DOCSLIB.ORG

Habeas Corpus Casestyle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habeas Corpus Casestyle Case 2:11-cr-00299-HH-FHS Document 276 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NEW ORLEANS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § § v. § 2:11-CR-299 § (2:14-CV-432) AARON F. BROUSSARD. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255, GRANTING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND DENYING MOTION FOR DISCOVERY Before the Court is Aaron Broussard’s motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and his motion for discovery. D.E. 250, 271. The government opposed both. D.E. 270, 273. The Court denies both motions, but grants him a certificate of appealability. I. JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. II. BACKGROUND A. Factual and Procedural Background Aaron Broussard, the former president of Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, was indicted in December 2011 for conspiracy to commit payroll fraud, wire fraud, and theft from programs receiving federal funds, with his former wife Karen Parker and former parish attorney Thomas Wilkinson. D.E. 1.1 Broussard became parish president of Jefferson Parish 1 Count One, the conspiracy count, charged violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Counts Two through Twenty-Eight charged wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Counts Twenty-Nine through Thirty-Three charged theft concerning programs receiving federal funds in violation of 18 Case 2:11-cr-00299-HH-FHS Document 276 Filed 07/14/14 Page 2 of 25 in 2003, was re-elected in 2007 and remained in that position until he resigned in January 2010. Id. As parish president, Broussard was responsible for the administration and supervision of parish departments, offices, agencies and special districts. He hired Tom Wilkinson as parish attorney and with Wilkinson’s help hired Parker, with whom he became romantically involved and later married. Parker was hired as a paralegal supervisor for the parish, a position for which she was in no way qualified and that she could not and did not perform. For Wilkinson’s part, he signed off on Parker’s raises and other personnel benefits, and in return, received substantial pay raises himself. The indictment was superseded twice. The Second Superseding Indictment was issued as to Broussard and Wilkinson in July 2012 in which additional details were added to the conspiracy count, including allegations that Broussard received pay-offs from a company that sought to do business with Jefferson Parish. The new charge as to Broussard included bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds in Counts Two through Six. Broussard and Wilkinson were charged in Counts Seven through Twenty-Three with wire fraud. Both were also charged with theft concerning programs receiving federal funds in Counts Twenty-Four through Twenty-Seven. D.E. 117.2 U.S.C. §§ 666(a)(1)(A) and 2. 2 The Second Superseding Indictment charged: Count One, conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Counts Two through Six charged bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 666(a)(1)(B) and 2. Counts Seven through Twenty-Three charged wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Counts Twenty-Four through Twenty-Seven charged theft concerning programs receiving federal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 666(a)(1)(A) and 2. 2 Case 2:11-cr-00299-HH-FHS Document 276 Filed 07/14/14 Page 3 of 25 Ultimately, in September 2012, Broussard pled guilty to Counts One and Twenty- Seven with a plea agreement in which he waived his right to appeal or to collaterally attack his judgment. D.E. 198. Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Broussard was rearraigned and the Court3 accepted his guilty plea on September 25, 2012. D.E. 202. During rearraignment, the Court found that Broussard was competent, understood his right to counsel, was satisfied with the performance of counsel, and understood his trial rights, including his right to a trial by jury at which the government would have to prove all of the elements of the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Brossard waived his right to trial and waived his right to silence. Id., pp. 8-9. The Court also found that Broussard understood the charges against him and the consequences of his guilty plea. Id., pp.10-18. The Court found Broussard’s plea was knowing and voluntary and not the result of force, threat, or promise of leniency. Broussard testified it was his own decision to plead guilty because he was guilty. Id., p. 18. 