat island effects; and • Performance/playability (injury) – including dog holes.
c. Each available turf product and infill product is to be reviewed given Vancouver’s climate, using four key criteria:
• Cost – includes capital, maintenance practices, maintenance equipment, maintenance frequency, life cycle, sourcing and availability; • Health – vapour/odour, dust, etc.;
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-16 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
• Environment – recycled/recyclable, pre/post use, impact on environment (habitat, aquatic, avian, migration), sourcing; and • Performance – safety, injury.
2.2 DEVELOPMENT OF AN OUTDOOR FACILITY ALLOCATION AND MANAGEMENT POLICY (“OFAMP”) The Consultant will develop in close collaboration with an internal staff team the Park Board’s first OFAMP which will guide future sport field allocation and facilitate fair, transparent and equitable access to fields. Currently the Park Board uses a rolling allocation system, whereby previous users with historical access have priority for future bookings. The Park Board wishes to move to a system that is more equitable, supports sport development, and provides balanced field provision ratios to sport amenity users. The policy will include but not be limited to creating guidelines on the development of a standard of play for each sport which in turn will help to verify sport facility needs by age group, gender, and level of play. The policy and accompanying procedures will reflect the long term player development guidelines for each sport and the principals established through VanPlay. This work should specifically include: Provincial (“PSO”) and Local Sport Organization (“LSO”) consultation and citizen engagement, environmental scan of best practices, program audit and analysis related to usage and capacity trends, and incorporating direction from Park Board staff. Coordinate and define field ‘resting periods’ with maintenance best practices. An Affiliation Policy will be developed by the Park Board concurrently with this projects timeline that will influence components this strategy including the OFAMP.
2.3 COST TO DELIVER SERVICES BY SPORT FACILITY The Consultant will develop true costs of delivering fields and diamonds per the updated classification system, with the Park Board Finance team. Conduct a peer review of the same with municipalities in the lower mainland and with select Canadian municipalities (to be determined). Provide recommendations on considerations for setting fees and charges for sport field facility booking, use and access grounded in the principles of VanPlay and the Sport Field Strategy. Include an analysis of revenue sources including both user fees and alternative funding models. This will include a detailed breakdown of the cost to deliver one field per hour including costs such as overhead, management and maintenance. These costs will help the Park Board with cost recovery and help set user fees. This will also need to align with future fees and charges projects and initiatives that the Parks Board has planned. Also take into account user groups who help share with maintenance of some of the fields.
2.4 USE AND ACCESS RECOMMENDATIONS Develop Use and Access Recommendations that align with VanPlay to support equitable access and increased participation in field sports by providing quality facilities in the right locations. This includes: • Opportunities for the Park Board and its partners to increase accessible use and access options for underserved and vulnerable populations;
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-17 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
• Gap analysis of how individuals and groups access field sport activities and facilities equitably; • Comparative analysis in Vancouver program provision compared to other municipalities with aligned values (equity, access, inclusion and reconciliation focus); and • Recommendations for range of options to better connect residents to sport field facilities aligned with VanPlay principles over the next 10 years.
2.5 DEVELOP OPTIMUM SERVICE LEVEL RECOMMENDATIONS Evaluate the information collected to inform the city-wide service level analysis. Provide a clear picture of the current baseline conditions and provide a rationale and framework for optimum service levels and ‘class’ of services needed. Base the recommendations on direction provided by VanPlay and an evaluation of existing field use, predicted demand and a scan of sports field facilities across the lower mainland that may impact demands on Vancouver fields.
2.6 DEVELOP FACILITY RECOMMENDATIONS Develop recommendations for the preferred number, type and location(s) to site sport field(s) within the City boundaries. These recommendations must respond to the background data collected (as described above) and to an impact analysis (e.g. parking, noise, lighting etc.), while also considering site ownership, existing site renewal, relative capital and operating costs, site design, accessibility (transit, parking etc.), population growth and demand, and equitable provision of services to a broad range of Vancouver residents.
• Recommend standards, models, guidelines, and practices related to:
o Partnerships; o service delivery; o land resources; o facility design and construction; o sport field use, access and organized activities; o maintenance - annual and ongoing; and o on site management and supervision.
• Determine various development priorities as appropriate, such as:
o Improving existing fields quality and maintenance; o Developing additional new fields, diamonds etc.; o Tournament facilities; and o Conversion of existing facilities to other sport use.
• Recommendations shall include:
o Rationale and priority; o Be directed toward accomplishing the identified strategic goals; and
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-18 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
o Be informed by the best practices review, Vancouver context and input.
• Based on user trends and needs analysis, determine what are the required facility needs now and over the next 10-12 years; • Determine facility needs (number, size, amenities) and priorities by sport, throughout the life of the plan, based on recommended service standards, participation levels and pressures, gaps, trends, and population growth; Rationale for recommendations and phasing must be included based upon service delivery objectives, sport usage, requirements and trends; • Provide appropriate direction regarding the timing of the implementation of facility recommendations, using a priority ranking (i.e. high, medium, low) and target year; • Determine what and where needs could be accommodated through upgrading of existing facilities (facilities and parks/open space). Factor in new growth areas; and • Recommend a general distribution of facilities.
PHASE 3 - Draft Strategy Delivery
3.1 DRAFT INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The draft interim technical report is one of two key milestones for the project. Through the draft interim technical report, the Consultant will:
a. Consolidate the findings from the project to-date, the goals and directions identified in VanPlay, and from sports user groups, Park Board, Staff and the public: o Develop or refine a shared vision for the future of sport and leisure in Vancouver; and o Develop the strategic principles for the study.
b. Summarize field sports trends, facility inventory, gaps, optimum service levels, and recommendations; and
c. Present the Draft Interim Report and Recommendations to the Stakeholder Advisory Committee, the Senior Management Steering Committee (SMSC), and Park Board Commissioners for review.
