DOCSLIB.ORG

Palestinian Americans for 2 States, Part 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Palestinian Americans for 2 States, Part 1 Palestinian Americans for 2 States, Part 1 Rafi Dajani is the executive director of the American Task Force on Palestine, an organization that advocates the US national interest in a two- state solution and has dialogued and cooperated with Meretz USA programmatically. The following is his op-ed article of Dec. 4 in the Orlando Sentinel, “TOO LATE FOR 2 STATES?” — along with three observations of my own, [in brackets]. None of these comments should be mistaken for hostility toward Mr. Dajani, whose work I admire. As progress toward a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict stalls, an old idea has gained increased currency in some circles: one bi- national state for both Israelis and Palestinians. There are a number of variations of this argument, but proponents essentially call for forgoing the concept of two distinct national entities. Instead, they advocate that Israelis and Palestinians share the land between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River in one state. The idea of a bi-national state is not a new one. Several prominent Jewish intellectuals [also the Hashomer Hatzair socialist-Zionist movement — Ed.] in mandatory Palestine between the two world wars advocated such an arrangement, though they had little political influence. Originally, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) advocated the establishment of a democratic Palestinian Arab state in all of mandatory Palestine, with Jews as citizens of this state. [Yet this “democratic” state appeared to be of the Soviet “people’s democracy” model and the call for a “secular democratic state” implied a rejection of the Jewish people as having national rights; as written in Article 6 of the Palestinian National Charter, only those “Jews who had normally resided in Palestine until the beginning of the Zionist invasion will be considered Palestinians.” The “Zionist invasion” was understood as beginning with the Balfour Declaration of 1917– Ed.]. In 1987, the PLO and Palestinian National Council (PNC) formally embraced the two-state solution, calling for the establishment of a Palestinian state in all of the territories occupied by Israel in 1967. This continues to be the position of the PLO and Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. The recent resurgence in discussion about the bi-national concept is essentially due to the lack of movement toward a negotiated two-state solution coupled with what are deemed irrevocable Israeli facts on the ground in the occupied territories, making the possibility of a viable and independent Palestinian state remote. What makes the one-state argument seductive is that it sounds theoretically reasonable. Israeli facts on the ground, primarily settlements, control of vital resources, and the appropriation of critical parts of a future Palestinian state including East Jerusalem through the separation barrier, are serious challenges to the two-state concept. The idea of “one man, one vote” is fundamentally democratic. The land in question is small and the two societies are intertwined to some extent. But however well intentioned proponents of a bi-national state are, their argument suffers from fatal flaws. The first is that international support for the idea barely exists. All of the relevant international world powers and institutions, including the U.S., United Nations, European Union and Arab League, support a two-state solution. More important, the overwhelming majority of Palestinians continue to desire to express their national aspirations in an independent state of their own where they will be first class citizens. On the Israeli side, the bi-national idea predictably has no support. To assume that Israeli Jews would willingly give up on the idea of a Jewish state is to show lack of understanding of the existential need of Jews for a state of their own after centuries of persecution culminating in the Holocaust. To Israelis and Jews, a bi-national state means a state where they will be a minority, equating in their eyes to calls for their destruction. [Or, at least, where their rights as a sovereign people are protected — e. g., the power to maintain Israel as a refuge from and bulwark against antisemitic persecution — Ed.] For Palestinians, the danger of talking now about a one-state solution is that it diverts critically needed energies from the still achievable goal of two states, and destroys decades-long work towards achieving international recognition of the need for a Palestinian state, essentially returning them to square one. Since no realistic individual can assume that Israelis will willingly give up on a Jewish, Israeli state, it condemns the two peoples to decades of bloody conflict in the pursuit of an unachievable goal. Even if such a state were to miraculously come into being, Palestinians would very likely be an underclass, with decades if not more of civil rights to fight for. Worse, with such a bitter history of violence between the two peoples, it is easy to foresee degeneration into Balkans-style and ceaseless inter-communal conflict. What is required at the present time is a refocusing of efforts toward surmounting the challenges facing a two-state solution, the parameters of which are well known and have been accepted by all parties: a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders with its capital in East Jerusalem, and a negotiated settlement of the refugee issue. In terms of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian territory, though all illegal under international law, it is also recognized that some Israeli settlement blocs, accounting for four percent to five percent of the West