An Analysis of the Blind Man No. 2 the Blind

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Brinkley 1 Kyla Brinkley Susan Rosenbaum ENGL 4750 25 March 2016 Making It New: An Analysis of The Blind Man No. 2 The Blind Man No. 2 is the second and final issue of a Dada journal published by editors Marcel Duchamp, Henri-Pierre Roche, and Beatrice Wood. It is best known for a statement written by Wood titled “The Richard Mutt Case,” which defends the ban of Duchamp’s (Mutt’s) Fountain from the 1917 Independents exhibition. Loyal to the opinions stated in Wood’s essay, The Blind Man No. 2 is a true modernist work because it emphasizes that access to truth and knowledge is best found in observing the world unconventionally through art, literature, and collaboration. Wood exemplified the ideals of the magazine in “The Richard Mutt Case” by stating that “He CHOSE it. He took an ordinary article of life, placed it so that its useful significance disappeared under the new title and point of view—created a new thought for that object” (Wood 5). Throughout the magazine, works of art and writing are centered around “the exhibit refused by the independents” (The Blind Man). The magazine includes both poetry and prose and also short essays as well, often commenting on the visual art that is also present. The dialogue between the art and the writing is the only organization discernable in the magazine, because at first it seems almost cluttered: multiple works are often presented on the same page. For example, Theorem by Walter Conrad Arensberg is featured on the same page as Joseph Stella’s Coney Island. Stella’s painting is a bright, abstract depiction of the lights and attractions on the Brinkley 2 island and Arensberg writes, “…to the swing of a suspended / lens / from which the waves wash / the protective coloration” (9). Arensberg’s poem responds to the painting by pointing out the contrast between the artificial elements of Coney Island’s manmade attractions and the natural element of the sea surrounding it, which can eventually destroy it. Stella’s and Arensberg’s works support the idea that truth is uncovered by looking at the world creatively, and that art is created by uncovering that truth. Known as America’s first futurist painter, Stella’s painting may not immediately register to viewers as a depiction of Coney Island, but it captures the raw, energetic feeling created by its artificial atmosphere. The written works in The Blind Man also support the unconventional approach to art that supports Duchamp’s Fountain. Many of the writings are featured in different typefaces, which showcases the collaborative nature of the magazine because each essay or poem is submitted separately by individual writers. Therefore, although many of the submissions are liberal, the magazine is true to that collaborative nature by featuring a conservative essay as well. “Letter from a Mother” voices the concerns of the “mother” of two artists showcasing in the Independents exhibit. She writes, “People without refinement, cubists, futurists, are not artists. For Art is noble. And they are distorted. Independence is needed, but a line must be drawn somewhere” (8). This is an excellent example of the goals of the artists in the magazine, even if it seems to disagree with what they do. It is unknown whether or not the piece was included to contrast the clearly “independent” work featured throughout the magazine and to satirize the opinions of those who disagree with its ideas. However, its presence demonstrates how The Blind Man creates an open dialogue that allows art and writing to be shared freely, rebelling against the suppression of Duchamp’s art in the exhibit. Brinkley 3 A poem in The Blind Man also supports the abstract approach to art and life. Third Dimension; Portrait Sketch by Charles Duncan is presented along with instructions printed sideways on the page that read, “To be read beginning with lowest line. Top line last” (12). The poem itself is written in the fragmented style also found in the work of Gertrude Stein, which can be seen as cubism in written form. Stein’s influence is also evident in a direct reference to her by Beatrice Wood in “The Richard Mutt Case,” when Wood writes, “If it is true, as Gertrude Stein says, that pictures that are right stay right…” (6). In her essay, Wood uses Stein’s logic to support her argument that Duchamp’s Fountain should have been considered art by the Independents exhibition. The Blind Man is famous for Wood’s “The Richard Mutt Case,” and the works in the issue support her