PHASE 4 - Final Strategy and Associated Documents
4.1 DRAFT FINAL STRATEGY WITH RECOMMENDATIONS & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The Consultant will incorporate Park Board and public feedback on draft materials to develop the final deliverables. The Sports Field Strategy and Appendices will include: a. Site assessment, quality, and suitability summary of all existing sport fields and diamonds;
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-19 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
b. Public engagement summary, including a process outline, input summaries by phase and a concise executive summary; c. Preferred type (grass, gravel, soil, or synthetic turf), number and locations of sports fields for implementation the next 10 years; d. Best practices to support designing, building and operating sports field facilities in Vancouver. Include recommendations/templates for design standards, identifying core facilities and required and optional amenities at each site; e. Financial implications including capital planning and alternative funding models (e.g. developer contributions related to growth areas); f. Create and use a sport field service level classification system as a city-wide framework, develop a 10-year implementation plan for Park Board sport fields, ball diamonds, and facilities development and maintenance, with recommendations for timing and estimated costs for upgrades for existing sport fields and ball diamonds, annual site maintenance, decommissioning, renewals, end of life replacement and funding; and g. Well written document in accordance with the conventions set out in the City of Vancouver Writing Style Guide (to be provided to the successful Consultant).
This component will form the basis of the final report, with the vision and strategic principles, a prioritized action plan, an implementation plan, and funding recommendations. A summary of key highlights from the technical background report will provide an introduction to the Sport Field Strategy.
4.2 SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND BOARD APPROVAL The Consultant will present the final draft strategy to the Senior Leadership Team and Park Board Commissioners (assume 2 meetings). The Consultant will make any required revisions or amendments to the Strategy as requested by the Park Board Commissioners.
5. CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES
The successful Consultant will be responsible for:
• Developing and revising a Work Plan and Schedule (using Gantt style charts, with clear deliverables, timeframes and responsibilities) and an invoice template broken down by major tasks and team member to track budget expenditure against progress on the project, in consultation with the Project Manager; • Planning and executing project elements as detailed in the Work Plan; • In collaboration with the Project Manager, organizing and facilitating meetings with key decision makers. Tasks include setting agendas, producing presentations and materials, and recording and distributing meeting notes, developing open house materials and website content; and • Leading the engagement strategy, clearly identifying engagement goals, stakeholder groups, and the way actions will link to feedback.
The Park Board will:
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-20 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
• Provide links, digital files or hard copies of all relevant City and Park Board documents; • Provide data, where available (facility booking information, mapping, etc.); • Provide the Consultant with neighbourhood and City-wide demographic information to support effective engagement; • Arrange and invite stakeholders as needed; • Organize logistics and venues for meetings; • Arrange display of notification materials at Park Board and City sites (community centres, libraries, parks etc.); and • Support coordination with Communications staff (Park Board and City Corporate) and Digital Services (website support).
6. CONSULTANT EXPERTISE
The Park Board is seeking the services of an experienced multi-disciplinary Consultant team with expertise in system-wide recreation planning of locations similar in size and complexity to Vancouver. Specific experience and expertise should include research, needs assessments and gap analysis, environmental assessments, long-range capital and service planning, design needs for field sports facilities, and the City of Vancouver’s colonial history. The scope of work requires expertise in research, analysis, long-range budgeting and costing, field sports and facility maintenance, irrigation, turf management, urban ecology, public engagement, classification, design and standard setting for sports fields and diamonds, environmental and health assessments, cooperative partnerships and models for field facilities, as well as a commitment to equity and reconciliation.
The engagement process requires an experienced, creative and innovative team with expertise and extensive experience in public and stakeholder engagement, public policy, communication, and planning to lead an engagement process to deliver the Sport Fields Strategy. The successful Consultant will have demonstrated creative and collaborative ways of engaging the public, including under-represented communities and organizations, towards the creation of a comprehensive and successful strategy and its components (e.g. allocation).
The Park Board expects the Consultant’s proposal to demonstrate expertise in developing broad based engagement strategies that define the scope of influence for participants, applying innovative consultation and evidence-based assessment techniques to similar projects and clearly showing how the public’s input has influenced decision making. A demonstrated ability to bring together varying and divergent interests to a supportable conclusion will be a key attribute of the successful proposal.
i. TEAM ORGANIZATION AND QUALIFICATIONS
A Lead Consultant will be required to retain a multi-disciplinary Consultant team to develop and address items outlined in the scope of services. The Lead Consultant shall be a landscape architecture/urban planning firm with expertise in the master-
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-21 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
planning, design of urban parks, and leading multidisciplinary teams. If the Lead Consultant is not a local firm, they should be supported by a local firm with at least one project team member who is a registered landscape architect or registered Planner in good standing with the British Columbia Society of Landscape Architects or registered planner registered with the Planning Institute of British Columbia.
The Consultant must identify the members of the core team and other Consultant team members shown in an organizational chart. The core team will be comprised of Planner or Recreation Management Professional (Lead Consultant), and supported by engineering, landscape architecture, engagement consultants, and an urban ecologist/biologist. The team will have expertise, at a minimum, in landscape architecture, urban planning and design, GIS, civil engineering (master planning, design of sports facilities, stormwater, integrated approaches to water services including nature-based solutions and the design of green infrastructure), urban ecology/biology in natural water filtration systems, hydrogeology, public engagement and costing.
The team should demonstrate:
• Significant project management experience in projects of similar size and scope; • A proven track record in similar projects for other jurisdictions; • References provided by client representatives that are relevant to the scope of work; • Experience in engaging large and broad groups of stakeholders; • Must include an experienced public engagement specialist, including team members with strong graphic capabilities to support public engagement; • The specialist must have led complex and broad consultation processes including with Advisory Groups, multi-lingual and Indigenous communities with local presence and experience as an asset; and • The engagement lead must have experience developing detailed community engagement strategies, and be able to organize and deliver multiple public and stakeholder processes using a variety of tactics and tools.
