DOCSLIB.ORG

ASHAAP Issues and Options

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ASHAAP Issues and Options Introduction 1 Welcome to this Area Action Plan 4 2 What is the Area Action Plan 5 3 How to Comment 7 4 What are the Next Stages of the AAP 8 Context 5 Location and Boundary 9 6 Overview of the AAP Area 12 7 Core Strategy Requirements 15 8 Key Issues for the AAP to Address 20 Vision and Objectives 9 Vision 23 10 Spatial Objectives 25 Attleborough: Housing 11 Meeting Attleborough's Housing Requirement 27 12 Principles of New Housing 33 13 Providing a permanent Gypsy & Traveller Site 35 Attleborough: Economy 14 Meeting Attleborough's Employment Needs 38 15 Diversifying Employment Opportunities 45 16 Determining the Approach to the Former Gaymers Site 47 17 Determining the Approach to the Hamilton-Acorn Brush Factory Site 49 18 Meeting Attleborough's Retail Requirements 51 ASHAAP Issues and Options Attleborough: Transport 19 Transport 56 20 Routing Options for a New Distributor Road from the A11 to the B1077 64 Attleborough: Infrastructure 21 Upgrading the Water Infrastructure 71 22 Enhancing the Energy Supply Network (electricity) 77 23 Expanding Education Provision 81 24 Providing new Health and Social Care Facilities 83 Attleborough: Natural Environment 25 Protecting and Enhancing Sites of Local & Strategic Environmental Importance 84 26 Minimising Flood Risk 92 27 Increasing the Provision of Green Spaces 97 Attleborough: Built & Historic Environment 28 Requiring High Standards of Design 108 29 Protecting Areas of Particular Historic Importance 109 Snetterton Heath: Economy 30 Meeting Snetterton Heath's Reqirements for Employment Land Expansion 113 Snetterton Heath: Transport 31 Improving Public Transport Connetions from Snetterton Heath to Attleborough 117 32 Improving Sustainable Freight Movement 120 ASHAAP Issues and Options Snetterton Heath: Infrastructure (Physical) 33 Overcoming Contraints in the Electricity Supply Network 121 Snetterton Heath: Natural Environment 34 Protecting and Enhancing Sites of Local & Strategic Importance 123 35 Built and Historic Environment 126 Snetterton Heath: Developer Contributions 36 Tariff Approach or Community Infrastructure Levy 128 Besthorpe Settlement Boundary 37 Besthorpe Settlement Boundary 133 Snetterton Settlement Boundary 38 Snetterton Settlement Boundary 135 Eccles Road (Quidenham) Settlement Boundary 39 Eccles Road (Quidenham) Settlement Boundary 137 Appendices 40 Glossary 139 41 Evidence Base List 149 ASHAAP Issues and Options 1 Welcome to this Area Action Plan 1.1 This document has been prepared by Breckland Council, which is the Local Planning Authority for Attleborough and Snetterton Heath, to set out how development will be managed over the forth coming years. The scale of growth is significant and it is understandable that there will be local concerns and anxieties as the detail on where and how the growth is delivered are identified. Consultation will be important to ensure the right choices are made in the long term interest of the area; that Attleborough and Snetterton Heath continue to flourish and existing and new communities benefit; that long needed infrastructure improvements are secured; and that the quality of new development respects the character and vibrancy of the area. 1.2 The document has not been prepared by Breckland Council in isolation. Important partners at the Town Council and Norfolk County Council have shaped this document through the Attleborough Task Force Forum. We have also received evidence from Attleborough Community Team and responded to the ideas and issues raised when the Core Strategy was debated through the examination in 2009. This document is also a bridging point between the dialogue, meetings and events since 2005 when Attleborough was first identified for growth and the extensive consultation and debate that now needs to take place on the sites and their delivery. 1.3 Much has changed since the Core Strategy was examined and there is much debate over growth and housebuilding. However, at a local level this document needs to recognise: i. The good economic potential of Attleborough and Snetterton Heath; ii. The strong housing need and the demand to improve access to a decent home; iii. The opportunity to deliver infrastructure and service improvements; and, iv. The potential to maintain Attleborough as a hub for its rural hinterland. 4 ASHAAP Issues and Options 2 What is the Area Action Plan 2.1 The Attleborough and Snetterton Heath Area Action Plan (ASHAAP) will be used to provide a clear framework for the development of Attleborough and Snetterton Heath to make sure growth is delivered in a planned, sustainable way. 2.2 The ASHAAP is one of the series of documents that will form the Breckland Local Development Framework (LDF). The LDF sets out planning policies and strategies for Breckland and is a framework for determining planning applications. 