DOCSLIB.ORG

Waves Wave Parameters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Waves Krauss Chapter Nine Wave Parameters • Wavelength = λ = Length between wave crests (or troughs) • Wave Number = κ = 2π/λ (units of 1/length) • Wave Period = T = Time it takes a wave crest to travel one wavelength (units of time) • Angular Frequency = ω = 2π/T (units of 1/time) • Wave Speed = C = ω/κ Distance a wave crest travels per unit time (units of distance/time) • Wave Height = 2a = Twice the wave amplitude • Wave Steepness = Wave Height/Wavelength 1 - Ideal waves Propagate Energy but not Mass Wave Equation Navier-Stokes Equation Ignoring viscous forces and looking just at the x and z components… Expanding the terms… 2 These equations used Eq. 1 to establish boundary conditions… (see Krauss) Eq. 2 This expression solved to obtain wave equation… (see Krauss) Eq. 3 Guess a solution for Eq. 3 of the form… Eq. 4 Plug Eq. 4 into Eq. 3 to yield the following differential equation… Eq. 5 Eq. 5 One solution to Eq. 5 is… Eq. 6 So… The lower boundary condition requires that w (or… dΦ/dz) go to zero at z = h (h is the seafloor depth) (see Krauss) The boundary condition at the free surface must satisfy the following expression (see Krauss) The lower boundary condition requires B=0 The free surface boundary condition requires (see Krauss)… Eq. 7 3 Eq. 7 or… or… Also known as the dispersion relation of Lamb (1945) or… Given that the phase velocity can be written as C = ω/κ it follows that… Phase velocity as a function of wave number and water depth note… Therefore… For h < λ/20 For h > λ/2 4 – Wave Speeds - • Deep-Water Waves (Bottom Depth > λ/2) – Speed is a Function of Wavelength Only – Waves with Longer Wavelength move faster than Waves with Shorter Wavelength • Shallow-Water Waves (Bottom Depth < λ /20) – Speed is a Function of Depth Only – Waves Travel Slower in Shallower Water Irrespective of Wavelength as long as Depth < λ /20 Deep-Water and Shallow-Water Wave Regions 5 Speed of Deep-Water and Shallow- Water Waves as a Function of Wavelength and Depth Important Consequences of Wave Speed Dependency on Wavelength or Bottom Depth 6 Wave Dispersion: Self Sorting of Deep-Water Waves Leaving a Storm Region based on Wavelength. It Occurs Because Longer Wavelength Waves Travel Faster than Shorter Wavelength Waves (for Deep Water). Wave Refraction: Bending of Shallow-Water Wave Fronts Due to Change in Bottom Depth. The Leading Edge of a Wave Front Enters Shallower Water and Slows While the Remaining Front Continues at Higher Speed. The Net Result is a Rotation of Wave Fronts To Become Parallel with Bottom Depth Contours. 7 Consequence of Wave Refraction Focusing and Defocusing of Wave Energy on Headlands and Bays, Respectively Group Velocity 8 Group Velocity Group Velocity using a trigonometric rule… recall… Wave Speed = C = ω/κ for: Then by analogy… In the limit… 9 C = ω/κ or ω = C κ The Main Point: Group velocity for Deep Water Waves is 1/2 the phase velocity. Group velocity for Shallow Water Waves is equal to the phase velocity. Wave Spectra 10 Spectral Analysis Time Domain to Frequency Domain Transformation Spectral Analysis Two Sine Waves at 260 Hz and 525 Hz, Respectively 11 Spectral Analysis Time Series derived from the Summation of the Two Sine Waves Spectral Analysis Fourier Transform from Time Domain to Frequency Domain of Previous Time Series 12 Distribution of Wave Energy in the Ocean as a Function of Wave Frequency or Wavelength 13 Aliasing in Wave Sampling 14 Wave Generation Wave Height of Wind-Generated Waves is a Function of… 1. Wind Speed 2. Duration of Wind Event 3. Fetch - the distance over which wind can blow without obstruction Full Developed Waves (Unlimited by Fetch and Duration) 15 The Importance of Fetch Northerly/Southerly Winds Produce a Long Fetch Over Finger Lakes (A), and Easterly/Westerly Winds Produce a Short Fetch (B) A B Fetch in the Open Ocean is Limited by the Size of the Storm System 16 Lateral Spreading of Wave Energy from a Storm Source (95% of Energy Contained Within ±45o of Storm Direction) 17.
Recommended publications
  • Glossary Physics (I-Introduction)

