War Nears the Capital

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

War Nears the Capital VOLUME 11, ISSUE 8 An Integrated Curriculum For The Washington Post Newspaper In Education Program War Nears the Capital ■ Student Activity: A Personal Side of the American Civil War ■ Resource: Civil War Diaries, Letters and Manuscripts ■ Post Reprint: “The day ‘Old Jube’ nearly took Washington” ■ Map Study: Civil War Defenses of Washington ■ Map Study: Fort Stevens and Battleground National Cemetery ■ Post Reprint: “On a hot July day, Bethesda became a battleground” ■ Post Reprint: “At Battle of the Crater, black troops prove their courage” May 9, 2014 ©2014 THE WASHINGTON POST VOLUME 11, ISSUE 8 An Integrated Curriculum For The Washington Post Newspaper In Education Program s the District of Columbia was transforming into a capital city, it was a city targeted for attack by Confederate generals. To the north was Maryland, a slave-owning state. To the south across the Potomac River, Virginia was home to the Southern Acapital city of Richmond. Only Fort Washington, built in 1808 south on the Potomac River to control river access, protected the vulnerable city. In order to better secure D.C., the Union army constructed 68 forts in a defensive ring. Former slaves assisted troops to build and maintain the fortifications. In the hot July of 1864, General Robert E. Lee ordered General Jubal Early, with around 20,000 troops, to strike D.C. from the north. Encamped at Rockville, Md., on July 10, Early was ready to attack Fort Stevens — and from here the Federal capital. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE May 9, 2014 ©2014 THE WASHINGTON POST VOLUME 11, ISSUE 8 An Integrated Curriculum For The Washington Post Newspaper In Education Program A Personal Side of the Civil War Diaries, Letters and Manuscripts http://www.vmi.edu/archives.aspx?id=3945 American Civil War Civil War Letters, Diaries, Manuscripts Annotated entries from the Virginia Military Institute Archives Archivists work to preserve manuscripts. Historians carefully read diaries that have http://digital.lib.uiowa.edu/cwd/ survived. Scholars enjoy the personal nature of Civil War Diaries and Letters letters. All look for clues to troop movement, A University of Iowa Libraries project time and place of activity, and mundane events http://americanhistory.si.edu/documentsgallery/exhibitions/ and schemes to survive another day. nursing_1.html You too can understand how Americans dealt The Diary of a Civil War Nurse with friendly and enemy troops, disease and daily Smithsonian document file includes an interactive map of D.C. chores, changing seasons and disparate fortunes. in 1863 Read the diaries, letters and manuscripts that are available online. http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mogenweb/cwdiary.htm Diary of Mrs. Rachel Young King Anderson (1818-1898) TWEET Written in Greene County, Missouri, the diary begins Aug. 26, Based on information gained from diary entries 1861, and ends April 15, 1865. and letters, write tweets as if you were living then. Give a sense of war-time activities, impact http://www.rarebooks.nd.edu/digital/civil_war/letters/index.shtml on citizens and changes imposed on daily life. Manuscripts of the American Civil War Letters and correspondence from the manuscript holdings in the Department of Special Collections, University of Notre Dame. WRITE A LETTER Each is annotated to give a sense of person, time period, place After reading diary entries and letters from a and engagements covered. particular state or region, write a letter to relate the impact of war upon people living there and http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/blacks-civil-war/ article.html soldiers from the area. You may use information Teaching with Documents: The Fight in The Washington Post’s Civil War 150 articles for Equal Rights: Black Soldiers in the Civil War and timelines to add insight. This lesson includes letters, photographs and military service records. BLOG Read diaries, letters and memoirs of military http://www.loc.gov/collection/diary-of-horatio-taft/about-this- collection/ leaders, foot soldiers and women who lived Washington During the Civil War: The Diary of Horatio during the Civil War. Write a series of blog Nelson Taft, 1861-1865 entries from the perspective of different Three volumes that document daily life in D.C. and events individuals to give insight into the effects of a surrounding the assassination of Abraham Lincoln particular battle or skirmish. May 9, 2014 ©2014 THE WASHINGTON POST VOLUME 11, ISSUE 8 An Integrated Curriculum For The Washington Post Newspaper In Education Program The day ‘Old Jube’ nearly took Washington With Lincoln watching, the last rebel invasion of the North ended at Fort Stevens in the District retreat. Lee’s first invasion, in September 1862, led to the single BY STEVE VOGEL bloodiest day in American history, at Antietam, where the Confederates • Originally Published April 24 were turned back but escaped to Virginia. Less than a year later, Forty-one white headstones form Lee