DOCSLIB.ORG

Rural Road Sector Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rural Road Sector Project Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors Project Number: 40610 September 2007 Proposed Loan and Technical Assistance Grant Republic of Armenia: Rural Road Sector Project CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 24 August 2007) Currency Unit – dram (AMD) AMD1.00 = $0.0030 $1.00 = AMD337.75 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank ARD – Armenian Roads Directorate Non-Commercial State Organization ASIF – Armenia Social Investment Fund EA – executing agency EARF – environmental assessment and review framework EIRR – economic internal rate of return EMP – environmental management plan GDP – gross domestic product HDM4 – Highway Development and Management Model 4 IA – implementing agency ICB – international competitive bidding IDPR – internally displaced persons and refugees IDPRDF – internally displaced persons and refugees development framework IDPRDP – internally displaced persons and refugees development plan IEE – initial environmental examination iRAP – international Road Assessment Programme IRI – international roughness index JBIC – Japan Bank for International Cooperation JICA – Japan International Cooperation Agency LRNP – Lifeline Road Network Program MCC – Millennium Challenge Corporation MOTC – Ministry of Transport and Communications NCB – national competitive bidding NPV – net present value PAM – project administration memorandum PBC – performance-based contract PGC – project governing council PMU – project management unit PPMS – project performance monitoring system PRSP – Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper RF – resettlement framework RP – resettlement plan SIEE – summary initial environmental examination TA – technical assistance UNESCAP – United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific UNAIDS – Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS UNDP – United Nations Development Programme USAID – United States Agency for International Development NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Armenia and its agencies ends on 31 December. (ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. Vice President L. Jin, Operations Group 1 Director General J. Miranda, Central and West Asia Department (CWRD) Director S. O’Sullivan, Infrastructure Division, CWRD Team leader H. Koide, Principal Infrastructure Finance Specialist, CWRD Team members B. Konysbayev, Counsel, Office of the General Counsel L. B. Lahm, Senior Advisor, Office of the Vice President (Operations 2) P. Lizot, Head, Project Administration Unit, CWRD O. Nazmieva, Financial Control Specialist, Controllers Department S. Tu, Environmental Specialist, CWRD L. P. Alejandro, Assistant Project Analyst, CWRD A. L. Silverio, Administrative Assistant, CWRD CONTENTS Page LOAN AND PROJECT SUMMARY i MAP I. THE PROPOSAL 1 II. RATIONALE: SECTOR PERFORMANCE, PROBLEMS, AND OPPORTUNITIES 1 A. Performance Indicators and Analysis 1 B. Analysis of Key Problems and Opportunities 2 III. THE PROPOSED PROJECT 6 A. Impact and Outcome 6 B. Outputs 6 C. Special Features 7 D. Project Investment Plan 7 E. Financing Plan 8 F. Implementation Arrangements 8 IV. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 12 V. PROJECT BENEFITS, IMPACTS, ASSUMPTIONS, AND RISKS 13 A. Economic Benefits 13 B. Project Sustainability 14 C. Environmental Impacts 14 D. Social and Poverty Impacts 14 E. Indigenous People 14 F. Internally Displaced Persons and Refugees 15 G. Land Acquisition and Resettlement 15 H. Risks 16 VI. ASSURANCES AND CONDITIONS 16 A. Implementation Arrangements 16 B. Conditions for Disbursement 19 VII. RECOMMENDATION 20 APPENDIXES 1. Design and Monitoring Framework 21 2. Road Subsector Analysis 23 3. External Assistance to the Road Subsector 29 4. Selection Criteria and Approval Process for Subprojects 30 5. List of Subprojects Identified for the Project 32 6. Detailed Cost Estimates and Financing Plan 34 7. Project Organization and Implementation Arrangements 36 8. Indicative Implementation Schedule 37 9. Procurement Plan 38 10. Economic Analysis 42 11. Summary Poverty Reduction and Social Strategy 47 SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIXES (available on request) A. Outline Terms of Reference for Subproject Preparation and Project Supervision B. Financial Management Assessment C. Outline Terms of Reference for Transport Sector Development Strategy D. Summary Initial Environmental Examination E. Internally Displaced Persons and Refugees Development Framework F. Resettlement Framework LOAN AND PROJECT SUMMARY Borrower Republic of Armenia Classification Targeting classification: Targeted intervention (geographic poverty) Sector: Transport and communications Subsector: Roads and highways Themes: Sustainable economic growth, capacity development Subthemes: Fostering physical infrastructure development, institutional development Environment Category B. An initial environmental examination (IEE) has been Assessment undertaken, and a summary initial environmental examination (SIEE) is in Supplementary Appendix D. Project Description The proposed Rural Road Sector Project (the Project) will (i) enhance the economic integration of selected rural communities, which make up about 10% of the total rural population, through improvement of high priority rural feeder roads totaling about 220 kilometers (km) connected to the national road network; and (ii) strengthen the transport sector management capability. To maximize the benefits and reach out to the majority of the rural population in the country, the Project has been designed by actively maintaining operational partnerships with the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), US Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), Armenian Social Investment Fund (ASIF), international Road Assessment Programme (iRAP), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Rationale Facing ongoing globalization, Armenia has progressively made efforts to strengthen the interlinkage between its economy and other economies. The transport sector, particularly the road subsector, has played an increasingly important role in this process. As the predominant transport mode, road transport is important for the national economy and population and serves 98% of passenger traffic and 66% of freight traffic. The majority of the road network traverses mountainous terrain, and altitudes frequently exceed 1,500 meters (m) above sea level. Steep gradients, deep cuttings, and high embankments are common in mountainous areas, and landslides occur frequently. Severe winter weather requires extensive efforts to maintain access. In many areas of the road network, high intensity rainfall and poor road drainage cause traffic problems and road infrastructure damage. The extreme climate also causes a negative impact on the behavior of road pavements, particularly because of freezing and thawing in the spring. In Armenia, 1.2 million people (about 38% of the total population) live ii in rural areas, of which more than 45% is poor. Poverty has been reduced from 50.0% in 2000 to 29.8% in 2005 but poverty reduction has been slower in rural areas. This is mainly because of constrained economic activities—primarily attributable to mountainous topography and poor transport infrastructure—imposing high direct and indirect transport costs on the rural population, and limiting income opportunities and expansion of rural industries. High transport costs and constrained road access have also negatively affected non- income aspects of poverty in rural areas because of limited access to social service delivery institutions. To respond to challenges created by road infrastructure deficiency, the Government’s main road subsector policy until 2015 focuses on the rehabilitation and maintenance of existing roads in line with the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP). The Government adopted three strategic goals for its road infrastructure development for the period 2006–2015: (i) maintenance and improvement of the main road network to enhance the country’s business competitiveness and support the economy, (ii) improvement of the socioeconomic condition of the rural population through rehabilitation of rural roads in support of the PRSP, and (iii) improvement of traffic safety. The Government plans to (i) complete the rehabilitation of old bridges and other ancillary facilities along the main highways by 2010, (ii) complete the rehabilitation of secondary roads and bridges by 2015, (iii) meet rural road transport demands in a cost-effective manner, and (iv) ensure road safety throughout all road categories. To address inefficient infrastructure as one of the main causes of poverty, the Government has set rural infrastructure development as the cornerstone of the PRSP and has prepared rural infrastructure investment programs to reduce rural poverty. In the road sector, the Government developed a Lifeline Road Network Program (LRNP) in 2004, with assistance from the World Bank. The LRNP will improve the access of rural communities to the national highway system in an optimal manner throughout the country. It targets 784 high priority rural feeder roads (secondary and local roads) totaling about 2,700 km. Under the small-scale technical assistance for preparing the Project, the overall cost of the LRNP has been preliminarily updated to an estimated $300 million. MCC has committed to provide $67 million for the rehabilitation of rural roads (totaling about 940 km), while the Government
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preparatory Survey for Yeghvard Irrigation System Improvement Project