    Glossary Physics (I-Introduction)

    1 Glossary Physics (I-introduction) - Efficiency: The percent of the work put into a machine that is converted into useful work output; = work done / energy used [-]. = eta In machines: The work output of any machine cannot exceed the work input (<=100%); in an ideal machine, where no energy is transformed into heat: work(input) = work(output), =100%. Energy: The property of a system that enables it to do work. Conservation o. E.: Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it may be transformed from one form into another, but the total amount of energy never changes. Equilibrium: The state of an object when not acted upon by a net force or net torque; an object in equilibrium may be at rest or moving at uniform velocity - not accelerating. Mechanical E.: The state of an object or system of objects for which any impressed forces cancels to zero and no acceleration occurs. Dynamic E.: Object is moving without experiencing acceleration. Static E.: Object is at rest.F Force: The influence that can cause an object to be accelerated or retarded; is always in the direction of the net force, hence a vector quantity; the four elementary forces are: Electromagnetic F.: Is an attraction or repulsion G, gravit. const.6.672E-11[Nm2/kg2] between electric charges: d, distance [m] 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (q1q2/d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] m,M, mass [kg] Gravitational F.: Is a mutual attraction between all masses: q, charge [As] [C] 2 2 2 2 F = GmM/d [Nm /kg kg 1/m ] = [N] 0, dielectric constant Strong F.: (nuclear force) Acts within the nuclei of atoms: 8.854E-12 [C2/Nm2] [F/m] 2 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (e /d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] , 3.14 [-] Weak F.: Manifests itself in special reactions among elementary e, 1.60210 E-19 [As] [C] particles, such as the reaction that occur in radioactive decay.
  • Dispersion of Tsunamis: Does It Really Matter? and Physics and Physics Discussions Open Access Open Access S

    Dispersion of Tsunamis: Does It Really Matter? and Physics and Physics Discussions Open Access Open Access S

    EGU Journal Logos (RGB) Open Access Open Access Open Access Advances in Annales Nonlinear Processes Geosciences Geophysicae in Geophysics Open Access Open Access Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1507–1526, 2013 Natural Hazards Natural Hazards www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/1507/2013/ doi:10.5194/nhess-13-1507-2013 and Earth System and Earth System © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Sciences Sciences Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric Chemistry Chemistry Dispersion of tsunamis: does it really matter? and Physics and Physics Discussions Open Access Open Access S. Glimsdal1,2,3, G. K. Pedersen1,3, C. B. Harbitz1,2,3, and F. Løvholt1,2,3 Atmospheric Atmospheric 1International Centre for Geohazards (ICG), Sognsveien 72, Oslo, Norway Measurement Measurement 2Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Sognsveien 72, Oslo, Norway 3University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway Techniques Techniques Discussions Open Access Correspondence to: S. Glimsdal ([email protected]) Open Access Received: 30 November 2012 – Published in Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: – Biogeosciences Biogeosciences Revised: 5 April 2013 – Accepted: 24 April 2013 – Published: 18 June 2013 Discussions Open Access Abstract. This article focuses on the effect of dispersion in 1 Introduction Open Access the field of tsunami modeling. Frequency dispersion in the Climate linear long-wave limit is first briefly discussed from a the- Climate Most tsunami modelers rely on the shallow-water equations oretical point of view. A single parameter, denoted as “dis- of the Past for predictions of propagationof and the run-up. Past Some groups, on persion time”, for the integrated effect of frequency dis- Discussions the other hand, insist on applying dispersive wave models, persion is identified.
  • Test of Self-Organization in Beach Cusp Formation Giovanni Coco,1 T

