DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Assembly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legislative Assembly 24047 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday 9 June 2010 __________ The Speaker (The Hon. George Richard Torbay) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. The Speaker read the Prayer and acknowledgement of country. HEALTH PRACTITIONER REGULATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010 THREATENED SPECIES CONSERVATION AMENDMENT (BIODIVERSITY CERTIFICATION) BILL 2010 Messages received from the Legislative Council returning the bills without amendment. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Notices of Motions General Business Notices of Motions (General Notices) given. VISITORS The SPEAKER: I recognise the presence in the gallery of the family of the late Adrian Cruickshank and welcome them to the Parliament on this sad occasion. DEATH OF ADRIAN JOHN CRUICKSHANK, A FORMER MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Mr RICHARD AMERY (Mount Druitt) [10.13 a.m.]: I move: That this House extends to the family the deep sympathy of members of the Legislative Assembly in the loss sustained by the death, on 21 May 2010, of Adrian John Cruickshank, a former member of the Legislative Assembly. It gives me a great deal of pride that I have been asked to move this condolence motion on behalf of the Government, representing the other side of politics to Adrian Cruickshank, who was a particularly interesting, colourful and intriguing member of this Parliament. Members of The Nationals, who are in the Chamber today, led by the Leader of The Nationals, will be making contributions regarding Adrian's political career and personal life, including Adrian's successor in Murrumbidgee, Mr Adrian Piccoli, who will talk more substantially about his personal involvement with the member who represented the Murrumbidgee in this House for some 15 years. I cannot say that I knew Adrian particularly well outside of this House or our roles as members of Parliament; however, as I was elected only five months before his own first election to Parliament in 1984, we shared many years together in this place and saw the history of this place unfold during some turbulent years of the 1980s and 1990s, and we saw it from different sides of politics representing different views. As I say, he served the electorate for some 15 years. Adrian Cruickshank was a prominent person outside this House in his family life, his business life, and of course, as has been recognised many times, for his substantial charitable work not only here but also in Africa, something which I understand was well acknowledged at his funeral recently. It is in his role as a member of this Parliament that I wish to pay particular tribute to him. The Murrumbidgee electorate is one that the Labor Party held for many years. It is an electorate with some incredible history. It is one of just two seats in this Parliament that has been constantly in existence since 1856, and a country seat held by Labor for over 40 years before Adrian Cruickshank was elected to the Parliament. 24048 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 9 June 2010 After George Enticknap won it from the Country Party in 1941 as part of the McKell Government, setting up 24 years of Labor Government between 1941 and 1965, it was held by various members of the Labor Party who had distinguished careers. I think George at the first election was an independent Labor candidate. George Enticknap held the seat until 1965 when the new Labor member Al Grassby won it, despite Labor losing the general election in 1965 to the then Premier Robert Askin. Grassby went to the Federal Parliament in about 1969 and he was followed by yet another Labor man, Lin Gordon—a man to whom I think members on both sides of the House would pay their respect, as Adrian Cruickshank did in his own maiden speech. Lin was a popular member and became a Minister in the Wran Government following Labor's election win in 1976. After a successful career, Lin Gordon announced his intention to retire at the 1984 elections. The Labor Party then selected Peggy Delves, a respected and popular local figure who had worked for Lin Gordon in his office. The Labor Party went into that election, despite difficult times, with some confidence of holding the Murrumbidgee electorate. With such a good candidate and a history of holding the seat going back to 1941, even when it had lost general elections, in 1984 Labor was quietly confident of holding on to Murrumbidgee yet again. After all, as I have said, it held it for some 43 years. The National Party endorsed Adrian Cruickshank. He had been active in Country and National party activities since the mid-1960s. He had also served in local government—but I will not hold that against him. As history shows, he was a formidable opponent, winning the seat back for the Conservatives, something that had not been done since the 1930s. Until Adrian Cruickshank won in 1984, the Country Party had not won an election in that electorate since the late 1930s. By the time the next session of Parliament got underway, all of the new members started to get to know each other across the Chamber, and I recall being involved in many debates and Adrian's name has been recorded as interjecting on many of my speeches—appalling behaviour— during the period 1984 to 1988. I have been reading a few of them over the last few days. The 1988 elections came around and, despite the Labor Party putting up yet another good candidate Terry Allen, Adrian won again. It appeared that his win of 1984 was no fluke. After that election I picked up the position of Shadow Minister for Natural Resources. One of the seats