A Cycle Plan for East Hampshire 2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Cycle Plan for East Hampshire 2004 A Cycle Plan for East Hampshire 2004 A CYCLE PLAN FOR EAST HAMPSHIRE 2005 East Hampshire District Council January 2005 2 A Cycle Plan for East Hampshire 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................3 a) Objectives ..................................................................................................................5 b) Targets .......................................................................................................................5 2. Consultation process ............................................................................................6 3. Links with Key Partners .......................................................................................8 4. Strategy for Cycling ........................................................................................... 12 a) Benefits of Cycling ................................................................................................ 12 b) Key Concerns & Issues ........................................................................................ 14 c) Current Levels of Cycling ..................................................................................... 15 d) Safe Routes to School .......................................................................................... 15 5. Funding .................................................................................................................. 18 a) Hampshire County Council .................................................................................. 18 b) Developers’ Contributions .................................................................................... 18 c) Promoting Travel Plans ........................................................................................ 19 d) Government Funding ............................................................................................ 19 e) Highways Agency .................................................................................................. 19 6. Cycling in East Hampshire ............................................................................... 20 7. Proposed & Existing Utility & Recreational Cycle Routes ....................... 22 a) Alton ........................................................................................................................ 24 b) Whitehill & Bordon ................................................................................................. 43 c) Liphook ................................................................................................................... 75 d) Liss .......................................................................................................................... 91 e) Petersfield ............................................................................................................... 97 f) Clanfield, Horndean & Rowlands Castle ......................................................... 121 8. Priority Routes ................................................................................................... 136 9. Calculation of Construction Costs ............................................................... 138 10. Review/Monitoring of Cycle Plan .................................................................. 138 11. Cycle Parking ..................................................................................................... 139 12. Design Criteria ................................................................................................... 142 13. Existing Recreational Routes ........................................................................ 158 14. Settlements of East Hampshire and Their Populations ......................... 160 15. Index ..................................................................................................................... 161 2 1. INTRODUCTION Cycling is an attractive, enjoyable and non-polluting mode of transport which can benefit the local economy, environment, accessibility, and personal health and fitness. Recognising the advantages of increased cycle use, the stated aim of the Government’s National Cycling Strategy is to quadruple the number of cycling trips by 2012 from a 1996 base. In order to encourage more cycling in East Hampshire, one of the key priorities identified in the East Hampshire District Council Best Value Transport Action Plan in May 2003 was a review of the existing Cycle Plan, which was originally produced in 1997. We have taken care to consult with cycle, community and other interested groups in the development of this revised Cycle Plan, recognising that the help of those with a strong interest in cycling is an essential component in the development of an effective cycle strategy. There is evidence that the public will cycle if given the chance and that there is a considerable suppressed demand for cycle use in Britain. Bicycle sales have risen steadily and there are at least 20 million cycles in this country. However, many are currently discouraged from using their bikes by the volume and speed of traffic on the roads and the lack of provision for the needs of cyclists. ‘There are few reports of cycling accidents on roads carrying fast moving traffic for the simple reason that cyclists are afraid to use them. The roads are not then ‘safe’, but are on the contrary perceived to be so unsafe that the freedom to use them is restricted. If it is true that this perception of danger is linked to traffic volume, then as traffic levels rise, more roads will become off-limits to cyclists, walkers and other vulnerable road users.’ (Transport Research Laboratory, Report 310). To be successful, a cycle route should be safe, direct, comfortable, coherent and attractive. We need to identify routes which follow the desire lines of cyclists, linking all major trip attractions, and facilities must be designed and built with the same standard of care and workmanship as those provided for cars or public transport. In addition, routes will need to be well signposted and clear, easy to read maps should be freely available. The new Cycle Plan outlines key utility and recreational cycle routes, following the desire lines of cyclists, identifies priority routes, and discusses primary objectives, local targets, policy context, links with partners, funding opportunities and design criteria. Opportunities will be taken to include Safe Routes to School within the proposed networks. Almost every child has a bike but few children cycle to school, the one journey they have to make on a regular basis. In contrast to our European neighbours, children don’t cycle here because of the danger on the roads, because of parents’ anxiety, because schools discourage cycle use and do not provide safe cycle storage, 3 and because of peer pressure against cycling. To change this situation we need to provide safe routes to schools, secure cycle parking, leadership from staff and those in authority and a supportive attitude from society. To achieve significant modal shift we will have to enhance the status of cycling and make it clear that in certain areas cycling and walking are to be encouraged over and above motoring. This will need to be conveyed to the public by means of policy statements, publicity and action on the ground. Changing attitudes will be an essential ingredient in encouraging greater cycle use. Initiatives need to focus on influencing organisations, existing road users and potential cyclists with the use of travel awareness campaigns and Travel Plans for both schools and businesses. If we are successful in encouraging more people to take up cycling as a mode of transport, we should also make provision for and encourage novice cyclists and children to take part in cycle training as a means of encouraging safety on the roads and good cycling behaviour. However, cyclists should not be held solely responsible for their safety. A balance needs to be struck between vulnerable road users protecting themselves and measures to reduce the risk imposed by motorised traffic. One should not put the onus of protection on the vulnerable road users without any attempt to enforce, for example, lower speeds by the driver. The topic of vulnerable road users should also form part of driver education. Finally it is vital that any cycling strategy should review its progress. This will involve monitoring individual schemes to evaluate the benefits of the measures and to review progress towards targets. 4 a) Objectives This new Strategy aims to provide improved facilities and conditions for cyclists in East Hampshire and has three main objectives: Objective 1: To maximise the role of cycling as a transport mode, in order to reduce the use of private cars. Objective 2: To develop a safe, convenient, efficient and attractive transport infrastructure, which encourages and facilitates the use of walking, cycling and public transport and which minimises reliance on, and discourages unnecessary use of, private cars Objective 3: To ensure that policies to increase cycling and meet the needs of cyclists are fully integrated into Hampshire County Council’s Structure Plan, the Local Plan, Transport Policies and Programme, resource bids, and the Road Safety Plan; and in all complementary District Council strategies such as transport studies, environment, education, health and leisure strategies. b) Targets Target 1: To adopt locally appropriate targets which will contribute to a national quadrupling of
Recommended publications
  • SITUATION of POLLING STATIONS UK Parliamentary East Hampshire Constituency
    SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS UK Parliamentary East Hampshire Constituency Date of Election: Thursday 8 June 2017 Hours of Poll: 7:00 am to 10:00 pm Notice is hereby given that: The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Ranges of electoral Ranges of electoral Station register numbers of Station register numbers of Situation of Polling Station Situation of Polling Station Number persons entitled to vote Number persons entitled to vote thereat thereat Alton Community Centre, Amery Street, St Mary`s R C Church Hall, 59 Normandy 1 AA-1 to AA-1848 2 AB-1 to AB-1961 Alton Street, Alton St Mary`s R C Church Hall, 59 Normandy Holybourne Village Hall, Church Lane, 3 AC-1 to AC-2083 4 AD-1 to AD-1558 Street, Alton Holybourne, Alton Alton Community Centre, Amery Street, 5 AE-1 to AE-2380 All Saints Parish Hall, Queens Road, Alton 6 AF-1 to AF-2418 Alton St John Ambulance Hq, Edgar Hall, Anstey Beech Village Hall, Wellhouse Road, 7 AG-1 to AG-1775/1 8 AH-1 to AH-484/4 Lane Beech Bentworth Jubilee Hall, Church Street, Bentley Memorial Hall, Hole Lane, Bentley 9 AI-1 to AI-892 10 AJ-1 to AJ-465 Bentworth Binsted Sports Pavillion, The Sports Jolly Farmer Public House (Skittle Alley), 11 AKA-1 to AKA-562 12 AKB-1 to AKB-893 Pavillion, The Street, Binsted Binsted Road, Blacknest Liphook Church Centre, Portsmouth Road, Liphook Church Centre, Portsmouth Road, 13 AL-1 to AL-1802 14 AL-1803 to AL-3605/5 Liphook Liphook Liphook Millennium Centre, 2 Ontario Way, Liphook Millennium Centre, 2 Ontario
