Gastroenterology_1

MRCP (UK)-1 Review

 Dr. Mohamed Zakaria, MD, MRCP (UK), FACC, FESC  Professor of Medicine Consultant Cardiologist  Senior Fellow New Westminster College

Esophageal Anatomy

Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES)

Esophageal Body 18 to 24 cm (cervical & thoracic)

Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Normal Phases of Swallowing  Voluntary  oropharyngeal phase – bolus is voluntarily moved into the pharynx  Involuntary  UES relaxation   LES relaxation Normal Phases of Swallowing  Between swallows  UES prevents air entering the during inspiration and prevents esophagopharyngeal reflux  LES prevents gastroesophageal reflux  peristaltic and non-peristaltic contractions in response to stimuli  capacity for retrograde movement (belch, vomiting) and decompression Normal Swallowing Cortical Swallowing Areas Frontal cortex

Swallowing Center Brainstem Motor Nuclei

Oropharynx & Esophagus

Motility Disorders

 upper esophageal  primary disorders  UES disorders  achalasia  neuromuscular disorders  diffuse  esophageal body   achalasia  nonspecific esophageal  dysmotility  nutcracker esophagus  secondary disorders  nonspecific esophageal  severe dysmotility  scleroderma  LES  diabetes  achalasia  Parkinson’s  hypertensive LES  stroke Diagnostic Tools

 cineradiology or videofluoroscopy  barium esophagram  esophageal manometry  endoscopy Normal Manometry Motility Disorders Based on Manometry  Achalasia – Inadequate LES relaxation  Diffuse Esophageal Spasm – Uncoordinated contraction  Nutcracker Esophagus – Hypercontraction  Ineffective Esophageal Motility – Hypocontraction Achalasia Achalasia

 first clinically recognized esophageal motility disorder  Achalasia means “failure to relax.” LES

 epidemiology  1-2 per 200,000 population  usually presents between ages 25 to 60  average symptom duration at diagnosis: 2-5 years Pathophysiology  Degeneration of NO producing inhibitory neurons  loss of ganglionic cells in the (distal to proximal)  vagal fiber degeneration  underlying cause: unknown  autoimmune (antibodies to myenteric neurons in 50% of patients)

 High Basal LES pressure. Mechanical End Result

 LES fails to appropriately relax  resistance to flow into stomach  increased basal LES pressure

 loss of peristalsis in distal 2/3 esophagus Clinical Presentation

 solid 90-100% (75% dysphagia to liquids)  post-prandial regurgitation 60-90%  33-50%  pyrosis 25-45%  weight loss  nocturnal cough and recurrent aspiration Diagnostic Work Up  plain film (air-fluid level, wide mediastinum, absent gastric bubble, pulmonary infiltrates)  barium esophagram (dilated esophagus with taper at LES) Bird peak  good screening test (95% accurate)  endoscopy (rule out GE junction tumors, esp. age>60)  esophageal manometry (absent peristalsis,  LES relaxation, & resting LES >45 mmHg)

Manometric Features  Incomplete LES relaxation  Elevated resting pressure (>45 mmHg)  Aperistalsis of esophageal body Treatment of Achalasia Goals  reduce LES pressure and  increase emptying Nitrates and Calcium Channel Blockers  Reduces LES Pressure 66% for 90 min  Nifedipine Reduces LES pressure 30-40% for > 60 minutes

 50-70% initial response; <50% at 1 year  limitations: tachyphylaxis and side-effects  prevents ACH release at NM junction  90% initial response; 60% at 1 year  Needs repetitive sessions Pneumatic Dilatation  Balloon dilatation (endoscopy)  disrupt circular muscle  60-95% initial success; 60% at 5 years  1/3 will require re-dilation  Success increases with repeat dilatations  risk of perforation (5%)  death (0.5%) Surgical Treatment

 surgical myotomy (open or minimally- invasive)  >90% initial response; 85% at 10 years; 70% at 20 years  (85% at 5 years with min. inv. techniques)  <1% mortality   10-25% develop GERD. Recommended treatment algorithm for patients with achalasia. PD, pneumatic dilation. Spastic Motility Disorders of the Esophagus

