Ramsar Wetlands of Australia ±
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Painted Snippets the Newsletter of the Australian Painted Snipe Project
Painted Snippets The newsletter of the Australian Painted Snipe Project Volume 4 May 2012 A stunning female bathes herself, unperturbed by onlookers at Canberra’s Kelly Swamp. Photo: David Stowe None of us would have predicted the events Just add water which unfolded in the months that followed, It’s been an eventful 2 years since our last when one-in-10-year rains extended south edition of Painted Snippets hit the stands. After from the tropics and caused extensive flooding the 2008/09 summer, our concerns for the throughout 4 states, rejuvenating wetland and species were reinforced by a return of just 11 river systems throughout the Murray Darling, individuals observed across Australia. Bulloo-Bancannia and Lake Eyre Basins as well as across the Top End. Once the floods began to subside, observers Contents ventured out, discovering ephemeral wetlands which, in some cases, hadn’t been inundated in 1. Just Add Water 20 years! Soon enough, Australian Painted 2. Around the soggy grounds Snipe (APS) records started rolling in. With 5. Déjà vu 2005 conditions remaining wet throughout the year 6. A bird in the hand and Tropical Cyclone Yasi providing similar flows in early 2011, the last 2 years have seen 7. BirdLife Australia Wetland Birds Project over 400 individual APS1 recorded (Fig 2)across 8. iBis for your iPhone every state and territory except Tasmania, in 8. APS EPBC listing upgrade what has been true testament to the 9. Moolort Plains wetland project opportunistic nature of this enigmatic wader. 9. APS surveys. How to contribute to species conservation. -
Motion 2- RAMSAR Listing Menindee Lakes.Pdf
Motion 2 Region 4 – Central Darling Shire Council Motion: That the MDA calls on Basin Governments to endorse the Menindee Lakes, or a portion of the Lake system to be listed as a Ramsar site, in further consultation with the community. Objective: To protect the Menindee Lakes as a wetlands of cultural and ecological significance and to preserve and to conserve, through wise use and management, those areas of the system identified as appropriate for listing. Key Arguments: • In 2010-11 there were attempts to have a proportion of the Menindee Lakes recognised as being listed as a Ramsar site. Regional Development Australia Far West NSW (RDAFW) invested resources and efforts into having a proportion of the Lakes listed as a Ramsar Sites on behalf of Central Darling Shire and the Far West region. At this point in time, the State Government recognised the significance of the Menindee Lakes, however they were not able to support the project with the position of the Murray Darling Basin plan at the time. • Ramsar Convention and signing on Wetlands took place on 2 February 1971 at the small Iranian town named Ramsar and came into force on 21 December 1975. Since then, the Convention on Wetlands has been known as the Ramsar Convention. The Ramsar Convention's intentions is to halt the worldwide loss of wetlands and to conserve, through wise use and management, of those that remain. This requires international cooperation, policy making, capacity building and technology transfer. • Under the Ramsar Convention, a wide variety of natural and human-made habitat types ranging from rivers to coral reefs can be classified as wetlands. -
Northern Region
Section 5 Northern Region 109 5.1 Northern Region overview ............................................................................................... 111 5.2 Victorian Murray system .................................................................................................. 114 5.2.1 Barmah Forest ...................................................................................................... 116 5.2.2 Gunbower Creek and Forest ................................................................................ 119 5.2.3 Central Murray wetlands ...................................................................................... 124 5.2.4 Hattah Lakes ........................................................................................................ 129 5.2.5 Lower Murray wetlands ........................................................................................ 132 5.2.6 Lindsay, Mulcra and Wallpolla islands .................................................................. 137 5.3 Ovens system ................................................................................................................... 141 5.4 Goulburn system .............................................................................................................. 145 5.4.1 Goulburn River ..................................................................................................... 147 5.4.2 Goulburn wetlands ............................................................................................... 152 5.5 Broken system ................................................................................................................. -
Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R. -
Hattah-Kulkyne Ramsar Wetlands Protection Project: Can Fox Control Reduce Predation of Freshwater Turtle Nests? A
Hattah-Kulkyne Ramsar Wetlands Protection Project: can fox control reduce predation of freshwater turtle nests? A. Robley, K. Howard, L. Woodford, A. Taglierini, and M. Thompson August 2017 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Unpublished Client Report for the Mallee Catchment Management Authority Hattah-Kulkyne fox control and turtle nest survival Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Client Report Hattah-Kulkyne fox control and turtle nest survival Hattah-Kulkyne Ramsar Protection Project: can fox control reduce predation of freshwater turtle nests? Alan Robley1, Katie Howard1, Luke Woodford1, Angelo Taglierini2, and Malcolm Thompson2 1Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 2Mallee Catchment Management Authority, PO Box 5017, Mildura, Vic 3502 August 2017 In partnership with and Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Heidelberg, Victoria Hattah-Kulkyne fox control and turtle nest survival Report produced by: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning PO Box 137 Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Phone (03) 9450 8600 Website: www.delwp.vic.gov.au Citation: Robley, A., Howard, K., Woodford, L., Taglierini, A., and Thompson, M. (2017). Hattah-Kulkyne Ramsar Protection Project: can fox control reduce predation of freshwater turtle nests? Unpublished Client Report for the Mallee Catchment Management Authority. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Victoria. Front cover photo: Lake Konardin and Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) (Alan Robley); turtle nest monitoring (Malcolm Thompson). © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. -