2.3 The Breckland Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document (Core Strategy) is the strategic LDF document which covers the whole of the District and sets the vision and framework for the other LDF documents. The Core Strategy identifies Attleborough as a focus for substantial housing and employment growth and Snetterton Heath Employment Area as a focus for employment land expansion. The Attleborough and Snetterton Heath AAP will contribute toward the achievement of the vision set out in the Core Strategy. 2.4 Area Action Plans are used when there is a need to provide the planning framework for areas where significant change is needed and to help deliver planned growth areas. This ASHAAP will provide a spatial planning framework and set out detailed proposals to ensure that the growth in Attleborough and Snetterton Heath is delivered in a comprehensive and co-ordinated way, in order to guide investment and support planning decisions. What is the Attleborough and Snetterton Heath Area Action Plan Issues and Options Report? 2.5 It is important that everyone who has an interest in the future development of Attleborough and Snetterton Heath has a chance to be involved in the preparation of the AAP. 2.6 This Issues and Options Report is the first formal consultation stage in the process of preparation of the AAP. It considers the main issues facing Attleborough and Snetterton Heath and for each issue, a series of options are set out as alternative ways of tackling the problems. Throughout the document there are a series of questions which seek to obtain your views on the vision, objectives and options. 2.7 This report is set out in 6 main sections including: 1. Introduction – This section explains what the Attleborough and Snetterton Heath AAP is and more specifically what this Issues and Options Report is. It explains how you can comment and obtain additional information and outlines the next steps in the AAP process. 2. Context – This section sets out the location and boundary of the AAP, it provides an overview of Attleborough and Snetterton Heath, the requirements for the area as set out in the Core Strategy and the main issues that the AAP needs to address. 3. Vision and Objectives – A draft vision has been drawn up of how Attleborough and Snetterton Heath will look by 2026. This vision aims to tackle the main issues that have been identified in the area and a series of objectives have been developed to fulfil the vision. 4. Attleborough – Thematic Issues – This section discusses the more detailed issues facing Attleborough and suggests various options for addressing these. 5. Snetterton Heath – Thematic Issues - This section discusses the more detailed issues facing Snetterton Heath and suggests various options for addressing these. 6. Developer Obligations – This section considers how the infrastructure requirements to facilitate the growth of Attleborough and Snetterton Heath can be funded. A number of the infrastructure requirements associated with growth at Attleborough and Snetterton are already known and a number of proposed solutions have been identified with indicative costs. The Core Strategy sets out the over-arching approach to developer contributions recognising that established sources of funding (public sector, utility companies etc) will not cover the total cost of infrastructure. This document will set out broad options for developer contributions including whether the most appropriate option is to establish a development levy for Attleborough and 5 ASHAAP Issues and Options Snetterton in a separate document or whether it is more appropriate to present a tariff in this Area Action Plan. Relationship to other Documents, Plans and Strategies 2.8 When preparing this report we have had regard to various documents and strategies. These include national Planning Policy Statements, and at a local level the Breckland Sustainable Community Strategy and the recently adopted Breckland Core Strategy and Development Control Policies document. 2.9 The Area Action Plan (AAP) will link into the preparation of an Attleborough Masterplan. The Masterplan will help to inform the strategic framework for the growth of the town, and in particular, how best to integrate the scale of housing development with the existing community and infrastructure . The Attleborough Masterplan is being funded by the Homes and Community Agency (HCA) who are working with Breckland Council to oversee the project. Consultants Scott-Wilson have been appointed to undertake the Masterplan work and this is currently expected to be completed in February 2011. Future iterations of the ASHAAP will have regard to the findings of the Scott-Wilson Masterplan document which will form a key part of the supporting evidence base. 2.10 The AAP is accompanied by a Sustainability Appraisal. The Sustainability Appraisal highlights any significant environmental, social or economic effects of the plan, assessing it against a number of sustainability objectives. The appraisal will be fully integrated into the plan process, so that it can inform and influence the plan as it develops, it can be accessed on the Council’s website at www.breckland.gov.uk/ldf. Habitats Regulations Assessment 2.11 The AAP will also be informed by a Habitats Regulation Assessment.
Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

    Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
  • Landscape Character Assessment Documents 2

    Landscape Character Assessment Documents 2

    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Landscape Character Assessment Documents 2. Breckland District Part 1 of 5 Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: ExA; ISH; 10.D3.1E 2.1 Deadline 3 Date: February 2019 Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm May 2007 Breckland District Landscape Character Assessment Final Report for Breckland District Council by Land Use Consultants LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT OF BRECKLAND DISTRICT Final Report Prepared for Breckland Council by Land Use Consultants May 2007 43 Chalton Street London NW1 1JD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Fax: 020 7383 4798 [email protected] CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................... 1 PART 1: OVERVIEW 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 The landscape of Breckland...................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the report................................................................................................................................ 1 Structure of the report ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. Method Statement.............................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Data collation
  • Norfolk & Suffolk Brecks

    Norfolk & Suffolk Brecks

    NORFOLK & SUFFOLK BRECKS Landscape Character Assessment Page 51 Conifer plantations sliced with rides. An abrupt, changing landscape of dense blocks and sky. Page 34 The Brecks Arable Heathland Mosaic is at the core of the Brecks distinctive landscape. Page 108 Secret river valleys thread through the mosaic of heaths, plantations and farmland. BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 04 Introduction Page 128 Local landscapes Context Introduction to the case studies Objectives Status Foulden Structure of the report Brettenham Brandon Page 07 Contrasting acidic and calcareous soils are Page 07 Evolution of the Mildenhall juxtaposed on the underlying Lackford landscape chalk Physical influences Human influences Page 146 The Brecks in literature Biodiversity Article reproduced by kind permission of Page 30 Landscape character the Breckland Society Landscape character overview Page 30 The Brecks Arable Structure of the landscape Heathland Mosaic is at the Annexes character assessment core of the Brecks identity Landscape type mapping at 1:25,000 Brecks Arable Heathland Mosaic Note this is provided as a separate Brecks Plantations document Low Chalk Farmland Rolling Clay Farmland Plateau Estate Farmland Settled Fen River Valleys Page 139 Brettenham’s Chalk River Valleys landscape today, explained through illustrations depicting its history 03 BREAKING NEW GROUND INTRODUCTION Introduction Context Sets the scene Purpose and timing of the study How the study should be used Status and strategic fit with other documents Structure of the report BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION Introduction Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Context Study Area (NCA 85) Study Area Buffer This landscape character assessment (LCA) County Boundary Castle Acre focuses on the Brecks, a unique landscape of District Boundary heaths, conifer plantations and farmland on part Main Road of the chalk plateau in south-west Norfolk and Railway north-west Suffolk.
  • A Profile of Thetford