argument. However, the first issue, The Blindman, did not contain art or poetry, and serves as an introspective collection of essays. The Blind Man No. 2 is more cohesive in that its works come together to support and demonstrate the argument that art should not be suppressed, but should be “an integral part of its time” (Crowninshield 10). The idea of art as being interwoven with its time suggests that it has a dialogue with the place from which it came. Many of the authors themselves hail from other countries, or are somewhat isolated from society because of their radical ideas. Duchamp and Roche were French, for example, and some writings in the magazine even appear in French. However, they convened in New York along with other independents. The international aspect of the magazine thus contributes to “The Richard Mutt Case” by presenting the opinions of diverse contributors. These contributors also represented the modernist ideas presented in “The Richard Mutt Case” by commenting on the world through experiences as unconventional writers. Many of the contributors, for example, were women because Duchamp quietly promoted female artists like Brinkley 4 Beatrice Wood and Mina Loy. These writers both had strong opinions to share in the magazine, which adds to its independent character that was seen as radical to some audiences. Loy, for example, wrote, “Anyhow, Duchamp meditating the leveling of all values, witnesses the elimination of Sophistication” (12). Loy’s examination of Duchamp’s work demonstrates that women in The Blind Man are presented as valid critics who can accurately examine modernist work. Beatrice Wood herself, who wrote “The Richard Mutt Case” was an accomplished sculptor whose work was featured in the exhibition from which Duchamp’s Fountain was banned. Wood, who also designed the poster for the 1917 Blindman’s Ball, represented the modernist desire to view the world abstractly because of her background in art. The Blind Man was only printed for two months. The first issue appeared in April 1917 and No. 2 appeared in May of that year. The first issue featured a disclaimer on the front cover claiming that “The second number of the Blind Man will appear as soon as YOU have sent sufficient material for it” (The Blindman). The magazine subsisted on donations from readers, with a few ads at the end of No. 2 featuring art galleries. The second issue of The Blind Man contains a note at the end that reads: “Perhaps—The Blind Man may become a monthly— perhaps a quarterly—perhaps a yearly—All depending on contributions, literary and financial. Brave people who like to run risks may send five dollars as a subscription and encouragement.” It is said that The Blind Man ceased publication because Roché lost a bet with artist Francis Picabia “to decide who would continue publishing his respective magazine” (Heller). Roché lost, but after The Blind Man went out of circulation he published another Dada journal, Rongwrong, along with Wood and Duchamp. Overall, The Blind Man serves to shed light on the definition of art and the ability to create it by observing the world in an unconventional manner. The title speaks to this by Brinkley 5 demonstrating the process by which “the blind man” (who does not understand why works like Duchamp’s “Fountain” should be considered art) is able to “see” through art and writing that penetrates the mind and distorts the reality of how the world is viewed. The truth and knowledge provided by “seeing” in that way is a true representation of the modernist process of “making it new.” Brinkley 6 Works Cited Arensberg, Walter Conrad. "Theorem." The Blind Man 2 (1917): 9. Print. "Battle of Lights, Coney Island, Mardi Gras." Battle of Lights, Coney Island, Mardi Gras. Web. 21 Mar. 2016. Crowninshield, Frank. "From a Friend." The Blind Man 2 (1917): 10. Print. Duncan, Charles. "Third Dimension; Portrait Sketch." The Blind Man 2 (1917): 12. Print. Girst, Thomas. "Rarities from 1917: Facsimiles of The Blind Man No.1, The Blind Man No.2 and Rongwrong." Collections, TOUT-FAIT: The Marcel Duchamp Studies Online Journal. Ed. Andrzej Mika. Dec. 2000. Web. 21 Mar. 2016. Heller, Steven. "The D Word: Print Ready." Design Observer. 2 Mar. 2016. Web. 23 Mar. 2016. New York Times News Service. "Dada Ball Raises Money in Definitely Unboring Way." The Baltimore Sun. 10 Oct. 1994. Web. 23 Mar. 2016. "Letter from a Mother." The Blind Man 2 (1917): 8. Print. Wood, Beatrice. "The Richard Mutt Case." The Blind Man 2 (1917): 5-6. Print. .
Recommended publications
  • HARD FACTS and SOFT SPECULATION Thierry De Duve

