Senate Rule on the Sub- Nication from the Speaker: Correct, I Did Not File an Objection Dur- Ject
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 163 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, JANUARY 9, 2017 No. 5 House of Representatives The House met at noon and was Different States handle their faith- Constitution, who stated that as the called to order by the Speaker pro tem- less electors in different ways. In my Framers wished the President to be pore (Mr. HARRIS). view, the joint session rightly fulfilled independent, ‘‘It never was intended f its constitutional responsibility by . to have given to Congress . the simply taking the certified results of right to object to any electoral vote.’’ DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO each State without intervention. This The first successful effort to expand TEMPORE was in line with precedent set in 1969 Congress’ power in counting did not The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- and with the text of the Constitution. come until 1865, when Congress adopted fore the House the following commu- Because I believe this decision to be a joint House-Senate rule on the sub- nication from the Speaker: correct, I did not file an objection dur- ject. Under the rule, no electoral vote ing the counting process. However, I that incurred an objection could be WASHINGTON, DC, counted unless both Houses agreed. January 9, 2017. wish for the RECORD to contain my The joint rule was tempered by the I hereby appoint the Honorable ANDY HAR- views on this matter and to express my Electoral Count Act of 1887, which still RIS to act as Speaker pro tempore on this concern that an avoidable constitu- day.
[Show full text]