DUCK HUNTING in VICTORIA 2020 Background
DUCK HUNTING IN VICTORIA 2020 Background The Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 provide for an annual duck season running from 3rd Saturday in March until the 2nd Monday in June in each year (80 days in 2020) and a 10 bird bag limit. Section 86 of the Wildlife Act 1975 enables the responsible Ministers to vary these arrangements. The Game Management Authority (GMA) is an independent statutory authority responsible for the regulation of game hunting in Victoria. Part of their statutory function is to make recommendations to the relevant Ministers (Agriculture and Environment) in relation to open and closed seasons, bag limits and declaring public and private land open or closed for hunting. A number of factors are reviewed each year to ensure duck hunting remains sustainable, including current and predicted environmental conditions such as habitat extent and duck population distribution, abundance and breeding. This review however, overlooks several reports and assessments which are intended for use in managing game and hunting which would offer a more complete picture of habitat, population, abundance and breeding, we will attempt to summarise some of these in this submission, these include: • 2019-20 Annual Waterfowl Quota Report to the Game Licensing Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries • Assessment of Waterfowl Abundance and Wetland Condition in South- Eastern Australia, South Australian Department for Environment and Water • Victorian Summer waterbird Count, 2019, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research As a key stakeholder representing 17,8011 members, Field & Game Australia Inc. (FGA) has been invited by GMA to participate in the Stakeholder Meeting and provide information to assist GMA brief the relevant Ministers, FGA thanks GMA for this opportunity. -
Management Plan for the South Australian Lake Eyre Basin Fisheries
MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN LAKE EYRE BASIN FISHERIES Part 1 – Commercial and recreational fisheries Part 2 – Yandruwandha Yawarrawarrka Aboriginal traditional fishery Approved by the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries pursuant to section 44 of the Fisheries Management Act 2007. Hon Gail Gago MLC Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries 1 March 2013 Page 1 of 118 PIRSA Fisheries & Aquaculture (A Division of Primary Industries and Regions South Australia) GPO Box 1625 ADELAIDE SA 5001 www.pir.sa.gov.au/fisheries Tel: (08) 8226 0900 Fax: (08) 8226 0434 © Primary Industries and Regions South Australia 2013 Disclaimer: This management plan has been prepared pursuant to the Fisheries Management Act 2007 (South Australia) for the purpose of the administration of that Act. The Department of Primary Industries and Regions SA (and the Government of South Australia) make no representation, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this management plan or as to the suitability of that information for any particular purpose. Use of or reliance upon information contained in this management plan is at the sole risk of the user in all things and the Department of Primary Industries and Regions SA (and the Government of South Australia) disclaim any responsibility for that use or reliance and any liability to the user. Copyright Notice: This work is copyright. Copyright in this work is owned by the Government of South Australia. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Commonwealth), no part of this work may be reproduced by any process without written permission of the Government of South Australia. -
Eco-Hydrological Investigation and Restoration Planning for Big Marsh
Eco-hydrological Investigation and Restoration Planning for Big Marsh The Spit Nature Conservation Reserve, Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Ramsar Site Report to Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority Ben Taylor, Mark Bachmann, Lachlan Farrington and Tessa Roberts 27th September 2020 Eco-hydrological Investigation and Restoration Planning for Big Marsh. The Spit Nature Conservation Reserve. Citation Taylor B., Bachmann M., Farrington L. and Roberts, T. (2020) Eco-hydrological Investigation and Restoration Planning for Big Marsh. The Spit Nature Conservation Reserve, Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Ramsar Site. Report to Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority. NGT Consulting – Nature Glenelg Trust, Mumbannar, Victoria. For correspondence in relation to this report, please contact: Mr Ben Taylor Senior Wetland Ecologist Nature Glenelg Trust 0434 620 646 [email protected] OR Mr Mark Bachmann Principal Ecologist Nature Glenelg Trust 0421 978 181 [email protected] Disclaimer This report has been developed using the best information available and all efforts have been made to ensure accuracy. No warranty express or implied is provided for any errors or omissions, nor in the event of its use for any other purposes or by any other parties. Page ii Eco-hydrological Investigation and Restoration Planning for Big Marsh. The Spit Nature Conservation Reserve. Acknowledgements This investigation was commissioned by Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority, through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Program. We would especially like to acknowledge and thank the following people for their generous assistance with this investigation: Andrew Morrison (Port Phillip and Westernport CMA) for contract management, technical support and providing assistance with fieldwork. -