    Test of Self-Organization in Beach Cusp Formation Giovanni Coco,1 T

    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 108, NO. C3, 3101, doi:10.1029/2002JC001496, 2003 Test of self-organization in beach cusp formation Giovanni Coco,1 T. K. Burnet, and B. T. Werner Complex Systems Laboratory, Cecil and Ida Green Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA Steve Elgar Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA Received 4 June 2002; revised 6 November 2002; accepted 13 November 2002; published 29 March 2003. [1] Field observations of swash flow patterns and morphology change are consistent with the hypothesis that beach cusps form by self-organization, wherein positive feedback between swash flow and developing morphology causes initial development of the pattern and negative feedback owing to circulation of flow within beach cusp bays causes pattern stabilization. The self-organization hypothesis is tested using measurements from three experiments on a barrier island beach in North Carolina. Beach cusps developed after the beach was smoothed by a storm and after existing beach cusps were smoothed by a bulldozer. Swash front motions were recorded on video during daylight hours, and morphology was measured by surveying at 3–4 hour intervals. Three signatures of self- organization were observed in all experiments. First, time lags between swash front motions in beach cusp bays and horns increase with increasing relief, representing the effect of morphology on flow. Second, differential erosion between bays and horns initially increases with increasing time lag, representing the effect of flow on morphology change because positive feedback causes growth of beach cusps. Third, after initial growth, differential erosion decreases with increasing time lag, representing the onset of negative feedback that stabilizes beach cusps.
  • Type-I Hyperbolic Metasurfaces for Highly-Squeezed Designer

    Type-I Hyperbolic Metasurfaces for Highly-Squeezed Designer

    Type-I hyperbolic metasurfaces for highly-squeezed designer polaritons with negative group velocity Yihao Yang1,2,3,4, Pengfei Qin2, Xiao Lin3, Erping Li2, Zuojia Wang5,*, Baile Zhang3,4,*, and Hongsheng Chen1,2,* 1State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, College of Information Science and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. 2Key Lab. of Advanced Micro/Nano Electronic Devices & Smart Systems of Zhejiang, The Electromagnetics Academy at Zhejiang University, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. 3Division of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, Singapore 637371, Singapore. 4Centre for Disruptive Photonic Technologies, The Photonics Institute, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore. 5School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China *[email protected] (Z.W.); [email protected] (B.Z.); [email protected] (H.C.) Abstract Hyperbolic polaritons in van der Waals materials and metamaterial heterostructures provide unprecedenced control over light-matter interaction at the extreme nanoscale. Here, we propose a concept of type-I hyperbolic metasurface supporting highly-squeezed magnetic designer polaritons, which act as magnetic analogues to hyperbolic polaritons in the hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) in the first Reststrahlen band. Comparing with the natural h-BN, the size and spacing of the metasurface unit cell can be readily scaled up (or down), allowing for manipulating designer polaritons in frequency and in space at will. Experimental measurements display the cone-like hyperbolic dispersion in the momentum space, associating with an effective refractive index up to 60 and a group velocity down to 1/400 of the light speed in vacuum.
  • Part II-1 Water Wave Mechanics

    Part II-1 Water Wave Mechanics

    Chapter 1 EM 1110-2-1100 WATER WAVE MECHANICS (Part II) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents Page II-1-1. Introduction ............................................................II-1-1 II-1-2. Regular Waves .........................................................II-1-3 a. Introduction ...........................................................II-1-3 b. Definition of wave parameters .............................................II-1-4 c. Linear wave theory ......................................................II-1-5 (1) Introduction .......................................................II-1-5 (2) Wave celerity, length, and period.......................................II-1-6 (3) The sinusoidal wave profile...........................................II-1-9 (4) Some useful functions ...............................................II-1-9 (5) Local fluid velocities and accelerations .................................II-1-12 (6) Water particle displacements .........................................II-1-13 (7) Subsurface pressure ................................................II-1-21 (8) Group velocity ....................................................II-1-22 (9) Wave energy and power.............................................II-1-26 (10)Summary of linear wave theory.......................................II-1-29 d. Nonlinear wave theories .................................................II-1-30 (1) Introduction ......................................................II-1-30 (2) Stokes finite-amplitude wave theory ...................................II-1-32
  • Waves and Weather

