Meeting Agenda

Board Members Lori Holt Pfeiler, Chair Mayor, Escondido Jerome Stocks, First Vice Chair Councilmember, Encinitas Jack Dale, Second Vice Chair Councilmember, Santee Matt Hall Councilmember, Carlsbad Cheryl Cox BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mayor, Chula Vista Carrie Downey AGENDA Councilmember, Coronado Crystal Crawford Councilmember, Del Mar Mark Lewis Note meeting time change to 8 a.m. Mayor, El Cajon Jim Janney Mayor, Imperial Beach Friday, July 23, 2010 Art Madrid Mayor, La Mesa ¾ ¾ ¾ 8 a.m. to 12 noon ½ ½ ½ Mary Teresa Sessom SANDAG Board Room Mayor, Lemon Grove 401 B Street, 7th Floor Ron Morrison Mayor, National City San Diego Jim Wood Mayor, Oceanside Don Higginson Mayor, Poway Jerry Sanders Mayor, San Diego AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Ben Hueso Council President, San Diego Jim Desmond • DRAFT 2010 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION Mayor, San Marcos IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Lesa Heebner Deputy Mayor, Solana Beach Judy Ritter • MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT – FINAL Mayor Pro Tem, Vista COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES Pam Slater-Price Chairwoman, County of San Diego REPORT Bill Horn Vice Chairman, County of San Diego • 2010 TransNet PLAN OF FINANCE UPDATE Advisory Members Hon. Wally Leimgruber, Supervisor • 2050 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: DRAFT Imperial County PLAN PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND DRAFT Cindy McKim, Director California Department UNCONSTRAINED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK of Transportation Harry Mathis, Chairman Metropolitan Transit System PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES DURING THE MEETING Bob Campbell, Chairman North County Transit District YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CAPT Keith Hamilton, USN, CEC, Southwest Division Naval Facilities MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEB SITE AT WWW.SANDAG.ORG Engineering Command U.S. Department of Defense Scott Peters, Commissioner San Diego Unified Port District MISSION STATEMENT The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making. Mark Muir, Director San Diego County Water Authority SANDAG builds consensus, makes strategic plans, obtains and allocates resources, plans, engineers, Edwin ‘Thorpe’ Romero/Allen Lawson and builds public transit, and provides information on a broad range of topics pertinent to the Southern California Tribal region's quality of life. Chairmen’s Association

Remedios Gómez-Arnau Consul General of Mexico San Diego Association of Governments ⋅ 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231 (619) 699-1900 ⋅ Fax (619) 699-1905 ⋅ www.sandag.org Gary L. Gallegos Executive Director, SANDAG

Welcome to SANDAG. Members of the public may speak to the Board of Directors on any item at the time the Board is considering the item. Please complete a Speaker’s Slip, which is located in the rear of the room, and then present the slip to the Clerk of the Board seated at the front table. Also, members of the public are invited to address the Board on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments. Speakers are limited to three minutes. The Board of Directors may take action on any item appearing on the agenda.

This agenda and related staff reports can be accessed at www.sandag.org under Meetings on the SANDAG Web site. Public comments regarding the agenda can be forwarded to SANDAG via the e- mail comment form also available on the Web site. E-mail comments should be received no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the Board of Directors meeting. Any handouts, presentations, or other materials from the public intended for distribution at the Board of Directors meeting should be received by the Clerk of the Board no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the meeting.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905.

SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 511 or see 511sd.com for route information.

2 Rev041410 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA Friday, July 23, 2010

ITEM # RECOMMENDATION

+1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES APPROVE

+A. JUNE 11, 2010, BOARD POLICY MEETING MINUTES +B. JUNE 25, 2010, BOARD BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS

Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the Board on any issue within the jurisdiction of SANDAG that is not on this agenda. Anyone desiring to speak shall reserve time by completing a “Request to Speak” form and giving it to the Clerk of the Board prior to speaking. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Board members also may provide information and announcements under this agenda item.

+3. ACTIONS FROM POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES APPROVE

This item summarizes the actions taken by Borders Committee on June 25, the Transportation and Regional Planning Committees on July 2, the Executive Committee on July 9, and the Transportation Committee and Public Safety Committees on July 16, 2010.

CONSENT ITEMS (4 through 7)

+4. 2008 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 23 AND AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS (Sookyung Kim)*

The 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) is the five-year program of major transportation projects in the San Diego region covering the period from FY 2009 to FY 2013. This RTIP amendment includes a programming action for a City of San Marcos project, which also required a re-determination of air quality conformity. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve Resolution No. 2011-02, including Amendment No. 23 to the 2008 RTIP, as well as a finding of conformity and the redetermination of conformity of the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan.

+5. PROPOSED FY 2011 BUDGET AND OVERALL WORK PROGRAM APPROVE AMENDMENT: ARJIS REGIONAL INFORMATION SHARING AND COLLABORATION PROJECT (El Cajon Mayor Mark Lewis, Public Safety Committee Chair; Kurt Kroninger)

The Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS) has been selected to receive $684,731 in grant funding from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for a project entitled “Regional Information Sharing and Collaboration,” or RISC. The goals of the RISC project include capturing and sharing information about individuals of interest to aid in their identification as well as sharing information about different law enforcement operations to ensure enhanced collaboration. The Public Safety Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve an amendment to the FY 2011 Budget and Overall Work Program to accept $684,731 in funding from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for OWP Project No. 73512: ARJIS: Regional Information Sharing and Collaboration.

+6. REPORT SUMMARIZING DELEGATED ACTIONS TAKEN BY EXECUTIVE INFORMATION DIRECTOR (Lauren Warrem)

In accordance with SANDAG Board Policy Nos. 003 (Investment Policy), 017 (Delegation of Authority), and 024 (Procurement and Contracting- Construction), this report summarizes certain delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board of Directors meeting.

+7. REPORTS ON MEETINGS AND EVENTS ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF INFORMATION SANDAG (Kim Kawada)

Board members will provide brief reports orally or in writing on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board of Directors meeting.

CHAIR’S REPORT (8)

+8. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR APPROVE

Pursuant to the employment agreement with the Executive Director, the Board of Directors annually shall review his performance. If the Executive Director’s performance is determined to be satisfactory, the Board of Directors shall adjust his base salary in accordance with the employment agreement provisions. The Executive Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve the Executive Director’s Performance Evaluation for the period July 2009 to June 2010 and Performance Objectives for the period July 2010 to June 2011.

REPORTS (9 through 15)

+9. SANDAG FINAL PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO FEDERAL TRANSIT APPROVE ADMINISTRATION OVERALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE GOAL-SETTING METHODOLOGY FOR FFY 2010-FFY 2012 (First Vice Chair Jerome Stocks; Laura Coté)

The Board of Directors is asked to approve the Final Proposed Amendment to the Federal Transit Administration Overall Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Goal-Setting Methodology.

+10. DRAFT 2010 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, ACCEPT INCLUDING THE DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY DETERMINATION (Second Vice Chair Jack Dale, Transportation Committee Chair; Sookyung Kim)*

SANDAG, as the metropolitan planning organization for the San Diego region, is required by state and federal laws to develop a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), a multiyear program of proposed major highway, arterial, transit, and nonmotorized projects, including the TransNet Program of Projects. The 2010 RTIP, covering FY 2011 to FY 2015, is due to the state by October 1, 2010. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors (1) accept for review and distribution the draft 2010 RTIP, including its air quality conformity analysis and the draft air quality conformity redetermination of the 2030 Revenue Constrained Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future for a 30-day public comment period; and (2) schedule a public hearing regarding the draft 2010 RTIP.

+11. MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT – FINAL COMPARATIVE APPROVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES REPORT (Second Vice Chair Jack Dale, Transportation Committee Chair; Leslie Blanda)*

The final Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives report presents a summary of the comments received during the scoping period for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIS/SEIR) as well as proposed responses to the comments. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors: (1) reconfirm the previously adopted Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) as refined to include direct service to University of California, San Diego and University Towne Centre, by selecting light rail transit (LRT) Alternative 1 (combines 1, 4, and 5) as the LPA; (2) approve LRT Alternative 1 and the No-Build Alternative for evaluation in the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Subsequent Environmental Impact Report; and (3) approve the final Public Involvement Plan.

+12. 2010 TransNet PLAN OF FINANCE UPDATE (Second Vice Chair Jack Dale, APPROVE Transportation Committee Chair; Kim Kawada and Marney Cox)*

Staff will provide an update on the annual Plan of Finance, including an updated program-level analysis of the current TransNet Early Action Program of projects and possible financial scenarios for future consideration. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors (1) approve the 2010 TransNet Plan of Finance update, which incorporates the proposed projects in the revised Robust scenario; (2) authorize the Executive Director to amend the FY 2011 SANDAG Budget to incorporate the new capital projects; and (3) approve revision to the set-aside of federal and state discretionary funding for the TransNet Early Action Program from 94 percent to 90 percent. These actions will support the pending issuance of $300-$350 million in long-term fixed rate debt.

+13. 2050 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: DRAFT PLAN PERFORMANCE APPROVE MEASURES (Second Vice Chair Jack Dale, Transportation Committee Chair; Charles “Muggs” Stoll)*

Proposed plan performance measures have been developed for use in the preparation of the 2050 Regional Transportation Plan. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve the 2050 Regional Transportation Plan performance measures in substantially the same form as attached to the report.

+14. 2050 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: DRAFT UNCONSTRAINED ACCEPT TRANSPORTATION NETWORK (Second Vice Chair Jack Dale, Transportation Committee Chair; Charles “Muggs” Stoll)*

Defining the Unconstrained Transportation Network is an important step in developing an updated Regional Transportation Plan, because it establishes the broadest multimodal network from which revenue constrained network scenarios will be developed. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors accept the draft Unconstrained Transportation Network for use in the development of the 2050 Regional Transportation Plan.

+15. SENATE BILL 375 IMPLEMENTATION: PROPOSED FINAL GREENHOUSE APPROVE GAS TARGETS FOR THE SAN DIEGO REGION (Rob Rundle)

SANDAG has been collaborating with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the other metropolitan planning organizations in the state on developing draft greenhouse gas (GHG) targets pursuant to Senate Bill 375 (Steinberg, 2008) (SB 375). The Board of Directors is asked to approve the submittal of the proposed final GHG targets for 2020 and 2035, pursuant to SB 375 to CARB for consideration in advance of the release of their proposed final GHG targets (anticipated to be released on August 9, 2010).

16. UPCOMING MEETINGS INFORMATION

The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, September 10, 2010, at 10 a.m. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, September 24, 2010, at 9 a.m.

17. ADJOURNMENT

+ next to an agenda item indicates an attachment * next to an agenda item indicates a San Diego Regional Transportation Commission item

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-1A JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS JUNE 11, 2010

Chair Lori Holt Pfeiler (Escondido) called the meeting of the SANDAG Board of Directors to order at 9:02 a.m. The attendance sheet for the meeting is attached. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS

Lorraine Leighton, a member of the public, spoke regarding problems she has had with her Compass Card. Chair Pfeiler directed staff to work with Ms. Leighton to resolve her issues.

REPORTS (2 through 5)

Chair Pfeiler noted changes to the order of agenda items.

5. EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO GREEN LINE TROLLEY NEAR GILLESPIE FIELD (APPROVE)

On June 2, 2010, an aircraft accident occurred along the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) Green Line near Gillespie Field, requiring emergency repairs. At the request of MTS and as permitted by Board Policy No. 017 – Delegation of Authority, the Executive Director authorized an emergency contract to make the necessary repairs. The Board of Directors ratified the actions taken by the Executive Director to enter into a sole source contract with HMS Construction to repair damage to the San Diego Trolley Green Line that resulted from the June aircraft accident near Gillespie Field.

Jim Linthicum, Director of Mobility Management and Project Implementation, presented the item.

Action: Upon a motion by Mayor Pro Tem Carrie Downey (Coronado) and second by Supervisor Pam Slater-Price (County of San Diego), the SANDAG Board of Directors ratified the actions taken by the Executive Director to enter into a sole source contract with HMS Construction to repair damage to the San Diego Trolley Green Line that resulted from the June aircraft accident near Gillespie Field. Yes – 14 (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent – Chula Vista, Encinitas, Lemon Grove, Oceanside, and San Diego.

2. 2050 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP) OVERVIEW (DISCUSSION)

The development of regional transportation plans has always been a relatively complex process of assessing the existing system, setting goals and objectives, establishing project evaluation criteria and system performance measures, and developing an effective and efficient transportation network. The current 2050 RTP update includes all of these steps as well as the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy in compliance with Senate Bill 375 (Steinberg, 2008) and a new Urban Area Transit Strategy visioning exercise. Staff will provide an overview of how all of these RTP components fit together and how they will lead to development of a plan for moving people and goods in the San Diego region through the year 2050. The Board of Directors will have an opportunity to discuss and confirm the attached 2050 RTP Goals and Policy Objectives originally discussed last fall.

Charles “Muggs” Stoll, Director of Land Use and Transportation Planning, presented the item.

Julie Wiley, General Counsel, presented information regarding Title IV requirements and social equity/environmental justice issues in the 2050 RTP.

Elyse Lowe, Executive Director, Move San Diego, distributed written comments and spoke in support of this item.

Duncan McFetridge, Save Our Forests and Ranchlands (SOFAR), gave a brief presentation and spoke regarding SOFAR’s position on the various aspects of the 2050 RTP.

Action: This item was presented for discussion only.

4. 2050 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: DRAFT EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR HIGHWAY CORRIDORS, CONNECTORS, TRANSIT SERVICES, AND FREIGHT PROJECTS (APPROVE)

Proposed evaluation criteria for several categories of transportation projects have been developed for use in the preparation of the 2050 RTP. At its May 28, 2010, meeting the Board of Directors moved to continue the conversation on the evaluation criteria to the June 11, 2010, Board Policy meeting. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve the transportation project evaluation criteria for highway corridors, connectors, transit services, and freight projects in substantially the same form as attached to the report.

Mr. Stoll presented the item.

Albert “Boxie” Phoenix, Barona Tribe of Mission Indians, spoke regarding the project evaluation criteria, in support for a separate criterion to address transportation access to federally recognized tribal reservations.

Myles Pomeroy, a member of the public, requested the inclusion of bicycle and pedestrian project evaluation criteria and related modeling, and asked that the evaluation criteria also address connectivity to low-/moderate-income areas.

Duncan McFetridge, SOFAR, gave a brief presentation and spoke regarding SOFAR’s position on the evaluation criteria for the 2050 RTP, which were included in written comments submitted by SOFAR at the June 11 Board Policy meeting.

Hannah Cohen, Sustainable San Diego, spoke in support of the item and distributed written comments outlining specific requests for changes to the criteria.

Erin Steva, CalPIRG, spoke in support of the item and requested the Board of Directors consider prioritizing specific projects.

Kathy Keehan, Executive Director, San Diego County Bicycle Coalition, spoke in support of this item and recommended that the network be developed before the project evaluation criteria.

Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Slater-Price and second by Second Vice Chair Jack Dale (Santee), the SANDAG Board of Directors approved the transportation project evaluation criteria for highway corridors, connectors, transit services, and freight projects in substantially the same form as attached to the report. Yes – 14 (weighted vote, 97%). No – 2 (weighted vote, 3%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent – Lemon Grove, Oceanside, and San Diego.

3. 2050 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

A. UPDATE ON THE URBAN AREA TRANSIT STRATEGY (DISCUSSION)

Significant progress has been made on the Urban Area Transit Strategy, which is an important component of the 2050 Regional Transportation Plan. The purpose of today’s report is threefold: (1) to introduce the three draft transit network alternatives and summarize feedback received to-date; (2) to review proposed transit mode share goals for key corridors/communities; and (3) to present a preliminary summary of the performance of each network.

Carolina Gregor, Senior Regional Planner, and Dave Schumacher, Principal Regional Planner, presented the item.

Elyse Lowe, Executive Director, Move San Diego, distributed written comments and spoke in support of this item and expressed some concerns.

Action: This item was presented for discussion only.

B. DEVELOPMENT OF THE INITIAL UNCONSTRAINED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK (DISCUSSION)

The transit network under development as part of the Urban Area Transit Strategy, combined with highway improvements and other management strategies, form the basis for the proposed initial 2050 Unconstrained Transportation Network. Board members were asked to discuss and provide feedback on the initial Unconstrained Transportation Network.

Heather Werdick, Senior Regional Planner, and Mr. Schumacher presented the item.

Action: This item was presented for discussion only.

6. UPCOMING MEETINGS (INFORMATION)

The next Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, June 25, 2010, at 9 a.m. The next Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 9, 2010, at 10 a.m.

7. ADJOURNMENT

The meeting was adjourned at 11:51 a.m.

ATTENDANCE SANDAG BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING JUNE 11, 2010

JURISDICTION/ ORGANIZATION NAME ATTENDING

City of Carlsbad Matt Hall (Member) Yes City of Chula Vista Cheryl Cox (Primary) Yes City of Coronado Carrie Downey (Primary) Yes City of Del Mar Crystal Crawford (Primary) Yes City of El Cajon Mark Lewis (Primary) Yes City of Encinitas Jerome Stocks, 1st Vice Chair (Primary) Yes City of Escondido Lori Holt Pfeiler, Chair (Primary) Yes City of Imperial Beach Jim Janney (Primary) Yes City of La Mesa Dave Allan (2nd. Alt.) Yes City of Lemon Grove Mary Sessom (Primary) No City of National City Ron Morrison (Member) Yes City of Oceanside James Wood (Member) No City of Poway Don Higginson (Primary) Yes City of San Diego – A Jerry Sanders (Primary, Seat A) No City of San Diego - B Ben Hueso (Primary, Seat B) No City of San Marcos Jim Desmond (Primary) Yes City of Santee Jack Dale (2nd Vice Chair) Yes City of Solana Beach Lesa Heebner (Primary) Yes City of Vista Judy Ritter (Primary) Yes County of San Diego - A Pam Slater-Price (Primary, Seat B) Yes County of San Diego - B Dianne Jacob (Alternate) No Caltrans Bill Figge (2nd. Alt.) Yes MTS Harry Mathis (Member) Yes NCTD Dave Roberts (1st Alt.) Yes Imperial County Wally Leimgruber (Member) No US Dept. of Defense CAPT Keith Hamilton (Member) No SD Unified Port District Scott Peters (Member) Yes SD County Water Authority Mark Muir (Primary) Yes Baja California/Mexico Remedios Gómez-Arnau (Member) No Southern California Tribal Allen Lawson (Member) No Chairmen’s Association Edwin Romero (Member) Yes

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-1B JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS

JUNE 25, 2010

Chair Lori Holt Pfeiler (Escondido) called the meeting of the SANDAG Board of Directors to order at 9:04 a.m. The attendance sheet for the meeting is attached. 1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES (APPROVE)

Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Pam Slater-Price (County of San Diego), and a second by Councilmember Carrie Downey (Coronado), the Board of Directors approved the minutes from the May 14 and May 28, 2010, meetings.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS

Councilmember Downey provided information about the recent vote to cease traffic congestion relief studies in the City of Coronado. She said that once the election results have been certified, the full Coronado City Council would determine next steps and return to SANDAG at that time.

Supervisor Slater-Price announced the grand reopening of the San Dieguito River Valley Park Sikes Adobe Historic Farmhouse from 10 a.m. to 12 noon on Saturday, June 26, 2010, at 12655 Sunset Drive in Escondido, across from the Westfield North County mall.

Mayor Jim Desmond (San Marcos) noted that there was an article in last Sunday’s New York Times on the Future Aviation Advisory Committee, of which San Diego County Regional Airport Authority President/CEO Thella Bowens is a member. The article talked about infrastructure costs at airports. He provided a quote from Ms. Bowen contained in the article, “We have to find better ways to manage demand. The only solution without additional infrastructure is to partner with other modes of transit.”

Councilmember Judy Ritter (Vista) invited everyone to the grand opening of the city’s new civic center on Tuesday, June 29, 2010, from 2 to 4 p.m.

3. ACTIONS FROM POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES (APPROVE)

This item summarized the actions taken by the Transportation and the Regional Planning Committees on June 4, the Executive Committee on June 11, and the Transportation and Public Safety Committees on June 18, 2010.

Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Slater-Price and second by Councilmember Downey, the Board of Directors approved the actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees at the meetings noted above. Yes – 18 (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent – City of San Diego.

CONSENT ITEMS (4 through 7)

4. SANDAG PROPOSED ANNUAL ANTICIPATED DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PARTICIPATION LEVEL FOR FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION- ASSISTED CONTRACTS FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2011 (APPROVE)

As recipients of Federal Highway Administration funds through Caltrans, SANDAG is required to develop and submit an annual Anticipated Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Participation Level. The Board of Directors was asked to approve the FFY 2011 Proposed Annual Anticipated DBE Participation Level of 5.70 percent for Federal Highway Administration-assisted contracts.

5. REPORT SUMMARIZING DELEGATED ACTIONS TAKEN BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (INFORMATION)

In accordance with SANDAG Board Policy Nos. 003 (Investment Policy), 017 (Delegation of Authority), and 024 (Procurement and Contracting-Construction), this report summarized certain delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board of Directors meeting.

6. REPORTS ON MEETINGS AND EVENTS ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF SANDAG (INFORMATION)

Board members provided brief reports orally or in writing on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board of Directors meeting.

7. ANNUAL REVIEW ON COMMITTEES AND WORKING GROUPS (INFORMATION)

As required by SANDAG Board Policy No. 004, this item provided an annual report on the status of all standing and ad hoc committees and working groups.

Action: Upon a motion by Mayor Mary Sessom (Lemon Grove), and a second by Councilmember Lesa Heebner (Solana Beach), the Board of Directors approved Consent Items Nos. 4 through 7. Yes - 18. No - 0. Abstain - 0. Absent – City of San Diego.

REPORTS (8 through 16)

8. SMART GROWTH TRIP GENERATION STUDY AND PARKING STRATEGIES (ACCEPT)

The Regional Comprehensive Plan calls for preparation of a smart growth trip generation study to better understand trip generation and parking in smart growth settings. The Transportation and Regional Planning Committees recommended that the Board of

Directors accept Trip Generation for Smart Growth: Planning Tools for the San Diego Region for inclusion into the San Diego Traffic Generators Manual as an appendix, and Parking Strategies for Smart Growth: Planning Tools for the San Diego Region as an appendix to Designing for Smart Growth, and as a resource in the SANDAG Smart Growth Toolbox.

Second Vice Chair and Transportation Committee Chair Jack Dale (Santee) introduced this item.

Christine Eary, Associate Planner, provided the staff report.

Chair Pfeiler noted there was one request to speak on this item.

Nathan Batchelder, Move San Diego, provided comments on fostering walk, bicycle, and transit opportunities in the region. He also encouraged the Board to give the transit system top priority and road space. He indicated that a resource for incentivizing alternative transportation modes is the Green TRIP (Traffic Reduction and Innovative Parking) program (www.greentrip.org).

Action: Upon a motion by Councilmember Heebner and second by First Vice Chair Jerome Stocks (Encinitas), the Board of Directors accepted Trip Generation for Smart Growth: Planning Tools for the San Diego Region for inclusion into the San Diego Traffic Generators Manual as an appendix, and Parking Strategies for Smart Growth: Planning Tools for the San Diego Region as an appendix to Designing for Smart Growth, and as a resource in the SANDAG Smart Growth Toolbox. Yes –19 (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent - None.

9. FY 2011 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ALLOCATIONS (APPROVE)

As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency for the San Diego region, SANDAG is responsible for the annual allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds to the region's cities, the County of San Diego, and transit operators. The Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors approve Resolution Nos. 2010-16 through 2010-19, in substantially the same form as attached to the agenda report, approving the FY 2011 TDA allocations. In addition, the Board is asked to approve deferral of Article 3 TDA claims and placement of the associated funds in reserve.

Second Vice Chair Dale introduced this item.

Sookyung Kim, Financial Programming Manager, provided the staff report.

Action: Upon a motion by First Vice Chair Stocks and second by Mayor Sessom, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution Nos. 2010-16 though 2010-19, approving the FY 2011 TDA allocations; and approved deferral of Article 3 TDA claims and placement of the associated funds in reserve. Yes – 18 (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent – National City.

10. COMPREHENSIVE FREIGHT GATEWAY STUDY: FINAL REPORT (ACCEPT)

This report highlighted the findings of the San Diego and Imperial Valley Gateway Study, including forecast freight volumes to the year 2050 for both counties. The Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors accept the Comprehensive Freight Gateway Study for planning purposes, in substantially the same form as attached to the agenda report.

Second Vice Chair Dale introduced this item.

Christina Casgar, Goods Movement Policy Manager, provided the staff report.

Action: Upon a motion by Council President Ben Hueso (City of San Diego) and second by Councilmember Downey, the Board of Directors accepted the Comprehensive Freight Gateway Study for planning purposes, in substantially the same form as attached to the agenda report. Yes – 19 (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent - None.

11. PROPOSED FY 2011 BUDGET AMENDMENT: LOSSAN BRIDGE REPLACEMENTS (APPROVE)

The U.S. Navy would like two obsolete bridges along the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) corridor in Camp Pendleton to be replaced in order to allow larger vehicles to pass underneath. The Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors authorize the Executive Director to enter into agreements with the Naval Facilities Engineering Command to fully fund the project development and reconstruction of LOSSAN bridges 208.6 at Green Beach and 218 at Red Beach and amend the FY 2011 budget accordingly. The Transportation Committee further recommended that staff evaluate whether the bridge replacements could include double tracking.

Second Vice Chair Dale introduced the item.

Bill Prey, Principal Engineer, provided the staff report.

Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Slater-Price and second by Mayor Jim Wood (Oceanside), the Board of Directors authorized the Executive Director to enter into agreements with the Naval Facilities Engineering Command to fully fund the project development and reconstruction of LOSSAN bridges 208.6 at Green Beach and 218 at Red Beach and amend the FY 2011 budget accordingly; and directed staff to evaluate whether the bridge replacements could include double tracking. Yes – 19 (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent - None.

12. COMPASS CARD STATUS UPDATE AND BUDGET AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE TICKET VENDING MACHINES FOR METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM (APPROVE)

James Dreisbach-Towle, Principal Technology Program Analyst, provided a status report on the Compass Card program, and also reported on an opportunity for the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) to purchase additional ticket vending machines as an add-on to an order of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The Board of

Directors was asked to authorize the Executive Director to execute a memorandum of understanding with MTS, in substantially the form attached to the agenda report, to transfer up to $2 million for this procurement, subject to MTS Board approval, and amend the FY 2011 budget accordingly.

Chair Pfeiler recognized one request to speak on this item.

Clive Richard, a member of the public, expressed support for the procurement of the additional ticket vending machines.

MTS Chair Harry Mathis indicated that on Thursday, June 24, 2010, the MTS Board approved this action.

Action: Upon a motion by Councilmember Downey and second by Mayor Sessom, the Board of Directors authorized the Executive Director to execute a memorandum of understanding with MTS, in substantially the form attached to the agenda report, to transfer up to $2 million in funds for the procurement of additional ticket vending machines, and amend the FY 2011 budget accordingly. Yes – 19 (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent - None.

13. ENERGY ROADMAP PROGRAM (INFORMATION)

SANDAG is coordinating a program to offer free energy planning assistance to eligible local governments through an energy efficiency partnership with San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E). The Energy Roadmap Program is designed to assist local governments in developing a customized package of energy-saving policies and specific actions. This program also will help cities assess the energy efficiency opportunities for facilities, policies, operations, public education, outreach, and transportation, and then produce a report with detailed cost-benefit analyses and implementation recommendations.

Chair Pfeiler introduced this item.

Susan Freedman, Senior Planner, provided the staff report. She introduced Julie Ricks, with SDG&E.

Ms. Ricks provided information regarding the SDG&E Local Government Partnership Program.

Action: This item was presented for information only.

14. PROPOSED FY 2011 BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ACCEPT STATE RAIL PLANNING FUNDS (APPROVE)

The Board of Directors was asked to authorize the Executive Director to execute grant agreements and all documents necessary to accept $150,000 in state rail planning funds, and amend the FY 2011 LOSSAN Rail Corridor Planning project budget (OWP 34006) (as shown in Attachment 1 to the agenda report) for the purpose of completing a business case for future rail service improvements in the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) corridor.

Linda Culp, Senior Planner, provided the staff report.

Action: Upon a motion by Second Vice Chalr Dale and second by First Vice Chair Stocks, the Board of Directors authorized the Executive Director to execute grant agreements and all documents necessary to accept $150,000 in state rail planning funds, and amend the FY 2011 LOSSAN Rail Corridor Planning project budget (OWP 34006) for the purpose of completing a business case for future rail service improvements in the LOSSAN corridor. Yes – 18 (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent – National City.

15. FINANCIAL MARKET STATUS (INFORMATION)

This monthly briefing is intended to keep the Board of Directors informed about the latest developments in the financial markets, the economy, revenues, and the strategies we are exploring and implementing to minimize possible impacts to SANDAG.

Marney Cox, Chief Economist, reported on recent economic trends.

Lauren Warrem, Finance Director, provided a report on the SANDAG debt program.

Action: This item was presented for information only.

16. QUALITY OF LIFE FUNDING STRATEGY UPDATE (INFORMATION)

Chair Pfeiler stated that the Quality of Life Ad Hoc Steering Committee and the Quality of Life Stakeholders Working Group have been meeting regularly to provide input to the Board of Directors on the development of a Quality of Life funding strategy. She provided an update on the work that has been accomplished to date.

Action: This item was presented for information only.

17. UPCOMING MEETINGS

The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 9, 2010, at 10 a.m. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 23, 2010, at 9 a.m.

Chair Pfeiler indicated that Board members would be polled to determine a preference for a longer Board meeting on July 23 or scheduling an additional Board Policy meeting for Friday, July 30, 2010.

18. ADJOURNMENT

The meeting was adjourned at 11:08 a.m.

DGunn/M/DGU

ATTENDANCE SANDAG BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING JUNE 25, 2010

JURISDICTION/ ORGANIZATION NAME ATTENDING

City of Carlsbad Matt Hall (Member) Yes City of Chula Vista Cheryl Cox (Primary) Yes City of Coronado Carrie Downey (Primary) Yes City of Del Mar Crystal Crawford (Primary) Yes City of El Cajon Mark Lewis (Primary) Yes City of Encinitas Jerome Stocks, 1st Vice Chair (Primary) Yes City of Escondido Lori Holt Pfeiler, Chair (Primary) Yes City of Imperial Beach Patricia McCoy (1st Alt.) Yes City of La Mesa Art Madrid (Member) Yes City of Lemon Grove Mary Sessom (Primary) Yes City of National City Ron Morrison (Member) Yes City of Oceanside James Wood (Member) Yes City of Poway Don Higginson (Primary) Yes City of San Diego – A Anthony Young (1st Alt.) No City of San Diego - B Ben Hueso (Primary, Seat B) Yes City of San Marcos Jim Desmond (Primary) Yes City of Santee Jack Dale (2nd Vice Chair) Yes City of Solana Beach Lesa Heebner (Primary) Yes City of Vista Judy Ritter (Primary) Yes County of San Diego - A Pam Slater-Price (Primary, Seat B) Yes County of San Diego - B Bill Horn (Primary, Seat A) No Caltrans Laurie Berman (1st. Alt. Yes MTS Harry Mathis (Member) Yes NCTD Bob Campbell (Primary) Yes Imperial County Wally Leimgruber (Member) No US Dept. of Defense CAPT. Martin Smith (Alternate) Yes SD Unified Port District Scott Peters (Member) No SD County Water Mark Muir (Primary) Yes Authority Baja California/Mexico Lydia Antonio (Alternate) Yes Southern California Allen Lawson (Member) No Tribal Chairmen’s Association Edwin Romero (Member) Yes

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-3 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

ACTIONS FROM POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES

The following actions were taken by the Policy Advisory Committees since the last Board of Directors meeting.

BORDERS COMMITTEE MEETING (June 25, 2010)

• No actions were taken at this meeting.

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING (July 2, 2010)

The Transportation Committee took the following actions or recommended the following approvals:

• Recommended that the Board of Directors approve Resolution No. 2011-01, approving the FY 2010 State Transit Assistance claim for the North County Transit District.

• Approved Amendment No. 27 to the 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP).

REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING (July 2, 2010)

The Regional Planning Committee took the following actions or recommended the following approvals:

• Recommended that the SANDAG Board of Directors: (1) accept the “Regional Comprehensive Plan: 2009 Annual Performance Monitoring Report,” and (2) approve the revised schedule for biennial reporting in future years.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING (July 9, 2010)

The Executive Committee took the following actions or recommended the following approvals:

• Recommended that the Board of Directors approve the Executive Director’s Performance Evaluation for the period July 2009 to June 2010 and Performance Objectives for the period July 2010 to June 2011.

• Took a support position on The Broadband for First Responders Act of 2010 (H.R. 5081); and authorized the Public Safety Committee Chair to transmit a letter of support to Congress, request that members of the San Diego House delegation support the bill, request that Senators Feinstein and Boxer introduce a companion bill in the U.S. Senate, and request that

President Obama include in his upcoming budget submission an item addressing the topic of broadband spectrum for public safety.

• Approved the agenda for the July 23, 2010, SANDAG Board of Directors meeting, as amended.

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING (July 16, 2010)

The Transportation Committee is scheduled to take the following actions or recommend the following approvals:

• Approve: (1) the reappointment of four members to the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) for additional three-year terms; (2) the appointment of five new alternate citizen members; and (3) the restructuring of SSTAC membership and amendment of the SSTAC Charter.

• Recommend that the Board of Directors approve Resolution No. 2011-02, including Amendment No. 23 to the 2008 RTIP, as well as a finding of conformity and the redetermination of the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).

• Approve Resolution No. 2011-03, including Amendment No. 25 to the 2008 RTIP.

• Approve Resolution No. 2011-04 relating to 2011 Transportation Development Act claim amendments, and an amendment to the Metropolitan Transit System Article 4 claims; and direct staff to provide instructions to the County Office of Auditor Controller to revise these claims.

• Recommend that the Board of Directors: (1) accept for review and distribution the Draft 2010 RTIP, including its air quality conformity analysis and the draft air quality conformity redetermination of the 2030 Revenue Constrained Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future, for a 30-day public comment period; and (2) schedule a public hearing for the September 3, 2010, Transportation Committee meeting.

• Recommend that the Board of Directors accept the draft Unconstrained Transportation Network for use in the development of the 2050 RTP.

• Approve the list of proposed regional project submittals for the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER II) Discretionary Grants program and authorize the Executive Director to provide support letters for other local agency projects that are consistent with SANDAG policies and programs.

• Recommend that the Board of Directors: (1) reconfirm the previously adopted Mid-Coast Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA), as refined to include direct service to the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) and University Towne Centre, by selecting Light Rail Transit (LRT) Alternative 1 (combines 1, 4, and 5) as the LPA; (2) approve LRT Alternative 1 and the No-Build Alternative for evaluation in the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Supplemental Environmental Impact Report; and (3) approve the final Public Involvement Plan.

2 • Recommend that the Board of Directors: (1) approve the prioritized list of land management projects and funding allocations under the TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program; and (2) authorize the Executive Director to enter into agreements for the selected grants in the proposed allocations totaling $2.085 million under the fourth cycle of this grant program.

• Recommend that the Board of Directors: (1) approve the 2010 TransNet Plan of Finance update, which incorporates the proposed projects in the revised Robust scenario; (2) authorize the Executive Director to amend the FY 2011 SANDAG Budget to incorporate the new capital projects; and (3) approve revision to the set-aside of federal and state discretionary funding for the TransNet Early Action Program from 94 percent to 90 percent.

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING (July 16, 2010)

The Public Safety Committee is scheduled to take the following actions or recommend the following approvals:

• Recommend that the Board of Directors approve an amendment to the FY 2011 Budget and Overall Work Program to accept $684,731 in funding from the Department of Homeland Security for the Regional Information Sharing and Collaboration project.

Staff will update the Board of Directors if the actual actions taken by the Transportation and Public Safety Committees on July 16, 2010, differ from those described in this report.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-4 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

2008 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT File Number 1500300 PROGRAM: AMENDMENT NO. 23 AND AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

Introduction Recommendation

SANDAG, as the metropolitan planning organization, The Transportation Committee is responsible for the adoption of the Regional recommends that the SANDAG Board Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). The of Directors approve Resolution 2008 RTIP must conform to the State Implementation No. 2011-02 (Attachment 1), including Plan (SIP) for air quality. Conformity to the SIP means Amendment No. 23 to the 2008 RTIP as that transportation activities in the 2008 RTIP will not well as a finding of conformity and the create new air quality violations, worsen existing redetermination of the 2030 RTP. violations, or delay the attainment of the national ambient air quality standards. The SANDAG Board of Directors adopted the 2008 RTIP, including the regional emissions analysis at its meeting, on July 25, 2008. The 2009 Federal State Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP), which includes the SANDAG 2008 RTIP, received federal approval on November 17, 2008.

SANDAG has received a request from the City of San Marcos to add one new capacity-increasing project to the 2008 RTIP in order to advertise the project for construction this summer. The addition of this new capacity-increasing project to the RTIP requires a new regional emissions analysis. SANDAG has updated the regional emissions analysis that incorporates this new project, and a draft report was presented to the Conformity Working Group at its May 5, 2010, meeting. The draft 2008 RTIP, including the draft air quality conformity analysis, was distributed for a 30-day review and public comment on June 9, 2010. No comments were received in regard to the updated air quality emissions analysis or the new project.

Discussion

The 2008 RTIP is the multiyear program of proposed major highway, arterial, transit, and bikeway projects in the San Diego region covering the period FY 2009 to FY 2013. SANDAG processes amendments to the RTIP generally on a quarterly basis and occasionally on a more frequent basis as circumstances arise. Amendment No. 23 represents a special amendment to add one new capacity- increasing project and conduct a new air quality emissions analysis incorporating the new project. Attachment 2 updates the relevant sections for the 2008 RTIP related to Amendment No. 23.

Below summarizes the change proposed in this amendment, with additional details included in Chapter 2 of Attachment 2.

San Marcos

• Eastbound State Route 78 (SR 78) Auxiliary Lanes (SM44): This amendment proposes to add a new project, which will construct two auxiliary lanes along eastbound SR 78 the between Woodland Parkway and Nordahl Road interchanges in the city of San Marcos. Total project is $14,500,000.

Fiscal Constraint Analysis

Federal regulations require the 2008 RTIP to be a revenue-constrained document with programmed projects based upon available or committed funding and/or reasonable estimates of future funding. Chapter 2 of Attachment 2 provides updated program summaries, including a comparison with the prior approved amendment. Based upon the analysis, the projects contained within the 2008 RTIP, including Amendment No. 23, are reasonable when considering available funding sources.

Air Quality Analysis

On July 25, 2008, SANDAG found the 2008 RTIP in conformance with the Regional Air Quality Strategy/SIP for the San Diego region in accordance with the provisions of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 51 and 93. All of the required regionally significant, capacity-increasing projects were included in the quantitative emissions analysis conducted for the 2030 San Diego Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future (2030 RTP) and the 2008 RTIP. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) jointly approved the conformity determination for the 2008 RTIP and the conformity redetermination for the 2030 RTP on November 17, 2008. SANDAG updated the air quality conformity analysis as part of Amendment No. 16 to the 2008 RTIP (SANDAG approval on January 22, 2010; FHWA/FTA approval on February 19, 2010). This amendment again updates the conformity analysis.

The project in RTIP Amendment No. 23 meets the conformity provisions of the Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR §93.122(g)). An additional air quality analysis was conducted for the SM44 capacity-increasing project in Amendment No. 23 through a quantitative emissions analysis included in Chapter 3 of Attachment 2. SANDAG followed interagency consultation procedures. Amendment No. 23 does not interfere with the timely implementation of transportation control measures. The 2008 RTIP, including Amendment No. 23, remains in conformance with the SIP.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 2011-02: Approving Amendment No. 23 to the 2008 RTIP 2. 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23, including Air Quality Conformity Analysis

Key Staff Contact: Sookyung Kim, (619) 699-6909, [email protected]

2 Attachment 1

RESOLUTION

401 B Street, Suite 800 2011-02 San Diego, CA 92101 NO. Phone (619) 699-1900 • Fax (619) 699-1905 www.sandag.org

APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 23 TO THE 2008 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

WHEREAS, on July 25, 2008, SANDAG adopted the 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and found the 2008 RTIP in conformance with the 1998 Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS) and the applicable State Implementation Plans (SIP); and

WHEREAS, on November 17, 2008, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) determined the 2008 RTIP and 2030 San Diego Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future (2030 RTP) conform to the applicable SIPs in accordance with the provisions of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 51 and 93; and

WHEREAS, on January 22, 2010, SANDAG approved Amendment No. 16 to the 2008 RTIP and found it in conformance with the 1998 RAQS and the applicable SIPs; and

WHEREAS, on February 19, 2010, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) determined Amendment No. 16 to the 2008 RTIP and the 2030 RTP conform to the applicable SIPs in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93; and

WHEREAS, the City of San Marcos requested the addition of one new capacity-increasing project for inclusion in the 2008 RTIP as shown in Chapter 2 of Attachment 2; and

WHEREAS, the amendment is consistent with the metropolitan transportation planning regulations per 23 CFR Part 450; and

WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with the 2030 RTP which conforms to the 2003 and 2006 SIP and to the emissions budgets from the Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County, which were found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2008; and

WHEREAS, the updated air quality conformity analysis for Amendment No. 23 to the 2008 RTIP, as shown in Chapter 3 of Attachment 2, has been found to be in conformance with the 1998 RAQS/1982 SIP; and

WHEREAS, Amendment No. 23 to the 2008 RTIP continues to provide for timely implementation of transportation control measures contained in the adopted RAQS/SIP for air quality and a quantitative emissions analysis demonstrates that the implementation of the RTIP projects and programs meet all the federally required emissions budget targets; and

3 RESOLUTION NO. 2011-02 Page 2

WHEREAS, projects in Amendment No. 23 satisfy the transportation conformity provisions of 40 CFR 93.122(g) and all applicable transportation planning requirements per 23 CFR Part 450; and

WHEREAS, all other projects in Amendment No. 23 are either noncapacity increasing or exempt from the requirements to determine conformity; and

WHEREAS, the 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23 is fiscally constrained as shown in Tables 2-1a through 2-1c (Chapter 2 of Attachment 2); and

NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED, that SANDAG finds the 2008 RTIP, including Amendment No. 23, is consistent with the 2030 RTP, is in conformance with the applicable SIPs and 1998 RAQS for the San Diego region, is consistent with SANDAG Intergovernmental Review Procedures, and is consistent with SANDAG Public Participation Policy, as amended.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all regionally significant capacity-increasing projects included in Amendment No. 23 to the 2008 RTIP are included in the 2030 RTP;

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of July 2010.

______ATTEST: ______CHAIRPERSON SECRETARY

MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and County of San Diego. ADVISORY MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Transit System, North County Transit District, Imperial County, U.S. Department of Defense, San Diego Unified Port District, San Diego County Water Authority, Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association, and Mexico.

4 Attachment 2

2008 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTIP) AMENDMENT NO. 23

July 23, 2010

401 B Street, Suite 800 • San Diego, CA 92101-4231 • (619) 699-1900

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview ...... 3 Consistency with the 2030 RTP ...... 3 Financial Capacity Analysis ...... 3 Air Quality Conformity Determination ...... 4 Public Participation ...... 4

Chapter 2 – FINANCIAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Program and Revenues...... 13

Chapter 3 – AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint ...... 19 Development of Transportation Control Measures...... 20 Air Quality Conformity Requirements ...... 20 Quantitative Emissions Analysis ...... 22 Emissions Budget Analysis ...... 22 Conclusion ...... 25

Appendix A – Projects Exempt from Air Quality Conformity Determination Appendix B – Public Participation Policy Appendix C – Glossary of Terms and Acronyms

LIST OF TABLES

Chapter 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Table 1-1 2008 RTIP Transportation Control Measure Projects...... 7 Table 1-2 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23...... 9

Chapter 2 – FINANCIAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Table 2-1a 2008 RTIP Revenue Summary...... 14 Table 2-1b 2008 RTIP Program Summary...... 15 Table 2-1c 2008 RTIP Program Capacity...... 16

CHAPTER 3 – AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

Table 3-1 San Diego Region Transportation Control Measure Projects ...... 23 Table 3-2 Air Quality Conformity Analysis (Eight Hour Ozone) ...... 24 Table 3-3 Air Quality Conformity Analysis (CO)...... 24

Chapter 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

(Insert blank page)

Chapter 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OVERVIEW

The 2008 Regional/Federal Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) is a multi-billion dollar, five-year program of major highway, transit arterial, and nonmotorized projects funded by federal, state, TransNet local sales tax, and other local and private funding covering the years FY 2008/09 to FY 2012/13. The 2008 RTIP, which includes the air quality emissions analysis for all regionally significant projects, requires approval by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA).

The 2008 RTIP is a prioritized program designed to implement the region’s overall strategy for providing mobility and improving the efficiency and safety of the transportation system, while reducing transportation related air pollution in support of efforts to attain federal and state air quality standards for the region. The 2008 RTIP also incrementally implements the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), the long-range transportation plan for the San Diego region.

Amendment No. 23 to the 2008 RTIP adds one new capacity increasing project. The 2008 RTIP document, published in July 2008, fully documents the RTIP development process, project listings, financial capacity analysis, and the air quality conformity analysis. This report focuses on updated fiscal capacity analysis and new regional air quality emissions analysis for conformity purposes. The Final 2008 RTIP document as well as all subsequent amendments is available on the SANDAG Web site.

Consistency with the 2030 RTP

On December 10, 2007, FHWA and FTA issued a finding that the SANDAG 2030 revenue constrained RTP entitled, San Diego 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future (2030 RTP), was in conformance with federal air quality and planning regulations. On January 22, 2010, the SANDAG Board adopted the 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 16 and its conformity finding including the redetermination of the 2030 RTP. The U.S. DOT made a finding of conformity for the amendment on February 19, 2010. The 2008 RTIP, including Amendment No. 23, remains consistent with the 2030 RTP. As a financially-constrained document, the 2008 RTIP contains only those major transportation projects listed in the revenue-constrained plan of the 2030 RTP.

Financial Capacity Analysis

Federal regulations require the 2008 RTIP to be a revenue-constrained document with programmed projects based upon available or committed funding and/or reasonable estimates of future funding. Funding assumptions are generally based upon: (1) authorized or appropriated levels of federal and state funding from current legislation; (2) conservative projections of future federal and state funding based upon a continuation of current funding levels; (3) the most current revenue forecasts for the TransNet program; and (4) the planning and programming documents of the local transportation providers.

Chapter 4 of the Final 2008 RTIP discusses in detail the financial capacity analysis of major program areas including discussion of available revenues. Table 1-2 includes the project proposed for Amendment No. 23. Tables 2-1a to 2-1c of Chapter 2 demonstrate that the 2008 RTIP is fiscally constrained. Based upon this analysis, the projects contained within the 2008 RTIP, including the project in Amendment No. 23, are reasonable when considering available funding sources.

Air Quality Conformity Determination

Federal metropolitan planning and air quality regulations prescribe the process for determining air quality conformity. These regulations require that the proposed RTIP: (1) provide for the timely implementation of transportation control measures (TCMs); (2) include a quantitative emissions analysis of projects programmed in the RTIP, including all regionally significant projects; and (3) be within the region’s emissions budgets (targets) included in the approved State Implementation Plan (SIP).

The 2008 RTIP programs substantial funds for the implementation of the four TCMs (identified as “T-tactics”) adopted in the 1982 Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS)/1982 SIP for air quality improvement. As shown in Table 1-1, the TCMs/T-tactic projects programmed for implementation total approximately $3.1 billion, or approximately 31 percent of the total funds programmed. Included are $23.9 million for Ridesharing, $2.9 billion for Transit Improvements, $108.6 million for Bicycle Facilities and Programs, and $121.6 million for Traffic Flow Improvements. Based upon this analysis, the 2008 RTIP including Amendment No. 23 provides for the expeditious implementation of the four existing TCMs in the 1982 Revised RAQS, which remain the federally approved TCMs for the San Diego region.

Quantitative air quality emissions analyses were conducted for the years 2008, 2010, 2020, and 2030 revenue constrained transportation scenarios, as shown in Chapter 3. A draft report that discusses the results of this analysis, including Amendment No. 23, was reviewed by the San Diego Region Conformity Working Group (CWG) at its meeting on April 7, 2010 and was released for public comment on June 9, 2010. No comments were received. The 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23 meets the conditions for determining conformity with the applicable SIP for air quality. A detailed description of the regional emissions analysis and modeling procedures conducted for the 2008 RTIP is included in Appendix C of the Final 2008 RTIP. Chapter 3 of this report summarizes the air quality conformity analysis for Amendment No. 23.

Public Participation

It is the policy of SANDAG to encourage public participation in the development of agency planning and programming activities. SANDAG has various working groups made up of stakeholders and other members of the public. The public is provided opportunities to participate through comment at SANDAG Board and committee meetings, SANDAG public notices of document availability and public hearings, and through the SANDAG public communications program. Pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 134(i), the draft RTIP was released for public review and comment for a minimum of 30 days and a public hearing was held on July 18, 2008. Appendix B contains the portion of the Public Participation Policy, which refers to the RTIP process of public involvement. The Policy, in its entirety, can be found on the SANDAG website at www.sandag.org.

Examples of public outreach efforts and ongoing participation include:

Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC): In conformance with 2004 TransNet measure, a citizen advisory committee, the ITOC, oversees projects funded through the TransNet program. As the document through which SANDAG identifies TransNet projects, the RTIP is reviewed by the ITOC, and their

comments on the TransNet Program of Projects are conveyed to the SANDAG Transportation Committee, and ultimately, to the Board of Directors.

Tribes: In addition to sending out notices to local tribal governments regarding the development of the RTIP, SANDAG actively solicited participation from the 17 tribal governments, along with the Reservation Transportation Authority in San Diego County. SANDAG hosted a tribal forum made up of elected officials from each of the tribes. SANDAG also held a workshop specifically to seek involvement in the regional planning and programming processes.

Public Workshops: SANDAG provided information for the 2008 RTIP and sought comments during a special workshop developed for the 2030 San Diego RTP: Pathways for the Future. Five workshops were held in various parts of the county. The outreach effort for the RTP included an extensive public involvement program and was conducted as part of the RTP update process. The goal of the program was to secure participation from a broad range of groups and individuals in the RTP development and decision-making process. Activities included a community-based outreach program, updates through the rEgion electronic newsletter, public speaking engagements, among other efforts.

Expansion of Electronic Notifications: In addition to the current list of external industry professionals, SANDAG continually strives to expand the notifications to other citizen-involved working groups.

Appendix A in the 2008 RTIP describes the SANDAG public participation process and includes a copy of the latest the Public Participation Policy which contains the section specifically addressing the RTIP development and amendment process.

At its meeting on December 18, 2009, the SANDAG Board of Directors adopted an updated Public Participation Plan (PPP). The updated PPP reflects the SANDAG commitment to public participation and involvement to include all residents and stakeholders in the regional planning and decision-making process. The development of the PPP was a six-month collaborative process from June to December 2009 that included development, input, and feedback from the SANDAG Policy Advisory Committees, Regional Planning Stakeholders Working Group, community and business groups, residents, and other stakeholders.

The PPP was developed in accordance with guidelines established by Federal Highway Administration for metropolitan transportation planning (23 CFR 450.316). It addresses Title VI, related nondiscrimination requirements, and reflects the principles of social equity and environmental justice. Included in the PPP are procedures, strategies, and outcomes associated with the ten requirements listed in 23 CFR 450.316. The PPP also fulfills various state and federal public involvement requirements.

Table 1-1 2008 RTIP - SAN DIEGO REGION (IN $000s) TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURE PROJECTS

RIDESHARING Other - Transportation Demand Management (TDM) $23,930 Subtotal $23,930

TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS Transit - Bus/Rail Infrastructure $625,984 Transit - Bus/Rail Intermodal Stations $178,875 Transit - Bus/Rail Vehicle Purchase $433,001 Transit - I-15 BRT $107,660 Transit - Mid-Coast $122,023 Transit - Other BRT $191,667 Transit - Other Bus/Rail (Operations/Planning) $777,619 Transit - Sprinter $460,266 Subtotal $2,882,588

BICYCLE FACILITIES PROJECTS Other - Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects $108,619 Subtotal $108,619

TRAFFIC FLOW IMPROVEMENTS Other - Transportation Management System/Intelligent Transportation System $89,775 Local Streets and Roads - Traffic Signal Projects $31,819 Subtotal $121,594

Total All Transportation Control Measure Projects in 2008 RTIP TCM Total : $3,136,731

Total All Transportation Projects in 2008 RTIP: $10,149,846

Share of Transportation Control Measure Projects in 2008 RTIP: 30.9%

Table 1-2

Chapter 2 FINANCIAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS

This chapter provides an update to the analysis of the financial capacity of the region's programmed transportation projects. Financial capacity is measured by a comparison of the total cost of the proposed projects against the available revenues and a test of the reasonableness of the revenue assumptions.

Overview of the program and available revenues by funding sources is provided for all projects included in Chapter 4 of the Final 2008 RTIP. The assumptions used in the forecasts of available funding are based upon information in the Final 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) adopted by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in November 2007, forecasts provided by the California Department of Transportation, and other forecasts of ongoing transportation funding programs. For the local transportation sales tax program (TransNet), the forecast was updated which takes into account the recent economic trend.

PROGRAM AND REVENUES

Table 2-1a summarizes the revenues available by major funding source (i.e., federal, state, and local), Table 2-1b summaries the program using the revenues, and Table 2-1c provides the remaining revenues available for additional programming. Tables 2-1a to 2-1c include all costs and revenues for all projects in the 2008 RTIP including Amendment No. 23.

Note: the fiscal constraint analysis is through Amendment No. 24, which was approved by the state on April 20, 2010 as an administrative amendment to the 2008 RTIP.

Tables 2-1a thru 2-1c

Chapter 3 AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

Chapter 3 DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

On April 15, 2004, the EPA designated the San Diego air basin as nonattainment for the new Eight-Hour Ozone Standard. This designation took effect on June 15, 2004. Several areas that are tribal lands in eastern San Diego County were excluded from the nonattainment designation. The air basin was initially classified as a basic nonattainment area under Subpart 1 of the Clean Air Act and the maximum statutory attainment date for the Eight-Hour Ozone Standard was set as June 15, 2009. However, EPA in response to a court decision , on January 16, 2009, proposed that, among other areas of the country, the San Diego basic nonattainment area be reclassified as a Subpart 2 moderate nonattainment area, with a maximum statutory attainment date of June 15, 2010. Final EPA action on this proposed reclassification is still pending.

In cooperation with the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and SANDAG, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) developed an Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan which was submitted to the U.S. EPA on June 15, 2007. The budgets in the Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County were found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. EPA, effective June 9, 2008.

The SANDAG Board of Directors made a finding of conformity of the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future (2030 RTP) and 2006 RTIP, as amended, on November 30, 2007. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) issued its conformity finding on December 10, 2007. On July 25, 2008, a conformity determination for the 2008 RTIP and conformity redetermination for the 2030 RTP was made by the SANDAG Board of Directors. The U.S. DOT issued its conformity finding on November 17, 2008. On January 22, 2010 the SANDAG Board adopted the 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 16 and its conformity finding. The U.S. DOT made a finding of conformity for the amendment on February 19, 2010.

Also, the U.S. EPA designated the San Diego region as a federal maintenance area for the Carbon Monoxide (CO) standard. On January 30, 2006, the U.S. EPA approved the 2004 Revision to the California State Implementation Plan for Carbon Monoxide or CO Maintenance Plan as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision.

DEMONSTRATION OF FISCAL CONSTRAINT

The 2008 RTIP, including Amendment No. 23, is consistent with the 2030 RTP. As a financially constrained document, the 2008 RTIP contains only those major transportation projects listed in the revenue-constrained 2030 RTP. Chapter 4 of the 2008 RTIP includes detailed discussion on fiscal constraint and overall financial capacity to carry out projects included in the RTIP.

DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES

In 1982, SANDAG adopted four Transportation Tactics as elements of the 1982 Revised Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS). These Transportation Tactics are ridesharing, transit improvements, traffic flow improvements, and bicycle facilities and programs.

These four Transportation Tactics were subsequently approved by the San Diego Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) and are included in the 1982 SIP for Air Quality as Transportation Control Measures (TCMs). The U.S. EPA approved this State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the San Diego Air Basin in 1983. However, the four TCMs have been fully implemented.

The California Clean Air Act required the preparation of a 1991 RAQS, including TCMs. During 1991 and 1992, SANDAG, in cooperation with local agencies, transit agencies, and the APCD developed a TCM Plan. SANDAG approved the TCM Plan on March 27, 1992.

On June 30, 1992, the APCD amended the TCM Plan and adopted the 1991 RAQS, including the amended TCM Plan. TCMs included in the 1991 RAQS include the four Transportation Tactics described above, as well as a transportation demand management (TDM) program, vanpools, high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes, and park and ride facilities. On November 12, 1992, the Air Resources Board (ARB) gave approval to the 1991 RAQS, including the TCMs.

The 1995 Triennial RAQS Update subsequently deleted the Employee Commute Travel Reduction Program contained in the TDM program because the program was no longer required under federal law. Assembly Bill 3048 (Statutes of 1996, Chapter 777) eliminated all state requirements for mandatory trip reduction programs. As a result, the Student Travel Reduction Program, the Non-Commute Travel Reduction Program, and the Goods Movement/Truck Operation Program proposed in the 1991 RAQS were no longer statutorily mandated and were deleted from the RAQS in 1998. The 2001, 2004, and 2009 Triennial RAQS Revisions did not make changes to measures related to mobile sources or the TCM Plan.

AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY REQUIREMENTS

SANDAG, as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), and the U.S. DOT must make a determination that the 2008 RTIP, as amended, and the 2030 RTP conform to the applicable SIP. Conformity to the SIP means that transportation activities will not create new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay the attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

Based upon the U.S. EPA’s Transportation Conformity Rule, as amended, conformity of transportation plans and programs, including the 2008 RTIP, as amended, is determined according to the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) [Section 176(c)(3)(A)] if the following is demonstrated:

• The 2008 RTIP as amended provides for the timely implementation of the Transportation Tactics contained in the 1991 RAQS. These tactics are also included as TCMs in the 1982 SIP, but have been fully implemented.

• A quantitative analysis is conducted on the cumulative emissions of projects programmed within the 2008 RTIP as amended, including all regionally significant, capacity-increasing projects. Further, implementation of the projects and programs must meet the motor vehicle emissions budget developed by local and state air quality agencies and approved by the U.S. EPA. The 2008 RTIP as

amended must meet the applicable emission budgets prescribed in the Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County which were found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. EPA, effective June 9, 2008. Also, the 2008 RTIP as amended must meet the CO emissions budget established in the CO Maintenance Plan (approved by the U.S. EPA in January 2006).

• In addition to the required emissions tests, consultation with transportation and air quality agencies is required. The consultation process followed to prepare the air quality conformity analysis complies with the San Diego Transportation Conformity Procedures adopted in July 1998.

• Interagency consultation involves SANDAG, the SDAPCD, Caltrans, ARB, the U.S. DOT, and the U.S. EPA, which form the San Diego Region Conformity Working Group (CWG).

Consultation is a three-tier process that:

1. formulates and reviews drafts through a conformity working group;

2. provides local agencies and the public with opportunities for input through existing regional advisory committees and workshops; and

3. seeks comments from affected federal and state agencies through participation in the development of draft documents and circulation of supporting materials prior to formal adoption.

SANDAG consulted with the CWG for the preparation of the new air quality analysis of the 2008 RTIP as amended. Conformity of the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future also is being redetermined for consistency purposes.

The schedule for the development of the 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23 and criteria and procedures for determining conformity were presented to the CWG on April 7, 2010. The capacity increasing project was provided to the CWG on April 29, 2010. Comments from the CWG have been incorporated into the final exempt project list.

The quantitative emissions analyses for the 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23 and 2030 RTP redetermination were initiated in April 7, 2010 and the results distributed on April 29,2010 to the San Diego Conformity Working group for an initial review and comment period. The San Diego Region CWG reviewed the draft air quality conformity analysis at its May 5, 2010 meeting. The draft 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23 and its conformity analysis and the 2030 RTP conformity re-determination are was released for public review and comment on June 9, 2010. No comments were received. The results of the draft and final regional emissions analysis indicate that the 2008 RTIP, as amended, and 2030 RTP meet the air quality conformity requirements.

The SANDAG Board of Directors will be asked to make a conformity finding for the 2008 RTIP as amended and 2030 RTP re-determination and approve the 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23 at its July 23, 2010 meeting.

The following sections provide a summary of the air quality conformity analysis of the 2008 RTIP as amended and 2030 RTP in relation to the above conformity requirements.

The first requirement of the air quality conformity finding is to provide for the expeditious implementation of adopted TCMs, which are also the Transportation Tactics included in the 1991 RAQS. These tactics are ridesharing, transit service improvements, traffic flow improvements, and bicycle facilities and programs.

transit, bicycling, and traffic flow improvements continue to be funded, although the level of implementation established in the SIP has been surpassed. No TCMs have been removed or substituted from the SIP.

The 2008 RTIP as amended makes substantial progress in programming funds for implementation of the four adopted Transportation Tactics for the San Diego region contained in the 1991 RAQS. Table 3-1 shows that Transportation Tactics programmed for implementation total approximately $3.1 billion, or approximately 31 percent of the total funds programmed. Included are $23.9 million for Ridesharing, $2.9 billion for Transit Improvements, $108.6 million for Bicycle Facilities and Programs, and $121.6 million for Traffic Flow Improvements.

Based upon this analysis, the 2008 RTIP as amended continues to provide for the expeditious implementation of the four Transportation Tactics approved in the 1991 RAQS.

QUANTITATIVE EMISSIONS ANALYSIS

The second requirement of the conformity finding is to conduct a quantitative emissions analysis on the 2008 RTIP as amended. The emissions analysis must show that implementation of the 2008 RTIP as amended and 2030 RTP meet the emissions budgets established in the 2004 CO Maintenance Plan and in the Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County.

A quantitative emissions analysis was conducted according to the requirements established in the Transportation Conformity Rule under Section 93.122(b). Motor vehicle emissions forecasts were produced for the following analysis years: 2010, 2020, and 2030.

SANDAG's regional growth forecasts and transportation models, as well as ARB’s emissions model, were used to generate the emissions forecasts. Transportation forecasts were developed using the TransCAD 5.0 transportation planning computer package. The four-step transportation modeling process includes trip generation, trip distribution, mode split, and trip assignment. The quantitative emissions analysis was conducted using the EMFAC 2007 model.

All of the proposed capacity-increasing improvements identified in the 2008 RTIP as amended that are on the Regional Arterial System (as defined in the RTP) or the FHWA functional classification system (other principal arterials and higher classifications) were modeled.

EMISSIONS BUDGET ANALYSIS

Tables 3-2 and 3-3 provide a summary of the results of the quantitative emissions analysis conducted for the 2008 RTIP as amended and 2030 RTP.

The analysis shown in Table 3-2 demonstrates that the 2008 RTIP as amended and the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future meet the applicable budgets for the Eight-Hour Ozone standard. Projected reactive organic gas (ROG) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for 2010, 2020, and 2030 are below the established SIP budgets. Table 3-3 shows that projected CO emissions from the 2008 RTIP as amended and the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future are below the 2003 CO budget of 730 tons per day.

Table 3-1

2008 RTIP - SAN DIEGO REGION (IN $000s) TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURE PROJECTS

RIDESHARING Other - Transportation Demand Management (TDM) $23,930 Subtotal $23,930

BICYCLE FACILITIES PROJECTS Other - Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects $108,619 Subtotal $108,619

TRAFFIC FLOW IMPROVEMENTS Other - Transportation Management System/Intelligent Transportation System $89,775 Local Streets and Roads - Traffic Signal Projects $31,819 Subtotal $121,594

Total All Transportation Control Measure Projects in 2008 RTIP TCM Total : $3,136,731

Total All Transportation Projects in 2008 RTIP: $10,149,846

Share of Transportation Control Measure Projects in 2008 RTIP: 30.9%

Table 3-2 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23 and 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways to the Future Air Quality Conformity Analysis for Eight-Hour Ozone

Average Average ROG NOx Weekday Weekday Year Vehicle Vehicle SIP SIP ROG NOx Starts Miles Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions (1,000s) (1,000s) Budget Budget Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day

2010 13,021 81,010 53 37 98 71

2020 14,567 89,216 53 24 98 40

2030 15,968 101,689 53 19 98 32

Note: Emissions budgets from Eight Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County, found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. EPA, effective June 9, 2008.

Table 3-3 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23 and 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways to the Future Air Quality Conformity Analysis for Carbon Monoxide

Average Average CO Weekday Weekday Year Vehicle Starts Vehicle Miles SIP Emissions CO Emissions (1,000s) (1,000s) Budget Tons/Day Tons/Day

2010 13,021 81,010 730 391

2018 14,258 87,575 730 245

2020 14,567 89,216 730 209

2030 15,968 101,689 730 160

Note: Emissions budgets for the San Diego region from 2004 Revision to California State Implementation Plan for Carbon Monoxide, Updated Maintenance Plan for Ten Federal Planning Areas (Approved as SIP revision in January 2006).

CONCLUSION

Based upon an evaluation of projects and funds programmed and a quantitative emissions analysis, the 2008 RTIP as amended and 2030 RTP meet the U.S. EPA transportation conformity regulations contained within the federal guidelines published on August 15, 1997, and subsequent amendments, as well as the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act amendments of 1990.

2030 Regional Transportation Plan E-17

APPENDICES

(Insert blank page)

Appendix A PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY DETERMINATION

APPENDIX A

PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY DETERMINATION* SAFETY - Railroad/highway crossing. - Hazard elimination program. - Safer non-Federal-aid systems roads. - Shoulder improvements. - Increasing sight distance. - Safety Improvement program. - Traffic control devices and operating assistance other - Railroad/highway crossing warning devices. than signalization projects. - Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions. - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation. - Pavement marking demonstration. - Emergency relief (23 U.S.C. 125). - Fencing. - Skid treatments. - Safety roadside rest areas. - Adding medians. - Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area. - Lighting improvements. - Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges - Emergency truck pullovers. (no additional travel lanes). MASS TRANSIT - Operating assistance to transit agencies. - Purchase of support vehicles. - Rehabilitation of transit vehicles. - Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for - Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles existing facilities. (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, etc.). - Construction or renovation of power, signal, and - Construction of small passenger shelters and communications systems. information kiosks. - Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and - Rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, structures (e.g., rail or bus buildings, storage and track, and trackbed in existing rights-of-way. maintenance facilities, stations, terminals, and ancillary - Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace structures). existing vehicles or for minor expansions of fleet. - Construction of new bus or rail storage/maintenance facilities categorically excluded in 23 CFR part 771. AIR QUALITY - Continuation of ride-sharing and van-pooling - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities. promotion activities at current levels. OTHER - Specific activities which do not involve or directly lead - Engineering to assess social, economic, and environmental to construction, such as: effects of the proposed action or alternatives to that action. Planning and technical studies. - Noise attenuation. Grants for training and research programs. - Emergency or hardship advance land acquisitions (23 CFR Planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 710.204(d)). and 49 U.S.C. - Acquisition of scenic easements. Federal-aid systems revisions. - Plantings, landscaping, etc. - Sign removal. - Directional and informational signs. - Transportation enhancement activities (except - Repair of damage caused by natural disasters, civil unrest, rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation or terrorist acts, except projects involving substantial buildings, structures, or facilities). functional, locational or capacity changes. ALL PROJECTS - Intersection channelization projects. - Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections. - Interchange reconfiguration projects. - Changes in vertical and horizontal alignment. - Truck size and weight inspection stations. - Bus terminal and transfer points.

*Source: Part II Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 51 & 93 Transportation Conformity Rule, as amended, July 1, 2004.

Appendix B PUBLIC PARTICIPATION POLICY

Excerpt from PUBLIC PARTICIPATION/INVOLVEMENT POLICY as it pertains to the RTIP:

B. Short Range Program – Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) – document updated every two years outlining major transportation projects to be implemented during a five- year period.

1. SANDAG shall follow the latest federal and state regulations regarding participation by interested parties.

2. As the document that implements the long range plan, the RTIP shall be incorporated as part of the Board adopted public involvement process established for the Regional Transportation Plan (October 27, 2006) including participating in public outreach efforts, providing adequate public notice (legal notice publications), employing visualization techniques, holding public meetings at convenient and accessible locations.

3. SANDAG shall respond to any significant public input or comment received during the development of the biennial update and/or during the amendment cycle as part of its report to the Board or Transportation Committee (as appropriate).

4. The biennial RTIP update will be noticed in newspapers of general circulation including in alternate languages and a public hearing shall be held prior to final adoption by the Board of Directors.

5. During the amendment cycle, SANDAG will provide a draft of the amendment to all interested parties for a 15-day comment period.

Appendix C GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS

A AC Advanced Construction ADA Americans with Disabilities Act APCB/APCD San Diego Air Pollution Control Board District ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Federal Stimulus Program)

B BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs BIP Border Infrastructure Program BTA Bicycle Transportation Account

C CAAA 1990 Clean Air Act, as amended Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CBI Corridors and Borders Infrastructure CDBG Community Development Block Grant (Federal) CI Capacity Increasing CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program CMIA Corridor Mobility Improvement Account CMP Congestion Management Program CO Carbon Monoxide CON Construction Phase CTC California Transportation Commission CWG Conformity Working Group

D DEMO ISTEA Special Projects/TEA-2/SAFETEA-LU 1 High-Priority Demonstration DOT U.S. Department of Transportation

E EMFAC Emissions Factors Model EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

F FHWA Federal Highway Administration FSP Freeway Service Patrol (and FSP Act) FTA Federal Transit Administration

HES/SR2S Hazard Elimination Safety/Safe Routes to School program HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HUD Housing and Urban Development

I IM Interstate Maintenance IRR Indian Reservation Road ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 ITOC Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems

L LRT Light Rail Transit

M MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MTDB/MTS San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board/Metropolitan Transit System

N NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NCI Non Capacity Increasing NCPD National Corridor Planning and Development NCTD North County Transit District NHS National Highway System NOx Nitrogen Oxide

P P/PE Preliminary Engineering Phase PPNO Project Number (Caltrans) PM Particulate Matter

R RAQS Regional Air Quality Strategy ROG Reactive Organic Gas RW/ROW Right-of-Way phase RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program RTP Regional Transportation Plan RSTP Regional Surface Transportation Program

S SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: a Legacy for Users SANDAG San Diego Association of Governments SBTA State Bicycle Transportation Account SDTC San Diego Transit Corporation SDTI San Diego Trolley, Incorporated SHOPP State Highway Operation and Protection Program SIP State Implementation Plan (for air quality)

SLTPP State-Local Transportation Partnership Program/SB300 SR State Route (as in SR 52 - State Route 52) STA State Transit Assistance STIP State Transportation Improvement Program STIP-IIP State Transportation Improvement Program - Interregional Program STIP-RIP State Transportation Improvement Program – Regional Improvement Program (SANDAG) STP Surface Transportation Program

T TEA Transportation Enhancement Activities TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TCI Transit Capital Improvement TCM Transportation Control Measure TCRP Traffic Congestion Relief Program TDA Transportation Development Act TDM Transportation Demand Management TIP Transportation Improvement Program TMA Transportation Management Agency TP&D Transportation Planning and Development TransCAD Transportation Panning Computer Package TransNet San Diego Region 1/2% Local Transportation Sales Tax Program TSM Traffic Systems Management T-1 Transportation T-tactic: Ridesharing T-2 Transportation T-tactic: Transit T-3 Transportation T-tactic: Bicycle T-5 Transportation T-tactic: Traffic Improvement

V VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-5 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

PROPOSED FY 2011 BUDGET AND File Number 7350400 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT: ARJIS REGIONAL INFORMATION SHARING AND COLLABORATION PROJECT

Introduction Recommendation

The Automated Regional Justice information The Public Safety Committee recommends System (ARJIS) has been selected to receive that the Board of Directors approve an $684,731 in grant funding from the amendment to the FY 2011 Budget and U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for Overall Work Program to accept $684,731 in a project entitled “Regional Information Sharing funding from the U.S. Department of and Collaboration” or RISC. The goals of the Homeland Security for OWP Project No. 73512: RISC project include capturing and sharing ARJIS: Regional Information Sharing and information about individuals of interest to aid Collaboration. in their identification, as well as information about different law enforcement operations to ensure enhanced collaboration.

Discussion

Over the past several years, ARJIS has partnered with DHS on several initiatives to enhance information sharing throughout the San Diego region, including the development of the ARJIS Wireless Program, and implementation of the COPLINK application. These projects have been instrumental in providing data to multijurisdictional field personnel involved in dynamic law enforcement response, investigative, and surveillance operations, which has resulted in increased public and officer safety in the San Diego region.

The continued partnership with DHS on the RISC project would enable ARJIS to initiate four new information sharing capabilities that would improve criminal justice operations and create standards and models for best practices. These technologies directly apply to the current DHS subject areas of “Border Security” and “Command, Control, and Interoperability” in that they would improve law enforcement operations and investigations and allow better identification of persons contacted by law enforcement in the San Diego region.

Capability I: Sharing Information Related to Scars and Tattoos

One of the most common physical attributes used to identify subjects (both suspects and victims) are tattoos. The proliferation and uniqueness of tattoos provides public safety and homeland security personnel the opportunity to significantly enhance identification. ARJIS would conduct a review and gap analysis between existing systems, standards, and development efforts and the needs of criminal justice practitioners for storage and access to images of scars, marks, and tattoos (SMTs). Using the results of this assessment as guidance, ARJIS would collaborate with practitioners from multiple levels of the criminal justice system to develop standards for content, storage, and messaging to expand access to and capture of SMT images. These standards would then be utilized in a pilot project that involves the capture of tattoo images in the field.

Capability II: Developing an Interface to DHS Image Storage and Retrieval Systems

In collaboration with U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement, ARJIS would conduct an evaluation to address the technical and policy requirements involved in linking to DHS Image Storage and Retrieval Systems. Upon completion of the assessment, a system would be selected and technical specifications produced to guide the development of the interface. This interface would allow mobile users access to more relevant data while working in the field. Currently, ICE agents are able to access local ARJIS data via personal digital assistants (PDAs), but are unable to access their own systems. The ability to access both local and federal data would enhance the effectiveness of law enforcement agents in the San Diego region. The focus would be on sharing photographs and other documentation to enhance positive identification in the field.

Capability III: Enhancing Officer Notification and Smart Alerting System (ONASAS) by Creating an Interface to the Regional Information Sharing Systems (RISS)

The third component of this project would involve ARJIS developing, demonstrating, and piloting an interagency alert and deconfliction system that leverages the ARJIS alert system and RISSafe – the RISS deconfliction system. Bridging these systems would enable seamless cross‐jurisdictional sharing of federal and local law enforcement alerts for the first time. ARJIS would develop and test standards to coordinate alert capabilities with every level of law enforcement. Metrics would be captured for the alert and deconfliction capabilities by monitoring usage by officers as the system becomes operational. The number of alerts pushed to officers would be recorded, and process improvements would be measured as new sources are connected for interagency data-sharing.

Capability IV: Expanding ARJIS E-mail Distribution to Enhance Tactical Information Exchange

ARJIS would expand the use of existing e-mail bulletin distribution lists to enhance tactical information exchange among first responder agencies in the Southwest region of the United States. The current distribution lists allow users to subscribe to e-mail lists that are relevant to their assignments, via an easy-to-use subscription Web site. Prospective distribution lists can be created for categories of related investigative functions and for regions. ARJIS would expand this functionality by adding the ability to select a geographic area for distribution of bulletins. For example, users could choose to send a bulletin only to the San Diego region or to areas on the U.S./Mexico border in California and Arizona. This would give wide reach to alerts that warrant this level of distribution or a more focused distribution to a specifically targeted area if appropriate.

2 Process improvements made by implementation of this system would be quantified by monitoring the number of users and user agencies participating on the system and the number of bulletins shared among agencies.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachment: 1. Work Element 73512.00 ARJIS: RISC

Key Staff Contact: Kurt Kroninger, (619) 699-6996, [email protected]

3 Attachment 1

WORK ELEMENT: 73512.00 ARJIS: REGIONAL INFORMATION SHARING AND COLLABORATION (RISC) FY 2011 BUDGET: $364,388

AREA OF EMPHASIS: INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL COORDINATION

Funds Source

Prior FY 11 FY 12 - 15 TOTAL FTA MPO Planning (5303) $0 $0 $0 $0 FTA Transit Planning (5307) $0 $0 $0 $0 FHWA Metropolitan Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 FHWA CMAQ $0 $0 $0 $0 Federal Other $0 $364,388 $320,343 $684,731 State Other $0 $0 $0 $0 TDA Planning/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 TransNet Program $0 $0 $0 $0 Member Assessment $0 $0 $0 $0 Local Other $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL $0 $364,388 $320,343 $684,731

Funds Application

Prior FY 11 FY 12 - 15 TOTAL Salaries, Benefits, Indirect $0 $106,631 $106,630 $213,261 Other Direct Costs $0 $15,877 $5,873 $21,750 Temporary Employees $0 $0 $0 $0 Contract Employees $0 $0 $0 $0 Contracted Services $0 $187,860 $187,860 $375,720 Materials & Equipment $0 $54,020 $19,980 $74,000 Pass through/In-kind Services $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL $0 $364,388 $320,343 $684,731

OBJECTIVE

Collaborating with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), ARJIS will initiate four information sharing capabilities that will improve criminal justice operations and create standards and models for best practices. These technologies will improve law enforcement operations, investigations, and allow better identification of subjects in the field in San Diego region. Emphasis in FY 2011 will be on (1) establishing a project team of federal, local, and state member agency representatives; (2) addressing privacy concerns and developing policies for capturing and sharing images of scars, marks, and tattoos; (3) completing a feasibility assessment of developing an interface to one of the DHS Image Storage and Retrieval systems; (4) piloting an interagency alert and deconfliction system leveraging the existing ARJIS alert system and RISSafe – the Regional Information Sharing Systems (RISS) deconfliction system; and (5) expanding the use of existing e-mail bulletin distribution lists to other regions in the Southwest.

PREVIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ARJIS has partnered with DHS on previous initiatives that were implemented to enhance information sharing throughout the San Diego region. Several projects have been successfully completed from this partnership, including the development of the ARJIS Wireless Program and implementation of the COPLINK application. These projects have been instrumental in providing data to multijurisdictional field personnel involved in dynamic law enforcement response, investigative, and surveillance operations, which has resulted in increased public and officer safety in the San Diego region.

Project Manager: Katie Mugg Committee(s): Chiefs'/Sheriff's Management Committee; Public Safety Committee; ARJIS Enterprise Committee Working Groups: ARJIS Technical Working Group; ARJIS Business Working Group; ARJIS Users Working Group

PRODUCTS, TASKS, AND SCHEDULES

TASK PERCENT TASK / PRODUCT DESCRIPTION(S) / SCHEDULE NO. EFFORT

1 15% Task Description: Hire project manager and establish project team. Product: Detailed project plan Completion Date: 10/15/2010

2 25% Task Description: Develop policy standards for sharing images of scars, marks, and tattoos. Product: Policy guidance document Completion Date: 3/31/2011

3 20% Task Description: Complete an evaluation of linking to federal image databases. Product: Feasibility assessment document Completion Date: 3/31/2011

5 TASK PERCENT TASK / PRODUCT DESCRIPTION(S) / SCHEDULE NO. EFFORT

4 20% Task Description: Complete an evaluation and address policies involved in linking RISSafe and ARJIS Alerting systems. Product: Memorandum of understanding Completion Date: 6/3/2011

5 20% Task Description: Expand e-mail distribution lists to the Southwest region. Product: E-mail distribution lists Completion Date: 6/30/2011

FUTURE ACTIVITIES

The results of the feasibility assessments that will be completed in FY 2011 will assist ARJIS in identifying the next steps for developing the RISSafe and federal image interfaces. If it is determined that the interfaces will be feasible, functional and technical specifications will be developed for each. Following this, the ARJIS technical team will develop the code and associated documentation for the design and implementation of the interfaces. Following the policy guidance document produced in FY 2011, ARJIS will develop the capability to share scars, marks, and tattoo images. A pilot project will be initiated that will involve the capture of these images in the field via handheld personal digital assistant devices. A final report will be produced to DHS for review and approval.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-6 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

REPORT SUMMARIZING DELEGATED ACTIONS File Number 8000100 TAKEN BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Introduction

Board Policy Nos. 003, 017, and 024 require the Executive Director to report certain actions to the Board of Directors on a monthly basis.

Discussion

Board Policy No. 003

Board Policy No. 003, “Investment Policy,” requires the submittal of a monthly report of investment transactions to the Board. Attachment 1 contains the reportable investment transactions for May 2010.

Board Policy No. 017

Board Policy No. 017, “Delegation of Authority,” requires the Executive Director to report to the Board certain actions taken at the next regular meeting.

Section 4.1 of the policy authorizes the Executive Director to enter into agreements not currently incorporated in the budget and make other modifications to the budget in an amount up to $100,000 per transaction, so long as the overall budget remains in balance. Attachment 2 contains the reportable actions since the report made at the last meeting.

Board Policy No. 024

Board Policy No. 024, “Procurement and Contracting-Construction,” requires the Executive Director to report to the Board the granting of (1) Relief from Maintenance and Responsibility over $25,000, and (2) Acceptance of Work for construction contracts over $25,000. There are two delegated action items to report.

1) In a letter dated June 21, 2010, West Coast General Corporation was granted Acceptance for the Blue Line Grade Crossing Replacement Project – Palm Avenue, effective March 22, 2010 (CIP 1129300, Contract No. 5001196). The contract value was $439,179.

2) In a letter dated June 28, 2010, ABC Construction Company, Inc., was granted Acceptance for the Old Town Bus Driveway Project, effective June 23, 2010 (SANJOC9-02, CIP 1128200, Contract No. 5001244). The contract value was $428,858.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Reportable Investment Transactions for May 2010 2. Budget Transfers and Amendments

Key Staff Contact: Lauren Warrem, (619) 699-6931, [email protected]

2 Attachment 1

MONTHLY ACTIVITY FOR INVESTMENT SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS FOR MAY 1 THROUGH MAY 31, 2010

Transaction Maturity Par Amount Yield Date Date Security Value (Cost) on Cost BOUGHT 05/06/2010 05/06/2013 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN NOTES (CALLABLE) $ 4,470,000.00 $ 4,467,765.00 1.89%

TOTAL BOUGHT: $ 4,470,000.00 $ 4,467,765.00 1.89% SOLD 05/06/2010 03/23/2013 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP GLOBAL NOTES $ 4,470,000.00 $ 4,565,345.10 1.11%

TOTAL SOLD: $ 4,470,000.00 $ 4,565,345.10 1.11% MATURED 05/11/2010 05/11/2010 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP GLOBAL NOTES (CALLED, OMD)$ 17,000,000.00 $ 16,971,950.00 1.70% 05/17/2010 05/17/2010 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP NOTES (CALLED, OMD) 5,000,000.00 4,998,000.00 1.27% 05/28/2010 05/28/2010 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP GLOBAL REFERENCE NOTES 6,200,000.00 6,174,536.60 2.57%

33 Attachment 2 BUDGET TRANSFERS AND AMENDMENTS

CURRENT PROJECT BUDGET (in NEW BUDGET CHANGE (in NUMBER PROJECT NAME '000s) (in '000s) '000s)

33203 Passenger Counting Program ( FY 2010) $608.5 $578.5 ($30.0) Carryover of contractual commitment and related funding from FY 2010 to FY 2011.

4 Item 6. lwa-Delegated Actions att 2.xls

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-7 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

REPORTS ON MEETINGS AND EVENTS ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF SANDAG

Since the last Board of Directors meeting, Board members participated in the following meetings and events on behalf of SANDAG. Key topics of discussion also are summarized.

June 13-18, 2010: National Association of Regional Councils (NARC) 44th Annual Conference Cleveland, OH

• Second Vice Chair Jack Dale and National City Mayor Ron Morrison attended this annual conference, which focused on the Administration’s priorities, Congressional activities, and critical policy issues and pending federal legislation in the areas of economic development, energy and climate change, homeland security, and livable communities. As a member of the NARC Board of Directors, Mayor Morrison also attended the NARC Finance Committee and Executive Committee meetings. The annual election of Board Officers was held during the conference, and Mayor Morrison was elected as NARC President-Elect. He welcomed NARC members to the upcoming 2011 annual conference, which will be held in San Diego.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-8 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR File Number 8000100

Introduction Recommendation

Pursuant to the employment agreement with the The Executive Committee recommends that Executive Director, the Board of Directors shall the Board of Directors approve the annually review his performance. If the Executive Director’s Performance Evaluation Executive Director’s performance is determined to for the period July 2009 to June 2010 be satisfactory, the Board of Directors must adjust (Attachment 1) and Performance Objectives his base salary in accordance with the employment for the period July 2010 to June 2011 agreement provisions. (Attachment 2).

At its July 9, 2010, meeting, the Executive Committee reviewed the Executive Director’s performance evaluation for the period July 2009 to June 2010 (Attachment 1), and recommends that the Executive Director’s performance during the past year be determined satisfactory.

The employment agreement also provides that the Board of Directors use established performance criteria (objectives), as amended from time to time, in the annual review. The Executive Committee reviewed the Executive Director’s draft performance objectives for the coming year (Attachment 2) and recommends their approval.

LORI HOLT PFEILER Chair

Attachments: 1. Executive Director Annual Performance Evaluation (July 2009 to June 2010) 2. Executive Director Annual Performance Objectives (July 2010 to June 2011)

Attachment 1

SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Annual Executive Director Performance Objectives

Executive Director Name Period covered by this review Gary L. Gallegos From: 7-2009 To: 6-2010

PART I - To be completed by the Executive Director and distributed to the Executive Committee for review and comment.

A. PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

Goals for the next year in order to meet or exceed standards for the Executive Director position:

Strategic Goals

1. Develop a regional vision and guiding principles.

2. Develop and implement strategies to improve the quality of life in the region.

3. Improve mobility.

4. Enhance organizational effectiveness.

Areas of Emphasis

1. Implement Transportation Projects. Rapid delivery of transportation projects, utilizing TransNet, Proposition 1B and other available funds, through improved coordination with federal, state, and local agencies and streamlining of project development processes.

2. Modeling and Research. Employ new technologies, methodologies, and models to enhance and expand research and analysis capabilities, equipping SANDAG to more comprehensively address complex policy issues today and into the future.

3. Long-Range Regional Plans and Forecasts. Initiation of a coordinated planning process that will lead to adoption of an updated Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) by 2011, including an updated regional growth forecast, regional housing needs assessment, and regional climate action plan.

4. Sustainable Development Strategies. Formulation of integrated planning, funding, and implementation strategies for regional investment in the areas of habitat conservation, water quality, shoreline preservation, and public transportation that will lead to a healthy environment, economic prosperity, and social equity in the region.

5. Smart Mobility Programs and Services. Collaborative planning/implementation efforts among SANDAG, Caltrans, and local jurisdictions to reduce congestion and improve mobility in key corridors through subregional plans, financing strategies, transportation demand management (TDM) programs, enhanced intergovernmental review of development projects, and other means.

2 6. Interregional Planning. Collaborative efforts with partner agencies in neighboring counties, Mexico, and tribal nations, focusing on development of strategies and delivery of projects and programs that will improve mobility and sustainability in our regions.

7. New Border Crossing / State Route 11. Preparation of plans and investment strategies to implement a third border crossing and connecting highway improvements in East Otay Mesa.

8. Internal and External Communication. Strategic efforts to improve communications, records management, and record security within SANDAG, as well as enhancement of communications with member and partner agencies and the general public via the Web and other methods.

B. PLANS FOR ACHIEVING PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

Specific methods by which the Executive Director can work toward accomplishing performance objectives.

Strategic Goals

1. Develop a regional vision and guiding principles.

o Update the Regional Transportation Plan (2050 RTP).

o Comply with all the requirements of Senate Bill (Steinberg) (SB 375) in development of the 2050 RTP.

o Continue to implement the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP).

o Seek new multiyear federal transportation authorization bill consistent with SANDAG priorities.

o Seek/provide input to key state and federal legislation consistent with SANDAG priorities.

2. Develop and implement strategies to improve the quality of life in the region.

o Continue to implement the RCP.

o Update the Regional Energy Strategy.

o Complete the Regional Climate Action Plan.

o Develop a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) to comply with SB 375.

o Continue to pursue a Quality of Life Initiative.

3. Improve mobility.

o Update the RTP.

o Continue to implement transportation projects throughout the region.

o Continue to develop and implement goods movement plan and projects.

3 o Continue to provide transportation demand management (TDM) options that will help reduce congestion, provide choices, and improve mobility.

o Continue to implement intelligent transportation systems (ITS) technologies that with help improve the efficiency of the existing system.

4. Enhance organizational effectiveness.

o Continue to strengthen technical skills through training and development.

o Continue to aggressively recruit and develop new staff.

o Continue to improve and enhance the SANDAG models and our modeling capabilities.

o Look for opportunities to cross train staff to improve technical capabilities.

o Partner with other agencies to improve technical skills.

o Continue to provide services to member agencies (e.g., 18 cities, County, and Caltrans) through Service Bureau and other efforts.

o Continue to seek additional funds from the state and federal governments for our regional infrastructure projects.

Areas of Emphasis

1. Implement Transportation Projects.

o Monitor and track project scope, schedule, and costs on all transportation projects.

o Implement TransNet Early Action Program (EAP) projects.

o Keep the TransNet Plan of Finance up-to-date to ensure projects stay on track and funds are efficiently utilized.

o Work with the Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) to complete its fiscal and compliance audit of the TransNet Program.

o Develop and implement regional bikeway projects.

o Continue to develop and deliver Proposition 1B Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) projects in the San Diego region.

o Continue to develop and deliver Proposition 1B Trade Corridor Improvement Fund (TCIF) goods movement projects in the San Diego region.

o Complete implementation of the Compass Card Program.

2. Modeling and Research.

4 o Ensure the existing four-step transportation model is up-to-date and is used for the 2050 RTP update.

o Continue transition of the transportation model to an Activity Based Model (ABM) (transition expected to be complete by 2013).

o Continue transition of our demographic, economic, and land use forecasting models to PECAS – Production Exchange and Consumption Allocation System.

o Ensure continued integration between ABM and PECAS models.

o Develop a new freight travel forecasting model for the San Diego region.

o Continue to provide up-to-date population, housing, income, and daytime population estimates to support planning, analysis, and other work at SANDAG and with our member agencies.

o Enhance the Freeway Performance Measurement System (PeMS) visualization model with Arterial (A-PeMS) and Transit (T-PeMS) data.

o Continue to improve and enhance our geographic information systems (GIS) and ensure it integrates with our new models.

o Continue to conduct transportation studies and surveys that are used for transportation and transit planning purposes (e.g., onboard passenger surveys for transit operators, Border Crossing Travel Behavior Survey, and Parking Study).

o Provide economic and fiscal analysis to support the RCP, RTP, and TransNet.

o Continue to serve as the Regional Census Data Center and work with the Census Bureau to plan for the 2010 Census.

o Continue to conduct research in Criminal Justice and provide improvements in the Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS) system, including starting transition to the ARJIS Enterprise system.

o Continue to provide services to member agencies and to other public and private sector clients through the Service Bureau.

o Develop an aggregate supply strategy for the San Diego region.

3. Long Range Regional Plans and Forecasts.

o Develop and adopt a 2050 Regional Forecast.

o Start the 2050 RTP update.

o Participate in the development of regional greenhouse gas emission targets with the California Air Resources Board (CARB).

o Start development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) to comply with SB 375.

5 o Develop an Urban Core Transit Strategy that could be used in the update of the 2050 RTP.

o Continue emissions analyses to determine air quality conformity for the RTP and Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP).

o Update the regional freight strategy.

o Complete the Gateway Freight Forecast model.

o Complete the Regional Air-Rail Network Study and transition the study findings into the Airport Multimodal Accessibility Plan (AMAP) required under SB 10 (Kehoe).

o Continue work and partnership with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (SDCRAA) on the AMAP and the Regional Aviation Strategic Plan (RASP) required under SB 10. (SANDAG is lead for the AMAP, and SDCRAA is lead for the RASP.)

4. Sustainable Development Strategies.

o Work with the Quality of Life Ad Hoc Steering Committee on an expenditure plan, educational and outreach plan, and timeline for a Quality of Life Initiative.

o Continue implementing an advance environmental mitigation strategy for the RTP and TransNet projects.

o Implement a five-year funding strategy for TransNet-funded environmental management and monitoring program.

o Continuing planning and funding efforts for a Regional Beach Sand Retention project.

o Update the Regional Energy Strategy and complete the Regional Climate Action Plan.

o Work with the County of San Diego and other stakeholders to develop a Regional Water Quality Plan that would lead to an expenditure plan for the Quality of Life Initiative.

5. Smart Mobility Programs and Services.

o Continue to administer and implement the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program.

o Complete and begin implementation of the Regional Bicycle Plan.

o Complete studies and roll out implementation of smart parking management strategies.

o Continue operating the Freeway Service Patrol to help reduce congestion by providing motorist assistance services.

o Continue management and operation of the I-15 FasTrak Value Pricing Program.

o Continue the 511 Advance Traveler Information Services.

o Complete implementation of the Compass Card and continue to market and implement the new smart card.

6 o Administer the Regional TDM Program (includes Regional Vanpool program, Regional Carpool program, employee and school outreach efforts, and Guaranteed Ride Home program).

o Continue to work with cities, Caltrans, and the County of San Diego on traffic synchronization and implementation of QuicNet.

o Continue to implement the Transit Passenger Counting Program on behalf of the transit agencies.

o Update the Regional Short Range Transit Plan.

o Work with the City of San Marcos and other North County communities to develop and evaluate marketing, advertising, and promotion options for expanding transit use in the heavily traveled State Route 78 Corridor.

o Develop a Corridor Management Plan for the I-805 Corridor.

o Complete the I-5 South Multimodal Corridor Study.

o Continue monitoring and commenting on projects and plans throughout the region to ensure regional impacts and mitigations are identified.

6. Interregional Planning.

o Start implementation of the San Diego-Imperial County I-8 Corridor Strategic Plan.

o Continue binational planning and coordination activities.

o Continue coordination and collaboration with Orange County, including meetings with Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and other officials.

o Complete Phase 3 of the I-15 Interregional Partnership (I-15 IRP) with Riverside County and continue implementation efforts.

o Continue partnering and planning with all Tribal Governments in San Diego County.

o Continue to participate as a member of the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency (LOSSAN) and provide staff support.

o Continue to participate in the West Coast Coalition Corridor.

o Partner with Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to hold a joint summit on areas of common interest (e.g., high-speed rail, goods movement).

7. New Border Crossing / State Route 11.

o Partner with Caltrans to complete the environmental documents (EIS/EIR) for the Otay Mesa East border crossing and SR 11 project.

o Develop a financial strategy to advance SR 11 and the new border crossing at Otay Mesa East.

7 o Hire a senior investment underwriter skilled in developing financing for large complex capital projects.

o Coordinate financial strategy and implementation with partners and Mexico.

o Coordinate project meeting with Caltrans, Otay Mesa community groups, General Services Agency (GSA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), California Highway Patrol (CHP), and other key stakeholders.

8. Internal and External Communication.

o Develop strategic efforts to improve communications within SANDAG, as well as with member and partner agencies and the general public.

o Continue to be proactive with local news media (i.e., meet with staff writers and go before editorial boards on a regular basis).

o Continue relationship with Spanish media.

o Continue outreach effort to keep all locally elected officials up-to-date on SANDAG activities.

o Continue to promote SANDAG throughout the region.

o Continue to implement the SANDAG Legislative Program.

o Continue to meet with the San Diego state delegation on a regular basis.

o Continue to partner with CALCOG (California Association of Councils of Governments), League of California Cities, NARC (National Association of Regional Councils), and Self- Help Counties Coalition on issues of common interest.

o Continue to work with the San Diego Congressional delegation on legislative issues, such as annual federal appropriations process.

o Attend federal and state legislative committee hearings and testify when necessary.

o Attend and participate at California Transportation Commission (CTC) meetings and committees/task forces.

o Actively participate during the development of the next federal surface transportation authorization bill.

o Continue to meet with counterparts at Riverside, Orange, and Imperial Counties.

o Continue to partner with Mexico through the Borders Committee and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities (COBRO).

o Continue to include the Tribal Nations in all SANDAG activities.

o Continue to partner with chambers of commerce and economic development corporations (EDCs) throughout the region on issues of common interest.

8 o Continue to partner with other regions throughout the country and stay active on both CALCOG and NARC.

o Continue to partner with the Port of San Diego in goods movement activities.

o Continue to pursue funding from the state and federal governments for implementation of goods movements projects in the region.

o Continue to promote and advance border transportation infrastructure.

o Work with federal authorities and other stakeholders to include a goods movement program in the next federal surface transportation authorization.

THE ABOVE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND AGREED UPON.

______Signature of Executive Director Date

______Signature of Chair Date

9 1. PART II - Accomplishments made towards achieving the agreed upon performance objectives.

Strategic Goals

1. Develop a regional vision and guiding principles.

; Board of Directors adopted vision, goals, policy objectives, and project evaluation criteria for the 2050 RTP.

; Board of Directors accepted a new Series 12 Regional Growth Forecast for planning purposes. A new bottom-up approach in which the assumptions for growth were tailored to each local jurisdiction has resulted in one of the best forecasts done by the agency. Series 12 also is the agency’s longest forecast to date, incorporating projections for population, housing, and employment to the year 2050.

; Board of Directors adopted guiding principles for the multi-year federal transportation authorization bill. SANDAG’s principles are consistent with statewide principles.

; Participated on the CARB Regional Targets Advisory Committee (RTAC) and was able to influence the greenhouse gas target-setting process to take into account SANDAG goals, policies, and plans. This is one of the initial significant efforts in the implementation of Senate Bill 375 (Steinberg, 2008) (SB 375).

; Board of Directors adopted the first ever San Diego Regional Bicycle Plan.

; Board of Directors adopted our first ever Climate Action Strategy.

; Board of Directors updated the Regional Energy Strategy.

; Continued implementation of the RCP through the Smart Growth Incentive Program.

; Continued to add planning tools to the SANDAG Smart Growth Toolbox, a resource available to local jurisdictions. Board of Directors accepted a Smart Growth Trip Generation Study as well as a study on Parking Strategies for Smart Growth.

2. Develop and implement strategies to improve the quality of life in the region

; Worked with stakeholders and partners to develop a strategy to continue our “Quality of Life” Initiative from 2010 to the 2012 election cycle. With key information from a privately-funded poll, a revised work plan and schedule were developed. To assist in the efforts, the Board of Directors created a new Quality of Life Stakeholder Working Group to provide input to the Board’s Quality of Life Ad Hoc Steering Committee on specific funding elements.

; Completed the San Diego Regional Bike Plan, Climate Action Strategy, and updated the Regional Energy Strategy.

; Received a $1.8 million grant from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for a local government partnership with San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E). The grant will enable SANDAG, in partnership with SDG&E, to coordinate a program to

10 offer energy planning assistance to local jurisdictions in the San Diego region (Energy Roadmap Program).

; Developed a new 2050 Regional Growth Forecast, which provides long-term projections of housing to match population and employment projections. Compared to the prior 2030 forecast, the 2050 forecast also provides for more multi-family housing and less sprawl and interregional commuting.

; Continued work on a new border crossing that will improve our ability to move goods, services and people across the United States/Mexico border.

; Worked with GSA on their planned improvements for the San Ysidro Port of Entry (POE). This work resulted in improved accommodations for pedestrians and a proposed southbound pedestrian crossing on the east side of the POE that provides better access to public transit.

; Started development of an Urban Area Transit Strategy that would create a world class transit system for the San Diego region.

; Worked with the California High-Speed Rail Authority to start the project development work for the Los Angeles to San Diego portion of the statewide high- speed train system.

; Through ARJIS, created a new Domestic Violence intake system for the Family Justice Center that allows for coordinated services, improved efficiency, and enhanced victim safety; this is being used as a model system in other family justice centers throughout the nation. ARJIS also developed a law enforcement mapping application that allows real-time mapping of the region’s crimes and arrests.

3. Improve mobility

; Continued implementation of transportation projects throughout the region. (See list of specific projects under “Implement Transportation Projects” Area of Emphasis on page 12.)

; Completed implementation of the Compass Card.

; Continue to partner with Caltrans and the Port of San Diego on the development of the Proposition 1B Trade Corridor Improvement Fund (TCIF) projects.

; Completed a Freight Gateway Study that includes forecasting tools.

; Received an $8.6 Million federal grant for Integrated Corridor Management on I-15 – using technology to optimize multi-modal and arterial capacity to reduce congestion.

; Launched a new commuter program called iCommute that offers a wide array of free tools to help commuters get out of solo vehicles and into alternative commutes. The new program includes an online RideMatcher tool that helps people find carpool, vanpool, SchoolPool, or cycling partners. A TripTracker tool that helps add up commuter savings – in cash, and greenhouse gases. And other tools that help plan trips on transit, calculate the cost of your commute, and provide incentives for ridesharing.

11 ; Continued to grow the Regional Vanpool Program to more than 660 vans, one of the largest in the country. During FY 2010 (through May 2010), the vanpool program has reduced more than 125 million vehicle miles of travel (VMT) and reduced nearly 350,000 pounds of smog-forming pollution.

; Developed an extensive list for the Board’s consideration of possible short-term and long-term options to provide additional transit operations funding for the region. Board of Directors approved the use of carryover funds from the original TransNet measure for transit operations, and efforts are continuing on the longer-term Quality of Life funding measure, which includes public transit as a component.

; Board of Directors approved an allocation of $70 million in TransNet funds to develop another $750 million of “shelf-ready” projects.

; Received $20.2 million federal Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant for the SR 905/I-805 interchange project. The process was highly competitive. The project was one of only 61 TIGER grants awarded in the nation, and one of only four awarded in California; more than 1,400 TIGER applications were submitted ($60 billion in requests) for the $1.5 billion program.

4. Enhance organizational effectiveness.

; As the entire original Executive Management Team retired, our succession plans allowed us to fill all the positions from within, resulting in a well-qualified and strong performing team. This also presented an opportunity to combine positions and responsibilities resulting in overall cost savings for the organization while maintaining our organizational effectiveness.

; Continued to enhance employee skills through training in areas, such as project management, communications and presentation skills, media training, and supervisory training.

; Continued to promote and encourage employees to stay active in professional organizations, such as the Women’s Transportation Seminar (WTS), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), San Diego Highway Development Association, American Planning Association (APA), and Urban Land Institute (ULI), among others.

; Continued strengthening our capacity and partnerships in the areas of Goods Movement and Energy Planning.

; Continued the transition of our models to an activity based model for transportation and to PECAS (Production Exchange and Consumption Allocation System) for demographic, economic, and land use forecasting.

; Developed a partnership with the other major metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) in California – SCAG, Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), and Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) – on the implementation of SB 375. Our Planning, Modeling, and Legal teams have been working to share information, standardize assumptions, conduct joint evaluations, and develop common scenarios for the greenhouse gas target-setting process. This effort has lead to a unified message from the major metro areas to CARB on what levels of greenhouse gas reductions could be ambitious yet achievable.

12 ; Continued to implement the Service Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan. We are currently working on 50 projects generating about $227,000 in revenues. Long- standing transportation modeling capabilities continue to be a mainstay of the Service Bureau, and more than half of the new projects were concentrated in this area. These studies include small requests that can be completed in a few hours as well as complex projects that span many months.

; Received Certificate of Achievement for Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officer’s Association for the third year, recognizing excellence in SANDAG’s financial reporting.

; Received Achievement of Excellence in Procurement Award sponsored by the National Purchasing Institute and other nationwide organizations, which recognize organizational excellence in procurement.

Areas of Emphasis

1. Implement Transportation Projects.

; Continued implementation of transportation projects throughout the region. These projects are all part of the TransNet Early Action Program, and several are additionally funded with Proposition 1B (CMIA, TCIF programs, etc.) and/or federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) monies:

Continued construction of the north and south segments of I-15, scheduled to be completed in 2012.

Continued construction of the last segment of SR 52, scheduled for completion in March 2011.

Started construction of the middle section of SR 76 from Melrose Drive to Mission Road.

Started construction of a Proposition 1B CMIA project, the I-805 Widening from SR 54 to E Street, which is scheduled for completion in September 2010.

Started construction of initial improvements for the Blue and Orange Trolley rehabilitation project.

Started construction of SR 905 from I-805 to the US/Mexico border, and the SR 905/ I-805 interchange project (federal TIGER-funded project).

Started construction of the I-805/Carroll Canyon Road interchange and extension project.

Started construction of the Santa Margarita River Bridge Replacement project.

Completed public scoping for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit project; currently starting the environmental and preliminary engineering project phases.

Completed the design for the Mid-City Rapid Bus project; currently proceeding with the right-of-way acquisition phase.

13 ; Continuing to monitor and track project scope, schedule, and costs through our TransNet Project Office. While the recession has been hard on TransNet revenues (declining by nearly 20 percent), we have been able to balance this with very attractive bidding conditions; many projects have been bid at 25-30 percent below the engineer’s estimate, resulting in a favorable financial position.

; All TransNet projects continued to be reviewed by the Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee.

; Executed a new one-year agreement with J.P. Morgan, one of the liquidity providers for the 2008 SANDAG variable rate demand bonds, resulting in an annual cost savings of more than $900,000.

; Completed the EIR/EIS for proposed improvements to the I-5 North Coast Corridor in partnership with Caltrans. The environmental document is currently out with a 90-day public comment period.

; Completed implementation of the Compass Card.

; Continued to develop and implement segments of the Bayshore Bikeway project.

; Board of Directors updated the Smart Growth Concept Map to align it with the 2030 RTP update and in preparation for the call for projects for the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program.

; Board adopted criteria for the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program and approved the list of projects for funding under the first cycle of the new program.

2. Modeling and Research.

; Continued migration of SANDAG transportation models from the traditional four- step model to a state-of-the-art activity based model, which will enhance our modeling capabilities and allow more robust analysis of different land use/transportation alternatives. Complete migration scheduled to be completed in time for use in the development of the next RTP in 2015.

; Continued development of the PECAS demographic, economic, and land use forecasting model (Production, Exchange, and Consumption Allocation System). We have completed the first of three iterations of the model. We expect to have the transition completed in time for the 2015 RTP update.

; Developed several web-based GIS applications to support transportation modeling and forecast land use updates. Updated the regional land use and general plan maps, and revised the employment lands inventory.

; Developed a visualization model and created several animations demonstrating traffic conditions along major freeways in the San Diego region using performance measurement system (PeMS) data. These animations were used at several public meetings throughout the year.

; Completed a 2009 onboard passenger survey, 2010 Parking Lot Survey, and started on the 2010 Cross-Border Travel Behavior Survey.

; Completed the San Diego Regional Employment and Residential Lands Inventory.

14 3. Long-Range Plans and Forecasts.

; Completed and Board of Directors accepted the Series 12 Growth Forecast out to 2050. This forecast goes well beyond the planning horizon of any of the existing general plans. We worked with each jurisdiction to develop a bottom-up approach that has resulted in one of the most comprehensive forecasts prepared by SANDAG. The forecast was presented and reviewed by all 18 city councils and the County Board of Supervisors.

; Board of Directors adopted the vision, goals, policy objectives, and project evaluation criteria for use in the development of the 2050 RTP.

; Developed various land use and transportation scenarios for reducing greenhouse gases that have been shared with CARB as part of the goal-setting process required under SB 375.

; Continued development of a Smart Growth Toolbox that includes a new Smart Growth Trip Generation Study, a new study on Parking Strategies for Smart Growth, and smart growth visual simulation tools that are designed to help local jurisdictions developing smart growth projects.

; Completed and Board of Directors adopted the San Diego Regional Bike Plan.

; Completed and Board of Directors approved a Climate Action Strategy that will help inform the 2050 RTP and the next RCP update.

; With the completion of Destination Lindbergh (a master plan for the San Diego International Airport), began developing initial plans and cost estimates for the proposed Intermodal Transportation Center.

; Started development of an Urban Area Transit Strategy that will create the vision for a world class transit system for the San Diego region, for use in the development of the 2050 RTP.

; Updated and Board of Directors approved the Regional Energy Strategy.

; In partnership with the California High-Speed Rail Authority, began work on the comprehensive environmental process for the Los Angeles to San Diego via the Inland Empire section of the high-speed train system. Also conducted a feasibility study that considers extending the system to the International Border.

; Completed a comprehensive freight gateway study, which provides information about freight flows through regional gateways. The study also includes an economic simulation tool that helped us forecast freight flows and better understand the impacts of infrastructure changes on these flows.

; Continued to partner with the City of Tijuana, including serving as a permanent advisory member on the Governing Board of the City of Tijuana’s IMPlan.

; In partnership with the Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association (SCTCA), cohosted the 2010 Regional Tribal Summit.

; Continued planning and financing for the next major beach sand replenishment project scheduled for 2011.

15 4. Sustainable Development Strategies.

; After extensive consultation with stakeholders and partners, the Board of Directors amended the TransNet Extension Ordinance to extend the timeline for acting on a Quality of Life measure from 2010 to 2012.

; Achieved a milestone for the TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program (EMP) with the purchase of more than 1,000 acres of habitat land. This effort has helped keep our transportation projects on schedule by having the necessary mitigation in place in advance of construction.

; Completed the first annual report on the status of regional habitat conservation management and monitoring efforts under the TransNet EMP. Board of Directors approved a 5-year funding strategy and approved eight land management grants totaling $1.63 million.

; Board of Directors adopted our first ever Climate Action Strategy and updated the Regional Energy Strategy.

; Received funds ($22.3 million in total) from the California Department of Boating and Waterways (DBW) for the planning and construction of the second Regional Beach Sand Project. Received funding for FY 2009 and FY 2010, with the remainder of the DBW funds anticipated in FY 2011.

; Continued to work with the County of San Diego, the Quality of Life Ad Hoc Steering Committee, and the new Quality of Life Stakeholder Working Group on the development of a regional water quality component and other funding elements that would lead to an expenditure plan for a future Quality of Life Initiative.

5. Smart Mobility Programs and Services.

; Successfully developed program guidelines and project selection criteria for the first call for projects under the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program and currently implementing and monitoring the first round of projects.

; Continued to implement the I-15 FasTrak® Value Pricing Program, consisting of 16 miles of Express Lanes along the I-15 corridor and a state-of-the-art toll collection system. The system’s design also allows for potential new technology, including future traffic management and communications technology that would enable vehicles to communicate with the roadway systems. Provided $500,000 in I-15 FasTrak funding to the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) to support operations of express bus services in the corridor.

; The official roll out of the Compass Card project began in May 2009 and was recently completed. Developed a partnership with VONS to sell this innovative, plastic “smart card” at their supermarket locations, resulting in improved access/distribution and overall cost savings.

; Continued to administer an aggressive Regional Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program, which at the end of the third quarter of FY 2010 (March 2010), included more than 660 vanpools, nearly 5,400 vanpool passengers, more than 800 bike lockers, more than 1,100 Guaranteed Ride Home participants,

16 and more than 3,000 new iCommute registrants. These fiscal year to date participation levels resulted in a reduction of more than 1.8 million person trips, nearly 102 million VMT, more than 280,000 pounds of smog-forming emissions, and more than 5.5 million gallons in fuel consumption; they also resulted in an overall cost savings of more than $49.6 million.

; The Regional Vanpool Program received the award for Special Achievement in Transportation from the California Center for Sustainable Energy for its success in eliminating approximately 130 million VMT in the region during 2009.

; Continued to operate a Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) to help reduce congestion by providing motorist assistance services; FSP will provide more than 40,000 assists this year.

; Continued to improve and expand the 511 traveler information system. Through the third quarter of this fiscal year, there have been nearly 183.000 web hits and nearly 650,000 phone calls. This compares to approximately 550,000phone calls for all of last fiscal year. Developed new 511 component to offer direct connection to taxi service option, which is expected to generate additional revenue to support 511 operations.

; Partnered with the US Navy and MTS to develop a proposed one-year pilot for a limited express transit service from the Murphy Canyon military housing area to Naval Base San Diego.

; Completed and the Board of Directors adopted the Regional Bicycle Plan; currently working on an initial financing proposal to implement the projects identified in the overall plan.

; Updated the Regional Short Range Transit Plan and currently working on the Urban Area Transit Strategy that will be included as part of the 2050 RTP.

; Rolled out the first smart parking project at three COASTER Stations. The goal was to use modern technologies to collect parking data, provide real-time information to COASTER customers, and examine innovative parking pricing methods. Given the current economy, this may not have been the best time to implement this strategy.

; Completed a regionalized communications network, installation of security software, and installation of QuicNet software to support interconnected traffic signals for our member agencies.

; Completed the I-5 South Multimodal Corridor Study.

6. Interregional Planning.

; In partnership with the Imperial County Transportation Commission (ICTC) and Caltrans, developed a strategic plan for the I-8 corridor; this partnership study evaluated the demographics and travel characteristics in the I-8 corridor.

; Continued our binational planning and coordination activities with a focus on the rehabilitation of the existing San Ysidro POE and the proposed new border crossing at Otay Mesa East. SANDAG played a very important role in advocating for pedestrian improvements at the San Ysidro POE.

17 ; Strengthened our coordination and collaboration with Orange County. Throughout the year we held regular meeting at the policy level with our OCTA counterparts. The main areas of focus were the SR 241 toll road and the LOSSAN rail corridor.

; Continued partnering and planning with all the Tribal Governments in San Diego County. SCTCA representatives continue to participate on four of the SANDAG Policy Advisory Committees (Borders, Regional Planning, Transportation, and Public Safety). This relationship has been highlighted as a best practice statewide. Held the 2010 Regional Tribal Summit and agreed to develop a joint legislative agenda.

; Participated as the Chairman of the West Coast Corridor Coalition, through which we have been coordinating our goods movement strategies along the west coast.

; Continued to strengthen our partnership and interaction with SCAG. Over the past year the Executive Committees of both organizations met and agreed to advocate jointly in Washington DC, and address high-speed rail, CALCOG, and goods movement issues.

; SANDAG, North County Transit District (NCTD), MTS, and the other LOSSAN member agencies entered into a memorandum of understanding to explore ways to better integrate the corridor's three passenger rail services. Onboard surveys were completed with riders of Amtrak, COASTER, and Metrolink trains and with nonriders to learn more about their travel patterns and opinions on why they use or don’t use the corridor’s passenger rail services.

; Continue implementation of Phase 3 of the I-15 Interregional Partnership (I-15 IRP) with Riverside County, which included a strategic transportation implementation plan, interregional economic strategic action plan, and transit-oriented housing strategies, including development of a smart growth concept map for southwestern Riverside and workforce housing proposals in northern San Diego.

7. New Border Crossing / State Route 11.

; Continued partnering with Caltrans on the completion of the project level environmental document (EIR/EIS) for the Otay Mesa East border crossing and SR 11 project. The draft environmental document is scheduled to be released for public review in fall 2010. ; Developed a financial strategy that was adopted by the Board of Directors to fund the new border crossing and SR 11 project. Produced a request for proposals to secure a senior investment underwriter for the project. This effort is currently in the procurement process, and we expect to have an investment underwriter on board by July 2010. ; Coordinated our proposed financial strategy with our partners in Mexico. We have reached agreement on conducting a joint Traffic & Revenue Study that will be used by both sides to help finance the projects and establish toll levels. ; Have continued to coordinate project details with Caltrans, County of San Diego, Otay Mesa community groups, property owners, GSA, DHS, and CHP. We recently presented before the Binational Committee on Bridges and Border Crossings where the project was highlighted for its innovation.

18 ; Obtained a $3.5 million federal grant to study toll collection and ITS integration on both sides of the border. ; Received the La Prensa Binational Endeavor Award from the South County EDC for the agency’s work on the new Otay Mesa East border crossing and recognizing the need bring in government representatives from both sides of the border to support the effort.

8. Internal and External Communications.

; Updated the SANDAG agencywide public participation plan.

; Developed a marketing and outreach plan for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project.

; Continued to work closely with news media to highlight SANDAG projects and activities throughout the region (i.e., press events for all major projects, interviews, and meetings with editorial boards).

; Continued to work closely with Spanish media to highlight SANDAG projects and activities throughout the region. All interviews conducted in Spanish.

; Held press events and ceremonies to highlight groundbreaking and completion of major construction projects, including SR 76, I-805 widening, and I-805/Carroll Canyon.

; Continued to meet with the San Diego legislative delegation on a regular basis to provide input on key issues and to advance the SANDAG legislative program. Also testified at various legislative hearings on transportation and other issues that impact the San Diego region.

; Developed a Board-approved priority list of regional transportation projects for our Congressional members. This joint, collaborative effort with NCTD and MTS proved successful in reaching consensus on key regional projects, which helps to maximize federal dollars to the region.

; Took advantage of the federal economic stimulus program – helped maximize flexibility by exchanging ARRA funds with TransNet to assist the 18 cities and County in implementing local transportation improvements.

; Continued to participate with both CALCOG at the state level and NARC at the national level. Held leadership positions in both organizations and helped develop a reform agenda for CALCOG and influenced NARC’s goals at the national level.

; Stayed active on Chamber and EDC boards throughout the region. Continued to serve on the Board of Directors of the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce. Also participated in the “One Region, One Voice” trips to Washington, DC and Mexico City.

; Strengthened partnerships with Riverside, Orange, and Imperial Counties. SANDAG and SCAG Executive Committees met and developed a joint agenda on CALCOG, high-speed rail, and federal reauthorization issues.

; Attended, participated, and testified at the California Transportation Commission and the California High-Speed Rail Authority Board meetings.

19 ; Continued to meet with officials from the local, state, and federal levels in Mexico on the new border crossing at Otay Mesa East and the rehabilitation of the San Ysidro POE.

; Continued to meet and partner with the Tribal Nations. SCTCA representatives are active and participating on four of the SANDAG Policy Advisory Committees and the Board of Directors. Also held a successful 2010 Regional Tribal Summit.

; Continued to partner with the Port of San Diego on the project development for the Proposition 1B TCIF projects that will enhance access to the Port’s marine terminals. The Port has continued to fund the project development of these projects.

; Continued outreach to locally elected officials, including traveling throughout the San Diego region to meet one-on-one with both existing and newly elected officials.

20 1. PART III - COMMENTS

Pursuant to the employment agreement with the Executive Director, the Board of Directors shall annually review the performance of the Executive Director. If the Executive Director’s performance is determined to be satisfactory, the Board of Directors shall adjust his base salary in accordance with the employment agreement provisions. The Chair has reviewed the Executive Director’s performance evaluation for the period July 2009 to June 2010, and recommends that his performance during the past year be determined satisfactory.

THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HAS MET THE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES.

______Signature of Chair Date

21 Attachment 2

SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Annual Executive Director Performance Objectives

Executive Director Name Period covered by this review Gary L. Gallegos From: 7-2010 To: 6-2011

PART I - To be completed by the Executive Director and distributed to the Executive Committee for review and comment.

A. PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

Goals for the next year in order to meet or exceed standards for the Executive Director position:

Strategic Goals

1. Develop a regional vision and guiding principles that can be used by SANDAG in preparing the next update of the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) and the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and in providing constructive input into the next federal surface transportation act and other key federal and state legislation.

2. Improve mobility by providing better public transportation services and implementing TransNet and goods movement projects, transportation demand management (TDM), and intelligent transportation systems (ITS).

3. Develop and implement strategies to improve the quality of life in the region, as characterized by a strong economy, healthy environment, public safety, and more housing choices, consistent with the RCP strategic initiatives and other mandates.

4. Enhance organizational effectiveness both internally and externally through continuous improvements.

5. Pursue innovative solutions to fiscal and economic challenges and opportunities.

Areas of Emphasis

1. Modeling and Research. Employ new technologies, methodologies, and models to enhance and expand research and analysis capabilities, equipping SANDAG to more comprehensively address complex policy and operational issues today and into the future.

2. Planning and Forecasts. A coordinated planning process that will lead to a scheduled adoption of an updated RTP in July 2011, including a Sustainable Communities Strategy and regional housing needs assessment. This area of emphasis also includes collaborative efforts with partner agencies in neighboring counties, Mexico, and tribal nations, focusing on development of strategies and delivery of projects and programs that will improve mobility and sustainability in our regions.

22 3. Sustainable Development Strategies. Formulation of integrated planning, funding, and implementation strategies for regional investment in the areas of habitat conservation, water quality, shoreline preservation, smart growth, and transportation. Participate in discussions and encourage sustainable strategies in other areas such as energy and water supply. By working together, these efforts are expected to provide the opportunity to achieve three goals simultaneously: a healthy environment, economic prosperity, and social equity in the region.

4. Smart Mobility Programs and Services. Collaborative planning/implementation efforts among SANDAG, Caltrans, and local jurisdictions to reduce congestion, improve mobility, and address air quality and climate change goals in key corridors through subregional plans, financing strategies, transportation demand management programs, enhanced intergovernmental review of development projects, and other means.

5. Intermodal Planning and Implementation. Prepare plans and investment strategies for evolving, high-concept intermodal transportation hubs and corridors, including a third border crossing and connecting highway improvements in East Otay Mesa, an intermodal transportation center at the San Diego International Airport, and high-speed, intercity, and freight rail services connecting the San Diego region.

6. Internal and External Coordination. Coordination within the agency, as well as with federal, state, and local agencies to ensure rapid delivery of transportation projects, strategic efforts to enhance communications with member, partner agencies, advisory committees, and the public, and providing innovative solutions to fiscal and economic challenges.

B. PLANS FOR ACHIEVING PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

Specific methods by which the Executive Director can work toward accomplishing performance objectives.

Strategic Goals

1. Develop a regional vision and guiding principles.

o Update the Regional Transportation (RTP) (2050 RTP).

o Comply with all the requirements of Senate Bill (Steinberg) (SB 375) in development of the 2050 RTP.

o Continue to implement the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP).

o Seek new multiyear federal transportation authorization bill consistent with SANDAG priorities.

o Seek/provide input to key state and federal legislation consistent with SANDAG priorities.

2. Improve mobility.

o Continue to implement transportation projects throughout the region (i.e. TransNet, Proposition 1B CMIA and TCIF, TCRP, and ARRA funded projects).

23 o Continue to implement intelligent transportation systems (ITS) technologies that with help improve the efficiency of the existing system.

o Seek opportunities to implement ITS technologies that help improve mobility.

3. Develop and implement strategies to improve the quality of life in the region.

o Continue to pursue a Quality of Life ballot initiative for 2012.

o Develop a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) or Alternative Planning Strategy (APS) to comply with SB 375.

o Update the RTP and the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).

4. Enhance organizational effectiveness.

o Continue to strengthen technical skills through training and development.

o Continue to aggressively recruit and develop new staff.

o Look for opportunities to cross train staff to improve technical capabilities.

o Partner with other agencies to improve technical skills.

5. Pursue innovative solutions.

o Continue to seek additional funds from the state and federal governments for our regional infrastructure projects.

o Continue to provide services to member agencies (e.g., 18 cities, County, and Caltrans) through Service Bureau and other efforts.

o Continue to partner with other MPOs on an urban mobility program at the national level.

Areas of Emphasis

1. Modeling and Research.

o Maintain the transportation model for transit and highway networks and provide continuous quality control of the modeling process, input data, and output results.

o Integrate new travel survey information (e.g., travel behavior surveys, onboard surveys, crossborder travel studies and wait times).

o Develop ad hoc models for providing travel analysis where the regional transportation model is not the most appropriate tool to use.

o Continue transition of the transportation model to an Activity Based Model (ABM) (transition expected to be complete by 2013).

o Continue transition of our demographic, economic, and land use forecasting models to PECAS – Production Exchange and Consumption Allocation System.

24 o Ensure continued integration between ABM and PECAS models.

o Start utilizing our new freight travel forecasting model for the San Diego region.

o Continue to improve and enhance our geographic information systems (GIS) and ensure it integrates with our new models.

o Complete the 2010 Cross Border Travel Behavior Survey.

o Provide economic and fiscal analysis to support the RCP, RTP, and TransNet.

o Continue to conduct research in Criminal Justice that supports local criminal justice planning and policy-making by providing analyses of crime and other public safety statistics.

o Continue to provide traffic modeling services to member agencies and to other public and private sector clients through the Service Bureau.

o Continue to participate as a member of the City of San Diego Commission on Gang Prevention.

2. Planning and Forecasts.

o Complete the 2050 RTP update.

o Develop a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) or an Alternative Planning Strategy (APS) to comply with SB 375.

o Complete development of the Urban Core Transit Strategy that will be used in the update of the 2050 RTP.

o Develop performance measures that will be used to evaluate the various transportation networks that will be developed as part of the 2050 RTP.

o Continue collaboration with other metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), Caltrans, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other agencies to refine the state and national goods movement strategies and incorporate strategic objectives into the SANDAG 2050 RTP.

o Coordinate with Orange County, Riverside County, and Imperial County on the development of the 2050 RTP.

o Continue oversight and review of the San Ysidro Port of Entry (POE) reconfiguration and expansion project to ensure that public transit and pedestrians are adequately accommodated.

o Continue to involve Tribal Nations in the development of the 2050 RTP.

o Continue to provide up-to-date population, housing, income, and daytime population estimates to support planning, analysis, and other work at SANDAG and with our member agencies.

25 3. Sustainable Development Strategies.

o Continue to develop and implement a Quality of Life funding strategy and ballot initiative for 2012 to meet regional needs for habitat conservation plans, shoreline preservation activities, water quality improvements, and transit service enhancements.

o Continue to plan and implement the region’s habitat preserve system through assisting in the development and implementation of the regional habitat conservation plans pursuant to the RCP.

o Continue implementation of regional beach restoration through opportunistic replenishment activities, and continue the implementation of the regional shoreline monitoring program. The emphasis for this year will be to finish the environmental, permitting, and engineering for the construction of the second Regional Beach Sand Project.

o Continue providing energy and climate planning assistance to local governments through the Sustainable Region Program (SRP).

o Continue to participate in regional water quality efforts lead by the County of San Diego, including continued participation on the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Regional Advisory Committee.

o Continue to coordinate and collaborate with the San Diego County Water Authority on water quality/supply issues of common concern.

4. Smart Mobility Programs and Services.

o Continue implementing the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program by monitoring and providing oversight of the projects funded in the program's first funding cycle, and preparing for the second cycle.

o Start implementation of the Regional Bicycle Plan.

o Continue operating the Freeway Service Patrol to help reduce congestion by providing motorist assistance services.

o Continue management and operation of the I-15 FasTrak® Value Pricing Program.

o Continue the 511 Advance Traveler Information Services.

o Administer the Compass Card as a common fare product for regional transit customers. Continue working with VONS as the primary distribution outlet, and support a few new independent locations, to provide ease of access throughout the region.

o Administer the Regional TDM Program (includes Regional Vanpool Program, Regional Carpool Program, employee and school outreach efforts, bicycle lockers, and Guaranteed Ride Home Program).

o Continue working with cities throughout the region to enhance and connect traffic signals by utilizing the recently completed QuicNet4+ software.

26 o Implement the I-15 Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Initiative, which focuses on utilizing multimodal partnerships and integrated, corridor-based systems to establish a cooperative and multiagency philosophy for improving mobility, maximizing system efficiency, and providing traveler choices for commuters in the I-15 corridor.

o Continue monitoring and commenting on projects and plans throughout the region to ensure regional impacts and mitigations are identified.

5. Intermodal Planning and Implementation.

o Complete the advanced planning work for the Phase 1 of an Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC) at San Diego International Airport. Also assist Caltrans in the development of capital cost estimates for the Interstate 5 direct connector ramps, and begin environmental work on the Phase 1 ITC improvements.

o Continue to coordinate planning and project development along the Los Angeles to San Diego to San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) rail corridor. Work to complete the LOSSAN Corridorwide Strategic Implementation Plan, a plan of short-term and long-term strategies to better integrate the corridor's three passenger rail services.

o Continue to stay active and participate in the West Coast Coalition Corridor (WCCC), an advocacy group of member agencies from the states of California, Oregon, Washington, and Alaska on goods movement policy issues.

o Continue to participate in the planning, environmental, and preliminary engineering along the Los Angeles to San Diego via Inland Empire high-speed train section with the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and fellow corridor planning agencies.

o Continue development of the new border crossing at Otay Mesa East and SR 11. Coordinate activities at the local, state, and federal levels of governments on both sides of the border.

6. Internal and External Coordination.

o Monitor and track project scope, schedule, and costs on all transportation projects.

o Implement TransNet Early Action Program (EAP) projects and keep the TransNet Plan of Finance up-to-date to ensure projects stay on track and funds are efficiently utilized.

o Work with Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) on management and oversight of independent fiscal audits for FY 2010 and implementation of the 2009 Triennial Performance Audit recommendations for TransNet.

o Continue to market and support major work efforts, including ongoing construction projects such as SuperLoop, South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Escondido Rapid Bus, and Mid-City Rapid Bus – as well as the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program, Service Bureau, and other projects.

27 o Manage federal and state legislative activities in accordance with the SANDAG Legislative Program; emphasis for this year includes pursuing SANDAG priorities for the next federal surface transportation authorization.

o Provide ongoing support and maintenance for current network and applications used by Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS) agencies, including updating to the ARJIS Enterprise System.

o Continue to be proactive with local news media (i.e., meet with staff writers and go before editorial boards on a regular basis), including Spanish media.

o Continue to promote SANDAG throughout the region.

o Continue outreach effort to keep all locally elected officials up-to-date on SANDAG activities.

o Continue to partner with chambers of commerce, economic development corporations, and other collaboratives/organizations throughout the region on issues of common interest.

THE ABOVE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND AGREED UPON.

______Signature of Executive Director Date

______Signature of Chair Date

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-9 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

SANDAG FINAL PROPOSED AMENDMENT File Number 8000100 TO FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION OVERALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE GOAL-SETTING METHODOLOGY FOR FFY 2010-FFY 2012

Introduction Recommendation

SANDAG has an established Disadvantaged Business The Board of Directors is asked to Enterprise (DBE) Program in accordance with Title 49 approve the Final Proposed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 26 provisions, Amendment to the Federal Transit which concerns participation by DBEs in United States Administration Overall Disadvantaged Department of Transportation (USDOT) programs. Business Enterprise Goal-Setting SANDAG receives federal financial assistance from the Methodology. Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and as a condition of receiving this assistance, SANDAG is required to sign an assurance that it will comply with the DBE regulations. As a recipient of federally assisted funds through FTA, SANDAG is required to develop an Overall DBE Goal for its FTA-assisted projects (Attachment 1). The purpose of the DBE goal-setting process is to level the playing field so that DBEs can compete fairly for USDOT-assisted contracts; however, the program must be narrowly tailored in accordance with applicable law. The attached version of the Final Proposed Amendment to the FTA Overall DBE Goal-Setting Methodology (Final Proposed Amendment) proposes amending the methodology for setting DBE goals for FTA-assisted projects for a period of three federal fiscal years (FFY) – from FFY 2010 to FFY 2012 (October 1, 2009, to September 30, 2012).

At its May 28, 2010, meeting, the Board of Directors accepted the release of the FFY 2010–FFY 2012 Proposed Draft Amendment to the FTA Overall DBE Goal-Setting Methodology (Proposed Draft Amendment) to the public for a 45-day comment period. SANDAG received questions and comments through focused meetings with numerous minority and trade organizations. SANDAG reviewed the comments submitted/provided and found the input to be valuable in addressing program areas for improvement. Of all the comments received, however, none provided demonstrable evidence that would merit an adjustment to the goal or methodology that were in the Proposed Draft Amendment.

Final Proposed Overall Annual DBE Goal Calculation Methodology for FTA

The Final Proposed Amendment described in Attachment 1 (“Amendment”) was established utilizing the federal two-step goal-setting methodology. Step 1 includes establishing a base figure utilizing quantifiable evidence to determine the relative availability of DBEs (ready, willing, and able to work for SANDAG) within specified industries identified as a part of SANDAG FTA-assisted contracting projects anticipated to be awarded within the period of October 1, 2010, to September 30, 2011.

Factors considered in the adjustment of the Step 1 Base Figure include: the FTA Disparity Study, SANDAG historical DBE data, current capacity of DBEs measured by actual attainments, SANDAG Bidders List, and other evidence within the SANDAG market area. After taking these factors into account, the Final Proposed Amendment calls for an Overall DBE Goal of 7.04 percent.

Proposed Race-Conscious and Race-Neutral Projections

As a part of the prescribed goal-setting methodology, SANDAG must ascertain the percentage of its Overall DBE Goal that can be met utilizing race-neutral (RN) and race-conscious (RC) measures. SANDAG is required by law to meet the maximum amount possible of its Overall DBE Goal using RN methods. To ascertain the portion of the Overall DBE Goal that SANDAG predicts it would be able to obtain using RN methods, SANDAG considered two principal factors, historical RN DBE attainments on its FTA-assisted contracts, and historical attainment trends as tangible evidence of the amount it is presumably able to achieve using RN means.

SANDAG weighted the percentage of USDOT funding anticipated in the forthcoming goal period for the Construction and Professional Services categories. This represents a percentage of the anticipated USDOT funding for each category. Based on the evidence and calculations in Section IV of Attachment 1, the following numbers are currently proposed:

Portion of 7.04% Race-Neutral Race-Conscious Project Type Overall Goal Percentage Percentage Construction 97.68% of 7.04% = 6.88% 3.40% 3.48% Professional Services 2.32% of 7.04% = 0.16% 0.16% 0%

Based on the results of the FTA Disparity Study that was accepted at the March 25, 2010, Board of Directors meeting, the RC portion of the goal will include the following underutilized DBE categories: African American, Hispanic American, Native American, Subcontinent Asian American, and women-owned firms. The Asian Pacific American category is not considered to be an underutilized DBE, however participation from this category would be included in the RN goal.

FTA does not allow a program to be tailored to only certain groups of DBEs unless a waiver is sought and obtained from FTA. Staff recommends that SANDAG submit a waiver request to FTA to limit eligibility for meeting RC DBE contract goals to only those race/ethnic/gender groups for which the Disparity Study showed that there were substantial disparities (underutilization).

2 Public Participation and Facilitation

In accordance with Public Participation Regulatory Requirements of Title 49 CFR Part 26, minority, women, local business associations, and community organizations within the SANDAG market area were consulted and provided an opportunity to review the goal analysis and provide input. SANDAG prepared Outreach Consultation letters advising the aforementioned business communities of the proposed DBE goal methodology and its availability for review and comment. SANDAG additionally conducted one-on-one meetings with industry and trade groups, including minority and women-specific groups and hosted a Small Business Public Facilitation Forum (public hearing) as part of this process.

All comments submitted/provided were carefully reviewed, however, none provided demonstrable evidence concerning the availability of disadvantaged and nondisadvantaged businesses (i.e., statistical and/or anecdotal evidence, etc.), the effects of discrimination on opportunities for DBEs, or SANDAG’s efforts to establish a level playing field for the participation of DBEs, to merit an adjustment to the goal in the Proposed Draft Amendment. The public participation process was conducted in conformance with 49 CFR Part 26.45. The public comments and responses may be referenced in Attachment 2.

In summary, the comments that were made most frequently during the public participation process include the following:

• Some solicitations need to be broken down into smaller procurements so small disadvantaged business enterprises may bid as prime contractors. This will ensure that more DBEs are able to perform the work. • Small businesses are unable to consistently obtain bonding and insurance for large dollar projects due to the downturn in the economy. • The current economy and financial institution restrictions have made it more difficult for small businesses to obtain financing. • Many small firms are not knowledgeable about the DBE program and the benefits that can be realized by becoming DBE certified. • The DBE certification process takes too long. • Agencies need to include strong contract language requiring prime contractors to use DBEs listed in their bid.

Staff plans to assess all recommendations and make enhancements to the program where it is feasible and legal to do so. Specific responses from staff to the public's comments also can be found in Attachment 2.

Next Steps

Upon Board of Directors approval of the Final Proposed Amendment to FTA Overall DBE Goal- Setting Methodology for the FFY 2010 to FFY 2012 goal period, SANDAG will seek a waiver for limited application and approval from FTA.

3 Effective March 3, 2010, USDOT issued a new final rule affecting the implementation and management of the USDOT DBE program. The new rule, which amends the current provision requiring annual submission of DBE goals and methodology, now requires submission of a DBE goal and goal-setting methodology that will be valid for a three-year period. Pursuant to this final rule, SANDAG is still required to conduct an annual review of its FTA DBE goal to account for changes that may warrant an adjustment; however, once the goal-setting methodology is established, it will be valid for a three-year period.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Final Proposed Amendment to FTA Overall DBE Goal-Setting Methodology for FFY 2010-FFY 2012 Goal Period 2. Final Proposed Amendment to FTA DBE Goal-Setting Methodology for FFY 2010- FFY 2012: Public Comments and Responses

Key Staff Contact: Elaine Richardson, (619) 699-6956, [email protected]

4 Attachment 1

SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

FFiinnaall PPrrooppoosseedd AAmmeennddmmeenntt ttoo FFeeddeerraall TTrraannssiitt AAddmmiinniissttrraattiioonn ((FFTTAA)) OOvveerraallll DDBBEE GGooaall--SSeettttiinngg MMeetthhooddoollooggyy

ffoorr

FFFFYY 22001100--FFFFYY22001122 Goal Period

Submitted in fulfillment of:

Section 1101 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 26 and Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 22 [Docket No. OST–2010–0021]

This analysis is prepared exclusively for SANDAG; it is non-transferable and is not to be duplicated.

5 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 6 of 20

SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FINAL PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO OVERALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE GOAL AND METHODOLOGY FOR Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) Period 2010-12 (October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2012)

I. INTRODUCTION

The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) herein sets forth its Final Proposed Amendment to Overall Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Goal and corresponding federally prescribed goal-setting methodology for the three-year Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) goal period of 2010-12 (“Amendment”), pursuant to Section 1101 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users; 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 26 “Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in U.S. Department of Transportation Programs”; and the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) Master Agreement and Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 22 [Docket No. OST–2010–0021], February 3, 2010, rules and regulations. The purpose of the DBE goal-setting process is to level the playing field so that DBEs can compete fairly for Department of Transportation-assisted contracts, however, the program must be narrowly tailored in accordance with applicable law.

II. BACKGROUND

Effective March 3, 2010, the United States Department of Transportation (“U.S. DOT”) issued a new final rule affecting the implementation and management of the DBE program. The new rule, which effectively amends the current provision requiring annual submission of DBE goals and methodology, now requires submission of a goal-setting methodology on a three-year cycle. A copy of the applicable Federal Register is attached as Attachment 1. Pursuant to this final rule, SANDAG is still required to conduct an annual review to account for changes that may warrant an adjustment to the overall goal or make an adjustment based on changed circumstances (i.e., significant change in the legal standards governing the DBE program, new contracting opportunities presented by the availability of new or different grant opportunities, etc.) to ensure the goal and program as a whole are narrowly tailored throughout the goal period. Under the new schedule, SANDAG’s next DBE goal and methodology submission will not be due to FTA until August 12, 2012, however, due to SANDAG’s release of the Disparity Study report and corresponding results and recommendations1, SANDAG is proposing to amend its FFY 2010/11 Overall DBE Goal and potentially some of its DBE contracting practices to respond to the Disparity Study findings and recommendations.

1 In conformance with directives issued by the U.S. DOT Operating Administration (FTA), which required direct recipients to submit an Approach and Plan to conduct a Disparity and Availability study or an equivalent analysis to determine if specific and sufficient evidence of discrimination exists within SANDAG’s contracting program and jurisdiction, SANDAG became an active participant and funding partner of the Southern California Regional Disparity Study Consortium. SANDAG’s Board of Directors accepted the Disparity Study and its findings in March 2010.

6 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 7 of 20

SANDAG herein presents its Proposed Amendment to Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010-12.

III. FTA-ASSISTED CONTRACTING PROGRAM FOR FFY 2010-12

Table 1 represents SANDAG’s FTA-assisted defined contracting program, which includes thirteen (13) projects considered in preparing this Amendment. The 13 projects, which include both Construction and Professional Services contracting opportunities, have viable subcontracting possibilities and corresponding availability of DBEs, a required criterion for Overall Goal consideration, and are anticipated to be awarded within the respective goal period:

Table 1 Total Estimated Estimated Estimated Federal Dollar Federal Dollar Project No. Project Name Project Share of Share of Cost Construction Professional Services Light Rail Vehicle (LRV) 1128600 Car Wash $895,000.00 $630,000.00 $0.00 (Replacement/Design) OCS Insulator & Catch 1129200 $550,000.00 $259,000.00 $0.00 Cable Replacement System Grade Crossing 1129300 $578,000.00 $462,000.00 $0.00 Replacement San Luis Rey Transit 1143600 $1,495,000.00 $1,155,000.00 $0.00 Center Blue Line Crossover & 1210020 $10,000,000.00 $9,500,000.00 $0.00 Signals System Station Platforms - Eric (Green 1210070 $8,380,000.00 $1,313,000.00 $0.00 & Orange Line Upgrades)

1240001 Mid-City Rapid Bus $19,550,000.00 $9,000,000.00 $0.00

Vehicle Assist 1280507 Automation/Bus on $15,108,000.00 $5,500,000.00 $0.00 Shoulder Service Software application development 23006 $366,741.00 $0.00 $293,392.80 (Modeling and Research) Survey Analysis - Travel Behavior Survey 23011 $350,020.00 $0.00 $280,016.00 (Modeling and Research)

7 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 8 of 20

Total Estimated Estimated Estimated Federal Dollar Federal Dollar Project No. Project Name Project Share of Share of Cost Construction Professional Services Economic Analyses/Assessments 31005 $300,299.00 $0.00 $18,017.94 (Planning and Forecasts) Public Outreach 31005 Services (Planning and $275,000.00 $0.00 $16,500.00 Forecasts) Environmental Services (Sustainable 32000 $204,893.00 $0.00 $53,272.18 Development Strategies)

TOTAL $58,052,953.00 $27,819,000.00 $661,198.92

*Professional Service Contracts (shaded)

Table 2 provides a summary of work grouped by two (2) primary categories: Construction & Professional Services, utilizing the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) primary work categories. Table 2 also serves to identify the estimated Federal Dollar Share and the Percent of Federal funding, as follows:

Table 2 ESTIMATED % OF FEDERAL CONTRACT NAICS WORK FEDERAL DOLLAR FUNDING CATEGORY CATEGORIES2 SHARE (Rounded) Construction 237310 $27,819,000.00 97.68% Professional Services 541330 $661,198.92 2.32% TOTAL $28,480,198.92 100%

IV. GOAL METHODOLOGY

Step 1: Determination of a Base Figure (26.45)3

To establish SANDAG’s Base Figure of the relative availability of DBEs to all comparable firms (DBE and Non-DBEs) available to propose on SANDAG’s FFY 2010/12 FTA-assisted contracting opportunities projected to be solicited during the respective goal period, SANDAG followed one of the five prescribed federal goal-setting methodologies in accordance with 49 CFR Part 26 regulations. This was accomplished by accessing the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP) Directory of Certified DBE Firms and the 2007 U.S. Census Bureau County Business Patterns (CBP) Database. Comparisons were made within SANDAG’s market area (defined as Imperial, Riverside, and San Diego County) and by specified industries and types of businesses identified in Table 2.

2 Refer to Attachments I and II for corresponding detail of all work trades grouped under the primary NAICS Codes. 3 26.45 refers to Title 49 CFR Part 26 regulatory goal-setting methodology.

8 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 9 of 20

SANDAG’s local market area consists of the geographic area in which a substantial majority of SANDAG’s contracting dollars are expended and/or where the substantial majority of contractors and subcontractors bids or quotes are located.

SANDAG made a concerted effort to ensure that the scope of businesses included in the numerator was as close as possible to the scope included in the denominator. For corresponding detail of all work category classifications grouped, refer to Attachments I and II.

Ö For the numerator: California UCP DBE Database of Certified Firms Ö For the denominator: 2007 U.S. Census Bureau’s Business Pattern Database (CBP)

To determine the relative availability of DBEs, SANDAG divided the numerator4 representing the ratio of ready, willing, and able DBE firms, by the denominator5 representing all firms (DBE and Non-DBEs) available in each work category. Application of this formula yielded the following baseline information:

Number of Ready, Willing, and Able DBEs = BASE FIGURE Number of All Available Firms (including DBEs and Non-DBEs)

The Base Figure was further weighted by contract type and corresponding contract value. The Base Figure resulting from this weighted calculation is as follows:

Step 1: Base Figure (weighted by type of work to be performed and corresponding contracting dollars)

Construction Professional Services

Base Figure = 97.68% (DBEs in NAICS 237310*) + 2.32% (DBEs in NAICS 541330*) CBPs of all Firms in NAICS 237310** CBPs of all firms in NAICS 541330**

Base Figure = .9768 (492) + .0232 (273) 12,378 5,367

Base Figure = .9768 (.0397) + .0232 (.0509)

Base Figure = .0388 + .0012

Base Figure = (.0400) 100 = 4.00%

* For additional NAICS codes from the CUCP DBE Directory, refer to Attachment I. ** For additional NAICS codes, refer to Attachment II.

4 Numerator represents all certified DBE firms established within SANDAG’s market area that are ready, willing, and able to work for SANDAG. 5 Denominator represents all comparable established firms ready, willing, and able to work for SANDAG.

9 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 10 of 20

Step 2: Adjusting the Base Figure

Upon establishing the Base Figure, SANDAG reviewed and assessed other known evidence potentially impacting the relative availability of DBEs within SANDAG’s market area, in accordance with prescribed narrow tailoring provisions set forth under 49 CFR Part 26.45 Step 2; DBE Goal Adjustment guidelines.

Evidence considered in making an adjustment to the Base Figure included SANDAG’s Disparity Study, Past DBE Goal Attainments, its Bidders List6, and Other Evidence, as follows:

A. Disparity Study Base Figure

As stated above, SANDAG commissioned a Disparity Study to be conducted as a member and funding partner of the Southern California Regional Disparity Study Consortium in order to assess whether or not discrimination exists within SANDAG’s marketplace and the effects therein. The Final Draft Disparity Study was released and published for public comment in November 2009. SANDAG also held a public hearing to collect anecdotal evidence and input from the public. The Disparity Study was finalized in late January 2010 and accepted by SANDAG’s Board of Directors in March 2010. The Disparity Study included the development of a Base Figure (relative availability of ready, willing, and able DBEs) based on availability data gathered during the Disparity Study period. SANDAG has incorporated the Disparity Study recommended Base Figure of 9.4% as an adjustment to SANDAG’s established Step 1 Base Figure of 4.00% (based on current relative availability of DBEs participating on SANDAG’s FTA-assisted contracting program) using the methodology discussed below.

Disparity Study Base Figure 9.40%

SANDAG is proposing to adjust the Step 1 Base Figure by adding both the Step 1 Base Figure and the Disparity Study Base Figure together and dividing them by two to calculate the average, to assess whether the Step 1 Base Figure would require further adjustment. The result of this formula is as follows:

Step 1 Base Figure (4.00%) + Disparity Study Base Figure (9.4%) = ADJUSTED BASE FIGURE 2

Formula

Step 1 Base Figure: 4.00% Disparity Study Base Figure: + 9.40% 13.40%

13.40% ÷ 2 = 6.70% Adjusted Base Fi

The formula resulted in a proposed upward adjustment to the Step 1 Base Figure from 4.00% to 6.70%.

6 The Bidders List is the list of firms that have historically submitted a bid or proposal to SANDAG.

10 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 11 of 20

B. Past DBE Goal Attainments

The table below reflects the demonstrated capacity of DBEs (measured by actual historical DBE participation attainments) on FTA-assisted contracts awarded by SANDAG within the last three (3) federal fiscal years:

Table 3 FTA DBE Goal FTA DBE Goal Attainment % Total DBE Attainment % Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) (Professional Attainment (A+B) (Construction) Services) (C) (A) (B) 1 2007/08 0.11% 7.02% 7.13% 2 2008/09 0.71% 6.94% 7.65% 3 2009/10 (to date) 2.88% 4.49% 7.37% TOTAL 3.70% 18.45% 22.15%

Average DBE Attainment Within the Last three 3.70% = 1.23% 18.45% = 6.15% 22.15% = 7.38% (3) Years 3 3 3

As historical DBE participation attainments provide demonstrable evidence of DBE availability and capacity to perform, SANDAG proceeded to calculate past DBE participation attainments for the three (3) federal fiscal years, for which SANDAG has DBE attainment data. The Adjusted Base Figure and Total Average DBE Attainment were added and divided by two to determine the average and to assess whether the Adjusted Base Figure would require further adjustment. The results of this formula follows:

Adjusted Base Figure (6.70%) + Total Average DBE Attainment (7.38%) = ADJUSTED BASE FIGURE 2

Formula

Adjusted Base Figure 6.70% Total Average DBE Attainment + 7.38% 14.08%

14.08% ÷ 2 = 7.04% ADJUSTED BASE FIGURE

The formula resulted in a further proposed adjustment (upward) to the Adjusted Base Figure from 6.70% to 7.04%.

C. SANDAG’s Bidders List

While SANDAG’s Vendor/Consultant and Plan holder databases were assessed and utilized to verify SANDAG’s market area, SANDAG’s database is currently undergoing refinement to facilitate analysis

11 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 12 of 20 by contract type and corresponding NAICS codes. Therefore, SANDAG does not plan to make an adjustment to the Adjusted Base Figure based on the Bidders List. SANDAG will continue to capture the required information from all bidders/proposers at the time of bid/proposal submission and will utilize such information in future Overall DBE Goal-setting analysis.

D. Evidence from Disparity Studies Barriers to Entry: Employment, Self Employment, Education and Training, Business Ownership Rates, and Access to Capital

The Disparity Study suggests that there are certain barriers affecting entry of minorities and women into the Southern California construction and engineering industries. These barriers begin with education and continue through occupation advancement and business ownership. However, the Disparity Study did not quantify barriers to entry sufficiently for SANDAG to propose making any further adjustment to the Base Figure at this time.

E. Other Available Evidence

As part of 45-day public facilitation process, SANDAG issued a Public Notice and sent out nine invitations to organizations within its market area to provide information concerning the availability of disadvantaged and nondisadvantaged businesses and the effects of discrimination on opportunities for DBEs. SANDAG hosted a Public Forum and additionally, met face-to-face with six (6) community organizations that represented minority, women, and general contractor groups to solicit their input on SANDAG’s Proposed Amended Overall Goal for FFY 2010-2012, the corresponding federal prescribed methodology, as well as SANDAG’s proposed waiver of limited application. These outreach and public facilitation efforts were undertaken by SANDAG to assess whether an adjustment to the Base Figure is warranted based on input received from this process. Please refer to the Section VI. Public Participation and Facilitation of this report and corresponding attachments for additional information and comments received.

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO OVERALL DBE GOAL:

The Final Proposed Amendment to SANDAG’s Overall DBE Goal for FFY 2010-12 for its FTA-assisted contracts is 7.04%. The Final Overall DBE goal was further weighted by each contracting category (Construction and Professional Services) based on the percent of federal funding anticipated to be received during for the goal period. The result of this application follows:

CONSTRUCTION (97.68% of federal funding)

Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal: 7.04% % of Federal Funding FFY 2010/12: x 97.68% 6.88%

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (2.32% of federal funding)

Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal: 7.04% % of Federal Funding FFY 2010/12: x 2.32% 0.16%

12 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 13 of 20

The proposed goal further serves to identify the relative availability of DBEs based on evidence of ready, willing, and able DBEs to all comparable firms, which are known to be available to compete for and perform on SANDAG’s FTA-assisted contracts. The proposed goal is intended to reflect a determination of the level of DBE participation, which would be expected to participate in SANDAG’s FTA-assisted contracts absent the effects of discrimination.

PROPOSED RACE-CONSCIOUS AND RACE-NEUTRAL PROJECTIONS:

As a part of the prescribed goal-setting methodology, SANDAG must ascertain the percentage of its Proposed Amendment to Overall DBE Goal that can be met utilizing race-neutral (RN) and race-conscious (RC) measures. To ascertain what these required projections may be, SANDAG considered two principle factors, historical RN DBE attainments on its FTA-assisted contracts, as well as historical attainment trends as tangible evidence of the amount it is presumably able to achieve race-neutrally (the percentage of the amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal that would not require the application of numeric goals to drive DBE participation). To perform this analysis, SANDAG first assessed the past three (3) federal fiscal years’ RN DBE attainments of the two primary FTA-assisted contracting work categories (Construction and Professional Services), which contain similar FTA-assisted contracts to those anticipated to be solicited and awarded by SANDAG within the respective goal period. Secondly, the average attainment was calculated utilizing the formula stipulated in the table that follows:

Table 4 FTA DBE Goal FTA DBE Goal

Attainment % Attainment % Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) (Construction) (Professional

(A) Services) (B) 1 2007/08 (Race-Neutral) 0.11% 7.02% 2 2008/09 (Race-Neutral) 0.71% 6.94% 3 2009/10 (Race-Neutral) 2.88% 4.49% TOTAL 3.70% 18.45%

Average DBE Attainment Within the Last three 3.70% = 1.23% 18.45% = 6.15% (3) Years 3 3

As reflected in Table 4 above, SANDAG achieved an average of 1.23% RN DBE attainment for its FTA-assisted Construction contracts and 6.15% RN DBE attainment for its Professional Service contracts.

Additionally, based on the RN DBE attainment trend depicted in Table 4 for construction, SANDAG’s RN DBE attainments increased by 2.17% (from 0.71% to 2.88%) between FFY 2008/09 to 2009/10 (hereinafter referred to as the attainment trend factor). SANDAG is required by law to meet the maximum feasible portion of its Overall DBE Goal by utilizing race-neutral means. Accordingly, SANDAG proposes to use the attainment trend factor to determine the percentage of its DBE goal it

13 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 14 of 20 can expect to meet using RN methods. Effects of the application of this factor are further assessed in the RN and RC projections for this category of work in the table below.

RACE CONSCIOUS PROJECTION FOR CONSTRUCTION

In the table below, SANDAG weighted the percentage of FTA-assisted funding anticipated in the forthcoming goal period for the Construction category, which represents 97.68% of the anticipated FTA funding. This resulted in a weighted DBE Goal for Construction of 6.88% of the Proposed Overall DBE Goal. The RC and RN anticipated projections for the Construction category would be determined as follows:

RACE-CONSCIOUS AND RACE-NEUTRAL PROJECTION FOR CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY

Proposed Overall DBE Goal: 7.04% % Of Federal Funding FFY 2010/12: x 97.68% 6.88%

Construction Component of Proposed DBE Goal %: 6.88% Avg. Past Race-Neutral DBE Attainment for Construction: - 1.23% 5.65%

Race-Conscious Projection Based on Avg. Attainments: 5.65% Race-Neutral Attainment Trend Factor: - 2.17% 3.48%

RACE-CONSCIOUS PROJECTION = 3.48%

RACE-NEUTRAL PROJECTION = 3.40% (Sum of average attainment and attainment trend factor 1.23 + 2.17)

SANDAG projects to meet 3.48% of its 7.04% overall goal by setting RC DBE goals for its FTA-assisted construction contracts and the remainder of the goal would be met using the RN methods discussed in Section V of this Amendment.

