Evolution of Predetermined Germ Cells in Vertebrate Embryos: Implications for Macroevolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of Predetermined Germ Cells in Vertebrate Embryos: Implications for Macroevolution EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT 5:4, 414–431 (2003) Evolution of predetermined germ cells in vertebrate embryos: implications for macroevolution Andrew D. Johnson,a,b,* Matthew Drum,b Rosemary F. Bachvarova,c Thomas Masi,b Mary E. White,d and Brian I. Crotherd aDivision of Genetics, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK bDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA cDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA dDepartment of Biological Science, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA 70402, USA *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) SUMMARY The germ line is established in animal embryos To determine which mechanism is ancestral to the tetrapod with the formation of primordial germ cells (PGCs), which give lineage and to understand the pattern of inheritance in higher rise to gametes. Therefore, the need to form PGCs can act as vertebrates, we used a phylogenetic approach to analyze a developmental constraint by inhibiting the evolution of basic morphological processes in both groups and correlated embryonic patterning mechanisms that compromise their these with mechanisms of germ cell determination. Our results development. Conversely, events that stabilize the PGCs indicate that regulative germ cell determination is a property of may liberate these constraints. Two modes of germ cell embryos retaining ancestral embryological processes, determination exist in animal embryos: (a) either PGCs are whereas predetermined germ cells are found in embryos predetermined by the inheritance of germ cell determinants with derived morphological traits. These correlations (germ plasm) or (b) PGCs are formed by inducing signals suggest that regulative germ cell formation is an important secreted by embryonic tissues (i.e., regulative determination). developmental constraint in vertebrate embryos, acting Surprisingly, among the major extant amphibian lineages, one before the highly conserved pharyngula stage. Moreover, mechanism is found in urodeles and the other in anurans. In our analysis suggests that germ plasm has evolved anuran amphibians PGCs are predetermined by germ plasm; independently in several lineages of vertebrate embryos. in urodele amphibians PGCs are formed by inducing signals. INTRODUCTION of an early developmental process, the germ cell deter- mining mechanisms among vertebrates, and its relation Variations in adult morphology arising during evolution are to developmental processes occurring before and after attributable to changes in developmental processes. The the pharyngula stage. Throughout we use the two major embryos of many vertebrates pass through a morphologically amphibian groups, the anurans (frogs and toads) and the similar stage, the pharyngula, occurring after the completion urodeles (salamanders and newts), as the prime examples for of neurulation, which is characterized by visible somites, discussion, but we also consider several issues at the level of prominent pharyngeal arches, and ventral flexure occurring the vertebrates. at the position of the neck (i.e., cervical flexure). Embryo- Anuran and urodele embryos begin to diverge before logical variation occurring after the pharyngula stage plays a gastrulation, at least a day before the pharyngula stage. When major role in diversification at higher order taxonomic levels compared within a phylogenetic context, we note that in all (Richardson 1999), and understanding the molecular me- cases early (prepharyngula) anuran development appears to chanisms underlying such diversification is currently an area be more derived and shows significant variability among of intense research. However, it is likely that variation of individual species, whereas urodele development retains earlier developmental processes, occurring before and ancestral features and is less variable within the various during the pharyngula stage, will result in the most pro- urodele lineages that have been examined. Because the germ found morphological variation, even though these events line develops by very different mechanisms in anuran and may also be the most highly constrained and resistant to urodele embryos, we next considered if this is related to the change (Raff 1996). In this review we consider the evolution observed differences in morphogenesis in these groups. 