“Rural” Cemeteries and Urban Context in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Rural” Cemeteries and Urban Context in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Parceling the Picturesque: "Rural" Cemeteries and Urban Context Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6493s78s Author Wunsch, Aaron Vickers Publication Date 2009 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Parceling the Picturesque: “Rural” Cemeteries and Urban Context in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia by Aaron Vickers Wunsch A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Margaret Crawford, Chair Professor Paul Groth Professor David Henkin Fall 2009 Parceling the Picturesque: “Rural” Cemeteries and Urban Context in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia © 2009 by Aaron Vickers Wunsch 1 Abstract Parceling the Picturesque: “Rural” Cemeteries and Urban Context in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia Aaron V. Wunsch Doctor of Philosophy in the History of Architecture University of California, Berkeley Margaret Crawford, Chair Moving beyond traditional studies of the picturesque as a European-born artistic phenomenon, this dissertation connects the naturalistic treatment of landscape to a particular city’s cultural and economic transformation in the early industrial age. Three narrative strands unite the project. The first traces the arrival of garden-like graveyards on Philadelphia’s periphery. Known after 1830 as “rural” cemeteries, these places were incubators for new conceptions of home, community, and outdoor aesthetic propriety. Closely related to this geographical shift was a vocational one. Beginning in the antebellum decades, several occupations involved in the division and depiction of land recast their services in new terms. Although Philadelphia’s landscape architecture profession eventually emerged from this ferment, my focus is on the period just prior to coalescence – a period when surveyors, horticulturists, and “rural architects” competed for legitimacy (and commissions) in a field without clear-cut boundaries. Embedded in these stories is a third, involving the city as built and imagined. In the early nineteenth century, Philadelphia was America’s grid city par excellence. As such, it exemplified a uniform and “neutral” approach to land division – one initially lauded as compatible with the aims of a republican society but increasingly derided as a speculator’s instrument of convenience. Coded “rural” by its proponents, the picturesque curve seemed to offer an alternative. Its pedigree was aristocratic but its meaning grew less stabile with the dawn of mass culture. A metropolitan picturesque had emerged by mid century. With it came new ways of thinking about art, commerce, and urban community. i Acknowledgements Edward North, a professor of ancient languages at Hamilton College, once declared: “Every burial-place is a repository of unorganized history.” The same is true of many doctoral theses and this one now joins their ranks. A project too long in the making creates deep debts and high expectations. I don’t pretend to have satisfied either in the pages that follow. Still, those who have contributed advice, questions, source materials, and moral support deserve to be thanked. They have made this opus possible and will have to live with the consequences. Veterans of my original committee may have forgotten they served in that capacity but I have not. Mary Ryan, now of John Hopkins, and Kathleen James-Chakraborty, now of University College Dublin, provided early guidance. Paul Groth and David Henkin survived the entire journey. Friends and mentors, they have set an example I hope to emulate with my own students. Despite successive appointments at other universities, Dell Upton remained a source of inspiration through his scholarship and written comments. I trust he will see the stamp of his ideas on these pages. Andrew Shanken graciously stepped into the breach for a time. When Margaret Crawford’s turn came around, she, too, gamely took the lead and I am grateful for it. In addition to an official committee, I was lucky enough to have a shadow committee whose members did as much heavy lifting as if they were being paid for the job. Daniel Bluestone and Barbara Clark Smith read chapters, challenged me at every turn, and kindly supplied me with an office in their house. Jeffrey Cohen of Bryn Mawr College and Michael Lewis of Williams both served as de facto advisors. Peter Onuf of UVA and Michael Zuckerman of Penn read sections and offered valuable suggestions. One of the pleasures of prolonged research is meeting librarians and archivists who know just what you’re getting at or are willing to play along. At the Library Company