DOCSLIB.ORG

BINARY NEUTRON STAR MERGERS: Testing Ejecta Models for High Mass-Ratios

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BINARY NEUTRON STAR MERGERS: Testing Ejecta Models for High Mass-Ratios BINARY NEUTRON STAR MERGERS: Testing Ejecta Models for High Mass-Ratios Student Author Mentor Allen Murray is currently a Aaron Warren is an associate junior at Purdue University professor of physics and director Northwest and is majoring in of the Science Interdisciplinary both physics and mathematics, Research Center at Purdue with minors in astrophysics and University Northwest. Dr. Warren French. He currently conducts completed his AB degree at research with Dr. Aaron Warren Vassar College, with majors that focuses on binary neutron in physics, mathematics, and star mergers of particularly astronomy, in 2000 and his PhD high mass ratio. Their research seeks to see how from Rutgers University in physics in 2006. He mass ejecta, kilonova, and gravitational wave conducts research in both astrophysics and physics characteristics can help determine neutron star education research. His early work in computational structure and the nuclear equation of state. Murray astrophysics studied simulations of stellar intends to pursue a graduate degree in physics after collisions and the production of blue stragglers in completion of his BS in the spring of 2021. He also globular clusters. Currently, Warren focuses on enjoys casual astronomical observation and French simulations of binary neutron star mergers having cooking. exceptional characteristics such as high mass ratios and magnetizations, with a particular interest in determining whether and how the electromagnetic and gravitational signals from such mergers may provide insights regarding the nuclear equation of state, neutron star structure, and merger remnant properties. 52 Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research: Volume 10, Fall 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/2158-4052.1442 INTRODUCTION Abstract Neutron stars are stars at supranuclear density, tending to have masses one to two times that of Neutron stars are extremely dense stellar the sun with a radius of about 10 km. From this we corpses which sometimes exist in orbiting determine that the maximum density of a neutron pairs known as binary neutron star (BNS) star is roughly 1015 g/cm3. The nuclear equation systems. The mass ratio (q) of a BNS system of state of matter at this extreme density is not is defi ned as the mass of the heavier neutron known. Due to various mechanisms, two neutron star divided by the mass of the lighter neutron stars can sometimes form a gravitationally bound star. Over time the neutron stars will inspiral pair called a binary neutron star (BNS) system. toward one another and produce a merger Over time these two stars will lose orbital energy event. Although rare, these events can be rich and gradually inspiral toward one another until sources of observational data due to their they eventually merge. This event is called a BNS many electromagnetic emissions as well as merger. For a summary review, see Baiotti and the gravitational waves they produce. The Rezzola (2017). BNS mergers are especially violent ability to extract physical information from and highly energetic, producing gravitational waves such observations relies heavily on numerical (Abbot et al., 2017b) and a short gamma ray burst simulations of merger events. In this project, (Abbot et al., 2017a). During the merger process we report results of six simulations for BNS neutron star material can become gravitationally mergers having total system masses of unbound by several mechanisms, allowing it to 2.50 or 2.75Msun and with mass ratios of escape out into the host galaxy. One such method 1.75, 2.00, and 2.25 (the highest mass ratio for ejection relies on tidal interactions and shock simulated in the world). Our goals are to (a) heating to throw material outward at high velocity; test community-developed models of the this material is called dynamical ejecta (hereafter ejecta produced by BNS mergers, (b) examine simply ejecta). Ejecta play a critical role in galactic the gravitational waveforms for distinctive chemical evolution including the formation of heavy spectral characteristics, and (c) estimate the elements, which due to their high velocity can be electromagnetic emissions of the merger dispersed over interstellar distances. Numerical remnants. Simulations are run using the simulations typically include estimates of the ejecta Einstein Toolkit and employ a semirealistic characteristics, such as the mass, velocity, and seven-segment piecewise-polytrope model geometric distribution of the ejecta. Based on results for the neutron stars based on the Skyrme- of simulations from many researchers, Dietrich and Lyon equation of state. We