414 & BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC. Johnson et al. Evolution of germ cells in vertebrate embryos 415 In anuran embryos primordial germ cells (PGCs), the cells to the view that passage through the pharyngula stage that give rise to gametes, are of endodermal origin, and they represents a developmental bottleneck (for discussions of the are specified by the differential distribution of maternally ‘‘hourglass model’’ describing the pharyngula stage as a deposited germ cell determinants (known as germ plasm) to developmental bottleneck, see Elinson 1987; Raff 1996; the presumptive germ line blastomeres. Thus, from the Gerhart and Kirschner 1997). Changes in developmental inception of development, anuran PGCs are considered to processes occurring before the pharyngula stage, however, be predetermined by germ plasm. In urodele embryos PGCs may result in profound alterations to body structure, that is, derive from lateral plate mesoderm. Urodele embryos do not macroevolution (Raff 1996). An excellent example of early contain germ plasm, and so PGCs are specified later developmental changes correlating with differences in adult in development than in anurans. In urodeles PGCs form in morphology are found in the major amphibian lineages. response to extracellular inducing signals, not unlike those Pharyngula stage embryos and adults of Xenopus laevis (a that produce other mesodermal cell types. This is considered frog) and axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum, a salamander) are regulative germ cell specification. When compared within a compared in Figure 1. Note that in Xenopus embryos (Fig. 1A) phylogenetic context, again the anuran mode of development the cervical region is reduced and does not undergo flexure appears to be derived, whereas the urodele mechanism (marking the future position of the neck) as it does in axolotls appears to be primitive to the tetrapods. Furthermore, when (Fig. 1B, arrow) or other vertebrates. X-rays of adult Xenopus considering the phylogeny of animals with and without germ and axolotl females show the vastly different skeletal structure plasm, the data suggest that germ plasm has evolved of these animals. The axolotl (Fig. 1, E and F) has a skeletal independently in several lineages of vertebrate embryos. structure similar to that of most vertebrates, including two Development of the notochord is a fundamental aspect of cervical vertebrae in the neck and 18 total vertebrae (arrow); vertebrate embryogenesis. We identified a strong correlation Xenopus (Fig. 1, C and D), in contrast, has a much shortened between the position of the notochord at the completion of vertebral column with only eight total vertebrae and one gastrulation and the mode of germ cell specification carried cervical vertebra. In addition, Xenopus also has the expanded out by embryos. Thus, regulative germ cell specification is pelvic girdle and lengthened hindlimbs typical of most frogs. correlated, in diverse groups, with the ancestral mode of Anurans and urodeles diverged from a common ancestor notochord development. In contrast, a derived process of about 250 million years ago (Cannatella and Hillis 1992; notochord development is observed in embryos that develop Milner 1992), and therefore it is likely that only one of the with a predetermined germ line. Within this context, we patterns of early development observed in the extant discuss how the emergence of germ plasm within an individual amphibians reflects the ancestral pattern. The other mode lineage may alleviate developmental constraints that are would be a derived pattern. The adult urodele body plan more imposed on morphogenetic movements by the process of closely approximates that of the common amphibian ancestor regulative germ cell specification and that regulative germ cell than does that of anurans (Duellman and Trueb 1986), specification may cause the retention of ancestral embryolog- particularly that of Xenopus, which is highly derived ical characters. In this way germ plasm may facilitate the (Cannatella and De Sa 1993). Here we compare various evolution of novel embryological features and thereby aspects of embryonic development. For clarification, the contribute to macroevolutionary divergence of adult form. anuran or urodele species referred to in each study are identified in text by superscripted letters that are listed in Table 1. We conclude that urodele embryos have retained EARLY MORPHOGENESIS DIVERGES BEFORE more features that can be considered primitive to vertebrates, THE PHARYNGULA STAGE IN AXOLOTLS and anuran embryos are generally more derived. Although AND XENOPUS comparative aspects of amphibian morphogenesis have been reviewed before (Hanken 1986; Malacinski et al. 1997), this Nothing in biology makes sense except when seen in the light of has not been addressed within a framework assuming a evolution. monophyletic origin of urodeles and anurans nor with T. Dobzhansky (1973) insights available from more recent work. The fact that vertebrate embryos from diverse taxa and very different early embryological forms (such as fish, amphibians, and mammals) converge on a similar morphology