    [Show full text]
  • THE SERPENT TRAIL11.3Km 7 Miles 1 OFFICIAL GUIDE
    SOUTH DOWNS WALKS ST THE SERPENT TRAIL11.3km 7 miles 1 OFFICIAL GUIDE ! HELPFUL HINT NATIONAL PARK The A286 Bell Road is a busy crossing point on the Trail. The A286 Bell Road is a busy crossing point on the Trail. West of Bell Road (A286) take the path that goes up between the houses, then across Marley Hanger and again up between two houses on a tarmac path with hand rail. 1 THE SERPENT TRAIL HOW TO GET THERE From rolling hills to bustling market towns, The name of the Trail reflects the serpentine ON FOOT BY RAIL the South Downs National Park’s (SDNP) shape of the route. Starting with the serpent’s The Greensand Way (running from Ham The train stations of Haslemere, Liss, 2 ‘tongue’ in Haslemere High Street, Surrey; landscapes cover 1,600km of breathtaking Street in Kent to Haslemere in Surrey) Liphook and Petersfield are all close to the views, hidden gems and quintessentially the route leads to the ‘head’ at Black Down, West Sussex and from there the ‘body’ finishes on the opposite side of Haslemere Trail. Visit nationalrail.co.uk to plan English scenery. A rich tapestry of turns west, east and west again along High Street from the start of the Serpent your journey. wildlife, landscapes, tranquillity and visitor the greensand ridges. The trail ‘snakes’ Trail. The Hangers Way (running from attractions, weave together a story of Alton to the Queen Elizabeth Country Park by Liphook, Milland, Fernhurst, Petworth, BY BUS people and place in harmony. in Hampshire) crosses Heath Road Fittleworth, Duncton, Heyshott, Midhurst, Bus services run to Midhurst, Stedham, in Petersfield just along the road from Stedham and Nyewood to finally reach the Trotton, Nyewood, Rogate, Petersfield, Embodying the everyday meeting of history the end of the Serpent Trail on Petersfield serpent’s ‘tail’ at Petersfield in Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Empshott Lodge Empshott, Liss, Hampshire
    Empshott Lodge Empshott, Liss, Hampshire A substantial Victorian family house set in lovely mature gardens with long distance views Features • Porch Outside • Entrance hall • Loggia • Library • Log store • Family room • Mature landscaped gardens • Drawing room • Paddock of approximately 4.2 (1.70 ha) • Kitchen/dining room • In all about 6.43 acres (2.60 ha) • Cloakroom • Utility room • Pantry • Larder • Cellars • Studio/office • Conservatory • Car port • Garage • External storage First Floor • Master bedroom suite with bathroom, shower room & dressing room • 2 further double bedrooms • Family bathroom Second Floor • Double bedroom (4) with shower room en suite • 3 further double bedrooms • Single bedroom (8) • Bathroom • Box room The Property Empshott Lodge, which is not Listed, was believed to have been built in 1860 on the site of Chases Farm. It was built for Colonel Butler to a design by the Winchester Cathedral Architect, John Colson, who designed a number of churches and vicarages. It is built in the Elizabethan style, over three floors with Selborne Stone and red brick dressings under tiled roofs. Particularly notable are the original doors, staircase and joinery and the Elizabethan style chimneys which have just been repaired. The property oozes charm and character and the well proportioned rooms provide spacious, flexible accommodation. Gardens and Grounds Empshott Lodge is approached over a long gravelled drive to a large parking area at the front of the house. The formal gardens have wonderful mature trees, among them a Wellingtonia, a Cut Leaved Beech, Scots Pine and a rare Spanish Chestnut. There are also shrubs, flower borders and beech hedging.
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 2018 No: 441
    FROYLE VILLAGE MAGAZINE MARCH 2018 No: 441 http://www.froyle.com/magazine/magazine.htm Advertising in the Froyle Village Magazine The rates are as follows: For Froyle businesses £3.50 +VAT/month for advertisements of up to half a page. For non-Froyle businesses: £5 +VAT/month for up to half a page. For both residents and non residents: £10 +VAT/month for a full page and £5 + VAT for a third of a page in the inside covers. All advertising must be requested and paid for through the Parish Clerk at [email protected] and co pied to [email protected] PARISH NEWS & VIEWS Parish Clerk - Philippa Cullen Stephenson Crabtree Gate, Well Lane, Lower Froyle Tel: 01420 520102 Email: [email protected] Web: www.froyleparishcouncil.org.uk FROYLE PARISH COUNCIL The Froyle Parish Council did not meet in February. The next meeting will be on Tuesday 13th March at 7.45pm in the Village Hall. MARCH EVENTS Lent lunches 2018 Running throughout Lent, these lunches are a simple soup, bread and cheese affair, in aid of a charity chosen by the host/hostess. They take place between 12.30 and 2.00 pm, and all donations from those attending will be gratefully received. If anyone needs a lift, would like to offer a lift, or has any other queries, please call me on 23697. The venues for the Lent lunches in March are as follows: Thursday March 8th (note change of day) at The Old Malthouse, in aid of Canine Partners (Gill Bradley 520484) March 14th at Beech Cottage, in aid of 'Thrive' (Caroline Findlay 22019) March 21st at Copse Hill Farm, in aid of Canine Partners (Jane Macnabb 23195).