Mangroves and Salt Marshes in Westernport Bay, Victoria Robyn Ross
Mangroves and Salt Marshes in Westernport Bay, Victoria BY Robyn Ross Arthur Rylah Institute Flora, Fauna & Freshwater Research PARKS, FLORA AND FAUNA ARTHUR RYLAH INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 123 BROWN STREET (PO BOX 137) HEIDELBERG VIC 3084 TEL: (03) 9450 8600 FAX: (03) 9450 8799 (ABN: 90719052204) JUNE 2000 0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following people assisted in gathering information for this review: Michele Arundell, Dale Tonkinson, David Cameron, Carol Harris, Paul Barker, Astrid d’Silva, Dr. Neil Saintilan, Kerrylee Rogers and Claire Turner. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................1 MANGROVE-SALT MARSH MAPPING IN WESTERNPORT BAY....................................................................................................4 MANGROVE–SALT MARSH MONITORING IN WESTERNPORT BAY..................................................................................................10 MANGROVE-SALT MARSH MONITORING IN NEW SOUTH WALES ..................................................................................................20 SEDIMENT ELEVATION TABLE (SET).........................................................................22 SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................23 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................25 APPENDIX I Westernport Contacts .......................................................................................................30 -
Australian Historic Theme: Producers
Stockyard Creek, engraving, J MacFarlane. La Trobe Picture Collection, State Library of Victoria. Gold discoveries in the early 1870s stimulated the development of Foster, initially known as Stockyard Creek. Before the railway reached Foster in 1892, water transport was the most reliable method of moving goods into and out of the region. 4. Moving goods and cargo Providing transport networks for settlers on the land Access to transport for their produce is essential to primary Australian Historic Theme: producers. But the rapid population development of Victoria in the nineteenth century, particularly during the 1850s meant 3.8. Moving Goods and that infrastructure such as good all-weather roads, bridges and railway lines were often inadequate. Even as major roads People were constructed, they were often fi nanced by tolls, adding fi nancial burden to farmers attempting to convey their produce In the second half of the nineteenth century a great deal of to market. It is little wonder that during the 1850s, for instance, money and government effort was spent developing port and when a rapidly growing population provided a market for grain, harbour infrastructure. To a large extent, this development was fruit and vegetables, most of these products were grown linked to efforts to stimulate the economic development of the near the major centres of population, such as near the major colony by assisting the growth of agriculture and settlement goldfi elds or close to Melbourne and Geelong. Farmers with on the land. Port and harbour development was also linked access to water transport had an edge over those without it. -
Ecological Character Description for Roebuck Bay
ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION FOR ROEBUCK BAY Wetland Research & Management ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION FOR ROEBUCK BAY Report prepared for the Department of Environment and Conservation by Bennelongia Pty Ltd 64 Jersey Street, Jolimont WA 6913 www.bennelongia.com.au In association with: DHI Water & Environment Pty Ltd 4A/Level 4, Council House 27-29 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 www.dhigroup.com.au Wetland Research & Management 28 William Street, Glen Forrest WA 6071 April 2009 Cover photographs: Roebuck Bay, © Jan Van de Kam, The Netherlands Introductory Notes This Ecological Character Description (ECD Publication) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar Wetlands (National Framework) (Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2008). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision. Further, it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision to approve an action. This ECD Publication is provided without prejudice to any final decision by the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia on change in ecological character in accordance with the requirements of Article 3.2 of the Ramsar Convention. -
The Following Notice to Mariners Is
LOCAL NAVIGATION WARNING GIPPSLAND PORTS The following navigation warning is published for general information. AUSTRALIA - VICTORIA LNW NO.1 OF 2021 GIPPSLAND PORTS NAVIGATION ADVICE OCEAN ACCESS BAR CROSSINGS ARE DANGEROUS DATE: Tuesday 9th March 2021 PREVIOUS Local Navigation Warning No10 of 2018 is referred. NOTICE: DETAILS: A recent Marine Incident has occurred at McLoughlins Beach ocean access entrance highlighting the risks involved for vessel operators attempting to make passage through and across ocean entrance sand bars. Gippsland Ports is the Local Port Manager for 5 Local Ports; Each of the following ports is a recognised Bar Port. • Port of Corner Inlet and Port Albert • Port of Gippsland Lakes • Port of Anderson Inlet • Port of Snowy River (Marlo) • Port of Mallacoota Inlet. Only the Ports of Corner Inlet, Port Albert and the Gippsland Lakes (Lakes Entrance Bar) have recognised aids to navigation to guide the Mariner through and across their respective ocean entrance sand bars. The entrances to these ports remain open at all times, however sound local knowledge and favorable environmental conditions are required to make a safe passage. The Port of Snowy River (Marlo), Port of Mallacoota Inlet and Port of Anderson Inlet are dynamic in nature with ever changing channel configuration and depths. Ocean access can be closed off at Marlo and Mallacoota during times of drought. There are no aids to navigation to guide the mariner through and across their respective ocean entrance sand bars. Lake Tyers - Sydenham Inlet and Tamboon Inlet, all remain closed until sufficient back up of water creates an ocean access entrance.