    Waves and Weather

    Waves and Weather 1. Where do waves come from? 2. What storms produce good surfing waves? 3. Where do these storms frequently form? 4. Where are the good areas for receiving swells? Where do waves come from? ==> Wind! Any two fluids (with different density) moving at different speeds can produce waves. In our case, air is one fluid and the water is the other. • Start with perfectly glassy conditions (no waves) and no wind. • As wind starts, will first get very small capillary waves (ripples). • Once ripples form, now wind can push against the surface and waves can grow faster. Within Wave Source Region: - all wavelengths and heights mixed together - looks like washing machine ("Victory at Sea") But this is what we want our surfing waves to look like: How do we get from this To this ???? DISPERSION !! In deep water, wave speed (celerity) c= gT/2π Long period waves travel faster. Short period waves travel slower Waves begin to separate as they move away from generation area ===> This is Dispersion How Big Will the Waves Get? Height and Period of waves depends primarily on: - Wind speed - Duration (how long the wind blows over the waves) - Fetch (distance that wind blows over the waves) "SMB" Tables How Big Will the Waves Get? Assume Duration = 24 hours Fetch Length = 500 miles Significant Significant Wind Speed Wave Height Wave Period 10 mph 2 ft 3.5 sec 20 mph 6 ft 5.5 sec 30 mph 12 ft 7.5 sec 40 mph 19 ft 10.0 sec 50 mph 27 ft 11.5 sec 60 mph 35 ft 13.0 sec Wave height will decay as waves move away from source region!!! Map of Mean Wind
  • Chapter 16: Fourier Series

    Chapter 16: Fourier Series

    Chapter 16: Fourier Series 16.1 Fourier Series Analysis: An Overview A periodic function can be represented by an infinite sum of sine and cosine functions that are harmonically related: Ϧ ͚ʚͨʛ Ɣ ͕1 ƍ ȕ ͕) cos ͢!*ͨ ƍ ͖) sin ͢!*ͨ Fourier Coefficients: are)Ͱͥ calculated from ͕1; ͕); ͖) ͚ʚͨʛ Fundamental Frequency: ͦ_ where multiples of this frequency are called !* Ɣ ; ͢! * harmonic frequencies Conditions that ensure that f(t) can be expressed as a convergent Fourier series: (Dirichlet’s conditions) 1. f(t) be single-values 2. f(t) have a finite number of discontinuities in the periodic interval 3. f(t) have a finite number of maxima and minima in the periodic interval 4. the integral /tͮ exists Ȅ/ |͚ʚͨʛ|ͨ͘; t These are sufficient conditions not necessary conditions; therefore if these conditions exist the functions can be expressed as a Fourier series. However if the conditions are not met the function may still be expressible as a Fourier series. 16.2 The Fourier Coefficients Defining the Fourier coefficients: /tͮ 1 ͕1 Ɣ ǹ ͚ʚͨʛͨ͘ ͎ /t /tͮ 2 ͕& Ɣ ǹ ͚ʚͨʛ cos ͟!*ͨ ͨ͘ ͎ /t /tͮ 2 ͖& Ɣ ǹ ͚ʚͨʛ sin ͟!*ͨ ͨ͘ ͎ / t Example 16.1 Find the Fourier series for the periodic waveform shown. Assessment problems 16.1 & 16.2 ECEN 2633 Spring 2011 Page 1 of 5 16.3 The Effects of Symmetry on the Fourier Coefficients Four types of symmetry used to simplify Fourier analysis 1. Even-function symmetry 2. Odd-function symmetry 3.
  • Estimating Fire Properties by Remote Sensing

