Park West Two Cliff Mine Road NU_ _ __ S Pittsburgh. PA 15275 CORPORATION 412-788-1080

D-3 1-6-3- 13 DRAFT

COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN

DRAKE CHEMICAL SITE LOCK HAVEN, PENNSYLVANIA

EPA WORK ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 10-3M31.0

PROJECS NU T NUMBER 0710.10

JUNE 1983

ARSi

A Halliburton Company ORIGINAL ~. e-rfV

DRAFT CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

2.0 BACKGROUN COMMUNITD DAN Y RELATION1 2- S HISTORY 1 2- 2.1 SITE HISTORY 2.2 3 2- COMMUNITY RELATIONS HISTORY 1 3- 3.0 ISSUE CONCERND SAN S

4.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS OBJECTIVES 4-1 5.0 COMMUNIT1 5- Y RELATIONS TECHNIQUES 1 6- 6.0 SCHEDUL ACTIVITIEF EO S 1 7- 7.0 BUDGE STAFFIND TAN G PLAN

1 8- 0 8. INTERESTED PARTIES '-iCaiNAL ~*d) DRAFT 1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Community Relations Plan e Drak(CRPth r e) fo Chemical Site discussee th s previou d currenan s t involvemen e publith f o ct wite d sitoutlineth an he e th s objectives and techniques recommended for an effective community relations program. Also included are scheduling and budgeting of activities and a list of parties interested In the site.

The primary sources for information on which this plan is based were file materials from the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region III (EPA III), telephone interviews wit ha previouofficial d A IIIan EP , t sa s community relations plan prepared by the EPA Office of Public Affairs. Additional information came from newspaper articles covering the site and from the "Remedial Action Master Plan for Drake Chemical Company, Lock Haven, Pennsylvania" prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc Wesf .o t Chester, Pennsylvania.

A wilEP l e e retaiimplementatio Th th e lea n th ni d e communitth f o n y relations program. The contractor will provide support as requested.

AB5QOOIi 1-1 'M'CailSAL, ••RpH) . DRAFT 2.0 BACKGROUND AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS HISTORY

2.1 Site History e DrakTh e Chemical Sit s locatee citi ef Locth o yn i kd Have d Castenean n a Township, Clinton County, Pennsylvania A manufacture. f o chemicar l intermediates used in the dye, cosmetic, textile, pharmaceutical, and pesticide industries, the Drake Chemical Company was in operation from 1962 until it filed r bankruptcfo Augusn i y t 1981. Previousl e sits occupieth y wa e e Kilsdonth y b d k Chemical Company which also manufactured chemicals A thir. d company, American Color and Chemical, located next to the Drake Chemical Site was also involve chemican di l production. e DrakTh e Chemical Site covers approximately eight acre d containan s n te s buildings including offices, production facilitiesn a effluen d an ,t treatment building. e sit There th rea ea ponth f o fros rt i e a d m which effluen seepins i t g through a railroad bed, creating a leachate stream which then flows through a major recreational area. This leachate stream empties into Bald Eagle Creek,a major tributar e Susquehannth f o y a Rivere sitTh e. also contain o unlinetw s d pretreatment impoundment d thresan e unlined lagoons. Within one-quarter milf eo e site locateth ar e a largd e apartment complex with many elderly residents ,larga e shopping centera municipa d ,an l park called Castanea Park. Lock Haven State College, elementary schools d severa,an l churche e locatear s d withi e milon f no e the site. The west branch of the Susquehanna River is located approximately one e sitee •nort th milth , f o o hwhilt e e Bald Eagle Cree locates ki d approximatele on y e southmilth generalo n et I . e are ,mixeth s ai d residentia d commerciallan .

In additioe leachatth o t n e stream migratin f siteof g, problem e Drakth t ea s Chemical Site include heavy organic chemical contamination of groundwater, contamination of the soil, the possibility of buried drums, an unlined lagoon with high concentrations of organics, and buildings and debris that may be contaminated. When tested, the soil showed high concentrations of 2,4,5- trichlorophenylacetic acid (TCPAA) a ,herbicid e commonly know s Fenaca n . AR5000I2 2-1 C-.iNAS.