    HARD FACTS and SOFT SPECULATION Thierry De Duve

    THE STORY OF FOUNTAIN: HARD FACTS AND SOFT SPECULATION Thierry de Duve ABSTRACT Thierry de Duve’s essay is anchored to the one and perhaps only hard fact that we possess regarding the story of Fountain: its photo in The Blind Man No. 2, triply captioned “Fountain by R. Mutt,” “Photograph by Alfred Stieglitz,” and “THE EXHIBIT REFUSED BY THE INDEPENDENTS,” and the editorial on the facing page, titled “The Richard Mutt Case.” He examines what kind of agency is involved in that triple “by,” and revisits Duchamp’s intentions and motivations when he created the fictitious R. Mutt, manipulated Stieglitz, and set a trap to the Independents. De Duve concludes with an invitation to art historians to abandon the “by” questions (attribution, etc.) and to focus on the “from” questions that arise when Fountain is not seen as a work of art so much as the bearer of the news that the art world has radically changed. KEYWORDS, Readymade, Fountain, Independents, Stieglitz, Sanitary pottery Then the smell of wet glue! Mentally I was not spelling art with a capital A. — Beatrice Wood1 No doubt, Marcel Duchamp’s best known and most controversial readymade is a men’s urinal tipped on its side, signed R. Mutt, dated 1917, and titled Fountain. The 2017 centennial of Fountain brought us a harvest of new books and articles on the famous or infamous urinal. I read most of them in the hope of gleaning enough newly verified facts to curtail my natural tendency to speculate. But newly verified facts are few and far between.
  • The Richard Mutt Case'

    The Richard Mutt Case'

    248 Rationalization and Transformation Dadaism - a mask play, a burst of laughter? And behind it, a synthesis of the romantic, dandyistic and - daemonistic theories of the 19thcentury. 2 Marcel Duchamp (1887-1968) 'The Richard Mutt Case' Duchamp, having abandoned painting and emigrated to America, began to produce 'Readymades', works calculated to reveal, among their other effects, the workings of the art institution as inseparable from the attribution of artistic value. In 1917, under the pseudonym Richard Mutt, he submitted a urinal to an open sculpture exhibition; the piece was refused entry (as he no doubt intended). The present text was originally published in The Blind Man, New York, 1917. It is reproduced here from Lucy Lipparcl (ed.), Dadas on Art, New Jersey, 1971. They say any artist paying six dollars may exhibit. Mr Richard Mutt sent ih a 'fountain. Without discussion this article disap­ peared and never was exhibited. What were the grounds for refusing Mr Mutt's fountain: - 1 Some contended it was immoral, vulgar. 2 Others, it was plagiarism, a plain pkce of plumbing. Now Mr Mutt's fountain is not immoral, that is absurd, no more than a bathtub is immoral. It is a fixture that you see every day in plumbers' show windows. Whether Mr Mutt with his own hands made the fountain or not has no importance. He CHOSE it. He took an ordinary article of life, placed it so that its useful significance disappeared under the new title and point of view - created a new thought for that object. ' · As for plumbing, that is absurd.
  • Genius Is Nothing but an Extravagant Manifestation of the Body. — Arthur Cravan, 1914

    Genius Is Nothing but an Extravagant Manifestation of the Body. — Arthur Cravan, 1914

    1 ........................................... The Baroness and Neurasthenic Art History Genius is nothing but an extravagant manifestation of the body. — Arthur Cravan, 1914 Some people think the women are the cause of [artistic] modernism, whatever that is. — New York Evening Sun, 1917 I hear “New York” has gone mad about “Dada,” and that the most exotic and worthless review is being concocted by Man Ray and Duchamp. What next! This is worse than The Baroness. By the way I like the way the discovery has suddenly been made that she has all along been, unconsciously, a Dadaist. I cannot figure out just what Dadaism is beyond an insane jumble of the four winds, the six senses, and plum pudding. But if the Baroness is to be a keystone for it,—then I think I can possibly know when it is coming and avoid it. — Hart Crane, c. 1920 Paris has had Dada for five years, and we have had Else von Freytag-Loringhoven for quite two years. But great minds think alike and great natural truths force themselves into cognition at vastly separated spots. In Else von Freytag-Loringhoven Paris is mystically united [with] New York. — John Rodker, 1920 My mind is one rebellion. Permit me, oh permit me to rebel! — Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven, c. 19251 In a 1921 letter from Man Ray, New York artist, to Tristan Tzara, the Romanian poet who had spearheaded the spread of Dada to Paris, the “shit” of Dada being sent across the sea (“merdelamerdelamerdela . .”) is illustrated by the naked body of German expatriate the Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven (see fig.
  • The Artwork Caught by the Tail*