in our sights was the seat of Murrumbidgee. Whilst Adrian was a popular local figure and had a long history in the area, we felt that there were some issues that made him vulnerable—or so we thought. Let me explain. The Murrumbidgee had a long history of government involvement in the constituency—in its industries and in its people, in government capital works and government regulation in particular. For example, the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Scheme was a major government program starting from the first 10 years after Federation. The rice industry was heavily regulated, and also sustained by government regulation, or orderly marketing, were the wine grapes industry, the egg industry, and many others. With this landscape, and an electorate that was so much involved with government, both in the employment sector and in regulation, we always felt that Adrian Cruickshank's philosophy on politics made him a vulnerable local candidate—as I said before, so we thought. Adrian Cruickshank said in his maiden speech—and this is what we picked up on when we were looking at the profile of his electorate: I was elected on a platform of small Government, of small bureaucracies and a determination to see that Government does not get in the way of the individual. To me, he sounded more like a City Liberal than a National or Country Party member of the time, and I hear heckles from the Opposition. As I said earlier, the electorate was heavily involved with government. The electorate also had a large public sector employment base, along with many industries that relied on government regulations. When I say employment base, I mean the substantial water resources department, the Roads and Traffic Authority, agriculture, and so on. So, given Adrian Cruickshank's view about small government and less bureaucracy, and so on, we always thought we had some opportunities to highlight those sorts of policies, or that sort of rationale or theory— Mr John Williams: You should have adopted that theory. Mr RICHARD AMERY: That could be true. Along with many other members of Parliament—like Jack Hallam, the former Minister for Agriculture and shadow spokesman after 1988; Fred Hankinson, a former member of the Legislative Council; and Bob Christie, a former member for Seven Hills who was on our caucus committee—we, as Opposition, started making regular visits to the area after 1988. We were involved with the 9 June 2010 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 24049 very popular and substantial Labor listeners campaign. We chose places like Griffith and Leeton to espouse our views, and to tell the public just how bad the Coalition Government was here in New South Wales. Unfortunately, in some parts of the State they did not listen to us; but in other parts, thank goodness, they did. Our branch structure in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area was strong. With locals like Ron Anson, Les and Joan Spence, and Tony Catanzariti, we did tours all over the Murrumbidgee. I must say, we were terrified of being driven around in a Toyota bus a couple of times, and I was very pleased that we finished the day safely. We were not concerned about attacks from the Nationals but about the driving of our own people. We were trying to get the word out that Adrian Cruickshank was against regulation of agricultural industries, and that he was against bureaucracies. In effect, from our point of view, he was against government employment in his electorate. We thought, surely we could knock him off. We would tell the workforce that their jobs were at risk because of Adrian's view on small government, et cetera. At the 1991 elections, Labor made inroads into the Greiner Government's majority. In fact, the Government lost its majority. Indeed, the Greiner Government only survived because of the crossbenchers in this House. We campaigned hard and our candidate, Ron Anson, was everywhere. I know that, because I went with him on many occasions. Despite this effort, and despite what we thought were Adrian's policy issues, he beat us yet again.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scelte Politiche a Griffith 1947-1984
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Arts - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 30-6-2007 Dalle bicilette alle Mercede. Gli Italiani nel New South Wales: scelte politiche a Griffith 1947-1984 James Hagan University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/artspapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Hagan, James, Dalle bicilette alle Mercede. Gli Italiani nel New South Wales: scelte politiche a Griffith 1947-1984 2007. https://ro.uow.edu.au/artspapers/129 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Dalle biciclette alle Mercede. Gli Italiani nel New South Wales: scelte politiche a Griffith 1947-1984 Jim Hagan University of Wollongong La città di Griffith, nello Stato del New South Wales (Australia), si trova nel centro del Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area (MIA), distante circa 500 km da Sydney. Alla fine degli anni sessanta c’erano a Griffith più residenti nati in Italia, pro capite di popolazione, che in qualsiasi altro luogo dello Stato. Come si spiega questa concentrazione? E quali circostanze, riguardo al loro insediamento, hanno influenzato il loro adattamento al nuovo paese e le loro scelte politiche? La prassi con la quale fu stabilito il MIA può fornire, in parte, una possibile risposta a tale domanda. Dopo un lungo periodo di disastrosa siccità all’inizio del ventesimo secolo, il governo cominciò a mettere in atto un grande progetto di irrigazione e lottizzazione lungo il fiume Murrumbidgee, e nel 1913 i primi ‘blocks’ (appezzamenti) erano pronti.
