DOCSLIB.ORG

The Critique of Calvin in Jansenius's Augustinus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Critique of Calvin in Jansenius's Augustinus The Critique of Calvin in Jansenius’s Augustinus Ralph Keen Jansenism was merely another form of Calvinism, or so it was commonly assert- ed by Jesuits and others, who found the Jansenist position on sovereign grace a denial of the freedom of the will that had been a central point of difference between Catholics and Protestants since the beginning of the Reformation. An anonymous polemic of 1650, attributed to the Jesuit François Vavasseur (1605–1681), charged Jansenius with five points of similarity with the Calvin- ists.1 Refuting Calvinism, or what was included under that term, had been a Jesuit-led enterprise for decades before the appearance in 1638 of Jansenius’s Augustinus; thus the charge of Calvinism, when leveled against the Jansenists, needed little explanation. It identified the followers of the Bishop of Ypres and the Abbot of St.-Cyran with Protestants already condemned a century before in the harshest of terms. Cornelius Jansenius (1585–1638) and Jean du Vergier de Hauranne, abbot of St. Cyran (1581–1643) were no Calvinists; and neither was Antoine Ar- nauld (1612–1694), although his grandfather had been for a while and some members of his family remained Reformed. The label was used for polemical purposes to identify those holding views of sin and grace more readily associ- ated with Reformed anthropology than with the system of cooperating grace and merit that characterized religious teaching and practice in Counter- Reformation Catholicism. Research into the Reformation-era confessionalizing of the Church Fathers has revealed the degree to which efforts to deploy Patristic testimony helped shape religious argumentation by virtually every party to the controversies of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. In the process the familiar rubrics of “scripture alone” and “scripture and tradition(s)” which had been used to char- acterize Protestant and Catholic positions on authority in doctrine have been replaced by a more subtle awareness that the theological tradition, whether as source or as corroboration, was no less a contested field than scripture itself for much of the extended Reformation era. Given the centrality of the doctrines of justification and sanctification, and contrasting conceptions of merit accom- panying the formulations of these doctrines, there is no mystery surround- ing the enduring importance of Augustine as the touchstone of orthodoxy in 1 François Vavasseur, Cornelius Iansenius Iprensis Suspectus (Parisiis: apud Sebastianum and Gabrielem Cramoisy, 1650), sigs. O8-S2. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2018 | doi 10.1163/9789004356795_026 406 Keen religious controversy of the Reformation and post-Reformation eras. If it can be said that the beginnings of the Reformation were a series of footnotes to the Pauline corpus, its continuation through the following century was a series of footnotes to Augustine. Within Catholicism, no theologian was more zealous in recovering Augus- tinianism than the Bishop of Ypres from 1635 to 1638, Cornelius Jansenius, and few were more controversial. Educated at Louvain, where he became a follower of Michael Baius and the “Augustinian” reaction to the Jesuit theology then dominant elsewhere, Jansenius represents a reaction both to the severe Protestant appropriation of the Augustinian legacy (which may be said to cul- minate in the Synod of Dordrecht) and the method of accommodation associ- ated with the Jesuits. Jansenius’s work was the Catholic recovery of Augustine, an effort occupying two dimensions. On the one hand, as with Patristic reception generally, Janse- nius’s task was to present the legacy of the Church Father in a way that un- derscored his importance in the seventeenth century: a Counter-Reformation ressourcement in which the early tradition never loses its relevance. In its po- lemical mode, the weight of the tradition had often been brought to bear on the questions of the present. The other dimension, one that became a priority as the Reformation progressed and Patristic authority was being summoned to the support of positions on every side, was that of a Catholic interpretation of these early sources, one in which the Reformers’ allegedly erroneous and heretical appropriation of these authors would be fully exposed.2 Such confes- sionally differentiated interpretations of the Church Fathers became common after the Council of Trent, polemical erudition arguably reaching its peak in the work of Cardinal Robert Bellarmine. 1 Jansenius and His Circle According to the brief Life published with the Augustinus, Cornelius Jansen was born to a devoted Catholic family, attended Louvain as a member of the Falcon, and after studying Greek in Paris, moved to Cambridge where he stud- ied the Church Fathers, especially Augustine. Jansenius considered no other Church Father equal to Augustine, and held that all things originated in and 2 See Erika Rummel, The Confessionalization of Humanism in Reformation Germany (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) and Irena Backus, Historical Method and Confessional Identity in the Era of the Reformation (1378–1615), Studies in Medieval and Reformation Thought (Leiden: Brill, 2003), 94..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and The
    Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and the Limits of Control in the Information Age Jan W Geisbusch University College London Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Anthropology. 15 September 2008 UMI Number: U591518 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591518 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Declaration of authorship: I, Jan W Geisbusch, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature: London, 15.09.2008 Acknowledgments A thesis involving several years of research will always be indebted to the input and advise of numerous people, not all of whom the author will be able to recall. However, my thanks must go, firstly, to my supervisor, Prof Michael Rowlands, who patiently and smoothly steered the thesis round a fair few cliffs, and, secondly, to my informants in Rome and on the Internet. Research was made possible by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download How to Read Church History
    HOW TO READ CHURCH HISTORY: FROM THE BEGINNINGS TO THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY V. 1 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Jean Comby, J. Bowden | 202 pages | 08 Sep 2011 | SCM PRESS | 9780334020509 | English | London, United Kingdom How to Read Church History: From the Beginnings to the Fifteenth Century v. 1 PDF Book A theologian of Louvain, Cornelius jansen — , and a French ecclesiastic, Jean duvergier de hauranne — , dreamed of a revival of patristic theology and practice beginning with the doctrine of grace. The Church in the High Middle Ages Moral decline The rise of the popes as secular princes was matched by the moral decline of the Church in western Europe. For a discussion of the religious doctrine, see Protestantism. Under henry viii the English Church was separated from Rome, but Catholic practice and doctrine were retained almost without alteration. Project Gutenberg 0 editions. Only in Russia did the society survive until its restoration in Such anachronistic gestures as the attempted deposition of Elizabeth I of England, however, were ultimately harmful. By the popes seemed to be more Renaissance princelings than spiritual fathers of Christendom. Followers embrace the sacraments of baptism and holy communion. If the work of these men, often quite unappreciated in its time, in defending Catholic doctrine was flawed by anything, it was that they were speaking as individuals without the authority of the entire Church. On his arrival in Worms in April , crowds gathered to see the man who embodied the struggle against the seemingly all-powerful Catholic Church. Dry, dry, sand paper dry. Church Universal and Triumphant. Many other satirized the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornelius Jansen
    BIBLIOTECA UNIVERSITARIA DI GENOVA – PERCORSI TEMATICI UNIVERSALITAS & PERVASIVITAS il costituirsi e diffondersi della S.J. e suoi echi (1540 - 1773) di A. Pisani Schede autori Sotto attacco Cornelius Jansen Jansenius and Jansenism Cornelius Jansen, Bishop of Ypres ( Cornelius Jansenius Yprensis ), from whom Jansenism derives its origin and name, must not be confounded with another writer and bishop of the same name Cornelius Jansenius Gandavensis (1510-1576), of whom we possess several books on Scripture and a valuable "Concordia Evangelica." The subject of this article lived three-quarters of a century later than his namesake. He was born 28 October, 1585, of a Catholic family, in the village of Accoi, near Leerdam, Holland ; died at Ypres, 6 May, 1638. His parents, although in moderate circumstances, secured for him an excellent education. They sent him first to Utrecht. In 1602 we find him at the University of Louvain , where he entered the College du Faucon to take up the study of philosophy. Here he passed two years, and at the solemn promotion of 1604 was proclaimed first of 118 competitors. To begin his theological studies he entered the College du Pape Adrien VI, whose president, Jacques Janson, imbued with the errors of Baius and eager to spread them, was to exert an influence on the subsequent course of his ideas and works. Having hitherto been on amicable terms with the Jesuits, he had even sought admission into their order. The refusal he experienced, the motives of which are unknown to us, seems not to be altogether unrelated to the aversion he subsequently manifested for the celebrated society, and for the theories and practices it championed.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS of ST. PIUS X's DECREE on FREQUENT COMMUNION JOHN A
    HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS OF ST. PIUS X's DECREE ON FREQUENT COMMUNION JOHN A. HARDON, SJ. West Baden College HPHE highest tribute to the apostolic genius of St. Pius X was paid by * his successor on the day he raised him to the honors of the altar: "in the profound vision which he had of the Church as a society, Pius X recognized that it was the Blessed Sacrament which had the power to nourish its intimate life substantially, and to elevate it high above all other human societies." To this end "he overcame the prejudices springing from an erroneous practice and resolutely promoted frequent, even daily, Communion among the faithful," thereby leading "the spouse of Christ into a new era of Euchari^tic life."1 In order to appreciate the benefits which Pius X conferred on the Church by his decree on frequent Communion, we might profitably examine the past half-century to see how the practice which he advo­ cated has revitalized the spiritual life of millions of the faithful. Another way is to go back in history over the centuries preceding St. Pius and show that the discipline which he promulgated in 1905 is at once a vindication of the Church's fidelity to her ancient traditions and a proof of her vitality to be rid of whatever threatens to destroy her divine mission as the sanctifier of souls. The present study will follow the latter method, with an effort to cover all the principal factors in this Eucharistic development which had its roots in the apostolic age but was not destined to bear full fruit until the present time.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary's Report the Forty-Third Annual Convention
    SECRETARY'S REPORT THE FORTY-THIRD ANNUAL CONVENTION The Catholic Theological Society of America held its forty-third annual con- vention June 15-18, 1988, at the Sheraton Centre Hotel in Toronto. The theme of the convention was "The Sources of Theology." In the opening session, Wednes- day evening, June 15, G. Emmett Cardinal Carter, Archbishop of Toronto, and E. James Reed, Director of the Toronto School of Theology, welcomed the con- vention participants to Toronto. The first plenary address followed. The evening concluded with a reception sponsored by the University of St. Michael's College, Regis College, St. Augustine Seminary, and the Toronto School of Theology. The convention's Eucharistic liturgy was celebrated in the late afternoon of Thursday, June 16, in St. Basil's Church on the campus of the University of St. Michael's College. Bishop Richard Sklba, a CTSA member and recipient this year of the John Courtney Murray Award, was the celebrant and homilist. The con- vention reception and banquet followed the liturgy. At the end of the banquet President Michael Scanlon read the citation for the John Courtney Murray Award and presented the plaque and the medal to Bishop Richard Sklba. Thursday evening, after the convention banquet, the Resolutions Committee held a "hearing" for a discussion of several resolutions which were submitted for consideration and action at the annual business meeting. Friday evening there was a Special Session in which J. Bryan Hehir, of Georgetown University and the United States Catholic Conference, spoke about "Sollicitudo Rei Socialis and the Social Teaching of Pope John Paul II." The schedule of the convention program, with its plenary sessions, work- shops, and seminars, follows.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Old Catholicism
    The Origins of Old Catholicism By Jarek Kubacki and Łukasz Liniewicz On September 24th 1889, the Old Catholic bishops of the Netherlands, Switzerland and Germany signed a common declaration. This event is considered to be the beginning of the Union of Utrecht of the Old Catholic Churches, federation of several independent national Churches united on the basis of the faith of the undivided Church of the first ten centuries. They are Catholic in faith, order and worship but reject the Papal claims of infallibility and supremacy. The Archbishop of Utrecht a holds primacy of honor among the Old Catholic Churches not dissimilar to that accorded in the Anglican Communion to the Archbishop of Canterbury. Since the year 2000 this ministry belongs to Archbishop JorisVercammen. The following churches are members of the Union of Utrecht: the Old Catholic Church of the Netherlands, the Catholic Diocese of the Old Catholics in Germany, Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, the Old Catholic Church of Austria, the Old Catholic Church of the Czech Republic, the Polish-Catholic Church and apart from them there are also not independent communities in Croatia, France, Sweden, Denmark and Italy. Besides the Anglican churches, also the Philippine Independent Church is in full communion with the Old Catholics. The establishment of the Old Catholic churches is usually being related to the aftermath of the First Vatican Council. The Old Catholic were those Catholics that refused to accept the doctrine of Papal Infallibility and the Universal Jurisdiction. One has to remember, however, that the origins of Old Catholicism lay much earlier. We shouldn’t forget, above all, that every church which really deserves to be called by that name has its roots in the church of the first centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Points of Calvinism