The Consultant team should include at a minimum:
• A planner (if local, in good standing with the Planning Institute of BC or Canadian Institute of Planners); • A registered landscape architect in good standing with the British Columbia Society of Landscape Architects (if locally based); • A civil engineer (if local, Accredited Professional Engineer by the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia); • An urban ecologist or biologist with experience with urban recreation facilities, stormwater infrastructure, and natural water filtration systems; • A geotechnical engineer/hydrogeologist (if local Accredited Professional Engineer by the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia)/ hydrogeologist;
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-22 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
• A public engagement specialist or consultation facilitator with strong graphic capabilities(must have IAP2 certification and 10+ years of experience leading public engagement processes); and • A presentation graphics specialist (provide in proposal examples of 3D renderings, Photoshop-montages and other relevant high caliber design graphics including presentation boards).
7. PROJECT GOVERNANCE The project will be managed by a Park Board Project Manager from the Planning, Policy and Environment Group with input and direction from the Park Board Manager of Citywide Recreation, and a Planning, Policy and Environment Senior Planner – they will make up the Project Management Team. The Sport Field Strategy and associated documents will be the culmination of a comprehensive research and policy development process which includes input and feedback from multiple perspectives from within the Park Board and the School Board, as well as the field sport stakeholders and general public. In order to ensure an integrated but efficient process for gathering information and providing overall direction to the strategy, a hierarchy of project coordination groups and suggested timing for associated meetings/workshops are proposed in Table 1 – Project Governance and Management Meeting Summary, below. These groupings are outlined in order to support strategic feedback and guidance at key points during the project. Proponents are to use this table to help inform their proposed work plan and project schedule. Where materials will be presented or workshopped at multiple levels of meetings, Proposals should include sufficient time and resources to make revisions and refinements to deliverables between meetings.
Table 1 - Project Governance and Management Meeting Summary
Type of Meetings Purpose Personnel Frequency / Suggested length of meeting Project To check in on a Project • Bi-weekly/As Management regular basis on management Team: needed Phone Meetings overall PM issues • Park Board PM Calls and project • Park Board • One hour administration Recreation Lead meetings • Consultant PM
Technical Working To check in on the • Park Board PM • Min. 5 meetings Group direction of the • Park Board • Consultant can strategy from a Recreation propose technical Lead(s) additional perspective, and • Relevant PB Core meetings and provide an avenue & Tech Teams should provide a for all disciplines to • VSB rate for ad hoc provide feedback at Representative meetings. key milestones. • Consultant PM • Two Hour
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-23 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
Meetings Steering Committee To receive overall • Park Board/City • At key milestones direction for the PMs (and prior to any strategy from • Consultant PM Park senior and Board/City leadership staff at selected Council Meetings) the Consultants • Allow for 1 Park Board and VSB (to vary pending meeting and and meeting focus) provide a rate for share material in • Steering additional advance of any Park Committee meetings. Board/City Council (made up of • Two Hour Meeting senior leadership) External Advisory To check in on the • Park Board PM • Min. 5 meetings Group direction of the • Park Board • Consultant can strategy from a Recreation Lead propose user and • Relevant PB Core additional neighbourhood & Tech Teams meetings and perspective, and • VSB should provide a provide an avenue Representative rate for ad hoc for more in depth • Consultant PM meetings. discussion and and subject • Two Hour feedback at key matter experts Meetings milestones. as needed • Consultant Engagement team Park Board / School To present • Park Board/City • At key milestones Board information PMs and for decision. at key milestones • Park Board • The Consultants for Commissioners should include an approval/decision • Key members of allowance to by Commissioners the Consultant attend 2 and Trustees. team may be meetings. asked to attend meetings at specific milestones.
8. PROJECT DELIVERABLES & TIMELINE
Under the direction of the Project Manager and Recreation Manager, the successful Consultant will be expected to develop the Strategy to include components as identified in the Scope of Work. The successful Consultant must submit a project timeline that outlines the proposed Work Plan along with key milestones such as public
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-24 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
engagement, working group and steering committee meetings, and Board updates and presentations.
Deliverables
All items above must be consolidated into a comprehensive Sports Fields Strategy document. The document must be clear and well structured, and should be delivered in a creative, engaging, and visually accessible package. More technical information may be presented in adjoining appendices.
The deliverables include, but are not limited to, the scope of work outlined above:
• Draft Interim Report on Draft Recommendations; • Electronic versions and twenty (20) bound hard copies of the final Sport Field Strategy (as described above) including Policy Framework & Implementation Plan, service levels, regulation and enforcement recommendations. Written in plain language and aligned with the City of Vancouver Writing Style Guide; • Public Engagement Components: o Public Engagement and Outreach Plan; o All materials developed for stakeholder engagement including website copy, images and presentation materials (power point presentations, presentation boards, etc.), in both hard copy and digital format suitable for uploading to Parks Board website; o All summaries of all engagement activities; and o All presentation materials, suitable for large format presentations as well as reports and hard copy documents. • Environment and human health assessment; • Outdoor Facility Allocation and Management Policy; • Costing Analysis and recommendations for sport field fees and charges structure; • Use and Access Recommendations; • Inventory and assessment data gathering and analysis; • Asset mapping / data analysis; and • All GIS data and mapping products (refer to Appendix 1 at end of Part B).
The Consultant shall deliver the document in both a ‘camera ready’ and web- compatible format. The Consultant will also summarize the work for the Park Board pages of the City of Vancouver website, including a description of the process, updates at specific milestones, and any other relevant materials.