of Philadelphia, James Green and Cornelia King went out of their way to pull relevant sources. Their colleagues Sarah Weatherwax, Jenny Ambrose, Erika Piola, Linda Wisniewski, and Charlene Peacock were also similarly motivated. At the National Archives’ Mid-Atlantic Branch, Jefferson Moak helped me think about J. C. Sidney and Philadelphia mapmaking. Susan Olsen guided me through Sidney-related records at Woodlawn Cemetery. Patricia O’Donnell and Christopher Densmore of Swarthmore College’s Friends Historical Library put their hands on materials I would otherwise have failed to locate. Diana Peterson and Ann Upton did the same in Haverford College’s Quaker Collection. Winterthur’s Jeanne Solensky made sure I knew about Deborah Norris Logan’s diary – a major service as it turned out. Sandra Markham discovered key documents while processing the Smith Papers at the Library Company. Rachel Onuf and Jack Gumbrecht tracked down manuscripts and articles at the Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Scholars in a variety of fields came to my aid throughout the project. During a stint at the University of Pennsylvania’s McNeil Center for Early American Studies, made possible through a Barra Foundation Fellowship, I received good counsel from the Center’s director, Daniel Richter. Fellow doctoral students Matthew Osborn, Sarah Rivett, Andrew Heath, Martha Schoolman, Kyle Farley, Julie Kim, Justine Murison, and Amanda Moniz assisted me in the same period, as did Purdue University’s John Larson and Christopher Iannini, now of Rutgers. A 2004 Lois F. McNeil Dissertation Fellowship at Winterthur Library introduced me to Elise ii Ciregna, Linzy Brekke (now Brekke-Aloise), and Briann Greenfield, all of whom made valuable suggestions. Earlier still, a Mellon Foundation Fellowship at the Library Company of Philadelphia and Historical Society of Pennsylvania acquainted me with the staffs of those institutions and with materials I would use in years to come. Outside of sponsored time, I have benefitted from conversations with Johann Neem, Blanche Linden, Donna Rilling, Elizabeth Milroy, and Emily Cooperman. At the University of Delaware, Wendy Bellion asked the question, “What comes next?,” that appears in the Introduction. At the National Park service, my former colleagues pitched in, too. Timothy Davis, Catherine Lavoie, Jamie Jacobs, Virginia Price, and Timothy Long all deserve mention. Attendees of UVA’s Early American Seminar sometimes wondered what I was doing in their midst but made useful observations nonetheless. William Ayres of 19th Century read the opening section of Chapter Four and helped me turn it into an article for that magazine. Friendship, moral support, and intellectual stimulation came from many quarters. At Berkeley, Don Choi, Tamsen Anderson, and Claire Tichi (now Tichi-Grezemkovsky) were allies. In Charlottesville, Hal Sharp read drafts and provided encouragement. Clifton Ellis and Judith Kucharski offered ideas when in town, as did Phil Krone. Of the many people who put me up or found me shelter during research trips, Dorsa Russell, Linda May, and Winterthur’s Pat Elliott were especially considerate. To their ranks I must now add Randy Mason, my colleague at the University of Pennsylvania, who supplied the hermitage in which the final pages emerged. He, Frank Matero, John Hinchman, Judy Peters, and Suzanne Hyndman made it a pleasure to teach in Penn’s Preservation Program while laboring on this project. My greatest debt is to my wife, Jillian Galle. She gave me the time, encouragement, keen insight, and stern discipline needed to get through the hardest parts. She also gave me Elias Galle Wunsch, a delight to both of us. My parents, Lydia Vickers and David Wunsch, and their spouses / partners Mark White and Mary Morgan, buoyed me, too. My brother, Oliver Wunsch, has learned so little from my example that he has embarked on a similar academic journey. I wish him luck and look forward to years of discussions. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………. i LIST OF ILUSTRATIONS………………………………………………………. iv INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………… ix Chapter 1 Death and Life in the Walking City, 1793-1825………………………….. 1 2 Towards New Homelands……………………..…………………………... 37 Quakers, Commerce, and Crisis……………………………………….. 51 The First True Homeland: Urban Chaos and the Rise of Laurel Hill Cemetery………………………………………………………………. 65 3 Dream Houses of the Dead and the Living……………………………….. 88 Institutions and the Villa Ideal………………………………………... 90 Laurel Hill: The Landscape of Genteel Literature……………………. 102 Monument Cemetery: The Rational City……………………………... 123 Communities, Commodities, and the Picturesque: the case of Woodlands Cemetery………………………………………………….. 129 4 Sorting Things Out: Mass Culture