Bank, will be incorporated into Israel as part of a negotiated and equitable land swap. The rest of the settlers would return to Israel proper. Negotiation and the application of political power can separate settlers from the settlements and bring down walls. This is achievable because the majority of Israelis realize that the settlement enterprise has been an obstacle to peace. It is true that time is running out on the resolution of the Israeli- Palestinian conflict. Israelis, Palestinians and the U.S. need to shoulder their responsibilities to create a viable and contiguous Palestinian state living alongside Israel in peace. Such a state is in the interest of all these parties and remains the only way to fulfill Palestinian national aspirations and address Israel’s security and integration into the Middle East. Achieving a two-state solution is admittedly difficult, but replacing it with something far less achievable is not the answer. The Palestinian national project is hardly any less achievable than Jewish hopes for a state of their own as recently as 70 years ago. The alternative is continued and expanding conflict with the real danger of degeneration into a holy war between Muslims and Jews. At the end of that fight there will neither be one nor two states..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Remarks to the Palestine National Council and Other Palestinian
    Administration of William J. Clinton, 1998 / Dec. 14 2487 human dignity, the rule of law, a society that NOTE: The President spoke at 2:15 p.m. at the teaches tolerance, values education, and now, Zahrat Al Madian. In his remarks, he referred to at last, has the chance to unleash the creative Chairman Arafat's wife, Shua. The transcript power of its people against the destructive made available by the Office of Press Secretary pull of hopelessness and poverty. also included the remarks of Chairman Arafat. I think of you at this hopeful moment as a family reuniting after too many years of dislocation and despair; a community of be- Remarks to the Palestine National lievers helping to build a Middle East in Council and Other Palestinian which people of all faiths can live in security Organizations in Gaza City and peace; a people known through the December 14, 1998 world, like the olive tree, for your attachment to this land and now to peace; a society that Thank you. Mr. Speaker, Mr. Za'anoun, demands of yourselves what you rightly de- Chairman Arafat, Mrs. Arafat, members of mand of others. the Palestinian National Council, the Pal- The way ahead may be hard and uncertain, estinian Central Council, the Palestinian Ex- but the way you have left behind is full of ecutive Committee, Palestinian Council self-defeating violence and soul-withering Heads of ministries, leaders of business and hate. So we have no choice but the way religion; to all members of the Palestinian ahead. community, and to my fellow Americans who Tomorrow my family and I, along with come here from many walks of lifeÐArab- Chairman and Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Assimilation Suspended Focuses on the Lives of Palestinians Who Migrated to the United States After the 1967 Israeli Military Oc
    Assimilation Suspended focuses on the lives of Palestinians who migrated to the United States after the 1967 Israeli military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and their American-born children. The community written about is one that is physically dispersed across parts of Brooklyn, NY and North Jersey. Based on 7 years of participant observation that ended in 2009, followed by periodic return to the field for data collection in 2012, 2014, and between 2017- 2019, this book begins with the observation that Palestinian Americans proudly identify as Palestinian and American despite the inherent tensions in the two identities given the United States’ close relationship with Israel. On the one hand, being Palestinian is associated with terrorism and a stigmatized identity, and on the other Palestinians reject American foreign policy in the region. Which begs the question: what keeps so many people unhappy with American foreign policy and treated as the “other” from becoming radicalized? A partial answer is that Palestinian Americans have been able to integrate economically and are upwardly mobile across generations (realizing the American dream). Assimilation Suspended argues that a more accurate answer is that Palestinian American assimilation is based on their ability to be, become, and raise Palestinians. In other words, feeling American is based on a community’s ability to celebrate itself and maintain ethnic boundaries. Yet, I describe their assimilation as suspended because this group is continuously called upon to reaffirm its commitment, and yet do not turn away from striving to belong to the larger polity. To this end, Assimilation Suspended explains the interaction of three levels of politics from the macro that brought Palestinians to the United States after 1967 and transformed them into self- proclaimed exiles; to the meso-level in the form of American public opinion especially after 9/11 that reinvigorated rejection and in turn demanded reincorporation; and finally to the everyday identity politics of boundary maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019 Coming to America Arab Americans Are Among the Many Ethnic Groups That Make up the United States