crossed the Potomac River two concentric circles around an again, culminating in the fateful American flag in the tiny graveyard Confederate defeat at Gettysburg in that is tucked into the middle of July 1863. a block on Georgia Avenue in Lee was a risk-taker, and Northwest Washington. in the summer of 1864, he was The two six-pound smoothbore ready to gamble again. Lt. Gen. guns guarding the entrance of Ulysses S. Grant’s relentless Battleground National Cemetery NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Army of the Potomac had backed seem out of place amid the The center of the cemetery is marked the Confederates into battle by a central flagpole surrounded by 41 surrounding apartment buildings. regulation marble headstones marking lines protecting Richmond and The immaculate one-acre plot, one the remains of the honored dead of Fort Petersburg, and it appeared poised of the country’s smallest national Stevens. Behind these headstones and for a drive to capture the Southern to the east, stands a marble rostrum capital. cemeteries, draws scant attention used to conduct yearly Memorial Day from cars whizzing by, perhaps services. The four granite pillars are in On June 12, Lee entrusted Lt. fitting for a little-remembered Civil memory of the four volunteer companies Gen. Jubal A. Early, one of his War episode. who fought at Fort Stevens. most aggressive and experienced Yet 150 years ago, the fate of commanders, with a bold mission the capital, and, some feared, the along a Confederate line of intended to relieve pressure on Union, hung on the men defending advance that cut through towns and the Confederate defenders. Lee Washington during the third and neighborhoods that today are at or would send his 2nd Corps under final Confederate invasion of the near the heart of the Washington Early — a major portion of his North. The soldiers laid to rest there region, including Frederick, army — to clear out a Union died protecting the northernmost Gaithersburg, Rockville, Bethesda, force that had taken possession of of Washington’s fortifications, Fort Takoma Park, Silver Spring, and, much of the Shenandoah Valley. Stevens (from the cemetery, go six most critically, Monocacy Junction. If he saw an opening, Early was blocks south on Georgia and take a Twice before, Gen. Robert E. Lee to invade Maryland, disrupt right at the Wonder Chicken.) had sent the Army of Northern Union rail and communication That fight was the culmination of Virginia on invasions of the North, lines, and threaten Washington. a series of battles and engagements and twice he had been forced to Lee was fond of Early — “my May 9, 2014 ©2014 THE WASHINGTON POST VOLUME 11, ISSUE 8 An Integrated Curriculum For The Washington Post Newspaper In Education Program LIBRARY OF CONGRESS PRINTS AND PHOTOGRAPHS DIVISION Members of Company F, 3rd Regiment, Massachusetts Heavy Artillery at Fort Stevens, where Confederate Gen. Jubal Early asserted, “we scared Abe Lincoln like hell.” bad old man,” as he called the skedaddling to Charleston, W.Va. Bolstered by reinforcements, their cantankerous and blunt commander. Compounding Hunter’s wretched numbers reached 16,000. Early, a West Point graduate who performance was his failure to alert On July 4, the nation’s 88th practiced law in Rocky Mount, the Union high command that he birthday, Early’s army reached the Va., had vigorously opposed would be unable to cut off Early’s Potomac, celebrating with raucous secession but took up arms when advance. Grant — who believed feasts on Yankee provisions captured war was declared. Lee had grown Early’s corps was still at Petersburg at Martinsburg and Harpers Ferry, to rely on “Old Jube,” particularly — was left blind to a great and including sardines, oysters and with the death of Maj. Gen. sudden danger. plenty of liquor. The third invasion Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson at “Nothing blue stood between of the North was underway. Chancellorsville the previous year. Early and the Potomac,” historian The idea of Washington falling to Early and his men — many of them Shelby Foote wrote. an enemy army may seem almost tough veterans of Jackson’s 1862 The rebels moved northeast at impossible today, but it did not Shenandoah campaign — took to a rapid clip beginning June 23, seem at all implausible to residents the mission with verve. Little more passing through Lexington, where in 1864. Just fifty years earlier, than the sight of the Confederate the men marched past Jackson’s within the lifetime of old-timers, a force at Lynchburg on June 18 was grave, baring their heads in silent bold British force had captured the enough to send Union Maj. Gen. salute. They reached New Market capital, burning the White House David Hunter and his larger force on June 30, and Winchester July 2. and the Capitol. May 9, 2014 ©2014 THE WASHINGTON POST VOLUME 11, ISSUE 8 An Integrated Curriculum For The Washington Post Newspaper In Education Program LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Officers of Companies A and B, 3rd Massachusetts Heavy Artillery, and crew of 100-pounder.
Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Report of the Battle of the Crater, 30 July 1864
    Holding the Line A Preliminary Report of The Battle of the Crater 30 July 1864 Adrian Mandzy, Ph. D. Michelle Sivilich, Ph. D. Benjamin Lewis Fitzpatrick, Ph. D. Dan Sivilich Floyd Patrick Davis Kelsey P. Becraft Dakota Leigh Goedel Jeffrey A. McFadden Jessey C. Reed Jaron A. Rucker A PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE SURVEY OF THE BATTLE OF THE CRATER, 30 JULY 1864 By Adrian Mandzy, Ph.D., Michelle Sivilich, Ph. D., Floyd Patrick Davis, Kelsey P. Becraft, Dakota Leigh Goedel, Jeffrey A. McFadden, Jessey C. Reed, and Jaron A. Rucker With a Contributions by Daniel Sivilich and Dr. Benjamin Lewis Fitzpatrick Report prepared for the Northeast Region Archeology Program National Park Service 115 John Street, 4th Floor Lowell, Massachusetts 01852-1195 _______________________________ Adrian Mandzy Principal Investigator ARPA Permit 2014.PETE.01 2 Abstract In March 2015, faculty and students from Morehead State University’s History program, along with members of the Battlefield Restoration and Archeological Volunteer Organization (BRAVO) conducted a survey of The Crater Battlefield. Fought on 30 July 1864, during the Siege of Petersburg, the Battle of the Crater, according to the National Park Service, is one of the most important events of the Civil War. The participation of African-American troops in the battle and the subsequent execution of black prisoners highlights the racial animosities that were the underpinning causes of this conflict. The goal of this project is to document the level of integrity of any archaeological resources connected with this field of conflict and to examine how far the Union troops advance beyond the mouth of the Crater.
    [Show full text]
  • Cal Reader of ARMY, “Who Is the Most Famous General Of- Ficer Of
    Remembering MG George G. Meade: Th e Forgotten Victor Of Gettysburg f one were to ask the average American or even the typi - By COL Kevin W. Farrell U.S. Army retired cal reader of ARMY, “Who is the most famous general of - Ificer of the American Civil War?” the most likely answer would be “Robert E. Lee.” Similarly, “Gettysburg” would overwhelmingly be the answer to a query as to which is the most important and most famous battle of that war, even if some historians might argue that the Union victory at Vicks - burg, Miss., on July 4, 1863, the day after Gettysburg ended, was actually more important to the ultimate Union victory. On the other hand, counterintuitively, the victor of the Battle of Gettysburg, MG George G. Meade, is largely forgotten to - A monument to MG George G. Meade stands on Cemetery Ridge in Gettysburg day. To military personnel, his memory lives on dimly at the National Military Park, Pa. MG Meade is shown atop his horse, Old Baldy, who U.S. Army post that is his namesake: Fort Meade, Md. Other survived the general by 10 years. 44 ARMY I July 2013 e l e e t S s i n n e D July 2013 I ARMY 45 MG Meade, circa 1864. than a few memorials at the Gettysburg Battlefield and in the cities of Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., his is a name largely unknown to the vast majority of Americans. Even the most popular works on Gettysburg—the eponymous 1993 film and the 1974 Pulitzer-Prize-winning novel by Michael Shaara, The Killer Angels , on which it was based—barely address the Union victor of the battle, con - tinuing a historical oversight that dates almost to the battle itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline 1864
    CIVIL WAR TIMELINE 1864 January Radical Republicans are hostile to Lincoln’s policies, fearing that they do not provide sufficient protection for ex-slaves, that the 10% amnesty plan is not strict enough, and that Southern states should demonstrate more significant efforts to eradicate the slave system before being allowed back into the Union. Consequently, Congress refuses to recognize the governments of Southern states, or to seat their elected representatives. Instead, legislators begin to work on their own Reconstruction plan, which will emerge in July as the Wade-Davis Bill. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reconstruction/states/sf_timeline.html] [http://www.blackhistory.harpweek.com/4Reconstruction/ReconTimeline.htm] Congress now understands the Confederacy to be the face of a deeply rooted cultural system antagonistic to the principles of a “free labor” society. Many fear that returning home rule to such a system amounts to accepting secession state by state and opening the door for such malicious local legislation as the Black Codes that eventually emerge. [Hunt] Jan. 1 TN Skirmish at Dandridge. Jan. 2 TN Skirmish at LaGrange. Nashville is in the grip of a smallpox epidemic, which will carry off a large number of soldiers, contraband workers, and city residents. It will be late March before it runs its course. Jan 5 TN Skirmish at Lawrence’s Mill. Jan. 10 TN Forrest’s troops in west Tennessee are said to have collected 2,000 recruits, 400 loaded Wagons, 800 beef cattle, and 1,000 horses and mules. Most observers consider these numbers to be exaggerated. “ The Mississippi Squadron publishes a list of the steamboats destroyed on the Mississippi and its tributaries during the war: 104 ships were burned, 71 sunk.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthwork Management at Petersburg National Battlefield
    Earthwork Management at Petersburg National Battlefield Dave Shockley Chief, Resource Management Petersburg National Battlefield June, 2000 ******************************************************************************************** TABLE OF CONTENTS ******************************************************************************************** Acknowledgments…….………………………… i Foreword………………………………………... ii Introduction…………………………………….. iii Map of Petersburg National Battlefield…… iv I. Historical Significance A. Earthworks……………………………………….………………………………… 1 B. Archeological Components………………………………………………………... 2 II. Inventory of Existing Earthworks A. Definitions of Earthworks………………………………………………………..… 3 B. Prominent Earthen Structures…..…………………………………………………... 4 C. Engineers Drawings and Current GPS Maps ……………………………………… 6 III. Management Objective……………………….………………………………………….. 23 IV. Conditions/Impacts Affecting Earthworks A. Preservation of Structures and Features………………………………………….… 24 B. Interpretive Values……………………………………………………………….… 33 C. Sustainability……………………………………………………………………..… 34 D. Visitor Accessibility………………………………………………………………... 35 E. Safe Environment…………………………………………………………………... 36 F. Non-historic Resources…………………………………………………………….. 37 G. Additional Issues…………………………………………………………………….38 V. Fundamentals for Earthwork Management at Petersburg National Battlefield A. Tree Removal……………………………………………………………………… 39 B. Erosion Control……………………………………………………………………. 39 C. Seed Selection……………………………………………………………………… 39 D. Hydroseeding…………………………………………………………………….…
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Harbor to the Crater: the End of the Overland Campaign
    Civil War Book Review Winter 2016 Article 8 Cold Harbor to the Crater: The End of the Overland Campaign Christian Keller Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Keller, Christian (2016) "Cold Harbor to the Crater: The End of the Overland Campaign," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 18 : Iss. 1 . DOI: 10.31390/cwbr.18.1.09 Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol18/iss1/8 Keller: Cold Harbor to the Crater: The End of the Overland Campaign Review Keller, Christian Winter 2016 Gallagher, Gary W. and Janney, Caroline E.. Cold Harbor to the Crater: The End of the Overland Campaign. University of North Carolina Press, $35.00 ISBN 9781469625331 Fresh Perspectives on an Overlooked Portion of the Overland Campaign At long last UNC Press’s vaunted Military Campaigns of the Civil War series has returned under the careful co-editorship of Gary Gallagher and Caroline Janney. A well-written, well-researched, and topically comprehensive anthology of essays, the book is a fine addition to the scholarship on the Overland Campaign and the Siege of Petersburg, and worth the investment of time and money. Moreover, the essays are linked by several common themes that enhance the cohesion and readability of the volume. Advanced and beginning scholars and the informed general public will all gain by perusing its pages. It is not a book for the uninformed public reader. Keith Bohannon, Stephen Cushman, M. Keith Harris, Robert E. L. Krick, Kevin Levin, Kathryn Shively Meier, Gordon Rhea, and Joan Waugh wrote chapters along with the two co-editors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Sailor's Creek
    THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war.