Recommended publications
  • Preservation Guidelines Historic Burial Grounds and Cemeteries
    preservation guidelines for municipally owned historic burial grounds and cemeteries third edition These Guidelines are a publication of the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EOEEA) Commonwealth of Massachusetts Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lt. Governor Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Ian A. Bowles, Secretary Department of Conservation and Recreation Richard K. Sullivan, Commissioner Office of Cultural Resources, DCR Patrice Kish, Director Prepared by Walker-Kluesing Design Group for the DCR Historic Cemeteries Preservation Initiative. Cover Illustration: Steel engraving of "The First edition recipient of: Burial Hill" from The Pilgrim Fathers by William Honor Award for Landscape Planning, H. Bartlett, London 1854 [Boston Public Library/ American Society of Landscape Architects, 2000 Rare Books Department, Courtesy of the Trustees] Merit Award for Landscape Planning, June 2002, Second Edition, Boston Society of Landscape Architects, 2000 Expanded and Revised, 2009 Third Edition Memoral entrance gate Rvervew Cemetery, Groveland contents INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ON BURIAL GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS Significance of Historic Burial Grounds and GROUND AND Cemetery DEVELOPMENT PERTAINING TO MUNICIPAL HISTORIC Cemeteries IN MASSACHUSETTS 5 BURIAL GROUND AND CEMETERY Massachusetts Historic Cemetery Preservation COMPONENTS 23 Initiative GUIDELINES FOR General Purpose and Goals of the Preservation Guide- PRESERVATION
    [Show full text]
  • Cemetery Landscapes of Philadelphia
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1997 Cemetery Landscapes of Philadelphia René L. C. Torres University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Torres, René L. C., "Cemetery Landscapes of Philadelphia" (1997). Theses (Historic Preservation). 283. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/283 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Torres, René L. C. (1997). Cemetery Landscapes of Philadelphia. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/283 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cemetery Landscapes of Philadelphia Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Torres, René L. C. (1997). Cemetery Landscapes of Philadelphia. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/283 UNIVERSITY^ PENNSYIVANK LIBRARIES CEMETERY LANDSCAPES OF PHILADELPHIA Rene L.C. Torres A Thesis in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 1997 CLr^J*. ^C&mqum^I^ ^ NfjjT^fVJ,., - Supervisor Reaqer Christa Wilmanns-Wells John Milner Lecturer in Historic Preservation Associate Professor of Architecture M^=^VCL/^v) Gracfb^teXBroup Chair Frank G. Matero Associate Professor of Architecture W|fW^/Wm 7/: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LIBRARIES Cemetery Landscapes of Philadelphia Dedicated to the memory of my mother for her endless love, faith, and trust in everything I did.
    [Show full text]
  • Cemetery Resources
    Delaware Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs 21 The Green T: (302) 736-7400 Dover, DE 19901 F: (302) 739-5660 Cemetery Resource Guide 2 Publications Applegate, Shannon. Life Among the Headstones: Life in a Country Cemetery. New York, NY: Thunder’s Mouth Press, 2005. Bender, Thomas. “The “Rural Cemetery Movement: Urban Travail and the Appeal of Nature.” New England Quarterly 47, no. 2 (June, 1974): 196-211. Boston Parks and Recreation Department. The Boston Experience: A Manual for Historic Burying Grounds Preservation, 1989. Carmack, Sharon DeBartolo. Your Guide to Cemetery Research. Cincinnati, OH: Betterway Books, 2002. Chicora Foundation. Grave Matters: The Preservation of African-American Cemeteries. Columbia, SC: Chicora Foundation, 1996. Chicora Foundation. Recording Historic Cemeteries: A Guide for Historical Societies and Genealogists. Columbia, SC: Chicora Foundation, 1998. Farrell, James J. Inventing the American Way of Death, 1830-1920. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1980. Forbes, Harriette M. Gravestones of Early New England and the Men Who Made Them. Boston, Massachusetts: Riverside Press, 1927. New York: DaCapo reprint, 1967. French, Stanley. "The Cemetery as Cultural Institution: The Establishment of Mount Auburn and the Rural Cemetery' Movement," American Quarterly, 26: 37-59, March, 1974. 3 Jackson, Kenneth T., and Camilo Jos, Vergara. Silent Cities: The Evolution of the American Cemetery. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1989. Keister, Douglas. Stories in Stone: A Field Guide to Cemetery Symbolism and Iconography. Salt Lake City, UT: Gibbs Smith, 2004. Ludwig, Allan I. Graven Images. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 1966. McDowell, Peggy, and Richard E. Meyer. The Revival Styles in American Memorial Art.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Tour Guides