    [Show full text]
  • Canberra Liberals Submission for the 2019 Redistribution of the ACT’S Legislative Assembly Electorates
    4 March 2019 Mr Damian Cantwell AM ACT Electoral Commissioner Elections ACT PO Box 272 Civic Square ACT 2608 Dear Mr Cantwell I am pleased to provide the Canberra Liberals submission for the 2019 redistribution of the ACT’s Legislative Assembly electorates. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Elections ACT for the opportunity to make a submission. Yours sincerely John Cziesla President Canberra Liberals 02 6273 5155 Liberal Party of Australia (ACT Division) [email protected] PO Box 66 Deakin West ACT 2600 ABN: 65 727 304 134 2 Overview The Canberra Liberals note that the main challenge faced by the Redistribution Committee is the high population growth rate in the north of Canberra, especially in the Gungahlin district compared with the lower growth rate in the south, especially in Tuggeranong. This has created a situation where it is impossible to correct the “anomalies” from the previous redistribution to keep all suburbs and communities of interest normally associated with the geographic districts, or areas associated with town centres, together. This is especially apparent in the cases of Tuggeranong and Kambah and the various Belconnen suburbs currently included in Yerrabi. Kambah presents the largest issue as there are few practical alternatives to splitting Kambah, keeping part of the suburb within Murrumbidgee while including part in Brindabella. While splitting a suburb is not ideal other alternatives would also split communities of interest in ways that would not serve those communities well. Given that future growth rates will likely result in a situation where the remainder of Kambah can be included in Brindabella in the 2023 redistribution, the Canberra Liberals believe including part of Kambah in Brindabella in this redistribution is a better alternative than taking a selection of suburbs from the Woden Valley district to include in Brindabella or including all of Kambah in Brindabella and taking a number of Tuggeranong suburbs and including them in Murrumbidgee.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    7366 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Thursday 21 November 2002 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. John Henry Murray) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. VALEDICTORY SPEECHES Mr GLACHAN (Albury) [10.00 a.m.]: May I first of all thank the Leader of the House for his indulgence in allowing me this opportunity to speak today on this the last occasion on which I will address this Chamber. This morning began for me as mornings usually do when I am here in Sydney. I got out of bed, had my usual breakfast of cereal, toast and tea, then walked up from where I stay to Parliament House here in Macquarie Street. But, of course, it is not an ordinary or usual day at all, because this is my last chance to say things that I want to say about the people who have assisted me as I have been here serving the people of my electorate of Albury. In many ways, it is a sad day because this is the last chance that I will have to address the House. I do so with some sadness, of course. But, for me, it is simply one era of my life that comes to a close, and I look forward to the next era that begins at the end of March next year. My life has been a very fortunate one, and I am very grateful to all of the people who have assisted me along the way. I am particularly thankful for the parents I had. Although I grew up in a home where there was not a lot of money, it was a very happy home.