Recommended publications
  • The Phylum Vertebrata: a Case for Zoological Recognition Naoki Irie1,2* , Noriyuki Satoh3 and Shigeru Kuratani4
    Irie et al. Zoological Letters (2018) 4:32 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-018-0114-y REVIEW Open Access The phylum Vertebrata: a case for zoological recognition Naoki Irie1,2* , Noriyuki Satoh3 and Shigeru Kuratani4 Abstract The group Vertebrata is currently placed as a subphylum in the phylum Chordata, together with two other subphyla, Cephalochordata (lancelets) and Urochordata (ascidians). The past three decades, have seen extraordinary advances in zoological taxonomy and the time is now ripe for reassessing whether the subphylum position is truly appropriate for vertebrates, particularly in light of recent advances in molecular phylogeny, comparative genomics, and evolutionary developmental biology. Four lines of current research are discussed here. First, molecular phylogeny has demonstrated that Deuterostomia comprises Ambulacraria (Echinodermata and Hemichordata) and Chordata (Cephalochordata, Urochordata, and Vertebrata), each clade being recognized as a mutually comparable phylum. Second, comparative genomic studies show that vertebrates alone have experienced two rounds of whole-genome duplication, which makes the composition of their gene family unique. Third, comparative gene-expression profiling of vertebrate embryos favors an hourglass pattern of development, the most conserved stage of which is recognized as a phylotypic period characterized by the establishment of a body plan definitively associated with a phylum. This mid-embryonic conservation is supported robustly in vertebrates, but only weakly in chordates. Fourth, certain complex patterns of body plan formation (especially of the head, pharynx, and somites) are recognized throughout the vertebrates, but not in any other animal groups. For these reasons, we suggest that it is more appropriate to recognize vertebrates as an independent phylum, not as a subphylum of the phylum Chordata.
    [Show full text]
  • Vasa Unveils a Common Origin of Germ Cells and of Somatic Stem Cells from the Posterior Growth Zone in the Polychaete Platynereis Dumerilii ⁎ N
    Developmental Biology 306 (2007) 599–611 www.elsevier.com/locate/ydbio Vasa unveils a common origin of germ cells and of somatic stem cells from the posterior growth zone in the polychaete Platynereis dumerilii ⁎ N. Rebscher a, ,1, F. Zelada-González b,1, T.U. Banisch a, F. Raible c, D. Arendt c a Institute of Zoology, Philipps University Marburg, Karl von Frisch Strasse 8, 35032 Marburg, Germany b CIML, Marseille, France c EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany Received for publication 27 February 2006; revised 27 March 2007; accepted 27 March 2007 Available online 1 April 2007 Abstract To elucidate the evolution of germ cell specification in Metazoa, recent comparative studies focus on ancestral animal groups. Here, we followed the germline throughout the life cycle of the polychaete annelid Platynereis dumerilii, by examining mRNA and protein expression of vasa and other germline-specific factors in combination with lineage tracing experiments. In the fertilised egg, maternal Vasa protein localises to the yolk-free cytoplasm at the animal pole. It then asymmetrically segregates first into the micromeres, then into the founder cells of the mesodermal posterior growth zone (MPGZ). Vasa transcripts initially show ubiquitous distribution, but then become progressively restricted to the MPGZ. The cells of the MPGZ are highly proliferative, as evidenced by BrdU pulse labelling experiments. Besides vasa, they express nanos along with the stem cell- specific genes piwi, and PL10. At 4 days of development, four primordial germ cells are singled out from within the MPGZ, and migrate into the anterior segments to colonise a newly discovered ‘primary gonad’. Our data suggest a common origin of germ cells and of somatic stem cells, similar to the situation found in planarians and cnidarians, which may constitute the ancestral mode of germ cell specification in Metazoa.