fi nd that the Ujevic (2017) and Radice et al. (2018) developed community models of ejecta are robust, with fi tted models of ejecta properties. some systematic overestimation of the amount of ejecta produced at extremely high mass Currently the total number and spatiotemporal ratios. Also, several gravitational wave and distribution of neutron stars is not fully known, but electromagnetic characteristics are identifi ed, by using population synthesis models a multitude such as reduced gravitational spectral peaks of estimates can be made regarding the number and extended kilonova emissions in the near of neutron star binary systems. These population infrared for weeks after the merger. models predict that a detectable fraction of BNS Binary Mergers Star Neutron mergers will have mass ratios as high as q = 2.00 Murray, A. (2020). Binary neutron star (Dietrich et al., 2015). However, community mergers: Testing ejecta models for high mass- research has focused mostly on simulations of BNS ratios. Journal of Purdue Undergraduate mergers with mass ratios q < 1.5. Although this Research, 10, 52–61. is understandable, since most BNS mergers are expected to have mass ratios near 1, there may be Keywords distinctive traits for high mass ratio mergers that could provide stronger insights regarding neutron neutron stars, black holes, gravitational star structure and remnant properties. Thus, our waves, kilonova, astrophysics, numerical research seeks to explore these possibilities by relativity focusing on extreme mass ratios q > 1.5, with three goals in mind. First, we aim to test the accuracy of the community-developed ejecta models. Second, we study the distinct gravitational wave characteristics 53 in order to test spectral features found in low and to aid interpretation of numerical analyses. mass ratio BNS mergers. Third, estimation of the Also using VisIt, ejecta are identified following the electromagnetic emissions produced by high mass method of Dietrich and Ujevic (2017), and their ratio mergers may show distinctive features relative total mass and energy are calculated. We created to low mass ratio mergers. Python scripts to extract gravitational waveforms from the simulations, based on the method METHODS described in De Pietri, Feo, Maione, and Loffler We conduct simulations at two different resolutions (2016). Spectrograms and power spectral densities for each of six different BNS systems. The six of the waveforms are then calculated to identify systems have total neutron star masses of either 2.50 distinguishing features of high mass ratio systems. or 2.75 Msun and mass ratios of either 1.75, 2.00, or Finally, calculations of the light emitted from the 2.25. While the last of these mass ratios is perhaps ejecta (called a kilonova) are performed using unrealistically large, it is hoped that its inclusion light curve model estimates by Dietrich and Ujevic may exaggerate and make clearer any distinguishing (2017). trends or signals that may be present but less pronounced at the lower mass ratios. RESULTS Examples of the identified ejecta from the Initial models of the neutron stars for each system simulations are shown in the first three figures below. are constructed using the LORENE pseudospectral Figure 1 shows a snapshot from the M = 2.75Msun, code (Gourgoulhon, Grandclement, Taniguchi, q = 1.75 simulation, with surfaces representing Marck, & Bonazzola, 2001). The neutron stars are various densities of bound matter (in shades of initially placed 45 km apart, allowing several orbits orange) orbiting the black hole that has formed before merger. We assume a Skyrme-Lyon equation (the small dark sphere corresponds to the apparent of state for the neutron stars, modeled as seven- horizon) and other surfaces representing various segment piecewise-polytropes. This is a standard and densities of ejected matter (in shades of green and semirealistic assumption that is generally consistent blue). Note that the densities of the ejected material with observations of neutron stars to date, such as are far lower than the densities of the bound material, seen in Abbot et al. (2017b). Our model has several and there is quite a bit of diffuse bound material flaws, including an absence of neutrinos as well as not shown here for the sake of visual clarity. The neutrino-driven winds and cooling, no modeling background stars and nebula in the image are purely of neutron capture or electron fraction, and an aesthetic and not part of the simulation. assumption of no initial magnetization of the neutron stars. It is left to future work to alleviate these flaws. The ejecta are again plotted with green surfaces in Figure 2, which is zoomed out. In general, portions Once constructed, each BNS system is evolved of the ejecta travel as fast as 30% the speed of light, using the Einstein Toolkit (Loffler et al., 2012), covering hundreds of kilometers in milliseconds on an open-source community-developed numerical their way out of the system. As seen in Figure 2, relativity package. All simulations reported here the physical time for this snapshot is nearly 14 use the “Tesla” release of the Einstein Toolkit. To milliseconds after the start of the simulation. estimate uncertainties due to numerical rounding and Figure 3 plots the density of the ejecta in both the resolution limitations, we evolved each system at equatorial and meridional planes at this time. The two different resolutions. Results from the highest- distance scales are plotted in code units (100M = 147 resolution simulations, accurate down to 369 m, km).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Determining the Hubble Constant with Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei
    Determining the Hubble Constant with AGN-assisted Black Hole Mergers Y. Yang,1 V. Gayathri,1 S. M´arka,2 Z. M´arka,2 and I. Bartos1, ∗ 1Department of Physics, University of Florida, PO Box 118440, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 2Department of Physics, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA Gravitational waves from neutron star mergers have long been considered a promising way to mea- sure the Hubble constant, H0, which describes the local expansion rate of the Universe. While black hole mergers are more abundantly observed, their expected lack of electromagnetic emission and poor gravitational-wave localization makes them less suited for measuring H0. Black hole mergers within the disks of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) could be an exception. Accretion from the AGN disk may produce an electromagnetic signal, pointing observers to the host galaxy. Alternatively, the low number density of AGNs could help identify the host galaxy of 1 − 5% of mergers. Here we show that black hole mergers in AGN disks may be the most sensitive way to determine H0 with gravitational waves. If 1% of LIGO/Virgo's observations occur in AGN disks with identified host galaxies, we could measure H0 with 1% uncertainty within five years, likely beyond the sensitivity of neutrons star mergers. I. INTRODUCTION Multi-messenger gravitational-wave observations rep- resent a valuable, independent probe of the expansion of the Universe [1]. The Hubble constant, which de- scribes the rate of expansion, can measured using Type Ia supernovae, giving a local expansion rate of H0 = 74:03 ± 1:42 km s−1 Mpc−1 [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Kilonovae and Short Hard Bursts A.K.A: Electromagnetic Counterparts to Gravitational Waves
    Kilonovae and short hard bursts a.k.a: electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational waves Igor Andreoni for the Multi-Messenger Astronomy working group ZTF Phase II: NSF reverse site visit November 19th 2020 Electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational waves Short hard GRB - Are neutron star mergers the dominant sites for heavy element nucleosynthesis? - What extreme Physics can we learn? Kilonova (optical/IR) - How can we use kilonovae for cosmology? - What is the rate of binary neutron Gravitational star and neutron star-black hole mergers? Waves Image credit: NASA November 19th 2020 Igor Andreoni Finding kilonovae is challenging! Kilonovae are rare, fast and faint transients compared to supernovae Faint Fast modified from Andreoni+2018, LSST White Paper November 19th 2020 Igor Andreoni Why do we need ZTF? During the second LIGO-Virgo observing run (O2), the binary neutron star merger GW170817 was localized to 32 deg2 GW170817 (a couple of ZTF pointings) During O3 (2019-2020), the median localization for neutron star mergers was 4,480 deg2! …and the sources were more distant November 19th 2020 Igor Andreoni Gravitational Wave follow-up during O3 We used ZTF to follow-up 15 GW triggers that included at least one neutron star Kilonova luminosity function Kasliwal et al., ApJ, in press Second binary NS merger follow-up Coughlin et al., ApJ Letters, Vol 885, Issue 1, article id. L19, 13 pp. Constraints on NS-BH merger Anand & Coughlin et al., Nature Astronomy, in press November 19th 2020 Igor Andreoni Short, hard gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) We used ZTF to follow-up 8 short GRBs found by the Fermi satellite Ahumada et al., in prep.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects
    universe Review Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects Diego Bersanetti 1,* , Barbara Patricelli 2,3 , Ornella Juliana Piccinni 4 , Francesco Piergiovanni 5,6 , Francesco Salemi 7,8 and Valeria Sequino 9,10 1 INFN, Sezione di Genova, I-16146 Genova, Italy 2 European Gravitational Observatory (EGO), Cascina, I-56021 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] 3 INFN, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy 4 INFN, Sezione di Roma, I-00185 Roma, Italy; [email protected] 5 Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università di Urbino, I-61029 Urbino, Italy; [email protected] 6 INFN, Sezione di Firenze, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trento, Povo, I-38123 Trento, Italy; [email protected] 8 INFN, TIFPA, Povo, I-38123 Trento, Italy 9 Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Pancini”, Università di Napoli “Federico II”, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] 10 INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Virgo detector, based at the EGO (European Gravitational Observatory) and located in Cascina (Pisa), played a significant role in the development of the gravitational-wave astronomy. From its first scientific run in 2007, the Virgo detector has constantly been upgraded over the years; since 2017, with the Advanced Virgo project, the detector reached a high sensitivity that allowed the detection of several classes of sources and to investigate new physics. This work reports the Citation: Bersanetti, D.; Patricelli, B.; main hardware upgrades of the detector and the main astrophysical results from the latest five years; Piccinni, O.J.; Piergiovanni, F.; future prospects for the Virgo detector are also presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for the Neutron Star Or Black Hole Resulting from Gw170817
    SEARCHING FOR THE NEUTRON STAR OR BLACK HOLE RESULTING FROM GW170817 With the detection of a binary neutron star merger by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) and Virgo, a natural question to ask is: what happened to the resulting object that was formed? The merger of two neutron stars can lead to four ultimate outcomes: (i) the prompt formation of a black hole, (ii) the formation of a "hypermassive" neutron star that collapses to a black hole in less than a second, (iii) the formation of a "supramassive" neutron star that collapses to a black hole on much longer timescales, (iv) the formation of a stable neutron star. Which of these four possibilities occurs depends on how much mass remains in the resulting object, as well as the composition and properties of matter inside neutron stars. Knowing the masses of the original two neutron stars before they merged, which can be measured from the gravitational wave signal detected, and under some assumptions about the compactness of neutron stars, it seems most likely that the resulting object was a hypermassive neutron star, although the other options cannot be excluded either. In this analysis, we search for gravitational waves from the post-merger object, and although we do not find anything, we set the groundwork for future searches when we have further improved the sensitivity of our detectors and where we might also observe a merger even closer to us. WHAT MIGHT WE EXPECT TO OBSERVE? Simulations tell us that the remnant object that results from merging binary neutron stars also emits gravitational waves.
    [Show full text]
  • Probing the Nuclear Equation of State from the Existence of a 2.6 M Neutron Star: the GW190814 Puzzle
    S S symmetry Article Probing the Nuclear Equation of State from the Existence of a ∼2.6 M Neutron Star: The GW190814 Puzzle Alkiviadis Kanakis-Pegios †,‡ , Polychronis S. Koliogiannis ∗,†,‡ and Charalampos C. Moustakidis †,‡ Department of Theoretical Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; [email protected] (A.K.P.); [email protected] (C.C.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Current address: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece. ‡ These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: On 14 August 2019, the LIGO/Virgo collaboration observed a compact object with mass +0.08 2.59 0.09 M , as a component of a system where the main companion was a black hole with mass ∼ − 23 M . A scientific debate initiated concerning the identification of the low mass component, as ∼ it falls into the neutron star–black hole mass gap. The understanding of the nature of GW190814 event will offer rich information concerning open issues, the speed of sound and the possible phase transition into other degrees of freedom. In the present work, we made an effort to probe the nuclear equation of state along with the GW190814 event. Firstly, we examine possible constraints on the nuclear equation of state inferred from the consideration that the low mass companion is a slow or rapidly rotating neutron star. In this case, the role of the upper bounds on the speed of sound is revealed, in connection with the dense nuclear matter properties. Secondly, we systematically study the tidal deformability of a possible high mass candidate existing as an individual star or as a component one in a binary neutron star system.