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    1650 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Thursday 7 September 2006 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. John Joseph Aquilina) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. Mr SPEAKER: I acknowledge the Gadigal clan of the Eora nation and its elders and thank them for their custodianship of this land. PAY-ROLL TAX AMENDMENT (SUPPORTING JOBS AND SMALL BUSINESS) BILL Second Reading Debate resumed from 31 August 2006. Mrs SHELLEY HANCOCK (South Coast) [10.00 a.m.]: I am pleased to support the Pay-roll Tax Amendment (Supporting Jobs and Small Business) Bill. Indeed, I am pleased to support any measure from either side of this House that will improve the situation for struggling businesses, not only in my electorate of South Coast but throughout New South Wales. The bill provides that an employer is not liable to pay payroll tax for a financial year if the total taxable wages and interstate wages paid or payable by the employer during that year are less than $850,000. It will mean a significant tax cut for many businesses and no doubt will boost employment in this State. It will eliminate payroll tax for 4,500 New South Wales businesses and will free them from the need to maintain systems and processes used to assess and pay the tax, which are often cumbersome, time consuming and obviously a hindrance to business. As honourable members would know, businesses in New South Wales are currently struggling—if they do not know, they are simply turning a blind eye to reality. They should support this bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    5507 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Tuesday 13 September 2011 __________ The Speaker (The Hon. Shelley Elizabeth Hancock) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. The Speaker read the Prayer and acknowledgement of country. GOVERNOR'S SPEECH: ADDRESS-IN-REPLY Presentation The House proceeded to Government House at 10.03 a.m., there to present to the Governor its Address-in-Reply to the Speech Her Excellency had been pleased to make to both Houses of Parliament on opening the session. The House returned at 12.06 p.m. The Speaker reported that the Address-in-Reply to the Governor's Speech had been presented, and that Her Excellency had been pleased to give thereto the following answer: MARIE BASHIR Office of the Governor Governor Sydney, 13 September 2011 It gives me much pleasure to receive your Address and to thank you for your expression of loyalty to Australia and the people of New South Wales. I am also glad to have your assurance that earnest consideration will be given to the measures to be submitted to you and the necessary provision for the Public Services made in due course. I have every confidence that your labours will advance the general welfare and happiness of the people of this State. IDENTIFICATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2011 Agreement in Principle Debate resumed from 12 September 2011. Dr GEOFF LEE (Parramatta) [12.10 p.m.]: I continue to quote the majority opinion of the electorate, as summarised by a constituent: Just letting you know I support the legislation. This is no different to having a person wear a full bike helmet.
    [Show full text]
  • The ACT Election 2016: Back to the Future?
    The ACT election 2016: back to the future? Terry Giesecke 17 February 2017 DOI: 10.4225/50/58a623512b6e6 Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this paper are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the view of APO. Copyright/Creative commons license: Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0 AU) 12 pages Overview This resource is a summary of the outcome of the ACT election, held in October 2016. It was an unusual election, in that it saw little movement in party support from the previous election in 2012 and no fringe parties or candidates were elected. The main issues were the construction of a tramline, the implementation of tax reform, the demolition of over one thousand houses to resolve asbestos contamination and allegations of corruption. The ACT Election 2016: Back to the future? The ACT election on October 15 was more of a 1950s or 1960s election. In that era little movement occurred from one election to the next. In 1967 political scientist Don Aitkin wrote, “Most Australians have a basic commitment to one or other of the major parties, and very few change their mind from one election to the other”1. Not so today. In the last few years Australia has experienced three one term State/Territory Governments, huge swings from election to election and the rapid rise and fall of new parties. So why was the ACT different? The ACT election saw a swing of 0.5 per cent against the governing ALP and their partner the Greens and a 2.2 per cent swing against the opposition Liberals.