DRAFT Sediment samples along the leachate stream and at the mouth of Bald Eagle Creek also show concentration TCPAf o s addition Ai o dichloroanilinet n , dichlorobenzene and phenol. e firsTh t recor f environmentao d l importance involvin e Drakth g e Chemical Site occurred in 1973 when the company received a citation from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (DER) for violating the Clean Streams Act. Apparently the citation was issued as a result of the flooding of Lock Haven that occurred in June 1972. The company was cited again in November 1973 and January 1977 Aprin I . l 1979 Drake Chemical Company signe Consena d t Orded ran Agreement with PADER for interim waste handling. In September 1979 the company was found to be in violation of the agreement. EPA personnel made a site inspection in June of 1980 for a preliminary assessment of the site.

Because of ten counts of health violations noted by inspectors from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Drake Chemical Company was cited again in March 1981. The NIOSH staff found equipment in poor repair, leaking pipes, dripping tanks, spills, and corrosion. A 1983 article in a local newspaper, written about the inspection, noted that the management did not enforce safety regulations, that the workers had a callous attitude toward the chemicals that they worked with, and that workers did not wear protective equipment.

In February 1982 the USEPA sent a letter to both Drake Chemical Company and American Color and Chemical informing them that they could clean up their sites voluntarily or the agency would step in and conduct the cleanup for -them. Apparentl o responsyn ther s wa ee R froDE e m th Drak d an e A becausEP e th e undertook n emergenca y remedial projec o removt t e drumo t d tank an d s an s contain the site in February 1982. On February 23 and 24, 1982 the site entry team, consisting of representatives from the EPA, DER, Emergency Response Team and the Region III Technical Assistance Team, inspected the site and noted 1,700 drums filled with wast d sludgeean . drume Somth f eso were rusted, others were bulging and leaking their contents. In addition, the team found cyanide

2-2 DRAFT reactant stored outside e pondTh . , unlined lagoon d impoundmentan s s were also located on the property. Although there was a fence around the site, people could still come in contact with the leachate stream that was flowing off site.

From March 2 to April 23, 1982 the team conducted an emergency cleanup at the site. This involved puttin p fencu gd removinan e e drumsth g , sludge d liqui,an d waste from the site. This cleanup action was not without problems. On March 15 acid mist from an oleum tank escaped and a cloud of the mist moved off site. Five Penndot workers one and one-half mile from the site reported respiratory irritation d theran , e were numerous incident f paino s t peelin f vehicleof e g th n i s town n insurancA . o handlt e claimp u resula eth e t s prograthif a sse o t s s wa m mist cloud. The next day a two inch gas main was accidentally ruptured during site work. Although the gas was turned off, nearby stores and buildings were evacuated. Again on March 23 a second cloud of oleum mist escaped, and the fire compan foro t wated ma yha r scree contaio nt e acith nd mist. Peoplaree th an ei were told to stay inside to avoid the cloud. From April 15 to April 21 wastes were wore truckes completedth n Apriko wa 3 site f e poin2 d l of don ,an snoa tt A .w fence was erected around the leachate stream flowing through Castanea Park, and warning signs were put up.

A team of surveyors from NUS Corporation (NUS) entered the site May 24 to May 27, 1983 to conduct ground surveying and establish ground control points for aerial photography approximatelt A . same yth e time anothen o rs teawa S m NU fro e mth site to conduct a reconnaissance in preparation for site work. This included air monitoring, photography, and an assessment of the conditions and locations of buildings, lagoon sitee pondd th san . n so

2.2 Community Relations History

Apparently the people of Lock Haven first became aware of the problems with the Drake Chemical Site as a result of fires there. According to volunteer firemen in the area ownee ,th histora thercompanf r e o s fireth f n e wa yo n so so e y th site d ,an mentioned that the main processing building burned in 1969. QaffvCffttfteffiitefe,• i

2-3 ARBOOQIk DRAFT >•» _ reportedly sent a cloud over the city that damaged the paint on several hundred vehicles.

Durin e emergencth g e spriny th e sitactiof n 1982th o i ge t a n, Lock Haved an n Castanea Township officials were concerned but were cooperative with the EPA and the DER. Township officials were on call 24 hours a day in case an emergency developed. At the same time there were indications that local officials were critical of the EPA because they did not receive notification of the work at the site befor emergence eth y action began.