    Estimating Fire Properties by Remote Sensing

    Estimating Fire Properties by Remote Sensing1. Philip J. Riggan USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station 4955 Canyon Crest Drive Riverside, CA 92507 909 680 1534 [email protected] James W. Hoffman Space Instruments, Inc. 4403 Manchester Avenue, Suite 203 Encinitas, CA 92024 760 944 7001 [email protected] James A. Brass NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Federal Airfield, CA 94035 650 604 5232 [email protected] Abstract---Contemporary knowledge of the role of fire in the TABLE OF CONTENTS global environment is limited by inadequate measurements of the extent and impact of individual fires. Observations by 1. INTRODUCTION operational polar-orbiting and geostationary satellites provide an 2. ESTIMATING FIRE PROPERTIES indication of fire occurrence but are ill-suited for estimating the 3. ESTIMATES FROM TWO CHANNELS temperature, area, or radiant emissions of active wildland and 4. MULTI-SPECTRAL FIRE IMAGING agricultural fires. Simulations here of synthetic remote sensing 5. APPLICATIONS FOR FIRE MONITORING pixels comprised of observed high resolution fire data together with ash or vegetation background demonstrate that fire properties including flame temperature, fractional area, and INTRODUCTION radiant-energy flux can best be estimated from concurrent radiance measurements at wavelengths near 1.6, 3.9, and 12 µm, More than 30,000 fire observations were recorded over central Successful observations at night may be made at scales to at Brazil during August 1999 by Advanced Very High Resolution least I km for the cluster of fire data simulated here. During the Radiometers operating aboard polarorbiting satellites of the U.S. daytime, uncertainty in the composition of the background and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  • Group Velocity

    Group Velocity

    Particle Waves and Group Velocity Particles with known energy Consider a particle with mass m, traveling in the +x direction and known velocity 1 vo and energy Eo = mvo . The wavefunction that represents this particle is: 2 !(x,t) = Ce jkxe" j#t [1] where C is a constant and 2! 1 ko = = 2mEo [2] "o ! Eo !o = 2"#o = [3] ! 2 The envelope !(x,t) of this wavefunction is 2 2 !(x,t) = C , which is a constant. This means that when a particle’s energy is known exactly, it’s position is completely unknown. This is consistent with the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle. Even though the magnitude of this wave function is a constant with respect to both position and time, its phase is not. As with any type of wavefunction, the phase velocity vp of this wavefunction is: ! E / ! v v = = o = E / 2m = v2 / 4 = o [4] p k 1 o o 2 2mEo ! At first glance, this result seems wrong, since we started with the assumption that the particle is moving at velocity vo. However, only the magnitude of a wavefunction contains measurable information, so there is no reason to believe that its phase velocity is the same as the particle’s velocity. Particles with uncertain energy A more realistic situation is when there is at least some uncertainly about the particle’s energy and momentum. For real situations, a particle’s energy will be known to lie only within some band of uncertainly. This can be handled by assuming that the particle’s wavefunction is the superposition of a range of constant-energy wavefunctions: jkn x # j$nt !(x,t) = "Cn (e e ) [5] n Here, each value of kn and ωn correspond to energy En, and Cn is the probability that the particle has energy En.
  • Double Negative Dispersion Relations from Coated Plasmonic Rods∗