    [Show full text]
  • GW170817-Like Disk Produces a Blue Kilonova J
    GW170817-Like Disk Produces a Blue Kilonova J. M. Miller, with: B. R. Ryan, J. C. Dolence, A. Burrows, C. L. Fryer, O. Korobkin, J. Lippuner, M. R. Mumpower, R. T. Wollaeger A Groundbreaking Discovery The Case For the Disk Nucleosynthesis Heat, neutrinos, and magnetic fields can drive a wind off On August 17, 2017, the in-spiral and I I We find structured outflow. I the disk. merger of two neutron stars was observed. I Polar material has high Ye and produces less-robust r-process. This wind may produce a less-robust r-process and be a This event is called GW170817. I I Midplane material has low Ye and produces more-robust r-process. source for the blue kilonova. I Events like this one drive short gamma ray I Structure persists in time! bursts, some of the most energetic events in I Depends on electron fraction Ye. Low Ye means robust the universe. r-process and implies a red kilonova. High means less robust r-process and implies a blue kilonova. I Mergers are sites of r-process Literature is sparse and divided on wind and r-process nucleosynthesis, where the heaviest elements Above: A spectrogram showing the I [3, 4, 5]. in our universe are formed. characteristic gravitational wave chirp due to Above: Volume rendering of a Result depends sensitively on complex interplay of I Many more events to come! GW170817. Image from [1]. I simulated accretion disk formed by a neutrino transport, general relativity, magnetic fields, and BNS merger. fluid dynamics. An In-Spiral Story Above: Left: Total mass in the outflow as a 4 4 Presenting νbhlight function of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds
    Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds Nelson Christensen1;2 z 1ARTEMIS, Universit´eC^oted'Azur, Observatoire C^oted'Azur, CNRS, 06304 Nice, France 2Physics and Astronomy, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, USA Abstract. A stochastic background of gravitational waves can be created by the superposition of a large number of independent sources. The physical processes occurring at the earliest moments of the universe certainly created a stochastic background that exists, at some level, today. This is analogous to the cosmic microwave background, which is an electromagnetic record of the early universe. The recent observations of gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors imply that there is also a stochastic background that has been created by binary black hole and binary neutron star mergers over the history of the universe. Whether the stochastic background is observed directly, or upper limits placed on it in specific frequency bands, important astrophysical and cosmological statements about it can be made. This review will summarize the current state of research of the stochastic background, from the sources of these gravitational waves, to the current methods used to observe them. Keywords: stochastic gravitational wave background, cosmology, gravitational waves 1. Introduction Gravitational waves are a prediction of Albert Einstein from 1916 [1,2], a consequence of general relativity [3]. Just as an accelerated electric charge will create electromagnetic waves (light), accelerating mass will create gravitational waves. And almost exactly arXiv:1811.08797v1 [gr-qc] 21 Nov 2018 a century after their prediction, gravitational waves were directly observed [4] for the first time by Advanced LIGO [5, 6].