    The Artwork Caught by the Tail*

    The Artwork Caught by the Tail* GEORGE BAKER If it were married to logic, art would be living in incest, engulfing, swallowing its own tail. —Tristan Tzara, Manifeste Dada 1918 The only word that is not ephemeral is the word death. To death, to death, to death. The only thing that doesn’t die is money, it just leaves on trips. —Francis Picabia, Manifeste Cannibale Dada, 1920 Je m’appelle Dada He is staring at us, smiling, his face emerging like an exclamation point from the gap separating his first from his last name. “Francis Picabia,” he writes, and the letters are blunt and childish, projecting gaudily off the canvas with the stiff pride of an advertisement, or the incontinence of a finger painting. (The shriek of the commodity and the babble of the infant: Dada always heard these sounds as one and the same.) And so here is Picabia. He is staring at us, smiling, a face with- out a body, or rather, a face that has lost its body, a portrait of the artist under the knife. Decimated. Decapitated. But not quite acephalic, to use a Bataillean term: rather the reverse. Here we don’t have the body without a head, but heads without bodies, for there is more than one. Picabia may be the only face that meets our gaze, but there is also Metzinger, at the top and to the right. And there, just below * This essay was written in the fall of 1999 to serve as a catalog essay for the exhibition Worthless (Invaluable): The Concept of Value in Contemporary Art, curated by Carlos Basualdo at the Moderna Galerija Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Before Zen: the Nothing of American Dada

    Before Zen: the Nothing of American Dada

    Before Zen The Nothing of American Dada Jacquelynn Baas One of the challenges confronting our modern era has been how to re- solve the subject-object dichotomy proposed by Descartes and refined by Newton—the belief that reality consists of matter and motion, and that all questions can be answered by means of the scientific method of objective observation and measurement. This egocentric perspective has been cast into doubt by evidence from quantum mechanics that matter and motion are interdependent forms of energy and that the observer is always in an experiential relationship with the observed.1 To understand ourselves as in- terconnected beings who experience time and space rather than being sub- ject to them takes a radical shift of perspective, and artists have been at the leading edge of this exploration. From Marcel Duchamp and Dada to John Cage and Fluxus, to William T. Wiley and his West Coast colleagues, to the recent international explosion of participatory artwork, artists have been trying to get us to change how we see. Nor should it be surprising that in our global era Asian perspectives regarding the nature of reality have been a crucial factor in effecting this shift.2 The 2009 Guggenheim exhibition The Third Mind emphasized the im- portance of Asian philosophical and spiritual texts in the development of American modernism.3 Zen Buddhism especially was of great interest to artists and writers in the United States following World War II. The histo- ries of modernism traced by the exhibition reflected the well-documented influence of Zen, but did not include another, earlier link—that of Daoism and American Dada.
  • A Critical Reassessment of Duchamp's Readymades and His Antiaesthetic of the Ordinary

    A Critical Reassessment of Duchamp's Readymades and His Antiaesthetic of the Ordinary

    University of Mary Washington Eagle Scholar Student Research Submissions Spring 5-1-2015 A Critical Reassessment of Duchamp's Readymades and his Antiaesthetic of the Ordinary Alexandra M. Parrish Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Parrish, Alexandra M., "A Critical Reassessment of Duchamp's Readymades and his Antiaesthetic of the Ordinary" (2015). Student Research Submissions. 103. https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research/103 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Eagle Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Research Submissions by an authorized administrator of Eagle Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CRITICAL REASSESSMENT OF DUCHAMP'S READYMADES AND HIS ANTIAESTHETIC OF THE ORDINARY An honors paper submitted to the Department of Art and Art History of the University of Mary Washington in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Departmental Honors Alexandria M Parrish May 2015 By signing your name below, you affirm that this work is the complete and final version of your paper submitted in partial fulfillment of a degree from the University of Mary Washington. You affirm the University of Mary Washington honor pledge: "I hereby declare upon my word of honor that I have neither given nor received unauthorized help on this work." Alexandria M. Parrish 05/01/15 (digital signature) University of Mary Washington A Critical Reassessment of Duchamp's Readymades and his Antiaesthetic of the Ordinary By: Alexandria Parrish Faculty Advisor: Professor Joseph Dreiss Spring 2015 2 Marcel Duchamp has been described fittingly by painter Willem de Kooning as a "one-man movement."1 During his lifetime Duchamp created a limited number of works that had a seemingly infinite impact on modern art.
  • Pg 518-520.Pdf

