Recovery Plan for Two Plants from Rota

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recovery Plan for Two Plants from Rota U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Two Plants from Rota ©Gregory A Koob, used with permission. DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare and publish recovery plans, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, Tribal agencies, and other affected and interested parties. The objectives of recovery plans will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific actions and may not represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in recovery plan formulation, other than our own. They represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Recovery plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to peer review before we adopt them as approved final documents. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. Recovery Plan for Two Plants from Rota (Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense). Portland, Oregon. 86 pp. An electronic copy of this plan is available at: <http://pacific.fws.gov/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/default.htm> and also at <http://endangered.fws.gov/recovery/index.html>. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This recovery plan was prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office in cooperation with the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Department of Lands and Natural Resources. Its completion would not have been possible without their assistance. Many individuals and organizations have contributed to our knowledge of Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense and work cooperatively with us to recover these species. We would especially like to thank the following individuals for their support: James Manglona, Lynn Raulerson, Estanislao Taisacan, and Laura Williams. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Current Status: The plants Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense (no common names) are found only on the island of Rota in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). Nesogenes rotensis is a low-growing herbaceous plant in the verbena family (Verbenaceae) and Osmoxylon mariannense is a spindly, soft-wooded tree in the ginseng family (Arialiaceae). Both species were federally listed as endangered in 2004 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS] 2004). Osmoxylon mariannense is also protected by the government of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Currently, there are 2 known populations of N. rotensis of 15 to 20 plants each. The 10 known individuals of O. mariannense are in scattered locations on the Sabana (the cloudswept plateau that dominates the western half of Rota). Habitat Requirements: Nesogenes rotensis is found on exposed, raised limestone flats in non-forested coastal strand habitat. These flats are subject to salt spray during severe storms. Osmoxylon mariannense is found in limestone forests on the Sabana, a raised plateau unique in the Mariana archipelago, that are often shrouded in clouds and mist. Limiting Factors: Human activities that alter native vegetation and habitat are believed to be the primary factors leading to the small population sizes and limited distribution of Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense. These activities include agriculture, ranching, nonnative plant and animal introductions, resort and beach park development in the coastal habitat of N. rotensis, and road construction and maintenance in the Sabana habitat of O. mariannense. In the last decade, several major typhoons have made landfall on Rota, severely impacting individuals of both species. Another factor that may affect the recovery of these two species is their vulnerability to extinction from reduced reproductive vigor due to their small population sizes. iii Recovery Strategy: Recovery of Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense focuses on the following actions: (1) protecting and restoring the native coastal strand and forest habitat of N. rotensis and O. mariannense, respectively; (2) establishing new populations and augmenting existing populations of these species through methods including controlled propagation and outplanting; (3) assessing the impacts of feral ungulates (deer and pigs), rats, mice, insects, diseases, and introduced plants, and determining methods for their appropriate control or eradication; (4) building public support for conservation; and (5) reassessing and refining recovery actions as appropriate. Recovery Priority Numbers: Nesogenes rotensis has a recovery priority number of 2 on a scale of 1 (highest) to 18 (lowest), reflecting a high degree of threat, high recovery potential, and its taxonomic status as a full species. Osmoxylon mariannense has a recovery priority number of 5, reflecting a high degree of threat, low recovery potential, and its taxonomic status as a full species. Recovery Goals: The interim goal is to control threats and increase population sizes and geographic distribution sufficient to reclassify or downlist these two endangered species to threatened status. The long-term goal is to conserve and recover Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense in order to remove them from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (delisting). Recovery Objectives: Restore and maintain multiple naturally reproducing populations of Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense on the island of Rota such that the protections of the Endangered Species Act are no longer necessary. Recovery Criteria: Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense may be considered for downlisting to threatened status when all of the following criteria are achieved and maintained for a minimum of 10 consecutive years: iv 1) A total of two populations of Nesogenes rotensis are naturally reproducing and stable, or increasing in numbers. Each population of N. rotensis must consist of at least 300 mature, reproducing individuals. A total of two populations of Osmoxylon mariannense are naturally reproducing and stable, or increasing in numbers. Each population of O. mariannense must consist of at least 100 mature, reproducing individuals. A stable or increasing population is defined as having a finite rate of increase (known as 8 or lambda) greater than or equal to 1 over the requisite 10-year time period. 