    A Profile of Thetford

    A Profile of Thetford August 2004 Compiled by Corah Carney Keystone Development Trust A Thetford Profile Introduction by Neil Stott, Chief Executive of Keystone Development Trust Welcome to the Thetford profile, a comprehensive and informative digest of local data. I hope you find the profile interesting and useful. Thetford faces many challenges, illustrated by the data contained in the profile – but numerous organisation and local people are working hard to build on Thetford’s many assets and regenerate the town, Thetford is changing. Since the 2001 Census there has been a significant amount of new housing built, investment in local infrastructure, major European investment in social and economic activity and new services and activities springing up – and a real will to make Thetford a better place to live, work, study and visit. Working together we can make a real difference. Neil Stott Chief Executive Keystone Development Trust 1 A Thetford Profile Purpose of The Thetford Profile The main purpose of compiling this document of current information is to provide a single source for much of the information about the Thetford area. In addition it provides an opportunity to highlight the common links between data sets and allows the user access to a unique compilation of data relating to the area. When viewed as a whole it also provides a fascinating insight into the area. It can also support both proposals and decisions for improvements. As with any data however, it is a snapshot, limited to a point in time and by the data available. The data is in this document has been collated from a variety of sources, the main one being the 2001 Census data from the Office of National Statistics Web-site.
  • Tactical Flood Response Plan Part One

    Tactical Flood Response Plan Part One

    OFFICIAL Tactical Flood Response Plan Part One Version 5.1 Author NRF Severe Weather & Flood Risk Group Reviewed by NRF Severe Weather & Flood Risk Authorised by Environment Agency Next review date June 2018 OFFICIAL Page 1 of 65 OFFICIAL Foreword This document has been produced after consultation with Category 1 and 2 Responders (as defined within the Civil Contingencies Act 2004), through the Norfolk Resilience Forum. It provides guidance by which Norfolk can be suitably prepared to respond to an actual or potential major flooding emergency, whereby the combined resources of numerous agencies are required. It will be used by these agencies when information is received or events occur that require a coordinated response at the tactical level. Tom McCabe NRF Executive Lead – Protection Capability Workstream Norfolk County Council OFFICIAL Page 2 of 65 OFFICIAL Table of Contents Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose ...............................................................................................................................................................................................8 Local Considerations: ........................................................................................................................................................................8 Protocols .............................................................................................................................................................................................9
  • SNETTERTON APPNTYPE: Full Land at Chalk Lane POLICY: out Settlemnt Bndry CONS AREA: N

    SNETTERTON APPNTYPE: Full Land at Chalk Lane POLICY: out Settlemnt Bndry CONS AREA: N

    BRECKLAND COUNCIL - PLANNING COMMITTEE - 5th May 2021 ITEM: RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL REF NO: 3PL/2020/0780/F CASE OFFICER Fiona Hunter LOCATION: SNETTERTON APPNTYPE: Full Land at Chalk Lane POLICY: Out Settlemnt Bndry CONS AREA: N APPLICANT: 2 Agriculture Ltd LB GRADE: N C/o Agent - AGENT: WYG TPO: N 54 Hagley Road 3rd Floor PROPOSAL: The construction of an agricultural feed mill (Use Class B2) with ancillary offices and welfare facilities, creation of a new vehicular access and associated infrastructure including silos; engineering; landscaping; and ground works - this is an Environmental Impact Assessment Development REASON FOR COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION This is a significant planning application, with significant public interest, which warrants consideration at Planning Committee. This is due to the sites location outside General Employment Area, number of traffic movements and that the proposal is EIA development. KEY ISSUES Principle of Development Highways, Road Network and Parking Design and Landscape Impact Drainage and Flooding Tree, Hedges, Ecology, Biodiversity, Emissions and Protected Sites Residential Amenity Heritage Assessment Benefits of the Development Environmental Impact Assessment Planning Balance and Conclusion DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT Full Planning Application for a agricultural feed mill (Use Class B2) with ancillary offices and welfare facilities, creation of a new vehicular access and associated infrastructure including silos; engineering; landscaping; and ground works. The development will create 12,360sqm of agricultural feed mill floor space. The mill will create circa 12,000 tonnes of feed per week. The Mill is 43.27m in height at it's tallest point, dropping down to 38m. The tallest grain store is 28m in height.