    Tucson Med Club ZUROUNA A publication of the Tucson MED Club tucsonmedclub.org Issue 55 Summer 2019 Coming to America Arab Americans are among the many ethnic groups that make up the United States. They trace their roots to the Arab world, which stretches from North Africa to “ West Asia. Arab Americans are I am the just as diverse as the Arab world it- self. They come from rural and ur- descendant ban areas in 22 different countries, of a people practice different religions, work in a variety of fields, and have a that builded range of educational backgrounds Damascus, and political affiliations. Despite this diversity, Arab Americans and Byblos, have a shared sense of history, lan- and Tyre and guage, and cultural heritage. http://www.arabamericanmuseum.org/Coming-to-Amer- Whereas the majority of the peo- ica.id.18.htm Sidon you, ple who come from an Arab coun- and with a try identify themselves as Arab will Americans, some might identify by their country of origin such as Syrian Americans or Palestinian Americans. Some might identify themselves by their ethnic backgrounds such as Chaldean Americans. Kahlil Gibran “ Arabs have been coming to the The artifact is a reproduction United States for hundreds of of the bell worn around the years. Like others, they came seek- neck of each camel of the ing better opportunities. The first Camel Military Corps. Cour- significant number of immigrants tesy of the Texas Camel Corps came between 1880 and 1920. This (www.texascamelcorps.com) slowed down drastically because of restrictive immigration laws passed after World War I.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Exclusion at Israel's External Border Crossings
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Senior Theses Pomona Student Scholarship 2016 Banned from the Only Democracy in the Middle East: Targeted Exclusion at Israel’s External Border Crossings Alexandra Goss Pomona College Recommended Citation Goss, Alexandra, "Banned from the Only Democracy in the Middle East: Targeted Exclusion at Israel’s External Border Crossings" (2016). Pomona Senior Theses. Paper 166. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses/166 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Pomona Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pomona Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Goss 1 Banned from the Only Democracy in the Middle East: Targeted Exclusion at Israel’s External Border Crossings Alexandra Goss Readers: Professor Heidi Haddad Professor Zayn Kassam In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts in International Relations at Pomona College Pomona College Claremont, CA April 29, 2016 Goss 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements........................................................................................................4 Chapter 1: Introduction...............................................................................................5 I. Israel: State of Inclusion; State of Exclusion................................................5 II. Background of the Phenomenon...................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Hamas, Islamic Jihad the Muslim Brotherhood
    ADL Special Background Report: Hamas, Islamic Jihad and The Muslim Brotherhood: Islamic Extremists and the Terrorist Threat to America 1913·1993 ' .' From: December 21, 1994 Michael Winograd FOR YOUR INFORMATION To: Dr. Samuel Portnoy As per your request. Sincerely, ANTI-DEFAMATION l"EAGUE OF B'NAI B•RITH FLORIDA RE.GIONAL OFFICE 373-6306 SUITE 800- lSO S.E. 2nd AVE. MIAMI9 FLORIDA 33131 Melvin Salberg, National Chairman Abraham H. Foxman, National Director David H. Strassler, Chair, National Executive Commirtee Peter T. Willner, Associate National Direct.or Meyer Eisenberg, Chair, Civil Rights Comn1ittee Jeffrey P. Sinensky, Director, Civil Rights Division Gary Zaslav, Chair, Fact Finding and Research Committee This publication was made possible by the Marilyn and Leon Klinghoffer Memorial Foundation. ADL Special Background Report is a publication of the Civil Rights Division Research and Evaluation Department. This issue prepared by Yehudit Barsky, Research Analyst. Edited by Alan M. Schwartz, Director, Research and Evaluation Department © 1993 The Anti,Defamation League 823 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY 10017 TABLE OF CONTENTS . Holy War: Now or Later? ........................................................................................ 5 Refuge in Mosques ................................................................................................... 5 Support From Abroad: Money No Object ............................................................. 6 Haven in the Land of the Free ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • As a Palestinian-American: an Oral History Project of One Man’S Life Story
    FINDING “HOME” AS A PALESTINIAN-AMERICAN: AN ORAL HISTORY PROJECT OF ONE MAN’S LIFE STORY by DAWN LE A THESIS Presented to the Department of Anthropology and the Robert D. Clark Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts December 2015 An Abstract of the Thesis of Dawn Le for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of Anthropology to be taken December 2015 Title: Finding “Home” as a Palestinian-American: An Oral History Project of One Man’s Life Story Approved: _______________________________________ Dr. Diane Baxter For immigrants and refugees, the concept of “home” is seldom a concrete definition, as the question of where “home” is - either in the country of origin or the new country, activates a tension in self-identity. For the Palestinian immigration and refugee experience, the longstanding Arab-Israeli Conflict produces an even more complex tension. The purpose of this study is to explore this tension in a Palestinian-American context. To do so, the research project focuses on an oral history project about Ibrahim Hamide, a restaurateur and human rights activist in Eugene for the past 40 years. The project involved taking participant observation notes prior to the series of interviews, conducting the interviews themselves, coding the interviews for common themes, and then analyzing the information with other works about the Palestinian/Arab American experience. The primary findings of this study indicate that in addition to the challenges of migration, Orientalism, a term by Edward Said that means the representation of the Middle East in a stereotyped and colonialist manner, has a major influence on the tension of self-identity.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Executive Council Narrative Minutes Embassy Suites, Montgomery