    [Show full text]
  • General AP Hill at Gettysburg
    Papers of the 2017 Gettysburg National Park Seminar General A.P. Hill at Gettysburg: A Study of Character and Command Matt Atkinson If not A. P. Hill, then who? May 2, 1863, Orange Plank Road, Chancellorsville, Virginia – In the darkness of the Wilderness, victory or defeat hung in the balance. The redoubtable man himself, Stonewall Jackson, had ridden out in front of his most advanced infantry line to reconnoiter the Federal position and was now returning with his staff. Nervous North Carolinians started to fire at the noises of the approaching horses. Voices cry out from the darkness, “Cease firing, you are firing into your own men!” “Who gave that order?” a muffled voice in the distance is heard to say. “It’s a lie! Pour it into them, boys!” Like chain lightning, a sudden volley of musketry flashes through the woods and the aftermath reveals Jackson struck by three bullets.1 Caught in the tempest also is one of Jackson’s division commanders, A. P. Hill. The two men had feuded for months but all that was forgotten as Hill rode to see about his commander’s welfare. “I have been trying to make the men cease firing,” said Hill as he dismounted. “Is the wound painful?” “Very painful, my arm is broken,” replied Jackson. Hill delicately removed Jackson’s gauntlets and then unhooked his sabre and sword belt. Hill then sat down on the ground and cradled Jackson’s head in his lap as he and an aide cut through the commander’s clothing to examine the wounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Petersburg He Gets to the James River
    :':GPO 1979-281-357/21 Reprint 1979 We must destroy this tles. After each encounter. Grant moved farther Army of Grant's before southward and closer to Richmond. Finally, on Petersburg he gets to the James River. If he gets there June 3, at Cold Harbor, 8 miles east of the Con­ NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD • VIRGINIA it will become a siege federate capital. Grant tried by frontal attack to and then it will be a crush the Confederate army and enter the city. mere question of time. R. E Lee He failed in a defeat marked by very heavy The key to casualties. taking Richmond is Petersburg. After Cold Harbor, Grant abandoned, at least for U. S Grant the time being, his plan to capture Richmond by direct assault. Instead, he moved his army to the In a grim 10-month struggle, Ulysses S. Grant's south side of the James River and on June 15 Union army gradually but relentlessly encircled threw his forces against Petersburg. Except for a Petersburg and cut Robert E. Lee's railroad supply series of Union fumbles, the city might well have lines from the south. For the Confederates it was fallen in that attack. Federal commanders, per­ 10 months of desperately hanging on, hoping the haps shaken by the Cold Harbor disaster, failed to people of the North would tire of the war. For press home their assaults, allowing the few Con­ soldiers of both armies it was 10 months of rifle federate defenders to hold on until Lee transferred bullets, artillery, and mortar shells, relieved only his army south from Richmond.
    [Show full text]
  • Battles of Mobile Bay, Petersburg, Memorialized on Civil War Forever Stamps Today Fourth of Five-Year Civil War Sesquicentennial Stamps Series Continues
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contacts July 30, 2014 VA: Freda Sauter 401-431-5401 [email protected] AL: Debbie Fetterly 954-298-1687 [email protected] National: Mark Saunders 202-268-6524 [email protected] usps.com/news To obtain high-resolution stamp images for media use, please email [email protected]. For broadcast quality video and audio, photo stills and other media resources, visit the USPS Newsroom. Battles of Mobile Bay, Petersburg, Memorialized on Civil War Forever Stamps Today Fourth of Five-Year Civil War Sesquicentennial Stamps Series Continues MOBILE, AL — Two of the most important events of the Civil War — the Battle of Mobile Bay (AL) and the siege at Petersburg, VA — were memorialized on Forever stamps today at the sites where these conflicts took place. One stamp depicts Admiral David G. Farragut’s fleet at the Battle of Mobile Bay (AL) on Aug. 5, 1864. The other stamp depicts the 22nd U.S. Colored Troops engaged in the June 15-18, 1864, assault on Petersburg, VA, at the beginning of the Petersburg Campaign. “The Civil War was one of the most intense chapters in our history, claiming the lives of more than 620,000 people,” said Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe in dedicating the Mobile Bay stamp. “Today, through events and programs held around the country, we’re helping citizens consider how their lives — and their own American experience — have been shaped by this period of history.” In Petersburg, Chief U.S. Postal Service Inspector Guy Cottrell dedicated the stamps just yards from the location of an underground explosion — that took place150 years ago today — which created a huge depression in the earth and led to the battle being named “Battle of the Crater.” Confederates — enraged by the sight of black soldiers — killed many soldiers trapped in the crater attempting to surrender.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspective on Meade's Actions Following the Battle Of
    HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON MEADE'S ACTIONS FOLLOWING THE BATTLE OF GETTYSBURG Terrence L. Salada and John D. Wedo Pursuit and destruction of a defeated army is an often unfulfilled wish of both generals and history. Accounts of battles sometimes offer a postscript similar to this: "But General (or Admiral) So-and-So did not pursue and destroy the enemy thereby losing an opportunity to end the war then and there." In many cases, the battles are tremendous victories, such as Borodino in the Napoleonic wars, Shiloh in the American Civil War (referred to hereafter as simply the Civil War), and Midway and El Alamein in World War II (WW2). This is particularly true for the Battle of Gettysburg in the Civil War and the Union commander, Major General George Meade. For almost no other battle is the criticism of no quick pursuit and destruction more injurious to the reputation of the victorious commander. This paper first presents a summary of the arguments pro and con for a pursuit after Gettysburg. It then presents the core of the paper, a meta-analysis of five decisive victories without pursuit and the conditions leading to those decisions. These battles span roughly 130 years, occur on land and sea, and include three wars. The objective is to present Meade's decision in a historical context both in situ (discussing only that battle) and in comparison with other such decisions. The goal is to ascertain whether historiography has been more critical of Meade than others. The hope is that examination 1 of the actions of other commanders of great victories will open the door for a different interpretation of Meade's actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide
    GETTYSBURG: THREE DAYS OF GLORY STUDY GUIDE CONFEDERATE AND UNION ORDERS OF BATTLE ABBREVIATIONS MILITARY RANK MG = Major General BG = Brigadier General Col = Colonel Ltc = Lieutenant Colonel Maj = Major Cpt = Captain Lt = Lieutenant Sgt = Sergeant CASUALTY DESIGNATION (w) = wounded (mw) = mortally wounded (k) = killed in action (c) = captured ARMY OF THE POTOMAC MG George G. Meade, Commanding GENERAL STAFF: (Selected Members) Chief of Staff: MG Daniel Butterfield Chief Quartermaster: BG Rufus Ingalls Chief of Artillery: BG Henry J. Hunt Medical Director: Maj Jonathan Letterman Chief of Engineers: BG Gouverneur K. Warren I CORPS MG John F. Reynolds (k) MG Abner Doubleday MG John Newton First Division - BG James S. Wadsworth 1st Brigade - BG Solomon Meredith (w) Col William W. Robinson 2nd Brigade - BG Lysander Cutler Second Division - BG John C. Robinson 1st Brigade - BG Gabriel R. Paul (w), Col Samuel H. Leonard (w), Col Adrian R. Root (w&c), Col Richard Coulter (w), Col Peter Lyle, Col Richard Coulter 2nd Brigade - BG Henry Baxter Third Division - MG Abner Doubleday, BG Thomas A. Rowley Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide Page 1 1st Brigade - Col Chapman Biddle, BG Thomas A. Rowley, Col Chapman Biddle 2nd Brigade - Col Roy Stone (w), Col Langhorne Wister (w). Col Edmund L. Dana 3rd Brigade - BG George J. Stannard (w), Col Francis V. Randall Artillery Brigade - Col Charles S. Wainwright II CORPS MG Winfield S. Hancock (w) BG John Gibbon BG William Hays First Division - BG John C. Caldwell 1st Brigade - Col Edward E. Cross (mw), Col H. Boyd McKeen 2nd Brigade - Col Patrick Kelly 3rd Brigade - BG Samuel K.
    [Show full text]
  • General Meade at Gettysburg a Life of Service to His State and Nation
    337th Regular Meeting Volume 35 Number 6 February 3, 2017 A life of service to his state and nation Friday, February 3, 2017, 7:30 p.m. his final resting place in Laurel Hill Cemetery, Philadelphia, on his birthday, December 31. Each Arlington Heights Historical Museum 110 West Fremont Street, Arlington Heights, Illinois year since 1990 Meade enthusiasts have gathered at his grave to honor him, his career, and his vet- erans. Depending on the weather, the event rou- General Meade tinely attracts hundreds of visitors. Waskie served for 10 years as a Pennsylvania at Gettysburg Commonwealth Speaker/Scholar, representing Pennsylvania by giving his presentation, entitled Meet General Meade, to groups and institutions throughout the Commonwealth. It is a first- person, living-history-style presentation in which he portrays Meade using Meade’s own words and reminiscences to introduce him to the public. He wears an authentic uniform and uses his extensive background with Meade and his family and per- sonal research. He has received a number of awards for this presentation and has been invited nationwide to present the program, including at West Point, the Naval Academy, the Air Force Academy, the Smithsonian, and the National Archives. He has also appeared in several movies, docu- mentaries, and programs and done voice presenta- tions of Meade for various purposes. He gives an annual presentation on the first Saturday in Janu- ary at Barnegat Lighthouse on Long Beach Island, one of the 10 lighthouses associated with Lt. Andy Waskie as General George Meade Meade of the U.S. Coastal Survey before the Civil War.
    [Show full text]