    [Show full text]
  • Redistribution Report Accessibility
    ACT Legislative Assembly Electoral Boundaries Redistribution 2019 Redistribution report Accessibility Elections ACT is committed to making its information and services accessible to as many people as possible. If you have difficulty reading a standard printed document and would like to receive this publication in an alternative format – such as large print or audio – please telephone 02 6205 0033. If English is not your first language and you require the translating and interpreting service – please telephone 13 14 50. If you are deaf or have a hearing impairment or speech impairment, contact us through the National Relay Service: ▪ TTY users phone 133 677 then ask for 02 6205 0033 ▪ Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 then ask for 02 6205 0033 ▪ Internet relay users connect to NRS (www.relayservice.com.au) and then ask for 02 6205 0033 ACT Interpreter Service – for the deaf and blind – please telephone 02 6287 4391. ISBN 978-0-642-60670-9 © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2019 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Territory Records Office, Community and Infrastructure Services, Territory and Municipal Services, ACT Government, GPO Box 158, Canberra City ACT 2601. Produced by Publishing Services for the ACT Electoral Commission PO Box 272, Civic Square ACT 2608. Phone: 02 6205 0033 Web: www.elections.act.gov.au Email: [email protected] http://www.act.gov.au Telephone: Canberra 132 281 Mrs Joy Burch MLA Speaker ACT Legislative Assembly London Circuit CANBERRA ACT 2601 Dear Madam Speaker Redistribution report of Augmented Electoral Commission I submit to you the report of the Augmented Electoral Commission concerning the 2019 redistribution of the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly electoral boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1990-91
    DEl'IIR'!McrlT OF THE SENATE ~~~~RNO, 4-"\Q't, PRE.SEN1'r:0 12 OEC 1991 /1~-e.- THE PARLIAMENT OF THE CO.... -··· vr AUSTRALIA SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES NINETIETH REPORT ANNUAL REPORT 1990-91 DECEMBER 1991 © Commonwealth of Australia 1991 CONTENTS PAGE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE V PRINCIPLES OF THE COMMITTEE vii CHAPTER 1 OVERVJEW AND STATISTICS Introduction 1 Membership changes 2 Independent. legal adviser 2 Committee staff 2 Statistics 2 Ministerial undertakings 3 Committee Reports 3 CHAPTER 2 ISSUES AND ROLES Senator Giles, 20 December 1990 Senate Weekly Hansard p.6097 Senator Giles, 21 June 1991 Senate Weekly Hansard p.5370 13 CHAPTER 3 GUIDELINES ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF THE COMMITTEE Introduction 22 Principle (a) Is delegated legislation in accordance with the statute? 22 Principle (b) Does delegated legislation trespass unduly on personal rights and liberties? 34 Principle (c) Does delegated legislation make rights unduly dependent on administrative decisions which are not subject to independent review of their merits? 43 Principle (d) Does delegated legislation contain matters more appropriate for parliamentary enactment? 4 7 CHAPTER 4 MINISTERIAL UNDERTAKINGS IMPLEMENTED 48 CHAPTER 5 MINISTERIAL UNDERTAKINGS NOT YET IMPLEMENTED 54 iii CHAPTER 6 LETTER FROM SENATOR GJLF.s TO PRIME MINISTER 61 CHAPTER 7 DEPARTMENTAL MANUAI.S AS QUASI-LEGISLATION: STATEMENT BY SENATOR BISHOP 63 CHAPTER 8 DELEGATED LEGISLATION AND DISALWWANCE: INITIATIVE BY SENATOR PATTERSON 66 CHAPTER 9 THE THIRD CONFERENCE
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Redistribution Report
    ACT Legislative Assembly Electoral Boundaries Redistribution 2019 Proposed redistribution of the ACT into electorates for the ACT Legislative Assembly ACCESSIBILITY Elections ACT is committed to making its information and services accessible to as many people as possible. • If you have difficulty reading a standard printed document and would like to receive this publication in an alternative format – such as large print or audio – please telephone 6205 0033. • If English is not your first language and you require the translating and interpreting service – please telephone 13 14 50. • If you are deaf or have a hearing impairment or speech impairment, contact us through the National Relay Service: TTY users phone 133 677 then ask for 02 6205 0033 Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 then ask for 02 6205 0033 Internet relay users connect to NRS (www.relayservice.com.au) and then ask for 02 6205 0033 • ACT Interpreter Service – for the deaf and blind – please telephone 6287 4391. ISBN: 978-0-642-60684-6 © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2019 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the ACT Electoral Commission, except that permission is given for use and reproduction of the statistics included in this publication. Produced by the ACT Electoral Commission PO Box 272, Civic Square ACT 2608. Email: [email protected] Phone: (02) 6205 0033 ACT Electoral Commission homepage: http://www.elections.act.gov.au Publication Number: 19/0484 ACT Government homepage: http://www.act.gov.au Phone: Canberra 13ACT1 or 132 281 ACT Legislative Assembly Electoral Boundaries Redistribution 2019 Table of Contents Summary of proposed redistribution.............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by the Augmented ACT Electoral Commission of Its Reasons for Its Proposed Redistribution of the ACT Legislative Assembly Electoral Boundaries