    STATE COMMITTEE OF WATER ECONOMY MINISTRY OF ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURES AND NATURAL RESOURCES THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA PREPARATORY SURVEY FOR YEGHVARD IRRIGATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FINAL REPORT (FR) APPENDIXES NOVEMBER 2016 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) SANYU CONSULTANTS INC. (SCI) ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD. (OCG) 3R CR 16-033 CONTENTS OF APPENDIXES Appendix A: Current Conditions of Irrigation Facilities ................................. APP A-1 Appendix B: Agriculture ............................................................................... APP B-1 Appendix-C: Results of Surveys Carried out and WUA Workshops ...........APP C-1 Appendix-D: Meteorology, Hydrology and Water Resource .........................APP D-1 Appendix-E: Irrigation Planning .................................................................... APP E-1 Appendix-F: Geological and Hydro-geological Conditions ........................... APP F-1 Appendix-G: Reservoir Planning ................................................................. APP G-1 Appendix-H: Estimation of Leakage Rate ....................................................APP H-1 Appendix-I: Laboratory Test ........................................................................ APP I-1 Appendix-J: Conditions and Results of Dam Stability Analysis ................... APP J-1 Appendix-K: Environmental and Social Considerations ............................... APP K-1 Appendix-L: Project Cost ............................................................................. APP L-1
    [Show full text]
  • The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia
    30312 Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia: Addressing Gaps in Service Delivery Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure and Energy Services Department Europe and Central Asia Region 1st September 2004 FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 Disclaimer: This paper is published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with minimum delay. The typescript of this paper, therefore, has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. © 2004 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), The World Bank. ii FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 CONTENTS Abbreviations And Acronyms vi Acknowledgments vii Overview and Summary of Recommendations 1 Introduction 5 Why did we do this Study?........................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Environmental Examination
    5 ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EXAMINATION FOR RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT SEWAGE SYSTEMS IN RA 5-1 Environmental Examination for Cultural Properties (1/2) Nos. of Nos. of Community cultural Rating Community cultural Rating properties properties ARAGATSOTN MARZ Akunq 9 D Lusagyugh 10 D Aghdzq 9 D Tsaghkahovit 5 D Antarut 3 D Tsaghkashen 2 D Ashnak 16 D Tsilqar 6 D Avan+Khnusik 36 D Katnaghbyur 10 D Avtona 13 D Karmrashen 13 D Aragats (Aparan district) 12 D Kaqavadzor 9 D Arayi 6 D Hartavan 15 D Arteni 1 D Dzoraglukh 14 D Apnagyugh 10 D Dzoragyugh 3 D Baysz 4 D Meliqgyugh 3 D Byurakan 40 D Miraq 4 D Garnahovit 10 D Mulqi 2 D Geghadir 1 D Nigavan 9 D Gegharot 11 D Norashen (Aparan district) 8 D Norashen (Aragats Davtashen 5 D District) 2 D Dian 4 D Shenavan 4 D Yeghipartush 8 D Shgharshik 2 D Yeghnik 10 D Vosketas 2 D Yernjatap 14 D Chqnagh 6 D Zovasar 3 D Vardenis 14 D Ttujur 7 D Vardenut 5 D Irind 6 D Verin Sasunik 18 D Lernapar 4 D Tegher 2 D Lernarot 24 D Orgov 24 D SHIRAK MARZ Alvar 3 D Krasar 6 D Aghvorik 2 D Hovit 11 D Ardenis 3 D Dzorashen 1 D Arpeni 6 D Mets Sariar 3 D Bandivan 14 D Musaelyan 19 D Bashgyugh 8 D Shaghik 3 D Garnaritch + Yeghnajur 4 D Shirak 2 D Kamkhut 2 D Pemzashen 12 D Lernakert 12 D Jajur 4 D Lernut 4 D Jrarat 18 D Tsaghkut 5 D Sarnaghbyur 45 D Kamo 12 D Sarapat 2 D Karmrakar 10 D Sizavet 1 D Kaqavasar 3 D Tzoghamarg 8 D Krashen 2 D Poqr Sariar 2 D Source: The Study Team (2007) EE-1-1/2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EXAMINATION FOR RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT SEWAGE SYSTEMS IN RA 5-1 Environmental Examination for Cultural Properties (2/2) Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia Lifeline Road Network Improvement Project - Second Additional Financing
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: PAD3259 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PAPER ON A PROPOSED ADDITIONAL LOAN AND A RESTRUCTURING IN THE AMOUNT OF EUR 13.4 MILLION TO THE Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FOR THE LIFELINE ROAD NETWORK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT April 16, 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Transport Global Practice Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective March 31, 2019) Currency Units EURO (€) US$1.12 EUR 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AF Additional Financing ARD Armenian Roads Directorate CADaS Common Accident Data Set CARE Community Database on Accident on the Road in Europe CER Contingent Emergency Response CERC Contingent Emergency Response Component CPF Country Partnership Framework CW Civil Works DA Designated Account DBST Double Bituminous Surface Treatment DO Development Objective EaP Eastern Partnership EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan EUR Euro FM Financial Management FY Fiscal Year GBV Gender-Based Violence GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Greenhouse Gas GIS Geographic Information System GoA Government of Armenia GPS Global
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Satisfaction Survey Baseline Evaluation in Aragatsotn