4 The Court found that Broussard conferred with counsel regarding the 3 The undersigned district judge was designated by Circuit Court Judge Edith Jones to hear the case following the recusal of all of the judges of the Eastern District of Louisiana. D.E. 4, 6. 4 3 THE COURT: I find the defendant understands the 4 charge and the consequence of a plea. 5 Has anyone threatened you or forced you to plead 6 guilty? 7 THE DEFENDANT: No, Your Honor. 8 THE COURT: Has anyone promised you leniency if you 9 would plead guilty? 10 THE DEFENDANT: No, Your Honor. 11 THE COURT: Who makes the decision for you to plead 12 guilty? 13 THE DEFENDANT: I make the decision, Your Honor. 3 Case 2:11-cr-00299-HH-FHS Document 276 Filed 07/14/14 Page 4 of 25 plea agreement and understood the terms of the agreement, including his waivers of his right to appeal or to collaterally attack his conviction or sentence.5 The Court additionally found that Broussard was not promised a specific sentence. Id., pp. 18-21. After consulting with 14 THE COURT: Why are you pleading guilty? 15 THE DEFENDANT: Because I am guilty, Your Honor. Id. 5 10 THE COURT: That is especially true because you are 11 giving up your right to appeal your sentence and your 12 conviction and the fine and the restitution that can be ordered 13 unless I sentence you -- I don’t see any exceptions for that 14 waiver of right of appeal. 15 You’re also giving up your right to file a 2255 16 petition and other federal writs that would allow you to 17 challenge your conviction or your sentence collaterally, that 18 is, after they have become final, another request to the Court 19 that the Court reconsider its decisions, but you’re giving up 20 your right to make those appeals. 21 Now, I see at paragraph 7 you are retaining your 22 right to appeal a sentence in excess of the statutory maximum. 23 Of course, I would hope that you would retain such a right, but 24 I would hope I would never commit such an error. You do have 25 that right. 1 If there is a circumstance under which you 2 believe your attorneys have rendered ineffective assistance of 3 counsel, you may still bring a postconviction challenge to your 4 conviction and your sentence. Do you understand? 5 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor. 6 THE COURT: Based on ineffective assistance of 7 counsel and no other exception. Do you understand that? 8 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor. **** 4 Were you aware that the plea agreement requires 5 you to give up your rights of appeal? 6 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor. 7 THE COURT: You had discussed that with Mr. Jenkins? 8 THE DEFENDANT: I sure did, Your Honor. Id., pp. 20-21, 33. 4 Case 2:11-cr-00299-HH-FHS Document 276 Filed 07/14/14 Page 5 of 25 counsel, Broussard agreed to the facts related to his crimes as set out by the government. There was factual basis for the Court’s finding of guilt. Id., pp. 25-33. At no time since has Broussard attempted to withdraw his plea of guilty or assert his innocence of the charges. After deciding various sentencing guideline issues favorably to Broussard, the Court sentenced him to 46 months on Count One and the same for Count Twenty-Seven on February 28, 2013. The sentences were to be served concurrently and to be followed by three years supervised release for each count to be served concurrently, a special assessment of $200.00, and restitution in the amount of $214,209.94. Additionally, Broussard was to forfeit $66,000. D.E. 237. He did not appeal, but timely filed the present motion. B. Prosecutorial Ethical Breaches in the Eastern District of Louisiana During Broussard’s prosecution, the United States Attorney was investigating a variety of public corruption cases, some of which also implicated Broussard. During these various prosecutions, the misconduct of two attorneys in the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Eastern District was uncovered. It first came to light that Sal Perricone, senior litigation counsel in that office, was blogging anonymously on criminal justice matters, including cases prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office. The blogging occurred on the newspaper internet site for the New Orleans Times-Picayune in the form of comments to various news articles regarding various criminal justice and political matters. Perricone’s blogging under various pseudonyms was highly critical of the New Orleans Police Department, as well as Broussard 5 Case 2:11-cr-00299-HH-FHS Document 276 Filed 07/14/14 Page 6 of 25 and a number of other high profile individuals who were being investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s Office.6 In March 2012, the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A FAILURE of INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina
    A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina U.S. House of Representatives 4 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Union Calendar No. 00 109th Congress Report 2nd Session 000-000 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Report by the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoacess.gov/congress/index.html February 15, 2006. — Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U. S. GOVERNMEN T PRINTING OFFICE Keeping America Informed I www.gpo.gov WASHINGTON 2 0 0 6 23950 PDF For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COVER PHOTO: FEMA, BACKGROUND PHOTO: NASA SELECT BIPARTISAN COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE PREPARATION FOR AND RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA TOM DAVIS, (VA) Chairman HAROLD ROGERS (KY) CHRISTOPHER SHAYS (CT) HENRY BONILLA (TX) STEVE BUYER (IN) SUE MYRICK (NC) MAC THORNBERRY (TX) KAY GRANGER (TX) CHARLES W. “CHIP” PICKERING (MS) BILL SHUSTER (PA) JEFF MILLER (FL) Members who participated at the invitation of the Select Committee CHARLIE MELANCON (LA) GENE TAYLOR (MS) WILLIAM J.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate's Report
    CANDIDATE’S REPORT (to be filed by a candidate or his principal campaign committee) 1.Qualifying Name and Address of Candidate 2. Office Sought (Include title of office as OFFICE USE ONLY well AARON BROUSSARD Report Number: 4291 Parish President 3400 Chateau Blvd. Jefferson Parish Date Filed: 4/7/2003 Apt. 227D Kenner, LA 70065 Report Includes Schedules: Schedule A-1 Schedule A-2 Schedule E-1 Schedule E-2 3. Date of Primary 10/4/2003 This report covers from 1/1/2003 through 3/28/2003 4. Type of Report: X 180th day prior to primary 40th day after general 90th day prior to primary Annual (future election) 30th day prior to primary Supplemental (past election) 10th day prior to primary 10th day prior to general Amendment to prior report 5. FINAL REPORT if: Withdrawn Filed after the election AND all loans and debts paid Unopposed 6. Name and Address of Financial Institution 7. Full Name and Address of Treasurer (You are required by law to use one or more DAVID R SHERMAN banks, savings and loan associations, or money One Galleria Blvd. market mutual fund as the depository of all Suite 1100 Metairie, LA 70001 FIRST BANK & TRUST P.O. Box 60007 New Orleans, LA 70160-0007 9. Name of Person Preparing Report Daytime Telephone 10. WE HEREBY CERTIFY that the information contained in this report and the attached 8. FOR PRINCIPAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEES ONLY schedules is true and correct to the best of our knowledge, information and belief, and that no a. Name and address of principal campaign committee, expenditures have been made nor contributions received that have not been reported herein, committee’s chairperson, and subsidiary committees, if and that no information required to be reported by the Louisiana Campaign Finance Disclosure any (use additional sheets if necessary).
    [Show full text]
  • TROUT POINT LODGE, LIMITED, a Nova Scotia Limited Company; VAUGHN PERRET and CHARLES LEARY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 1:12-CV-90LG-JMR V
    Case 1:12-cv-00090-LG-JMR Document 27 Filed 08/06/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION TROUT POINT LODGE, LIMITED, A Nova Scotia Limited Company; VAUGHN PERRET and CHARLES LEARY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 1:12-CV-90LG-JMR v. DOUG K. HANDSHOE, Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY MEMORANDUM OF DEFENDANT, DOUGLAS K. HANDSHOE MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT: This Supplemental Memorandum is submitted by defendant, Douglas K. Handshoe (“Handshoe”), in reply to the Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, which was filed by the plaintiffs, Trout Point, Vaughn Perret, and Charles Leary (collectively, “Trout Point”). As previously discussed in defendant’s Reply Memorandum, the parties agreed that this dispute would focus on pure questions of law, rather than specific facts, and would be resolved solely on motions for summary judgment. Still, as pointed out in defendant’s Reply Memorandum, plaintiffs have focused a great deal of their arguments on facts. Because of plaintiffs’ harping on the facts, defendant feels compelled to provide the court with factual points as well. Thus, this supplemental memorandum will focus on revealing the factual bases for defendant’s allegedly defamatory statements. Case 1:12-cv-00090-LG-JMR Document 27 Filed 08/06/12 Page 2 of 10 Plaintiffs repeatedly point to the assertion that in the Canadian adjudication, they proved that the statements made about them were false. Specifically, they state in their Response to Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment that plaintiffs have clearly demonstrated that the statements were false and defamatory.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Hurricane Katrina and Violations of ICCPR Articles