    THE FIVE POINTS OF CALVINISM "Weighed And Found Wanting" TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction MAJOR SECTION ONE: EXPLANATIONS 1. Total Depravity Explained 2. Unconditional Election Explained 3. Limited Atonement Explained 4. Irresistible Grace Explained 5. Perseverance of the Saints Explained MAJOR SECTION TWO: COUNTER POINTS 6. Calvinistic Total Depravity Refuted 7. Unconditional Election Refuted 8. Limited Atonement Refuted 9. Irresistible Grace Refuted 10. Calvinistic Perseverance of the Saints Refuted Conclusion The Lazy Man's Guide to Understanding Calvinism An Even Lazier Man's Guide to Understanding Calvinism INTRODUCTION For more than a decade I was the host of a Christian talk show called 'Scripturally Speaking.' On many different occasions the topic of Calvinism in general, and the Five Points of Calvinism in particular, was introduced either by me, an in-studio guest, or a caller. I can clearly remember one discussion in which a Calvinist guest was debating with an Arminian caller over the question of whether or not predestination was taught in Scripture. When the question before us was simply a matter of affirming or denying predestination, I appeared to be on the side of my Calvinist guest. The caller expressed surprise at my agreement with my guest because he incorrectly thought that I must have been a Calvinist because of this agreement. When I explained to him that I was not a Calvinist, the caller's surprise then turned to confusion. Affirmation vs. Definition My guest then admitted that he was also surprised, if not confused, for he too wrongly assumed I was a Calvinist because I agreed that predestination was taught in Scripture.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Catholic View Ii
    These Living Waters: Common Agreement on Mutual Recognition of Baptism A Report of the Catholic Reformed Dialogue in United States 2003 - 2007 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Common Agreement on Mutual Recognition of Baptism 3. Historical overview: sacraments and sacramentality a. Sacramentality i. Roman Catholic view ii. Reformed view b. Sacraments i. Roman Catholic view ii. Reformed view c. Summary 4. Baptismal rites a. Our Common Early History b. Historical Developments: The Reformation c. Historical Developments: Roman Catholic d. [comparative chart of pre and post-Tridentine Baptismal Rites – appendix?] e. Development of Baptismal Rite after the Reformation i. Reformed ii. Roman Catholic f. Twentieth Century Convergence in Scholarship and Ritual i. Reformed ii. Roman Catholic g. Critical Comparison of Roman Catholic and Reformed Rites h. Conclusion: Similar Rites with Different Hermeneutics 5. Theology of Baptism: Roman Catholic, Reformed, and Common Perspectives a. What is baptism? b. Why does the church baptize? c. What does Baptism effect or signify? d. How is Christian Baptism related to the Biblical Economy of Salvation? e. What is the Relationship between Baptism, Faith and Discipleship? f. What implications does Baptism have for the church? g. Who may baptize and with what means and Formula ? h. Why do people need to be baptized? i. Who can receive baptism? j. Why do we baptize children? k. Why should someone be baptized only once? l. What is the relationship between baptism and confirmation and/or profession of faith? m. What is the relationship between baptism and election? n. What is the relationship between baptism and grace? 1 o.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther on Sanctification
    Scholars Crossing Articles The Works of Elmer Towns 1969 Martin Luther on Sanctification Elmer L. Towns Liberty University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/towns_articles Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Towns, Elmer L., "Martin Luther on Sanctification" (1969). Articles. 14. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/towns_articles/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The Works of Elmer Towns at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Martin Luther On Sanctification Elmer L. Towns Martín Luther is well known for preaching justification by faith apart from works. This doctrine became the cornerstone for the reformation. During Luther's day he was accused of antinomianism. Erasmus charged, "Lutherans seek two things only—wealth and wives—censum et uxorem ... to them the gospel meant the right to live as they please."1 John Wesley accused Luther of distorting the doctrine of sanctification, if Luther had any doctrine of sanctification at all. "Who hath wrote more ably than Martin Luther on justification by faith alone?" Wesley then asked, "And who was more ignorant of the doctrine of sanctification, or more confused in his con­ ception of it?" He then advises us, if we would be thoroughly convinced of Luther's "total ignorance with regard to sancti­ fication" to read "without prejudice" his Commentary on Galatians.2 This misunderstanding of Luther's concept of sanctifica­ tion might have arisen because he uses Paul's first-century message of grace as opposed to works to attack legalistic sal­ vation found in the sixteenth-century church.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Francis of Assisi Parish ! ! !! ! the Catholic Community in Weston ! Sunday, Aug