RACE-CONSCIOUS PROJECTION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

In the table below, SANDAG weighted the percentage of FTA-assisted funding anticipated in the forthcoming goal period for the Professional Service contracting category, which represents 2.32% of the anticipated FTA funding. This resulted in a weighted DBE Goal for Professional Services of 0.16% of the amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal. The race-conscious and race-neutral anticipated projections for the Professional Services category were determined as follows:

14 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 15 of 20

RACE-CONSCIOUS AND RACE-NEUTRAL PROJECTION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CATEGORY

Proposed Overall DBE Goal: 7.04% % Of Federal Funding FFY 2010/12: x 2.32% 0.16%

Professional Services Component of Proposed DBE Goal %: 0.16% Avg. Past Race-Neutral DBE Attainment for Prof. Services: - 6.15% -5.99%7

RACE-CONSCIOUS PROJECTION = 0%

RACE-NEUTRAL PROJECTION = 0.16%

SANDAG projects to meet all of its 7.04% overall goal for its FTA-assisted professional services contracts using the RN methods discussed in Section V of this Amendment.

SANDAG plans to continue to monitor these projections throughout the goal period and would make adjustments as necessary based on DBE attainments and/or the implementation of additional race neutral measures.

Application of Disparity Index to Race-Conscious Component of Proposed Goal

The Disparity Study calculated a disparity index based on the relative utilization and availability of minority- and women-owned firms. The disparity index in the Disparity Study is based on FTA-funded contracts during the period of May 2006 through December of 2007 when SANDAG was operating its FTA DBE program using solely race neutral methods (“Race Neutral Period”). A disparity index below 80 for a particular race/ethnic/gender group has been deemed by some courts to constitute a “substantial disparity”. Based on the results of the disparity index, which are discussed further below, SANDAG is proposing to apply the race conscious portion of its DBE Program only to those groups that have been historically underutilized according to the Disparity Study. FTA does not allow a program to be tailored to only certain groups of DBEs unless a waiver is sought and obtained from FTA.

SANDAG plans to proceed with the waiver application request process to effectively tailor its race-conscious component of the goal to those groups which were identified as having substantial disparities during the Race Neutral period. Based on the Disparity Study, the following groups had a disparity index below 80:

7 Negative percentages changed to 0% as it is not possible to have negative RN projections.

15 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 16 of 20

RACE/ETHNIC/GENDER GROUPS DISPARITY INDEX Women-owned firms 8 African American owned-firms 76 Subcontinent Asian American-owned firms 0 Hispanic American-owned firms 12 Native American-owned firms 0

V. RACE-NEUTRAL MEASURES

SANDAG is currently implementing a number of race and gender neutral remedies and partners with other organizations serving small businesses in the Southern California region to outreach and promote participation of DBEs in SANDAG’s FTA-assisted contracting program. SANDAG must attempt to meet the maximum feasible portion of its Overall DBE Goal by utilizing race neutral means. SANDAG plans to implement the following race neutral measures for FFY 2010/2011 and will continue to explore other options for consideration in FFY 2011/2012 based on SANDAG’s success in meeting its overall DBE goals based on these efforts:

• SANDAG will arrange solicitations, times for the presentation of bids, quantities, specifications, and delivery schedules in ways that facilitate participation by DBE and other small businesses (e.g., unbundling large contracts to make them more accessible to small businesses, requiring or encouraging prime contractors to subcontract portions of work that they might otherwise perform with their own forces). Planned race neutral measures include holding prebid conferences for the SANDAG federally aided projects, which include a networking component to promote teaming opportunities between prospective prime contractors and the DBE and small business contracting community.

• Providing assistance in overcoming limitations, such as inability to obtain bonding or financing (e.g., by such means as simplifying the bonding process, reducing bonding requirements, and providing services to help DBEs and other small businesses obtain bonding and financing). Planned race-neutral measures include referring the DBE and small business contracting community through the SANDAG Web site to the Small Business Administration (SBA) bonding assistance program, via the California Construction Contracting Program (CCCP) and its technical counselors.

• Providing technical assistance and other services to potential proposers and bidders.

• Carrying out information and communication programs on contracting procedures and specific contract opportunities (e.g., ensuring the inclusion of DBEs and other small businesses on recipient mailing lists of bidders; ensuring the dissemination to bidders on prime contracts of lists of potential subcontractors). Planned race neutral measures include soliciting DBEs and small businesses within the SANDAG defined market area utilizing any or all of the following means: issuing solicitation flyers/letters to promote upcoming bid opportunities through e-mail blasts, postcards, Web site posting, fax blasts, electronic vendor database system, etc.

16 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 17 of 20

• Implementing a supportive services program to develop and improve immediate and long-term business management, record keeping, and financial and accounting capability for DBEs and other small businesses. The planned race neutral measure includes providing educational and technical assistance through the San Diego Contracting Opportunity Center.

• Providing services to help DBEs and other small businesses, improve long-term development, increase opportunities to participate in a variety of types of work, handle increasingly significant projects, and achieve eventual self-sufficiency. Planned race neutral measures include co-sponsoring Caltrans District 11 Calmentor Program for small firms that are in the Architecture and Engineering (A&E) categories. The Calmentor program establishes a mentoring program that pairs small businesses with large firms. The goal is to enhance small business operations to achieve their growth potential and also to create more small business opportunities and provide more meaningful participation on transportation projects.

• Ensuring distribution of the Caltrans DBE directory, through print and electronic means, to the widest feasible universe of potential prime contractors. Planned race neutral measures include advising the contracting community of the availability of the CUCP database (directory of certified DBEs) Web site at http://www.californiaucp.com/index.html. SANDAG also has established an online electronic vendor registration and procurement management system that indicates firms with DBE certification, as well as other small certifications to interested prime contractors.

• Assisting DBEs, and other small businesses, to develop their capability to utilize emerging technology and conduct business through electronic media. SANDAG has launched an online vendor requisition system through PlanetBids. By utilizing this system, the list of consultants, contractors, and vendors may be accessed by numerous public agencies. The consultants, contractors, and vendors themselves also can access information on upcoming training classes, upcoming business opportunities, DBE certification process and approval, and significant small business outreach events.

Additionally, SANDAG will participate in and/or co-sponsor the following events during FFY 2010/2011:

EVENT # OF ATTENDEES

Caltrans Procurement Fair More than 300

San Diego Regional Operation Opportunity for More than 200 Small Businesses

Submarine Sandwiches for Subcontractors More than 500 (Subs 4 Subs)

Paths for Partnerships More than 800

Cal Mentor – A&E Small Business Mentor Protégé More than 100 Program, over 30 pairings

17 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 18 of 20

SANDAG additionally attends many other small business outreach events to promote its FTA-assisted contracting program.

The Disparity Study listed additional contracting opportunities that could potentially be used in SANDAG’s Race Neutral program. SANDAG is evaluating these programs to ensure that they meet the requirements of SANDAG’s federal funding agencies.

• Subcontracting minimum. For each contract above a certain dollar amount, SANDAG would set a percentage to be subcontracted based on analysis of the work to be performed and experience from similar contracts (different types of projects involve relatively greater or smaller amounts of subcontracting). For some contracts, SANDAG would set a 0 percent Mandatory Subcontracting Minimum (MSM) or just no MSM. Prime contractors bidding on the contract would need to subcontract a percentage of the work equal to or exceeding the minimum for their bids to be deemed responsive.

• Small business subcontracting program. SANDAG could consider expanding its small business program to include subcontracting goals for certified small businesses. SANDAG might set goals and evaluate contractor compliance using the same processes provided for in the federal DBE program.

VI. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND FACILITATION

In accordance with Public Participation Regulatory Requirements of Title 49 CFR Part 26.45 and 26.15, SANDAG engaged in numerous outreach activities and a public forum to solicit input from minority and women professional industry organizations and the general contracting community regarding SANDAG’s Proposed Amended Overall DBE Goal for the FFY 2010-12, the corresponding federally prescribed methodology, as well as SANDAG’s consideration of submitting a waiver of limited application to U.S. DOT. The limited application waiver enables SANDAG to narrowly tailor the race conscious component of the program to the Underutilized Disadvantaged Business Enterprise groups identified by the Disparity Study.

Please refer to Attachment 2 for a summary of outreach efforts undertaken by SANDAG as a part of the public facilitation process.

18 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 19 of 20

ATTACHMENT I SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) PROPOSED OVERALL DBE GOAL FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2010/12 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NUMERATOR:

# OF ESTABLISHED DBE FIRMS BY NAICS WORK CATEGORIES WITHIN SANDAG's MARKET AREA (DEFINED AS IMPERIAL, RIVERSIDE & SAN DIEGO COUNTY)3

CONSTRUCTION: BY CORRESPONDING ZIP CODE

NAICS CODE NAICS DESCRIPTION 919 920 921 922 925 928 TOTAL 221310 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems 1 3 1 1 1 1 8 221330 Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply 000000 0 236210 Industrial Building Construction 678037 31 Commercial and Institutional Building 236220 4590610 34 Construction Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures 237110 344243 20 Construction Power and Communication Line and Related 237130 200000 2 Structures Construction 237310 Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction 798097 40 237990 324286 25 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction Poured Concrete Foundation and Structure 238110 364335 24 Contractors 238120 254331 18 Structural Steel and Precast Concrete Contractors 238130 Framing Contractors 111010 4 238140 Masonry Contractors 131010 6 238150 Glass and Glazing Contractors 001001 2 238160 Roofing Contractors 310011 6 Other Foundation, Structure, and Building 238190 011103 6 Exterior Contractors Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring 238210 565287 33 Installation Contractors Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning 238220 546000 15 Contractors 238290 Other Building Equipment Contractors 201010 4 238310 Drywall and Insulation Contractors 243002 11 238320 Painting and Wall Covering Contractors 303013 10 238330 Flooring Contractors 211002 6 238340 Tile and Terrazzo Contractors 001000 1

19 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 20 of 20

238910 Site Preparation Contractors 3155 3 5 8 39 238990 All Other Specialty Trade Contractors 13 23 23 3 6 12 80 321911 Wood Window and Door Manufacturing 000000 0 Prefabricated Metal Building and Component 332311 000000 0 Manufacturing 332322 Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing 101000 2 All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal 332999 001001 2 Product Manufacturing 335921 Fiber Optic Cable Manufacturing 000000 0 Other Communication and Energy Wire 335929 000000 0 Manufacturing 336510 Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing 000000 0 339950 Sign Manufacturing 000101 2 Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel 423310 000000 0 Merchant Wholesalers Brick, Stone, and Related Construction Material 423320 000010 1 Merchant Wholesalers Roofing, Siding, and Insulation Material 423330 000000 0 Merchant Wholesalers Other Construction Material Merchant 423390 003002 5 Wholesalers Other Commercial Equipment Merchant 423440 000000 0 Wholesalers Electrical Apparatus and Equipment, Wiring 423610 Supplies, and Related Equipment Merchant 021110 5 Wholesalers Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant 423690 000010 1 Wholesalers

423860 Transportation Equipment and Supplies (except 002000 2 Motor Vehicle) Merchant Wholesalers 485111 Mixed Mode Transit Systems 000111 3 485112 Commuter Rail Systems 000100 1 485113 Bus and Other Motor Vehicle Transit Systems 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 485119 Other Urban Transit Systems 000100 1 485210 Interurban and Rural Bus Transportation 000010 1 All Other Transit and Ground Passenger 485999 000010 1 Transportation 488210 Support Activities for Rail Transportation 000011 2 488490 001100 2 Other Support Activities for Road Transportation 488999 All Other Support Activities for Transportation 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 561730 Landscaping Services 143023 13 561790 Other Services to Buildings and Dwellings 0 1 2 0 0 3 6 TOTAL NUMBER OF ESTABLISHED DBE FIRMS 76 110 115 27 71 93 492

20 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 21 of 20

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: BY CORRESPONDING ZIP CODE NAICS CODE NAICS DESCRIPTION 919 920 921 922 925 928 TOTAL 541310 Architectural Services 0 4 10 0 0 2 16 541320 Landscape Architectural Services 006100 7 541330 Engineering Services 49323720 75 541380 Testing Laboratories 013003 7 541511 Custom Computer Programming Services 1514105 26 541512 Computer Systems Design Services 2415009 30 541620 Environmental Consulting Services 010193 512 49 Other Scientific and Technical Consulting 541690 05141411 35 Services Research and Development in the Social Sciences 541720 013010 5 and Humanities 541820 Public Relations Agencies 3 3 13 0 1 3 23 TOTAL NUMBER OF ESTABLISHED DBE FIRMS 10 42 129 9 18 65 273

3: DATA SOURCE: California UCP DBE Database of Certified Firms.

21 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 22 of 20

ATTACHMENT II SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) PROPOSED OVERALL DBE GOAL FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2010/12

ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DENOMINATOR:

# OF ALL ESTABLISHED FIRMS (DBEs and Non-DBEs) BY NAICS WORK CATEGORIES WITHIN SANDAG's MARKET AREA (DEFINED AS IMPERIAL, RIVERSIDE & SAN DIEGO COUNTY)4

CONSTRUCTION: BY CORRESPONDING COUNTY TOTAL NAICS NAICS DESCRIPTION IMPERIAL RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO CODE 221310 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems 2 19 20 41 221330 Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply 001 1 236210 Industrial Building Construction 2 37 39 78 Commercial and Institutional Building 236220 12 263 439 714 Construction Water and Sewer Line and Related 237110 39774174 Structures Construction Power and Communication Line and 237130 4384486 Related Structures Construction 237310 45688148 Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction 237990 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construc 44037 81 Poured Concrete Foundation and Structure 238110 9 233 233 475 Contractors Structural Steel and Precast Concrete 238120 1253561 Contractors 238130 Framing Contractors 089112 201 238140 Masonry Contractors 0 152 182 334 238150 Glass and Glazing Contractors 14768 116 238160 Roofing Contractors 3 110 173 286 Other Foundation, Structure, and Building 238190 2306698 Exterior Contractors Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring 238210 20 527 764 1,311 Installation Contractors Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning 238220 29 559 774 1,362 Contractors 238290 Other Building Equipment Contractors 03553 88 238310 Drywall and Insulation Contractors 7 203 227 437 238320 Painting and Wall Covering Contractors 4 240 463 707 238330 Flooring Contractors 293216 311 238340 Tile and Terrazzo Contractors 2 148 187 337 238350 Finish Carpentry Contractors 7 183 274 464

22 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 23 of 20

238390 Other Building Finishing Contractors 34092 135 238910 Site Preparation Contractors 13 266 290 569 238990 All Other Specialty Trade Contractors 12 316 405 733 321911 Wood Window and Door Manufacturing 081422 Prefabricated Metal Building and 332311 05 510 Component Manufacturing 332322 Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing 02633 59 All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal 332999 0263056 Product Manufacturing 335921 Fiber Optic Cable Manufacturing 01 2 3 Other Communication and Energy Wire 335929 00 00 Manufacturing 336510 Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing 00 0 0 339950 Sign Manufacturing 12864 93 Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood 423310 14284127 Panel Merchant Wholesalers Brick, Stone, and Related Construction 423320 4325187 Material Merchant Wholesalers Roofing, Siding, and Insulation Material 423330 3102235 Merchant Wholesalers Other Construction Material Merchant 423390 2203759 Wholesalers Other Commercial Equipment Merchant 423440 1144358 Wholesalers Electrical Apparatus and Equipment, Wiring 423610 Supplies, and Related Equipment Merchant 5 62 139 206 Wholesalers Other Electronic Parts and Equipment 423690 5 58 282 345 Merchant Wholesalers Transportation Equipment and Supplies 423860 (except Motor Vehicle) Merchant 1103041 Wholesalers 485111 Mixed Mode Transit Systems 00 0 0 485112 Commuter Rail Systems 0 0 1 1 Bus and Other Motor Vehicle Transit 485113 341118 Systems 485119 Other Urban Transit Systems 0 0 1 1 485210 Interurban and Rural Bus Transportation 11 35 All Other Transit and Ground Passenger 485999 021517 Transportation 488210 03 36 Support Activities for Rail Transportation Other Support Activities for Road 488490 5312157 Transportation All Other Support Activities for 488999 01 23 Transportation 561730 Landscaping Services 8 559 911 1,478 561790 Other Services to Buildings and Dwellings 4 84 155 243

TOTAL NUMBER OF ESTABLISHED FIRMS 190 4,873 7,315 12,378

23 SANDAG FTA – Amended Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2010/12 Page 24 of 20

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: BY CORRESPONDING COUNTY TOTAL NAICS NAICS DESCRIPTION IMPERIAL RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO CODE 541310 Architectural Services 5 92 357 454 541320 Landscape Architectural Services 0 47 117 164 541330 Engineering Services 16 263 961 1,240 541380 Testing Laboratories 1 23 75 99 541511 Custom Computer Programming Services 3 142 864 1,009 541512 Computer Systems Design Services 3 99 615 717 541620 Environmental Consulting Services 0 43 105 148 Other Scientific and Technical Consulting 541690 12 287 1,045 1,344 Services Research and Development in the Social 541720 04 6367 Sciences and Humanities 541820 Public Relations Agencies 1 16 108 125 TOTAL NUMBER OF ESTABLISHED FIRMS 41 1,016 4,310 5,367

4: DATA SOURCE: 2007 U.S. Census Bureau: County Business Patterns, NAICS Work Category Codes.

24 Final Proposed Amendment to FTA DBE Goal Setting Methodology for FFY 2010-FFY 2012 Attachment 2 Public Comments and Responses

No. Date Name/Agency Comment Summary Response Summary 1 June 16, San Diego We are a resource specifically designed to work with small businesses that 2010 Contracting want to work in the government and private sector. We provide service Opportunities free of charge to small businesses that need one-on-one assistance in the Center certification process and understanding how to do business with a government entity.

Has research been done to determine how SANDAG’s DBE goal compares We are aware of other agency’s goals. As our projects are different to other agencies that have a DBE goal? from other agencies, there are no real apples to apples comparison for us to make on a year-to-year basis.

We suspect that DBE and non-DBE firms have decreased over the last few We plan to address the issue of a lengthy DBE certification process years due to bankruptcies, undercapitalization, and other things. We are with Caltrans and try to develop solutions that may expedite the hearing that to become DBE certified takes 9 months to a year due to process. furloughs and budget cuts at Caltrans. This inhibits firms that want to be DBE certified.

Many times, we have small firms come to us after they have submitted their applications and the forms are in shambles. The firms do not know SANDAG provides financial support to the San Diego Contracting where to go for assistance in the certification process. There are private Opportunities Center (SDCOC). The SDCOC provides assistance to certifiers that cost $3,000 and upwards. This can be a negative if a firm small businesses in training programs, certification, and networking. tells others about the high cost of certification assistance. We plan to do additional outreach in spreading the word about their services. It is difficult for small firms to obtain financing. The recession also has impacted business owners that may have to use their personal wealth to fund their business. Bonding and insurance also has become more SANDAG can review bonding and insurance contract language to difficult to purchase due to lost business, etc. make it more feasible for the small businesses to adhere to.

Small businesses choose the wrong NAICS codes as a description of their services. Additional guidance should be given to firms explaining the NAICS codes designation. SANDAG provides lists of NAICS codes that are used in the vendor database system. The lists are provided at all outreach events and are Project scopes should be broken into smaller pieces. This gives the available online. impression that the agency is small business friendly. Pre-bid meetings should be used as networking events. SANDAG allows time before and after a pre-bid/pre-proposal meeting to allow primes and subs to network with each other. Firms also are given the opportunity to state their name, type of work, and certification that they have in the introductory stage of the meeting.

25 No. Date Name/Agency Comment Summary Response Summary 2 June 16, Asian Business I have a concern with SANDAG’s calculation of past DBE goal SANDAG follows the prescribed FTA goal methodology in developing 2010 Association attainments. The goal was averaged over three years and that makes the the DBE goal. We do look at year-to-year trends in a subsequent number lower, we would prefer that you evaluate the increase in calculation. attainment from year-to-year. From 2008 to 2009, SANDAG increased attainment from .11% to 2.88%, this should be taken into account. The same calculation of averaging the Disparity Study percentage of 9.4% with the base figure results in a lower percentage. This does not seem to be a realistic. This may be indicative of the strong participation that we have The number of Asian-owned businesses has grown and receipts have experienced from Asian American firms. increased and the number of people employed by Asian firms has grown. SANDAG plans to explore using the ABA for posting of solicitations. One of the reasons that firms do not seek DBE certification is lack of knowledge. It is important to get the information out. The Asian Business Association (ABA) can assist you in posting upcoming contracts on our Web site, we have 4,000 members. To establish an Owners Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP) similar to I have heard that it is more difficult to obtain bonding and insurance for the Airport Authority, this would require a minimum of a $100 million small contractors. It may be helpful for SANDAG to develop a bonding construction program and SANDAG is not currently at this level of program similar to the Airport Authority. Also, encouraging prime funding. contractors to assist small business contractors with bonding and insurance.

SANDAG has a very comprehensive NAICS code list. SANDAG understands this concern, however we are required to use all firms unless we have evidence that these firms are not ready, willing, I do not think you can assume that just because a firm is on the Census and able to do business with SANDAG. list, that they are ready, willing, and able to work for SANDAG. At smaller firms, they may not have the resources to download RFP information, this should be a consideration. We plan to address the issue of a lengthy DBE certification process with Caltrans and try to develop solutions that may expedite the The DBE certification process takes too long. process. 3 June 16, Small Business I am a DBE and I prefer to enter into direct contracts with government DBE firms can submit their bids as primes and be counted towards the 2010 Facilitation entities rather than participate as a subcontractor. This means that when goal. The objective for the DBE program is to provide subcontracting Forum big contractors try to solicit my bids as a DBE I do not offer them. opportunities on SANDAG procurements. Small businesses that do not participate as subcontractors may experience missed opportunities. Yogen Dalal, Precise It is difficult to be awarded contracts when there is a requirement that the SANDAG has the ability to control the experience requirement and can Construction business have five years of continuous revenue above $5 million – evaluate contract language on smaller procurements to make it more Management especially in this economy. Would like to see larger contracts be broken feasible for small contractors. In terms of breaking procurements down into smaller ones along with a lower threshold for revenue down to smaller pieces, we use the Job Order Contracting (JOC) requirements. program to outreach to small construction subcontractors. 26 No. Date Name/Agency Comment Summary Response Summary 4 June 16, Small Business Had a question about the benefits of becoming a DBE and also interested Contractors are more likely to obtain work as a certified DBE in a race- 2010 Facilitation in knowing who polices the DBE program to make sure that DBEs are conscious program. SANDAG is recommending a program to our Forum actually getting the jobs. Board of Directors in July to include a race-conscious component for our FTA-funded construction contracts. SANDAG contracting staff Juan Hernandez, verifies whether a prime contractor is using and paying a DBE Buck Petroleum subcontractor to perform work as was listed on the bid/proposal. Company Posed a question asking if it would be possible for DBEs that do similar Yes, SANDAG encourages DBEs to team together or with other firms work to band together to bid on and execute work. to bid/propose on solicitations. It is possible for multiple DBEs to form a joint venture and bid on a project as a single entity. 5 June 16, Small Business We are having trouble getting any bids at all and one of the issues is the SANDAG encourages primes to limit subcontractor insurance and 2010 Facilitation high threshold for general liability. We do not have the financial strength, bonding requirement to the portion of the work they will perform. Forum capital, or collateral to qualify for the limits required by the project, so we Firms that are finding insurance and bonding to be a barrier on a are unable to participate. One prime contractor didn’t pay us for a job specific contract are encouraged to bring this to the SANDAG Mary Vallejos, and now we are on a payment plan to pay back debts – this has hurt our contracting officer’s attention. AR Engineering credit and our ability to receive bonding at more favorable rates. This Construction makes it hard to be competitive in your bids.

Another concern is the cost of mobilization to get ready to start a project Small firms are invited to attend pre-bid meetings at SANDAG to – we have heard that prime contractors offer assistance, however have network with the primes and determine whether they are willing to not seen this come through. assist with mobilization costs on a specific bid.

I am looking for another way to approach prime contractors, so that we SANDAG is not involved with the prime’s contractual relationship with can qualify to bid on the project. Maybe we can be an independent their subcontractors; however, we do encourage DBEs that have a contractor or employee vs. a traditional subcontractor so that we do not unique arrangement to propose to a prime, to do so. have to get the bonding and insurance ourselves.

Breaking up the solicitations into smaller projects is a really good idea as SANDAG utilizes various contracting methods, such as the JOC to this takes away the control from the larger prime contractors and levels break down contracts into smaller pieces. the playing field.

I see that prime contractors sometimes use their wife’s women-owned Evidence of an invalid DBE certification should be brought to the DBE to fulfill their DBE requirements. attention of Caltrans or any other certifying agency.

27 No. Date Name/Agency Comment Summary Response Summary 6 June 16, Small Business 95 percent of our business is with the federal government and although SANDAG is not permitted by the FTA to have “set asides” available for 2010 Facilitation we receive announcements from local agencies, it has not been worth our DBEs and small contractors. Forum effort to pursue those opportunities due to the difference in the way things work. At the federal level there are small business set asides that Bruce Goff, we successfully compete for and I do not see that in the SANDAG Geomorphis, program. If there are set asides then the small business can be prime LLC contractors and the larger businesses come to you to make deals.

I believe that this program will only work if there are strict requirements If there are race conscious goals set on an agreement and the (“teeth”) requiring the prime contractors to actually use the DBEs that contractor lists a DBE to perform work within the agreement, it is they say they will in the bid. considered a material breech if the DBE does not perform the work and the contractor can be terminated.

We receive faxes from large prime contractors requesting us to bid on Good faith effort requires several steps for a contractor to prove that a projects; however, we see that they are asking us to bid on the type of concerted effort was made to contact DBEs for bids on a project. work we do not provide. I am unsure of where these contractors receive Communication can occur by faxing and/or calling, if contact is not their lists, however many are inaccurate. This makes it feel like all the made, repeated attempt to contact DBEs must be documented. prime contactor is doing is checking off a box.

One way of encouraging prime contractors that proactively use DBEs is to SANDAG is a member of the Public Agency Consortium (PAC) that is recognize them. I recently did a public records request at the made up of numerous public agencies in the San Diego region. At the Water Authority to see who the winning teams were. I noticed that the Paths to Partnership outreach event, with over 1,000 people in teams who won actually did make more use of small business attendance, we recognized a general contractor and Architecture and subcontractors. Engineering (A&E) consultant for their contribution in using subcontractors on their projects. 7 June 16, Small Business Would like SANDAG to set aside a ceiling for a project and restrict the SANDAG is not permitted to have set asides for DBEs per the 2010 Facilitation bidding to DBEs only. requirement of the FTA funding provisions. Forum I have a concern about not being awarded a subcontract even if I am the Within the good faith effort review, a contractor is required to provide Ed Petil, Petil lowest bid among the DBEs. If the prime contractor already has a DBE bids received and their analysis of the bid. Any improprieties will be Construction & they are working with then they negotiate with them so that they discovered at this stage. SANDAG also is in agreement that the best Engineering, Inc. become the lowest bid. Larger businesses have the ability to bid low just method of increasing a small firm’s opportunities is in effective to keep their employees working. The best thing to do is network with networking with primes. the larger contractors.

Is interested in researching other DBEs in the region in order to possibly On the SANDAG Contracts Web site is a link to the California Unified work together to bid on projects. Certification Program (CUCP) that is the listing of all DBEs in California. In addition, SANDAG provides a list of DBEs specific to each procurement at the pre-bid/pre-proposal meeting.

28 No. Date Name/Agency Comment Summary Response Summary 8 June 16, Small Business Does the good faith effort require the prime contractor to actually call me Good faith effort requires several steps for a contractor to prove that a 2010 Facilitation for a bid? Do the primes receive a preference for hiring DBEs? concerted effort was made to contact DBEs for bids on a project. Forum Communication can occur by faxing and/or calling, if contact is not made, repeated attempt to contact DBEs must be documented. Primes Rebecca do not receive a preference for DBE participation. Aguilera, Diego & Son Printing It has been beneficial for us to obtain the DBE certification. They are very We appreciate your feedback, if this forum encourages you to become thorough and it really is a lot of work – the entire process took about DBE certified, we will have met one of our objectives. 6 to 7 months.

How does SANDAG address a situation when a DBE is awarded a project, SANDAG monitors DBE participation on a monthly basis. If a DBE but the prime does not send them any work? subcontractor is not awarded work anticipated on a contract, SANDAG will follow-up with the prime and work to ensure that the DBE receives work in compliance with the contract. 9 June 16, Small Business I just started my company and hearing all the comments in this forum has We appreciate your feedback, if this forum encourages you to become 2010 Facilitation been interesting, since I am in the process of learning all of these issues. It DBE certified, we will have met one of our objectives. Forum was very good information.

Virginia Partridge 10 June 16, Small Business Would like SANDAG to assign goals for various bid items and not just an SANDAG evaluates each bid and determines the various work 2010 Facilitation overall job goal. categories that will be required for the project. The work categories Forum are cross-referenced to the NAICS codes and an estimated percentage of work is assigned, this process results in the overall DBE goal. In Kevin Tipton, essence, specific bid item requirements are evaluated in order to Tipco develop the DBE goal. Engineering, Inc. 11 June 16, Small Business Would like to see SANDAG set aside up to $500, 000 to $1,000,000 SANDAG is not permitted to have set asides for DBEs per the FTA 2010 Facilitation projects for small businesses. funding provisions. Forum Many larger contractors have paid off their equipment and this makes SANDAG encourages primes to limit subcontractor insurance and Ahmad Rategh, them more competitive to be awarded projects. Obtaining bonding and bonding requirement to the portion of the work they will perform. Falcon insurance is about 10 times more difficult than it was 2 years ago. For Firms that are finding insurance and bonding to be a barrier on a Construction example, I have been required by the prime contractors to come up with specific contract are encouraged to bring this to the SANDAG Company $1,000,000 in bonding, which means that I must have $120,000 in the contracting officer’s attention. bank. This is difficult with the current economy.

29 No. Date Name/Agency Comment Summary Response Summary 12 June 17, Black The local and national Black Contractors Association believes that white The results of the SANDAG Disparity Study show that SANDAG has a 2010 Contractors females should not be eligible to receive DBE status nor be considered an much higher utilization of the African American-owned firms on our Association Underutilized DBE in SANDAG’s program. White female business owners contracts as compared to women-owned firms. are all too often the wives of white male contractors and since the economy has gone bad, these white males have used their wives as a front to get more business.

There are a lot of businesses under water that are not getting work; however, they are ready, willing, and able to do so.

We are trying to find out how to help our membership become DBE SANDAG offers “How to become DBE certified” information on our certified; however, are not sure what the resources might be. We have outreach flyers. This is a summary of the requirements of the DBE heard of companies that will charge a fee to assist, but it would be program and also the resources available to assist small businesses helpful if free resources existed. The black community perishes from lack with the certification process. SANDAG supports the San Diego of knowledge and if we can get information into their hands on how to Contracting Opportunities Center that can help the African American become certified, we can help them all get certified. It is an incentive to community free of charge with their certification paperwork. become certified if we know it will help them be more attractive to prime contractors.

Establishing a DBE goal creates an incentive for prime contractors to get SANDAG agrees with your vision that “DBE goals create partnerships more aggressive in their outreach to the trades, especially to with prime contractors and mandates from public agencies create African Americans who are particularly excluded from opportunities to bid successes for our community. “ on federal contracts. DBE goals create partnerships with prime contractors and mandates from public agencies create successes for our community.

It is tougher to get bonded because of the economy. Even large firms SANDAG encourages primes to limit the subcontractor bonding have had challenges with bonding due to reduced lines of credit. We are requirement to the portion of the work they will perform. Firms that looking for prime contractors that are willing to carry the bonds are finding insurance and bonding to be a barrier on a specific themselves. We have seen examples of this already but not enough. contract are encouraged to bring this to the SANDAG contracting officer’s attention. Smaller contractors in the black community would like to bid on projects as a prime contractor, however in order to do so the project would need SANDAG has small construction contracts that are under $250,000. It to be no more than $250,000 to $500,000 in value. is important to be registered in the SANDAG vendor database, so you are notified when the solicitations are advertised. Many prime contractors have used the same DBE subcontractors for 30 years and we do not think this will change to open up opportunities for The African American minority category is considered underutilized African Americans. We are on our way to Washington, DC because and as such will be considered in our race conscious program goal. African Americans are not benefiting from the stimulus money – the money is going to same firms and everyone is included except for black minorities.

30 No. Date Name/Agency Comment Summary Response Summary

13 June 17, National Across the board, regardless of the agency, women are a lower portion of The proposed FTA DBE goal takes into consideration that women are 2010 Association of the goal. considered underutilized and contract-specific DBE goals would Women in include women. Construction (NAWIC) I see more companies evaluating whether they meet the DBE The SANDAG small disadvantaged business outreach includes qualifications to become certified. The reason is that the government has disseminating the DBE certification requirements and the benefits of the money for contracting. Small firms are uninformed in the DBE becoming a DBE. SANDAG holds training workshops at the San Diego certification process. I think workshops would help get the word out, Contracting Opportunities Center. We also participate at several firms will discover how to qualify for government contracts. We have outreach events throughout the year that allow for discussion of how agencies present their program at our monthly meetings and SANDAG is to do business with SANDAG. We will schedule a presentation at one invited to participate at one of our meetings. of NAWIC’s monthly meetings.

The impact of the current economy to women-owned firms is that they As SANDAG has several procurements to offer to women-owned are still in business, they are cutting costs to remain in business, such as firms, it is important that they are familiar with registering in our the NAWIC membership. We see changes in the future, the firms will database to receive notices and to download our solicitations. once again be able to afford their membership. NAWIC helps mentor and be proactive in growing relationships.

Bonding is becoming more difficult for small businesses to purchase. SANDAG plans to explore bonding and insurance contract language Banks are looking a lot closer at the financial stability and keeping a that may be added or modified to address firms’ financial limitations. tighter rein on bonding. Insurance also is more difficult to purchase.

Best Value procurements, such as design-build, tend to develop SANDAG will be issuing the first design-build procurement within the partnerships of trust and long-term relationships between primes and first quarter of 2011. subs. This encourages more work and for the primes and subcontractors to work harmoniously with each other.

14 June 18, Associated Potential DBEs do not always want to deal with the paperwork that is DBE certification will be addressed with Caltrans to determine if any 2010 General involved to become certified. new programs to expedite the DBE certification process are in process. Contractors of America Our association communicates to our membership through our online SANDAG will evaluate a process to include providing our solicitations plan room and we provide a list of prime contractors who are seeking to the AGC online plan room. subcontractors.

The association is involved in a program with Caltrans that is trying to SANDAG plans to follow-up with Caltrans and AGC upon the improve DBE participation and find out what the barriers are. At this time, conclusion of this survey, as we would be very interested in this a survey is being conducted and it shows that inability to obtain bonding information. is a huge impediment for smaller businesses. We also are trying to find out how primes can best reach out to DBEs.

31 No. Date Name/Agency Comment Summary Response Summary 14 June 18, (Cont’d) 2010 Associated I believe that there is a partnership between the prime contractors and General DBEs. Both have to reach out. It should not be that the primes have SANDAG recognizes the issue of networking between primes and Contractors of 100% responsibility to search out for DBEs and just because you are DBEs. We have held co-sponsored A&E/Prime Contractor events with America certified should not mean that work is guaranteed. Prime contractors Caltrans. We also participate in the PAC’s four major networking want to hire these companies, but often do not know about them. It outreach events each year. Lastly we use each pre-bid/pre-proposal needs to be easier to match up primes and subcontractors. meeting as an opportunity for interested primes and subcontractors to network. We believe that DBE goals should be based on firms that are actually able to do the work and not those that simply state that they can do the work. Until this determination can be made, participation levels are not realistic. The DBE goals are based on certified DBEs listed in the CUCP that are There are instances when prime contractors call DBEs on a list and find qualified to do specific work. If firms are being listed that cannot do out that the firms do not do that kind of work. This is a waste of time for the work, we encourage firms to bring this to the attention of the everyone involved. There has to be a better way to determine who is SANDAG contracting officer. The goal is to include certified DBEs on actually out there in the different work categories. contracts that are federally funded.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-10 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – ACCEPT

DRAFT 2010 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION File Number 1500300 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, INCLUDING THE DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY DETERMINATION

Introduction Recommendation

SANDAG, serving as the region’s metropolitan The Transportation Committee planning organization (MPO), is required by state recommends that the SANDAG Board of and federal laws to develop and adopt a Regional Directors (1) accept for review and Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). The distribution the draft 2010 Regional RTIP is a multiyear program of proposed major Transportation Improvement Program, highway, arterial, transit, and nonmotorized including its air quality conformity analysis projects, including the TransNet Program of Projects. and the draft air quality conformity The current 2008 RTIP, adopted by the Board of redetermination of the 2030 Revenue Directors on July 25, 2008, covers the five-year Constrained Regional Transportation Plan: period FY 2009 through FY 2013. This Draft 2010 Pathways for the Future for a 30-day public RTIP, covering the period FY 2011 through FY 2015, comment period; and (2) schedule a public includes the programming of various federal, state, hearing for the September 3, 2010, TransNet, and other local funds. The final 2010 RTIP Transportation Committee meeting. is due to the state by October 1, 2010.

Attachment 1 provides an overview of the Draft 2010 RTIP by the different modes. Of the $10 billion program total, funding is programmed for highway projects (including Managed Lanes for high-occupancy vehicles (HOVs), bus rapid transit, and FasTrak® users), transit projects, local street and road projects, and other projects, such as bicycle/pedestrian facilities, transportation demand management, and transportation systems management. Federal and state funds account for about 46.1 percent of the total Draft 2010 RTIP.

One of the major components of the RTIP includes the state and federally funded transportation projects that are programmed in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP). At its February and May meetings, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) adopted the 2010 SHOPP and STIP, respectively. This Draft 2010 RTIP includes the CTC-adopted 2010 STIP- and SHOPP-funded projects for the San Diego region. State funds from Proposition 1B: Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, passed by voters in November 2006, also are included.

Discussion

RTIP Content

Federal and state regulations identify the process and required content of the RTIP. In general, the RTIP must include all major projects receiving certain categories of federal or state transportation funding, projects needing federal project approval, and/or projects identified as being regionally significant. This includes projects funded by the federal Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) formula and discretionary programs, and other federal sources, as well as projects funded by the STIP and SHOPP. As prescribed by the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the RTIP also includes the TransNet Program of Projects.

Background

On January 29, 2010, SANDAG transmitted a memorandum to all local agencies requesting project submittals for the 2010 RTIP. Submittals were to include new projects, project deletions, or changes to existing programmed project scopes, funding, or phasing. The project listings were due to SANDAG by April 2, 2010. Staff has reviewed the projects and conducted the required air quality conformity analysis for the projects included in the Draft 2010 RTIP. In addition, SANDAG is required to redetermine conformity of the 2030 Revenue Constrained Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future (2030 RTP) to ensure consistency between the long-range transportation plan and the transportation improvement program.

Federal funds programmed are based on the federal authorizing legislation, Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). SAFETEA-LU expired September 30, 2009, but was extended through December 31, 2010, via HR 2847, the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act, signed by the President on March 18, 2010. For the subsequent years (FY 2011 to FY 2015), continuation of the formula programs (for both FTA and Federal Highway Administration) is assumed. No assumptions are made with regard to any new discretionary program funding.

The list of projects proposed for the Draft 2010 RTIP is listed in Table 1 (Attachment 2). This list includes projects submitted by local agencies, transit agencies, Caltrans, and SANDAG, as well as other agencies that have transportation projects in the San Diego region.

Pursuant to Board Policy No. 031: TransNet Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Rules, local agencies are required to submit documentation by June 30, 2010, (in the form of a resolution) attesting to the approval by the local governing body for projects included in the RTIP. This process ensures that interested public parties and the local governing body are aware of the projects proposed to be included in the RTIP. The City of Lemon Grove is in the process of completing the required documentation, and council approval is anticipated prior to the scheduled July 23, 2010, Board of Directors action. Upon receipt of the signed resolution, the projects from Lemon Grove will be incorporated into the Draft 2010 RTIP.

2 Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC)

The ITOC reviewed the Draft 2010 RTIP at its meeting on July 14, 2010, focusing its review on the TransNet Program of Projects, including compliance with the TransNet Extension Ordinance and requirements of Board Policy No. 031: TransNet Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Rules. The ITOC did not have any comments regarding the Draft 2010 RTIP.

Air Quality Conformity Requirements

Federal regulations require that SANDAG conduct an air quality conformity analysis of all regionally significant projects that increase the transportation system capacity. This includes major local and privately funded projects and any other state or federally funded projects that might not otherwise appear in the RTIP, as well as new projects or major changes in the project scope for existing programmed project.

The draft quantitative emissions analyses for the Draft 2010 RTIP and for the conformity redetermination for the 2030 RTP have been conducted, and the draft results indicate that they meet the air quality conformity requirements (Attachment 3). The San Diego Region Conformity Working Group (CWG) reviewed the draft air quality conformity assessment at its June 9, 2010, meeting. There were no comments at that meeting. The CWG will be providing comments throughout the RTIP process.

Schedule

At its meeting on July 16, 2010, the Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors release the Draft 2010 RTIP for distribution for public review and comment, and schedule a public hearing at the September 3, 2010, Transportation Committee meeting. Pending the Transportation Committee’s recommendation in September, the Board of Directors will be requested to adopt the final 2010 RTIP and make its air quality conformity determination at its September 24, 2010, meeting.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Draft 2010 RTIP Program Summary – Summary of Major Projects by Mode 2. Table 1, Draft 2010 RTIP List of Proposed Projects 3. Draft Air Quality Conformity Analysis

Key Staff Contact: Sookyung Kim, (619) 699-6909, [email protected]

Note: Full copies of the Draft 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program will be available via the SANDAG Web site at www.sandag.org\2010RTIP. Hard copies also may be obtained by contacting the SANDAG Publications Hotline at (888) 707-7827.

3 Attachment 1

DRAFT 2010 RTIP Program Summary Summary of Major Projects by Mode (in $000s)

LOCAL/ DESCRIPTION FEDERAL STATE TransNet PRIVATE TOTAL

Highway Projects I-5 (HOV/Managed Lanes/Lomas Santa Fe) $48,474 $48,826 $78,304 $24,800 $200,404 I-15 (Managed Lanes including Debt Service) $242,919 $892,863 $224,524 $18,262 $1,378,568 SR 52 (HOV Managed Lanes/Auxiliary Lanes) $67,531 $291,769 $204,474 $1,000 $564,774 SR 76 (East and Middle) $99,853 $0 $229,603 $30,000 $359,456 I-805 (HOV/Managed Lanes/DAR at Carroll Canyon) $59,253 $0 $88,750 $180 $148,183 SR 905 (I-805 to Otay Mesa POE) $256,958 $187,673 $1,582 $0 $446,213 SR 78 $500 $18,463 $1,000 $30,400 $50,363 SR 11 $5,700 $88,001 $0 $626,420 $720,121 SR 241 TCA Toll $0 $0 $0 $442,663 $442,663 Highway Bridge Program/Other State Administered Programs $143,947 $5,294 $0 $7,334 $156,575 State Highway Operations Protection Program (SHOPP) $0 $262,505 $0 $0 $262,505 Other Highway Projects $164,217 $157,028 $41,279 $448,262 $810,786 Subtotal Highway Projects $1,089,352 $1,952,422 $869,516 $1,629,321 $5,540,611 Transit Projects Mid-Coast $15,159 $43,293 $578,088 $0 $636,540 I-15 BRT $24,920 $13,043 $73,245 $36 $111,244 Other BRT $24,928 $0 $159,802 $355 $185,085 Bus/Rail Infrastructure $266,970 $224,655 $84,272 $54,885 $630,782 Bus/Rail Intermodal Stations $12,026 $123,960 $15,460 $683 $152,129 Bus/Rail Vehicle Purchase $63,446 $201,805 $34,442 $19,912 $319,605 Other Bus/Rail (Operations/Planning) $302,171 $0 $229,448 $178,816 $710,435 Subtotal Transit Projects $709,620 $606,756 $1,174,757 $254,687 $2,745,820 Local Streets & Roads Projects Highway Bridge Replacement/Rehabilitation $147,523 $0 $14,090 $18,503 $180,116 Regional Arterial System $17,928 $0 $128,907 $218,846 $365,681 Roadway Maintenance & Rehabilitation $0 $0 $107,119 $34,355 $141,474 Traffic Signal Projects $200 $0 $31,187 $1,900 $33,287 Other Local Street & Road $19,059 $0 $283,903 $169,899 $472,861 Subtotal Local Streets & Roads Projects $184,710 $0 $565,206 $443,503 $1,193,419 Other Projects Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects $1,285 $5,903 $15,293 $17,296 $39,777 Miscellaneous* $0 $3,771 $402,419 $0 $406,190 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) $19,685 $0 $0 $0 $19,685 Transportation Enhancement Activities (TE) $0 $5,867 $6,795 $280 $12,942 Transportation Management System/Intelligent Transportation System $22,411 $14,063 $22,009 $2,744 $61,227 Subtotal Other Projects $43,381 $29,604 $446,516 $20,320 $539,821

GRAND TOTAL $2,027,063 $2,588,782 $3,055,995 $2,347,831 $10,019,671 *Includes SANDAG planning and the TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program

4 Table 1 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL09 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Interstate 5 - HOV Managed Lanes EA NO: 235800 PPNO: 0615 Project Description: From La Jolla Village Dr. to Harbor Dr. - construct HOV/Managed Lanes on I-5 RTP PG NO: A-5 SANDAG ID: 1200501, 1200504

RT:5 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $89,782 Open to Traffic: Jul 2016

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CBI $500 $500 $500 IM $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 RSTP $29,121 $29,121 $29,121 STIP-RIP NHS $1,831 $1,831 $1,831 STIP-RIP State Cash $628 $628 $628 STP $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TransNet - MC $51,702 $28,283 $22,840 $579 $44,025 $7,677 TOTAL $89,782 $66,363 $22,840 $579 $82,105 $7,677

MPO ID: CAL09A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-5 Lomas Santa Fe Interchange/HOV lanes EA NO: 2358U PPNO: 0701 Project Description: From Via De La Valle to San Elijo Lagoon - construct interchange and HOV Lane RTP PG NO: A-5 SANDAG ID: 1200502

RT:5 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $55,408 Open to Traffic: Mar 2009

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Corridor Mobility Program $24,500 $24,500 $24,500 TCRP $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 TransNet - MC $24,908 $19,955 $1,689 $1,574 $1,690 $2,518 $210 $22,180 TOTAL $55,408 $50,455 $1,689 $1,574 $1,690 $2,518 $210 $52,680

MPO ID: CAL09C ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-805 Direct Access Ramp and HOV at Carroll Canyon EA NO: 2T040 PPNO: 0716 Project Description: From Carroll Canyon Road to I- 5 - on I-805, construct Direct Access Ramps (DARs) RTP PG NO: A-5, A22, A-39 and HOV lanes to Carroll Canyon Road SANDAG ID: 1280505 RAS (TA 9-5)

RT:805 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $86,743 Open to Traffic: Jun 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Other Fed - ARRA-RSTP $51,817 $51,817 $51,817 TransNet - MC $24,426 $16,928 $2,563 $2,430 $935 $935 $635 $15,625 $1,500 $7,301 TOTAL $76,243 $68,745 $2,563 $2,430 $935 $935 $635 $15,625 $1,500 $59,118 *Additional local contribution programmed in SD32

Page 1 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

5 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL18 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-15 Managed Lanes (Middle) EA NO: 064811 PPNO: 0672 Project Description: From SR56 to Centre City Pkwy - construct managed lanes including 3 Direct Access RTP PG NO: A-5 Ramps (DARs) SANDAG ID: 1201502 EARMARK NO: 3783, CA707

RT:15 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $471,115 Open to Traffic: Mar 2009

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CMAQ $35,586 $35,586 $974 $34,612 DEMO - Sec 115 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 HPP $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Local Funds $15,810 $15,810 $15,810 RSTP $57,153 $57,153 $57,153 SHOPP - State Cash $4,136 $4,136 $4,136 STIP-IIP NHS $36,032 $36,032 $36,032 STIP-IIP NHS GARVEE $49,250 $49,250 $49,250 STIP-IIP State Cash $4,668 $4,668 $4,668 STIP-RIP NHS $3,984 $3,984 $3,984 STIP-RIP NHS GARVEE $147,750 $147,750 $147,750 STIP-RIP State Cash $516 $516 $516 TCRP $64,300 $64,300 $24,963 $9,337 $30,000 TransNet - MC $45,930 $14,504 $10,220 $10,220 $10,986 $984 $126 $44,820 TransNet - MC AC $0 TOTAL $471,115 $439,689 $10,220 $10,220 $10,986 $30,447 $10,437 $430,231

MPO ID: CAL18A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-15 Managed Lanes-North Segment EA NO: 081001 PPNO: 0672F Project Description: From Clarence Lane to SR 78 - construct managed lanes RTP PG NO: A-5 SANDAG ID: 1201503

RT:15 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $190,231 Open to Traffic: Dec 2011

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CMAQ $64,803 $64,803 $4,050 $5,432 $55,321 RSTP $56,654 $56,654 $1,505 $55,149 STIP-RIP NHS $4,426 $4,426 $4,426 STIP-RIP State Cash $574 $574 $574 TransNet - MC $63,774 $33,122 $12,653 $13,112 $4,372 $210 $305 $17,482 $704 $45,588 TOTAL $190,231 $159,579 $12,653 $13,112 $4,372 $210 $305 $28,037 $6,136 $156,058

Page 2 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

6 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL18B ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-15 Managed Lanes- South Segment and Mira Mesa Transit Center EA NO: 081501 PPNO: 0672G Project Description: From SR 163 to I-15/SR 56 Separation - construct managed lanes, south segment RTP PG NO: A-5 including Direct Access Ramps: construct auxiliary lane along northbound I-15 from SANDAG ID: 1201501 Pomerado Rd. overcrossing to Carroll Canyon Rd. overcrossing, construct transit center at Miramar College near Hillery Dr.

RT:15 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $442,324 Open to Traffic: Dec 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CMAQ $11,744 $11,744 $11,744 Corridor Mobility Program $326,682 $286,482 $40,200 $326,682 Local Funds $2,315 $2,315 $2,315 STIP-RIP NHS $8,853 $8,853 $8,853 STIP-RIP State Cash $1,147 $1,147 $1,147 TransNet - MC $91,583 $43,875 $17,699 $15,861 $7,835 $4,970 $1,343 $41,009 $18,937 $31,637 TOTAL $442,324 $354,416 $57,899 $15,861 $7,835 $4,970 $1,343 $62,753 $18,937 $360,634

MPO ID: CAL26 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: State Route 52 Freeway (E&F) EA NO: 010611 PPNO: 0260 Project Description: In San Diego, Santee and Lakeside, from SR 125 to Cuyamaca Street to SR 67 - RTP PG NO: A-5 construct 4 lane freeway SANDAG ID: 1205203 EARMARK NO: CA424/604, HPP 1134/2735

RT:52 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $520,529 Open to Traffic: Dec 2010

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON DEMO $2,250 $2,250 $2,250 HPP $10,015 $9,737 $278 $10,015 RSTP $54,038 $46,199 $7,839 $22,438 $31,600 STIP-IIP NHS $3,010 $3,010 $2,125 $885 STIP-IIP State Cash $5,355 $5,355 $4,732 $623 STIP-RIP NHS $26,558 $26,558 $5,848 $20,710 STIP-RIP Prior NHS $16,375 $16,375 $16,375 STIP-RIP Prior State Cash $802 $802 $802 STIP-RIP State Cash $192,669 $192,669 $11,140 $26,205 $155,324 TCRP $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 TCSP $1,228 $1,228 $1,228 TransNet - H $44,340 $44,340 $671 $43,669 TransNet - MC $118,889 $87,981 $4,558 $15,696 $9,054 $1,600 $14,781 $53,969 $50,139 TOTAL $520,529 $481,504 $12,675 $15,696 $9,054 $1,600 $39,297 $234,154 $247,078

Page 3 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

7 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL26B ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 52 Auxiliary Lanes, Truck Lane and Inside Widening EA NO: 267300, 2T020X, 2T061X PPNO: 0698, 0702, 0706B Project Description: From SR 52/I-15 to Mast Blvd. Undercrossing (7.4/13.3) (Aux Lanes); from Mast Blvd. RTP PG NO: A-5 Undercrossing to SR 52/SR 125 separation(13.3/14.9) (IW); and from west of Santo SANDAG ID: 1205202 Road Overcrossing to west of Oak Canyon Bridge (truck lanes) - in San Diego, Phase 1: construct eastbound and westbound auxiliary lanes and truck lanes; Phase 2: add one mixed flow lane in each direction, widen two structures and install a ramp meter at Mission Gorge Road (PE only) and widen existing roadway

RT:52 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $44,245 Open to Traffic: Jun 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 SHOPP - State Cash $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TransNet - MC $41,245 $34,287 $6,958 $4,292 $10 $36,943 TOTAL $44,245 $37,287 $6,958 $5,292 $10 $38,943

MPO ID: CAL29 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 76 Middle EA NO: 08010 PPNO: 0759 Project Description: From Melrose Dr. to So. Mission Rd. - in San Diego County in and near Oceanside - RTP PG NO: A-6 widen from 2 to 4 lanes SANDAG ID: 1207602 EARMARK NO: CA603/2719

RT:76 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $171,359 Open to Traffic: Dec 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON DEMO - TEA 21 $5,519 $5,519 $5,519 HPP $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 Other Fed - ARRA-RSTP $75,613 $75,613 $75,613 RSTP $6,285 $6,285 $6,285 STP $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 TransNet - MC $65,490 $45,663 $9,409 $6,678 $3,740 $9,434 $37,362 $18,694 TOTAL $157,907 $138,080 $9,409 $6,678 $3,740 $16,719 $46,881 $94,307 *The state contributed $13M for environmental support outside of the STIP or RTIP

Page 4 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

8 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL29B ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 76 East EA NO: 25711 RTP PG NO: A-6 Project Description: From Mission Rd. to I-15 - In and near Oceanside from Mission Rd to I-15, widen from SANDAG ID: 1207606 2 to 4 lanes

RT:76 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $201,549 Open to Traffic: Jul 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 RSTP $7,436 $7,436 $7,436 TransNet - MC $164,113 $7,776 $15,394 $38,596 $49,367 $37,834 $15,146 $14,102 $16,201 $133,810 TOTAL $201,549 $15,212 $15,394 $38,596 $49,367 $67,834 $15,146 $21,538 $16,201 $163,810

MPO ID: CAL31 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 125 (Toll, Gap, Connector) EA NO: 00300 RTP PG NO: A-6 Project Description: From SR 905 to SR 54 - construct 4-lane facility and 6-lane freeway with interchange and HOV provisions

RT:125 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $492,244 Open to Traffic: Jan 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $332,946 $332,946 $24,850 $40,075 $268,021 RSTP $136,702 $136,702 $44,116 $92,586 TransNet - H $22,596 $9,903 $12,693 $2,103 $20,493 TOTAL $492,244 $479,551 $12,693 $24,850 $86,294 $381,100

Page 5 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

9 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL38 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR-905 New Freeway EA NO: 093160 PPNO: 0374K Project Description: From I-805 to Otay Mesa Port of Entry - construct 6-lane freeway (Phase 1) RTP PG NO: A-6 SANDAG ID: 1390501 EARMARK NO: CA612, HPP 2813

RT:905 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $426,013 Open to Traffic: Aug 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CBI $105,342 $105,342 $105,342 DEMO - Sec 115 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 DEMO - TEA 21 $40,485 $40,485 $40,485 HPP $12,000 $12,000 $600 $11,400 Other Fed - ARRA-STP $73,931 $73,931 $73,931 STIP-IIP Interstate $100,666 $100,666 $12,944 $28,087 $59,635 STIP-IIP Prior NHS $6,406 $6,406 $1,976 $4 $4,426 STIP-IIP Prior State Cash $12,966 $12,966 $7,000 $5,966 STIP-IIP State Cash $23,296 $23,296 $1,933 $9,176 $12,187 STIP-RIP Interstate $20,974 $20,974 $11,912 $9,062 STP $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 STP - Sec 117 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 TCRP $23,365 $23,365 $23,365 TransNet - Border $1,582 $1,114 $225 $243 $1,582 TOTAL $426,013 $425,545 $225 $243 $24,453 $229,337 $172,223

MPO ID: CAL38A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 905/I-805 Interchange EA NO: 09183 PPNO: 0957 Project Description: In San Diego on SR 905 from I-805 to 0.9 mile east and on I-805 between SR 905 and RTP PG NO: A-6 Palm Ave. - improve interchange including widen connector, widen exit from SR 905, widen entrance to I-805, and construct auxiliary lane on I-805

RT:905 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $20,200 Open to Traffic: Jul 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Other Fed - FRA ARRA Tiger $20,200 $20,200 $1,000 $200 $19,000 TOTAL $20,200 $20,200 $1,000 $200 $19,000

Page 6 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

10 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL42 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Emergency Repair - SHOPP Emergency Response Program

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories - repair damage caused by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts; this applies to damages that do not qulalify for Federal Emergency Relief funds or to damages that qualify for federal Emergency Relief funds but extend beyond the Federally declaired disaster period

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Emergency Relief (23 U.S.C. 125)

Est Total Cost: $1,023

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC) $905 $906 $140 $27 $738 SHOPP - State Cash $118 $117 $18 $4 $96 TOTAL $1,023 $1,023 $158 $31 $834

MPO ID: CAL44 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Highway Bridge Program

Project Description: Countywide - projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories – widen narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $145,446

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HBP $134,285 $48,519 $4,356 $675 $5,735 $11,259 $63,739 $134,285 Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Acct $5,294 $3,599 $743 $21 $931 $5,294 Local Funds $5,867 $3,675 $297 $75 $4,192 $(2,372) $5,867 Local Funds AC $0 $2,000 $(2,000) $32,354 $(32,354) TOTAL $145,446 $57,793 $2,653 $750 $43,024 $11,280 $29,944 $145,446

MPO ID: CAL46A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Mobility Program

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories -railroad/highway crossing, safer non-federal-aid system roads, shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects, intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, pavement marking demonstration, truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, lighting improvements, emergency truck pullovers

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Shoulder Improvements

Est Total Cost: $16,065

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC) $13,057 $825 $10,247 $1,984 $1,746 $24 $11,287 SHOPP - State Cash $3,008 $107 $1,328 $1,574 $736 $5 $2,267 TOTAL $16,065 $932 $11,575 $3,558 $2,482 $29 $13,554

Page 7 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

11 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL46B ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Collision Reduction Program

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement marking demonstration

Est Total Cost: $40,833

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON SHOPP - Collision Reduction - National Hwy$4,218 System (AC) $4,218 $761 $10 $3,447 SHOPP - Collision Reduction - Surface Transportation$31,931 Program$18,316 (AC) $6,717 $6,897 $4,176 $475 $27,280 SHOPP - State Cash $4,684 $2,373 $1,417 $894 $640 $63 $3,981 TOTAL $40,833 $20,689 $12,352 $7,791 $5,577 $548 $34,708

MPO ID: CAL46D ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bridge Rehabilitation and Reconstruction - SHOPP Program

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories – widen narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $9,820

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC) $8,695 $2,518 $6,176 $2,049 $12 $6,634 SHOPP - State Cash $1,125 $326 $800 $265 $1 $859 TOTAL $9,820 $2,844 $6,976 $2,314 $13 $7,493

MPO ID: CAL46E ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation - SHOPP Roadway Preservation Program Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories – pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation, emergency relief (23 USC 125), widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $130,912

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC) $115,897 $63,172 $9,601 $43,123 $8,656 $817 $106,424 SHOPP - State Cash $15,015 $8,185 $1,244 $5,587 $1,121 $106 $13,788 TOTAL $130,912 $71,357 $10,845 $48,710 $9,777 $923 $120,212

Page 8 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

12 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL46I ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Group Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Mandates Program

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Plantings, landscaping, etc

Est Total Cost: $63,853

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC) $56,530 $1,348 $736 $27,262 $27,183 $5,298 $259 $50,973 SHOPP - State Cash $7,323 $175 $95 $3,532 $3,522 $686 $33 $6,604 TOTAL $63,853 $1,523 $831 $30,794 $30,705 $5,984 $292 $57,577

MPO ID: CAL66 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: State Route 11 EA NO: 05631 PPNO: 0999 Project Description: From Border of Mexico east of SR 905/Otay Mesa Border Crossing to future SR 125/905 RTP PG NO: A-6; B-5 junction - From Britannia Blvd. on SR 905 to the Border of Mexico east of SR 905 / Otay EARMARK NO: CA393/740 Mesa Border Crossing - construction of 4-lane freeway.

RT:11 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $720,121 Open to Traffic: Dec 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CBI $4,900 $4,900 $4,900 HPP $800 $800 $800 Local Funds $626,420 $123,070 $503,350 $42,690 $80,380 $503,350 STIP-IIP NHS $6,882 $6,882 $6,882 STIP-IIP Prior State Cash $5,200 $5,200 $5,200 STIP-IIP State Cash $919 $919 $919 Trade Corridor Program $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 TOTAL $720,121 $141,771 $578,350 $61,391 $80,380 $578,350

Page 9 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

13 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL67 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 94 Widening EA NO: 28710 PPNO: T0770 Project Description: In San Diego on Route 94 between I-805 and Downtown for the South Bay Bus Rapid SANDAG ID: 1280508 Transit - environmental studies and future construction of HOV lanes; also includes environmental clearance for 2 HOV lanes in the median of SR94 and direct connectors at the I-805/SR94 interchange

RT:94 Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $11,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TCRP $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 TransNet - MC $1,000 $934 $33 $33 $1,000 TOTAL $11,000 $10,934 $33 $33 $11,000

MPO ID: CAL68 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 94/125 Widening EA NO: 14665 PPNO: 0356 Project Description: From SR 94 to SR125 - Near La Mesa and Lemon Grove on SR 125 from Mariposa St RTP PG NO: A-6 to SR 94 and on SR 94 from SR 125 to Bancroft Dr. Construct freeway connector, replace and widen bridges

RT:94 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $60,000 Open to Traffic: Jan 2018

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TCRP $60,000 $6,196 $47,268 $6,536 $12,732 $47,268 TOTAL $60,000 $6,196 $47,268 $6,536 $12,732 $47,268

MPO ID: CAL71 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-5/SR 78 EA NO: 07890K EARMARK NO: 210 (2003), 275 Project Description: In Carlsbad, on I-5 from Carlsbad Village Drive (formally Elm Street) undercrossing to (2005) California Street overcrossing, on SR 78 from I-5/SR 78 separation to Jefferson Street overcrossing - modify interchange, future construction of auxiliary lanes and direct connectors

RT:5 Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $1,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON STP $500 $500 $500 STP - Sec 117 $500 $500 $500 TOTAL $1,000 $500 $500 $1,000

Page 10 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

14 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL73 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Balboa Park Historic Preservation

Project Description: From Richmond to 6th - landscaping, lighting and fencing; rehabiiltate and preservation of the architectual features

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Transportation enhancement activities

Est Total Cost: $5,867

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON STIP-IIP STP TE $5,194 $3,197 $73 $219 $1,705 $607 $27 $4,560 STIP-IIP State Cash $673 $414 $10 $28 $221 $78 $4 $591 TOTAL $5,867 $3,611 $83 $247 $1,926 $685 $31 $5,151

MPO ID: CAL75 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-5 Sorrento Valley Auxiliary Lane EA NO: 06500 PPNO: 0129P Project Description: From Genesee Avenue to Sorrento Valley Overhead - in San Diego from Genesee Ave. RAS (TA 7-48) OC to Roselle St., realignment and widening of the existing Genesse Ave. SB off-ramp to provide for a 2-lane exit configuration and additional left turn storage

RT:5 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $12,987 Open to Traffic: Jun 2015

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON SHOPP (AC) $11,498 $11,497 $2,184 $443 $8,871 SHOPP - State Cash $1,489 $1,490 $283 $57 $1,149 TOTAL $12,987 $12,987 $2,467 $500 $10,020

MPO ID: CAL77 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-5/I-8 Connector EA NO: 00270 EARMARK NO: CA643/3120 Project Description: On I-5 from 0.1 km south of junction with I-8 and on the right lanes through the Sea World Drive interchange, On I-8 from I-8/I-5 separation to 0.6 km east of Morena Blvd. undercrossing - construction of auxiliary lanes and widening of connectors

RT:5 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $4,033 Open to Traffic: Apr 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $1,038 $1,038 $1,038 IM $1,025 $1,025 $1,025 SHOPP - State Cash $1,970 $1,970 $1,970 TOTAL $4,033 $1,970 $2,063 $4,033

Page 11 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

15 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL78B ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-805 HOV/Managed Lanes - North EA NO: 08163 PPNO: 0732 Project Description: On I-805 from the I-805/SR 52 to Sorrento Valley, on SR 52 at the I-805/SR 52 RTP PG NO: A-5; A-10 separation - Preliminary engineering for future construction of managed lanes; design SANDAG ID: 1280503 Phase 1 - one HOV lane in each direction including the south facing Direct Access Ramps at Carroll Canyon Rd

RT:805 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $25,924 Open to Traffic: Jan 2016

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON RSTP $1,775 $1,775 $1,775 TransNet - MC $24,149 $7,649 $13,212 $3,288 $23,349 $800 TOTAL $25,924 $9,424 $13,212 $3,288 $25,124 $800

MPO ID: CAL78C ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-805 HOV/Managed Lanes - South EA NO: 08161 PPNO: 0730 Project Description: From Palomar Street to Landis Street - preliminary engineering for future construction RTP PG NO: G-2, F-6 of managed lanes including design of 2 HOV lanes in the median of I-805 for the South SANDAG ID: 1280501/510 Bay Rapid Transit project including DAR at Palomar Street

RT:805 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $46,016 Open to Traffic: Dec 2021

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $180 $180 $180 RSTP $5,661 $4,113 $1,548 $5,661 TransNet - MC $40,133 $21,621 $16,856 $1,656 $40,133 TransNet - Transit $42 $42 $42 TOTAL $46,016 $25,956 $18,404 $1,656 $46,016

MPO ID: CAL104 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories - railroad/highway crossing, safer non-federal-aid system roads, shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects, intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, pavement marking demonstration, truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, lighting improvements, emergency truck pullovers

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Lighting improvements

Est Total Cost: $3,751

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $359 $259 $100 $359 Safe Routes to School (SR2S) $3,392 $371 $450 $1,842 $730 $3,392 TOTAL $3,751 $371 $709 $1,842 $830 $3,751

Page 12 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

16 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL105 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Highway Safety Improvement - HSIP Program

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories - railroad/highway crossing, safer non-federal-aid system roads, shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects, intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, pavement marking demonstration, truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, lighting improvements, emergency truck pullovers

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Safety Improvement Program

Est Total Cost: $8,450

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HSIP $7,235 $443 $334 $3,705 $2,753 $7,235 Local Funds $1,215 $50 $860 $306 $1,215 TOTAL $8,450 $443 $384 $4,565 $3,059 $8,450

MPO ID: CAL107 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: 32nd Street - Grade Separation EA NO: 29321 RTP PG NO: B-5 Project Description: From 32nd Street to Harbor Drive - in San Diego, grade separation SANDAG ID: 1300702 EARMARK NO: CA380/618

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Railroad/highway crossing

Est Total Cost: $118,460

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $800 $800 $800 Local Funds $66,995 $3,600 $20,860 $42,535 $11,350 $13,110 $42,535 Trade Corridor Program $50,665 $50,665 $50,665 TOTAL $118,460 $4,400 $20,860 $93,200 $12,150 $13,110 $93,200

MPO ID: CAL110 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: At Civic Center Drive, Harbor Drive, and I-5 EA NO: 29760 PPNO: 0859 Project Description: I-5, Harbor Drive, and Civic Center Drive - in National City, at-grade improvements and SANDAG ID: 1300703 construct truck ramp linking I-5 to National City Marine Cargo terminal EARMARK NO: CA560/2340

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection channelization projects

Est Total Cost: $3,950

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $20 $20 $20 Local Funds $2,780 $1,206 $1,574 $1,106 $100 $1,574 Trade Corridor Program $1,150 $1,150 $1,150 TOTAL $3,950 $1,226 $2,724 $1,126 $100 $2,724

Page 13 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

17 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL111 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grade Separation At 10th Ave Marine Terminal/Cesar Chavez Blvd. EA NO: 297700 RTP PG NO: B-5, B-1 Project Description: 10th Avenue and Harbor Drive from 10th Ave./Ceasar Chavez - Marine Terminal to SANDAG ID: 1300701 Harbor Drive - Port of San Diego Access Improvement and Truck Route to I-5 and I-15 EARMARK NO: CA588/2618

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Railroad/highway crossing

Est Total Cost: $67,200

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $400 $400 $400 Local Funds $35,890 $1,750 $12,750 $21,390 $5,510 $8,990 $21,390 Trade Corridor Program $30,910 $30,910 $30,910 TOTAL $67,200 $2,150 $12,750 $52,300 $5,910 $8,990 $52,300

MPO ID: CAL115 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bay Marina Drive at I-5 At-Grade Improvements EA NO: 29761 PPNO: 0855 Project Description: Bay Marina/I-5 Intersection - in National City, at-grade intersection improvements, SANDAG ID: 1300704 construction of truck ramp linking I-5 to National City Marine Cargo terminal EARMARK NO: CA560/2340

RT:5 Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: All Projects - Intersection channelization projects

Est Total Cost: $3,290

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $2,380 $535 $375 $1,470 $875 $35 $1,470 Trade Corridor Program $910 $910 $910 TOTAL $3,290 $535 $375 $2,380 $875 $35 $2,380

MPO ID: CAL116 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Tecate International Border Crossing, Pedestrian Facilities EA NO: 29490 PPNO: 0743 Project Description: From Tecate International Border Crossing to Thing Road - in San Diego County - improve pedestrian facilities

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $2,383

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON STIP-IIP STP TE $2,110 $97 $311 $1,702 $399 $9 $1,702 STIP-IIP State Cash $273 $13 $40 $220 $52 $1 $220 TOTAL $2,383 $110 $351 $1,922 $451 $10 $1,922

Page 14 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

18 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL117 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Otay POE Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities - Paseo De La Amistad International Border EA NO: 26630 Crossing PPNO: 0962 Project Description: From Otay Mesa IBC to Siempre Viva Road Overcrossing South - in San Ysidro, on SR 905 from the Otay Mesa International Border Crossing into Mexico to Siempre Viva Road Overcrossing South - improve pedestrian and bicycle aesthetics, accessibility, and safety

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $2,060

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON STIP-IIP STP TE $1,824 $89 $208 $1,527 $284 $13 $1,527 STIP-IIP State Cash $236 $11 $27 $198 $36 $2 $198 TOTAL $2,060 $100 $235 $1,725 $320 $15 $1,725

MPO ID: CAL120 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 78 Auxiliary Lanes EA NO: 29310 RTP PG NO: A-5 Project Description: From I-15 to Nordahl Road - cities of Escondido and San Marcos, widen southbound SANDAG ID: 1201510 I-15 to westbound SR78 ramp; construct westbound auxiliary lane on SR78; widen westbound SR78 offramp to Nordahl Road

RT:78 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $8,963 Open to Traffic: Sep 2011

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON SHOPP - State Cash $200 $200 $200 SHOPP Augmentation - Mobility $7,763 $7,763 $90 $7,673 TransNet - MC $1,000 $840 $134 $26 $1,000 TOTAL $8,963 $840 $8,097 $26 $1,000 $290 $7,673

MPO ID: CAL194 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation on the State Highway System - Highway Maintenance Program Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories -pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation - Project listing for Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation on the State Highway System - Highway Maintenance

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $13,422

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Highway Maintenance - NHS $9,738 $9,738 $9,738 Highway Maintenance - State Cash $3,684 $3,684 $1,200 $22 $2,462 TOTAL $13,422 $13,422 $1,200 $22 $12,200

Page 15 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

19 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Caltrans MPO ID: CAL213 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for the State Minor Program

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 - railroad/highway crossing, safer non-federal-aid system roads, shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects, intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, pavement marking demonstration, truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, lighting improvements, emergency truck pullovers

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $5,402

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Minor Program $4,782 $4,782 $1,830 $2,952 Minor Program - St Cash $620 $620 $237 $383 TOTAL $5,402 $5,402 $2,067 $3,335

Page 16 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

20 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Carlsbad, City of MPO ID: CB04A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Camino Real Widening - Tamarack Avenue to Chestnut Avenue RAS (TA 7-43) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: El Camino Real from Tamarack Ave. to Chestnut Ave. - in Carlsbad, widen El Camino Real to prime arterial standards with three travel lanes, bike lanes and sidewalks in each direction including intersection improvements at Tamarack Avenue and Chestnut Avenue

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $12,349 Open to Traffic: Jun 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $8,001 $8,001 $1,225 $60 $6,716 Local RTCIP $422 $422 $422 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,926 $3,926 $3,926 TOTAL $12,349 $8,423 $3,926 $1,225 $60 $11,064

MPO ID: CB04B ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Camino Real and Cannon Road RAS (TA 7-43)

Project Description: El Camino Real and Cannon Road - in Carlsbad, along the eastside of El Camino Real just south of Cannon Road widen to prime arterial standards with three through lanes, a right turn lane and a sidewalk approaching the intersection

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $589 Open to Traffic: Dec 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $589 $589 $85 $504 TOTAL $589 $589 $85 $504

MPO ID: CB04C ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Camino Real - Lisa Street to Crestview Drive RAS (TA 7-43) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: El Camino Real from Lisa Street to Crestview Drive - in Carlsbad, along the west side of El Camino Real, roadway widening to provide three southbound through lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalk per Prime Arterial standards

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $2,125 Open to Traffic: Jun 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,955 $1,955 $1,955 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $170 $170 $170 TOTAL $2,125 $170 $1,955 $170 $1,955

Page 17 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

21 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Carlsbad, City of MPO ID: CB13 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Poinsettia Lane Reach E EARMARK NO: CA366, CA517 RAS (TA 7-43) Project Description: Poinsettia Lane from Cassia Drive to Skimmer Court - in Carlsbad, from Cassia Drive to Skimmer Court, construct a new 4-lane roadway with median, bike lanes, and sidewalks/trails to major arterial standards

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $13,450 Open to Traffic: Jun 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $1,436 $1,436 $1,436 Local Funds $12,014 $1,260 $10,754 $1,260 $1,900 $8,854 TOTAL $13,450 $1,260 $12,190 $1,260 $1,900 $10,290

MPO ID: CB17 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Carlsbad Blvd. Bridge over Encina Power Station RTP PG NO: A-6 RAS (TA 7-43) Project Description: Carlsbad Blvd. from Encina Power Plant to Warm water outfall channel - in Carlsbad, on the Carlsbad Blvd bridge over the Encina Power Plant warm water discharge, upgrade bridge railings on the bridge, (local match to HBP, part of CAL44)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions

Est Total Cost: $158

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $158 $8 $150 $57 $101 TOTAL $158 $8 $150 $57 $101

MPO ID: CB18 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Carlsbad Blvd. Bridge over SDNR Railroad RTP PG NO: A-6 RAS (TA 7-43) Project Description: Carlsbad Blvd. from Mountain View to State - in Carlsbad 0.6 miles NW of Carlsbad Village Drive, upgrade the bridge railings on the Carlsbad Blvd. Bridge over the San Diego Northern Railway (SDNR) railroad (local match to HBP, part of CAL44)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions

Est Total Cost: $44

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $44 $12 $32 $44 TOTAL $44 $12 $32 $44

Page 18 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

22 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Carlsbad, City of MPO ID: CB20 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Pavement Management - Overlay TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Street locations by year as follows: FY10/11 roadways - Palomar Airport Road, College Blvd., Cannon Blvd., Faraday Ave., Paseo del Norte, Carslbad Blvd., FY 11/12 roadways - La Costa Ave., Calle Barcelona, El Camino Real, Levante Street, Rancho Santa Fe, Los Coches and FY 12/13 roadways - Carlsbad Blvd., Carlsbad Village Drive, Grand Avenue, Jefferson Street, State Street, Chestnut Avenue, Basswood Ave., Las Flores, and Kelly Dr., FY 13/14 roadways - Avenida Encinas, Paseo Del Norte, Poinsettia, El Camino Real, Alicante, and El Fuerte, FY 14/15 roadways - El Camino Real, Faraday Avenue, El Fuerte, Palmer Wary, Melrose Drive, Palomar Airport Road, Cannon Road and College Blvd. - in Carlsbad, pavement overlay and roadway repairs; to be implemented in a series of zones throughout the city

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $22,620

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $11,400 $3,715 $2,120 $1,260 $1,310 $1,370 $1,625 $11,400 TransNet - L (Cash) $946 $946 $946 TransNet - LSI $5,895 $1,990 $2,030 $1,875 $5,895 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,269 $329 $1,940 $2,269 TOTAL $20,510 $4,990 $2,120 $3,200 $3,300 $3,400 $3,500 $20,510

MPO ID: CB21 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Pavement Management -Seal

Project Description: Various minor/local roadways within each zone as noted on the project diagram - in Carlsbad, street sealing and roadway repairs

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $3,300

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $3,300 $800 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $3,300 TOTAL $3,300 $800 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $3,300

MPO ID: CB22 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Avenida Encinas - Widen from PAR to EWPCF

Project Description: Avenida Encinas from Palomar Airport Rd. to EWPCF - in Carlsbad; Avenida Encinas from Palomar Airport Road southerly to existing improvements adjacent to the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility; roadway widening to Secondary Arterial standards

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $3,041 Open to Traffic: Dec 2015

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $3,041 $2,605 $436 $400 $30 $2,611 TOTAL $3,041 $2,605 $436 $400 $30 $2,611

Page 19 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

23 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Carlsbad, City of MPO ID: CB24 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: College Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road - Intersection Improvements RAS (TA 7-43)

Project Description: From College Boulevard to Palomar Airport Road - in Carlsbad, at the intersection of College Blvd. and Palomar Airport Raod, roadway widening along southbound College Blvd. to provide dual left turns, one thru lane, one shared thru/right turn lane and one right turn lane and to lengthen right turn lanes on the other approaches to the intersection

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $838 Open to Traffic: Jun 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $838 $838 $193 $645 TOTAL $838 $838 $193 $645

MPO ID: CB26 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Melrose and Palomar Airport Road RAS (TA 7-43)

Project Description: From Melrose Drive to Palomar Airport Road - in Carlsbad, at the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive, roadway widening along southbound Melrose to provide an additional right turn lane to westbound Palomar Airport Road

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $410 Open to Traffic: Jan 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $410 $410 $50 $360 TOTAL $410 $410 $50 $360

MPO ID: CB30 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Camino Real Left Turn Lane to westbound Tamarack Ave. RAS (TA 7-43)

Project Description: From El Camino Real to Tamarack Avenue - in Carlsbad at the intersection of El Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue construct a second left turn lane from El Camino Real to westbound Tamarack

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $286 Open to Traffic: Jun 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $286 $286 $70 $216 TOTAL $286 $286 $70 $216

Page 20 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

24 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Carlsbad, City of MPO ID: CB31 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Camino Real Widening - La Costa Avenue to Arenal Road RAS (TA 7-43)

Project Description: El Camino Real from La Costa Ave, to Arenal Rd. - in Carlsbad, along El Camino Real from 700 feet north of La Costa Avenue to Arenal Road, widening along the southbound side of the roadway to provide three travel lanes and a bike lane in accordance with Prime Arterial Standards

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $2,400 Open to Traffic: Mar 2017

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $625 $625 $625 Local RTCIP $1,775 $1,775 $1,775 TOTAL $2,400 $2,400 $625 $1,775

MPO ID: CB32 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Camino Real Widening - Cassia to Camino Vida Roble RAS (TA 7-43) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: El Camino Real from Cassia Road to Camino Vida Roble - in Carlsbad, widen El Camino Real from 900 feet north of Cassia Road to Camino Vida Roble, along the northbound side of the roadway to provide three travel lanes and a bike lane in accordance with Prime Arterial standards

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $2,650 Open to Traffic: Mar 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,650 $215 $2,435 $315 $1,350 $985 TOTAL $2,650 $215 $2,435 $315 $1,350 $985

MPO ID: CB33 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real Right Turn Lane RAS (TA 7-43)

Project Description: From Palomar Airport Road to El Camino Real - in Carlsbad, widening along eastbound Palomar Airport Road to provide a dedicated right turn lane to southbound El Camino Real

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $590 Open to Traffic: Jun 2016

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $590 $590 $90 $500 TOTAL $590 $590 $90 $500

Page 21 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

25 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Carlsbad, City of MPO ID: CB34 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte Right Turn Lane RAS (TA 7-43)

Project Description: From Palomar Aiport Road to Paseo Del Norte - in Carlsbad, widening along eastbound Palomar Airport Road to provide a dedicated right turn lane to southbound Paseo Del Norte

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $563 Open to Traffic: Jun 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $563 $563 $63 $500 TOTAL $563 $563 $63 $500

MPO ID: CB35 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte Left Turn Lane RAS (TA 7-43)

Project Description: From Palomar Airport Road to Paseo Del Norte - in Carlsbad, lengthen the left turn pocket along eastbound Palomar Airport Road to northbound Paseo Del Norte

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $232 Open to Traffic: Jun 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $232 $232 $30 $202 TOTAL $232 $232 $30 $202

MPO ID: CB36 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment RAS (TA 7-43) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Carlsbad Boulevard from Palomar Airport Road to Avenida Encinas - in Carlsbad, realign the southbound lanes of Carlsbad Blvd and future construction completion of roadway to major arterial standards with enhanced parkways

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $3,250

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $250 $250 $250 TransNet - L Carry Over $346 $346 $346 TransNet - LSI $1,967 $1,967 $1,967 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $687 $687 $687 TOTAL $3,250 $250 $3,000 $3,250

Page 22 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

26 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV06 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Pavement Rehabilitation Program TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - AC overlay, chip seals and slurry seal rehabilitation

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $27,588

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,000 $1,000 $160 $840 TransNet - L $15,900 $15,900 $3,250 $12,650 TransNet - L (Cash) $6,900 $6,900 $1,300 $5,600 TransNet - LSI $2,670 $250 $400 $280 $920 $820 $690 $1,980 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $613 $613 $106 $507 TOTAL $27,083 $23,800 $863 $400 $280 $920 $820 $5,506 $21,577

MPO ID: CHV08 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Willow Street Bridge Project

Project Description: Willow Street from Bonita Road to Sweetwater Road - replace and widen bridge including shoulders

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $17,057 Open to Traffic: Dec 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HBP $14,381 $1,320 $240 $12,821 $1,320 $240 $12,821 HBRR $500 $500 $500 Local Funds $1,897 $236 $1,661 $236 $1,661 Local RTCIP $279 $219 $60 $219 $60 TOTAL $17,057 $2,275 $300 $14,482 $2,275 $300 $14,482

MPO ID: CHV18 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Sidewalk Rehabilitation/Installation Program

Project Description: Citywide - sidewalk construction, replacements, installation in areas along school routes, around senior citizen centers and in areas of high pedestrian traffic

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $3,339

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,289 $1,289 $1,289 TransNet - L $1,950 $1,950 $1,950 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $100 $100 $100 TOTAL $3,339 $3,239 $100 $3,339

Page 23 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

27 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV19 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: North Broadway Reconstruction TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: North Broadway from C Street to D Street - pavement reconstruction and associated drainage

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $2,957

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $324 $324 $324 TransNet - L (Cash) $2,368 $2,368 $300 $2,068 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $265 $265 $265 TOTAL $2,957 $2,692 $265 $300 $2,657

MPO ID: CHV20 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: North Fourth Avenue and Brisbane St TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Fourth Ave. from Brisbane St. to SR54 - add additional lane on east side of Fourth Ave.