    [Show full text]
  • New Germline Specification Gene Found
    RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology (CDB) 2-2-3 Minatojima minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan New germline specification gene found July 15, 2008 – Germ cells diverge from their somatic counterparts fairly early during mammalian development, undergoing at least three processes: the repression of somatic genes, the reacquisition of the potential for pluripotency, and subsequent epigenetic reprogramming to a committed germline fate. The genetic factors involved in germline specification have been traced as far back as day 6.25 of embryonic development, when the gene Prdm1 (also known as Blimp1) is switched on in a handful of cells in the epiblast, in what is believed to be the first critical step in the pathway to determining germline fate. A recent genome-wide study of transcriptional dynamics in early germline progenitors by the Laboratory for Mammalian Germ Cell Biology (Mitinori Saitou; Team Leader) has revealed, however, that the network is more diverse than previously expected, with Prdm1 acting as a sort of conductor keeping this genetic orchestra in harmony. The expression of Prdm1 (Blimp1) (left) and Prdm14 (right) in embryonic day 7.0 embryos visualized by transgenic reporters. Note that Prdm14 is exclusive to the precursors of primordial germ cells, whereas Prdm1 is also expressed in the visceral endoderm. Now, Masashi Yamaji and others from the Saitou lab have discovered that a gene identified in their previous analysis, Prdm14, plays a critical role in the establishment of the germ cell lineage. In a study published in Nature Genetics, they report that this gene, a transcription factor expressed only in the germline, is necessary for two of the three hallmark events in the acquisition of germ cell fate.
    [Show full text]
  • Specification of the Germ Line* Susan Strome§, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, in 47405-3700 USA
    Specification of the germ line* Susan Strome§, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-3700 USA Table of Contents 1. Overview ...............................................................................................................................1 2. pie-1 and transcriptional repression ............................................................................................. 2 3. The MES proteins and regulation of chromatin .............................................................................. 3 4. P granules and regulation of RNA ............................................................................................... 5 5. mep-1 and avoiding germline specification ................................................................................... 6 6. Summary and future directions ................................................................................................... 7 7. References ..............................................................................................................................7 Abstract In C. elegans, the germ line is set apart from the soma early in embryogenesis. Several important themes have emerged in specifying and guiding the development of the nascent germ line. At early stages, the germline blastomeres are maintained in a transcriptionally silent state by the transcriptional repressor PIE-1. When this silencing is lifted, it is postulated that correct patterns of germline gene expression are controlled, at least in part, by MES-mediated
    [Show full text]
  • There Is No Highly Conserved Embryonic Stage in the Vertebrates: Implications for Current Theories of Evolution and Development
    Anat Embryol (1997) 196:91–106 © Springer-Verlag 1997 REVIEW ARTICLE &roles:Michael K. Richardson · James Hanken Mayoni L. Gooneratne · Claude Pieau Albert Raynaud · Lynne Selwood · Glenda M. Wright There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: implications for current theories of evolution and development &misc:Accepted: 5 April 1997 &p.1:Abstract Embryos of different species of vertebrate tal biology, and especially in the conservation of devel- share a common organisation and often look similar. opmental mechanisms, re-examination of the extent of Adult differences among species become more apparent variation in vertebrate embryos is long overdue. We pres- through divergence at later stages. Some authors have ent here the first review of the external morphology of suggested that members of most or all vertebrate clades tailbud embryos, illustrated with original specimens pass through a