 Diffuse Esophageal Spasm  Nutcracker Esophagus  Hypertensive LES  Nonspecific Esophageal Dysmotility Epidemiology  Any age (mean 40 yrs)  Female > Male Clinical Presentation  Dysphagia to solids and liquids  intermittent and non-progressive

 Chest Pain  constant  swallowing is not necessarily impaired  can mimic cardiac chest pain

 Pyrosis (heartburn) Diffuse Esophageal Spasm  frequent non-peristaltic contractions  simultaneous onset (or too rapid propagation) of contractions in two or more recording leads

Nutcracker Esophagus

 high pressure peristaltic contractions  avg pressure in 10 wet swallows is >180 mm Hg  33% have long duration contractions (>6 sec) Nonspecific Esophageal Hypertensive LES Dysmotility

 abnormal motility  high LES pressure pattern  >45 mm Hg  fits in no other category  normal peristalsis  non-peristalsis in 20-  often overlaps with 30% of wet swallows other motility  low pressure waves disorders (<30 mm Hg)  prolonged contractions Diagnosis of Spastic Motility Disorders of the Esophagus  Manometry  Barium Esophagram  Endoscopy  PH monitoring Spastic Motility Disorders of the Esophagus

 treatment  reassurance  nitrates, anticholinergics, hydralazine  calcium channel blockers  psychotropic drugs (antidepressants).  dilation Hypomotilty Disorders

 primary (idiopathic)  aging produces gradual decrease in contraction strength  reflux patients have varying degrees of hypomotility  more common in patients with atypical reflux symptoms  usually persists after reflux therapy  defined as  low contraction wave pressures (<30 mm Hg)  incomplete peristalsis in 30% or > of wet swallows Hypomotilty Disorders  secondary  scleroderma  in >75% of patients  progressive, resulting in aperistalsis in smooth-muscle region  incompetent LES with reflux  other “connective tissue diseases”  CREST  polymyositis & dermatomyositis  diabetes  60% with neuropathy have abnormal motility  other  hypothyroidism, alcoholism, amyloidosis

GERD

 daily GERD symptom, weekly symptoms, or monthly.

 Symptoms include: heartburn, acid regurgitation, water brash, dysphagia, dyspepsia

 atypical symptoms (asthma) Pathophysiology  Lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction  Delayed gastric emptying  Esophageal dysmotility  +/- hiatal  Repetitive mucosal injury / esophagitis  Barrett’s Esophagus

Medical Treatment  Lifestyle modifications – avoid coffee, fatty foods, smoking; lose weight, raise head of bed, eliminate late night meals

 Trial of PPI’s for 4 weeks. Indications for Surgery  Failed medical management  Need for lifelong medical therapy   Atypical symptoms with (+) pH probe  Complications  – Barrett’s esophagus (5-15% develop BE)  – Erosive esophagitis Surgical Treatment  Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication  Goals of antireflux surgery:  – Recreate Angle of His  – Reconstitute LES with wrap

GERD diagnostic test:

 Manometric measurements of the lower esophageal sphincter had asensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 89%, and an accuracy of 87%.

 Twenty-four hour esophageal pH monitoring had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 96%.

Pathophysiology & Classification  Type I – sliding

 Type II – paraesophageal

 Type III - para and sliding component

 Type IV - other viscera involved Clinical Presentation  postprandial fullness (63%),  Reflux (31%),  Dysphagia (34%),  Bleeding (24%)  Regurgitation/vomiting (36%)  Dyspnea (11%) Work Up  upper GI series.  endoscopy.  manometry.