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $750 Open to Traffic: Dec 2011

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $500 $500 $100 $400 TransNet - LSI $250 $250 $75 $175 TOTAL $750 $500 $250 $175 $575

MPO ID: CHV22 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Advance Planning Studies TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - study GIS-based infrastructure deficiency database for pavement and street improvements; planning rehabilitation programs; prepare Capital Improvement Program related to street improvements

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $1,303

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $585 $585 $585 TransNet - L $375 $375 $375 TransNet - L (Cash) $82 $82 $82 TransNet - LSI $261 $45 $39 $40 $42 $46 $49 $261 TOTAL $1,303 $1,087 $39 $40 $42 $46 $49 $1,303

Page 24 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

28 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV26 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Pedestrian Master Plan TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - master plan will identify missing pedestrian improvements, establish priorities and program capital improvement projects that will increase connectivity among existing facilities

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $281

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TDA - Bicycles $150 $150 $150 TransNet - L (Cash) $45 $45 $45 TransNet - L Carry Over $61 $61 $61 TransNet - LSI $25 $25 $25 TOTAL $281 $195 $86 $281

MPO ID: CHV30 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-5 Multi-Modal Corridor Improvement Study PPNO: 09CA013 EARMARK NO: CA3482, CA677 Project Description: On I-5 between SR 54 and Main Street interchange - conduct a study to examine TransNet - LSI: CR multi-modal improvements to the I-5 corridor between the Main Street Interchange and State Route 54

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $2,765

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $1,987 $800 $1,187 $1,987 TCSP $222 $222 $222 TransNet - L $50 $50 $50 TransNet - L (Cash) $16 $16 $16 TransNet - LSI $100 $100 $100 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $390 $390 $390 TOTAL $2,765 $950 $1,815 $2,765

Page 25 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

29 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV33 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: School Zone Traffic Calming Program TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - field identification and installation/ construction of traffic calming devices in public school zones, such as traffic control devices (for example, flashing beacons), signs, striping and minor street improvements

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operatng

Est Total Cost: $1,200

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $50 $50 $50 TransNet - L $280 $280 $280 TransNet - L (Cash) $97 $97 $97 TransNet - LSI $510 $240 $270 $510 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $130 $130 $130 TOTAL $1,067 $427 $130 $240 $270 $1,067

MPO ID: CHV34 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - provide community outreach and education regarding traffic/ safety hazards; install and construct traffic calming and pedestrian safety measures

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operatng

Est Total Cost: $1,400

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $70 $70 $70 TransNet - L $280 $280 $280 TransNet - LSI $460 $230 $230 $460 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $320 $320 $320 TOTAL $1,130 $350 $320 $230 $230 $1,130

MPO ID: CHV35 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Signing, Studies and Signal Upgrade TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Upgrade of signals located at Fourth Ave. and Beyer Blvd., Fourth Ave. and Main Street and at Third Avenue and Montgomery Street - annual program to prioritize Traffic Signing and Striping CIP projects including upgrading and maintaining traffic signal and streetlight systems

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $3,661

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $571 $571 $571 TransNet - L $135 $135 $135 TransNet - LSI $1,715 $20 $1,075 $160 $160 $150 $150 $240 $1,475 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,240 $1,240 $590 $650 TOTAL $3,661 $726 $2,315 $160 $160 $150 $150 $1,536 $2,125

Page 26 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

30 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV36 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Heritage Road Bridge Studies EARMARK NO: CA356, CA450

Project Description: Heritage Road from Main Street to Entertainment Circle - preliminary engineering, environmental analysis for future widening of bridge

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $4,620

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $2,800 $1,995 $805 $2,800 Local Funds $1,820 $1,820 $1,820 TOTAL $4,620 $3,815 $805 $4,620

MPO ID: CHV39 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Signal System Optimization TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Palomar Street from I-5 to Orange Ave.; Broadway from Palomar Street to C Street; H Street from I-805 to I-5; Heritage Rd. from Telegraph Canyon Rd. to Palomar St.; Paseo Ranchero from E. J Street to Telegraph Canyon Rd.; Otay Lakes Rd. from Telegraph Canyon Rd. to E. H Street; E. H Street from I-805 to Hidden Vista; E. Orange/ Olympic Pkwy. at I-805; Telegraph Canyon Rd. at I-805 - upgrade traffic signal coordination at locations identified by the City's Traffic Monitoring Program in order to reduce congestion and intersection delays

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $602

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $150 $150 $150 TransNet - LSI $277 $25 $50 $50 $52 $50 $50 $277 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $175 $175 $175 TOTAL $602 $175 $225 $50 $52 $50 $50 $602

MPO ID: CHV40 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bayshore Bikeway TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Along Bayshore Bikeway from E Street to Main Street - provide funds for preliminary engineering on Segments 7 and 8 of the Chula Vista portion of the Bayshore Bikeway

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $125

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $50 $50 $50 TransNet - L $50 $50 $50 TransNet - LSI $25 $25 $25 TOTAL $125 $100 $25 $125

Page 27 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

31 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV43 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Congestion Relief Study and Implementation TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - program will allow for identification and implementation of solutions for congestion relief on local streets, such as median installation , new traffic signals, traffic signal upgrades, intersection lighting, traffic signal coordination/ interconnection, video traffic surveillance systems, traffic data collection systems.

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $1,070

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $50 $50 $15 $35 TransNet - L $75 $75 $25 $50 TransNet - L (Cash) $500 $500 $500 TransNet - LSI $300 $75 $75 $75 $75 $300 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $145 $145 $145 TOTAL $1,070 $625 $145 $75 $75 $75 $75 $985 $85

MPO ID: CHV44 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-805, SR54 and Otay Mesa Transportation System Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: In Chula Vista - preliminary analysis of the I-805/ SR54 interchange and include other on/off ramps on SR54 to I-5, the Bonita Road and Main Street on/ off ramps to I-805 and the impact of traffic in Otay Mesa on La Media Road and other major streets in Chula Vista in order to reduce congestion

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $570

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $100 $100 $100 TransNet - LSI $270 $90 $90 $90 $270 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $200 $200 $200 TOTAL $570 $100 $200 $90 $90 $90 $570

MPO ID: CHV45 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Monitoring Program TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - traffic monitoring to comply with the City's traffic threshold standards, as well as the city's annual traffic count program, which provides data for safety commission studies, capital improvements projects, speed surveys and other traffic uses

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operatng

Est Total Cost: $565

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local RTCIP $50 $50 $50 TransNet - LSI $330 $190 $70 $70 $330 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $185 $185 $185 TOTAL $565 $50 $375 $70 $70 $565

Page 28 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

32 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV46 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Harborside Elementary Pedestrian Improvements TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Area in the vicinity of Harborside Elementary School southeast of the intersection of Naples Street and Industrial Blvd. - install missing pedestrian improvements and rehabilitate existing pedestrian infrastructure in order to provide pedestrians with a safer route to school

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $640

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $65 $65 $65 TCSP $490 $80 $410 $80 $410 TransNet - LSI $85 $85 $20 $65 TOTAL $640 $165 $475 $100 $540

MPO ID: CHV47 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Urban Core Level of Service Thresholds Study TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Area is generally bounded by the northern City limits, the Bayfront, L Street to the south and Hilltop Drive to the east - update the traffic threshold standards established for the Urban Core Specific Plan area based on the General Plan update adopted by Council in late 2005; these standards need to take into account alternative modes of transportation emphasized in the General Plan

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $125

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local RTCIP $75 $75 $75 TransNet - LSI $20 $20 $20 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $30 $30 $30 TOTAL $125 $95 $30 $125

MPO ID: CHV48 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Pavement Major Rehabilitation TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Various locations (see list of specific locations) - ongoing program of pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction which includes overlays (one-inch thick and greater) and street reconstruction

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $19,921

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $13,881 $1,268 $2,752 $2,966 $3,245 $3,650 $2,070 $11,811 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $6,040 $6,040 $910 $5,130 TOTAL $19,921 $7,308 $2,752 $2,966 $3,245 $3,650 $2,980 $16,941

Page 29 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

33 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV49 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Third Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Access EARMARK NO: CA635/3067

Project Description: Within the Chula Vista Urban Core Specific Plan Area, which is bordered by SR54, I-5, H Street and I-805 - study to determine ways to develop more bikeways and pedestrian access to the downtown Third Avenue area; construction of improvements recommended by the study

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $3,150

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $240 $240 $240 Local Funds $910 $60 $850 $60 $850 TransNet - SMIP $2,000 $2,000 $325 $1,675 TOTAL $3,150 $300 $2,850 $625 $2,525

MPO ID: CHV51 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Naples and Oleander Cross Gutter TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Naples St. from Oleander Ave. to Oasis Ave. - reconstruct the steep cross gutter at the intersection of Naples St. and Oleander Ave. in order to increase vehicle safety and reduce congestion caused by vehicles slowing down; ADA-compliant pedestrian improvements will also be constructed

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Safer non-Federal-aid system roads

Est Total Cost: $205

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L Carry Over $205 $205 $45 $160 TOTAL $205 $205 $45 $160

MPO ID: CHV52 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Industrial Blvd. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Industrial Blvd. from L Street to Palomar Street - construct bike lanes on both sides of Industrial Blvd. from L Street to Palomar Street; construct curb, gutter and sidewalk on Industrial Blvd. from Naples Street to Palomar Street

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $465

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $181 $181 $181 TransNet - SMIP $284 $284 $39 $245 TOTAL $465 $465 $220 $245

Page 30 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

34 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV53 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bikeway Master Plan Update

Project Description: Citywide - update the Citywide Bikeway Master Plan

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $200

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TDA - Bicycles $150 $150 $150 TransNet - L (Cash) $50 $50 $50 TOTAL $200 $50 $150 $200

MPO ID: CHV54 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: South Broadway Improvements South of Main Street TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Broadway from Main Street to Southern City Limits - overlay and reconstruction of the pavement on Broadway, construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk and installation of bike lanes

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $2,200

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $500 $500 $500 TOTAL $500 $500 $500

MPO ID: CHV55 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Oxford Street between Third Avenue and Alpine Avenue, First avenue between Palomar Street and Naples Street, Second Avenue between Naples Street and Palomar Street, Glenhaven Way to Amy Street (cul-de-sac) - construction (Phase 1) of missing street improvements, primarily curb, gutter, sidewalk and ADA-compliant pedestrian ramps, on four streets in the Montgomery area of Chula Vista

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $2,838

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $717 $717 $200 $517 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $70 $70 $70 TOTAL $787 $717 $70 $270 $517

Page 31 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

35 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV58 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: New Sidewalk Construction TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: C Street from Fifth Ave. to 350 feet west of Fourth Ave.; Moss Street from Broadway to Fourth Ave.; Oxford Street from Broadway to Fifth Ave., Palomar Street from Broadway to Fifth Ave. - design and future construction of sidewalk and other pedestrian improvements in areas without existing sidewalk - design phase only

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $338

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $338 $338 $338 TOTAL $338 $338 $338

MPO ID: CHV59 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Naples Street New Sidewalk Construction TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: South side of Naples Street between Broadway and Fifth Ave. and areas with missing infrastructure on Naples Street between Fifth Ave. and Third Ave. - design phase of future construction of missing curb, gutter, sidewalk and other pedestrian infrastucture on Naples Street

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $1,500

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $182 $182 $182 TOTAL $182 $182 $182

MPO ID: CHV60 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Signal Upgrades TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Fourth Ave. and G Street; Second Ave. and Quintard St. - traffic signals will be upgraded and modified in order to reduce the frequency of collisions

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: All Projects - Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections Est Total Cost: $745

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $175 $175 $175 TransNet - LSI $34 $34 $34 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $265 $265 $265 TOTAL $474 $175 $299 $474

Page 32 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

36 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Chula Vista, City of MPO ID: CHV61 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bonita Road/ Allen School Road Drainage Structure TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Bonita Road from Allen School Road to Allen School Road - repair sections of the top and side of the existing reinforced concrete box culvert, which carries flow from Bonita Road, in order to eliminate the potential for failure and damage to Bonita Road and eliminate a potential hazard to the public

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Safer non-Federal-aid system roads

Est Total Cost: $150

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $150 $150 $150 TOTAL $150 $150 $150

Page 33 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

37 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Coronado, City of MPO ID: COR04 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street and Road Preventive Maintenance; Minor Drainage Repair TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: All streets in Coronado Cays - preventive maintenance such as slurry seal, crack sealing, and minor drainage repair

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $3,856

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,681 $306 $268 $260 $327 $260 $260 $103 $1,578 TransNet - L $1,581 $1,581 $138 $1,443 TransNet - LSI $270 $70 $100 $100 $15 $255 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $324 $176 $115 $33 $24 $300 TOTAL $3,856 $1,957 $444 $375 $360 $360 $360 $280 $3,576

MPO ID: COR05 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 75 Tunnel EARMARK NO: CA397/713, HPP866/3789 Project Description: From Glorietta to Alameda - from San Diego-Coronado Bridge plaza westerly 1.4 miles beneath Fourth Street with egress onto NAS North Island - SR 75 Tunnel EIS to provide analysis of a tunnel - this project is included as informational purposes for NEPA clearance only, future phases are outside of TIP cycle but included in the long range plan

RT:75 Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $19,146

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CBI $500 $500 $500 HPP $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 Local Funds $8,337 $8,337 $8,337 STP $745 $745 $745 TCSP $564 $564 $564 TOTAL $19,146 $19,146 $19,146

Page 34 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

38 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Coronado, City of MPO ID: COR07 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street and Road Major Rehabilitation; Major Drainage; Reconstruction; Traffic TransNet - LSI: CR Operations Project Description: First Street (D Avenue to east end cul-de-sac approximately 1,900 feet), Second Street (Orange Avenue to A Avenue, 1,400 feet), Aruba Bend ( 850 feet), St.Christopher Lane (800 feet), Park Place (Star Park Circle to Isabella Avenue, 600 feet), Star Park Circle (740 feet), Encino Row, 570 feet) and Kingston Court (all three legs, 1,430 feet). - rehabilitation of roadways including removal and replacement of severely damaged areas, grinding and overlays of 1 1/2"

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $7,154

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,833 $109 $912 $136 $353 $323 $75 $1,758 TransNet - L $1,665 $1,665 $165 $1,500 TransNet - L Carry Over $400 $400 $20 $380 TransNet - LSI $2,335 $180 $427 $441 $463 $397 $427 $145 $2,190 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $921 $461 $309 $151 $51 $870 TOTAL $7,154 $1,954 $2,200 $750 $750 $750 $750 $456 $6,698

Page 35 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

39 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Del Mar, City of MPO ID: DM01 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Resurfacing & Drainage Projects TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - resurface and/or rehabilitate roadways

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $1,776

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $590 $590 $590 TransNet - L $831 $831 $831 TransNet - LSI $355 $98 $48 $49 $50 $54 $56 $355 TOTAL $1,776 $1,519 $48 $49 $50 $54 $56 $1,776

MPO ID: DM02 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Local Match to Bridge Retrofit Projects TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: At N. Torrey Pines Bridge, CDM Bridge over San Dieguito River - local match to federal Highway Bridge Program providing for seismic retrofit (part of CAL44); project will undertake full replacement of bridge upper deck, full depth pavement repair, and seismic upgrades

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $294

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $294 $182 $12 $100 $294 TOTAL $294 $182 $12 $100 $294

MPO ID: DM03 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Jimmy Durante Blvd. Northbound lane TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Jimmy Durante Blvd. from Camino Del Mar to South of San Dieguito Drive - grind and 2" overlay

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $140

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $140 $20 $120 $140 TOTAL $140 $20 $120 $140

Page 36 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

40 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Del Mar, City of MPO ID: DM04 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Camino Del Mar Major Rehabilitation Projects TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: From 11th to 9th Street and from 13th to 15th Street - on Camino Del Mar, grind and 2" overlay

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $583

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $583 $230 $112 $83 $26 $132 $583 TOTAL $583 $230 $112 $83 $26 $132 $583

Page 37 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

41 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) El Cajon, City of MPO ID: EL03 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Overlay/Reconstruction Projects TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Mollison from Main Street to Washington, Mollison from Broadway to Greenfield, Greenfield, Third Street from Lexington to Washington, Jamacha Road from Washington to south city limits, 2nd Street/I8 overpass, Main Street from I8 to Travelodge - street reconstruction and overlays of 2" - 3" thick, including collectors, thoroughfares & residential streets

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $16,447

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $6,747 $6,747 $6,747 TransNet - L (Cash) $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 TransNet - LSI $4,600 $400 $200 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $4,600 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,600 $2,600 $2,600 TOTAL $16,447 $9,647 $2,800 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $16,447

MPO ID: EL06 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Signals Projects TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Replacement of interconnect cable at various streets including Jamacha, Washington Avenue and Chase Avenue. Modification of existing traffic signal to improve traffic flow and safety at Main Street and Ballard Street. - new, upgrade or modification of traffic signals and Traffic Management Center, including rewire, modifications, replacement of signal interconnect cable, wireless video monitoring cameras and other necessary equipment; matching funds for Proposition 1B Traffic Light Synchronization Program Grant

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $1,652

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $580 $580 $580 TransNet - L (Cash) $300 $300 $300 TransNet - LSI $772 $100 $272 $100 $100 $100 $100 $772 TOTAL $1,652 $980 $272 $100 $100 $100 $100 $1,652

Page 38 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

42 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) El Cajon, City of MPO ID: EL11 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Sidewalk and other Repairs TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Various locations - repair broken sidewalk, driveway, ramps, etc.

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $1,350

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $450 $450 $150 $300 TransNet - L (Cash) $150 $150 $150 TransNet - LSI $150 $150 $150 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $600 $150 $150 $150 $150 $600 TOTAL $1,350 $600 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $1,200

MPO ID: EL18 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Light Installation Projects TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Broadway from Main Street to City Limits - provide for new street lights which include removing wooden pole mounted lights with utility underground

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Lighting improvements

Est Total Cost: $266

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $200 $25 $100 $25 $25 $25 $200 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $66 $66 $66 TOTAL $266 $66 $25 $100 $25 $25 $25 $266

MPO ID: EL20 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Signal LED Light Bulb Replacement TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - replace led lights on all signals

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $135

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $135 $135 $135 TOTAL $135 $135 $135

Page 39 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

43 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) El Cajon, City of MPO ID: EL21 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Resurfacing with slurry seals and ARAM products TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Downtown El Cajon and surrounding areas. - street resurfacing with slurry seals and asphalt rubber aggregate membrane (ARAM)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $2,500

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L Carry Over $341 $341 $341 TransNet - LSI $1,759 $400 $159 $400 $400 $400 $1,759 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $400 $400 $400 TOTAL $2,500 $400 $500 $400 $400 $400 $400 $2,500

MPO ID: EL23 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Signal Maintenance TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: All City Traffic Signals - repainting of traffic signal heads and other minor traffic signal maintenance

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $135

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $15 $15 $15 TransNet - LSI $80 $40 $40 $80 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $40 $40 $40 TOTAL $135 $15 $40 $40 $40 $135

MPO ID: EL24 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Jamacha Road Traffic Signals RAS (TA 7-8) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Jamacha Road from Washington Avenue to Gustavo Avenue - upgrading of traffic signals on Jamacha at the intersection of Lexington Avenue, Washington Avenue and Granite Hills Drive

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $204

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $204 $204 $204 TOTAL $204 $204 $204

Page 40 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

44 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Encinitas, City of MPO ID: ENC14A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Overlay Program TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Orpheus Ave-Leucadia Blvd. to Glaucus St , Eolus Ave-Leucadia Blvd to Glaucus St , Falcon Hill Ct-Nolbey St to end , San Andrade Dr.-Balour Dr to San Clemente , San Abella Dr.-Balour Dr to San Clemente , Guadalajara Dr-Balour Dr to San Clemente , San Clemente-Guadalajara to end , Fulvia St.-Leucadia Blvd to Orpheus Ave , Leucadia Blvd.-Hermes Ave to Hymettus Ave , Monterey Vista Way-Santa Fe Dr to end , Monterey Vista Pl-Monterey Vista Way to end , Village View Rd-Wandering Rd to end , Tres Hermanas-Wandering Rd to Village View Rd , Avenida La Posta- Wandering Rd to Village View Rd , Summerdawn Pl-Village View Rd to end , Mountain Vista-Village Park to El Camino Real , Hummock Lane-Gardendale Rd to end , Lone Jack Rd-Rancho Santa Fe Rd to Fortuna Ranch Rd , Cerro St-Willowsprings to El Camino Real , Avenida De Las Adelsas-El Camino Real Cerro St , Elva Ct-Oakbranch Dr to end , Elva Terrace-Oakbranch Dr to end , Delage Dr-Oakbranch Dr to Pegaso St , Pegaso St-Delage Dr to Oakbranch Dr , Avenida De Las Rosas-Avenida De Las Adelsas to Willowsprings , Calle Narcisos-Avenida De Las Rosas to end , Pensa Mientos-Avenida De Las Rosas to end , Calle Tulipanes- Avenida De Las Rosas to end , - asphalt grinding, 6" dig outs, and 1-1/2" polymer modified asphalt overlay

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $10,331

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $6,616 $2,516 $850 $850 $850 $800 $750 $6,616 TransNet - L $600 $600 $600 TransNet - L (Cash) $240 $240 $240 TransNet - LSI $2,875 $665 $300 $350 $410 $520 $630 $2,875 TOTAL $10,331 $4,021 $1,150 $1,200 $1,260 $1,320 $1,380 $10,331

MPO ID: ENC17 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Safe Routes to School Sidewalk Program TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Sidewalks on Westminster/Summit from Verdi to Montgomery (Cardiff Elementary School), Hygeia Ave. from Leucadia Blvd. to 380' south, Hygeia from Cereus St. to 220' north of Cereus, Cereus Street from Hermes Ave. to Hygeia, Union St. from the Paul Ecke School driveway to the SE corner of Union/Vulcan, and Vulcan Ave. from Union to 260' south (Paul Ecke Elementary School), Melba Rd. from Nardo to Bonita, south side of Santa Fe from I-5 to MacKinnon, Balour Drive from Santa Fe to Melba Road, Encinitas Blvd from Balour westerly 600', a citywide sidewalk replacement program and matching funds for a TDA grant to complete a study for sidewalks on Vulcan Avenue. - installation of pathways to include curb, gutter, drainage improvements and landscaping where appropriate

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $3,408

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,212 $1,212 $1,212 TransNet - L $900 $900 $900 TransNet - L (Cash) $296 $296 $296 TransNet - LSI $1,000 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $1,000 TOTAL $3,408 $2,408 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $3,408

Page 41 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

45 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Encinitas, City of MPO ID: ENC19 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Safety/Calming TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: On Rubenstein Avenue, Summit Avenue and Westminster Drive;, Via Cantebria between Garden View Road and Town Center;, Gardendale Road - install horizontal and vertical traffic safety and calming improvements such as speed cushions, chicanes, narrowing roadway, landscaped pop-outs and stop signs; develop Traffic Calming Plan for local neighborhoods

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Safer non-Federal-aid system roads

Est Total Cost: $1,426

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $180 $180 $180 TransNet - L $450 $450 $450 TransNet - L (Cash) $87 $87 $87 TransNet - L Carry Over $150 $150 $20 $130 TransNet - LSI $559 $150 $150 $150 $50 $59 $559 TOTAL $1,426 $867 $150 $150 $150 $50 $59 $20 $1,406

MPO ID: ENC20 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: North Coast Highway 101 Beautification TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: N. Coast Hwy. 101 from A Street to La Costa Avenue - design/construct comprehensive streetscape improvements: new curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping - the preferred design may include pedestrian and bicycle improvements, lane reconfiguration, and five traffic circles to facilitate and ease traffic congestion and more efficiently move vehicular traffic

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $5,200

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $500 $500 $500 TransNet - L (Cash) $100 $100 $100 TransNet - L Carry Over $320 $320 $320 TransNet - LSI $2,700 $300 $300 $500 $1,000 $600 $600 $2,100 TOTAL $3,620 $920 $300 $300 $500 $1,000 $600 $1,520 $2,100

Page 42 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

46 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Encinitas, City of MPO ID: ENC28 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Signal Modifications TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: on Highway 101/Chesterfield; Leucadia/101; El Camino Real/Manchester Ave.; Manchester Ave./Mira Costa College; E Street/Hwy. 101; Balour Ave/Encinitas; Via Cantebria/Encinitas, D-E Streets/Hwy. 101 and other circulation element roads within the City - install radio communication to traffic signals, hard wiring system to traffic signals, audible pedestrian signal; replace battery backup units; install pedestrian countdown times; upgrade BiTrans Chip in signal controllers at various traffic signals

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $882

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $100 $100 $100 TransNet - L (Cash) $382 $382 $382 TransNet - L Carry Over $150 $150 $150 TransNet - LSI $250 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $250 TOTAL $882 $632 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $882

MPO ID: ENC31 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-5/Encinitas Blvd. Interchange Modification RTP PG NO: A-5 RAS (TA 7-44) Project Description: At I-5/Encinitas Blvd. Interchange - modify interchange to improve safety and alleviate congestion (design only)

RT:5 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $1,330 Open to Traffic: Nov 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,330 $883 $200 $247 $1,330 TOTAL $1,330 $883 $200 $247 $1,330

MPO ID: ENC32 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Encinitas Pedestrian Crossing SANDAG ID: 1143800

Project Description: Along LOSSAN railroad (MP 235.1 to 239.5) from La Costa Avenue to Chesterfield Drive - PE, PS&E for 4 grade separated crossings located at Montgomery Ave., Santa Fe Drive, El Portal and Hillcrest; construction of Phase I at Santa Fe Drive

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Railroad/highway crossing

Est Total Cost: $25,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,725 $425 $1,300 $1,725 STIP-IIP PTA $1,248 $1,248 $1,248 TCRP $4,000 $4,000 $1,248 $2,752 TOTAL $6,973 $4,425 $2,548 $1,248 $5,725

Page 43 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

47 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Encinitas, City of MPO ID: ENC44 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Downtown/Coaster Station Parking Lot TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Southwest corner of Vulcan Avenue and E Street - includes the design and construction of a parking lot to accommodate parking for downtown visitors/employees and patrons of the Coaster; project will also include bike storage facilities, a sidewalk and connection to the future Coastal Rail Trails project

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Transportation enhancement activities

Est Total Cost: $1,320

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $40 $40 $40 TransNet - L Carry Over $1,280 $640 $640 $1,280 TOTAL $1,320 $680 $640 $40 $1,280

Page 44 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

48 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC02A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: East Valley/Valley Center EARMARK NO: CA332/260 RAS (TA 7-44) Project Description: East Valley Pkwy to Valley Center Dr, New Eureka Ranch St to E. Valley Pkwy - widen TransNet - LSI: CR roadway from 4 to 6 lanes with raised medians and left turn pockets; modify signal at Lake Wohlford and Valley Center Road; widen bridge over Escondido Creek

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $14,299 Open to Traffic: Jan 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 Local Funds $1,342 $1,342 $256 $1,086 RSTP $7,969 $7,969 $1,771 $6,198 TransNet - L Carry Over $1,588 $1,588 $229 $1,167 $192 TransNet - LSI $400 $400 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 TOTAL $14,299 $11,311 $2,988 $2,200 $7,621 $4,478

MPO ID: ESC03 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Citracado Parkway RAS (TA 7-44) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Citracado from Don Lee to Vineyard - widen from 2 to 4 lanes with left turn pockets and new traffic signal at Aero Way and Citracado Parkway

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $7,373 Open to Traffic: Dec 2009

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $2,400 $2,400 $600 $1,800 TransNet - L $3,200 $3,200 $3,200 TransNet - L (Cash) $173 $173 $173 TransNet - L Carry Over $100 $100 $100 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 TOTAL $7,373 $5,773 $1,600 $100 $600 $6,673

MPO ID: ESC04 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Citracado Parkway II RAS (TA 7-44) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Citracado Parkway from West Valley to Harmony Grove - widen from 2 to 4 lanes with raised medians, construct bridge over Escondido Creek

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $19,547 Open to Traffic: Jul 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HUD $908 $908 $908 Local Funds $14,410 $13,625 $425 $180 $180 $839 $1,000 $12,571 TransNet - L $581 $581 $581 TransNet - LSI $3,648 $527 $1,712 $1,409 $3,648 TOTAL $19,547 $15,114 $952 $1,892 $1,589 $1,747 $1,581 $16,219

Page 45 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

49 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC05 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Norte Parkway Phase IV RAS (TA 7-44)

Project Description: From La Honda Drive at citrus/Mission Avenue to e. Washington Avenue - widen from 2 to 4 lanes and construct missing section of El Norte Pkwy. with left turn pockets, raised medians and new traffic signals

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $4,586 Open to Traffic: Jan 2009

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $700 $700 $700 TransNet - L (Cash) $351 $351 $351 TransNet - L Carry Over $3,535 $3,535 $3,535 TOTAL $4,586 $1,051 $3,535 $4,586

MPO ID: ESC06 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Norte Parkway Bridge at Escondido Creek RAS (TA 7-44)

Project Description: El Norte Parkway from Kaile Lane to Key Lime Way - construct missing two lane bridge at Escondido Creek

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $4,950 Open to Traffic: Jul 2009

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $650 $650 $650 TransNet - L $2,000 $2,000 $50 $1,950 TransNet - L (Cash) $1,950 $1,950 $1,950 TransNet - L Carry Over $350 $350 $350 TOTAL $4,950 $4,600 $350 $50 $4,900

MPO ID: ESC08 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Felicita Ave/Juniper Street

Project Description: From Escondido Boulevard to Juniper Street and from Juniper Street to Chestnut Street - widen from 2 to 4 lanes with left turn pockets, raised medians on Felicita; new traffic signals at Juniper and Chestnut, Juniper and 13th Ave., Juniper and 15th Ave.; modify traffic signal at Juniper and Felicita

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $5,186 Open to Traffic: Apr 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 TransNet - L (Cash) $330 $330 $330 TransNet - L Carry Over $1,356 $1,356 $50 $1,306 TOTAL $5,186 $3,830 $1,356 $50 $5,136

Page 46 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

50 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC09 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Ninth Avenue TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Ninth Avenue from La Terraza to Spruce - widen from 2 to 4 lanes with raised median and modify traffic signals at Ninth Ave and Tulip Street - design phase

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $1,331 Open to Traffic: Jul 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $161 $161 $161 TOTAL $161 $161 $161

MPO ID: ESC11 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Rehabilitation & Resurface TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - reconstruction, resurfacing, chip sealing, crack filling, sidewalk repair

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $15,804

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $7,768 $6,569 $1,199 $300 $7,468 TransNet - L $1,904 $1,904 $1,904 TransNet - L (Cash) $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 TransNet - L Carry Over $500 $500 $500 TransNet - LSI $3,225 $3,043 $182 $3,225 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $907 $907 $907 TOTAL $15,804 $13,016 $2,788 $300 $15,504

Page 47 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

51 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC13 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Nordahl Road Bridge @ SR-78 RAS (TA 7-44) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Nordahl Road from Mission Ave. to Montiel Road - replace the Nordahl Road Overcrossing to increase the minimum vertical clearance from 14’-9” to the Caltrans minimum vertical clearance of 16’-6”, and provide an additional 14-feet of structure width necessary to facilitate the required construction staging of the project; the additional width of the overcrossing will accommodate operational improvements through left-turn storage at the ramp intersections; widen the eastbound and westbound exit ramps to provide three lanes at the intersections; widen Nordahl Road to provide a dedicated right-turn onto Montiel Road (no additional travel lanes)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $7,651

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON DEMO - TEA 21 $2,250 $2,250 $1,100 $1,150 RSTP $300 $300 $300 TransNet - L $424 $424 $52 $372 TransNet - L (Cash) $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TransNet - L Carry Over $364 $364 $191 $173 TransNet - LSI $313 $313 $313 TransNet - MC $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TOTAL $7,651 $4,974 $2,677 $3,643 $4,008

MPO ID: ESC17 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Neighborhood Projects

Project Description: Citywide - curb & gutter, sidewalks, street lights and other misc. street improvements

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $2,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $200 $200 $200 TransNet - L $350 $350 $350 TransNet - L (Cash) $50 $50 $50 TransNet - L Carry Over $1,400 $1,400 $200 $1,200 TOTAL $2,000 $400 $1,600 $200 $1,800

Page 48 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

52 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC24 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Centre City Parkway RAS (TA 7-44) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Centre City Parkway from Mission Road to SR 78 - widen 4 lanes to 6 lanes with intersection improvements

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $3,520 Open to Traffic: Jan 2011

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $846 $846 $300 $100 $446 TransNet - L $974 $974 $974 TransNet - L (Cash) $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 TransNet - LSI $300 $300 $300 TOTAL $3,520 $3,220 $300 $300 $100 $3,120

MPO ID: ESC25 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Citracado/Nordahl RAS (TA 7-44)

Project Description: Citracado/Nordahl from Country Club Lane to SR 78 - widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes with double left turn lanes and exclusive right turn lanes

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $3,776 Open to Traffic: Jul 2008

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $477 $477 $25 $452 TransNet - H (78) $2,154 $2,154 $2,154 TransNet - L $700 $700 $175 $200 $325 TransNet - L (Cash) $245 $245 $245 TransNet - L Carry Over $200 $200 $200 TOTAL $3,776 $3,576 $200 $400 $200 $3,176

MPO ID: ESC27 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Maple Street Pedestrian Plaza TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Maple from 2nd Ave to Valley Prkwy - reconstruct from 2-lane through street to a short two-lane cul-de-sac ending in large pedestrian plaza - design phase

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $1,230

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $230 $230 $230 TransNet - LSI $200 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $800 $800 $800 TOTAL $1,230 $230 $1,000 $1,230

Page 49 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

53 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Escondido, City of MPO ID: ESC30 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Norte Parkway Medians and Landscaping RAS (TA 7-44) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: El Norte Parkway from Washington Avenue to Valley Parkway - construct stamped concrete medians with landscape and irrigation

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Adding medians

Est Total Cost: $1,109

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $271 $271 $271 TransNet - LSI $200 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $638 $638 $100 $538 TOTAL $1,109 $271 $838 $100 $1,009

MPO ID: ESC35 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bear Valley Parkway North Contribution RAS (TA 7-39) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Bear Valley Parkway from San Pasqual Valley Road to Boyle Avenue - Bear Valley Parkway from San Pasqual Valley Road to Boyle Avenue - widen from two lanes to four lanes, with a center median, a bike lane and shoulder in each direction of travel (CNTY39)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Non construction related activities

Est Total Cost: $100

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $100 $100 $100 TOTAL $100 $100 $100

Page 50 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

54 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Imperial Beach, City of MPO ID: IB02 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Maintenance Operations TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Various locations - street maintenance

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $2,828

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,655 $1,655 $1,655 TransNet - LSI $1,173 $305 $157 $163 $171 $183 $195 $1,173 TOTAL $2,828 $1,960 $157 $163 $171 $183 $195 $2,828

MPO ID: IB11 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 75 Vehicle, Bicycle, Transit, Pedestrian Improvements

Project Description: Palm Ave (SR75) from 7th Street to 9th Street - design and construct vehicle, bicycle and public transit circulation and pedestrian access improvements along and across SR 75, including 7th Street and 9th Street intersections

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $300

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local RTCIP $300 $300 $90 $210 TOTAL $300 $300 $90 $210

MPO ID: IB12 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Major Street Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: 1-11 3rd Street (I.B. Blvd. to Elm Ave.), 2-11 7th Street (Encina Ave. to I.B. Blvd.), 3-11-Adelfa Court (Oneonta Ave. to Hemlock Ave.), 4-11 Delaware Street (Grove Ave. to I.B. Blvd.), 5-11 Arriba Ave. (9th to Cul-de-sac), 6-11 Elder Ave. (3rd to Seacoast), 7-11 Elder Ave. (10th Street to east City Limits), 8-11 14th St (Grove Ave. to Iris Ave.), 9-11 Hemlock (Adela Court to 10th St.), 10-11 Daisy Ave. (Corvina St to Seacoast Dr.) , 11-11 Grove St. (Connecticut to 8th St.), 12-12 Elm Ave. New storm drain (Florence to Florida), 13-12 Calla storm drain (532 Calla to Rainbow), 14-13 9th Steet Overlay (Calla to Imperial Beach Blvd.), 15-14 Elm Ave (7th to 10th) , 16-14 7th St (Encina to Palm Ave), 17-15 Georgia St (I.B. Blvd. to Fern St.) , 18-15 Donax Ave (13th St. to East City Limits) , 19-15 Donax Ave (2nd to 3rd St.), 20-15 5th St. (I.B. Blvd. to Fern St.) , 21-15 Fern St. (5th St to Sports Park) , 22-15 Grove Ave (Sports Park to Louden Lane) , 23-15-Louden Lane (I.B. Blvd. to Grove Ave.) - work includes but not limited to overlay, new sidewalks, curbs and gutters, ramps, and storm drain

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $3,835

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $662 $200 $462 $662 TransNet - LSI $2,737 $711 $367 $379 $398 $428 $454 $821 $1,916 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $436 $436 $131 $305 TOTAL $3,835 $911 $1,265 $379 $398 $428 $454 $952 $2,883

Page 51 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

55 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s)

Page 52 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

56 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) La Mesa, City of MPO ID: LAM17 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Construction TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Resurfacing Projects: FY10 - Boulder Drive, Chevy Chase, from Hillcrest Ave. to Sunrise Ave., Colina Drive from Orchard Way to end of street, Crowder Lane from Lemon Ave. to Hillcrest Ave., Grape Street from Lee Ave. to Normal Ave., Hillcrest Ave., Lee Aven. from University Ave. to Grape Street, Maiden Lane, Normal Ave. from Windsor Dr. to Lemon Ave., Palm Ave. from University Ave. to Allison Ave., Spring Street from Allison Ave. to La Mesa Blvd., Summit Drive; FY11 - Normal Ave. From Lowell St. to Windsor Ave.; FY13 - Normal Avenue from Windsor Ave. to La Mesa Blvd. - rehabilitate pavement of identified priority streets that are in poor condition and in need of major reconstruction including removal of existing pavement greater than 1" in depth, and construction of new structural pavement to provide a smooth travel surface

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $5,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - CP $2,500 $2,500 $150 $2,350 TransNet - L $1,100 $1,100 $100 $1,000 TransNet - LSI $1,268 $100 $368 $200 $200 $200 $200 $140 $1,128 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $132 $132 $132 TOTAL $5,000 $1,200 $3,000 $200 $200 $200 $200 $390 $4,610

MPO ID: LAM18 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Maintenance-Various TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - minor repairs or maintenance based on Pavement Management System Study

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $1,260

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $340 $340 $340 TransNet - LSI $920 $170 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $920 TOTAL $1,260 $510 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $1,260

MPO ID: LAM19 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Update Pavement Management Study TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - updates to the existing Pavement Management System Study to determine condition of city streets

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $65

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $35 $35 $35 TransNet - LSI $30 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $30 TOTAL $65 $40 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $65

Page 53 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

57 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) La Mesa, City of MPO ID: LAM20 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - remove and replace identified and prioritized tripping hazards

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $825

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $200 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI $625 $125 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $625 TOTAL $825 $325 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $825

MPO ID: LAM21 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Lights for Utility Undergrounding TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Parkway Dr. from Marengo to Lambda Ln., Spring St. from Park Ave. to southern city limits, Orien Ave. from Lowell St. to 7463 Orien Ave., Normal Ave. from Lowell St. to Windsor Ave., Waite Dr. from western city limit to High St., Massachusetts Ave. from University Ave. to southern city limits - installation of new streetlights to bring underground districts up to current city standards

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Lighting improvements

Est Total Cost: $123

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $63 $63 $63 TransNet - LSI $60 $20 $20 $20 $60 TOTAL $123 $83 $20 $20 $123

MPO ID: LAM22 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Signal Upgrades - Various TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Lake Murray @ El Paso, Lake Murray @ Baltimore - improve existing traffic signal and intersection locations by providing safety improvements such as protected left turns, overhead signals in lieu of island signals, and pedestrian ramps for improved pedestrian access

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $470

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $170 $170 $20 $150 TransNet - LSI $300 $100 $100 $100 $30 $270 TOTAL $470 $170 $100 $100 $100 $50 $420

Page 54 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

58 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) La Mesa, City of MPO ID: LAM23 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Pedestrian Ramps-Various TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - install pedestrian ramps in the sidewalk where there is no existing access, in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $408

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $100 $100 $100 TransNet - LSI $308 $58 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $308 TOTAL $408 $158 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $408

MPO ID: LAM24 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Roadway Drainage Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Johnson St. from Garfield St. to 8975 Johnson St., Adams Avenue Drainage improvement between Adams/Tower Avenues, Amaya Dr. from Water St to Primrose Lane, Schuyler area - improvements to address inadequate street drainage by constructing new or improving existing storm drain or surface improvements, reducing congestion by improved vehicular and pedestrian flow all year around

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $1,388

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $160 $160 $18 $142 TransNet - LSI $1,228 $528 $300 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $1,128 TOTAL $1,388 $688 $300 $100 $100 $100 $100 $118 $1,270

MPO ID: LAM25 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Calming -Various TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - implement traffic calming measures including signing and striping, speed bumps and other similar measures

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operatng

Est Total Cost: $250

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $100 $100 $100 TransNet - LSI $150 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $150 TOTAL $250 $125 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $250

Page 55 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

59 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) La Mesa, City of MPO ID: LAM28 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Downtown Village Streetscape Improvement Project TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: La Mesa Blvd from Acacia Avenue to Grant Street - improvements to the downtown village along La Mesa Boulevard inlcuding reconstruction of poor pavement sections, replacement of pavement to accommodate alignment revisions/new medians/etc., new curb & gutter to address alignment revisions and replace C&G in poor condition, installation of new sidewalk to match alignment changes, replacement of sidewalk in poor condition, lighting and landscape enhancements and replacement

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Plantings, landscaping, etc

Est Total Cost: $991

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $991 $991 $991 TOTAL $991 $991 $991

Page 56 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

60 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) National City, City of MPO ID: NC01 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Plaza Blvd Widening RTP PG NO: A-6 RAS (TA 7-45) Project Description: Plaza Blvd. from Highland Ave. to Euclid Ave. - widen from 2 to 3 lanes including a new TransNet - LSI: CR traffic lane in each direction, new sidewalks, sidewalk widening, traffic signal upgrades and interconnection

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $3,393 Open to Traffic: Jul 2015

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON RSTP $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TransNet - L $797 $797 $797 TransNet - LSI $596 $200 $39 $33 $31 $142 $151 $303 $293 TOTAL $3,393 $2,997 $39 $33 $31 $142 $151 $3,100 $293

MPO ID: NC03 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Resurfacing Project TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Harding Avenue (north-end to W. 30th St.), Van Ness Avenue(Leonard St. to 200'south), E. 31st St. (B Ave. to D Ave., Roosevelt Avenue (north-end to W. 18th St.), Thelma Way (4th St. to E. 5th St.), E Avenue (E. 20th St. to Cul-de-sac), B Avenue (E. 7th St. to E. 8th St.), E. 5th Street (D Ave. to Highland Ave.), E. 17th St. (N Ave. to Palm Ave.), F Avenue (E. 4th St. to E. 8th St.), Lanoitan Avenue (Division St. to Melrose St.), Burden Dr. (E. 7th St. to E. 8th St.), E. 1st St. (Euclid Ave. to Clairmont Ave.), E. 24th St. (N.C. Blvd. to D Ave.), E. 2nd St. (Valva Ave. to Clairmont Ave.) W. 19th St. (Wilson Ave. to Harding Ave.), E. 3rd St. (Valva Ave. to Clairmont Ave.), W. 16th Street (Hoover Ave. to N.C. Blvd.), Prospect Avenue (E. 20th St. to E. 22nd St.), E. 28th St. (J Ave. to K Ave.), U Avenue (E. 1st St. to E. 4th St.), Paradise Dr. (PCC Fork in Road to E. 10th St.) E. 5th St. (N.C. Blvd. to D Ave.), E. 5th St. (Q Ave. to R Ave.), N Avenue (E. 16th St. to E. 18th St.), E. 15th St. (Highland Ave. to K Ave.), G Ave.(E. 21st St. to E. 22nd St.), E. 7th St. (Palm Ave. to Q Ave.), F Ave. (E. 26th St. to E. 28th St.), E. 18th St. (Highland Ave. to Palm Ave.), Valva Ave. (Melrose St. to E. 3rd St.), Paradise Drive (E. 8th St. to Fork in Road), Salot Street (E. 7th St. to E. 8th St.), I Ave. (E. 13th St. to E. 15th St.), Melrose St. (Valva Ave. to Clairmont Ave.), V Ave. (E. 7th St. to E. 8th St.), C Ave. (E. 18th St. to E. 22nd St.), Terry Lane (R Ave. to East Cul-de-sac), W. 11th St. (Hoover Ave. to N.C. Blvd.), 40 W. 20th St. (Wilson Ave. to Harding Ave.), E. 16th St. (N Ave. to Palm Ave.),E. 28th St. (K Ave. to L Ave.) - Provide roadway rehabilitation (grinding and new overlay 1 inch thick or greater)and repair of concrete sidewalks, curb and gutters

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $19,541

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $5,614 $4,114 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $5,614 TransNet - CP $4,500 $4,500 $4,500 TransNet - L $5,313 $5,313 $5,313 TransNet - L (Cash) $629 $629 $629 TransNet - LSI $3,485 $1,066 $102 $167 $246 $922 $982 $3,485 TOTAL $19,541 $15,622 $402 $467 $546 $1,222 $1,282 $19,541

Page 57 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

61 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) National City, City of MPO ID: NC04 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Signal Install/Upgrade TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: National City Boulevard (1st Street to 35th Street), Plaza Boulevard (Roosevelt Avenue to Paradise Valley Road), Euclid Avenue (Division Street to Sweetwater Road), 30th Street (National City Boulevard to Euclid Avenue), Harbor Drive (Civic Center Drive to 8th Street), Highland Avenue (Division Street to 30th Street), 8th Street (Harbor Drive to Paradise Valley Road), Division Street (Highland Avenue to Harbison Avenue), DD Avenue (8th Street to 30th Street), Palm Avenue (Division Street to 18th Street), 18th Street (National City Boulevard to Euclid Avenue), 24th Street (Tidelands Avenue to Highland Avenue), Sweetwater Road (Euclid Avenue to Plaza Bonita Center Way) - install and/or upgrade traffic signals

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $1,020

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $50 $50 $50 TransNet - L $472 $472 $472 TransNet - LSI $498 $300 $20 $17 $15 $71 $76 $498 TOTAL $1,020 $822 $20 $17 $15 $71 $76 $1,020

Page 58 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

62 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) North County Transit District MPO ID: NCTD01 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bus Associated Capital Maintenance

Project Description: NCTD service area - bus tire lease

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Rehabilitation of transit vehicles

Est Total Cost: $1,200

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $960 $240 $240 $240 $240 $960 Local Funds $240 $60 $60 $60 $60 $240 TOTAL $1,200 $300 $300 $300 $300 $1,200

MPO ID: NCTD02 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Preventive Maintenance

Project Description: NCTD service area - fixed route, rail fleet and facility maintenance costs

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance

Est Total Cost: $70,672

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $29,869 $7,027 $7,408 $7,657 $7,777 $29,869 FTA 5309 (FG) $26,669 $6,280 $6,532 $6,793 $7,064 $26,669 Local Funds $14,134 $3,327 $3,485 $3,613 $3,710 $14,134 TOTAL $70,672 $16,634 $17,425 $18,063 $18,551 $70,672

MPO ID: NCTD03 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: ADA Paratransit Services

Project Description: NCTD service area - operating cost associated with providing ADA/paratransit services

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance

Est Total Cost: $13,260

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $6,000 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $6,000 Local Funds $6,242 $1,404 $1,495 $1,632 $1,711 $6,242 TransNet - ADA $1,018 $236 $245 $258 $279 $1,018 TOTAL $13,260 $3,140 $3,240 $3,390 $3,490 $13,260

Page 59 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

63 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) North County Transit District MPO ID: NCTD05 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bus/ADA/ Revenue Vehicle Purchases & Related Equipment

Project Description: NCTD service area - purchase replacement vehicles and related equipment; CNG buses, ADA vans and shuttle vehicles

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Purchase new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or minor expansions of fleet Est Total Cost: $34,580

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $19,120 $9,243 $1,952 $2,415 $5,510 $19,120 FTA 5311 $2,036 $2,036 $2,036 FTA Funds - AR-5311 $578 $578 $578 Local Funds $5,146 $2,677 $488 $604 $1,378 $5,146 TCRP $7,700 $7,700 $7,700 TOTAL $34,580 $22,234 $2,440 $3,019 $6,888 $34,580

MPO ID: NCTD06 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bus/Rail Support Equipment & Facility

Project Description: NCTD service area - facility and support equipment for fixed route and rail services including radio equipment, buildings and structures, shop and garage equipment, computer hardware & software, furnitures and fixtures, service vehicles and solar installations

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Purchase of office, shop and operating equipment for existing facilities Est Total Cost: $5,618

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $4,494 $1,329 $1,060 $1,253 $852 $4,494 Local Funds $1,124 $332 $265 $313 $213 $1,124 TOTAL $5,618 $1,661 $1,325 $1,566 $1,065 $5,618

MPO ID: NCTD16B ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Oceanside to Escondido Rail Operations

Project Description: For Sprinter service - start-up operating cost; debt service payments on $34 million COP's after construction is completed

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance

Est Total Cost: $30,961

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CMAQ $16,000 $16,000 $16,000 Local Funds $2,250 $2,250 $2,250 TransNet - TSI $12,711 $2,945 $1,646 $2,720 $2,691 $2,709 $12,711 TOTAL $30,961 $21,195 $1,646 $2,720 $2,691 $2,709 $30,961

Page 60 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

64 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) North County Transit District MPO ID: NCTD18 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Rail - ROW Improvements

Project Description: NCTD service area - cross-tie renewal program, street cross protection, rail structure rehabilitation, rail replacement, storage tracks, rail lubricators, at-grade crossing renewal, turnout renewal, other misc. improvements

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way

Est Total Cost: $17,152

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $10,310 $7,277 $650 $787 $798 $798 $10,310 FTA 5309 (FG) $621 $621 $621 FTA Funds - AR-5307 $570 $570 $570 FTA Funds - AR-5309 $862 $862 $862 Local Funds $2,538 $1,780 $163 $197 $200 $200 $2,538 TransNet - Transit $2,251 $2,251 $2,251 TOTAL $17,152 $13,361 $813 $984 $998 $998 $17,152

MPO ID: NCTD20 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Rail Vehicles & Related Equipment

Project Description: NCTD service area - locomotive purchase/overhaul, revenue vehicles, misc. support equipment including vehicles, spare components and signal equipment upgrade/replacement and PTC

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Purchase new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or minor expansions of fleet Est Total Cost: $74,363

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $11,524 $5,839 $4,429 $418 $420 $418 $11,524 FTA 5309 (FG) $476 $476 $476 Local Funds $2,976 $1,479 $247 $244 $902 $105 $2,976 PTMISEA (Prop1B) $6,170 $6,170 $6,170 Prop 1A - High Speed Rail $41,843 $8,500 $14,000 $11,010 $8,333 $41,843 STA $1,454 $452 $1,003 $1,454 STIP-IIP PTA $1,000 $1,000 $500 $500 TCRP $129 $129 $129 TransNet - MC $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 TransNet - Transit (Cash) $1,349 $1,349 $1,349 Transit Sec Grant Prg (Prop1B) $3,442 $860 $860 $860 $860 $3,442 TOTAL $74,363 $20,084 $24,539 $18,702 $10,515 $523 $500 $73,863

Page 61 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

65 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) North County Transit District MPO ID: NCTD29 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Planning

Project Description: NCTD Service area - local short range and other transit planning studies

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Non construction related activities

Est Total Cost: $1,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $800 $200 $200 $200 $200 $800 Local Funds $200 $50 $50 $50 $50 $200 TOTAL $1,000 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,000

MPO ID: NCTD34 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Expanded Transit Service

Project Description: NCTD service area - operating support for existing fixed route and rail transit service, including intercity bus and rural services

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance

Est Total Cost: $125,562

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5311 $1,459 $349 $359 $370 $381 $1,459 Local Funds $95,462 $21,650 $22,780 $24,777 $26,254 $95,462 TransNet - TSI $28,641 $7,270 $6,517 $7,046 $7,808 $28,641 TOTAL $125,562 $29,269 $29,656 $32,193 $34,443 $125,562

MPO ID: NCTD40 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Rail Station Improvements

Project Description: NCTD service area - Coaster & Sprinter station improvements including platform extension; Convention Center/Padres stadium design; information display panel; electronic signage

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Reconstruction or renovation of transit structures Est Total Cost: $3,039

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $1,446 $589 $200 $200 $257 $200 $1,446 Local Funds $363 $149 $50 $50 $64 $50 $363 TransNet - MC $1,230 $1,230 $1,230 TOTAL $3,039 $1,968 $250 $250 $321 $250 $3,039

Page 62 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

66 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) North County Transit District MPO ID: NCTD42 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bridge & Infrastructure Program. NCTD

Project Description: Along coastal ROW from Orange County Line to downtown station at Santa Fe Depot and along inland ROW from Oceanside Transit Center (Oceanside, CA) to Escondido Transit Center (Escondido, CA). - bridges & other infrastructure improvements along rail ROW to be implemented by NCTD

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Railroad/highway crossing

Est Total Cost: $40,351

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $15,692 $2,840 $4,000 $6,632 $2,220 $15,692 FTA 5309 (FG) $16,568 $16,568 $3,120 $13,448 Local Funds $4,878 $4,878 $780 $4,098 STA $3,213 $1,000 $1,658 $555 $3,213 TOTAL $40,351 $24,286 $5,000 $8,290 $2,775 $3,900 $36,451

Page 63 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

67 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Oceanside, City of MPO ID: O06 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Melrose Drive Extension RAS (TA 7-45) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Melrose Drive from North Santa Fe Avenue to Spur Avenue - in Oceanside, future construction of 4-lane arterial highway with medians, sidewalks and bike lanes

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $13,025 Open to Traffic: Dec 2018

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 Local RTCIP $11,000 $3,000 $4,000 $4,000 $3,000 $8,000 TransNet - L $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 TransNet - L Carry Over $25 $25 $25 TOTAL $13,025 $1,000 $1,025 $3,000 $4,000 $4,000 $5,025 $8,000

MPO ID: O09 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Camino Real Bridge

Project Description: At SR 78 - reconstruct to accommodate increased lane/shoulder width - Design Phase

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $1,397

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $275 $275 $275 Local RTCIP $250 $250 $250 TransNet - L $872 $872 $872 TOTAL $1,397 $1,147 $250 $1,397

MPO ID: O14 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bridge Rehabilitation

Project Description: North Coast Highway bridge over the San Luis Rey River, Douglas Drive bridge over the San Luis Rey River - seismic retrofit of highway bridges over the San Luis Rey River

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $3,900

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $50 $50 $50 TransNet - L $3,850 $3,850 $3,850 TOTAL $3,900 $3,850 $50 $3,900

Page 64 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

68 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Oceanside, City of MPO ID: O17 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Loma Alta Creek/Sprinter Detention Basin TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Loma Alta Creek and Sprinter right-of-way east of El Camino Real and east of Rancho del Oro Blvd. - construction of flood control walls

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way

Est Total Cost: $10,200

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 TransNet - L Carry Over $700 $700 $700 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,500 $2,000 $500 $2,500 TOTAL $10,200 $7,000 $700 $2,000 $500 $10,200

MPO ID: O18 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Neighborhood Sidewalk/ADA/Traffic Improvements TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - in Oceanside, slurry sealing of streets, completion of missing segments of sidewalks, new access ramps and shoulder improvements for pedestrian accessibility and road safety, parkway trees, streetlights

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $7,550

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $1,150 $1,150 $1,150 TransNet - L (Cash) $600 $600 $600 TransNet - LSI $4,600 $500 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,100 $4,600 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,200 $1,200 $1,200 TOTAL $7,550 $1,750 $1,700 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,100 $7,550

MPO ID: O20 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Oceanside Boulevard Bus Stop ADA Upgrades RAS (TA 7-45)

Project Description: Oceanside Boulevard from I-5 to El Camino Real - acquire right-of-way and construct wider sidewalk and bus stop waiting pads to allow NCTD buses to deploy wheelchair lifts

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Construction of small passenger shelters and information kiosks Est Total Cost: $180

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $180 $180 $50 $50 $80 TOTAL $180 $180 $50 $50 $80

Page 65 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

69 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Oceanside, City of MPO ID: O22 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: College Boulevard Widening from Vista Way to Old Grove Road RAS (TA 7-45)

Project Description: College Boulevard from Vista Way to Old Grove Road - in Oceanside, widen from the existing four lanes to six lanes with bike lanes and raised median

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $300 Open to Traffic: Jun 2020

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $300 $200 $100 $300 TOTAL $300 $200 $100 $300

MPO ID: O23 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: College Boulevard Bridge Widening at San Luis Rey River RAS (TA 7-45) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: College Boulevard from Adams Street to North River Road - in Oceanside, widen from four to six lanes plus bike lanes and a striped-only median; widening includes the approach roadway and the bridge deck over the San Luis Rey River - Design Phase

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $200 Open to Traffic: Jun 2019

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $75 $75 $75 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $125 $125 $125 TOTAL $200 $125 $75 $200

MPO ID: O24 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Overlay Program TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Oceanside Boulevard from Coast Highway to College Boulevard, College Boulevard from Vista Way to Mesa Drive, Vista Way from Jefferson Street to El Camino Real, and El Camino Real from SR-78 to Douglas Drive, and North River Road from Vandegrift Boulevard to Sleeping Indian Road. - in Oceanside, permanent asphalt overlay (2-inches minimum)of arterial streets

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $9,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $6,000 $1,000 $2,000 $1,500 $1,500 $6,000 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 TOTAL $9,000 $3,000 $1,000 $2,000 $1,500 $1,500 $9,000

Page 66 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

70 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Oceanside, City of MPO ID: O25 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Management Center and Adaptive Traffic Signals TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: College Boulevard and El Camino Real, College Boulevard and SR-78, El Camino Real and SR-78, Oceanside Boulevard and El Camino Real, College Boulevard and North River Road, Mission Avenue and El Camino Real, Coast Highway and Mission Avenue, Coast Highway and Oceanside Boulevard - in the City of Oceanside, installation of a new traffic management center (TMC) to conduct real time traffic monitoring and demand-based adaptive control of traffic signals

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $1,850

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Other Fed - Economy Recovery $200 $200 $200 TransNet - LSI $1,200 $400 $400 $400 $1,200 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $450 $450 $450 TOTAL $1,850 $650 $400 $400 $400 $1,850

MPO ID: O26 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR76 Widening at Rancho del Oro Boulevard RAS (TA 7-45) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: From W. of Rancho del Oro to East of Rancho del Oro - widen SR76 for one additional lane width 1500 feet west and east of Rancho del Oro Boulevard

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $3,100 Open to Traffic: Dec 2017

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $2,850 $250 $1,000 $1,600 $250 $2,600 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $250 $250 $250 TOTAL $3,100 $250 $250 $1,000 $1,600 $500 $2,600

MPO ID: O27 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Coast Highway and SR-76 Roundabout TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: North Coast Highway from SR-76 to SR-76 - in Oceanside, construction of a traffic circle at the intersection of North Coast Highway and State Route 76. The traffic circle will be unsignalized; free traffic flow at all approaches

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $1,050 Open to Traffic: Jun 2016

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 TransNet - LSI $50 $50 $50 TOTAL $1,050 $50 $1,000 $50 $1,000

Page 67 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

71 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Poway, City of MPO ID: POW02 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Espola Road RAS (TA 7-45)

Project Description: Espola Road from Twin Peaks Road to Titan Way - widen Espola Road from 2 to 3 lanes with 8-foot bike lanes/shoulders

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $4,922 Open to Traffic: Nov 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $4,332 $1,275 $1,572 $1,486 $1,275 $3,057 Local RTCIP $300 $100 $100 $100 $100 $200 RSTP $290 $290 $290 TOTAL $4,922 $1,565 $100 $1,672 $1,586 $1,665 $3,257

MPO ID: POW10 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Poway Road Reconstruction and Overlay Projects TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Carriage Road Reconstruction from Poway Road to Buckley Street - 10/11, Twin Peaks Road Overlay from Ted Williams Road to Silverset Street - 11/12, Stowe Drive Overlay from Pomerado Road to Iavelli Street - 12/13, Scripps Poway Parkway Overlay from Tech Center to Community Road - 13/14, Solara Way Overlay from Tannin Drive to Valle Verde Drive - 13/14, Scripps Poway Parkway Overlay from Eeast City Limits to Danielson Street - 14/15 - reconstruction and overlay

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $3,256

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $3,256 $601 $761 $650 $839 $405 $3,256 TOTAL $3,256 $601 $761 $650 $839 $405 $3,256

MPO ID: POW11 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: In Poway - Poway Road Corridor Study TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Poway Road from Pomerado Rd to Garden Rd - to study the design options to increase traffic flow and safety on Poway Road from Pomerado Road to Garden Road

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $200

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $200 $200 $200 TOTAL $200 $200 $200

Page 68 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

72 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Poway, City of MPO ID: POW12 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Intersection Improvement Projects TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Poway Rd from Millards Rd to Millards Rd - redesign intersection to increase traffic flow and safety

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection channelization projects

Est Total Cost: $250

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $250 $250 $40 $210 TOTAL $250 $250 $40 $210

MPO ID: POW13 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Intersection Signalization Projects TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Intersections of Stowe Drive and Danielson Street (11/12) and Kirkham Drive and Community Road (13/14) - signalization of intersections

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $430

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $430 $180 $250 $90 $340 TOTAL $430 $180 $250 $90 $340

MPO ID: POW14 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Poway Annual Street Maintenance Program TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Zone 1 - 10/11, Zone 2 - 11/12, Zone 3 - 12/13, Zone 4 - 13/14, Zone 5 - 14/15 - street resurfacing and rehabilitation of the local City streets by maintenance zones

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $1,811

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,801 $330 $310 $360 $388 $413 $1,801 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $10 $10 $10 TOTAL $1,811 $340 $310 $360 $388 $413 $1,811

Page 69 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

73 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN03A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Freeway Service Patrol

Project Description: Countywide - provides rapid removal of disabled vehicles; joint project between SANDAG, Caltrans and CHP to alleviate traffic congestion associated with non-recurring incidents

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operatng

Est Total Cost: $17,903

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FSP $14,063 $2,483 $2,895 $2,895 $2,895 $2,895 $14,063 Local Funds $325 $325 $325 RSTP $3,515 $621 $723 $723 $724 $724 $3,515 TOTAL $17,903 $3,429 $3,618 $3,618 $3,619 $3,619 $17,903

MPO ID: SAN04 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-15 FasTrak RTP PG NO: A-5 SANDAG ID: 1201504 Project Description: From SR 163 to SR 78 - implementation and expansion of FasTrak system along I-15 corridor

RT:15 Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operatng

Est Total Cost: $25,464

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CMAQ $234 $234 $234 Local Funds $17 $17 $17 RSTP $250 $250 $250 Toll - Managed Lanes $120 $120 $120 TransNet - MC $23,237 $17,838 $2,445 $1,688 $1,266 $5,022 $18,215 Value Pricing Program $1,606 $1,606 $1,606 TOTAL $25,464 $20,065 $2,445 $1,688 $1,266 $7,249 $18,215

MPO ID: SAN07A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Plan, Program & Monitor SANDAG ID: 11091

Project Description: Regionwide - planning, programming and monitoring activities related to transportation funding

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Non construction related activities

Est Total Cost: $3,771

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON STIP-RIP State Cash $3,771 $2,115 $705 $317 $317 $317 $3,771 TOTAL $3,771 $2,115 $705 $317 $317 $317 $3,771

Page 70 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

74 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN11A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Regional Rideshare Program SANDAG ID: 60001

Project Description: Countywide - Component of overall regional Transportation Demand Management

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Ride-sharing and van-pooling program

Est Total Cost: $19,685

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CMAQ $19,685 $4,031 $4,283 $5,547 $5,824 $19,685 TOTAL $19,685 $4,031 $4,283 $5,547 $5,824 $19,685

MPO ID: SAN13 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Joint Transit Operations Center SANDAG ID: 1142600 EARMARK NO: Project Description: Regionwide - operations facility/control center to coordinate and integrate several ITS E2008-BUSP-0111 deployments; part of ITS regional architecture

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems Est Total Cost: $2,631

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5309 (Bus) $1,668 $1,668 $1,668 TransNet - H $963 $15 $948 $963 TOTAL $2,631 $1,668 $15 $948 $2,631

MPO ID: SAN19 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: GARVEE Debt Service RTP PG NO: A-5

Project Description: From SR 56 to Centre City Pkwy - Debt service for issue of GARVEE bonds for the I-15 ML (CAL18) project

RT:15 Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Non construction related activities

Est Total Cost: $238,283

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON STIP-IIP NHS GARVEE $59,282 $31,987 $5,459 $5,459 $5,459 $5,459 $5,459 $59,282 STIP-RIP NHS GARVEE $179,001 $97,121 $16,376 $16,376 $16,376 $16,376 $16,376 $179,001 TOTAL $238,283 $129,108 $21,835 $21,835 $21,835 $21,835 $21,835 $238,283

Page 71 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

75 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN21 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories - bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and non-motorized)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $18,461

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $9,899 $9,144 $755 $1,750 $8,149 TDA - Bicycles $4,552 $4,436 $116 $1,090 $3,462 TransNet - B $1,795 $1,449 $347 $75 $1,720 TransNet - BPNS $1,849 $1,003 $847 $1,849 TransNet - L (Cash) $16 $16 $14 $2 TransNet - LSI $250 $250 $250 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $100 $100 $100 TOTAL $18,461 $16,032 $2,431 $2,929 $15,532

MPO ID: SAN23 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Mid-Coast Corridor Project PPNO: 7307 RTP PG NO: A-5 Project Description: From Old Town Transit Center to University City - 11-mile trolley line with new transit SANDAG ID: 1041501 stations proposed at Tecolote Road, Clairemont Drive, Balboa Avenue, University Center Lanes, UCSD West, UCSD East, Executive Drive, and the UTC transit center

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $1,246,292 Open to Traffic: Dec 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $519 $519 $519 FTA 5309 (NS) $14,640 $14,640 $14,640 PTA $537 $537 $537 STIP-RIP PTA $28,756 $28,756 $28,756 STIP-RIP State Cash $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 TCRP $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 TransNet - MC $577,428 $14,747 $39 $255,980 $164,879 $141,783 $14,786 $562,642 TransNet - Transit $660 $660 $660 TOTAL $636,540 $30,356 $14,747 $28,795 $255,980 $164,879 $141,783 $73,898 $562,642 *Total cost assumes Full Funding Grant Agreement with FTA

Page 72 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

76 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN26 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-15 BRT Transit Stations @Rancho Bernardo, Sabre Springs, and Del Lago RTP PG NO: A-5 SANDAG ID: 1201505 Project Description: From SR 163 to SR 78 - construct transit stations along the at Del Lago, Rancho Bernardo Road, and Sabre Springs Parkway for I-15 BRT service including surface parking, bus staging, bike lockers and station amenities

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $46,170 Open to Traffic: Mar 2009

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CMAQ $12,012 $12,012 $12,012 FTA 5309 (Bus) $2,788 $2,788 $2,788 STIP-RIP PTA $7,327 $7,327 $7,327 TCRP $5,716 $5,716 $5,716 TransNet - MC $11,227 $4,273 $4,058 $2,210 $686 $11,227 TransNet - Transit $7,100 $7,100 $7,100 TOTAL $46,170 $39,216 $4,058 $2,210 $686 $5,716 $40,454

MPO ID: SAN26A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-15 BRT Operations and Vehicles SANDAG ID: 1201508

Project Description: From Escondido to San Diego - planning, operations and vehicle acquisition for the BRT service along I-15 corridor

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $34,470 Open to Traffic: Dec 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CMAQ $10,120 $10,120 $10,120 Local Funds $36 $36 $36 TransNet - MC $24,314 $1,576 $7,283 $14,673 $425 $357 $1,576 $22,738 TOTAL $34,470 $11,732 $7,283 $14,673 $425 $357 $1,612 $32,858

MPO ID: SAN26B ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Transit Stations Upgrades SANDAG ID: 1201509

Project Description: Broadway corridor, Kettner and India Streets - upgrade transit stations in downtown San Diego for BRT services

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $9,154 Open to Traffic: Mar 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $9,154 $633 $3,830 $4,691 $1,400 $803 $6,951 TOTAL $9,154 $633 $3,830 $4,691 $1,400 $803 $6,951

Page 73 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

77 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN26C ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-15 BRT Mid-City In-Line Bus Rapid Transit Stations SANDAG ID: 1201507

Project Description: At University Avenue and at El Cajon Blvd. (mid-city area of San Diego) - construct transit stations

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Reconstruction or renovation of transit structures Est Total Cost: $21,450

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $21,450 $1,303 $1,862 $1,674 $6,046 $10,410 $155 $6,372 $52 $15,026 TOTAL $21,450 $1,303 $1,862 $1,674 $6,046 $10,410 $155 $6,372 $52 $15,026

MPO ID: SAN27 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: San Ysidro Intermodal Freight Facility/South Line Rail RTP PG NO: A-5 SANDAG ID: 1300601, 1300602 Project Description: From Commercial St. to International Border - SD&AE freight facility and South Line Mainline in San Ysidro - environmental studies, design, site planning, and construction for an international freight facility; signal installation for the track and rail cars

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way

Est Total Cost: $149,090

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CBI $600 $600 $600 DEMO - TEA 21 $9,980 $9,980 $2,055 $7,925 Local Funds $320 $320 $320 Trade Corridor Program $107,360 $107,360 $107,360 Trade Corridor Program Conversion $16,600 $16,600 $16,600 TransNet - Border $14,230 $1,725 $5,900 $3,888 $500 $700 $1,517 $14,230 TransNet - MC AC $0 $1,700 $14,900 $(16,600) TOTAL $149,090 $14,325 $20,800 $111,248 $500 $700 $1,517 $17,205 $7,925 $123,960

MPO ID: SAN28 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Del Mar Bluff Stabilization EA NO: R550SB PPNO: 7300 Project Description: From MP 244.1 in Del Mar to MP 245.7 in Del Mar - stabilize bluff areas SANDAG ID: 1143000

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way

Est Total Cost: $14,237

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5309 (NS) $4,386 $4,386 $405 $3,981 STIP-GF IIP State Cash $4,500 $4,500 $4,500 STIP-IIP PTA $4,597 $1,200 $3,397 $1,200 $3,397 STIP-IIP State Cash $754 $754 $754 TOTAL $14,237 $10,840 $3,397 $1,605 $12,632

Page 74 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

78 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN29 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Sorrento to Miramar Double Track/Realign EA NO: R690SA PPNO: 7301 Project Description: Phase 1: CP Pines (MP 249,8) to CP Miramar (MP 251), Phase 2: CP Miramar (MP 251) RTP PG NO: A-5 to CP Cumbres (MP 252.9) - realign curve and construct second main track; fully funds SANDAG ID: 1142200, 1239801 PE and design for both Phase 1 and Phase 2; construction for Phase 1 only

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way

Est Total Cost: $26,800

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON STIP-IIP PTA $3,900 $3,900 $3,900 STIP-IIP State Cash $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 Trade Corridor Program $10,800 $10,800 $10,800 TransNet - MC $10,800 $371 $1,090 $540 $7,669 $1,130 $2,381 $8,419 TOTAL $26,800 $5,571 $11,890 $540 $7,669 $1,130 $7,581 $19,219

MPO ID: SAN40 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Metropolitan Planning