    35 NǐǓLJNJdžǍDž RǐǂDž ! WdžǔǕǐǏ, CǐǏǏdžDŽǕNJDŽǖǕ 06883 ! ST. FRANCIS! We extend a warm welcome to all who ! worship at our church! We hope that you ! will find our parish community to be a place ! where your faith is nourished. ! OF ASSISI ! ! Rectory: 203 !227 !1341 FAX: 203 !226 !1154 Website: www.stfrancisweston.org Facebook: Saint Francis of Assisi ! The PARISH! Catholic Community in Weston Religious Education/Youth Ministry: ! ! 203 !227 !8353 THE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY IN WESTON Preschool: 203 !454 !8646 ! ! RdžDŽǕǐǓǚ OLJLJNJDŽdž HǐǖǓǔ ! August 4, 2019 Monday Through Friday 9:00 a.m. ! 4:00 p.m. ! SǖǏDžǂǚ Mǂǔǔdžǔ ! Saturday Vigil ! 5:00 P.M. Sundays 8:00, 9:30 ! Family Mass, 11:00 A.M. 5:00 p.m. Scheduled Weekly ! Except for Christmas & Easter. ! WdždžnjDžǂǚ Mǂǔǔdžǔ ! Monday ! Friday ! 7:30 A.M. Saturday & Holidays ! 9:00 A.M. ! HǐǍǚ Dǂǚ Mǂǔǔdžǔ ! 7:30 A.M. , Noon , 7:00 P.M. ! NǐǗdžǏǂ ! Novena prayers in honor of Our Lady of the Miraculous Medal every Saturday following the 9:00 A.M. Mass. ! SǂDŽǓǂǎdžǏǕ OLJ RdžDŽǐǏDŽNJǍNJǂǕNJǐǏ ! Saturdays, 4:00 !4:45 P.M.; Sundays 4:00 P.M. ! SǂDŽǓǂǎdžǏǕ OLJ BǂǑǕNJǔǎ ! The Sacrament of Baptism is offered every Sunday at 12:00 noon. Please make arrangements for the Pre !Baptismal instructions after the birth of the child in person at the rectory. Pre !instruction for both parents is required. ! SǂDŽǓǂǎdžǏǕ OLJ MǂǕǓNJǎǐǏǚ ! Arrangements must be made at the rectory in person by the couple. Where possible, arrangements should be made one year in advance and no later than six months. ! SǂDŽǓǂǎdžǏǕ OLJ AǏǐNJǏǕNJǏLj ! Communal anointings of the sick are celebrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Irenaeus Shed Considerable Light on the Place of Pentecostal Thought for Histories That Seek to Be International and Ecumenical
    Orphans or Widows? Seeing Through A Glass Darkly By Dr. Harold D. Hunter Abstract Scholars seeking to map the antecedents of Pentecostal distinctives in early Christendom turn to standard reference works expecting to find objective summaries of the writings of Church Fathers and Mothers. Apparently dismissing the diversity of the biblical canon itself, the writers of these reference works can be found manipulating patristic texts in ways which reinforce the notion that the Classical Pentecostal Movement is a historical aberration. This prejudice is evident in the selection of texts and how they are translated and indexed as well as the surgical removal of pertinent sections of the original texts. This problem can be set right only by extensive reading of the original sources in the original languages. The writings of Irenaeus shed considerable light on the place of Pentecostal thought for histories that seek to be international and ecumenical. Introduction I began advanced study of classical Pentecostal distinctives at Fuller Theological Seminary in the early 1970s. Among those offering good advice was the then academic dean of Vanguard University in nearby Costa Mesa, California, Russell P. Spittler. While working on a patristic project, Spittler emphasized the need for me to engage J. Quasten and like scholars. More recently I utilized Quasten et al in dialogue with William Henn in a paper presented to the International Roman Catholic - Pentecostal Dialogue which convened July 23-29, 1999 in Venice, Italy. What follows is the substance of the paper delivered at that meeting.i The most influential editions of Church Fathers and Mothers available in the 20th Century suffered from inadequate translation of key passages.
    [Show full text]
  • John H, Roinoehl 194.9
    THE JANSENIST MOVEMENT IN FRANCE TO 1713 Thai: for fine Dam of M. A. MiCHlGAN STATE COLLECR. John H, Roinoehl 194.9 I ‘-.l . THE JANSENILLT HOVELENT IN FREQCE 1‘0 1713 BY John H. Reinoehl A THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science in partical fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of l-IAS’I‘ER OF ARTS Department of flietory and Political Science 1949 Acknowledgement I wish to express my thanks to Professor John B. Harrison for his helpful suggestions and constructive criticism in both the research and writing done in the completion of this essay. TABLE OF CONTENTS m m IntrOdUO‘ion o c c c c c c c c c 1. I. Boginningn......... l. II. The Controversial Period . 20. III. False Peace and Destruction. 1668.171} 0 O O O O C O O 7". IV. Conclncionc I O O O O I ‘ O 97. Introduction Man's religious beliefs have always been ideas for which he would fight and die .. they have been vital to him in revealing a reason for his existence and in giving him a suggestion of what is to happen to him in a new life. Religion has been a serious business with man; and he who has strayed from the accepted trail of his co-religionists has ever been punished. These heretics have suffered the greatest variety of punishment; from mild ostracism to a violent and tortured death; from short to long prison terms; from a day in the stocks to death on the rack.
    [Show full text]