    Pg 518-520.Pdf

    Discovery First Soviet of penicillin Five-Year Plan 1928 1928 1925 1927 1928 1929 Charles Lindbergh flies nonstop First television U.S. stock market crash; from New York to Paris broadcast Great Depression begins Dada and Surrealism Founded simultaneously in Zurich, Berlin, Paris, and New York during the war, Dada took up Futurism’s call for the annihilation of tradition but, as a result of the war, without its sense of hope for the future. Its name referred, some said, to a child’s first words; others claimed it was a reference to a child’s hobbyhorse; and still others cele­ brated it as a simple nonsense sound. As a movement, it championed senselessness, noise, and illogic. Dada was, above all, against art, or at least art in the traditional sense of the word. Its chief strategy was insult and out­ rage. Perhaps Dada’s chief exponent, Marcel Duchamp always challenged tradition in a spirit of fun. His L.H.O.O.Q. (Fig. 21-8) is an image of Leonardo’s Mona Fig. 21-9 Marcel Duchamp, Fountain, 1917. Fountain by R. Mutt. Glazed sanitary china with black print. Photo by Alfred Stieglitz in The Blind Man, No. 2 (May 1917); original lost. © Philadelphia Museum of Art. The Louise and Walter Arensberg Collection, 1950. 1998-74-1. The Philadelphia Museum of Art/Art Resource, NY. © 2012 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/ADAGP, Paris/Succession Marcel Duchamp. Lisa with a moustache drawn on her upper lip. Saying the letters of the title with French pronunciation reveals it to be a pun, elle a chaud au cul, roughly translated as “she’s hot in the pants.” Such is the irreverence of Dada.
  • Dada and Surrealist Journals in the Mary Reynolds Collection

    Dada and Surrealist Journals in the Mary Reynolds Collection

    Documents of Dada and Surrealism: Dada and Surrealist Journals in the Mary Reynolds Collection... Page 1 of 26 Documents of Dada and Surrealism: Dada and Surrealist Journals in the Mary Reynolds Collection IRENE E. HOFMANN Ryerson and Burnham Libraries, The Art Institute of Chicago Dada 6 (Bulletin The Mary Reynolds Collection, which entered The Art Institute of Dada), Chicago in 1951, contains, in addition to a rich array of books, art, and ed. Tristan Tzara ESSAYS (Paris, February her own extraordinary bindings, a remarkable group of periodicals and 1920), cover. journals. As a member of so many of the artistic and literary circles View Works of Art Book Bindings by publishing periodicals, Reynolds was in a position to receive many Mary Reynolds journals during her life in Paris. The collection in the Art Institute Finding Aid/ includes over four hundred issues, with many complete runs of journals Search Collection represented. From architectural journals to radical literary reviews, this Related Websites selection of periodicals constitutes a revealing document of European Art Institute of artistic and literary life in the years spanning the two world wars. Chicago Home In the early part of the twentieth century, literary and artistic reviews were the primary means by which the creative community exchanged ideas and remained in communication. The journal was a vehicle for promoting emerging styles, establishing new theories, and creating a context for understanding new visual forms. These reviews played a pivotal role in forming the spirit and identity of movements such as Dada and Surrealism and served to spread their messages throughout Europe and the United States.
  • Readymade Digital Colour: an Expanding Subject for Painting

    Readymade Digital Colour: an Expanding Subject for Painting

    READYMADE DIGITAL COLOUR: AN EXPANDING SUBJECT FOR PAINTING Doctorate of Philosophy DAVID SERISIER 2013 College of Fine Arts University of New South Wales ORIGINALITY STATEMENT ‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.’ Signed ................................................................. Date ................................................................. ii COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ‘I hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350 word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstract International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only).
  • The Alterity of the Readymade: Fountain and Displaced Artists in Wartime