  • Investigation Report Into the Flooding in Breckland in 2016 Report Reference: FIR028 Draft Report Prepared by Robert Webster on June 2019

    Investigation Report into the flooding in Breckland in 2016 Report Reference: FIR028 Draft Report prepared by Robert Webster on June 2019 * OS 25k mapping has been used within this report which are not current 1 Executive Summary (a) Flooding incidents and causes This report summarises the following 2016 flooding events: Thetford Redcastle Catchment – Canons Walk, Thetford; Burrell Way, Thetford Thetford Centre Catchment – King Street, Thetford Stonebridge South Catchment – Hilda Raker Close, Wretham Croxton Catchment – The Street, Croxton Upper Great Fen Catchment – Kenninghall Road, Banham Attleborough East Catchment – Station Road, Attleborough Thompson Carr Catchment – Hallfield Road, Thompson Ashill Centre Catchment – Church Street, Ashill Ashill South Catchment – Cressingham Road, Ashill Upper River Blackwater Catchment – High Street, Shipdam; Little Hale Road, Shipdam Upper River Yare Catchment – Dereham Road, Whinburgh and Westfield; Dereham Road, Garvestone Upper River Wissey Catchment – Church Street, Bradenham The above events were caused by Surface run-off flowpaths; Surface run-off from roads; Individual property drainage unmaintained; Drainage system or outfall blockage, unmaintained or obstructed; Surcharging of the drainage system; Drainage system overloaded and Neighbouring property. This led to the internal flooding of 16 properties. (b) Key recommendations The recommendations set out in the report have been summarised below. Please note a number of these recommendations have already been followed up by the respective organisations identified. Progress against these recommendations will assessed as part of an addendum to this report to be undertaken a year from the date of publication of this report. Risk Management Authorities should; • Communicate with affected residents where their assets have given rise to the flooding of properties.
  • Ely Ouse Catchment Management Plan

    Ely Ouse Catchment Management Plan

    \OV\ ELY OUSE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT SUMMARY • CAMBRIDGE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY ANGLIAN REGION CATALOGUE NRA \CCESSION CODE National Rivers Ant Anglian Region 0 7 8 5 8 1 INTRODUCTION Catchment management planning aims to create a consistent framework within which all the N RA ’s functions and responsibilities can be applied in a co­ ordinated manner within a particular catchment area. The current state of the water environment and associated land is systematically analysed and compared with appropriate standards. Where these standards are not being met or are likely to be affected in the future, the shortfalls, together with options for action to resolve them, are presented as issues in a table at the end of this brochure. YOUR VIEWS Formulation of this plan involves consulting and working with many public bodies and individuals. Your views on the issues identified are welcomed. You may also wish to comment on other matters affecting the water environment in the catchment area which you think should be examined by the NRA. Please write with your comments to the following address, from which a full copy of the consultation report may also be obtained:- Ely Ouse Catchment Management Plan, Area General Manager National Rivers Authority, Central Area, Bromholme Lane, Brampton, Huntingdon, Cambs, PEI8 8NE Comments must be received by 25th June 1993 Aerial view of the Denver system. 2 — rW v^l \&/y LEf) Pj WHAT IS CATCHMENT PLANNING? River catchments are subject to increasing use by a wide variety of activities, many of which interact giving rise to some conflicts. The many competing demands on the water environment and the interests of users and beneficiaries must be balanced.
  • Appendix 1 Outcome of CWS Review