virtually identical, conserved stage. This from a wide range of vertebrate groups. We find that em- idea was promoted by Haeckel, and has recently been re- bryos at the tailbud stage – thought to correspond to a vived in the context of claims regarding the universality conserved stage – show variations in form due to allome- of developmental mechanisms. Thus embryonic resem- try, heterochrony, and differences in body plan and blance at the tailbud stage has been linked with a con- somite number. These variations foreshadow important served pattern of developmental gene expression – the differences in adult body form. Contrary to recent claims zootype. Haeckel’s drawings of the external morphology that all vertebrate embryos pass through a stage when of various vertebrates remain the most comprehensive they are the same size, we find a greater than 10-fold comparative data purporting to show a conserved stage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Function and Regulation of Vasa-Like Genes in Germ-Cell C O M Development M E N
    http://genomebiology.com/2000/1/3/reviews/1017.1 Minireview The function and regulation of vasa-like genes in germ-cell c o m development m e n Erez Raz t Address: Department for Developmental Biology, Institute for Biology I, Freiburg University, 79104 Freiburg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] r e v i Published: 1 September 2000 e w Genome Biology 2000, 1(3):reviews1017.1–1017.6 s The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://genomebiology.com/2000/1/3/reviews/1017 © GenomeBiology.com (Print ISSN 1465-6906; Online ISSN 1465-6914) r e ports Abstract The vasa gene, essential for germ-cell development, was originally identified in Drosophila, and has since been found in other invertebrates and vertebrates. Analysis of these vasa homologs has revealed a highly conserved role for Vasa protein among different organisms, as well as some important differences in its regulation. deposited research Germ-cell development in vertebrates and location. In mutants in which the formation of this morpho- invertebrates logically characteristic cytoplasm is disrupted, germ-cell for- In sexually reproducing organisms, primordial germ cells mation is impaired (reviewed in [5]). The pole plasm is (PGCs) give rise to gametes that are responsible for the characterized by the presence of the polar granules, electron- refereed research development of a new organism in the next generation. dense structures not delimited by a membrane that contain These cells must remain totipotent - able to differentiate into many RNAs and proteins and that are associated with mito- each and every cell type of all the different organs.
    [Show full text]
  • 723.Full.Pdf
    | WORMBOOK CELL FATE, SIGNALING, AND DEVELOPMENT Developmental Plasticity and Cellular Reprogramming in Caenorhabditis elegans Joel Rothman* and Sophie Jarriault†,1 *Department of MCD Biology and Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93111, and †IGBMC (Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire), Department of Development and Stem Cells, CNRS UMR7104, Inserm U1258, Université de Strasbourg, 67404 Illkirch CU Strasbourg, France ORCID IDs: 0000-0002-6844-1377 (J.R.); 0000-0003-2847-1675 (S.J.) ABSTRACT While Caenorhabditis elegans was originally regarded as a model for investigating determinate developmental programs, landmark studies have subsequently shown that the largely invariant pattern of development in the animal does not reflect irrevers- ibility in rigidly fixed cell fates. Rather, cells at all stages of development, in both the soma and germline, have been shown to be capable of changing their fates through mutation or forced expression of fate-determining factors, as well as during the normal course of development. In this chapter, we review the basis for natural and induced cellular plasticity in C. elegans. We describe the events that progressively restrict cellular differentiation during embryogenesis, starting with the multipotency-to-commitment transition (MCT) and subsequently through postembryonic development of the animal, and consider the range of molecular processes, including transcriptional and translational control systems, that contribute to cellular
    [Show full text]
  • Stages of Embryonic Development of the Zebrafish
    DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS 2032553’10 (1995) Stages of Embryonic Development of the Zebrafish CHARLES B. KIMMEL, WILLIAM W. BALLARD, SETH R. KIMMEL, BONNIE ULLMANN, AND THOMAS F. SCHILLING Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1254 (C.B.K., S.R.K., B.U., T.F.S.); Department of Biology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 (W.W.B.) ABSTRACT We describe a series of stages for Segmentation Period (10-24 h) 274 development of the embryo of the zebrafish, Danio (Brachydanio) rerio. We define seven broad peri- Pharyngula Period (24-48 h) 285 ods of embryogenesis-the zygote, cleavage, blas- Hatching Period (48-72 h) 298 tula, gastrula, segmentation, pharyngula, and hatching periods. These divisions highlight the Early Larval Period 303 changing spectrum of major developmental pro- Acknowledgments 303 cesses that occur during the first 3 days after fer- tilization, and we review some of what is known Glossary 303 about morphogenesis and other significant events that occur during each of the periods. Stages sub- References 309 divide the periods. Stages are named, not num- INTRODUCTION bered as in most other series, providing for flexi- A staging series is a tool that provides accuracy in bility and continued evolution of the staging series developmental studies. This is because different em- as we learn more about development in this spe- bryos, even together within a single clutch, develop at cies. The stages, and their names, are based on slightly different rates. We have seen asynchrony ap- morphological features, generally readily identi- pearing in the development of zebrafish, Danio fied by examination of the live embryo with the (Brachydanio) rerio, embryos fertilized simultaneously dissecting stereomicroscope.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Pluripotency and Reprogramming
    Na et al. Stem Cell Research & Therapy 2010, 1:33 http://stemcellres.com/content/1/4/33 REVIEW Molecular mechanisms of pluripotency and reprogramming Jie Na1*, Jordan Plews2, Jianliang Li2, Patompon Wongtrakoongate2, Timo Tuuri2, Anis Feki3, Peter W Andrews2 and Christian Unger2* Defi ning pluripotent stem cells Abstract Discovery of pluripotent stem cells - embryonal carcinoma Pluripotent stem cells are able to form any terminally cells diff erentiated cell. They have opened new doors for Pluripotency is the potential of stem cells to give rise to experimental and therapeutic studies to understand any cell of the embryo proper. Th e study of pluripotent early development and to cure degenerative diseases stem cells from both mouse and human began with the in a way not previously possible. Nevertheless, study of teratocarcinomas, germ cell tumours that occur it remains important to resolve and defi ne the predominantly in the testis and constitute the most mechanisms underlying pluripotent stem cells, as that common cancer of young men. In 1954, Stevens and Little understanding will impact strongly on future medical [1] found that males of the 129 mouse strain developed applications. The capture of pluripotent stem cells in testicular teratocarcinomas at a signifi cant rate. Th is a dish is bound to several landmark discoveries, from fi nding opened the way for detailed studies of these the initial culture and phenotyping of pluripotent peculiar cancers, which may contain a haphazard array of embryonal carcinoma cells to the recent induction of almost any somatic cell type found in the developing pluripotency in somatic cells. On this developmental embryo [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Relevance of Ipsc-Derived Human PGC-Like Cells at the Surface of Embryoid Bodies to Prechemotaxis Migrating Pgcs
    Relevance of iPSC-derived human PGC-like cells at the PNAS PLUS surface of embryoid bodies to prechemotaxis migrating PGCs Shino Mitsunagaa, Junko Odajimaa, Shiomi Yawataa, Keiko Shiodaa, Chie Owaa, Kurt J. Isselbachera,1, Jacob H. Hannab, and Toshi Shiodaa,1 aMassachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129; and bDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel Contributed by Kurt J. Isselbacher, October 11, 2017 (sent for review May 11, 2017; reviewed by Joshua M. Brickman and Erna Magnúsdóttir) Pluripotent stem cell-derived human primordial germ cell-like cells Although PSCs can produce cells resembling PGCs [primor- (hPGCLCs) provide important opportunities to study primordial dial germ cell-like cells (PGCLCs)] in cell culture (5–14), direct + germ cells (PGCs). We robustly produced CD38 hPGCLCs [∼43% of conversion of mouse PSCs to PGCLCs is inefficient (6). Hayashi FACS-sorted embryoid body (EB) cells] from primed-state induced et al. (6) generated cells resembling early epiblast [epiblast-like pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) after a 72-hour transient incubation cells (EpiLCs)] from mouse