2) Sufficient habitat is protected and managed to achieve criterion 1 above. 3) Management and control of nonnative species by local, regional, Commonwealth, and Federal authorities are demonstrated to be successful and sufficient to achieve criterion 1 above. Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense may be considered for removal (delisting) from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants when all of the following criteria are achieved and maintained for a minimum of 10 consecutive years: 1) A total of four populations of Nesogenes rotensis are naturally reproducing and stable, or increasing in numbers. Each population of N. rotensis must consist of at least 300 mature, reproducing individuals. A total of four populations of Osmoxylon mariannense are naturally reproducing and stable, or increasing in numbers. Each population of O. mariannense must consist of at least 100 mature, reproducing individuals. A stable or increasing population is defined as having a finite rate of increase (known as 8 or lambda) greater than or equal to 1 over the requisite 10-year time period. 2) Sufficient habitat is protected and managed to achieve criterion 1 above. v 3) Management and control of nonnative species by local, regional, Commonwealth, and Federal authorities are demonstrated to be successful and sufficient to achieve criterion 1 above. Recovery Actions Needed: 1) Coordinate and monitor recovery efforts; 2) Address factors affecting viability of the wild populations; 3) Monitor the extant Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense populations, establish new populations, and augment existing populations; and 4) Provide educational and informational opportunities to build public support for conservation. Date of Recovery: Due to the present uncertainties regarding the roles of introduced species, habitat loss and degradation, and the susceptibility of the wild populations to random catastrophic events, we cannot realistically estimate when delisting of Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense might occur. We expect that it will likely take several decades to fully recover these species, depending on the status of controlling threats to the species and the status of their populations. As we implement the recovery actions in this plan we anticipate that we will be able to more accurately estimate when delisting might occur. Total Estimated Cost of Recovery: Due to the great number of unknown variables affecting the management and potential recovery of these two species, the total cost to recover Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense cannot be realistically determined at this time. Future recovery actions will be initiated, implemented, and modified as informed by research and monitoring of ongoing management actions (see Recovery Actions
Recommended publications
  • Nesogenes Rotensis (No Common Name) 5-Year Review Summary
    Nesogenes rotensis (No common name) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii 5-YEAR REVIEW Species reviewed: Nesogenes rotensis (No common name) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 3 1.1 Reviewers ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Methodology used to complete the review: ................................................................. 3 1.3 Background: .................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) policy ......................... 5 2.2 Recovery Criteria .......................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Updated Information and Current Species Status .................................................... 7 2.4 Synthesis ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.0 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Recommended Classification: ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules
    49398 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR time. The information on candidate taxa Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New will be revised and updated continually Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Fish and Wildlife Service by the Regional Offices identified as Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West having lead responsibility for the Virginia. 50 CFR Part 17 particular taxa. The Service anticipates Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Endangered and Threatened Wildlife publishing annually an update of the Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035± and Plants; Review of Plant and candidate notice of review, annual notice of findings on recycled petitions, 9589 (413/253±8615). Animal Taxa That Are Candidates or Region 6. Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Proposed for Listing as Endangered or and annual description of progress on listing actions. Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Threatened, Annual Notice of Findings Utah, and Wyoming. on Recycled Petitions, and Annual ADDRESSES: Interested persons or organizations should submit comments Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Description of Progress on Listing Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, Actions regarding a particular taxon to the Regional Director of the Region Denver Federal Center, Denver, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, identified as having the lead Colorado 80225±0486 (303/236±7398). Interior. responsibility for that taxon. Comments Region 7. Alaska. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and ACTION: Notice of review. of a more general nature may be Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, submitted to the Chief, Division of Anchorage, Alaska 99503±6199 (907/ SUMMARY: In this document, the Fish Endangered Species, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Osmoxylon Mariannense (No Common Name) 5-Year Review Summary
    Osmoxylon mariannense (No common name) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii 5-YEAR REVIEW Species reviewed: Osmoxylon mariannense (No common name) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 3 1.1 Reviewers ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Methodology used to complete the review: ................................................................. 3 1.3 Background: .................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) policy ......................... 5 2.2 Recovery Criteria .......................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Updated Information and Current Species Status .................................................... 7 2.4 Synthesis....................................................................................................................... 11 3.0 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Recommended Classification: ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Genus Osmoxylon (Araliaceae) in Palau, Including Two New Species
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys A58: revision 49–64 (2016) of the genus Osmoxylon (Araliaceae) in Palau, including two new species 49 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.58.5292 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A revision of the genus Osmoxylon (Araliaceae) in Palau, including two new species Craig M. Costion1, Gregory M. Plunkett2 1 Botany Department, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Wa- shington DC 20013-7012 2 Cullman Program for Molecular Systematics, New York Botanical Garden, 2900 Southern Blvd., Bronx, NY 10458-5126, USA Corresponding author: Craig M. Costion ([email protected]) Academic editor: Mark Watson | Received 12 May 2015 | Accepted 10 November 2015 | Published 12 January 2016 Citation: Costion CM, Plunkett GM (2016) A revision of the genus Osmoxylon (Araliaceae) in Palau, including two new species. PhytoKeys 58: 49–64. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.58.5292 Abstract Osmoxylon Miq. (Araliaceae) is revised for Palau, Micronesia including descriptions of two new taxa Os- moxylon leidichii Costion, sp. nov. and Osmoxylon ngardokense Costion, sp. nov. Full descriptions are provided for all four Palau species, along with diagnostic field keys. Keywords Pacific Islands, taxonomy, Asteriids, Apiales Introduction Osmoxylon Miq. (Araliaceae) is a genus of rainforest trees and shrubs from southeastern Asia and the western Pacific (Philipson 1979; Frodin and Govaerts 2003). All of the 60 currently recognized species are characterized by large umbelliform panicles composed of several to many three-branched inflorescence units. Each inflorescence unit terminates in a stalked head or umbellule that develops sterile baccate “pseudo-fruits” and two lateral stalked heads or umbellules with fertile bisexual flowers and fruits.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Updated July 15, 2021 Curriculum Vitae GREGORY M. PLUNKETT ADDRESS: New York Botanical Garden Phone: (718) 817-8179 2900 Southern Blvd. FAX: (718) 817-8101 Bronx, NY 10458-5126 e-mail: [email protected] BIRTH DATE: February 21, 1965. Bayonne, New Jersey, USA EDUCATION: Ph.D. (Botany), Washington State University (D.E. Soltis, advisor). 1994. M.A. (Biology), The College of William and Mary in Virginia (G.W. Hall, advisor). 1990. B.S. (Biology), The College of William and Mary in Virginia. 1987. CURRENT POSITION: Director & Curator, Program for Molecular Systematics, New York Botanical Garden. PAST FACULTY POSITIONS Professor of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University. 2008–2009. Associate Professor of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University. 2002–2008. Assistant Professor of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University. 1996–2002. CURRENT AFFILIATED POSITIONS: Affiliate Professor of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University. 2009–present. Adjunct Professor of Plant Sciences, The Graduate Center, City University of New York. 2009–present. Adjunct Faculty, Fordham University. 2014–present. Research Associate, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. 2002–present. OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Curator, Herbarium of Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU). 1996–2009. Graduate Faculty, Molecular Biology and Genetics Program, VCU. 1998–2009. Fellow, Center for the Study of Biological Complexity, VCU. 2002–2009. Visiting Curator/Professeur, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. 2004, 2005. Visiting Scientist, University of the South Pacific,