    2017 Tour Guides CAROL BALDRIDGE Carol has been an archivist at both the American Philosophical Society and the Historical Society of Pennsylvania. After leaving the archives and book world to raise her sons, Jake and Sam, she morphed into a 3rd grade teacher at Chestnut Hill Academy. Her interest in cemeteries started with trips to family graves with her mother and grandmother where stories were told for each person visited. With an abiding interest in Philadelphia history, Carol is adding Laurel Hill to her volunteer schedule. BILL BARKER Bill has enjoyed portraying Thomas Jefferson at Colonial Williamsburg since 1993. Born and raised in Philadelphia, Bill’s interest in Thomas Jefferson reaches back to his youth. He enjoys researching the American world Jefferson knew with an interest in the role the man played and continues to play in our American identity. Bill is a student of history and an actor. He is passion- ate about both and brings them together in a way that allows people to be transported back in time to feel, hear and taste what it would be like to mingle with Mr. Jefferson. KRISTIE BERGIE As a resident of Philadelphia’s Fairmount neighborhood since 2004, Kristie is thrilled with the many exciting changes that are occurring throughout the City. Her extensive knowledge of Phila- delphia’s diverse neighborhoods, appreciation for its history, and the wide range of lifestyle op- tions available are just some of the reasons Kristie calls Philadelphia her home. A world traveler, Kristie embraces the many cultural differences expressed in the City’s arts, culture, and cuisine.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Hedren's Burial Places of Officers, Physicians, and Other
    All Rights Reserved, 2011, Paul L. Hedren [updated 9-19-11] WHERE ARE THEY NOW? Burial places of officers, physicians, and other military notables of the Great Sioux War compiled by Paul L. Hedren Introduction The names in this “Where Are They Now?” compilation are drawn from Great Sioux War Orders of Battle: How the United States Army Waged War on the Northern Plains, 1876-1877 (Norman, Okla.: Arthur H. Clark Company, 2011), which acknowledges in context every officer and physician engaged in this Indian war. The intent here is to identify the dates of death and burial places of these individuals. The ranks and affiliations given are timely to the war, not to later service. The dates of death and burial places provided are largely drawn from the sources noted at the end. Details that are probable but unconfirmed are noted within parentheses. This compilation is a work-in- progress and I welcome additional information and/or corrections and will strive to keep the file current. Please write me in care of <[email protected]>. AAA Adam, Emil, Captain, Fifth Cavalry, d January 16, 1903. Allison, James Nicholas, Second Lieutenant, Second Cavalry, d May 2, 1918. Anderson, Harry Reuben, First Lieutenant, Fourth Artillery, d November 22, 1918, Arlington National Cemetery, Arlington, Virginia. Andrews, William Howard, Captain, Third Cavalry, d June 21, 1880. Andrus, Edwin Procter, Second Lieutenant, Fifth Cavalry, d September 27, 1930, Arlington National Cemetery, Arlington, Virginia. Arthur, William, Major, Pay Department, d February 27, 1915. Ashton, Isaiah Heylin, Acting Assistant Surgeon, d February 16, 1889, Sleepy Hollow Cemetery, Sleepy Hollow, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Design for Fairmount Park
    The First Design for Fairmount Park AIRMOUNT PARK IN PHILADELPHIA is one of the great urban parks of America, its importance in landscape history exceeded only by FNew York’s Central Park. Its name derives from the “Faire Mount” shown on William Penn’s plan of 1682, where the Philadelphia Museum of Art now perches, and where the gridded Quaker city suddenly gives way to an undulating scenery of river and park. Measuring over 3,900 acres, it is one of the world’s largest municipal parks. Nonetheless, for all its national importance, the origin of the park, its philosophical founda- tions, and its authorship have been misunderstood in the literature.1 About the principal dates there is no dispute: in 1812–15 a municipal waterworks was built on the banks of the Schuylkill, the site of which soon became a popular resort location and a subject of picturesque paintings; in 1843 the city began to acquire tracts of land along the river to safeguard the water supply; in 1859 the city held a competition for the design of a picturesque park; finally, in 1867, the Fairmount Park Commission was established to oversee a much larger park, whose layout was eventually entrusted to the German landscape architect Hermann J. Schwarzmann. This is the version rehearsed in all modern accounts of the park. All texts agree that 1867 marks the origin of the park, in conception and execution. They depict the pre–Civil War events as abortive and inconclusive; in particular, they dismiss the 1859 competition. According to George B. Tatum, writing in 1961, a series of “plans were prepared,” I am indebted to five generous colleagues who read this manuscript and contributed suggestions: Therese O’Malley of CASVA; Sheafe Satterthwaite and E.