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Unknown Forces THAT DRIVE Neutron Star Mergers
    Measuring the Unknown Forces THAT DRIVE Neutron Star Mergers Interview with Professor Eliot Quataert Figure 1: Merger of two neutron stars and their corresponding gravitational waves. Modeled after BY CASSIDY HARDIN, MICHELLE the first gravitational waves from a neutron star LEE, AND KAELA SEIERSEN detected by the LIGO telescope.1 Eliot Quataert is a Professor of Astronomy and Physics at the University of California, Berkeley. He is also the director of the Theoretical Astrophysics Center, examining cosmology, planetary dynamics, the interstellar medium, and star and planet formation. Professor Quataert’s specific interests include black holes, stellar physics, and galaxy formation. In this interview, we discuss the formation of neutron stars, the detection of neutron star mergers, and the general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) model that was used to predict the behavior of these mergers. Analysis of these cosmic events is significant because it sheds light on the origins of the heavier elements that make up our universe. Professor Eliot Quataert. 42 Berkeley Scientific Journal | FALL 2018 now. It was really getting involved with research that allowed me to realize that I love astrophysics. One of the great things about astrophysics relative to particle or string theory is the close con- nection with observation. This interplay between the abstract, theoretical things I do and the observational side is really fun and exciting, and it also keeps my research grounded in reality. I think this combination is what really convinced me to do astrophysics in graduate school. Right now, I’m working on relating stars with black holes and investigating how stars collapse at the end of their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: Gw170817 and Grb 170817A
    GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AND GAMMA-RAYS FROM A BINARY NEUTRON STAR MERGER: GW170817 AND GRB 170817A The gravitational-wave signal GW170817 was detected on August 17, 2017 by the Advanced LIGO and Virgo observatories. This is the first signal thought to be due to the merger of two neutron stars. Only 1.7 seconds after the gravitational-wave signal was detected, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and the Anticoincidence Shield for the SPectrometer for the INTErnational Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory (INTEGRAL SPI-ACS) detected a short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A. For decades astronomers suspected that short gamma-ray bursts were produced by the merger of two neutron stars or a neutron star and a black hole. The combination of GW170817 and GRB 170817A provides the first direct evidence that colliding neutron stars can indeed produce short gamma-ray bursts. INTRODUCTION FIGURES FROM THE PUBLICATION Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) are some of the most energetic events For more information on the meaning of these figures, see the full publication here. observed in Nature. They typically release as much energy in just a few seconds as our Sun will throughout its 10 billion-year life. They occur approximately once a day and come from random points on the sky. These GRBs can last anywhere from fractions of seconds to thousands of seconds. However, we usually divide them in two groups based roughly on their duration, with the division being at the 2 second mark (although more sophisticated features are also taken into account in the classification). Long GRBs (>2 seconds) are caused by the core-collapse of rapidly rotating massive stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Brian David Metzger
    Curriculum Vitae, Updated 10/20 Brian David Metzger Columbia University Email: [email protected] Department of Physics Web: http://www.columbia.edu/∼bdm2129 909 Pupin Hall, MC 5217 Phone: (212) 854-9702 New York, NY 10027 Fax: (212) 854-3379 ACADEMIC POSITIONS 07/20− Full Professor of Physics, Columbia University 07/19−07/20 Visiting Scholar, Simons Flatiron Institute 01/17−07/20 Associate Professor of Physics, Columbia University 01/13−01/17 Assistant Professor of Physics, Columbia University 09/12−12/12 Lyman Spitzer Jr. Fellow, Princeton University 09/09−12/12 NASA Einstein Fellow, Princeton University EDUCATION 08/03−05/09 University of California at Berkeley M.A. & Ph.D. in Physics (Thesis Adviser: Prof. Eliot Quataert) Dissertation: \Theoretical Models of Gamma-Ray Burst Central Engines" 08/99−05/03 The University of Iowa B.S. in Physics, Astronomy, & Mathematics (Highest Distinction) SELECT HONORS, FELLOWSHIPS and AWARDS 2020 Blavatnik National Laureate in Natural Sciences & Engineering 2020 Simons Investigator in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics 2019 Simons Fellow in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics 2019 2020 Decadal Survey in Astronomy & Astrophysics, Program Panelist 2019 Salpeter Honorary Lecturer, Cornell 2019 Bruno Rossi Prize, American Astronomical Society 2018,19,20 Blavatnik National Awards for Young Scientists, Finalist 2019 New Horizons Breakthrough Prize in Physics 2018 Charles and Thomas Lauritsen Honorary Lecture, Caltech 2016 Scialog Fellow, Research Science Corporation 2014 Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship 2009−12 NASA Einstein Fellowship, Princeton 2009 Dissertation Prize, AAS High Energy Astrophysics Division 2009 NASA Hubble Fellowship 2009 Lyman Spitzer Jr. Fellowship, Princeton 2009 Mary Elizabeth Uhl Prize, UC Berkeley Astronomy 2005−08 NASA Graduate Student Research Fellowship 2003 James A.