    Double Negative Dispersion Relations from Coated Plasmonic Rods∗

    MULTISCALE MODEL. SIMUL. c 2013 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 192–212 DOUBLE NEGATIVE DISPERSION RELATIONS FROM COATED PLASMONIC RODS∗ YUE CHEN† AND ROBERT LIPTON‡ Abstract. A metamaterial with frequency dependent double negative effective properties is constructed from a subwavelength periodic array of coated rods. Explicit power series are developed for the dispersion relation and associated Bloch wave solutions. The expansion parameter is the ratio of the length scale of the periodic lattice to the wavelength. Direct numerical simulations for finite size period cells show that the leading order term in the power series for the dispersion relation is a good predictor of the dispersive behavior of the metamaterial. Key words. metamaterials, dispersion relations, Bloch waves, simulations AMS subject classifications. 35Q60, 68U20, 78A48, 78M40 DOI. 10.1137/120864702 1. Introduction. Metamaterials are artificial materials designed to have elec- tromagnetic properties not generally found in nature. One contemporary area of research explores novel subwavelength constructions that deliver metamaterials with both a negative bulk dielectric constant and bulk magnetic permeability across cer- tain frequency intervals. These double negative materials are promising materials for the creation of negative index superlenses that overcome the small diffraction limit and have great potential in applications such as biomedical imaging, optical lithography, and data storage. The early work of Veselago [39] identified novel ef- fects associated with hypothetical materials for which both the dielectric constant and magnetic permeability are simultaneously negative. Such double negative media support electromagnetic wave propagation in which the phase velocity is antiparallel to the direction of energy flow and other unusual electromagnetic effects, such as the reversal of the Doppler effect and Cerenkov radiation.
  • Marine Forecasting at TAFB Scott.Stripling@Noaa.Gov

    Marine Forecasting at TAFB [email protected]

    Marine Forecasting at TAFB [email protected] 1 Waves 101 Concepts and basic equations 2 Have an overall understanding of the wave forecasting challenge • Wave growth • Wave spectra • Swell propagation • Swell decay • Deep water waves • Shallow water waves 3 Wave Concepts • Waves form by the stress induced on the ocean surface by physical wind contact with water • Begin with capillary waves with gradual growth dependent on conditions • Wave decay process begins immediately as waves exit wind generation area…a.k.a. “fetch” area 4 5 Wave Growth There are three basic components to wave growth: • Wind speed • Fetch length • Duration Wave growth is limited by either fetch length or duration 6 Fully Developed Sea • When wave growth has reached a maximum height for a given wind speed, fetch and duration of wind. • A sea for which the input of energy to the waves from the local wind is in balance with the transfer of energy among the different wave components, and with the dissipation of energy by wave breaking - AMS. 7 Fetches 8 Dynamic Fetch 9 Wave Growth Nomogram 10 Calculate Wave H and T • What can we determine for wave characteristics from the following scenario? • 40 kt wind blows for 24 hours across a 150 nm fetch area? • Using the wave nomogram – start on left vertical axis at 40 kt • Move forward in time to the right until you reach either 24 hours or 150 nm of fetch • What is limiting factor? Fetch length or time? • Nomogram yields 18.7 ft @ 9.6 sec 11 Wave Growth Nomogram 12 Wave Dimensions • C=Wave Celerity • L=Wave Length •
  • Photons That Travel in Free Space Slower Than the Speed of Light Authors

    Photons That Travel in Free Space Slower Than the Speed of Light Authors

    Title: Photons that travel in free space slower than the speed of light Authors: Daniel Giovannini1†, Jacquiline Romero1†, Václav Potoček1, Gergely Ferenczi1, Fiona Speirits1, Stephen M. Barnett1, Daniele Faccio2, Miles J. Padgett1* Affiliations: 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, SUPA, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK 2 School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, SUPA, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK † These authors contributed equally to this work. * Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract: That the speed of light in free space is constant is a cornerstone of modern physics. However, light beams have finite transverse size, which leads to a modification of their wavevectors resulting in a change to their phase and group velocities. We study the group velocity of single photons by measuring a change in their arrival time that results from changing the beam’s transverse spatial structure. Using time-correlated photon pairs we show a reduction of the group velocity of photons in both a Bessel beam and photons in a focused Gaussian beam. In both cases, the delay is several microns over a propagation distance of the order of 1 m. Our work highlights that, even in free space, the invariance of the speed of light only applies to plane waves. Introducing spatial structure to an optical beam, even for a single photon, reduces the group velocity of the light by a readily measurable amount. One sentence summary: The group velocity of light in free space is reduced by controlling the transverse spatial structure of the light beam. Main text The speed of light is trivially given as �/�, where � is the speed of light in free space and � is the refractive index of the medium.