HRM, endoscopy and barium esophagogram, using in vivo assessment as gold standard diagnostic reference for hiatal hernia. Surgical Treatment  Effective repair includes: – Excision of hernia sac – Reduction of hernia contents – Repair of crural defect  – Fundoplication, gastropexy. Stomach & Gastric Gland

Gastric lumen

Columnar  Gastric (oxyntic) gland mucus cells  Surface epithelia cells (mucus cells) Mucous neck cell  Alkaline mucus- viscid Parietal  Mucous neck cells (neck cell chief cells) Peptic cell  Soluble mucus  pepsinogen

From Physiology Book by H.T. Sherrief Gastric Gland

Gastric lumen

Columnar  Parietal cells (oxyntic mucus cells cells)  Hydrochloric acid Mucous neck cell  Intrinsic factor Parietal cell  Chief [peptic] cells Peptic cell (zymogen cells)  Pepsinogen

From Physiology Book by H.T. Sherrief Gastric Gland

Gastric lumen

Columnar  Enterochromaffin cells mucus cells  serotonin  Histamine Mucous neck cell  Parietal Specialized cells cell  vasoactive intestinal Peptic cell peptide (VIP)  Substance P  Glucagon

From Physiology Book by H.T. Sherrief Gastric Gland

Gastric lumen

Columnar  Parietal cell mucus cells  Produce a solution containing Mucous neck cell  Approx. 160 mmol of Parietal cell HCl/l; pH 0.8 (H+ conc. = 3 to 4 million time that in Peptic cell plasma)  Energy cost = 1500 calories/l of HCl

From Physiology Book by H.T. Sherrief Gastric Gland

Gastric lumen

Columnar  Intrinsic factor (vit. mucus cells B12 - R factor binding macromolecule) Mucous neck cell  Parietal cell Parietal cell  Also produce Peptic cell  Gastric lipase  Gastric amylase  Gelatinase

From Physiology Book by H.T. Sherrief Gastric Gland

Gastric lumen

Columnar  Chief cells mucus cells  Produce small volume of electrolyte similar to ECF Mucous neck cell  Contain Pepsinogen( PG I,

Parietal PG II) cell  Some individuals secrete Peptic cell ABO blood group antigen in their gastric juice

From Physiology Book by H.T. Sherrief Pyloric Gland

Gastric lumen

Columnar  Similar structure like mucus cells the oxyntic gland  Contain few peptic Mucous neck cell (chief) cells G-cells  No parietal cells

Peptic cell  Contain mucus cells  Have G-cells

From Physiology Book by H.T. Sherrief Pyloric Gland

Gastric lumen Columnar  secrete mucus cells  Mucus and

Mucous electrolytes neck cell

G-cells  G cells produce Gastrin Peptic cell  Peptic cells produce pepsinogen

From Physiology Book by H.T. Sherrief Control of Gastric Acid Secretion  Vagal stimulation increases secretion by  Stimulating histamine releasing cells  Histamine then diffuses to stimulate parietal cells  Vagal stimulation activates antral G – cells  Produce Gastrin  Gastrin acts on parietal and chief cells

Peptic ulcer  A break in superficial epithelial cells penetrating down to muscularis mucosa Peptic Ulcer Duodenal vs Gastric DUODENAL GASTRIC

INCIDENCE More common Less common

ANATOMY First part of duodenum – Lesser curvature of anterior wall stomach DURATION Acute or chronic Chronic

MALIGNANCY Rare Benign or malignant Risk factors  HELICOBACTER PYLORI  Non Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs  Steroid therapy  Smoking  Excess alcohol intake  Genetic factors  Zollinger Ellison syndrome – rare syndrome caused by gastrin-secreting tumour  Hyperparathyroidism How does hyperparathyroidism cause ?  Hyperparathyroidism causes increased serum calcium levels which leads to increased serum levels of gastrin and acetylcholine.