    [Show full text]
  • Two Plants from Rota, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
    Recovery Outline for Two Plants from Rota Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Species and Nesogenes rotensis (no common name) Listing Status: Endangered; listed April 8, 2004 Osmoxylon mariannense (no common name) Endangered; listed April 8, 2004 Recovery Priority 2 for both species (based on classification as full species, high degree of Number: threat, high recovery potential, and absence of controversy) Population Trend: Declining Scope of Recovery Multi-species Effort: Lead Region: Region 1, Portland, Oregon Lead Field Office: Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122 Box 50088 Honolulu, Hawaii 96850-0001 Phone: 808-792-9400 Purpose and Use of this Recovery Outline: In the interim between listing and recovery plan approval, a recovery outline provides preliminary strategies for conservation that conform to the mandates of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). It organizes near-term recovery actions, provides rangewide conservation context for our decisions, and sets the stage for recovery planning and stakeholder involvement. The recovery outline is intended primarily for internal use by us, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to guide conservation actions until a draft recovery plan is developed and distributed for public comment prior to the approval of the final recovery plan. Note on Information Sources: This recovery outline is based on available data contained in the final listing decision (69 FR 18499) for Nesogenes rotensis and Osmoxylon mariannense and the proposed listing rule (65 FR 35025) for N. rotensis, O. mariannense, and Tabernaemontana rotensis. Our knowledge of the natural history and ecology of these two plant species is very limited at this point in time; research to gather data critical for the conservation and recovery of these species is identified as a high priority need in this outline.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CV: Snow 2018
    1 NEIL SNOW, PH.D. Curriculum Vitae CURRENT POSITION Associate Professor of Botany Curator, T.M. Sperry Herbarium Department of Biology, Pittsburg State University Pittsburg, KS 66762 620-235-4424 (phone); 620-235-4194 (fax) http://www.pittstate.edu/department/biology/faculty/neil-snow.dot ADJUNCT APPOINTMENTS Missouri Botanical Garden (Associate Researcher; 1999-present) University of Hawaii-Manoa (Affiliate Graduate Faculty; 2010-2011) Au Sable Institute of Environmental Studies (2006) EDUCATION Ph.D., 1997 (Population and Evolutionary Biology); Washington University in St. Louis Dissertation: “Phylogeny and Systematics of Leptochloa P. Beauv. sensu lato (Poaceae: Chloridoideae)”. Advisor: Dr. Peter H. Raven. M.S., 1988 (Botany); University of Wyoming. Thesis: “Floristics of the Headwaters Region of the Yellowstone River, Wyoming”. Advisor: Dr. Ronald L. Hartman B.S., 1985 (Botany); Colorado State University. Advisor: Dr. Dieter H. Wilken PREVIOUS POSITIONS 2011-2013: Director and Botanist, Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, Montana 2007-2011: Research Botanist, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 1998-2007: Assistant then Associate Professor of Biology and Botany, School of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado 2005 (sabbatical). Project Manager and Senior Ecologist, H. T. Harvey & Associates, Fresno, CA 1997-1999: Senior Botanist, Queensland Herbarium, Brisbane, Australia 1990-1997: Doctoral student, Washington University in St. Louis; Missouri Botanical Garden HERBARIUM CURATORIAL EXPERIENCE 2013-current: Director
    [Show full text]
  • IX Apiales Symposium
    IX Apiales Symposium Abstract Book 31 July – 2 August 2017 The Gold Coast Marina Club Guangzhou, China Compiled and edited by: Alexei Oskolski Maxim Nuraliev Patricia Tilney Introduction We are pleased to announce that the Apiales IX Symposium will be held from 31 July to 2 August 2017 at the The Gold Coast Marina Club in Guangzhou, China. This meeting will continue the series of very successful gatherings in Reading (1970), Perpignan (1977), St. Louis (1999), Pretoria (2003), Vienna (2005), Moscow (2008), Sydney (2011) and Istanbul (2014), where students of this interesting group of plants had the opportunity to share results of recent studies. As with the previous symposia, the meeting in Guangzhou will focus on all research fields relating to the systematics and phylogeny of Apiales (including morphology, anatomy, biogeography, floristics), as well as to ecology, ethnobotany, pharmaceutical and natural products research in this plant group. Organizing Commettee Chairman: Alexei Oskolski (Johannesburg – St. Petersburg) Vice-Chairman: Maxim Nuraliev (Moscow) Scientific Committee: Yousef Ajani (Tehran) Emine Akalin (Istanbul) Stephen Downie (Urbana) Murray Henwood (Sydney) Neriman Özhatay (Istanbul) Tatiana Ostroumova (Moscow) Michael Pimenov (Moscow) Gregory Plunkett (New York) Mark Schlessman (Poughkeepsie) Krzysztof Spalik (Warsaw) Patricia Tilney (Johannesburg) Ben-Erik van Wyk (Johannesburg) 2 Program of the IX Apiales Symposium 31 July 2017 Lobby of the Gold Coast Marina Club 14.00 – 18.00. Registration of participants. "Shi fu zai" room (4th floor of the Gold Coast Marina Club) 19.00 – 21.00. Welcome party 1 August 2017 Meeting room (5th floor of the Gold Coast Marina Club) Chair: Dr. Alexei Oskolski 9.00 – 9.20.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Time