Project Description: Region-wide - ongoing regional transportation planning

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Non construction related activities

Est Total Cost: $16,249

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $873 $873 $873 Local Funds $412 $194 $218 $412 TOTAL $1,285 $194 $1,091 $1,285

MPO ID: SAN46 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Super Loop RTP PG NO: A-5 SANDAG ID: 1041502 Project Description: University City in San Diego - design and construction of transit priority treatments, que jumper lanes, street modifications, new and modified transit stations, and acquisition of 12 expansion shuttles

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $36,349 Open to Traffic: Jun 2009

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5309 (NS) $617 $617 $617 TransNet - MC $35,033 $13,023 $12,923 $9,088 $6,873 $752 $27,408 TransNet - Transit $699 $699 $699 TOTAL $36,349 $14,339 $12,923 $9,088 $8,189 $752 $27,408

Page 75 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

79 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN47 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: South Bay BRT SANDAG ID: 1280504

Project Description: From Otay Ranch to downtown San Diego - plan, design, and construct transit stations, transit way, local street and road modifications, freeway modifications

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $97,108 Open to Traffic: Sep 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $545 $545 $545 FTA 5309 (Bus) $1,017 $1,017 $1,017 Local Funds $355 $355 $355 TransNet - MC $94,397 $6,740 $18,812 $42,309 $26,043 $493 $13,261 $6,194 $74,942 TransNet - Transit $794 $794 $794 TOTAL $97,108 $9,451 $18,812 $42,309 $26,043 $493 $15,972 $6,194 $74,942

MPO ID: SAN54 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: ITS Operating

Project Description: Regionwide - implementation of ITS projects such as Compass Card Program, IMTMS, Freeway Service Patrol, 511 Advanced Traveler Information System, Regional Arterial Management System; activities include data collection, dissemination, software upgrades

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operatng

Est Total Cost: $11,743

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $11,743 $2,179 $2,260 $2,345 $2,433 $2,526 $11,743 TOTAL $11,743 $2,179 $2,260 $2,345 $2,433 $2,526 $11,743 *Exchange with RSTP

MPO ID: SAN58 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Operating Assistance - 5317 New Freedom Program

Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 categories: operating assistance to transit operators - non profit agencies providing transit service to eldery and disabled residents

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance

Est Total Cost: $1,530

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5317 - NF $368 $368 $368 Local Funds $692 $571 $120 $692 TransNet - SS $470 $269 $201 $470 TOTAL $1,530 $1,208 $321 $1,530

Page 76 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

80 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN64 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: San Luis Rey Bridge Replacement & Second Track PPNO: 2074

Project Description: From MP 225.3 to MP 225.9 - in Oceanside, adds a new 0.6 mile section of double track and replace the 700-foot long San Luis Rey River Bridge just north of the Oceanside Transit Center on the San Diego Subdivision of the SDNR

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $3,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON STIP-IIP PTA $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 TOTAL $3,000 $3,000 $3,000

MPO ID: SAN66 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Blue Line Upgrade SANDAG ID: 1210010-70

Project Description: From 12th/Imperial to San Ysidro - design and construction for Trolley wayside and trackway modifications including stations to support new low-floor vehicle operations on the Blue Line

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Reconstruction or renovation of transit structures Est Total Cost: $219,304

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $26,313 $1,313 $4,000 $8,000 $10,000 $3,000 $1,000 $25,313 FTA Funds - AR-5307 $42,904 $42,904 $6,786 $36,118 FTA Funds - AR-5309 $2,011 $2,011 $2,011 PTMISEA (Prop1B) $37,936 $6,134 $3,627 $17,425 $10,750 $37,936 Prop 1A - High Speed Rail $57,855 $6,351 $17,690 $25,450 $8,364 $57,855 SLPP (Prop1B) $17,750 $1,313 $592 $15,845 $17,750 TransNet - MC $34,535 $1,885 $10,064 $13,215 $7,489 $1,186 $696 $1,885 $32,650 TOTAL $219,304 $48,113 $17,511 $27,785 $66,449 $47,386 $12,060 $9,671 $209,633

MPO ID: SAN67 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Blue Line Vehicles SANDAG ID: 1210002

Project Description: Along Blue Line service - low-floor vehicle procurement and existing light rail vehicle rehabilitation for the San Diego Trolley system sufficient to run low floor service on the Blue Line

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Purchase new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or minor expansions of fleet Est Total Cost: $233,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $4,453 $4,453 $4,453 PTMISEA (Prop1B) $163,008 $25,558 $81,620 $55,830 $163,008 SLPP (Prop1B) $31,097 $31,097 $31,097 TransNet - MC $34,442 $3 $5,830 $13,952 $3,010 $11,647 $3 $34,439 TransNet - MC AC $0 $46,000 $(46,000) TOTAL $233,000 $50,456 $62,485 $81,620 $23,782 $3,010 $11,647 $4,456 $228,544

Page 77 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

81 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN68 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Vehicle Assist and Automation/Bus on Shoulder Service SANDAG ID: 1280507

Project Description: Between Chula Vista and Sorrento Valley along I-805 corridor - new buses equipped with lane-keeping and adaptive cruise control technology; freeway median lane restriping and signing (MTS to procure vehicles)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Non construction related activities

Est Total Cost: $22,500

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5309 (Bus) $15,000 $15,000 $660 $14,340 ITS $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 TransNet - MC $4,500 $1,098 $1,502 $1,900 $2,438 $1,300 $762 TOTAL $22,500 $16,098 $4,502 $1,900 $6,098 $1,300 $15,102

MPO ID: SAN73 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Cardiff to Craven Double Track

Project Description: From MP 239.6 to MP 241.1 - in the Cities of Encinitas and Solana Beach, preliminary engineering to double track 1.5 miles between Control Point (CP) Cardiff and CP Craven

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $4,397

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON STIP-IIP PTA $4,397 $2,200 $2,197 $4,397 TOTAL $4,397 $2,200 $2,197 $4,397

MPO ID: SAN74 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Escondido Bus Rapid Transit SANDAG ID: 1143300

Project Description: Route 350, a six-mile local bus route in the City of Escondido - improvements include bus stop consolidation and enhancements, queue jumper, and transit signal priority; improve transit travel times and reliability

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Reconstruction or renovation of transit structures Est Total Cost: $4,301

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $4,301 $2,353 $1,948 $1,425 $2,876 TOTAL $4,301 $2,353 $1,948 $1,425 $2,876 *STIP/SLPP for TransNet exchange

Page 78 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

82 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN78 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Mid-City Rapid Bus SANDAG ID: 1240001

Project Description: From downtown San Diego to San Diego State University via Park and El Cajon Boulevards - development of a Rapid Bus route including enhanced vehicles and stations, transit signal priority, real-time information and improved frequencies

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $44,527 Open to Traffic: Jun 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $320 $320 $320 FTA 5309 (NS) $22,429 $22,429 $729 $21,700 TransNet - MC $21,579 $3,444 $3,910 $12,693 $1,532 $471 $21,108 TransNet - Transit $199 $199 $199 TOTAL $44,527 $26,392 $3,910 $12,693 $1,532 $1,719 $42,808

MPO ID: SAN79 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Centralized Train Control (CTC) SANDAG ID: 1142500

Project Description: MTS service area - develop modern operation center which combines elements of train location, switch control, and fire/life and safety monitoring, to control passenger information signs and public address systems; procure both a back-end computer system, as well as deploy the necessary field equipment to safely and efficiently control the train network

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems Est Total Cost: $12,131

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $3,200 $3,200 $3,200 Local Funds $800 $800 $800 TransNet - MC $8,131 $3,126 $2,959 $1,110 $936 $8,131 TOTAL $12,131 $7,126 $2,959 $1,110 $936 $12,131 *STIP-TransNet swap

MPO ID: SAN80 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: TransNet Major Transit Corridor Operations

Project Description: Countywide - Coaster, Sprinter, Blue/Orange/Green Line improvements, Mid Coast, I-15 BRT, Mid City Rapid, Super Loop, South Bay BRT , and the Transit Only Lane project operating costs

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance

Est Total Cost: $59,567

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - BRT/Rail Ops $59,567 $2,805 $3,730 $5,594 $15,661 $15,751 $16,026 $59,567 TOTAL $59,567 $2,805 $3,730 $5,594 $15,661 $15,751 $16,026 $59,567

Page 79 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

83 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN84 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Operating Assistance - TransNet Senior Mini-Grant Program

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance

Est Total Cost: $3,761

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $905 $585 $319 $905 TransNet - SS $2,856 $1,537 $1,320 $2,856 TOTAL $3,761 $2,122 $1,639 $3,761

MPO ID: SAN94 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-15 Integrated Corridor Management Project

Project Description: From SR 52 to SR 78 - I-15 Corridor in San Diego region is one of eight pioneer sites selected throughout the nation by USDOT for the the ICM initiative; I-15 ICM project establishes an operational platform that will allow the transportation network to be operated in a more coordinated and integrated manner; project includes the integration of existing ITS system platforms, development of a Decision Support System, and upgrades to the traffic signal syncrhonization network to a responsive system; provide for better management of traffic conditions along the I-15 corridor

RT:15 Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Non construction related activities

Est Total Cost: $11,151

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON STA $100 $100 $100 State Bond - TLSP $2,162 $2,162 $2,162 USDOTs $8,889 $200 $3,218 $3,694 $1,777 $8,889 TOTAL $11,151 $2,462 $3,218 $3,694 $1,777 $11,151

Page 80 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

84 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN114 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Group Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures, Track, and Trackbed in Exisiting Rights-of-Way: Coastal Rail Corridor Project Description: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories: rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in existing right-of-way (non-capacity increasing)- From Oceanside to San Diego along the LOSSAN Corridor; design track improvements; SANDAG ID 1239802 to 1239808

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way

Est Total Cost: $36,004

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Other Fed - ARRA - Federal railroad Administration$11,800 $11,800 $11,800 Prop. 116 $501 $501 $501 RSTP $11,738 $11,738 $11,738 State Bond - HRCSA $3,146 $3,146 $3,146 TCRP $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 TransNet - MC $7,819 $2,901 $4,718 $200 $7,819 TOTAL $36,004 $16,140 $19,664 $200 $24,204 $11,800

MPO ID: SAN122 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: South Bay BRT: West Guideway SANDAG ID: 1280509

Project Description: From Heritage Road to I-805 - design extension of transit guideway for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit service along East Palomar

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way

Est Total Cost: $2,800

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $2,800 $700 $2,100 $2,800 TOTAL $2,800 $700 $2,100 $2,800

MPO ID: SAN123 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: University Town Center (UTC) Transit Center SANDAG ID: 1143200

Project Description: Within the parking area of the UTC Shopping mall area - off street transit center for existing Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and North County Transit District (NCTD) for local and express service for SuperLoop, Mid-Coast and BRT

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Reconstruction or renovation of transit structures Est Total Cost: $5,700

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - MC $5,700 $5 $855 $1,335 $3,505 $550 $5,150 TOTAL $5,700 $5 $855 $1,335 $3,505 $550 $5,150

Page 81 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

85 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Association of Governments MPO ID: SAN125 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: FTA Section 5310 Elderly and Disabled Transit Program

Project Description: San Diego County - purchase of modified vans/buses by various non-profit organizations for purposes of transporting elderly and disabled

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Purchase new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or minor expansions of fleet Est Total Cost: $1,088

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5310 $963 $963 $963 Local Funds $125 $125 $125 TOTAL $1,088 $1,088 $1,088

Page 82 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

86 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY05 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Channel Road Equestrian Crossing TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Between Lakeside Avenue and Mapleview Street;, in the vicinity of Channel Rd Bridge - in Lakeside, design an equestrian trail crossing at the San Diego River

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $215

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $87 $87 $87 TransNet - L (Cash) $1 $1 $1 TransNet - LSI $127 $35 $92 $127 TOTAL $215 $88 $35 $92 $215

MPO ID: CNTY14 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: South Santa Fe Avenue North RAS (TA 7-50) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: South Santa Fe Avenue from Montgomery Dr to 700 ft South of Woodland Ave - Vista City limits to 700 feet south of Woodland - reconstruct and widen from 2 to 4 lanes including bicycle lane

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $22,066 Open to Traffic: Apr 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $200 $200 $200 TransNet - H $8,836 $8,836 $500 $8,336 TransNet - H (78) $4,513 $4,512 $3,670 $843 TransNet - L $611 $611 $12 $599 TransNet - L (Cash) $671 $671 $671 TransNet - LSI $3,065 $12 $2,791 $262 $12 $3,053 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $4,170 $4,170 $300 $3,870 TOTAL $22,066 $14,842 $4,170 $2,791 $262 $4,865 $9,679 $7,522

Page 83 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

87 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY14A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: South Santa Fe Avenue South RAS (TA 7-50) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: South Santa Fe from 700 ft south of Woodland Dr to Smilax Rd - widening of South Santa Fe Avenue to a five-lane major road with a center left turn lane, curb, gutter, sidewalk, bike lanes, and drainage improvements from 700 ft south of Woodland Dr to Smilax Road

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $1,500 Open to Traffic: Jun 2019

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON RSTP $61 $61 $61 TransNet - L $175 $175 $175 TransNet - L (Cash) $36 $36 $36 TransNet - LSI $1,102 $433 $669 $1,102 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $98 $98 $98 TOTAL $1,472 $644 $828 $1,472

MPO ID: CNTY17 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 54/94 Phase II & III TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Ph 2: on SR94 extend Jamacha Blvd; Ph 3: on SR54 extend from Cuyamaca College east to Braham - previously CI and widened from 4 to 6 lanes with intersection improvements, raised median and left turn pockets; current money allocated is NCI for plant establishment and environmental mitigation

RT:54 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $16,890 Open to Traffic: Sep 2008

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,207 $1,207 $1,207 TransNet - L $15,410 $15,410 $200 $15,210 TransNet - L Carry Over $40 $40 $40 TransNet - LSI $233 $211 $22 $233 TOTAL $16,890 $16,868 $22 $200 $16,690

MPO ID: CNTY21 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bradley Avenue Overpass at SR 67 RAS (TA 7-49) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Bradley Avenue from Magnolia Ave. to Mollison Ave. - widen of Bradley Ave. including the SR-67 overpass from 2 to 4 lanes plus sidewalks

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $34,000 Open to Traffic: Dec 2017

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON RSTP $750 $750 $750 TransNet - L $195 $195 $195 TransNet - LSI $4,781 $914 $332 $206 $106 $109 $3,114 $1,197 $3,584 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $69 $69 $69 TOTAL $5,795 $1,859 $401 $206 $106 $109 $3,114 $2,211 $3,584

Page 84 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

88 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY24 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Cole Grade Road RAS (TA 7-49) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Cole Grade Road from N. of Horse Creek Trail to South of Pauma Heights Road - widen to accommodate 14-ft traffic lane in both direction, 12-ft center 2-way left turn, 6-ft bike lane & 10-ft pathway

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $1,474 Open to Traffic: Dec 2018

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $350 $350 $350 TransNet - L (Cash) $430 $288 $142 $430 TransNet - LSI $694 $143 $26 $80 $109 $336 $249 $445 TOTAL $1,474 $638 $285 $26 $80 $109 $336 $1,029 $445

MPO ID: CNTY26 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Improvements Lump Sum TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Ramona Drive Sidewalks, Julian Avenue, Olive Vista Drive, and Valley Center Road - Projects are consistent with CFR 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories: plantings, landscaping, etc. - construction of curbs, gutter, sidewalks, drainage, and landscaping

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Plantings, landscaping, etc

Est Total Cost: $14,781

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $8,005 $8,005 $405 $500 $7,100 TransNet - L (Cash) $883 $883 $124 $111 $648 TransNet - LSI $2,153 $1,185 $942 $26 $673 $50 $1,430 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $2,540 $2,540 $2,540 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,200 $1,200 $500 $50 $650 TOTAL $14,781 $12,613 $2,142 $26 $1,702 $711 $12,368

MPO ID: CNTY33 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Via de Santa Fe/La Granada TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: At Via de Santa Fe and La Granada from Camino Selva to La Fletcha - modify intersection to encourage northbound traffic to use La Granada north of this intersection; work includes new striping, stop signs and new sidewalk

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Interchange reconfiguration projects

Est Total Cost: $1,009

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $169 $169 $121 $48 TransNet - L (Cash) $37 $37 $37 TransNet - L Carry Over $4 $4 $4 TransNet - LSI $674 $460 $214 $40 $634 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $125 $125 $125 TOTAL $1,009 $670 $339 $198 $52 $759

Page 85 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

89 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY34 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Dye Road Extension RAS (TA 7-49) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Dye Road from Dye Road to San Vicente Road - in Ramona, study, design and construct a 2-lane community collector road with intermittent turn lanes, bike lanes, curb, gutter, and pathway/walkway

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $2,521 Open to Traffic: Dec 2017

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $300 $300 $300 TransNet - L (Cash) $250 $250 $250 TransNet - LSI $1,871 $1,126 $378 $179 $106 $82 $1,751 $120 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $100 $100 $100 TOTAL $2,521 $1,676 $478 $179 $106 $82 $2,401 $120

MPO ID: CNTY35 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Ramona Street Extension TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Ramona Street from Boundary Ave. to Warnock Dr. - in the community of Ramona, construct new road extension, 2 lanes with intermittent turn lanes, bike lanes and walkway/pathway

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $4,507 Open to Traffic: Jun 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $287 $287 $233 $54 TransNet - LSI $4,220 $396 $240 $3,054 $530 $1,081 $105 $3,034 TOTAL $4,507 $683 $240 $3,054 $530 $1,314 $159 $3,034

MPO ID: CNTY36 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: San Vicente Road Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: San Vicente Road from Warnock Drive to Wildcat Canyon Road - in Ramona, design and reconstruct road improvements, including 2-lane community collector road with intermittent turn lanes, bike lanes, asphalt concrete dike, and pathway/walkway

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $27,242 Open to Traffic: Jan 2015

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $790 $790 $790 TransNet - L (Cash) $591 $591 $591 TransNet - LSI $25,401 $1,081 $981 $618 $8,268 $7,358 $7,095 $2,797 $983 $21,621 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $460 $460 $381 $79 TOTAL $27,242 $2,462 $1,441 $618 $8,268 $7,358 $7,095 $4,559 $1,062 $21,621

Page 86 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

90 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY38 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Rancho Santa Fe Roundabouts TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: At intersections of Via De La Valle/Paseo Delicias, El Montevideo/Paseo Delicias/La Valle Plateada, and El Camino Del Norte/El Escondido Del Dios Highway - in Rancho Santa Fe, replace existing stop sign control with roundabouts at several intersections including ADA compliant pathways to accommodate bicycles in the traffic lane or on walked on the pedestrian paths

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Interchange reconfiguration projects

Est Total Cost: $612

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON RSTP $96 $96 $96 TransNet - LSI $516 $503 $13 $512 $4 TOTAL $612 $503 $109 $608 $4

MPO ID: CNTY39 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bear Valley Parkway North RAS (TA 7-49) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Bear Valley Parkway from San Pasqual Valley Road to Boyle Avenue - widen from two to four lanes, with a center median, a bike lane and shoulder in each direction of travel

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $13,151 Open to Traffic: Dec 2015

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $6 $6 $6 TransNet - L (Cash) $6 $6 $6 TransNet - LSI $13,139 $783 $10 $2,237 $4,505 $3,924 $1,680 $1,041 $1,729 $10,369 TOTAL $13,151 $795 $10 $2,237 $4,505 $3,924 $1,680 $1,053 $1,729 $10,369

MPO ID: CNTY42 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Otay Mesa Road Widening RAS (T A7-50) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Otay Mesa Road from SR 125 to Enrico Fermi Drive - future widening of Otay Mesa

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $220

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $210 $198 $10 $2 $210 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $10 $10 $10 TOTAL $220 $198 $10 $10 $2 $220

Page 87 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

91 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY46 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: AC Overlay RAS (TA 7-49 and 50) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Avocado Blvd, Paradise Valley Rd, San Miguel Rd, Spring St, Alpine Blvd, Ballantyne St, Graves Ave, Pino Dr, Posthill Rd, Riverside Dr, Valle Vista Rd, Woodside Ave, Black Canyon Rd, Haverford Rd, Old Julian Hwy, Pamo Rd, Pile St, Wildcat Canyon Rd, Fallbrook St, Green Canyon Rd, Olive Hill Rd, Osborne St, Buena Creek Rd, Del Dios Hwy, El Camino del Norte, El canino Real, South Santa Fe Ave, Via de la Valle, Cole Grade Rd, and Lilac Rd. (More or fewer roads may be resurfaced depending on bid results) - roadway rehabilitation and resurfacing along several miles of county maintained roads; pavement overlays applied will be between 2" and 4" in thickness

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $7,900

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $7,345 $7,345 $7,345 TransNet - LSI (Cash) $555 $555 $555 TOTAL $7,900 $7,345 $555 $7,900

MPO ID: CNTY66 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Lonestar Road RTP PG NO: TA 7A - 49 EARMARK NO: CA475 Project Description: Lonestar Road from Alta Road to SR 125 - in Otay, future construction of 4-lane Major RAS (TA 7A-49) Road (Alta Road to Enrico Fermi Drive) and 6-lane Prime Arterial (Enrico Fermi Drive to TransNet - LSI: CR SR125) with bike lanes and sidewalks

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $30,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $400 $400 $400 TransNet - LSI $167 $100 $67 $167 TOTAL $567 $500 $67 $567

MPO ID: CNTY75 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: City of San Diego Funding Swap TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: See Project CNTY38 RSF Roundabouts and CNTY14A South Santa Fe South - transfer of funds to the City of San Diego in exchange for RSTP with City of SD project El Camino Real (SD34) project

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Non construction related activities

Est Total Cost: $157

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $157 $157 $157 TOTAL $157 $157 $157

Page 88 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

92 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego County MPO ID: CNTY76 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Jamacha Blvd (Phase 1 and 2) RAS (TA 7-49) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Jamacha Blvd from Omega St to Sweetwater Springs Blvd - in unincorporated Spring Valley, the current funds programmed are for Phase 1 - between Omega Street and Spring Valley Glen, widen from two lane to four lane roadway with bicycle and pedestrian improvements

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $7,038 Open to Traffic: Jan 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $2,654 $2,654 $2,654 TransNet - LSI $2,207 $1,550 $657 $2,207 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,177 $2,177 $2,177 TOTAL $7,038 $4,204 $2,177 $657 $7,038

MPO ID: CNTY78 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Inland Rail Trail RTP PG NO: 6-55; E-14 TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: NCTD RIGHT OF WAY from City of San Marcos/County border to City of Vista/County border - In unincorporated North County Metro: the current funds programmed are for the segment from City of San Marcos/County border to City of Vista/County border; construct bicycle/pedestrian trail within NCTD right of way

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $2,323

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON BTA $1,461 $1,461 $1,461 TransNet - LSI $862 $25 $555 $282 $25 $80 $757 TOTAL $2,323 $25 $2,016 $282 $25 $80 $2,218

Page 89 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

93 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Metropolitan Transit System MPO ID: MTS23A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Transit Service Operations

Project Description: MTS service area - Operating support for existing services including urban, ADA, and rural bus service

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance

Est Total Cost: $143,553

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $18,061 $4,253 $4,423 $4,600 $4,784 $18,061 TDA $4,515 $1,063 $1,106 $1,150 $1,196 $4,515 TransNet - TSI $120,977 $21,733 $22,517 $23,734 $25,636 $27,357 $120,977 TOTAL $143,553 $27,049 $28,046 $29,484 $31,616 $27,357 $143,553

MPO ID: MTS28 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bus & Rail Rolling Stock purchases and Rehabilitations

Project Description: MTS service area - purchase replacement buses, replacement Light Rail Vehicles, procurement of materials and services for the rehabilitation or retrofit of mechanical components, electrical components, and coach bodies of Light Rail Vehicles and buses. Transportation Development Credit of $952,200 will used used to match FY10 federal funds for the constructin phase

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Purchase new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or minor expansions of fleet Est Total Cost: $50,936

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $40,749 $8,568 $9,318 $8,224 $14,639 $40,749 TDA $10,187 $2,142 $2,330 $2,056 $3,660 $10,187 TOTAL $50,936 $10,710 $11,648 $10,280 $18,299 $50,936

Page 90 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

94 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Metropolitan Transit System MPO ID: MTS30 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bus/Rail Support Facilities and Equipment

Project Description: MTS facilities throughout the MTS service area - install security cameras on bus/rail rolling stock and at bus/rail facilities and stations; Southbay and East County bus maintenance facility expansions and upgrades including: land acquisition, Site development plans, building demolition and remodeling, fencing, lot paving, and storm water pollution prevention program compliance; other misc capital equipment for transit maintenance; design and procurement of materials and services for support equipment. Transportation Development Credit of $2,557,351 will used used to match FY10 federal funds for the construction phase

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Purchase of office, shop and operating equipment for existing facilities Est Total Cost: $74,055

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $31,522 $25,402 $2,445 $1,225 $1,225 $1,225 $31,522 FTA 5309 (FG) $259 $259 $259 FTA 5316 - JARC $63 $63 $63 Local Funds $1,898 $1,898 $1,898 PTMISEA (Prop1B) $7,478 $7,478 $7,478 STA $3,242 $3,242 $3,242 TDA $21,473 $19,943 $611 $306 $306 $306 $21,473 TransNet - Transit $7,224 $7,224 $7,224 Transit Security (TSGP) $896 $896 $896 TOTAL $74,055 $66,405 $3,056 $1,531 $1,531 $1,531 $74,055

MPO ID: MTS31 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Rail Electrification and Power

Project Description: Along Blue Line ROW - Blue Line tie replacement, rail profile grinding

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way

Est Total Cost: $2,800

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $2,240 $1,400 $280 $280 $280 $2,240 TDA $560 $350 $70 $70 $70 $560 TOTAL $2,800 $1,750 $350 $350 $350 $2,800

Page 91 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

95 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego Metropolitan Transit System MPO ID: MTS32A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Preventive Maintenance

Project Description: MTS service area - Maintenance of equipment, rolling stock, and facilities for bus and rail systems. Transportation Development Credit of $2,529,084 will used used to match FY10 federal funds for the preliminary engineering phase

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance

Est Total Cost: $326,750

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $143,734 $70,854 $19,089 $18,525 $17,938 $17,327 $143,734 FTA 5309 (FG) $114,877 $54,956 $14,111 $14,675 $15,262 $15,873 $114,877 Local Funds $7,383 $7,383 $7,383 TDA $60,756 $27,556 $8,300 $8,300 $8,300 $8,300 $60,756 TOTAL $326,750 $160,749 $41,500 $41,500 $41,500 $41,500 $326,750

MPO ID: MTS33A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Senior Disabled Program

Project Description: MTS service area - Subsidy for senior and disabled as required by TransNet

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance

Est Total Cost: $3,208

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - ADA $3,208 $576 $597 $630 $680 $725 $3,208 TOTAL $3,208 $576 $597 $630 $680 $725 $3,208

MPO ID: MTS35 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Fixed Guideway Transitways/Lines

Project Description: MTS service area - Rail infrastructure maintenance and upgrades including rail tie replacement, WYE switch indicator standardization, rail file grinding, and traction motor disconnects

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way

Est Total Cost: $11,894

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON FTA 5307 $9,355 $2,561 $2,149 $1,321 $3,324 $9,355 TDA $2,539 $840 $537 $330 $831 $2,539 TOTAL $11,894 $3,401 $2,686 $1,651 $4,155 $11,894

Page 92 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

96 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD01 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Alvarado Canyon Road Realignment TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Alvarado Canyon Road from Fairmount Ave./Camino del Rio N to Fairmount Ave./Mission Gorge Road - in San Diego, roadway realignment and improvements to include traffic signal modifications to improve traffic flow at the interchange of I-8, Fairmount Avenue and Mission Gorge Road. (CIP: 52-713.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $1,550

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 TransNet - L $450 $450 $450 TransNet - LSI $100 $100 $100 TOTAL $1,550 $550 $1,000 $1,550

MPO ID: SD06 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Aldine Drive and Fairmont Avenue Slope Restoration RAS (TA7-47) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Fairmount Avenue between Meade Avenue and Aldine Drive, Aldine Drive between Fairmount Avenue and Adams Avenue - in San Diego, provides for road restoration and slope stability improvements for the purpose of improving capacity impeding conditions as a result of slope failure and related drainage conditions (CIP 52-592.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions

Est Total Cost: $4,135

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,110 $1,110 $1,110 TransNet - L $500 $500 $300 $200 TransNet - LSI $2,525 $1,825 $700 $2,525 TOTAL $4,135 $3,435 $700 $300 $3,835

Page 93 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

97 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD09 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Sidewalks - Citywide TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Genesee Ave. & Marlesta Dr.: new sidewalk, curb ramps, railings, Satellite Blvd.: new sidewalk northside between Thermal & Saturn, Hollister St & Ilex St.: new sidewalk & curb ramps where missing, 28th St. from Treat St. to 115'north: new sidewalk, La Jolla Shores Dr. n/o Cam del Collado: new sidewalk where missing Nimitz Blvd. at W. Pt. Loma: new sidewalk on southside, Juniper St. from Felton St. to Westland Ave.: new sidewalk northside 67th St. from El Cajon Blvd. to Amherst: new sidewalk where missing including curb and gutter: install new 5 foot wide sidewalk Green Bay from Iris to Rimbey: new sidewalk and curb ramps: east and west side of Viewridge Ave from Balboa Ave to Ridgehaven Court: east and west side of Candlelight Dr from Candlelight Pl to Van Nuys: north and south side of Euclid Ave between Dwight St and Isla Vista Dr: Genesee Ave from Derrick Dr to Mt. Herbert Ave: SD Mission Rd from Fairmount Ave to Rancho Mission Rd: 54th from Santa Margarita to Imperial and from Naranja to Imperial: Montezuma Road: 5922 El Cajon Blvd: - install new sidewalks (CIP 52-700/715, 59-002.0,37-064.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $7,880

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $2,150 $2,150 $2,150 TransNet - LSI $5,730 $3,264 $1,041 $375 $350 $350 $350 $5,730 TOTAL $7,880 $5,414 $1,041 $375 $350 $350 $350 $7,880

MPO ID: SD14 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 15 Bikeway TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: State Route 15 from Landis Street to Adams Avenue - in San Diego, Pedestrian and bicycle right-of-way improvements along I-15 corridor including widened pedestrian paths, lighting, signage, striping and signal improvements (581270) Funding for construction of this project is programmed in V04, Smart Growth Incentive Program

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $912

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON CMAQ $645 $645 $525 $120 TransNet - B $57 $57 $57 TransNet - LSI $210 $160 $50 $160 $50 TOTAL $912 $862 $50 $742 $170

Page 94 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

98 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD15 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Lights TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Install new street lights:, Donahue St @ Friars Rd, southside, Fifth Ave @ Brookes Ave, ne corner & @ Anderson Pl, se corner, 43rd @ Keeler Ave, (1)east side (1) sw corner, Abalone Pl @ Chelsea Ave, east side, Brookhaven Rd @ S Meadowbrook Dr(1) nw corner (1)se corner, Buena Vista St @ Ingraham St, ne corner, Carmel Ridge Rd @ Ted Williams Pkwy, ne corner, Carroll Road at Carroll Way (1) nw corner (1) se corner, Chatsworth Blvd @ Tennyson St, Chickasaw Ct @ Genesee Ave, nw corner, Chollas Station Rd @ Winlow St, nw corner, El Camino Real @ San Raphael Driveway (east) (nw corner), Fay Ave @ Rushville St, east side, Genesee Ave @ Sauk Ave, se corner, Imperial Ave @ Rainbow St (1) ne corner, (1) se corner, La Jolla Scenic Dr N @ Via Posada, sw corner, Mesa Way @ Via Maria, south side, Sixth Ave @ Anderson Pl (1) east side (1) nw corner, Sixth Ave @ Ivy Lane, nw corner, Federal Blvd @ Pentacost Way (1) ne corner (1) nw corner, Coast Blvd @ Girard Ave (1) sw corner (1) nw corner, 18th St @ Coronado Ave SB (1) ne corner (1) nw corner (1)south side, Candida St @ Via Pasar, south side, Chatsworth Blvd @ Tennyson St, - in San Diego, install new street lights (CIP 52-293.0, 61-201.0, 68-012.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Lighting improvements

Est Total Cost: $2,311

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $400 $400 $400 TransNet - L $1,100 $1,100 $1,100 TransNet - LSI $811 $311 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $811 TOTAL $2,311 $1,811 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $2,311

MPO ID: SD16A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Signals Citywide TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: New traffic signal installation locations:, 31st Street @ Imperial Avenue; El Cajon Blvd @ Dayton St; 29th St @ Oceanview Blvd, Traffic signal upgrades/modernization locations:, El Cajon @ Texas St, Coronado Blvd @ Saturn Blvd, Euclid Ave @ Imperial Ave, 9th Ave @ E St, 10th Ave @ F St, 16th St @ Market St, Alvardo Canyon Rd @ Paradise Valley Rd, Moore St & Old Town Ave, Interconnect Systems:, Hardware, Software upgrades to centrally controlled traffic signal optimization system, Traffic signal controller replacement:, 75 downtown locations, Clairemont Mesa Bvd @ Clairemont Mesa Drive , Clairemont Mesa Bvd @ Diane Ave, Clairemont Mesa Bvd @ Limerick Ave, Clairemont Mesa Bvd @ Doliva Dr, Santo Rd @ Shields St, Bannock Ave @ Genesee Ave, - install new traffic signals with intersection street lighting systems, upgrade/modernize traffic signals, install passive/permissive traffic signal systems; traffic signal interconnect systems (CIP 62-001/002/210, 63-002/043, 68-001/010/011, 62-275/292, 62-331.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $14,780

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $4,280 $4,280 $4,280 TransNet - LSI $10,500 $2,745 $1,655 $1,525 $1,525 $1,525 $1,525 $10,500 TOTAL $14,780 $7,025 $1,655 $1,525 $1,525 $1,525 $1,525 $14,780

Page 95 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

99 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD18 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Traffic Control Measures TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: In Smart Growth Areas of San Diego: Park Blvd. @ City College; lighted crosswalk and pop-outs, Park Blvd. @ Essex St; lighted crosswalk, Rimbey Ave. @ school location mid-block: crosswalk and pop-outs, 5th Ave. @ Nutmeg St.; lighted crosswalk, Thermal Ave. @ Hermes St.; pop-outs, Park Blvd. @ Cypress Ave.; lighted crosswalk and pop-outs, Girard between Pearl St. and Gentner; pop-outs and lighted sidewalk, Adams Ave. @ Hamilton St.; pop-outs, Saturn Ave. @ Hermes St.; pop-outs, La Jolla Mesa @ Van Nuys; pop outs, La Jolla Blvd at Marine St; pop outs and crosswalk. Traffic calming measures at; Landale Drive, Leon Avenue, Washington Place, Cardeno Drive, Lotus Drive, Calle Cristobal, Park Village Road, Villa Mallorca - traffic control and traffic calming measures (CIP 61-001.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operatng

Est Total Cost: $3,471

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $371 $371 $371 TransNet - L $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 TransNet - LSI $1,500 $400 $300 $200 $200 $200 $200 $1,500 TOTAL $3,471 $2,371 $300 $200 $200 $200 $200 $3,471

MPO ID: SD19 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Streamview Drive TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Streamview Drive from 54th Street to College Avenue - in San Diego, installation of new raised median, new sidewalk including curb & gutter, and traffic circles to improve the flow of traffic and increase safety (CIP 52-588.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Adding medians

Est Total Cost: $1,975

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $350 $350 $350 TransNet - LSI $1,625 $180 $200 $200 $795 $250 $380 $1,245 TOTAL $1,975 $530 $200 $200 $795 $250 $730 $1,245

Page 96 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

100 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD23 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Storm Drains - Roadway Drainage Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Ransom/Darwin , Glen Curtis Drain, Ingulf Place , Riviera Drive at 3663, Wenrich Drive, Fashion Valley Road, - roadway drainage projects for the purpose of improving traffic impeding conditions and alleviate significant and frequent flooding (CIP 13-005.0, 13-502.0, 11-3020/3060/3070)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection channelization projects

Est Total Cost: $8,008

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,605 $1,605 $1,605 TransNet - L $3,302 $3,302 $3,302 TransNet - LSI $3,101 $477 $185 $600 $633 $606 $600 $3,101 TOTAL $8,008 $5,384 $185 $600 $633 $606 $600 $8,008

MPO ID: SD31 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Carmel Valley Road RAS (TA7-46) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Carmel Valley Road from 300 feet east of Portofino Drive to Via Mar Valle (Del Mar limit) - in San Diego, modify existing 2-lane collector street by adding Class II bike path (CIP 52-517.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $6,004

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $562 $562 $562 TransNet - L $5,197 $5,197 $5,197 TransNet - LSI $245 $195 $25 $25 $245 TOTAL $6,004 $5,954 $25 $25 $6,004

MPO ID: SD34 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: El Camino Real RAS (TA7-47) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: El Camino Real from San Dieguito Road to Via de la Valle - in San Diego on El Camino Real from San Dieguito Road to Via de la Valle - reconstruct & widen from 2 to 4 lanes and extend transition lane and additional grading to avoid biological impacts (CIP 52-479.0)

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $33,805 Open to Traffic: Jun 2015

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HBP $23,008 $320 $1,992 $20,696 $2,312 $20,696 HBRR $1,708 $1,708 $1,700 $8 Local Funds $1,629 $1,472 $157 $1,128 $501 Local Funds AC $0 $20,696 $(20,696) RSTP $2,560 $2,560 $2,560 TransNet - LSI $4,900 $600 $500 $2,100 $1,700 $1,100 $3,800 TOTAL $33,805 $4,100 $25,905 $2,100 $1,700 $3,928 $2,821 $27,056

Page 97 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

101 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD38 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Georgia St Bridge/University Ave TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: On Georgia Street over University Avenue - in San Diego, provides for bridge replacement, retaining walls and guardrails along bridge walls (CIP 52-555)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions

Est Total Cost: $2,652

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $421 $421 $421 TransNet - L $631 $631 $631 TransNet - LSI $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 TOTAL $2,652 $631 $421 $1,600 $2,652

MPO ID: SD49 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Median Improvements Citywide TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: El Cajon Blvd. (CIP 39-234.0), Navajo (CIP 52-668.0), Normal St. (CIP 52-769.0) and Thorn (52-406.0), Balboa Ave @ Hathaway, Camino Ruiz @ Capricorn Way, Balboa Ave @ Mt. Culebra, (52-808) - safety improvements and/or left turn movements

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement marking demonstration

Est Total Cost: $3,902

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,327 $1,327 $1,102 $225 TransNet - L (Cash) $641 $641 $641 TransNet - LSI $1,934 $510 $400 $297 $327 $200 $200 $1,934 TOTAL $3,902 $2,478 $400 $297 $327 $200 $200 $1,102 $2,800

MPO ID: SD51 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: North Torrey Pines Road Bridge RAS (T7-48) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: North Torrey Pines Road from Carmel Valley Road to Torrey Pines Park Road - in San Diego, replace North Torrey Pines Road bridge over Los Penasquitos Creek (CIP 53-050.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $1,606

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $243 $243 $243 TransNet - L $1,035 $1,035 $100 $935 TransNet - LSI $328 $75 $88 $65 $50 $50 $328 TOTAL $1,606 $1,353 $88 $65 $50 $50 $100 $1,506

Page 98 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

102 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD70 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: West Mission Bay Drive Bridge RAS (T7-49) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: West Mission Bay Drive bridge over San Diego River - in San Diego, replace bridge and increase from 4 to 6-lane bridge including Class II bike lane (52-643)

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $120,600 Open to Traffic: Dec 2015

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HBP $102,766 $5,560 $97,206 $4,040 $1,520 $97,206 HBRR $2,600 $2,600 $2,600 Local Funds $13,984 $1,390 $12,594 $1,010 $380 $12,594 Local Funds AC $0 $97,206 $(97,206) TransNet - L $650 $650 $650 TransNet - LSI $600 $200 $100 $100 $200 $600 TOTAL $120,600 $3,450 $7,050 $100 $200 $109,800 $8,900 $1,900 $109,800

MPO ID: SD81 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Genesee Avenue - Nobel Drive to SR52 RAS (TA7-47)

Project Description: Genesee Avenue from Noble Drive to SR 52 - in San Diego, future widening to 6-lane major street north of Decoro Street and to a 6-lane primary arterial south of Decoro Street and included Class II bicycle lanes (CIP 52-458.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $5,952

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $5,952 $1,500 $2,675 $1,777 $5,952 TOTAL $5,952 $1,500 $2,675 $1,777 $5,952

MPO ID: SD83 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 163/Friars Road Interchange Modification RAS (TA7-47) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Friars Road from Avenida de las Tiendas to Mission Center Road - widen and improve Friars Road and overcrossing; reconstruct interchange including improvements to ramp intersections (Phase 1). Construct new connector roadways and structures (Phase 2). Construct auxilliary lanes along northbound and southbound SR163 (Phase 3). (CIP Legacy#52-455.0) (WBS# S-00851)

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $68,020 Open to Traffic: Jun 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $42,273 $4,273 $38,000 $1,153 $3,120 $38,000 RSTP $2,240 $2,240 $2,240 TransNet - L $2,207 $2,207 $2,207 TransNet - LSI $21,300 $4,500 $2,500 $5,379 $2,219 $5,100 $1,602 $2,000 $17,698 $1,602 TOTAL $68,020 $13,220 $2,500 $5,379 $40,219 $5,100 $1,602 $7,600 $20,818 $39,602

Page 99 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

103 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD86 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Famosa Slough Salt Marsh Restoration TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: West Point Loma Blvd. from Rue D'Orleans to Famosa Blvd. - in San Diego, provide enhanced pedestrian and bicycle access, and usability to the open space area by leveling and widening access road which would improve emergency vehicle access and also provided mitigation for impacts to coastal salt marsh (CIP 12-152.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $178

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $129 $129 $89 $40 TransNet - LSI $49 $24 $25 $49 TOTAL $178 $153 $25 $89 $89

MPO ID: SD90 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR 163/Clairemont Mesa Blvd. Interchange RAS (TA7-46) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Clairemont Mesa Blvd. from Kearny Villa Road to Kearny Mesa - in San Diego, widen from 4 to 6 lane prime arterial; Phase II of the project - west ramps (CIP 52-745.0)

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $22,200 Open to Traffic: Dec 2015

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $10,462 $10,462 $2,535 $7,927 RSTP $5,238 $5,238 $5,238 TransNet - L $500 $500 $500 TransNet - LSI $6,000 $1,000 $3,920 $1,080 $1,000 $5,000 TOTAL $22,200 $17,200 $3,920 $1,080 $3,535 $18,665

MPO ID: SD97 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: School Traffic Safety Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Willow Elementary located in San Ysidro on Willow Road, Joyner Elementary located on Myrtle Ave, Nestor Elementary School, Southwest High School, Mar Vista Middle School - in San Diego, provide traffic control devices (CIP 68-017,62-266.0,62-337.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $2,100

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $150 $150 $150 TransNet - L $620 $620 $620 TransNet - LSI $1,330 $330 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $1,330 TOTAL $2,100 $1,100 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $2,100

Page 100 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

104 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD99 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bridge Rehabilitation TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Citywide - in San Diego, bridge retrofit or replacement projects citywide(CIP 525190) including Voltaire Street Bridge over Nimitz Blvd. rehabilitation (CIP 525233) and Barnett Ave. Bridge over Pacific Highway (CIP 525231)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $670

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $300 $300 $300 TransNet - LSI $370 $100 $270 $370 TOTAL $670 $400 $270 $670

MPO ID: SD102 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Otay Truck Route TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Otay Truck Route from Drucker Lane to Point of Entry - in San Diego, add emergency lane primarily for Border Patrol use and fire department access (Phase 3) (CIP 52-682.1)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Emergency truck pullovers

Est Total Cost: $4,602

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,202 $1,202 $442 $760 STP - Sec 117 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TransNet - LSI $1,400 $150 $200 $300 $750 $500 $900 TOTAL $4,602 $3,352 $200 $300 $750 $442 $500 $3,660

MPO ID: SD102A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Otay Truck Route Widening (Ph. 4) EARMARK NO: CA596/2655, CA700/3776 Project Description: on Otay Truck Route - in San Diego, from Drucker Lane to La Media, add one lane TransNet - LSI: CR (total 3 lanes) for trucks; from Britannia to La Media, add one lane for trucks and one lane for emergency vehicles (Border Patrol/fire department access); along Britannia from Britannia Court to the Otay Truck Route - add one lane for trucks(CIP 52-682.1)

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $5,718 Open to Traffic: Dec 2009

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $4,200 $800 $1,000 $2,400 $1,800 $2,400 Local Funds $1,168 $318 $200 $650 $518 $650 TransNet - L $100 $100 $100 TransNet - LSI $250 $250 $250 TOTAL $5,718 $1,468 $1,200 $3,050 $2,668 $3,050

Page 101 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

105 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD103 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-5/Genesee Ave Interchange RTP PG NO: A-5 RAS (TA7-41) Project Description: Along I- 5 from Sorrento Valley Road to Genesee Avenue - in San Diego, replace Genesee Ave. over crossing from 4-lane bridge with 6-lane bridge; construct auxiliary lanes and replace Voight Drive bridge; add additional lane at on/off ramp to Sorrento Valley Rd.; add one carpool lane and one general purpose lane to on ramp from Sorrento Valley Road to southbound I-5; install ramp meters at on ramp and construct a southbound auxiliary lane between Sorrento Valley Road and Genesee Avenue

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $27,363 Open to Traffic: Oct 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 Local Funds $24,800 $9,200 $15,600 $9,940 $3,960 $10,900 TransNet - MC $963 $963 $963 TOTAL $27,363 $10,800 $16,563 $11,540 $3,960 $11,863

MPO ID: SD113 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: I-5/Sorrento Valley Road RAS (TA7-41) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Interstate 5 from Sorrento Valley Rd to Sorrento Valley Rd - in San Diego, future new freeway access interchange including ramp (CIP 52-765.0) (S-00914)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $3,775

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON DEMO - Sec 115 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 STP - Sec 112 $600 $600 $600 STP - Sec 117 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 TransNet - LSI $175 $175 $175 TOTAL $3,775 $3,600 $175 $3,600 $175

MPO ID: SD115 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: La Jolla Village Drive/I-805 Interchange Ramps RAS (TA7-47)

Project Description: I 805 from La Jolla Village to La Jolla Village - in San Diego on I-805 at La Jolla Village Drive - reconfigure interchange and add 220 meters of acceleration lane (CIP 524850)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Interchange reconfiguration projects

Est Total Cost: $28,975

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $28,975 $23,975 $5,000 $3,055 $25,920 TOTAL $28,975 $23,975 $5,000 $3,055 $25,920

Page 102 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

106 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD120 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: San Diego River Multi-Use Bicycle and Pedestrian Path EARMARK NO: CA 317/90 TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Hazard Center Drive from 400' west of SR163 to 600' east of SR163 - in San Diego on Hazard Center Drive under SR 163 - construct bicycle and pedestrian path on north side of San Diego River (CIP 58-191.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $2,040

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $400 $400 $400 TransNet - B $180 $180 $180 TransNet - LSI $1,460 $320 $1,140 $320 $1,140 TOTAL $2,040 $900 $1,140 $500 $1,540

MPO ID: SD129 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: University Avenue Mobility Project Phase 2 RAS (TA7-48) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: University Avenue from Florida Street to Boundary Street - in San Diego, environmental studies for improvements to University Avenue transit corridor in North Park (CIP 52-766.0), improvements include installation of new medians for safety improvements, restriping, pedestrian popouts, new traffic signal, enhanced pedestrian crossings, and new bike racks (augments Smart Growth Funding for this project in V04)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Transportation enhancement activities

Est Total Cost: $3,675

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $175 $175 $175 TransNet - LSI $3,500 $200 $300 $200 $2,800 $200 $500 $2,800 TOTAL $3,675 $375 $300 $200 $2,800 $375 $500 $2,800

MPO ID: SD130 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Skyline Drive - 58th Street to Sears Avenue EARMARK NO: CA574/2479 TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Skyline Drive from 58th St. to Sears Avenue - Skyline Drive from 58th Street to Sears Avenue - in San Diego, installation of new medians for safety improvements, intersection lighting, traffic signal upgrades and other street improvements to enhance pedestrian and vehicular movement (CIP 52-763.0)(WBS# S-00912)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection channelization projects

Est Total Cost: $1,755

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $800 $800 $800 Local Funds $325 $325 $325 TransNet - L $305 $305 $305 TransNet - LSI $325 $325 $325 TOTAL $1,755 $630 $1,125 $630 $1,125

Page 103 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

107 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD133 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Mira Sorrento Place TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Mira Sorrento Place from Scranton Rd. to Vista Sorrento Pkwy. - in San Diego, widen the existing two-lane 560' portion of Mira Sorrento Place (40' road width, 55' right of way) to a four-lane collector (72' road width, 92' right of way), and extend the road to intersect with Vista Sorrento Parkway at the existing on/off ramps to I-805 (CIP 52-676.0)

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $12,875 Open to Traffic: May 2008

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $11,885 $11,885 $2,600 $1,500 $7,785 TransNet - L $810 $810 $810 TransNet - LSI $180 $120 $60 $180 TOTAL $12,875 $12,815 $60 $2,600 $1,500 $8,775

MPO ID: SD137 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Palm Avenue Roadway Improvements RAS (TA7-48) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Palm Ave from I-805 to Beyer Blvd - in San Diego, install traffic improvements to include raised medians with turn pockets, traffic signals, pedestrian refuge areas, etc (CIP 52-764.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Non construction related activities

Est Total Cost: $3,754

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $300 $300 $300 TransNet - LSI $3,454 $569 $630 $2,255 $569 $2,885 TOTAL $3,754 $869 $630 $2,255 $869 $2,885

MPO ID: SD153 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: 25th Street Renaissance TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: 25th Street from F Street to Russ Boulevard (Balboa Park) including adjacent intersecting streets along 25th Street from F Street to Russ Boulevard. - in San Diego, augments existing Smart Growth projects (V04) related infrastructure improvements to include the construction of amenities to improve pedestrian safety and provide traffic calming, including the installation of a roundabout at the intersection of 25th and B Streets; the roundabout will replace a four-way stop controlled intersection and will provide continuous flow and reduce delay; congestion will be reduced as vehicles will no longer stop and queue at the stop signs; the improvements will promote and improve pedestrian safety at intersection crossings and create a more walkable neighborhood; streetscape and parking improvements may also be provided (CIP 62-332.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Interchange reconfiguration projects

Est Total Cost: $1,025

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,025 $200 $125 $700 $200 $125 $700 TOTAL $1,025 $200 $125 $700 $200 $125 $700

Page 104 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

108 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD155 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Old Otay Mesa Road

Project Description: Old Otay Mesa Road from Hawkin Dr. to 1,100 feet west of Crescent Bay Dr. - in San Diego, widen road by approximately 20 feet for the purpose of installing new sidewalk with concrete curb and gutter, and to allow for the installation of bike lanes, guardrails, fence, minor drainage facilities and retaining walls. This project will not increase traffic lanes (CIP 52-775.0/52-642.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $7,600

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $7,400 $3,900 $3,500 $2,400 $1,500 $3,500 TransNet - L $200 $200 $200 TOTAL $7,600 $4,100 $3,500 $2,600 $1,500 $3,500

MPO ID: SD156 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: 34th and 35th at Madison Avenue Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: On 34th and 35th Streets from Adams to Madison, on from Felton to 35th Street - in San Diego, construction of new sidewalk and drainage improvements including curbs and gutters (CIP 52-774.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $1,734

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $60 $60 $60 TransNet - LSI $1,674 $120 $251 $303 $1,000 $120 $251 $1,303 TOTAL $1,734 $180 $251 $303 $1,000 $180 $251 $1,303

MPO ID: SD157 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Cherokee Street Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Cherokee St from Monroe Ave to E Mountain View - in San Diego, construction of sidewalk and drainage improvements including curb and gutter; drainage improvements will reduce frequent flooding problems (CIP 52-773.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $2,060

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $30 $30 $30 TransNet - LSI $2,030 $70 $480 $1,480 $70 $480 $1,480 TOTAL $2,060 $100 $480 $1,480 $100 $480 $1,480

Page 105 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

109 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD161 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Preliminary Engineering for Congestion Relief Projects TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Various locations: Balboa Avenue from I-5 to I-15, Rosecrans St from I-8 to Kellog Street, University Avenue from 54th St to 68th St - in San Diego, perform preliminary design work for future congestion relief project development (CIP 59-023.0); project types include roadway realignment, roadway widening for bike lanes, new or widened sidewalks, new traffic signals and traffic signal upgrades including intersection lighting, traffic calming measures

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $1,426

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $600 $600 $600 TransNet - LSI $826 $576 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $826 TOTAL $1,426 $1,176 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $1,426

MPO ID: SD163 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Prospect Street/Silverado Street Roundabout TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Prospect Street and Silverado Street - in San Diego, install intersection improvements to include a roundabout which provide continuous flow and reduce delay; the improvements will promote and improve pedestrian safety at the intersection crossing (CIP 52-776.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection channelization projects

Est Total Cost: $1,811

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $891 $891 $891 TransNet - L $150 $150 $150 TransNet - LSI $770 $770 $770 TOTAL $1,811 $920 $891 $150 $1,661

MPO ID: SD166 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Minor Bicycle Facilities TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Citywide including , Park Blvd, Adams Ave, Aldine Dr, Monroe Ave, & El Cajon Blvd - install Class II bike lanes or Class II bike routes (CIP 58-204.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $465

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $15 $15 $15 TransNet - LSI $450 $290 $100 $15 $15 $15 $15 $175 $275 TOTAL $465 $305 $100 $15 $15 $15 $15 $175 $290

Page 106 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

110 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD172 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Transportation Grant Matches TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: various locations citywide including West Mission Bay Drive Bridge Seismic Retrofit project, and Desert View Drive Alley Repair (CIP 52-805.1) grant funding provided through FHWA and OES R-304725, and the At-Grade Crossing and Traffic Synchronization Improvement Project (TSLP)(CIP 59-021.0) - in San Diego; the City's share of TLSP Grant (R-304384); match to Safe Routes to School - Florence Griffith Joyner Elementary (CIP 62-337.0)(R-303994)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $4,565

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L $458 $458 $458 TransNet - L Carry Over $108 $108 $108 TransNet - LSI $3,999 $399 $755 $700 $900 $610 $635 $3,999 TOTAL $4,565 $857 $863 $700 $900 $610 $635 $4,565 *list of approved grants available

MPO ID: SD175 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Talbot Street Slope TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: On Talbot Street at Martinez Street - in San Diego, stabilize adjacent slope to prevent slope failure which would create capacity impeding conditions by impacting vehicle usage of roadway (CIP 13-501.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Plantings, landscaping, etc

Est Total Cost: $3,106

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TransNet - L $250 $250 $250 TransNet - L Carry Over $480 $480 $480 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $376 $376 $376 TOTAL $3,106 $250 $2,856 $250 $2,856

MPO ID: SD176 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Maintenance and Non Congestion Relief Efforts TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - in San Diego, maintenance and non congestion relief efforts including but not limited to pavement overlay, pot hole repair, etc

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $49,866

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L Carry Over $536 $536 $536 TransNet - LSI $49,330 $13,990 $6,639 $6,759 $7,029 $7,310 $7,602 $49,330 TOTAL $49,866 $13,990 $7,175 $6,759 $7,029 $7,310 $7,602 $49,866

Page 107 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

111 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD178 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Pershing Drive/Redwood Street Intersection TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: At Pershing and Redwood Street - in San Diego, install permanent traffic roundabout improvement to replace stop signs at the controlled intersection; roundabouts provide continuous flow and reduce delay; congestion is reduced because vehicles will no longer stop and queue up at the stop signs. The improvements will promote and improve pedestrian safety at the intersection crossing (CIP 52-696.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection channelization projects

Est Total Cost: $900

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI Carry Over $900 $900 $900 TOTAL $900 $900 $900

MPO ID: SD179 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Linda Vista Road at Genesee Avenue RAS (TA7-47) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: on Linda Vista Road at Genesee Avenue - in San Diego, roadway improvements to include extension of medians for left turn lanes and the widening of Linda Vista Road for the creation of exclusive right turn lanes (CIP 52-754.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection channelization projects

Est Total Cost: $1,003

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $53 $53 $53 TransNet - LSI $950 $70 $150 $150 $580 $70 $300 $580 TOTAL $1,003 $123 $150 $150 $580 $123 $300 $580

MPO ID: SD181 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Soledad Mountain Road Emergency Repair

Project Description: Soledad Mountain Road from Desert View Dr. to Palomino Circle - in San Diego, reconstruct roadway lost as result of landslide (CIP 52-805.0); grant match provided for Soledad Mountain Road (CIP 52-805.0) grant funding provided through FHWA and OES R-304725.

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Damage repair caused by unusual disasters

Est Total Cost: $26,919

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $26,090 $26,090 $26,090 TransNet - L Carry Over $829 $829 $829 TOTAL $26,919 $26,090 $829 $26,919

Page 108 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

112 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD183 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Division Street - Bryanview to 61st - Reconstruction TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Division Street from Bryanview to 61st - in San Diego, major roadway reconstruction; improvements may include installation of curb, gutter and sidewalks, retaining walls, drainage, landscaping and property acquisition (CIP 52-813.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $500

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $500 $500 $300 $200 TOTAL $500 $500 $300 $200

MPO ID: SD184 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Saturn Boulevard Westside TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Saturn Blvd from Coronado to Grove - in San Diego, roadway reconstruction to include installation of new sidewalk, curb and gutter; new paving and retaining walls, drainage improvements (CIP 52-814.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection channelization projects

Est Total Cost: $2,350

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $2,350 $100 $150 $700 $1,400 $250 $2,100 TOTAL $2,350 $100 $150 $700 $1,400 $250 $2,100

MPO ID: SD186 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Administrative Expenses

Project Description: Citywide - City of San Diego 1% administrative costs

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Non construction related activities

Est Total Cost: $1,726

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,538 $348 $224 $228 $237 $246 $256 $1,538 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $188 $188 $188 TOTAL $1,726 $348 $412 $228 $237 $246 $256 $1,726

Page 109 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

113 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD188 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Congestion Relief/Traffic Operations TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Various locations - studies to provide congestion relief efforts to include intersection lighting, traffic signal coordination, centrally controlled traffic signal optimization system, traffic data collection for performance monitoring; traffic calming in Smart Growth areas; and project development/preliminary engineering/Corridor studies

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $13,558

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $13,558 $3,400 $2,032 $2,032 $2,032 $2,032 $2,032 $13,558 TOTAL $13,558 $3,400 $2,032 $2,032 $2,032 $2,032 $2,032 $13,558

MPO ID: SD189 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Sea World Drive Widening and I- 5 Interchange Improvements RAS (TA 7-48)

Project Description: Sea World Drive from Friars Road to Morena Boulevard - in San Diego, replace existing 4-lane bridge with an 8-lane bridge with new on/off ramps; widen approachways to add right turn lanes to improve access to I-5 (CIP 52-706.0)

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $20,249 Open to Traffic: Jul 2019

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $20,249 $3,175 $472 $5,616 $10,986 $9,263 $10,986 TOTAL $20,249 $3,175 $472 $5,616 $10,986 $9,263 $10,986

MPO ID: SD190 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Palm Avenue/Interstate 805 Interchange RAS (TA 7-48)

Project Description: On Palm Avenue at Interstate 805 - in San Diego, future widening of Palm Avenue Bridge including providing for repairs to the bridge approaches and abutments, installing sidewalks, signals, striping and • Phase I was work pertaining to re-striping to reconfigure travel lanes. No actual modifications to the physical geometry of the bridge took place. • Phase II of the project will widen the bridge on the north side. In addition to this the scope of work will also contain restriping of the lanes and modifications to the on/off ramps. • Phase III of the project will widen the bridge on the south side. In addition to this the scope of work will also contain restriping of the lanes and modifications to the on/off ramps. • Both Phase II & III will have environmental documentation prepared and all technical studies performed before entering into full design. signage modifications: also modify freeway on and off ramps (CIP 52-640.0)

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $6,000 Open to Traffic: Jun 2019

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $6,000 $2,000 $2,000 $1,380 $620 $5,750 $250 TOTAL $6,000 $2,000 $2,000 $1,380 $620 $5,750 $250

Page 110 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

114 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD196 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Torrey Pines Road Improvements, Phase 2 RAS (115) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: Torrey Pines Road from Prospect Place to La Jolla Shores Drive - improvements to include guardrails, medians, a new traffic signal, bike lanes and sidewalks. (WBS S-00613)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Transportation enhancement activities

Est Total Cost: $1,670

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,670 $500 $300 $870 $500 $1,170 TOTAL $1,670 $500 $300 $870 $500 $1,170

MPO ID: SD198 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Cherokee Traffic Calming TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Cherokee Avenue from Madison Avenue to Cherokee Avenue - this project provides for reconstruction of the intersection of Madison Avenue and Cherokee Avenue for pedestrian safety. (Sublet of 58-127.0)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Safety Improvement Program

Est Total Cost: $240

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $240 $240 $240 TOTAL $240 $240 $240

MPO ID: SD199 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Market Street - Euclid to 54th Roadway Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Market Street from Euclid Avenue to 54th Street - in San Diego, this project provides for roadway reconstruction improvement of Market Street - Euclid Avenue to 54th Street

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $240

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $240 $240 $240 TOTAL $240 $240 $240

Page 111 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

115 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Diego, City of MPO ID: SD200 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: SR94/Euclid Avenue Interchange Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Euclid Avenue from Euclid Avenue to SR-94 Off-Ramp - study of the feasibility for constructing an SR-94 Eastbound off-Ramp at Euclid Avenue to facilitate community access to the freeway

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $2,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 TOTAL $2,000 $2,000 $2,000

Page 112 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

116 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Marcos, City of MPO ID: SM19 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grand Avenue Bridge

Project Description: From Discovery Street to San Marcos Boulevard - in San Marcos, construct 4-lane arterial; between Bent Ave to Discovery Street construct 6-lane arterial

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $12,524 Open to Traffic: Jun 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $12,524 $2,424 $4,600 $5,500 $2,044 $680 $9,800 TOTAL $12,524 $2,424 $4,600 $5,500 $2,044 $680 $9,800

MPO ID: SM22 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: South Santa Fe from Bosstick to Smilax RAS (TA 7-50)

Project Description: From Bosstick to Smilax - widen and realign existing road to 4-lane secondary arterial standards

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $5,435 Open to Traffic: Jun 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $4,855 $3,335 $320 $600 $600 $335 $3,320 $1,200 TransNet - H (78) $580 $580 $580 TOTAL $5,435 $3,915 $320 $600 $600 $335 $3,900 $1,200

MPO ID: SM24 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Woodland Parkway Interchange Improvements RAS (TA 7-51) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: From La Moree Road to Rancheros Drive - modify existing ramps at Woodland Parkway and Barham Drive; widen and realign SR 78 undercrossing and associated work

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $48,550 Open to Traffic: Jun 2015

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $46,950 $1,980 $4,170 $700 $4,500 $35,600 $1,850 $5,000 $40,100 TransNet - L $600 $600 $600 TransNet - LSI $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 TOTAL $48,550 $2,580 $4,170 $700 $5,500 $35,600 $2,450 $5,000 $41,100

Page 113 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

117 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Marcos, City of MPO ID: SM25 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Borden Road Street Improvements and Bridge Construction RAS (TA 7-50) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: From Twin Oaks to Woodward Street - construction of approximately 700 lineal feet of a new 4-lane secondary arterial including a bridge

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $10,800 Open to Traffic: Apr 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $6,800 $1,090 $910 $1,500 $3,300 $800 $1,200 $4,800 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 TOTAL $10,800 $1,090 $910 $5,500 $3,300 $800 $1,200 $8,800

MPO ID: SM27 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: McMahr Street Improvements

Project Description: From San Marcos Boulevard to Main Street - reconstruct road to arterial street standards

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $3,670

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $3,670 $470 $200 $1,500 $1,500 $470 $200 $3,000 TOTAL $3,670 $470 $200 $1,500 $1,500 $470 $200 $3,000

MPO ID: SM30 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: San Marcos Boulevard Street Improvements RAS (TA 4-50) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: From Rancho Santa Fe to Bent Avenue - widen road to a 6-lane prime arterial

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $5,930 Open to Traffic: Jul 2016

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $2,930 $290 $270 $700 $870 $800 $650 $2,060 $220 TransNet - L (Cash) $188 $70 $118 $188 TransNet - LSI $1,830 $112 $1,718 $412 $1,418 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $982 $982 $982 TOTAL $5,930 $360 $270 $700 $1,100 $3,500 $650 $2,660 $2,620

Page 114 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

118 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Marcos, City of MPO ID: SM31 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Discovery Street Improvements RAS (TA 7-50)

Project Description: From McMahr Rd to Bent Ave/Craven Rd - widen roadway to four lane secondary arterial

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $4,100 Open to Traffic: Jul 2012

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $4,100 $500 $2,000 $1,600 $200 $300 $3,600 TOTAL $4,100 $500 $2,000 $1,600 $200 $300 $3,600

MPO ID: SM32 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Via Vera Cruz Bridge and Street Improvements

Project Description: From San Marcos Boulevard to Discovery Street - widen to four lane secondary arterial and construct a bridge at San Marcos Creek

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $11,500 Open to Traffic: Jul 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $11,500 $9,000 $2,500 $11,500 TOTAL $11,500 $9,000 $2,500 $11,500

MPO ID: SM38 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Maintenance Operations TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Various Locations - roadway, street lighting, traffic signal, signage maintenance

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $1,100

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $430 $430 $430 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $670 $670 $670 TOTAL $1,100 $1,100 $1,100

Page 115 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

119 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Marcos, City of MPO ID: SM42 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Improvements: Discovery Street; Craven Road to West of Twin Oaks Valley RAS (TA 7-51) Road Project Description: From Craven Road to Twin Oaks Valley Road - in the City of San Marcos, on Discovery Street from Craven Road to west of Twin Oaks Valley Road, construct approximately 5,100 lineal feet of a new 6-lane roadway.

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $12,500 Open to Traffic: Jun 2013

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $12,500 $2,500 $3,300 $6,700 $500 $2,000 $10,000 TOTAL $12,500 $2,500 $3,300 $6,700 $500 $2,000 $10,000

MPO ID: SM43 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Improvements and Widening RAS (TA 7-51)

Project Description: Barham Drive from Twin Oaks Valley Road to La Moree Road - in the City of San Marcos, on Barham Drive between Twin Oaks Valley Road and La Moree Road, widen and reconstruct the north side of Barham Drive to a 6-lane prime arterial and associated work

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $3,580 Open to Traffic: May 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $3,580 $350 $2,680 $550 $350 $1,600 $1,630 TOTAL $3,580 $350 $2,680 $550 $350 $1,600 $1,630

MPO ID: SM44 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Eastbound SR-78 Auxiliary lane RTP PG NO: A-19

Project Description: From Woodland Parkway to Nordahl Road - construct auxiliary lanes along eastbound SR-78 between Woodland Parkway Interchange and Nordahl Road Interchange; includes widening of Mission Road undercrossing

RT:78 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $14,500 Open to Traffic: Aug 2011

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $4,000 $750 $3,250 $1,250 $2,750 SHOPP Augmentation - Mobility $10,500 $10,500 $10,500 TOTAL $14,500 $750 $13,750 $1,250 $13,250

Page 116 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

120 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) San Marcos, City of MPO ID: SM45 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: San Marcos Creek Bridge at State Route 78

Project Description: From San Marcos Blvd to Twin Oaks Valley Rd - in San Marcos, on SR-78 at San Marcos Creek between Twin Oaks Valley Road and San Marcos Boulevard Interchange, construct a culvert

RT:78 Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $21,400

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $21,400 $1,380 $2,020 $15,000 $3,000 $1,400 $20,000 TOTAL $21,400 $1,380 $2,020 $15,000 $3,000 $1,400 $20,000

MPO ID: SM46 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bent Avenue Bridge between San Marcos Blvd and Discovery Street

Project Description: From San Marcos Blvd to Discovery Street - in San Marcos, widen existing roadway and construct bridge to a 4-lane arterial road including sidewalks and bicycle facilities

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $13,000 Open to Traffic: Dec 2014

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $13,000 $1,000 $500 $500 $11,000 $1,000 $1,000 $11,000 TOTAL $13,000 $1,000 $500 $500 $11,000 $1,000 $1,000 $11,000

MPO ID: SM47 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Nordahl Road Bridge @ SR-78 RAS (TA 7-44)

Project Description: Nordahl Road from Mission Road to Montiel Road - Nordahl Road from Mission Road to Montiel Road - replace the Nordahl Road Overcrossing to increase clearance and provide additional 14-feet of structure width necessary to facilitate the required construction staging of the project; the additional width of the overcrossing will accommodate operational improvements through left-turn storage at the ramp intersections; widen Nordahl Road to provide a dedicated right-turn onto Montiel Road (no additional travel lanes) - joint project with City of Escondido and Caltrans

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $5,500

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $5,000 $500 $4,500 $500 $4,500 TCSP $500 $500 $500 TOTAL $5,500 $500 $5,000 $500 $5,000

Page 117 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

121 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Santee, City of MPO ID: SNT04 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Santee Rehabilitation and Major Repair Work TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: FY 2010/2011 - Residential Zone CE:, Iverness Road - Carlton Oaks Drive to Carlton Oaks Drive, Wethersfield Road - Carlton Oaks Drive to Iverness Road, Massot Avenue, Lomker Way, Lomket Court, Allano Way, Pine Valley Drive, Dunwoodie Road - Residential Zone BG:, Caretta Drive - El Nopal to Second Street, Cleary Street - Holborn Street to Second Street, Trigal Way, Montura Court, Montura Avenue, Holborn Street, Holborn Court, Valor Place, Valor Lane, Sayers Court, Melanie Court, Delia Court - Residential Zone DD:, Heartly road, Isacc Street, Abraham Way, Stevens Street, , Wheatlands Avenue, Wheatlands Court, Wheatlands Road - Residential Zone EA: - Bushy Hill Drive, Simeon Drive, Wahl Street - Other: Tamberly Way - Mission Gorge Road to end of cul-de-sac Los Ranchitos Road - Mast Boulevard to north City limits - reconstruction and rehabilitation in the form of removal and replacement of existing pavement section 2 inches minimum, 3 inches typical, edge grind with 1.5 inch minimum overlay, complete reconstruction with 6 inches base and 2 inch surface course

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $16,535

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $3,686 $1,186 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $90 $3,596 TransNet - L $7,729 $7,729 $7,729 TransNet - LSI $3,934 $287 $937 $974 $475 $582 $679 $190 $3,744 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,186 $1,186 $50 $1,136 TOTAL $16,535 $10,388 $1,437 $1,474 $975 $1,082 $1,179 $330 $16,205

Page 118 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

122 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Solana Beach, City of MPO ID: SB07 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Highway 101 Streetscape and Traffic Calming Project RAS (TA 7-51) TransNet - LSI: CR Project Description: From Dahlia Dr to Ocean St - construct street and parkway improvements to increase pedestrian safety and enhance pedestrian parkways; complement and connect to the recently constructed Coastal Rail Trail providing a pedestrian friendly environment along the Highway 101 corridor

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $930

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $787 $787 $400 $387 TransNet - LSI $143 $143 $143 TOTAL $930 $787 $143 $400 $530

MPO ID: SB08 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Marine View Avenue Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: From San Andres Drive to Solana Drive - add pedestrian facilities along existing 2-lane road; construct approximately 590 lineal feet of curb, gutter and sidewalk and retaining walls along east side of road, as well as restoring highly eroded slope above proposed sidewalk

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $419

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $185 $185 $185 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $234 $234 $234 TOTAL $419 $234 $185 $419

Page 119 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

123 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Transportation Corridor Agencies MPO ID: TCA01 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Foothill Transportation Corridor South

Project Description: On SR 241 from Orange/San Diego County line to Cristianitos interchange - construct 3 general purpose toll lanes; from Cristianitos interchange to I-5 - construct 2 general purpose toll lanes (program funding for Phase 1 only)

RT:241 Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $442,663 Open to Traffic: Dec 2030*

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $442,663 $83,275 $2,658 $11,730 $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 $82,333 $15,330 $345,000 TOTAL $442,663 $83,275 $2,658 $11,730 $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 $82,333 $15,330 $345,000

*Funding Source = Foothill/Eastern Tansportation Corridor Agency; Phase I is scheduled to be completed by 2015

Page 120 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

124 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Various Agencies MPO ID: V04 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grouped Projects for Transportation Enhancement Activities - Smart Growth Incentive Program Project Description: Projects are consistent with CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories: transportation enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation of historic transportaion buildings, structures, or facilities)

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Transportation enhancement activities

Est Total Cost: $705

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $280 $280 $280 TransNet - LSI $425 $425 $425 TOTAL $705 $280 $425 $705

MPO ID: V07 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Biological Mitigation Program SANDAG ID: 1200200

Project Description: Countywide - habitat acquisition, restoration, creation, enhancement, management and monitoring necessary for meeting project mitigation requirements; mitigation efforts will focus on TransNet Early Action Program projects, then Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Revenue Constrained projects, then the remaining RTP projects in this order

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Advance land acquisitions

Est Total Cost: $428,000

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - REMP $369,912 $85,862 $60,150 $59,100 $53,600 $58,100 $53,100 $4,510 $220,350 $145,052 TOTAL $369,912 $85,862 $60,150 $59,100 $53,600 $58,100 $53,100 $4,510 $220,350 $145,052 *Project completion outside of programming cycle

MPO ID: V08 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Regional Habitat Conservation Fund SANDAG ID: 1200300

Project Description: Countywide - regional habitat management and monitoring

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Plantings, landscaping, etc

Est Total Cost: $44,906

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - REMP $32,350 $7,882 $4,519 $4,699 $4,886 $5,081 $5,283 $8,232 $24,118 TOTAL $32,350 $7,882 $4,519 $4,699 $4,886 $5,081 $5,283 $8,232 $24,118 *Project completion outside of programming cycle

Page 121 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

125 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Vista, City of MPO ID: VISTA08 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: West Vista Way Widening Design, CIP 7741 RAS (TA 7-51)

Project Description: From Melrose Dr to Thunder Dr - realign West Vista Way including providing preliminary improvement plans, final right-of-way maps, and a metes and bounds legal description anticipated to provide congestion relief with future widening of West Vista Way from 2 to 4 lanes

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $1,981

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $35 $35 $35 RSTP $990 $990 $990 TCSP $570 $570 $570 TransNet - L $386 $386 $386 TOTAL $1,981 $1,411 $570 $1,981

MPO ID: VISTA08A ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: W. Vista Way Widening Construction - Phase I, CIP 8191 EARMARK NO: CA028 RAS (TA 7-51) Project Description: From Emerald Dr to Grapevine Rd - the scope of this project is to provide Right-of-Way TransNet - LSI: CR acquistion and construction for the widening of W. Vista Way a distance of 1,500 feet from the intersection with Emerald Drive to the intersection with Grapevine Road

Capacity Status: CI Exempt Category: Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $2,908 Open to Traffic: Dec 2010

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON HPP $245 $245 $245 STP $250 $250 $250 TransNet - L Carry Over $705 $705 $705 TransNet - LSI $1,708 $1,708 $50 $200 $1,458 TOTAL $2,908 $2,203 $705 $50 $445 $2,413

MPO ID: VISTA17 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Grapevine Road Street Improvement Project CIP 8018 TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: From Olive Ave to Date St - reconstruct pavement and install curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes to provide a safe route to school

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Plantings, landscaping, etc

Est Total Cost: $1,604

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $1,304 $1,304 $180 $190 $934 TransNet - L $230 $230 $230 TransNet - L Carry Over $25 $25 $25 TransNet - LSI $45 $45 $45 TOTAL $1,604 $1,559 $45 $180 $190 $1,234

Page 122 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

126 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Vista, City of MPO ID: VISTA25 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Roadway Rehabilitation/Curbs and Gutters CIP 7650 TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: Citywide - repair/replace sidewalks, curbs, and gutters

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $546

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $371 $371 $371 TransNet - LSI $175 $75 $25 $25 $25 $25 $175 TOTAL $546 $446 $25 $25 $25 $25 $546

MPO ID: VISTA27 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Foothill Overlay and Improvements CIP 8141 TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: Foothill Drive including improvements between Beverly Drive and Vale Terrace Drive and from east of Bonair Road to Elm Drive. - overlay various portions of Foothill Drive including improvements between Beverly Drive and Vale Terrace Drive and from east of Bonair Road to Elm Drive.