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • February Speaker
    ______________________________________________________________________________ CCWRT February, 2016 Issue Meeting Date: February 18, 2016 Place: The Drake Center (6:00) Sign-in and Social (6:30) Dinner (7:15) Business Meeting (7:30) Speaker Dinner Menu: Baked Stuffed Fish, Wild Rice, Ratatouille, Waldorf Salad, Rye Dinner Roll, and Carrot Cake Vegetarian Option: Upon request Speaker: Gene Schmiel, Washington D.C. Topic: Citizen-General: Jacob D. Cox ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Reservations: If you do not have an Automatic Reservation, please remember to email your meeting reservation to [email protected] or call it in to Lester Burgin at 513-891-0610. If you are making a reservation for more than yourself, please provide the names of the others. Please note that all reservations must be in no later than 8:00 pm Tuesday, February 9, 2016. _______________________________________________________________________________________ February Speaker: In the 19th century there were few professional schools other than West Point, and so the self-made man was the standard for success. True to that mode, Jacob Dolson Cox, a long-time Cincinnati resident who is buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, fashioned himself into a Renaissance man. In each of his vocations and avocations— Civil War general, Governor of Ohio, Secretary of the Interior, President of the University of Cincinnati, Dean of the Cincinnati Law School, President of the Wabash Railroad, historian, and scientist— he was recognized as a leader. Cox’s greatest fame, however, is as the foremost participant-historian of the Civil War. His accounts of the conflict are to this day cited by serious scholars and serve as a foundation for the interpretation of many aspects of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Albany Rural Cemetery
    <^ » " " .-^ v^'*^ •V,^'% rf>. .<^ 0- ^'' '^.. , "^^^v ^^^os. l.\''' -^^ ^ ./ > ••% '^.-v- .«-<.. ^""^^^ A o. V V V % s^ •;• A. O /"t. ^°V: 9." O •^^ ' » » o ,o'5 <f \/ ^-i^o ^^'\ .' A. Wo ^ : -^^\ °'yi^^ /^\ ^%|^/ ^'%> ^^^^^^ ^0 v^ 4 o .^'' <^. .<<, .>^. A. c /°- • \ » ' ^> V -•'. -^^ ^^ 'V • \ ^^ * vP Si •T'V %^ "<? ,-% .^^ ^0^ ^^n< ' < o ^X. ' vv-ir- •.-.-., ' •0/ ^- .0-' „f / ^^. V ^ A^ »r^. .. -H rr. .^-^ -^ :'0m^', .^ /<g$S])Y^ -^ J-' /. ^V .;••--.-._.-- %^c^ -"-,'1. OV -^^ < o vP b t'' ^., .^ A^ ^ «.^- A ^^. «V^ ,*^ .J." "-^U-o^ =^ -I o >l-' .0^ o. v^' ./ ^^V^^^.'^ -is'- v-^^. •^' <' <', •^ "°o S .^"^ M 'V;/^ • =.«' '•.^- St, ^0 "V, <J,^ °t. A° M -^j' * c" yO V, ' ', '^-^ o^ - iO -7-, .V -^^0^ o > .0- '#-^ / ^^ ' Why seek ye the living among the dead }"—Luke xxiv : s. [By i)ormission of Erastus Dow Palmer.] e»w <:3~- -^^ THE ALBANY RURAL ^ CEMETERY ITS F A3Ts^ 5tw copies printeil from type Copyn.y:ht. 1S92 Bv HKNkv 1*. PiiKi.rs l*lioto>;raphy by l*iiic MarPoiiaUl, Albany Typogrnpliy and Prcsswork by Brnndow l^rintinj; Comimny, Albany ac:knowledgments. rlfIS hook is tlir D/i/i^mio/fi of a proposilioii on lite pari ot the Iriixtccx to piihlisli a brief liislorv of the .llhaiiy Cemetery A ssoeiation, iiieliidiiiQa report of the eonseeration oration, poem and other exercises. It li'as snoocsted that it niioht be well to attempt son/e- thino- more worthy of the object than a mere pamphlet, and this has been done with a result that must spealc for itself. Jl'h/le it would be impi-aclicable to mention here all who have kindly aided in the zvork, the author desi/'cs to express his particular oblioations : To Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewing an Exhibition