    Appendix 1 Outcome of CWS Review

    County Wildlife Sites – Breckland 2018 Site Site Name Last Survey Transboundary Grid reference Number Date (T) or registered common (C) 169 Coston Meadow 85 T (SN) 170 River Yare Corridor 85 T (SN) 177 Bickerston Meadow 9/95 T (SN) 178 The Carrs 6/95 T (SN) 541 West and Pentney Commons 9/95 & 6/97 T (WN) 542 Sovereign Meadow 10/95 T (WN) 593 Little Ouse Meadow 85 TM 003800 594 Little Fen 7/96 TM 035792 595 The Lows 7/09 TM 032789 596 Adj. Little Fen 85 TM 046799 597 Old Fen 9/95 TM 000807 598 Broomscott Common 7/16 C TM 004806 599 Oak Plantation 85 TM 006803 600 Wood near Garboldisham 5/96 TM 016846 601 Lang Fen (South) 4/96 TM 063800 602 Holland’s Wood 5/96 TM 050822 603 Lopham Grove 85 TM 062838 604 Broom Covert and Downhill Plantation 09/07 TM 020863 605 East Harling Fen 8/96 TM 000874 607 The Lows 8/96 TM 014880 608 West of Quidenham 6/96 TM 020877 611 Arnold’s Belt 85 TM 043880 614 Adj. to River Wittle 8/96 TM 009880 615 East Harling Common 8/96 TM 005882 616 Adj. River Wittle 8/96 TM 008881 618 Common Plantation 8/96 TM 035885 619 Copince’s Fen 85 TM 049883 620 Eccles Wood (North) 8/96 TM 013895 621 Eccles Wood (Middle) 8/96 TM 013893 622 Eccles Wood (South) 8/96 TM 017890 623 The Carr 5/96 TM 024890 624 Jubilee Plantation 5/96 TM 064896 625 Warren and Nuttery Plantation 5/96 TM 062898 626 Stacksford Wood 8/13 TM 052903 627 Lower Plantation 5/96 TM 060905 630 New Buckenham Common (north) 85 C TM 095910 632 East of Old Buckenham Fen 5/96 TM 052921 633 Abbey Farm Meadow 5/96 TM 073926 634 West Moor 85 TM 067946 635 Hargham Estate 5/96
  • The State of England's Chalk Streams

    The State of England's Chalk Streams

    FUNDED WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM REPORT UK 2014 The State of England’s Chalk Streams This report has been written by Rose O’Neill and Kathy Hughes on behalf of WWF-UK with CONTENTS help and assistance from many of the people and organisations hard at work championing England’s chalk streams. In particular the authors would EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 like to thank Charles Rangeley-Wilson, Lawrence Talks, Sarah Smith, Mike Dobson, Colin Fenn, 8 Chris Mainstone, Chris Catling, Mike Acreman, FOREWORD Paul Quinn, David Bradley, Dave Tickner, Belinda by Charles Rangeley-Wilson Fletcher, Dominic Gogol, Conor Linsted, Caroline Juby, Allen Beechey, Haydon Bailey, Liz Lowe, INTRODUCTION 13 Bella Davies, David Cheek, Charlie Bell, Dave Stimpson, Ellie Powers, Mark Gallant, Meyrick THE STATE OF ENGLAND’S CHALK STREAMS 2014 19 Gough, Janina Gray, Ali Morse, Paul Jennings, Ken Caustin, David Le Neve Foster, Shaun Leonard, Ecological health of chalk streams 20 Alex Inman and Fran Southgate. This is a WWF- Protected chalk streams 25 UK report, however, and does not necessarily Aquifer health 26 reflect the views of each of the contributors. Chalk stream species 26 Since 2012, WWF-UK, Coca-Cola Great Britain and Pressures on chalk streams 31 Coca-Cola Enterprises have been working together Conclusions 42 to secure a thriving future for English rivers. The partnership has focused on improving the health A MANIFESTO FOR CHALK STREAMS 45 of two chalk streams directly linked to Coca-Cola operations: the Nar catchment in Norfolk (where AN INDEX OF ENGLISH CHALK STREAMS 55 some of the sugar beet used in Coca-Cola’s drinks is grown) and the Cray in South London, near 60 to Coca-Cola Enterprises’ Sidcup manufacturing GLOSSARY site.
  • Attleborough Future Growth Community Planning Event 5 - 6 February 2010