The Consultant will be required to prepare presentations for staff to present to the Park Board at steps along the way as required: generally at the mid-point as a project update, and at the project conclusion as a summary of the work and recommendations for Park Board approval.
Table 2. Project Phases and Timeline
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-25 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
Target Completion Phases Dates Project kick-off June 2021 June 2021
Phase 1: Background and Analysis June - September 2021 • Policy, Literature, and Previous Engagement Review • Data Collection & Analysis • Optimum Service Levels and Gap Analysis • Develop Public Engagement Plan • Advisory Group Meeting #1 Phase 2: Preliminary Strategy Development October 2021 – • Develop high level recommendations January 2022 • Public Engagement Discussion Guide • Public Engagement Round 1 • Allocation Policy framework development* • Environment and Human Health Assessment Scope • Round 1 Engagement Summary • Report out to Steering Committee Phase 3: Draft Strategy Delivery February – March 2022
• Draft Interim Report and Recommendations • Refine Recommendations • Public Engagement Round 2 • Round 2 Engagement Summary • Draft Final Strategy with Recommendations & Implementation Plan Phase 4: Final Strategy and Associated April 2022 Documents • Strategy presented to Park Board and School Board for decision.
*Timeline for completion of the Final Allocation Policy may need to extend beyond the overall Sports Field Strategy end date due to ongoing stakeholder discussions and negotiations.
The project milestones prescribed in this RFP are high-level and approximate only. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to recommend an innovative plan and detailed timeline as part of their RFP submission, which is to be reconfirmed at project start-up after award of contract.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-26 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
Appendix 1. DATA ASSEMBLY
To be provided by the Consultant through their experience, references or research:
• Changing demographic composition of the population and impact on sports and leisure requirements for the next 20 years; • Emerging sports and leisure trends for the next 20 years; • Shift in levels of sport participation related to sport trends and demographics from the last 10 years; • Current and future standards in sport facility sizes and accompanying amenities for different levels of play and age groups; • Identification and analysis of materials (i.e. artificial turf and fill) and products for consideration in new and upgraded fields; • Environmental scan and analysis of allocation and management policies from other communities; and • Experiences, models and provision from other municipalities facing similar demographic issues as Vancouver.
Data Delivery Requirements
• All GIS data has to be in ESRI format (file geodatabase); • All data needs to be in NAD83 Zone 10 coordinate system; • All map documents (ESRI projects MXD, APRX); • Methodology Manual for all analysis (background information, data & methodology, assumption & limitation, recommendation for future work, etc.); and • Data Dictionary (detailed documents about all data, figures and graphs created).
Data to be updated/collected and provided by Consultant:
Facility Description and Information Notes Bookable Fields layer notes Facility type (Eg. Soccer Field, Mini Soccer, softball Facility Facility Type diamond gravel field). This layer is point features (no polygon dimensions) and requires an update. no GIS data at this Facility Facility Classification (new system) time Facility Accessibility Rating no GIS data at this
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-27 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
time Currently the bookable fields layer is used to Facility Standalone or Overlap Facility list sport fields (facilities). The layer requires an update. Some information exists in GIS - Ball Diamonds are stored as For ball diamonds: LF, RF, Infield, Dimensions (in metres) polygons, but it does pitching mound/area not separate the areas within ball diamonds. Layer requires update. Some information exists in GIS - Turf Dimensions (in metres) For rectangular fields: L, W, run offs layer (polygons) includes fields - requires update. Cricket data in GIS is a Dimensions (in metres) For cricket fields: boundary, pitch point feature showing location only Highest Level of Play (cross ref with tech standards) for each no GIS data at this Accommodated sport time
Highest Level of Play no GIS data at this Child/Youth/Adult/Competitions/Tourna Accommodated time ments? Assets inventoried as part of hard assets project were given a condition based on field inspection. Condition Information Asset Management Condition rating Condition assessments are specific to a maintained asset (i.e. asphalt pathway) and not as a whole facility. no GIS data at this Condition Information Set criteria and evaluate time no GIS data at this time. Some excel data inventory for associated field buildings with facility Condition Information Remaining life of facility age, size and replacement value from City REFM Asset Management spreadsheet.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-28 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
no GIS data at this Service Level Level provided from user group time no GIS data at this Service Level Hours available for permit each season time Amenities at Each Facility (Number and Quality) Benches (including Team, Scoreboard) and Bleachers have inventory in GIS, Amenity Benches and spectator stands except QE and Stanley Park. Additional information on some of the benches/bleaches may be required. no GIS data at this Amenity Sport group storage box time Light Poles layer includes attributes for Location, Fixture Type, Number of Lamps, and Amenity Lights - Type of Bulb and Fixture Lamp type. Not all fields are complete (null/no data values exist) Goal Posts are not in GIS. Inventory for portable goal posts to Amenity Posts - location be completed by Structures Shop this Spring/Summer 2021 Goal Posts are not in GIS. Inventory for portable goal posts to Amenity Posts (type/dimension) be completed by Structures Shop this Spring/Summer 2021 What is the storage available, and where no GIS data at this Amenity is it located, and who uses it time What the user group provides and where. Sports Accessories/ sport specific And where do they Amenity equipment store it. Eg, crickets, nets, etc. Limited attributes collected. no GIS data at this Amenity # of Batter Boxes time no GIS data at this Amenity Scoreboard time
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-29 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