    Hurricane Katrina and Violations of ICCPR Articles 6 and 26: A Response to the Third Periodic Report of the United States of America 1 Introduction 1. Hurricane Katrina ripped through the Gulf Coast area of the United States on August 29, 2005. 2 The resulting floods, deaths, displacement, and humanitarian crisis made this hurricane one of the most devastating the United States has ever experienced. The public watched on their televisions as death and destruction unfolded in New Orleans and its surrounding areas. The question asked by nearly every viewer during those days was, “if the media can get there, why can’t any assistance? Why are these people dying?” The fact was that assistance could reach the people of New Orleans. It simply didn’t. 2. Although death and destruction was inevitable given the magnitude of this hurricane, a great many deaths were a direct result of the State party’s failure to provide adequate evacuation plans, evacuation assistance, and humanitarian aid. 3 These failures constitute a violation to the State’s obligation under article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (the “Covenant”) to protect, and fulfill the right to life. Further, the failure of the State party to provide appropriate remedies to the victims of article 6 violations constitutes a separate violation under article 2, paragraph 3 of the Covenant. 4 3. In addition to violations of the right to life, the State party also violated article 26 by violating the principle of non-discrimination in the way it prepared for Hurricane Katrina. The State party’s evacuation plans discriminated on the basis of property ownership, which resulted in discrimination based on race.
    [Show full text]
  • Plaintiff Trout Point Lodge Vaughn Perret Charles Leary and Defendant Douglas K
    Yarmouth No. 411345 Supreme Court of Nova Scotia Between: Plaintiff Trout Point Lodge Vaughn Perret Charles Leary and Defendant Douglas K. Handshoe Brief in opposition to Plaintiff’s request to amend their claims and request for Summary disposal of these proceedings Introduction 1. This is the third proceeding instituted in Nova Scotia by Plaintiffs against Defendant alleging defamation and or Copyright Act Infringement to harass and punish Defendant for exposing Plaintiffs’ roles in the corrupt criminal activities and schemes of a felonious United States politician named Aaron Broussard (Broussard). The record shows Broussard used Plaintiff as his property managers, said property1 being the result of an illegal bribery scheme. The record also shows Plaintiff’s profited from Broussard’s criminal activity and that plaintiff combined with the criminal enterprise identified by the United States Attorney’s Office, on behalf of self-admitted felon Broussard in the no less than three Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP suits) filed in Nova Scotia against three media outlets located in Mississippi and Louisiana that covered this sordid tale of corruption in metro New Orleans, including the submission of perjured affidavits in a case to which defendant was not a party that resulted in the invasion of privacy of at least 5 1 Nova Scotia Enterprises, LLC, which owned the River Bend Lodge at Trout Point, which was marketed by Plaintiff Trout Point Lodge indistinguishable from the Lodge itself and for which visitors were charged an 18% gratitude by the Lodge itself. 1 residents of the States of Mississippi and Louisiana.2 Broussard’s co-conspirators, as Plaintiffs in this instant action now seek to duplicate allegations in a SLAPP suit brought in Louisiana by Trout Point Lodge owner Daniel G.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Recovery Comes out of a Box Photo: Joanna Andreasson Joanna Photo