    Attleborough Future Growth Community Planning Event 5 - 6 February 2010

    Attleborough Future Growth COMMUNITY PLANNING EVENT 5 - 6 FEBRUARY 2010 Welcome to the Community Planning Weekend Please get involved... Attleborough Land Ltd - part of Ptarmigan Land Ltd View from the South West At the Community Planning Weekend you have the chance to participate in topic workshops and hands-on planning groups to explore local and site specific “Ptarmigan Land are working with the Council, issues and possible solutions. landowners and local community to help deliver part of the What is Community Planning? Council’s aspirations for the town.” Community Planning is a way of engaging with local people to shape the future of their towns and neighbourhoods. The aim of the Community Planning Weekend is to bring together everyone with an interest in Attleborough to Attleborough Land Ltd are working with the Council, landowners and the local produce a shared, practical Vision for its future growth. community to help deliver a long-term Vision for the town which will best accommodate the 4500 houses which are planned to be located there. Please also come to the Report Back Following the Community Planning Weekend the design team led by John Attleborough Land’s job is to create a vision for the land, responsive to both Thompson and Partners (JTP) will analyse and summarise the outcomes and planning and local issues, and to draw up plans for that new vision, securing develop an illustrated Vision. This will be reported back to the community at necessary agreements and obtaining the support of key stakeholders. 7.00pm on Tuesday 9 February at Attleborough High School.

  • River Little Ouse Brandon to Thetford Prefeasibility Study - Stage 2 Report

    BabtleBrown & Root RiverLittle Ouse (Brandonto ThetfordNavigation) Pre-FeasibilityStudy Stage2 Report t:t-) '. :'j ,,...i _t-ji;:1 1,:il !" *# E{-:s- ',.jij EnvironmentAgency Anglian Region BBR Ref: 0006077/D4l135 EA ProjectRef: LVN 17010 Babtie Brown & Root JV 8 The SquareMartlesham Heath lpswich Suffolk lP5 3SL Tel 01473624326 Fax 01473623021 BabtieBrown & Root River Little Ouse Brandon to Thetford Prefeasibility Study - Stage 2 Report Rev Date Purpose Draft 26t6t03 Draftfor Discussion 20t8t03 Stage1 Reportissue A 1611tO4 Stage2 Report(Draft for Discussion) B 16t2t04 Stage2 Reportdraft in preparation C 25t5t04 Stage2 Reportincorporating EA commentsof 2614104 D 17t10t05 Stage2 Report(Final) incorporatinq EA comments Front Cover Photo Abbey Heath Weir, River Little Ouse, Thetford. 35 Stage 2 Flnal Revo.dc RIVERLITTLE OUSE (BRANDONto THETFORDNAVIGATION) Notes Pagesnot printed (or reprinted) 2: Blank 28: Blank 29: Titlepage only - AppendixA, EnvironmentalReport. 52: Blank 53: Titlepage only - Citations(Appendix 3 - sic) 54: Blank 55 - 67: ThetfordGolf Course And Marsh,Sites of SpecialScientific lnterest, Conservationof Wild Birds. SeePages 35 to 47 in originalreport. 68: Blank 69: Titlepage only - AppendixB, Photographs 70 - 76 14photographs. See pages 50 to 56 of originalreport. 77: Titlepage only - AppendixC, Works Required for Navigation 78 - 79 Scheduleof newworks - Seepages 58 & 59 of originalreport 80: Blank 81: Titlepage only - AppendixD, CostsEstimates 85: Titlepage only - AppendixE, EconomicAssessment 91: Titlepage only - WorkingGroup Consultation 92: Blank 93 - 94: WorkingGroup. See pages 67 & 68 of originalreport 98: Blank 99: Titlepage only - AbstractionLicence Summaries 100:Blank 103-106:River Flow Records 107',Drawings BabtieBrcwn&Root River Little Ouse Brandon to Thetford Prefeasibility Study - Stage 2 Report Tableof Gontents |NTRODUCT|ON............. '....".""....'....4 TECHNTCALASSESSMENT..............