 These changes result in stimulation of gastric acid secretion and peptic ulcer disease H Pylori  Urease producing, gram negative bacillus  Developing countries  Infection increases with age  Infects mucosa of stomach > inflammatory response > > increased gastrin secretion > gastric metaplasia > damage to mucosa > ulceration  Increased risk of developing gastric adenocarcinoma Symptoms of PUD  Asymptomatic  Epigastric pain   Oral flatulence, bloating, distension and intolerance of fatty food  Heartburn  Pain radiating to the back ALARM signs for epigastric pain  Chronic GI bleeding  Iron-deficiency anaemia  Progressive unintentional weight loss  Progressive dysphagia  Persistent vomiting  Epigastric mass  Patients aged 55 years and older with unexplained and persistent recent- onset dyspepsia Management of dyspepsia  NICE guidance for dyspepsia

Investigations  H pylori testing H pylori testing  C urea breath tests  Stool antigen tests  Serology  Endoscopy with biopsy H pylori treatment  7-day, twice-daily  Use a PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin 500 mg (PAC500) regimen.  Do not re-test even if dyspepsia remains unless there is a strong clinical need.

Acute upper GI bleed  Common, 10% mortality  Common causes: PUD, varices  Endoscopy: primary diagnostic investigation & allows for treatment  Assess using the Blatchford score at first assessment and full after endscopy

Blatchford Score  Most useful for safely discriminating low risk UGIB patients who will likely NOT require endoscopic hemostasis  “Fast track Blatchford” – patient at low risk if:

BUN < 18 mg/dL Hgb > 13 (men), 12 (women) SBP >100 HR < 100 Rockall score Definitions  Upper GI bleed – arising from the esophagus, stomach, or proximal duodenum  Mid-intestinal bleed – arising from distal duodenum to ileocecal valve  Lower intestinal bleed – arising from colon/ Differential Diagnosis – Upper GIB

 Peptic ulcer disease Most  Gastroesophageal varices common  Erosive esophagitis/gastritis/  Mallory Weiss tear  Vascular ectasia  Neoplasm  Dieulafoy’s lesion  Aortoenteric fistula  Hemobilia, hemosuccus pancreaticus History Physical Examination

 Localizing symptoms  Vital signs  History of prior GIB  Abdominal tenderness  NSAID/aspirin use  Skin, oral examination  /  Stigmata of liver disease   Rectal examination  Aortic valvular disease,  Objective description of stool chronic renal failure  Assess for mass,  AAA repair  Radiation exposure  Family history of GIB Initial Assessment

Class I Class II Class III Class IV

Blood loss 750 750-1500 1500-2000 >2000 (mL)

Blood volume < 15% 15-30% 30-40% >40% loss (%)

Heart rate <100 >100 >120 >140

SBP No change Orthostatic Reduced Very low, change supine

Urine output >30 20-30 10-20 <10 (mL/hr)

Mental status Alert Anxious Aggressive/dr Confused/unc owsy onscious Endoscopic Therapy

 ~80% bleeds spontaneously resolve  Endoscopic stigmata of recent hemorrhage

Stigmata Continued/rebleeding rate Active bleeding 55-90% majo r Nonbleeding visible vessel 40-50%

Adherent clot Variable, depending on underlying lesion: 0-35%

Flat pigmented spot 7-10%

Clean base < 5% Major Stigmata - NBVV Adherent Clot Minor Stigmata Flat pigmented spot Clean base

Low rebleeding risk – no endoscopic therapy needed Variceal Bleeding  Occurs in 1/3 of patients with cirrhosis  1/3 initial bleeding episodes are fatal  Among survivors, 1/3 will rebleed within 6 weeks  Only 1/3 will survive 1 year or more Predictors of

 Severity of liver disease  Platelet count < 88  Palpable spleen  Platelet count/spleen diameter (mm) ratio <909 leed

asoconstrictor therapy ntibiotics esuscitation U level care ndoscopy ternative/Rescue therapies eta blockade asoconstrictor therapy  Goal: Reduce splanchnic blood flow

 Terlipressin – only agent shown to improve control of bleeding and survival ntibiotics