    Winter 1983 Annual Report 1983 Annual Report 1983 Report of the President Much important material has been added to our library and the many patrons who come to use our collections have grown to the point where space has become John Diehl quite critical. However, collecting, preserving and dissemi- President nating Cincinnati-area history is the very reason for our existence and we're working hard to provide the space needed Nineteen Eight-three has been another banner to function adequately and efficiently. The Board of Trustees year for the Cincinnati Historical Society. The well docu- published a Statement of the Society's Facility Needs in December, mented staff reports on all aspects of our activities, on the to which you responded very helpfully with comments and pages that follow clearly indicate the progress we have made. ideas. I'd like to have been able to reply personally to each Our membership has shown a substantial increase over last of you who wrote, but rest assured that all of your comments year. In addition to the longer roster, there has been a are most welcome and carefully considered. Exciting things heartening up-grading of membership category across-the- are evolving in this area. We'll keep you posted as they board. Our frequent and varied activities throughout the develop. year attracted enthusiastic participation. Our newly designed The steady growth and good health of the quarterly, Queen City Heritage, has been very well received.Society rest on the firm foundation of a dedicated Board We are a much more visible, much more useful factor in of Trustees, a very competent staff and a wonderfully the life of the community.
    [Show full text]
  • "Citizens in the Making": Black Philadelphians, the Republican Party and Urban Reform, 1885-1913
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 "Citizens In The Making": Black Philadelphians, The Republican Party And Urban Reform, 1885-1913 Julie Davidow University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Davidow, Julie, ""Citizens In The Making": Black Philadelphians, The Republican Party And Urban Reform, 1885-1913" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2247. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2247 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2247 For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Citizens In The Making": Black Philadelphians, The Republican Party And Urban Reform, 1885-1913 Abstract “Citizens in the Making” broadens the scope of historical treatments of black politics at the end of the nineteenth century by shifting the focus of electoral battles away from the South, where states wrote disfranchisement into their constitutions. Philadelphia offers a municipal-level perspective on the relationship between African Americans, the Republican Party, and political and social reformers, but the implications of this study reach beyond one city to shed light on a nationwide effort to degrade and diminish black citizenship. I argue that black citizenship was constructed as alien and foreign in the urban North in the last decades of the nineteenth century and that this process operated in tension with and undermined the efforts of black Philadelphians to gain traction on their exercise of the franchise. For black Philadelphians at the end of the nineteenth century, the franchise did not seem doomed or secure anywhere in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Philadelphia City Guide
    Philadelphia City Guide Page | 1 Philadelphia Rocky statue outside the Philadelphia Museum of Art Philadelphia located in southeastern Pennsylvania, on the southern fringe of the mid-Atlantic region, is the fourth-largest urban area in the United States and the country's fifth-largest city. Often referred to as "Philly," the official city boundaries are actually quite large—what started as a much smaller city began annexing the surrounding districts and suburbs in the mid-19th century, and Philadelphia the city is now coterminous with Philadelphia the county. Altogether, Philadelphia's metropolitan area encompasses a total twelve counties in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware. Districts As a result of Philadelphia's size, there are very large residential districts most visitors will never see. On the other hand, you could roam for miles, see distinct changes in atmosphere, architecture, and demographics, and still be within the city. For most tourists, the landing point will be in Center City, the "downtown" section of Philadelphia. It is bounded by South St. to the south, the Delaware River to the east, the Schuylkill River to the west, and Vine St. to the north. The 2005 Center City population, at nearly 100,000, makes it one of the most populated central business districts in the U.S, just behind New York City. Other popular districts to visit are Old City, West Philly, and South Philly. In the recent years, Northern Liberties (in the North region) has been gaining traction as a hip, trendy place. Page | 2 Center City East Philadelphia's beautiful City Hall, the Convention Center, Chinatown, Washington Square West, the gay-friendly Gayborhood, and the Broad Street Arts Corridor.
    [Show full text]