    The Alterity of the Readymade: Fountain and Displaced Artists in Wartime

    THE ENDURING IMPACT OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR A collection of perspectives Edited by Gail Romano and Kingsley Baird The Alterity of the Readymade: Fountain and Displaced Artists in Wartime Marcus Moore Massey University Abstract In April 1917, a porcelain urinal titled Fountain was submitted by Marcel Duchamp (or by his female friend, Louise Norton) under the pseudonym ‘R. MUTT’, to the Society of Independent Artists in New York. The Society’s committee refused to show it in their annual exhibition of some 2,125 works held at the Grand Central Palace. Eighty-seven years later, in 2004, Fountain was voted the most influential work of art in the 20th century by a panel of world experts. We inherit the 1917 work not because the original object survived—it was thrown out into the rubbish—but through a photographic image that Alfred Steiglitz was commissioned to take. In this photo, Marsden Hartley’s The Warriors, painted in 1913 in Berlin, also appears, enlisted as the backdrop for the piece of American hardware Duchamp selected from a plumbing showroom. To highlight the era of the Great War and its effects of displacement on individuals, this article considers each subject in turn: Marcel Duchamp’s departure from Paris and arrival in New York in 1915, and Marsden Hartley’s return to New York in 1915 after two years immersing himself in the gay subculture in pre-war Berlin. As much as describe the artists’ experiences of wartime, explain the origin of the readymade and reconstruct the events of the notorious example, Fountain, the aim of this article is to additionally bring to the fore the alterity of the other item imported ready-made in the photographic construction—the painting The Warriors.
  • Dada-Guide-Booklet HWB V5.Pdf

    Dada-Guide-Booklet HWB V5.Pdf

    DA DA DA DA THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA LIBRARIES PRESENTS DOCUMENTING DADA // DISSEMINATING DADA THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA LIBRARIES MAIN LIBRARY GALLERY JANUARY 17 - APRIL 28, 2017 An exhibition featuring items from the UI Libraries' International DADA Archive, the world’s most comprehensive collection of material related to the Dada movement. GALLERY HOURS & COMPLETE EXHIBITION INFORMATION AT LIB.UIOWA.EDU/GALLERY EXHIBITION GUIDE 1 DOCUMENTING DADA // DISSEMINATING DADA From 1916 to 1923, a new kind of artistic movement Originating as an anti-war protest in neutral swept Europe and America. Its very name, “DADA” Switzerland, Dada rapidly spread to many corners —two identical syllables without the obligatory of Europe and beyond. The Dada movement was “-ism”—distinguished it from the long line of avant- perhaps the single most decisive influence on the gardes that had determined the preceding century of development of twentieth-century art, and its art history. More than a mere art movement, Dada innovations are so pervasive as to be virtually taken claimed a broader role as an agent of cultural, social, for granted today. and political change. This exhibition highlights a single aspect of Dada: Its proponents came from all parts of Europe and the its print publications. Since the essence of Dada was United States at a time when their native countries best reflected in ephemeral performances and actions were battling one another in the deadliest war ever rather than in concrete artworks, it is perhaps ironic known. They did not restrict themselves to a single that the dadaists produced many books and journals mode of expression as painter, writer, actor, dancer, of astonishing beauty.
  • November/Dec Galley 4/9/15 16:59 Page 1

    November/Dec Galley 4/9/15 16:59 Page 1

    Duchamp and the Fountain:November/Dec galley 4/9/15 16:59 Page 1 THE JACKDAW WHO DID IT? NOT DUCHAMP! Duchamp and the Fountain:November/Dec galley 4/9/15 16:59 Page 2 2 A CONCEPTUAL INCONVENIENCE Former museum director Julian Spalding and academic Glyn Thompson published an important article in The Art Newspaper in November 2014 (available online at the paper’s website and also in a longer version on the Scottish Review of Books website) proposing that the object we know as Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain , the urinal, was in fact the work of someone else: dadaist artist and poet Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven. The original Fountain was famously lost. In 1999 the Tate bought a 1964 copy for $500,000: it is one of 16 replicas made between 1951 and 1964. In 2004 ‘art experts’ declared Fountain the most influential work of art of the 20th century. Spalding and Thompson have asked for Fountain to be reattributed to its true author. What follows is a correspondence between the authors and Sir Nicholas Serota, director of the Tate Gallery. An exhibition, ‘A Lady’s not a Gent’s’, about the history of Fountain will take place at Summerhall, 1 Summerhall, during the Edinburgh Festival from August 5th to October 5th. www.summerhall.co.uk Duchamp and the Fountain:November/Dec galley 4/9/15 16:59 Page 3 3 November 10th, 2014 consultation must be in the public domain. Dear Nick, We would, therefore, be grateful if you A call to reattribute Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain would supply us with a list of these specialists and a summary of the cases e write following our argument made in the November issue of they have made.