 Bacterial infection occurs in up to 66% of patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleed  Negative impact on hemostasis (endogenous heparinoids)  Prophylactic antibiotics reduces incidence of bacterial infection, significantly reduces early rebleeding  Ceftriaxone 1 g IV QD x 5-7 days  Alt: Norfloxacin 400 mg po BID esuscitation

 Promptly but with caution  Goal = maintain hemodynamic stability, Hgb ~7-8, CVP 4-8 mmHg  Avoid excessively rapid overexpansion of volume; may increase portal pressure, greater bleeding. ndoscopy

 Should be performed as soon as possible after resuscitation (within 12 hours)

 Band ligation is preferred method ternative/Rescue therapies

 TIPS – Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt  Early placement of shunt (within 24-72hrs) associated with improved survival among high-risk patients  Preferred treatment for gastric variceal bleeding (rule out splenic vein thrombosis first) ternative/Rescue therapies

Sengstaken-Blakemore  Very effective for immediate, Tube temporary control  High complication rate – aspiration, migration, necrosis + perforation of esophagus  Use as bridge to TIPS within 24 hours  Airway protection strongly recommended eta blockade

 Reduces risk for recurrent variceal hemorrhage  Use nonselective beta blocker (e.g. Nadolol – splanchnic vasoconstriction, decrease cardiac output) and titrate up to maximum tolerated dose, HR 50-60 Esophagus-Gastric Tumors Esophageal Cancer

• Esophageal cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer death worldwide.

• squamous cell carcinoma is responsible for 95% of all esophageal cancer worldwide.

Esophageal Esophageal Squamous Cell Adenocarcinoma Carcinoma Signs and Symptoms of Esophageal Cancer

•Difficulty swallowing *(dysphagia)

•Weight loss without trying

•Chest pain, pressure or burning

•Worsening or heartburn

•Coughing or hoarseness (due reflux) diagnostics:

1. Endoscopy and bx (pathologic diagnosis)

2. Barium esophagraphy

3. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT)

4. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

4. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)

5. Positron-emission tomography (PET) are powerful tools in the detection, diagnosis, and staging of this malignancy. Esophageal Cancer

Barium esophagram demonstrates an abrupt An ulcerative tumour growth measuring about 5cm change in the caliber and contour of the esophagus longitudinally is present involving most of the caused by an irregular circumferential stricture circumference of oesophagus. The tumour has fairly containing focal ulcerations sharply demarcated margins. Esophageal Cancer

Anteroposterior barium esophagram demonstrates an abrupt change in the caliber of the esophagus, with a long, irregular, annular stricture of the lower esophagus. The masslike shouldering at the proximal extent of the lesion at which filling defects are present within the dilated esophageal lumen. Findings are most consistent with esophageal carcinoma. Esophageal Cancer

CT SCAN

Key findings include the following: 1. Eccentric or circumferential wall thickening is greater than 5 mm. 2. Peri-esophageal soft tissue and fat stranding may be demonstrated. 3. A dilated fluid- and debris-filled esophageal lumen is proximal to an obstructing lesion. Esophageal Cancer

CT Findings

Nonenhanced axial CT image demonstrates dilated Nonenhanced axial CT image demonstrates wall esophagus with a large amount of retained ingested thickening of the esophagus and complete food and a slight trace of barium. obstruction of the esophageal lumen. Esophageal Cancer MRI Preliminary studies have shown that the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for the determination of tumor invasion are equivalent to those of CT.

r - thymus s - ascending aorta e - superior vena cava u - pulmonary trunk v - left pulmonary vein b - lung q - left main bronchus p - right main bronchus x - azygos vein g - esophagus c - descending aorta Esophageal Cancer

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)

Unlike CT, EUS allows visualization of the distinct layers within the esophageal wall. Alternating circumferential layers define: the mucosal interface (hyperechoic), the mucosa (hypoechoic), the submucosa (hyperechoic), the muscularis propria (hypoechoic), and the adventitial interface (hyperechoic). Esophageal Cancer

Nuclear medicine PET - Positron Emission Tomography PET is quickly becoming a standard oncologic imaging modality.