no GIS data at this Amenity Fieldhouse Accessibility Rating time Field house layer has some attribute fields Amenity # of Change rooms in Fieldhouse detailing change rooms. Updates required. Field house layer has some attribute fields # of Alternate Change rooms in Amenity detailing change Fieldhouse rooms. Updates required. # of rooms/multipurpose space in no GIS data at this Amenity Fieldhouse time no GIS data at this Amenity First Aid Room in Fieldhouse time no GIS data at this Amenity Officials Room in Fieldhouse time no GIS data at this Amenity Storage rooms in Fieldhouse time no GIS data at this Amenity Training facilities in Fieldhouse time Field house layer has some attribute fields Amenity Showers at Facility detailing showers. Updates required. User Data Total # of Registered Non Profits, For Geographic/demographic Profits booking clients, non-booking no GIS data at this s of outdoors sport clients; membership with age grouping time amenity users as defined by sport and gender, Indigenous breakdown if available) Type of Group (age group, gender, Active User Groups in competitive level); Registration numbers no GIS data at this Vancouver that book – min. 3 year trend – broken down by age time fields groupings Active User Groups in Desired amount, time, location of no GIS data at this Vancouver that book facilities available to book time fields Active User Groups in Portion providing access or opportunities no GIS data at this Vancouver that book to special populations time fields School-based sports Membership, with age & gender break no GIS data at this programs that use fields down if available time School-based sports no GIS data at this Facilities used programs that use fields time
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-30 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART B – CITY REQUIREMENTS
School-based sports no GIS data at this Daytime use of fields by schools programs that use fields time no GIS data at this Other User fees time no GIS data at this Other Other community’s user fees time Trend Data no GIS data at this Type of Trend Sport facility/fields/diamonds trends time no GIS data at this Type of Trend Private facilities time Sport participation trends: locally, no GIS data at this Type of Trend regionally, nationally time Market conditions (location compared to no GIS data at this Type of Trend surrounding municipalities) time Turf Layer & Bookable Fields Layer holds Field Grass Type/Maintenance Field classifications for different sports Standard (Eg. "Grade Type of Trend and types/scales of competition B"). Layers require (provision capacity) (technical standards) updates based on newly developed classification system as part of this project. no GIS data at this Type of Trend Events and tourism sport hosting time
To be provided by the Park Board:
• Broad population growth projections; • Existing supply and provision of facilities in Vancouver and the surrounding market area; • The average cost of land resources to accommodate facilities; • Existing operational procedures; • Existing permitting data; • Existing stakeholder data; • Hours of operation; • Staffing levels/structure; and • Facility inventory, asset management and rental information (where available - in various formats, GIS, Excel, etc.).
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page B-31 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
PART C – FORM OF PROPOSAL
RFP No. PS20210234, SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES (the “RFP”)
Proponent’s Full Legal Name:______
“Proponent”
Address:
Jurisdiction of Legal Organization:
Key Contact Person:
Telephone:
E-mail:
The Proponent, having carefully examined and read the RFP, including all amendments and addenda thereto, if any, and all other related information published on the City’s website, hereby acknowledges that it has understood all of the foregoing, and in response thereto hereby submits the enclosed Proposal.
The Proponent further acknowledges that it has read and agrees to the Legal Terms & Conditions attached as Appendix 1 to this Form of Proposal.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Proponent has executed this Proposal Form:
Signature of Authorized Signatory for the Proponent Date
Name and Title
Signature of Authorized Signatory for the Proponent Date
Name and Title
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
APPENDICES
The Form of Proposal includes the following attached Appendices:
APPENDIX 1 Legal Terms and Conditions of RFP
APPENDIX 2 Questionnaire
APPENDIX 3 Commercial Proposal
APPENDIX 4 Proponents References
APPENDIX 5 Certificate of Insurance
APPENDIX 6 Declaration of Supplier Code of Conduct Compliance
APPENDIX 7 Personal Information Consent Form(s)
APPENDIX 8 Subcontractors
APPENDIX 9 Proposed Amendments to Form of Agreement
APPENDIX 10 Conflicts; Collusion; Lobbying
APPENDIX 10 Proof of WorkSafeBC Registration
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
APPENDIX 1 LEGAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RFP
1 APPLICATION OF THESE LEGAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
These legal terms and conditions set out the City’s and the Proponent’s legal rights and obligations only with respect to the RFP proposal process and any evaluation, selection, negotiation or other related process. In no event will the legal terms and conditions of this Appendix 1 apply to, or have the effect of supplementing, any Contract formed between the City and the Proponent, or otherwise apply as between the Proponent and the City following the signing of any such Contract.
2 DEFINITIONS
In this Appendix 1, the following terms have the following meanings:
(a) “City” means the City of Vancouver, a municipal corporation continued pursuant to the Vancouver Charter.
(b) “Contract” means a legal agreement, if any, entered into between the City and the Proponent following and as a result of the Proponent’s selection by the City in the City’s RFP process.
(c) “Losses” means, in respect of any matter, all direct or indirect, as well as consequential: claims, demands, proceedings, losses, damages, liabilities, deficiencies, costs and expenses (including without limitation all legal and other professional fees and disbursements, interest, penalties and amounts paid in settlement whether from a third person or otherwise).
(d) “Proponent” means the legal entity which has signed the Proposal Form, and “proponent” means any proponent responding to the RFP, excluding or including the Proponent, as the context requires.
(e) “Proposal” means the package of documents consisting of the Proposal Form (including this Appendix 1), the Proponent’s proposal submitted under cover of the Proposal Form, and all schedules, appendices and accompanying documents, and “proposal” means any proposal submitted by any proponent, excluding or including the Proponent, as the context requires.
(f) “Proposal Form” means that certain Part C of the RFP, completed and executed by the Proponent, to which this Appendix 1 is appended.
(g) “RFP” means the document issued by the City as Request for Proposals No. PS20210234, as amended from time to time and including all addenda.
3 NO LEGAL OBLIGATION ASSUMED BY THE CITY
Despite any other term of the RFP or the Proposal Form, including this Appendix 1 (except only Sections 7, 8.2 and 10 of this Appendix 1, in each case to the extent applicable), the City
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-3 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
assumes no legal duty or obligation to the Proponent or to any proposed subcontractor in respect of the RFP, its subject matter or the Proposal unless and until the City enters into a Contract, which the City may decline to do in the City’s sole discretion.