PSCs and showed their strong ability in the four chemical inhibitors (4i)-naïve reprogramming medium to produce PGCLCs as cell aggregates in the presence of bone and showed transcriptional consistency of our hPGCLCs with morphogenetic protein 4 (Bmp4). In the absence of Bmp4, ro- hPGCLCs generated in previous studies using various and distinct + − bust PGCLC production can also be achieved by overexpression protocols. Both CD38 hPGCLCs and CD38 EB cells significantly of three transcription factors (TFs)—namely Prdm1, Prdm14, expressed PRDM1 and TFAP2C, although PRDM1 mRNA in CD38− and Tfap2c (7, 14)—or by a single TF Nanog (8) from exogenous cells lacked the 3′-UTR harboring miRNA binding sites regulating vectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Approaches Underlying the Oogenic Cycle of the Scleractinian
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Molecular approaches underlying the oogenic cycle of the scleractinian coral, Acropora tenuis Ee Suan Tan1, Ryotaro Izumi1, Yuki Takeuchi 2,3, Naoko Isomura4 & Akihiro Takemura2 ✉ This study aimed to elucidate the physiological processes of oogenesis in Acropora tenuis. Genes/ proteins related to oogenesis were investigated: Vasa, a germ cell marker, vitellogenin (VG), a major yolk protein precursor, and its receptor (LDLR). Coral branches were collected monthly from coral reefs around Sesoko Island (Okinawa, Japan) for histological observation by in situ hybridisation (ISH) of the Vasa (AtVasa) and Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor (AtLDLR) genes and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of AtVasa and AtVG. AtVasa immunoreactivity was detected in germline cells and ooplasm, whereas AtVG immunoreactivity was detected in ooplasm and putative ovarian tissues. AtVasa was localised in germline cells located in the retractor muscles of the mesentery, whereas AtLDLR was localised in the putative ovarian and mesentery tissues. AtLDLR was detected in coral tissues during the vitellogenic phase, whereas AtVG immunoreactivity was found in primary oocytes. Germline cells expressing AtVasa are present throughout the year. In conclusion, Vasa has physiological and molecular roles throughout the oogenic cycle, as it determines gonadal germline cells and ensures normal oocyte development, whereas the roles of VG and LDLR are limited to the vitellogenic stages because they act in coordination with lipoprotein transport, vitellogenin synthesis, and yolk incorporation into oocytes. Approximately 70% of scleractinian corals are hermaphroditic broadcast spawners and have both male and female gonads developing within the polyp of the same colony1. Tey engage in a multispecifc spawning event around the designated moon phase once a year2–4.
    [Show full text]
  • Trajectory Mapping of the Early Drosophila Germline Reveals Controls of Zygotic Activation and Sex Differentiation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.11.292573; this version posted September 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Trajectory Mapping of the Early Drosophila Germline Reveals Controls of Zygotic Activation and Sex Differentiation Hsing-Chun Chen1, Yi-Ru Li1, Hsiao Wen Lai1, Hsiao Han Huang1, Sebastian D. Fugmann1,2,4, Shu Yuan Yang1,2,3* 1Department and 2Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333 Taiwan 3Departmen of Gynecology and 4Nephrology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333 Taiwan *To whom correspondence should be directed: [email protected] Abstract Germ cells in D. melanogaster are specified maternally shortly after fertilization and are transcriptionally quiescent until their zygotic genome is activated to sustain further development. To understand the molecular basis of this process, we analyzed the progressing transcriptomes of early male and female germ cells at the single-cell level between germline specification and coalescence with somatic gonadal cells. Our data comprehensively covered zygotic activation in the germline genome, and analyses on genes that exhibit germline-restricted expression revealed that polymerase pausing and differential RNA stability are important mechanisms that establish gene expression differences between the germline and soma. In addition, we observed an immediate bifurcation between the male and female germ cells as zygotic transcription begins. The main difference between the two sexes is an elevation in X chromosome expression in females relative to males signifying incomplete dosage compensation with a few select genes exhibiting even higher expression increases.
    [Show full text]