Afte e sitth r e e earlworth n yi k A par helf 1982EP o ta publi d e ,th c meetinn o g Septembe , 198 18 o rdiscust 2 e Drakth s e Chemical Site. Approximately thirty people attended the meeting including the mayor of Lock Haven and representatives from the Clinton County Commissioners, the DER, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the Rural Economic Development Committee. At the time the citizens expressed a fear that flooding would spread the contamination froe sitth me throughou e cityth t . They also questioned whether site work would provid area'e e th jobr s sfo man y unemployed e meetinTh . s wa g attended by the media, and it was noted that radio coverage was good.

Before the beginning of the Remedial Investigation, a public meeting was held in January 198 discuso 3t RAMPe sth . Late locae rth l newspaper commented thae tth residents could not understand the RAMP and found that the answers the EPA gave to their questions were also difficult to understand. The city made similar comments. Much of this is due to the long chemical names involved at the site and e complexitth e problemth f o y , although lac f concreto k e information availablo t e the EPA has resulted in a credibility problem.

Another public meeting was scheduled for April, but was postponed because the Work Plan was not ready to present. However during April the Rural Develpment Committee, a group established in 1982 with representatives from local agencies d designean o helt d p rural development, decide o forwart d d their questions about the site in writing to the EPA. Following a committee meeting on April 26 > IS93 a

2-4

AR5000I5 DRAFT letter was sent. The questions in the letter were detailed and covered all aspects of concern at the site. The committee requested that the questions be answered durin e upcominth g g public meeting. Copiee letteth f rso were a lissenf o to t representatives from the Federal, State, and local governments and from the media. A newspaper article in the local press the next day reported on the committee's activitie d summarizesan contente dth lettere th f so .

A second grou f citizeno p s intereste e Drakth n ei d Chemical Sits formewa e d during April 1983. Called CLEAN (Citizens and Laborers for Environmental Action Now) groue ,s th comprise pwa formef o d r Drake Chemical Company workerd san interested citizens. CLEAN was apparently formed as a result of the investigative articles that had appeared in the local press. The group announced their desire to for n organizatioa m e locath ln i npape d commentean r d that they woule b d releasing a public statement and sending letters about the site to their Federal and State officials. Their main concern e articlth , e o securt noted s ewa , health screenin r formefo g r Drake Chemical employees e organizatioth t A . n meeting, which was closed to the general public, fifty people attended. They retained the services of the Boccardo Law Firm of San Jose, California, a firm known for its work in the area of hazardous waste. Attorney Michael Day from State College would also serve as advisor for the group. Franklin Furl is the group's coordinator and spokesman.

The public meeting postponed from April was held on May 24, 1983 on the campus of Lock Haven State College. Approximately 250 people attended the meeting. Also present were crews from three television stations and representatives from the EPA, NUS Corporation, DER, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH).

The meeting was opened by the EPA. When the EPA representative began to explain the role of Superfund she was interrupted by a citizen who asked "How long will this take?" The citizen was told that all questions could be asked later in the meeting. AR500016

2-5 \(Red) DRAFT * * • . « : . A introductionEP Afte e th r , slide se showb wer o t en .coverin e Remediath g l Investigation/Feasibility Study, but before the slides could be projected, a television crew had to drag out ladders to turn out their lights. This caused delays, and the crowd was restless during the slide program. Members of the audience made comments to each other. At one point one of the crowd said to the officials platforme th n o , "You're all from Philadelphia/Ne ww JerseyYorNe r ko . You're not from here!" ' . . , ;

At the end of the slide program, the television crews had to drag out their aluminum ladders lightse agai th d tur n an .n o Afte slide rth e program healte ,th h contaminatioIssuee th f so n were discusse representativey b d s frome NIOSth d Han CDC. Both employe non-employed ean e exposures were covered thit A .s poinn ti the meetin people gth e were quie attentived an t e doctoTh . r from NIOSH helped alleviat e peopl e fearth th ey f bein b o es g very open abou e risk tth f bladde o s r cancer from betanaphtvlamine. He emphasized that exposure does not mean that everyone will get cancer. ,