    Hurricane Recovery Comes Out of a Box Photo: Joanna Andreasson Joanna Photo: 48 LOCAL KNOWLEDGE n August 26, 2005, three days before Hurricane Katrina made landfall, a team of people nearly 500 miles away in The private-sector response to Hurricane Katrina Atlanta was hard at work get- is often overlooked when reviewing and drawing ting needed supplies staged into lessons from the catastrophe that followed. But the hurricane zone. Two days any community responding to future disaster, before that on August 24, in the whether in the Gulf Coast or elsewhere, must northwest corner of Arkansas, a different center usually staf- Ofed by six to ten people was augmented to over fifty people learn from the successful relief efforts of for- profit tracking the storm and making plans to dispatch necessary companies in order to avoid the mistakes the items to the area once the storm had passed. They coordina- public has come to know so well. ted the delivery of what would amount to 2,500 truckloads over the next two-and-a-half weeks,1 none of which was handled by FEMA. Steven Horwitz The story of Katrina, as commonly understood, is one of dramatic failure: an unprepared emergency response, unco- ordinated recovery efforts, a clumsy federal bureaucracy, and, ultimately, more than 1,400 dead. But a complete telling of the Katrina story does include some significant successes— lesser-known actions that saved hundreds and im proved quality of life for thousands in the aftermath of disaster. The private-sector response to Hurricane Katrina—par- ticularly the response of Wal-Mart, which will be the focus here—is often overlooked when reviewing and drawing les- sons from the catastrophe that followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Relief
    ABOUT THE MERcaTUS POLICY SERIES The objective of the Mercatus Policy Series is to help policy makers, scholars, and others involved in TIVE the policy process make more effective decisions by incorporating insights from sound interdisciplinary A research. The series aims to bridge the gap between advances in scholarship and the practical requirements of policy through four types of studies: Policy Primers present an accessible explanation of fundamental economic ideas necessary to the practice of sound policy. PERITY INITI MERCATUS Policy Resources present a more in depth, yet still accessible introduction to the basic elements S of government processes or specific policy areas. Policy Comments present an analysis of a specific policy situation that Mercatus scholars have L PRO explored and provide advice on potential policy changes. A POLICY Country Briefs present an institutional perspective of critical issues facing countries in which Mercatus scholars have worked and provide direction for policy improvements. GLOB SERIES POLICY COMMENT No .17 MAKING HURRICANE RESPONSE MORE EFFECTIVE: Lessons from the Private Sector and the Coast Guard during Katrina Steven Horwitz Professor, St. Lawrence University 3301 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 450 March 2008 Arlington, Virginia 22201 Tel: (703) 993-4930 Fax: (703) 993-4935 About Steven Horwitz, author About the Mercatus Center Steven Horwitz is a professor of economics at St. Lawrence University, where his areas of specialization and interest The Mercatus Center at George Mason University is a research, education, and outreach organization that works with include Austrian economics, monetary theory and history, macroeconomics, and political economy. scholars, policy experts, and government officials to connect academic learning and real world practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Generated from the Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fourth
    NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION CHICAGO PROPERTY * NO. 2011-CA-0788 INTERESTS, LLC AND ZOE ALDIGE', INDIVIDUALLY * AND ON BEHALF OF THOSE COURT OF APPEAL SIMILARLY SITUATED * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA AARON BROUSSARD AND * * * * * * * JEFFERSON PARISH CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: DARLENE JACOB LEVY NO. 2011-CA-0789 VERSUS THE PARISH OF JEFFERSON CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: LLOYD LOGA, VINCA NO. 2011-CA-0790 DELESDERNIER, MICHAEL & MARY DELESDERNIER, DAVID MAIN, DOUGLASS & PAULETTE GRUBBS, KEVIN GRUBBS, JASON GRUBBS, JOSEPH & MICHELLE MAYFIELD, DENNIS & DEBRA GEE, VAL & ELIZABETH REINHARDT, MITCH & MELISSA CHILAN, DWIGHT & GAY RAMSEY, KATHLEEN PENDER, MICHAEL & LISA MORGANI, RALPH & AUDRY SCHINDLER AND TOMMY & LYN FOTO VERSUS JEFFERSON PARISH, AARON BROUSSARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRESIDENT OF JEFFERSON PARISH, A CONSULTING CO., B CONSULTING CO., C. ENGINEERING CO. & D CONSTRUCTION CO. CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: ROB SCHMIDT NO. 2011-CA-0791 VERSUS