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $1,900

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $118 $118 $118 TransNet - L $382 $382 $382 TransNet - L Carry Over $527 $527 $527 TransNet - LSI $873 $873 $873 TOTAL $1,900 $1,027 $873 $1,900

MPO ID: VISTA30 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance Annual Project 07/08, CIP 8154 TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: S. Melrose Dr. from South City Limit to W. Vista Way; N. Melrose Dr. from Copper to North City Limit; Bobier Dr. from West City Limit to Lynette Circle; North Dr. from West City Limit to Melrose Dr.; and N. Santa Fe Ave from Osborne to Bobier. - FY2006/07 and FY2007/08, repair/rehabilitate distressed pavement areas and overlay streets with asphalt concrete where identified as priorities in street inventory

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $7,995

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $3,017 $3,017 $300 $2,717 TransNet - L $1,242 $1,242 $1,242 TransNet - L Carry Over $1,723 $1,723 $1,723 TransNet - LSI $2,013 $1,957 $56 $2,013 TOTAL $7,995 $7,939 $56 $300 $7,695

Page 123 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

127 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Vista, City of MPO ID: VISTA32 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Signal - E. Vista Way at Oak Drive CIP 8127

Project Description: From Oak Dr to East Vista Way - install new traffic signal, curb and gutter, and ADA improvements at the intersection

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $245

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $241 $241 $241 TransNet - L Carry Over $4 $4 $4 TOTAL $245 $241 $4 $245

MPO ID: VISTA33 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Signal - N. Santa Fe at East Drive CIP 8128

Project Description: From East Dr to N. Santa Fe - install a new traffic signal and ADA improvements

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $215

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $212 $212 $212 TransNet - L Carry Over $3 $3 $3 TOTAL $215 $212 $3 $215

MPO ID: VISTA34 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance CIP8155 TransNet - LSI: CR

Project Description: University Dr from Sycamore Ave. to Wal-Mart driveway; Business Park Dr. from Sycamore Ave to Poinsettia Ave.; Hacienda Dr. from West city limit to Emerald Dr.; Hacienda Dr. from La Tortuga Dr. to 1475 west of La Tortuga Dr.; Crescent Dr. from Escondido Ave. to Eucalyptus Ave.; Arcadia Ave. from Oak Dr. to Bonair Road; Osborne St. from N. Santa Fe Ave. to Guajome Lake Rd.; Townsite Dr. from Wellpot Pl. to Indian Rock Rd.; Alta Vista Dr. from Escondido Ave. to Verdant Pl.; and Beaumont Dr. from Eucalyptus Ave. to Coventry Rd. - repair/rehabilitate distressed pavement areas and overlay streets with asphalt concrete where identified as priorities in street inventory, including all preparation work such as dig-outs, skin patching, shoulder grading, traffic loops, raising manholes, striping, and traffic safety control, as well as survey monument preservation

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $6,630

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $2,679 $2,679 $2,679 TransNet - L Carry Over $73 $50 $23 $73 TransNet - LSI $3,878 $3,313 $564 $3,878 TOTAL $6,630 $6,042 $587 $6,630

Page 124 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

128 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Vista, City of MPO ID: VISTA39 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Pedestrian Improvements, CIP 8187

Project Description: Longhorn Dr at Promontory Ridge Way - install curb pop-outs and medians at the intersection of Longhorn Drive at Promontory Ridge Way

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Safety Improvement Program

Est Total Cost: $66

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON Local Funds $15 $15 $15 TDA - Bicycles $51 $51 $51 TOTAL $66 $15 $51 $66

MPO ID: VISTA42 ADOPTION: 10-00 Project Title: Bobier Dr. Storm Drain & Street Rehabilitation, CIP 8218 TransNet - LSI: Maint

Project Description: From North Santa Fe to Melrose Dr - install storm drain from N. Santa Fe to 1,500 ft west to address groundwater problems; rehabilitate pavement from N. Santa Fe and Melrose Drive

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $55

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $55 $55 $55 TOTAL $55 $55 $55

Page 125 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

129 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s)

RTIP Fund Types AC = Advanced Construction ARRA = American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Federal Stimulus Program) BIP = Border Infrastructure Program (Federal under SAFETEA-LU) BTA = Bicycle Transportation Account (State) CBI = Corridors and Borders Infrastructure Program (Federal under TEA-21) CMAQ = Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (Federal formula) CMIA = Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (Prop. 1B) DEMO = High Priority Demonstration Program under TEA-21 (Federal discretionary) DEMO-Sec 115 = High Priority Demonstration Program under FY 2004 Appropriations DEMO-Sec 117/STP = Surface Transportation Program under FHWA Administrative Program (congressionally directed appropriations) FSP = Freeway Service Patrol (State legislation) GARVEE = Grant Anticipated Revenue Vehicles (FHWA bonds) HBP = Highway Bridge Program under SAFETEA-LU (Federal) HBRR = Highway Bridge Repair and Rehabilitation under TEA-21 (Federal) HES = Hazard Elimination System (Federal administered by Caltrans) HPP = High Priority Program under SAFETEA-LU (Federal discretionary) HSIP = Highway Safety Improvement Program (Administered by Caltrans) HUD = Housing and Urban Development (Federal) IM = Interstate Maintenance Discretionary (Federal) IRI = Intercity Rail Improvement (Prop 1B) IRR = Indian Reservation Roads program (Federal) ITS = Intelligent Transportation System (Federal) NHS = National Highway System PTA = Public Transportation Account (State) PTMISEA = Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement (Prop. 1B state bond) Prop 1A - High Speed Rail = High Speed Passenger Bond Program (Prop 1A) RSTP = Regional Surface Transportation Program (Federal) RTCIP = Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (Local) RTP = Recreational Trails Program (Federal) SHOPP = State Highway Operation & Protection Program SLPP = State Local Partnership Program (Prop. 1B) SRTS = Safe Routes to School (Federal program administered by Caltrans) STIP-IIP = State Transportation Improvement Program - Interregional Program (State) STIP-RIP = State Transportation Improvement Program - Regional Improvement Program (State) Section 5307 = Federal Transit Administration Urbanized Area Formula Program (Federal including ARRA)

Page 126 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

130 DRAFT 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s)

Section 5309 (Bus) = Federal Transit Administration Discretionary Program (Federal) Section 5309 (FG) = Federal Transit Administration Fixed Guideway Modernization Formula program (Federal including ARRA) Section 5309 (NS) = Federal Transit Administration Discretionary - New Starts Program (Federal) Section 5310 = Federal Transit Administration Elderly & Disabled Program (Allocated by CTC) Section 5311 = Federal Transit Administration Rural Program (Federal including ARRA) Section 5316 (JARC) = Federal Transit Administration Jobs Access Reverse Commute (Federal) Section 5317 (NF) = Federal Transit Administration New Freedom (Federal) TCRP = Traffic Congestion Relief Program (State) TCSP = Transportation & Community & System Preservation (Federal) TDA = Transportation Development Act (Local) TDA-B = Transportation Development Act-Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities (Local) TEA/TE = Transportation Enhancement Activities Program (Federal) TIGER (ARRA) = Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (Federal Stimulus) TIGGER (ARRA) = Transit Investment for Greenhouse Gas and Energy Reduction (Federal Stimulus) TLSP = Traffic Light Synchronization Program (Prop. 1B) TSGP = Transit Security Grant Program (Federal Homeland Security Office and State) TSM = Transportation Systems Management (State) TransNet-78 = Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - SR 78 (Local) TransNet-ADA = Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Transit (Local) TransNet-B = Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Bike (Local) TransNet-BPNS = Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax extension - Bicycle, Pedestrian and Neighborhood Safety Program TransNet-BRT/Ops = Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Bus Rapid Transit/New Service TransNet-Border = Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Border TransNet-CP = Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Commercial Paper TransNet-H = Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Highway TransNet-L = Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local Streets & Roads TransNet-LSG = Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local Smart Growth TransNet-LSI = Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local System Improvements TransNet-MC = Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Major Corridors TransNet-REMP = Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Regional Environmental Mitigation Program TransNet-SMIP = Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Regional Smart Growth Incentive Program TransNet-SS = Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Senior Services TransNet-T = Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Transit TransNet-TSI = Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax- Transit System Improvements

Page 127 Tuesday, July 13, 2010

131 Attachment 3

DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

On April 15, 2004, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated the San Diego air basin as nonattainment for the new Eight-Hour Ozone Standard. This designation took effect on June 15, 2004. Several areas that are tribal lands in eastern San Diego County were excluded from the nonattainment designation. The air basin was initially classified as a basic nonattainment area under Subpart 1 of the Clean Air Act and the maximum statutory attainment date for the Eight-Hour Ozone Standard was set as June 15, 2009. However, U.S. EPA in response to a court decision, on January 16, 2009, proposed that, among other areas of the country, the San Diego basic nonattainment area be reclassified as a Subpart 2 moderate nonattainment area, with a maximum statutory attainment date of June 15, 2010. Final U.S. EPA action on this proposed reclassification is still pending.

In cooperation with the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and SANDAG, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) developed an Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan, which was submitted to the U.S. EPA on June 15, 2007. The budgets in the Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County were found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. EPA, effective June 9, 2008.

The SANDAG Board of Directors made a finding of conformity of the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future (2030 RTP) and 2006 RTIP, as amended, on November 30, 2007. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) issued its conformity finding on December 10, 2007. On July 25, 2008, a conformity determination for the 2008 RTIP and conformity redetermination for the 2030 RTP was made by the SANDAG Board. The U.S. DOT issued its conformity finding on November 17, 2008. On January 22, 2010, the SANDAG Board adopted the 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 16 and its conformity finding. The U.S. DOT made a finding of conformity for the amendment on February 19, 2010. On July 23, 2010, the SANDAG Board will be asked to make a finding of conformity for the 2008 RTIP Amendment No. 23 and a conformity redetermination for the 2030 RTP.

DEMONSTRATION OF FISCAL CONSTRAINT

The 2010 RTIP is consistent with the 2030 RTP. As a financially constrained document, the 2010 RTIP contains only those major transportation projects listed in the revenue-constrained 2030 RTP. Chapter 4 of the 2010 RTIP includes detailed discussion on fiscal constraint and overall financial capacity to carry out projects included in the RTIP.

DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES

132 These four Transportation Tactics were subsequently approved by the San Diego Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) and are included in the 1982 SIP for Air Quality as Transportation Control Measures (TCMs). The U.S. EPA approved this SIP revision for the San Diego Air Basin in 1983. However, the four TCMs have been fully implemented.

The California Clean Air Act required the preparation of a 1991 RAQS, including TCMs. During 1991 and 1992, SANDAG, in cooperation with local agencies, transit agencies, and the APCD, developed a TCM Plan. SANDAG approved the TCM Plan on March 27, 1992.

On June 30, 1992, the APCD amended the TCM Plan and adopted the 1991 RAQS, including the amended TCM Plan. TCMs included in the 1991 RAQS include the four Transportation Tactics described above, as well as a transportation demand management (TDM) program, vanpools, high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, and park and ride facilities. On November 12, 1992, the Air Resources Board (ARB) gave approval to the 1991 RAQS, including the TCMs.

The 1995 Triennial RAQS Update subsequently deleted the Employee Commute Travel Reduction Program contained in the TDM program because the program was no longer required under federal law. Assembly Bill 3048 (Statutes of 1996, Chapter 777) eliminated all state requirements for mandatory trip reduction programs. As a result, the Student Travel Reduction Program, the Noncommute Travel Reduction Program, and the Goods Movement/Truck Operation Program proposed in the 1991 RAQS were no longer statutorily mandated and were deleted from the RAQS in 1998. The 2001, 2004, and 2009 Triennial RAQS Revisions did not make changes to measures related to mobile sources or the TCM Plan.

AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY REQUIREMENTS

SANDAG, as the metropolitan planning organization (MPO), and the U.S. DOT must make a determination that the 2010 RTIP and the 2030 RTP conform to the applicable SIP. Conformity to the SIP means that transportation activities will not create new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay the attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

Based upon the U.S. EPA’s Transportation Conformity Rule, as amended, conformity of transportation plans and programs, including the 2010 RTIP is determined according to the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) [Section 176(c)(3)(A)] if the following is demonstrated:

The 2010 RTIP provides for the timely implementation of the Transportation Tactics contained in the 1991 RAQS. These tactics also are included as TCMs in the 1982 SIP, but have been fully implemented.

A quantitative analysis is conducted on the cumulative emissions of projects programmed within the 2010 RTIP, including all regionally significant, capacity-increasing projects. Further, implementation of the projects and programs must meet the motor vehicle emissions budget developed by local and state air quality agencies and approved by the U.S. EPA. The 2010 RTIP must meet the applicable emission budgets prescribed in the Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County, which were found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. EPA, effective June 9, 2008. Also, the 2010 RTIP must meet the CO emissions budget established in the CO Maintenance Plan (approved by the U.S. EPA in January 2006).

In addition to the required emissions tests, consultation with transportation and air quality agencies is required. The consultation process followed to prepare the air quality conformity analysis complies with the San Diego Transportation Conformity Procedures adopted in July 1998.

133 Interagency consultation involves SANDAG, the SDAPCD, Caltrans, ARB, the U.S. DOT, and the U.S. EPA, which form the San Diego Region Conformity Working Group (CWG).

Consultation is a three-tier process that:

1. formulates and reviews drafts through a conformity working group; 2. provides local agencies and the public with opportunities for input through existing regional advisory committees and workshops; and 3. seeks comments from affected federal and state agencies through participation in the development of draft documents and circulation of supporting materials prior to formal adoption.

SANDAG consulted with the CWG for the preparation of the new air quality analysis of the 2010 RTIP. Conformity of the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future also is being redetermined for consistency purposes.

The schedule for the development for the 2010 RTIP and criteria and procedures for determining conformity were presented to the CWG on March 3, 2010. The draft list of noncapacity increasing projects was provided to the CWG on April 26, 2010, and the draft list of capacity increasing project was provided to the CWG on May 5, 2010. Comments from the CWG were incorporated into the final exempt projects list.

The quantitative emissions analyses for the 2010 RTIP conformity determination and 2030 RTP redetermination were initiated in April 2010 and the results distributed on June 1, 2010, to the CWG for an initial review and comment period. The San Diego Region CWG reviewed the draft air quality conformity analysis at its June 9, 2010, meeting. The draft 2010 RTIP and its conformity analysis and the 2030 RTP conformity redetermination are scheduled to be released for public review and comment on July 23, 2010. The results of the regional emissions analysis indicate that the 2010 RTIP and 2030 RTP meet the air quality conformity requirements.

The SANDAG Board of Directors will be asked to make a conformity finding for the 2010 RTIP and redetermination of conformity for the 2030 RTP and approve the 2010 RTIP at its September 24, 2010, meeting. The following sections provide a summary of the air quality conformity analysis of the 2010 RTIP and 2030 RTP in relation to the above conformity requirements.

The first requirement of the air quality conformity finding is to provide for the expeditious implementation of adopted TCMs, which also are the Transportation Tactics included in the 1991 RAQS. These tactics are ridesharing, transit service improvements, traffic flow improvements, and bicycle facilities and programs.

The 1982 SIP established the TCMs, which identified general objectives and implementing actions for each tactic. Due to substantial investments since 1982, SANDAG has fully implemented the TCMs. Ridesharing, transit, bicycling, and traffic flow improvements continue to be funded, although the level of implementation established in the SIP has been surpassed. No TCMs have been removed or substituted from the SIP.

134 The 2010 RTIP makes substantial progress in programming funds for implementation of the four adopted Transportation Tactics for the San Diego region contained in the 1991 RAQS. Table 5-1 shows that Transportation Tactics programmed for implementation total approximately $2.9 billion, or 29 percent of the total funds programmed. Included are $19.7 million for ridesharing, $2.7 billion for transit improvements, $39.8 million for bicycle facilities and programs, and $95.6 million for traffic flow improvements. Based upon this analysis, the 2010 RTIP continues to provide for the expeditious implementation of the four Transportation Tactics approved in the 1991 RAQS.

QUANTITATIVE EMISSIONS ANALYSIS

The second requirement of the conformity finding is to conduct a quantitative emissions analysis on the 2010 RTIP. The emissions analysis must show that implementation of the 2010 RTIP and 2030 RTP meet the emissions budgets established in the 2004 CO Maintenance Plan and in the Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County.

All of the proposed capacity-increasing improvements identified in the 2010 RTIP that are on the Regional Arterial System (as defined in the RTP) or the FHWA functional classification system (other principal arterials and higher classifications) were modeled.

EMISSIONS BUDGET ANALYSIS

Tables 5-2 and 5-3 provide a summary of the results of the quantitative emissions analysis conducted for the 2010 RTIP and 2030 RTP. The analysis shown in table 5-2 demonstrates that the 2010 RTIP and the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future meet the applicable budgets for the eight-hour ozone standard. Projected reactive organic gas (ROG) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for 2010, 2020, and 2030 are below the established SIP budgets. Table 5-3 shows that projected CO emissions from the 2010 RTIP and the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future are below the 2003 CO budget of 730 tons per day.

135 Table 5-1

DRAFT 2010 RTIP - SAN DIEGO REGION (IN $000s) TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURE PROJECTS

RIDESHARING Transportation Demand Management (TDM) $19,685

Subtotal: $19,685

TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS Transit - Bus/Rail Infrastructure $630,782 Transit - Bus/Rail Intermodal Stations $152,129 Transit - Bus/Rail Vehicle Purchase $319,605 Transit - I-15 BRT $111,244 Transit - Mid-Coast $636,540 Transit - Other BRT $185,085 Transit - Other Bus/Rail (Operations/Planning) $710,435

Subtotal: $2,745,820

BICYCLE FACILITIES PROJECTS Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects $39,777

Subtotal: $39,777

TRAFFIC FLOW IMPROVEMENTS

Transportation Management System/Intelligent Transportation System $61,227 Traffic Management/Signal Projects $34,359

Subtotal: $95,586

Total Transportation Tactics in 2010 RTIP: $2,900,868

Total All Transportation Projects in 2010 RTIP: $10,019,671

Share of T-Tactics Projects in 2010 RTIP: 29.0%

136 Table 5-2 2010 RTIP and 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways to the Future Air Quality Conformity Analysis for Eight-Hour Ozone

Average Average ROG NOx Weekday Weekday Year Vehicle Vehicle SIP SIP ROG NOx Starts Miles Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions (1,000s) (1,000s) Budget Budget Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day

2010 13,470 82,599 53 38 98 72

2020 15,066 90,819 53 24 98 40

2030 16,511 103,449 53 20 98 32

Note: Emissions budgets from Eight Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County, found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. EPA, effective June 9, 2008.

Table 5-3 2010 RTIP and 2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways to the Future Air Quality Conformity Analysis for Carbon Monoxide

Average Average CO Weekday Weekday Year Vehicle Starts Vehicle Miles SIP Emissions CO Emissions (1,000s) (1,000s) Budget Tons/Day Tons/Day

2010 13,470 81,599 730 399

2018 14,747 89,175 730 250

2020 15,066 90,819 730 213

2030 16,511 103,449 730 163

137 CONCLUSION

Based upon an evaluation of projects and funds programmed and a quantitative emissions analysis, the 2010 RTIP and 2030 RTP meet the U.S. EPA transportation conformity regulations contained within the federal guidelines published on August 15, 1997, and subsequent amendments, as well as the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act amendments of 1990.

138

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-11 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT – FINAL File Number 1041501 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES REPORT

Introduction Recommendation

The scoping period for the Mid-Coast Corridor The Transportation Committee Transit Project draft Supplemental Environmental recommends that the Board of Directors: Impact Statement/Subsequent Environmental (1) reconfirm the previously adopted Impact Report (SEIS/SEIR) provided the public and Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) as agencies with an opportunity to review and refined to include direct service to comment on environmental issues and alternatives University of California, San Diego and proposed to be analyzed in the draft environmental University Towne Centre, by selecting document. The scoping period began on May 3 and light rail transit (LRT) Alternative 1 continued through June 1, 2010. (combines 1, 4, and 5) as the LPA;

(2) approve LRT Alternative 1 and the This report presents a summary of the outreach activities for public scoping, scoping meetings, No-Build Alternative for evaluation in the comments received during the scoping period, and Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project draft an analysis of the scoping comments. This report Supplemental Environmental Impact also provides the basis for the recommendation on Statement/Subsequent Environmental selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Impact Report; and (3) approve the final and alternatives for evaluation in the Mid-Coast Public Involvement Plan. Corridor Transit Project draft SEIS/SEIR. A map of the alternatives carried forward for consideration at scoping is included as Attachment 1.

Discussion

The final Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives report has been completed. In addition to the information provided in the draft report, the final report includes a summary of the process for selection of alternatives for scoping, a summary and analysis of scoping comments, and a recommendation on selection of an LPA refined from the LPA adopted by the SANDAG Board of Directors on December 19, 2003, and alternatives for review in the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project draft SEIS/SEIR. Sections 8 and 9 of the final Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives report are included as Attachment 2. Section 8 presents a summary of the scoping process and a summary and analysis of scoping comments. Section 9 presents the recommended LPA and alternatives for evaluation in the draft SEIS/SEIR.

Outreach for Scoping Period

Prior to scoping, a variety of outreach activities were performed to inform the public and agencies about the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project and the scoping period. These outreach activities were outlined in the draft Public Involvement Plan released by the Board in May 2009.

Outreach activities included the following: • Formal notice of notice of preparation (NOP) published in two regional circulation newspapers • NOP sent to State Clearinghouse and the Office of the San Diego County Clerk • NOP sent to approximately 130 federal, state, and local agencies and Native American Tribes • Advertisement of scoping period and meetings published in two regional circulation newspapers, eight local newspapers, and one Spanish-language newspaper • Mid-Coast e-mail newsletter distributed to Mid-Coast distribution list of over 200 • Scoping information highlighted in SANDAG e-mail newsletter • Approximately 25,000 postcards sent to household and business addresses in Mid-Coast Corridor announcing scoping meetings • News release issued to local and regional newspaper, television, and radio outlets • SANDAG and Keep San Diego Moving Web sites promoted scoping period • SANDAG Facebook page promoted scoping period • Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group (PWG) members requested to outreach to constituents • Business and community group meetings presentations to provide project information and promote scoping period

Public Scoping Meetings

During the scoping period, five public meetings were held at locations throughout the Mid-Coast Corridor: the SANDAG offices, Caltrans District 11, Western Clairemont, University City, and University of California, San Diego. Approximately 215 individuals attended the scoping meetings to gain further information on the project, of which 68 provided comments.

The scoping meetings were conducted in an open-house forum, with several stations providing information about the project. The stations included: project and process overview, draft comparative evaluation of alternatives, alternatives for scoping, public involvement, and comments. Project team members staffed each station to provide information and answer questions. Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) staff participated in each scoping meeting and provided information about current MTS services and the plan for future service connections to the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. A Spanish translator was in attendance at each of the meetings, and many scoping materials were available in Spanish.

2 In addition to the staffed stations, a video presentation ran on a loop throughout the entire open-house period. The video included information and graphics about the location and characteristics of the Mid-Coast Corridor, an animated map showing the three alternatives for scoping, and a “flyover” of each alternative using Google Earth satellite images of the corridor. Comments were taken verbally with the assistance of a court reporter or in writing by meeting participants filling out a comment form.

Options for Submittal of Scoping Comments

A number of methods were available to the public for submitting comments during the scoping period. Members of the public could participate in one of the five scoping meetings and submit comments verbally or in writing by filling out a comment form. Comments also could be submitted via U.S. mail, e-mail, facsimile, or telephone to (619) 595-5620.

The various methods for submitting comments were detailed on the project Web site, on the comment form, in the scoping meeting invitation flier, and in public notices and advertisements published in newspapers.

Summary of Scoping Comments

SANDAG received 244 comment submissions, which include letters, e-mails, comment cards, telephone messages, and verbal testimony provided to the court reporter at the scoping meetings. Most submissions contained several comments, each of which was logged into a database. Approximately 740 individual comments were received.

Comments received were categorized into one of six categories: general comments; comments related to purpose and need; comments related to alternatives; comments related to evaluation; comments related to costs and funding; and comments related to analysis of environmental effects. There are a total of 21 subcategories within the 6 main categories. A summary of the scoping comments is included in Attachment 2, Section 8.3.

The comment that was made most frequently, with 107 comments received, is opposition to LRT Alternative 3 due to either proximity to or potential impacts to Rose Canyon Open Space Park and/or concerns with tunnel construction. The second most frequent comment, with 97 comments received, is support for LRT Alternative 1.

Scoping Comment Analysis

Each comment received during the scoping period was reviewed and considered. Comments related to the scope of the draft SEIS/SEIR, including purpose and need, the evaluation process, costs and funding, and environmental impacts, will be addressed in the draft SEIS/SEIR.

Scoping comments regarding alternatives are addressed in the final Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives report. These include comments supporting or opposing one of the three LRT alignments carried forward into scoping; supporting evaluation of a bus rapid transit (BRT) alternative in the draft SEIS/SEIR; suggesting new or revised alternatives; and supporting additional LRT stations.

3 As noted above, approximately 100 comments supported LRT Alternative 1, while slightly more than 100 comments opposed LRT Alternative 3. There were three comments received opposing LRT Alternative 6 and no comments received specifically supporting LRT Alternative 6.

There were three comments supporting evaluation of a BRT alternative in the draft SEIS/SEIR. Four BRT alternatives were evaluated in the draft Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives report. The BRT alternatives evaluated were less effective than the LRT alternatives in improving mobility and accessibility. In addition, the BRT alternatives were far less cost-effective and financially feasible than the LRT alternatives. At its April 23, 2010, meeting, the Board of Directors did not approve moving any of the BRT alternatives forward into scoping. As the BRT alternatives were found to be less effective than the LRT alternatives, it is not recommended that a BRT alternative be evaluated in the draft SEIS/SEIR.

There were four comments suggesting new or revised alternatives received during the scoping period. Each of these alternatives was reviewed and considered. The evaluation concluded that none of the proposed new or revised alternatives would satisfy the purpose and need for the project at less cost, with greater effectiveness, or less environmental or community impacts. As a result, none of the new or revised alternatives are recommended for further evaluation in the draft SEIS/SEIR.

There were several comments suggesting that stations be added at State Route 52 (SR 52), Gilman Drive, Jutland Drive, and the VA Medical Center. Each of these station locations was reviewed and considered. The station locations at SR 52, Jutland Drive, and Gilman Drive were either previously considered and eliminated or are not functional due to topography and location. For these reasons, the addition of the three station sites is not recommended.

The original LPA approved by the Metropolitan Transit Development Board included a station at the VA Medical Center; however, the subsequently adopted LPA approved by the SANDAG Board of Directors eliminated this station and added the UCSD West station. The VA Medical Center has not been previously evaluated as an additional station, and it is recommended that it be evaluated as an additional station location in the draft SEIS/SEIR.

Actions by MTS

The MTS Board of Directors received a report on the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project at its May 13, 2010, meeting, and voted unanimously to support LRT Alternative 1.

PWG and Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) Review

The PWG reviewed the final Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives report and its recommendations and the final Public Involvement Plan at the working group’s July 14 meeting. The PWG unanimously approved staff’s July 16, 2010, recommendation to the Transportation Committee on the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project with minor revisions to the final Public Involvement Plan.

The ITOC reviewed the final Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives report at its July 14 meeting, and had no comments regarding the report.

4 Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Public Involvement Plan (PIP)

The draft PIP was released for public review and comment on May 22, 2009. The PWG reviewed and commented on the draft PIP at its September, October, and December 2009 meetings. As noted above, at its July 14, 2010, meeting the PWG approved the final PIP with minor revisions. The final PIP has been revised based on all comments received and the minor revisions recommended by the PWG. All comments and responses are included in Appendix E of the final PIP. The PIP will continue to guide public involvement efforts through the development of the draft SEIS/SEIR and other project activities. The PIP will be updated as needed. Attachment 3 provides information on where to locate and/or request a copy of the final PIP.

Next Steps

Should the Board adopt an LPA, the preliminary engineering application would be prepared and submitted to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for approval in the fall of 2010. The preliminary engineering application would address the FTA New Starts Criteria and allow the project to be rated by FTA. FTA approval of the preliminary engineering application by November 2010 would allow the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project to be included in the FTA February 2011 Annual Report on New Starts to Congress. Preliminary engineering would proceed once FTA approval is gained.

Should the Board approve Alternative 1 and the No-Build Alternative for review in the draft SEIS/SEIR on July 23, development of the draft SEIS/SEIR would proceed. The draft document would be anticipated to be completed in the summer of 2011.

GARY L. GALLEGOS

Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Map of alternatives for consideration during scoping 2. Sections 8 and 9 from the final Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives report 3. Final Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Public Involvement Plan Access Information

Key Staff Contact: Leslie Blanda (619) 699-6907, [email protected]

Funds are budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program #1041501

5 El Camino Attachment 1

Real Camino Ruiz

Carmel Mountain Rd Camino Santa Fe Genesee Ave Calle Cristobal Sorrento Valley Blvd

N Torrey Pines Rd Sorrento Valley Rd

Voigt Dr Mira Mesa Blvd SORRENTO UCSD East* VALLEY UCSD Eastgate Mall West Genesee Ave

N Torrey Pines Rd Executive Drive Carroll Rd La Jolla Village Dr Miramar Rd University Towne Miramar Rd Nobel Nobel Dr Drive Centre (Future La Jolla Village Dr Transit Nobel Dr Center)

Regents Rd Gilman Dr Gilman UNIVERSITY CITY

Governor Dr

La Jolla Rd PkwyPines Torrey

Gilman Dr

Genesee Ave

Via Capri Regents Rd Regents Governor Dr Clairemont Mesa Blvd Clairemont Mesa Blvd

Soledad Mtn. Rd St Convoy CLAIREMONT Jutland Dr Mid-Coast Corridor Balboa Transit Project

Ave

Morena Blvd April 2010

P Rd Alternatives for Scoping

L Kearny Villa

Foothill L

J LRT – Alternative 1 Blvd A

Beryl St Balboa Ave L Aero Dr (Combines 1, 4, and 5) Genesee Ave Balboa Clairemont Dr LRT – Alternative 3 LRT – Alternative 6 Mt Acadia Blvd Garnet Ave Trolley Station Grand Ave Ingraham St *UCSD East location differs by alignment Clairemont LINDA Transit Center VISTA Stations are for illustrative purposes; Mission locations are not exact Bay

Ulric St Existing Rail

Morena Blvd Trolley – Green Line

Mission Center Rd Trolley – Blue Line

Mission Bay Dr Tecolote COASTER Line Linda Vista Rd Trolley Station Friars Rd COASTER Station Transit Center Sea World Dr MISSION

VALLEY 0 Miles 1 2 Sports Arena Point Loma Blvd Blvd

Park Sunset Blvd Pacific Old Town Hwy Washington St Cliffs Blvd Ave Nimitz 5th Blvd Transit Center University Ave RosecransSt

6 Attachment 2

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Report

Following are Sections 8 and 9 of the final Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives report. SANDAG board members have received a CD containing the complete report. A copy of the report will be available on CD at the meeting and can be downloaded from the project Web site www.sandag.org/midcoast. A printed copy of the report is available upon request at (619) 595-5620.

July 23, 2010

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

8.0 PUBLIC OUTREACH, SCOPING PROCESS, AND SCOPING COMMENTS This chapter describes public outreach and agency coordination undertaken by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) prior to and during the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) scoping process and summary and analysis of the comments received from the public and agencies during scoping. Through the scoping process, SANDAG invited all interested individuals and organizations, public agencies, and Native American Tribes to comment on the scope of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIS/SEIR), including the project's purpose and need, the alternatives to be studied, the impacts to be evaluated, and the evaluation methods to be used in preparation of the Draft SEIS/SEIR. 8.1 PUBLIC OUTREACH Public outreach activities were conducted before and during the scoping process for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project to ensure public awareness of opportunities to review and comment on the project. The activities included the following:

• Project briefings and presentations for key stakeholders and other interested parties in the corridor, including elected/agency officials, community groups, employers/institutions, environmental organizations, transportation advocates, and business/trade organizations; • Developing and implementing the Draft Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Public Involvement Plan (PIP) and developing a stakeholder database; • Establishing the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group (PWG) to provide input on the project purpose and need, alternatives for consideration in the environmental review process, the Draft SEIS/SEIR, and the Draft PIP; • Placing scoping meeting notices in newspapers of general circulation; • Providing key documents and public information materials in both English and Spanish; • Posting up-to-date project information on the www.sandag.org/midcoast and www.keepsandiegomoving.com SANDAG Web sites, and publicizing via e-mail and telephone communications; and, • Recording comments that were received at, and subsequent to, the scoping meetings through mail and email correspondence during the scoping period.

8.1.1 City of San Diego Planning Groups Informational presentations providing a summary of the Draft Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Report and findings for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project were presented to community planning groups prior to and during the scoping period. The informational presentation included a review of alternatives considered, purpose and need, analysis and findings, a video of alternatives recommended for scoping, and information on the scoping period. This informational presentation was presented to University Community Planning Group on April 13, 2010. After hearing comments from the public at the meeting, the group

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 8-1 8 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

unanimously passed a motion to strongly support Light Rail Transit (LRT) Alternative 1 and to eliminate LRT Alternatives 3 and 6.

This informational presentation for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project was presented to the Linda Vista Planning Group on April 26, 2010. After receiving the report on the project, the Linda Vista Planning Group heard comments from the public at the meeting, but took no action on the project.

During the scoping period, the informational presentation for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project was presented to the Clairemont Community Planning Group on May 18, 2010 as an information item.

8.2 SCOPING PROCESS SANDAG issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for a SEIR to 120 agencies and tribes on April 28, 2010. The NOP was posted with the State Clearinghouse and the San Diego County Office of the County Clerk. All business and residential addresses located within one-half mile of the alternative alignments under consideration were sent a postcard notification of the scoping meetings. The scoping meeting invitation postcard was mailed to a total of 24,959 addresses. The project team delivered scoping meeting invitation fliers to the offices of elected officials, cities, community planning groups, and other groups located within the corridor, to increase community awareness of the project and to promote participation at the scoping meetings. Meeting notices/advertisements were published in local newspapers to announce the scoping meetings.

Five scoping meetings were conducted in the Mid-Coast Corridor, in compliance with CEQA guidelines. In total, 215 people attended the scoping meetings.

The meetings were conducted in an open house style with several stations providing information about the project. The stations included: Check-In, Project and Process Overview, Draft Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives, Alternatives for Scoping, Public Involvement, and Comments. Project team members staffed the stations, making themselves available to answer questions about the project. A Spanish translator and materials in Spanish were also available (no attendees required translation).

In addition to the staffed stations, a video presentation ran on a loop throughout the entire open house period. The video included information and graphics about the location and characteristics of the Mid-Coast Corridor, an animated map showing the three alternatives for scoping, and a “flyover” of each alternative using GoogleEarth satellite images of the corridor.

Following are the scoping meeting dates and locations, including the number of attendees at each meeting:

Downtown San Diego Clairemont Wednesday, May 5, 2010 Thursday, May 20, 2010 SANDAG Board Room Clairemont High School Cafeteria 401 B Street, 7th Floor 4150 Ute Drive San Diego, CA 92101 San Diego, CA 92117 Number of attendees: 13 Number of attendees: 35

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 8-2 July 2010 9

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Campus Old Town Tuesday, May 11, 2010 Tuesday, May 25, 2010 Price Center East Ballroom Caltrans District 11 9500 Gilman Drive Gallegos Conference Room La Jolla, CA 92093 4050 Taylor Street Number of attendees: 101 San Diego, CA 92110 Number of attendees: 23 University City Wednesday, May 12, 2010 Lawrence Family Jewish Community Center Garfield Theater 4126 Executive Drive La Jolla, CA 92037 Number of attendees: 43

8.3 Scoping Comments Comments on the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project were received during the scoping period through the following methods: verbal testimony or written comment cards at the scoping meetings; and via e-mail, postal mail, and telephone correspondence. The comments covered a variety of topics and were submitted by various parties, including: agencies, community organizations, elected officials, and members of the general public.

The 30-day scoping period began on May 3, 2010 and closed on June 1, 2010. Scoping comments were accepted for one week after the close of the scoping period to account for any comments that were in the mail. In all, 244 comment submissions were received. Comment submissions included any letters, e-mails, phone calls, comment forms, or verbal comments given by an individual or an organization. In most cases, each submission included multiple comments.

The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Scoping Report (SANDAG 2010) includes all agency and public comments received during scoping. Comments were related to purpose and need, alternatives considered, the evaluation of the alternatives, costs and funding, and issues to be studied in the Draft SEIS/SEIR. Comments were categorized into six major categories and 21 sub-categories (or topics). A brief analysis of the comments by category, and their respective topics, is provided below.

8.3.1 General Comments General comments identified an overall need for improved transit service, not limited to the Mid-Coast Corridor. Suggestions included expanding transit operating hours and developing a transit policy/system that would eliminate the need for individual automobiles in the San Diego area. Other comments suggested a need for transit system improvements/features, including bathrooms and increased public art.

Several general comments pertained to the Mid-Coast Corridor. Some comments advocated for enhanced transit services to areas within the Mid-Coast Corridor not served by the proposed alternatives, including: La Jolla, Miramar, Pacific Beach, Ocean Beach, Sorrento Mesa, Sorrento Valley, Torrey Pines, the San Diego International

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 8-3 10 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

Airport, Interstate 805 (I-805), I-8, and State Route 163 (SR 163). Other comments suggested serving entirely different corridors, such as I-15 or I-5 north of I-805. One comment suggested a connection between the Poway area and UCSD.

There were also several suggestions for other projects in the Mid-Coast Corridor, including: COASTER enhancements, such as double track, a tunnel, and additional stations; roadway improvements, such as a Regents Road bridge; and, pedestrian and bicycle projects at various locations. One suggestion was to add pricing to existing freeways rather than provide additional transit capacity. Another comment suggested following a systemwide approach to San Diego County’s transportation problems rather than developing an individual project.

8.3.2 Comments Related to Purpose and Need Five comments specifically were related to the project purpose and need. The comments focused on the need for connecting transit service to the project, on clarifying the nature of transit-supportive land uses identified in the purpose and need, expanding the definition of need to include additional travel markets, and clarifying what would constitute a competitive trip time. One comment questioned the need for the project and suggested the resources be directed to upgrade existing light rail transit (LRT) lines, including new elevators and the addition of restrooms.

8.3.3 Comments Related to Alternatives Comments related to the alternatives were analyzed by each of the individual topics listed below. Of the 244 comment submissions received, 177 (over 70 percent) included comments related to the technology of the alternatives. In addition to the topics listed below, there were questions about the type and location of supporting facilities and other project features, such as station parking, and the interface of the project with shuttles and other transit services. One comment noted that any alternative must meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Other comments questioned using LRT in favor of heavy rail transit (powered by an electrified third-rail) or diesel single-unit vehicles.

8.3.3.1 Bus Rapid Transit Three comment submissions by one organization requested the inclusion of a bus rapid transit (BRT) alternative in the SEIS/SEIR.

8.3.3.2 Light Rail Transit Alignments/Routes Most of the comments received for alignments/routes were supportive of LRT Alternative 1. A total of 97 comment submissions specifically supported LRT Alternative 1, while 12 comment submissions were supportive of any LRT alternative, three comment submissions supported LRT Alternative 1 or 6, and two comment submissions supported LRT Alternative 3. One-hundred and seven comment submissions were opposed to LRT Alternative 3, three were opposed to LRT Alternative 6, and two were opposed to LRT Alternative 1.

Concerns with LRT Alternative 1 were related to looping back to the south, complicating a potential future extension north. The comments that objected to LRT Alternative 3 cited the proximity to Rose Canyon Open Space Park, potential environmental effects of

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 8-4 July 2010 11

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

the project on Rose Canyon Open Space Park and adjacent areas, and concerns with tunnel construction. The limited support for LRT Alternative 3 identified advantages associated with a potential future extension north. Other comments opposed LRT Alternative 6 because of its design or potential environmental and transportation impacts on the Lawrence Family Jewish Community Center.

Several alternative alignments or project configurations were suggested, including:

• A design option to LRT Alternative 1 that would replace the UCSD West Station with a Veterans Administration (VA) Medical Center Station, crossing I-5 south of Voigt Drive. • An alignment following LRT Alternative 1, but terminating in the vicinity of the Gilman Drive/Voigt Drive intersection, along with the construction of a separate dedicated right-of way loop for rubber-tired transit that would connect UCSD, University Towne Centre (UTC), and the COASTER Sorrento Valley Station. • An alignment following LRT Alternative 1, but extending north from the UCSD West Station through the UCSD Park north of Voigt Drive to Genesee Avenue. • An alignment serving Pacific Beach by crossing Mission Bay on Ingram Street, rather than using the existing Metropolitan Transit System (MTS)/San Diego Northern Railway (SDNR) right-of-way.

8.3.3.3 Light Rail Transit Stations Thirty-four of the comment submissions discussed stations. Many supported proposed station locations. Others suggested either eliminating or adding stations. The Executive Drive, UCSD West, and Clairemont Drive Stations were suggested for elimination. Additional stations were suggested for State Route 52 (SR 52), Gilman Drive, Jutland Drive, and the VA Medical Center. Seven comment submissions supported a station at the VA Medical Center and the SR 52, Gilman Drive, and Jutland Drive locations were each identified as potential station locations in two submissions.

Other comments related to stations included providing good non-motorized transportation access, good bus connections, park-and-ride facilities, secure bike parking, and a design that supports redevelopment in station vicinities. One comment suggested a major roadway grade-separated connection from Grand Avenue to Morena Boulevard near the Balboa Avenue Station. Increased crime and public safety near stations also was identified as a concern.

8.3.4 Comments Related to Evaluation Five comments related to the evaluation of the alternatives. The comments requested additional details on how the preliminary analysis was completed and the process used by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to evaluate New Starts projects. There were requests to change the presentation of findings, including using highly detailed maps for planning-level analysis. One comment requested that the SEIS/SEIR evaluate the competitiveness of transit travel times to drive times, another indicated concern that standard FTA user benefit calculations over-estimate the effect of transfers. One comment noted the need for complete documentation of travel forecasting methods and assumptions.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 8-5 12 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

8.3.5 Costs and Funding Twenty-four submissions included comments related to costs and funding. Several comments observed cost differences between the alternatives evaluated. Multiple comments suggested reduced-rate or free fares. Highway and other funds were suggested to be redirected to transit. Other comments requested that no University of California funds be used to support the project and that the dedicated TransNet funds be redirected to other transit improvements. Other comments were concerned with the long-term project costs, considering the current economic recession. One recommendation was to accelerate the project to seek Federal funds earlier.

8.3.6 Comments Related to the Environmental Impacts Analyses Sixty-eight comment submissions included comments related to the topics listed below.

8.3.6.1 Traffic and Parking Twenty-two comments were related to traffic and parking effects during construction and operation. Comments noted the need for park-and-ride facilities to serve local demand and to intercept southbound I-5 traffic. Some comments stated that students and workers already park in residential neighborhoods and take transit to their destinations; and they were concerned that the project would increase this occurrence. Several comments related to how the system will integrate with and affect the existing bus system.

Traffic concerns included increased general traffic and congestion, loss of travel lanes, the need for transit signal priority for transit, conflicts between transit and roadway traffic in the UCSD area, and increased traffic around stations. One comment noted that local street infrastructure needs should be determined prior to selection of alternatives. Also, the need for an interface with Caltrans and project coordination with other transportation projects was noted. Comments noted that mitigation needs to be considered to facilities where the project would result in an impact.

8.3.6.2 Non-motorized Transportation Numerous comments were related to providing good pedestrian and bicycle access to the stations. Other comments requested recreational trail improvements near the project.

8.3.6.3 Land Use Land use comments included concerns with density, if it would be sufficient to support the system, and recommendations to consider transit-oriented development (TOD) potential. One comment noted an “urban farm” at UCSD for consideration during evaluation. One comment stated that general plan and municipal code requirements should be reviewed and any planned smart-growth centers should be identified.

8.3.6.4 Neighborhoods Neighborhood concerns included parking pressure from residents outside of the neighborhoods using the system, and an increase in neighborhood crime.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 8-6 July 2010 13

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

8.3.6.5 Safety and Security One comment requested analyzing any correlation between transit and crime and noted the San Diego Police Department’s large coverage area. Safety concerns about at- grade pedestrian track crossings, especially by students in the UCSD and University City areas also were noted.

8.3.6.6 Economic Development Comments on economic development were related to redevelopment of areas around stations. One comment noted that the long-term economic benefits of transit should be presented.

8.3.6.7 Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Opposition was voiced to the acquisition of parkland for the project.

8.3.6.8 Environmental Justice Comments included the need to consider transit access for and impacts to low-income and minority populations. One comment noted that the SEIS/SEIR should identify whether the proposed alternatives may disproportionately and/or adversely affect low- income or minority populations and document the process for community involvement.

8.3.6.9 Visual Comments included a request for renderings showing how the project will look in the UCSD area and lighting effects on surrounding uses, including wildlife. One comment related to visual effects of vehicles, guideway infrastructure, and stations and mitigation of effects on views from commercial and residential properties.

8.3.6.10 Air Quality One comment noted that the project would help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The project is located in an ozone nonattainment and a carbon monoxide maintenance area. One comment noted that mobile source air toxins should be addressed.

8.3.6.11 Geology One comment was received on the need to study fault crossings near proposed major structures. An assessment of the potential for earthquakes and the extent of damage to structures also was requested. Another comment was received on what other hazards would be studied and what mitigation would be required.

8.3.6.12 Noise and Vibration Several comments were related to the noise and vibration analyses. An explanation of acoustics science was requested. Other requests included measuring existing levels, and evaluating construction and future project noise generation to interior and exterior areas, including wheel squeal, track maintenance effects, and cumulative effects for at-grade and elevated guideway sections and for supporting facilities. The Balboa/Morena, La Jolla Colony, La Jolla Village Square, and University City areas were areas of concern and noise effects on wildlife in open-space areas was also a concern. Other comments were related to bus and road noise from other projects.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 8-7 14 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

8.3.6.13 Solid Waste and Hazardous Materials An analysis of solid waste impacts was requested. One comment asked that the project consider green infrastructure and material reuse and recycling. One comment requested evaluating toxins and human health impacts.

8.3.6.14 Ecosystems Comments noted a need to evaluate the project as a barrier to wildlife, especially if fencing is introduced. The evaluation of habitat loss, lighting, and noise effects on wildlife was requested. One comment noted a concern that invasive species could be introduced by Trolley operations. Potential mitigation sites were noted in the Rose Creek Watershed Opportunities Assessment, if the project would result in impacts that would require mitigation. The analysis of potential temporary and long-term impacts to Least Bell’s Vireo was requested.

8.3.6.15 Water Resources Comments identified concerns with flood control, hydrology, runoff from on-site contamination, water supply, and hydraulic modeling. A stormwater impacts analysis was requested. Comments stated that functional conditions of waters and riparian areas should be evaluated. One comment noted that Section 404 of the Clean Water Act will be applicable to the project and that measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to waters should be incorporated into the project.

8.3.6.16 Parks A total of 109 comment submissions, more than for any other environmental topic, were related to parks and parklands. The comments focused on protecting and analyzing potential effects on Mandell-Weiss Eastgate City Park, Marian Bear Memorial Park, and Rose Canyon Open Space Park. Comments noted a need to address project compatibility with relevant park plans, including the Marian Bear Memorial Park Natural Resources Management Plan, the San Diego River Master Plan, and the Rose Creek Watershed Opportunities Assessment. Several comments were related to existing uses of, and resources within, the parks, including the current frequent practice of accessing the parks by illegal trespass and crossing of the existing MTS/SDNR right-of-way. Opposition to the use of the parkland was noted. The potential to affect the Mission Valley Preserve was also noted.

8.3.6.17 Historic/Cultural Resources The Native American Heritage Commission identified Native American cultural resources within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) for the project and commented that cultural landscapes should be considered along with other resources evaluated. Avoiding significant cultural resources, when discovered during project planning and implementation, also was suggested.

8.3.6.18 Construction Impacts Several comments noted that construction effects related to traffic, noise, access, water quality, and jobs should be evaluated.

8.3.6.19 Indirect and Cumulative Effects Comments identified a need to consider the cumulative effects of various planned projects, including the planned I-5 improvements, on the environmental topics discussed

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 8-8 July 2010 15

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

above. One comment suggested that previous comments on the “UC North/South Transportation Corridor Project EIR” should be reviewed.

8.4 Analysis of Scoping Comments All comments received during scoping were reviewed and considered. The comments related to the scope of the Draft SEIS/SEIR, including purpose and need, evaluation process, costs and funding, and environmental impacts will be addressed in the Draft SEIS/SEIR. The comments related to alternatives under consideration are addressed in this Final Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Report. The comments included a request to evaluate a BRT alternative in the Draft SEIS/SEIR and comments on LRT alignments and station locations. Following are the responses to the comments related to alternatives.

8.4.1 Bus Rapid Transit Comments were received on the need to include a BRT alternative in the Draft SEIS/SEIR. BRT was evaluated in the Draft Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Report and the SANDAG Board eliminated it as an alternative for scoping at their April 23, 2010 meeting. The SANDAG Board decision was based on the SANDAG staff recommendation and findings that the BRT alternatives evaluated were less effective than the LRT alternatives in improving mobility and accessibility and are also less cost effective and financially feasible than the LRT alternatives. BRT also was evaluated in the Mid-Coast Light Rail Transit Extension Locally Preferred Alternative Update Summary (SANDAG 2004b), which concluded that LRT was more appropriate for the Mid-Coast Corridor. The Draft Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Report findings support the prior decision and do not indicate that changed conditions would alter the prior decision. Thus, BRT has been eliminated from further consideration in the Draft SEIS/SEIR.

8.4.2 Light Rail Transit Alignments Several comments included new LRT alignment options for consideration. The alternatives, including recommendations to carry them forward or eliminate them from further consideration, are discussed below.

• Proposed design option to LRT Alternative 1, with an I-5 crossing at Gilman Drive and a station at the VA Medical Center – This proposed design option to LRT Alternative 1, with a station near the UCSD West Campus just east of the VA Medical Center, is the alignment adopted as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) in 1995. Alternative alignments to the LPA and alternative station locations at the VA Medical Center and in Pepper Canyon on the UCSD West Campus were previously evaluated in the Mid-Coast Corridor UCSD Alignment Evaluation (MTDB 2000). The Metropolitan Transit Development Board concluded that the alignments with a station in Pepper Canyon on the UCSD West Campus should be advanced for further consideration and the alignments with a station at the VA Medical Center should be eliminated. In 2004, the SANDAG Board adopted an LPA that refined the 1995 LPA with an alignment along Voigt Drive and a station in Pepper Canyon. This station location is consistent with the UCSD Long Range Development Plan (UCSD 2004a) and is included in the University Center/Six College Neighborhood Planning Study

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 8-9 16 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

(UCSD 2004b) adopted by UCSD in 2004. LRT Alternative 1 includes the following design measures to minimize impacts to UCSD: a below-grade alignment at Gilman Drive, an at-grade or grade separated alignment in the vicinity of the Gilman Drive/Voigt Drive intersection, and an above-grade alignment or below-grade alignment to avoid possible impacts to existing and planned sports facilities east of I- 5. As a result of these considerations, the proposed alignment option is recommended for elimination as an alternative for further consideration. The addition of a station at the VA Medical Center is addressed separately under the Light Rail Transit Stations section. • Proposed alternative to terminate the LRT line in the vicinity of the Gilman Drive/Voigt Drive intersection and construct a separate dedicated right-of way circulator loop for rubber-tired transit that would connect UCSD, UTC, and the COASTER Sorrento Valley Station – This proposed alternative (referenced by the commenter as the Blue and Gold Alternatives) would provide LRT service to a terminus station on the UCSD West Campus. It would then use a rubber-tired transit circulator system to provide connecting service via an exclusive guideway instead of mixed-traffic operations to UTC and the COASTER Sorrento Valley Station. The proposed alternative does not meet the project purpose and need because it does not provide direct service to the UCSD East Campus or UTC. The alternative requires a transfer from the LRT system to the transit circulator system. The existing SuperLoop service, which is planned for upgrade and expansion, includes transit priority at intersections and provides some of the benefits of the proposed alternative for the area south of Voigt Drive. While the proposed exclusive right-of-way loop for local transit service would provide connectivity benefits in the UCSD and UTC communities, it would require using open space and constructing elevated structures through the UCSD campus, which would be larger and more extensive than those proposed as part of some of the LRT alternatives. Furthermore, the exclusive right- of-way loop would be considered a separate project outside the Mid-Coast Corridor Project purpose and need. As a result, the proposed alternative is recommended for elimination from further consideration. • Proposed alternative to follow LRT Alternative 1, but extend north from the UCSD West Station through UCSD Park to Genesee Avenue – This alternative proposed a station and parking facility on Genesee Avenue west of I-5 to accommodate vehicles on southbound I-5. The alternative also proposed alignment variations branching off the main alignment for service to the Sorrento Valley COASTER Station. The LPA the SANDAG Board adopted in 2003 provides for improving transit service to University City. The analysis of changed conditions did not identify a need to extend the project limits to the north of University City because a future extension to the north of University City is included as a separate project in the Reasonably Expected Revenue Scenario of the 2030 San Diego Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future (RTP) (SANDAG 2007). Furthermore, the project travel market analysis did not identify the area north of University City as a major travel market for the project. Extending the project north from the UCSD West Station to Genesee Avenue would require use of land from the UCSD Park. UCSD Park is identified in the UCSD Long Range Development Plan (UCSD 2004a) and is comprised of ecological reserve, grove reserve, and restoration land areas. The canyons north of Voigt Drive lie within an ecological reserve area. The UCSD

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 8-10 July 2010 17

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

Long Range Development Plan identifies the ecological reserve resources within the park as being biologically sensitive, further stating that no buildings, roads, or driveways are permitted in such areas of the park. As such, the alternative would require using a resource protected by Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Act of 1966, Title 49 U.S. Code (now 23 CFR 774). Such use is only permitted if there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use. Secondly, the proposed alternative would add almost a mile of alignment, including substantial tunnel sections and elevated structure. As a result, the proposed alternative is recommended for elimination from further consideration. • Proposed alternative to serve Pacific Beach by crossing Mission Bay on Ingram Street rather than using the existing MTS/SDNR right-of-way – This alternative proposes an alternative alignment to using the existing MTS/SDNR right- of-way and service to Pacific Beach instead of Clairemont. Because there is no existing available right-of-way, the proposed LRT alignment would have to be constructed across Mission Bay on an elevated structure for approximately 3 miles. Compared to using the MTS/SDNR right-of-way under the LRT Alternatives 1, 3, and 6, this alternative would result in additional impacts to Mission Bay Park, the San Diego River, and the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The alternative would also increase the project cost. As a result, the proposed alternative is recommended for elimination from further consideration.

8.4.3 Light Rail Transit Stations In addition to comments recommending LRT alignments for consideration, stations at SR 52, Gilman Drive, Jutland Drive, and the VA Medical Center were identified for consideration.

Adding a station at SR 52 was proposed; however, there would be no walk access to the station because all development within one-half mile of the station would have restricted access because of the area topography. Open space near SR 52 is parkland and any non de minimis use is precluded by Section 4(f), unless there is no feasible and prudent alternative. Therefore, it would not be possible to construct a park-and-ride in the area to serve auto commuters. Because of grade differences, it would be difficult to serve a station with buses at this location. Bus service would require widening the freeway ramp structures to provide bus stops that would be connected by elevators and stairs to a station below the ramps. Because the stops would be on freeway ramps, it would not be possible to turn-around bus service at the station. For these reasons, the proposed station location is not recommended for further consideration.

Stations at Jutland Drive and Gilman Drive were previously considered in the Mid-Coast Corridor Alternatives Analysis/Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Draft Environmental Impact Report (MTDB 1995). The SANDAG Board’s adoption of the LPA in 2003 resulted in these stations being eliminated. Pages 20 to 22 of the Mid-Coast Light Rail Transit Extension Locally Preferred Alternative Update Summary identified the changed station locations between the 1995 and 2003 LPA decisions. Because there has been no change in land use or development that would change the conditions under which they were eliminated, the stations at Jutland Drive and Gilman Drive are not recommended for further consideration.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 8-11 18 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 8.0 - Public Outreach, Scoping Process, and Scoping Comments

As identified above in the alternative alignments discussion, an alternative station location at VA Medical Center was identified for consideration. Although alternative alignments to the current LPA and an alternative station location at the VA Medical Center were previously evaluated in the Mid-Coast Corridor UCSD Alignment Evaluation (MTDB 2000) and eliminated in favor of a station location in Pepper Canyon on the UCSD West Campus, the VA Medical Center Station was not evaluated as an additional station with the UCSD West Station. Therefore, it is recommended that a station location at the VA Medical Center be considered during preparation of the Draft SEIS/SEIR.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 8-12 July 2010 19

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

9.0 RECOMMENDED LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE AND ALTERNATIVES FOR EVALUATION IN DRAFT SEIS/SEIR This chapter summarizes the comparative evaluation of alternatives and scoping process results and presents the recommended Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) and alternatives to be evaluated in the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (SEIS/SEIR).

9.1 Summary of Results The comparative evaluation of alternatives conducted for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project considered a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Alternative, seven light rail transit (LRT) alternatives, four bus rapid transit (BRT) alternatives, and a Commuter Rail Alternative. Based on the evaluation results described in Chapter 6.0 of this Final Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Report, three alternatives were recommended to the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Board of Directors (Board) for presentation at California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) scoping: LRT Alternatives 1 (combined LRT Alternatives 1, 4, and 5), 3, and 6. The three LRT alternatives effectively meet project goals, improve regional mobility, are cost effective or near cost effective, and are anticipated to be competitive for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) New Starts funding.

The remaining LRT alternatives (LRT Alternatives 2 and 7) were recommended for elimination from scoping. While similar, LRT Alternative 2 was found to be higher in capital costs, lower in user benefits, and lower in cost effectiveness than LRT Alternative 1. LRT Alternative 7 was found not to be as effective as the other LRT alternatives, as evidenced by ridership, user benefits, and travel time savings, and would not provide direct service to the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) West Campus, which is an important project goal.

It also was recommended that the TSM Alternative, all four of the BRT alternatives, and the Commuter Rail Alternative be eliminated from further consideration as build alternatives. Compared to the LRT alternatives, these alternatives were not as effective in meeting the project goals or in improving regional mobility and accessibility. Also, they were not cost effective and were unlikely to be competitive for FTA New Starts funds.

On April 23, 2010, the SANDAG Board approved LRT Alternatives 1 (combining LRT Alternatives 1, 4, and 5), 3, and 6 to be carried forward for consideration at scoping for the Draft SEIS/SEIR. The scoping period extended from May 3 through June 1, 2010.

As identified in Chapter 8.0 of this report, public comments during the scoping period were overwhelmingly in favor of LRT Alternative 1 (combined LRT Alternatives 1, 4, and 5) and opposed to LRT Alternative 3, with an alignment along the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS)/San Diego Northern Railway (SDNR) railroad right-of-way through Rose Canyon. Less than five comments supported LRT Alternatives 3 and 6, the BRT alternatives, or some other alternative not previously evaluated. The consideration of alternatives not previously considered included a qualitative review, which concluded that

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 9-1 20 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

none of the new alternatives proposed during scoping would satisfy the project purpose and need at less cost, with greater effectiveness, or less environmental or community impacts. The only refinement to the alternatives suggested during scoping, and recommended to carry forward for further study during preparation of the Draft SEIS/SEIR, is the consideration of an additional LRT station at the Veterans Administration (VA) Medical Center.

The findings of the Draft Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Report and information provided by the public or agencies during CEQA scoping support reconfirmation of the previously selected LPA, as revised.

9.2 Recommended LPA and Alternatives for Evaluation in the Draft SEIS/SEIR Based on the results of the comparative evaluation of alternatives and consideration of comments received during scoping, it is recommended that the previously adopted LPA, as refined to include direct service to UCSD and University Towne Centre (UTC), be reconfirmed by selecting LRT Alternative 1 as the LPA for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. It also is recommended that LRT Alternative 1 and the No-Build Alternative be carried forward for evaluation in the Draft SEIS/SEIR. LRT Alternative 1 received strong public support during the scoping process and the MTS Board voted unanimously to support the alternative. LRT Alternative 1 includes three alignment options in the vicinity of Voigt Drive, which will allow for the selection of a specific alignment to avoid potential environmental impacts that may be discovered during the environmental review process.

Elimination of LRT Alternatives 3 and 6 from further consideration is recommended based on the additional information and comments received during the scoping period. Elimination of LRT Alternative 3 is recommended because of public opposition and comments about potential environmental impacts to Rose Canyon. Although this alternative would maximize using the MTS/SDNR right-of-way and provide more direct service to UTC, LRT Alternative 3 had the highest potential for significant biological impacts. Further, LRT Alternative 3 was analyzed in the previously adopted Mid-Coast Corridor Alternatives Analysis/Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Draft Environmental Impact Report (AA/DEIS/DEIR) (MTDB 1995a) and it was eliminated after completion of the environmental review process due to concern regarding many of the same potential impacts identified during the recent scoping process. In addition, the California Department of Fish and Game raised concerns during scoping regarding the potential for LRT Alternative 3 to adversely impact California gnatcatcher habitat located within the canyon near Thornton Hospital on the UCSD East Campus. Based on these reasons, elimination of LRT Alternative 3 is recommended.

Elimination of LRT Alternative 6 is recommended because its performance is not significantly distinguishable from LRT Alternative 1 and its impacts are potentially greater. MTS raised concerns regarding the tight curves through an alignment section that could result in noise and additional maintenance. The California Department of Fish and Game raised concerns regarding potential adverse impacts on California gnatcatcher habitat located within the canyon near Thornton Hospital. In addition to these concerns, LRT Alternative 6 would result in elimination of a through-traffic lane on Executive Drive and potential impacts to access to private property. The Lawrence Family Jewish Community Center, which has its main entrance on Executive Drive, raised this concern. The primary benefit of LRT Alternative 6 is the avoidance of impacts to Voigt Drive. However, an

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 9-2 July 2010 21

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

alternative that avoids affecting Voigt Drive is incorporated into LRT Alternative 1 and its variations (LRT Alternatives 1, 4, and 5). Based on the concerns raised during scoping, the similarities in environmental consequences and performance of LRT Alternatives 1 and 6, and the strong support for LRT Alternative 1, elimination of LRT Alternative 6 from further consideration is recommended.

The No-Build Alternative is required to be included in the SEIS/SEIR in compliance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and CEQA requirements. The No-Build Alternative will serve as a baseline in assessing the environmental impacts of the build alternatives evaluated in the SEIS/SEIR.

9.3 Description of Alternatives for Evaluation in the Draft SEIS/SEIR The No-Build Alternative and recommended LPA are described in this section. This alternatives description is subject to refinements during preliminary engineering and Draft SEIS/SEIR evaluation.

9.3.1 No-Build Alternative The No-Build Alternative includes all of the highway and transit facilities identified in the Revenue Constrained Scenario of the 2030 San Diego Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future (RTP) (SANDAG 2007). Figure 9-1 shows the following major projects included in the RTP Revenue Constrained Scenario that are located within the Mid-Coast Corridor and are part of the No-Build Alternative background transportation network. The major RTP improvements that are included in the No-Build Alternative are:

• Double tracking of SDNR railroad and other rail improvements with an increase in frequency of service of the COASTER to 20 minutes during peak and 60 minutes during off-peak periods. • High-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on Interstate 5 (I-5) from I-8 north to Oceanside, with direct access ramps (DARs) at various locations, of which the DAR at Voigt Drive would be located within the Mid-Coast Corridor. The HOV lanes would be restricted to vehicles with two or more occupants. • Combination of HOV and Managed Lanes on I-805 from I-5 to South Bay, with DARs at Carroll Canyon Road and Nobel Drive.

The Mid-Coast Corridor No-Build Alternative transit system is shown in Figure 9-2. The regional transit system consists of MTS and North County Transit District bus, light rail, and commuter rail services that are projected to be operating in 2030. UCSD operated shuttle services also are included in the No-Build Alternative transit system.

The Mid-Coast Corridor LRT project included in the RTP Revenue Constrained Scenario is excluded from the No-Build Alternative in order to represent conditions in the corridor without the LRT project. Excluding the Mid-Coast Corridor LRT project from the No-Build Alternative would require more direct transit service between Downtown San Diego, Old Town Transit Center (OTTC), and University City.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 9-3 22 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

Figure 9-1. No-Build Alternative Transportation Improvements

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 9-4 July 2010 23

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

Figure 9-2. No-Build Alternative Transit System

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 9-5 24 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

To replace the loss of service under the No-Build Alternative, the existing transit Route 150, operating between Downtown San Diego, OTTC, and University City, is included in the alternative. The existing Route 150 was eliminated in the RTP Revenue Constrained Scenario with the inclusion of the Mid-Coast Corridor LRT line. Under the No-Build Alternative, the route would be modified to operate within the proposed HOV lanes on I-5 from OTTC north to Nobel Drive. This HOV lane operation modification would improve travel times over the existing Route 150 operation in the I-5 general- purpose lanes north to Gilman Drive. The modification of the route to exit the HOV lanes at Nobel Drive instead of at Gilman Drive would increase the route’s utilization of the HOV lanes and improve travel times over the Gilman Drive routing. The new Route 150 would operate at 15-minute intervals during peak periods (i.e., 6:00 to 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 to 6:00 p.m.) and 30-minute intervals during the off-peak and the midday period (i.e., 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.). Articulated buses would be used in the operation of the service. The route assumes a fixed fare of $2.50 per one-way trip.

The No-Build Alternative also includes improvements to the Trolley system. As shown in Figure 9-3, the Trolley Green Line would be extended from OTTC to the 12th and Imperial Transit Center via the Convention Center. Other changes to the Trolley system include terminating the Trolley Blue Line at Santa Fe Depot and the Trolley Orange Line at America Plaza. All Trolley lines would be operated at 7.5-minute frequencies all day except the Trolley Orange Line, which would operate at 7.5 minutes during peak and 15 minutes during off-peak periods.

9.3.2 Recommended LPA The recommended LPA is a refinement of the LPA options the SANDAG Board adopted in 2003. The recommended LPA (Figure 9-4) would extend the Trolley system from OTTC north via the existing MTS/SDNR right-of-way and I-5 corridor to the UCSD West Campus, and then east along one of the following three alignment options to a terminus at the UTC Transit Center:

• An at-grade alignment on Voigt Drive and an aerial alignment on Genesee Avenue; • An aerial alignment along the south side of Voigt Drive and on Genesee Avenue; or, • An at- and below-grade alignment south of Voigt Drive and an aerial alignment on Genesee Avenue.

The recommended LPA would add eight new LRT stations located at Tecolote Road, Clairemont Drive, Balboa Avenue, Nobel Drive, UCSD West, UCSD East, Executive Drive, and the UTC Transit Center. An additional station location at the VA Medical Center also will be considered during the Draft SEIS/SEIR.

9.3.2.1 Alignment and Station Locations The recommended LPA proposes the use of the existing LRT tracks from Santa Fe Depot north to a point just south of San Diego River where the alignment would cross the San Diego River on a new LRT bridge located parallel to and east of the existing railroad bridge and west of the existing Trolley Green Line LRT bridge. After crossing the river, the LRT alignment would continue north next to the existing SDNR tracks to the proposed at-grade station at Tecolote Road (under the existing Tecolote Road overcrossing). The

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 9-6 July 2010 25

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

Figure 9-3. No-Build Alternative Trolley System

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 9-7 26 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

Figure 9-4. Recommended LPA and Alignment Options

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 9-8 July 2010 27

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

Tecolote Road Station would be located on City of San Diego right-of-way, directly under the Tecolote Road overcrossing, just south of Tecolote Road and west of West Morena Boulevard. The station would include a parking lot.

North of the Tecolote Road Station, the LRT alignment would continue along the east side of the existing SDNR tracks to the proposed at-grade station at Clairemont Drive, which would be partially located below the Clairemont Drive overcrossing. A joint-use parking facility on the east side of Morena Boulevard is being considered.

The LRT alignment would then continue north to the proposed Balboa Avenue Station, which would be at grade south of Balboa Avenue. This station would include transfer facilities for feeder bus routes and a parking lot located immediately east of the station.

North of Balboa Avenue, the alignment would be located along the east side of the existing SDNR tracks, generally within the existing MTS/SDNR right-of-way. South of the SR 52, the LRT alignment would transition to an aerial structure in order to cross over to the west side of the SDNR tracks, allowing the LRT alignment to continue north along I-5, while the SDNR tracks head east to Genesee Avenue.

North of SR 52, the LRT alignment would leave the MTS/SDNR right-of-way and travel along the east side of I-5, crossing under La Jolla Colony Drive in a cut-and-cover tunnel. North of the cut-and-cover tunnel, the LRT alignment would continue along the east side of I-5, generally within or adjacent to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) right-of-way and transition to an aerial structure in order to cross I-5 south of Nobel Drive. The aerial structure would continue north along the west side of I-5 to an aerial station at La Jolla Village Square (Nobel Drive Station). A joint- use parking structure is proposed at this station, which would replace the parking spaces lost with the aerial guideway and transit station. Continuing north from the Nobel Drive Station, the alignment would remain in an aerial configuration along the west side of I-5 until returning to grade just north of the I-5/La Jolla Village Drive interchange.

North of La Jolla Village Drive interchange, the alignment would proceed at grade along the west side of I-5 and east side of the VA Medical Center. The recommended LPA includes consideration of a station at the VA Medical Center. North of the VA Medical Center, the LRT alignment would enter a cut-and-cover tunnel and cross under Gilman Drive and the surface parking lot located north of Gilman Drive. North of the tunnel, the alignment would enter Pepper Canyon and continue at grade along the bottom of the canyon to the UCSD West Station, which would be at grade.

At-Grade Alignment Option on Voigt Drive After exiting the UCSD West Station, the LRT alignment would enter a short tunnel, turn east, and surface in the median of Voigt Drive. Currently, Voigt Drive does not have a median. In order to accommodate the LRT in the median, Voigt Drive would be widened and realigned. Once on Voigt Drive, the alignment would run at grade in the center of the roadway, crossing over I-5 on the reconstructed Voigt Drive overcrossing that is being proposed as part of the I-5 North Coast Project. The I-5 North Coast Project proposes to lower the elevation of the Voigt Drive overcrossing, add north facing DARs in the center of the overcrossing, realign Voigt Drive to connect to Genesee Avenue, and realign Campus Point Drive to connect to Voigt Drive. The at-grade UCSD East Station

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 9-9 28 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

is proposed to be located in the median of Voigt Drive, just west of the realigned Campus Point Drive.

The LRT alignment would continue at grade to Genesee Avenue, where it would turn south and transition to an aerial structure just before the intersection of Genesee Avenue and Regents Road. The LRT movements through the Voigt Drive intersections with realigned Campus Point Drive and Genesee Avenue would be traffic signal controlled. The LRT alignment would continue south in an aerial configuration to the proposed Executive Drive Station and UTC Transit Center Station. The Executive Drive Station would provide drop-off and pick-up access only, while the UTC Transit Center Station would include opportunities for a shared parking facility with the Westfield UTC shopping center. Both stations would have aerial platforms. This option would have a total length of 10.94 miles.

Aerial Alignment Option along the South Side of Voigt Drive From the UCSD West Station, the LRT alignment would enter a cut-and-cover tunnel segment just north of the station and exit the tunnel along the south side of Voigt Drive. The alignment would immediately transition to an aerial structure along the south side of Voigt Drive and travel adjacent to the eastbound lanes of Voigt Drive, crossing over Gilman Drive, I-5, and the proposed future Voigt Drive DAR. The aerial alignment would continue east to the aerial UCSD East Station. The UCSD East Station would be located east of the realigned Campus Point Drive.

From the UCSD East Station, the LRT alignment would continue in an aerial configuration crossing the UCSD East Campus parking lots, Regents Road, and southbound lanes of Genesee Avenue. The aerial LRT alignment would then continue south in the median of Genesee Avenue to aerial stations at Executive Drive Station and UTC Transit Center. This option would have a total length of 10.88 miles.

Alignment Option South of Voigt Drive The UCSD West Station would be located slightly south of the station site described for the other options. After exiting the UCSD West Station, the LRT alignment would enter a short tunnel, turn east, and quickly ascend to grade and then onto an aerial structure to cross both Gilman Drive and I-5. The LRT alignment would descend back to grade near the south end of the existing baseball diamond parking lot and continue east, where the alignment would transition to a cut-and-cover configuration to cross the planned future soccer fields and the realigned Campus Point Drive, as proposed by the I-5 North Coast Project.

East of the realigned Campus Point Drive, the LRT alignment would transition to an at-grade configuration and enter the UCSD East Station, which is proposed to be located in the southeast quadrant of the re-aligned Voigt Drive and Genesee Avenue intersection, but outside of the Voigt Drive right-of-way.

After exiting the UCSD East Station, the LRT alignment would travel parallel to Genesee Avenue and transition to an aerial configuration prior to crossing Regents Road and entering the median of Genesee Avenue. The aerial alignment would then continue south in the median of Genesee Avenue to the Executive Drive and UTC Transit Center Stations. This option would have a total length of 10.82 miles.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 9-10 July 2010 29

Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

9.3.2.2 Operating Plan A conceptual operating plan has been developed for the recommended LPA for ridership forecasting and capital and operating cost estimating purposes. Hours of service would be similar to those operated on the existing Trolley Blue, Green, and Orange Lines. Weekday LRT service in 2030 would operate every 7.5 minutes during peak periods (i.e., 6:00 to 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 to 6:00 p.m.) and the off-peak midday period (i.e., 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.). The fare structure would be the same as the No-Build Alternative.

The proposed recommended LPA operating plan for the recommended LPA provides for the extension of the Trolley Blue Line to University City (Figure 9-5). The plan provides for the operation of a single line operating from the existing San Ysidro/International Border Station on the south to the proposed UTC Transit Center Station in University City, with stops at all 29 intermediate stations. By extending the Trolley Blue Line to University City, LRT would be able to connect the major travel markets in University City with Downtown San Diego and South San Diego and South Bay without a transfer in downtown. This direct connection is particularly important in serving home-to-college trips because UCSD is located in University City and a large percentage of the trips to the university originate in the travel markets to the south of Downtown San Diego. The recommended LPA would also provide direct service between University City and Uptown, as well as areas of Mission Bay to the west and Clairemont to the east. The major travel market of Mission Valley would be served by a transfer to the Trolley Green Line at OTTC.

With the new LRT service, the service provided by Route 150 operating between Downtown San Diego and University City would be duplicated and therefore, eliminated. In addition to these modifications, several other routes would be modified to improve access to the proposed LRT stations. The frequency of service for the connecting bus routes would also be modified to improve the transfer of passengers between the bus and LRT system.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 9-11 30 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 9.0 - Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

Figure 9-5. 2030 Recommended LPA Operating Plan

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT 9-12 July 2010 31 Attachment 3

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project

Public Involvement Plan

July 23, 2010

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ...... 1 1.1 Project Overview and Background 1.2 Key Issues to Consider 1.3 Purpose of the Public Involvement Plan 1.4 Statutory Requirements and Policies for Public Involvement 1.4.1 Federal and State Guidelines and Requirements for Public Involvement 1.4.2 Environmental Justice

2.0 Mid-Coast Corridor Communities, Demographics and Public Stakeholder Categories ...... 8 2.1 Mid-Coast Corridor Communities 2.2 Mid-Coast Corridor Demographics 2.3 Mid-Coast Corridor Public Stakeholder Categories

3.0 Key Information about the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project ...... 11

4.0 Public Involvement Plan Structure and Implementation ...... 13 4.1 Public Involvement Goals and Objectives 4.2 Public Involvement Strategies 4.3 Public Involvement Process 4.3.1 Early Public Involvement 4.3.2 Public Involvement During Scoping 4.3.3 Public Involvement Prior to Circulation of the Draft SEIS/SEIR 4.3.4 Public Involvement During Draft SEIS/SEIR Public Review 4.3.5 Public Involvement Leading up to the Certification/Approval of the Final SEIS/SEIR and Record of Decision 4.3.6 Public Involvement Subsequent to the Record of Decision 4.3.7 Plan Assessment

Appendices

A: Stakeholders List ...... 26

B: Project Working Group Charter and Summary of Activities ...... 31

C: Project Working Group Application Form...... 33

D: Media List ...... 35

E: Public Involvement Plan Comments...... 36

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) have initiated the preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIS/SEIR) for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project in San Diego, California. The FTA is serving as lead agency for purposes of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental clearance and SANDAG is serving as lead agency for purposes of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental clearance.

The requirements and guidance for public involvement during the development of the environmental document are described in the NEPA and CEQA guidelines. Additional public involvement guidance is provided in the Federal Highway Administration/Federal Transit Administration Interim Policy on Public Involvement.

The SEIS/SEIR will build upon previous transit planning, engineering, and environmental studies completed for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. These studies will be incorporated, by reference, into the SEIS/SEIR.

Coordination with the agencies responsible for approving or permitting the project and public involvement have been an on-going part of the planning and environmental review process since the inception of the Mid-Coast Corridor project planning. The goal of the Mid-Coast Corridor Public Involvement Plan is to foster a public involvement process that will support the development of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. This public involvement plan will build upon the coordination and public involvement that was initiated during the previous planning and environmental review for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project conducted in 1995 and 2001. In addition to the public involvement addressed in this plan, the project will also include public agency coordination as part of the environmental process, as outlined in the Final Agency Involvement Plan.

1.1 Project Overview and Background

The Mid-Coast Corridor starts at Downtown San Diego, extending to the existing Old Town Transit Center (OTTC) north to North University City, as shown in Figure 1-1. The corridor is entirely within the City of San Diego and includes the following communities: University City, including North University City and South University City; La Jolla; Clairemont Mesa; Pacific Beach; Mission Beach; Linda Vista; Old Town; Midway; Middletown; Little Italy and Downtown San Diego.

The Mid-Coast Corridor features a variety of physical terrains. A narrow coastal beach extends the entire length of the corridor. Mission Bay Park lies immediately north of the Interstate 8 (I-8) freeway and west of the Interstate 5 (I-5) freeway, at the southern end of the corridor. Many inland areas, particularly in the northern portion of the corridor (north of State Route 52 or SR-52), have steep hillsides and narrow canyons.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 DRAFT 1

Figure 1-1. Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project

Source: Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2008

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 2

A number of large, environmentally sensitive lands are also present within the corridor, including: the Rose Canyon Open Space Park, Mission Bay Park, San Diego River Park and the Marian Bear Memorial Park.

The corridor is characterized by a variety of land uses, including commercial, office, residential, recreational, and educational land uses. Major employment and retail centers are located in University City and Clairemont. Light industrial uses are located along the I-5 Freeway corridor, and single- and multi-family housing units are found throughout the corridor. Key employment and activity centers, located within or adjacent to the corridor include:

• The Golden Triangle;

• The University of California San Diego (UCSD), the University of San Diego (USD), and Mesa College;

• Westfield University Towne Centre (UTC), La Jolla Square Shopping Center, Mission Valley shopping centers, the Fashion Valley Mall and Horton Plaza;

• The Veterans Administration, Scripps Memorial, Scripps Green, and UCSD Thornton Hospitals;

• The Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, Gateway, Qualcomm, General Atomics, the Neurosciences Institute, Novartis, and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography;

• Sea World, Old Town State Park, and Mission Bay Park; and

• Downtown San Diego.