•' - " - : -. „ . ,.,;,,; ',,., Durin questioe th g d answean n r period e eudienc,th mand ha e y questions ranging from health costs for those who are unemployed to whether tests at the site would cover dloxln. The people seemed particularly worried about the health effects of the chemicals and the financial burdens If they did become ill. At one point Franklin Furl of CLEAN presented a petition of 1500 signatures asking for health screening. Reportedl signaturee yth s were collected with little e weekefforon n t.I Residents also voiced concern about employee records left at the Drake plant A separate meeting to discuss the health issue was scheduled for May 25. A fact shee s distribute tcovewa o t y rtr somo dt e citizen questions.

Media coverag meetine th f s heavyeo gwa . This coverage Includee spoth a d n to nationally televised "CBS Morning News followine "th g day.

188, 25 mornin3e y representativeth Ma n f O o g s fro locae mth l government tme o settlt questioe y d NIOSth etr witan o f hmedicaHt C o n CD member e lth f so monitorin citizense th r d NIOSfo g. an Althoug HC coulCD e dhth . ..

2-6 ____ ORIGINAL

DRAFT monitoring C representativCD ,a e agree o sendt d informatio locao nt l officiala n o s monitoring program set up at another site. The Drake employee health records were also discussed at the morning health meeting, and it was agreed to try to mov ee Loc theth ko t mHave n hospital. State Representative Russell Letterman . RepresentativS . U d an e William Clinger were both very intereste e statuth n si d d locatioe recordsan th f o nA loca . l newspape s reporterha d tha tasa t k force, locaf mado lp e u officials , doctor d interestesan d groupd s an wil lC assisCD e tth e Pennsylvanith a Departmen f o Healtt n conductini h a medicag l study. Mechanism screeninr sfo residente safeguardinr th g fo d san employee gth e records are presently being worke. don

Throughou e discussion th e wor d tth kan s regardin e Drakth g e Chemical Sitee ,th media has provided continuous coverage. The local press has covered the story extensively, often running stories several times a week and preparing investigative pieces resula s thif A o t. s coverage e loca,on l grassroots citizens group, CLEAN, s formedwa . While these stories generally repor e facttth s regardin casee th g t ,a e poinon t they reported that dioxi s presen wa ne sit th et bee t talthouga no ns ha t i h found during testing.

2-7 ORIGINAL /Ve r^

DRAFT 3.0 ISSUE CONCERND SAN S

f primarO y concer e Drakth t ea n Chemica le issu th Sit f healths o ei e . Bot- hex employees of the chemical company and residents of the area are extremely worried about the effect the chemicals in the area may have on their health and e healtth theif ho r families.

Among former employee e Drakth ef o sChemica l Company e healt,th h issue e possibilitfocuseth n o f so bladde y r cancer cause y b exposurd o t e betanaphtylamine. This chemical was manufactured by Drake's predecessor on the site, Kilsdonk Chemical Company, until its manufacture was outlawed in 1961. Betanaphtylamine is also formed as a by-product of improperly synthesized Bronner's acid whic s producewa h Drakey db . Accordin newspapea o gt r account published in the local press, one batch of the acid was returned to the company for containin o mucto g h betanaphthylamine e newspapeTh . r reported thae batcth t h was returned marked "carcinogenic." The newspapers have also reported that doctors have stated that several month workinf so g wit chemicae hth l will produce tumors.

Becaus e migratioth f o e f chemicalo n sitef e residentsof ,th worriee ar s d that they too may have been exposed to betanaphthylamine and are in danger of developing cancer e locaTh . l newspaper noted that worker e chemicath t sa l plant have said that chemicals were running off the site and seeping into the soil. This information seems to have caused a great deal of concern among the residents. Several doctors and public officials have been quoted in reference to the health issue. An unnamed local doctor was quoted in the local press as saying the health problem was "the biggest disaster threat around anybody's seen" while a Clinton County commissioner commented that local residents were "scared to death." In addition the local e Americachapteth f o r n Cancer Societ s beeha y n contactey b d numerous residents. According to an article in the Centre Daily Times, the executive director of the group reported, "People are very much concerned about the health effects of these chemicals. I've had numerous calls asking: 'What should we do?'" These calls have been increasing since the public, meeV'm$ oP

3-1 AR5000I9 (Red\ ) DRAFT May 24, 1983. In addition the local chapter of the American Lung Association and some local staff member hospitale th f so concernee sar d abou probleme tth .