THE PARISH OF JEFFERSON AND AARON BROUSSARD IN HIS CAPACITY AS ITS PRESIDENT CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: BRIDGETTE D. KACZMAREK NO. 2011-CA-0792 WIFE OF & GERALD M. KACZMAREK, PAIGE H. WINSTEAD, WIFE OF & SCHOTT B. WINSTEAD, SHELLY CENTANNI, WIFE OF & NICHOLAS CENTANNI, BETTINA DIAZ, WIFE OF & MICHAEL DIAZ, NY DANG THANH, WIFE OF & MINH THANH VU, INDIVIDUALLY & ON BEHALF OF THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED VERSUS AARON BROSSARD, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF/AND JEFFERSON PARISH CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: DENISE CASON, WIFE OF & NO. 2011-CA-0793 JOHN CASON, CHARLENE SIGNORELLI, AND PATRICIA FARNSWORTH, INDIVIDUALLY & ON BEHALF OF THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED VERSUS AARON BROUSSARD & JEFFERSON PARISH CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: JUDY BROWN AND SHERON & NO. 2011-CA-0794 CORNEL SANDERS VERSUS AARON BROUSSARD, JEFFERSON PARISH, CONSOLIDATED DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bricoleur and the Possibility of Rescue: First-Responders to the Flooding of New Orleans
    The Bricoleur and the Possibility of Rescue: First-Responders to the Flooding of New Orleans Steve Kroll-Smith University of North Carolina, Greensboro Pam Jenkins University of New Orleans Vern Baxter University of New Orleans In this paper, we interviewed first-responders to the 2005 flooding of New Orleans to discern and make sense of what they thought and how they acted in a protracted moment of terror. Viewed from a certain angle, the behavior of first-responders is a window onto a self stripped of convention and the mundane protocols of proper conduct. First- responders, we argue, often employ a cleverness that does not recognize itself as such. Measured against the principles and standards of official training manuals and tests, “clever” first-responders might appear to be reckless or incompetent. A shape-shifter, assuming whatever forms are necessary to accomplish the tasks at hand, the first- responder resembles in action and character the bricoleur, that person who alters and transforms ideas and materials to create new and innovative approaches to the world (Levi-Strauss 1966). It is not rationality per se that guides the bricoleur, but neither is his or her behavior irrational, though it may at times appear something other than reasonable. A grounded imagination operates through an admixture of disposition, intuition, emotion, intellect, and the acumen of the body. Neither rational nor irrational, the bricoleur behaves in, what Dreyfus and Dreyfus call, an “arational” manner (1988, 35-36). “Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school.” Albert Einstein (1951, 17) - 5 - Journal of Public Management & Social Policy Fall 2007 Monday morning, August 29, Hurricane Katrina came ashore near the village of Buras, not an hour’s drive from New Orleans.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Kenner
    CITY OF KENNER OFFICE OF THE MAYOR EDMOND J. “ED” MUNIZ EMILE LAFOURCADE MAYOR ASSISTANT TO THE MAYOR, PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Friday, Oct. 10, 2008 GRAND ISLE MAYOR SAID KENNER HELP SHOWS STRENGTH OF JEFFERSONIANS Mayor Muniz’ Offer to Help “Brought Tears to My Eyes.” A storm-weary Mayor David Carmadelle said he was in the attic of Grand Isle Town Hall trying to pull his Hurricane Gustav damaged town back together when a phone call came in from fellow Jefferson Mayor Ed Muniz of Kenner. “My friend Ed Muniz said his city was ready to help us,” Carmadelle said in a phone interview. Carmardelle was asked to comment on the unusual action of one Jefferson Parish city conducting a large benefit fund raiser for a sister city in the parish. Kenner is hosting a Hurricane Survivors Benefit Concert on Saturday, Oct. 18, with 100 percent of the proceeds going to Grand Isle’s first responders. Partners in the event are Jefferson Parish and the Kenner Police and Fire Departments. The Kenner Convention and Visitors Bureau is sponsoring the benefit. Several days after Gustav, MAYOR CARMADELLE the backlash from Hurricane Ike trashed Grand Isle again. “I told Muniz he did not have to send any personnel or equipment and that we would be okay,” Carmadelle said. “But he insisted on raising money for Grand Isle. After I got off the phone it brought tears to my eyes. It shows what good people we have in Jefferson.” Muniz said when he ran the idea of a fund raiser past members of the Kenner Council, all agreed it was indeed a fitting project to help fellow Jeffersonians.