4 NO DUTY OF CARE OR FAIRNESS TO THE PROPONENT
The City is a public body required by law to act in the public interest. In no event, however, does the City owe to the Proponent or to any of the Proponent’s proposed subcontractors (as opposed to the public) any contract or tort law duty of care, fairness, impartiality or procedural fairness in the RFP process, or any contract or tort law duty to preserve the integrity of the RFP process. The Proponent hereby waives and releases the City from any and all such duties and expressly assumes the risk of all Losses arising from participating in the RFP process on this basis.
5 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
5.1 Compliance / Non-Compliance
Any proposal which contains an error, omission or misstatement, which contains qualifying conditions, which does not fully address all of the requirements or expectations of the RFP, or which otherwise fails to conform to the RFP may or may not be rejected by the City at the City’s sole discretion. The City may also invite a proponent to adjust its proposal to remedy any such problem, without providing the other proponents an opportunity to amend their proposals.
5.2 Reservation of Complete Control over Process
The City reserves the right to retain complete control over the RFP and proposal processes at all times. Accordingly, the City is not legally obligated to review, consider or evaluate the proposals, or any particular proposal, and need not necessarily review, consider or evaluate the proposals, or any particular proposal, in accordance with the procedures set out in the RFP, and the City reserves the right to continue, interrupt, cease or modify its review, evaluation and negotiation processes in respect of any or all proposals at any time without further explanation or notification to any proponents.
5.3 Discussions/Negotiations
The City may, at any time prior to signing a Contract, discuss or negotiate changes to the scope of the RFP, any proposal or any proposed agreement with any one or more of the proponents without having any duty or obligation to advise the Proponent or to allow the Proponent to vary its Proposal as a result of such discussions or negotiations with other proponents or changes to the RFP or such proposals or proposed agreements, and, without limiting the general scope of Section 6 of this Appendix 1, the City will have no liability to the Proponent as a result of such discussions, negotiations or changes.
5.4 Acceptance or Rejection of Proposals
The City has in its sole discretion, the unfettered right to: accept any proposal; reject any proposal; reject all proposals; accept a proposal which is not the lowest-price proposal;
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-4 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
accept a proposal that deviates from the requirements of the RFP or the conditions specified in the RFP; reject a proposal even if it is the only proposal received by the City; accept all or any part of a proposal; enter into agreements respecting the subject matter of the RFP with one or more proponents; or enter into one or more agreements respecting the subject matter of the RFP with any other person at any time.
6 PROTECTION OF CITY AGAINST LAWSUITS
6.1 Release by the Proponent
Except only and to the extent that the City is in breach of Section 8.2 of this Appendix 1, the Proponent now releases the City, its officials, its agents and its employees from all liability for any Losses incurred in connection with the RFP or the Proposal, including any Losses in connection with:
(a) any alleged (or judicially determined) breach by the City or its officials, agents or employees of the RFP (it being agreed that, to the best of the parties’ knowledge, the City has no obligation or duty under the RFP which it could breach (other than wholly unanticipated obligations or duties merely alleged or actually imposed judicially));
(b) any unintentional tort of the City or its officials or employees occurring in the course of conducting the RFP process;
(c) the Proponent preparing and submitting the Proposal;
(d) the City accepting or rejecting the Proposal or any other submission; or
(e) the manner in which the City: reviews, considers, evaluates or negotiates any proposal; addresses or fails to address any proposal or proposals; resolves to enter into a Contract or not enter into a Contract or any similar agreement; or the identity of the proponent(s) or other persons, if any, with whom the City enters any agreement respecting the subject matter of the RFP.
6.2 Indemnity by the Proponent
Except only and to the extent that the City breaches Section 8.2 of this Appendix 1, the Proponent indemnifies and will protect, save and hold harmless the City, its officials, its agents and its employees from and against all Losses, in respect of any claim or threatened claim by the Proponent or any of its proposed subcontractors or agents alleging or pleading:
(a) any alleged (or judicially determined) breach by the City or its officials or employees of the RFP (it being agreed that, to the best of the parties’ knowledge, the City has no obligation or duty under the RFP which it could breach (other than wholly unanticipated obligations or duties merely alleged or actually imposed judicially));
(b) any unintentional tort of the City or its officials or employees occurring in the course of conducting the RFP process, or
(c) liability on any other basis related to the RFP or the proposal process.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-5 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
6.3 Limitation of City Liability
In the event that, with respect to anything relating to the RFP or this proposal process (except only and to the extent that the City breaches Section 8.2 of this Appendix 1), the City or its officials, agents or employees are found to have breached (including fundamentally breached) any duty or obligation of any kind to the Proponent or its subcontractors or agents whether at law or in equity or in contract or in tort, or are found liable to the Proponent or its subcontractors or agents on any basis or legal principle of any kind, the City’s liability is limited to a maximum of $100, despite any other term or agreement to the contrary.
7 DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Any dispute relating in any manner to the RFP or the proposal process (except to the extent that the City breaches this Section 7 or Section 8.2 of this Appendix 1, and also excepting any disputes arising between the City and the Proponent under a Contract (or a similar contract between the City and a proponent other than the Proponent)) will be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Act (British Columbia), amended as follows:
(a) The arbitrator will be selected by the City’s Director of Legal Services;
(b) Section 6 of this Appendix 1 will: (i) bind the City, the Proponent and the arbitrator; and (ii) survive any and all awards made by the arbitrator; and
(c) The Proponent will bear all costs of the arbitration.
8 PROTECTION AND OWNERSHIP OF INFORMATION
8.1 RFP and Proposal Documents City’s Property
(a) All RFP-related documents provided to the Proponent by the City remain the property of the City and must be returned to the City, or destroyed, upon request by the City.