Although the health effects of the chemicals on site are the primary concern of the citizens, residents are also interested in other aspects of the site. There has been some concern about contaminatio botf o n h Bald Eagl eSusquehanne Creeth d kan a River. Apparently the creek flows through the municipal park and is heavily fished in the area. A local newspaper has mentioned that fish from the creek are not edible whic concernes hha d some residents.

Becaus f higeo h unemploymen aree th an ti man y resident worriee ar s d aboue tth financial burden caused by the site. Not only have they expressed concern about their personal financial liability should they becom fro l e chemicalsil eth m t bu , they have expressed concern thae sitth te will cose citth ty more moneye Th . newspapers have already mentioned thacite tth y sewe e replaceb r o t line n d i d ha s some areas because chemicals had caused the pipes to deteriorate. During the emergency e actiosprinth n f 1982i o ng e loca,th l a fir p u e companiet se o t d sha screen of water to fight a cloud of acid fumes that were threatening to migrate off site. There have been questionr fo s o e residenty wilraisewh th pa l o y t b d s a s equipment the fire companies may need to handle future problems at the site during work there.

Because of the publicity that has been generated as a result of the Drake Chemical Site e cit f Loc,th o y k Have concernes ni dy develothama t i t poopa r e imagth n i e e publiceyeth f so . Linke e concer th o thi t ds i s n locae voiceth ly b Chambed f ro Commerce that other companies may leave Lock Haven because of the contamination. They also fear that industries wilt wanno l o locate cittt n th i yn i e the future. The Chamber would like to have the Drake Chemical Company land use r futurfo d e industries a ,mov e difficulb ee sit s heavilth thay i ef ma i tt y contaminate peoplf i r do e fear. thais t ti

While residents in the area are concerned about the contamination o£4he, Surface. e possibilitwateth d ran y that floodin y spreama g contaminatioe th d n tanner, there

3-2 ' AR5QQQ2Q r -IN DRAFT seem e littlb o set concern about contaminatio e groundwaterth f o n reportes i t I . d that groundwater in the immediate area does not seem to be used for drinking. At the present, the town well has been tested and found to be uncontaminated.

s alsi It o interestin o nott g e that articlee locath n li s press have givee th n impression that the residents do not seem to harbor hard feelings toward the Drake Chemical Company or its owner. Repeatedly in news articles, former workers at e planth t decline e identifiedb o t de fac th spitn ti , f o thaee compan th t o n s i y longe businesn i r o longe n d thee an s ar yr working there. Several ex-employees quoted in the newspapers have said that they do not hold the company responsible for what happened. However, they do seem to be frustrated by the situation and y ma direct this frustratio n directioni n s othe e rDrak th that ea n Chemical Company.

In addition, e site issuefurtheth ar e t a sr complicate e facth t y thab d t American Color and Chemical was recently listed by the EPA as one of the sites in Region III to be tested for dioxin. Residents have already been frightened by the possibility of dioxin at the Drake Chemical Site. The fear that dioxin may be present at a neighboring sity increasma e e concerneth their sfo r health. Thi especialls si y true because dioxi receivins ni g widespread publicity nationally.

SR5QOQ2

3-3 DRAFT 4.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS OBJECTIVES e followinTh g objective recommendee ar s communite th r dfo y relations prograt ma the Drake Chemical Site:

• To develop effective communication between government agencies and citizens in order to keep citizens informed of on-going activities and the status and results of those activities.

• To develop effective communication between government agencies and local officials in order to keep officials abreast of progress and plans at the site so they can respond knowledgeably to citizen inquiries.

• To develop effective communication between government agencies and the medi n ordei a o providt r e media representatives with accurate information on the status of the project and the on-going activities.

• To seek opinions of community citizens and public officials on the method remediaf so l action being considere provido t d dan e opportunities communite forth commeno yt remedian to l alternatives.

o establisT • h reasonable expectation sitr sfo e e activitie th pare f th o t n o s e publipublith d can c officials.