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Interim Supplement Incorporating Sequential Test
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Interim Supplement Incorporating Sequential Test For the East Hampshire District Local Plan Regulation 18 consultation December 2018 SFRA Interim Supplement 2018 Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Background 3.0 Local Flood Risk Context 4.0 Planning Context 5.0 Site Requiring Sequential/Exception Test 6.0 Conclusion Appendix 1 – Sequential Testing Scoring on LAA sites and sites brought forward from the development plan Appendix 2 – Sequential Test Methodology and Scoring Criteria Appendix 3 – A list of sites with planning permission 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This document supplements the East Hampshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA), October 2018 and supports the East Hampshire Local Plan 2017–2036 (Regulation 18 consultation). The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that proposed site allocations in areas of flood risk are appropriate in the context of the Sequential Test which are required as part of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and its accompanying National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG). However, as this is the first public consultation on the East Hampshire draft Local Plan, the Exception Test has not been carried out at this stage (Regulation 18) as allocations may be subject to change. Those allocations that may require an Exception Test prior to the Proposed Submission Local Plan 2017-2036 (Regulation 19) will be carried out at that time. 1.2 The East Hampshire Local Plan covers the area of East Hampshire outside of the South Downs National Park. This area is known as the Planning Authority area (the ‘Area’). The SFRA 2018 therefore covers the Planning Authority area only but during its preparation neighbouring authorities were consulted to address any cross boundary flood issues to inform the SFRA.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, Issue 51493, Page 11268
    11268 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH OCTOBER 1988 (a) to improve, raise, lower or otherwise alter highways, route, shall send to the Secretary of State for Transport at his South (b) to stop up highways, East Regional Office, Federated House, London Road, Dorking, (c) to construct new highways, Surrey RH4 1SZ not later than 17th October 1988 sufficient (d) to stop up private means of access to premises, information about the alternative route or the route of the new (e) to provide a new means of access to premises, highway, as the case may be, to enable it to be identified. Failure to comply with this Direction will entitle the Secretaries of State and all on or in the vicinity of the route of the new trunk road between the person holding the Inquiries to disregard so much of any Ham Barn and Petersfield, and provide for the transfer of those new objection as consists of such submission. Any person who has highways to the County Council of Hampshire as from the date on already submitted an alternative route to the Department is deemed which he notifies the Council that those new highways have been to have complied with this Direction and need not re-submit their completed and opened for through traffic. alternative. (7) The London-Portsmouth Trunk Road A3 (Liphook- E. W. A. Smith, a Principal for Regional Director South East Flexcombe Section) Compulsory Purchase Order (No. SE ), 19 , Region, Departments of the Environment and Transport. notice of which was published on 27th July 1988. This is an Order (Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Opinion
    SCOPING OPINION: Proposed M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange Improvement Case Reference: TR010030 Adopted by the Planning Inspectorate (on behalf of the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government) pursuant to Regulation 10 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 January 2018 [This page has been intentionally left blank] 2 Scoping Opinion for M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 5 1.1 Background ................................................................................. 5 1.2 The Planning Inspectorate’s Consultation ........................................ 7 1.3 Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union ..................................... 7 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .......................................................... 8 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 8 2.2 Description of the Proposed Development ....................................... 8 2.3 The Planning Inspectorate’s Comments ........................................... 9 3. EIA APPROACH ................................................................................ 13 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 13 3.2 Relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs) .................................. 13 3.3 Scope of Assessment .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Liss Abbas & Liss Turney [Burgates]) 1.0 PARISH Liss 2.0 HUNDRED
