473
THE KINEMATICS OF MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS FROM HIPPARCOS DATA
1 1 2 3 4
J.J. Binney , W. Dehnen , N. Houk , C.A. Murray , M.J. Penston
1
Theoretical Physics, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3NP,UK
2
Dept. of Astronomy, UniversityofMichigan, 1041 Dennison Building, Ann Arb or, MI 48109-1090, USA
3
12 Derwent Road, Eastb ourne, Sussex BN20 7PH, UK
4
Royal Greenwich Observatory, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0EZ, UK
ABSTRACT
We analyze a kinematically unbiased sample of 5610
stars around the south celestial p ole that i haveMK
sp ectral typ es in the Michigan catalogues with lumi-
nosity class V and ii had photometric parallaxes
that placed them within 80 pc of the Sun. We bin
the stars by B V and determine for each bin the so-
lar motion from prop er motions alone. As exp ected,
the U and W comp onents of the derived solar mo-
tions do not vary signi cantly from bin to bin, while
the V comp onentvaries systematically. As the clas-
sic Stromb erg relation predicts, V is a linear function
2
of the variance S within each bin around the solar
2
motion. Extrap olating V S toS =0 we determine
the solar motion with resp ect to the LSR, obtaining
a signi cantly smaller value of V than is usually em-
ployed. Parenago's discontinuityin the dep endence
2
of S on sp ectral typ e emerges with exceptional clar-
ity.
Figure1. The distribution with respect to distance of the
5610 objects in the sample. 2384 of these have a distance
> 80 pc.
Key words: Stars: main-sequence; Galactic Struc-
ture: solar motion.
The Hipparcos satellite provides an imp ortant opp or-
tunity to re-examine the fundamental data of solar-
1. INTRODUCTION
neighb ourho o d kinematics by providing the rst all-
sky catalogue of absolute parallaxes and prop er mo-
The kinematics of stars near the Sun has long b een tions. From the Hipparcos catalogue we can, more-
known to provide crucial information regarding b oth over, extract samples of ob jects that are completely
the structure and the evolution of the Milky Way. free of the kinematic biases that have plagued simi-
Karl Schwarzschild 1908 already interpreted the lar studies in the past. The present pap er rep orts the
distribution of random velo cities as forming a tri- analysis of one such kinematically unbiased sample.
axial `velo city ellipsoid', which Oort, B. Lindblad Other asp ects are analysed by Murray et al 1997
and Stromb erg were able to relate to the large-scale and Houk et al. 1997.
structure of the disk. In the early 1950s Pare-
nago 1950, Nancy Roman 1950, 1952 and oth-
ers p ointed out that stellar kinematics varies system-
2. THE SAMPLE
atically with stellar typ e, in the sense that groups
of stars that are on average younger have smaller
velo city disp ersions and larger mean Galactic rota-
tion velo cities than older stellar groups. Spitzer &
The sample is based on the rst three volumes of
Schwarzschild 1953, Barbanis & Woltjer 1967 and
the Michigan Sp ectral Catalogue Houk & Cowley
Wielen 1977 explained these correlations in terms
1975, Houk 1978, Houk 1982, which provide two-
of the di usion of stars through phase space as the
dimensional MK classi cations of stars in the Henry
Galactic disk ages|for recent studies of these pro-
Drap er Catalogue with declinations < 26 . All
cesses see Binney & Lacey 1988 and Jenkins 1992.
stars of luminosity class IV-V and V were identi ed in
474
randomly chosen star has a radial velo city increases
strongly with its prop er motion b ecause high-prop er
motion stars are preferentially put on radial-velo city
programmes. In the absence of precise knowledge of
how stars with radial velo cities have b een selected,
it is dangerous to employ any radial velo cities in a
study such as this. Thus, we feel obliged to discard
the radial velo cities that wedohave and to work with
prop er motions alone. The unsatisfactoriness of this
state of a airs cannot b e to o strongly emphasized.
4. THE SOLAR MOTION
Let the direction to the k th star b e given by the unit
^
vector r and let the distance and prop er motion of
k
this star b e denoted by d and , resp ectively. Then
k
k
is related to the space velo cities v and v of the
k
k
k th star and the Sun by:
Figure 2. The distribution with respect to magnitude of