• To provide clear information to help citizens and local officials understan complexitiee dth sitee th .f so

AR500022

4-1 DRAFT 5.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS TECHNIQUES

e followinTh g technique recommendee ar s s methoda d meetinf so objectivee th g s listed in Section 4.0:

______Objectives______Techniques______

o developT effective communication Creat information ea n repository between government agencies and convenient for use by all citizens. citizens in order to keep citizens informed of on-going activities Issue fact sheets providing information on and the status and results of those remedial investigation results and feasible activities. alternatives.

Issue press release correspono st o dt project milestones.

To develop effective communication Establish telephone contact with officials * between governmen d providan t agenciee the d m san wit h regular updaten so local official orden si keeo rt p site progress. officials abreast of progress and plans at the site so they can re- spond knowledgeabl citizeo yt n inquiries. Conduct briefings with official inforo st m them of planned work at the site.

o develoT p effective communication Establish contact witprese providhth d san e witmedie hth orde n ai provido rt e them with contact telephone numbera d san them with accurate informatio n no press kit. the status of the project and the on-going activities.

Issue press releases. AH500Q23

5-1 DRAFT

______Objectives ______Techniques ______'__

To seek opinions of community citizens Conduct public meetings to communicate d publian c official methode th n so f so informatio d solicinan t citizien input. remedial action being considered dan o providt e opportunitiee th r sfo communit commeno yt remedian to l alternatives.

To establish reasonable expectations Stress the necessity of the procedures in- for site activities on the part of volved in site remediation in information the public and the public officials. provided to the press and the public. Clarify reasons for scheduling and the time involved.

Avoid givin impressioe gth n that problems will be solved as quickly as the community may like. o providT e clear informatio o nt Issue fact sheets. help citizen d locasan l officials understan complexitiee dth e th f so When developing information strivr efo site. clea concisd ran e wording wit miniha - mum of technical language. Explain terms when technical languag- in s ei cluded.

5-2 DRAFT 6.0 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES e followinTh lisa f majoo s ti g r projec e specifit th step d an cs community relations activities that should accompany each step. Community relations activities are closely tieo technicat d l progres e sited th shoul an t ,a se b conducted n i d conjunction with technical work.

1. Remedial Investigation

• Conduct a briefing of public officials on plans for site work prior to notifying the press.

• issu presa e s planrelease sitr th fo sen worko e . Supply membere th f so media with contact telephone numbers and a press kit.

• Issue fact sheets monthl announco t y e progres previoue sth s montd an h plans for the following month.

• Conduct briefings to update officials on the progress of the remedial investigations.

• Establis n informatioa h n repositor a locatio n i y n with e accesth r fo s entire communit d announcyan availabilits eit y wit presha s release. e conclusioth e remediat A th f • o n l investigation, brief official d issuan s e press releases on the results of the investigation.

• Conduct a public meeting to present the alternatives to be considered and o solicit t public input.

6-1 ORIGINAL '',_.- j\

DRAFT . 2 Feasibility Study

• Conduc tbriefina publif o g c official d issuan s e press release n remediaso l alternatives being considered.

• Update e feasibilitofficialth n o s y study through regular telephone contacts.

• Develo facpa findingte Remediasheee th th n f to so l Investigation.

• Issue fact sheets monthly on progress and plans.

« Hold a public meeting to explain the findings of the study, to announce the selected alternatives and to announce the three-week comment period.

ftR500026 6-2 a d) DRAFT

7.0 BUDGE STAFFIND TAN G PLAN

e followinTh g list contain e communitsth y relations activities that wil e requireb l d during the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study at the Drake Chemical Site. Local and regional interest in the site may fluctuate during the course of the work because of the political and social climate of the community. Because of this, it is recommended that a reassessment be conducted prior to implementation of the remedial action. The following figures apply only to the initial community relations activities as described in this plan.