    Liss Abbas & Liss Turney (Burgates) Liss (Liss Abbas & Liss Turney [Burgates]) 1.0 PARISH Liss 2.0 HUNDRED Liss (Abbas): Meonstoke (until 1831, then Finchdean) Liss (Turney): Odiham 3.0 NGR Liss (Abbas): 477500 128400 Liss (Turney): 477500 127900 4.0 GEOLOGY Liss / Burgates Folkstone Beds. 5.0 SITE CONTEXT (Maps 2 & 3) The present ‘town’ of Liss has been sub-divided into ‘East’ and ‘West’ Liss. However, these sub-divisions appertain to Modern development east and west of the railway; they have no relevance to the medieval manor estates of Liss Abbas and Liss Turney. These manors are associated with settlement areas that lie north-north-west of Liss station by 1.4km and 1.2km respectively. 5.1 Liss Abbas is represented by the site of Lyss Place (c. 70m AOD). It is the site of post-Conquest medieval fishponds and the remains of a monastic grange of St Mary’s, Winchester. 5.2 Liss Turney is less easy to identify than Liss Abbas. The best indicators of the manorial centre are the Church of St Peter at Burgates (Farm) and the area now known as Upper Green, but called Liss Green on the Tithe Map of 1840. In reality, the manor of Liss Turney is unlikely to have had a clear-cut geographical boundary. In this survey it is used a term of convenience for the settlement area that includes Burgates Farm, The Plestor, and Upper Green. This group is sometimes known as West Liss but this is a vague term of relatively recent origin. 6.0 PLAN TYPE & DESCRIPTION (Maps 4 / 1, 4 / 2, 5 / 1, 5 / 2, 6 / 1 & 6 / 2) 6.1.1 Liss Abbas: monastic grange Lyss Place is now a single farmstead and as such it would not normally fall within the scope of this survey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediaeval Paving Tiles of the Alton Area of N. E. Hampshire
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 289 THE MEDIAEVAL PAVING TILES OF THE ALTON AREA OF N.E. HAMPSHIRE. By THE REV. G. E. C. KNAPP. HE interest of the writer in the study of Mediaeval Paving Tiles was aroused by the paper on the Tiles of Titchfield TAbbey in the Proceedings of the Hampshire Archaeological Society, Vol. XVII, Part I, and by Dr. and Mrs. A. R. Green, without whose help and encouragement the writer would not have embarked on the task of recording the tiles found in this part of the County, and to whom any value which the paper may have is due. The writer found ready assistance in this local research in a group of young people in whom, as part of their preparation for Confirmation, he was trying to arouse an interest in the inheritance which is ours in our ancient churches. The writer would record his appreciation of the help of the Misses Diana and Jennifer French, who traced many of the tiles and prepared the drawings for the illustration of this paper. Starting with our own church at Hartley Mauditt, the tiles there were recorded, and then, going further afield, Selborne was the objective. But the interest and enthusiasm of the young tile hunters was heightened by the discovery of further tiles in the churches of Faringdon and Binsted, which, Dr. Green assured us, had not been recorded in any of the books or reports on the Church treasures of Hampshire. The following churches in the Alton area have been inspected, those containing mediaeval tiles being shown in block letters : New Alresford, Old Alresford, ALTON ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Croft
    Island Croft ISLAND I STEEP I PETERSFIELD I HAMPSHIRE I GU32 1AE Master Bedroom with adjacent Dressing Room | 2 Further Bedrooms | Family Bathroom | Hall | Sitting Room | Dining Room | Kitchen | Study | Utility Room | Cloakroom | Studio Garage | Parking | Attractive Gardens of about 0.3 Acres (0.121 ha) Petersfield Station 1.5 miles, Petersfield 1.8 miles, Guildford 28 miles, Chichester 18 miles, London 59 miles I Location Steep is a highly sought after village under 2 miles from Petersfield and is probably best known as the home of Bedales School. Apart from Bedales, the village has a thriving primary school, tennis and cricket clubs as well as The Cricketers just a short walk from the house. Petersfield has a comprehensive range of facilities including Waitrose and a mainline station with train services to London Waterloo in just over an hour. The area is particularly blessed with an excellent range of schools including Bedales as already mentioned, Churchers College, Ditcham Park and in the state sector TPS and Bohunt. The A3 at Petersfield provides good regional transport links to the M25 and beyond and the larger centres of Winchester, Guildford and Chichester are all within reasonable driving distance, as are the harbours and creeks of the South Coast. There are a number of good footpaths and bridleways in the surrounding area including the South Downs Way, Hangers Way and Sussex Border Path. I The Property Island Croft is that rare thing, looking like a cottage bathroom. On the ground floor there is a lovely large from the outside, but with great internal space, well sitting room and a big dining room linking to the proportioned rooms and good ceiling heights, having kitchen.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Suitability of Paulownia As an Agroforestry Species for UK & NW European Farming Systems
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311558333 An investigation into the suitability of Paulownia as an agroforestry species for UK & NW European farming systems Thesis · May 2016 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31955.78882 CITATION READS 1 2,475 1 author: Janus Bojesen Jensen Coventry University 1 PUBLICATION 1 CITATION SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: An Exploration of the Potential of Quantum-Based Agriculture for Sustainable Global Food Production View project Quantum Agriculture View project All content following this page was uploaded by Janus Bojesen Jensen on 10 December 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. An investigation into the suitability of Paulownia as an agroforestry species for UK & NW European farming systems Janus Bojesen Jensen, B.B.A. (Beirut) Submitted to the Department of Agriculture & Business Management, SRUC, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science SRUC, 2016 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Jo Smith for her invaluable support and guidance throughout this project. I would also like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Lou Ralph and all the teaching staff at SRUC for my experience and learning as a student at SRUC over the last three years. Lastly, I would like to express my thanks and appreciation to all the participants who were involved in this study and shared their time and knowledge with a particular acknowledgement to Dr. Ian Lane for all his contributions and for going the ‘extra country mile’ with me on two occasions.
    [Show full text]