    Executive Council Narrative Minutes Embassy Suites, Montgomery, Alabama October 18 - 21, 2019 Friday morning, October 18, 2019 The meeting began with morning prayer designed to support the work in racial justice and reconciliation that will be the focus of this meeting. Following morning prayer, The Most Rev. Michael Curry, Chair, called the meeting to order and called on the Secretary, the Rev. Canon Michael Barlowe, to call the roll and make announcements. All present, unless otherwise noted: Michael Curry, Chair Gay Jennings, Vice Chair Thomas Alexander – arriving late Anne Hodges-Copple - excused Lloyd Allen Anne Kitch Devon Anderson Edward Konieczny Liza Anderson Alexizendria Link – arriving late Diane Butler Mally Ewing Lloyd Jane Cisluycis Frank Logue - excused Matthew Cowden - excused Andrea McKellar Lillian Davis-Wilson Steven Nishibayashi Patricia Downing - excused Aaron Perkins Noreen Duncan Mayra Gonzalez Polanco Cornelia Eaton Diane Pollard Blanca Echeverry Holli Powell Strum Alice Freeman Russell Randle Pauline Getz Rose Sconiers Louis Glosson Dabney Smith Angela Goodhouse-Mauai Sarah Stonesifer Mark Goodman George Wing Julia Ayala Harris Warren Wong Scott Hayashi Ex-officio members and those with seat and voice: Michael Barlowe, Secretary Kurt Barnes, Treasurer Byron Rushing, Vice President of the House of Deputies Geof Smith, COO 1 Doug Anning, Acting CLO Companion Church Partners: Andrew Asbil, Anglican Church of Canada - excused Joanne Engquist, ELCA Pastor Joanne Engquist was introduced as the new liaison from the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. The other new liaison, The Rt. Rev. Andrew Asbil from the Anglican Church of Canada was unable to attend this meeting due to prior scheduled events.
    [Show full text]
  • A Poetics of Reconciliation
    A POETICS OF RECONCILIATION: THE AESTHETIC MEDIATION OF CONFLICT BY CYNTHIA E. COHEN B.A., Wesleyan University, 1976 Masters in City Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1984 DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Reading and Writing Instruction December, 1997 2 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED c 1997 Cynthia E. Cohen 3 to my parents to Ann and to Amelia and to the children who choose to be seeds of peace. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The practice of community oral history that gave rise to the questions that animate this study evolved through years of collaboration with artists, scholars and culture-bearers from many diverse communities. In particular, I would like to thank Feryal Abbasi Ghnaim, Tamar Yehoshua, Inea Bushnaq, Klara Barker, Wen-ti Tsen and all those whose stories and efforts made possible A Passion for Life: Stories and Folk Arts of Palestinian and Jewish Women. I also appreciate the insights of Bill Thompson and colleagues at The Oral History Center; Jane Sapp and friends at the Center for Cultural and Community Development; Ewa Pytowska of the Intercultural Training and Resource Center; Pat Dugan, Nancy Love and the women of the Trainers' Support Group; Judy Rigmont, Sarah Haskell and the New Hampshire PrisonArts Project; and Randy Thomas, Christy Hammer and the women of the New Hampshire Women's Oral History Project. This dissertation has benefitted directly from the courage and creativity of the young people of the Haitian bi-lingual program of the Graham and Parks Alternative School in Cambridge, Massachusetts and of the African-American teenagers affiliated with the Moore Community house in Biloxi, Mississippi.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Chicago
    Conclusion On April 25, 2017, two years after I had completed my fieldwork, Rasmea Odeh, Associate Director of the Arab American Action Network (AAAN), walked into a federal courtroom in Detroit, Michigan to plead guilty to one count of fraudu- lently obtaining United States citizenship. Ending a three-and-a-half-year legal and political struggle, she agreed to admit to not having disclosed a previous con- viction and imprisonment on her 2004 naturalization application and to accept immediate loss of her citizenship and deportation in return for the waiving of prison time beyond the period she had already served prior to her release on bail. The incident Odeh was accused of not disclosing pertained to her sentencing by an Israeli military court to life imprisonment for membership in the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and participation in two bombings in 1969.1 Odeh firmly and consistently denied the charges on which she was convicted. Soon after her release as part of a prisoner exchange in 1979, she testified at the United Nations General Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland to having been tortured and sexually assaulted during her initial, forty-five-day detention and interrogation (United Nations General Assembly 1979). A psychiatrist who evaluated Odeh in Chicago determined that she suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder related to the abuse she had suffered and that this condition, which can cause repression of traumatic memories, likely accounted for her not indicating the 1969 arrest in her United States citizenship application form.2 In 1997, three years after Odeh’s arrival in the United States, the US State Depart- ment listed the PFLP as a terrorist organization.3 On this basis, federal prosecutors threatened to charge Odeh retroactively with membership in a terrorist group if she refused to accept the plea deal they offered her in relation to the immigration 185 186 Conclusion charge.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for Congregational Study: Facilitator Guide