______Activity______Work Hours______

6 1 Press Release ) s(4 8 28 Fact Sheets (12) 4 Information Respository Community Meetings (2) 128 Briefing of public officials (4) 64 On-going telephon0 4 e contact with officials

7-1 DRAFT

8.0 INTERESTED PARTIES

Local Government

Alfred E. Hoberman, Councilman Dian Stuempfle. nH , Councilwoman Churc. E 0 2 h Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-8380 (home) 717/893-2055 (office)

Richard Adner Public Works Director Churc. E 0 2 h Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-9513

James Eckert Clinton County Commissioner Court House Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-7779

Rich Marcinkavage City Engineer Churc. E 0 2 h Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-9513

Thomas Conklin Castanea Township Supervisor 4 Nittan38 y Road Castanea, Pennsylvania 17726 717/748-9070 8-1 tea \

DRAFT Joe Quercia Director Clinton County Emergency Center 5 Wes40 t Church Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-5105

Dr. James L Dolan CAPS 955 Bellefonte Avenue Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-7714

Local Organizations

Franklin Furl Spokesman CLEAN 200 E. Water Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-4297

Harriet Cooper Executive Director Clinton County Cancer Society 72 East Church Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-6072

HR500029

8-2 DRAFT Herb Larson Co-Chairman Rural Economic Development Committee . ChurcW 5 40 h Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-5295

Vera Visscher President Leagu Womef eo n Voters 1304 Commerce Park Drive Williamsport, Pennsylvania 17701 717/323-5802

Roger Poremski Executive Director Chamber of Commerce 138 E. Water Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-5782

Gerry Lacy Trout Unlimited

Al Speth, President Lock Haven Hospital 24 Cree Drive Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/893-5024

ftBSOOOSO

8-3 DRAFT Ellen R. Dietrich Rural Development Committee 6 Mai32 n Street Mill Hall, Pennsylvania 17751

Media

Jeff Fleishman Staff Writer Lock Haven Express Mai. W n Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-6791

George Lewis News Editor Lock Haven Express Mai. W n Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-6791

Justin Catanoso Staff Writer Centre Daily Times 9 8 x Bo P. .0 3400 E. College Avenue State College, Pennsylvania 16801

D. Froke Daily Collegian Penn State University 6 Carnegi12 e Building University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

8-4 QKiGiNAL

DRAFT

Patric Leon. kJ e Express 4 Hill Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-8077

Julie Brennan WBPZ-Radio Lock Haven, Pennsylvania • 17745 717/748-4038

Kirn Pettingill WSQV Bo4 x35 Jersey Shore, Pennsylvania 17740

Federal Officials

Senator John Heinz 277 Senate Russell Office Building Constitution Avenue Washington, D.C. 20510 202/224-6324

Senator Arlen Specter 1 Senat33 e Hart Office Building 2nd Street & Constitution Avenue N.E. Washington, D.C. 20510 202/224-4254

8-5 ORIGINAL (&£ r*»\

DRAFT Representative Willia Clinger. F m . ,Jr 1122 Longworth House Office Building Independence Avenue between C Street & South Capital Street S.E. Washington, D.C. 20515

Suite 219 315 South Alien Street State College, Pennsylvania 16801 814/238-1776

Rebecc Mill. aM s Congressman William F. Clinger 315 S. Alien Street Suite 219 State College, Pennsylvania 16801 814/238-1776

Paul A. Schultz NIOSH 4676 Columbia Parkway Cincinnati, Ohio 45220 513/684-4386

State Officials

Governor Richard Thornburgh 717/787-2500

8-6 ORIGINAL TZ- -IN DRAFT Sar Williamso. aA n PA DOH Streeh 4t t. W 4 73 Williamsport, Pennsylvania 17701 717/327-3400

James S. Lovette Representative Russel Letterma. lP n 0 12 x Bo P. .O Main Capitol Building Pennsylvania Hous Representativef eo s Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 717/783-8956

Dennis Sciabica Norma Fische. nE r Senator J. Doyle Corman Hig. W h9 Stree21 t Bellefonte, Pennsylvania 16823

Public Meeting

Ulmer Planetarium Lock Haven State College Fairview Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745

Interested Citizens

Dorothy Hummer

8-7 ORIGINAL,

DRAFT

Gary Wamser 344 E. Water Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745

Larry Kephart Fallon Hote» l 13Wate. 1E r Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745

Jame Bottor. sE f Wate. W 4 r 34 Street Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745 717/748-9673

Information Repository

Library Lock Haven State College 893-2309

88500035

8-8