    Friday September 19, 1997 Part V Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Species; Review of Plant and Animal Taxa; Proposed Rule federal register 49397 49398 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR time. The information on candidate taxa Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New will be revised and updated continually Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Fish and Wildlife Service by the Regional Offices identified as Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West having lead responsibility for the Virginia. 50 CFR Part 17 particular taxa. The Service anticipates Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Endangered and Threatened Wildlife publishing annually an update of the Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035± and Plants; Review of Plant and candidate notice of review, annual notice of findings on recycled petitions, 9589 (413/253±8615). Animal Taxa That Are Candidates or Region 6. Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Proposed for Listing as Endangered or and annual description of progress on listing actions. Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Threatened, Annual Notice of Findings Utah, and Wyoming. on Recycled Petitions, and Annual ADDRESSES: Interested persons or organizations should submit comments Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Description of Progress on Listing Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, Actions regarding a particular taxon to the Regional Director of the Region Denver Federal Center, Denver, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, identified as having the lead Colorado 80225±0486 (303/236±7398). Interior. responsibility for that taxon. Comments Region 7. Alaska. Regional Director (TE), U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Costion Plant Endemism 133-166 PROOFS
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265109793 Plant Endemism, Rarity, and Threat in Palau, Micronesia: A Geographical Checklist and Preliminary Red List Assessment Article in Micronesica · January 2009 CITATIONS READS 8 178 3 authors, including: Craig Costion Ann Kitalong Smithsonian Institution Independent Researcher 38 PUBLICATIONS 263 CITATIONS 18 PUBLICATIONS 52 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: The Environment, Inc. and Belau National Museum Herbarium View project The Environment Inc View project All content following this page was uploaded by Craig Costion on 24 November 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Micronesica 41(1): 131–164, 2009 Plant Endemism, Rarity, and Threat in Palau, Micronesia: A Geographical Checklist and Preliminary Red List Assessment 1 CRAIG M. COSTION Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5001 [email protected] ANN HILLMANN KITALONG The Environment, Inc., P.O. Box 1696, Koror, Palau 96940 TARITA HOLM Palau Conservation Society/PALARIS, P.O. Box 1811, Koror, Palau, 96940 Abstract—An official checklist of the endemic plant species of Palau has been long awaited, and is presented here for the first time. For each species a substrate limitation, growth form, and relative abundance is listed. In addition an IUCN red list assessment was conducted using all available data. For over half of the endemic species there is insufficient data to provide a red listing status however an expected minimum number of threatened plants out of the total is inferred.
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam David G. Frodin (8 April 1940 – 12 August 2019)
    Blumea 65, 2020: xi–xviii www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea OBITUARY https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2020.65.03.00 In memoriam David G. Frodin (8 April 1940 – 12 August 2019) R. Cámara-Leret1, B.J. Conn2 Citation: Cámara-Leret R, Conn BJ. 2020. In memoriam David G. Frodin (8 April 1940 – 12 August 2019). Blumea 65 (3): xi–xviii. https://doi.org/10.3767/ blumea.2020.65.03.00. Effectively published online: 23 November 2020. Fig. 1 David (2018) writing species descriptions in London. Photo by Tony Barrett. David Gamman Frodin passed away unexpectedly at the West began in Vermont where he spent endless summer hours walk- Middlesex Hospital (London) on 12 August 2019. He was un- ing the woods and developing a good sense of the terrain and aware that bladder cancer had taken hold and metastasized. geography. His school projects at the Albany Academy led to The memorial service held at Arch 8 in Kew Bridge (London) his first properly dried and labelled collections of leaves from on 5 September 2019 overflowed with his colleagues, neigh- Vermont trees. With his father, David shared a fascination bours and friends. The scientific community has lost a brilliant for trains and learned encyclopaedic amounts about them. individual and one of the last Titans of New Guinean botany. However, those teenage years were not easy. David did not David was born on 8 April 1940 in Chicago, Illinois, USA, to make friends readily at the Academy because his non-sporting Reuben S. Frodin, then a student at the Law School of the interests and solitary pursuits set him apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2020-2021)
    IUCN Red List version 2021-2: Table 7 Last Updated: 04 September 2021 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2020-2021) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2020 (IUCN Red List version 2020-3) and 2021 (IUCN Red List version 2021-2) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered [CR(PE) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct), CR(PEW) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct in the Wild)], EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2020) List (2021) change version Category
    [Show full text]