    ACT Legislative Assembly Electoral Boundaries Redistribution 2019 Statement by the Augmented ACT Electoral Commission of its reasons for its proposed redistribution of the ACT Legislative Assembly electoral boundaries ACCESSIBILITY Elections ACT is committed to making its information and services accessible to as many people as possible. • If you have difficulty reading a standard printed document and would like to receive this publication in an alternative format – such as large print or audio – please telephone 02 6205 0033. • If English is not your first language and you require the translating and interpreting service – please telephone 13 14 50. • If you are deaf or have a hearing impairment or speech impairment, contact us through the National Relay Service: TTY users phone 133 677 then ask for 02 6205 0033 Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 then ask for 02 6205 0033 Internet relay users connect to NRS (www.relayservice.com.au) and then ask for 02 6205 0033 • ACT Interpreter Service – for the deaf and blind – please telephone 02 6287 4391. © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2019 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the ACT Electoral Commission, except that permission is given for use and reproduction of the statistics included in this publication. Produced by the ACT Electoral Commission PO Box 272, Civic Square ACT 2608. Email: [email protected] Phone: (02) 6205 0033 ACT Electoral Commission homepage: http://www.elections.act.gov.au ACT Government homepage: http://www.act.gov.au Phone: Canberra 13ACT1 or 132 281 ACT Legislative Assembly Electoral Boundaries Redistribution 2019 Table of Contents Summary of the redistribution proposed by the Augmented ACT Electoral Commission ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar 2020
    Calendar 2020 UTS organisational structure 3 UTS committee structure 4 Governance and management 5 University of Technology Sydney Act 1989 32 University of Technology Sydney By-law 2005 54 UTS Rules 61 Changes to UTS Rules 61 Student Rules 63 General Rules 134 Responsibilities of Responsible Academic Officers 153 Standing orders for UTS Council 157 Standing orders for Academic Board 160 Standing orders for Faculty Boards 165 Principal dates for 2020 170 Disclaimer This publication contains information current at December 2019. UTS takes all due care to ensure that the information contained here is accurate, but reserves the right to vary any information described in this publication without notice. Readers are responsible for verifying information that pertains to them by contacting the university. Editorial and production Corporate Information Governance Support Unit Division of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Corporate Services) Copyright statement © All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the University of Technology Sydney, except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth). 2 UTS Calendar 2020 UTS organisational structure Chancellor and Council Vice-Chancellor and President Controlled entities Vice-President, Advancement Provost and Senior Vice-President accessUTS Pty Limited Faculties Insearch Limited Centre for Social Justice and Inclusion UTS Global Pty Ltd Jumbunna Institute for Indigenous
    [Show full text]
  • ACT Electoral Commission
    ELECTORAL COMPENDIUM 1989–2017 Facts and figures about the electoral process for the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly ISBN 978-0-642-60662-4 © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2018 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the ACT Electoral Commission. Produced by the ACT Electoral Commission PO Box 272, Civic Square ACT 2608. Phone: 02 6205 0033 Web: www.elections.act.gov.au Email: [email protected] Printed on recycled paper Publication Number 17/1126 ii ELECTORAL COMPENDIUM 1989–2017 INTRODUCTION This is the fifth edition of this compendium of facts and figures about the electoral process for the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) Legislative Assembly. It has been updated to include the change to the composition of the Legislative Assembly to 25 members, the redrawing of the electoral boundaries from three to five electorates, two casual vacancies occurring late in the eighth Legislative Assembly, the 2016 Legislative Assembly election and a casual vacancy early in the life of the ninth Legislative Assembly. The first election for the ACT Legislative Assembly was held in 1989, after the ACT was granted self-government by the Commonwealth parliament. The ACT Legislative Assembly is unique in Australia in several ways. For example: - It is the only unicameral parliament elected by proportional representation. - It is the only Australian parliament that combines State government and local government responsibilities. - In 2001, it became the first parliament in Australia to be elected using electronic voting, combined with traditional paper ballots.
    [Show full text]