    [Show full text]
  • LIGO Listens for Gravitational Waves
    LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Findings So Far, and Current Events Peter S. Shawhan University of Maryland Physics Department and Joint Space-Science Institute University of Maryland APS Mid-Atlantic Senior Physicists Group February 19, 2020 1 LIGO = Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory LIGO Hanford Observatory Two LIGO Observatories LIGO Hanford LIGO Livingston Observatory Plus the Virgo Observatory in Italy Having three detectors significantly improves our ability to confidently detect weak sources and to locate them in the sky 4 Improving detectors over time to reduce the noise level Initial LIGO (2002-2010) Advanced LIGO (as of 2015) 10−23 amplitude spectral density! LIGO-G1501223-v3 5 Advanced Detector Observing Runs O1 — September 12, 2015 to January 19, 2016 LIGO Hanford and Livingston O2 — November 30, 2016 to August 25, 2017 Initially, just the two LIGO observatories Virgo joined on August 1, 2017 O3 — Began April 1, 2019 Both LIGO observatories plus Virgo 6 Ten binary black hole mergers detected in O1+O2! Browse events at https://ligo.northwestern.edu/media/mass-plot/index.html 7 Highlights: Binary Black Hole Mergers Exploring the Properties of GW Events Bayesian parameter estimation: Adjust physical parameters of waveform model to see what fits the data from all detectors well Illustration by N. Cornish and T. Littenberg Get ranges of likely (“credible”) parameter values 9 Population of Merging BBHs: Masses Mass ratio (풒) consistent with 1 for all these events, but with significant uncertainty The data determines “chirp mass” best for low-mass BBHs, and total mass best for high-mass BBHs [Abbott et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Emission from a Kilonova Following a Gravitational-Wave-Detected Neutron-Star Merger
    Optical emission from a kilonova following a gravitational-wave-detected neutron-star merger Iair Arcavi1,2, Griffin Hosseinzadeh1,2, D. Andrew Howell1,2, Curtis McCully1,2, Dovi Poznanski3, Daniel Kasen4,5, Jennifer Barnes6, Michael Zaltzman3, 1,2 3 7 Sergiy Vasylyev , Dan Maoz and Stefano Valenti 1Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9530, USA 2Las Cumbres Observatory, 6740 Cortona Dr Ste 102, Goleta, CA 93117-5575, USA 3School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel 4Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720- 8169, USA 5Departments of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720- 7300, USA 6Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA 7Department of Physics, University of California, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616-5270, USA The merger of two neutron stars has been predicted to produce an optical- infrared transient (lasting a few days) known as a ‘kilonova’, powered by the radioactive decay of neutron-rich species synthesized in the merger1-5. Evidence that short γ-ray bursts also arise from neutron star mergers has been accumulating6-8. In models2,9 of such mergers a small amount of mass (10−4-10−2 solar masses) with a low electron fraction is ejected at high velocities (0.1-0.3 times light speed) and/or carried out by winds from an accretion disk formed around the newly merged object10,11. This mass is expected to undergo rapid neutron capture (r-process) nucleosynthesis, leading to the formation of radioactive elements that release energy as they decay, powering an electromagnetic transient1-3,9-14.
    [Show full text]