    PATIENT SATISFACTION SURVEY BASELINE EVALUATION IN ARAGATSOTN, ARMAVIR, AND ARARAT MARZES 2008 DISCLAIMER This publication is made possible by the support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared by the Primary Health Care Reform (PHCR) Project, Armenia. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the USAID or the United States Government. Preface The Primary Healthcare Reform (PHCR) project is a nationwide five-year (2005-2010) program funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under a contract awarded to Emerging Markets Group, Ltd. (EMG) in September 2005. The project’s primary objective is the increased utilization of sustainable, high-quality primary healthcare services leading to the improved health of Armenian families. This objective is operationalized by supporting the Ministry of Health (MoH) to implement a package of six interventions that links policy reform with service delivery so that each informs the other generating synergistic effects. These six interventions address healthcare reforms and policy support (including renovation and equipping of facilities); open enrollment; family medicine; quality of care; healthcare finance; and public education, health promotion and disease prevention. “What impact are these interventions having?” is a question frequently asked but less frequently funded. Fortunately, provision was made in the PHCR project to address the “impact” question. PHCR developed a set of six tools to monitor progress and evaluate results. Three of these tools are facility-based and are designed to assess changes through a pre-test and post-test methodology at 164 primary healthcare facilities and their referral facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION TRANSPORT PIU SI Public Disclosure Authorized LIFELINE ROAD NETWORK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN CHECKLIST FOR SMALL SCALE ROAD REHABILITATION Public Disclosure Authorized REHABILITATION OF THE SECTION AT KM 0+000 – KM 18+795 OF THE ROAD ARMAVIR-NORAPAT-MRGASHAT-AREVIK- EGHEGNUT-ERASKHAHUN OF THE RA ARMAVIR MARZ Public Disclosure Authorized December 2015 PART 1: GENERAL PROJECT AND SITE INFORMATION INSTITUTIONAL & ADMINISTRATIVE Country Armenia Project title Rehabilitation of Armavir-Norapar-Mrgashat-Arevik-Eghegnut-Yeraskhahun road section. Scope of project The project envisages rehabilitation of the km 0+000 – km 18+795 section of and activity the Armavir-Norapar-Mrgashat-Arevik-Eghegnut-Yeraskhahun road. Design work is done in accordance with acting norms and standard designs. The main technical parameters of existing road adopted in the design are the following: ➢ Subgrade width 7.0-15 m ➢ Carriageway width 6.0-14 m ➢ Width of shoulders 0.6-1.5 m The following works are designed on the basis of visual observation, geological surveys, and environmental measures: ➢ Rehabilitation of the subgrade. ➢ Restoration of the drainage system (repair and construction of culverts), construction of side ditches and chutes. ➢ Rehabilitation and reconstruction of pavement. ➢ Filling of shoulders. ➢ Road furnishing (access ramps, sidewalks, guardrails, traffic signs and road marking). Institutional WB Project Management arrangements Project team leader (Name and Transport Projects contacts) Carolina Monsalve Implementation Unit SI Implementation Safeguard Supervision Contactor arrangements «Kuarlini» Ltd, «Sisian F&PA», (Name and KocksConsult Gmbh Road Vehicles CJSC, contacts) Kapavor Ltd SITE DESCRIPTION Name of site Armavir-Norapar-Mrgashat-Arevik-Eghegnut-Yeraskhahun road section Describe site Armavir Marz Attachement 1: location Site Map [x]Y [ ] N Who owns the Community / State land? Description of Administratively, the road section belongs to Armavir Marz.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Status & Results
    The World Bank Report No: ISR16191 Implementation Status & Results Armenia Social Investment Fund III (P094225) Operation Name: Social Investment Fund III (P094225) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 12 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 07-Oct-2014 Country: Armenia Approval FY: 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Armenia Social Investment Fund Key Dates Board Approval Date 26-Oct-2006 Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2011 Planned Mid Term Review Date 15-May-2009 Last Archived ISR Date 09-Feb-2014 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 20-Dec-2006 Revised Closing Date 31-Mar-2015 Actual Mid Term Review Date 06-May-2010 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The objective of the Project is to support the Government's policy to raise the living standards of the poor and vulnerable groups through: (i) improving the quality and access, and increasing the coverage of community infrastructure and services in poor communities, and for the most vulnerable groups in response to critical needs; (ii) promoting complementary institutional capacity building at the community and municipal level so as to improve the quality and sustainability of community investments and service delivery, increase accountability, and enhance greater stakeholder empowerment at the local level; and (iii) creation of employment associatedwith the provision of community infrastructure and services.