The original Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA), which was adopted by the Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) in 1995, combined with revisions that were approved by the SANDAG Board in 2003, comprise the current LPA, which extends the existing trolley system from downtown to the existing OTTC north to UCSD and the Westfield UTC shopping center, in North University City.

The LPA would provide connections to other high capacity transit and commuter lines. Connections to the San Diego Trolley Blue and Orange Lines would be provided at Santa Fe Depot in Downtown San Diego. The LPA connection to the San Diego Trolley Green Line, which serves population and employment centers east of the OTTC in Mission Valley, would be provided at OTTC and stops between OTTC and Santa Fe Depot. Connections to the Coaster would also be provided at OTTC and Santa Fe Depot.

The LPA and possible variations identified in response to changed conditions in the Mid- Coast Corridor will be considered in the SEIS/SEIR. These variations may consist of alternative light rail transit (LRT) alignments, station locations, and operating plans. Modal alternatives to the LPA will also be considered following a review of changed conditions in the corridor (since the publication of the 1995 Alternatives Analysis/Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Draft Environmental Impact Report or AA/DEIS/DEIR). These alternatives will be considered and will be presented at the Scoping meetings at the beginning of the environmental review process.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 3

In addition to the LPA and LRT variations, alternatives that will be developed and evaluated, leading up to Scoping for the SEIS/SEIR, are summarized below:

• No-Build Alternative – This alternative will include committed highway and transit projects that are part of the Revenue Constrained Scenario of the 2007 update to the 2030 San Diego Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).

• Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative – The TSM Alternative would enhance the No-Build Alternative, by emphasizing relatively low-cost transportation system upgrades.

• Commuter Rail Alternative – This alternative would use the existing COASTER commuter rail line in the corridor. Capital investments and operational improvements will be identified.

• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Alternative – This alternative will use BRT or Rapid Bus to serve activity centers along the north-south axis of the corridor.

To compete successfully for the FTA New Starts funding, SANDAG will have to select a cost effective and financially strong Locally Preferred Alternative and continue to advance supportive land use policies. It will be important for the Board as well as stakeholders to use the FTA criteria when considering project alternatives.

1.2 Key Issues to Consider

As the environmental review process gets underway, there are a number of issues to consider and be aware of, including:

• Issues raised during prior environmental reviews During prior environmental review processes, a number of comments were made by public agencies, community groups, interested organizations and individuals. These comments and responses are included in their entirety in the 1995 Final EIR for the Mid- Coast Corridor and the 2001 Mid-Coast Balboa Segment Final EIS. An awareness and understanding of the comments made in prior reviews is important for the current stage of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project’s development, since similar concerns may be raised during the public review of the Draft SEIS/SEIR. The issues raised in comments made in prior environmental review processes include the following:

- Other modal alternatives were not considered - Competition for service with the COASTER - Business centers along the corridor are not adequately served - Impacts to parks and open space preserves (Rose Canyon, Marian Bear Natural Park, Tecolote Park, Mandell Weiss Eastgate City Park) - Public safety impacts - Physical impacts to neighborhoods and facilities along the route (reduced access to facilities, noise, visual impacts) - Impacts to sensitive biological habitat and wetlands - Impacts to bicycle facilities - Impacts to vehicular traffic circulation - Impacts to public utilities - Beach communities are not served by the project - Concerns about station locations - Cost effectiveness of the project

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 4

• Varying levels of awareness about the project A number of stakeholders in the corridor will have participated in past public involvement efforts associated with prior environmental reviews for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. There may be expectations about the project or assumptions based on information from these prior efforts that need to be taken into consideration. On the other hand, some members of the public will not have the same history of participation, and will need to be educated about the current process and how it relates to past efforts. Efforts will be made to communicate the current alternatives being considered and the environmental review process and how past efforts have informed the current analysis.

• Significant public interest in SANDAG’s process for development and evaluation of design and modal alternatives Since the approval of the LPA in 1995, there has been increased public interest in and awareness of BRT. Supporters of BRT will want to ensure that it is given fair consideration in comparison to the LPA and other modal alternatives. In addition, the Independent Transit Planning Review committee recommended that a COASTER (Commuter Rail) alternative be considered in the alternatives evaluation.

• Project cost Because this is a significant public infrastructure project projected to cost more than $1 billion, the public likely will have a high interest in the project. This interest will be heightened due to current economic conditions.

• Physical impacts of project As was the case with prior environmental reviews, the public will be concerned about potential impacts from the project such as noise, visual impacts, changes to community character, station locations and access.

• Compatibility with existing and future plans The public will want to ensure that the project is compatible with existing and future plans, including existing land uses, general and community plans, and I-5 expansion plans.

• Relationship to recent State legislation State legislation addressing climate change recently has gone into effect. Most relevant to the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project, SB 375 aims to limit urban sprawl and support urban, walkable developments. The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project may help achieve the goals of SB 375 by providing reliable transit that can support existing and new development patterns in the corridor.

• Biological impacts and mitigation Potential impacts to biological resources including habitat, watershed, and wetlands, as well as proposed mitigations will be of concern to the public. Areas of particular interest will include environmentally sensitive lands within the corridor, including: Rose Canyon Open Space Park, Mission Bay Park, the Marian Bear Memorial Natural Park and the San Diego River Park.

1.3 Purpose of the Public Involvement Plan

SANDAG intends to embark on a comprehensive public involvement effort to communicate information to the public and to provide opportunities for public input during the environmental review process for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. This project is a high priority for SANDAG and the region, and is included in the TransNet Early Action Program. This public

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 5

involvement plan outlines the means by which SANDAG will provide the public with timely information about the project, and identify issues important to the general public and stakeholders.

The public involvement program for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project will be wide reaching and thorough, helping SANDAG communicate important information to the public, identify and address issues throughout the process, and incorporate relevant input from affected and interested audiences.

The goal of the Mid-Coast Corridor Public Involvement Plan is to foster a public involvement process that will support the development of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. This will be achieved by ensuring that the public is provided with timely and useful information about the project, given opportunities to provide public input on draft plans and environmental documents, and made aware of how their comments have been responded to and utilized in the decision-making process. These efforts will help to build and enhance public trust, understanding and confidence in the SANDAG decision making process.

This public involvement plan is intended to be a “living” document. Because of the fluid nature of the public involvement process, this plan may be adjusted to respond to issues and circumstances that arise throughout the process and will also be updated at major milestones in the planning and development process.

1.4 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AND POLICIES FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

1.4.1 Federal and State Guidelines and Requirements for Public Involvement

This Public Involvement Plan has been designed to meet all requirements and guidelines of the various Federal and State statutes addressing public involvement for transportation projects. These statutes include the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Section 1506.6, Public Involvement, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Federal Highway Administration/Federal Transit Authority (FHWA/FTA) Interim Policy on Public Involvement. Table 1-1 below summarizes the guidelines and requirements included in each statute or policy:

Table 1-1 Public Involvement Guidelines and Requirements

Statute Public Involvement Guidelines and Requirements NEPA • Publish Notice of Availability of Draft SEIS • 45-day public comment period for Draft SEIS • Conduct public hearing during Draft SEIS public comment period • Publish Notice of Availability of Final SEIS with EPA in Federal Register • Project Record of Decision by FTA 30 days after filing notice with EPA for Federal Register in availability of Final SEIS

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 6

Statute Public Involvement Guidelines and Requirements CEQA • Publish Notice of Preparation of Draft SEIR • 30-day Scoping period • Conduct Scoping meetings during Scoping period • Invite public to participate in Scoping • Publish Notice of Availability of Draft SEIR • 45-day public comment period on Draft SEIR • Publish Notice of Availability of Final SEIR • SANDAG Board Action by Resolution FHWA/FTA Interim Policy on Public • Clearly-defined purpose and objectives for Involvement initiating a public dialogue on transportation plans, programs, and projects • Identification of specifically who the affected public and other stakeholder groups are with respect to the plan(s), program(s), and project(s) under development • Identification of techniques for engaging the public in the process • Notification procedures which effectively target affected groups • Education and assistance techniques which result in an accurate and full public understanding of the transportation problem, potential solutions, and obstacles and opportunities within various solutions to the problem • Follow through demonstrating that decision makers seriously considered public input.

1.4.2 Environmental Justice

Consistent with the guidelines discussed above, the Public Involvement Plan will comply with the SANDAG Public Participation Plan (approved by the SANDAG Board of Directors on December 18, 2009), SANDAG Policy 25, Federal Title VI legislation, the Americans with Disabilities Act (as defined in Title 49, Part 37, of the United States Code), Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice, Executive Order 13166 on Limited English Proficiency, and other relevant regulations to ensure social equity, environmental justice, non-discrimination and accessibility.

To ensure meaningful access to Limited English Proficient (LEP) persons, SANDAG certifies compliance with the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) “Policy Guidance Concerning Recipients’ Responsibilities to Limited English Proficient (LEP) Persons.” The policy guidance includes a “Safe Harbor” provision where the USDOT considers the written translation of vital documents in languages other than English (for eligible LEP language groups consisting of 5 percent or more of the population) to be strong evidence of compliance with the recipient’s obligations under Title VI. Based on the Census 2000 data, Spanish is the only language in the San Diego Region that meets or exceeds the 5 percent LEP trigger. However, SANDAG will print materials (or provide translation services or bilingual representatives) in any other languages deemed appropriate by SANDAG.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 7

In addition, proactive efforts will be made to ensure that audiences that may not traditionally participate in the transportation planning process are given the opportunity to participate. These audiences include, but are not limited to, minority groups, non-English speakers, lower income households, individuals with disabilities, the elderly, and transit riders.

To reach these audiences, organizations and media outlets representing these communities will be approached to provide project information, solicit participation and input, and provide a means for communicating back with members of these communities. Participation will be encouraged via presentations to these organizations, participation in events sponsored by these organizations or targeted at these audiences, publishing articles in organizational newsletters, and publishing notices and articles in ethnic media outlets. SANDAG has identified a number of local organizations that work with or represent underserved populations in the project area.

SANDAG will work with these groups to identify opportunities to communicate with or solicit input from their constituents to meet their transportation needs. Groups that will be contacted include, but are not limited to:

• Asian Business Association • San Diego Hispanic Chamber of Commerce • Filipino-American Chamber of Commerce of San Diego County • Bayside Community Center • MAAC Project • Urban League • San Diego Workforce Partnership • SANDAG Accessibility Committee • Access to Independence of San Diego • City of San Diego Disabled Services Advisory Committee • AARP • Elder housing complexes • San Diego Organizing Project • Area students • Transit riders • Ethnic media • Others as identified

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 8

2.0 MID-COAST CORRIDOR COMMUNITIES, DEMOGRAPHICS AND PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER CATEGORIES

2.1 Mid-Coast Corridor Communities

The Mid-Coast Corridor is primarily located along the Interstate 5 corridor and extends from Downtown San Diego to the University City community. The study area includes approximately 250,000 residents in the following communities:

• Downtown San Diego • Little Italy • Middletown • Old Town • Midway • Linda Vista • Clairemont • Bay Park • Mission Valley • Beach communities (Mission Bay, Pacific Beach) • La Jolla • University City/Golden Triangle (Source: SANDAG 2008 Census Estimates)

2.2 Mid-Coast Corridor Demographics

The residents in the Mid-Coast Corridor study area are predominantly Caucasian. The Hispanic population in the corridor is approximately 15 percent, the Asian population is approximately 10%, and the Black population is approximately 3%. Other ethnicities (American Indian, Hawaiian, other) comprise approximately 1 percent of the population. Three percent of the corridor population identifies themselves as more than one race. (Source: SANDAG 2008 Census Estimates)

According to 2000 census data, nearly 2 percent of the population in the corridor speaks only Spanish, less than 1 percent are Asian Pacific Islanders who speak no English, and less than 1 percent are of other ethnicities who speak no English.

The majority of residents in the Mid-Coast Corridor are between 20 and 64 years of age (66 percent). Those aged 65 and older comprise 15 percent of the population in the corridor, higher than the percentage citywide (11 percent) and region-wide (11 percent). (Source: SANDAG 2008 Census Estimates)

The average median household income in the Mid-Coast Corridor is $53,304, slightly higher than the citywide median household income of $51,808 and the region-wide median household income of $47,268. (Source: SANDAG 2008 Census Estimates)

The Mid-Coast Corridor supports more than 300,000 jobs. On either end of the Mid-Coast Corridor are two of San Diego’s largest employment centers. Downtown San Diego employs more than 80,000 people in a number of employment sectors, most of whom commute from various areas of the county. At the north end of the corridor, the University City/Golden Triangle area supports more than 100,000 jobs. It is home to three major medical facilities –

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 9

UCSD Thornton Hospital, the VA Medical Center and Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla – a thriving business district, several hotels and Westfield UTC, a major retail destination. UCSD also is located in the northern portion of the corridor, and supports thousands of jobs along with a student population of approximately 28,000. In the central corridor, Caltrans, the University of San Diego, SeaWorld, Old Town State Park and Costco are sources of employment. (Source: SANDAG 2008 Census Estimates)

2.3 Mid-Coast Corridor Public Stakeholder Categories

There are a number of public groups — each with a unique perspective — that will be interested in the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project development process. These include organizations and individuals representing the following interests:

- Accessibility Challenged - Business Organizations - Community Planning Groups - Community Services - Employers/Businesses - Environmental Groups - General Public - Industry Peers & Associations - Neighborhoods/Residential - Commercial & retail - Students - Taxpayer advocates - Labor interests - Tourism - Transit riders - Transportation advocates

The focus of this public involvement plan is on public stakeholders. A separate Agency Involvement Plan addresses how SANDAG will coordinate with the various public agencies throughout the development process. A stakeholders list is included in Appendix A.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 10

3.0 KEY INFORMATION AND GOALS FOR THE MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT

The following provides key information about and goals for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project development process:

• The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project will expand the value of the existing transit system and increase mobility within the region.

- The project will expand transportation capacity in the corridor. - The project will provide high quality, high speed, reliable transit service that will be attractive to all riders. - The project will increase mobility choices, providing a reliable and user-friendly alternative to auto travel. - The project will provide connections to many of the area’s major attractions and destinations, including Petco Park, the Gaslamp Quarter, Old Town State Park, SDSU, La Jolla, UCSD, and Qualcomm Stadium. - The project will connect business centers in downtown, Mission Valley and the Golden Triangle.

• The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project will have a positive impact on the San Diego region and the communities within the Corridor.

- The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project will help achieve state and regional planning and transportation goals. - The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project will be a benefit to San Diego’s economy by creating jobs through construction and providing a transit system that facilitates a stable workforce and helps expand consumer access throughout the region. - Transit is beneficial to the environment by providing an alternative to traffic congestion, increasing transportation capacity, and reducing air pollution, including greenhouse gases. - Ensuring the public’s safety will be a top priority in the design and implementation of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project.

• The development process for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project has included significant technical analysis and public input.

- The current evaluation of alternatives and environmental review will analyze changed conditions that have occurred since prior alternatives analysis and environmental reviews were completed in 1995 and 2001. - The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project analysis has been thorough and gave consideration to a number of mode alternatives that compared the feasibility, cost and ridership for providing transit service in the Mid-Coast Corridor. - SANDAG will implement a comprehensive public involvement plan to ensure that up- to-date information is provided to stakeholders, ample opportunities are provided for interested members of the public to participate, and information is provided back to the public about how their input will be used in the decision making process.

• The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project has a guaranteed source of local funding through TransNet that will help attract additional federal funding.

- 100 percent of operational subsidies for the project are covered through 2048.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 11

- San Diego’s transit system is a leader in farebox recovery (Source: National Transit Database. Current MTS farebox recovery is 43% and national average is 35%) - The project is being evaluated based on Federal Transit Administration (FTA) criteria to ensure that it can successfully compete for FTA New Starts funding.

• The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project has been supported by decision makers and the public.

- The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project was supported by voters in the 2004 TransNet reauthorization. - The SANDAG Board of Directors identified the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project as one of the top regional transit priorities and included it in the TransNet Early Action Program.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 12

4.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION

4.1 Public Involvement Goals and Objectives

The goals for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Public Involvement Plan are as follows:

• Build awareness about the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project and its importance to regional mobility among the public, including those that the project will serve (transit riders, residents, students and businesses), and the general public.

• Conduct an open and transparent public process that provides up-to-date public information, opportunities for interested members of the public to comment, and provide input to the decision-making process for the project.

• Meet public involvement requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) New Starts Program.

• Seek opportunities to involve a broad range of stakeholders throughout the Mid- Coast Corridor, including non-traditional groups, to ensure that SANDAG understands the issues from all those who may be impacted by the project and to help guide the decision making process

• Address social equity and environmental justice issues, to provide information to comply with relevant regulations, including SANDAG Policy 25, Title VI, Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice, Executive Order 13166 on Limited English Proficiency and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Achieving the following measurable objectives during the environmental review process will help demonstrate that the goals have been met:

• Increase hits on project Web site by 10 percent from the baseline of 2,380 hits • Display project information at five high-traffic locations in the corridor • Make 30 presentations through speakers bureau program • Distribute three issues of Mid-Coast eBlast • Participate in three community events • Issue three news releases • Conduct 15 stakeholder briefings • Conduct three meetings of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group • Conduct five scoping meetings during the Scoping period • Conduct four public hearings/meetings during the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Study/Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIS/SEIR) public review period

4.2 Public Involvement Strategies

The following strategies will be implemented to achieve the objectives discussed above.

• Establish a clear project identity and convey consistent messages about the Mid- Coast Corridor Transit Project, its importance to increasing mobility in the region, and its benefits to the community and region.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 13

• Involve public stakeholders in the process on a regular basis to foster understanding and agreement on issues related to the development of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project.

• Use a variety of communication methods to reach audiences including presentations, one-on-one/small group meetings, public workshops, written materials, online and media communication.

• Coordinate outreach efforts with Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) representatives to build awareness about how the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project will be integrated into the MTS network through presentations, public workshops, written materials (e.g., Take Ones) for posting on affected transit routes, Web-based notification, and other outreach strategies.

• Provide the public with up-to-date information about the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project on a regular basis through presentations, the Web site and online communications, written materials and news updates.

• Document public comments received during the public involvement process.

• Provide information to the public about the environmental review process and opportunities for review of public documents and opportunities for comments.

• Provide information to decision makers regarding comments received throughout the public involvement process.

• Utilize traditional and new media to convey project information to a broad audience.

• Assess the effectiveness of the Public Involvement Plan at the conclusion of each phase to evaluate how the strategies and tactics worked and what enhancements could be made for future phases.

4.3 Public Involvement Process

Implementing the strategies listed above will involve a number of coordinated tactics executed in conjunction with key project development milestones. These tactics will involve face-to-face communication with stakeholders, written and online communications, and media relations. Public involvement tactics that will be employed are described below in a sequential manner associated with the following phases of the public involvement process:

1. Early Public Involvement 2. Public Involvement During Scoping 3. Public Involvement Prior to Circulation of the Draft SEIS/SEIR 4. Public Involvement During Draft SEIS/SEIR Public Review 5. Public Involvement Prior to the Final SEIS/SEIR and Record of Decision 6. Public Involvement Subsequent to the Record of Decision 7. Plan Assessment

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 14

4.3.1 Early Public Involvement

Early public involvement activities provide the opportunity to introduce the public to the Mid- Coast Corridor Transit Project and its development process, gain initial feedback about how they would like to be involved, and to prepare for the Scoping period. Public involvement tactics during this period include:

• Prepare informational materials to help educate the public about the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Informational materials to support the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Public Involvement Plan will be posted at www.sandag.org/midcoast as well as on www.keepsandiegomoving.com/midcoast. These materials include project information, project map, fact sheet, Frequently Asked Questions, and multimedia presentations, videos, and other information. These materials will provide information about the project, the development process, and information and/or referrals about how to get involved in the process. These materials will be updated as needed throughout the process. The Web site will provide an opportunity to learn about the project online and the ability to register for future e-mail newsletters and updates. It also will provide access to project materials and documents, including fact sheets, news releases, project documents (NOP, Draft SEIS/SEIR), and images to download. The Web site also will provide interactive and other multimedia materials.

• Conduct stakeholder briefings Conducting briefings with a representative group of key stakeholders prior to the beginning of the Scoping period will provide an opportunity to introduce the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project, the development process and the upcoming opportunities for public involvement. These briefings will help SANDAG assess the level of awareness about the project and identify issues to address through public involvement activities.

Topics to be covered during the briefings include:

- Preliminary project information - Understanding of the process and how they can provide input - Input on proposed means of public involvement - Recommendations on other stakeholders to involve

The following groups/individuals will be approached for briefings:

- SANDAG Accessibility Committee - Access 2 Independence - San Diego County Taxpayers Association - San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce - San Diego Convention & Visitors Bureau - Golden Triangle Chamber of Commerce - Downtown San Diego Partnership - University Community Planning Group - Clairemont Community Planning Group - Linda Vista Planning Group - Mission Valley Community Planning Group - Centre City Advisory Committee - Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla - VA Medical Center - Costco

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 15

- Friends of Rose Canyon - San Diego River Park Foundation - Mission Valley Preserve - La Jolla Village Square - Lawrence Family Jewish Community Center - San Diego Mormon Temple - La Jolla Country Day School - Move San Diego - San Diego County Bicycle Coalition - San Diego Workforce Partnership - Bayside Community Center - Goodwill Industries of San Diego County - UCSD - UCSD Thornton Hospital

Additional briefings will be conducted, as deemed appropriate by SANDAG.

• Convene Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group The Mid-Coast Corridor comprises a large geographical area, and there are a number of stakeholders that are interested in the project. To help manage the effort to provide regular project updates, seek input from these numerous stakeholders, and provide regular feedback about how their input is used, a Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group will be convened.

The Working Group will serve as a forum for the exchange of information throughout the project’s development. Working with this group will provide SANDAG with an opportunity to engage in dialog with and gain input from these stakeholders at key milestones in the environmental review process. Members of the Working Group can help convey project information to a wider audience by reporting back to the constituencies they represent. While the Working Group will have no decision-making authority, it provides a venue for regular communication with the public throughout the environmental review process. All meetings will be open to the public, and meeting summaries will be documented. The Working Group Charter and Summary of Activities are attached as Appendix B.

The Working Group will be composed of members representing key stakeholder groups, and members will be identified through a nomination process. A sample application form is attached as Appendix C. Nominations will be sought from groups in specific categories. In addition, individual nominations can be submitted to SANDAG. A SANDAG committee composed of two members of the Transportation Committee and SANDAG staff will select members from the nominations received based on a number of criteria, including regional representation, community served and the commitment to regularly attend meetings.

Table 4-1 summarizes the proposed membership categories and the number of Working Group seats in each category. The number of seats for each member category was chosen to provide balanced representation from the various entities and organizations in the corridor. It is recommended that the chair of the Working Group be an elected official and co-chair be a Working Group member. The chair will be selected by the SANDAG Board Chair and the Working Group co-chair will be selected by the Working Group participants. To ensure continuity, Working Group participants will be asked to commit to attend meetings throughout the environmental review process.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 16

Table 4-1 Composition of Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group

MEMBER CATEGORY NUMBER OF SEATS Access advocate 1 Business community 2 Community representatives 4 Community services 2 Employers 2 Environmental 2 Retail 1 Student representative 1 Taxpayers advocate 1 Transportation advocate 2 Transit rider representative 1 At-large members 3

• Prepare Draft Notice of Preparation Distribution List SANDAG will prepare a comprehensive distribution list for the draft Notice of Preparation. This list will include community groups, business organizations, environmental groups, transportation advocates, accessibility advocates, and residents, businesses, schools, churches, and community facilities in the corridor. Public agencies that have an interest in the project will also be included on the distribution list, as outlined in the Agency Coordination Plan. This list also will be used for distribution of future notices related to the environmental review process (i.e., Notice of Availability of the Draft SEIS/SEIR).

• Make advance preparations to conduct scoping meetings SANDAG will make all advance preparations to conduct four Scoping meetings in various locations along the corridor (Downtown San Diego, Old Town/Morena, Clairemont, University City/Golden Triangle). All meetings will be scheduled in locations that meet ADA requirements and are accessible by transit. Meetings will be scheduled at various times of the day to maximize opportunities for public participation.

4.3.2 Public Involvement During Scoping

The process of determining the focus and content of the SEIR/SEIS is known as environmental scoping. Scoping helps to identify the range of actions, alternatives, environmental effects, and mitigation measures to be analyzed in depth, and eliminates from detailed study those issues that are not pertinent to the final decision on the Proposed Project. The scoping process is not intended to resolve differences of opinion regarding the Proposed Project or evaluate its merits. Instead, the process allows the public to express their concerns regarding the Proposed Project and thereby provides an opportunity for input to the environmental analysis. Scoping is an effective way to bring together and address the concerns of the public, affected agencies, and other interested parties. Members of the public, relevant Federal, State, regional and local agencies, interests groups, community organizations, and other interested parties may participate in the scoping process by providing comments or recommendations regarding alternatives to carry forward for environmental review and the range of environmental issues to be analyzed in the SEIR/SEIS.

A number of efforts will be implemented during this period to expand communication about the project:

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 17

• Provide public notice of the Scoping period The public will be provided notice of the commencement of the 30-day Scoping period, opportunities for providing public comment and dates and locations of Scoping meetings in the following ways:

- Public notices will run in local publications - The Notice of Preparation will be mailed to the individuals and organizations on the distribution list and sent to the State Clearinghouse - Notices/invitations will be prepared to distribute to stakeholder groups in the corridor so that they can share the information with their members - A news release will be prepared and distributed to the San Diego Union-Tribune, community newspapers and ethnic media outlets (as detailed in the media list attached as Appendix D)

• Make Scoping Documents Available to the Public The Notice of Preparation, Draft Public Involvement Plan, Draft Purpose and Need statement and information about the evaluation of alternatives (including those eliminated from further analysis) will be made available to the public during the Scoping period. These documents will be posted on the project Web site and made available at other public venues (SANDAG offices and public libraries in the corridor) at the commencement of the Scoping period to allow the public the opportunity to review them and provide comments during the Scoping period. Public information documents such as fact sheets, advertisements, and presentation materials will be prepared in English and Spanish.

• Schedule and conduct briefings with media To promote awareness among the media and foster accurate news coverage, one-on- one briefings with reporters covering the project will be conducted at the beginning of the Scoping period. Reporters will be briefed on the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project and provided an overview of the project development milestones. A media kit also will be provided to each of the reporters.

• Issue first Mid-Coast e-blast A Mid-Coast e-blast will be kicked-off to provide a regular vehicle for sharing new information about the project. This first issue will be distributed following the Board of Directors decision on alternatives to take into scoping and will focus on introducing the project, announcing the commencement of the Scoping period, schedule of Scoping meetings, and providing information about opportunities to provide public input on project alternatives, the scope of the environmental document and the Public Involvement Plan.

• Provide news updates for rEgion and other newsletters A number of organizations along the Mid-Coast Corridor publish newsletters to keep their constituencies informed about issues of interest. Regular news updates about the Mid- Coast Corridor Transit Project will be provided for publication in these organizational newsletters. Examples of newsletters to target are rEgion (SANDAG’s electronic newsletter) and publications of homeowners associations, churches, community groups and others. The first of regular news updates will be prepared during this stage to provide an introduction to the project, announce the commencement of the Scoping period, schedule of Scoping meetings, and information about opportunities to provide public input.

• Conduct Scoping meetings SANDAG will conduct five Scoping meetings to provide information about the Project Alternatives, Purpose and Need for the project and the environmental review process.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 18

Scoping also provides an opportunity for public input on the identification of issues to be studied in the Draft SEIR. The meetings will be held in communities along the Mid-Coast Corridor: Downtown San Diego, Old Town/Morena, Clairemont, UCSD, and University City/Golden Triangle. Comment cards and a court reporter will be used at each meeting to formally record comments. All comments will be collected following the meetings and catalogued for inclusion in the Scoping summary report. SANDAG will establish protocol for how meetings, comments, and contacts are to be recorded.

• Prepare Scoping summary report At the conclusion of all Scoping meetings, a report including all comments received at the meetings will be prepared. Comments received will be used by SANDAG to help determine the scope of the environmental review and alternatives to be studied. This report will be made available to the public so they can review the extent of all public comments received.

A report also will be prepared with comments received on the Draft Public Involvement Plan. This summary of comments received will be used by SANDAG to update the Public Involvement Plan. This report, including responses to comments, will be made available to the public so they can be made aware about how their comments were addressed in the Public Involvement Plan. The Public Involvement Plan will be updated as needed to respond to comments received.

4.3.3 Public Involvement Prior to Circulation of the Draft SEIS/SEIR

After completion of the Scoping period, SANDAG will decide which alternatives to carry forward for detailed environmental review and will initiate the preparation of the Draft SEIS/SEIR. It also is anticipated that Preliminary Engineering on the project will begin during this period.

Public Involvement efforts will focus on continued work with the Working Group, as well as efforts to communicate information about the project through community organizations and events. The following tactics will be employed during this stage to continue working with the public:

• Update Informational Materials All project informational materials will be updated to reflect any new or changed information resulting from the Scoping period. This will include updates to the project fact sheet, Frequently Asked Questions, Web site, multimedia presentation and any other materials that provide project information.

• Continue working with Working Group Meetings will be held as needed to update the Working Group.

• Begin Speakers Bureau program To keep the local community and larger regional interests informed about the project throughout the process, a speakers bureau will be established to provide presentations to interested organizations. These presentations will serve to share information about the project and the planning and development process.

Groups that will be approached for presentations include, but are not limited to (specific stakeholders in each category are listed in Appendix A):

- Community planning groups

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 19

- Community and town councils - Business organizations (e.g., San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce, Golden Triangle Chamber of Commerce) - UCSD campus groups - Major employers - Transportation Advocates (e.g., Move San Diego, San Diego Bicycle Coalition) - Environmental groups (e.g., Sierra Club, San Diego River Coalition) - Local schools - Area churches - Others as identified

The schedule of presentations will be recorded in the Public Involvement Contacts Database. The Contacts Database will include the date, time, place, presenter, and audience of each presentation. SANDAG will proactively seek to make presentations to interested organizations in the corridor. SANDAG also will make presentations upon request from members of the community.

• Participate in community events To reach a wider audience, project information will be provided and community input sought through participation in community events and festivals. These events may be sponsored by community groups, or could be targeted toward a specific audience, i.e., minority groups. A portable informational booth will be taken to various festivals, street fairs, etc., to share information about the project and its benefits to the Mid-Coast Corridor and the San Diego region and seek feedback from members of the public through comment cards, surveys and other means. These events also will provide an opportunity for event attendees to opt into the Mid-Coast e-blast list. In addition to community events, the portable information booth can be used at Westfield UTC and other community gathering places. The information booth will be staffed by members of the speakers bureau and/or appropriate SANDAG staff and consultant team members. All events will be recorded in the Public Involvement Contacts Database.

• Seek locations to display project information SANDAG will seek locations in the Mid-Coast Corridor that are willing to allow the placement of project information displays to reach a wide audience with project information. Attractive table-top displays will be created that contain project brochures and other useful information for the general public. The following locations will be targeted to display project information:

- Westfield UTC - Costa Verde Shopping Center - La Jolla Village Square - Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla - VA Medical Center - UCSD Thornton Hospital - UCSD - Lawrence Family Jewish Community Center - Transit vehicles and transit centers - Libraries within the Corridor - Others, as deemed appropriate

• Continue Mid-Coast e-blast SANDAG will continue to write and distribute the Mid-Coast Corridor e-blast on a regular basis to provide a regular source of updated project information.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 20

• Continue regular news updates SANDAG will continue to provide news updates for rEgion and other relevant newsletters in the Mid-Coast Corridor to report newsworthy information.

• Update Informational Materials All project informational materials will be updated to reflect any updated or changed information that occurred during the preparation of the Draft SEIS/SEIR. This will include updates to the project fact sheet, Frequently Asked Questions, Web site, multimedia presentation and any other materials that provide project information.

• Update distribution list for Notice of Availability of Draft SEIS/SEIR SANDAG will update the distribution list for the Notice of Availability of the Draft SEIS/SIER to include all those who participated in the Scoping process and/or who have indicated that they would like to be added to the distribution list.

• Make advance preparations to conduct public hearings/meetings for the Draft SEIS/SEIR SANDAG will make all advance preparations to conduct four public hearings/meetings in various locations along the corridor (Downtown San Diego, Old Town/Morena, Clairemont, University City/Triangle). All meetings will be scheduled in locations that meet ADA requirements and are accessible by transit. Meetings will be scheduled at various times of the day to maximize opportunities for public participation.

4.3.4 Public Involvement During Draft SEIS/SEIR Public Review

The release of the Draft SEIS/SEIR for public review and comment marks the beginning of a 45-day period where the public is provided the opportunity to review and provide comments on the Draft SEIS/SEIR. SANDAG will make efforts during this period to ensure that the public is aware of opportunities to comment and also to continue to convey project information to a broad audience throughout the corridor and region.

The following efforts will be implemented during this period to expand and continue communication about the project:

• Public notice of the Draft SEIS/SEIR public comment period The public will be provided notice of the availability of the Draft SEIS/SEIR, opportunities for providing public comment and dates and locations of public hearings/meetings in the following ways:

- The Notice of Availability will be sent to the Federal Register, the State Clearinghouse, and the County Clerk’s office - Public notices will run in local publications - Notices of Availability will be mailed to the individuals and organizations on the distribution list, including all adjacent property owners along the project corridor - Notices/invitations will be prepared to distribute to stakeholder groups in the corridor so that they can share the information with their members - Notice will be provided on the project Web site - A news release will be prepared and distributed to the San Diego Union-Tribune, community newspapers and ethnic media outlets (as detailed in the media list attached as Appendix D)

• Make the Draft SEIS/SEIR Available to the Public The Draft SEIS/SEIR will be made available to the public for review and comment during the 45-day public review period. This document will be posted on the project Web site

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 21

and made available at other public venues (SANDAG offices and public libraries in the corridor) at the commencement of the public review period to allow the public the opportunity to review it and provide comments during the public review period. CDs of the Draft SEIS/SEIR will be available upon request.

• Schedule and conduct briefings with reporters SANDAG will schedule and conduct one-on-one briefings with reporters covering the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project to provide information about the Draft SEIS/SEIR and the public review process. Reporters will be briefed on the findings of the environmental document, and any significant mitigation measures that may be proposed as a result of the project.

• Continue Mid-Coast e-blast SANDAG will continue to write and distribute the Mid-Coast Corridor e-blast on a regular basis to provide a regular source of updated project information, including the release of the Draft SEIS/SEIR for public review, schedule of public hearings/meetings and information about other opportunities to provide public input.

• Continue regular news updates SANDAG will continue to provide news updates for rEgion and other relevant newsletters in the Mid-Coast corridor to report newsworthy information, including the release of the Draft SEIS/SEIR for public review, schedule of public hearings/meetings and information about other opportunities to provide public input.

• Conduct public hearings/meetings Four public hearings/meetings will be conducted to provide an opportunity for stakeholders to learn more about the Draft SEIS/SEIR and provide public comment. These meetings will be held in Downtown San Diego, Old Town/Morena, Clairemont and University City/Golden Triangle. Comment cards and a court reporter will be used to formally record comments received.

• Prepare public hearing/meeting summary report At the conclusion of the Draft SEIS/SEIR public review period, a summary report of all comments received at the meetings will be prepared. This report will include a record of all comments received at the public hearings/meetings and by direct mail to SANDAG and will be responded to by SANDAG in the Final SEIS/SEIR. The public will be informed that the final public comment report has been published and it will be made available upon request and posted on the project Web site so they can review the extent of public comments received. It will also serve as a resource for decision makers so they are aware of issues raised by the public during the environmental review process.

• Continue working with Working Group Meetings will be held as needed to update the Working Group.

• Continue Speakers Bureau program SANDAG will continue to seek opportunities to present project information to interested community and regional organizations. Speaking engagements will be tracked in the Public Involvement Contacts Database and will include information about presentation date, time, presenter, audience and comments received.

• Continue to participate in community events SANDAG will continue to seek opportunities to participate in community events throughout the corridor.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 22

• Provided updated information for display at public locations SANDAG will provide updated project information at all locations where project information displays are located.

4.3.5 Public Involvement Leading up to the Certification/Approval of the Final SEIS/SEIR and Record of Decision

During the stage when SANDAG is responding to comments made on the Draft SEIS/SEIR, the following activities will be conducted:

• Prepare the Public Involvement Section for the Final SEIS/SEIR SANDAG will draft a Public Involvement section for inclusion in the Final SEIS/SEIR. This section will include a summary of all efforts made to involve the public during the development of the environmental document.

• Continue working with Working Group Meetings with the Working Group will continue throughout this stage, as needed, and at a frequency determined by SANDAG in conjunction with the Working Group.

• Continue Speakers Bureau program SANDAG will continue to seek opportunities to present project information to interested community and regional organizations. A record of these presentations will be maintained that will include information about presentation date, time, presenter, and audience.

• Continue to participate in community events SANDAG will continue to seek opportunities to participate in community events throughout the Corridor.

• Continue Mid-Coast e-blast SANDAG will continue to write and distribute the Mid-Coast Corridor e-blast on a regular basis to provide a regular source of updated project information.

• Continue regular news updates SANDAG will continue to provide news updates for rEgion and other relevant newsletters in the Mid-Coast corridor to report newsworthy information.

• Update Informational Materials All project informational materials will be updated to reflect any updated or changed information that occurred as a result of the response to comments made on the Draft SEIS/SEIR. This will include updates to the project fact sheet, Frequently Asked Questions, Web site, multimedia presentation and any other materials that provide project information.

• Update distribution list for Notice of Availability of Final SEIS/SEIR SANDAG will update the distribution list for the Notice of Availability of the Final SEIS/SIER to include all those who participated in the public review of the Draft SEIS/SEIR and/or who indicated that they would like to be added to the distribution list.

• Public notice of the availability of the Final SEIS/SEIR The release of the Final SEIS/SEIR is the final step before the SANDAG Board of Directors will be asked to certify the Final SEIR and the FTA will be asked to issue a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final SEIS. The public will be provided notice of the availability of the Final SEIS/SEIR in the following ways:

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 23

- A Notice of Availability of the Final SEIS will be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Federal Activities for publication in the Federal Register - Public notices will run in local publications - Notices of Availability will be mailed to the individuals and organizations on the distribution list - Notices will be prepared to distribute to stakeholder groups in the corridor so that they can share the information with their members - Notice will be provided on the project Web site - A news release will be prepared and distributed to the San Diego Union-Tribune, community newspapers and ethnic media outlets (as detailed in the media list attached as Appendix D)

• Schedule and conduct briefings with reporters SANDAG will schedule and conduct one-on-one briefings with reporters covering the project to provide information about the Final SEIS/SEIR and the remaining steps until the document is certified by the SANDAG Board and a Record of Decision is issued by the FTA. Reporters will be briefed on responses provided to significant public comments, the expected timeline for certification and approval of the document and the next steps in the project development process.

• Continue to participate in community events SANDAG will continue to seek opportunities to participate in community events throughout the Corridor.

• Provide updated information for display at public locations SANDAG will provide updated project information at all locations where project information displays are located.

• Continue Mid-Coast e-blast SANDAG will continue to write and distribute the Mid-Coast Corridor e-blast on a regular basis to provide a regular source of updated project information.

• Continue regular news updates SANDAG will continue to provide news updates for rEgion and other relevant newsletters in the Mid-Coast corridor to report newsworthy information.

4.3.6 Public Involvement Subsequent to the Record of Decision

After SANDAG certifies the Final SEIR and adopts the Findings of Effect and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, the Board can approve the project. The FTA will issue a Record of Decision on the Final SEIS 45 days after the Federal Register notice of the availability of the Final SEIS. SANDAG will notify the public of the decisions and provide information about the next steps in the process (Final Design, leading eventually to Construction) in the following manner:

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 24

• Issue news release announcing the certification of the Final SEIR and FTA’s Record of Decision on the Final SEIS SANDAG will issue a news release to the appropriate media outlets, including ethnic media, announcing the certification of the Final SEIR, and project approval and Record of Decision on the Final SEIS. The news release will include information about the approved project and the next steps in the project development and public involvement processes.

• Final Mid-Coast e-blast (for this phase) SANDAG will issue the final Mid-Coast e-blast for the Environmental/Preliminary Engineering stage. The e-blast will focus on the certification of the Final SEIR and Record of Decision on the Final SEIS, and the next steps in the project development and public involvement processes.

• Final news update (for this phase) A final news update for the Environmental/Preliminary Engineering stage will be issued to provide information about the certification of the Final SEIR and Record of Decision on the Final SEIS, and next steps in the project development and public involvement process. This news update will be used for an article in rEgion and other relevant newsletters in the Mid-Coast Corridor.

• Update informational materials Informational materials for the project will be updated to reflect the certification of the Final SEIR and Record of Decision of the Final SEIS. These materials include the Web site, fact sheet, Frequently Asked Question and multimedia presentation.

• Provided updated information for display at public locations SANDAG will provide updated project information at all locations where project information displays are located.

4.3.7 Plan Assessment

In order to assess the effectiveness of the public involvement efforts, SANDAG will assess the effectiveness of the Public Involvement Plan at key milestones in the project development process. These reports will help SANDAG to evaluate public involvement strategies and tactics and make adjustments along the way, and will inform future public involvement outreach phases of the Mid-Coast Transit Corridor project.

These reports will include:

• A summary of all outreach efforts and input received • A qualitative assessment of how effective the efforts to obtain input were, i.e., audiences reached, level of agreement on project issues, input incorporated into project design • A quantitative assessment of the public involvement plan including the number meetings/presentations/events participated in, Web site hits, approximate number of people reached, number of comments received, and number of media contacts along with the resulting media coverage • The Public Involvement Plan will be revised and strategies/tactics adjusted based on assessments at key milestones

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 25

APPENDIX A

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS LIST

Category Organization Accessibility Advocates AARP San Diego Accessibility Advocates Access to Independence of San Diego Accessibility Advocates City of San Diego Disabled Services Advisory Council Business Groups Biocom Business Groups Building Owners and Managers Association Business Groups Discover Pacific Beach Business Groups Downtown San Diego Partnership Business Groups Golden Triangle Chamber of Commerce Business Groups Greater Clairemont Chamber of Commerce Business Groups Old Town San Diego Chamber of Commerce Business Groups Promote La Jolla Inc. BID Business Groups San Diego BID Council Business Groups San Diego Coastal Chamber of Commerce Business Groups San Diego North Chamber of Commerce Business Groups San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce Business Groups San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation Civic Associations La Jolla Golden Triangle Rotary Club Civic Associations Linda Vista Civic Association Civic Associations Linda Vista Community Collaborative Civic Associations Mission Bay Rotary Club Civic Associations Old Mission Rotary Club Civic Associations University City Community Association Civic Associations League of Women Voters Community Groups Balboa Avenue Citizens Advisory Group Community Groups Carmel Valley Community Planning Board Community Groups Centre City Advisory Committee (CCAC) Community Groups Clairemont Planning Committee Community Groups Clairemont Town Council Community Groups La Jolla Community Planning Association Community Groups La Jolla Shores Association Community Groups La Jolla Town Council Community Groups Linda Vista Community Planning Committee Community Groups Little Italy Association Community Groups Little Italy Residents Association Community Groups Midway Community Planning Advisory Committee (North Bay Planning Committee) Community Groups Mission Beach Precise Planning Board Community Groups Mission Beach Town Council Community Groups Mission Valley Community Planning Group

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 26

Category Organization Community Groups North Bay Redevelopment PAC Community Groups Old Town Community Planning Committee Community Groups Pacific Beach Community Planning Committee Community Groups Pacific Beach Town Council Community Groups Torrey Hills Community Planning Board Community Groups Torrey Pines Community Planning Group Community Groups UC Golden Community Groups University City Community Association Community Groups University City Community Planning Group Community Services All Saints Lutheran Church Community Services Braille Institute Community Services Church of the Good Samaritan Episcopal School Community Services Congregation Adat Yeshurun Community Services Curie Elementary School Community Services Doyle Elementary School Community Services La Jolla Country Day School Community Services La Jolla Country Day School Community Services Lawrence Jewish Family Community Center Community Services Mission Bay Montessori Academy Community Services San Diego California Temple - Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Community Services Spreckles Elementary School Community Services St Anthony Antiochian Orthodox Church Community Services Standley Middle School Community Services Torrey Pines Christian Church Community Services Torrey Pines Elementary School Community Services University City High School Community Services University City United Church of Christ Community Services University Lutheran Church Community Services University Lutheran Church Employers Biogen IDEC Employers Costco Employers Evans Hotels Employers Genesee Executive Plaza Employers La Jolla Hyatt at Aventine Employers La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology Employers La Jolla Spine Institute Employers La Jolla Village Professional Center Employers Ligand Pharmaceuticals Employers Nobel Corporate Plaza Center / Equity Properties Employers Pfizer Employers Sheraton La Jolla (formerly Radisson) Employers Regents Square Business Park Employers Residence Inn by Marriott - La Jolla

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 27

Category Organization Employers San Diego Sports Arena Employers Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla Employers SeaWorld Employers Skye Pharmaceuticals Employers UCSD Employers UCSD, Thornton Hospital Employers USD Employers Veteran Affairs San Diego Healthcare System Environmental Org. Association of Environmental Professionals Environmental Org. California Coastal Coalition Environmental Org. California Native Plant Society San Diego (CNPSSD) Environmental Org. Endangered Habitats League Environmental Org. Environmental Health Coalition Environmental Org. Friends of Rose Canyon Environmental Org. Friends of Rose Creek Environmental Org. Friends of Tecolote Canyon Environmental Org. Friends of the San Diego River Mouth Environmental Org. I Love A Clean San Diego Environmental Org. Industrial Environmental Association Environmental Org. League of Conservation Voters, San Diego Environmental Org. Mission Valley Preserve Environmental Org. Rose Creek Watershed Alliance Environmental Org. San Diego Archaeological Society Environmental Org. San Diego Audubon Society Environmental Org. San Diego Canyonlands Environmental Org. San Diego Coastkeeper Environmental Org. San Diego River Conservancy Environmental Org. San Diego River Coalition Environmental Org. San Diego River Park Foundation Environmental Org. San Diego Sierra Club Environmental Org. Southwest Wetlands Interpretative Association (SWIA) Environmental Org. Surfrider, San Diego Chapter Labor San Diego-Imperial Counties Labor Council Military MCAS Miramar Minority Org. Asian Business Association Interest Groups The Urban Land Institute Interest Groups NAIOP Interest Groups Building Industry Association Interest Groups San Diego Housing Federation Minority Org. Bayside Community Center Minority Org. Filipino-American Chamber of Commerce of San Diego County Minority Org. MAAC Project Minority Org. San Diego County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Minority Org. San Diego Organizing Project (SDOP)

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 28

Category Organization Minority Org. San Diego Urban League Minority Org. San Diego Workforce Partnership Park Committee Marian Bear Memorial Park Recreation Council Park Committee Mission Bay Park Committee Park Committee Rose Canyon Recreation Council Park Committee Tecolote Canyon CAC (Citizen's Advisory Committee) Neighborhoods/Residential Andria HOA Neighborhoods/Residential Avanti HOA Neighborhoods/Residential Cambridge Park Apartments Neighborhoods/Residential Capri HOA Neighborhoods/Residential Casa Bella HOA Neighborhoods/Residential Canyon Park Apartments Neighborhoods/Residential Costa Verde Apartments - North and South Neighborhoods/Residential Costa Verde Towers Neighborhoods/Residential Garden Communities Neighborhoods/Residential La Florentine HOA Neighborhoods/Residential La Jolla Canyon Apartments Neighborhoods/Residential La Jolla Colony Neighborhoods/Residential La Jolla Crossroads Neighborhoods/Residential La Jolla International Garden Apartments Neighborhoods/Residential La Jolla Vista Townhouses Neighborhoods/Residential La Scala Luxury Villas Neighborhoods/Residential Lucera at University Towne Centre Neighborhoods/Residential Pacific Garden Apartments - UTC Neighborhoods/Residential Playmor Terrace West Homeowners Association Neighborhoods/Residential Regency Villas Senior Complex Neighborhoods/Residential Regents Court La Jolla Neighborhoods/Residential Renaissance La Jolla Homeowners Association Neighborhoods/Residential Southcoast Homeowners Association Neighborhoods/Residential The Villas of Renaissance Apartments Neighborhoods/Residential Toscana HOA Neighborhoods/Residential Trieste Apartment Villas Neighborhoods/Residential University Towne Square Homeowners Association Neighborhoods/Residential Valentia HOA Neighborhoods/Residential Venetian Condominiums Homeowners Association/ JJN Neighborhoods/Residential Villa Vicenza Condominiums Neighborhoods/Residential Village Apartments on the Square Neighborhoods/Residential Villas HOA Neighborhoods/Residential Windemere Homeowners Association Commercial & Retail Costa Verde Shopping Center/ Regency Property Management Commercial & Retail La Jolla Village Square Shopping Center - Madison Marquette Commercial & Retail Renaissance Towne Centre Commercial & Retail Westfield Shoppingtown, University Towne Centre

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 29

Category Organization Students UCSD Associate Students Students UCSD Graduate Student Government Students USD Associate Students Taxpayer Advocate San Diego County Taxpayers Association Tourism San Diego Convention & Visitors Bureau Tourism San Diego Convention Center Corporation Transportation Advocate COMPACT Transportation Advocate La Jolla Traffic & Transportation Board Transportation Advocate Move San Diego Transportation Advocate San Diego Bicycle Coalition Transportation Advocate Transit Alliance for a Better North County (TABNC) Transportation Advocate Walk San Diego

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 30

APPENDIX B

Charter for Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group

Purpose The purpose of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group (PWG) is to receive information from SANDAG about the project and provide input into key activities associated with the development of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. The PWG will lay the foundation for public involvement in future phases of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project’s implementation. Line of Reporting The PWG will provide input to SANDAG staff on specific activities related to the development of the Mid- Coast Corridor Transit Project, as discussed in the next section. Staff will consider input from the PWG in making recommendations to the Transportation Committee. The SANDAG Board will make final decisions on the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project, its components, and the certification of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR). Responsibilities The PWG will review the project purpose and need, consideration of alternatives for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project, and the Public Involvement Plan. The PWG will have an opportunity to review and comment on the public Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS)/SEIR, including impacts and mitigation measures, when it is available. The information that will be presented to the PWG includes, but is not limited to, the draft Public Involvement Plan, Federal Transit Administration evaluation criteria and review process, and SANDAG evaluation of various alternatives. The PWG also will assist with associated public outreach and help inform and encourage active public participation by outside groups with which they are affiliated. The PWG will provide input to SANDAG staff and the Transportation Committee. Membership The PWG will have up to 23 members, representing the geographic areas of the corridor and the diverse perspectives of stakeholders interested in the project. The primary membership, as well as a membership waiting list, will be approved by the SANDAG Board. The members are selected based on the review of applications submitted to SANDAG that assessed their qualifications and affiliations with representative organizations and interests in the Mid-Coast Corridor. Members do not have alternates. If a member misses three meetings in a row or four meetings over the course of one year, s/he will be replaced. In the event that any members need to be replaced, new members will be selected from the approved waiting list by a majority vote of the PWG. Meeting Time and Location The PWG will meet on a monthly basis, or as determined by the members of the PWG, in coordination with SANDAG staff. Meetings typically will be held on the first Wednesday of the month from 3:30 to 5 p.m. at the SANDAG offices at 401 B Street in San Diego. The PWG will hold some of its meetings at other locations in the corridor. Working Group Leadership The Chair of the PWG is appointed by the Chair of the SANDAG Board. The PWG will elect a Vice Chair from its membership by a majority vote. Duration of Existence The PWG will complete its work with the certification of the SEIR by the SANDAG Board and the approval of the SEIS by the FTA (anticipated in summer 2011). Brown Act and Conflict Of Interest Consistent with Government Code Section 54952(b), the PWG is subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 31

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group (PWG)

Summary of Activities

Public Involvement Plan In accordance with state and federal guidelines, a draft Public Involvement Plan has been prepared to actively involve the public in the planning and development process for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. There will be a series of public meetings and other means for involving the public by providing information on the project and receiving input at key milestones in the planning and development process for the project. The PWG will be asked to review and provide input on the draft plan to ensure that it effectively provides opportunities to involve the public in the process.

Review Draft Purpose and Need Statement A draft Purpose and Need Statement has been prepared by SANDAG for presentation at the SEIS Scoping meetings. This statement will be provided to the PWG at the initial meeting. Any comments from PWG members or from the Group would need to be submitted at the official Scoping meetings.

Review of Alternatives Evaluation SANDAG is currently in the process of evaluating a number of project alternatives for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. These alternatives are being evaluated against FTA cost effectiveness criteria defined in the New Starts Program. SANDAG will provide information to the PWG on the various alternatives under evaluation to fully understand how alternatives were evaluated and screened from further consideration.

Review of environmental findings and proposed mitigation SANDAG will begin the environmental review process for the project with the initiation of project scoping in Spring 2010 and will prepare a draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIS/SEIR) over the following year. Information regarding the scope of the Draft SEIS/SEIR and methods of analysis will be shared with the PWG during the development of the SEIR/SEIS and comments from the PWG will be made after the public Draft SEIR/SEIS is available for review.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 32

APPENDIX C

APPLICATION FORM FOR THE SANDAG 2009-2011 MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT WORKING GROUP (due June 22, 2009)

Name: ______

Address:______

Phone: ______

E-mail: ______

Return to: Anne Steinberger, Marketing Manager San Diego Association of Governments 401 B St., Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 [email protected] (619) 699-1937

Please check the membership category you are applying for (please check all that apply):

Access advocate Business community Community representative Community services (schools, churches, community facilities) Employer Environmental Retail Student Taxpayer advocate Transportation advocate Transit rider At-large member (resident or business owner in the Mid-Coast Corridor)

Please answer the following questions:

(Please make responses as concise as possible; applications will not be judged on length of response) 1. Why are you interested in serving on the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group?

2. What skills and abilities would you bring to the Project Working Group?

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 33

3. Which of the following topics are of most interest to you as they relate to the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project? (please select no more than two)

Environmental review Alternatives evaluation Design elements Community impacts Social Equity & Environmental Justice Other ______

4. Have you participated in any activities related to the areas of interest selected in Question 3? If so, briefly describe the activity/ies.

5. What would you hope to accomplish by your participation?

6. What ZIP code(s) do you work in and/or live in?

7. List any civic organizations to which you belong now, or have in the past.

The Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Working Group will meet the first Wednesday of each month from 3:30 to 5 p.m. at the SANDAG offices in downtown San Diego. Members of the working group will be replaced if they miss three consecutive meetings or five over the course of one year. Please only apply if you can make this commitment to the process.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 34

APPENDIX D

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT MEDIA LIST

ASIA KPBS TV Asian Journal KUSI TV Beach & Bay Press La Jolla Light Chinese News La Jolla Village News Clairemont Community News La Prensa San Diego Coast News Mission Valley News & Views Coastal Sun North County Times Corridor News Peninsula Beacon CTN County Television Network Philippine Mabuhay News Fox 5 News / KSWB Philippines Today Daily Transcript, The Pomerado Newspapers Del Mar Times Presidio Sentinel Del Mar Village Voice San Diego Business Journal Diamond Gateway Signature San Diego City Beat Diario San Diego San Diego Community Newspaper Group East County Californian San Diego Ranch Coast Newspaper Group El Latino San Diego Downtown News Enlace San Diego Metropolitan Filipino Press San Diego Newsline Hispanos Unidos San Diego Reader Imperial Beach Eagle & Times San Diego Union-Tribune KBNT TV Channel 17 San Diego Voice & Viewpoint KFMB TV Star News KGTV Channel 10 Tieng Viet San Diego KNSD TV (NBC 7/39) UCSD Guardian KOGO AM Voice of San Diego KPBS FM XETV 6 The CW

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 35

APPENDIX E

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN COMMENTS

Commenter Comment Response William Beck, UCPG Can SANDAG create a shorter SANDAG prepared a summary of the “Cliff’s Notes” version of the plan elements of the Public Involvement Plan that is easier for the public to for public distribution during scoping. understand? Ann Van Leer, Land The mission statement or objective The goals/purpose of the Public Conservation Brokerage, Inc. of the plan should be more Involvement Plan are currently outlined in prominently displayed in the Section 1.3; however a brief sentence document. referencing the goals/purpose will also be added to the Introduction, Section 1.0. Anette Blatt, Scripps Health I would like more information This comment has been noted and presented about the structure of the information on how to schedule speakers’ bureau. presentations will be posted on the Mid- Coast Web site. Rob Hutsel, San Diego River Mission Valley Community Planning The Mission Valley Community Planning Park Foundation Group should be added as a Group was added to the list of stakeholder. stakeholders in Appendix A, on page 27, under “Community Groups”. Rob Hutsel, San Diego River The Mission Bay Park Committee Mission Bay Park Committee was Park Foundation should also be added as a included among the list of stakeholders in stakeholder. Appendix A, on page 29, under “Park Committee”. Chris Westling, UCSD Student UCSD graduate student UCSD Graduate Student Government government should be added to the was added to the list of stakeholders in list of stakeholders. Appendix A, on page 30 under “Students”. Chris Westling, UCSD Student USD should also be added to the USD was added to the list of stakeholders list of stakeholders. in Appendix A, on page 28, under “Employers”. Debbie Knight, Friends of Rose The scoping comment period A formal request to extend the Scoping Canyon should be extended to 60 days from period should be made to the SANDAG the required 30 days. Executive Director/Chairman of Transportation Committee/Chairman of the SANDAG Board in advance of scoping. Debbie Knight, Friends of Rose The comment period for the draft A formal request to extend the Scoping Canyon EIR should also be extended from period should be made to the SANDAG the required 45 days to 60 days. Executive Director/Chairman of Transportation Committee/Chairman of the SANDAG Board in advance of scoping.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 36

Commenter Comment Response Debbie Knight, Friends of Rose The results of the alternatives Information on the alternatives evaluation Canyon evaluation should be made will be presented and available for available to the public and 60-day comment during the scoping process. public comment period should be provided. Debbie Knight, Friends of Rose The Rose Creek Watershed Rose Creek Watershed Alliance and Canyon Alliance and the Friends of Rose Friends of Rose Creek have been added Creek should be added to the list of to the list of stakeholders in Appendix A, stakeholders. on page 28, under “Environmental Org.”. Ann Van Leer, Land The purpose of the project and what This will be addressed in the Statement of Conservation Brokerage, Inc. is driving it should be made clear. Purpose & Need and will be available for review and comment during the Scoping period. Lani Lutar, San Diego County The results of the alternatives This comment has been noted. Taxpayers Association evaluation should be presented objectively. Brooke Peterson, Clairemont Add Clairemont News to the list of Clairemont News has been added to the Mesa Planning Committee media publications. list of media publications in Appendix D, beginning on page 35. Rob Hutsel, San Diego River Property owners along the selected This comment has been noted. Park Foundation alternative should be notified of the Notification procedures are outlined on project. page 17, under Section 4.3.2, and will meet all necessary noticing requirements. Greg Fitchitt, Westfield The Urban Land Institute, NAIOP, The Urban Land Institute, NAIOP and Corporation Building Industry Association and Building Industry Association and San San Diego Housing Federation Diego Housing Federation have been should be added to the list of added to the list of stakeholders in stakeholders. Appendix A, on page 28, under “Interest Groups”. Joe LaCava, La Jolla Community The Pacific Beach Planning Group Pacific Beach Planning Group and La Planning Association and La Jolla Community Planning Jolla Community Planning Association Association should be added to the have been added to the list of list of stakeholders. stakeholders in Appendix A, on pages 26 and 27, under “Community Groups”. Joe LaCava, La Jolla Community Libraries within the Corridor should “Libraries within the Corridor” has been Planning Association be added as places to post public added on page 18, under the 2nd bullet information about the project. point. Joe LaCava, La Jolla Community The title of section 3 should be The first two bullets of Section 3.0 on Planning Association changed from “Key Information page 11 are more goal-oriented but the About the Project” to “Goals for the last three bullets are more factual in Project.” nature. The title of Section 3.0 has been revised to “Key Information and Goals for the Project”.

Daniel Allen, La Jolla Resident Several of the employers listed in This comment has been noted. the Corridor are outside of the Corridor. SANDAG should consider whether these employers would really be users of the system if they are so far away.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 37

Commenter Comment Response Evan McLaughlin, San Diego- The requirements of CEQA should A list of federal/state requirements for Imperial Counties Labor Council be clearly stated in the plan. public involvement under both NEPA/CEQA are outlined on page 6, under Section 1.4.

Evan McLaughlin, San Diego- Employee groups (labor unions) San Diego-Imperial Counties Labor Imperial Counties Labor Council should be added to the list of Council has been added to the list of stakeholders, since many of these stakeholders in Appendix A, on page 28, people will be the ones using the under “Labor”. transit system. Daniel Allen, La Jolla Resident In Section 3, La Jolla should be La Jolla has been added to the list of area listed as a “Visitor Serving Center.” attractions under the first bullet point on page 11. Rob Hutsel, San Diego River The Sports Arena should be added The San Diego Sports Arena has been Park Foundation to the list of stakeholders. added to the list of stakeholders in Appendix A, on page 28, under “Employers”. Joe La Cava, La Jolla Some thought should be given to On page 25, Section 4.3.7, outlines the Community Planning Association how you will assess the measures necessary to gauge the effectiveness of the plan. effectiveness of the plan. Rob Hutsel, San Diego River In Appendix B, the times of the The frequency of the Project Working Park Foundation Project Working Group meetings Group meetings has been corrected to 1st are listed incorrectly. Wednesday of the month at 3:30 p.m. in Appendix B.

Brian Gregory, UCSD Should the Coastal Commission be This comment has been noted and this listed as a stakeholder in the will be addressed in a separate Agency document? Coordination Plan. Brian Gregory, UCSD On Page 11, UCSD’s student The figure for UCSD’s student population population should be listed as has been corrected to 28,000 on page 10. 28,000. Brian Gregory, UCSD On page 14, you mention that you This comment has been noted and would like to achieve a 10 percent SANDAG will add the baseline figure of increase in Web site hits. It would 2,380 for Web site hits on page 13. be helpful to know the baseline figure.

Brian Gregory, UCSD MCAS Miramar should be added to MCAS Miramar has been added to the list the stakeholder list. of stakeholders in Appendix A, on page 28, under “Military”.

Brian Gregory, UCSD On Page 17, UCSD and UCSD UCSD and UCSD Thornton Hospital have Thornton Hospital should be listed been listed separately, on page 16. separately.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 38

Commenter Comment Response Brian Gregory, UCSD Under Employers, I would propose References to UCSD have been corrected to standardize how UCSD is in the list of stakeholders in Appendix A, referenced, by eliminating UCSD, on page 28, under “Employers”. Government and Community Relations, Student Human Relations; add UCSD and leave remaining UCSD Thornton Hospital.

William Beck, UCPG Suggestion to add HOAs in La Jolla These HOAs have been added to the list Colony: La Florentine, Casa Bella, of stakeholders in Appendix A, on page Avanti, Toscana, Andria, Capri, 29, under “Neighborhoods/Residential”. Valentia, Villas

Rob Hutsel, San Diego River Suggestion to include Mission Mission Valley has been added to the list Park Foundation Valley in references to stakeholder of Mid-Coast Corridor Communities in groups, media, environmental Section 2.1, page 9. organizations for the Project. Mission Valley Community Planning Group and Mission Valley Preserve have been added to the list for stakeholder briefings in Section 4.3.1 on page 15.

Mission Valley Preserve has been added to the stakeholders list in Appendix A on page 28.

Mission Valley News & Views has been added to the media list in Appendix D on page 35. Rob Hutsel, San Diego River Suggestion to remove repeated Repeated comment removed. Park Foundation comment in Appendix E and correct Organization name corrected to “San organization name to “San Diego Diego River Park Foundation” in Section River Park Foundation” in Section 4.3.1 on page 15. 4.3.1 on page 15. Ann Van Leer, Land Suggestion to add a statement in Strategy addressing this added to Section Conservation Brokerage the plan addressing coordination 4.2 on page 14. with MTS on how the Project will be integrated into the MTS network.

Evan McLaughlin, San Diego- Suggestion to add UCSD Guardian UCSD Guardian was included in Imperial Counties Labor Council to the media list in Appendix D. Appendix D on page 35.

MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 23, 2010 39

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-12 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

2010 TransNet PLAN OF FINANCE UPDATE File Number: 1500100

Introduction Recommendation

The TransNet Plan of Finance is updated on an The Transportation Committee recommends annual basis, or more frequently as that the Board of Directors (1) approve the circumstances arise. The Board of Directors 2010 TransNet Plan of Finance update, which approved the last Plan of Finance update in incorporates the proposed projects in the March 2009. During its meetings in May and revised Robust scenario (Attachment 4); July, the Transportation Committee reviewed (2) authorize the Executive Director to amend the major revenue, budget, and cash flow the FY 2011 SANDAG Budget to incorporate assumptions used in the 2010 TransNet Plan of the new capital projects; and (3) approve Finance update. The Committee also reviewed revision to the set-aside of federal and state two financial scenarios: (1) a Baseline scenario discretionary funding for the TransNet Early that addresses the near-term cash flow needs to Action Program from 94 percent to keep the existing TransNet Early Action Program 90 percent. These actions will support the (EAP) projects on their current schedules; and pending issuance of $300 million to (2) a Robust scenario that would advance to $350 million in long-term fixed rate debt. construction (prior to FY 2018) several projects currently under development in key EAP corridors and prepare new “shovel-ready” projects.

At its July 14, 2010, meeting, the TransNet Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee recommended approval of the 2010 Plan of Finance update, including the projects in the revised Robust scenario. At its July 16, 2010, meeting, the Transportation Committee also supported moving forward with the revised Robust scenario. This report includes a summary of the projects proposed to be advanced along with the additional bonding that would be needed during FY 2011 to meet projected cash flow needs.

Discussion

TransNet Early Action Program

The current TransNet EAP (Attachment 1) includes the development of the Interstate 15 (I-15) Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service; widening of State Route 76 (SR 76); State Route 52 (SR 52) widening and extension; implementation of the Mid-Coast Corridor, SuperLoop, and Mid-City Rapid transit projects; and Trolley vehicle and station upgrades along the Blue and Orange Lines. The EAP also includes environmental efforts for the Interstate 5 (I-5) North Coast Corridor, including high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, and environmental and design efforts for the Interstate 805 (I-805) corridor and implementation of the South Bay BRT service.

In July 2009 the Board of Directors approved programming $70.4 million of TransNet funds for the design of seven projects in the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) coastal rail corridor, design of HOV lanes in the I-5 North Coast corridor, and design of guideway, a direct-access ramp and station, and HOV lanes on I-805 and along SR 94 to support the South Bay BRT service. The objective was to replenish the number of “shovel-ready” projects, to enable the region to capitalize on future funding opportunities.

Analysis of 2010 Plan of Finance Update

The last Plan of Finance update approved in March 2009 enabled SANDAG to meet the near-term cash flow needs of the TransNet EAP and the Board’s objectives to make early progress on constructing major corridor projects and to develop the next list of ready-to-go projects. The 2009 update enabled completion of all EAP construction projects by FY 2016. As part of the 2010 Plan of Finance update, staff has evaluated a Baseline scenario that would keep all existing EAP projects on their current schedules and an additional scenario that would advance several additional projects in the EAP corridors. More details about the major assumptions used for the 2010 update are provided in Attachment 3, which includes a summary of projected sales tax revenues, state and federal matching revenues, program costs, and the proposed revision to cost assumptions for the I-5 North Coast Corridor (discussed with the Transportation Committee on July 2).

With the 2010 update, we have continued to see declines in construction costs, which have led to significantly lower bid prices on several key EAP project construction contracts. In addition to cost adjustments to the current EAP projects, these trends have led to a substantial revision to the cost escalation assumptions for this 2010 Plan of Finance update and present the Board with a unique opportunity.

The decline in project costs has helped offset the reduction in sales tax revenue. The chart shown in Attachment 2 indexes the costs and revenues to 2005 and tracks their cumulative growth rates through 2017. In addition to these recent trends (costs falling more rapidly than revenues), the chart shows that staff is expecting the cumulative rate of growth in sales tax revenue to outpace the increase in construction costs. This general trend (revenues rising faster than costs) is not unusual coming out of a recession as price pressures are kept at bay while the economy struggles to put idle resources back to work and get back above prerecession levels of economic production and output. The chart suggests that for a short period of time (about five years) the purchasing power of the TransNet program would increase, providing an opportunity to advance the planning and construction schedule of additional projects without jeopardizing the financial feasibility of the remaining projects.

Baseline and Revised Robust Scenarios

Working with our financial advisor, staff has evaluated two Plan of Finance scenarios – a Baseline scenario and a revised Robust scenario:

2 Baseline Scenario – The Baseline scenario evaluated in the 2010 Plan of Finance update would enable the current EAP projects to be completed by FY 2016 (same as 2009 update). To meet near-term cash flow needs for the Baseline scenario, SANDAG would need to obtain bond financing of approximately $100 million-$110 million in FY 2012 and $160 million-$170 million in FY 2014. The program balance at the end of the 40-year program is projected to be approximately $400 million (in 2009 dollars). For comparison purposes, the 2009 Plan of Finance update projected a negative cash flow would occur in FY 2036, resulting in the assumption that $1.3 billion in additional funding (in 2008 dollars) would need to be identified to keep the 40-year TransNet program whole.

The substantial decline in construction costs, as reflected in the 2010 Plan of Finance update, presents a unique opportunity. Based on the analysis to date, the TransNet program would have the capacity to advance additional EAP projects to construction, while keeping the 40-year program whole (without the need to identify additional matching funds in the future).

Revised Robust Scenario – Staff also has evaluated a revised “Robust” scenario, which would advance additional projects to construction, as well as prepare the next list of “shovel-ready” projects – allowing the region to capitalize on opportunities presented by the current financial and construction market conditions. The additional projects included in this scenario continue to focus on the approved EAP corridors, and they reflect the Board’s priorities for project readiness – putting resources on projects that are “ready to go” to construction, funding the next phase of work for corridor projects the region has started, and thinking longer-term by starting environmental and design work for future opportunities. The proposed projects also are consistent with the current 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), reflecting progress on the projects the RTP anticipated would be completed by the interim year 2020.

Like the Baseline, the revised Robust scenario would enable the current EAP projects to be completed by FY 2016. This scenario also would advance to construction several projects under development in the LOSSAN rail corridor and allow for the completion of the environmental phases and design of other LOSSAN corridor projects. Also proposed would be various construction projects in the I-15 Corridor to support the I-15 BRT service and replacement of the Nordahl Bridge; construction of HOV lanes in the I-805 Corridor (North and South segments); and construction of HOV lanes and related improvements in the I-5 North Coast Corridor (Attachment 4).

To take advantage of the low cost of construction marketplace, the revised Robust scenario would advance nearly $1.2 billion in project costs prior to FY 2018 in comparison with the Baseline scenario. To meet near-term cash flow needs for this revised Robust scenario, SANDAG would need to obtain bond financing of approximately $300 million-$350 million in FY 2011 and $900 million- $950 million in FY 2013. The analysis shows that at the end of the 40 years, the TransNet program would be kept whole, demonstrating that all the Major Corridor projects included in the Extension Ordinance could be completed by the program’s end.

3 Sensitivity Analysis for I-5 North Coast Corridor – As discussed with the Transportation Committee on July 2, when compared with other potential EAP projects that could be advanced to construction, the I-5 North Coast Corridor project has significant risks that could impact the project delivery schedule; these schedule risks include the improvements needed across multiple coastal lagoons and securing necessary permits from the California Coastal Commission. Caltrans released the draft environmental document for the I-5 North Coast Corridor on July 9, and the construction schedule should be better detailed once the environmental phase is complete. While there are potential risks as the project moves through the environmental process, with funding and permits it is estimated the initial two HOV lane construction phase could be opened to the public by 2014. In addition to serving commuter and local trips in the region, the I-5 corridor is a lifeline for the Southern California/Baja California region, providing a critical link for commercial vehicles traveling between the U.S./Mexico border area and the greater Los Angeles basin.

To identify the possible effects a schedule delay could have on near-term financing needs, staff conducted a sensitivity analysis that assumes completion of construction of the I-5 North Coast Corridor HOV lanes and related improvements after FY 2018. This analysis shows that a project schedule delay would reduce the FY 2011 borrowing need from $300 million-$350 million to $250 million-$300 million. To take advantage of historically low fixed rate borrowing costs and current construction market conditions, staff recommends sizing the FY 2011 bond issuance in the $300 million-$350 million range. If delays to project schedules occur that would affect the cash flow assumed in the 2010 Plan of Finance update, additional design projects could be advanced similar to the Board’s action in July 2009 to prepare the next round of ready-to-go projects. In addition, the annual updates to the Plan of Finance provide the opportunity to review the ongoing project budget and cash flow needs and adjust any future financing plans. A memorandum from the PFM Group (the agency’s financial advisor), which outlines the proposed debt issuance recommendation, is included as Attachment 5.

ITOC Comments – At its June 28, 2010, meeting, the ITOC supported moving forward with the Robust scenario, noting that the current financial and construction market conditions provided a unique opportunity to advance projects at lower costs. The ITOC focused its comments on the capacity for project delivery; the Committee requested that SANDAG and Caltrans evaluate using design-build, design-sequencing, and private sector staffing as necessary to help deliver projects under the aggressive delivery schedules for the Robust scenario. SANDAG and Caltrans District 11 have had a long history of using consultants in the development of major TransNet projects and have had experience with alternative project delivery methods, including the use of design sequencing on the I-15 and SR 76 corridors. Both agencies are continuing to work together to evaluate which TransNet projects would make good design-build candidates. At its July 14, 2010, meeting, the ITOC recommended approval of the 2010 TransNet Plan of Finance to the Transportation Committee and Board of Directors.

4 Next Steps

Upon Board of Directors action on the 2010 Plan of Finance update, staff would amend the FY 2011 Budget to incorporate the new capital projects in the revised Robust scenario, including detailing the multiyear revenues, expenses, and schedule by phase. Draft and final bond documents would be presented to the ITOC, Transportation Committee, and Board of Directors in the fall to enable a bond issuance by the end of the calendar year. In addition, an amendment to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program would be brought to the ITOC and Transportation Committee in the fall to program the TransNet funding and federal and state matching funds for the approved projects.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. TransNet Early Action Projects - May 2010 (map) 2. Comparison of TransNet Revenues and Construction Index – Cumulative Escalation Indexed to FY 2005 3. 2010 TransNet Plan of Finance Update – Major Assumptions 4. TransNet Early Action Program Baseline and Revised Robust Scenarios 5. Memorandum dated July 13, 2010 from SANDAG Financial Advisor

Key Staff Contacts: Kim Kawada, (619) 699-6994, [email protected] Richard Chavez, (619) 699-6989, [email protected] Marney Cox, (619) 699-1930, [email protected]

5 Attachment 1

EARLY ACTION PROJECTS May 2010 www.KeepSanDiegoMoving.com

SR 76: Widen highway

SR 52: Camp Pendleton Widen and extend highway 1

Mid-Coast: Transit: Old Town-UCSD Transit: UTC SuperLoop

I-15: HOV/Express Lanes Transit: Escondido-Downtown Transit: Escondido-Sorrento Valley

I-805: 7 HOV/Express Lanes Transit: Otay-Downtown 6 Transit: Otay-Sorrento Valley

North Coast: I-5 HOV/Express Lanes Coastal rail double-tracking 4 SPRINTER: Oceanside-Escondido light rail

County Blue and Orange Line Trolley: of Low-ﬂoor vehicles San Diego Station upgrades 4 Mid-City: Transit: Downtown-SDSU 3 Goods Movement: 5 South Line rail upgrades 2 2 SR 905 3 4

Highway Projects 9 Completed 8 Under Construction 8 Preliminary Engineering

Transit Projects 5 Completed Under Construction Preliminary Engineering 10 Light Rail Line

8 10

6 Attachment 2

Comparison of TransNet Revenues and Construction Index Cumulative Escalation Indexed to FY2005 30%

20%

Actual Projected 10%

-10%

-20%

-30% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Construction Index TransNet Revenues

7 Attachment 3

2010 TransNet Plan of Finance Update Major Assumptions

Projected Sales Tax Revenues – The recession that began in December 2007 resulted in downward trends in taxable retail sales from which TransNet revenues are derived. In January 2010, the Board of Directors approved a 10 percent reduction to the FY 2010 TransNet sales tax revenue estimates, compared to actual FY 2009 receipts, making it the third year in a row of revenue declines. For FY 2011, a 1.87 percent increase in TransNet revenue is projected.

SANDAG staff expects a modest economic recovery over the next few years, with net job growth of 0.5 percent to 1.0 percent (an increase of approximately 6,000 to 12,000 local jobs). The unemployment rate is expected to begin to decline slowly beginning in the second quarter of 2010, reducing by one percentage point by the end of 2010. The anticipated slow rate of economic growth nationally and locally during the year, setting the pace of the recovery for the next few years, is reflected in our local sales tax revenue forecasts. During FY 2015, our sales tax revenue estimates are expected to exceed the level reached during 2007 prior to the start of the recession.

The overall revenue growth rates assumed in the 2009 and 2010 Plan of Finance updates are summarized in Table 1, below.