(b) The documentation containing the Proposal, once submitted to the City, becomes the property of the City, and the City is under no obligation to return the Proposal to the Proponent.
8.2 Proponent’s Submission Confidential
Subject to the applicable provisions of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (British Columbia), other applicable legal requirements, and the City’s right to publicly disclose information about or from the Proposal, including without limitation names and prices, in the course of publicly reporting to the Vancouver City Council about the RFP, the City will treat the Proposal (and the City’s evaluation of it), in confidence in substantially the same manner as it treats its own confidential material and information.
8.3 All City Information Confidential
(a) The Proponent will not divulge or disclose to any third parties any non-public documents or information concerning the affairs of the City which have been or are in
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-6 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
the future provided or communicated to the Proponent at any time (whether before, during or after the RFP process). Furthermore, the Proponent agrees that it has not and must not use or exploit any such non-public documents or information in any manner, including in submitting its Proposal.
(b) The Proponent now irrevocably waives all rights it may have by statute, at law or in equity, to obtain any records produced or kept by the City in evaluating its Proposal (and any other submissions) and now agrees that under no circumstances will it make any application to the City or any court for disclosure of any records pertaining to the receipt, evaluation or selection of its Proposal (or any other submissions) including, without limitation, records relating only to the Proponent.
9 NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST / NO COLLUSION / NO LOBBYING
9.1 Declaration as to no Conflict of Interest in RFP Process
(a) The Proponent confirms and warrants that there is no officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee or contractor of the Proponent or of any of its proposed subcontractors, or any other person related to the Proponent’s or any proposed subcontractor’s organization (a “person having an interest”) or any spouse, business associate, friend or relative of a person having an interest who is: (i) an official or employee of the City; or (ii) related to or has any business or family relationship with an elected official or employee of the City, in each case, such that there could be any conflict of interest or any appearance of conflict of interest in the evaluation or consideration of the Proposal by the City, and, in each case, except as set out, in all material detail, in a separate section titled “Conflicts; Collusion; Lobbying” in the Proposal in accordance with the form set out in Part C – APPENDIX 10.
(b) The Proponent confirms and warrants that there is no person having an interest (as defined above) who is a former official, former employee or former contractor of the City and who has non-public information relevant to the RFP obtained during his or her employment or engagement by the City, except as set out, in all material detail, in a separate section titled “Conflicts; Collusion; Lobbying” in the Proposal in accordance with the form set out in Part C – APPENDIX 10.
9.2 Declaration as to No Conflict of Interest Respecting Proposed Supply
The Proponent confirms and warrants that neither the Proponent nor any of its proposed subcontractors is currently engaged in supplying (or is proposing to supply) goods or services to a third party such that entering into an agreement with the City in relation to the subject matter of the RFP would create a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest between the Proponent’s duties to the City and the Proponent’s or its subcontractors’ duties to such third party, except as set out, in all material detail, in a separate section titled “Conflicts; Collusion; Lobbying” in the Proposal in accordance with the form set out in Part C – APPENDIX 10.
9.3 Declaration as to No Collusion
The Proponent confirms and warrants that:
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-7 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
(a) the Proponent is not competing within the RFP process with any entity with which it is legally or financially associated or affiliated, and
(b) the Proponent is not cooperating in any manner in relation to the RFP with any other proponent responding to the RFP, in each case, except as set out, in all material detail, in a separate section titled “Conflicts, Collusion, Lobbying” in the Proposal in accordance with the form set out in Part C – APPENDIX 10.
9.4 Declaration as to No Lobbying
The Proponent confirms and warrants that:
(a) neither it nor any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee or agent of the Proponent or any of its proposed subcontractors is registered as a lobbyist under any lobbyist legislation in any jurisdiction in Canada or in the United States of America; and
(b) neither it nor any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee or agent of the Proponent or any of its proposed subcontractors has engaged in any form of political or other lobbying whatsoever with respect to the RFP or sought, other than through the submission of the Proposal, to influence the outcome of the RFP process, in each case, except as set out, in all material detail, in a separate section titled “Conflicts, Collusion, Lobbying” in the Proposal in accordance with the form set out in Part C – APPENDIX 10.
10 GENERAL
(a) All of the terms of this Appendix 1 to this Proposal Form which by their nature require performance or fulfillment following the conclusion of the proposal process will survive the conclusion of such process and will remain legally enforceable by and against the Proponent and the City.
(b) The legal invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Appendix 1 will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Appendix 1, which will remain in full force and effect.
(c) The Proponent now assumes and agrees to bear all costs and expenses incurred by the Proponent in preparing its Proposal and participating in the RFP process.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-8 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
APPENDIX 2 QUESTIONNAIRE Complete this Appendix 2 - Questionnaire in the form set out below.
A. Executive Summary
In the space below, provide a brief executive summary of your Proposal. Summarize your understanding of the Project, including scope, vision, purpose, partners, values and timing.
B. Proponent Overview
In the space below, provide a description of the Proponent’s company, and include its ownership structure, the number of years in business, number of employees, purpose and history of successes.
If the head office of the Proponent is located within the City of Vancouver or if the Proponent is to perform any work at a site located within the City of Vancouver, this section should also indicate whether the Proponent has a valid City of Vancouver business license (or, if available, a Metro West Inter-municipal Business License).
ii. Provide a summary of successful projects that illustrate why your team will be successful in achieving the desired outcomes of this work. For each project include project objectives, outcomes, methods used to support outcomes, sub-consultants involved and their role versus that of the consultant. Suggested areas of focus:
• Development of needs assessments and gap analysis, environmental and health assessments, long-range capital and service planning, design needs for field sports facilities in municpalities of comparable size to Vancouver.
• Development of long-range budgeting and costing, field sports and facility maintenance, irrigation, turf management, urban ecology, classification, design and standard setting for sports fields and diamonds, cooperative partnerships and models for field facilities, as well as a commitment to equity and reconciliation.