FDG PET scanning remains the technique of choice for the detection of metastatic abdominal lymph nodes. Gastric Cancer Gastric Cancer

 Stomach cancer is the second cause of death among cancers in the world.  Men have a higher incidence of gastric cancers than women. Risk factors:

 A diet high in smoked foods and low in fruits and vegetables may increase the risk of gastric cancer.

 chronic inflammation of the stomach, anemia, gastric ulcer.  H. pylori infection.  Genetics.  Smoking.  alcohol Pathophysiology

 Most gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas and can occur in any portion of the stomach.

 The tumor infiltrates the surrounding mucosa, penetrating the wall of the stomach and adjacent organs and structures.

 The liver, pancreas, esophagus, and duodenum are often affected at the time of diagnosis.

 Metastasis through lymph to the peritoneal cavity occurs later in the disease. Clinical Manifestations

 In the early stages of gastric cancer, symptoms may be absent.

 Early symptoms are seldom definitive because most gastric tumors begin on the lesser curvature, where they cause little disturbance of gastric functions. Clinical features:

anorexia dyspepsia (indigestion) weight loss abdominal pain anemia nausea and vomiting   Cachexia

 Abdominal/epigastric mass

 Ascites  Virchow's node (or signal node) is a lymph node in the left supraclavicular fossa (the area above the left clavicle).  It takes its supply from lymph vessels in the abdominal cavity.  It is a finding of distant metastasis of gastric cancers. gastroscopy with multiple biopsies taken from the area suspected is the method adopted for the diagnosis of carcinoma of the stomach.

Must be supported by taking swabs brushing during endoscopy and sent for testing cell, since the cytological may be positive (about 15% of cases) at the time the biopsies do not reveal the presence of carcinoma computed tomography (CT) scan, bone scan, and liver scan are valuable in determining the extent of metastasis. MALT Lymphoma  MALT: Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue

 Can be induced/expanded by chronic antigenic stimulation  Lymphomas of MALT-type : ~8% of all NHL

 Two subgroups

 Gastric MALT Lymphomas (70%)  Non-Gastric MALT Lymphomas (30%) Gastric MALT lymphoma

• Distinct disease entity • Pivotal role of chronic antigenic stimulation by H. pylori • Can be cured by antibiotic treatment (HP eradication). Gastric MALT Lymphoma: Gastroscopy Gastric MALT Lymphoma: Histology

• LEL’s (Lymphoepithelial lesions) • monoclonal small/meduim sized B cells (“marginal zone cells”) • CD20+,CD79a+,CD5-,CD10-, CD23- , CD21+, CD35+,IgM+ •Plasmacytoid differentiation Gastric MALT Lymphoma: assessment of localisations

 Gastroscopy with multiple biopsies (H.Pylori culture)

 Endosonography of the stomach

 CT-chest and abdomen (gastric protocol)

 Ophthalmologic and ENT-examination 25 % also  Bone Marrow investigation extragastric localisation !  Further Investigation of GI-tract depending on symptoms Gastric MALT Lymphoma Therapy local disease

 H.Pylori eradication with strict Follow-Up • Omeprazole 20 mg bid d1-7, • Amoxycillin 1000 mg bid d1-7,  CR 70-80% • Clarithromycin 500 mg bid d1-7

 Similar OS with different treatments : 5yrs OS 82%

• chemotherapy, surgery, surgery with additional chemotherapy or radiation therapy or H.Pylori eradication Gastric MALT Lymphoma Therapy II

 Radiotherapy:  Chemotherapy (mild, oral)  Immunotherapy: Rituximab

Advanced disease:  Comparable with follicular lymphoma:  CVP-R or FCR MRCP Part 1

•A is a gastrin-secreting tumor that can occur in the pancreas.

•25% of are related to multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type I and are associated with hyperparathyroidism and pituitary adenomas