    A Guide for Congregational Study: Journeys Toward Justice Facilitator Guide Taurean J. Webb, Author Itihari Toure, PhD, Editor Iva E. Carruthers, PhD, General Secretary Samuel DeWitt Proctor Conference, Inc. ©2016 Samuel DeWitt Proctor Conference, Inc. ©2016 Samuel DeWitt Proctor Conference, Inc. Table of ConTenTs Overview 1 Journeys Toward Justice: Instruction and Administration Notes ........................................................................3 To The Facilitator: Potential Pedagogy .......................................................................................... 4 Examples for Effective Delivery ................................................................................................... 5 Proposed Session Format ............................................................................................................. 7 Characteristics of an Effective Facilitator ...................................................................................... 8 Materials Included and Needed .................................................................................................... 9 Feedback from Facilitators ..........................................................................................................10 Learning Outcomes ....................................................................................................................11 How to Contribute .................................................................................................................... 13 Journeys Toward Justice:
    [Show full text]
  • Contextualizing Palestinian Hybridity: How Pragmatic Citizenship Influences Diasporic Identities Nicholas E
    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Sociology Honors Projects Sociology Department Spring 4-25-2017 Contextualizing Palestinian Hybridity: How Pragmatic Citizenship Influences Diasporic Identities Nicholas E. Bascuñan-Wiley Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/soci_honors Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Bascuñan-Wiley, Nicholas E., "Contextualizing Palestinian Hybridity: How Pragmatic Citizenship Influences Diasporic Identities" (2017). Sociology Honors Projects. 50. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/soci_honors/50 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Contextualizing Palestinian Hybridity: How Pragmatic Citizenship Influences Diasporic Identities By Nicholas Bascuñan-Wiley Senior Seminar Department of Sociology Macalester College Spring 2017 Bascuñan-Wiley 2 Abstract Palestinians are one of the largest diaspora populations in the world, with members in the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and the Americas. How are the individual diasporic experiences of nationalism similar and different to one another? This research examines the creation and maintenance of Palestinian identity in diasporic contexts through ethnographic analysis and a series of interviews conducted in Chile, Jordan, and The United States. The results show that despite Palestinians maintaining Palestinianness as a dominant characteristic of identity in all three settings, there are contextual influences on how people integrate that identity into their lives. Within Jordan, Palestinians experience conflicting national identities and economic disparity while sharing language, culture and geographic proximity with Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I --Advocating for Peace and Justice in Israel/Palestine
    Appendix I --Advocating for Peace and Justice in Israel/Palestine As described on page 31 of the Facilitators’ Manual, members of the class expressed interest in having more time to discuss options for individual advocacy to promote peace in the Holy Land and changes in U.S. policies towards Israel and Palestine. As a result, the course facilitators, together with other members of the St. Mark’s Mid- East Working Group, prepared the following hand-outs, which were used as part of a follow-up discussion on advocacy in May, 2011. In Appendix G - Evaluation and Recommendations (pages 10, 14-15), the facilitators discuss the possible use of these handouts in an expanded course of six sessions. In one scenario, a two-hour class might be devoted to exploring the response of the Episcopal Church to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and also to considering options for individual advocacy. In another scenario, course planners might hold a half-day or full-day retreat to delve into these topics. The handouts have been revised to reflect additional information and events up to January, 2012. Handout 1 -- Resources for Episcopalians pages 2-7 This document describes the relevant public policy positions, actions, and advocacy resources of The Episcopal Church, the Diocese of Washington, the Palestine Israel Network of the Episcopal Peace Fellowship, and Churches for Middle East Peace. Handout 2 -- Options for Individual Advocacy pages 8-18 This handout reviews a wide range of possible actions: speaking to friends and family members, communicating with U.S., Israeli, and Palestinian officials, contacting media editors and journalists, supporting ad campaigns, attending advocacy conferences and rallies, and participating in various aspects of the global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement to influence consumer and corporate behavior that supports the occupation of Palestine.
    [Show full text]