Table 1. Plan of Finance (POF) – Projected TransNet Revenue Annual Rates of Change, FY 2009 through FY 2048 Revenue FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY 2018- Growth 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 FY 2048 Rate 2009 POF -9.00% 2.00% 3.50% 3.50% 5.40% 4.50% 6.30% 6.37% 5.54% 4.91% to 6.43% 2010 POF -9.17% -10.00% 1.87% 3.64% 5.39% 8.00% 6.70% 5.18% 4.84% 3.83% to update (actual) 5.18%

State and Federal Matching Revenues – The amount of state and federal funds assumed for the Early Action Program (EAP) are based on committed funds to date, including the current Regional Transportation Improvement Program period (FY 2009 to FY 2013). For future years, SANDAG estimated federal, state, and local transportation funds based on historic experience. The 2010 Plan of Finance revenue assumptions for future years are consistent with the draft 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (2050 RTP) revenue estimates that are currently under development.

Current Board policy directs 94 percent of all discretionary state and federal formula funds1 to support the TransNet EAP, and the remaining 6 percent of these funds for non-EAP projects, such as the transportation demand management (TDM) and transportation systems management (TSM) programs.

1 These revenue sources include the State Transportation Improvement Program, Proposition 1B State-Local Partnership Program, Regional Surface Transportation Program, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funding program. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 funding also has been dedicated to fund EAP projects.

8 As required by Senate Bill 375 (Steinberg, 2008), SANDAG must develop a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as part of the 2050 RTP. The SCS must meet certain greenhouse gas emission targets established by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), or SANDAG must prepare an Alternative Planning Strategy to meet the CARB targets. The initial greenhouse gas target-setting scenarios tested to date have shown that TDM and TSM measures could help reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the region. With the 2010 Plan of Finance update, staff evaluated other funding ratios that could continue to provide sufficient funds to support the TransNet EAP as well as provide opportunities to advance the region’s TDM and TSM programs. Staff recommends revising the commitment of discretionary state and federal funds for the TransNet program from 94 percent to 90 percent, thereby increasing the state and federal funds available for the region’s TDM and TSM programs. The draft 2010 Plan of Finance assumes 90 percent of all discretionary state and federal revenues for the TransNet program.

Program Costs – For TransNet EAP projects, SANDAG works with our project partners to update the Capital Improvement Program project costs and schedules as part of the annual SANDAG Budget. These revised and more detailed costs and schedules are used for the EAP projects, while the non-EAP project costs use the rates of change in costs shown below in Table 2. With the approval of the FY 2011 Budget in May 2010, the Board of Directors approved several budget changes, which are reflected in this year’s Plan of Finance update.

After a period of unprecedented high rates of growth in construction costs from 2004 to 2007, we have seen an equally unprecedented decline in construction costs during the last two years (see Caltrans Construction Index chart below). This decline has resulted in lower costs for several EAP projects. Going forward, additional declines in construction costs are anticipated during FY 2011, and then costs are expected to begin to escalate and return to typical annual escalation rates of 3 percent by FY 2015. The escalation rates assumed in the 2009 and 2010 Plan of Finance updates are shown in Table 2, below:

Table 2. Plan of Finance (POF) – Projected TransNet Construction Costs Annual Rates of Change, FY 2009 through FY 2048 Construction FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY 2018- Escalation 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 FY 2048 Rate 2009 POF -3.00% 0.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 2010 POF --- -8.00% -1.00% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% update

Proposed Revision to Cost Assumptions for the I-5 North Coast Corridor – Except for construction projects currently underway, costs for typical TransNet projects are based on the original budget contained in the TransNet Extension Ordinance, updated to current year dollars, and then escalated to the year of construction based on projected construction escalation rates. As a project progresses from planning and environmental stages to preliminary engineering and design, cost estimates are updated as additional information is gathered and the project’s scope is refined. These updated estimates are evaluated as part of the annual budget and Plan of Finance updates.

At the June 18 Transportation Committee meeting, Caltrans provided a status report on the I-5 North Coast Corridor project, which extends 27 miles from La Jolla Village Drive in San Diego to Vandegrift Boulevard in Oceanside. Caltrans is finalizing the project’s draft environmental document and expects to release it in early July. The draft document includes four possible build alternatives, all of which would include the construction of a four-Managed Lane (ML) facility in the median of I-5. The alternatives differ in their assumptions for additional general purpose lane widening, and whether they include either a concrete barrier separating the ML from the general purpose lanes or a four-foot painted buffer separation.2

For the I-5 North Coast Corridor, the TransNet Extension Ordinance assumed a $1.2 billion cost (in 2002 dollars), which when escalated to 2009 would result in a $1.7 billion cost estimate. As part of the environmental phase, Caltrans has prepared updated project cost estimates, and due to the complexity of the proposed improvements in the coastal corridor, the updated estimates are significantly higher than the original 2002 estimates. The four build alternatives range between $3.3 billion and $4.4 billion in estimated costs. To reflect these more up-to-date estimates in the 2010 Plan of Finance, staff proposes to assume a $3.3 billion cost estimate for the I-5 North Coast Corridor project, which is consistent with the lowest cost of the four build alternatives included in the draft environmental document. This higher project cost estimate has been assumed in both the Baseline and revised Robust scenarios. The initial evaluation shows that the higher estimate would not significantly impact the affordability of the overall TransNet program.

2 The four alternatives include: (1) 8 general purpose lanes plus 4 buffer-separated 4 ML; (2) 8 general purpose lanes plus 4 barrier-separated ML; (3) 10 general purpose lanes plus 4 buffer-separated 4 ML; and (4) 10 general purpose lanes plus 4 barrier-separated ML.

10 Caltrans Construction Index (12-Month Average)

350

325

300

275

250

225

200

175

150

125

11 TransNet Early Action Program ($thousands) Attachment 4 Baseline and Revised Robust Scenarios

Revised Baseline Robust Increase

1 I-15 2 I-15 South 4ML $361,937 $361,937 $0 3 I-15 Middle 4ML $471,115 $471,115 $0 4 I-15 North 4ML $215,427 $215,427 $0 5 I-15 FasTrak® $24,122 $24,122 $0 I-15 BRT Stations - Rancho Bernardo, Sabre 6 Springs, Del Lago $46,170 $46,170 $0 7 I-15 Mira Mesa DAR & BRT Station $79,557 $79,557 $0 8 I-15 Mid-City In-Line BRT Stations $21,631 $21,631 $0 9 I-15 BRT Vehicles & Planning $34,608 $34,608 $0 10 Downtown Stations $9,154 $9,154 $0 11 Nordahl Bridge Replacement $13,000 $37,042 $24,042 12 Mira Mesa Blvd Queue Jumpers $0 $14,000 $14,000 13 I-15 BRT Parking Structures $0 $39,000 $39,000 14 BRT Maintenance Facility $0 $50,900 $50,900 15 BRT Layover Facility $0 $16,000 $16,000 16 $1,276,721 $1,420,663 $143,942 17 18 I-805 19 I-805 South 4ML $31,516 $31,516 $0 20 I-805 North 4ML $9,424 $9,424 $0 21 South Bay BRT $97,108 $97,108 $0 22 I-805 2HOV/Carroll Cyn DAR $86,743 $86,743 $0 23 Bus on Shoulder $22,500 $22,500 $0 24 SR 94 2HOV (I-5 to I-805) $11,000 $11,000 $0 25 BRT Guideway (Heritage to I-805) $2,800 $2,800 $0 26 I-805 South 2HOV $15,000 $200,000 $185,000 27 I-805 North 2HOV $16,000 $165,000 $149,000 28 $292,091 $626,091 $334,000 29 30 I-5 South/ SR 94/ SR 125 31 Mid-Coast LRT $1,246,292 $1,246,292 $0 32 SuperLoop Transit $36,349 $36,349 $0 33 Blue-Orange Line PM $23,019 $23,019 $0 34 Blue Line Crossovers $29,270 $29,270 $0 35 Blue Line Stations $64,400 $64,400 $0 36 Blue Line New Rail $56,600 $56,600 $0 37 Blue Line Slope Repair $2,725 $2,725 $0 38 Blue Line Substation Rehab $1,390 $1,390 $0 39 Blue-Orange Line Platform Upgrades $43,290 $43,290 $0 40 Blue-Orange Line New Vehicles $233,000 $233,000 $0 41 SR 94/ SR 125 South to East Connector $0 $1,000 $1,000 42 $1,736,335 $1,737,335 $1,000 43

12 July 9, 2010 TransNet Early Action Program ($thousands) Baseline and Revised Robust Scenarios

Revised 44 I-5 North Baseline Robust Increase 45 I-5 North Coast 4ML $57,282 $57,282 $0 46 I-5 2HOV/Lomas Interchange $71,759 $71,759 $0 47 I-5 2HOV (Manchester to SR 78) $32,500 $32,500 $0 48 I-5 Soundwalls (Manchester to SR 78) $0 $41,500 $41,500 49 I-5 McKinnon Bridge Replacement $0 $12,000 $12,000 50 I-5 2HOV (Manchester to SR 78) $0 $216,000 $216,000 51 Fiber Optic Line $0 $13,500 $13,500 52 I-5 San Elijo Bridge $0 $180,500 $180,500 53 $161,541 $625,041 $463,500 54 55 COASTER/LOSSAN 56 Sorrento-Miramar (Phase 1) $23,700 $23,700 $0 57 Oceanside Stub Tracks $3,058 $18,000 $14,942 58 Carlsbad Double Track $1,600 $1,900 $300 59 Poinsettia Run-Through $1,700 $15,500 $13,800 60 Cardiff - Craven (San Elijo) $4,600 $93,200 $88,600 61 Sorrento Valley Double Track $3,700 $33,700 $30,000 62 Tecolote Crossovers $9,400 $10,200 $800 63 Eastbrook to Shell Double Track $0 $7,000 $7,000 64 Carlsbad Village Double Track $0 $6,000 $6,000 65 Elvira to Morena Double Track $0 $80,000 $80,000 66 Sorrento-Miramar (Phase 2) $0 $5,000 $5,000 67 San Dieguito Double Track $0 $5,000 $5,000 68 LOSSAN PE $0 $1,000 $1,000 69 $47,758 $300,200 $252,442 70 71 SR 52 72 SR 52 Widening (I-15 to Mast) $44,425 $44,425 $0 73 SR 52 Extension $520,529 $520,529 $0 74 $564,954 $564,954 $0 75 SR 78 76 SPRINTER $65,870 $65,870 $0 77 78 SR 76 79 SR 76 Middle $171,359 $171,359 $0 80 SR 76 East $201,549 $201,549 $0 81 $372,908 $372,908 $0 82 Mid-City 83 Mid-City Rapid $44,526 $44,526 $0 84 85 Goods Movement 86 San Ysidro Yard $40,460 $40,460 $0 87 South Line Improvements $107,030 $107,030 $0 88 SR 905 (I-805 to Britannia) $77,646 $77,646 $0 89 $225,136 $225,136 $0 90 91 TOTAL $4,787,839 $5,982,723 $1,194,884

13 July 9, 2010

Attachment 5

Suite 710 949 721-9422 660 Newport Center Drive 949 721-9437 fax Newport Beach, CA www.pfm.com Public Financial Management, Inc. 92660 PFM Asset Management LLC PFM Advisors July 13, 2010

Memorandum

To: SANDAG Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC), Transportation Committee, and Board of Directors From: Keith D. Curry, Public Financial Management Re: Financial Plan and Next Financing

Public Financial Management (“PFM”) has worked with SANDAG staff to prepare the annual update for the TransNet Extension Plan of Finance. For the past several months, PFM and SANDAG staffs have been working to optimize SANDAG’s financing strategy to minimize program borrowing costs while maximizing the timing and advancement of TransNet Early Action Program (EAP) projects.

Background With the initial planning of the TransNet Extension program, PFM created a multi-functional financial planning model that allows SANDAG to project its project delivery requirements, along with its funding availability constraints to optimize its financing strategy. The TransNet Extension model allows staff to modify assumptions to reflect changing project delivery readiness, increased or decreased project cost estimates, and changes in revenue trends and interest rates. Debt issuances are sized to meet the upcoming two years of construction and project activity. This is done to optimize bond sizing, reduce costs of issuance, and to best comply with Federal requirements related to issuance of debt.

Current Debt Portfolio In April of 2008, SANDAG issued $600 million in variable rate demand bonds, and by using interest rate swaps, established a “synthetic fixed” cost of funds of 3.681%. This borrowing enabled SANDAG to implement its “Early Action” Program and to send out for bid many projects in a favorable construction cost environment, thereby partially offsetting the impact of lower sales tax revenues. SANDAG staff indicates the agency is expected to fully expend its 2008 bond proceeds during the upcoming fiscal year. As of July 1st, the agency has approximately $150 million of bond proceeds from its previous issuance; however the agency’s short-term capital requests far exceed the amount available. Therefore, it is time to consider a second TransNet Extension borrowing.

Upcoming Issuance A “Robust” scenario, which would advance additional TransNet projects to construction as well as prepare the next list of shovel-ready projects, is being recommended. After careful review of project delivery timetables and project readiness, it appears that a need to borrow between $300-350 million in the current fiscal year (FY 2011) exists.

One of the most significant changes to the municipal bond market over the past year and half has been the introduction of the Build America Bonds (“BABs”) in the municipal market. BABs provide state and local governments with a new method of financing capital projects with the aid of a federal subsidy. The subsidy was intended to ease the burden state and local governments began experiencing with the financial crisis. The BABs program allows states and local governments to issue an unlimited amount of taxable debt through December 31, 2010.

These bonds are intended to provide an additional source of market access to municipal issuers by expanding the current pool of U.S. municipal bond investors. The taxable market is a sizable global market driven by the underlying credit of its issuers, potentially making U.S. state and local government

14 SANDAG July 13, 2010 Page 2

bonds a desirable investment vehicle given their relative strength and stability versus global corporate issuers. BABs provide a way for large issuers to achieve potentially advantageous pricing versus traditional tax-exempt debt through a 35% subsidy paid by the U.S. Treasury on the interest due on the bonds in the form of a direct subsidy to the issuer or a tax credit to the investor. The BABs program is available for SANDAG to use if its pricing is advantageous at the time of issuance.

Due to the successful 2008 financing, and receipt of additional federal and state funds, SANDAG has been able to accumulate substantial cash balances. This cash also is programmed for project needs. While it may be possible to delay the proposed 2010 financing one year by fully depleting SANDAG’s cash, we believe this is a good time to borrow for the following reasons:

1. Opportunities exist in the current financial markets to bring SANDAG’s all-in-cost of borrowing to below 4.00%. SANDAG, with the help of its financial advisor and underwriting pool have come up with a hybrid structure for the upcoming issuance using tax-exempt fixed rate bonds to capture savings on the short-end of the yield curve, and federal taxable BABs to capture savings on the long-end of the yield curve:

a. Tax- exempt fixed rates have rarely been lower historically since 1993. (Please see Appendix A for graph)

b. The Federal BABs program allows SANDAG to sell taxable bonds and receive a Federal subsidy equal to 35% of the debt service payment. While the relationship of taxable BABs vs. tax exempt bonds will be monitored right up to the pricing date, in today’s market, BABs are expected to provide 55 basis points of benefit to SANDAG. This amounts to an annual savings of $1.8 million compared to tax exempt bonds. It is important to note that the Federal subsidy level is likely to fall to 31% in calendar year 2011 and to even lower levels in subsequent years. Therefore, in order to take advantage of the maximum Federal subsidy, the transaction must close before December 31, 2010.

2. When coupled with the 2008 issue, SANDAG will have hedged the cost of $900 million of its debt program or 38% of its projected borrowing (assuming a $300 million debt issuance in 2010). This makes SANDAG less vulnerable to rising interest rates while reducing construction cost risk by funding projects now, during a period of low inflation.

3. Issuing fixed rate debt would be seen favorable by rating agencies, as it would diversify SANDAG’s debt portfolio, which includes approximately $600 million in variable rate demand bonds and a $100 million commercial paper program. It would assist in maintaining SANDAG’s strong credit rating of AAA by S&P and Aa1 by Moody’s.

4. Borrowing in 2010 allows an additional year of debt amortization, and thus slightly reduces the cash flow impact on the agency.

SANDAG's procurement office has recently completed a process to designate a pool of investment banking firms to serve SANDAG in a variety of financings in the upcoming years. These types of financings include SANDAG’s commercial paper program, senior manager and co-managers of typical bond issuances, as well as innovative financings.

With the Board of Directors concurrence, a schedule has been identified to bring final bond documents through the ITOC and Transportation Committee structure, culminating with Board of Directors approval in October, 2010 and bond pricing and closing in November.

15 SANDAG July 13, 2010 Page 3

Recommendation Accordingly, PFM recommends that SANDAG proceed to sell approximately $300-350 million in senior lien TransNet sales tax revenue bonds in 2010. We further recommend that the hybrid structure of BABs and tax-exempt alternatives continue to be evaluated and the final choice be made immediately prior to bond pricing based on relative value to SANDAG.

This recommendation allows your ongoing TransNet Extension program to remain fully funded over the next two years.

Should you have any questions regarding this recommendation, please do not hesitate to call.

SANDAG, July 13, 2010, Appendix A

July 16, 2010

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-13 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

2050 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: File Number 3100500 PLAN PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Introduction Recommendation

As part of the development of a Regional The Transportation Committee recommends Transportation Plan (RTP), performance measures, that the Board of Directors approve the or indicators, are used to evaluate different 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) multimodal transportation network alternatives performance measures in substantially the against one another. This assists the Board of same form as attached to this report Directors in selecting a preferred revenue (Attachments 1-2). constrained network for the RTP. The proposed plan performance measures for the 2050 RTP have been developed with the input from an ad hoc working group known as the Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria Ad Hoc Working Group. In addition, the Transportation Committee reviewed and provided input at meetings in May and June, and on June 18, 2010, it recommended approval of the revised set of performance measures (Attachments 1 and 2). This report summarizes the proposed plan performance measures, highlighting where key revisions have been made to the measures used in the development of the 2030 RTP.

Discussion

Working Group and Transportation Committee Review

The Executive Director and Chair of the Board of Directors established the Transportation Project Evaluation Criteria Ad Hoc Working Group (TPEC) to provide input on transportation project evaluation criteria and plan performance measures, which will support the goals and objectives for the 2050 RTP. The TPEC is composed of representatives from a number of standing SANDAG working groups, including the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group (BPWG), Cities/Counties Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC), Regional Planning Stakeholders Working Group (SWG), Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG), and Tribal Transportation Technical Working Group. Partner agency representatives include Caltrans, Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), North County Transit District (NCTD), Port of San Diego, and San Diego County Regional Airport Authority. The TPEC met twice in March and April to provide input on the draft plan performance measures.

In addition, SANDAG staff has made presentations to other SANDAG working groups, including the BPWG, CTAC, San Diego Regional Traffic Engineers Council, Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association, SWG, and TWG, as well as the TransNet Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee.

Staff presented the 2050 RTP draft plan performance measures to the Transportation Committee for discussion at its May 21, 2010, meeting. Staff incorporated input from the May 21st meeting and presented the revised performance measures to the Transportation Committee on June 18, 2010. At this meeting, the Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors approve the 2050 RTP plan performance measures.

Plan Performance Measures – Process

The Board of Directors established six policy goals for the 2050 RTP. These goals are structured into two overarching themes: Quality of Travel & Livability and Sustainability. Quality of Travel & Livability relates to how the transportation system functions from the individual customer perspective (System Preservation & Safety, Mobility, and Reliability). Sustainability relates to making progress simultaneously in each of the Three “Es” (Prosperous Economy, Healthy Environment, and Social Equity) from a regional perspective. The plan performance measures are grouped within each of the six policy goals for the 2050 RTP.

The Board of Directors discussed the 2050 RTP vision, goals, and policy objectives at its Board Policy meetings in September and December 2009. The Board’s discussion highlighted the interconnectedness of the issues related to achieving the goals and the importance of all six goals in achieving the vision for the 2050 RTP. At its June 11, 2010, Policy meeting, the Board again discussed the 2050 RTP goals and reconfirmed their collective importance.

The application of the RTP performance measures is two-fold. First, the plan performance measures will serve as an aid for decision makers to select a preferred transportation network alternative for the 2050 RTP revenue-constrained funding scenario, among options that will be presented to the Transportation Committee and the Board of Directors. Second, plan performance measures will be used to compare the performance of the preferred revenue-constrained transportation network to other transportation network scenarios such as a current, future no build, and land use alternative and to measure how well the 2050 RTP is projected to perform.

Plan Performance Measures – Existing and New Measures

The plan performance measures are included in Attachment 1 and the methodology to estimate those indicators is included in Attachment 2. Revisions have been made to the current 2030 RTP performance measures to incorporate new data sources, technical tools, and analysis, and to coordinate and maintain consistency with other SANDAG plans and/or programs, and partner agencies.

Several new plan performance measures are proposed to address policy objectives discussed by the Board of Directors and input from stakeholders. These include:

• Annual projected number of bicycle/pedestrian injury/fatal collisions per capita • Percent of transportation investments toward maintenance and rehabilitation and toward operational improvements • Number of interregional transit routes by service type • Network enhancements by freight mode

2 • Net benefits, return on investment, and economic impacts (note that the methodology to estimate these performance measures will be developed in the fall of 2010) • Percent of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by travel speed (by mode) • Percent of total transit travel in congested conditions (peak period and all day) • Nonwork trip mode share (peak period and all day) including bike/walk • Total bike and walk trips

• CO2 emissions per capita • Comparison of outcomes for environmental justice (EJ) and non-EJ communities for access to schools and the San Diego International Airport (within 30 minutes); and to healthcare, parks, and beaches (within 15 minutes). • Distribution of RTP expenditures per capita (EJ and non-EJ populations)

The plan performance measures have incorporated indicators from the Urban Area Transit Strategy. They also have incorporated additional EJ indicators in response to the Joint Certification Review of the Metropolitan San Diego Area Transportation Planning Process report prepared by the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration in 2008. The report recommended that “the next RTP update by SANDAG include appropriate measures and analysis of the burdens of regional transportation system investments and strategies for different socio-economic groups.” These new proposed performance measures were developed in conjunction with the environmental justice work effort underway through the Regional Planning SWG.

Next Steps

Pending the approval of the performance measures and the establishment of the unconstrained multimodal transportation network for the 2050 RTP (see Agenda Item No. 14), the performance measures would be used to aid decision makers in selecting a preferred transportation network alternative for the 2050 RTP revenue-constrained funding scenario from options that will be presented to the Transportation Committee and the Board of Directors in the fall of 2010.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. 2050 RTP Plan Performance Measures 2. Methodology to Estimate Performance Measures

Key Staff Contacts: Scott Strelecki, (619) 699-6954, [email protected]

3 2050 RTP Performance Measures Attachment 1

Goal Policy Objectives Potential Plan Performance Measure(s)

System Preservation & Safety Keep the region's transportation system in a good Annual projected number of vehicle injury/fatal collisions per state of repair The public's investment in transport- capita ation should be protected by main- Reduce bottlenecks and increase safety by Annual projected number of bicycle/pedestrian injury/fatal collisions per capita taining the transportation system. It is improving operations critical to preserve and ensure a safe Improve emergency preparedness within the Percent of transportation investments toward maintenance and rehabilitation regional transportation system. regional transportation system Percent of transportation investments toward operational improvements

Mobility Tailor transportation improvements to better Average work trip travel time (in minutes) connect people with jobs and other activities The transportation system should Average work trip travel speed by mode (in m.p.h.) provide for convenient travel options Provide convenient travel choices, including transit, Percent of work and higher education trips accessible in 30 for people and goods and maximize its intercity and high-speed trains, driving, ridesharing, minutes in peak periods by mode walking, and biking productivity. The system should reduce Percent of non work-related trips accessible in 15 minutes by both the time it takes to travel as well Preserve and expand options for regional freight mode as the total costs of travel. movement Travel time (by mode) in key travel corridors/ communities Increase the use of transit, ridesharing, walking, Peak-period mode share in key travel corridors/ communities and biking in major corridors and communities Out-of-pocket user costs per trip Provide transportation choices to better connect Number of interregional transit routes by service type the San Diego region with Mexico, neighboring Network enhancements by freight mode counties, and tribal nations

Prosperous Economy Maximize the economic benefits of transportation Net benefits (such as congestion management and enhanced investments The transportation system should play mobility) a significant role in raising the region's Enhance the goods movement system to support Return on investment standard of living. economic prosperity Economic impacts (such as jobs, wages, value of goods, and services produced in the region)

Note: Bold performance measures were used in the 2030 RTP and nonbold performance measures represent potential new measures. Performance measures that compare metrics of different modes include the following: auto, transit, and carpool unless otherwise noted.

4 2050 RTP Performance Measures Goal Policy Objectives Potential Plan Performance Measure(s)

Reliability Employ new technologies to make Percent of total auto travel in congested conditions (peak periods) travel more reliable and convenient The transportation system should be Percent of total auto travel in congested conditions (all day) reliable so that travelers can expect Daily vehicle delay per capita Manage the efficiency of the transport- Daily truck hours of delay relatively consistent travel times from ation system to improve traffic flow day-to-day for the same trip by Percent of VMT by travel speed (by mode) Percent of total transit travel in congested conditions (peak periods) mode(s). Percent of total transit travel in congested conditions (all day) Healthy Environment Develop transportation improvements Gross acres of constrained lands consumed for transit and highway that respect and enhance the environ- infrastructure The transportation system should ment On-road fuel consumption (all day) per capita lead to environmental sustainability Smog-forming pollutants (pounds/year) per capita and foster efficient development Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from Systemwide VMT (all day) per capita patterns that optimize travel, vehicles and continue to improve air quality in the region Transit passenger miles (all day) per capita housing, and employment choices Percent of peak-period trips within ½ mile of a transit stop and encourage future growth away Make transportation investments that Percent of daily trips within ½ mile of a transit stop from rural areas and closer to result in healthy and sustainable Work trip mode share (peak periods including bike/walk) existing and planned development. communities Work trip mode share (all day including bike/walk) Nonwork trip mode share (peak period including bike/walk) Nonwork trip mode share (all day including bike/walk) Total bike and walk trips

CO2 emissions per capita Social Equity Create equitable transportation Comparison of outcomes for EJ and non-EJ communities for the following opportunities for all populations indicators: The transportation system should be regardless of age, ability, race, Average travel time per person trip (in minutes) designed to provide an equitable ethnicity, or income Percent of work trips accessible in 30 minutes by mode level of transportation services for all Percent of homes within ½ mile of a transit stop populations. Ensure access to jobs, services, and recreation for populations with fewer Percent of population within 30 minutes: transportation choices – schools (higher education including vocational) – San Diego International Airport Percent of population within 15 minutes: – healthcare (hospitals, community clinics) – parks and beaches Distribution of RTP expenditures per capita

5 Attachment 2

METHODOLOGY TO ESTIMATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES

System Preservation & Safety—

(1) Annual projected number of vehicle injury/fatal collisions per capita = VMT by facility type (freeway, prime arterial, other) multiplied by basic average collision rate by facility type divided by total population

(2) Annual projected number of bicycle/pedestrian injury/fatal collisions per capita = bicycle/pedestrian trips multiplied by basic average collision rate divided by total population

(3) Percent of transportation investments toward maintenance and rehabilitation = sum of maintenance and rehabilitation transportation investments divided by all transportation investments

(4) Percent of transportation investments toward operational improvements = sum of operational improvement transportation investments divided by all transportation investments

Mobility–

(1) Average work trip travel time (all day) = work trip person-hours of travel divided by work trips (all day by mode: auto, transit, and carpool)

(2) Average work trip travel speed by mode (in m.p.h.) = work trip VMT divided by work trip person-hours of travel (peak period by mode: auto, transit, and carpool)

(3) Percent of work and higher education trips accessible in 30 minutes in peak periods by mode = work and college trips within 30 minutes divided by total work and college trips (by mode: auto, transit, and carpool)

(4) Percent of non work-related trips accessible in 15 minutes by mode = non work-related trips within 15 minutes divided by total non work trips (all day) (by mode: auto, transit, and carpool)

(5) Travel time (by mode) in key travel corridors/communities = work trip person-hours of travel divided by work trips (peak period by mode: auto, transit, and carpool) as applied to corridors/communities

(6) Peak-period mode share in key travel corridors/communities = peak mode share (auto, transit, and carpool) as applied to corridors/communities

(7) Out-of-pocket user costs per trip = total auto and transit costs divided by total auto and transit person trips respectively

(8) Number of interregional transit routes by service type = total number of interregional transit routes multiplied by weighting factor (Rail/BRT = 5, arterial rapid = 3, high frequency local = 2)

(9) Network enhancements by freight mode = part A: total sum of freight capacity acreage (for rail yards, port terminals, and ports of entry) and part B: total sum of freight capacity mileage (for rail mainline, highway connectors to terminals, and highway truck routes)

Prosperous Economy–

(1) Net benefits (such as congestion management and enhanced mobility) = TBD

(2) Return on investment = TBD

(3) Economic impacts (such as jobs, wages, and value of goods and services produced in the region) = data from the economic input/output model

Reliability–

(1) Percent of total auto travel in congested conditions (peak periods) = VMT at level of service (LOS) E and LOS F (volume/capacity > 0.85) divided by total VMT (peak periods)

(2) Percent of total auto travel in congested conditions (all day) = VMT at LOS E and LOS F (volume/capacity > 0.85) divided by total VMT (all day)

(3) Daily vehicle delay per capita = congested vehicle hours traveled (VHT) at LOS E and LOS F minus free flow VHT (Volume/Capacity >0.85) divided by population

(4) Daily truck hours of delay = modeled roadway delay time multiplied by modeled truck volume (all day)

(5) Percent of VMT by travel speed (by mode) = speed ranges by mode: auto, carpool, truck) divided by total VMT (by mode: auto, carpool, truck)

(6) Percent of total transit travel in congested conditions (peak periods) = transit VMT on facilities at LOS E and LOS F (volume/capacity > 0.85) divided by total transit VMT (peak periods)

(7) Percent of total transit travel in congested conditions (all day) = transit VMT on facilities at LOS E and LOS F (volume/capacity > 0.85) divided by total transit VMT (all day)

Healthy Environment–

(1) Gross acres of constrained lands consumed for transit and highway infrastructure

(2) Total fuel consumption (all day) per capita = VMT divided by on-road fleet fuel economy divided by total population

(3) Smog-forming pollutants (pounds/year) per capita = daily pounds of reactive organic gases plus daily pounds of nitrogen oxides divided by total population

(4) Systemwide VMT (all day) per capita = total sum of vehicles on roadway segment (all day) multiplied by length of roadway segment divided by total population

(5) Transit passenger miles (all day) per capita = total sum of transit passengers on transit segment (all day) multiplied by length of transit segment divided by total population

(6) Percent of peak-period trips within ½ mile of a transit stop = number of peak-period trip origins and destinations within ½ mile of a transit stop divided by total peak-period trips

(7) Percent of daily trips within ½ mile of a transit stop = number of daily trip origins and destinations within ½ mile of a transit stop divided by total daily trips

Healthy Environment (cont’d)–

(8) Work trip mode share (peak periods including bike/walk) = percent of work trips by mode (peak periods)

(9) Work trip mode share (all day including bike/walk) = percent of work trips by mode (all day)

(10) Non work trip mode share (peak periods including bike/walk) = percent of non work trips by mode (peak periods)

(11) Non work trip mode share (all day including bike/walk) = percent of non work trips by mode (all day)

(12) Total bike and walk trips = total number of bike and walk trips

(13) CO2 emissions per capita = daily pounds of CO2 divided by total population

Social Equity–

Comparison of outcomes for EJ and non-EJ communities:

The measures below will be estimated for the following community types: “low-income and minority” (low-income households, minority population, severe overcrowding, and population living at or below 100 percent of the poverty level), “low mobility” (zero-car households, disabled, and 75+), and “low community engagement” (linguistic isolation and low educational attainment).

(1) Average travel time per person trip (in minutes, EJ and non-EJ) = person hours of travel divided by person trips (by mode: auto, transit, and carpool)

(2) Percent of work trips (EJ and non-EJ) accessible in 30 minutes in peak periods by mode = work trips within 30 minutes divided by total work trips (by mode: auto, transit, carpool)

(3) Percent of homes within ½ mile of a transit stop (EJ and non-EJ) = number of homes within ½ mile of a transit stop divided by total homes in the community

(4) Percent of population (EJ and non-EJ) that can access schools (higher education including vocational) within 30 minutes = EJ population within 30 minutes of schools divided by total EJ population (three community types): non-EJ population within 30 minutes of schools divided by non-EJ community population (by mode: auto, transit)

(5) Percent of population (EJ and non-EJ) that can access San Diego International Airport within 30 minutes = EJ population within 30 minutes of the airport divided by total EJ population (three community types); non-EJ population within 30 minutes of the airport divided by non- EJ community population (by mode: auto, transit)

(6) Percent of population (EJ and non-EJ) that can access healthcare (hospitals, community clinics) within 15 minutes = EJ population within 15 minutes of healthcare divided by total EJ population (three community types); non-EJ population within 15 minutes of healthcare divided by non-EJ community population (by mode: auto, transit)

(7) Percent of population (EJ and non-EJ) that can access parks and beaches within 15 minutes = EJ population within 15 minutes of parks and beaches divided by total EJ population (three community types); non-EJ population within 15 minutes of parks and beaches divided by non- EJ community population (by mode: auto, transit)

Social Equity (cont’d)–

(8) Distribution of RTP expenditures (EJ and non-EJ) per capita = dollar value of RTP expenditures serving EJ communities divided by population in EJ communities; dollar value of RTP expenditures serving non-EJ communities divided by population in non-EJ communities. Serving the community is defined as a one-mile buffer for transit projects and a five-mile buffer for freeway projects. Note: this indicator will provide a snapshot of RTP expenditures by geographic area (EJ and non-EJ communities). Other factors such as proximity impacts of transportation projects and services are not reflected in this indicator.

9 **REVISED**

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-14 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – ACCEPT

2050 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: File Number 3100500 DRAFT UNCONSTRAINED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

Introduction Recommendation

During the past few months, staff presented the initial The Transportation Committee 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Unconstrained recommends that the Board of Highway and Transit Networks to the Board of Directors, Directors accept the draft Policy Advisory Committees (PACs), various SANDAG working Unconstrained Transportation Network for use in the groups, and at other public meetings for input. The basis of development of the 2050 the draft 2050 Unconstrained Transportation Network Regional Transportation Plan. presented in this report includes the “hybrid” transit scenario from the Urban Area Transit Strategy, highway improvements to serve people and goods, local streets and roads improvements, bicycle projects within the regional network, rail grade separations, and other management strategies.

At its July 16, 2010, meeting, the Transportation Committee discussed the draft Unconstrained Transportation Network and recommended its approval for use in the development of the 2050 RTP. The Transportation Committee supported incorporating the additional ideas suggested by the transit operating agencies in the Unconstrained Transportation Network. Based on the Transportation Committee’s discussion, staff will has prepared necessary modifications and related cost estimate refinements to the network and incorporated the updated information into this report for and will provide this updated information to the Board of Directors prior to the July 23, 2010, Board meeting.

Discussion

Draft Unconstrained Transportation Network

In developing the 2050 RTP, the Unconstrained Transportation Network represents the region’s vision for transit, highway, and arterial improvements and operations to meet travel demand in 2050. Defining the Unconstrained Transportation Network is an important step in developing an updated RTP, because it establishes the broadest multimodal network from which revenue- constrained network scenarios will be developed.

Once the Unconstrained Transportation Network is defined, staff will prioritize all of the future projects in this network using the Board-approved transportation project evaluation criteria. Based on revenue projections to 2050, various revenue-constrained transportation network scenarios will be developed using this prioritized project list and other factors. The revenue-constrained network scenarios would attempt to build and operate as much of the Unconstrained Transportation

Network as possible, given revenue availability and flexibility, and project priorities. These scenarios would be evaluated using performance measures leading to the eventual selection of a preferred revenue-constrained scenario by the Board of Directors.

The draft Unconstrained Transportation Network totals approximately $115119 billion to $130134 billion through 2050. Costs will continue to be refined during the development of the 2050 RTP.

Transit Network

As described in previous reports, the Urban Area Transit Strategy has served as the basis for development of the regional transit network for the 2050 RTP. Through the planning process, three transit network alternatives with a focus on the urban areas of the San Diego region were developed and tested. The alternatives were based on the following themes: “Transit Propensity” (expanding transit in the most urbanized areas), “Commuter Point-to-Point” (emphasizing quick access to work), and “Many Centers” (connecting local smart growth areas and activity centers). The overarching goal is to create a world-class transit system for the San Diego region in 2050 that significantly increases the use of transit, walking, and biking in the urbanized areas of the region, makes transit more time-competitive with the automobile, maximizes the use of transit during peak periods, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled in the region.

The best transit system strategies from each of the three alternatives, as well as ideas received from the SANDAG working groups, PACs, and through the public outreach process have been combined into a “Hybrid” 2050 Unconstrained Transit Network. The Unconstrained Transit Network is based on the following strategies and network assumptions:

• Strengthen the current transit network in communities that already have strong transit/land use integration. Improvements focus on: o Including local transit routes and service frequencies called for in the comprehensive operational analysis of the two transit agencies and further enhancing most local bus frequencies in the urban areas to 10-minute or better all-day frequencies, o Developing rapid bus services along major arterial corridors with 10-minute all-day frequencies, and o Adding streetcar and/or other shuttle/circulator services with 10-minute all-day frequencies to help improve intra-community circulation within smart growth centers. • Interconnect the existing, most highly urbanized areas and future smart growth centers to each other and to major employment areas. Improvements focus on: o Double-tracking the COASTER, and completing the Del Mar and University Towne Centre COASTER tunnels to provide 15-minute all-day frequencies, and adding a permanent station at the Del Mar Fairgrounds and a new station at the Convention Center in Downtown San Diego, o Extending the SPRINTER to North County Fair and eastern Escondido, and double-tracking the SPRINTER to provide 7.5-minute all day frequencies, o Providing “Express” SPRINTER service to the Oceanside, Vista, and Escondido transit centers with 10-minute peak period frequencies and 15-minute off-peak frequencies,

2 o Building a Trolley tunnel and supporting bus tunnel in downtown San Diego to support enhanced operations of the Blue and Orange Trolley lines and support capacity needs for the extensive network of BRT/rapid bus routes that serve downtown San Diego, o Increasing frequencies along the Orange, Blue, and Green Trolley lines to 7.5-minute all-day, o Completing the Mid-Coast Light Rail Transit (LRT) extension to University City, o Adding new LRT service with 10-minute or better all-day frequencies to better serve high-demand corridors, such as Mira Mesa, Kearny Mesa, Chula Vista, Pacific Beach, and Mid-City/Southeastern San Diego communities, o Adding Express LRT service along the Blue Line from San Ysidro to UTC and along several other lines to facilitate faster long-distance trips, o Adding a system of high-frequency, high-speed bus rapid transit (BRT) services with 10- to 15-minute peak and off-peak frequencies that will facilitate easy and convenient access across the region along freeway/Managed Lanes corridors and build a dedicated transitway between Kearny Mesa and downtown San Diego to facilitate several high-speed BRT and rapid bus routes that provide access to the job centers in Kearny Mesa, Sharp/Children’s Hospital Complex, Mission Valley, University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Medical Center/Hillcrest, Bankers Hill, and downtown San Diego, and o Adding select peak commuter BRT bus services with 10- or 15-minute peak directional frequencies that offer high-speed, one-seat ride travel to facilitate access to key regional employment centers, also using the Kearny Mesa transitway.

• Integrate high-speed rail (HSR) from Riverside County to the U.S./Mexico international border and add a commuter rail overlay service (similar to existing COASTER service) into the transit network. Improvements focus on: o Providing HSR stations in downtown Escondido and at San Diego International Airport, as assumed in the most recent California High-Speed Rail Authority alignment (subject to change) with service frequencies to be determined by the Authority; and o Adding commuter rail overlay stations along the Interstate 15 (I-15) and I-5 corridors at the following locations: Temecula, State Route 76 (SR 76), Escondido Transit Center, Mira Mesa, University City, Destination Lindbergh, 8th Street in National City, H Street in Chula Vista, the San Ysidro border crossing, the proposed cross-border terminal, and the Otay Mesa border crossing with 15-minute peak period services and 60-minute off-peak services.

• Emphasize improvements to the pedestrian environment in and around rail and bus station areas to maximize convenient and safe walking access to transit, and create interconnections between transit and the Regional Bike Plan as a means to facilitate access to transit stations from areas outside a walking distance and create new last-mile solutions.

A “subway-style” map illustrating the “Hybrid” draft 2050 Unconstrained Transit Network is included as Attachment 1. Attachment 2 contains the list of transit routes and headways for the draft 2050 Unconstrained Transit Network. The following table summarizes existing miles of transit service by mode, miles of transit service included in the TransNet Early Action Program (EAP), and additional miles of transit service included in the Hybrid Unconstrained Transit Network. The table has been revised for two reasons: first, to reflect corrections to initial numbers that were listed inaccurately (the revised numbers more accurately reflect one-way directional route miles), and

3 second, to capture the modified route mileage resulting from the improvements that were suggested by MTS and NCTD and incorporated into the Unconstrained Transit Network per the Transportation Committee’s recommendation:.

Summary of Transit Miles (One-Way Directional Route Miles by Mode)

Total Mode Existing Miles TransNet EAP Miles Additional Miles* Miles 78 75 (HSR and 41 Commuter Rail/HSR None commuter 119 116 (COASTER) rail overlay service)

86 82 11 LRT 89 210 186 303 (Trolley and SPRINTER) (Mid-Coast Extension)

82 (I-15 BRT to Downtown BRT None today 158 263 240 345 San Diego, I-15 BRT to UTC, and South Bay BRT) 19 5 (Mid-City Rapid, Rapid Bus 226 250 (SuperLoop) Escondido Rapid, and additional SuperLoop)

Streetcar/Shuttle None today None 36 33 36 33

*Assumed in Hybrid Unconstrained Transit Network

Initial cost estimates for the Unconstrained Transit Network total approximately $35 39 billion to $42 46 billion. This range is based on an estimated range of $29 33 billion to $34 38 billion (or approximately 80 85%) for capital costs (including vehicle replacement) and $6 billion to $8 billion (or approximately 20 15%) for transit operating subsidy costs (total operating cost minus fare revenues).

SANDAG staff met with staff from the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and the North County Transit District (NCTD) to review the Hybrid Unconstrained Transit Network. MTS and NCTD staffs provided the following comments:

•Consider substituting the HSR extension from Lindbergh Field to South Bay with third track improvements that would allow for Express Trolley service along the Blue Line

•Consider express Trolley service on other existing and future LRT lines

•Include a bus tunnel in addition to the proposed Trolley tunnel in downtown San Diego to support capacity needs for the extensive network of proposed BRT/rapid routes that would serve downtown San Diego. Underground layover terminals would be included.

•Add streetcar/shuttle in the Mission Bay area

•Add a COASTER station at the Convention Center at Harbor Drive in downtown San Diego and a permanent COASTER station at the Del Mar Fairgrounds

4 •Test a BRT line along the future SR 78 high occupancy vehicle (HOV) corridor

•Test the extension of the SPRINTER line into eastern Escondido along Grand Avenue

•Explore the concept of interoperable trains for “one-seat ride” rail service in the region to minimize the need for transfers, for example, between COASTER and SPRINTER services. (This would be explored as a vehicle technology improvement in the RTP.)

SANDAG staff supports these additions/modifications and proposes incorporating them into the Unconstrained Transit Network. At its July 16 meeting, the Transportation Committee recommended incorporating these additional suggestions from MTS and NCTD staffs. Staff will prepare any necessary updated maps, cost estimates, and mode-share figures for consideration by the SANDAG Board of Directors at its July 23, 2010, meeting.

Presentations on the Unconstrained Transit Network will be made to the NCTD Board of Directors on July 22, 2010, and to the MTS Board of Directors in August.

Transit Mode-Share Goals

In June the Board of Directors accepted home-to-work, peak-period transit mode share goals for 14 geographic subareas within the urban area. The current transit mode share (2008) for the overall combined urban area is 5 percent. The mode-share goal accepted by the Board of Directors for the urban area in 2050 is a range of 10 percent to 15 percent. Attachment 3 provides a map that illustrates the mode-share goal ranges for each geographic subarea. Attachment 4 provides a table that delineates the mode-share goal ranges for each subarea along with projected mode shares in 2050 under the Transit Propensity, Commuter Point-to-Point, Many Centers, and the Hybrid Unconstrained Transit Network scenarios.1

Initial analysis of the Hybrid Unconstrained Transit Network shows that the unconstrained network results in a 12 percent home-to-work, peak-period transit mode share in the urban area, coming in at the mid-point of the goal range accepted by the Board of Directors. Other mode-share data of interest include a projected 29 percent transit mode share in downtown San Diego under the Unconstrained Transit Network, compared to the goal of 30+ percent; a 16 percent projected mode share in the University City area compared to the goal range of 15 percent to 20 percent; and a 19 20 percent projected mode share in the central core area compared to the goal range of 20 percent to 25 percent (see Attachment 3 map for definition of areas).

Initial analysis also indicates that the Hybrid Unconstrained Transit Network more than doubles daily transit trips compared to the existing transit network (+145%) and increases transit trips beyond the Many Centers scenario (overall highest performing scenario of the three initial scenarios). Regional population during the same time period is projected to increase by 40 percent.

The data also indicates that a higher percentage of people would be accessing transit stations by walking/biking than by park and ride.

1 Staff is in the process of refining the transportation model to more accurately assign transit trips originating and/or ending at the international U.S./Mexico border, the San Diego/Riverside County border, and the region’s military facilities, which may have an effect on the mode share projections. Any significant differences in mode share projections will be posted to the SANDAG Web site, and will be used to further refine the Unconstrained Transit Network.

5 Over the next several weeks, staff will conduct a series of sensitivity tests to see how various operating plan and policy options could further affect home-to-work, peak-period transit mode share and system performance. These may include options such as increasing transit frequencies, increasing transit travel speeds, decreasing fares, testing a regional parking pricing policy, and adjusting land use assumptions around key transit corridors. Results from the sensitivity tests, as well as the network suggestions by MTS and NCTD staffs, will help staff refine the transit networks to attempt to meet the mode-share goals by geographic subarea. Indications from other peer cities that were evaluated as part of the Urban Area Transit Strategy show these factors can have a significant impact on transit usage.

Highway Network

Similarly to the process being proposed for the transit network, SANDAG and Caltrans staffs are analyzing potential modifications to the 2030 RTP Unconstrained Highway Network. These modifications are based on supporting proposed transit investments in key corridors and communities, while providing an adequate level of service for the overall transportation system. It is important to note that the 2030 RTP Unconstrained Highway Network includes an extensive Managed Lanes system that provides tremendous flexibility in serving transit and HOVs by maximizing the available rights-of-way in several of the region’s major highway corridors. The goal in reviewing the highway network is to build upon this existing plan by integrating the revised transit network into it, thereby creating the most efficient and balanced transportation system.

Modifications to the 2030 RTP Unconstrained Highway Network include: • Removal of the SR 54 outer loop extension from SR 125 to I-8 (I-8)2 • Removal of two HOV lanes on SR 52 from I-5 to I-805 and on SR 94 from SR 125 to Avocado Boulevard • Additional operational improvements to I-5 from SR 15 to I-8 and to I-8 from I-5 to SR 67 and removal of two HOV lanes on I-5 and I-8 from I-5 to Los Coches3 • Removal of general purpose lane-widening (two lanes) on I-5 from I-8 to La Jolla Village Drive, I-805 from Telegraph Canyon Road to I-8, and SR 52 to La Jolla Village Drive, and SR 125 from I-8 to SR 52 • Additional operational improvements on SR 76 east of I-15

Remaining congested corridors that are proposed for further study include: • SR 78 from I-5 to I-154 • I-8 from I-5 to College Avenue

Initial cost estimates for the draft 2050 RTP Unconstrained Highway network total approximately $26 billion to $30 billion. A map of the draft 2050 Unconstrained Highway Network is included as Attachment 5.

2 The City of El Cajon and County of San Diego concur with SANDAG and Caltrans’ findings that the expansion of the SR 54 freeway between SR 125 and I-8 is not needed. 3 In the central I-5 and I-8 corridors, SANDAG and Caltrans’ staffs believe that operational improvements will work as well or better than HOV lane improvements. The overall HOV system will still operate satisfactorily without these segments. 4 The SR 78 Corridor Study will be initiated in late July 2010.

6 Goods Movement

The draft unconstrained goods movement system consists primarily of road and truckway projects (accommodating over 90 percent of freight by volume) that comprise the backbone of the freight distribution network. The unconstrained system outlined in the draft 2050 Goods Movement Strategy (GMS) also includes several maritime, rail, border, air cargo, and pipeline related projects. The cost to implement the unconstrained goods movement project list is estimated at $28 billion, including approximately $22 billion in highway projects already identified in the draft Unconstrained Highway Network. Projects included in the GMS will be evaluated using updated evaluation criteria approved by the Board of Directors in June 2010.

Local Streets and Roads

The draft Unconstrained Transportation Network also includes improvements to the local streets and roads. The cost estimates for improvements to local streets and roads are currently being developed to incorporate into the 2050 RTP.

San Diego Regional Bicycle Plan

The San Diego Regional Bicycle Plan proposes a vision for a diverse regional bicycle system of interconnected bicycle corridors, support facilities, and programs to make bicycling more practical and desirable to a broader range of people in our region. The Board of Directors approved the San Diego Regional Bicycle Plan in May 2010. The cost to implement the Regional Bicycle Network is estimated at $419 million. The projects will be prioritized, using previously approved evaluation criteria, for inclusion in the 2050 RTP. The San Diego Regional Bicycle Network is included as Attachment 6.

Intermodal Transportation Center

The draft Unconstrained Transportation Network also includes improvements to intermodal transportation centers, such as Destination Lindbergh and San Ysidro. The cost estimates are currently being developed to incorporate into the 2050 RTP.

Rail Grade Separations

The Transportation Committee approved the rail grade separation evaluation criteria in October 2009. These criteria will be used to create a prioritized list of potential grade-separation projects for the COASTER, SPRINTER, and Trolley corridors within the San Diego region for incorporation into the 2050 RTP. The cost estimates for the rail-grade separations are currently being developed.

Transportation Demand Management

The Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program at SANDAG, known as iCommute, provides sustainable and flexible transportation options to reduce peak-period traffic congestion. These programs include: vanpool, carpool, buspool, SchoolPool, Guaranteed Ride Home, telework, and bike programs, in addition to employer outreach, public education, and marketing. While transportation infrastructure, land use, and smart growth development patterns can take many years and resources to implement, TDM strategies are cost-effective, proven methods for reducing environmental pollutants and alleviating congestion more immediately. Consequently, TDM

7 programs are likely to play a larger role in achieving the near-term goals of the 2050 RTP. The cost of the TDM program is estimated at approximately $730 million through 2050. The iCommute Strategic Plan currently under development will refine and prioritize the implementation of the various TDM programs.

Transportation System Management

Our existing transportation system represents a major investment of resources over the past several decades. While the RTP identifies additional infrastructure investments needed to meet future transportation needs, it is critical that the region place an increased focus on maximizing the efficiency of the facilities already in place. SANDAG is developing a multimodal and integrated strategy for the comprehensive management of the transit, arterial, and highway networks serving both people and goods. Through a combination of programs, such as signal- and ramp-metering coordination and optimization; improved performance monitoring and microsimulation; and advanced vehicle/roadside communication platforms, the delivered tools and services will increase monitoring capabilities, enhance management, and improve system efficiency. The initial estimate for the programs totals approximately $700 million through 2050 and will be further refined and prioritized through the Intelligent Transportation Systems Strategic Plan currently under development.

Next Steps

Staff would prioritize all of the future projects in the Unconstrained Transportation Network, using Board-approved evaluation criteria. Based on revenue projections, various revenue-constrained transportation scenarios would be developed using this prioritized project list and other factors. The revenue-constrained transportation scenarios would attempt to build and operate as much of the Unconstrained Transportation Network as possible, given revenue availability and flexibility and project priorities. Alternative revenue-constrained transportation scenarios would be brought back in the fall for discussion and would be evaluated using the network performance measures that the Board of Directors approves (see Agenda Item No. 13).

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Draft 2050 Unconstrained Transit Network (Revised) 2. Draft 2050 Unconstrained Transit Routes and Headways (Revised) 3. 2050 Transit Mode-Share Goal Ranges 4. Transit Mode-Share Goal Ranges and Projected Transit Mode Shares for Initial Transit Network Alternatives and Draft 2050 Unconstrained Transit Network (Revised) 5. Draft 2050 Unconstrained Highway Network 6. Regional Bicycle Plan Network

Key Staff Contacts: Heather Werdick, (619) 699-6967, [email protected] Carolina Gregor, (619) 699-1989, [email protected] Dave Schumacher, (619) 699-6906, [email protected]

8 Camp Pendleton

Oceanside ˆ Riverside County

Vista

San Marcos

Carlsbad Escondido

Encinitas

Poway Solana Beach

Carmel Valley Del Mar

Sorrento Mesa Mira Mesa

UTC

La Jolla

Kearny Mesa Paciﬁc Beach Santee

Mission Valley

Old El Cajon Ocean Beach Town La Mesa Point Mid City Loma

Lemon Grove Downtown Draft 2050 Coronado National Unconstrained City Transit Network

Legend High Speed and Commuter Rail Chula Vista Otay COASTER Rail Ranch Light Rail Transit Express Light Rail Transit Bus Rapid Transit Imperial Beach Peak Bus Rapid Transit Otay Mesa Rapid Bus Streetcar/Shuttle-Circulator San Ysidro High Frequency Local Bus Services 9 7/23/2010 Attachment 2 Draft 2050 Unconstrained Transit Routes and Headways

Peak Off-Peak Route Mode Description Frequencies Frequencies COASTER with Del Mar and University Town Center (UTC) Tunnels, Permanent Station at 398 Commuter Rail 15 15 Del Mar Fairgrounds, and New Station at Convention Center in downtown San Diego 598 Commuter Rail High Speed Rail - Commuter Rail Service from Riverside to int'l border 15 60 399 Light Rail SPRINTER (with branch extensions to North County Fair, East Escondido) 7.5 7.5 510 Light Rail Blue Line w/ Mid-Coast Extension and downtown tunnel 7.5 7.5 520 Light Rail Orange Line with Extension to Airport and downtown tunnel 7.5 7.5 530 Light Rail Green Line with Extension to 12th/Imperial 7.5 7.5 550 Light Rail SDSU to San Ysidro via East San Diego, SE San Diego, National City 7.5 10 560 Light Rail SDSU to Downtown via El Cajon Blvd/Mid-City 7.5 7.5 561 Light Rail UTC to Mira Mesa via Sorrento Mesa 7.5 10 562 Light Rail UTC to Chula Vista via Kearny Mesa, Mission Vly, Mid-City, Nat'l City 7.5 10 563 Light Rail Pacific Beach to El Cajon via Kearny Mesa, Mission Valley, SDSU 7.5 10 564 Light Rail Otay Mesa to Chula Vista via Otay Ranch/Millenia 7.5 10 588 Express Light Rail SPRINTER - Stops only at Oceanside, Vista, Escondido Transit Centers 10 15 540 Express Light Rail UTC to San Ysidro via Downtown San Diego 10 10 522 Express Light Rail El Cajon to Downtown San Diego via Euclid 10 10 566 Express Light Rail Otay Ranch to UTC via Mid-City, Kearny Mesa 10 10 610 BRT Temecula/Escondido to Downtown via I-15, Kearny Mesa Guideway 10 10 640 BRT San Ysidro to Kearny Mesa via South Bay, Downtown San Diego, Hillcrest, Mission Vly 10 10 692 BRT El Cajon to Otay Mesa via Spring Valley, SR125, Millenia 10 15 San Ysidro Downtown to UTC via South Bay Hillcrest, Mission Valley, Kearny Mesa 652 BRT 10 10 Guideway 430 BRT Oceanside to Escondido via SR 78 HOV Lanes 10 10 607 Peak BRT Rancho Bernardo to Downtown San Diego via Sabre Springs/Kearny Mesa 10 0 608 Peak BRT Escondido to Downtown San Diego via South Escondido, Kearny Mesa 10 0 650 Peak BRT Otay Ranch/Chula Vista to Palomar Airport Bus. Park via I-805/I-5 15 0 653 Peak BRT SE San Diego/Mid-City to Palomar Airport Road Bus. Park via I-805/I-5 15 0 688 BRT Millenia/Otay Ranch to Sorrento Mesa via Chula Vista, I-805 15 0 689 BRT Millenia/Otay Ranch to UTC via Chula Vista, I-805 15 0 870 Peak BRT El Cajon to UTC via Santee, SR 52, Kearny Mesa 10 0 890 Peak BRT El Cajon to Sorrento Mesa via Santee, SR 52 10 0 940 Peak BRT Oceanside to Sorrento Mesa via I-5, Carlsbad, Encinitas 10 0 10 Draft 2050 Unconstrained Transit Routes and Headways

Peak Off-Peak Route Mode Description Frequencies Frequencies

2 Rapid Bus 30th Ave to Downtown San Diego via North Park 10 10 10 Rapid Bus La Mesa to Ocean Beach via Mid-City, Hillcrest, Old Town 10 10 11 Rapid Bus Spring Valley to SDSU via SE San Diego, Downtown, Hillcrest, Mid-City 10 10 28 Rapid Bus Point Loma to Kearny Mesa via Old Town, Linda Vista 10 10 30 Rapid Bus Old Town to Sorrento Mesa via Pacific Beach, La Jolla, UTC 10 10 41 Rapid Bus Old Town to UTC via Linda Vista, Clairemont 10 10 120 Rapid Bus Kearny Mesa to Downtown via Sharp Hospital, Mission Valley, Hillcrest 10 10 350 Rapid Bus Escondido to North County Fair via South Escondido 10 10 440 Rapid Bus Carlsbad to San Marcos via Palomar Airport Rd Corridor 10 10 471 Rapid Bus Downtown Escondido to East Escondido 10 10 473 Rapid Bus Oceanside to UTC via Hwy 101 coastal communities, Carmel Valley 10 10 474 Rapid Bus Oceanside to Vista via Mission Ave/Santa Fe Rd corridor 10 10 477 Rapid Bus Camp Pendleton to Carlsbad Village via College Blvd, Plaza Camino Real 10 10 635 Rapid Bus Millienia to Palomar Trolley via Main St corridor 10 10 636 Rapid Bus SDSU to Spring Valley via East San Diego, Lemon Grove, Skyline 10 10 637 Rapid Bus North Park to 32nd St Trolley via Golden Hill, SE San Diego 10 10 638 Rapid Bus San Ysidro to Otay Mesa via Otay, SR 905 corridor 10 10 639 Rapid Bus Otay to North Island via Imperial Beach, Silver Strand, Coronado 10 10 709 Rapid Bus H St Trolley to Millenia via H St corridor, Southwestern College 10 10 910 Rapid Bus Coronado to Downtown via Coronado Bridge 10 10 448/449 Streetcar/Shuttle San Marcos Downtown 10 10 551 Streetcar/Shuttle Chula Vista Downtown 10 10 552 Streetcar/Shuttle National City Downtown 10 10 553 Streetcar/Shuttle San Diego Downtown - Little Italy to East Village 10 10 554 Streetcar/Shuttle Hillcrest/Balboa Park/ Downtown San Diego Loop 10 10 555 Streetcar/Shuttle 30th Ave to Downtown San Diego via North Park/Golden Hill 10 10 557 Streetcar/Shuttle El Cajon Downtown 10 10 558 Streetcar/Shuttle Escondido Downtown 10 10 559 Streetcar/Shuttle Oceanside Downtown 10 10 565 Streetcar/Shuttle Mission Beach to La Jolla via Pacific Beach 10 10

11 Attachment 3 !"^$ !"a$ 10% - 15%

A©

5% - 10%

A©

!"^$ 5% - 10% @?5 6

15% - 20% !"a$ %&s( Mode Share (%) ?h !"_$ Under 5% 5% to 10% 5% - 10% 10% to 15% 10% - 15% 10% - 15% 15% to 20% !"_$ 20% to 25% 25% to 30% 20%-25% Over 30% 30%+ AÀ A× 2050 Transit Mode Share Goal Ranges %&s(

0 2 4 6 ± Miles 10%!"^$ - 15%

Values represent peak period home-to-work 5% - 10% July 23, 2010 transit mode share for destination districts. 12 Attachment 4 Urban Area Transit Strategy Transit Mode Share Goals and Projected Transit Mode Shares for Initial Transit Network Alternatives and Draft 2050 Unconstrained Transit Network Peak-Period, Home-to-Work Trips1

Peak-Period, Home-to-Work Transit Mode Share

Projected Performance Baseline Projected Performance of Initial Transit Network Goals of Unconstrained Data Alternatives Network Identified Corridors/Areas

2008 2050 Peak-Period Transit Commuter 2050 Unconstrained Existing Transit Mode Share Many Centers Propensity Point-to-Point Transit Network Transit Goal Ranges

Major Employment Areas Downtown San Diego 24% 30% + 28% 26% 28% 29% University City 3% 15%-20% 14% 15% 17% 16% Sorrento Mesa 2% 10%-15% 9% 12% 12% 12% Kearny Mesa 3% 10%-15% 11% 11% 15% 15% Otay Mesa/ Otay Ranch 3% 5%-10% 6% 4% 7% 9% Palomar Airport 1% 5%-10% 5% 5% 7% 6%

High Activity Areas Central Core 12% 20%-25% 18% 16% 18% 19% 20% Oceanside/Escondido Corridor 3% 10%-15% 7% 7% 8% 8%

Other Urbanized Areas North I-15 Corridor 1% 5%-10% 4% 6% 7% 7% North Central Coastal Area 2% 10%-15% 9% 9% 9% 9% Central Coastal Area 5% 10%-15% 11% 11% 13% 14% 15% Coastal South Bay 8% 10%-15% 13% 11% 13% 14% East County/El Cajon 4% 10%-15% 9% 8% 10% 11% East County/Santee 3% 5%-10% 7% 6% 8% 8%

Urban Area Transit Strategy Study Area 5% 10%-15% 11% 10% 12% 12%

1 Values represent peak period home-to-work trip transit mode-share for destination districts. 13 Camp Pendleton 8F+4T 5 241 2C Riverside County 4C Orange County 4C 8F+4T 4T/6T Northern San Diego Extent County 6C 036 15 MILES

5 8F+4T 6E 76 76 2C

Oceanside 8F+4ML Vista

78 6F+2HOV San Marcos 10F+4ML P A C I I F Carlsbad II Escondido C

O 10F+4ML C 2C

E 10F+4ML 78

A 2C

N 78

Encinitas 10F+4ML/MB 2C 10F+4ML 67 Solana Beach 5 Poway

56 Del County of San Diego Mar 4C 6F+2HOV Draft 2050 10F+4ML/MB Unconstrained 14F+4ML Highway Network 15 8F+4ML July 2010

Managed/HOV Lanes 6F+2HOV 6F+3ML/MB Santee 6F 52 General Purpose Lanes 67 6F 4F 52 6F 6F 8 Toll Lanes 5 8F/10F +4ML 805 8F+2HOV 6F Operational Improvements 8F/10F 125 6F + San 6F+2HOV Freeway Connectors 2HOV Diego 10F 8F 805 HOV Connectors 8F 8 El Cajon La Mesa Freeway & HOV Connectors 10F+2HOV 4F 15 6F 163 C = Conventional Highway 8F Lemon 4C 94 Grove E = Expressway 125 94 F = Freeway 282 10F+2HOV 6C+2TU 8F+2HOV HOV = High Occupancy Vehicle 8F+4ML 54 MB = Movable Barrier Coronado 10F+2HOV National 2C ML = Managed Lanes City 54 8F+2HOV 8T T = Toll Road 75

TU = Tunnel 125 8F+4ML MILES Chula 0 3 6 Vista 5 805 0 4.83 9.6 8F+4ML KILOMETERS 8F+ Imperial 8F 2HOV 905 UNITED STATES Beach 11 4T MEXICO 8F 8F

1-D Tijuana, B.C.

14 REGIONAL BICYCLE CORRIDORS

1 - Bayshore Bikeway 30 2 - Bay to Ranch Bikeway 3 - Border Access Corridor 4 4 - Camp Pendleton Trail Oceanside 33 5 - Carlsbad-San Marcos Corridor 6 - Central Coast Corridor 7 - Centre City-La Mesa Corridor Vista 8 - Chula Vista Greenbelt 9 - City Heights-Old Town Corridor 10 - Clairemont-Centre City Corridor 20 11 - Coastal Rail Trail Carlsbad San Marcos 12 - East County Northern Loop Escondido 14 13 - East County Southern Loop 16 14 - El Camino Real 5 15 - Encinitas-San Marcos Corridor 16 - Escondido Creek Bikeway 17 - Gilman Connector 18 - Hillcrest-El Cajon Corridor 15 19 - Imperial Beach Connector 20 - Inland Rail Trail 21 - Kearny Mesa-Beaches Corridor Encinitas 22 - Kensington-Balboa Park Corridor 23 - North Park-Centre City Corridor 24 24 - Mid-County Bikeway 35 25 - Mira Mesa Corridor 26 - Mission Valley-Chula Vista Corridor 27 - Park Boulevard Connector Solana 11 28 - Poway Loop Poway Beach 29 - San Diego River Bikeway 30 - San Luis Rey River Trail Del 37 28 31 - Santee-El Cajon Corridor Mar 32 - Sweetwater River Bikeway 33 - Vista Way Connector 34 - I-8 Corridor 35 - I-15 Bikeway Pacific Ocean 36 - SR-52 Bikeway 25 37 - SR-56 Bikeway 38 - SR-125 Corridor 39 - SR-905 Corridor San Diego 17 Santee 34 6 36 31 21 El Cajon 10 29 18 La 12 Mesa 9 22 23 26 13 27 7 Coronado 38

32 1 2 Chula Vista 01 2 4 Miles 8 FIGURE 3-3 19 NOTE: UPDATED REGIONAL Colors do not represent facility type. Imperial 3 The color variations are intended to BICYCLE NETWORK Beach 39 San Diego differentiate start and end of all SAN DIEGO REGIONAL BICYCLE PLAN corridors.

15 Alta Planning + Design, March 2009

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 10-07-15 JULY 23, 2010 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

SENATE BILL 375 IMPLEMENTATION: File Number 3100000 PROPOSED FINAL GREENHOUSE GAS TARGETS FOR THE SAN DIEGO REGION

Introduction Recommendation

SANDAG is in the process of developing its first The Board of Directors is asked to Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) subject to the approve the submittal of the proposed provisions of Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) (Steinberg, 2008). final greenhouse gas (GHG) targets for The 2050 RTP is scheduled for Board adoption in 2020 and 2035, pursuant to Senate Bill summer 2011. At the July 9, 2010, Board of Directors 375 to California Air Resource Board Policy meeting, SANDAG staff provided an overview of for consideration in advance of the the SB 375 implementation efforts, which included the release of their proposed final GHG draft greenhouse gas (GHG) target ranges issued by targets (anticipated to be released on the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for the August 9, 2010). years 2020 and 2035.

Discussion

On June 24, 2010, CARB staff presented an information item to its Board of Directors that described the process of collaborating with the metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to establish a draft GHG target within the timeframe required by SB 375. To inform CARB on where the existing RTPs for each of the four major MPOs [Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Metropolitan Transportation Commission/Association of Bay Area Governments (MTC/ABAG), SANDAG, and Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)] would lead, MPO staffs provided data on various scenarios that were tested to better understand the potential to reduce GHG emission from passenger vehicles. The GHG emission targets are relative to a 2005 baseline, which for SANDAG, was based on the 2030 RTP (Table 1).

Table 1 – SANDAG Greenhouse Gas Emissions

(Average Weekday Pounds Per Capita CO2 Emissions from Passenger Vehicles)

2030 RTP Percentage Change From From MPO 2005 Base Year 2020 2035* 2005 to 2020 2005 to 2035

SANDAG 26.0 23.7 24.6 -8.8 -5.4

* The 2030 RTP has a 2030 horizon year. Data in the plan was extrapolated in order to estimate a 2035 per capita CO2 emissions number.

At the June 24 meeting, CARB issued draft target ranges (Table 2) instead of specific targets, which reflect CARB’s desire to continue the collaboration with the MPOs to further refine the information to be considered before a final GHG target for 2020 and for 2035 are set. Since the CARB meeting, SANDAG staff has continued to collaborate with CARB and the other large MPOs to determine if a single target number for both horizon years is feasible. The draft targets that were issued by CARB for 2020 reflect commonality among the large MPOs for what would be aggressive and achievable within that timeframe. However, the GHG target range for 2035 is specific to the San Diego region as each large MPO received a different target range for that time horizon. The individual target ranges for 2035 were based on results of each region’s scenario testing process. The purpose of the scenario-testing process was to determine what additional GHG reductions could potentially be achieved. While CARB staff understands that additional analysis is required to determine feasibility and level of deployment of the measures included in the scenarios, the information was used as input into the GHG target-setting process.

Table 2 – California Air Resources Board Draft Greenhouse Gas Targets for the San Diego Region

Target Per-Capita Reduction Year From 2005 Baseline

2020 5 to 10%

2035 5 to 19%

It also should be noted that throughout the scenario testing process, various transportation model inputs (i.e., fuel cost, vehicle maintenance cost) have been modified and tested to try to make each region’s model, and model inputs more consistent. Each iteration of the scenario testing process included some model input that may reflect different assumptions than prior scenario model runs, thus resulting in outputs that are not easily comparable.

After the July 9, 2010, SANDAG Board of Directors meeting, staff indicated that additional revisions to the hybrid GHG reduction scenario would be tested based on a further analysis of: (1) projected revenues through 2020 and 2035; and (2) assumptions made in the measures that were tested. SANDAG, to the extent feasible, used the model assumptions that would be used in the 2050 RTP in order to enable fair comparisons between the baseline assumptions and the results of the revised hybrid model analysis. SANDAG also contracted with a consultant to validate the methodology and assumptions made in the various elements of the hybrid scenario.

Based on feedback from the consultant, SANDAG assumed that the telecommuting benefits to GHG reduction would be slightly offset by trips that would still be made by commuters during those telecommute days. Additionally, the parking pricing measure that was presented to the Board of Directors was modified to reflect a slower progression of implementation. It should be further clarified that any policy measures included in the revised hybrid scenario will have to be further considered by the Board of Directors – including financial considerations – before they would be included in the 2050 RTP. Those discussions will occur this fall.

2 Senate Bill 375 includes a provision for the MPOs to propose targets for their respective regions prior to the final targets being set by the CARB Board. Based on the revised hybrid scenario (all measures included in the revised hybrid scenario are outline in Attachment 1) and the direction of CARB to set a target that is aggressive and achievable, the final targets for SANDAG are proposed to be within the draft ranges provided by CARB in June, and refined as depicted in Table 3.

Table 3 – SANDAG Proposed Final GHG Targets for the San Diego Region

Target Per-Capita Reduction Year From 2005 Baseline

2020 7%

2035 13%

Next Steps

Over the next few weeks, SANDAG staff will continue to collaborate with CARB, Caltrans, and other MPOs and will report progress to the Board of Directors. A final GHG target is required to be set by CARB no later than September 30, 2010. In order to meet this deadline, CARB staff has indicated that they will be posting a report for its Board’s consideration on August 9, 2010. Pending Board of Directors approval, the proposed final GHG target would be submitted to CARB. If additional refinements to the proposed final GHG target are made, an update will be provided to the Board of Directors in September so that any further direction can be provided to CARB before the statutory deadline for setting final GHG targets of September 30, 2010.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachment 1: SB 375 Target Setting: Revised Hybrid Scenario Description

Key Staff Contact: Rob Rundle, (619) 699-6949, [email protected]

3 Attachment 1 SB 375 Target Setting: Revised Hybrid Scenario Description

Existing RTP Level of On Model/ Off Deployment Model 2020 Level of Deployment 2035 Level of Deployment System Efficiency & TDM 1 Bottleneck relief projects Revenue Constrained highway On 2020 Revenue Constrained highway network updated to include 17 additional projects: 2030 Revenue Constrained highway network (with 17 additional network projects noted in the 2020 Level of Deployment)

I-805 NB Plaza Blvd. Auxiliary Lane I-8 WB Fletcher Pkwy Auxiliary Lane I-15 SB Centre City Pkwy Auxiliary Lane I-15 SB Valley Pkwy Auxiliary Lane I-8 WB Texas St./Mission Ctr. Capacity Improvements I-805 NB University Ave. Auxiliary Lane SR-52 (AM/PM) Mast Blvd. Interchange Improvements SR-94 WB 49th St. Auxiliary Lane I-5 NB B St. Auxiliary Lane SR-78 EB/WB (AM/PM) Barham Dr. Auxiliary Lane I-805 SB Governor Dr. Auxiliary Lane I-805 NB La Jolla Village Dr. Auxiliary Lane I-5 SB 29th St. Auxiliary Lane I-5 NB Manchester Ave. Auxiliary Lane I-5 SB 5th Ave. Auxiliary Lane 2 Telecommuting/flexible/alternative 5 percent daily white-collar On 15 percent of daily white-collar work trip reduction (Output reduced by 25 percent to account Same as 2020 deployment level work schedules worker trip reduction for trips made by telecommuters. This equates to an overall 11.25 percent reduction compared to the initial 15 percent assumptions)

3 Vanpool programs Projected 20 percent vanpool Off 70 percent increase in number of vanpools by 2020 (1,124 vans up from 662) 174 percent increase in number of vanpools by 2035 (1,814 vans up increase by 2010 already from 662) achieved

4 Safe routes to schools strategies Not included in RTP assumptions Off 10 percent increase in walk/bike school trips by 2020 (159,775 trips up from 145,250) 20 percent increase in walk/bike school trips by 2035 (179,542 trips up from 149,618)

5 Carpool programs Not included in RTP assumptions Off 70 percent increase in number of carpoolers from 2010 to 2020 (214,724 carpoolers up from 126,587 144 percent increase in number of carpoolers from 2010 to 2035 carpoolers) (309,342 carpoolers up from 126,587 carpoolers)

6 Buspool programs Not included in RTP assumptions Off Buspool participation of 15 percent military personnel by 2020 (15,766 buspoolers) Buspool participation of 40 percent military personnel by 2035 (41,708 buspoolers)

*Measures with bold italicized text reflect changes made from the previous hybrid scenario presented at May 28 Board meeting. 4 SB 375 Target Setting: Revised Hybrid Scenario Description

Existing RTP Level of On Model/ Off Deployment Model 2020 Level of Deployment 2035 Level of Deployment Systems Development 1 Transit system improvements Revenue Constrained transit On 2020 Reasonably Expected transit network 2030 Reasonably Expected transit network plus 13 routes added network from the Revenue Unconstrained network including: 150: UTC to Downtown 13: National City to Allied Gardens 929: San Ysidro to 8th St. Trolley 27: Pacific Beach to Kearny Mesa 660: El Cajon to Kearny Mesa 31: Mira Mesa to University Towne Centre 709: H St. Trolley to Otay Mesa 50: Bay Park to Kearny Mesa 35: Old Town to Ocean Beach 303: Oceanside to Vista 633: Old Town to San Diego International Airport 662: Centre City Shuttle 520: Orange Line Trolley – Unconstrained Headways 2 Transit station park-and-ride facilities Revenue Constrained park-and- On Model was allowed to unconstrain number of park-and-ride spaces at suburban lots and transit Model was allowed to unconstrain number of park-and-ride spaces ride network stations (3,500 additional spaces utilized above 16,800 in the 2020 Revenue Constrained network) at suburban lots and transit stations (6,900 additional spaces utilized above 17,500 in the 2030 Revenue Constrained network)

3 Bicycle network facilities Not included in RTP assumptions Off Test full deployment of regional bicycle network (2035 network reduced by 50 percent to estimate Test full deployment of regional bicycle network (560,062 bike trips) 2020 time period) (280,031 bike trips)

4 Pedestrian network facilities Not included in RTP assumptions Off 10 percent increase in all walk trips by 2020 (494,203 walk trips up from 449,275) 20 percent increase in all walk trips by 2035 (559,018 walk trips up from 465,848)

Pricing 1 High-occupancy vehicle (HOV) and 2030 Revenue Constrained On 2020 Reasonably Expected highway network including the following enhancements over the 2030 Reasonably Expected highway network, including the high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes highway network: Revenue Constrained plan: following enhancements over the Revenue Constrained plan (where only 2 HOT lanes available, assumes 3 occupant HOV):

Managed Lanes (ML) on I-15, I- SR 94 from I-805 to SR 125: Add 2 HOV lanes I-5 from SR 905 to SR 54: Add 2 HOT lanes 5, SR 52, and portions of I-805 I-5 from SR 54 to I-8: Add 2 HOT lanes SR 78 from I-15 to I-15: Add 2 HOT lanes HOV lanes on I-5, SR 52, SR 94 SR 94/SR 125 from I-805 to I-8: Add 2 HOT lanes and portions of I-805 I-805 from SR 905 to I-5: Add 4 HOT lanes 2 Regional parking pricing program RTP model 5 zone parking: On Adjust 5 zone system pricing as follows: Adjust 5 zone system pricing as follows

Zone 5 - Metropolitan Center: $8 Zone 5 - Metropolitan Center: $16 per day Zone 5 - Metropolitan Center: $24 per day per day Zone 4 - Urban Center: $6 per Zone 4 - Urban Center: $6 per day Zone 4 - Urban Center: $12 per day day Zone 3 - Town Center: $4 per day Zone 3 - Town Center: $4 per day Zone 3 - Town Center: $8 per day

Zone 2 - Community Center: $1 Zone 2 - Community Center: $1 per day Zone 2 - Community Center: $2 per day per day Zone 1 - Other: $0 per day Zone 1 - Other: $0 per day Zone 1 - NA: $0 per day

*Measures with bold italicized text reflect changes made from the previous hybrid scenario presented at May 28 Board meeting. 5