• Development of complex and broad consultation processes including with Advisory Groups, multi-lingual and Indigenous communities with local presence and experience as an asset.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-9 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
Development of detailed creative and innovative community engagement strategies, and be able to organize and deliver multiple public and stakeholder processes using a variety of tactics and tools.
iii) Proponents that are submitting a multi-firm bid, please demonstrate in detail how you will work together or have worked together in the past. Describe any challenges and how they were overcome. Include any processes or work methodologies you intend to use.
C. Key Personnel
i) Provide a complete organization chart for the project, identifying the project manager/partners and outline all roles and areas of responsibility including for all key personnel and sub-consultants and percent time availability. The City is interested to know the relevance of each proposed team member, including their knowledge, professional qualification and relevant experience to complete and deliver on the key tasks within the timelines outlined.
Suggested areas of knowledge, professional qualification and relevant experience includes:
Project management of projects similar in size and scale;
Work with municipalities, regions and other government bodies as clients;
Expertise in the master-planning, design of urban parks, and leading multidisciplinary teams;
Expertise in current approaches and options for high intensity sport field surfaces (e.g. synthetic turf);
Experience in engaging large and broad groups of stakeholders;
A registered planner (in good standing with the Planning Institute of BC or Canadian Institute of Planners);
A registered landscape architect in good standing with the British Columbia Society of Landscape Architects;
A irrigation and turf management specialist with 10+ years of experience with sports field and facilities;
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-10 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
A civil engineer, Accredited Professional Engineer by the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia with experience in master planning, design of sports facilities, stormwater, integrated approaches to water services including nature- based solutions and the design of green infrastructure;
An urban ecologist or biologist with experience with urban recreation facilities, stormwater infrastructure, and natural water filtration systems;
A GIS (Geographic Information System) specialist with a minimum of 5+ years experience in strategy and master planning assessments, inventory, mapping, gap analysis and data management;
A geotechnical engineer/hydrogeologist (Accredited Professional Engineer by the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia);
A public engagement specialist or consultation facilitator with strong graphic capabilities(must have IAP2 certification and 10+ years of experience leading public engagement processes); and
A presentation graphics specialist (provide in proposal examples of relevant high caliber layout and design graphics including presentation boards).
ii) Also attach to this Form of Proposal as an additional Appendix, CVs with a focus on projects by the team members within the last five years, that details experience which is relevant to the scope of work, including the level of seniority for each task or project undertaken. Include at least three (3) relevant and successfully completed projects with a brief description of the project, total fees, project reference number, year completed, location and client representative details such as name, phone number and email address for each key personnel.
iii) Proponents that are submitting a multi-firm bid or by identifying sub-consultants are to demonstrate past colloboration on how the key personnel will work with one another and detail their project experience that shows they were a part of a previous joint project. Describe how the project will be managed and how the team will communicate and work together. Describe any challenges and how they were overcome/mitigated.
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-11 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
D. Work Plan
i) In the space below (or attached to this Form of Proposal as an additional Appendix clearly titled “Work Plan”), detail your understanding of the Project and comment on the feasibility of meeting the City’s objectives and requirements. Provide a detailed plan of approach and methodology, including the description of the services proposed and the level of detail to be included in the Project Tasks and sub-tasks to complete each of the Deliverables. Outline methods by which the Proponent proposes to undertake the work including methods to control the scope, quality, schedule and cost of the project. The Proponent’s work plan should make reference to the Requirements as appropriate. The Proponent should state a clear and thorough description of all assumptions made for the completion of the Work. These include but are not limited to a listing of all services the Consultant would require from the City throughout the term of the Project.
ii) The Proponent should provide a project schedule/timeline (Gantt Chart) to ensure that the Deliverables Schedule is completed on time, outlining key milestones for completion of each task and sub-task and each deliverable as well as all dates of meetings, workshops or consultations. The work schedule should incorporate at least a two week review time for City staff to provide comments on draft version of all major deliverables. The Proponent should make reference to the Requirements as appropriate.
iii) The Proponents should articulate all assumptions underlying their Proposal in terms of the amount of project management and other project resources that the Proponent would require from the City’s Project Manager or other City staff in the performance of their services, including the following: a detailed list of all activities that the City is expected to undertake and a detailed list of all data and information required from the City to undertake the scope of services.
iv) The Proponent should provide details as to what they perceive to be the special challenges or considerations to successful completion of the project as described, as well as their strategy to overcome these challenges.
E. Innovation, Alternative Solutions/Value Add
Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, the City welcomes Proposals respecting
{00153432v27} March 31, 2021 Page C-12 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. PS20210234 SPORTS FIELD STRATEGY CONSULTANT SERVICES PART C - FORM OF PROPOSAL
innovative or novel approaches to the City’s objectives and requirements and may consider value-creating Proposals that derogate from the Requirements. In the space below, note any proposed innovative approaches to meeting the City’s requirements. Proponents should articulate any pricing impacts. If, in addition to proposing services which meet the Requirements, the Proponents wishes to offer an alternative or alternatives, the alternative solutions should be described in the space provided below. Any pricing impact of the alternative solution(s) should also be provided.
F. Social Sustainability i. SUPPLIER DIVERSITY
In the space below, indicate the vendor’s company profile with regards to social value and economic inclusion including recognized certifications and/or if owned/controlled by an equity-seeking demographic (including but not limited to non-profit, cooperative, Women, Indigenous Peoples, Ethno-cultural People (minorities, newcomers, immigrants), persons with disabilities or LGBTQ2+ people).
Majority owned/controlled/ by: Social / Environmental Certifications Women BCorp Indigenous Peoples BuySocial Non-Profit/Charity (Social Enterprise) Supplier Diversity Certification Coop