    [Show full text]
  • F I L E D May 9, 2008
    REVISED MAY 28, 2008 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D May 9, 2008 No. 06-30840 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MAUREEN O'DWYER; HAROLD JOSEPH GAGNET; SALLY EGERTON RICHARDS; STEPHANIE PORTER, doing business as Interior Specialties LLC; SHEILA JORDAN JORDAN; ET AL Plaintiffs - Appellants v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through its agencies & instrumentalities the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (a/k/a FEMA); KATHLEEN BLANCO, Louisiana State Governor, both individually & in her elected capacity; LOUISIANA STATE; RAY NAGIN, Mayor, both individually & in his elected capacity; NEW ORLEANS CITY; EDDIE COMPASS, Chief of police, both individually & in his appointed capacity; EDDIE JORDAN, District Attorney, both individually & in his appointed capacity; JIM HUEY, President of Orleans Parish Levee Board, both individually & in his official capacity; ORLEANS PARISH LEVEE BOARD; RAY NAGIN, Orleans Parish Sewerage & Water Board, both individually & in his capacity; CRIMINAL SHERIFF FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS; CLERK OF COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS, CRIMINAL DISTRICT; UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES; ORLEANS PARISH SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD; AARON BROUSSARD, individually & in his capacity as President for the Parish of Jefferson; JEFFERSON PARISH; KIMBERLY WILLIAMSON BUTLER, Clerk of Court, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court; EUSTIS ENGINEERING COMPANY INC; MODJESKI & MASTERS INC; C RAY NAGIN, Honorable Mayor, sued as Ray Nagin; EDWIN COMPASS, III, former Superintendent of Police, sued as Eddie Compass; ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT, Board of Commissioners, sued as Orleans Parish Levee Board; ST PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO; LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT; SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS; B & K CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC; BURK KLEINPETER, INC; CSX TRANSPORTATION INC; GEOTECH, INC; No.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2008
    VOL. 17, NO. 10 KENNER’S COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER SINCE 1991 OCTOBER 2008 Leased generators keep Kenner gets serious scares from Gustav, Ike Kenner to raise funds Kenner’s lift stations but damage is minimal and cooperation for Gustav, Ike relief working, help city within government is unprecedented in lower Jefferson avoid flooding By ALLAN KATZ ernment are pleased by their response and Concert to benefit Grand Isle By ALLAN KATZ cooperation that linked city government, With fervent prayers that the worst of the Kenner Police Department, the New For years, Councilwoman-at-Large the hurricane season is over, Kenner resi- Kenner Fire Department and the emer- Orleans Soul Jeannie Black has been telling anyone dents are cleaning up after Hurricanes gency medical services technicians Queen and who would listen that Kenner’s chron- Gustav and Ike, glad that East Jefferson together as a single unified team. Grammy win- ic flooding problems could be signifi- has not received any direct hits. “We thought that we really made some ner Irma cantly reduced if the city had genera- At the same time, officials within gov- important advances in governmental Thomas will tors that could keep the 79 lift stations cooperation this hurricane season,” said headline a “Hurricane functioning during period of high Emile Lafourcade, Kenner’s public infor- Survivors winds and heavy rain. mation officer. “For the first time, we had Party” in Irma Thomas During the last two years, everyone together in the police complex. Kenner’s Laketown on Saturday, Councilwoman Black has been joined Police Chief Steve Caraway and his team did a great job of making everyone com- October 18, for the benefit of first by District 3 Councilman Ben Zahn.
    [Show full text]