    [Show full text]
  • AM 15SC Decisions EN.Pdf
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15th MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE ON WATER SECTOR ISSUES IN ARMENIA April 26, 2016 Yerevan, Armenia The 15th Meeting of the Steering Committee (SC) of the National Policy Dialogue (NPD) on Water Sector Issues in Armenia was chaired by Mr. Volodya Narimanyan, Deputy Head of the State Committee on Water Systems (SCWS) of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Armenia. 15th Meetings of the Steering Committee of the NPD on Water Sector Issues in Armenia The objective of the meeting was to discuss the status of NPD activities and recent developments in water sector of Armenia, as well as the progress in implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) principles in Armenia. The meeting also served as platform for establishing synergies with other international water projects implemented in Armenia. In the opening session Mr. Narimanyan welcomed the participants of the meeting, and presented the main points of the agenda. The SC members adopted the agenda as it was presented. Opening statement were made by Mr. John Barker from the Delegation of the European Union (EU) to Armenia, Ms. Tatiana Efimova from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)/Environmental Action Programme (EAP) Task Force Secretariat, and Mr. Peep Mardiste from the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). In his remarks Mr. Barker welcomed the participants of the meeting, and stressed the importance of the platform, which the NPD is serving for. He also mentioned about the European Investment Bank loan of 30.7 mln Euro for financing the improvement of the quality and reliability of water supply services and the upgrading of wastewater treatment in Armenia, and the planned grant of 15 mln Euro within the EU Neighbourhood Investment Facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex to the Protocol Decision of the Sitting of the Government of the Republic of Armenia No 32 of 9 August 2012 THIRD REPOR
    Annex to the Protocol Decision of the Sitting of the Government of the Republic of Armenia No 32 of 9 August 2012 THIRD REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH POINT 1 OF ARTICLE 15 OF THE EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Yerevan 2012 Content Introduction Part 1 Analysis of the situation Part 2 Practical steps taken at national level summarising results of the 2nd stage of monitoring of implementation of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages Part 3 Measures taken and projects implemented after the second report submitted by the Republic of Armenia aimed at application of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages Part 4 Steps taken – according to articles Part 5 Implementation of the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the application of the Charter by Armenia Annexes Annex 1 Distribution of permanent population of the Republic of Armenia by cities and villages Annex 2 The list of mixed rural settlements or settlements populated predominantly by national minorities Annex 3 The list of settlements, where Yezidi or Kurdish language is taught at state general education schools Annex 4 The list of settlements, where Assyrian language is taught at state general education schools Annex 5 The list of state general education schools which have classes with Russian language instruction INTRODUCTION 1. According to point 1 of Article 15 of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages, the Republic of Armenia submits the third report on the course of measures aimed at application of the principles of the Charter and of provisions of the Charter, as well as on results of the second stage of observations of the Committee of Experts on application of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages in Armenia, on practical steps implemented at national level in the framework of the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick LORIN
    ______________ Patrick LORIN QUARTERLY REPORT January-March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. COMMERCIAL............................................................................................................................ 5 QUARTERLY ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................................6 DIAGRAMS 1-5 ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 2. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................... 14 EXPLOITATION DIRECTORATE............................................................................................................................... 15 2.1 WATER PRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 16 PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT .................................................................................................................................... 17 1. PRODUCED WATER QUANTITY AND POTABLE WATER LOSSES .............................................................. 17 WATER PRODUCTION & LOSSES DIAGRAMS – 6,7 ...................................................................................... 17 WATER PRODUCTION & LOSSES TABLE-1 .......................................................................................................... 18 2. POTABLE WATER DISINFECTION ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Seventy-Fifth Session Seventy-Fifth Year Agenda Items 34, 71 and 135
    United Nations A/75/495–S/2020/981 General Assembly Distr.: General 16 October 2020 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventy-fifth session Seventy-fifth year Agenda items 34, 71 and 135 Prevention of armed conflict Right of peoples to self-determination The responsibility to protect and the prevention of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity Letter dated 5 October 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General I have the honour to enclose herewith the ad hoc report of the Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia on fact-finding activities in villages of the Gegharkunik region (marz) of Armenia (see annex). The report testifies to the indiscriminate and targeted artillery and air attacks by Azerbaijani armed forc es from 27 September to 1 October 2020 on the villages of Sotk, Shatvan and Kut, which have resulted in the killing of one civilian and damage to civilian infrastructure. I kindly request that the present letter and its annex be circulated as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda items 34, 71 and 135, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Mher Margaryan Ambassador Permanent Representative 20-13759 (E) 201020 *2013759* A/75/495 S/2020/981 Annex to the letter dated 5 October 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Ad hoc report on fact-finding activities in villages of Gegharkunik province of Armenia damaged by Azerbaijani military attacks, 30 September–1 October Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia Yerevan, 2020 On September 30, the Human Rights Defender visited Gegharkunik province of Armenia to conduct a fact-finding mission related to the Azerbaijani air and artillery attacks towards civilian settlements.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]